#429 — The New World Order
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
180.29468
Summary
Ann Applebaum recounts her two trips to Sudan, which has been plunged into yet another civil war, and I want to use her experience of Sudan as a lens through which to look at the consequences of American retreat from the world, and the general unraveling of the system of international law and international aid which has really underpinned what we have come to call the liberal world order for more or less as long as we ve been alive.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris. Just a note to say that if you're
00:00:11.740
hearing this, you're not currently on our subscriber feed, and we'll only be hearing
00:00:15.720
the first part of this conversation. In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense
00:00:20.060
Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org. We don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore
00:00:26.240
it's made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers. So if you enjoy what we're
00:00:30.200
doing here, please consider becoming one. I am here with Ann Applebaum. Ann, thanks for joining
00:00:39.020
me again. No, thanks for having me. It's great to see you. Well, so you've just written a cover
00:00:43.640
article in The Atlantic, titled online at least. I haven't seen the physical magazine, but the title
00:00:49.080
online is The Most Nihilistic Conflict on Earth. This is recounting your two trips to Sudan, which
00:00:56.060
has been plunged into yet another civil war. And I want to use it, as you do in the article,
00:01:01.780
I want to use your experience of Sudan as a lens through which to look at the consequences of
00:01:08.660
American retreat from the world, and this general unraveling of the system of international law
00:01:16.440
and international aid, which has really underpinned what we have come to call the liberal world order
00:01:23.220
for more or less as long as we've been alive, a little bit longer. So let's start with your
00:01:28.020
experience in Sudan. What is happening in Sudan?
00:01:31.820
So Sudan is engulfed by a civil war. The two main warring parties, and actually there are several
00:01:38.560
others as well, but the two main warring parties are formerly components of the Sudanese military.
00:01:44.560
One part is the Sudanese armed forces, the kind of main part of the army. And the other
00:01:49.520
is a group called the Rapid Support Forces, who older readers or older listeners rather will
00:01:55.940
remember as the Janjaweed. This was a group that was created a couple of decades ago by a previous
00:02:02.820
Sudanese dictator, and it was used as a force against—there's an ethnic conflict in Western
00:02:10.360
Sudan between Arab-speaking nomads and non-Arabic farmers. Very old conflict, resolved many times
00:02:18.580
through intermarriage and so on, but in the modern era was juiced up by outside weapons,
00:02:24.660
outside interests, and so on. And that's a kind of—that's more or less a broader version of that
00:02:30.220
is what's happening now. But anyway, the other—the Rapid Support Forces are the other group.
00:02:34.960
They are fighting for control of territory. There are some other groups involved as well,
00:02:40.000
but they're the main two groups. And the hard thing about the war and the thing that makes it hard
00:02:44.980
for outsiders to understand is that it's not ideological. It's not a war of ideas.
00:02:51.120
It's not clearly an ethnic war either. It's really a war between two groups who want power,
00:02:58.960
who want money, who want control of territory, who want gold—they're big and important gold mines in
00:03:05.440
Sudan—who want other kinds of resources, and who are not particularly concerned about Sudanese civilians.
00:03:12.800
And the civilians have really borne the brunt of the war. I mean, it's, of course, always true that
00:03:18.620
civilians bear the brunt of the war, but they're in the middle of the fighting and often the subject
00:03:23.060
of the fighting in a way that's not always true in other places. So they're the focus of ethnic
00:03:28.820
cleansing or of revenge or of, you know, they're—particularly the Rapid Support, the RSF,
00:03:35.960
as they're called, have quite a lot of mercenaries in their ranks who've been told that they won't be
00:03:40.560
paid, but they can take whatever they can steal. And so there's an immense amount of
00:03:44.760
theft as well. So it's a very unusually ugly war. And I should say one other thing about it just at
00:03:51.460
the beginning, which is one of the other things that makes it unusually ugly, is the number of
00:03:56.960
outside powers who have—who are contributing to it, who are buying weapons, selling weapons,
00:04:03.900
trying to—making deals with one side or the other, increasing the conflict. And they are—include the
00:04:08.800
Saudis, the Emiratis, the Turks, the Egyptians, the Iranians are there, the Russians are there on
00:04:14.740
both sides, you know, and others. And none of them right now have any particular interest in ending
00:04:21.680
the war. Instead, they're all seeing what they can get out of it. And that, you know, in the way that
00:04:27.740
the old conflict, you know, in Darfur was once juiced up by outsiders, this one really is too. And of
00:04:35.400
course, now they're modern weapons, they're drones. The level of sophistication of the, you know, the
00:04:41.520
kind of violence that can be done is now just on a much different level than ever before.
00:04:46.620
Yeah, the list of outsiders from your article I found genuinely surprising. I mean, so you just
00:04:53.300
listed some, but I'll just read you from your article. The Turkish, Egyptian, Saudi, Emirati,
00:04:58.380
Qatari, Russian, Iranian, Ukrainian, Eritrean, Ethiopian, Kenyan, South Sudanese, Chad, Libya,
00:05:05.800
Central African Republic, and the Chinese hovering in the background. I mean, maybe I don't know
00:05:11.120
enough about the history of whatever the 500 civil wars that have been fought in the last 200 years,
00:05:16.060
but that sounds like a pretty novel and awful contribution of outside powers.
00:05:21.600
And there are really novel elements to it. I mean, the Ukrainians, for example, this is one of the
00:05:26.620
big surprises for me. I have a special interest in Ukraine, and I told a Ukrainian friend of mine I
00:05:30.900
was going there, and he sort of turned pale, and he said, oh, be really careful. You know, I know some
00:05:36.540
people there, and Ukrainians are there too, and they're there to kill Russians. So in a way,
00:05:42.720
they're not there. They're not fighting on one side or the other. They're there attracted by the
00:05:47.760
anarchy itself. You know, that this is a place where they can harm members. Basically, it's members of
00:05:53.540
the Wagner group, that Russian mercenary group, has had a long involvement in Sudan, and the Ukrainians
00:05:58.840
attacked them there. And so the fact that they're there, you know, is from pretty far away, tells you
00:06:05.180
how much of a vacuum has been created by the war and by really, you know, and I'm sure this is the next
00:06:15.280
question by the absence of any outside power or organization or institutions who are able to help
00:06:23.580
end it. Yeah. You just used the word anarchy, and as I was reading your article, it put me in mind of
00:06:30.700
Robert Kaplan's very famous article from over 30 years ago, The Coming Anarchy, which was also in
00:06:36.360
the Atlantic. I think probably the most read article for at least a decade in the magazine. And his
00:06:42.000
prediction there, I think, I think in the final analysis of, did not come true. He was imagining
00:06:48.860
the unraveling of international order and kind of all of us being pitched into a kind of crime planet
00:06:57.440
as a result. But in reading your article and in, you know, now posing the question I have to pose
00:07:05.020
for you, I began to worry that, that you are, this is sort of the, an echo of his prediction there.
00:07:13.040
And it's now we're, we're on the cusp of something that is, you know, that of bearing out that
00:07:19.500
prediction that, because I mean, we really are witnessing a, just the consequences of a vacuum
00:07:25.360
of leadership. And I mean, there was, there was, there's one quote from your article that really
00:07:30.020
struck me as quite poignant and fairly arresting. I'll just read it to you because it, it, um, you
00:07:35.920
say a Middle Eastern ambassador in Port Sudan thought I was joking when I suggested that the
00:07:41.620
U S might no longer care that much about Africa. That was beyond his imagination and beyond the
00:07:47.220
imagination of many other people who still believe that someday, somehow American diplomats are going
00:07:52.240
to come back and make a difference. And I mean, that to me, that really speaks to the brand damage
00:07:57.200
that our country has suffered. I mean, it seems to me we've Trump and Trumpism and this American
00:08:03.520
America first, no nothingism has really, at least on the international stage ruined the very idea
00:08:10.360
of America. And so I just want, I wanted you to just reflect on that and, and, and tell me what
00:08:15.820
you noticed and what you, what you continue to notice. Well, you may live overseas most of the time. So
00:08:20.300
you have a, a very global view of our current moment in the States.
00:08:25.340
Yep. I'm in Poland right now. In fact, you know, I'll, I'll start with saying that Robert Kaplan,
00:08:31.600
you know, I agree. He, the meltdown that he described didn't happen, but you can find on the
00:08:37.900
planet now, a number of places where, you know, there used to be order and there isn't now. Sudan is
00:08:43.180
one, Libya, Yemen, Syria's on the cusp could go one way or the other. And all these places are also
00:08:50.140
places where this role of these so-called middle powers is very important where there's no, you
00:08:56.400
know, there, there's no U S there's no UN there's nobody else. And so you get these competition
00:09:01.100
between, between other countries. And I would say that the, you know, some of what people say about
00:09:06.420
the U S is maybe even nostalgia for something that never was. I mean, it's a, it's more of an idea of
00:09:12.880
America that there was such a thing as, I don't know, it's, you know, Camp David or either the,
00:09:19.680
the Dayton agreement, you know, that there could be an America that would come in and bring all the
00:09:23.700
warring parties and make them sit down at the table and have a conversation. I mean, maybe that
00:09:28.000
didn't happen as much as people like to think. And maybe when it did happen, it didn't work as well
00:09:32.100
as people remember, but there is a, it's a, it's almost a, you know, it's kind of reflex. Like
00:09:37.080
when are they coming back and why have they gone? Of course you do also increasingly have people who
00:09:43.100
are angry or don't care or have tossed America into the group of, you know, irrelevant sort of
00:09:51.980
countries that are just as nihilistic and just as transactional as everybody else. And so again,
00:09:57.680
I don't know whether, how much of the longing for a different America, what is some based on something
00:10:02.120
real and based on an ideal, I don't know, but it is going to be gradually replaced by an
00:10:06.900
idea that, Oh, America is just another, you know, what's the difference between America and Saudi
00:10:10.980
Arabia and Russia and Iran? I mean, they're all just a bunch of greedy transactional countries
00:10:15.880
whose leaders are looking for personal wealth and, you know, who, who, who aren't really bothered
00:10:22.600
about anybody's wellbeing. And, you know, I should say the United States, I mean, it's complicated
00:10:27.200
because the United States has behaved badly in so many places over so many years, but it was always
00:10:32.500
that the bad behavior was often balanced out by other things, by USAID, especially maybe by American
00:10:40.000
health, you know, the contribution that Americans made to ending AIDS, to ending pandemics,
00:10:45.840
working on Ebola, working on, on child health care all around the world. I mean, people knew
00:10:51.600
all of that as America too, whatever they thought of American foreign policy at any given moment.
00:10:56.860
So there was an idea of American benevolence, you know, that is, I think really gone or is
00:11:04.900
When I think about the, the damage to our reputation and just the, now the, the failure of, of leadership,
00:11:11.220
I'm thinking much more in terms of those ideals against which we measured ourselves, even in our
00:11:17.000
failure. I mean, we do have a lot to apologize for, uh, in how we've behaved historically, but our
00:11:23.000
failures have always been measured by the ideals that we really did stand for on our best days.
00:11:30.200
I mean, like we, you know, for as long as we've been alive, America could credibly be thought to
00:11:37.220
care about whether other nations cared about human rights or, you know, through, through their
00:11:42.740
journalists in prison or, you know, treated women like chattel. I mean, like those are, you know,
00:11:48.240
we stood for something, but as you say, now we seem to stay, I mean, we seem to have announced to
00:11:54.960
the world that none of that really matters. And we just want our president and his rapacious family
00:12:03.420
to get a hotel deal in your capital city. I mean, so it really, it is just a, just the corruption
00:12:09.400
is not even hidden and it's just been shamelessly advertised. And it really, it just, it, it makes me
00:12:15.980
very sad to think that the ideals themselves now are understood, I think erroneously, but,
00:12:23.780
you know, all too plausibly, they are understood to have been bogus this whole time. I mean, we are
00:12:31.460
So one other thing that's happening, this is, this wasn't the subject of this story,
00:12:34.960
although it's something I am going to write about in the near future. The U.S. is also dismantling
00:12:40.480
a lot of small institutions. This is much smaller than USAID or trying to dismantle,
00:12:46.100
I should say, because they're, they're all fighting back. But the administration is trying
00:12:49.880
to dismantle. For example, we have foreign broadcasters who broadcast in a lot of languages,
00:12:56.040
you know, Russian, you know, many Central Asian languages, Chinese, Uyghur language, actually,
00:13:02.480
which almost nobody else broadcasts in Arabic, obviously Persian and so on. And we have broadcasters
00:13:08.900
and a lot of them have real important followings and they have listeners in around the world.
00:13:13.900
And the Trump administration has been trying to cut them or trying to end them and their work for a
00:13:18.520
long time. And, you know, for a lot of the world, that's how they know us. I mean, they listen to
00:13:22.480
Radio Free Europe or Radio Liberty or Radio Farta or Radio Free Asia. And that's how they knew about
00:13:30.080
America. And that's how they learned about us. And also that's how they learned alternative stories
00:13:35.240
to the ones told them by their own propagandists, you know, by their own, by their own regimes. And
00:13:40.340
they would listen to, you know, U.S. radio. And often it was, as I said, it was U.S.-backed radio,
00:13:46.600
but the radios was done by nationals of those countries and those places. So it felt to them
00:13:51.960
like it had a local element as well. And that a lot of it has already gone off the air or there's
00:13:57.820
already, because they've had cuts to their funding, it's disappearing. And when that disappears,
00:14:02.860
you know, it's not as if, you know, the U.S. stops doing that and nothing happens. You know,
00:14:08.520
the U.S. will stop those broadcasts if that happens, which I hope it doesn't. And Chinese
00:14:13.640
and Russian, you know, and Cuban and Iranian information will come and take their place.
00:14:20.140
There isn't, you know, there isn't ever a vacuum, you know, in the world. I mean,
00:14:26.340
And there are already examples, for example, of Voice of America had a number of Chinese
00:14:31.060
language programs that have disappeared to be replaced by Chinese state media. There was a
00:14:36.920
specific example, the Wall Street Journal found of, there was a Thai program that used material
00:14:42.140
from Voice of America, Voice of America has now disappeared. That's been replaced by its Chinese
00:14:46.800
equivalent. Over and over and over again, every time we disappear, the stories that we used to tell,
00:14:53.500
the ideals that we used to have, we used to talk about, you know, the information that we were able
00:14:58.120
to provide is simply gone. And so it's very ironic, given how many people who back this
00:15:04.680
administration or claim to back it, who talk about fighting censorship and that they believe
00:15:09.300
in free speech. And it may turn out, I mean, very soon, that one of the biggest impacts of this
00:15:16.000
administration is to undermine and degrade people's ability to speak and to hear real information
00:15:22.880
all around the world. So it's not just aid. It's also the end of those kinds of programs,
00:15:29.160
the small, small support that we often gave to democratic leaders and movements, but also to
00:15:35.520
independent press, independent lawyers, all those things that were, again, really tiny amounts of
00:15:41.720
money by compared to what we spend on the military or what we're about to spend on ICE. And cutting those
00:15:48.760
means that people won't even hear about this democratic ideal or the free speech ideal anymore
00:15:55.240
because it simply won't be available to them. And the short-sightedness of that, you know, the lack
00:16:03.140
of thought about what that means, you know, for the future kind of flabbergasts me, particularly given
00:16:09.480
there's still China hawks kicking around and there's still people in and around the White House and
00:16:15.320
certainly in Congress who understand that the United States is in competition with other
00:16:20.360
countries, not only economic competition and military competition, but also kind of war of
00:16:25.100
ideas competition and that the United States would just give that up is extraordinary. And I'm amazed
00:16:31.180
there isn't louder reaction. I know that there's some in Congress are trying to help and trying to
00:16:36.900
save some of these, some of these programs, but the administration seems to be not interested at
00:16:41.920
all. Well, you mentioned USAID. Can you tell me what has been the effect of Elon Musk's
00:16:48.900
compassionate and judicious and technically agile editing of that program? So what you need to
00:16:56.820
understand about USAID is that it was, it represented, aside from everything else, whatever else it did,
00:17:02.260
it was about 40% of international humanitarian aid. That means food and medicine, basically. It's nothing
00:17:08.780
else. No other programs, nothing. But it was also a huge part of the logistics. So, you know,
00:17:16.320
trucking contracts to bring grain around the world or shipping contracts or statistics or payment
00:17:23.160
systems. And as it turned out, there were a lot of international organizations that were somehow
00:17:29.040
dependent on them and those systems that didn't necessarily even know it. And so one of the things,
00:17:34.600
even when I was in Sudan in the spring, which was a little bit after the destruction of USAID,
00:17:39.720
is people were literally just discovering that they, you know, they had a budget cut or some
00:17:44.540
institution they were used to relying on was going offline. And you had this sense of this complete
00:17:50.380
disruption. And remember that when USAID ended, it didn't end in a way that, you know, we passed on
00:17:57.240
responsibilities to someone else or, you know, wasteful programs were cut, but in a bit in a
00:18:03.560
careful way so that programs that were useful were kept. No, it was shuttered. It was shut down.
00:18:10.940
I spoke to a woman, she's quoted in the article, who didn't want her name used because she's still
00:18:15.360
technically there. She's still part of the humanitarian aid programs in the United States.
00:18:20.000
And who said to me, I talked to her in February and she had been cut off from her email. She had
00:18:26.480
been kicked out of her office. She had been cut off from payment systems. And she was personally
00:18:30.840
responsible for a group of refugees. I won't say in which country, you know, and that was like her,
00:18:37.200
her responsibility was to get food to them or get payments to them. And she was unable to do it.
00:18:43.040
She didn't know what had happened. She didn't know where the money or the food was going.
00:18:46.340
She had no ability to track it. And it just disappeared overnight. And the consequences
00:18:51.940
of that, you know, the chaos, the canceled contracts, the expense, a colleague of mine
00:18:57.500
at the Atlantic reported a few recently in the last couple of weeks reported a story about
00:19:02.460
a huge amount of sort of nutritional food aid. They're these special products that are high,
00:19:07.320
high calorie products that are made for people who are malnourished that was in a warehouse.
00:19:12.240
And because it hadn't been distributed, it was going to have to be destroyed.
00:19:15.640
But of course, to destroy a warehouse full of food is also very expensive. So the cost of
00:19:22.240
destroying it, the cost of this destruction is going to be with us for a long time. And there
00:19:26.760
were there were other very specific moments. I mean, I met a doctor who was using exactly some
00:19:33.220
of this kind of nutritional aid food for the malnourished children in the hospital where he
00:19:38.380
worked. And these were I saw the children. I mean, they were tiny babies. Mostly they were
00:19:43.580
very weak. They were lying down. Their mothers were also famished and lying down and they were
00:19:48.240
in a hospital ward. And he was almost, you know, he was saying to me, don't worry, you know, we don't
00:19:54.040
waste it. I mean, he'd heard that Elon Musk or somebody in America is worried that they're wasting
00:19:58.560
this food. And he said, no, no, of course we don't waste it. We use it. And I I had this feeling of
00:20:03.560
shame, you know, that this man who's really on the front line of saving people's lives is
00:20:09.200
justifying his use of, you know, of this product that Americans, you know, don't even care enough
00:20:15.380
about to continue sending and would rather burn in a warehouse. I mean, it's a it's a very dramatic
00:20:20.940
moment. And people don't understand it either. They ask, you know, what why? What's the reason?
00:20:26.980
And it's very hard to explain, you know, why didn't you hand it off? Why didn't you you know,
00:20:32.380
if you didn't want if you wanted to end it, why didn't you do it slowly? Why didn't you make sure
00:20:35.640
nobody was going to starve or die because of what you're doing? And there's no explanation.
00:20:40.960
Yeah, I mean, I'm hard pressed to come up with any charitable framing of what happened. I mean,
00:20:47.040
I, you know, I think the obvious callousness and ruthlessness and even cruelty and, you know,
00:20:53.860
jubilation with which it was this vandalism was accomplished, you know, going on to X and saying,
00:20:59.100
I spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper when I could have been going to great parties.
00:21:04.700
Uh, I mean, just the gloating and calling all the people in the field who have given their life to
00:21:10.980
this kind of work criminals. I mean, it's just a completely psychopathic exercise in the destruction
00:21:16.880
of American soft power. But if we were going to come up with some charitable version of skepticism
00:21:25.140
about aid to Africa or to anywhere in the developing world, what would you say to someone who would say,
00:21:32.260
listen, Africa has been, you know, you know, many of these countries certainly have been basket cases
00:21:37.800
for as long as I've been alive. We've been giving aid there, uh, at whatever level continuously,
00:21:42.860
maybe there's some set of incentives here that need to be re-examined. Maybe this is,
00:21:49.060
maybe aid is not really as helpful as we imagine. Maybe what these countries need is a dealmaker like
00:21:55.460
Donald Trump to, uh, come in and, uh, you know, privilege economic interests over handouts. And
00:22:01.840
we've, you figure out how to bring these countries into the 21st century under their own power in some
00:22:08.200
sense. I mean, is there any, again, I'm, you know, I'm casting a straws here, but is there some version
00:22:13.660
of skepticism that would kind of demand a reset of, of the status quo in this area that, that would be
00:22:25.380
So you can meet people, and I know some of them, who worked at USAID and who've worked in the aid world
00:22:32.220
and who would argue very strenuously for a different way of thinking about it, a different way of doing it.
00:22:37.840
I mean, just for example, so in Sudan, one of the few really amazing positive stories is a movement
00:22:45.180
called the Emergency Response Rooms, somewhat awkward name, but what it is, is a kind of Sudanese
00:22:50.040
mutual aid organizations. And in a lot of cities, they've sprung up, they created, they raised outside
00:22:56.300
money or they, they found access to food or medicine and they created their own networks. This is after the
00:23:01.820
war broke out, their own networks to help people and so on. And sometimes they had a little bit of money
00:23:06.600
from, from the outside world and some they raised themselves and so on. And there are, for example,
00:23:12.120
ex-USAID people who think that that's the kind of, you know, organization we should help. So rather
00:23:18.100
than helping, you know, large organizations or large charities or large, you know, these sometimes even
00:23:25.380
for-profit companies who helped to move aid and food around the world, you know, we should, it should
00:23:29.800
have all been much more grassroots and local. So there is a, there's a version that would make that
00:23:34.660
argument. But that wasn't what Elon Musk did. You know, what Elon Musk did was just blow up the whole
00:23:41.240
thing, as I said, in ways that were disorienting and costly. You know, it's also, you know, it's not
00:23:47.320
true that there's no progress. Actually, there's a lot of Africa that's better off than it was. And a lot
00:23:52.920
of, much of the rest of the world is more prosperous than it was. And lots of countries that were formerly
00:23:58.280
consumers of aid, like India, aren't anymore. You know, so it's, you know, it's not, it's not true
00:24:04.760
that it doesn't work or doesn't help or it never changes or nothing ever, nothing ever alters. I
00:24:09.540
mean, countries go up and down for different reasons. Sudan is a kind of, maybe is a special
00:24:13.980
case because of the war. But also Sudan, you know, and one of the things I regret about the article
00:24:19.580
and in some ways the story and the photographs and so on is that, you know, you can see in Sudan,
00:24:25.780
you can see in Khartoum that there was a middle class life there. I mean, there were apartment
00:24:31.100
buildings and blocks and infrastructure and schools and universities. And I met a lot of people who had
00:24:37.980
young people who had been in university and studying something at the time the war broke out and then
00:24:43.900
had to go home. I mean, there, it's not as if there was nothing. It's not, you know, or it's some
00:24:49.860
primitive empty place. I mean, it's very rich in terms of culture and in terms of people are well
00:24:55.200
educated. They speak excellent English. They have, they know very, they know a lot about the outside
00:24:59.960
world. You know, they're not as far away from us as we would like to imagine. And as I say, it's not
00:25:05.680
clear that everything that we did there was a disaster and a catastrophe. But there were moments when the
00:25:10.800
U.S. did help and there was a big North-South Civil War in the past. That was the old Civil War.
00:25:15.920
Which did have a more, it has a more of a religious component because the North was Muslim and the South
00:25:20.860
was Christian. And we did help to end that. And we did, we were part of the South Sudan, which had
00:25:26.700
been part of the same country. We were part of them breaking off and establishing themselves as an
00:25:31.160
independent state. That's a longer story, but there is progress and things do improve. And, you know,
00:25:37.040
it's just not true that, I mean, the kind of aid that I'm talking about is the aid that keeps people
00:25:41.940
alive. So nutritional supplements, medicine, things like that. And I don't see any good argument for
00:25:49.560
ending that. I can see good arguments for finding ways to get it to people in better ways. I can
00:25:55.400
see, I can imagine, you know, changing the way it was distributed, but to cut it off from one day to
00:26:01.000
the next seems like it was impossibly cruel and pointless.
00:26:04.540
Yeah. Yeah. I don't think we have good intuitions for how societies unravel. And this is, a lot of your
00:26:12.020
work is focusing on how precarious democracy is and, you know, what happens when democracies turn
00:26:19.980
illiberal. If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation, you'll need to subscribe
00:26:25.880
at samharris.org. Once you do, you'll get access to all full-length episodes of the Making Sense
00:26:31.580
podcast. The Making Sense podcast is ad-free and relies entirely on listener support. And you can