Making Sense - Sam Harris - January 31, 2022


Vaccine Mandates, transgender athletes, billionaires… (AMA #19)


Episode Stats

Length

28 minutes

Words per Minute

139.45753

Word Count

3,983

Sentence Count

179

Misogynist Sentences

3


Summary

In this episode of the Making Sense Podcast, host Sam Harris answers a question from an anonymous reader about being pro-vaccine and anti-restrictions, a position unmoored from any political base, in this interesting timeline. Sam's AMA is hosted by Alex Blumberg and features audio from the first part of his conversation with the anonymous reader, who asks about the impact of restrictions on access to vaccines and other preventative care in the post-9/11 world. This is a great episode to listen to if you ve ever wondered what it's like to live in a world where vaccines aren't available everywhere, or if you don't have access to them, and if you want to know what it really means to be pro- or anti-lockdown, this is the episode for you. Sam and Alex discuss: What is the difference between good and bad luck when it comes to dealing with a pandemic? Why is it that some people have it easier than others, and why is it more important than others? What does it mean to be a good or bad luck in the long-term? And is there a difference between luck and good luck in dealing with pandemic epidemics? Is there any such thing as luck, and is it possible to be prepared for something new in advance of the next pandemic and prepared for the next one? Sam answers these questions, and much more, in a thoughtful, thoughtful and thoughtful answer to your questions! Thanks to anonymous reader's questions. We don't know who you'd you'd like to hear from Sam Harris, and we'd love to hear your thoughts on the answers to them! Make sure to the questions you have submitted by Sam. Subscribe to The Making Sense podcast! Subscribe on Apple Podcasts! Subscribe to our podcast! Subscribe on iTunes Learn more about your ad choices and subscribe to our new podcast, and become a supporter of the podcast, too, using the promo code MINDING MONDAYSUMMING MADE Sense, by searching for "MAKING SENSE" in iTunes, wherever else you listen to podcasts are listening to this podcast? You can get 10% off your ad-free version of the show? Subscribe and get 20% off the latest episode of Making Sense, plus a FREE 7-day shipping throughout the week, starting on January 1st, only $99 a month, shipping worldwide, shipping free, free shipping, and more!


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast.
00:00:08.860 This is Sam Harris.
00:00:10.920 Just a note to say that if you're hearing this,
00:00:13.120 you are not currently on our subscriber feed
00:00:15.180 and will only be hearing the first part of this conversation.
00:00:18.460 In order to access full episodes of the Making Sense Podcast,
00:00:21.600 you'll need to subscribe at samharris.org.
00:00:24.180 There you'll find our private RSS feed
00:00:25.980 to add to your favorite podcatcher,
00:00:28.000 along with other subscriber-only content.
00:00:30.660 We don't run ads on the podcast,
00:00:32.400 and therefore it's made possible entirely
00:00:33.960 through the support of our subscribers.
00:00:35.840 So if you enjoy what we're doing here,
00:00:37.700 please consider becoming one.
00:00:46.140 Welcome to the Making Sense Podcast.
00:00:48.420 This is Sam Harris.
00:00:51.420 Okay, jumping into an AMA here.
00:00:54.520 We got questions over Twitter and by email.
00:00:58.100 I have audio for, I believe, most of those questions.
00:01:03.800 Let's jump in.
00:01:05.280 First question.
00:01:06.800 Hi, Sam.
00:01:07.620 I'd rather remain anonymous.
00:01:09.540 My question for you pertains to being pro-vaccine
00:01:12.020 and anti-restrictions,
00:01:13.640 a position unmoored from any political base
00:01:15.860 in this interesting timeline.
00:01:17.060 I listened intently to your last
00:01:19.500 On Disappointing My Audience segment,
00:01:21.860 and I'm wondering if perhaps you're allowing
00:01:23.440 your understandable frustration
00:01:24.900 with a backwards, anti-vaccine minority
00:01:27.560 to obscure your view of what these restrictions
00:01:30.460 have really been like for much of America
00:01:32.560 that does not have the luxury of remote work.
00:01:35.540 My wife and I have been incredibly fortunate
00:01:37.440 these past two years,
00:01:38.760 but we have many friends that have lost careers,
00:01:41.480 businesses, and family
00:01:42.580 without the ability to stay home and stay safe
00:01:45.380 that is increasingly classified
00:01:47.020 as a virtuous position.
00:01:49.020 I consider myself deeply pro-vaccine
00:01:51.860 and also vehemently anti-lockdown,
00:01:54.680 a position born of a career managing risk
00:01:57.300 in complex systems for the aerospace
00:01:59.280 and defense industries.
00:02:01.360 The absolute risk that children
00:02:03.160 and vaccinated individuals have faced from COVID
00:02:05.900 has been well below ordinary background hazards
00:02:08.960 for nearly a year now,
00:02:10.460 and I believe our failure to grasp
00:02:12.520 the harm we are inflicting on children,
00:02:14.980 working women, and the poor
00:02:16.520 risks further polarization
00:02:17.940 if it is not immediately stopped.
00:02:21.080 Do you feel that unrelenting mandates
00:02:23.020 and restrictions from the left are justified?
00:02:26.120 And what do you feel they will do
00:02:27.620 to our already splintered political
00:02:29.520 and class structures if allowed to persist?
00:02:32.300 Thanks so much for taking my question.
00:02:34.560 Okay, well, good question.
00:02:36.040 Actually, I agree with most of that,
00:02:39.300 probably all of that,
00:02:41.040 and yet the question was asked
00:02:43.400 as though I was expected not to,
00:02:47.620 which makes me think there's something,
00:02:49.060 and I'm also looking at
00:02:50.060 some of these other questions here,
00:02:51.940 which put this concern in my mind.
00:02:55.060 There's something about
00:02:55.880 the way I've spoken about COVID
00:02:58.940 and vaccines
00:03:01.320 and misinformation
00:03:03.500 that has conveyed the sense
00:03:07.440 that I'm completely in favor
00:03:09.520 of the most draconian measures
00:03:12.820 we've taken to achieve
00:03:15.640 zero COVID, right?
00:03:18.920 Which, apart from in the first month or so,
00:03:22.220 was never in the cards.
00:03:24.360 I take all those points.
00:03:26.140 I think it's almost impossible
00:03:27.460 to exaggerate the difference
00:03:29.380 between good and bad luck
00:03:31.140 with respect to
00:03:32.980 what one was doing
00:03:35.480 to earn a living,
00:03:37.040 in particular,
00:03:38.220 when the pandemic hit.
00:03:39.840 And this interacts with the variable of class,
00:03:42.200 but not entirely.
00:03:44.180 I mean, there were people who
00:03:45.200 were, in fact,
00:03:47.200 very well off
00:03:48.320 before the pandemic hit,
00:03:51.460 but happened to be in industries
00:03:53.700 that just could not survive
00:03:55.660 anything like a lockdown.
00:03:58.200 So, I mean,
00:03:58.700 think of people who owned
00:03:59.680 movie theater chains
00:04:00.920 or restaurants.
00:04:03.140 And no matter how successful,
00:04:05.380 unless you had a restaurant
00:04:06.400 that could pivot to delivery,
00:04:09.780 there were some great restaurants
00:04:11.280 that failed during the pandemic.
00:04:14.160 And all of this was just luck, right?
00:04:16.420 So, I take the point
00:04:17.920 that some people have been very lucky
00:04:19.920 and had it very easy, comparatively.
00:04:22.120 In fact, some people's businesses
00:04:23.980 grew during the pandemic.
00:04:26.480 And, of course,
00:04:27.260 this differed by country, too,
00:04:29.100 where there were some countries
00:04:29.920 that locked down much harder
00:04:32.120 and much more effectively
00:04:33.020 than we did in the U.S.
00:04:35.340 I think in the beginning,
00:04:37.500 locking down
00:04:38.300 and locking down harder
00:04:39.780 than we managed to do
00:04:41.020 made eminent sense, right?
00:04:44.080 We didn't know
00:04:44.560 what we were dealing with,
00:04:45.700 and there was the possibility
00:04:47.780 of achieving something
00:04:50.220 like zero COVID,
00:04:51.300 although our openness
00:04:54.000 to immigration and travel
00:04:55.900 would have always posed
00:04:57.220 a problem there, right?
00:04:58.480 We would have had to have
00:04:59.260 closed the borders.
00:05:00.860 But the rationale for locking down
00:05:02.920 then was not so much
00:05:05.040 achieving zero COVID.
00:05:06.880 It was to avoid crashing
00:05:08.200 our health care system.
00:05:09.940 And it made perfect sense.
00:05:11.740 And the people who were
00:05:12.680 complaining about it
00:05:13.700 at the time
00:05:14.700 had no leg to stand on.
00:05:17.140 And we spent
00:05:18.500 an enormous amount
00:05:19.260 of money
00:05:19.740 trying to ensure
00:05:21.380 that no one was
00:05:22.800 too badly damaged
00:05:23.840 by our efforts there.
00:05:26.060 But once we began
00:05:27.980 to understand
00:05:28.700 the scope of the disease
00:05:31.380 and how it was transmitted,
00:05:34.720 and needless to say,
00:05:36.460 once we got
00:05:37.140 effective vaccines,
00:05:39.320 yeah,
00:05:39.700 then our thinking about
00:05:41.220 what was saying
00:05:42.320 public policy
00:05:43.280 shifted
00:05:44.100 and had to shift.
00:05:45.480 And perhaps it should
00:05:46.260 have shifted more.
00:05:47.080 I think it's pretty clear
00:05:48.280 at this point
00:05:48.840 that the degree
00:05:50.180 to which
00:05:50.760 we closed the schools
00:05:52.480 and the length
00:05:53.580 of those closures
00:05:54.440 turned out to be
00:05:55.700 a very significant mistake.
00:05:58.500 Distance learning
00:05:59.280 didn't work
00:06:00.060 all that well.
00:06:01.720 And
00:06:02.100 once we got
00:06:03.260 to a position
00:06:03.800 where anyone
00:06:04.960 who wanted to get vaccinated
00:06:06.180 could get vaccinated,
00:06:07.920 then I think
00:06:08.600 the rationale
00:06:09.160 for closing schools
00:06:10.320 and frankly
00:06:12.020 even forcing kids
00:06:13.560 to wear masks
00:06:14.380 in schools,
00:06:16.120 generally speaking,
00:06:17.560 all of that
00:06:18.060 is at minimum
00:06:18.720 quite debatable.
00:06:20.260 And my mind
00:06:20.800 is not settled
00:06:21.460 on some of these points.
00:06:23.700 But many things
00:06:24.640 have changed.
00:06:25.940 Vaccines
00:06:26.500 are ubiquitous.
00:06:28.120 We have treatments
00:06:28.780 for COVID now
00:06:29.700 that we didn't have
00:06:30.920 even a few months ago.
00:06:33.080 And the latest variant,
00:06:34.800 Omicron,
00:06:36.040 which I think
00:06:36.560 has a 98% prevalence
00:06:39.300 now,
00:06:40.420 appears to be
00:06:41.440 far more mild,
00:06:42.960 especially if you've
00:06:44.000 been vaccinated.
00:06:45.320 And COVID,
00:06:46.060 as we know,
00:06:46.480 has always been
00:06:47.320 comparatively mild
00:06:48.320 in kids.
00:06:49.800 So as for lockdowns
00:06:51.240 and even mandates,
00:06:52.600 at this point
00:06:53.780 I am skeptical,
00:06:55.720 right?
00:06:56.060 I think
00:06:56.540 mandates
00:06:58.120 are probably
00:06:59.400 counterproductive
00:07:00.520 across the board.
00:07:02.200 My friend
00:07:02.900 Peter Atiyah
00:07:03.520 just wrote
00:07:03.920 a nice article
00:07:04.600 avidly supporting
00:07:06.080 vaccines
00:07:06.700 and just as
00:07:08.040 avidly
00:07:08.560 condemning
00:07:09.220 mandates.
00:07:10.680 You can look
00:07:11.400 that up
00:07:11.700 on his website.
00:07:12.940 And I think
00:07:13.300 I agree
00:07:13.660 with basically
00:07:14.540 every point
00:07:15.060 he makes.
00:07:16.620 The one thing
00:07:17.180 I would emphasize
00:07:17.700 though
00:07:18.200 is that
00:07:19.520 his argument
00:07:20.680 only makes
00:07:21.520 sense
00:07:21.940 in the presence
00:07:23.040 of a disease
00:07:24.800 that is
00:07:25.280 comparatively
00:07:25.880 benign.
00:07:27.320 And much
00:07:27.660 of my thinking
00:07:28.240 in the last
00:07:29.520 year or year
00:07:30.420 and a half
00:07:31.020 around COVID
00:07:32.520 has been
00:07:33.620 not so much
00:07:34.300 worrying about
00:07:35.360 COVID per se.
00:07:37.320 Again,
00:07:37.640 once we got
00:07:38.360 good vaccines,
00:07:40.360 things changed
00:07:41.380 a lot.
00:07:42.660 And now
00:07:43.020 in the presence
00:07:43.520 of good treatments,
00:07:45.240 things have
00:07:46.000 changed again.
00:07:47.180 What has worried
00:07:48.200 me most
00:07:48.920 is that
00:07:49.480 we seem
00:07:50.880 completely
00:07:52.060 unable
00:07:52.620 to depoliticize
00:07:54.940 a conversation
00:07:56.040 about basic
00:07:57.920 epidemiological
00:07:59.080 facts.
00:07:59.880 and this
00:08:01.080 is terrifying
00:08:01.700 if you
00:08:02.140 imagine
00:08:02.680 a much
00:08:03.780 more
00:08:03.980 lethal
00:08:04.400 pandemic.
00:08:05.880 Again,
00:08:06.520 it's possible
00:08:07.040 to imagine
00:08:07.660 that as you
00:08:08.860 turn the
00:08:09.260 lethality
00:08:09.840 dial up,
00:08:11.300 everyone's
00:08:11.980 politics will
00:08:13.080 magically
00:08:13.920 evaporate.
00:08:15.120 All the
00:08:15.540 conspiracy
00:08:15.940 thinking
00:08:16.460 will find
00:08:17.320 nowhere to
00:08:17.760 land.
00:08:18.620 Just the
00:08:19.460 sheer terror
00:08:20.200 of mortality
00:08:21.480 will clarify
00:08:22.920 everyone's
00:08:24.180 epistemology.
00:08:24.920 no one
00:08:26.240 will have
00:08:26.520 any time
00:08:27.020 for Alex
00:08:27.940 Jones
00:08:28.340 when they
00:08:28.680 see a
00:08:28.960 sufficient
00:08:29.240 number
00:08:29.520 of bodies
00:08:30.160 stacked
00:08:30.860 like
00:08:31.460 cordwood
00:08:31.960 in a
00:08:32.520 park.
00:08:33.340 But I'm
00:08:34.140 not so
00:08:34.460 sure.
00:08:35.300 I think
00:08:35.500 the fragmentation
00:08:36.360 of our
00:08:37.660 media
00:08:38.540 ecosystem,
00:08:40.280 I think
00:08:40.600 what's
00:08:40.840 happened
00:08:41.200 on podcasts
00:08:42.400 and in
00:08:43.180 newsletters
00:08:43.820 and in
00:08:44.500 right-wing
00:08:44.860 media,
00:08:45.960 I think
00:08:46.220 the ways
00:08:46.540 in which
00:08:46.860 Republicans
00:08:47.400 in particular
00:08:48.220 have tried
00:08:48.580 to leverage
00:08:49.280 an anti-vax
00:08:50.740 hysteria,
00:08:52.140 something like
00:08:52.720 this I
00:08:53.800 think is
00:08:54.120 quite possible
00:08:55.000 even in
00:08:56.260 the presence
00:08:56.740 of much
00:08:57.620 more serious
00:08:58.380 disease.
00:08:59.820 And if
00:09:00.280 that's the
00:09:00.640 case,
00:09:01.520 and we
00:09:01.840 were to
00:09:02.180 fail to
00:09:02.900 solve our
00:09:04.260 problems of
00:09:04.940 coordination
00:09:05.560 and cooperation
00:09:06.900 and basic
00:09:08.480 trust of
00:09:09.260 institutions
00:09:09.860 and public
00:09:11.100 health messaging
00:09:11.780 in the
00:09:12.700 presence of
00:09:13.140 something 10
00:09:14.460 or 20
00:09:15.000 or 30
00:09:15.520 times more
00:09:16.540 lethal,
00:09:17.240 that's what
00:09:18.420 I'm worried
00:09:18.740 about.
00:09:19.600 It has been
00:09:20.280 a very long
00:09:21.220 time since
00:09:22.600 I was
00:09:22.860 personally
00:09:23.520 worried
00:09:24.060 about
00:09:24.760 catching
00:09:25.260 COVID.
00:09:26.440 I haven't
00:09:26.980 caught it.
00:09:27.740 I still
00:09:28.120 do what
00:09:28.540 I can
00:09:29.040 to keep
00:09:29.900 myself
00:09:30.300 and my
00:09:30.940 family
00:09:31.340 safe.
00:09:32.760 Much of
00:09:33.340 my thinking
00:09:33.660 here is
00:09:34.200 still focused
00:09:34.800 on the
00:09:35.160 few members
00:09:35.600 of our
00:09:35.840 family who
00:09:36.440 have
00:09:36.980 significant
00:09:37.560 comorbidities
00:09:38.620 and for
00:09:39.600 whom
00:09:39.940 even a
00:09:40.780 vaccine
00:09:41.260 doesn't
00:09:41.860 seem like
00:09:42.280 a perfect
00:09:43.040 insurance
00:09:43.620 policy.
00:09:44.600 But
00:09:45.280 if you've
00:09:46.100 gotten the
00:09:46.440 idea
00:09:46.840 that
00:09:47.900 I think
00:09:48.840 we should
00:09:49.200 be responding
00:09:49.880 to COVID
00:09:51.140 itself
00:09:52.080 as though
00:09:53.220 it were
00:09:54.160 a terrifyingly
00:09:55.040 lethal
00:09:55.380 illness
00:09:55.960 at this
00:09:56.760 point,
00:09:57.260 that's not
00:09:58.280 what I've
00:09:58.620 meant to
00:09:58.900 convey.
00:09:59.580 What I've
00:10:00.060 meant to
00:10:00.280 convey is
00:10:00.920 my absolute
00:10:01.800 astonishment
00:10:02.960 and despair
00:10:03.780 in the face
00:10:05.260 of the
00:10:06.480 fragmentation
00:10:07.260 of our
00:10:08.440 society,
00:10:09.220 the total
00:10:10.440 loss of
00:10:11.140 trust
00:10:11.940 in institutions.
00:10:13.620 In fact,
00:10:14.080 the conviction
00:10:14.720 among so many
00:10:16.260 otherwise smart
00:10:16.900 people that
00:10:18.120 we don't
00:10:18.400 even need
00:10:18.960 institutions.
00:10:20.520 That's the
00:10:20.960 old way.
00:10:22.300 Now we're
00:10:22.700 going to
00:10:22.860 just run
00:10:23.280 this thing
00:10:23.760 by podcast
00:10:24.720 and newsletter
00:10:25.900 and Twitter
00:10:26.900 feed.
00:10:27.620 That's how
00:10:28.240 we're going
00:10:28.460 to deal
00:10:28.680 with all
00:10:28.920 the challenges
00:10:29.520 we face
00:10:30.560 in this
00:10:31.160 century.
00:10:32.940 Cybersecurity,
00:10:33.940 cyberterrorism,
00:10:35.280 the remaining
00:10:35.720 threat of
00:10:36.160 nuclear war,
00:10:37.920 climate change,
00:10:39.520 pandemics,
00:10:40.400 natural and
00:10:41.020 engineered,
00:10:42.440 the threat
00:10:42.820 of artificial
00:10:43.260 intelligence,
00:10:44.540 run amok,
00:10:45.060 the pressures
00:10:46.320 exerted on
00:10:46.960 our society
00:10:47.580 by wealth
00:10:48.360 and equality.
00:10:49.560 All we need
00:10:50.040 to do is
00:10:50.520 move fast
00:10:51.200 and break
00:10:51.640 things.
00:10:52.400 We just
00:10:52.740 need disruptors.
00:10:54.120 We're going
00:10:54.420 to run
00:10:54.620 this whole
00:10:55.000 thing like
00:10:55.460 it's a
00:10:55.740 new tech
00:10:56.900 startup.
00:10:58.180 That's how
00:10:58.500 we're going
00:10:58.700 to maintain
00:10:59.120 cruising altitude
00:10:59.900 into the
00:11:00.700 22nd century.
00:11:02.840 That's
00:11:03.400 completely
00:11:03.860 insane.
00:11:05.580 It feels
00:11:06.400 in some
00:11:06.720 sense like
00:11:07.120 the teenagers
00:11:07.720 have taken
00:11:08.520 over the
00:11:09.220 place.
00:11:10.020 There's no
00:11:10.720 expertise
00:11:11.180 that matters.
00:11:12.960 You can't
00:11:13.440 trust the
00:11:13.860 experts anymore.
00:11:15.060 know we're
00:11:16.640 all going
00:11:16.860 to get
00:11:17.020 online and
00:11:17.760 become
00:11:18.340 epidemiologists
00:11:20.160 and virologists
00:11:21.720 and immunologists
00:11:22.980 in a few
00:11:24.500 short weeks
00:11:25.140 by doing
00:11:26.400 a lot of
00:11:27.040 Google
00:11:27.840 searching
00:11:28.340 and YouTube.
00:11:31.720 Douglas
00:11:32.320 Murray told
00:11:33.120 me recently
00:11:33.780 that he
00:11:35.260 saw a tweet
00:11:35.900 where someone
00:11:37.460 said on
00:11:37.880 Twitter,
00:11:38.500 oh look,
00:11:39.140 all the people
00:11:39.700 who knew
00:11:40.020 everything about
00:11:40.600 COVID last
00:11:41.220 week now
00:11:41.880 know everything
00:11:42.300 about Afghanistan.
00:11:45.260 I mean,
00:11:46.020 that is the
00:11:46.600 spirit of
00:11:47.120 the time
00:11:47.580 and it's
00:11:49.900 not good
00:11:50.380 for us.
00:11:52.000 The truth
00:11:52.800 is I have
00:11:54.040 at no point
00:11:54.960 in this
00:11:56.040 pandemic
00:11:56.460 had a
00:11:57.720 strong opinion
00:11:58.720 about
00:11:59.960 COVID
00:12:00.800 or public
00:12:02.460 health measures.
00:12:03.400 Right?
00:12:03.980 I have just
00:12:04.900 had a strong
00:12:05.860 opinion
00:12:06.220 that it
00:12:08.600 makes no
00:12:09.140 sense for
00:12:10.400 unqualified
00:12:11.240 people to
00:12:12.480 have strong
00:12:13.080 opinions on
00:12:14.340 these matters
00:12:14.840 and that it's
00:12:16.020 dangerous when
00:12:17.380 you have
00:12:17.660 millions and
00:12:18.540 millions of
00:12:19.060 people deciding
00:12:20.620 that their
00:12:21.660 intuitions about
00:12:23.200 a brand new
00:12:23.920 pathogen and
00:12:25.280 the first
00:12:25.800 significant
00:12:26.320 pandemic in
00:12:27.120 anyone's
00:12:27.720 lifetime should
00:12:29.100 supersede the
00:12:30.600 product of
00:12:31.140 rational scientific
00:12:32.620 investigation by
00:12:34.400 those who are
00:12:35.000 most qualified
00:12:35.880 to perform
00:12:37.060 it.
00:12:37.980 And the
00:12:38.600 difference
00:12:39.120 between
00:12:39.740 dispassionate
00:12:41.020 scientific analysis
00:12:42.000 of COVID
00:12:43.480 or anything
00:12:43.940 else and
00:12:45.400 advocacy,
00:12:46.980 right,
00:12:47.280 there's a
00:12:47.700 difference there
00:12:48.540 that is
00:12:50.100 very difficult
00:12:51.600 to digest
00:12:53.300 and we are
00:12:54.760 clearly bad
00:12:55.820 at doing
00:12:56.760 this.
00:12:57.520 And we have
00:12:58.320 to get our
00:12:58.660 act together
00:12:59.120 because this
00:12:59.960 will not be
00:13:00.420 the last
00:13:00.860 pandemic.
00:13:01.340 In fact,
00:13:03.460 given how
00:13:04.320 disruptive
00:13:04.920 COVID has
00:13:05.940 been, I
00:13:07.040 would bet
00:13:07.340 that the
00:13:07.660 threat of
00:13:08.220 bioterrorism
00:13:09.180 has increased
00:13:10.440 significantly.
00:13:11.820 This is about
00:13:12.440 the easiest
00:13:12.980 way possible
00:13:14.580 to disrupt
00:13:15.800 a society.
00:13:17.020 And if
00:13:17.340 you're a
00:13:17.600 nihilist,
00:13:18.580 or you're
00:13:19.160 insane,
00:13:20.320 or you're
00:13:20.740 a jihadist,
00:13:22.080 or you're
00:13:22.460 a fanatic of
00:13:23.200 some other
00:13:23.680 stripe,
00:13:24.900 well then
00:13:25.400 bioterrorism
00:13:26.800 just got its
00:13:28.160 Super Bowl
00:13:28.900 commercial.
00:13:30.880 So,
00:13:31.500 getting better
00:13:32.020 at responding
00:13:32.700 to a
00:13:33.400 pandemic,
00:13:34.660 getting better
00:13:35.260 at producing
00:13:36.100 vaccines,
00:13:37.240 and getting
00:13:37.660 people to
00:13:38.160 actually take
00:13:38.820 them,
00:13:40.060 I consider
00:13:40.640 that one
00:13:41.020 of our
00:13:41.240 most important
00:13:42.080 tasks as
00:13:43.300 a society
00:13:43.940 at this
00:13:44.540 point.
00:13:46.140 Okay,
00:13:47.100 next question.
00:13:48.480 Hi Sam,
00:13:49.000 my name is
00:13:49.520 Andy and I
00:13:50.160 live in
00:13:50.440 Milwaukee,
00:13:50.960 Wisconsin.
00:13:52.300 My question
00:13:52.880 for you is
00:13:53.420 related to
00:13:54.040 mindfulness and
00:13:54.800 memories.
00:13:55.940 I've been
00:13:56.280 finding a lot
00:13:56.880 of value in
00:13:57.460 your guided
00:13:57.860 meditations on
00:13:58.720 the Waking
00:13:59.100 Up app,
00:14:00.040 and since
00:14:00.500 I've started
00:14:00.960 practicing I've
00:14:01.780 noticed an
00:14:02.320 improvement in
00:14:03.240 my ability to
00:14:04.000 recenter myself
00:14:04.840 in times of
00:14:05.500 stress,
00:14:06.540 especially when
00:14:07.280 confronted with
00:14:08.040 embarrassing or
00:14:08.820 regrettable memories.
00:14:10.720 Some people
00:14:11.260 suggest that
00:14:11.900 memories like
00:14:12.480 these resurface
00:14:13.380 now and then
00:14:13.940 because they
00:14:14.440 aren't fully
00:14:14.900 resolved.
00:14:16.460 Do you think
00:14:16.880 that these
00:14:17.260 memories need
00:14:17.960 a resolution,
00:14:19.180 or is
00:14:19.520 mindfulness the
00:14:20.180 best way to
00:14:20.660 manage them?
00:14:21.840 Thanks Sam.
00:14:23.080 Thank you for
00:14:23.760 the question Andy.
00:14:25.300 I don't have
00:14:25.700 much of a
00:14:26.200 psychodynamic
00:14:27.100 interest in
00:14:28.700 mulling over
00:14:30.160 the past.
00:14:31.680 It's not to
00:14:32.220 say that's
00:14:32.860 not ever
00:14:33.740 useful.
00:14:34.980 There are
00:14:35.180 certainly patterns
00:14:35.980 you can
00:14:36.500 discover,
00:14:37.480 and making
00:14:37.960 that discovery
00:14:38.620 can equip you
00:14:40.140 to live
00:14:40.960 differently,
00:14:41.740 right?
00:14:42.020 If you see
00:14:42.320 you keep
00:14:42.620 getting into
00:14:43.020 the same
00:14:43.400 situations and
00:14:44.420 suffering the
00:14:45.780 same kinds
00:14:46.520 of collisions
00:14:47.500 with other
00:14:49.200 people or
00:14:49.980 circumstances,
00:14:51.620 there may be
00:14:52.480 something to
00:14:52.980 resolve conceptually
00:14:55.220 about all
00:14:55.900 that, but
00:14:57.580 generally
00:14:58.980 speaking, the
00:15:00.520 fact that a
00:15:01.460 painful memory
00:15:02.720 or an
00:15:03.940 embarrassing
00:15:04.380 one surfaces
00:15:06.160 and that it
00:15:07.620 is painful or
00:15:09.100 embarrassing in
00:15:09.840 the present,
00:15:11.180 that doesn't
00:15:11.880 really suggest to
00:15:12.700 me that there's
00:15:13.180 something unresolved
00:15:15.080 about that.
00:15:17.340 It's just a
00:15:18.120 more general
00:15:18.560 symptom of
00:15:19.580 this feeling
00:15:21.160 of being a
00:15:22.560 self, right?
00:15:23.400 that's what's
00:15:24.380 unresolved for
00:15:25.700 everyone until
00:15:26.660 you can resolve
00:15:28.140 it, right?
00:15:29.240 I mean, it
00:15:29.560 just feels
00:15:30.500 lousy to
00:15:32.900 feel identified
00:15:34.860 with this
00:15:38.200 fictional center
00:15:40.280 of gravity,
00:15:41.640 especially in
00:15:42.720 the midst of
00:15:43.780 unpleasant thoughts
00:15:45.480 about one's
00:15:46.480 past or
00:15:47.280 future,
00:15:48.140 right?
00:15:48.980 So the
00:15:50.200 interesting
00:15:50.460 question is,
00:15:51.180 how is it
00:15:52.460 that in
00:15:53.940 the present
00:15:54.480 moment,
00:15:55.520 a memory
00:15:56.200 of something
00:15:57.560 that happened
00:15:58.200 even quite
00:15:59.640 long ago
00:16:00.280 can arise
00:16:01.700 in the
00:16:02.180 totally
00:16:02.880 evanescent
00:16:03.980 way that
00:16:04.720 any memory
00:16:05.680 does,
00:16:07.000 and yet
00:16:07.560 carry with
00:16:08.840 it a
00:16:09.720 fair tonnage
00:16:11.200 of misery,
00:16:13.160 right?
00:16:13.980 How does it
00:16:14.720 impose its
00:16:15.520 weight on
00:16:16.560 you in
00:16:17.680 this moment?
00:16:18.140 not why
00:16:20.180 does it,
00:16:21.120 right?
00:16:21.380 That's the
00:16:22.600 sort of
00:16:22.880 resolution
00:16:23.360 you're asking
00:16:24.420 about,
00:16:25.040 but how
00:16:25.940 does it?
00:16:27.340 What is
00:16:27.900 the mechanism?
00:16:29.180 How is it
00:16:29.660 possible for
00:16:31.180 something as
00:16:31.700 gossamer as
00:16:33.080 a thought to
00:16:34.740 make you
00:16:35.140 miserable in
00:16:36.540 this moment?
00:16:38.180 Well, the
00:16:39.100 discovery to be
00:16:39.940 made here is
00:16:40.900 that it is
00:16:41.400 something that
00:16:43.360 you're doing,
00:16:44.200 right?
00:16:44.660 There's a
00:16:44.960 contraction,
00:16:45.600 there's a
00:16:46.820 failure to
00:16:48.160 recognize
00:16:48.840 thought as
00:16:50.520 thought that
00:16:51.920 is the
00:16:52.180 proximate cause
00:16:53.080 of the
00:16:54.000 present
00:16:54.380 suffering,
00:16:55.480 and for
00:16:56.620 that,
00:16:57.000 mindfulness
00:16:57.400 really is
00:16:58.440 the antidote,
00:16:59.800 right?
00:16:59.980 A clear
00:17:00.480 scene of
00:17:01.800 the mechanics
00:17:02.300 here,
00:17:02.640 and the
00:17:04.280 freedom to
00:17:05.600 be felt is
00:17:06.800 the freedom
00:17:07.220 of just
00:17:08.020 watching this
00:17:09.820 otherwise
00:17:10.340 lethal thought
00:17:12.040 just pass
00:17:13.140 you by,
00:17:14.120 right, and
00:17:14.540 realize that
00:17:15.260 you as
00:17:16.680 the conscious
00:17:17.140 witness in
00:17:17.940 this moment
00:17:18.460 are truly
00:17:19.980 unimplicated.
00:17:21.640 The past
00:17:22.260 truly resolves
00:17:23.400 itself when
00:17:24.820 you can stand
00:17:25.420 free of it
00:17:26.060 in the
00:17:26.560 present.
00:17:27.780 Again, there
00:17:28.520 may be other
00:17:28.900 things that
00:17:29.460 are useful to
00:17:30.040 do conceptually.
00:17:32.440 Reframing
00:17:33.060 your thoughts
00:17:33.600 about the
00:17:34.100 past can
00:17:35.260 also help
00:17:36.380 in many
00:17:36.980 ways.
00:17:38.060 You can
00:17:38.260 view some
00:17:38.680 past trauma
00:17:39.840 or embarrassment
00:17:40.640 as the
00:17:42.640 very thing
00:17:43.360 that gave
00:17:44.280 you certain
00:17:45.500 skills or
00:17:46.780 feelings of
00:17:47.840 compassion
00:17:48.360 in the
00:17:49.700 present.
00:17:50.360 You might
00:17:51.000 be able to
00:17:51.340 draw a
00:17:51.720 direct line
00:17:52.460 from something
00:17:53.920 terrible that
00:17:54.600 happened a
00:17:55.960 decade ago
00:17:56.680 to your
00:17:58.200 ability to
00:17:58.920 help specific
00:18:00.500 people in
00:18:01.020 your life
00:18:01.520 with similar
00:18:03.060 challenges in
00:18:04.220 the present.
00:18:04.620 So there's
00:18:05.640 reframing
00:18:06.600 that is
00:18:08.060 available to
00:18:09.220 us much of
00:18:09.760 the time
00:18:10.180 that can be
00:18:11.160 very powerful.
00:18:12.820 But from
00:18:13.680 my point of
00:18:14.160 view, there
00:18:14.460 is no
00:18:15.160 real antidote
00:18:17.260 to the
00:18:18.260 most basic
00:18:18.960 mental
00:18:19.520 suffering that
00:18:21.000 is better
00:18:21.400 than insight
00:18:22.300 into the
00:18:23.560 illusoriness
00:18:24.260 of the
00:18:25.340 self around
00:18:26.760 which all
00:18:27.280 of our
00:18:27.560 suffering
00:18:28.000 appears to
00:18:28.920 be
00:18:29.160 constellated.
00:18:30.900 Anyway, hope
00:18:31.800 that helps,
00:18:32.240 Andy.
00:18:32.380 Hi, Sam.
00:18:34.480 My name is
00:18:35.000 Isabel and
00:18:35.660 I live in
00:18:36.100 New York.
00:18:37.160 My question
00:18:37.720 for you is
00:18:38.540 how can you
00:18:39.240 work through
00:18:39.620 a consequential
00:18:40.420 lie by a
00:18:41.540 close and
00:18:41.960 trusted person
00:18:42.660 in your
00:18:42.980 life?
00:18:43.860 How can you
00:18:44.620 forgive and
00:18:45.260 trust again?
00:18:46.440 Can you share
00:18:46.960 your own
00:18:47.340 experience on
00:18:48.100 how you've
00:18:48.560 dealt with
00:18:48.920 lying by
00:18:49.360 someone you
00:18:49.840 care about?
00:18:51.080 Thank you,
00:18:51.520 Sam.
00:18:52.740 Hey, Isabel.
00:18:53.440 Thanks for
00:18:53.800 the question.
00:18:54.920 Well, this
00:18:55.220 goes to the
00:18:56.100 topic of
00:18:57.140 forgiveness,
00:18:58.540 which is more
00:19:00.120 general than
00:19:00.980 the issue of
00:19:01.800 lying.
00:19:03.300 And there,
00:19:03.840 for me,
00:19:04.740 the crucial
00:19:05.740 variable in
00:19:07.760 whether or
00:19:08.100 not you can
00:19:08.480 forgive somebody,
00:19:10.100 whether or
00:19:10.340 not an
00:19:10.840 apology is
00:19:11.740 acceptable,
00:19:13.300 is if you
00:19:15.160 can see how
00:19:16.220 this person
00:19:17.120 has changed.
00:19:18.860 If you can
00:19:19.440 see how
00:19:20.080 they view
00:19:21.420 their past
00:19:22.340 action,
00:19:23.860 which you
00:19:24.260 find
00:19:24.680 reprehensible,
00:19:25.760 in this
00:19:26.160 case a lie,
00:19:27.240 in the same
00:19:28.240 way that you
00:19:28.640 do,
00:19:29.680 which is to
00:19:30.860 say they
00:19:31.140 disavow it,
00:19:32.000 and they
00:19:33.000 assure you
00:19:33.940 that it
00:19:34.220 won't happen
00:19:34.640 again.
00:19:35.640 To take your
00:19:36.480 question generically,
00:19:37.920 assuming we're
00:19:39.060 talking about a
00:19:39.780 significant betrayal
00:19:41.120 of trust,
00:19:42.600 the question for
00:19:43.240 you is,
00:19:44.500 well,
00:19:45.220 can I ever
00:19:46.240 trust this
00:19:46.820 person again?
00:19:48.200 And that
00:19:48.500 depends,
00:19:49.160 at least in
00:19:49.640 part,
00:19:50.000 on their
00:19:51.120 view of
00:19:52.020 what they
00:19:52.320 did.
00:19:53.280 Do they
00:19:53.680 regret
00:19:54.200 lying to
00:19:55.000 you?
00:19:55.720 Or do they
00:19:56.400 have some
00:19:56.940 defensive story
00:19:58.020 about why
00:19:58.660 it was
00:19:59.280 necessary?
00:20:00.280 So those
00:20:01.060 are the
00:20:01.300 kinds of
00:20:01.780 details that
00:20:02.460 matter.
00:20:03.260 I think to
00:20:03.780 forgive someone,
00:20:05.480 we need to
00:20:06.960 feel that
00:20:07.640 there's a
00:20:08.300 plausible path
00:20:09.300 that stretches
00:20:10.180 from who
00:20:10.980 they used
00:20:11.400 to be,
00:20:12.280 when they
00:20:13.100 intentionally
00:20:14.140 injured us,
00:20:15.380 to who they
00:20:16.420 purport to be
00:20:17.480 now,
00:20:18.180 someone who
00:20:19.520 can be
00:20:19.880 forgiven and
00:20:21.560 brought back
00:20:22.660 into the
00:20:23.000 fold.
00:20:23.320 but it's
00:20:26.140 also important
00:20:26.640 to acknowledge
00:20:27.160 that it
00:20:28.280 is often
00:20:29.000 hard for
00:20:30.040 people to
00:20:30.480 change,
00:20:31.620 right?
00:20:31.880 And if you
00:20:32.460 have someone
00:20:32.840 who's quite
00:20:34.120 habituated to
00:20:35.060 lying,
00:20:36.360 that's hard
00:20:38.200 to completely
00:20:39.040 reform,
00:20:40.560 unless the
00:20:41.000 person has
00:20:41.580 had some
00:20:42.000 real ethical
00:20:43.100 breakthrough.
00:20:44.680 So,
00:20:45.580 sometimes,
00:20:46.660 when you
00:20:47.380 catch someone
00:20:47.840 lying,
00:20:48.380 you understand
00:20:49.700 something about
00:20:51.020 who they're
00:20:52.020 likely to be
00:20:52.520 in the future,
00:20:53.320 and forgiveness
00:20:55.260 or apologies
00:20:56.540 aside,
00:20:57.560 it might not
00:20:58.860 be appropriate
00:20:59.800 to trust them
00:21:01.120 all that much
00:21:01.940 going forward,
00:21:02.800 depending on how
00:21:04.060 ingrained this
00:21:05.260 tendency is.
00:21:07.040 So,
00:21:07.600 there are many
00:21:08.180 variables that
00:21:08.980 are hopeless
00:21:09.640 to quantify
00:21:10.280 and really
00:21:11.760 must be judged
00:21:12.560 intuitively.
00:21:14.820 Anyway,
00:21:15.520 I hope that
00:21:15.980 helps.
00:21:16.860 Thanks for the
00:21:17.320 question.
00:21:18.780 Hi,
00:21:18.960 Sam.
00:21:19.360 My name is
00:21:19.900 Tim,
00:21:20.220 and I live
00:21:20.520 in Ontario,
00:21:21.240 Canada.
00:21:22.300 My question
00:21:22.800 for you is
00:21:23.340 regarding your
00:21:23.920 plans to
00:21:24.600 promote
00:21:24.960 effective
00:21:25.500 altruism
00:21:26.140 by awarding
00:21:27.520 NFTs to
00:21:29.240 certain
00:21:29.760 individuals who
00:21:30.760 donate sufficiently
00:21:31.780 large amounts
00:21:32.600 to certain
00:21:33.960 charitable
00:21:34.380 organizations.
00:21:35.740 I think it's a
00:21:36.680 great idea,
00:21:37.740 but I'm just
00:21:38.280 wondering if you
00:21:39.120 would consider
00:21:39.620 expanding the
00:21:40.400 scope to
00:21:41.540 include people
00:21:42.280 who may or may
00:21:43.060 not have a lot
00:21:43.680 of money to
00:21:44.100 give,
00:21:44.760 or who simply
00:21:45.580 give their time
00:21:46.220 and efforts in
00:21:46.820 a way that
00:21:47.800 also achieves
00:21:48.500 effective
00:21:48.920 altruism and
00:21:50.200 equals or exceeds
00:21:51.000 any good that
00:21:51.580 a monetary
00:21:52.040 donation to
00:21:53.340 a charitable
00:21:53.720 organization might
00:21:54.760 do.
00:21:56.020 Should such
00:21:56.540 people not
00:21:57.120 also be eligible
00:21:58.140 to receive the
00:21:59.300 recognition that
00:22:00.080 these NFTs
00:22:00.780 endow?
00:22:01.720 Thanks very much,
00:22:02.660 Sam.
00:22:03.540 Thanks for the
00:22:04.440 question,
00:22:04.800 Tim.
00:22:05.420 This gives me a
00:22:06.020 chance to clarify
00:22:06.700 something that
00:22:07.380 apparently was not
00:22:08.520 clear, although if
00:22:10.340 you get into the
00:22:11.140 fine print on the
00:22:12.360 giving what we can
00:22:13.700 pledge, it becomes
00:22:15.620 clear.
00:22:15.920 it's not about the
00:22:17.520 amount of money
00:22:18.560 that anyone would
00:22:19.700 give, it's the
00:22:21.180 percentage of
00:22:22.420 earnings, right?
00:22:23.620 So it doesn't
00:22:24.240 matter how much
00:22:24.800 money you make,
00:22:26.040 you could be
00:22:26.460 making $30,000 a
00:22:28.480 year, if you're
00:22:29.940 giving a minimum
00:22:31.080 of 10% of what
00:22:32.880 you make, you can
00:22:34.200 take that pledge.
00:22:35.900 Of course, there's
00:22:36.500 this added
00:22:37.160 consideration that
00:22:39.620 many people might
00:22:40.960 realize that the
00:22:41.740 best way they can
00:22:42.580 contribute to the
00:22:44.260 most urgent causes
00:22:45.260 is to simply make
00:22:47.300 a lot of money in
00:22:48.460 some unobjectionable
00:22:50.000 way and give a
00:22:52.120 lot of money each
00:22:53.140 year to those
00:22:53.760 causes, right?
00:22:54.860 Rather than
00:22:55.420 volunteer somewhere
00:22:57.180 or spend their
00:22:58.580 time in some way
00:22:59.260 that's explicitly
00:23:00.060 philanthropic.
00:23:01.920 And this is what
00:23:02.420 Will McCaskill and
00:23:03.400 the other effective
00:23:04.220 altruists call
00:23:05.180 earning to give.
00:23:07.300 And that's what
00:23:07.720 Sam Bankman-Fried
00:23:08.620 is up to over
00:23:09.920 there at FTX.
00:23:11.200 And of course,
00:23:12.060 10% is just the
00:23:13.120 minimum many
00:23:14.220 effective altruists
00:23:15.120 give much more
00:23:16.700 than that.
00:23:17.920 And some people
00:23:18.420 pledge to give
00:23:19.380 everything above
00:23:21.260 a certain amount.
00:23:22.340 They decide what
00:23:23.500 they want every
00:23:24.900 year to live on
00:23:25.620 and then give
00:23:28.000 100% beyond
00:23:29.660 that number.
00:23:31.680 And again, that
00:23:32.540 number can be
00:23:33.520 whatever you want
00:23:34.280 it to be, right?
00:23:35.140 I mean, I'm not
00:23:36.120 advocating that
00:23:37.760 people live
00:23:38.700 abstemious lives
00:23:40.620 and give everything
00:23:42.200 else to charity.
00:23:43.480 I mean, that's
00:23:44.100 amazing if you
00:23:45.820 want to live that
00:23:46.440 way, but I really
00:23:47.980 don't have a
00:23:48.740 negative conception
00:23:50.340 of wealth here,
00:23:51.960 right?
00:23:52.220 I don't think that...
00:23:54.420 I mean, you take
00:23:54.840 someone like Sam
00:23:55.500 Bankman-Fried,
00:23:56.420 right, who's making
00:23:57.180 billions of dollars
00:23:58.960 and will be giving
00:24:00.260 billions of dollars
00:24:01.300 to the most urgent
00:24:02.640 causes.
00:24:03.360 In my mind, it
00:24:04.400 really doesn't matter
00:24:05.280 how much money he
00:24:06.860 spends on himself,
00:24:08.000 right?
00:24:08.980 Because anything he
00:24:09.920 spends on himself
00:24:10.880 really is just a
00:24:12.520 rounding error on
00:24:14.040 the amount of money
00:24:14.800 he will ultimately
00:24:15.820 be giving away,
00:24:16.720 right?
00:24:16.900 The difference
00:24:17.360 between him living
00:24:18.220 in a studio apartment
00:24:19.260 and him having a
00:24:21.300 30,000 square foot
00:24:22.420 house in one of the
00:24:23.740 most expensive cities
00:24:24.740 on earth would be
00:24:25.940 almost impossible to
00:24:27.120 discern against his
00:24:29.600 actual wealth.
00:24:30.960 Obviously, he's an
00:24:31.840 outlier, but something
00:24:33.540 like that applies to
00:24:35.360 the rest of us.
00:24:36.140 I do think that if
00:24:37.540 we're going to solve
00:24:38.140 our problems
00:24:38.960 collectively, it's
00:24:41.480 not going to be a
00:24:42.140 matter of convincing
00:24:44.040 the most affluent
00:24:45.640 people and societies
00:24:47.600 to make significant
00:24:49.440 sacrifices.
00:24:50.660 I think we need to
00:24:51.600 improve technology,
00:24:53.000 we need to
00:24:53.700 increasingly produce
00:24:55.460 what we produce in
00:24:56.340 a carbon-neutral way,
00:24:57.660 and then we need to
00:24:58.880 prioritize helping
00:25:01.060 people and
00:25:02.760 safeguarding the
00:25:03.760 future.
00:25:04.720 And I really do
00:25:05.320 think we can
00:25:05.960 massively change
00:25:07.840 how we allocate
00:25:09.300 resources without
00:25:10.940 stigmatizing wealth.
00:25:13.580 And part of this
00:25:14.100 has to do with
00:25:15.040 creating virtuous
00:25:17.820 cycles that leverage
00:25:20.200 people's desire
00:25:22.400 for better things.
00:25:24.160 This has happened
00:25:25.100 with electric cars,
00:25:26.380 right?
00:25:26.580 Elon Musk started
00:25:28.200 building electric cars
00:25:30.080 that did not represent
00:25:32.220 a sacrifice for anyone,
00:25:34.140 right?
00:25:35.080 He made electric cars
00:25:36.400 some of the most
00:25:37.320 desirable cars
00:25:38.480 ever built.
00:25:40.120 I mean, you have to
00:25:40.680 spend something like
00:25:41.520 two million dollars
00:25:42.740 on a combustion
00:25:44.360 engine car
00:25:45.220 to have a car
00:25:46.560 that is faster
00:25:47.600 than the
00:25:48.900 current version
00:25:50.080 of the Model S.
00:25:51.640 So,
00:25:52.420 if you want a fast
00:25:53.760 car,
00:25:54.500 it's completely
00:25:55.400 rational to want
00:25:56.580 an electric one
00:25:57.480 at this point.
00:25:58.720 And I think
00:25:59.940 that's the path
00:26:00.700 forward on many
00:26:02.060 other fronts,
00:26:02.880 in particular
00:26:03.860 with the problem
00:26:05.080 of climate change.
00:26:06.440 I think we can
00:26:06.980 get there by
00:26:07.560 focusing on the
00:26:08.580 things we want,
00:26:09.940 right?
00:26:10.200 For climate change,
00:26:11.880 and now I'm
00:26:12.700 rambling,
00:26:13.820 for climate change,
00:26:14.920 we don't even have
00:26:15.720 to talk about
00:26:16.260 climate change.
00:26:17.360 We can just talk
00:26:18.220 about the virtues
00:26:18.820 of having clean air.
00:26:20.900 You just look at
00:26:21.580 the consequences
00:26:22.340 of particulate
00:26:23.120 pollution
00:26:23.560 and how much
00:26:24.780 nicer it is
00:26:25.740 to live in a city
00:26:27.080 that doesn't have any.
00:26:28.940 That solves for
00:26:29.640 climate change.
00:26:30.960 And there you're
00:26:31.360 just talking about
00:26:31.900 people not dying
00:26:32.880 from emphysema
00:26:34.020 and cardiac arrest
00:26:35.680 and everything else
00:26:36.980 that bad air
00:26:37.780 creates.
00:26:39.140 Literally millions
00:26:39.900 of people,
00:26:40.760 globally speaking,
00:26:41.780 die every year
00:26:42.580 because we use
00:26:44.200 dirty fuel
00:26:45.080 that puts
00:26:46.300 particulates
00:26:47.080 into the air.
00:26:48.720 So rather than
00:26:49.800 guilt trip people
00:26:50.700 over risks
00:26:52.720 that seem
00:26:53.880 merely hypothetical
00:26:54.820 to most of them,
00:26:56.580 why not
00:26:57.060 focus on
00:26:57.640 how much nicer
00:26:58.620 our world
00:26:59.180 could be
00:26:59.780 if we weren't
00:27:00.920 breathing bad air
00:27:02.080 everywhere.
00:27:03.720 Anyway,
00:27:04.360 there's just a few
00:27:04.840 thoughts,
00:27:05.640 but the short
00:27:06.680 answer is
00:27:07.280 at any level
00:27:08.700 of giving,
00:27:10.300 if you're going
00:27:10.800 to give a minimum
00:27:11.320 of 10% of your
00:27:12.520 pre-tax earnings
00:27:13.600 to some of the
00:27:14.800 most effective
00:27:15.320 charities,
00:27:16.060 that is not
00:27:17.180 to your alma mater
00:27:17.980 or to the local
00:27:19.280 symphony
00:27:19.880 or anything else
00:27:20.740 you might want
00:27:21.140 to support,
00:27:22.040 that's all good too,
00:27:23.080 but separate,
00:27:24.300 you can take
00:27:24.980 the giving what we can
00:27:26.280 pledge and
00:27:27.120 the waking up
00:27:27.980 pledge will be
00:27:28.560 structured along
00:27:29.700 those lines.
00:27:31.740 Hey Sam,
00:27:32.380 this is Clint
00:27:33.020 from Monument,
00:27:33.800 Colorado.
00:27:35.040 My question is this,
00:27:36.740 what are your views
00:27:37.760 on transgender
00:27:38.420 women in sports?
00:27:39.860 If you were asked
00:27:40.700 to advise policy
00:27:41.680 on this issue,
00:27:42.780 what would you
00:27:43.420 recommend?
00:27:44.640 Or philosophically,
00:27:45.760 how would you
00:27:46.180 approach this
00:27:46.960 complex and
00:27:47.700 sensitive topic?
00:27:48.440 Well, thank you
00:27:51.100 Clint for asking
00:27:51.860 the question
00:27:52.460 that gets
00:27:53.300 everyone
00:27:53.900 cancelled.
00:27:55.760 It is the very
00:27:56.760 essence of a
00:27:57.740 fringe issue,
00:27:59.600 but I do have
00:28:00.860 a few thoughts
00:28:01.620 about it.
00:28:03.060 First, it strikes
00:28:03.920 me that there's
00:28:04.380 a spectrum
00:28:04.940 of concerns here.
00:28:06.780 If you'd like
00:28:09.600 to continue
00:28:10.040 listening to this
00:28:10.640 conversation,
00:28:11.620 you'll need to
00:28:12.180 subscribe at
00:28:12.860 SamHarris.org.
00:28:14.360 Once you do,
00:28:15.080 you'll get access
00:28:15.580 to all full-length
00:28:16.480 episodes of the
00:28:17.120 Making Sense
00:28:17.520 podcast, along
00:28:18.760 with other
00:28:19.100 subscriber-only
00:28:19.840 content, including
00:28:21.180 bonus episodes and
00:28:22.640 AMAs and the
00:28:23.800 conversations I've
00:28:24.500 been having on
00:28:24.980 the Waking Up app.
00:28:26.400 The Making Sense
00:28:26.920 podcast is ad-free
00:28:28.180 and relies entirely
00:28:29.580 on listener support,
00:28:30.740 and you can
00:28:31.440 subscribe now at
00:28:32.740 SamHarris.org.