#65 — We're All Cucks Now
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
175.94678
Summary
David Frum is a senior editor at The Atlantic, a speechwriter for George W. Bush, and has been well-known in Republican political circles for many years. He s written many books, and is one of Donald Trump s most notable Republican critics. I wanted to get David on the podcast because he's obviously much more knowledgeable about government in general, and the Republican Party in particular, than I am, and I wanted him to walk us through this moment in history and just talk about what we might expect to happen in the near term here, and how maybe something good might come of all this. Sam Harris The Making Sense Podcast is made possible entirely through the support of our subscribers. If you enjoy what we re doing here, please consider becoming a supporter of the podcast by becoming a subscriber. You ll get access to full episodes of Making Sense wherever you get your podcasts, as well as access to our most popular podcasting platform, The Huffington Post, where more in-depth discussions about politics, culture, and pop culture. Subscribe to our newest podcast, The Weekly Standard, wherever you re listening to podcasts are available. We don t run ads, and therefore, you re not missing out on the best listening to the podcast you ve ever heard of! Want to become a supporter? Subscribe, become a patron, and you ll get 20% off the entire podcast for a year, plus a free year of unlimited ad-free trial when you upgrade your membership gets rolling in January 1st, 2020. Thanks to our sponsor, VaynerMedia! . Learn more about your ad choices, including the best deals, best practices, and more! The best deals in the making sense of the whole year, the best places to get the most of it all, including best vids, the ultimate deal in the whole world. and the best travel and the most authentic experience in the place you can get the best of the best reviews, anywhere you can access the best deal possible, the most affordable in the best place on the whole place in the world, anywhere and the only place you get the whole thing that s the best the most anywhere you get it all v=1st_tweeted at the best review and most authentic all of it gets the most vids most of the most authentic, the nicest review and the podcast
Transcript
00:00:10.880
Just a note to say that if you're hearing this, you are not currently on our subscriber
00:00:14.680
feed and will only be hearing the first part of this conversation.
00:00:18.420
In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense Podcast, you'll need to subscribe at
00:00:24.060
There you'll find our private RSS feed to add to your favorite podcatcher, along with
00:00:30.520
We don't run ads on the podcast, and therefore it's made possible entirely through the support
00:00:35.880
So if you enjoy what we're doing here, please consider becoming one.
00:00:49.920
David is a senior editor at The Atlantic magazine.
00:00:52.880
He was a speechwriter for George Bush, and has been well-known in Republican political
00:01:01.340
He's written many books, and he is one of Trump's most notable Republican critics.
00:01:07.720
I wanted to get David on the podcast because he's obviously much more knowledgeable about
00:01:11.640
government in general, and the Republican Party in particular, than I am.
00:01:17.540
And I wanted him to walk us through this moment in history and just talk about what we might
00:01:22.840
expect to happen in the near term here, and how maybe something good might come of all
00:01:30.120
We don't say much that will be viewed as charitable toward Trump, but if you listen to the podcast,
00:01:36.620
you'll hear that we really do our best to be even-handed.
00:01:40.080
That doesn't paint a rosy picture, you'll see, but David's conservative bona fides are
00:01:47.460
beyond dispute, and that makes his opinions about Trump and the people around him and the
00:01:52.600
Republicans' support for him all the more incisive.
00:01:56.160
So without further preamble, I bring you David Frum.
00:02:13.120
I've been a fan of your work for quite some time, but my appreciation for you has just
00:02:17.940
gone up by a factor of 10 in recent months, seeing your opposition to Trump and just imagining
00:02:26.180
what your experience is like holding the line there.
00:02:31.700
I want to talk about Trump, obviously, and the state of our country and the state of the
00:02:37.520
media, but the challenge for us, given that we're going to agree so much about the problem
00:02:43.360
here and given how much we each hate Trump, the challenge is really for us to say something
00:02:48.980
that could conceivably persuade someone who doesn't already agree with us.
00:02:52.260
I don't want us to just be indulging confirmation bias here or just rattling around our own
00:03:00.540
I'd like us to be on our guard against exaggerating anything.
00:03:04.200
And I really want us to say things about Trump and about the current situation that are as
00:03:10.860
So with that in mind, let's just start with it.
00:03:14.120
Can you summarize your political background and background as a writer so people who are
00:03:27.600
And maybe to answer your question about not getting bottlenecked, maybe after I give that
00:03:31.420
introduction, maybe the place to start is like, I'm going to present some things where I think
00:03:35.340
Donald Trump is saying some things that are worth hearing, some things that are true and
00:03:39.640
where he's maybe, if he's not right, he's on to something important.
00:03:48.940
My mother was a quite well-known Canadian journalist, in fact, a very well-known Canadian
00:03:54.100
journalist, a host of a radio show called As It Happens in the 1970s.
00:03:57.780
And she went on to host a program called The Journal, which was the CBC's Canadian Broadcasting
00:04:03.480
Corporation's main late-night face-to-face television talk show in the 1980s.
00:04:07.880
She died in 1992 at age 54, an extraordinary career and much missed.
00:04:15.240
I graduated from college in 1982, and I was very caught up in the politics of that time.
00:04:22.960
The class of 1982 was, these are people who had grown up during the chaos of the 1970s,
00:04:29.440
And I think to this day, we are probably the most Republican-oriented cohort of people who
00:04:39.120
I've worked for many conservative magazines over the years, National Review, I was on
00:04:44.820
I worked for conservative think tanks, the American Enterprise Institute, and the Manhattan
00:04:50.080
And to catch the story, I'll skip over most of the earlier parts, but to catch the story
00:04:54.580
up into the more recent times, in 2001, I joined the staff of the George W. Bush White
00:05:00.140
I worked as a speechwriter there for two years.
00:05:07.780
I wrote a history of the 1970s called How We Got Here.
00:05:10.360
That was published just before I went into government.
00:05:14.340
I've written about eight books altogether, including most recently a novel of all foolish
00:05:18.440
I went to work from the Bush administration at the American Enterprise Institute, where
00:05:23.620
I did a lot of work on the need to understand the consequences of the failure of economic
00:05:32.040
I wrote a book about that that was published in 2007, and I started a website on that subject
00:05:36.740
called From Forum that flourished from about 2009 to 2012.
00:05:41.180
I think I obviously overdid it because I got sacked by AEI in 2010 for going a little too
00:05:46.940
I was kind of disgruntled about that at the time, but in retrospect, I think if you drive
00:05:51.200
through enough red lights, you can't be angry if the state trooper writes you a ticket.
00:05:55.120
And I have arrived at the Atlantic, where I'm senior editor.
00:06:00.120
I've been working here since 2014, and I've written a number of articles on all of these
00:06:03.740
various subjects and continue to write on the Atlantic website almost every day.
00:06:10.140
With respect to this current moment, there's one article that has got to be among the most viral
00:06:23.080
I actually want to ask you about the good case to be made for Trump, if there is one.
00:06:28.800
There's one sort of scene-setting question that I'd like to ask you here, kind of a personal
00:06:35.280
What your experience has been taking the stand that you have?
00:06:38.680
Because you're among the few really prominent conservatives who came out against Trump early
00:06:46.480
I put, you know, Bill Kristol and David Brooks and I guess Brett Stevens of the Wall Street
00:06:53.820
I've heard from other conservatives who've taken similar positions that their experience
00:07:01.680
I'm wondering, have you had a rough go of it at all, or have you just come out of this
00:07:08.240
Compared to what anybody has to put up with in a genuinely unfree country, it's not.
00:07:13.320
Second, I would say, do you remember that saying, if you want a friend in Washington,
00:07:20.680
But more seriously, actually, I think I've gotten off quite lightly compared to some other
00:07:25.440
people, and that was maybe due to the experience I mentioned in the setup bit, where I've been
00:07:32.020
This happened, I went through this experience in a much more traumatic way between 2009 and
00:07:38.820
And at that point, I was concerned that the then-new Tea Party movement was way too radical,
00:07:45.020
And I urged a more restrained form of opposition to President Obama.
00:07:51.820
The article that got me fired from AEI, actually, was one I'd been writing through 2009 and 2010.
00:07:58.140
To those conservatives who imagined that by stopping the health care law, they would destroy
00:08:02.860
the Obama administration, please remember, the Democrats have also seen this movie.
00:08:07.020
They know how it ends if they don't hold together.
00:08:14.500
It's full of things that you don't like, but it's also got things in it that you should
00:08:19.460
So this is a time to do business, to negotiate, because this law will pass.
00:08:25.500
And if it passes over your opposition, you will be spending the next quarter century trying
00:08:29.220
to fix things that you could fix for the asking today.
00:08:31.640
But on the day the law passed at the end of March, it overcame the last procedural hurdle
00:08:37.820
after which it was a clear shot toward the president's signature, and that was the end
00:08:40.820
of March 2010, I wrote a blog post on my site called Waterloo that said, people like Jim
00:08:46.600
DeMint had promised that by breaking this law, they would deliver a Waterloo of defeat to
00:08:51.940
This is the Waterloo, indeed, of the radical Republican opposition.
00:08:59.440
Yes, Republicans will do well in 2010, but legislative majorities come and go.
00:09:06.540
And after that, I went through the experience that many of my anti-Trump conservative friends
00:09:12.580
are having now of true social isolation, true accusations of betrayal, of saying, you know,
00:09:18.100
the only reason you say this thing is because of those legendary Georgetown cocktail parties
00:09:22.420
and anybody that radical critics always presume that people would pay any price to attend.
00:09:32.600
In fact, for me now, on a personal level, I find I've been operating this little lemonade
00:09:38.420
stand by the side of the road, and I'm now seeing a lot of people stopping by to buy lemonade.
00:09:43.460
So it's actually been a kind of congenial experience.
00:09:46.040
And I've had this kind of grim amusement, not surprised, of seeing that a lot of the people
00:09:51.720
told me in 2010 that by saying we should try to come up with a market-centered approach
00:09:57.900
to universal health care coverage, and I was a sellout with that principles, they are now
00:10:01.500
working for Donald Trump, or apologizing for him, and a case where there is no principled
00:10:08.940
And that has been a kind of grim amusement to watch that.
00:10:13.980
Well, what was your experience watching the actual election results come in?
00:10:24.120
They had a panel covering the election results.
00:10:30.840
I'm quite sure, for example, that Trump could not break through in Michigan because the high
00:10:38.500
I was up till three o'clock in the morning that night.
00:10:43.940
I was actually coming out of a TV studio at three in the morning with the streets deserted
00:10:48.480
in Toronto, a foreign city, and walked back to the hotel I was staying at.
00:10:56.120
And you just felt like there had been this, and a chapter in one's life and human history
00:11:03.220
had just turned in a way that I knew then was not going to be good.
00:11:10.180
We're going to get into the dark side in a moment, but to start and to be as generous
00:11:17.440
as possible without being delusional, what is the smartest case you have heard in defense
00:11:25.220
If you had to give the most respectable case for having supported him until this point
00:11:29.400
and for continuing to support him even now, what is that case?
00:11:33.380
Well, Donald Trump got and even continues to get three big things right that the rest of
00:11:44.480
The first of those things is the crisis in what is happening in American rural life.
00:11:50.160
You know, Donald Trump uses the phrase inner city a lot when he wants to convey trouble
00:11:58.660
But actually, you know, American-centered cities are having an amazing revival almost
00:12:04.660
everywhere, even in some pretty hard-cressed places like the Clevelands and the Philadelphians.
00:12:11.360
Where you see real trouble is in the small towns and rural areas, drug abuse and family
00:12:18.780
breakdown and levels of imprisonment, signs of social dysfunction that you would associate
00:12:23.720
with the beginnings of the crisis of black America in the 1970s.
00:12:27.120
And Donald Trump went to those places and channeled the unhappiness of those people who,
00:12:34.880
you know, a lot of the rest of the political process of, you know, they should just move.
00:12:39.780
They should just, you know, move to Brooklyn and serve coffee.
00:12:43.020
He understood them and intuited what they were about.
00:12:47.500
They have not been heard and they needed to be heard.
00:12:49.460
The drug crisis in America is a rural phenomenon as much or more as an urban phenomenon.
00:12:54.120
He got right that we have had a series of beliefs about trade that grew up in the days when we're
00:13:01.840
building a trade system that included fellow democracies and then the Pacific Rim countries
00:13:08.380
that maybe they weren't always democratic, but at least they were small.
00:13:11.340
Places like Taiwan and Singapore, they weren't, at the time, we brought them into the world
00:13:15.840
Not democratic, but they were not also so big as to make a difference to anybody else.
00:13:19.540
And then we applied all of those ideas to China's arrival into the world economy.
00:13:27.260
The chart that we have had chronic and massive trade imbalances with China.
00:13:31.640
And those have caused real, harsh, ongoing dislocation for a lot of Americans who work in traded
00:13:41.360
And while we talk a lot about, well, the winners will compensate the losers and we can retrain
00:13:45.580
people, we don't do anything about that in proportion to the severity of the shock.
00:13:51.520
Donald Trump was talking about something important when he talked about the trade arrangements
00:13:56.120
that worked in the past have stopped working for a lot of Americans since the year 2000.
00:13:59.820
And the third thing I think where he's making, he has made, he perceived something true and
00:14:03.500
made a real contribution was on the immigration issue.
00:14:06.080
Immigration is described by economists as the only policy that creates no, that has no costs,
00:14:14.960
They're invisible to those of us who talk about it because we don't pay them.
00:14:18.220
But they, the cost of immigration, both economic and cultural, are heavy.
00:14:23.960
They fall on the bottom 30% or 40% of American society.
00:14:28.460
And even discussing those costs has been so beyond the pale in the media mainstream and
00:14:35.980
the political mainstream that this issue just went, was waiting there for somebody to talk
00:14:48.220
I think, I think all of that is interesting, but none of that suggests that Trump himself
00:14:52.820
would be the right person to implement any changes in any of those three areas.
00:14:57.820
One argument I keep encountering from reasonably smart people or ostensibly smart people in
00:15:05.600
defense of Trump, the man really, and all of his erratic unprofessionalism as was totally
00:15:13.180
on display in his last press conference, people seem to think that there's something about
00:15:19.820
him being a little nuts or seeming a little nuts, which in just a purely game-theoretic
00:15:27.820
way could turn out well for us, both domestically and as a matter of foreign policy.
00:15:33.380
Domestically, we have just this ossified political system with vested interests and bureaucracy
00:15:40.420
and deep state, and he is like a wrecking ball that is just swinging through that and
00:15:45.720
clearing out the mess, that it would take someone like Trump, perhaps someone as unhinged
00:15:52.400
as Trump, someone as narcissistic as Trump, to do that dirty work.
00:15:58.360
And as a matter of foreign policy, it could be advantageous, again, just along game-theoretic
00:16:04.880
lines, to have a bull in a china shop, right, who will break the right stuff.
00:16:10.260
And who will keep our adversaries on their toes, because now they're dealing with a genuinely
00:16:19.940
And so we could expect our adversaries, like North Korea or Iran or even China and Russia,
00:16:33.820
First, when you connect, when you speak about Trump, the man, I'm quite sympathetic.
00:16:38.460
I think I have something to learn from his voters on trade, and I'm quite sympathetic
00:16:45.020
And I've been worrying about the problems of rural life and what's happening to the
00:16:49.100
That's been a major theme in my writing since 2000.
00:16:51.360
But this is a little bit like the story of the legendary Plotkin diamond.
00:16:55.900
The Plotkin diamond is one of the most beautiful diamonds on earth, very romantic.
00:17:01.140
The Plotkin diamond, unfortunately, comes attended, as famous diamonds often do, by a terrible curse.
00:17:11.640
For Donald Trump, the man, there is no defense.
00:17:14.500
And all the things, that case you make, I mean, it's sort of ingenious, and you can well
00:17:18.960
see that somebody would have made it during the campaign.
00:17:21.340
But Donald Trump, on the day we speak, has been president for close to a month.
00:17:25.520
And we have seen that it's just not true, actually.
00:17:27.420
That he's not, domestically, he's not cutting through the bureaucracy.
00:17:30.600
On the contrary, because he is so massively disorganized and incompetent, that on something
00:17:35.620
like staffing his government, he is lagging far behind.
00:17:40.320
Of the 700 or so Senate-confirmed positions, he's nominated only about 90 of those.
00:17:47.720
That has, if you're a Republican-leaning person who wants to get, say, a tax cut through Congress,
00:17:53.820
Because if people, if the Senate is not confirming people in January and February, that means
00:17:59.520
it will be confirming them in April and May, by which time you should be passing major bills.
00:18:09.160
And if the schedule gets clogged later, because the president was too disorganized to get his
00:18:16.420
appointments done early, then you're going to discover major parts of your legislative agenda
00:18:24.860
The president of the United States has the power to end organized human life on this planet.
00:18:29.480
He has, there are almost zero checks on his power to do that.
00:18:33.080
It is really important that the United States, as a nuclear superpower, as the dominant power
00:18:39.920
In fact, an unpredictable United States empowers adversaries.
00:18:45.000
And what is especially ominous here, you listed potential adversaries in North Korea, Iran,
00:18:50.000
and China, and Russia, well, one of those adversaries, Russia, has just graduated from
00:18:54.340
the rank of adversary to something else that is really sinister.
00:18:58.880
And that goes back again to the unpredictability of this government is, I don't know what Russia is now.
00:19:07.220
But it's got a power inside the U.S. government that is unjustified and undisclosed and deeply ominous.
00:19:13.680
And that, too, comes from Trump's erratic nature.
00:19:15.920
So, no, I think there is no, for him, I think the verdict is there is a dispute whether Warren
00:19:21.400
Harding ever actually said these words, but words attributed to him on his deathbed, looking back
00:19:25.700
on his presidency, I'm unfit for this place and never should have come here, that is going
00:19:29.540
to be Donald Trump's epitaph, although he would lack the self-knowledge ever to pronounce that
00:19:34.040
Yeah, well, needless to say, I am deeply sympathetic with that summary of him.
00:19:40.040
I've never seen, even for a moment, a real method to the guy's madness.
00:19:46.120
People have been interpreting his boastfulness and his speaking style as a kind of stagecraft,
00:19:55.420
as a kind of master-level communication to the masses and a brilliant playing of the media.
00:20:01.060
I have just been seeing the ejaculations of a disordered personality.
00:20:05.360
I've seen someone who's so malignantly selfish and so uninformed, though occasionally he can
00:20:13.520
string a few sentences together. At bottom, he is deeply inarticulate. I mean, he has a kind of
00:20:18.380
confabulatory mind where he will get tripped up by his own word choices and take garden paths through
00:20:25.340
his own mind that he was clearly not intending, right? He was not intending to speak of something,
00:20:30.940
but the word just came out and then he's off and running on that topic. And this goes to questions
00:20:35.800
of policy, goes to questions of what our country will do next. It's terrifying to behold,
00:20:41.320
but you have people who are enamored of an interpretation of this, which is not only
00:20:46.500
exculpatory, but just praises the man to the skies as a kind of next-level genius communicator.
00:20:54.020
Well, the thought that you're in the car with a hopelessly drunk driver at the wheel
00:20:58.600
is so upsetting that you want to believe that the driver must have some secret plan.
00:21:03.540
But I do think there is some method to the madness. I don't think Donald Trump is a strategic
00:21:09.100
visionary. He never has a plan. But what he is very good at in his business career,
00:21:13.600
he makes impulsive decisions that are usually bad decisions. All of his shrewdness and canonness
00:21:20.800
is applied after the fact. What he's very good at is having made a bad decision, shifting the cost of
00:21:27.280
that decision onto other people, finding people to blame, finding people to cheat. He's very good at
00:21:33.460
that. And he is a master communicator of a particular kind. He is so deeply aggrieved. He is
00:21:41.400
so deep. He is so irresponsible that he's able to speak in ways that strike a chord with other people
00:21:47.300
who feel those same levels of grievances. I am not in any way making a Hitler analogy here. I want to,
00:21:54.800
I may have occasion to say that more than once. The analogy I often use is that people,
00:21:59.320
one of the reasons to study history is so that you're not always making Hitler analogies and you
00:22:04.260
understand that there are a lot of ways that things can be bad. You can be on a bad train,
00:22:08.620
but it has many stops before you arrive at Hitler station. But one of the contemporary observers of
00:22:15.160
Hitler's rise to power, an American journalist named Dorothy Thompson, wrote an essay in the early
00:22:19.080
1930s about who was susceptible in Germany to Hitler and who was not. And one of the things she noted was
00:22:23.760
that happy people never became Nazis. And I think there is something, but there's something,
00:22:29.600
Donald Trump, he's so full of bitterness and rage. And you look at the people in his inner circle.
00:22:34.180
There's not a person in his inner circle, except for his daughter and son-in-law, and they have to
00:22:39.020
be there. But there's not a person who's come into his inner circle who has a fully functioning
00:22:43.300
personal life. They are all people who are full of rage. General Flynn, enraged at Obama for firing
00:22:49.240
him from the Defense Intelligence Agency for Incompetence. Steve Bannon, a man who obviously
00:22:53.280
has tremendous rage and addiction issues, three marriages, three divorces. The others as well.
00:22:59.700
And there are millions of people in America who say, you know what, I am just delighted to see
00:23:08.880
Donald Trump be rude to the snobs. I don't care what he's going to do to me. It'll be worth it.
00:23:14.600
Right. Well, let's take a moment to talk about the Republicans for a second, because obviously they
00:23:20.720
are shouldering a lot of the responsibility for what happens now. I'm by no means the first person
00:23:27.160
to make this point, but I think it's very interesting and uncanny to consider what the world would be like
00:23:35.340
if this situation were reversed. I mean, imagine if Clinton had won the presidency without winning
00:23:41.420
the popular vote. And with evidence of assistance from Russia, right, the RNC had been hacked and
00:23:47.600
Clinton had delighted in this during the campaign, had even called for more hacking. And then,
00:23:53.760
inexplicably, she had only positive things to say about Vladimir Putin, a thug who jails and even
00:24:00.660
kills his political opponents. And let's say she's vastly wealthy, even more than she is, and yet known to
00:24:09.220
have financial ties to Russia, right? And she's refused to release her tax returns, even though
00:24:14.780
she promised to release them once her audit was over. But now she, now as president, she's refusing.
00:24:20.940
And she's appointed multiple people to her administration who have unusually deep connections
00:24:28.340
to Russia, right? And then we learn that some of these people were in dialogue with Russian
00:24:33.260
intelligence during the campaign and that Russia was attempting to influence the election with a
00:24:39.200
continuous stream of hacked leaks and state propaganda. So you have this just reverse picture
00:24:45.140
with Clinton. Imagine how the Republicans, the party of Reagan, the party that won the Cold War,
00:24:53.820
would have responded to this. Is it safe to say that we would be in a completely different
00:24:58.900
situation with the Republicans just going berserk? Well, that's clear. That's clearly right. I mean,
00:25:04.060
I have occasion to point out, Alger Hiss just had a lousy job at the Department of the Year.
00:25:11.580
If you'd like to continue listening to this conversation, you'll need to subscribe at
00:25:15.480
samharris.org. Once you do, you'll get access to all full-length episodes of the Making Sense podcast,
00:25:21.160
along with other subscriber-only content, including bonus episodes and AMAs,
00:25:25.840
and the conversations I've been having on the Waking Up app. The Making Sense podcast is ad-free
00:25:30.800
and relies entirely on listener support. And you can subscribe now at samharris.org.