Making Sense - Sam Harris - August 25, 2025


#431 — What Is Happening on College Campuses？


Episode Stats


Length

23 minutes

Words per minute

171.56184

Word count

4,009

Sentence count

210

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Wesleyan University President Michael Roth joins me in this episode to talk about what it means to be a liberal in the 21st century, and why we should all be concerned about what's happening in the ivory tower.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris. Just a note to say that if you're
00:00:11.740 hearing this, you're not currently on our subscriber feed, and we'll only be hearing
00:00:15.720 the first part of this conversation. In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense
00:00:20.060 Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org. We don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore
00:00:26.240 it's made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers. So if you enjoy what we're
00:00:30.200 doing here, please consider becoming one. Well, I'm here with Michael Roth. Michael,
00:00:39.000 thanks for joining me. Glad to be here. So you are the president of Wesleyan University
00:00:44.380 and also a frequent contributor to the New York Times. Are there any other hats you wear that I'm
00:00:49.340 not aware of? Well, I'm a grandpa and a dad and a husband, and those are the main things
00:00:58.340 right now. I teach every semester still at Wesleyan and try to write books for mostly academic
00:01:06.320 audiences, but more recently trying to broaden my reach. Yeah. So what do you teach? What was your
00:01:13.060 intellectual and academic background? So I'm a historian, and I was, as a student at Wesleyan,
00:01:19.960 I couldn't make up my mind between history, philosophy, and psychology. And I had a fairy 0.55
00:01:26.200 god dean, as I describe him now, who was a substitute dean. That's the best kind. And at the time he said
00:01:31.720 to me, why decide, man? And he allowed me to make up my own. What year was that accent from?
00:01:38.820 1976. I remember the ferns in his office. I think they were ferns. And Charlie, Dean Charlie. And
00:01:47.340 so he made up this major there called History of Psychological Theory, which I thought was I was
00:01:54.580 getting away with something. And as it turned out, for the next 40 years, I worked on history,
00:02:01.620 psychology, philosophy. So it turned out to be right. But as I left his office, he said,
00:02:06.500 you ought to go to California, man. And I had never been west of the Poconos from growing up in New
00:02:12.700 York. And so my girlfriend and I drove to California that summer. I bought a tent and then
00:02:19.020 couldn't really decide always between philosophy and history, especially. So I became an intellectual
00:02:23.900 historian. And my work has been on history of philosophy and psychology. Over the years,
00:02:30.500 I did a my senior thesis at Wesleyan was on psychoanalysis and politics. And that became
00:02:37.440 my first book. And then it became an exhibition at the Library of Congress. And then most of my work
00:02:43.060 is in the scholarly world was about how people make sense of the past. So things about memory and
00:02:48.820 historiography and how people deal with trauma. And then since I've been at Wesleyan, I've written a few
00:02:56.120 books on liberal arts education and freedom of speech and safe spaces and things like that.
00:03:03.220 Nice. Well, many of those ideas and areas of expertise will be brought to bear on the conversation
00:03:09.200 we're going to have today, I imagine. I don't know how deep into the history of ideas we need to go,
00:03:14.140 but certainly the recent history of ideas will be relevant.
00:03:17.060 Well, so let's begin with the very broad question. How are things in the ivory tower these days?
00:03:25.360 Oh, it's terrible. You know, I've been teaching undergraduates since 1983 on my own, I guess even
00:03:32.940 before that as a TA. And I don't remember a time of such trepidation of really angst about government
00:03:44.040 intervention and at the same time, a kind of reluctance by students and even by faculty and
00:03:52.020 certainly by administrators to stand up for the things we've claimed to believe in for the last
00:03:56.920 20 years or so. So it's been, it's a very odd feeling these days. We worried for the last dozen
00:04:05.860 years or so about illiberalism from the left, especially. Many people have worried about that.
00:04:11.520 And I, although I see myself on the left, I also worried about that. But to me, it has nothing
00:04:18.540 in way of comparison to the authoritarianism that is now being marshaled against freedom of thought
00:04:25.640 and freedom of inquiry, freedom of expression by the federal government. And so that's terrible.
00:04:31.180 But what really bothers me more than, even than that, which bothers me a lot, is the reluctance of
00:04:36.920 my colleagues to stand up for some basic freedoms that we until very recently took for granted.
00:04:44.440 Well, I definitely want to talk about the creeping authoritarianism and the capitulation of the
00:04:49.660 institutions. But before we jump into that, what are the legitimate concerns about the ideological
00:04:56.740 capture of American universities by the far left and far left ideologies? I mean, there's this
00:05:04.100 intersection of what is often goes by the name of wokeness, you know, what I would call a kind of
00:05:09.840 social justice, moral panic in certain areas. Also a kind of quasi-Marxist ideology, perhaps
00:05:17.160 informing that, and certainly an oppressor, oppressed ideology that has been mapped onto the protest
00:05:23.660 movement around, or animated the protest movement around October 7th. What is the most charitable
00:05:31.380 construal of the concern around all of that that many people, I think we're going to demur here,
00:05:39.640 but I think many people think the Trump administration is simply just acting on that concern. It's just
00:05:44.740 gone too far. There's been this leftist takeover of elite institutions and a resulting degradation of
00:05:52.820 the quality of thought there, certainly ethical thought, political thought. What can you say in defense
00:05:59.220 of that concern? Not much. I mean, to me, that's akin to saying that, you know, Putin has legitimate
00:06:06.080 concerns about the Ukrainian threat against Moscow, that, you know, the Ukraine could have joined NATO
00:06:13.420 and Russia would have been imperiled, or the Russians don't, you know, they have legitimate historical
00:06:19.240 concerns in what is called the Ukraine or the Ukrainian entity. So I think it's vastly overblown,
00:06:29.220 I think ideological capture itself is a misnomer. It doesn't really describe what's happened at most
00:06:37.120 colleges and universities. Where the most popular majors remain economics and psychology, the most
00:06:42.160 popular professions are the most desirable professions, especially at the elite schools,
00:06:47.080 or in finance, or people wanting to go to Wall Street so they could work for a private equity firm,
00:06:52.200 they could buy, let's say, a group of podcast entities like yours. I mean, this is not neo-Marxism,
00:06:59.960 this is not progressivism. You know, the danger in higher education is more vocationalism.
00:07:06.380 So I think that that's, it's important to not give in to the demands of the aggressor,
00:07:14.260 just because, because there are some worries that people who thought they were on the left
00:07:18.860 have to have. Michael, let me just take you back. So again, leaving aside the, I think the obvious
00:07:24.120 maliciousness and malignancy of the response to this from the Trump administration, let's just talk
00:07:30.460 about the problem. I mean, I remember first being alarmed by all of this when I saw Nicholas Christakis in
00:07:37.160 the quad at Yale being hounded by a group of students who, um, not all of whom, but certainly
00:07:44.500 several of whom, to my eye, were violating every norm of basic sanity on a college campus, short of
00:07:52.480 punching Nicholas in the face. I mean, there was a, a none too implicit threat of violence there at some
00:07:58.600 point. I mean, there was, it was actually, it was not clear to me that he could have safely left
00:08:02.800 that crowd at a certain point, uh, without having to physically force his way to pass students. And
00:08:08.580 those students got awards for their social justice activism, if I'm not mistaken.
00:08:14.220 Oh, well, they also got death threats because the reason you're aware of this is because it was filmed
00:08:18.340 by people who wanted to make propaganda out of that. And they did so very successfully.
00:08:24.760 I wrote to Nick Christakis right after that and said, you know, this is horrific. I'm so sorry this
00:08:29.560 happened. I don't know him actually. We've met more recently. So I don't disagree that that behavior
00:08:34.780 was awful, but it would be like saying, I don't know, go to a fraternity party and see people
00:08:40.200 vomiting and saying, Oh, American universities have been, there's an ideological capture by,
00:08:45.420 I don't know, the alcohol industry. I mean, this is idiotic behavior at Yale where most people are
00:08:50.620 trying to get good jobs on wall street, not destroy the system of free speech and liberal democracy.
00:08:57.480 It was bad. I think it was the, the, the folks behave badly and there, there, and there was
00:09:04.520 much too much tolerance for bad behavior on the part of colleges and universities. I think that's
00:09:10.500 true, but I really don't think it, I don't think that's a serious concern. I do think there was a
00:09:17.420 serious concern about, um, the lack of ideological or even intellectual diversity in, in the faculty
00:09:25.180 at colleges and universities. And I've been writing about this for a long time. And, and I do think
00:09:31.300 that's a serious problem and it's getting worse in, in many respects because folks aren't even going to
00:09:37.840 graduate school if they're moderates or conservatives in especially humanities and social sciences,
00:09:43.660 interpretive social sciences. And, and that just is a narrowing of education and narrowing of the
00:09:50.340 kind of questions asked. So I see that as a real problem. I think like the, the, the Yale example,
00:09:56.960 which is now what, 10 years old or eight years old and, or the Charles Murray at Middlebury example,
00:10:04.080 these are bad things, but you know, there are Charles Murray probably gave a hundred lectures
00:10:09.320 beyond aside from that one and which went without incident. So I, I just don't want to take those
00:10:15.760 examples as exemplifying something much broader than I, it seems to me, they, they merit being
00:10:22.520 used for it. I do think that the faculties at schools like mine have paid too little attention
00:10:30.800 to ensuring intellectual and ideological diversity in the departments where that would really make a
00:10:36.960 big difference like the humanities and interpretive social sciences. And it's hard to know exactly what
00:10:42.380 to do about that. We've tried some things at Wesleyan with very small successes here and there, but
00:10:48.220 that seems to me a real problem. The, when protests get out of hand, I think, I don't see that as big,
00:10:56.540 as big a deal as some of my friends do or some of my colleagues do. It, it did seem to me that a lot,
00:11:03.560 for a lot of people who thought of themselves as liberals, or at least moderates and liberals to be
00:11:08.880 outflanked by young students who demanded things we didn't think were reasonable, that was upsetting
00:11:14.840 to people. But that's kind of what happens as you get older. Young people ask you to do things that
00:11:20.160 are dumb from your perspective. You don't have to do them. And I think when, when, when the schools
00:11:27.240 actually stood up to protesters appropriately, acknowledging their right to protest, but not
00:11:31.320 to harass people, I think things actually worked out pretty well at most schools. So the Yale example
00:11:36.720 is a bad one. And there are probably, you know, two dozen other examples we can come up with.
00:11:42.840 But I want to, I want to talk about the protests and what you recommend there. Cause my understanding
00:11:47.040 is that Wesleyan navigated the moment post October 8th, slightly differently than campuses like
00:11:53.900 Columbia or UCLA, or, uh, I forget, I forget the others that, that really had a problem. But, uh,
00:12:00.540 before we do, so just on the point of viewpoint diversity that you just brought up,
00:12:04.180 is there any daylight between you and someone like Jonathan Haidt or Steven Pinker, both very
00:12:10.220 popular academics who've been, uh, you know, fairly voluble on, on the need here to somehow recruit
00:12:16.980 people who are politically right of the, uh, of the, you know, the, the 10% mark on the, um,
00:12:24.440 the left, right political continuum?
00:12:25.800 Well, I think Jonathan and I have, uh, worked together over the years on this issue. And though
00:12:33.160 we don't always see things the same way, I'm one of the few people who was, gave a mixed review to
00:12:38.420 the coddling of the American mind book, but I do agree with him that getting, bringing more ideological
00:12:44.860 diversity into the university's faculty is really important. And I called in, I think, 2010 or something
00:12:52.560 like that. Well, no, 15, I guess for an affirmative action program for conservatives and colleges,
00:12:58.820 universities, which pissed off everybody really. I mean, the left, the left, even the conservatives.
00:13:03.780 Oh, especially because they said, we don't need affirmative action. We just need, you know, merit.
00:13:07.440 But I actually think we had to be very intentional about hiring libertarians, people with strong
00:13:13.280 religious faith that was related to their scholarship and traditional conservatives. And I, I think,
00:13:19.380 I do think it's really important. I, I was made aware of this by a trustee at Westing who became
00:13:25.380 a friend, uh, who just kept pointing out to me all the ways in which things that seem normal to me,
00:13:30.520 if you didn't share that ideological perspective, they were incredibly biased. And so I, you know,
00:13:37.060 it was one of those moments where you say, oh my gosh, we, I am really biased. And so I need to
00:13:41.760 correct for that. I mean, I'm not, I teach Aquinas, I don't, you know, I haven't converted to
00:13:46.020 Catholicism, but I, I can teach Aquinas, but they shouldn't have only have Jews from Long Island 0.93
00:13:50.880 teaching Catholicism. They should have people who have lived experience, I think. And as much as you
00:13:56.820 can. And, and so I've tried to hire people from the military. I've hired people with different
00:14:02.520 points of view than the standard graduate from an Ivy League humanities department. And I think that
00:14:09.080 when I started this, there was a lot of skepticism to put it mildly on my, from my colleagues at
00:14:15.200 Westland and elsewhere. Now there's, it's a robust conversation on campus about ideological bias.
00:14:21.820 And that to me is, is really as much as I should do as the, as the president. I mean,
00:14:26.220 I should get people to be more aware of their biases and then they're good people. They're
00:14:30.780 professionals. They don't, they don't want to be acting with bias. And so I think there's been
00:14:35.460 some correction. I, it could be greater. It could be, and I think that is a real issue.
00:14:41.940 My understanding is that there were, I can only imagine we're past this point now as a shadow of
00:14:47.280 the Trump administration, uh, imposed itself over all of our universities, but in the not too distant
00:14:53.320 past perspective, hires or new hires were having to sign effectively, uh, you know, DEI pledges of some
00:15:01.900 kind, right. They, they had to, I forget the actual verbiage, but it was something like, you know,
00:15:06.280 I'm committed to it. Even if, even if their discipline was, you know, mathematics is I'm
00:15:11.660 committed to, you know, rooting out, you know, racism in my field or whatever it was, you didn't
00:15:17.120 see that as a kind of systematic way of, of filtering for, uh, and against the, the very people you would
00:15:24.480 otherwise want to recruit. Oh, I do. I do think those were bad ideas, except when what you were
00:15:31.840 trying to do is to make sure that somebody was able to teach a classroom of people from diverse
00:15:37.620 backgrounds. That seems to me perfectly reasonable. In other words, we want to have professors or
00:15:43.280 teachers who are able to teach a classroom with people who have different lived experiences, come
00:15:48.340 from different backgrounds. That, that seems to me perfectly legitimate concern. If, if I'm hiring 0.88
00:15:54.860 a crackerjack, uh, computer scientists who just is used to teaching in graduate school, other graduate
00:16:01.420 students are very, you know, high-end majors at a great school and you put them in a classroom at a
00:16:07.880 public university where people come from various backgrounds, you want to make sure that they're,
00:16:12.980 they're able to deal with that. I mean, as a teacher, you'd have to adjust to the people in
00:16:18.280 front of you and then have them adjust to you. So I think that's reasonable, but this idea that you
00:16:24.200 would really want someone to make an ideological commitment to a program of diversity in order to
00:16:28.940 teach math or history or whatever, that seems to me reprehensible. So where's the, the actual line
00:16:34.700 here? Because, um, I mean, obviously no university would want to recruit a professor who is a closeted or,
00:16:43.420 or, you know, out of the closet, neo-Nazi. So there's, there's some part of the, the, the ideological
00:16:49.620 spectrum that is disqualifying from the point of view of, you know, you just, you, you don't want the
00:16:55.540 brand damage. You don't want the influence on your kids. I mean, why would you want a neo-Nazi teaching
00:16:59.460 history or anything else at your university? But by the same token, why would you want a Hamas supporter? 0.91
00:17:06.000 Why would Columbia want a professor who is an unabashed supporter of, uh, a death cult, uh,
00:17:13.380 masquerading as a group of freedom fighters? Where's the line there for you?
00:17:18.180 So I, I think that a university shouldn't hire someone who is an active supporter of a terrorist
00:17:24.600 organization. So I think that's, to me, that's pretty clear as someone who is an opponent of the
00:17:33.320 occupation or of, of violence. That seems to me that that wouldn't be disqualifying, but I do think
00:17:41.460 it would be disqualifying to hire someone, whether they were, let's say a radical anti-Zionist or a
00:17:47.860 radical Zionist who thought their job in the classroom was to have more people like themselves.
00:17:52.820 I mean, I think that's just disqualifying because that's not what your job is as a teacher is not to
00:17:57.860 say, convert people to your view, whatever your view is. But to the question, like how broad the
00:18:02.860 spectrum should be of opinion, I have a terrible answer, which is that's a pragmatic issue. There
00:18:07.940 is no formula for that. I don't, I don't want a Nazi on, on my campus. And someone says, well,
00:18:14.360 you say you're in favor of free speech. Do you have limits to your support for free speech? I do have
00:18:18.520 limits. And those limits are defined really sociologically or historically. They're not,
00:18:24.840 there's not a formula for it, but I do think it's a, it's illegal in the United, I know it's illegal in
00:18:30.500 the United States to give material support to a terrorist organization. I think it should be
00:18:34.080 illegal. And I would not want those supporters teaching in my university. There are times when
00:18:41.340 you find out later on that somebody teaching whatever, I mean, they could be teaching, let's say
00:18:46.460 math and they actually are strong supporters of Hamas because they feel it's not what you described as a
00:18:53.860 death cult and a terrorist organization. I would agree with your description that they have a different
00:18:59.120 view of it. I think that as long as they're teaching math, that's really not my business,
00:19:04.540 what their idiotic views about politics are. Lots of people in my view have idiotic perspectives
00:19:10.280 on politics. When they bring them into the, into the classroom in a way that discriminates against
00:19:15.520 students or harasses students, then I think we should be fired. Is the line different for a guest
00:19:21.760 speaker? I mean, if you have a student group that wants to bring in a controversial speaker,
00:19:25.660 how do you handle that? And what is the, is the, the Overton window wider in that regard?
00:19:31.160 I think it's wider, but again, I have this wishy-washy answer. I mean, it's a pragmatist.
00:19:36.000 I don't think there's a formula for it. I'll give you an example. Years ago, before we, the word woke
00:19:42.300 was used, uh, we had, uh, Antonin Scalia was invited to give a talk at Wesleyan. Um, we have the free
00:19:48.460 speech series and I was asked to invite him. And, uh, and I thought the faculty were kind of baiting me
00:19:55.040 to see, like, if I would not accept their recommendation because, um, they were to the
00:19:59.800 left of me and I thought Justice Scalia had done more harm to the interpretation of the American
00:20:04.240 constitution than almost anyone since the 1800s. But they're the committee that recommends someone.
00:20:09.020 He's a Supreme court justice. You know, I invited him. I also thought he'd say no because he's a
00:20:14.280 Supreme court justice. He's busy. He wrote back immediately. He said, I'd love to come to Wesleyan.
00:20:19.200 And, uh, he mentioned that Larry Lessig had been there who have, of course, quite far on the left,
00:20:25.580 but had clerked for him and Lessig had a great experience at Wesleyan. So I said, okay, he's
00:20:30.280 coming. Now, if I hadn't invited him, I would have protested. I wouldn't have protested like to sort
00:20:35.540 of stop him from speaking, but I would have stood outside with a sign saying, you know, uh, Justice
00:20:41.360 Scalia is a bad guy or something, you know, something dumb. And, but instead I had to invite him. 0.99
00:20:46.460 I had to introduce him because I issued the invitation. So I did that. And, um, and he gave
00:20:53.340 a good talk. He spent the whole day on campus meeting with students. There were protests here
00:20:58.620 and there, not to keep him from speaking, but just acknowledge that they were against
00:21:02.860 the work he had done as a Supreme court justice. And we had a, it was actually a great day on campus.
00:21:09.980 I allowed myself a reference to a critic of his in my introductory comments, a very,
00:21:16.340 he's the only one in the room who understood, who got it. He did get it, who did, who would
00:21:20.820 disagree with originalism. And, um, so I thought that was about as good as it gets. We had protesters
00:21:26.640 who stood up in the room in orange jumpsuits because of Guantanamo at the, that was the issue
00:21:32.460 of the day. We went around and said, you have to sit down or leave. You can't block the view
00:21:36.640 of others. They sat down or left. He gave his talk. At some point when he was calling
00:21:42.160 on people, a young student, she joked up and said, why don't you call on a woman? Cause 1.00
00:21:46.960 he only called on guys. And then he said, okay, okay. And he called on a woman and it
00:21:50.680 was fine. You know, I mean, people expressed themselves in a way that was honest, but that
00:21:57.020 allowed for the conversation or debate to continue. I think that's, that's, that's to me,
00:22:02.960 the, the, a great model. It's not always possible, but you know, at Wesleyan, I think
00:22:08.660 we have developed a culture where people can be, they may be angry that we've invited,
00:22:14.080 you know, Roth to come and speak or Schmidt to come and speak or whomever, but they, they
00:22:19.860 have so far, knock on wood, they haven't forced us to cancel any events. If they did, we would
00:22:27.860 discipline those students that that's, it's very clear to them that that's against our
00:22:33.020 rules and we enforce our rules. And that's a really important rule because obviously if
00:22:38.920 you keep from someone from being heard that you're really undermining the whole educational
00:22:43.700 project.
00:22:44.240 Yeah. So why do so many colleges get this wrong? I mean, I, again, they could be outliers, but
00:22:50.060 many people in, in my audience will, uh, will have seen video after video of essentially
00:22:56.900 an effective use of the Hector. If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation,
00:23:01.860 you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org. Once you do, you'll get access to all full-length
00:23:07.320 episodes of the Making Sense podcast. The Making Sense podcast is ad-free and relies entirely on
00:23:13.180 listener support. And you can subscribe now at samharris.org.
00:23:20.060 you