Making Sense - Sam Harris - August 22, 2025


#430 — "More From Sam": Trump, Gavin Newsom, Class War, DOGE, & Rapid Fire Questions


Episode Stats

Length

15 minutes

Words per Minute

183.7788

Word Count

2,849

Sentence Count

164

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

In this episode of the Making Sense Podcast, host Alex Blumberg sits down with Sam Harris to discuss the new president, Donald Trump. They discuss how he got elected, why he s a terrible president, and why he should have won the Nobel Peace Prize.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris. Just a note to say that if you're
00:00:11.740 hearing this, you're not currently on our subscriber feed, and we'll only be hearing
00:00:15.720 the first part of this conversation. In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense
00:00:20.060 Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org. We don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore
00:00:26.240 it's made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers. So if you enjoy what we're
00:00:30.200 doing here, please consider becoming one. Welcome back to another episode of More From Sam.
00:00:39.320 Hi, Sam. How are you? Good to see you. Here's me. More of me. Yeah, there's more. As a reminder,
00:00:45.080 the goal of this series is to get more from Sam more often, and since we've been getting a lot
00:00:48.400 more of you lately, Sam, we haven't had an episode for a while. Along with subscriber input, I may
00:00:53.160 issue my own positions, exaggerated versions of my positions, or play devil's advocate and jump
00:00:58.080 between them seamlessly, and because I'm here in service of Sam, your ideas. I may also abandon
00:01:02.680 any position I authentically hold if I think I can get more from you. Thank you again to all our
00:01:07.160 subscribers for submitting your questions and comments. If you'd like to submit topics for a
00:01:11.380 future episode, you'll need to become a subscriber, and you can do that at samharris.org. And one more
00:01:16.520 announcement quickly. Sam currently has five shows on sale. Seattle, San Jose, New York, Boston,
00:01:20.760 and Chicago. I think Boston is sold out. There might be a few remaining tickets in New York,
00:01:25.040 and you can find all the details and ticket links at samharris.org. Okay, on to our first topic.
00:01:31.680 Is it fair to say that what concerns you most about Trump is what's yet to come? What happens
00:01:35.600 to our country after Trump? What happens to our democracy going forward? No, no. I'm concerned about
00:01:42.820 what's already happened. I think our democracy has eroded to an impressive degree that a few people
00:01:49.880 right of center seem prepared to acknowledge. I think when you have senators and congresspeople
00:01:55.020 not voting their conscience in the aftermath of January 6th because they're afraid they might be
00:01:59.720 killed or their families might be killed, something has gone wrong with our democracy, right? That's a
00:02:04.400 very new spot on the map, and it's quite close to tyranny, frankly. And that's years ago, right? That's
00:02:13.740 where we're coming from there. I'm more wondering if you're concerned that it's going to get worse
00:02:19.040 from here, meaning what Trump is doing now and where we are now. Are you not more concerned with
00:02:24.060 what does the future look like? Well, yeah. If the future gets worse, that's obviously a bad thing,
00:02:30.140 and I'm worried about that. But really, all of my criticism of Trump is based on what has already
00:02:37.240 happened. None of it is hypothetical. I mean, yes, I have on the hypothetical side of the ledger,
00:02:43.260 I have all these things I'm worried about, right? I mean, you know, because we don't know what
00:02:47.420 challenges we're going to face as a society going forward, but we know having a greedy, incompetent,
00:02:54.580 self-dealing ignoramus in charge is not optimal. We're putting him in a room with Putin, right,
00:03:01.300 to try to negotiate the end of a war in Europe. He's one of the last people I could think who's
00:03:07.460 qualified to do that. I mean, first, he's showing every sign of being easily manipulated by Putin,
00:03:12.280 and by default, he's anchored to Putin's view of the history of that war, right? He literally spouts
00:03:19.600 old Kremlin talking points in how he describes the war in Ukraine. He sounds like a guy who's
00:03:27.600 really thinking about what a great real estate deal he might do in Moscow when this whole thing
00:03:31.540 is over, right? I mean, if that's what was the only thing going on in his brain, if you could have
00:03:35.940 some South Park episode that showed the condo deal he was really worried about invading his entire
00:03:43.180 frontal cortex, that would explain it. But he pretends he's strong, but he's the most easily
00:03:49.420 manipulated president we've ever had. And again, he's anchored, his bias is on the side of, in this
00:03:57.840 case, the dictator who launched a war of aggression into Europe. Well, speaking of that, Hillary Clinton
00:04:03.740 said she'd nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize if he helped broker an end of the war without
00:04:07.880 capitulating to Putin. Would you? Well, that final phrase is crucial, right? Without capitulating to
00:04:12.840 Putin. Of course. Let's see how that goes. Right. But if he did, would you support nominating him
00:04:18.800 for Nobel Peace Prize? I mean, yeah, but who cares? I mean, the Nobel Peace Prize has been so devalued.
00:04:23.700 I mean, Obama got it before he did anything, right? It's a farce. Arafat got it, right? Well,
00:04:28.400 what we know about Arafat's contributions to peace in the Middle East. I mean, nobody should care about
00:04:34.140 the Nobel Peace Prize. He gets a peace prize for refraining from killing anyone. That was the bar
00:04:39.780 there. You've often mentioned that when Trump is out, we're going to need to rewrite the laws
00:04:43.880 and change everything in order to keep this from happening again, right? You know what I'm talking
00:04:48.820 about? Where you'll say, like, on a go-forward basis, let's shore up the norms and make rules that
00:04:53.780 avoid the loopholes from being exploited? Yeah, I have no hope we're going to actually do that.
00:04:58.340 But yes, I think one of the things we realize is that we have norms that are shoring up our
00:05:04.100 democracy in places where we really should have laws. I mean, because the fact that we don't have
00:05:10.120 laws and we only have norms testifies to the assumption that people aren't going to traduce
00:05:15.420 those norms for corrupt or otherwise self-serving reasons. But Trump has broken all that,
00:05:22.100 all that kind of invisible structure. So yeah, we need real structure that makes it illegal to
00:05:27.160 do certain things. You shouldn't be able to launch a cryptocurrency that is just a mechanism by which
00:05:33.480 you can take bribes from the entire world and enrich yourself to the tune of billions of dollars
00:05:38.520 and use U.S. foreign policy and tariff policy so as to do that better, right? Like there should,
00:05:45.400 there's no, apparently there's, you know, it remains to be seen, I guess maybe, maybe one of
00:05:48.820 these court cases is explicitly on that point, but it remains to be seen whether any of that stuff is
00:05:55.240 illegal. Right. The problem I see with having to rewrite the laws is that anytime you enter into
00:05:59.900 any sort of agreement with somebody, a contract is only as good as the people that are involved.
00:06:04.420 There's a lot of good faith that's required. Well, that's not true. A real contract that's
00:06:08.580 enforceable by law has at the end of it, when you don't live up to your end of it, people with guns
00:06:14.480 showing up at your house and sticking those guns in your face. Of course, I understand that. I'm
00:06:18.700 saying that generally speaking, when you enter into agreement with somebody, if you're going to
00:06:22.280 make a deal with somebody, there's a spirit that you're trying to pay attention to. Instead, the idea,
00:06:28.340 what I'm getting at is that the history of the success of our country has come from the respect,
00:06:35.820 the relationship between the founding documents and its executors. And now we're being forced to
00:06:40.580 rewrite everything to protect ourselves against the enemy within. And that's sort of not really
00:06:45.900 the point. The point is, if you have to enter an agreement with somebody and you have to...
00:06:49.540 No, it's become the point. And this was something that the founding fathers, I think it was,
00:06:53.960 I think it was Madison somewhere, anticipated this explicitly. Like, well, you can't have an evil
00:06:59.760 person in the role of the chief executive and expect this system to work. I forget how it was put,
00:07:06.680 but there's some lines to that effect. It should be foreseeable. I mean, we're capable of being so
00:07:13.600 confused and so at odds with one another that the creative and not boring demagogue can win 51% of
00:07:23.020 the vote. Okay. So now we know that about ourselves and the rest of the world knows it too.
00:07:27.380 All right. I'm going to change topics on you.
00:07:29.640 Yeah.
00:07:30.040 Unless you have anything else to add there about Trump.
00:07:31.700 Well, this is just, you now need to price in all of the damage that has been done to our
00:07:37.000 reputation. I mean, even if we get rid of Trump and we don't elect the opportunist J.D. Vance in
00:07:43.580 2028, and we get some sane and ethical president, Republican or Democrat, and we try to reset the
00:07:54.660 world's expectations, it's very hard to see how we do that. And we have announced to the world that
00:07:59.560 we potentially stand for nothing other than the whims of the next guy or gal we put in office.
00:08:05.060 Right. Right. Well, I did like the take that you and Ann Applebaum discussed, which J.D. Vance,
00:08:10.800 the idea that he's sort of like tofu, or he sort of takes on the flavor of whatever room he's in at
00:08:16.140 any given time. That was interesting. All right. Let's move to Newsom. I know we debated this a few
00:08:22.440 months ago, but I'm going to say it again. Gavin Newsom is going to be the Democratic candidate for
00:08:26.580 2028. Any updated thoughts there? No. I'm just, I will wait and say, I mean, I just can't imagine
00:08:33.580 that's a winning ticket. I'm not disputing the guy's talent and charisma in certain contexts,
00:08:40.440 but I just think it's too much baggage to sell to 49 other states. Yeah. I mean, but what else,
00:08:47.580 what worse could we hear about Newsom at this point? Well, we can't, but we know that 49 other
00:08:52.220 states and their inhabitants more or less despise him. Right. I mean, I haven't seen national
00:08:57.800 polling, but I, I'd be willing to bet that forget about him as a, as a person and his, his, um,
00:09:04.820 his Clintonian indiscretions. It's just the bad PR baggage that California as a state has for the
00:09:10.920 rest of the country. I mean, I think a lot of that PR is misinformation at this point, but it's fairly
00:09:16.360 indelible, right? People think California is virtually a failed state. It's like the number
00:09:21.960 four economy on earth at this point. And it subsidizes all the dysfunction of the 49 other
00:09:27.720 states, but the other states think California sucks. Yeah. I think Gavin makes that case really
00:09:32.880 well. And I think he'll have to stand behind some of it. That's no match for the, the, uh, Vox Pop
00:09:39.360 interview with the homeless addict in downtown LA or downtown San Francisco who says, yeah, it's so great
00:09:46.280 here. They gave me a lawn chair and all the fentanyl I can take. And it's, it's awesome.
00:09:50.840 Right. California go California. Yeah. Yeah. Again, I think we need, we're going to need somebody
00:09:56.400 who is as shameless as he is. And he's really a great communicator. He's got a lot of talents.
00:10:02.380 Again, I'm not a fan of his, but I can just see what he's doing and whoever's working with him behind
00:10:07.920 the scenes and advising him, or if it's him, I just don't see that anyone else is playing that level
00:10:13.400 of Trump politics from the left, you know, that style. But again, who is he going to convince?
00:10:19.960 Right. I mean, it's just, you have to picture people who voted for Trump now voting for Newsom
00:10:25.380 and that only one or 2%. Yeah. But I think he's handsome enough and communicates well,
00:10:30.600 and he'll be able to put out enough good content that he persuades him. Anyway,
00:10:34.020 we don't have to get stuck on this. I'm just, I'm planning my flag. Talk to me in a year about that.
00:10:38.040 I may have another thought. I want to come back to your,
00:10:40.320 your hobby horse for a second and discuss wealth inequality and make two entry points for you. As
00:10:45.800 Scott Galloway has publicly stated a number of times, and I know you share this belief,
00:10:48.940 if you hit your number, 50 million, a hundred million, 250, whatever it is,
00:10:52.480 and then you don't start enjoying it by spending it on friends and family and being charitable and
00:10:56.280 helping others, then you're really missing out on the greatest joy of having wealth, right?
00:11:01.740 And the second part is rich people should be most invested in keeping the pitchforks from the
00:11:06.860 gates. They have won the lottery. So maybe stop building compounds and invest in communities.
00:11:12.400 Thoughts? Yeah. Well, so I'd be to take it from the top down. I mean, the ultra rich people who
00:11:16.900 don't think they have a stake in the common good and who think they can just jet off to New Zealand
00:11:22.240 if things ever get really tough here. I mean, that's one, it's just patently delusional.
00:11:28.340 I was like, I mean, if you're gaming out those end of the world scenarios, you know,
00:11:32.300 you have to think of who's going to protect you and who you're going to just, your pilot on your
00:11:39.200 private plane is not going to leave without his family to go to New Zealand when the world ends,
00:11:44.700 right? So you need to take the pilot's family. And what about your bodyguard's family? And who's
00:11:50.320 going to protect you from your bodyguards when your bodyguards understand that you really have
00:11:53.920 no power now. You're just a guy who bought this compound in New Zealand. It's a ridiculous end game
00:11:59.680 to think that you can privately ensure your survival when the shit really hits the fan,
00:12:05.560 right? So you have as much a stake in civilization not failing as anyone else, as anyone who doesn't
00:12:13.880 have nearly the resources you have. You should have more of a stake.
00:12:17.480 We have more of a stake, yeah, because life is or should be so good, right? And like you won the game,
00:12:22.000 right? Like you should be nothing but dessert at this point. So the fact that they don't see that
00:12:27.220 and they're wasting any time, rather than shoring up civil society and improving the government in
00:12:33.580 all kinds of ways that we should improve it, they're engaged in this private effort, like this
00:12:38.860 concierge prepping for the apocalypse. That just seems crazy and just a frank misappropriation of
00:12:45.720 their moral capital and to say nothing of their actual capital. But yeah, I mean, in addition to that,
00:12:51.700 they should be much more generous in trying to build a functional society wherein other people
00:12:59.080 are happy and secure, right? I mean, they have a stake in other people seeing their dreams realized,
00:13:07.100 right? I mean, do you want to be surrounded by desperate, angry, envious people? Or do you want
00:13:11.840 to be surrounded by people who are basically happy and thriving? And the answer is so obvious.
00:13:17.420 At any level of wealth, it's so obvious. Now, what's really corrupt here is that we all have a
00:13:23.240 sense, an understandable sense, that our tax dollars are often wasted, right? They're spent on things that
00:13:29.700 we wouldn't approve of if we could kind of line item veto some of these expenditures. We all have this
00:13:38.040 some version of a doge idiot in our head. Now, some of that is probably totally unrealistic and
00:13:45.700 irrational, right? I mean, I'm sure one of the lessons of doge is that there's far less fraud
00:13:52.000 and waste in government than anyone suspected, right? I mean, they went in there just guns blazing
00:13:57.320 looking for fraud, and they found like $15 worth, and then they just started cutting good projects to
00:14:03.140 the bone and alienating every person who's working for the government, and many of whom are quite
00:14:09.320 talented and could be working in the private sector and are taking a significant pay cut to serve the
00:14:14.720 country. I'm not saying I don't think there's waste in government, and I'm not saying that I don't
00:14:19.020 think we could spend our tax dollars more wisely, but what we need is a judicious and transparent and
00:14:25.800 nonpartisan and sane look at all that, not some dummy on ketamine with a chainsaw and bad sunglasses.
00:14:34.460 You can't privatize everything. It's the government that's going to fight our wars. It's the government
00:14:39.200 that's going to tell us what the hell to do when the next pandemic happens. It's the government that
00:14:42.880 needs to make sure the food supply and the drug supply.
00:14:47.180 If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation, you'll need to subscribe at
00:14:51.220 samharris.org. Once you do, you'll get access to all full-length episodes of the Making Sense podcast.
00:14:57.780 The Making Sense podcast is ad-free and relies entirely on listener support,
00:15:01.960 and you can subscribe now at samharris.org.
00:15:12.880 ...
00:15:13.980 ...
00:15:18.080 ...
00:15:19.200 ...
00:15:21.140 ...
00:15:22.080 ...
00:15:22.840 ...
00:15:23.840 ...