Mark Slapinski - October 11, 2025


CTV Drops BOMBSHELL, Has Bad News For Carney


Episode Stats

Length

13 minutes

Words per Minute

183.37372

Word Count

2,472

Sentence Count

176

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

3


Summary

Is the honeymoon over for Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Liberals? In this episode, we talk to Nick Nanos, founder and Chief Data Scientist at Nanos Research and CTV's Pollster of Record, about what's going on.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, he's having a really rough week.
00:00:04.020 He came back from the United States without a trade deal,
00:00:06.860 even though he said he was going to get one, and now both sides of the aisle,
00:00:10.440 they're angry. Let's take a look at a recent CTV report that completely rips him apart,
00:00:15.560 then stick around for some commentary. Well, Conservative leader Pierre Apoliev
00:00:19.120 and Prime Minister Mark Carney were both talking about the cost of living for Canadians.
00:00:23.800 That issue has eclipsed Canada-US relations as the number one concern for Canadians,
00:00:29.380 according to Nano's polling. And new today, Nano's has found that since the summer,
00:00:35.180 Mark Carney has experienced a 10-point drop in Canadians' optimism towards the government.
00:00:41.540 Did you hear that? Even the clowns at CTV are admitting that Carney is falling out of favour.
00:00:47.680 How big of a problem could that be for the Prime Minister? Well,
00:00:50.340 Nick Nano's is the founder and chief data scientist at Nano's Research. He's also CTV's
00:00:55.280 pollster of record. And guess what? He joins us in studio right now. How are you doing, Nick?
00:00:58.740 Good, Michael. How are you doing? Good. So, as I said off the top or earlier on,
00:01:04.000 is the honeymoon officially over or not? Well, it's not as good as it was for Mark Carney and
00:01:09.200 the Liberals, that's for sure. You know, the thing is, during the election, there was a lot of
00:01:12.840 hope coming out of the election. And, you know, the thing is, is that Carney's numbers pulled away,
00:01:19.900 the Liberal ballot numbers kind of, they had a larger gap. But, you know, the thing is,
00:01:24.720 is that when we look at the, how people feel, emotions that people would use to describe how
00:01:29.700 they feel about the government in Ottawa, not the Liberals or Carney, the government in Ottawa,
00:01:33.900 it was actually pretty, pretty positive in terms of the level of optimism. And what we're seeing now
00:01:39.040 is that optimism is eroding. Now, let me translate that. That's a polite way of saying that people
00:01:45.280 are done with Carney. And remember, I told you this is going to happen. You know, the other thing is,
00:01:50.440 you've got to remember, 15% said they're angry, another 22% pessimistic. And if you go to,
00:01:57.320 here's a little tidbit, go to the prairies, they're really angry, much more angry than
00:02:01.980 everybody else. I don't know if you're surprised. I mean, I don't want to call it not breaking news,
00:02:07.500 but yeah, certainly not happy. I mean, and when I was looking at the numbers, it seems like it is
00:02:12.660 back to those April levels. Yeah, it's back to the April levels. I guess the only consolation for
00:02:17.480 the Liberals is that it's not as bad as it was during the darkest days of the Trudeau government
00:02:23.240 where, you know, the people that said that they were optimistic, I can show it like this. You don't
00:02:28.780 need a board. Seven, Michael, 7% of Canadians were optimistic when Justin Trudeau was prime minister.
00:02:34.860 So even the 10 point drop to 33 is better for the Liberals than under the end, the tail end of
00:02:40.760 Justin Trudeau. And so how has that also reflected the party support? I mean, the numbers seem to be
00:02:45.700 narrowing between the two parties. Absolutely. You know, coming off the election, you know,
00:02:48.960 the election was almost a dead heat, right? Between the 43, 41, between the Liberals and the
00:02:53.200 Conservatives. The Liberals did have a honeymoon. They pulled away from the Conservatives, especially
00:02:57.440 during the period when, when Polyev was kind of seeking, reelect, seeking to get elected out West
00:03:02.800 in the by-election. But now the gap has narrowed. It's within the margin of error. It's a statistical
00:03:06.960 toying cost right now between the Liberals and the Conservatives. On the ballot numbers,
00:03:11.600 on the preferred prime minister front, Mark Carney still has a noticeable double-digit advantage over
00:03:17.680 Pierre Poiliev. Talk to me about that. You know, I don't call it an incongruence, but how the party
00:03:22.660 brand and Carney's brand seem to be so different. Well, why don't we say the same thing for both of
00:03:28.020 the front-running parties? So people still don't like the Liberals and are upset about the last 10
00:03:33.060 years, but they seem to like Mark Carney. When people look at the Conservatives and Pierre Poiliev,
00:03:38.740 the Conservatives have a stronger brand right now than Pierre Poiliev. So it's about Canadians who
00:03:45.640 still want change, think the Liberals have been in power too long. And Pierre Poiliev is kind of like
00:03:51.100 another dimension, not the driver of support for the Conservatives, not in the same way that Carney
00:03:56.240 is driving Liberal support today, at least. And it's interesting because that election was fought
00:04:01.140 so keyly over Canada-US relations and fighting back against the US. And you also have some numbers
00:04:07.820 about how Canadians feel about boycotting travel to the US and buying US items. What's that like?
00:04:14.560 Absolutely. In the survey that we did, we asked Canadians whether boycotting US goods or boycotting
00:04:19.820 travel to the United States would help or hinder the Canadian bargaining position. You can see that
00:04:26.000 80% or thereabouts of Canadians, 8 out of every 10, think that these types of boycotts help the
00:04:32.440 Canadian bargaining position. So it's pretty strong right across the board by gender, by region,
00:04:36.900 and stuff like that. Moral to the story, Michael, you poke a bear, it's going to respond.
00:04:42.960 Yeah, true.
00:04:43.640 No, right? It's what Canadians can do.
00:04:45.900 True, but you've had Pete Hoekstra, the US ambassador to Canada and Donald Trump,
00:04:52.340 both kind of push back against that, saying that they don't appreciate him. He's even brought up in
00:04:56.720 the Oval Office this week that travel to the US is down about 23%. And so while Canadians believe that
00:05:04.500 it is a good thing, it almost seems like it's more of an irritant to the US.
00:05:08.920 Well, maybe if it's an irritant, it's working. Think of it this way.
00:05:12.540 True.
00:05:12.840 Like if they didn't care, it'd be like, yeah, sure, do whatever. We can do whatever we want
00:05:15.960 because there's no repercussions. I think the fact of the matter, there are a lot of American
00:05:19.280 enterprises, especially close to the border, that rely on Canadian customers, visitors,
00:05:24.560 all that kind of stuff. And they're having a more difficult time than they have in the past.
00:05:28.740 Do you think, given the numbers that you are spelling out for us and how Canadians are feeling,
00:05:34.020 that that sort of bodes well for how Mark Carney is attacking Canada-US relations, even though
00:05:39.260 it's not the number one priority for Canadians right now?
00:05:42.380 Yeah. Yeah. I think for Mark Carney and the Liberals, they want to talk about Donald Trump
00:05:47.800 and the binational relationship. But for Pierre Poiliev, his strength, and for the Conservatives,
00:05:53.540 their strength has to do with the cost of living, affordability, inflation, the cost of housing,
00:05:59.720 paying for the groceries and stuff like that. So think of it as a battle of the ballot questions
00:06:04.400 right there with the Liberals wanting to talk Trump and the Conservatives wanting to talk about
00:06:09.660 the cost of living.
00:06:10.720 Yeah. And we always appreciate that when you come here, you talk Turkey. And that is a happy
00:06:15.620 Thanksgiving reference.
00:06:17.020 Thanks for not calling me a turkey.
00:06:18.360 Yeah. Never. Never. I would never do that. Founder and chief data scientist at Nanos Research,
00:06:22.780 that's what I'll call him. Nick Nanos. Appreciate that, Nick.
00:06:26.100 Okay. Let's quickly summarize what just happened here. Nick Nanos is being really nice,
00:06:30.800 but I'll say the quiet part out loud. Carney is done. Let me say it again. Carney is done.
00:06:38.260 Now, if I remember correctly, Carney was supposed to be coming home with a good trade deal this week.
00:06:43.100 Instead, he came home with nothing but a bag full of excuses. And of course, we all knew this was
00:06:48.840 going to happen. At least anyone that watches my channel regularly.
00:06:52.180 The next video I'm going to show you is a video of Polly Yev ripping apart Mark Carney and the
00:06:56.020 House of Commons earlier this week. If you're enjoying this episode so far,
00:06:59.940 take a second to like and subscribe. Let's go.
00:07:02.620 I think we're beginning to see how it is that the president has been able to bulldoze over this
00:07:07.720 prime minister. He won't even stand up when he is confronted by the Americans. Just over an hour
00:07:13.400 ago, a report came out that the U.S. commerce secretary said there will be no relief for
00:07:19.720 American Canadian made automobiles going in to the United States. The prime minister is back down on
00:07:25.660 counter tariffs, back down on the DST, back down on defense. Yesterday promised to push a trillion
00:07:32.440 dollars of private sector investment out of our country. How is he going to look those Canadian
00:07:37.300 autoworkers in the eye and tell them how he got nothing for them in return?
00:07:41.060 Mr. Speaker, it is a sad day in this House when the leader of the opposition suggests that
00:07:49.120 standing up for the defense of this country, when the leader of the opposition suggests
00:07:54.680 that spending for, to defend our borders, that spending to defend our filament in NATO,
00:08:02.200 that that is backing down on defense. We will shame, shame.
00:08:06.560 Mr. Speaker, at least he finally got up, but he didn't address the question about autoworkers.
00:08:13.460 There are autoworkers who are sitting at home right now who do not know how they're going to
00:08:17.800 pay their mortgages. This prime minister looked them in the eye and said he was going to protect
00:08:22.120 their jobs. And then he said he would put his elbows up. And then he said he would get a win by
00:08:27.120 July 21st. Then he said that he would have a deal. There's been no deal. There's been no win.
00:08:33.080 And now for these workers, there is no job. Today, we learned that he's backing down again
00:08:38.800 on auto tariffs. Why is it that he's selling out our autoworkers at a time when they need him most?
00:08:43.860 Japan, the European Union, the United Kingdom, every other country in the world is paying a
00:08:50.520 higher tariff than Canada has gotten on automobiles. And we are not done. That is why we have not signed
00:08:58.440 an accord on autos. That is why we are fighting hard for our autoworkers. And I put the president
00:09:05.800 on notice yesterday about the consequences of not having that accord.
00:09:11.060 Mr. President, you have been warned. If you put in another tariff, he's going to give you
00:09:15.760 yet another trillion dollars.
00:09:19.520 This is the tough negotiator that we hired?
00:09:22.260 The guy who broke his promise to have a deal on July 21st. A guy who broke his promise to
00:09:28.700 negotiate a win, who simultaneously removed the counter tariffs while he was giving speeches
00:09:34.160 promising to have them in place. And yesterday, he offered more concessions to the U.S. president
00:09:39.960 knowing that the tariffs that are killing our auto sector would stay in place. Why does he
00:09:46.400 always back down and give our jobs to the Americans instead of-
00:09:50.840 Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, and I think it's important for the entire House to understand,
00:09:56.120 that we have a strategy with the United States that means that our auto sector is paying less
00:10:09.400 less than 10% tariff when Japan, when Europe, when the U.K., when the rest of the world is
00:10:15.640 paying 50, which is bigger than 10 or higher. And we are not done yet because we refuse to
00:10:23.680 sign a deal that isn't better in the interests of Canadians, and that's why we're here today.
00:10:28.640 He is already signing a deal that makes us worse off because he makes concession after
00:10:34.040 concession after concession while getting nothing in return.
00:10:37.840 Yesterday, he announced that his policies will drive a trillion dollars of private sector
00:10:43.540 money out of our country as part of the agreement that he is going to sign with the United States.
00:10:49.960 That means factories and plants closing in Canada, most of all in our auto sector, which
00:10:55.760 is on the verge of being wiped out after he promised to save it. So can he tell me, did
00:11:01.480 he demand the president lift all tariffs on Canadian autos, yes or no?
00:11:06.200 Mr. Speaker, our agreement yesterday, the president and myself, is to focus now on steel, on aluminum,
00:11:17.900 on energy, the building blocks of our broader competitiveness, including our auto sector.
00:11:23.900 Those negotiations on autos continue. From a position that is the strongest in the world,
00:11:30.600 10 is less than 15, which is less than 25, which is less than 50.
00:11:35.600 Zero is less than 50. Zero is the paycheck that those workers who've lost their jobs are getting
00:11:40.900 right now. And Mr. Speaker, seventh is last place in the G7 when it comes to growth or in
00:11:48.840 this case, negative growth. This prime minister has to get his excuses straight. He blames the
00:11:55.500 tariffs for the fact that we have the second highest unemployment in the G7 and the fastest shrinking
00:12:01.100 economy. And then he claims at the same time that the tariffs are really not so bad. So which is it?
00:12:07.180 Why is our economy so weak? Because of his diplomatic failings abroad or his disastrous economic policies
00:12:12.460 at home? And like always, Polly Eve is 100% right. Carney promised Canadians the world. He gave Canadians
00:12:18.680 nothing. Carney promised he'd be elbows up. Instead, he's ankles up, folding like a cheap tent at
00:12:25.520 every single turn. Now here's the good news. And I like to give you people good news. Everyone is
00:12:31.460 turning on Carney. Let's look at it. CBC turned on Carney. CTV turned on Carney. Other left-wing
00:12:37.540 media organizations, they turned on Carney. His MPs, they're unhappy. One of them left,
00:12:42.900 Christopher Freeland, and there's rumors many more are going to follow her. On top of that,
00:12:47.420 his right-hand man, his budget officer, he turned on him. Everyone hates Carney right now,
00:12:52.900 and it just gets worse and worse every time I talk to you. And as a bonus, I heard Carney is
00:12:57.400 just like Trudeau in the sense that he's a complete jerk to women, and women don't like
00:13:01.740 being around him. Now this is my prediction. It's only a matter of time before Carney gets kicked out
00:13:06.560 or resigns. He knows the walls are closing in, and he's not going to make it. So like I always ask
00:13:12.320 you, please, have a bit of patience. Have a bit of faith. Conservatives are going to win,
00:13:18.040 and we're going to win big. Thanks for tuning in. Have a great Friday. Have a great
00:13:22.880 weekend. If you enjoyed this episode, take a second to like and subscribe. It really helps.
00:13:28.060 Talk to you tomorrow.