#444 — America's Zombie Democracy
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
155.89455
Summary
Author George P. Packer joins me to discuss his new novel, "The Emergency," and why he thinks we're living in an authoritarian state. We talk about his new book, "America's Zombie Democracy," and what it means to be a zombie democracy.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast. This is Sam Harris. Just a note to say that if you're
00:00:11.780
hearing this, you're not currently on our subscriber feed, and we'll only be hearing
00:00:15.740
the first part of this conversation. In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense
00:00:20.100
Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org. We don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore
00:00:26.260
it's made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers. So if you enjoy what we're
00:00:30.240
doing here, please consider becoming one. I'm here with George Packer. George, thanks for joining me.
00:00:38.800
Thanks for having me, Sam. Great to see you. I'm a huge fan of your work. I'm an avid reader of
00:00:43.820
everything you write in The Atlantic. I'm also now a reader of your latest novel, which is titled
00:00:49.420
The Emergency, which I haven't yet finished. I actually wasn't planning to talk about it,
00:00:54.620
but I can just say that it's extraordinarily good and alarming. You've done something very
00:01:01.440
Orwellian, and it's just a very unnerving fable you have written here that I'm deep into, and it
00:01:09.440
really grabbed me from the first page. So I just encourage people to read it, whether we talk about
00:01:13.380
it or not. You're a very talented writer, both in fiction and nonfiction. So congratulations.
00:01:19.340
Yeah. Yeah. It's actually beautifully published. FSG still produces a nice book. I love the cover.
00:01:25.920
And even the texture of it. Yeah. It's special.
00:01:28.020
Yeah. It's got a very good hand feel, which in these dark digital times, I take more and more
00:01:34.820
pleasure in now. There was a time where I was reading at least half of what I was reading on
00:01:39.260
Kindle and or an iPad, but that's behind me now. I still listen to audio, but now I really love to
00:01:46.240
get back to physical books and hardcovers, especially.
00:01:49.980
I'm with you on that. When I find myself reading too much on the screen on my phone,
00:01:54.840
I just feel alienated from the words and the world. And when I reach on my shelf for a physical book,
00:02:02.320
there's something solid and reassuring about it. And we must never let them disappear from the world.
00:02:07.340
Yeah. Yeah. I don't know if you're so wayward that you've had this experience, but I find that
00:02:13.820
with audio or digital books, because you really never see the cover again, it's possible for me
00:02:21.080
to read a book and even enjoy it and forget the author's name, right? Because I'm literally never
00:02:28.060
confronted by it again for the whole experience of interacting with the book. That, as a writer of
00:02:35.160
books, that makes me fairly nauseous. It's unnerving. Yeah. Someone wrote it in that
00:02:41.900
the book is the expression of their individuality, their humanity. So we got to keep their name in
00:02:49.120
Okay. Well, so I mostly want to focus on the article you wrote that was titled America's Zombie
00:02:54.220
Democracy, which came out at, I guess, the end of September, where you really just come right out
00:02:59.460
and say that you think we're living in an authoritarian state. And I mean, you argue that
00:03:05.380
our expectations about what it would mean to slide into authoritarianism are kind of faulty based on
00:03:13.060
some 20th century examples. And in the 21st century, the erosion of democratic norms has a different
00:03:20.900
character than goose-stepping troops in the streets or people getting put up against the wall and shot,
00:03:28.640
et cetera. So I guess to start, what in your view are the clearest indicators that we have slid
00:03:35.520
into something like authoritarianism in the US at this point?
00:03:40.360
Well, one of them came the day the piece was published or the day after, which was
00:03:45.400
the Justice Department filing charges against James Comey and filing them in the most nakedly
00:03:52.940
political way possible after a series of prosecutors had refused. And a grand jury had
00:03:58.320
originally refused to as well. And finally, President Trump found the prosecutor who would do his
00:04:04.480
bidding. And she, in a kind of shambolic way, assembled a case very quickly and got a grand
00:04:12.960
jury to go along with it. And since then, other enemies of the president, political enemies have
00:04:17.740
also been indicted. And that the rule of law is such a powerful tool. And the pressure of the state
00:04:24.020
weighing down on an individual is so crushing that it almost doesn't matter. Of course, it matters,
00:04:29.440
but they will suffer irrevocably whether or not they're convicted because of the amount of time
00:04:34.900
and money and energy and just sheer anxiety and stress that is involved in having the federal
00:04:39.200
government coming after you. So if the president can do that, can use the Justice Department as
00:04:43.940
his personal police force, prosecution force to go after people he regards as his political enemies.
00:04:51.720
That's a huge check against unaccountable power that's been taken down. And there are a whole
00:04:57.440
bunch of others. But that one was so glaring that when it happened right away after the article came
00:05:02.700
out, it was as if the White House was saying, we don't care. Yeah, this is what we're doing.
00:05:07.600
Make a stop. Of course, the MAGA retort to that would be no figure has been more victimized by
00:05:16.440
purely political prosecution than President Trump himself. And that happened under Joe Biden's watch.
00:05:24.060
So by the same measure, they would say, OK, well, then authoritarianism arrived during the Biden
00:05:29.240
administration. Right. And that would make some a little bit of sense when it came to the one
00:05:35.680
conviction that for 34 felonies that befell Trump under the Manhattan DA. That was the weakest case
00:05:43.200
against him. And it was the only one that was successful. The others never happened. They fell
00:05:50.000
apart along the way for mainly political reasons. And if you think about how long it took Merrick Garland
00:05:56.920
to a name of special prosecutor who then had to begin assembling a case on about January 6th, which was
00:06:03.980
a pretty strong case against the president, the former president. And the fact that it never came
00:06:10.240
to fruition before Trump was reelected, that tells you the rule of law and procedures and norms were
00:06:15.380
in place or else they would have nailed him long before he was reelected. They would have made sure
00:06:20.220
that Trump was in at least convicted, if not in prison, for attempting to overturn a democratic
00:06:27.120
election before he became president again. Now it's all history because he's back in power.
00:06:31.440
So I would say there's always some gray area where you can point and say you did it first,
00:06:37.340
but look at the details of that gray area and you see it's not Biden ordering it to be done.
00:06:43.220
It's not Biden going through a series of prosecutors until he can find one who will do it.
00:06:48.560
It's not a complete rookie prosecutor filing the charges. So it falls apart upon it on close inspection,
00:06:55.180
I think. So in the title of your piece, you have this phrase, you know, zombie democracy,
00:07:00.140
which is referring to the institutions that are persisting in some kind of, you know, zombie
00:07:07.040
afterlife. Which institutions are you most worried about at this point and which are the, um, the most
00:07:14.020
crucial in their failure to, uh, check Trump and, and MAGA's authoritarianism?
00:07:20.580
Let's name two or three. The rule of law, the justice department, the justice system is the
00:07:26.520
first. After Watergate presidents without having it written down as a law respected, at least to
00:07:34.320
varying degrees, the independence of the justice department, the, the need to insulate the credible
00:07:40.960
power prosecution from the white house, from politics that has completely disintegrated.
00:07:46.460
There is no distinction any longer between what Trump wants and what his attorney general is
00:07:51.240
willing to do. Second Congress, Congress has stopped functioning as Congress. And that happened
00:07:58.340
before the shutdown ever came along. They no longer assert their right to tax and spend. Trump can tax
00:08:05.660
with tariffs. Trump can spend or not spend if it's been appropriated and he decides he doesn't like it.
00:08:12.020
Trump can eliminate programs that Congress legislated beginning with, uh, USAID. So because of the
00:08:21.740
nature of our partisans politics, and this has been happening for a long time, again, you could say
00:08:27.600
the democratic party became more and more tool of democratic presidents and the democratic Congress
00:08:34.540
was more willing to cede article one power to the president. If it was a democratic president. Yes,
00:08:42.100
we've been watching presidents gain more and more power over the last decades. But again, this is a
00:08:47.340
complete qualitative break as the Republican Congress simply cedes its constitutional authorities to,
00:08:57.160
to the white house without a peep, without a peep. We're finally seeing a little bit of a break,
00:09:03.400
a little daylight over the Epstein files seems to be the very first matter in which Republicans in Congress
00:09:10.460
are not lining up in a single file behind Trump. And the third would be the defense department now called
00:09:16.660
the war department, not legally, which Trump makes no, no hesitation, no secret of using as a partisan tool or
00:09:26.060
at least trying to having his, you know, Pete Hegseth firing senior military leaders on the basis of
00:09:34.160
political dislike or even racial or gender dislike. Trump gives speeches to troops that are nakedly
00:09:42.100
partisan in which he insults Biden. He talks about using the military to go into the cities, the blue
00:09:49.060
cities as a training ground. This is maybe the most dangerous one. And I think the military is
00:09:54.780
probably the, still the most inherently independent institution in the government,
00:10:00.780
more than Congress, certainly more than apparently the justice department, because there is such a deep
00:10:06.000
code of nonpartisanship of independence, of not being political. And because it's so dangerous
00:10:10.940
if the military does become a tool, a political tool of the president, but Trump would love for it to be
00:10:16.640
that. And he's behaving as if he sees it that way.
00:10:21.400
Yeah. On the list of qualitative differences, the one that shocks me the most or the absence of widespread
00:10:29.300
shock in response to it shocks me the most, which is this, the level of corruption that is so obvious with
00:10:35.780
Trump and his enablers. I mean, I still remember a time when Hillary Clinton was castigated for her speaking
00:10:43.600
fees when she was out of office, right? People thought it was just totally unseemly that a former
00:10:50.320
secretary of state would dine out on her time in office to the tune of, you know, $200,000 or so
00:10:57.720
to speak to hedge funds and, you know, Wall Street firms and other deep pocketed hosts. And yet now we
00:11:06.220
have Trump and his family literally raking in billions of dollars and creating mechanisms by
00:11:12.760
which foreign agents and criminals can pay them directly, you know, in a meme coin and even holding
00:11:17.880
dinner for the people who have done that most lavishly to reward them with attention and even
00:11:23.380
using U.S. trade policy and even foreign policy to extort tribute from other countries. And yet somehow
00:11:31.560
this isn't perceived to be the five alarm fire that it is. I mean, somebody is worried about it.
00:11:38.700
I'm worried about it. I know you're worried about it, but I, and I think it's doing obvious damage to
00:11:43.680
our reputation as a country, but just stepping back from the autopsy we've begun to perform here,
00:11:50.120
how do you account for the fact that at least half of American society doesn't think that anything
00:11:57.320
truly out of the ordinary is happening? How do you account for that perception? And I mean,
00:12:02.460
leaving, leaving aside the people who simply don't follow the news or don't follow politics
00:12:07.760
at all, uh, or people who are, um, you know, so red pilled or so deep in, in the MAGA cult that they
00:12:15.740
just, you know, that up is down and down is up. And they simply don't care about the kinds of things
00:12:19.780
we would list here as being crucial to the survival of our democracy. But like, you know, I know
00:12:25.860
ordinary people who read the wall street journal and who are not, not MAGA who don't share our
00:12:34.040
concern about the fate of American democracy. Uh, I would imagine, you know, a few of those people
00:12:39.720
yourself too. How do you explain that state of mind? That's a profound question that I've been
00:12:45.940
asking myself all year and sort of waiting for the worm to turn and for suddenly there to be a
00:12:52.000
kind of collective shock and awakening and it doesn't happen. Perhaps it's because they wake
00:12:58.760
up in the morning. The wall street journal is still there. It's not been censored by the government.
00:13:04.480
No one is, is knocking down their door in order to bring them in and question them about their
00:13:09.480
political loyalties. They can take the commuter train or drive to work and listen to whatever they
00:13:16.400
want. Hundreds and hundreds of radio stations, podcasts, books, and then they get to work and
00:13:23.060
people are doing the same thing they've always done. There's a sort of eerie normality to life,
00:13:30.060
which I wrote about a bit in that piece. My life is also, even though I'm a journalist and this is
00:13:35.240
what consumes me. When I look at the world around me, I just see the same world. You have to leap a bit
00:13:42.700
into your imagination or into your ability to understand what's happening, maybe more abstractly.
00:13:49.160
The Qatari jet made it very concrete, but meme coins and deals with UAE over AI chips that lead to
00:13:59.700
all kinds of money flowing into the Trump family bank. These are pretty large, abstract scandals.
00:14:07.980
There is no, there's no, um, some of these same people would be, would have reacted to,
00:14:14.380
you know, the Hillary Clinton speaking fees or the Obama's getting a very rich Netflix deal or,
00:14:21.380
I mean, they, they were, their sense of indiscretion was finally calibrated enough
00:14:27.740
to react to those sorts of venial sins. And yet when you have this black hole of corruption
00:14:35.980
appear in the middle of our politics, sucking everything into it, they seem either not to care
00:14:43.240
or they just think that basically everything is on par with everything else. There's no sense of
00:14:49.200
magnitude. There's no scale that they're holding up to judge how colossal these changes are.
00:14:55.640
It's analogous to saying, well, if you refer to Trump's, you know, 30,000 and counting documented
00:15:02.320
lies, the response is, well, all politicians lie, right? As though Trump were not lying on a scale
00:15:08.680
we have never seen before. Right. And your first example about Trump being prosecuted during the
00:15:15.340
Biden years is that's a grayer area, but it's another example of, well, who started it. There's
00:15:21.020
always a way to say they do it too, or they did it first and to sort of intellectually disarm and not
00:15:28.640
bother with, let's look at this and really weigh it against what's happened before. There's always
00:15:34.300
been political corruption. There's never been corruption like this. And in a way, I don't know,
00:15:39.160
Sam, it may be that it's the blatancy of it. The openness is a bit of a, a shield for Trump.
00:15:46.120
It's as if, well, of course he's corrupt. He's Trump and he's not making any bones about it. He's doing
00:15:52.620
it in daylight. He's not trying to hide anything. So that makes it seem perhaps for some people as if
00:15:59.500
it's more acceptable than hypocrisy, which, which has a smell that people don't like.
00:16:06.080
I think you've put the, put your finger on, on at least one variable here, which is that
00:16:10.140
hypocrisy is the thing that people find most infuriating. And because Trump doesn't acknowledge
00:16:16.720
the existence of any of these norms, the one thing you can't convict him of is hypocrisy. He really
00:16:22.400
is not a hypocrite. He's just corrupt. He won't even acknowledge that corruption is a thing,
00:16:28.680
right? Or a self-dealing is a thing. This is, of course I'm self-dealing. This is, you know,
00:16:33.180
I would be stupid not to be self-dealing. Right. And we all hate hypocrisy and it,
00:16:38.120
it seems slimy and, you know, something sneaky about it. But when you're then confronted with
00:16:44.760
blatant immorality and corruption, the virtue of hypocrisy begins to become clear.
00:16:52.400
It is actually a sign that there are certain standards that have to be at least pretended
00:16:57.720
to be kept. And if you don't, there's some shame involved, whereas there's no shame and shamelessness
00:17:04.500
with Trump is a great superpower. I'm beginning to think shamelessness might be the superpower of
00:17:10.720
the most powerful and successful people in the world today. They all seem capable of doing anything,
00:17:17.100
coming back from any embarrassment or scandal without being crippled by it. You could say,
00:17:23.000
you know, Elon Musk can be revealed to have cheated on every woman he's ever been with and had children
00:17:27.940
across the landscape, et cetera. And it still doesn't matter because he's shameless and Trump
00:17:34.180
is shameless. And so what is there more to say? Yeah, you're corrupt. I don't, I don't deny it.
00:17:39.820
Yeah. Yeah. It is a kind of superpower to feel that you never have to look back at the harms you cause,
00:17:47.480
much less apologize for them. And I've noticed this whenever I've witnessed the aftermath of a
00:17:53.860
public apology, how it so often leads to a kind of redoubling of the outrage over the thing apologized
00:18:01.940
for. It rarely translates into just kind of relief. And I don't, I don't find this with personal
00:18:09.840
apologies, but I just noticed that when challenged with the, having to manage their reputation in
00:18:16.080
public, when public figures apologize for something, it almost invokes more outrage. So they become a kind
00:18:25.080
wounded prey animal and the public just wants to see more blood at that point. That is the nature I'd
00:18:32.800
think of social media for sure. And, and of media generally, if you apologize, if the, the baying
00:18:39.200
hounds finally force you into some public confession, it's going to look more like a cultural revolution
00:18:46.020
confession where that just becomes the trigger for them to then descend on you and tear you to pieces
00:18:52.360
rather than a ceremony of confession, atonement, redemption, forgiveness, which is what we would
00:19:00.280
have in a, in a more humane world. It just, in politics and in public life, it's a confession of
00:19:07.320
weakness. And it seems as if the only real sin is weakness and shame and self-reproach. And there's so
00:19:15.980
many politicians who apologized, didn't live to, to fight again. And the politicians who
00:19:22.160
pretended it never happened or just ignored it, just hung on. We didn't like them, but they,
00:19:29.540
Yeah. Just, uh, you just recall to mind, uh, Al Franken's exit from political life. What a quaint
00:19:38.640
He actually tried to say I did something wrong and I'm sorry. I want to apologize to each of them
00:19:44.000
individually. What a, what a fool. Why, why not just say, uh, yeah, so what make me resign?
00:19:49.760
Yeah. Okay. So looking forward, what, what bright lines do you see that if crossed,
00:19:57.840
they would, um, those indiscretions would suffice to wake people up or would just be whether,
00:20:04.400
whether the sleeping herd woke up, they would be especially worrying from your point of view that
00:20:10.440
we had crossed further into, you know, beyond the range of, of any democratic norms and physics.
00:20:18.220
I'm looking at next year's election and trying to think through all the ways of...
00:20:23.580
If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation, you'll need to subscribe at
00:20:28.860
samharris.org. Once you do, you'll get access to all full-length episodes of the Making Sense
00:20:34.140
podcast. The Making Sense podcast is ad-free and relies entirely on listener support. And you can