#433 — How Did We Get Here？
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
206.09085
Summary
Dan Carlin is a podcaster, writer, and podcaster-in-chief. He's been around for a long time and is one of the most influential voices in podcasting. In this episode of the Making Sense Podcast, Dan talks with Sam about how he got started, why he decided to go back to podcasting, and why he doesn't want to go to video.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris. Just a note to say that if you're
00:00:11.740
hearing this, you're not currently on our subscriber feed, and we'll only be hearing
00:00:15.720
the first part of this conversation. In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense
00:00:20.060
Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org. We don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore
00:00:26.240
it's made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers. So if you enjoy what we're
00:00:30.220
doing here, please consider becoming one. I am here with Dan Carlin. Dan, how the hell are you?
00:00:39.580
Good, man. How are you? Long time no hear from. Yeah, it's been too long. It's been years,
00:00:44.740
years upon years, I think. Yeah, a lot of water under the bridge. I didn't look back, but it seems
00:00:49.480
like we were probably talking in a different era. Yeah, different reality. Yeah, for sure.
00:00:54.300
So let me just introduce you for those few people who might not recognize you. You're one of the
00:01:02.540
first podcasters. You really are the OG podcaster, and many of us believe the best who has ever
00:01:10.040
lived thus far. I mean, you have several- Disarming at the start, right there, Sam.
00:01:17.000
Yeah, I usually- Disarming tactic. Anyone who's heard this podcast knows I don't tend to butter up my
00:01:23.120
guest with a ton of praise, but honestly, you have several series of the Hardcore History Podcast
00:01:29.240
that are just true masterpieces. And that is not an exaggeration. It's not a word I use very often. So
00:01:36.700
congratulations, and thanks for taking the time to do this podcast.
00:01:40.200
It's, first of all, very kind of you. And I feel like those of us, including yourself,
00:01:44.700
who've been doing this for a lot of years, it's a fraternity that's grown by leaps and bounds in the
00:01:53.900
Yeah. There's something like 4.6 million podcasts, I'm told now. I'm not sure I believe that, but
00:01:58.940
that's- I can remember when no one knew what it was, and it was a 45-minute conversation at a
00:02:04.460
cocktail party when people say, what do you do for a living? And you'd walk away after 45 minutes,
00:02:10.280
Can you imagine starting a podcast now? I mean, how would that work?
00:02:14.000
I don't even know, unless you came in bringing your own sort of notoriety or popularity or
00:02:20.720
audience with you, I don't know how you would grow from nothing. I mean, I know it happens,
00:02:26.260
and there's still people, but I don't know how I'd do it if you had to try to stand out in such a
00:02:29.980
crowded field now. Yeah. Yeah. And you have resisted the slide into video. The ordeal of doing this
00:02:36.640
setup for the last 20 minutes has convinced you that that is the right decision, no doubt.
00:02:40.620
It's empathy, Sam. I have empathy for my audience, and they don't need to see this. They hear it.
00:02:46.660
That's hard enough for some of them, especially with my loudness and softness of variability. So
00:02:52.200
we're doing as much to the audience as I think they deserve right now.
00:02:55.920
So now you release episodes on a, to call it a trickle is probably an exaggeration of your output
00:03:03.940
at this point. I mean, you are clearly a perfectionist, and you just, I mean, I recall
00:03:10.240
waiting with the rest of your fans for the next installment of one of your hardcore history
00:03:16.680
episodes, and it was like, you know, a six-month wait. And essentially, you're producing audiobooks
00:03:21.920
without acknowledging that level of work. Give me your philosophy around that. I mean,
00:03:27.660
that's just, it's so counter to what everyone else in podcasting feels they need to do to succeed.
00:03:33.820
Well, it sort of depends on the nature of the content. And in our case, we figured it out slowly.
00:03:39.360
I mean, it was a, it was something we sort of came to the understanding over time that you're
00:03:44.860
dealing with something that's sort of evergreen. And when you have something that's evergreen
00:03:48.760
instead of topical, you've got two audiences for this stuff. You've got the audience that's waiting
00:03:53.680
with bated breath for the next episode. And then you've got the people that aren't maybe even born
00:03:58.360
yet that are going to hear it down the road. It's very, it's very analogous to a book, right?
00:04:02.360
So you can put out a book and you might serialize it in a magazine. And then each month is probably
00:04:07.480
dating us now, but then each month the listenership is eagerly awaiting the next installment in the
00:04:12.240
magazine. But you're also writing for an audience that isn't going to find you for a long time.
00:04:16.180
And, and it sort of a light bulb went on over our heads a while back where we realized that
00:04:21.140
audience doesn't care how long it took you to make the production. They just care that it's good.
00:04:26.220
I was talking to a friend of mine who's a showrunner the other day, and I was going over that same
00:04:30.180
dilemma you said, where, you know, trick trickle of releasing new content. And he said,
00:04:34.120
you're making absolutely the right choice because he said, if you screw it up and do something that's
00:04:38.080
not that good, he goes, the people that are waiting with bated breath will just go,
00:04:41.400
oh, that sucked and move on. Whereas the people down the road who've never found it,
00:04:45.480
that's the real audience you need to be working for. And so once you have the luxury of not having
00:04:50.860
to produce content that quickly, you know, a lot of, a lot of people just need to get it out because
00:04:55.300
they have an audience waiting and they need the ads or whatever it is. We're in a position right now
00:04:59.140
where we can just focus on quality and figure that if you do that and it's good enough, everything else would have
00:05:04.120
takes care of itself down the road. Yeah. Yeah. And you're touring now, I noticed. I forget what
00:05:10.820
your next cities are, but presumably everyone can find your schedule on your website. What do you do
00:05:16.800
at those events? How do you structure those events? You know, I kind of got talked into that because
00:05:20.800
I wasn't sure what the attraction was. But, you know, my agents and whatnot were establishing that
00:05:28.520
there was a demand out there on the part of promoters and whatnot. So we did some test shows last year.
00:05:33.280
I've done like book tours and stuff like that. We did some test shows. They went really well.
00:05:37.360
And, uh, and so we thought about adding four or six shows a year when possible, when it doesn't,
00:05:41.880
you know, decrease our already voluminous, uh, voluminous release schedule. But otherwise, yeah,
00:05:47.460
just say it's, it's sort of a lark. I think, I think the audience enjoys it and I enjoy seeing
00:05:51.300
them, but it's never going to be a huge part of what we do probably. But do, do you write a talk
00:05:57.500
Oh, I see what you're saying. Well, you know, I'd like to, I think maybe, maybe that provides
00:06:01.760
a more predictable product for an audience showing up because part of the attraction now
00:06:06.360
is we don't know what's going to happen. I go on there with some, usually with some friend
00:06:09.840
or a, or a colleague or something. And then we start talking in front of the audience and
00:06:13.800
then we'll take audience questions. And every single time we've done it, it's been completely
00:06:17.480
different. So maybe there's some predictability if you have a show per se, but this isn't really
00:06:22.260
a show. It's just sort of a, of a talk. Yeah. Yeah. I'm actually touring for the first time
00:06:26.980
in six years, starting next week. And I'm really enjoying it. I haven't started yet. This is,
00:06:31.240
this is the, uh, I'm enjoying preparing for it. I've, I'm writing a talk and, um, thought I was
00:06:37.560
going to divide the event into talk and then discussion. But I, in writing the talk, I found
00:06:43.120
that I have so much to get off my chest that I'm just going to talk the whole time and then,
00:06:47.360
and walk off stage. I'm going to, I'm going to feel like two hours.
00:06:50.320
They're happy at the end, right? That's all we care about.
00:06:52.760
But no, I'm looking forward to it. It feels like in real life moments are more and more precious.
00:06:58.040
I mean, we've, we've just migrated our lives to this digital swamp, which I'm sure we're going to
00:07:03.460
talk about. And, uh, you know, the one thing you can't fake, the one thing you, you, you really
00:07:08.740
have to make tangible sacrifices for is to be present with people. And, uh, so it seems like
00:07:14.280
it's a good thing to do and it's been too long. So.
00:07:16.400
I think there's a pendulum aspect to it too. I think as, as we move into an era where it's
00:07:21.480
harder and harder to tell what's real and what's not. And a lot of the content out there is
00:07:25.860
artificially or computer generated. I think human beings start to seek authenticity. You know,
00:07:31.920
when the pendulum swings so far in the other direction, all of a sudden, maybe old time
00:07:35.980
theater comes back and you want to see people spitting on stage and unexpected lights falling
00:07:40.620
from the ceiling and audio and, you know, actors having to improv, maybe this, this creates a,
00:07:48.340
Yeah. All right. Well, um, let's get into it first before we get in, before I drag you,
00:07:53.260
uh, into the, uh, morass here, remind people of your own politics. I mean, how have you, you see,
00:07:59.320
you've, uh, apart from hardcore history, you've had your common sense podcast for years where you've
00:08:05.300
commented on topical issues and, and, uh, war, you know, frankly worried about the state of
00:08:10.280
American politics for quite a bit longer than, than many have worried about it. Uh, and we're
00:08:15.260
going to get into some of your concerns, but remind people of just how you frame your own
00:08:19.460
politics for your audience. Well, I mean, a politics, a political party of one, right? A religion of one.
00:08:25.660
I mean, I, I, I really, I think, you know, looking, when you look back on your life, as you get older,
00:08:30.280
as we are, you notice things that didn't really make sense when you were younger, that seemed
00:08:36.140
more clear to you. And one of those things for me is being a radio talk show host, uh, who didn't
00:08:42.220
fit in the daytime. I mean, I used to call me the Martian in the day part, right? I mean, there'd be
00:08:46.740
some conservative AM host before me and some conservative AM host after me. And the advantage
00:08:52.160
now looking back on it that I see was I fought with that audience all the time. I mean, they didn't
00:08:56.780
like me all that much a lot of the time. And, and I found that I learned things from them that I
00:09:02.120
didn't know as a kid from Los Angeles, you know, growing up when I did. And at the same time,
00:09:06.640
began to understand their arguments and concerns a little bit more. And then also at the same time
00:09:11.540
learned that I don't need to preach to a choir, right? I, there was not going to be any sort of
00:09:16.900
audience for me anyway. So it was all about learning how to live with people who disagreed with you
00:09:21.960
fundamentally about a lot of things. And so now when you, you know, convert that from AM radio,
00:09:26.820
commercial radio into something like podcasting with common sense, I was primed to not have an
00:09:32.560
audience that, that saw things my way. And if you listen to the, um, imaging, you know, I would write
00:09:37.360
the liners for the big voice guy. And a long time ago, I learned that when you have faults, as many as
00:09:42.420
I have, you try to make lemons into lemonade and you have the big voice announcer sort of turn
00:09:47.260
all of your problems and downsides and weaknesses into selling points. Right. And so being this guy
00:09:54.640
that wasn't a Democrat or Republican that didn't agree with the way things were, um, we turn those
00:09:59.000
from weaknesses into strengths through the branding and the marketing. What, and what was weird, Sam,
00:10:03.920
is that when I started in the 1990s, there literally was nobody on my side, but then somehow
00:10:08.860
we just caught a wave accidentally in the zeitgeist. Right. And so for a little while,
00:10:13.940
it almost seemed like there was a new generation coming up that was more in tune with the way I
00:10:18.660
thought. And it was all false hope because we fell right off the cliff later, but, uh,
00:10:23.300
into a worse situation than before. But for a long time, me doing AM radio with an audience that
00:10:28.040
didn't like me very much turned out to be a, a pretty good breeding ground I found in a way that
00:10:32.660
I didn't realize at the time. Hmm. So how is America doing, Dan? How, what's your general sense of the
00:10:39.820
last, I guess, a lot, but we're going to talk a fair amount about the Trump 2.0 moments of the
00:10:45.160
last seven months. Uh, but you can take a, you know, a larger bite of it than that. It's been
00:10:49.740
a few years since we've spoken. What's your sense of, uh, the state of our country?
00:10:54.920
Well, I think where I differ from a lot of people and, and, and this is to be expected, I guess,
00:10:58.980
given my proclivities, but, but I look at this in a much sort of zoom out longer term lens. I mean,
00:11:04.400
many of the things that we look at as relatively recent political developments, 10 years, 12 years,
00:11:09.540
whatever you want to say, look to me like decades of, of dominoes tumbling to get us to where we are
00:11:16.480
now. Like one of the things that I'll get slammed for by some people is that they'll say that I blame
00:11:21.380
both sides for things. You know, I'm a both sides or ism kind of guy, but when you've got problems
00:11:26.840
that I assert are decades and decades and decades in the making, it's not only one part of the
00:11:31.700
political system that's involved in it by its very nature. Right. And so when you ask how I see it,
00:11:37.100
I see it in a much more longer term sense. A lot of what's going on now to me seems like
00:11:42.120
the end result of a bunch of things we did warn about and talk about forever, along with a lot
00:11:46.900
of other people, the growth in executive power and authority, the Swiss cheesing over the eras of
00:11:52.420
the constitution, the weakening of the guardrails and all these sorts of things until you eventually
00:11:58.080
get somebody who isn't bound by protocol, which by the end of the 20th century was really the only
00:12:04.700
thing holding back some president who didn't want to be bound by protocol, if that makes sense.
00:12:09.300
Yeah. That was the, um, the shock of the first Trump administration from my point of view that
00:12:14.740
we discovered that in the place of laws, what we really had backstopping the protocol is, uh, norms
00:12:24.060
that people decided not to violate. And Trump certainly discovered that you could violate them
00:12:29.740
with impunity. And the second time around, we're getting more of that more or less as expected.
00:12:35.620
All right. So let's take the larger sweep before we focus on the last seven months.
00:12:39.460
What have been your concerns going back decades about the, what some have called the, the imperial
00:12:48.840
Well, I mean, first of all, let me just say, I feel like the error, you know, if you're looking on the
00:12:52.760
bright side, or if you're looking for silver linings, I feel like the error that we're living
00:12:56.160
through now has helped me better understand errors in the past. I mean, um, there tends to be,
00:13:02.100
you know, the times change and, and, and you never dip your, your toe into the same river water
00:13:07.880
twice, but you can dip your toe into the same river. And I feel like what we're seeing now
00:13:12.320
helps me better understand other eras in history where you were going, what were they thinking? Or how
00:13:17.240
do people behave? Because I think we sort of devolve toward the mean when we get into large groups of
00:13:22.380
people in similar kinds of structures. And I feel like watching what's happening to us now unfolding,
00:13:29.600
I understand the thirties better, the forties better. Uh, you know, I feel like, and that's
00:13:34.340
something that when you live longer, you just inherently understand history better because
00:13:37.880
you've lived through more of it. Right. So when you talk about our, our problems here, it's a
00:13:43.500
combination in my opinion of systemic and then the people, right? Because you couldn't get away with a
00:13:48.400
lot of the stuff that's being done now. If the American population were, for example, the same
00:13:53.160
people they were 40 years ago, uh, it's almost like the old frog in the hot water trope. I mean,
00:13:58.320
we were at a different level of, of water heat back then, and we wouldn't have put up with it.
00:14:02.780
What's so shocking to me as I watched the, the zeitgeist and the country unfold the way it is,
00:14:08.180
is how many people are either good with it, things that we never would have put up with a long time
00:14:13.200
ago or the unquantifiable ability we human beings have to tell ourselves we're not seeing what's
00:14:21.600
really happening. That to me is also, I find it instructive. Like I'm learning about humanity by
00:14:26.780
our ability to fool ourselves into not seeing what we think we're seeing. Like we smell brimstone.
00:14:32.100
We don't want to smell brimstone. So we pretend we're not smelling brimstone. And that's not really
00:14:36.200
an answer to your question, but, but I think we're in an end game here where there's some Rubicon
00:14:40.740
moments happening. That doesn't mean they're going to happen, but this is the most dangerous
00:14:45.040
I've felt the country has been in, in my lifetime. And the very things that I feel is, are threatening
00:14:51.380
it are the very things we talked about forever. I mean, these are all things I've been discussing
00:14:55.140
these things since long before I was on the radio, listening to the dead Kennedys in 1980
00:14:59.800
talking about these things, right? Yeah. So, well, I must say it is cold comfort that, uh, you might be
00:15:06.440
getting a better handle on the Weimar Republic or the fall of Rome, uh, living through the current
00:15:11.340
instance, right? I mean, we like looking for silver lining. These are the pleasures of a historian
00:15:15.120
or an amateur historian. That's right. And, um, yeah, I mean, I, I agree with you. I, I view those,
00:15:22.040
uh, points in history differently now. And, um, I want to get to the psychology and sociology of it all,
00:15:28.360
because I, I think you and I are similarly mystified as to how something like half the
00:15:34.960
country can see what's happening so differently. But, um, before we're there, just again,
00:15:41.040
generically, what are the concerns about presidential power that predate the Trump administration from
00:15:48.900
your point of view? I mean, do you take something like the executive order, which is being used with
00:15:52.980
such abandon now, uh, or, you know, the emergency powers, right? The ability to declare more or less
00:15:58.700
anything in emergency and then do whatever he wants. Yeah. This obviously precedes Trump. What's
00:16:06.740
your view of, of the history that has led up to this moment? Well, it goes back to the founding,
00:16:11.540
right? It predates the constitution, the articles of confederation. We're still having these questions
00:16:15.400
about the power of the executive and whether or not we need a King and how much the other branches
00:16:20.900
of government should be involved in, in being able to checkmate what a powerful executive wants to do.
00:16:26.100
I mean, Madison versus Marbury, these are all, I mean, when you study American history, this is the
00:16:30.460
basic one-on-one level stuff, right? I mean, so nothing's new in that regard. The difference is
00:16:36.300
though, when you read, and I'm a huge fan of the founding documents, when you read things like the
00:16:39.980
Federalist Papers and you realize the guys writing this are like 23, 24 years old, it's shocking,
00:16:45.400
right? But when you read what they're talking about, they're talking about all these questions,
00:16:49.760
like what the role of a chief executive could be. What do you do if the chief executive is not a
00:16:54.940
wise person? What other elements in the country are there to play off against that, right? And what
00:16:59.980
do you do if somebody goes rogue? You can find in our past presidencies, lots of examples of people
00:17:06.340
pushing the presidential envelope. You mentioned earlier the term, the imperial presidency. Well,
00:17:11.800
that dates back from a book from the early seventies that Arthur Schlesinger wrote. And he's writing
00:17:15.840
about the presidency from his era, right? The Nixonian presidency, right? Which we, when I grew
00:17:21.040
up, that was considered to be sort of the, the, the went too far president. And we're going to learn
00:17:25.740
from that, right? But the powers of the presidency now, 40 years later are infinitely stronger than
00:17:33.280
they were when we were worried about an imperial president in the early 1970s. The fact that we don't
00:17:38.820
talk more about that is indicative as to the problems. I mean, if you're not going to have a
00:17:44.220
conversation about what's wrong systemically with the system, well, you're certainly not going to
00:17:48.440
identify the problems and you're going to have even less public support towards fixing them.
00:17:52.340
So when you say, what was the common sense show about? We had a few pillars and one of the pillars
00:17:55.840
was partisanism and hyper-partisanism and what that was going to do to us and, and how the system
00:18:00.960
is incentivized. I mean, you know, there's a lot of money in dividing Americans from each other,
00:18:05.820
but also the idea of, of, of the checks and balances in our country and how those things have been
00:18:10.640
diminishing over time. And that eventually you're going to run into somebody who takes advantage of
00:18:15.060
that. Can you imagine a candidate for the presidency in 2028, say, picking as a central
00:18:22.600
plank of his or her platform, curtailing the powers of the presidency? It's counter, it's
00:18:28.740
counterintuitive, isn't it? It's, it's part of the problem. It's part of why we haven't had it.
00:18:32.120
So for example, let's say you had a Democrat run and say, well, we never have to have,
00:18:35.540
this can't happen again. So you elect me, I'm going to return power from the executive branch to the
00:18:40.500
courts and to the Congress and we'll fix this imbalance, right? Something we used to talk about
00:18:44.720
all the time. Well, the people that raised money for that candidate, the people that elected that
00:18:49.500
candidate, they're going to accuse that candidate of surrendering to the other side of behaving
00:18:54.200
in a unilateral disarmament, right? The other side pushes the envelope and then we give up.
00:18:59.120
In other words, all of the carrots and sticks in our system are designed to run with any
00:19:05.500
constitutional imbalances caused by the previous party and the previous occupant of the White House.
00:19:09.940
So you're right. It's absolutely counterintuitive to think about somebody gaining power with all
00:19:14.460
that that requires and then turning around and giving it away because that's what the system needs.
00:19:19.600
Yeah. I mean, it would be, I guess I could be an audience of one here, but it would be a very
00:19:23.800
attractive thing to run on from my point of view because I, you know, obviously I have many concerns
00:19:29.440
about what Trump is doing and intends to do, but I have similar concerns. If anyone too far to the left
00:19:37.740
took instruction from his example and we had a president AOC or someone like that, uh, who just
00:19:44.280
decided to declare a state of emergency left, right, and center and issue executive orders like we've
00:19:50.840
So it's political hypocrisy, isn't it? Right. If the other side did it, what would you, what would
00:19:54.340
people be saying? And you had mentioned executive orders earlier. I throw signing statements in with
00:19:58.920
those too. If you look at the way those things used to be used, so people will say something like,
00:20:04.000
well, you know, they've been using executive orders and signing statements forever. Yes, but not for
00:20:07.980
the same thing. Right. So for example, when George W. Bush started issuing signing statements to bills
00:20:13.640
that he disagreed with, but he wanted to pass for political reasons, what he essentially did was say,
00:20:19.100
I'm signing this bill, the signing statement would say, I'm signing this bill, but I'm not being bound
00:20:23.800
by anything that I feel later interferes with the, you know, actual powers of the presidency. In other
00:20:28.160
words, it was like putting an asterisk next to your signature. And you can say something like,
00:20:32.460
well, past presidents use signing statements and they absolutely did, but they didn't use them like
00:20:36.200
that. Right. So it's a little bit like executive orders. Now we don't use them the way we used to.
00:20:41.760
And when they used to be rare, it was one thing. So one of the things I'll hear Trump supporters say
00:20:46.060
is that Donald Trump isn't doing anything that other presidents haven't done, but let me make a
00:20:51.620
distinction. So let's say you take the most constitutionally extreme thing that Bill Clinton ever
00:20:56.700
did and add it to the most constitutionally extreme thing. Ronald Reagan ever did, et cetera,
00:21:01.040
et cetera, et cetera. And then you get a president in the future who does all those things. Right.
00:21:05.120
In other words, I'm not doing anything Ronald Reagan didn't do or Bill Clinton, but I am doing
00:21:09.240
what both of them did. In other words, there's a quantity has a quality all its own standard there
00:21:14.540
also. So the current president is doing things that have been done before, but not by one president.
00:21:21.400
So, I mean, we are, we are changing the nature of things that way.
00:21:25.680
Yeah. I mean, he's also doing things, I mean, in defense of our mutual incredulity at this point
00:21:31.540
about the mental states of our neighbors, he's also doing things that no president.
00:21:36.420
If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation, you'll need to subscribe at
00:21:40.680
samharris.org. Once you do, you'll get access to all full length episodes of the Making Sense
00:21:45.960
podcast. The Making Sense podcast is ad free and relies entirely on listener support. And you can