Order of Man - November 16, 2021


GREG ELLIS | Fatherhood in the Crosshairs, Part 2


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 21 minutes

Words per Minute

178.52657

Word Count

14,542

Sentence Count

679

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

Greg Ellis is back on the podcast for part two of his interview with Ryan Michler. In this episode, Greg shares his story of how he was falsely accused by his ex-wife, how he fought for his children, and why fatherhood is in the crosshairs of culture.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Guys, it's no surprise that the family court system is absolutely 100% stacked against men.
00:00:05.800 Millions of men are quite literally fighting for their rights and the rights of their children,
00:00:11.300 but I don't think most men, unless of course you've fallen prey to the courts,
00:00:14.780 know just how deep and deceitful this actually is. Today, I'm once again joined by Greg Ellis.
00:00:20.960 He is the author of The Respondent, Exposing the Cartel of Family Law. He shares with me
00:00:26.440 his story of how after 20 years of marriage, he found himself incarcerated based on false
00:00:31.380 accusations from his ex-wife, how he's been fighting for his children, the deep corruption
00:00:36.800 inside family law, how fatherhood is in the crosshairs of culture, and ultimately what he's
00:00:42.060 been doing to expose the truth. You're a man of action. You live life to the fullest. Embrace your
00:00:47.520 fears and boldly chart your own path. When life knocks you down, you get back up one more time,
00:00:53.100 every time. You are not easily deterred or defeated, rugged, resilient, strong. This is
00:00:59.680 your life. This is who you are. This is who you will become. At the end of the day, and after all
00:01:05.320 is said and done, you can call yourself a man. Gentlemen, what is going on today? My name is
00:01:10.580 Ryan Michler. I am the host and the founder of the Order of Man podcast and movement. Welcome here
00:01:15.320 and welcome back. It's my goal to bring incredible guests to you, New York Times bestselling authors,
00:01:21.720 scholars, athletes, warriors, entrepreneurs, men who are succeeding on just about every front.
00:01:30.260 And I think we've done over 350 interviews now, over 850 total shows. So we are on a roll,
00:01:37.640 been going for six and a half years, and I couldn't be more happy and excited and frankly honored that
00:01:44.980 we are doing as well as we are because it's a testament to not only the mission, but to you guys
00:01:50.020 going out into the world and becoming men and focusing on becoming better fathers and husbands
00:01:54.820 and business owners and community leaders. And this is what we need. It's apparent now more than
00:02:00.140 ever that society is just degenerate and lost and we need more men to step up. And I'm going to help
00:02:06.820 give you all the tools and resources you need to do just that. So we're going to get into the
00:02:10.780 conversation here in just a minute before I do also want to say thank you for the incredible support
00:02:16.900 that you guys have given to my friends and show sponsors over at originusa.com. If you're not
00:02:23.660 familiar with them, they're doing everything 100% made and sourced in America. Essentially,
00:02:28.660 they're bringing back American manufacturing. They've got geese, rash guards, boots, jeans,
00:02:35.820 hoodies, you name it, they're doing it or they will be doing it. And as I said earlier, 100% made and
00:02:42.880 sourced in America. And then Jocko's also got his supplemental lineup and they just came out with
00:02:47.540 their new pre-workout. So if you want to learn about their pre-workout again, 100% sourced and
00:02:53.340 made in America, then go to originusa.com. And when you do, if you pick up their jeans or their boots or
00:03:00.740 their pre-workout or their discipline go or their joint warfare or anything over there, make sure you
00:03:06.020 use the code order. That does two things. Number one, it saves you some money. And if you're going to
00:03:09.980 spend it anyways, save some money. Number two, it lets them know that you're coming to them from
00:03:14.400 the order of man podcast. So it supports me as well. So again, originusa.com use the code order
00:03:21.680 at checkout. All right, guys, let me introduce you to Greg. He's back on the podcast for part two.
00:03:26.700 We did a previous discussion several months ago about fatherhood being in the crosshairs.
00:03:30.480 His name is Greg Ellis. Many of you actually listened to part one in August, I believe. And I knew that we
00:03:37.680 needed to have him back on the podcast because not only is he an outspoken champion of father's rights,
00:03:43.340 but I know how many of you that these issues personally impact. Now, if you don't know Greg,
00:03:48.500 he's incredibly talented. He's an Emmy award nominated actor. He's a filmmaker. He's a coach.
00:03:55.680 He's a speaker. And he's also the author of this latest book, the respondent exposing the cartel of
00:04:01.360 family law. Now he's also become an incredibly powerful advocate for men who are desperately
00:04:06.520 fighting to maintain their rights as fathers. And I know this is going to be deeply impactful to a lot
00:04:11.920 of you. So guys, this is a powerful episode of Greg. And if also, if you know anyone who needs to hear
00:04:16.760 this message because of what they're going through currently, please, please pass it along.
00:04:22.440 Greg, it's good to see you, my friend. It's been too long. I know I released part one and then
00:04:27.300 everybody's like, where in the world is part two? I'm like, ah, just wait, just sit on it a little
00:04:31.320 longer. So I think it's been a couple of months, but we are glad to have you back, man.
00:04:35.300 It's great to be back, Ryan. Thank you for having me.
00:04:37.660 Everything going well in your life? Seems like you're busy.
00:04:40.600 Yeah, very busy indeed. Yeah. I was, I think last from last time we spoke, I've been in Hawaii,
00:04:46.140 which was nice filming Mac and PI. So that's soon. So yeah, that's, that's fun. And the audio.
00:04:53.000 Is that a series or is that a movie?
00:04:55.280 It's a series. It was a, it was a series when I was a little kid.
00:04:58.940 Right. Of course. Yeah. I remember that.
00:05:00.360 Yeah. And they rebooted it on CBS a couple of years ago. So yeah, they, they've tried to stay
00:05:06.360 as true as possible to the original and update many elements of the show to make it a little
00:05:11.320 more contemporary and, you know, fun for the younger viewers. And when I say younger, I mean
00:05:16.440 younger than I.
00:05:17.780 Yeah. Yeah. It seems weird to be in that, that category of, of, well, I'll say this way,
00:05:23.340 no longer a younger viewer. I can, I feel like I'm young, but then I look in the mirror,
00:05:27.580 I look at my, you know, 13 year old boy and I'm like, man, I'm not, I'm a dad. I'm getting
00:05:33.320 old. I see a little more gray in my beard these days. Um, my, my bones are aching a little bit
00:05:39.380 more than they probably ought to. And I realize I'm not on the younger side of the equation
00:05:44.040 any longer.
00:05:44.500 Yeah. I often wonder, and maybe this is a question for someone way more expert than
00:05:48.740 I, uh, what age do we individually stop growing and entropy sets in, you know? Um, but I think
00:05:55.300 we always, we always carry those younger versions of ourselves in our memory banks. So, uh, those
00:06:01.220 many past versions of our childlike selves. And I think with, as, as men, I think I mentioned
00:06:06.240 this to you before as men, uh, we need to let the boy play. And yeah, we always need to
00:06:11.720 have a little bit of fun, a little bit of adventure and be silly, you know, and have
00:06:17.300 a laugh. Otherwise we make life too seriously.
00:06:21.340 Well, it's a weird dichotomy though, because in a lot of ways, you know, and we learned this
00:06:26.300 from the Bible and things like that, that we need to put away childish ways, for example,
00:06:29.860 and we should, you know, as, as men, we have responsibilities and obligations that I don't
00:06:34.240 think children could shoulder the way that we can hopefully. Um, but also you're right.
00:06:38.780 We also do need to play and enjoy and have fun and laugh and tickle and adventure and
00:06:43.740 do all these other things with our, with our wife and our kids and the people we care
00:06:47.600 about. And so it's kind of a weird balancing act in trying to find like, where is the happy
00:06:53.520 medium between being an adult and then being able to still play and enjoy life.
00:06:57.860 Yeah, I completely agree. And, you know, trying to compartmentalize time, you know, to, to have
00:07:04.460 that boy time or that guy time or man time is really, it's really important that we have
00:07:09.420 that, but we also have to stay true to our responsibilities and not forget time. Um, and
00:07:15.760 keep communicating, you know, so on, someone said to me recently, you know, they were having
00:07:19.580 a difficult time with a, with their interpersonal relationship. And I said, and it sounded like
00:07:23.640 a grudge match. I'm like, before you hold a grudge, hold a conversation, it may just be
00:07:27.740 the result of a misunderstanding. And so how we communicate and the ways we can move back
00:07:32.780 to communicating, uh, with ourselves as well as others, uh, to kind of, you know, elevate
00:07:38.540 and enlighten ourselves continually. Um, remind, I guess is the word, you know, to remind, uh,
00:07:45.960 and request the question, requestion. There's a word.
00:07:49.460 Requestion. I like that. Yeah. I, you're right though. We take things so seriously that, uh, whether
00:07:55.200 we're trying to win an argument with some random, uh, emoji on Instagram or, you know, just, just
00:08:03.600 what we have to do in our day-to-day lives that we can't just realize, like, we don't have to be
00:08:08.420 right. We don't have to posture. Uh, we don't have to, you know, maintain these fragile egos that we,
00:08:15.620 as men do all the time. And we can just question and explore and be curious. And I think that's
00:08:21.280 actually threatening to a lot of guys because they believe that if they entertain an idea that
00:08:27.560 they have to embrace the idea, they don't have to embrace it. You don't have to accept it as
00:08:31.520 universal truth, but shouldn't we entertain and explore the concept? I mean, I've, I've got guests
00:08:36.600 on here that talk to me all the time about things I disagree with, but man, at least I'm willing to,
00:08:40.700 uh, listen at a minimum, listen to what they have to say, and maybe open my eyes and possibilities of,
00:08:46.520 of, of, of new thoughts and insights and ideas that will improve my life and other people's as well.
00:08:51.280 I think that's how we become more intimate with people is listening with curiosity and sharing
00:08:56.340 to be known. And when I say listen with curiosity and, and, you know, I, I have to keep striving
00:09:01.460 to do this as well is, you know, really stay attuned and tuned in to, uh, what the other person
00:09:09.340 is saying, not halfway through what they've said, what they've said, you're already readying a response
00:09:15.020 to that. Um, because we all, I think, you know, the more we, uh, the longer we speak, the more
00:09:21.080 thoughts as we listen to someone and the longer they speak, the more thoughts are kind of, you know,
00:09:25.620 welling up to be responded to. So you want to remember them, but the more you try to remember
00:09:30.520 them, the more you're not listening to the person who's still talking. So, you know, and then they
00:09:34.900 might interrupt you and you'll like, excuse me for talking while you're interrupting me. Um,
00:09:38.840 but it's yeah, conversation, communication, I think it just got harder with modernity and device
00:09:44.640 dependency and, um, you know, the, the 140 characters on Twitter and, you know, that's no
00:09:50.980 place to have a conversation. It's a, it's a bit like a dance without knowing the steps, right? Like
00:09:59.360 your partner might, or somebody else might, but you don't really. And so you just have to, you have to
00:10:03.900 respond in a way. I actually look at that a lot when it comes to jujitsu and the guys are already
00:10:08.440 rolling their eyes. Cause they talk about jujitsu every time I have a conversation, but like, I don't
00:10:12.500 know what the other player is going to do. And so in a lot of ways I have to respond and react or
00:10:17.780 anticipate what they might do and try to set them up to do something so I can do something different,
00:10:21.780 but I don't know the script. And I, I think that's, that's actually exciting if we're willing
00:10:28.000 to let go of it, but too many of us aren't, aren't willing to let go. And we have to control and force
00:10:33.360 everything into this, you know, square peg or whatever it may be. And it's a, it's a challenge for me for
00:10:38.000 sure. But the more I let go and the more I maintain my curiosity, like you're talking about the more
00:10:42.640 enjoyable life is at a minimum. I think, I think you're right. And I think, um, that challenge that
00:10:47.700 you speak of, I'm reminded of, uh, Alan Watts, I think the philosopher who talks about the two,
00:10:53.480 um, areas in life. Uh, he talks about, uh, the dance and the music. Uh, we listened to a song or
00:11:01.080 we danced to a piece of music. There isn't a finite end point. We don't know where we're going to end up
00:11:05.700 because we haven't heard the song before. We haven't done the dance before. There's newness and, uh,
00:11:10.220 rich, unique nuance to the novelty of, of that process. Those patterns, if you will, it's energy
00:11:16.520 moving in waves, uh, particularly if you're doing it with a partner. Um, so those waves move in patterns
00:11:23.140 and patterns move in rhythms. And a human being is just that really energy waves, patterns, rhythms,
00:11:28.500 nothing more, nothing less. It's a dance in that choreography. Uh, if we allow ourselves to surrender
00:11:33.520 to that, um, whatever that choreography is in the moment, uh, it's quite, uh, it can be a scary
00:11:41.580 adventure. Will, will I have my toe stepped on? Will I be able to lead the lady on the dance floor?
00:11:46.920 What, what are they thinking? Am I dancing well? But ultimately if you just lose yourself in the
00:11:51.800 moment and wherever you end up is, is probably a surprise of, it's about the experience of getting
00:12:00.200 there rather than I knowing where I was going, you know, the, the, the joy is in the journey,
00:12:05.380 not the destination. I totally, you know, one of the questions I get all the time is, you know,
00:12:11.560 where do you see order a man going in five years? I'm like, I don't even know what I'm going to have
00:12:15.100 for dinner tonight, let alone where this thing is going to go in the next five years. And if you
00:12:21.020 would have asked me that question five, 10 years ago, I would have had a very clear path of where it
00:12:26.120 would go. And then, um, I realized very quickly that those plans are futile. Like am I making all
00:12:34.920 these 10 year plans when I have no idea what life is going to present to me? And I think it's good to
00:12:41.060 have a direction, but, uh, to have these, these, these finely tuned plans that are going to just work
00:12:49.020 under the perfect set of circumstances is just a waste of time. Uh, yeah, I, I think it's good
00:12:56.820 to have goals and to have timelines and to have, you know, tasks and, um, you know, I, I actually use
00:13:05.900 a particular software to task through what I need to do, but I also have to remind myself to not be so
00:13:11.940 stringent that I don't take into account life is in session. The universe has other plans. Sometimes
00:13:18.560 there are opportunities that are afforded that I have to be distracted by because they may be part
00:13:24.100 of a bigger plan, uh, in the order of my manly hood nurse. I'm trying to get order of man in there.
00:13:30.200 You can hear what I did there. Well done. Well played. Well, look, um, I mean, I know we could riff and
00:13:37.960 have this conversation. I did want to talk with you about something very specific because
00:13:41.800 when we had our first conversation, we talked a lot about these issues, but also, um, we started
00:13:47.740 to talk a little bit about your personal experiences specifically with, with your children and your
00:13:52.920 family dynamic. Um, and as we talked about this, I know there's so many men who have dealt with,
00:13:58.420 uh, parental rights, fatherhood rights, uh, false accusations, dealing with the family court system.
00:14:05.820 And this is something that you become a real champion for. And in the tune of our conversation,
00:14:11.580 I can't imagine that you even had the slightest idea that it would go this way, but you found
00:14:16.820 yourself in a very, uh, to put it mildly interesting predicament. So I'd, I'd like to hear a little
00:14:23.060 bit about your personal story with your wife and your children, because I think a lot of guys are
00:14:27.700 going to resonate with your story and really be inspired by how you've navigated these waters.
00:14:33.200 Yeah. Great question. I'm happy to share. I mean, it, it, they are treacherous, existentially, uh,
00:14:43.560 dystopian waters at times. Um, so look, yeah, simply put, I was married for 20 years. Um,
00:14:51.840 um, I had two young sons, 10 and eight years old. They were, and are the meaning of my life. Um,
00:15:00.180 I love them more than I, I can express and put into words. Um, and on March 5th, 2015, um,
00:15:10.500 something catastrophic happened. And I was, uh, I was awakened to a system, um, to our institutions
00:15:21.300 of governance, uh, law enforcement in a way that it's hard for me to still comprehend. Um,
00:15:28.500 I was at home with my sons, uh, playing in the playroom. They were happy I'd taken the afternoon
00:15:34.720 off. And, um, in the span of, well, even less than 24 hours, I was ushered from my home in handcuffs
00:15:45.100 at the behest I later discovered of my ex-wife. Um, I was placed, I was incarcerated for the first
00:15:53.640 of five incarcerations, uh, subjected to a temporary restraining order on the basis of a false allegation,
00:16:00.520 became homeless, almost destitute overnight and watched helplessly as my professional reputation
00:16:07.640 was in many ways, irretrievably destroyed. And my sons lost their father for the half their
00:16:14.900 childhoods. And I was, I was their emotional, uh, rock, if you will. I mean, anyone who knew us and
00:16:21.700 our family knew and every family has challenges and, uh, you know, difficulties, but I was that
00:16:28.000 connected father. I was, you know, I would, I would get them up in the morning and play with them
00:16:34.160 outside and pack their lunches for school and drop them off at school and volunteer at school and
00:16:39.560 coach their AYSO. And I would greet them when they came home from school. That was my favorite part of
00:16:45.380 the day, or at least one of two favorite parts of the day. The second one being, uh, putting them to
00:16:50.340 bed and playing and laughing and singing songs and reading books. And, you know, I cut their umbilical
00:16:55.460 cords. And so to be, to have that catastrophic severing happened so shockingly and so suddenly
00:17:02.400 based on a false allegation. And then to find out that, um, as I removed, as I, as I crossed the,
00:17:09.720 the, the, the, the Rubicon from, um, uh, citizen to respondent, which is the name given to, um,
00:17:20.440 the person who is the defendant, if you will, in, in family law courts in America, similar to the
00:17:25.700 plaintiff, who's the petitioner, the defendant is the respondent. I migrated from a world of, of
00:17:32.260 presumed innocence and respected privacy, um, to one of assumed guilt and immediate and ruthless
00:17:39.720 judgment. And, and when I realized as I, as I tried to navigate this authoritarian maze and this Kafka
00:17:48.440 trap that I was not alone, it was at once relief to know that I, I wasn't going crazy, but it was also
00:17:58.360 deeply disturbing to me. And it wrote something rose up in me of a, of a mission and purpose to, um,
00:18:06.760 to help those affected, um, not just men and fathers, but women and mothers too, but predominantly,
00:18:13.080 um, our children, the, the true and only innocence of, um, a family law system that, that does not
00:18:22.060 offer a presumption of innocence. It's the one branch of our legal system that doesn't. Whereas
00:18:26.440 there's a, where, where there is a massive amount of corruption, I call the, the subtitle to my book,
00:18:31.920 the respondent is the cartel of family law. And they in effect showed up on my doorstep and,
00:18:37.160 uh, stole my freedom, um, and kidnapped or dadnapped me or my children and destroyed my family, shattered
00:18:45.000 my family. Um, and, and went about picking apart the carcass of it, like rabid vultures on autopilot.
00:18:53.480 Um, so that, that really became my mission to understand as many aspects of our legal system,
00:19:02.200 our social policies, our social ills, um, connect with people who've been affected by this. Um,
00:19:08.920 whether it be, you know, the farmer in Arkansas or the military vet, uh, in, in Virginia or the, um,
00:19:16.920 you know, restaurant worker in San Francisco, uh, whether it be the father in, uh, you know,
00:19:24.200 in, in Texas or the mother like Marianne Petrie, who I had on my show was falsely accused of child
00:19:29.400 abuse and she was a nurse and she lost her job. She lost her livelihood. She lost access to her
00:19:34.360 children and was thrown in prison and had a heart attack. Um, what, what in any walk of life,
00:19:39.640 in any geographic location, and this is extended through my quest and my shows through talking
00:19:45.960 to people in India in, I've heard from people in South Africa, South America, North America,
00:19:51.320 Europe, uh, Australia, New Zealand, it seems to be a worldwide, um, cultural phenomenon. Um, and
00:20:00.440 how to find ways to provide immediate, uh, relief for people, um, by way of education and information,
00:20:07.160 uh, but also through workshops and programs, but also find ways to affect the system and highlight
00:20:13.400 the impact that, uh, that it currently has. We have a president in America who is a, a Catholic
00:20:19.320 and he's a father. And yet he, I think is unaware of the policies and the laws that he's enacted and
00:20:26.520 pushed through, for example, the VAWA, the Violence Against Women Act, how that is being used against,
00:20:33.880 uh, families and fathers and mothers and women and children. Um, it's a very difficult, many of these
00:20:40.040 subjects are very difficult to unpack and work through, but ultimately how complicit, um, many of
00:20:45.720 our politicians and particularly our, some of our organizations and, and, and the charities out
00:20:51.320 there and particularly the 60, nearly $60 billion a year American divorce machine that's incentivized
00:20:57.480 to keep the presumption of guilt at the expense of families and places profits over parents and cash
00:21:04.040 over kids. Yeah, that's interesting. I was, I was actually going to ask, where does this, you talk
00:21:09.320 about the cartel of the family court system, like where, where this, where this actually stems from
00:21:14.440 and why you believe there's corruption. So you think it's, it's a purely profit driven. Is that
00:21:19.880 right? Or do you also feel like there is a misguided sense to do right and good? Like, for example,
00:21:27.720 I think about a couple of movements that come, come to mind right off hand is the me too movement. Um,
00:21:33.000 the concept of believe all women, where I think, you know, if you hear that and you look at it on
00:21:38.760 the surface level, you know, there, there is, I think in a lot of ways, a desire to protect women
00:21:44.920 in, in those statements and in those movements. But to your point, they're wielded as weapons against
00:21:50.440 men who, uh, are, are innocent towards, towards what, like towards this, this family destruction,
00:21:58.840 you know what I mean? Like there's no fault of their own, but they're wielded as weapons against
00:22:02.360 men. Yes. Super weapons. I mean, in particular, I mean, just going back to, you know, some of the,
00:22:08.440 the, some of the questions and answers that, that inspired me to look deeper, you know,
00:22:13.560 who is the world leader in, in, in children growing up in single parent households, America,
00:22:19.880 you know, 43% of American children live without their father, 63% of youth suicides are from dad
00:22:26.280 deprived homes. 71% of high school dropouts come from dad deprived homes. So there's a correlation
00:22:32.600 and those statistics go on and on and on, uh, between what Dr. Warren Farrell calls the boy crisis
00:22:38.680 in his book, um, to actually look to the underlying causality and the reasons for why, um, some of our
00:22:45.080 social ills, um, and very disturbing, um, events in, in our culture and have, and are taking place,
00:22:53.240 uh, this propensity to focus so much on, um, on the issue of, of which we obviously needs focus,
00:23:01.400 racial inequality, and rather than talking about the difference of the sexes and difference of class.
00:23:06.920 I mean, no one's talking about class. Uh, you know, the, who's looking out for the working class.
00:23:13.000 I mean, I hear the woking class speaking so much of virtue signaling about it, but, you know, really
00:23:18.760 bringing in policies that, that, that, that help, uh, our younger generations, um, particularly our
00:23:25.240 younger generations of boys who I think, if you look at all of the metrics, they're getting left
00:23:29.080 behind. And, you know, the Me Too, uh, monologue needs to be in Me Too dialogue. It's not believe all
00:23:35.240 women. It's listen to women, listen to the person who makes an allegation, investigate that allegation,
00:23:41.240 work with the authorities, but it still should be, but more and more we're hearing it's not innocent
00:23:46.440 until proven guilty. Um, but it's more guilty to proven innocent or guilty to proven more guilty.
00:23:53.320 And I think, um, you know, there are, there are some laws that aren't helping. Obviously attorneys
00:23:58.920 interpret those laws specific ways, and they find ways around it to suit a specific, uh, group or
00:24:07.480 organization and, um, or line their own pockets. Well, there's that as well. And look, this is the,
00:24:14.360 there are multi layers to this. It's similar to the conversation I have often about, uh, about
00:24:18.760 feminism. You know, I don't think we can look at feminism in a silo. I think there are, there are,
00:24:24.200 you know, for me, we can break it down just in a generalized way to two groups of feminists,
00:24:29.640 equality, empowerment, factual feminists, people like Christina Hoff Summers and Camille Paglia,
00:24:36.360 philosophers who've been studying the, this for decades. Um, and I'm with them. But then there's the other
00:24:43.320 side of radical third and fourth wave feminists who want to, to do away with the family unit,
00:24:50.280 don't see, uh, man as a viable, productive part of culture and society, and, uh, have, have really
00:24:57.480 gone out there to, to sow the seeds of, um, uh, of contempt and disagreement and division through these
00:25:06.040 toxic masculinity catchphrases and, uh, smashed the patriarchy and these intersectionalist, uh,
00:25:12.840 rallying cries that just set group against group. Um, and, and don't respect the fact that, that the
00:25:20.840 individuals, both men and women, um, can be good and evil. And, um, you know, when, when you,
00:25:28.760 when you look at the stats as well, they are harrowing, you know, 4,000 children a day lose
00:25:35.720 a parent in family law courts. Where do those children go? You add on top of that stat that
00:25:41.480 states are reimbursed $6,000 for every child they place into foster care. And it's usually the CPS or
00:25:47.880 the DCFS who are the facilitators of that. So, um, there is a part to this system that's grown so big
00:25:55.720 that people working within the system who one could argue are just doing their jobs. There is
00:26:01.800 no oversight. There is no, uh, family law is not, divorce courts are not subject to oversight
00:26:08.360 from the Supreme Court. There's no executive branch. Uh, in fact, they write the family law code books
00:26:13.960 themselves. They are the state bar associations. Um, and the lack of ethics, the lack of due process,
00:26:21.160 the lack of presumption of innocence is just a melting pot for family breakdown. In fact,
00:26:26.760 it encourages it, not only incentivizes it. So I think there are people within the system who are
00:26:32.040 obviously taking advantage of this and becoming very wealthy, uh, at the expense of horrific
00:26:40.760 injustices to, and I'm not talking about the, the, the parents that, um, you know, there are
00:26:48.520 men that are bad and commit acts of domestic violence. But when you look at the statistics
00:26:53.240 and the majority of, uh, allegations of domestic violence are false and unprovable and they don't
00:26:59.560 move from a temporary phase to a permanent phase because of that. Um, and you, and you actually,
00:27:05.000 you compare that and contrast that with what we're told in the media and through the media that
00:27:10.200 men are violent, women are victims, uh, in a, in a simple trope, it's not the case for in serious
00:27:16.280 rates of intimate partner violence actually dropped over the last 15 years. But the disparity is 48 to
00:27:22.200 52% male on female, female on male. So we're almost equal in the rates there. Um, so why we can't have
00:27:30.600 a more balanced conversation. I think part of this is the devaluation of, of man, uh, and males and
00:27:37.000 fathers and, and some of that, I think we may not be able to ever overcome. Um, particularly when we,
00:27:43.800 when I see people who, who fight and serve our country, um, and for our freedoms and, and they are seen
00:27:54.600 these days as if they don't align with one particular ideology, they're the other 50%. They're, they're, they are
00:28:03.400 insert the colloquialist, you know, negative, they're all white or right, or they're, you know,
00:28:10.760 neo-Nazi or they're, you know, we have to move beyond this. Like we really do. And I think we've
00:28:17.320 seen in the gubernatorial race in Virginia, um, you know, uh, Youngkin running, of course, you know,
00:28:24.920 this, this system of politics is set up and we don't dive too much into politics itself that you have to
00:28:29.960 run if you want any chance, one of the two major parties, but I think parents voted, uh, on, on
00:28:37.240 over, over politics. They, they really, for the first time the last year and a half, saw what their
00:28:42.200 children were, were being taught, the books they were, they were learning from, and they got educated
00:28:48.680 and it's really just, it was really disturbing to me to see that father handcuffed, uh, and, and thrown
00:28:54.920 to the ground and removed from a, from a, um, uh, uh, yeah, I think it was Loudoun County, the, um,
00:29:02.040 the parents, yeah, it was the child was, was, uh, raped in a bathroom, right? I mean, well, well, you
00:29:07.800 know, and this is the danger we have with our, with our culture and mainstream media reactivity and
00:29:13.800 anti-social media is the immediate, and, and how that tied into Merrick Garland talking about domestic
00:29:19.640 terrorists and, hey, come on, this, this is a, this is whatever side you're on, this is a parent whose
00:29:26.280 13 year old daughter had been raped and wanted to speak to the school board and, and was not only
00:29:33.800 didn't get to speak, but was handcuffed and treated like, so I don't know, you know, there is obviously
00:29:39.160 more coming out about the details of that case, but it's, it's ludicrous and really ignorant to suggest
00:29:46.840 the, and I think this is why it didn't work as well. I, I think we're losing the ability to just
00:29:52.680 say as Democrats, oh, you know, vote for us or you're going to get, uh, an incarnation of President
00:29:58.680 Trump. I think it's going to work. I don't think we, I don't think it's going to keep working anymore
00:30:02.920 because, and the reaction as well, frankly, after that was, was astonishing, not surprising,
00:30:07.720 but still astonishing by some of the, the mainstream media news punditry in terms of their justification
00:30:15.240 for like, let's learn some lessons here. The extreme radical progressive arm of the Democratic
00:30:21.000 Party will drag the Democratic Party and the DNC down rather than lift it up. There has to be
00:30:27.960 a little bit of a reckoning going on, I think. Do you believe that there's any sort of
00:30:34.280 greater plan to undermine and dismiss and render men in society obsolete? Or do you think it's just
00:30:43.640 the natural by-product of again, misguided, a misguided sense of trying to lift others up,
00:30:51.640 right? Like, I think it's really easy to say that, like, we're trying to lift up minorities. We're
00:30:55.320 trying to give women equal rights. And so this is the banner that's being flown. And I wonder if that's
00:31:01.560 the true intent and it's creating some unintended consequences, or if the intent is truly to do away
00:31:08.360 with manliness and masculinity and men as this, you know, tyrannical patriarchy of, of society. Is it,
00:31:15.480 is it that deliberate or is that just a by-product of people and organizations and powers attempting to
00:31:22.680 do good and right? Yeah. Great question. I think, I think it's probably a combination of both
00:31:29.320 and many, and maybe many other things too. You know, the, the predetermined strategy, I think back
00:31:35.640 to 19, I think it was 1969. Um, there was a meeting of the feminist movement in New York, and there was
00:31:43.240 a split because the more militant, uh, feminists decided, well, they wanted and they were successful
00:31:50.440 in their strategy of pivoting the media message away to focus on two words. And those two words,
00:31:56.120 and this is 1969, those two words were toxic masculinity. So we see decades later, it gets
00:32:02.280 seeded into our, you know, our public conversation and our almost kind of zeitgeist of our vernacular.
00:32:09.000 Yeah. Um, and so that was a very, um, a very, uh, pre-meditated, uh, focus on how can we instill this
00:32:20.680 message, uh, that is hate-filled towards men to achieve our agenda and our goals. And I think at
00:32:29.240 the, at the same time on the other side, and there are probably more examples of that. Um, and you know,
00:32:33.800 people may have examples of, of, you know, groups of men wanting to do the same, but I'm just talking
00:32:39.640 about from my perspective where I see the pendulum swing, it's kind of a by-product of, of our culture
00:32:44.920 and society over time. Um, the, the, there is a somewhat of a hierarchy and, and how we can
00:32:54.600 address those, uh, systemic inequalities in a way that we can also catch it when it goes too far
00:33:03.160 the other way. Um, and also be mindful of everyone, everyone being involved in that because
00:33:09.960 we can't talk about, um, race without talking about religion and sex and all of the identity
00:33:17.880 politics groups and then gender and so on, so forth. Um, so, and there's a major difference
00:33:24.600 between equality and equity. I, and I don't think people understand these differences of equity or
00:33:30.600 equality of outcome and equality of opportunity. Um, America is a land, a brave, bold new experiment
00:33:37.080 of opportunity. And in its short history, there are things that it, it's, it's deeply and should
00:33:42.280 be deeply ashamed of and learn from that and unpack that shame and be able to keep mindful of the
00:33:48.840 history. But at the same time, there are things in America that, that America's personality should be
00:33:53.240 deeply proud of. And so how do we counterbalance the, the pride and the shame, um, and keep, keep moving
00:34:01.640 forward in a way that, that, that, uh, includes as many people in the conversation as possible without
00:34:09.160 falling prey to the, the, um, the, the trap of talking from an identity politics group mentality of
00:34:17.880 me talking on behalf of my entire community. Well, what is that community? You know, blokes called Greg,
00:34:23.400 who were born in Northern England in 1968, or every person with the same pigmentation of skin as my,
00:34:29.800 I mean, the, the list in between is, is endless. So, um, yeah, it's a, it's a, it's a tricky one to
00:34:36.440 unpack, isn't it, Ryan? Well, yeah. And I think that's why we have these conversations and we need
00:34:41.160 to continue to have these conversations, even in disagreement. And I don't think you and I disagree
00:34:44.840 on a lot. I'm sure there are some things, but we need to open our, our mouths and our hearts to
00:34:49.640 listen to these things and hear these things. Uh, you know, as you were talking about, uh,
00:34:54.120 the, the way that organizations like the government, for example, wield these tools,
00:35:01.320 and I'm not talking about any particular side of the aisle, they both use them. I, I, I take,
00:35:06.040 uh, one example would be, uh, the left trying to, uh, introduce, you know, packing the Supreme court.
00:35:12.560 I'm like, well, that sounds really fine and dandy until you're on the other side of the equation.
00:35:16.260 And then all of a sudden that's a problem. So I think the solution as simple as it sounds,
00:35:22.260 it's not easy to implement is just being truthful, being honest, you know, like, for example,
00:35:29.440 you take freedom of speech. Uh, well, you're, you're, most people, I think are great proponents
00:35:35.780 of freedom of speech until they hear something they don't like. Well, hence why it's so important.
00:35:40.400 If you value freedom of speech to fight for your quote unquote enemies, freedom of speech,
00:35:46.800 a hundred percent, particularly if someone disagrees with you, like, you know, I remember on my show,
00:35:51.520 I had, I invited on one of the heads of, uh, Antifa and the proud boys, not because I agree
00:35:56.400 with the, either of them or their particular group ideologies, but because until we can break
00:36:00.720 through that preexisting and at least see a chink in the armor or, or a commonality, um,
00:36:08.720 that's freedom of speech. Now the line of incitement to violence, obviously is it's important to, to call
00:36:14.160 that out. And it can be very difficult to, to find out where that line is.
00:36:18.480 Well, yeah, because incitement to violence is subjective. There isn't an objective metric
00:36:25.120 for that. So I, I, I had posted something earlier, I think it was yesterday, in fact,
00:36:29.860 and somebody said, well, you're inciting violence. I'm like, what in the world are you talking about?
00:36:33.360 And I have, I have no doubt that that individual actually believes that's what he, that what he said
00:36:43.000 is true. It's, it's not true, but it's subjective. Right. And that's the challenge.
00:36:47.640 Yeah. And I think, you know, when, when we hear a lot that words are violence, um,
00:36:54.280 right. You know, and, and this is, I call it, you know, the speech police, uh, the linguistic
00:36:59.480 manipulation, you know, that's part of, you know, people who are drinking the Woka Cola,
00:37:05.000 you know, the strategy focus on like focuses on language for a very good reason. You don't need
00:37:09.960 to change the law. If you, and that's particularly difficult to do, if you can change the meaning
00:37:14.440 of the words written in the law, um, you know, this tendency, uh, to hold adjectives at gunpoint
00:37:21.240 until trembling, they confess to being verbs and, um, saying that, you know, your, your words are
00:37:27.240 violence and I don't feel safe. And you know what words if you can, you can slate my family and my
00:37:35.320 mother, and you know, you can say a lot of things and you could say it very angrily and vociferously.
00:37:41.000 Uh, ultimately I might feel threatened. Uh, if I have an option to, you know, leave the room,
00:37:47.880 if I have an option to, uh, you know, if there's a remedy that I can find, um, you know,
00:37:53.480 I can just not be in the presence of, you know, but it's not, it's not physical violence. And,
00:38:00.360 and I think, you know, finding that, uh, finding the middle ground where we can be a bit more
00:38:05.720 reasonable. I hear a lot about the offense Olympics. Well, you know, I subscribe to the
00:38:10.360 things, the Ricky Gervais school of thought, which is offense is not given. It's only taken. And if you
00:38:15.000 choose to take it, then it's, it's on you. But you know, if you don't like what he or any other
00:38:20.280 comedian has to say, don't buy a ticket to the show, don't buy a ticket to the webcast,
00:38:25.880 don't follow them on social media. And if you're outraged, then sure, you have the right to speak
00:38:31.160 up and be outraged. I'm going to protect your right to be outraged, but it doesn't mean to say
00:38:35.160 that you're right. Well, but we also love outrage. We, we actually, you know, I listened to some of these
00:38:40.920 political pundits and the talking heads and because it's entertaining and I realized there's an
00:38:44.520 entertainment factor. At least I'm honest about that. Um, but you know, when, when, when you hear
00:38:50.640 those, those individuals, you know, they're talking about the other side of the aisle and you pretend
00:38:56.120 like you're all pissed off and riled up and bothered, but at the same time, you're the one
00:38:59.760 who took me included. I'm the one who tunes in because I like to be bothered about trivial things
00:39:04.940 that the quote unquote other side is doing. You know, I'm not, I'm yes. I pretend like I'm outraged
00:39:10.840 and it's just like huge, like problem. And also I keep buying the ticket. I keep paying for it. I
00:39:16.400 buy the subscription. I give my time and energy attention to it because I like it, but we have
00:39:23.560 to admit that, I think, you know, I think we'd be better off, right. You just, and accepting it.
00:39:30.720 No, I think part of it is punditry and, you know, the rise of political punditry on television,
00:39:35.880 I think from the sixties onwards, uh, the, the, the political debate and how pundit and
00:39:42.120 the pressure on pundits as well, cause there is pressure. You don't want to get your point
00:39:45.600 across and you only have a limited amount of time and you know, as well, if you're, you're
00:39:49.800 going to be questioned or pressured or someone's going to speak over you or like, where's your
00:39:53.440 sound bite, you know, because people want to have their sound bites to pull from. Um, and,
00:39:58.440 and where as well, um, you know, in terms of, uh, the, the conversation that the broader
00:40:04.520 conversation, do you, you know, are you adding to the, the, the noise by, by buying the ticket
00:40:11.400 and being a part of it and being outraged and click bait and you're being led down this,
00:40:15.160 this garden path or you're leading yourself. Um, you know, so, so I think, um, how we have
00:40:23.320 this conversation in terms of, I think that's why podcasts, long form podcasts came about because
00:40:28.920 we can talk about these issues in a kind of, uh, you know, have more time rather than a reactivity,
00:40:35.720 click baity, uh, non-collaborative or at least a more civil discourse. Let's put it that way.
00:40:40.760 And people can comment, um, uh, and, and, and have at least have some sort of say and keep
00:40:47.320 the conversation going. This is a part two or so, you know, where the conversation goes,
00:40:52.120 who knows, but, um, yeah, I think, I think we have, we have such a disruptive, um, divisive
00:41:01.320 model within the algorithms of, of social media that it's like, you know, who's leading who here?
00:41:07.720 Are we being led by the technology or are we able to kind of break that dopamine addiction
00:41:14.120 and that device dependency and get off the screen, put the device down and find some relief
00:41:19.480 away from the maddeningness of the crowd and the conversation?
00:41:24.840 Yeah. I would like to say it's the latter, but, but if I'm being honest, it's the former that we
00:41:30.520 are being led and we don't want it to admit it. So we pretend like we have control over it and
00:41:36.040 we can pick and choose, but you know, ultimately it's all fed to us and we buy into it.
00:41:42.760 All right, man, let me hit the pause button on the conversation very quickly.
00:41:46.200 You may already know this, but the iron council is officially closed. It's closed.
00:41:50.760 We're going to be spending the next several months building out some tools and systems for
00:41:55.000 efficiency and, and for the current members and new members, when we do open it back up.
00:41:59.560 Now we'll have all of the new processes for onboarding and getting you up to speed and
00:42:03.240 new ways for you to connect with and learn from other high achieving men. And also strategies. This is,
00:42:08.200 this is very important strategies that will maximize your time in the premier men's brotherhood,
00:42:14.520 the iron council. There isn't anything better out there. I know I'm biased, but we're trying to
00:42:19.640 strive to create something incredibly powerful for you. So if you're ready to ramp up in 2022 and you
00:42:25.240 want the camaraderie and the accountability and the band of brothers to march with head to order
00:42:30.840 a man.com slash iron council. Again, it's closed right now, but you're going to be the first to be
00:42:35.080 notified when we do open this back up for new members. Again, order a man.com slash iron council.
00:42:42.360 And then you're going to be notified when we open it back up, which should be fairly soon here.
00:42:46.520 Again, order a man.com slash iron council. Do that right after the show. For now, I'll get back to it
00:42:51.320 with Greg.
00:42:53.480 Look, I want to go back though, to your own, your own story. One thing you said is that, that you had
00:42:58.040 some false accusations and allegations from your ex-wife. So was she your ex-wife at the time,
00:43:03.800 or were you two still married? And what was the relationship like leading up to that point? Were
00:43:08.760 there any indicators or red flags or awareness of what could be coming down the pipe?
00:43:14.120 Yes, we were married. No, there were no indicators, none whatsoever. It was a 10 word false accusation.
00:43:20.120 Well, what was it? It was, well, she'd called, she was out of town and she called the police
00:43:26.440 and said, you have to go to the, you have to go to my house. My husband's confused.
00:43:30.600 And they said, we can't go to the house if he's confused. And she said, well, what do you need to
00:43:34.440 hear? Do we need to hear he's a threat to himself or the children? And then she called back and,
00:43:39.080 you know, created the false allegation. And what, what then tumbled the, the, the dystopian spiral
00:43:44.840 after that. And eventually you see, you can, you can undo, you can find justice. But by that point,
00:43:51.240 it's months and months later, and you can't go back in time and re-untarnish your reputation and
00:43:59.000 get your life back. It's too late. And I think that's what I learned was that the value, and it's
00:44:04.360 broader culturally right now, Ryan, we have this culture of victimhood, which is the new social
00:44:09.880 currency and its economy is booming. Victimology is, is being weaponized and hyper incentivized.
00:44:18.760 And it's very difficult to, we have to treat allegations seriously, particularly in the area
00:44:24.760 of false allegations of say domestic violence. We have to, it's incumbent upon us as a society
00:44:30.600 to make sure that those, the most vulnerable among us are protected, but we cannot have a system with a
00:44:35.880 catch-all where jurisprudence is upended and the burden of proof is on the accused rather than the
00:44:41.720 accuser. That's why we did away with the Salem witch trials. We learn the lessons of the Spanish
00:44:46.120 Inquisition. And, but we have this system where the super weapon, particularly in family law,
00:44:51.560 of the false allegation has become the go-to playbook that guarantees a win every time. It guarantees the
00:44:58.360 estate and custody and, and, and all of the cash and ugly, you know, beautiful cash and prizes of
00:45:04.680 divorce. So it's a technique that's this, I call it the silver bullet of high conflict divorce. And
00:45:11.080 it's a, it's a technique and tool that's been weaponized for financial gain. And it's, you know,
00:45:16.360 there's many factors as to what led us there and here. But part of that is, is a piece of legislation
00:45:23.560 that President Biden introduced in 1974, the Violence Against Women Act. It was a series of
00:45:29.480 law enforcement grants that shifted the focus away from the problems of the relationship and the family
00:45:36.600 to a law enforcement approach to domestic violence that resulted again in another shift from the prior
00:45:43.560 discretionary approach to a dispatch call to a, to mandatory arrest or detainment policies. And all this
00:45:52.280 money was created by the Violence Against Women Act for stop grants and to qualify for these stop
00:45:57.640 grants, law enforcement had to adopt these policies of mandatory arrest. And of course,
00:46:01.400 this became more ingrained with high profile cases like OJ Simpson. So, you know, it's laws like that
00:46:09.880 and laws like the, that there was another piece of legislation introduced called the Adoption and Safe
00:46:15.160 Families Act in 1974 that offers financial incentives to the states that increase
00:46:21.720 adoption numbers. So we're incentivizing adoption. So to receive the, at least to receive the adoption
00:46:27.720 incentives or bonuses, there is actually bonuses, a local child protection service agency or DCFS
00:46:34.120 must have more children. They must have, it's an ugly way to say it, but they must have more merchandise
00:46:39.400 to sell and funding available when a child is placed in foster homes with strangers or placed in a,
00:46:45.400 as often happens as well, in a mental health facility. And, and it's called medicated,
00:46:50.440 usually against the parents wishes. So parents are being victimized by a system that profits for
00:46:55.800 holding children even longer bonuses for not returning children to their parents and families.
00:47:01.320 I think this is a growing global criminal and political scandal, that when we have the judiciary
00:47:08.280 involved, knowingly or unknowingly in child trafficking, and the child trafficking of children,
00:47:16.280 of poor parents, you know, the, again, the most vulnerable among us happens across the board,
00:47:23.640 but particularly, you know, vulnerable to their support parents who are targeted to lose their
00:47:28.760 children because they don't have the wherewithal or the financial resources to hire an attorney or an
00:47:35.400 advocate in any way to fight the system. And being poor and lacking housing, proper housing,
00:47:41.640 doesn't mean that your children should be removed from you for profit. So very few people are talking
00:47:47.000 about this because it's very, who wants to, you know, there's too many people profiting. There's too,
00:47:53.640 there's too much money to be made from the selling and the incentivized, you know, moving,
00:48:01.240 let's say generously of our children. Well, I mean, in a, yes, that there's that,
00:48:07.720 those financial incentives, but also it sounds right. You know, if a, if a parent, for example,
00:48:13.480 is financially destitute, then it sounds right that that's not going to be a great environment
00:48:19.400 for children. So it's very easy to pass off on that because you can say whether you're really
00:48:26.600 motivated by this or not, that you do truly care about the wellbeing of those children involved.
00:48:31.960 Yeah. Not having, not having financial resources or being a particular socioeconomic bracket
00:48:38.280 doesn't preclude you from, from being a great parent. There are people I know,
00:48:42.680 or I have known or seen or witnessed who are extremely comfortable financially, who are terrible,
00:48:48.920 terrible parents. And by terrible, I don't mean horrific, but just they could be better parents.
00:48:53.480 And there are people I know. Sure. It's not the only metric. Right.
00:48:57.880 So with your, with your wife coming, or your ex-wife coming with this, you know, this, the shocker to
00:49:03.880 you, you know, over a, over a span of six years now, maybe a little longer, did, have you ever gotten
00:49:10.920 to the root cause of this? Was there some sort of animosity or contention or jealousy, like what,
00:49:17.080 like what, or, or mental illness? Like, I don't know what, where did this even come from?
00:49:20.760 Gosh, how long do you have? I mean, look, there's conjecture as to why I was speaking with Dr. Drew
00:49:29.240 Penske recently. And I told him that, you know, my, my ex-wife was diagnosed with panic disorder
00:49:36.200 and she had medication at the time. She wasn't, she hadn't been taking her medication.
00:49:41.320 And he said, I don't know about panic disorder. It sounds like psychopathy.
00:49:45.320 I think some, some, you know, without going deep into the weeds of psychology and psychotherapy,
00:49:50.280 I think there's a lot dormant in the unconscious and subconscious in terms of family of origin. And,
00:49:58.280 and that can come up in a moment. It can like a Vesuvius and just snap the psychological system to do,
00:50:07.480 do things and act in ways that are so counterintuitive to the person that you've been.
00:50:14.600 I mean, I have, I've said this many times, the woman I was married to for 20 years without
00:50:19.640 any serious issues was not the woman from March 5th onwards. I mean, she was the same woman, but she,
00:50:25.960 her, she was, she used to be an ethical, decent, law-abiding, you know, I mean, great scheduler of
00:50:34.360 our family. You know, really marvelous in many ways in terms of the role she played within our family
00:50:41.960 unit in our marriage. But, you know, you look to the, the sins of the father and the perceived sins of
00:50:48.440 her father, her, her own mother, uh, twice divorced and a man hates, I mean, true misandrist in many
00:50:56.680 regards and how that, and how the system comes in, CPS comes in and threatens, you know, unless you do
00:51:03.320 this. I mean, they literally, it was only months later, I saw it in a report. They literally wrote,
00:51:07.480 unless you get a restraining order, um, and file for divorce, your children are at risk of going into
00:51:14.600 foster care. Um, there's the money aspect, you know, the CPS has to meet its numbers and make
00:51:19.480 its money. This, and we were a family that, you know, there was no issue of any, we lived in an
00:51:24.280 affluent community, boys at private school, members of the local country club. Um, there was no drama
00:51:30.680 or like there'd be no issue with law enforcement because there was no issue. Like we were a good,
00:51:36.200 sound, strong embodiment of what a wonderful family should be. So if it could happen to us,
00:51:42.600 which it did. Uh, and in terms of my, my ex-wife, I think, you know,
00:51:47.640 you know, the, the, the original title for my book when I was working through it was how,
00:51:51.880 how to survive when your spouse wants you dead and has the legal means and ways to kill you.
00:51:56.040 And it was, you know, it is a kind of a, of, you know, people have chuckled at that, but she literally
00:52:02.680 wanted me dead, like literally wanted me physically dead to end me. And when you think about that,
00:52:10.840 having two young children and having lived 20 years with someone to snap to that degree,
00:52:16.600 aside from the circumstances where you're carrying that much anger, resentment, vengeance, and
00:52:21.400 bitterness around that you want to, you want to get the ammunition within the family system,
00:52:28.440 family law system and the legal system to kill another human being. Um, not that I could ever be
00:52:34.680 dead in, in my, um, children, our, our children, our son's psychology. So, you know, anyway, um,
00:52:41.720 that's a, that's a particular brand of disturbing. And, you know, the, you mentioned about, you know,
00:52:47.800 was she mentally ill? Well, what's interesting was all the way through the five plus years of family law,
00:52:53.480 I was the one that, uh, had to be subjected to psychological evaluation.
00:52:57.560 Of course, sure.
00:52:58.600 Evaluations, you know, independent. And she would pick who the, the doctor was. And I included both
00:53:03.640 in my book at the end, in the final chapter for a reason, because they are extremely telling of how,
00:53:09.400 even when 2015, after extensive psychological testing by an independent court ordered, uh,
00:53:16.920 psychologist chosen by, by her, that it's evident that I'm not psychologically disturbed. I don't have
00:53:24.440 any diagnosis of mental illness, et cetera, et cetera. But the one person who should have been evaluated
00:53:32.120 was the one person who never was. Um, and we should also be mindful as well that having a diagnosis
00:53:37.640 of a major mental illness is not a crime. We should be empathic to that and understanding of that.
00:53:43.080 But it comes through this book, the DSM-5, you know, the, the kind of psychological,
00:53:47.640 psychiatric, uh, book that, that kind of, they have to find a diagnosis within the book.
00:53:53.240 Um, but when you had the, you know, I took, I took both, both of the evaluations to court in the,
00:53:58.520 I mean, or in 2015, the judge just, he summarily just washed it aside with a sweeping, say,
00:54:04.200 sentence of, I don't care about that. He didn't even look at it. Didn't even look at it.
00:54:08.120 And the evidence in that was so damning of, like, my sons as well, the parental alienation
00:54:15.320 and the brainwashing that they'd endured from such a young age and how they wanted to be with their
00:54:19.320 father. I love you, dad. Or the quotes, I love you, dad. I love you, dad. Can't we live with you?
00:54:23.640 Why can't we see you? Why can't we be with you half the time? The judge doesn't care. I think part of
00:54:28.440 them is stuck in this 1960s, uh, outlook of, you know, mother is the major and only caregiver
00:54:35.640 and, and father is the breadwinner. And, you know, children, particularly boys,
00:54:41.160 um, they need fathering and mothering. They need balanced parenting, particularly when there are
00:54:46.440 biological parents who are together, who are present, who are loving, who are meeting every
00:54:52.120 need of the child and the family unit is intact. Is it any wonder that, um, I think the greatest
00:54:59.160 threat to Western civilization today that's not being talked about is the breakdown of the family.
00:55:04.120 Um, it's a national health or international, it's a global health emergency that, um, would solve so
00:55:10.840 much if we could bring about some small reforms and improvement, um, but will also cause and is causing
00:55:17.240 catastrophic devastation to individuals across the Western hemisphere and particularly in America,
00:55:23.000 where, as I said, you know, who is the world leader in children growing up in single parent families,
00:55:29.000 is single parent households. It's, it's America. Why? There's a lot of reasons why we need to really
00:55:35.400 talk about them. I I'm just so fascinated by this because, you know, I've had guys that have reached
00:55:40.760 out to me or shared something about their own personal family dynamic. And they'll say things like,
00:55:45.320 you know, my wife snapped or my wife changed, or she's a completely different person right now.
00:55:49.320 And my knee jerk reaction with all due respect to you is no, no, like you, there's red flags.
00:55:56.120 There's something that you overlooked that, that you decided not to address because of some other
00:56:02.920 reason, or you were afraid of what would happen. Like surely, surely. And as I hear you speak and
00:56:09.240 I believe what you're saying, it's, it's just, it's fast. I don't even know what other word
00:56:14.600 to use to describe it. It's just such a fascinating thing. And I'm not trying to make
00:56:20.280 light of your situation. It's just, it's hard for me to fathom. It's very hard for me to fathom
00:56:25.560 and understand how this happens. I can relate to that because if, if I'd have heard my story
00:56:32.360 six, seven years ago, it would have been just as difficult for me to comprehend and understand.
00:56:39.080 And I think this is the challenge with why there hasn't been improvement or reform is because
00:56:43.480 unless it's happened to you, unless you've entered the star chamber of family law, unless you've
00:56:48.680 been removed from your children summarily by the institutions of power that are supposed to be
00:56:54.440 impartial and fair, unless you've experienced the billable hours to a degree that's insane and inane,
00:57:00.440 unless you've been the victim or the casualty of a false allegation and gone into court and realized
00:57:08.280 that, oh, criminals get more rights than, than parents and partners and spouses in, in this legal
00:57:14.120 kangaroo, quasi kangaroo court system. It's hard to make sense of. So, you know, how do we, how do we
00:57:21.800 have this conversation if, well, like you say, and it's understandable, oh, there had to be something,
00:57:26.440 had to be, well, of course, there's something on both sides. Of course, there's always issues,
00:57:30.360 minor issues within a marriage. And if left unaddressed, they're going to grow over time.
00:57:35.160 And people sometimes have a hard time coming back to be vulnerable and being intimate and find a way
00:57:39.880 to have that conversation. But at the same time, that doesn't mean to say that even if there is,
00:57:45.400 if there are irreconcilable differences, that the, the, the one side can have the super weapon
00:57:53.800 and have ultimately, for the most part, because I, again, I understand that sometimes there are
00:57:58.040 mothers and women who are respondents and mothers and women who are treated unfairly. But we look
00:58:02.600 at the evidence is predominantly given the way the system works and the, you know, the, the approach
00:58:06.360 to it. In my, in my experience, and I am a man, but I have also spoken with, with women as well. It's,
00:58:12.520 it's, it's men and fathers. Like we, we have to be able to, to acknowledge that, you know, there are
00:58:20.280 the, the, the, the, the punishment, quote, unquote, or the response is so outrageous compared to the
00:58:29.560 perceived, um, infraction, uh, of, of behavior. So if, if, you know, if, if a spouse had behaved in a
00:58:37.720 certain way, you'll, you know, if you would, if you would, um, I don't know, aired or transgressed,
00:58:43.880 Ryan, you wouldn't expect your wife to call law enforcement, make up a story, knowingly damning
00:58:52.040 you, removing you, making you homeless and destitute, removing you from your children's lives
00:58:57.240 with no ability legally or otherwise to remedy that false accusation. Um, and that's pretty scary,
00:59:08.120 you know, but we all want to believe it wouldn't happen to us. 20 years married, no real, no
00:59:13.320 incidents other than the odd disagreement here and here or there, and the odd slightly raised voice
00:59:17.720 on both sides, you know, of frustration. So it's, and it's gone on and it's going on. So I get your,
00:59:25.160 I get your, um, what, how could that happen? There's got to be something.
00:59:29.880 Right. What, so what is, what is the situation now if, if you're willing to discuss and share
00:59:36.920 with your boys? Well, when I realized that, um, I, I, I'd fought for five years and, and they were
00:59:44.440 suffering, um, just incalculably, uh, psychologically and through the, the, you know, adolescent years
00:59:53.800 and the, in order to, the inordinate amount of money, the millions of dollars that had been spent,
00:59:58.440 particularly by my ex-wife, I think is 1.8, nearly $1.8 million on her, uh, her attorney who summarily
01:00:05.240 left the case when she couldn't afford her anymore and is now suing her, I think for nearly half a
01:00:09.000 million dollars, um, with no relief. Um, my sons have, have suffered life changing. Um, my, my,
01:00:17.880 my boys were brilliant, beautiful and still are brilliant and beautiful boys. Um, but no child
01:00:24.440 should have to endure the sudden shocking, instant removal of one parent from a family home based on a
01:00:33.720 false allegation. Um, it's almost, I don't want to put words in your mouth here, but for just,
01:00:39.800 this is my perspective. It's almost worse than you dying. Well, you know, I talk about this a lot
01:00:46.360 because I've talked to a lot of parents who've been through this. Um, and I, you know, I talk about
01:00:51.560 living grief, suicide by living grief. There are parents, there are, there are children who no longer
01:00:56.600 have a father in rare rare instances, mothers, um, because it's unbearable because the system
01:01:02.840 doesn't provide relief. And when the, when the, the meaning of your life, the deepest,
01:01:07.240 most meaningful purpose of your life is removed from you unjustly and unfairly. And there is no
01:01:13.880 resource. There is no recourse to find relief and remedy. Um, many, many parents decide not to,
01:01:21.160 not to go on. Greg, I'm not, I'm not necessarily talking about it from that perspective. I'm talking
01:01:26.840 about it from a child's perspective, you know, losing a father or mother to, uh, an accident,
01:01:32.760 for example, while tragic, I think is less tragic than what they've had to endure over the course of
01:01:40.360 the last six years. Well, there's a finality to death, you know, when we lose someone we care
01:01:45.960 about the, there is a finality and even if it's sudden and shocking, uh, there is a process you
01:01:51.160 can move through that grieving process. Living grief or ambivalent grief that I talk about where
01:01:57.000 there is no definitive end. It's like the purgatory of the unknowing, the inescapability of the trauma,
01:02:03.560 the, the, the, the terror of the existential angst of will this, will this ever be remedied and solved,
01:02:10.760 um, and, and, and relief brought, brought about. Um, that's really, um, it's, it's a, it's a burden
01:02:21.160 of epic proportions to carry because it can strike at any time. You can't move on. How, how does a parent
01:02:27.240 move on from the sudden and catastrophic loss of the, the deepest meaning of their life? And how does a
01:02:32.920 child move forward through life? Um, not affected in many, so many negative ways of which they're not
01:02:41.880 aware of as children, but will manifest in many ways, uh, as they grow to become adults and maturate.
01:02:49.560 It's, it's no wonder if we look at some of this, the, the situations that have happened in our culture
01:02:56.440 over the last however many years. There is one, it seems to be one prevailing, uh, similarity,
01:03:03.560 and that's the, the lack of fathers in the home. Um, and again, this isn't blame and fault. I don't,
01:03:12.040 I try not to deal in blame and fault. It's about, you know, how can we be more responsible and talk
01:03:16.520 about this? Um, you know, whether it's, uh, rioting on the streets, whether it's school shootings,
01:03:23.800 whether it's, of course the individual has to be held accountable, but what's the, this one factor
01:03:29.640 that keeps coming up that's not talked about dad deprivation, what's causing that? How can we improve
01:03:35.720 a system to keep more fathers at home and at least keep more fathers connected in a co-parenting way
01:03:42.440 with their children? Um, because we don't, it's generationally, it's just going to get exponentially worse.
01:03:50.440 I agree. I, I interrupted you when you were talking about where the situation is with your boys right
01:03:58.520 now. Yeah, look, I wasn't able to affect, and I tried for years to, um, to get relief and to get,
01:04:08.280 you know, be a part of their lives again. And as I said, when you have two generations, uh, and a war
01:04:14.200 chest of money to, to fight where already one is behind the curve, I wasn't able to save my,
01:04:21.400 my sons from, or allow, you know, affect enough, uh, legally for me to remain a part of their lives
01:04:28.760 as a father. So I, I, that's why I started one of the reasons I started The Respondent and the
01:04:35.480 charitable extension of The Respondent, Children and Parents United, CPU,
01:04:39.800 to help other fathers and mothers and parents and children, um, navigate our zero-sum divorce laws,
01:04:47.640 keep, develop programs and workshops to keep them out of, uh, of our court system and our legal system.
01:04:54.200 If we, we need to keep people out of court in family law, because there is no justice.
01:04:59.320 Um, there is, for both parents, both parents, both sides and all, you know, even the extended family,
01:05:06.440 who we forget about a lot of the time, you know, the aunts and uncles, the cousins,
01:05:10.200 the grandparents, oh, the story's right of the grandparents I've spoken to,
01:05:14.520 who, because they're the grandparent of one side, who happens to be the, the respondent,
01:05:19.800 they are, they, they, their, their grandchildren are lost to them. And that grandparent grandchild bond
01:05:25.480 is super special and vital. It's that tethering of that is so vital intergenerationally
01:05:32.040 for the child and, and our older generation, who've really earned, uh, the, not just the right,
01:05:40.280 but, um, they shown the responsibility to be connected to their kin, you know?
01:05:46.280 Hmm. How has this impacted your career? I mean, obviously you're in a very liberal leaning career,
01:05:56.120 and how are you viewed? I mean, even the things that you've been saying in the last hour on this
01:06:01.320 podcast are probably not looked at favorably within your professional community. So I'm really
01:06:08.440 curious about that. Yeah, I'm not, I'm, I'm not, and I probably should be, but I, I'm not that concerned
01:06:14.360 about the perceptions of me. I know who I am. I know my value system and I, I know my flaws and I know my,
01:06:23.240 my, um, my, my, uh, strengths, I think, but I also know that what I don't know, uh, is that I don't
01:06:30.120 know what other people's perceptions are of me. Um, you know, I did a convention for a TV show called
01:06:35.560 24 the other day that I was on and a troll hopped in in the chat and just made some baseless nonsense,
01:06:42.440 uh, up about me that, you know, I have to laugh at because it's just silly. It's, it's, you know,
01:06:49.240 kids play on the school ground. Um, I, I did a show where someone said, oh, have you seen your
01:06:54.840 Wikipedia page? You're a vocal, uh, supporter of president Trump and Charlie Kirk. And I'm like,
01:07:01.320 what are you kidding me? Like, not that there's any, you know, each to their own, you know,
01:07:06.360 we're all individuals and have agency to support what we want, but that was so far from the truth.
01:07:10.840 It's not, you know, now it's been corrected that to the truth, which was, I was a vocal
01:07:15.240 supporter and publicly endorsed, uh, Andrew Yang for the, the, through the democratic primaries,
01:07:21.720 because I thought him and Tulsi Gabbard were the only two that, that weren't infested with identity
01:07:26.840 politics. Um, so, you know, as a registered Democrat, do I have some beliefs that I think
01:07:32.920 skew more to the right? Um, well, yeah, I think we talked about this. I think the left,
01:07:38.680 the extreme left has gone so far left that I haven't moved right. I've just gone, wow, that's
01:07:43.240 like, what is going on? Like I haven't moved, but they've moved so far and self critiquing that,
01:07:50.440 you know, I'll do that. But have I been effect? Sure. I mean, you know, Hollywood, I know that,
01:07:56.680 I know that people are afraid to speak out. I've spoken to a couple of people in very high positions
01:08:02.680 of power, one, one, a studio head and, you know, they are afraid to, they make decisions based on,
01:08:08.520 on fear now rather than, um, rather than on talent and, and creativity. Um, it's like, you know,
01:08:15.560 by the numbers and if we're making, if we're being creative on an equality of outcome, there's only
01:08:20.680 one way, one way that will go. And that will be this bland, uh, the, the, the product and the movies
01:08:27.240 and the TV shows we make will be affected in ways that will just not be good for our culture and for
01:08:33.720 our entertainment. Um, and so I think we have to be mindful, uh, to, uh, you know, to, to, to talk
01:08:41.240 about that, but people perceive, you know, if I don't drink the Kool-Aid or the Woka-Cola and say one
01:08:45.960 thing, uh, if I don't, if I'm not in agreement with one thing, one comment someone makes suddenly
01:08:51.480 I'm a, you know, whatever, you know, transphobe, racist, misogynist, et cetera, et cetera.
01:08:57.960 And the irony is, of course, when you do a little bit of research, that person who's confusing, uh,
01:09:03.320 who's accusing you of being these particular character assassins, um, or these word names
01:09:10.040 is, is the very thing they, they're accusing you of. Um, I wrote this quote once, you know,
01:09:15.560 I'm not, I'm not who you think I am. You are who you think I am. And so, um,
01:09:20.920 I saw that on your website, even just today, I saw that I, I had to like, stop and think about
01:09:24.840 it for a minute, but I'm like, that's pretty good. That's really good.
01:09:27.960 It, it, you know, what it does, it, it speaks to that mass projection. And I think we do have a mass,
01:09:33.800 uh, mind virus or this ideological projection going on. That's almost like a collective Munchausen's
01:09:39.960 by proxy. Um, I think we have, um, people who've gone through the academy who've been taught and told
01:09:46.920 what to think, not how to think. They haven't been taught critical thinking, how to think critically
01:09:51.640 in a way that disagrees or agrees with, or you can agree to disagree or disagree to agree.
01:09:56.120 Um, however you look at it, but just critical thinking rather than, um, uh, understanding
01:10:01.800 the nuances within the debate of things like critical race theory. So, you know, I had Chris
01:10:06.840 Rufo on my show and, um, you know, it's, it's, it's very difficult to talk about because
01:10:13.560 there is nuance to it. It is important to, um, to improve and study race and, uh, the history
01:10:21.720 of discrimination in America from the indigenous peoples, you know, on through. I mean, the irony
01:10:28.120 is of course that, you know, I'm, I'm English and American, so I'm conflicted moment by moment because
01:10:35.160 my people, uh, wanted to escape in the, the religious tyranny in England and came to America,
01:10:41.720 but also my people, uh, were there and got, you know, were part of it.
01:10:48.040 And you're the, you're just the worst of the worst that ever could have lived.
01:10:52.360 I first thought, heard about the Boston Tea Party and it sounded like a fun historical event
01:10:56.760 I wanted to be part of because we'd all sip, sip tea, drink and run. And I realized, oh no,
01:11:00.520 that was not how, and then I found out my, my great grandfather was my, my 24th great
01:11:05.240 grandfather was, uh, Robert the Bruce. So then I was,
01:11:08.280 that Celt heritage within me was like, oh, so the Scots fight in the English and I was born in
01:11:13.880 England. So where do you, where do we begin this, you know, and end the conversation? Yeah.
01:11:20.760 Yeah. Well, and I, I mean, you look at that and none of that has to do as anything to do with you.
01:11:26.440 So you can be your own person now, but it's just not enough in modern culture. You can't,
01:11:31.240 it's not enough that you didn't support Trump. For example, you have to be anti-Trump.
01:11:35.480 That's right. It's not enough that you are not racist and that you try as hard as you can not
01:11:42.120 to see color and look at people by the merit of, of, of, of who they are. You have to be anti-racist.
01:11:47.560 Like everything has to be the opposite of, you know, what is, what is culturally acceptable.
01:11:51.880 So it's, it's just a wild time to live. There's so many incredible things about the time in which we
01:11:57.800 live and there's so much bullshit and there's no other way to say it.
01:12:02.040 There's, there's so much moral hypocrisy. Um, you know, I, it, it reminded me, I've mentioned
01:12:07.640 this before, but it reminded me of, uh, when we talk about the, you know, the, the conversation on
01:12:12.600 race, I don't think we should dwell there because I actually don't like the way that this entire
01:12:17.960 conversation is the framework of it. Um, not with you, but just, you know, broader, broader aspect.
01:12:22.920 Um, you know, when, when Morgan Freeman was asked by, um, the interviewer, how do we, how do we get
01:12:28.680 rid of race in America? And he said, how about we start with, I don't call you a white man and you
01:12:34.200 don't call me a black man. Now I get it. It's, it's simplistic and it's somewhat pithy and all the
01:12:41.240 rest of it, but there is something in that. If you look to the needle of identity politics and what
01:12:47.560 primarily you identify as, uh, if we're having to go down the self-identification route.
01:12:55.480 You're opening an entirely different can of worms with that one.
01:12:58.600 Right. Well, let's not, let's, let's come back to the, um, let's come back to family law. Um,
01:13:03.720 and what are the, some of the solutions? I mean, you know, how I mentioned as well,
01:13:08.040 a lot about the CPS and DCFS, you know, we need, we need independent audits of every state.
01:13:13.400 You know, we need to, we need to actually see how much money, uh, this profiteering,
01:13:18.360 this racketeering is making each state, um, um, and the CPS and DCFS, uh, departments within each
01:13:26.760 state. We need a congressional hearing. It's long overdue, decades long overdue. We need to urgently
01:13:33.560 remove and abolish for good, the state financial incentives that have turned the CPS into a business
01:13:40.120 that, uh, that their business plan, which they've enacted very well is to take children and separate,
01:13:45.480 separate families, um, for money. Uh, we need to open family court and remove the,
01:13:52.520 the confidentiality laws. And we need to give parents their rights verbally and in writing.
01:13:58.920 And, and in extreme cases or high conflict cases, uh, when the, that involve removing children and,
01:14:06.280 and terminating the rights of parents, they must be heard in front of a jury. They must be domestic
01:14:13.560 violence in particular. We could rid the whole false alleg, or at least greatly reduce the false
01:14:18.680 allegations, domestic violence. If we put domestic violence in criminal court. So if there's an
01:14:23.960 accusation of domestic violence, the, those who are alleged will be investigated. If there is evidence,
01:14:30.600 then that goes before a jury and tried, they are innocent till proven guilty. But if they are found
01:14:36.760 guilty by a judge or jury and jury of their peers, beyond a reasonable doubt, then they must be
01:14:42.120 seriously dealt with. Because violence of any kind is wrong, but violence towards the most vulnerable
01:14:47.560 among us in a family setting with children involved, children should not be witness to physical
01:14:53.320 violence and, and individuals and parents. And, you know, mothers and fathers should not be subjected
01:15:02.600 to physical violence. So we have to find a better way within our system to adjudicate this. So to ease
01:15:09.560 the suffering as well as, you know, improving the, the legal system so that these unethical attorneys
01:15:16.200 and the crime syndicate that, that operates within family law for, for money is held accountable.
01:15:22.360 Well, I know you're championing all of this and, and I really appreciate that. And also I commend you,
01:15:27.560 you know, I, I talk with a lot of guys who go through varying degrees of difficulty in life. And I, I think
01:15:33.720 yours not to compare ranks right up there with the worst of the worst, quite honestly, but I commend you for
01:15:41.000 taking this and turning it into something and becoming an advocate so it doesn't happen to other
01:15:45.560 people. I think it'd be very easy for you to become bitter. I'm sure there's probably some of that to
01:15:52.280 withdraw. No, good. No, I'm really not bitter and withdraw maybe, maybe a little, I withdrew for a
01:15:59.160 little for a while. Yeah. Well, I commend, I commend where you've taken it. I mean, it takes a strong man
01:16:04.680 to be able to do that. And I honor you for doing that. Where, where can we go to learn more about the
01:16:10.440 work that you're doing? And just as if not more importantly, is how do we support what you're
01:16:15.400 doing? Are there organizations, whether it's yours or others that we need to be aware of,
01:16:18.920 that we need to donate to, that we need to become advocates for? What is that we can do as men to
01:16:23.400 support your work and make sure our kids are being taken care of? Thank you, Ryan. Well, first of all,
01:16:28.440 I want to thank you because, you know, having me on and allowing me the, the platform to speak about
01:16:33.400 this is, is, is wonderful. Um, I think, you know, I, my charity CPU, Children and Parents United is a place
01:16:41.080 that can be found at the respondent.com. All the information about, you know, my show,
01:16:45.480 my cause, why I do what I do and, uh, the book, the respondent, uh, there is a free downloadable
01:16:51.080 ebook as well called the code, uh, which is available for those who have read the respondent.
01:16:55.400 They, they use the coupon code and they get the book, the code for free. That's, um, that provides
01:17:00.680 immediate interventions into wellbeing for people who are, uh, struggling through interpersonal
01:17:05.240 relationships. And specifically if they find themselves in a courtroom or a family courthouse,
01:17:09.400 family law courthouse, um, there are workshops and programs that are cost effective that we're
01:17:14.840 developing mediation programs. Uh, we're setting up a law firm all through CPU, Children and Parents
01:17:20.440 United. We have a very dedicated, but small board of people. We have some great volunteers as well.
01:17:26.120 Um, so really, you know, donations help, uh, through, um, the respondent.com. There's a,
01:17:32.840 our nonprofit page CPU, um, sharing the information, talking with others, reaching out,
01:17:38.520 uh, we, we were actually about to set up a billboard campaign, uh, to have billboards around, uh, courthouses,
01:17:45.560 um, so that attorneys, judges, uh, people can see the effect that what goes on inside that courtroom
01:17:51.960 is having and empowering individuals as well, wherever they live, uh, to meet the targeted goal
01:17:57.560 of maybe raising some money to get them billboard paid for. And then our organization can deal with the
01:18:02.520 logistics and the messaging and, and find the space and put some pressure on. I think we need to put
01:18:08.680 some pressure on this system, um, that doesn't value family, um, that's devaluing fathers and, um, that is
01:18:16.360 putting mothers, uh, too often in, in single parent environments without help from, uh, um, from men who
01:18:24.920 want to be helpful. Uh, so I would say, yeah, the respondent.com is the place and CPU children and
01:18:31.480 parents united is the organization. Well, we're going to sync it all up and I'm going to spread
01:18:35.960 the message far and wide and you continue to share with me how I can personally help and what I can
01:18:40.360 do. Cause I believe in you, I believe in your message and I know how important it is. You know,
01:18:44.840 I talk a lot about men and I talk a lot about our young men and our young daughters and making sure
01:18:50.120 they get everything they need to thrive and the work you're doing is providing that. So again,
01:18:54.920 I honor you and I, and I just, I appreciate you coming on the show to talk about this stuff.
01:18:58.440 Thank you, Ryan. Right back at you as well. And, um, you know, it's been wonderful chatting with you
01:19:04.760 over two parts. I'm glad we got the second part done. And I can do for you, for you down on that.
01:19:10.200 You just let me know. Um, we'll do in a real, a real pleasure. Really. I'm sure we'll make it happen
01:19:15.000 again. I would love to have you on. We'd love to, I'm, you know, I, I just secured funding for
01:19:19.800 the development of a feature film documentary, um, about this, about family and, you know,
01:19:26.440 family war. So I think we'd, we'd love to have you involved, you know, on camera and that if
01:19:31.720 you're willing down the line. Absolutely. A hundred percent. Great. All right. Thanks,
01:19:35.960 Ryan. Appreciate it. All right, you guys, there's my conversation with Greg Ellis, part number two.
01:19:42.200 If you didn't listen to part number one, go back and listen to that guys. This is very,
01:19:45.800 very important stuff. And if you haven't had to deal with this, congratulations. I'm glad for you.
01:19:52.360 But if you have had to deal with father's rights and the family court system, you know, you know how
01:19:58.200 bad it is. And Greg is doing a phenomenal job, giving you tools and resources and access to information
01:20:04.280 that you need to be able to fight for yourself, your own rights and the rights of your children,
01:20:08.600 uh, in the wake of what's happening in society. And especially the, the degeneracy and even the
01:20:15.400 corruption inside the, uh, family court system. So make sure you connect with Greg, connect with me,
01:20:20.680 pick up a copy of the respondent. If you know of anybody who's dealing with this right now,
01:20:24.120 men specifically who are dealing with this, uh, buy them a, buy them a copy of the book, uh,
01:20:28.760 connect them with Greg. He's got a couple of organizations that he mentioned and connect their
01:20:32.440 valuable resources for you guys. And that's what we're all about is giving you the resources you need.
01:20:36.840 Uh, with that guys, make sure you check out again, Greg, take a screenshot. Um, I'm taking
01:20:41.560 a playbook out of, uh, or a play out of Andy's playbook, Andy for Silva's playbook. Uh, when he
01:20:46.520 talks about paying the fee guys, all I'm asking is that you just share this. All right. Send a text
01:20:52.440 to somebody, take a screenshot, tag me, tag Greg, tag, whoever, let people know what you're listening
01:20:58.160 to. If you have something valuable to share, then I think we have a responsibility to share it with
01:21:02.600 other people who would be impacted by it. And this is important work. And I think you
01:21:06.820 wouldn't be here if you, if you didn't believe that as well. Okay. All right, guys, you've got
01:21:10.440 your marching orders. We will be back next week until then go out there, take action and become
01:21:15.780 the man you are meant to be. Thank you for listening to the order of man podcast. You're
01:21:20.500 ready to take charge of your life and be more of the man you were meant to be. We invite you
01:21:24.840 to join the order at order of man.com.