Mark Slapinski

00:00:00.320 CBC is in big trouble. This comes as a former employee blows the whistle, telling Canadians

00:00:05.680 everything. Now we all knew CBC was bad. However, you're going to be surprised to learn just how bad

00:00:11.880 CBC really is. This was not like a short-term thing. I was thinking I'm moving my life to Ottawa,

00:00:18.340 right? I'm going to plant roots here. This is going to be a long-term thing.

00:00:21.680 Um, and, and the gig was, the gig was good. The environment was, boy, oh boy, from my perspective,

00:00:33.980 does that bureau have some major fucking issues? Okay. Let's hear, let's just hear about some of

00:00:39.740 them. Um, well, I mean the concentration of power from my perspective in that opinion is held in

00:00:48.840 very few hands and I'm talking very few, like three or four hands and that's problematic,

00:00:57.120 right? I also think that there is, um, there's not, there's not oversight for management in terms of

00:01:09.640 some of the personalities in that bureau to ensure that things are balanced in terms of

00:01:19.240 the, the, the, the weight of what everyone, and, you know, it talks about how, how, you know, yes,

00:01:24.660 of course, if you have a show, like that should count for a substantial amount, right? But also

00:01:32.260 you have to take everybody's opinion into perspective, right? And I just think that there

00:01:38.060 are certain folks in that bureau that what they say, like, it's like the word of God.

00:01:45.980 Okay. So what, to crystallize what you're saying, power was in a hand, in the hands of a

00:01:53.560 disproportionate few, very few people. Um, those people, when it came to the political coverage

00:02:00.340 of the network and that's very important for the public broadcaster, right? Like, I mean,

00:02:04.300 yeah, I mean, is there George Stephanopoulos, does he have some say on ABC news in terms of like what

00:02:10.460 the political coverage is for sure? Like at CTV at global? Yes, absolutely. However, and this is kind

00:02:18.820 of one of the cores that we're going to go back to, uh, those are private entities. This is a public

00:02:24.220 institution. And so you need to make sure that you have balance when it comes to the political

00:02:31.040 coverage, especially, I mean, everything, but political coverage is key. And so when you have

00:02:37.480 this concentration of power, um, I, I, I didn't think that that was happening all the, all the time

00:02:44.360 in terms of my perspective on things. And those few people, um, made life very difficult for many

00:02:50.300 people. Yeah. The knives were out for me when I, when I, when I, I came there. Um, and I'll say this,

00:02:56.640 that there are, there are a number of people in that bureau and they know who they are that were

00:03:00.920 fantastic to me, right. That actually were wonderful and very friendly to me, but I did feel

00:03:08.220 very isolated because, you know, uh, the folks that, uh, kind of ran the place weren't happy that I was

00:03:17.580 there. They're like, who is this kid coming in from my perspective is who is this kid coming in from

00:03:22.120 Toronto. Um, I was supposed to backfill on the major political show that didn't happen until I

00:03:29.100 actually left Ottawa and came back to Toronto for marketplace. Uh, uh, and then I filled in, but

00:03:35.700 like, yeah, no, it was, it was a, it was a hostile environment that is to be sure. Now you can tell by

00:03:41.780 watching this, that Don Raj is simply furious at the way he was treated by his former employer.

00:03:46.260 I also want to point out that there's a baseball bat and a broken TV in this podcast,

00:03:50.200 a nice touch. Don Raj is going to be the one that brings down CBC and I'm all here for it.

00:03:55.900 Now just wait. The best part hasn't even come yet. And there were several incidents where like

00:04:00.460 that happened. And we're going to talk about one of those incidents, um, because we came with receipts.

00:04:05.100 Um, yeah. So I mean, that's the thing as well about all of this. Can I just say like I'm a trained

00:04:14.280 investigative journalist on marketplace. I did undercover hidden camera investigations.

00:04:20.200 Like I'm not going to say something if I don't have the fucking receipts to back it up.

00:04:25.480 Right. So yeah, we do. Okay. We're just going to quit. We're going to stick to this topic and move

00:04:31.120 on. We're going to stick to workplace culture and toxicity. Uh, so tell us about one instance that

00:04:36.900 sticks out in your mind and we, we've got something to play to show it.

00:04:40.640 Yeah. So this was, I, I had left Ottawa at that point. Uh, I was back in Toronto. I was doing

00:04:47.340 marketplace. I was doing some stuff on the national. Uh, and you know, sometimes they'll call

00:04:52.460 you and they'll say, this has happened. Uh, something happened in Newfoundland. You guys

00:04:58.020 probably all remember the Titan, uh, implosion. So they call me, they're like, you need to get on a

00:05:03.460 flight and go to St. John's. I had a friend's funeral in Calgary. Like a very dear friend of

00:05:09.600 mine had passed away from a brain tumor. And I, because like I was married to work, I didn't go.

00:05:18.460 And this is a huge regret of mine. I didn't go to that funeral. I went on the assignment.

00:05:21.580 And so anyway, I'm, I'm there, things are going fine. Um, but the toxicity from Ottawa followed me

00:05:32.100 all the way to Newfoundland, right? Because there was a certain level of, um, one particular host

00:05:42.320 wanting a lot of say in terms of the, the, you know, how the story and the show and guests and

00:05:48.920 all that stuff. And there was one guest that, um, I had on that another host wanted to have on their

00:05:56.900 program. And, uh, and like it was on the program. This guy was doing interviews with everybody,

00:06:03.880 right? And this is kind of just like a guy who knew somebody who was on the sub. So I did like

00:06:08.740 a 20 second clip with this guy. And then, uh, I was accused of stealing, stealing the guest,

00:06:15.460 even though this guy was all over Fox news and CNN and, and CBC shows as well. So it kind of became

00:06:22.060 this very tense situation where even though I'm in Newfoundland, I'm hearing all of this stuff being

00:06:29.120 said about me in Ottawa. Yeah. And so when you approached your bosses about how that was handled

00:06:36.340 instead of dealing with it. So, well, I was supposed to do, uh, a special, a national special,

00:06:43.840 like shortly thereafter. And I was like, I don't want to do this because I don't want to be around

00:06:49.080 this particular individual because I like, I, they were just basically talking shit about me and

00:06:56.680 disparaging me. And I don't want to, I don't want to work with this person right now. I was supposed

00:07:01.380 to fill in like, this is like months later on that program, go back to Ottawa and fill in on the

00:07:09.140 program that I was supposed to fill in on when I was actually there. Now it was finally getting to do

00:07:13.360 it. That was an opportunity that was locked in. All of a sudden this incident happens

00:07:18.040 and I get a call basically saying, we're going to pull you off the show. We're going to, we'll do it

00:07:25.520 again sometime. Don't worry. We'll do it again sometime. But, and I was like, well, well, why?

00:07:30.960 Like this is clearly about this situation. And they said, yeah, like it's about the situation. They

00:07:36.340 can't, they, you know, the, the team can't get over it. Well, I mean, well, we know why the team can't get

00:07:42.180 over it. It is pretty petty. It's like, it's like, you know, schoolyard bullies. So the clip

00:07:47.420 that we're going to listen to right now is, uh, management calling me and basically saying,

00:07:53.900 we're taking you off the show, which I eventually did by the way, and me pushing back.

00:08:01.460 Man, CBC is so screwed right now. And I'm happy to hear it. It was only a matter of time before

00:08:06.780 somebody stood up to CBC and exposed the bullies in Ottawa for the world to see. And I guess fatal

00:08:13.020 have it that Don Raj would be that man. Let's take a listen to that. Have you replaced me with

00:08:17.360 somebody? Travis, let me ask you. Yes. Do you, do you want to do the show under some kind of threat

00:08:22.880 that, like that, that you're going to, that you're claiming this is retaliation? Like,

00:08:29.020 is that, you know, no, but it's the principle of the matter at the end of the day.

00:08:33.900 It's not the backfill week. It's the fact that you guys are now saying that you're pushing me

00:08:38.240 off the show because and company can't get over something that happened a month ago. And I'm

00:08:42.860 saying, put on your big boy pants. We're all professionals. This happened. It was screaming

00:08:47.880 and ranting and raving about me. And I heard that from everybody in the newsroom, from on the other

00:08:52.860 side of the newsroom, from people outside of CBC, that is wildly unprofessional. That's like a

00:08:58.720 workplace harassment complaint. If I wanted to be an asshole about the situation, frankly,

00:09:03.400 and now you're saying I can't backfill on the show because the team is not able to get over

00:09:09.840 this. Well, there are larger issues at play here. And the fact that you guys both can't see that is

00:09:15.080 very concerning and I'm sure would be concerning to other folks as well. So I, I, I can see how that,

00:09:25.480 you know, you could cast it that way. We're trying to reach a kind of a agreement. We're not going to

00:09:32.200 reach an amicable agreement if your, if your decision is to boot me from the show that week. Okay. So you

00:09:38.420 would like to do that. You would like to do the show that week under this, under, under these conditions.

00:09:44.860 Why don't I discuss? Yeah. Okay.

00:09:55.180 Yeah. So basically they're like, we'll discuss. And I was in Calgary. It was at my parents' house

00:10:01.220 when I'm having this call and I'm like, what bullshit is this? You're calling me to yank me

00:10:05.500 from the show now? Yeah. Because somebody had a diva fit? And I'm like, no. So anyway,

00:10:12.300 they called me back and like, okay, yeah, you can do the show. But, but that's the thing that,

00:10:16.620 that was the threat that again, an attempt to like bully me. Right. Yeah. Fall, fall in line.

00:10:24.540 Okay. So I mean, we could probably sit here all day and you probably have a number of examples.

00:10:28.220 That was one that we, we put out there. This is going to be a recurring theme throughout our discussion.

00:10:33.420 All, you know, um, and I will also say this also because my brain is again, like having anxiety.

00:10:42.620 I'm sure the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation has a different interpretation of all of these events.

00:10:48.380 That is their right. They can, uh, you know, have that interpretation, but this is my perspective

00:10:54.780 and this is how I recall these events happening. Okay. Fair. I want to move into something else

00:11:01.900 we're going to talk about, which is editorial independence, right? So we're now we're going to shift

00:11:05.820 into Canada tonight territory. This is your show. And, um, what my show, right? Like sort of frame,

00:11:13.900 frame this discussion for us. Like, well, what, why is editorial independence important? Now this

00:11:19.180 is the part where Don Raj completely exposes CBC for its lack of editorial independence and its pro

00:11:24.700 liberal bias. We always suspected that to be the case. Now Don Raj is going to confirm it.

00:11:30.940 It's very important because I think that if you don't have, this is the thing about newsrooms,

00:11:36.300 right? And I've watched this and you have watched this as well happen. And I mean, yeah, we're talking

00:11:41.420 about CBC, but I think that this is, this is a, an issue in general. Sometimes what happens is that

00:11:48.540 if you don't have different hosts and different producers and, you know, different members of the

00:11:55.340 team that bring different perspectives to the table and you're able to have a conversation editorially

00:12:04.620 where there's a range of perspectives, you can't really get, you can't really get to the nugget in

00:12:11.900 terms of what you need to be covering and how you need to be covering it and making sure that you have

00:12:16.940 all perspectives covered. And so what I think happens sometimes is that there is this group

00:12:23.340 think mentality like Tara Henley, who was previously at the CBC brought this issue up as well. It's one

00:12:31.260 of the reasons that she left. I'm bringing it up years later. I know that there are other people

00:12:35.660 behind the scenes who haven't come out publicly that have thought this as well, but that's why

00:12:40.300 like editorial independence is key to have that within newsrooms and to have that amongst hosts as

00:12:45.580 well. Like my show is going to be very different than somebody else, or I thought would be very

00:12:50.060 different than somebody else's on the network. And that's why I thought I was hired for my

00:12:55.660 perspective and my view. Now I love it. Don Ra just showed the world that there's no editorial

00:13:01.340 independence at CBC and it's just a small group of liberal minions behind the scenes pulling the

00:13:06.780 strings. It says that in the press release that they put out, right, that I would be shaping things

00:13:12.860 and it would be, I would have a certain level of editorial independence here. That was not the case.

00:13:17.980 Okay. So let's talk about two instances of this. Um, the first was, uh, with a segment

00:13:23.420 that you had developed, it was called the intersection. Yes, which you were on by the way,

00:13:26.780 which I was on a number of people were on. We would, we would go on a panel, people with diverse

00:13:31.020 views and we would kind of talk about the issues and it was never, it was never, you know, yelling

00:13:35.340 and screaming. It was always respectful conversation. Sometimes it was yelling and screaming, but like,

00:13:40.620 listen, the, the, the concept with this entire show is to not turn it into, uh, some left leaning

00:13:51.740 program to not turn it into some right leaning program to represent all views of Canadians to

00:13:58.700 have balance. And so that's why when, you know, in the development phase, when we were pitching it

00:14:04.780 and I had to fight hard for this segment, I thought that we should have a nightly panel where we were

00:14:10.700 talking about the issues of the day, having the conversations that Canadians are having

00:14:15.980 with different people and sometimes diametrically opposed people. I had Brian Lilly on with like

00:14:21.260 Sheila cops. I had like Sean Spicer and somebody on the left. Right. So it was like, I, I had a range

00:14:31.020 of voices and they weren't all just from one perspective. And so I thought that that segment

00:14:37.100 was really key because we were doing it in like a really kind of organic real way. It wasn't shades

00:14:44.060 of gray where like you, you, you kind of disagree with me a little bit. Like people were opposed,

00:14:50.060 but I think what it showed is that, yeah, people can have these very passionate opinions,

00:14:54.300 but we could have a civil discourse and at the end of the day, and sometimes a robust civil discourse,

00:14:59.660 but at the end of the day, we hear everybody out and we move on. Yeah. There wasn't really anything

00:15:05.020 quite like it. Yeah. And I was told by management at one point, well, we, we feel like the, the,

00:15:09.820 the conversations are sophomoric and my perspective on that is that like, that's, uh, uh, an intellectually

00:15:17.660 elitist attitude. And also it's not that intellectual because here's the thing, not everybody in this

00:15:25.180 country is paying attention to the minutiae in terms of what is going on in the Ottawa bubble.

00:15:31.100 And I think some of these panels sometimes focus too much on that as opposed to looking at things

00:15:36.860 in more, you know, okay. I want some water, uh, in more broad strokes. Right. And that's what we were

00:15:44.060 trying to do, but these idiots couldn't see that that's what we were attempting to do here. And they

00:15:49.580 canceled and they canceled the panel. Yeah. They canceled the panel. They canceled the panel. And

00:15:52.940 also money was an issue with, with that, which we'll talk about afterwards when it came to, you

00:15:58.860 know, we're supposed to be a primetime show. We're supposed to have equal footing. It was approved to

00:16:03.020 be a, uh, you know, they approved a panel on the show, but they didn't fund it accordingly. I mean,

00:16:08.060 this is pretty deep into the weeds, but it shows you like the, the imbalance and how this show was set

00:16:13.260 up for failure before I even started. Um, so the intersection panel was canceled. You had

00:16:20.460 in an effort to solicit feedback from the panelists, um, you email them, you say, Hey,

00:16:26.140 you know, let me know what you thought about it. You got in trouble for that. I got in trouble for that.

00:16:30.700 I got yanked off the air for that. Okay. Then that wasn't the end of your troublemaking.

00:16:37.260 So this, I'm going to get to that. You know, this was a time around this time where executive bonuses

00:16:43.100 at the CBC were under a microscope and the former president of CBC, Catherine Tate,

00:16:50.060 who I've never met, who you've never met, never met, uh, was, she can come on this show if she wants to.

00:16:56.140 Miss Tate, we would like to have you on. Can't be censored, but she was appearing before a

00:17:00.540 parliamentary committee. She was, she was, she was supposed to be talking about this. So like a

00:17:05.180 journalist, because they were cutting jobs and giving people bonuses, but as a journalist with

00:17:09.740 editorial independence, you requested an interview with her. She said, no, what happened next?

00:17:16.060 I mean, I had to go through like five people that requested it because I wasn't, I basically

00:17:20.060 was afraid to pick up Canada tonight requested an interview. Yeah, exactly.

00:17:23.340 She said, no, what happened next? She said, no, the, the, the chase producer that was doing it

00:17:30.060 sent me a note. I was still at home, um, going into the studio and I said, well, why? Like

00:17:35.820 they didn't give a reason, just a blanket note. So, well, that's unfortunate because it was

00:17:41.260 unfortunate. So I tweeted out like, and it was a very innocuous tweet. I think it's been reported on,

00:17:47.660 uh, I basically said, Catherine Tate, we interviewed her. We wanted to talk about this, that, and the

00:17:52.460 other, and she declined the interview. That's unfortunate. So that paired with the fact that

00:17:58.700 I wanted to get feedback from the folks that were contributing to having a diverse range of

00:18:03.500 perspectives on the show and take that to management, not for, for them to like have

00:18:08.780 any say, but just to get feedback. Why wouldn't you want feedback? Those two things got me yanked

00:18:13.660 off the air and put through hell. It was hell. Okay. So we've got a clip to play. Um, this is

00:18:21.820 clip number two, uh, of that, what happened, what you're describing the warning you got and the threat

00:18:29.420 of disciplinary action. Yeah. So this is at, I think this is at the end of that hole. And this

00:18:35.020 went on for days and like hours and hours, like a day. Right. And I like, there was one point where

00:18:41.260 I broke down in one of these meetings. Um, it was a very difficult process. Cause I'm thinking here,

00:18:47.900 I'm just doing my job. Like, why am I getting hauled into a meeting for doing my job for fighting for the

00:18:54.700 best product on the show for wanting to have interviews for wanting to hold people accountable,

00:18:59.900 including the CBC. There's supposed to be some separation here. And so, and then there was a

00:19:05.900 conversation about where's Travis happening online. And so this is at the end of that process where

00:19:11.420 they're basically like, uh, you can't really say where you were. I said, well, why not? So let's,

00:19:19.580 let's take a listen to that. And so if I go back on television, do you want to tell the team nothing?

00:19:30.220 That's the solution here. So I'm going to use a different analogy. If somebody has gone on,

00:19:37.100 has been away for personal or private or confidential reasons, we don't share that with the team. And that

00:19:43.260 if that person chooses not to, we don't in this situation, you're prevented from, I'm prevented

00:19:49.420 and so are you from sharing details. We don't know that actually as a fact yet, but sure, that's your,

00:19:53.900 that's your view of it. So yes. And I do believe that, um, our colleagues are respectful and mature

00:20:00.300 enough to continue working with their day and not to meddle in individuals, private matters.

00:20:08.140 Travis, may, may I ask you what you want to share or what your... Yeah, that I was taken off air for

00:20:15.500 sending an email and a tweet and put through this process. And that is what, that, that is what,

00:20:22.540 that's the reality of what happened. I don't want to have to be forced to lie by omission for the benefit

00:20:28.540 of the, of the CBC. And, and, and why do you, you're saying that for the benefit of your colleagues,

00:20:36.220 but none of your colleagues are aware of this process or this conversation. So I'm not sure. I'm

00:20:43.020 clear on, on, on, on why it needs that resolution. Like, is there an issue there that, that we need to

00:20:50.060 help you resolve when you return on it? I am aware of the, the media requests, but that includes a lot

00:20:57.500 of assumptions that when we think of it from an internal matter, is that specifically what the

00:21:01.900 concern is related to? Because, because your, your colleagues don't know, I don't believe know that

00:21:06.620 the media requests, they wouldn't be going through to them. But our, our colleagues, believe it or not,

00:21:12.860 are actually on social media and they're seeing, uh, various people tweeting about my whereabouts

00:21:19.900 and memes of me being dragged into, uh, a van with black windows and people saying that I've been

00:21:27.660 educated and I'm at reeducation camp, uh, and that I've been sent to, uh, at Nunavut to be the weather

00:21:34.620 host, uh, and that they're going to start putting my face on milk cartons and that I, I need to send

00:21:39.900 a flare up if I need help and on and on and on. There are hundreds of comments about what is going on

00:21:46.300 with me. Right. So, so like the, what you got, your solution for all of this is to say nothing. Like

00:21:59.020 I understand how that like protects CBC. I don't understand how that, that helps me, uh,

00:22:09.020 try to start the process of repairing the era, like irreparable harm that you have done material

00:22:15.980 harm that you have done to my reputation in one week. So having dealt with these social media

00:22:23.820 situations, I do advise strongly that you say nothing because based on previous experience,

00:22:29.900 no answer you give will satisfy people. And secondly, these are

00:22:38.620 The Canadian press would be asking about this if it wasn't a story.

00:22:42.300 There are temporal things on social media. So just to finish my thought on social media that

00:22:49.180 don't actually have an impact, like a true impact on like they're asking, but people can ask like

00:22:56.780 people have been asking when hosts are ill and they don't, they don't answer and people can speculate

00:23:02.300 all they want. Um, so I am only going on what has happened in the past, like where we've, we've advised

00:23:13.500 staff to, because especially for harassment and as I hear the impact on you, it is, silence is the

00:23:21.980 guidance on this because engaging is not going to fix or stop it. And so silence and it tends to end it.

00:23:29.740 Yeah, no, I need to clear my name. But again, this is why this is personal

00:23:37.180 social media and this is why we strongly under the guidelines have said not to post or engage there.

00:23:42.140 So you don't think that there's been any damage to my reputation?

00:23:48.140 I think that people speculating about where somebody has been is simple and speculation.

00:23:57.420 So no, I don't.

00:23:58.380 Right. Right. Okay. Yeah.

00:24:03.180 So I think Travis, you just, I hope, you know, we acknowledge her challenge in this process is

00:24:08.620 and, uh, you know, want you to know that we moved really quickly through this process to bring new

00:24:13.740 resolutions quickly as we could. I think to us too, sometimes it's not possible to do this quickly,

00:24:19.420 but this is a conversation that both you and I prioritize to get through with you this week

00:24:25.340 and to get you back on air into regular duties on Monday. Obviously your health and safety is

00:24:31.660 everyone's top priority. If you're not feeling well enough to go back on air on Monday, we've got

00:24:37.740 lots of supportive ways that we can help deal with that. And that's our priority. But our intention is

00:24:43.340 to get you back on air on Monday. And hopefully if you are well enough to go back on air, that will help,

00:24:48.860 you know, shut down some of the conversation about where you are. Yeah. And help the CBC. Right.

00:25:00.300 I just want to add on the social media piece, the silence isn't that do not engage is not to

00:25:05.660 protect the CDC. It's to protect the person who's the target of things. That is the best practice that

00:25:12.700 we have in such situations. So if the person who is the target of it is saying that they think that the

00:25:18.700 best solution is to bring daylight to this situation and you're preventing me from doing that, how is

00:25:26.300 that not creating more harm to me? And thank you for the consideration of going through this process

00:25:33.180 quickly. And I do feel very supported by the CBC right now. That process has been clear for the past

00:25:38.060 five days of this.

00:25:43.180 Okay. So, okay. At this point, you'd been off the air for how long?

00:25:47.340 I felt so supported. So you were so, wasn't I so supported? Thank you guys. So supportive.

00:25:58.460 You're still feeling, uh, it's just like when people like he's a disgruntled employee,

00:26:03.740 this is about larger issues, but yeah, I'm kind of pissed off. Cause no, that I did not feel

00:26:09.980 supported. Right. And if this is happening, Carmen to a national host with a prime time show,

00:26:18.940 I am concerned for other folks there, right? This is why I think that they need better whistle

00:26:24.780 protection, uh, whistleblower protections for folks that actually will call out some of this stuff.

00:26:31.020 Oh, I love it. Don Raj just showed the world that there's no editorial independence at CBC.

00:26:36.380 And it's a small group of liberal minions pulling the strings behind the scenes.

00:26:40.300 So basically the CBC tried to silence Don Raj because he tried to tell the truth.

00:26:44.780 They wanted him to lie. He wanted to tell the truth. So they fired him and then they tried to

00:26:49.980 cover it up. These people aren't just corrupt. These people aren't just dishonest. These people are

00:26:56.540 evil and I'm glad Don Raj is exposing them to the whole wide world. This poor guy gave everything

00:27:03.260 to the CBC. He gave his whole life to the CBC. He put everything online for the CBC and guess what?

00:27:10.860 They repay him by trying to ruin his life. That's just evil. And what did he do wrong?

00:27:16.700 His only crime was trying to tell the truth on television. This is just another example of why

00:27:21.500 we need Polyev in office. Polyev will shut down the CBC and expose their evil crimes to the whole

00:27:28.300 world. And that's why we need him in office now. Now I've been paying attention and Polyev's poll

00:27:33.180 numbers keep going up and up while Carney's poll numbers are going down and down. I believe a no

00:27:38.780 confidence vote truly is around the corner. Now Don Raj actually covered a lot during the podcast.

00:27:44.060 So if you want to see the full episode, check out the link in the description.

00:27:47.420 That's all I have. Thanks for tuning in. Talk to you tomorrow, Patriots.

00:27:51.500 you

CBC Employee REFUSED To LIE, Fired For Telling TRUTH

Episode Stats

Misogynist Sentences

Summary

Transcript