Mark Slapinski - CTV Has GOOD NEWS For Conservatives

00:00:00.000 have a view that a crime was committed the accusation for mr polyev who in a matter

00:00:04.080 of weeks or months could run an election and be prime minister whoa ctv just made a huge mistake

00:00:10.080 fascia kalapos admitted during an interview with andrew sheer that pure polyev could be prime

00:00:14.480 minister within a matter of weeks fascia brought sheer onto the program in an effort to embarrass

00:00:19.840 him instead she embarrassed herself and reminded the world that ctv is a pro-liberal propaganda

00:00:26.320 machine joining us now is conservative house leader andrew sheer hi mr sheer good to have you

00:00:30.640 back on the program thanks for making the time good afternoon how you doing good thank you i hope

00:00:36.240 you're doing well as well i wanted to start off on the question of not necessarily if you're going to

00:00:40.400 support it because you haven't seen it but just base you know i read the statement that your party

00:00:44.080 put out which was immediately criticizing the legislation and i'm wondering why you know if

00:00:49.520 you haven't read the details you aren't waiting until you do before you say this is bad well

00:00:56.240 based on what the government has announced what they've basically acknowledged is that they are

00:01:01.120 not going to tackle bail reform this is not bail reform um first of all what i would have loved to

00:01:06.880 have seen from a liberal prime minister making an announcement undoing uh claiming to undo previous

00:01:13.520 liberal laws that caused the crime wave is an apology you know mark carney stood up there and he's

00:01:18.720 trying to act like he's responding to some new thing that came out of left field liberal changes to our

00:01:24.720 bail regime caused the crime wave that is plaguing so many community community communities and i would

00:01:29.680 have liked to have seen a liberal prime minister make a direct apology to all the victims of crime

00:01:34.720 that have had their lives shattered because of criminals that this government set free uh they

00:01:40.320 didn't do that in typical arrogant liberal fashion they just tried to act like they should get a hero

00:01:44.480 cookie uh for trying to clean up their own mess nothing in this announcement today changes the

00:01:50.480 principle of least restraint that the liberal government brought in that forces judges to grant

00:01:56.320 bail as uh as a as an almost automatic option exactly and i'm glad that andrew sure brought this up

00:02:03.520 the liberal government they're lying to canadians they're telling people they're getting tough on

00:02:07.920 crime when in reality they're just getting tough on taxpayers and law-abinding gun owners i spent about

00:02:13.840 you know more than half of the last interview asking the government representative why they aren't

00:02:19.040 repealing that and and i and i do take your point on the initial legislation in c75 my understanding

00:02:25.520 though is you know by by focusing on major crimes for example and what the previous bill in 2023 did

00:02:32.240 it allows for that principle to remain part of the guidance for non-violent crimes for non-repeat

00:02:38.720 offenders which might actually go toward helping reduce some of the backlogs in the courts why not

00:02:44.320 remain open to that possibility well i i think you've asked a great question it gives me an opportunity

00:02:50.320 to uh to to contrast the liberal approach and the conservative approach as it relates this this key

00:02:56.080 point reverse onus does not make bail harder to get uh if you think of bail uh uh an accused getting

00:03:05.040 bail as a hurdle that that has to be jumped over reverse onus just changes the direction in which

00:03:10.960 the accused has to run to jump over it the liberals have set that so incredibly low that it kind of

00:03:16.960 doesn't matter which direction the criminal is trying to jump over it from uh this reverse onus

00:03:22.640 list does not take away that principle of least restraint it just shifts who has to make the arguments

00:03:27.840 about whether or not bail should be granted and judges will still have to look at the changes liberals

00:03:34.160 brought in and say i i am bound by this legislation to follow the principle of least restraint and it won't

00:03:39.520 really matter if it's the crown arguing or if it's the accused arguing they're still going to have

00:03:44.720 that very low barrier to bail and what we've seen since the liberals changed these laws there has been

00:03:51.680 an explosion we're not talking about a a slight tick up or we're not talking about you know in specific

00:03:58.080 areas violent crime is up across the board across the country it's up over uh 60 percent uh crimes with

00:04:05.520 firearms is up uh you know almost doubled so we're talking about places that used to be safe people

00:04:12.000 that used to be able to park their car at night and and go to evening events go to restaurants don't

00:04:16.800 feel safe anymore and so many lives have been shattered by criminals that this government has

00:04:21.040 let out so that's the key difference between the liberal approach and the concerted approach we want

00:04:24.560 to take away that principle of least restraint so that dangerous or repeat offenders actually go to jail

00:04:29.520 oh dear look at vashi's face right there she's got that disdainful look that dirty look in her eyes

00:04:35.440 now if a liberal was on the program she'd be smiling she'd be happy she'd be cordial but instead

00:04:41.360 you have a conservative and she gives him that dirty disdainful look just wanted to point that out

00:04:46.480 now while we're here my videos aren't getting as much traction as they normally do if you see

00:04:50.480 this part don't forget to like and subscribe and let me know in the comment section whether you saw

00:04:54.800 this i'm doing a quick test all right let's get back to the action i i do understand that but i i'm

00:05:01.120 looking at for example all the submissions put forward by the various police associations which

00:05:05.360 asked for exactly what the government says it's going to do which is apply that principle of reverse

00:05:10.560 onus i look at the reaction today from the toronto police association which represents police officers

00:05:15.280 in that city they say this is a step in the right direction the canadian police association this

00:05:20.560 should be a moment for collaboration not division we urge all parties to engage constructively and

00:05:25.760 pass this legislation as quickly as possible to enhance public safety and restore canadians

00:05:30.080 diminish confidence in the justice system what do you know that police don't

00:05:34.880 fashi thinks she's smart but sheer he's a lot smarter he's about to smack this bimbo all the way back to

00:05:41.440 montreal well i i i know that police have been calling for the elimination of that principle of least

00:05:48.160 restraint and while they may have been calling for other things uh we we continue to point out the

00:05:53.520 fact that basically what the liberals approaches is this liberals look at dangerous and repeat

00:05:58.640 offenders and they have compassion for that accused person they have they have compassion for that

00:06:02.720 criminal and they say all the you know these poor people that fall into a life of crime and it's

00:06:06.800 not really their fault and let's let's not make them go to jail conservatives our compassion are for

00:06:12.000 victims of crime our compassion is for the moms and dads that no longer let their kids go to the park

00:06:16.880 uh business owners for getting extorted i mean actually when when you're growing up did you ever

00:06:21.760 hear about canadian business owners getting extorted uh that's something you saw in in movies and and

00:06:27.040 mobster films you know uh this is now happening in many communities across the country it all it you

00:06:32.480 can draw a direct line to liberal legislation that both lowered penalties for dangerous repeat offenders

00:06:38.320 but also forced judges to grant bail and what we're saying is let's adopt if you want to have

00:06:43.840 collaboration if liberals are willing to admit that they've made mistakes great go the whole way work

00:06:49.520 with us to pass conservative bill uh jail not bail that will take away that principle of least

00:06:55.200 restraint and keep those dangerous and repeat offenders behind bars so that they can't terrorize

00:06:59.360 canadians that was the perfect answer by sheer of course the police are happy the liberal government

00:07:04.720 has let things go so bad that even a small improvement is worth celebrating that's what's happening

00:07:10.880 fashion is trying to make it sound like the liberals just ended crime completely in canada

00:07:14.960 but in reality they barely even did anything but again today mr sheer i don't hear police

00:07:20.720 associations saying what you are which is this doesn't go nearly far enough we need to repeal that

00:07:25.840 principle and even if they were to repeal that principle there are still you know three pieces of

00:07:31.120 case law including in 2019 the supreme court case r versus antic that was kind of the impetus for

00:07:37.200 the legislation in the first part that guides judges decisions anyway so even if you repealed what what

00:07:43.200 you say the government should you would still have a judiciary that is guided by that principle to some

00:07:48.400 effect applying reverse onus to major crimes will impact the way in which they're able to apply the

00:07:54.800 principle and keep it to non-violent crimes will it not no really all reverse onus means is which which

00:08:02.960 party in the in the court case has to make the arguments that that barrier to getting bail is

00:08:07.440 still incredibly low with that principle of least restraint and as to the court decisions that the

00:08:12.240 liberals used as an excuse i i know that's what the liberals want people to believe was that there

00:08:16.400 was some court ruling that forced them to write this law it's just not the case those court rulings were

00:08:20.960 uh were were kind of uh speaking to um uh financial uh surity around uh bail once bail was granted what

00:08:30.480 conditions were attached to that uh the liberals chose to take those court rulings and build a hole

00:08:37.280 that you could drive a mac truck through for for forcing judges to grant bail so they nowhere in

00:08:43.760 that court decision did it force the government to bring in bill c5 and bill c75 uh they codified

00:08:50.000 the principle of least restraint that is what led to the explosion in uh in crime across the country and

00:08:56.320 we believe and we believe canadians support us in this that bringing in our jail not bail law meets

00:09:03.360 the charter test of a reasonable uh response to a pressing and substantial issue facing canadians and

00:09:10.640 i don't believe there's a canadian out there who has had their car stolen or had their business broken

00:09:15.360 into or seen someone you know uh yelling threats on a on a bus or a subway that doesn't believe that crime

00:09:21.760 right now after 10 years of liberal uh policies is not a pressing and substantial issue exactly and

00:09:28.320 the fact that sure has to spell it out like this for her either means that vashi is dumber than she

00:09:32.640 looks or else she's got her check from the liberal party in the mail i mean to say that they were forced

00:09:37.600 to codify it it was their decision to codify it but the cases do exist in in case i just have to

00:09:44.480 they do not relate to the principle of least restraint i mean it's about ladder the latter principle the the

00:09:50.400 judgment in our versus antic did criticize lower courts for routinely overusing bail conditions but

00:09:55.360 but i do i have to move on to this one thing if you don't mind before i let you go seriously who

00:09:59.280 does this woman think she is look fashy you're not a lawyer you have no idea what you're talking about

00:10:05.120 and you're being very disrespectful you let a sitting mp a sitting politician the former leader

00:10:11.040 of the conservative party onto your show and you're acting really disrespectful that shameful behavior

00:10:16.640 from any journalist i don't like that uh because the leader of your party made some comments in a

00:10:22.320 podcast that i want to get your take on because it's actually about policing uh the podcast i believe

00:10:26.400 was taped october 3rd posted yesterday he was referencing the rcmp's decision not to pursue

00:10:31.040 criminal charges against justin trudeau or other people in the government over their involvement in

00:10:35.360 the snc scandal mr poly have characterized the leadership of the rcmp as quote despicable when it

00:10:40.320 comes to enforcing laws against the liberal government and accuse them of covering up for trudeau do you

00:10:45.120 have proof of that the mask is off right now bashi just proved that she's not a real journalist

00:10:50.640 and that she's a political hack that's getting paid off by the liberal party of course the rcmp

00:10:55.600 is corrupt even a dumb person that doesn't follow politics would know that um did you hear the uh

00:11:02.400 taped audio between the pro the liberal prime minister's uh clerk of the privy council and former

00:11:08.080 justice minister jody wilson raybold because i heard that i heard that audio recording and i heard

00:11:13.680 explicit and implicit threats to a justice minister uh to to to grant if she did not grant

00:11:21.120 a special deal to snc lavaland i believe that's a matter of public record and uh so i i certainly

00:11:27.520 uh i don't agree with the idea that there was not an attempt to interfere in uh in the justice

00:11:33.760 minister's role as an independent uh uh officer of the court but that's not what i asked mr sheer

00:11:40.480 you have a view that a crime was committed the accusation for mr polyeth who in a matter of

00:11:44.880 weeks or months could run in an election and be prime minister do you hear that right there

00:11:48.800 vashley just went off script and admitted that polyev could be in power within a matter of weeks

00:11:54.160 or months that's why they're so scared and that's why they're back to attacking conservatives

00:11:59.280 is that the rcmp leadership covered up for the prime minister that's a very direct accusation

00:12:04.480 about the leadership of our national police force do you have evidence of it

00:12:07.840 well as i as i just pointed out there's there's there's direct evidence of uh of an attempt by

00:12:14.480 the prime minister a sitting liberal prime minister to interfere with the attorney general's uh carrying

00:12:19.440 out of her duties that is that was that audio was released i i listened to it on on uh i i believe

00:12:26.240 you probably have too uh and uh thousand times when the rcmp says oh there's no evidence of interference

00:12:34.240 it's like well sorry what more do you need um you know there's other cases where you know the the

00:12:39.040 justin trudeau's illegal acceptance of a of a private holiday that the rcmp chose not to uh

00:12:44.960 investigate so you know uh there's a lot of there's a lot of examples where senior liberals have been

00:12:50.640 caught uh breaking the law or attempting or at least what a reasonable person would say there's evidence

00:12:57.680 that that that should be explored and uh and the rcmp chose not to no but the rcmp did choose to

00:13:05.440 explore that evidence and they they have public statements wait a second public statements on

00:13:12.240 record saying that they were not able to obtain certain cabinet confidences so why is that a cover

00:13:18.240 up isn't that the fault of cabinet at the time or the government at the time shouldn't your ire be

00:13:22.640 directed at the political level and not at calling the leadership of the rcmp despicable and covering

00:13:28.800 up for a prime minister well uh i i i absolutely believe that the liberals uh acted despicably uh in

00:13:37.440 in in this and i would just the rcmp commissioners who mr polyev accused oh my just let the man talk

00:13:44.080 let him talk and stop interrupting him fashi you're being really rude and i don't like it i don't think

00:13:50.400 you can make the accusation that i or or my leader peer polyev uh we're not holding the liberals

00:13:56.480 accountable for their role in this as well i mean we absolutely uh attempted to prosecute both uh the

00:14:02.080 snc lavalin scandal the green slush fund uh scandal we tried to get those documents uh to the rcmp we

00:14:09.120 tried to get uh the uh the rcmp to take action and and and elevate this uh to a level where these crimes

00:14:16.160 would actually be prosecuted uh that's not what happened so i i i think my leader has uh has a

00:14:21.920 strong case uh to make when he's when he calls this out and uh and and we certainly believe that

00:14:27.520 the leadership of the rcmp should act independently and should not be afraid to hold uh politicians

00:14:33.440 accountable he said today the the commissioner of the rcmp that he doesn't answer to any politician

00:14:39.760 that he isn't beholden to anyone do you not believe him well yeah i just do you point out that when

00:14:44.640 when when when you have uh liberal politicians attempting to interfere in an independent court

00:14:51.440 case accepting illegal gifts uh funneling money through liberal board members in the in the green

00:14:56.960 slush fund where the liberals put their their their friends and political donors onto a board to

00:15:02.560 allocate taxpayers money and they ran they allocated that taxpayers money they gave it to themselves they

00:15:08.320 gave it to their own companies and still uh you know we haven't seen criminal prosecutions on that we

00:15:14.400 haven't seen we saw the rcmp completely abandoned uh the snc laval affair when there was an audio of

00:15:19.520 the prime minister's uh right hand man you know michael wernick trying to uh pressure jody wilson

00:15:24.640 raybold into making a decision she did not believe was just and uh so i i i i think i've laid out of

00:15:31.440 a very compelling case uh that would uh certainly run counter to the quote you might have from the from the rcmp

00:15:38.160 okay i gotta leave it on that note i'm out of time i appreciate your time as always mr sheer thank you

00:15:43.040 so much thanks so much now in my opinion that was an excellent performance by sheer as always and a

00:15:49.040 terrible shameful pitiful performance by vashi i feel sorry for any man that ever wasted his time

00:15:55.840 taking that woman that ungrateful nasty dreadful woman on a date she clearly doesn't deserve it and

00:16:02.240 she clearly isn't worthy of any person's time now in case you missed it if it's not abundantly clear

00:16:07.760 ctv is deep in the liberals pocket and they're worried that polyev is going to get into power

00:16:12.960 so they're trying to brainwash canadians into not voting for him they're back to their dirty tricks

00:16:17.840 again now ctv wanted to do real journalism for a change they could find out why mark carney was

00:16:23.840 rubbing shoulders with prince andrew and galaine maxwell they could also look into why trudeau left his

00:16:29.440 teaching job mid-semester that would be a great place to start once again i have to commend sure

00:16:34.560 for remaining calm the whole time and pushing back against that dreadful woman with cold hard

00:16:40.000 facts and to quote vashi to use her words polyev could be in power within weeks or months it's

00:16:46.080 happening next month november we have the no confidence vote the bloc the ndp and the conservatives

00:16:52.480 they're all saying no to carney's disastrous budget so it's entirely possible we could have a new

00:16:57.680 election by the end of the year if that doesn't happen carney will either resign or be forced out

00:17:03.520 sometime next year once again like i always ask you have some patience have some faith we're going

00:17:09.360 to win big and we're going to do it soon have a great night talk to you tomorrow patriots

Mark Slapinski - October 17, 2025

CTV Has GOOD NEWS For Conservatives

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript