Order of Man - June 17, 2025


ORION TARABAN | Winning in the Sexual Marketplace


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 25 minutes

Words per Minute

191.518

Word Count

16,358

Sentence Count

1,044

Misogynist Sentences

103

Hate Speech Sentences

79


Summary

In this episode, psychologist Orion Taraband joins me to discuss the dynamics between men and women and how to make yourself more attractive to the opposite sex. Whether you re married or single, understanding the intricacies and nuance of what makes a man attractive to a woman will help him get more of what he wants from her.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Very few men think of relationships in the frame of the quote-unquote sexual marketplace,
00:00:05.400 although the rules and principles of attraction and connection can very much be understood as an
00:00:11.360 economic model of sorts of perceived value. And of course, the man who offers the most perceived
00:00:17.100 value is the man who gets the girl. Whether you're married or single, understanding the intricacies
00:00:22.200 and nuance of what makes a man attractive to a woman will help him get more of what he wants
00:00:27.000 from her. My guest today, psychologist Orion Taraband joins me to discuss these dynamics
00:00:32.020 between men and women so we all can get more of what we're after in relationships. We cover the
00:00:38.160 importance of knowing your value and knowing what is valuable to the opposite sex, why love has little
00:00:43.800 or nothing to do with attraction, what is known as the Madonna whore complex, the concepts of captains
00:00:50.520 and passengers as it relates to dating and mating, the differences between talking and communicating,
00:00:56.380 and how best to make yourself more attractive.
00:00:59.400 You're a man of action. You live life to the fullest, embrace your fears and boldly chart your
00:01:04.680 own path. When life knocks you down, you get back up one more time. Every time you are not easily
00:01:10.660 deterred, defeated, rugged, resilient, strong. This is your life. This is who you are. This is who you
00:01:18.220 will become at the end of the day. And after all is said and done, you can call yourself a man.
00:01:26.380 Gentlemen, welcome to the Order of Man podcast. I am Ryan Michler. I'm very, very excited to bring
00:01:31.020 this conversation to you. I was introduced to Orion several months ago. I think I caught some
00:01:37.680 of his YouTube videos and I've had some really, really good conversations about his topics and
00:01:42.780 his teachings. And I've been looking forward to having him on the podcast. So we've got a very good
00:01:48.680 one, a very interesting one, and I think you're going to find it valuable. At least I hope you do.
00:01:52.680 And that is my goal here, guys, is to give you as much value as I can, to give you all the tools
00:01:57.420 and resources you need to thrive as a man. And speaking of value and tools, I want to mention my
00:02:04.200 friends over at Montana Knife Company. They help make this show possible and they are building
00:02:09.260 Made in America knives. Whether you're hunting or cooking for your family, or you want to carry
00:02:15.400 something every day to protect yourself and your loved ones, then look no further than the knives
00:02:19.420 over at Montana Knife Company and use the code ORDER OF MAN. All one word, ORDER OF MAN at checkout
00:02:25.260 when you do. Again, that's MontanaKnifeCompany.com. Use the code ORDER OF MAN. Now let me introduce
00:02:31.100 you to Orion. He is a licensed clinical psychologist. He earned his doctorate in clinical psychology
00:02:36.740 from the California School of Professional Psychology. He focuses on men's health, healthy masculinity,
00:02:43.500 relationship dynamics, and personal development. He's also the creator of the wildly popular
00:02:48.780 YouTube channel Psych Hacks and also a podcast by the same name. And he offers brief thought
00:02:56.160 provoking videos on psychological tips drawn from his clinical work. He launched his business
00:03:02.860 with the YouTube channel and the podcast in particular in 2021 and has amassed hundreds and
00:03:10.060 hundreds of thousands of subscribers and over 140 million views. He's also the author of the book
00:03:16.620 The Value of Others, which explores an economic model of relationships in the modern dating
00:03:22.540 landscape. And his work has sparked a lot of discussion across very varied social media platforms.
00:03:29.240 And he's praised by some for his logic and also critiqued for his provocative and controversial
00:03:35.880 takes on intimacy and gender dynamics. Enjoy this one, fellas.
00:03:41.620 Well, Ryan, great to see you, man. Thanks for joining me on the podcast.
00:03:44.180 Of course. Thanks for having me on, Ryan. I'm happy to be here.
00:03:47.140 You bet. I've been digging into your book, The Value of Others. I'm not sure how I came across
00:03:50.860 it. I think, I don't know. I actually don't know. That's the interesting thing about social media and
00:03:56.320 interwebs these days is we never know how we run across things. But I came across your content and
00:04:00.460 have been very, very intrigued, to say the least, since I ran across the work that you're doing.
00:04:05.560 Right on. Well, I'm happy that you did. It's been quite a cult phenomenon. I haven't spent a single
00:04:11.140 dollar on marketing. I don't have an agent. This is self-published. And yet it's sold over 150,000
00:04:16.260 copies in less than 10 months. So it's doing very well, all through word of mouth and direct to
00:04:22.040 consumer through the YouTube channel. What do you attribute that to? Because I've written a couple
00:04:27.360 of books over the past 10 years, and I don't think they've, no, I don't think they have not hit the
00:04:32.300 level that you're talking about right now personally. What do you attribute that cult phenomenon to?
00:04:37.380 Well, I do think it has to do with the success of the YouTube channel, Psych Hacks. I think that
00:04:42.800 everything spins from the YouTube channel. So for many years, I've been posting content regularly,
00:04:49.580 new episodes twice a week. Earlier this year, I went down to once a week as an experiment
00:04:53.800 to see how that would impact YouTube. It impacted YouTube in many of the predictable ways,
00:04:59.380 but many other things started to suffer as well. Book sales went down, new consultation clients went down,
00:05:06.180 speaking opportunities became less frequent. So everything for better or for worse spins from
00:05:12.340 YouTube. So I think that if you want to write a book, it could be the best book in the world. But
00:05:17.800 unfortunately, if you don't have an audience already ready for it, it's only you and your Uncle Ted who
00:05:23.260 are going to read it. And maybe Uncle Ted is going to read it, you know. So unfortunately, the success of
00:05:28.640 a book isn't necessarily a metric of its wisdom or its elegance or its utility. It can be. But if you
00:05:38.300 want to write a book, it's better to build an audience first. So I don't know what size your
00:05:43.460 audience was when you wrote your previous books. But my hunch is that it's smaller than it is today.
00:05:48.920 Oh, yeah. Well, that's that's definitely true. I wrote my first book when I think we're a year into
00:05:54.560 the movement. We're 10 years into the movement now. So it would it would definitely be a little
00:05:58.160 different now that we've built up an audience. But I agree with you. You can find the people that
00:06:04.040 really resonate with your information and your work and the people who want to hear more about
00:06:08.720 what you have to say in the style that you have to share it. And you do share it in a very,
00:06:13.000 a very interesting style. I think maybe thoughtful, clinical, very in depth. I think how would you
00:06:21.860 describe the way that you explain the work that you do? At least the style of it anyways.
00:06:26.540 Another component to potentially the success of the book are some of the pictures in the
00:06:31.060 background there, which are I have some of the credentials. So I'm not simply a self-styled
00:06:37.220 relationship guru, which they're kind of a dime a dozen in 2025. So I do have some of the,
00:06:44.740 let's say, ascribed authority that comes from certain designations and education and whatnot,
00:06:49.540 which is helpful to kind of get your foot in the door and to have that sort of trustworthiness.
00:06:54.400 Because I do think, and I think it's for the best, that I tend to hold myself to, let's say,
00:06:59.080 higher standards of communication and integrity than the average influencer, just because of
00:07:05.460 my ethical code and my profession. So I do think that there's one thing for someone to write a book
00:07:10.960 about relationships, another thing for a psychologist to do so. Not that that necessarily makes me or anyone
00:07:17.680 with that degree an expert, but I do think it helps. So one thing that in terms of the style that I think
00:07:24.120 I'm pretty good at is you got definitely some experts in the field of relationships, intersectional
00:07:30.260 dynamics, but if they tend to be technical experts or academics, their work is often very inaccessible
00:07:37.900 to people. Some people write fantastic studies and know these dynamics that I described very
00:07:45.520 intimately, but they have a very small audience. The language is very inaccessible. It's in
00:07:49.840 the style of academic writing, which is almost like a foreign language. The person who's best at this
00:07:57.260 is probably David Buss, which is the name that many people know in the field of evolutionary psychology.
00:08:02.680 He's at the University of Texas, Austin. Many of his books are accessible to a lay audience,
00:08:06.900 but they are basically the description and summation of various scientific studies. Whereas I tend to
00:08:14.960 kind of dispense with that and make more of a theoretical argument and just sort of share the
00:08:20.980 ideas upon which many of these studies are based and the findings that they conclude. Another thing I do
00:08:28.060 is I tend to try to be a bit more conversational. So most of my episodes, for example, are inspired by
00:08:38.780 consultations that I do with my patients. If I see people and the same problem comes up over and over
00:08:44.860 again, I can assume that this is more or less a common problem in today's day and age. If these
00:08:49.660 five people have it, the chances are there's 50 million people out there that are dealing with
00:08:53.580 this or a similar problem. And if the intervention that works for these individuals work for these
00:08:58.280 five, it might also work for a substantial portion of that 50 million as well. But what helps people is
00:09:04.680 not factual evidence. What helps people is not theory divorced from practice. So the guidelines I give
00:09:12.060 are actually very actionable. They're not theoretical. They're not based on what should be the case.
00:09:18.380 They're based on what can actually move the needle. And this is something that I've discovered in my
00:09:22.400 own life and the lives of those that I've worked with and substantiated by a lot of the evidence base
00:09:26.520 in the literature. But rather than go down that road, I keep things fairly conversational. I generally riff
00:09:32.020 an idea to myself, transcribe that using AI into a document, and then spend some time polishing
00:09:37.860 the idea into a script, which I can then present in one of my episodes. And I think that keeps things
00:09:44.080 down to earth because it's rooted in a dialogue that was based in real human suffering and a desire
00:09:50.240 to get out of that and or to meet some sort of desired outcome.
00:09:55.040 Well, I mean, I want to dig into the material because I would definitely agree with the way that
00:09:59.460 you frame that. It certainly has been received that way from me.
00:10:03.720 And one of the things that really stood out to me is your use of metaphor and analogies,
00:10:08.500 and specifically this idea of the captain and the passenger. For whatever reason, that segment of
00:10:15.540 the book really stood out to me. And I think as we continue to explore what we're talking about
00:10:20.200 today, it would make sense for us to explain some terms. And what are the prerogatives? You talk
00:10:26.040 about the three prerogatives of the captain, and you also talk about the three prerogatives of
00:10:30.780 the passenger. You don't make any gender assignments, but I think I can assume for the
00:10:36.840 most part, the captain would traditionally be the male and the passenger would traditionally be the
00:10:42.780 female. Would you agree with that? Yeah, I mentioned that in the book, but we are no longer living
00:10:47.280 through that historical moment. Today, women are encouraged and incentivized and empowered to be
00:10:53.220 captains in their own right. But if they want to take a traditional path of being a passenger,
00:10:56.920 that's still open to them. The promise of gender equality under feminism was that men would also
00:11:04.140 be liberated from, let's say, their traditional gender roles and the toxic aspects of their
00:11:09.320 masculinity. And that hasn't really happened. It's not possible in 2025 for a man to really set his
00:11:17.100 sights on being a passenger. Women might want to be captains, but they don't want to be in
00:11:23.480 relationships with male passengers. So men kind of have a Hobson's choice where it's between going
00:11:30.040 through the trouble of ascending to his captaincy or sort of languishing on the dock, as I put it.
00:11:35.780 Those guys don't seem to go anywhere because it's very difficult for them to secure passage on a
00:11:39.780 female captain ship because of some of the economic incentives. So have you finished the book or you
00:11:44.040 just started with it? I think I'm on chapter seven at this point. I think there's what, nine,
00:11:50.420 ten chapters? Is that right? There's 12 chapters. And I think chapter four goes into the intersections
00:11:55.000 of gender and role. So I break down the four different ways where you can have a male captain
00:12:01.120 and a male passenger, a female captain and a female passenger, and how different combinations tend to lend
00:12:06.800 themselves better to the sexual marketplace because there's alignment in resources and incentives,
00:12:12.020 as it were. And a male passenger isn't very useful to women. So even though there might be a movement
00:12:19.080 to, let's say, normalize stay-at-home dads, we know that in practice, most women do not grow up and spend
00:12:25.920 most of their lives hoping that one day they will take material care of a grown man. Like, that's not an
00:12:33.580 attractive prospect to the vast majority of women. I don't even think it's an attractive prospect to
00:12:38.940 most men. I made a post probably a month and a half, two months ago, about the mental gymnastics
00:12:46.060 a man would have to play in order to justify him being a stay-at-home dad. And of course, all the
00:12:51.160 stay-at-home dads got very, very upset. But at the end of the day, you can look at the, I think you can
00:12:56.240 look at the statistics and see that they're generally less happy and lead to divorces sooner than their
00:13:02.120 traditional counterparts. Yes, it does take a lot of mental gymnastics and never underestimate a
00:13:07.980 human's ability to complete those gymnastics. Like, people will do all kinds of things to
00:13:13.020 diminish cognitive dissonance that would lead to otherwise sources of emotional pain. But yeah,
00:13:19.180 there's lots of statistics. With the little asterisk, which I'll say once because it's very annoying to
00:13:23.060 keep bringing it up over and over again, is that statistics are very different from individuals.
00:13:26.680 And you don't actually have relationships formed between men and women. You have a specific
00:13:32.700 relationship formed between this individual man and this individual woman. And their needs,
00:13:37.660 desires, and skill sets are going to be very different and could deviate significantly from
00:13:41.900 the statistical population or the norm. And that's okay. But in general, yes, we're talking in
00:13:47.900 generalities and these things tend to be true on a population level. Both things are accurate.
00:13:52.200 So then if that's the case, what would you say? And obviously I've read through this portion of
00:13:57.880 the book and it really resonates with me, the prerogatives of the captain. You know, obviously
00:14:02.100 we talk to men, this is called order of man. And if we are to assume that the captain is generally
00:14:07.560 geared towards men traditionally, then I think it would be good for them to understand what is their
00:14:12.240 prerogative in a sexual relationship, a sexual marketplace. Sure. And I also try to explain in the
00:14:17.600 book that there are liabilities to being a female captain that our culture does not very, do a very
00:14:22.680 good job of explaining to women on the front end, which is like bad for informed consent. If your
00:14:29.280 doctor isn't telling you about some of the risks of a drug or a procedure, how can you really make
00:14:33.480 an informed decision about whether to take it? You're just hearing a lot of the positives about
00:14:37.920 female captaincy and not some other liabilities. And I think that's irresponsible. It's leading to a lot
00:14:43.100 of unpreferred outcomes in today's day and age. Well, so let, before, well, before we get into that,
00:14:48.460 because you bring that up, I mean, obviously we have the concept of feminism and now third,
00:14:53.660 fourth way feminism as we move into the future. And I imagine it'll be even more so. What are some
00:15:00.520 of the liabilities that women face when they try to step into that captaincy role? Well, a lot of women,
00:15:06.260 first of all, it takes a long time. It takes at least a decade to ascend to one's captaincy.
00:15:11.900 So it's a lot of work. It's a lot of expense. It's a lot of effort. And it's certainly not guaranteed.
00:15:18.580 Lots of people start down that path and don't arrive. And there are risks associated to not
00:15:22.920 arriving after you invested a considerable amount of generally time and effort into something.
00:15:30.720 So that's one. But let's assume that a woman actually does the hard work and succeeds in a sense
00:15:36.720 to her captaincy. The main problem that she'll have at that stage is, one, regardless of what her
00:15:43.400 culture or third or fourth way feminism tells her, many of the things that she's attracted to,
00:15:50.640 she's not going to find in a male passenger. We know from the context of hypergamy that women tend to
00:15:55.900 mate and date up, that even as women become more successful, they don't think of that and say,
00:16:01.200 oh, now it's an opportunity for me to share some of my success with a less successful man in order
00:16:05.900 to secure the relationship that I would prefer. Women, for better or for worse, they don't share.
00:16:10.260 They don't grow up with that kind of attitude where a man is sort of expected to succeed and then
00:16:16.340 distribute some of those resources and success to his family, his children. That's part of what we're
00:16:24.280 acculturated to do. And I don't think that women are acculturated to do the same thing.
00:16:28.740 There's like the old joke about marriage where, you know, my money is my money and our money is
00:16:34.680 my money too, from a woman's perspective, right? Sorry to interrupt.
00:16:39.160 I mean, I think that's, no, and I interrupted you. I think that's accurate. Men traditionally,
00:16:43.640 from where I sit, are designed to give and women are designed to receive. So where we as men might take
00:16:49.200 the raw ingredients or the raw resources and distribute those to the people we love,
00:16:54.360 women are to receive that and make it better than we could do alone. That's how I look at it.
00:16:58.160 I think there's some truth to that. But in any case, when a woman succeeds, she still wants a
00:17:04.100 more successful man. And the more successful she is, the fewer more successful men there are. I talk
00:17:10.100 about this more later on in the book. And that increases the sexual interest for the top, let's
00:17:17.740 say 10% of men. And given some of their incentives, at least a substantial portion of those men are not
00:17:23.680 going to trade out an uncommon amount of sexual optionality to enter into an exclusive commitment
00:17:29.140 to any one woman, because that just goes against some of his, let's say, more biological incentives.
00:17:34.580 So I make the argument later on in the book that women's success is actually making society a little
00:17:38.740 bit more polygamous, because fewer men are controlling a greater share of all of the sexuality.
00:17:44.860 And those men, when put in that position, are going to be loath to give up that privileged
00:17:51.580 position. So that's another liability. You want to respond?
00:17:54.960 Well, yeah. Well, I was thinking about one thing I heard you talk about, and I can't remember if it
00:17:59.600 was in the book or a podcast. You talked about women controlling primarily the sexual marketplace
00:18:05.700 versus men controlling the commitment marketplace. Is that at odds with what you're saying right now,
00:18:12.880 that fewer men are going to then be able to determine the sexual marketplace? I hope that
00:18:17.900 makes sense. So the way that I and other people, I think, usually say this is that women are the
00:18:24.160 gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of commitment. And I do talk about that later on in
00:18:29.480 the book. So what we're getting at is just like women's, let's say, material success and social
00:18:37.820 success still motivates her to seek out more successful men. And there are fewer of them.
00:18:44.200 A man who has lots of sexual optionality will be loath to dispense with that in favor of one woman.
00:18:50.600 And if he ever does that, she is going to be more attractive than her competition.
00:18:55.480 Do you see? So it's like, just like there are going to be fewer men who can successfully capture
00:19:01.760 the sustained attention of a successful woman. There's going to be fewer women who can capture
00:19:08.280 the sustained attention of a very successful man. And those are going to be extremely attractive
00:19:12.480 women, just like they're going to be extremely successful men. And there's just so many very
00:19:18.380 successful men, and there's only so many very attractive women. But that's how the incentives go.
00:19:23.220 And it's not really a question of man and woman. Like, I think we have to be careful about
00:19:29.180 naturalizing some of these. I think they're economic. And whoever has, like, our standard shift
00:19:35.700 given the available opportunities that we experience at any given stage of our lives.
00:19:40.960 And sometimes that changes. Sometimes people can become wildly successful. Sometimes that's the
00:19:45.920 most destabilizing thing that can happen to a long-term relationship, is one person becomes wildly
00:19:50.140 successful, becomes very rich or very famous, or enters into a new echelon of society. And suddenly he or
00:19:55.920 she is exposed to more and potentially, probably more attractive sexual opportunities. So now what
00:20:03.700 used to be okay, maybe that was a virtue that was made out of a necessity. And now there's not that
00:20:09.300 necessity anymore. Now there's possibility and opportunity. It's going to cause people to
00:20:12.580 reevaluate their criteria for mating and dating. And that has nothing to do with men and women. That
00:20:16.820 has to do with power. That has to do with optionality. That has to do with attractiveness. I talk about
00:20:21.320 that more in chapters seven, eight. So you're right around there in the book. Yeah. Well, it is interesting
00:20:26.380 when you talk about it from an economic standpoint, because I imagine the precision in the way that
00:20:31.220 you talk about it might, for some people, strip away the, uh, some of the nuance or the romanticism
00:20:37.920 through relationships. But it is, I, you said good? Well, not good so much about the nuance, though
00:20:45.360 that's somewhat unavoidable when you talk in population level generalities. But yes, strip away the
00:20:50.540 romance. Let's get rid of it. Chapter nine is love has nothing to do with relationships.
00:20:54.260 And it's my favorite chapter of the book. It's generally the best received chapter of the book
00:20:58.520 as well, is that maybe part of the reason why we've had a terrible success rate with marriage
00:21:04.560 and long-term relationships over the last hundred years is that we have conflated multiple roles into
00:21:11.340 one single person. And most notably, we do that in the creation of the love marriage. Like throughout
00:21:17.240 most of human history, the wife and the mistress were not the same person, but now we want them
00:21:21.520 to be the same person. And it's extremely difficult for one person to discharge both of those roles
00:21:26.240 successfully. This is a little bit of the, uh, and I, and I heard this just over the past day or so,
00:21:31.180 the Madonna whore complex, where you may not be as attracted to your long-term female counterpart,
00:21:38.260 um, or, or partner. If you see her as solely the mother of your children instead of your,
00:21:44.940 your lover, if I'm understanding it correctly. Yeah, that's where it comes from. The Madonna
00:21:49.600 issue, I think traditionally comes up after a woman becomes a mother and it's bound up in the
00:21:56.100 psychoanalytic literature with that man's own idealized relationship to his mother. No one likes
00:22:01.760 to think of their own mother having sex and being a sexual partner, uh, which is why what's the biggest
00:22:08.880 schoolyard insult is I fucked your mom kind of a thing. You know, no one wants to think of their
00:22:13.120 mom as a sexual object who is, uh, satisfying a man's lust, but that might be how she got there.
00:22:20.140 That might be how you got there. Who knows? So, uh, that does tend to mess guys up. Now I'm in the
00:22:26.260 process of creating a series called why men lose interest in sex. None of those episodes have been
00:22:30.900 released yet. As of now, I don't know when this conversation is going to be released,
00:22:34.700 but I do look into some of the misunderstandings about male sexuality. I think the common perception
00:22:41.620 about male sexuality is that, you know, as long as it has a pulse, we're interested, you know,
00:22:46.560 and it's always the men who are clamoring for more sex. And it's always the woman who has the headache
00:22:51.580 and certainly that can happen, but male sexuality is actually far more complex than that. Maybe not as
00:22:58.580 complex as female sexuality, but still complex in its own right. And I do think that one of the
00:23:04.660 things that is at the heart of male sexual drive is objectification. I think that it's easier. It's
00:23:12.900 harder to fuck someone you love. I'm just going to say it's hard to fuck someone you love because when
00:23:18.460 you love somebody, you know them, you care about them. You don't want them to experience pain or
00:23:23.360 distress. But a lot of sex is actually aggressive, whether it's actually aggressive or it's, let's
00:23:29.800 say, sublimated aggression. It can be dark. It can be perverse. It can be wild. And that's not
00:23:38.660 something you do with someone you love. You want to keep someone you love safe. You want to keep
00:23:42.300 them, you want to protect them. But that doesn't make for hot and heavy sex. Like you can maybe make
00:23:47.120 love to someone that you love, but it's very hard to fuck someone you love. That's why sometimes it's
00:23:51.380 easier for guys to do all kinds of wild, exciting, fun stuff with women that they don't really care
00:23:56.940 about. The woman on the inside, the person on the inside is still mostly a cipher. So the guy doesn't
00:24:02.840 have to worry about that, even if he wanted to. He doesn't really know the person. He's just
00:24:07.380 interacting, let's say more or less lustfully, with the physical body that he now has access to.
00:24:12.540 And they're two bodies experiencing and exploring pleasure. And you can almost dispense with the
00:24:17.140 persons involved, which is sometimes leads to great sex. And so what I say to women sometimes
00:24:25.180 in long-term relationships who are suffering from a decline in attraction from their partners
00:24:28.760 is that on some level, it's important for her husband to be still to be able to objectify her.
00:24:35.740 Like there's a little switch that a guy needs to cultivate in his mind, where it's like no matter
00:24:40.200 how much he loves and cares about that woman, he needs to be able to flip that on and just see
00:24:44.280 a nice pair of tits or like this fat ass that he wants to just bend over. And I think that is a
00:24:50.880 way that he can keep the spark of sexual interest alive because that's what the male animal desires.
00:24:56.980 The male animal desires to do that. The male animal doesn't know anything about love. That's a human
00:25:01.340 concept or a higher animal concept. Let's put it that way. That's, that's, I think that's a fair,
00:25:06.840 but, but I also think women don't generally, they don't mind that, you know, we're, we're talking about
00:25:13.460 from, from the concept. I think that's true. Yeah, absolutely. You know, I think when you use the word
00:25:19.000 fuck, it seems like you're doing something to somebody, but at their expense, well, but at their
00:25:25.060 expense, but I don't think women are uninterested in being objectified to some degree, as long as
00:25:32.260 there's other elements that they appreciate, emotional, mental connection, then they're willing,
00:25:37.100 it seems like, to give themselves to a man who's willing to take and ravish them.
00:25:40.820 Absolutely. Women have no problem being objectified by the men. They want to objectify them.
00:25:47.860 But if you are trying to objectify a woman and she does not want to be objectified by you, then
00:25:52.280 you're going to get the HR complaints. So it's not the objectification per se that's problematic.
00:25:57.980 And this is why it's actually very dangerous and bad for, in many respects, bad for women on the
00:26:03.860 population level. When we come out and say things like, you should never objectify women. You should
00:26:09.160 always respect them, respect all women. I've been in an episode about this a long time ago. The
00:26:13.820 concept of respect, in my experience, means different things to the average man and to the
00:26:18.960 average woman. To a man, respect is based on honor and admiration, and it's devoid of sexuality.
00:26:28.680 Like you would never respect your buddy by sexualizing him. You know what I'm saying? It's based on,
00:26:37.000 in any ceremony or ritual or event that's designed to confer respect, like a graduation or a funeral or
00:26:45.260 a military decoration ceremony, it would be inappropriate, if not disgusting, to bring sexuality
00:26:50.860 into it. So respect and sexuality are like almost anathema to each other in the male imagination.
00:26:58.780 And when men are told to respect, respect, respect, and they want to do that because they want to give
00:27:05.720 women what they want in a good faith effort to say, like, I can be a good partner. I want to be a good
00:27:10.400 partner to a woman. Then they remove a lot of that sexuality, which turns them into nice guys.
00:27:15.420 They don't understand why women think that they're great, but they, they think of them like a brother.
00:27:21.800 They don't feel that spark or that chemistry. And the guy gets even more distressed when he sees the
00:27:26.760 woman go off with some, you know, asshole or toxic narcissist or whatever it is. It's no consolation
00:27:35.800 that she thinks that he's awesome, but she won't fuck him. And I think that has to do with the way that
00:27:40.200 he, he, he treats her sometimes.
00:27:43.020 Well, I think a lot of nice guys will look at the quote unquote bad boys and ask themselves why these guys,
00:27:48.460 these dicks, these jerks, these assholes get all the women. I don't think it's the, that they're a bad boy
00:27:54.040 or they mistreat them. I think there's elements of that behavior that makes them very attractive to the
00:28:00.600 women that they're out seeking.
00:28:02.760 Oh, certainly. That is absolutely true is that we can play with the linguistics and say, okay, they're not,
00:28:07.220 they're not cocky. They're confident or they're not arrogant. They're self-assured or bold. So
00:28:14.040 like, and clearly there are, those are different constructs that are adjacent and it's very hard
00:28:19.260 to walk those lines. But again, sexuality is not squeaky clean. Like there's darkness and
00:28:26.800 the bedroom plays by different rules than the rest of society. It's like the wild west.
00:28:32.280 And there are women who get off on being disrespected.
00:28:37.060 There are men who get off on being disrespected. So it's like the idea that
00:28:41.340 these women just want these men because
00:28:44.460 they're confident isn't necessarily the case. Like
00:28:48.780 what people are attracted to
00:28:51.460 is a labyrinth. It's a morass. It's very difficult to tease apart.
00:28:56.020 It's very difficult to understand. Is it even necessary to understand as long as it's not breaking
00:29:00.700 any laws? Um, you know, and, and both people are into it. Like what's the problem, but to say that
00:29:07.180 all women get off at just being treated respectfully by a confident man, that nice guy's mistake as an
00:29:12.700 asshole is also incorrect. Yeah. I, you know, I, as you were saying that I saw a funny video the other
00:29:17.540 day, uh, where it was, it was a video of a husband and wife trying to act normal after they had done
00:29:23.900 quote unquote feral things to each other. And I thought that's, that's good. That's a good
00:29:29.520 relationship. They're in the bedroom. They're, they're both consenting individuals. They're,
00:29:34.520 they're using each other for pleasure. They're giving each other pleasure. And then they come
00:29:39.460 back into quote unquote society or, you know, like, like more sophisticated or whatever and act the way
00:29:46.260 that they should. But I think there's a misconception about what should happen behind closed doors and what
00:29:51.640 should happen in the bedroom. Yeah. I had made an episode a while back called every woman is two
00:29:55.720 women. And what I argue is that there's the front facing woman that you see at work at the grocery
00:30:01.380 store going about society. And then there's the woman in the bedroom and they're very rarely the same
00:30:07.460 person. And men fall into all kinds of fallacies when they believe that the woman's going to act in
00:30:14.900 the bedroom, like she acts in society. And this can go a couple of ways. First of all, is you get the
00:30:20.500 idea that this is a competent, confident, successful woman. Maybe she's a boss bitch type
00:30:25.100 of a woman. That doesn't necessarily mean that she's going to be dominant in the bedroom. She can,
00:30:30.640 but you don't know. Like it's, it's almost impossible to tell by the same token.
00:30:35.640 I wonder if she may not even want to be that because she is so much that energy in public life
00:30:41.080 that she needs something to balance that out in a way. I would say that that's probably more likely,
00:30:45.600 but you never know the individual case until you're actually there and you're exploring that
00:30:51.160 and you're communicating about that. So you can make a reasonable assumption, but you know,
00:30:56.140 people hate to be the object of incorrect assumptions, right? But I, to corroborate what
00:31:00.720 you were saying, I dated in college, a woman who went on to be a dominatrix in a dungeon in New York
00:31:07.500 City. And this was 20 years ago. And she was getting paid a thousand dollars an hour by these high
00:31:11.800 powered lawyers and whatnot to come in. And these were men who basically got their way all the time
00:31:19.220 in society that weren't told no very often, if at all. And she, so what do you think the most asked
00:31:25.340 for services were at that dungeon from these high powered dominant men to be catheterized, to have
00:31:32.580 their balls stepped on, like to be humiliated. I mean, because that's what they don't have.
00:31:39.420 They don't get to feel that anymore. Uh, I I'm making an episode again. This is also in
00:31:44.580 pre-production. A lot of pornography is wish fulfillment. And if you look at a lot of the
00:31:51.180 pornography that men use, it's very transgressive. It's transgressive in a couple of ways. It could
00:31:56.280 be actually violent or aggressive. Like some of it can border on non-consensual or be, you know,
00:32:02.900 in the play of it, be non-consensual or it's just really aggressive. And the guy is just drilling
00:32:08.060 a corner or it can be, let's say, socially transgressive, which is that this is taboo.
00:32:13.940 We shouldn't be doing this. These boundaries shouldn't be crossed and yet they're being
00:32:18.020 crossed. So in both cases, the wish fulfillment of transgressive pornography is power. It's
00:32:23.900 I'm powerful enough to take what I want and to not suffer the consequences. I'm powerful enough that
00:32:29.600 women who shouldn't be fucking me are fucking me because they can't resist me and they're going
00:32:34.380 to suffer the consequences. The wish fulfillment of most pornography of men is power. And that's
00:32:40.180 because most men are powerless. When you look at the fantasies of powerful men, it's not the same
00:32:46.120 as the vast swath of male humanity. You get the opposite is that they want to experience what it's
00:32:53.440 like to be abashed and humiliated and put in their place and to be potentially dominated. Again, this
00:33:01.860 isn't a universal thing, but it does tend to that direction where people want to experience what
00:33:07.020 they, what they haven't experienced yet, what they don't get in other parts of their lives.
00:33:13.020 Men, I'm going to step away from the conversation briefly. I want to mention, I'm very happy to tell
00:33:18.160 you that the Iron Council, our exclusive brotherhood is now open for business. It's more than more than
00:33:24.440 just a group. It's, it's like a set of brotherhood, like-minded men who are committed to taking ownership
00:33:29.780 of every aspect of their lives. So if you're tired of drifting through life without direction,
00:33:35.220 this is where you'll go to build a battle plan, set objectives, build accountability with men who
00:33:41.440 will not let you slide or settle. We have weekly calls, frameworks, accountability. And really what
00:33:48.020 I want to do is help you forge discipline and purpose in your life. There's no fluff or BS. It's all
00:33:53.340 real results. It means that when you join the Iron Council, you're stepping into a tribe, a group of men,
00:33:59.500 and a band of brothers that values strength and integrity and growth. So if you want to become a
00:34:04.640 better father or husband, a leader of men, this community will give you access to men who are on
00:34:11.560 the same mission. And you'll have, again, all the tools and challenges and frameworks that are going
00:34:15.940 to help push you beyond your current limits and achieve better results. So again, we're open right
00:34:20.780 now. Check it out at order of man.com slash iron council. That's order of man.com slash iron
00:34:27.060 council. Do that right after the conversation. For now, I'll get back to it with Orion.
00:34:33.200 One of the things that stood out to me as you were talking about this concept of communicating
00:34:37.880 these issues. And I have been curious as I've read this book and listened to your videos and your
00:34:45.040 YouTube channel. It seems like we're finding a thin line between how much you communicate about
00:34:52.200 these types of issues versus how much you don't communicate because it might kill some of the
00:34:57.980 natural attractiveness to the opposite sex. Yeah, it's tricky. And of course, every individual
00:35:04.360 couple needs to work this out for themselves. But I would at this point make a little distinction
00:35:10.580 between talking and communication. Okay. Talking is a form of communication, but not all communication
00:35:15.260 is talking. And I do think talking for the most part is overrated, especially around things having
00:35:22.500 to do in the bedroom. Talking about sexual needs and desires requires a great deal of emotional maturity,
00:35:29.520 self-knowledge, confidence, vocabulary even can be obstructive to some people. So it's not like you
00:35:37.320 can't do it, but it's kind of the advanced course in both parties need to be there. One person could
00:35:42.960 be the most competent, accepting, open-minded, effective communicator. But if his or her partner
00:35:50.000 is not, it's going to be very difficult to tease that out. It's not impossible, but it's going to be
00:35:55.020 difficult. By the same token, people kind of tell us what we want, what they want and what they don't
00:36:01.200 want, what they like and what they don't like. But they communicate in other ways besides their
00:36:06.420 explicit words, they communicate with their expression, with their tone, with their proxemics,
00:36:13.380 with their body language, body language, with the eye contact. It's like, and we, we, we need to get
00:36:21.060 better at potentially picking up on, on those cues as opposed to relying on, well, everything needs to
00:36:27.080 be explicit, verbally discussed. There's a time and a place for that, but it's certainly, it does kill
00:36:33.860 the vibe. Let's put it that way. Well, and I wrote down, as you were saying that before you even
00:36:37.660 mentioned it is, yeah, you can pick up on that stuff if you listen. And I'm not talking about
00:36:42.420 listen, like auditory listening. Like a third ear. I'm saying paying attention, paying attention.
00:36:47.360 Being perceptive. How is she moving? How is she communicating? How is she, like you said, eye
00:36:51.920 contact? Is she moving closer? Is her body language open or is it closed? I think a lot of this goes to
00:36:58.360 just paying attention. But I also wonder, you know, how much of this material is for men who
00:37:04.220 don't quite have the ability to do that relative to the men who maybe intuitively understand more of
00:37:10.680 it? I don't know. I hear what you're saying, but if the guy's not good at picking up a lot of this
00:37:17.360 nonverbal communication, he, chances are he's not going to be mature and attuned and accepting enough
00:37:22.880 to have nonjudgmental, warm and welcoming, explicit discussions about sexuality either.
00:37:28.740 I would find that to be very strange. Because why? Why? I don't disagree, but I'm curious why you
00:37:34.080 think that's the case. Because on some level, the ability to kind of tease out another person's
00:37:42.060 inner state is not entirely separate from the ability to tease out your own inner state. Like you
00:37:47.980 have to be comfortable with your own feelings and your own desires. Not what you think you want,
00:37:55.080 not what you think you should want, not what you want to want, but what you actually want.
00:38:00.260 And it's hard to honestly perceive another person when you're not in the habit of honestly perceiving
00:38:07.320 yourself. And once you're attuned to your own fluctuations of feeling and sensing, it's easier for
00:38:15.320 to do it with other people. Otherwise, what you get are more or less scripted conversations between
00:38:21.460 people who aren't very self-aware or not very comfortable. And maybe there's a place for scripted
00:38:25.900 conversations because it creates a structure or scaffold for people to enter into a discussion
00:38:30.720 that they would just be terrified of doing otherwise. But that works more or less about as well
00:38:36.380 as scripted pickup. You know, it's not really embedded in the person. And as soon as you go off script,
00:38:42.200 they might not know really how to deal with it or handle it. So most people who are confident enough
00:38:48.920 to say, hey, I know this isn't everybody's bag, but I really like to be dressed up in a bunny suit and
00:38:54.060 be spanked while I'm sucking on a jar of molasses. Are you into that? It's like that person is probably
00:38:59.740 more attuned to other people's internal emotional states because he's so knowledgeable about the weird
00:39:08.920 quirky thing that turns him on. And he's so comfortable with it. And he's so confident in
00:39:12.880 being able to express it that I think it would be really weird if he couldn't pick that shit up in
00:39:16.780 other people. So would you say that's a, I mean, your, your example is a bit extreme, obviously,
00:39:22.940 and you did it for point, but would you say that's a pre knowing yourself and what you're into and what
00:39:28.160 you're interested in is a prerequisite to attracting the opposite sex? I think it's really powerful,
00:39:34.300 especially for men, because a lot of men, because this is the second part of the two woman problem
00:39:39.660 that I was describing earlier. The first part is people assume that the boss bitches just want to
00:39:43.120 be dominant in the bedroom. And as we've been discussing, that's not always, or even often the
00:39:48.300 case. The second side of it is a lot of men look at women like the average woman, and they just think
00:39:56.000 that she has very vanilla desires. And they think that all she wants to do is be in a committed
00:40:01.120 relationship. Women just want commitment. They want to get married. They want to have a family.
00:40:06.600 They're not into any kind of that crazy. She's a good girl, especially if you like the woman
00:40:11.100 for that type of relationship. You, it's part of the Madonna whore thing. You don't want her to be
00:40:16.260 a slut. You want her to be a good girl, a nice girl. And so she's, oh, she's not into that kind of
00:40:20.600 stuff, or she would never go into that. It's like, that's not true. Women can have all kinds of
00:40:25.980 perverse desires. And they do have all kinds of perverse desires. And this is the flip side of it
00:40:33.980 is that women are generally more open and interested in sexual exploration than most men give them
00:40:40.760 credit for. But that takes a certain level of boldness to be able to suggest that or to move
00:40:47.560 the woman in that direction in an actual sexual encounter. Does that answer your question or did I
00:40:51.800 get off topic? No, it does. It reminded me of the quote, you know, um, how's it go late lady in the
00:40:57.920 streets, you know, freak in the sheets type concept. But I think what, at least from where I sit and my
00:41:03.260 own personality is I want her to do that for me and me only that's the freak in the sheets. It's not
00:41:09.380 available to anybody else. Would you agree with that? Well, yeah. Another quote that I've heard
00:41:15.160 that's useful is that, uh, you know, um, woman wants a bad boy who's only good to her and men want a
00:41:23.060 good girl. Who's only bad for him. Good. That's a good, that's interesting. That's a really interesting
00:41:27.580 concept. Yeah. Yeah. I like that. So I agree that most men want that. It's hard to get because most
00:41:35.360 men, the other quote is like, I try to turn a hoe into a housewife where they take the, like, so how does
00:41:40.420 a woman learn to be that sexually open and accomplished? Like she doesn't do that without
00:41:46.180 practice dude. And she's got to get that practice somewhere. So if she's showing up and she can
00:41:51.500 already do it, I mean, where did she learn that? She didn't learn it from you. So she might not be
00:41:57.140 as much of a lady as you think in this metaphor. So you can get it, but I think the best way to get
00:42:02.720 it is to try to find a good girl who's in the context of that committed relationship is open to
00:42:09.260 exploring less vanilla aspects of her sexuality. And you can over time and in, I would say dialogue,
00:42:16.900 but not always spoken dialogue, though sometimes spoken dialogue in a dialogue between the two of
00:42:20.660 you, like open her up to new sexual experiences. And I think the more a woman is attracted to a man,
00:42:26.300 the more she will be willing to give it a shot. Let's put it that way. It leads me into the idea of,
00:42:33.020 of body count. And I think there's, there is a bit of a double standard and I've heard things that
00:42:38.980 you've addressed with this, you know, for example, you know, men are, I think men, it's more acceptable
00:42:44.260 for men to have a higher body count than it is for women. And part of the reason from where I sit and
00:42:49.800 what I've seen is that you make the case it's because in order for men to have sexual encounters,
00:42:53.880 they have to do something. And in order for women to not have sexual encounters, they need to do
00:42:58.780 something. Yeah, it is a double standard. Let's not pretend that it isn't. And there are plenty of
00:43:04.320 double standards that privilege women. One thing I say is that in sexual relationships,
00:43:09.900 inequality is the rule, not the exception. So both sides generally pick on the double standards
00:43:18.780 in which they are the unprivileged party, but they tend to sweep under the rug those double standards
00:43:25.560 from which they benefit. And maybe the disproportionate number of double standards tend to cancel each other
00:43:30.840 out in the wash. So I don't, I don't think that we should be striving, nor do I think it's even
00:43:35.440 possible to eliminate all the double standards and for men and women to really have the same experience.
00:43:40.580 I don't think that's going to happen ever. And certainly not anytime soon. But the argument I make
00:43:45.400 in the book in chapter three is that this is actually an economic thing. And you see it, for example,
00:43:51.420 in a soccer game. So when one team is up three nil, they switch to defense. It's their game to lose.
00:43:57.440 The team that's down will switch to more and more offense. It's their game to win.
00:44:03.000 They'll take more risks.
00:44:03.920 Exactly. And so it has to do with power. It has to do with who is in the more privileged position
00:44:09.880 at any one time. And it just so happens that for most of their singlehood, women are the more
00:44:15.220 powerful player in the sexual marketplace. The average woman from 18 to 30 is far more attractive
00:44:21.480 competitive and enjoys greater optionality than the average man. Now that tends to shift
00:44:27.600 from the thirties and beyond. But like a man who becomes very famous and very wealthy, he switches
00:44:33.240 to defense, dude. He's got more to lose by one woman with a paternity suit or somebody ruining his
00:44:40.780 reputation. So it's not really about men and women. It's about being in a position to either gain or
00:44:47.340 being in a position to lose. And we just think it has to do with men and women because most people
00:44:51.320 date and pair up before it really switches to the man being the more powerful party.
00:44:56.360 Meaning that, I don't know that I've heard you say this, but that women will generally in younger
00:45:01.060 ages date for potential before it actually switches to power in men. That's what I'm hearing you say.
00:45:07.520 They should. And sometimes they do. Like I made an episode a long time called Ladies Find Your Dark Horse,
00:45:12.840 which is, I think, one of the best sexual strategies for a long-term mating that women have,
00:45:19.380 which is as women have this tendency, they want the winner. They want the guy who already has the
00:45:25.540 million bucks. They want the guy who already has the social status. He's obviously less of a risk
00:45:31.160 because like my dad told me a long time ago, Orion, everyone has potential. Everyone has potential.
00:45:36.720 Potential is like sand. Every human being could be more than he or she currently is. How many people are
00:45:41.060 actually working on realizing it and how many people are going to succeed in realizing it
00:45:45.080 in an appreciable timeframe? So he told me, don't marry potential. And maybe that's because I'm a man.
00:45:51.960 The problem, if when women try to not marry potential, when women try to marry the successful
00:45:56.560 man, again, if he's successful and she wants him, chances are there's a hundred other women that
00:46:02.320 want him. And what's the likelihood that she's going to beat out 99 of her intersexual competitors
00:46:07.220 for that one man? And what's the likelihood that that one man who has interest from a hundred women
00:46:12.540 to say, no, I don't like this. I just want to settle down with one woman and not really,
00:46:17.200 who needs sexual novelty? What kind of man really wants to sleep with a whole bunch of women who
00:46:22.620 are really into him? Like that, that's just an immature boy. It's like, come on, let's, let's be real.
00:46:27.360 That's something that almost all men would enjoy and find difficult to give up.
00:46:33.900 So the alternative to that is you have to pick the horse before the race is run, because if you
00:46:39.980 wait until the race is run, you're going to have to compete against all the people around the winner
00:46:44.500 circle for that person's attention. Now you're fucked. But before the race, there might not be
00:46:48.640 anyone checking out that horse. And so you have to get really good as a, as a woman in this metaphor,
00:46:54.760 you got to learn about horses. You got to learn about like what the teeth say and what the forelocks
00:46:59.080 say, or whatever the fuck it is. You have to understand horses to be able to make an informed
00:47:04.300 decision about where to bet. So you can get that winner at a discount before anyone is interested
00:47:09.540 in him. But most women don't want to spend the time to really learn about horses as it were.
00:47:16.300 Um, and, but one of the ways what other women are doing, right? You've talked about that in the book
00:47:19.580 is just watch what other women are doing. And then there's, um, but the women are gathering around
00:47:23.920 the winner circle. They're not gathering around a horse before the race. They want the winner.
00:47:29.360 That's the surest thing. And it's the clearest signal. And that's where the biggest crowds are
00:47:33.900 going to be for sure. I mean, every guy experienced this in high school. It seemed like there was like
00:47:37.380 two guys that all the women wanted. It's like, there's faddishness to female desire, which I've
00:47:41.880 talked about in other episodes as well. I've, I've, I've got a lot of questions on this. Okay. So let's,
00:47:47.040 let's start with the first one. I'm taking notes as we, as we document and talk about these,
00:47:50.660 these conversations. It's interesting when we talk about this double standard, because one thing
00:47:55.660 that, um, I've had conversations about and acknowledged is that if a man wants a woman
00:48:00.360 with a low body count, for example, um, most men are willing to engage in behavior that would
00:48:06.860 increase a woman's body count. And then at the same time, they're looking for a woman who wants a
00:48:12.820 low body count. So a great example of this would be pornography. A man will engage in pornography
00:48:17.020 with a woman who has maybe slept with a thousand men, 10,000 men. I don't know, whatever, whatever
00:48:22.980 the number is. And yet they'll engage in that behavior. And at the same time say, I don't want
00:48:29.580 a woman like that. Although they're contributing to the body count of the woman herself.
00:48:35.440 Yep. Yeah. It's a, it's a double standard. And we're trying to figure out how to work with that.
00:48:40.040 It's like if, and I do make that argument later in the book that it's also important for men to be
00:48:46.380 confident and competent with women, both in terms of seducing them in the early stages of
00:48:52.720 attraction, all the way to like being a good boyfriend or a good husband. How are they going
00:48:57.560 to learn? Like, just like the women need practice to learn how to do all the crazy things in bed. Men
00:49:03.380 need practice to pick women up and to be good lovers and to be competent, caring boyfriends.
00:49:10.460 That's not something that's really taught, except in a very general way. That's not helpful. It's
00:49:15.040 just like, just be a good man. Just love her, just et cetera, et cetera. And that's not very specific,
00:49:21.560 actionable advice. That's why I don't find it useful. But I do think the, what, what it comes down to
00:49:27.980 is that men tend to compartmentalize women is that they're the women that they will use
00:49:35.240 for sexual pleasure in the context of a sexual, in the sexual marketplace. And there are women
00:49:40.580 and there are far fewer that they would be interested in marrying and starting a family
00:49:44.760 with and having a long-term emotional relationship with. And, and they're not the same person for any
00:49:50.440 given man, but there might be some crossover between the two of us. Like we wouldn't draw that line
00:49:56.020 exactly in the same place, you and I. And so that's what leads some women to have higher body counts
00:50:03.040 when they're still being targeted for long-term relationships because other guys didn't draw the
00:50:07.500 line in the same place. And this is why Arthur Schopenhauer in one of his infamous essays kind of
00:50:14.620 talked about the Institute of Prostitution. Most women hate female prostitutes, but Schopenhauer argued
00:50:22.500 that there's no rational basis for that animosity because they're actually protecting their virtue
00:50:28.340 is that they're basically jumping on the grenade of men's lust and sexual desire so that they can
00:50:34.500 remain ladies with low body count. I mean, I don't think that's why they're doing it though.
00:50:38.520 No, it's obviously because that's not their purpose. No, no, of course it's, that's not,
00:50:43.600 they're not thinking I'm going to do this so that another woman can get a husband,
00:50:47.400 like get out of here. Right, exactly. Yeah. He's saying that on a social level,
00:50:52.220 women's animosity around sluts is stupid and wrong. And most slut shaming we know comes from
00:50:58.360 other women. It doesn't come from men. Yeah. I mean, that's, it's interesting. There's just so
00:51:02.660 many dynamics to all of this. And, you know, one of the things that it led me to believe when you
00:51:06.360 were taught or think about when you were talking about men's desire for low body count, although
00:51:13.080 they'll engage in behavior that increases body count in women is this idea. And you mentioned
00:51:17.360 it earlier, this, this sexual novelty. And I'm very curious about when it comes to sexual novelty,
00:51:23.900 I think it's probably somewhat innate biologically for men to engage in that behavior with different
00:51:30.500 women, different personalities in order to fill our biological needs, mainly procreate. But do you
00:51:36.300 think it's possible? And if so, how could you create that same level of sexual novelty inside of a
00:51:41.660 monogamous committed relationship? It's very difficult. So this is another one of the forthcoming
00:51:46.340 episodes where I talk about what kills male sexual drive. And one of the things that kills
00:51:51.680 male sexual drive is habituation, the lack of novelty. And this is often talked about with
00:51:57.140 respect to the Coolidge effect. Are you familiar with that? No, I'm not. The Coolidge effect,
00:52:02.640 I talk about it in the book, but you're probably not there yet, is a well-documented phenomenon in
00:52:08.220 male mammals. So it's been seen in human men. It's been seen in non-human primates. It's been
00:52:15.640 seen in ronids, et cetera. There's some evidence. It's equivocal that there's an attenuated Coolidge
00:52:19.980 effect in women. But again, some of the evidence supports it, some of it doesn't. And when it does
00:52:24.780 support it, it's a much smaller effect than in men. Which is basically like, it could be,
00:52:31.100 if we look at life on this planet, since it's split off into sexes, because before that it was
00:52:38.100 just asexual budding or spores, you know, we didn't always have sexes on the planet. But since
00:52:46.520 that happened, all the way back to like trees, pollen producing trees, angiosperms, the male
00:52:51.320 strategy has been to spread the seed far and wide. And we're going to, we're going to, we're just going
00:52:57.040 to go for it. And the idea that we're going to overproduce 99% of it is going to fail because
00:53:03.140 that's how hard it is to succeed, to reproduce, whether you're a plant or a beaver or a man or
00:53:10.360 a gorilla, it's like, it's hard to make this work. We know throughout human history, like 60 to 70%
00:53:15.940 of women have reproduced, but only 40% of men have reproduced. So it's just harder for guys.
00:53:21.520 I think modernity has made, has maybe, I don't know the concept, I'm going to let you get to it,
00:53:25.940 but I imagine it's modernity has skewed this a little bit with medical advancements and
00:53:30.040 the ease of modernity that has made that less likely to be the case.
00:53:34.320 Less likely for what to be the case?
00:53:36.340 That your offspring won't survive. I mean, the reality is that today, the likelihood of your
00:53:42.320 child dying between the ages of zero to one is significantly less than it was maybe 150,
00:53:49.020 200 years ago.
00:53:50.060 You're absolutely correct. But you have to understand that these are psychological mechanisms that may
00:53:55.740 be based in a billion years of evolution. Just like you could be wearing a virtual reality helmet
00:54:01.900 and headphones and know that you're just experiencing a screen. If we put you on one of those little
00:54:07.300 contraptions where you think you're standing on the edge of a cliff and I push you, you're probably
00:54:10.900 going to startle and panic. It's like, yeah, some of these things inside of us are not very amenable
00:54:18.080 to reason or information. They're deeply rooted unconsciously, almost cellularly in the organism
00:54:26.220 that we inhabit. Let's put it that way.
00:54:29.760 Makes sense.
00:54:30.400 So men spread their seed far and wide because any one attempt is most likely to lead to failure. So
00:54:35.760 you overproduce or at least something sticks. And if possible, something sticks through with
00:54:41.180 multiple females because the genetic diversity will increase the likelihood that at least some
00:54:45.740 of your offspring will survive to sexual maturity under who knows what kind of conditions will occur
00:54:50.520 in the future. So, uh, and that's a very different potential incentive from the female's
00:54:56.000 perspective. Instead of producing a trillion more or less viable sperm in a month, she produces a
00:55:00.880 single viable gamete. And because she's also compromised to some extent and vulnerable in late
00:55:09.000 stage pregnancy and early postpartum, it, it's better for her and the child's survival to latch on to
00:55:16.720 a protector provider. Now, sometimes that protector provider can be the community. Like in the great
00:55:22.540 book, Sex at Dawn, um, they talk about how there isn't in a lot of traditional indigenous cultures,
00:55:30.800 like most of the societies that have existed on the planet have been polygamous. Um, like marriage
00:55:36.680 and monogamy is, uh, it's very prevalent, but that's because one or two societies became very
00:55:42.000 successful. Maybe they became successful in part because of the monogamy. It's a social stabilizing
00:55:47.560 force, but it's certainly possible for, uh, women to believe that they're going to be okay and
00:55:55.520 provided for and protected by the, by a community. And then we see a relaxation of, uh, all kinds of
00:56:02.760 sexual behaviors that are very formally protected in monogamous societies. Well, so I have a question
00:56:09.260 on that before you get to the rest of it. And I'm sorry, I've got a ton of questions on this stuff,
00:56:12.820 but it's great, man. So good conversation so far. Thank you. Yeah, no, it's been awesome, but I
00:56:17.940 understand why a man would spread his seed, so to speak. I get that. And when you talked about
00:56:22.720 genetic diversity, that's something I had not considered that makes sense to me, but what is
00:56:26.860 in the best interest of the woman from her perspective, because it seems like the more a
00:56:31.720 man spreads his seed or, or the more sexual partners he has, the less resources he has available
00:56:38.100 to protect and provide for her? Or is she just kind of left at the whim of, um, it is what it is
00:56:44.820 for lack of a better term. Well, it just depends on how you look at it. So are we on some level,
00:56:51.520 it probably took a while for human beings to even understand that sex makes babies. I know that sounds
00:56:58.340 crazy, but it's actually kind of crazy to think, Oh, that, that thing that we did nine months ago
00:57:03.760 made this baby. Like, I guess we probably figured that out by, by observing animals and their
00:57:11.060 copulation leading to pregnancy and to kind of draw the same parallel. But like in many traditional
00:57:17.660 societies where there were, let's say it was a more tribal, there wasn't a lot of monogamy.
00:57:25.380 It just like the food or the material resources weren't owned privately, sexual partners weren't owned
00:57:33.060 privately. And the idea that you could hoard that woman for yourself would be just as crazy as saying
00:57:38.360 that you could have that food to yourself and you don't have to share it. That's the argument that
00:57:42.880 the authors of sex at dawn make. And so monogamy really only came into vogue, let's say, in tandem
00:57:50.960 with the development of private property. And that only really happened post agricultural revolution
00:57:56.240 when people became settled and landed on some level. Before that people lived in tribes and it was
00:58:02.580 actually in their interest to go to war with neighboring tribes from time to time. And war
00:58:08.560 at this level looked very different. It didn't usually revolve around death and killing, though
00:58:13.280 there was probably some collateral damage involved, but it was, we need fresh stock. We need fresh
00:58:18.920 livestock. If we just keep breeding internally, that's, that's going to lead to complications. Now,
00:58:26.240 did they have an understanding of genetics and inbreeding at that time? No, that's why they just came up
00:58:31.000 with the incest taboo, which is on some intuitive level, they understood that bad evil things happen
00:58:37.680 to people. Like they get cursed when they break this taboo because they saw through subsequent
00:58:43.780 generations of inbreeding. Sure. Deformities, things like that you're talking about. Absolutely. So,
00:58:48.420 and how do they interpret that? They've been cursed. They've been visited by evil spirits. And so this is
00:58:53.700 the unbreakable taboo, but it's the unbreakable taboo because they saw the consequences of
00:58:59.880 progressive inbreeding. And so if you lived in a community of a hundred, 200 people, at least once
00:59:04.820 a generation, you got to go find some new wives. And that's either going to happen peaceably through
00:59:09.440 trade, or it's going to happen, let's say, aggressively by, by rating. Sure. Yeah. And that's,
00:59:15.720 that's mostly why wars were fought throughout human history was for livestock. It wasn't for
00:59:22.240 gold like that. That's a very recent development. Well, I mean, I think you bring up a good point
00:59:29.060 when you're talking about gold and property and land, you know, that's the general thing that we
00:59:33.400 think of regarding wars, but this is a little bit different context, but every fight that I ever got
00:59:39.100 into in high school was over a girl. You know what I mean? So, and, and I like this concept of,
00:59:47.300 or I like the idea or the way that you term it livestock, because this is interesting within your
00:59:52.800 book, you call it the value of others. And you're, you're really approaching it from an economic
00:59:57.460 standpoint, not necessarily the lovey dovey feel good stuff that so many people write about it in the
01:00:05.540 context of, and I think this gives it a bit of depth and framework in which to build maybe more
01:00:12.380 of that emotional connection on. Sure. I don't think it's impossible. Like I argue in, in chapter
01:00:17.740 nine, clearly things like love and loyalty and friendship exist in the context of long-term
01:00:23.060 romantic relationships, but it's almost like those things are overlaid on top and it's like a
01:00:30.100 serendipitous coincidence. The reason why that relationship got transacted and stays together
01:00:35.980 has to do with the exchange of value that undergirds it. And if the value exchange is too skewed for too
01:00:42.240 long, that generally leads to the dissolution of the relationship, or it would never would have been
01:00:45.780 formed to begin with. And when people put the emotions before the value proposition, they suffer
01:00:52.020 and they don't know why they think I'm a good person and they may be right. I have lots to offer a
01:00:57.540 partner. They may be right, but until they attend to the value proposition that undergirds relationships,
01:01:02.900 they're going to suffer. And especially when it comes to marriage, as I make the argument later in
01:01:07.000 the book, marriage is kind of like, certainly traditionally, it's kind of like founding a small
01:01:15.140 business. It's like you're going in with a co-founder to start Family Inc. Like I think the best
01:01:21.540 reason to get married is to raise a family. And so how do you choose a partner for a startup? Well,
01:01:30.160 we have complementary skill sets. We can't both be the CEO. That's not going to work. I don't need
01:01:35.460 another CEO. I need a CFO. I need a numbers guy. So there's complementary skill sets. There's fairly
01:01:42.340 equal competence and effort, because if one person is more competent and trying harder than the other,
01:01:46.660 that's not going to work in a partnership. And it's like, it works. We're here to kind of like
01:01:53.120 get some overarching mission accomplished. To that end, you don't even need to like your
01:02:00.200 co-founder. And I'm sure that happens over the course of a business relationship. But you know
01:02:05.820 what? You can talk to these guys, because I talk to a lot of powerful, successful entrepreneurs at
01:02:11.860 this stage in my career, especially in the Bay Area. And they'll tell me privately, I fucking can't
01:02:15.820 stand this guy anymore. But you know what? He's really good at his job. He gets the job done.
01:02:20.780 And that's it. Like you put on your professional face, and you do your fucking job together,
01:02:26.620 because you understand that it's the best possible chance of succeeding in your mutual mission. You
01:02:31.100 don't even have to like the guy. The same is true for marriage. I know that sounds very strange,
01:02:35.920 but you don't even have to like them. You're here to do a job. And as long as you are both
01:02:41.160 successfully discharging your roles in the service of your overarching mission,
01:02:45.000 and you don't put unnecessary expectations on that role or that relationship, you can succeed.
01:02:52.140 You can succeed. Now, the problem is, if you and I go into business, and I think, you know,
01:02:58.120 Ryan's the best CFO I can find. I'll be the CEO. He's a great guy. And I want to make a billion
01:03:02.700 dollars with this guy. If I want that, that's already a tall order, right? But if I also say,
01:03:07.000 yeah, I want a guy that I can make a billion dollars with, but I also want a new best friend.
01:03:11.680 I want somebody that like, after we kill at the office, we're just going to go down to a local
01:03:15.820 bar and just shoot the shit for three hours and chase girls and, you know, have like guy time.
01:03:21.000 It's like, good luck finding that dude. Good luck finding the guy that you can make a billion
01:03:25.180 dollars with and drink beer with every day after work. You're not going to find the guy. The guy
01:03:29.960 that's good at the drinking beer ain't going to be the guy that's going to help you make a million,
01:03:33.140 a billion dollars and vice versa. But how many expectations do we put on to our romantic
01:03:38.700 partners these days is I want, I want a mother of my children. I also want a sexy lover, but I also
01:03:45.800 want a stable partner who's emotionally available and who will support me through the ups and downs
01:03:51.120 of life. I want a therapist and a cheerleader. I want somebody who's going to be my business partner
01:03:58.300 because I want a contract. I want a legal agreement and all the privileges that come with it. Like how
01:04:02.320 many fucking things do you want? And that's why marriage is suffering is people want it to be
01:04:07.380 too many things. When for most of human history, it's a very humble institution. It's a protected
01:04:13.620 place to raise children. That's it. You never expected to love really in the sense of feeling
01:04:20.560 that kind of thing to your wife. More pragmatic. It's pragmatic and it was more role-based and
01:04:26.560 duty-bound, which is there are privileges and responsibilities to being a husband and
01:04:31.100 their privileges and responsibilities to being a wife. And as long as we both can do our jobs and
01:04:35.440 we understand like professionalism, like we can get along with each other. And if you want to drink
01:04:40.280 beer, you got buddies down the street. You want to have a love affair, you get a mistress. And it's
01:04:44.040 like, that's how things were for a long time. Now we want too many things. And that comes with the
01:04:48.960 dissolution of community and the extended family network. Well, I mean, in addition to what you're
01:04:52.840 saying, I also think there's this idea that you want the best version of that thing, but you don't want
01:04:57.800 the worst version of what comes with it. And it's a little bit of the scenario of maybe throwing the
01:05:02.140 baby out with the bathwater. So I was talking with somebody very close to me and we had talked about
01:05:07.280 this idea of passion. You know, I, I love passion. I love somebody who's excited about things, somebody
01:05:12.940 who has fire. And if I want that, then I can't complain when that fire, that ire is directed at me
01:05:18.480 sometimes because you can't have one without the other. And I think too many people, men will say,
01:05:25.180 Hey, I really want this woman who's passionate, but I don't want her to be emotional.
01:05:29.880 Good luck. They go hand and they're the exact same thing. They're two sides of the same coin.
01:05:35.420 Yeah. And I've dated some passionate women and I didn't think personally that the lows offset the
01:05:40.960 highs or the highs offset the lows. So I I'm better with more with women with more attenuated emotional
01:05:48.580 expressivity. And I've learned that about myself and that works for me. So just like, I'm not going to be
01:05:53.860 for every woman. Not every woman is going to be for me. And it's that kind of accurate self-knowledge
01:05:58.500 and that reality-based acceptance that, you know, everything that you get comes at some kind of
01:06:03.900 cost or price, uh, like which costs are you willing to pay? And again, to only want a few things to only
01:06:11.660 want a few things from your partner, because that makes it much less likely that you'll be disappointed.
01:06:16.680 If you want 10 things, even if I did nine of them perfectly and you really needed that 10th,
01:06:21.280 well, that's the end of that relationship. And what's the likelihood that you're going to find
01:06:24.920 the next person who can satisfy all 10 of them better than I could in an appreciable timeline?
01:06:29.700 It's very, very small, right? So people are optimizing, but sometimes optimization is really
01:06:34.820 disguised perfectionism and perfectionism is an anxiety disorder. It's a way of managing anxiety in,
01:06:40.480 uh, in the face of risk and uncertainty, uh, and foreclosure, which is a risk that we commit to soon
01:06:47.980 before a better option comes along. Well, I mean, I like the idea of, of, you know,
01:06:52.880 and obviously there's more than 10, but just so we can make it simple, 10 things like I'd rather have
01:06:58.000 somebody who's an eight or a nine and three things and maybe a three or a four and the seven others
01:07:03.560 than somebody who's a four to a six and all 10 things. It's just a matter of priorities.
01:07:10.000 Yeah. I think it's really important to dial in. What is it? What is it that you really,
01:07:14.100 you really want? So just to put this in perspective, Ryan, you talk to a lot of guys,
01:07:18.320 right? In your community. Sure. Okay. How many guys do you personally know who have a job that is
01:07:24.220 high paying, personally fulfilling and low stress? Yeah. Zero. Zero. And that's only three things.
01:07:32.600 That's only three things. Like no one gets three things from work. Maybe you get low stress and
01:07:40.160 fulfilling, but you're not going to make a lot of money. Maybe you get fulfilling and high paying,
01:07:44.420 but it's going to be stressful, et cetera, et cetera. Like you're lucky if you get two things.
01:07:47.960 Most people maybe get one. Like most people don't get any of those things. Most people do not have
01:07:52.260 high paying jobs. Most people do not have jobs that are very fulfilling. And most people don't
01:07:56.200 have jobs that are stress-free. You're lucky if you get one of those things, you get two of those
01:07:59.400 things, you know, once in a blue moon, no one gets all three of those things. And then how many
01:08:04.900 things do people then rattle off? You said it's 10 is a nice round number, but I'll want more things.
01:08:09.620 It's like, dude, that's not going to be good. Want two or three things max from a partner.
01:08:15.600 That also sets him or her up for success. Like if you want 15 things from me as a friend,
01:08:21.860 how can I not disappoint you inevitably? Yeah. I've set you up for failure.
01:08:26.460 You've set me up for failure. I could try with all of my heart and all the goodwill in the world
01:08:31.100 to satisfy you. I just can't be all things to you. You know what I'm saying? So give me opportunities
01:08:37.100 to win, give me opportunities to succeed. And when you want all those things for me,
01:08:41.860 you're just on some level going to, I'm going to let you down. You set me up for failure.
01:08:46.660 And maybe if you're not self-aware, you're going to think that I was the problem when I might've
01:08:51.340 been a pretty good friend. You know what I'm saying? Well, Orion, as we wind things down,
01:08:55.080 I have one other question for you. And I know this might be a difficult question to answer because
01:08:59.900 it's pretty general and there are so many nuances to this, but generally what would you say a woman
01:09:07.560 is looking for in men? Because I think if we understand that we as men might be able to
01:09:14.120 figure out how we can become more, to use your term, viable in the sexual marketplace.
01:09:19.800 Yeah. So I'm in an episode about this recently. It's called What Women Want.
01:09:23.880 And the true but unsatisfying answer is that women want what other women want.
01:09:30.100 So the best way to get, to be attracted to women is to be attractive to women. Okay. So this is a
01:09:36.740 chicken and the egg kind of thing. Yeah. Circular logic a little bit.
01:09:40.260 Right. So it's true, but unfulfilling. In general, you have to take what women tell you about what
01:09:46.040 they're looking for with a large grain of salt. You have to take that from men as well. In my
01:09:52.240 experience as a therapist, words are more often used to obscure the truth than reveal it. Words
01:09:58.480 are more often used to obscure the truth than reveal it. And a lot of people lie first and foremost to
01:10:02.060 themselves. They cannot give you what they don't have. And most people don't have the unvarnished
01:10:07.400 truth about their own inner workings. Like nobody does. It's just a question of degree. Clearly some
01:10:13.160 people are more self-aware and insightful than others. Okay. So when you talk to women about what they
01:10:18.840 want, they'll say things like, I want a kind man. I want a loyal man. I want a man who makes me feel
01:10:23.780 safe. I want an ambitious or driven man. It's like, yeah, let's, let's agree that they, they actually
01:10:30.680 want those things, but they want those things from the men that they're already attracted to. That's
01:10:35.220 the part that women always leave out and not being attracted to those women and having those things
01:10:41.960 will not succeed with women. The attraction always, always, always comes first. Okay. So the, again,
01:10:50.080 we're getting rid of a lot of nuance, but next level down is what do women want? They want an
01:10:54.060 attractive man and an attractive man is what they sexually respond to. Okay. Now there's some of those
01:11:00.960 things are in your control as a man. And some of those things are outside of your control as a man,
01:11:04.960 things like your height, your facial symmetry. That's about it. Like there's some people just have
01:11:10.080 better genetics than others. Your body composition. I'm sure your muscle mass versus fat, things like
01:11:15.500 that. I'm sure as well. But you can control that. That's my point. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Fair enough.
01:11:19.660 Yeah. Good point. So a lot of guys spend too much time lamenting the things that they don't have in
01:11:25.020 their control, their height, their facial symmetry, their genetics, and they ignore the things that they
01:11:30.780 do have in their control. It's like, are you, are you lifting weights? Are you at a reasonable,
01:11:36.460 if not attractive, body fat composition? Are you, are you happy and like excited about your life?
01:11:44.460 Like another one of the sound bites I have is that men kind of want the Barbie doll. Women want all
01:11:50.280 the shit that Ken doll comes with. So it's like, do you have an interesting life? Like, have you built
01:11:56.860 up an interesting life? Are you happy in it? Are you excited about getting up every day? Do you have
01:12:02.200 plans for the future? Like another thing, the trap that men fall into is that, oh, I just need to be
01:12:07.180 a billionaire. That's what Orion say. I just need to have six packs. It's like, no, both of those
01:12:11.180 things and many others besides are attraction proxies. I know men who can't get laid on their
01:12:16.640 own super yachts because they just think that buying the yacht, women just throw up, show up and start
01:12:21.620 stripping their clothes off. And that's not how it works. Like you still have to seduce the women when
01:12:27.360 you have a super yacht. Maybe it's a little easier, but you still have to do it. You can't
01:12:31.300 just be like, like my boat and I'll suck my dick. Like that doesn't work. They're not going to line
01:12:36.480 up in front of the, the, the boat. I mean, if that were the case, every guy would just go rent a yacht
01:12:41.380 and invite a bunch of beautiful women and get exactly what they wanted. So there's more to it,
01:12:45.020 clearly. Well, my point is, is that I think men are more into the idea of like, okay, women, all things
01:12:52.460 being equal, which is true. Women prefer a man with more resources to less. All other things being
01:12:57.100 equal. Why wouldn't they? And so men might think, okay, well I'll get, I'll just make a lot of money
01:13:02.780 and they'll work 10, 15, 20 years at doing that. And it's fucking hard to make a lot of money, but it
01:13:08.560 might only take a year or two for them to learn to seduce a woman and to learn how to talk to her
01:13:12.160 and to learn how to engage with her emotions and learn how to be confident in leading her to the
01:13:17.420 bedroom and in the bedroom. And that's the more direct path to getting more women. But a lot of
01:13:23.380 men will take the indirect path. I'll get the, oh no, I'm not ready to date yet. Once I get a six
01:13:28.320 pack, once I get down to 8% body fat, you know, when's that going to be, dude? That might be in
01:13:32.860 another five years of hard work. Maybe you'll get there. Maybe you don't. Oh, I'll, I'll just once I
01:13:39.260 have a million dollars, everything is to be easy. Well, it could take you 10 years. Maybe you get there.
01:13:42.880 Maybe you don't. How about you just learn to talk to a woman in a confident way? And how are you
01:13:46.700 going to learn to do that? By talking to women and fucking up and, and coming off as being awkward,
01:13:52.180 coming off as being creepy. Like you have to, it's like learning another language. You have to make
01:13:55.880 peace with the fact that you're going to make grammatical errors. You're going to make slips
01:13:59.480 of the tongue, but there's no other way of getting better at a language than fucking speaking the
01:14:03.960 language. So you have to go out and practice. Um, okay. So the things that you can control are your,
01:14:10.400 uh, your body composition, your fashion, like this is the easiest one to like, just throw two grand
01:14:18.660 at a few good outfits and you get one additional point, like get, take care of your hair, take care
01:14:25.220 of your shoes and have a couple of good outfits that play to your skin tone, your, your physique that
01:14:31.680 are hip. Um, I made an, an interesting episode a long time ago called most men are wallpaper. Um,
01:14:39.220 it's very easy to stand out as a man. It's harder. Women's fashion is all over the place. You go to
01:14:45.740 the Met Gala. It's like the women are doing one spectacular, sensational thing after the other.
01:14:52.960 It would be so easy to stand out as a guy from a fashion perspective. You know what I'm saying?
01:14:57.480 Sure. So don't be afraid to take a little bit of risk in that department. You don't have to like
01:15:02.240 pretend you're not playing dress up. You're not here to pretend. I didn't show up on this call
01:15:06.440 with a 10 gallon hat and some cowboy boots. You know what I'm saying? Um, we'll be disingenuous
01:15:10.820 and women would see right through it. One would think, right. Um, so you want to kind of lean into
01:15:17.240 yourself a little bit more and don't be afraid to take a few risks with respect to your presentation
01:15:22.020 in general, as a man, it's better to be more attractive to a, to fewer women than to be,
01:15:28.120 uh, less attracted to more. Yeah. I guess that's, that's the logical conclusion to that. It's
01:15:34.000 basically, you want to be, it's better to be fewer women's number one choice than to be more women's
01:15:38.300 number two, or in most cases, like number 10. Yeah. Well, yeah. Yeah. If you can be very,
01:15:43.420 if like 1% of women find you super duper hot, like that's more women than you're ever going to know
01:15:48.500 how to deal with in your entire life. I don't care how much of a Casanova you are. So just try
01:15:52.780 to find that. I mean, that's an eternal principle. I mean, it's, it applies to podcasting. You know,
01:15:56.500 I, I could talk about a lot of things to a lot of people, both men and women, but I don't,
01:16:00.740 I talk to men about these issues and that's more attractive to the men who want to hear it than
01:16:05.300 the billions of people who may not be interested at all. Yeah. I, I learned that in business. You know,
01:16:11.300 when I started as a tutor, I wanted to be, I taught Latin and calculus and American history.
01:16:16.460 And it was only when I dialed in on one particular test that the people were lighting up around the
01:16:22.060 block. When I first got my therapist license, I'll do depression. I'll do anxiety. I'll do
01:16:26.120 relationship coaching. And it was only when I dialed in and said, no, I'm going to focus on
01:16:29.840 men's mental health that I had a wait list within a month or two. So like in general, it's better to
01:16:35.320 be more specialized, but that means that we have to attenuate our expectations for that person.
01:16:39.480 You can't expect the guy, the best plumber in the town to be the best wedding planner.
01:16:46.460 Like that would be weird if that were true. Yeah. And it would, it would, it would confuse the
01:16:52.780 marketing as well. So it's like, pick your lane and stick with it. And you can't get everybody,
01:16:58.020 but you can get enough to be successful and to be happy for sure. So take care of your fashion,
01:17:03.120 take care of your health, learn to talk to women, like just learn to get comfortable with them.
01:17:07.820 It's really helpful for relationships of all kinds to develop a gregarious, if not a personality,
01:17:15.080 then at least a persona, someone that you can kind of turn on and light up in order to like
01:17:20.960 make connections with people. It's not the guys who just keep their head downs at their desks and
01:17:26.040 work really hard who end up being the CEO for better or for worse. It's not always the most,
01:17:30.800 the best person for the job who gets promoted. It's the person who knows how to work the network
01:17:36.500 of relationships that those jobs are embedded in. And the people who do that best are the ones
01:17:41.420 who practice and go out there and they shake hands and they get to know people. Um, we can roll our
01:17:46.740 eyes and sigh, or we can embrace the reality of that and get better at being gregarious and get better
01:17:52.580 at cultivating relationship. Um, what else is attractive? Uh, this gets into kind of darker realm,
01:17:59.540 but men are more attractive to women when their feelings are unclear. So think about it this way.
01:18:06.400 I do a lot of comparisons to the professional context because there are more similarities than
01:18:10.680 exceptions between professionalism and let's say romantic relationships. Let's say that, uh,
01:18:16.160 you're in the market for a job. You're interviewing at two places. The first one says, Ryan, we love you,
01:18:21.520 man. Like you're by far the best applicant that we've received this year. We can't wait for you to get
01:18:27.240 started. We already have your office set up. Just say the word. And if you need time, don't worry
01:18:32.400 about it. Take all the time in the world. This it's yours for the taking. You got it. Okay. It's
01:18:36.980 like, that feels good, but you know, what's behind door number two? Like there's absolutely no risk or
01:18:42.800 loss for me to look behind door number two, because I'm already guaranteed door number one.
01:18:47.020 If door number two is worse, great. I have door number one, but if door number two is better,
01:18:50.840 it's a good thing. I didn't foreclose on door number one and door number two might say, Hey,
01:18:54.360 you know, Ryan, thanks for coming out. Uh, we have a number of applicants that we still have yet to
01:18:59.140 interview. We'll be in touch. Like you're going to be thinking more about the second option than you
01:19:04.880 are about the first. You already know how things are going to go with the first option for better,
01:19:08.960 for worse. So this kind of, you know, when we deploy these strategies or tactics intentionally,
01:19:16.580 we call them manipulative. Right. I was going to ask that. Is this manipulation? I was going to ask
01:19:21.180 you that. Well, probably like, yeah, it's in a gray zone. I talk about it in the book is that maybe
01:19:27.400 we need to re-examine our attitude towards the word manipulation, because there's lots of things that
01:19:34.800 are manipulative and we want to be manipulated. We go to the movies. We want to be manipulated.
01:19:39.900 We don't want to be there the whole time being like, this is just projected light on a screen.
01:19:44.260 These are all paid actors in this role. Am I right? Like we want to be manipulated and that's
01:19:48.620 what allows us to feel something. Now we don't think we have a problem with that because on some
01:19:52.880 level we're consenting to being manipulated when we buy the ticket to the theater. But on some level,
01:19:58.640 when you enter into the sexual marketplace, I would like the woman to manipulate me with some makeup.
01:20:02.760 I would like the woman to show up and let's say, play to her strengths. I would like her to hold
01:20:08.660 in her farts. It's not that she doesn't, she doesn't have flatulence. Let's not pretend that
01:20:13.760 she's the, she doesn't have certain orifices, but like, I would prefer that the experience be
01:20:19.960 manipulated in such a way that we can have a kind of an emotional experience and connection
01:20:24.140 and certain things, if they're not manipulated, will, will prevent that or encourage that.
01:20:29.620 And the question is like, are you doing this solely for your own benefit or at another person's
01:20:35.140 detriment? Or are you doing this without integrity or with duplicity? I think those are really the,
01:20:40.540 the questions to ask, not whether this is manipulative.
01:20:43.040 I, I, I would, I would definitely agree with that. I thought a lot about this concept of manipulation
01:20:47.820 and another word that I've often used is influence. You're just influencing somebody for,
01:20:52.600 for a positive outcome. I think manipulation becomes a problem when you're doing it at the expense
01:20:58.080 of somebody else, but putting your best foot forward is not at the expense of anybody else.
01:21:03.600 I don't think so. Um, and on some level, you mean, yeah, we would call it manipulative. If I
01:21:09.660 was a car salesman and I sold you a lemon, I knew that the car sucked, but I wanted to put my commission
01:21:16.360 over your, uh, likelihood. However, if I show that car nice and clean and in the best lighting,
01:21:23.780 and I highlight all of the features that are relevant to you, I get my commission and you get
01:21:28.700 a car, you get the best car that's available for you. How do we both not fucking win as a consequence
01:21:33.480 of my manipulation?
01:21:34.900 Solid, solid point. Well, Orion, this has been fascinating, man. Um, I've got a lot more questions.
01:21:39.940 I hope at some point we can do a round two. If you're open for that, I'd love to do that.
01:21:44.220 Absolutely. You asked really good questions. You were an excellent interlocutor, as they say,
01:21:50.940 uh, really happy with the way this went. Uh, let me know if there's anything else I can do for you
01:21:55.400 in your community. Awesome. Thank you. Tell the guys where to connect with you. Obviously we've
01:21:59.720 been talking about the book, the value of others. I've read part of it. I know I listened to most
01:22:04.300 of it on my, uh, my commute and my drive. So it's available in, in audio as well, but tell the guys
01:22:09.980 where to connect with you and YouTube is big. You do some stuff over on Instagram as well. Let them
01:22:14.340 know where to go. Yeah. Everything sort of spins from YouTube. So if you're interested in my work,
01:22:18.280 check me out on YouTube, the channel is called psych hacks. Uh, and in the description of every
01:22:24.800 full length episode are links to my website where people can join my free weekly newsletter. They can
01:22:30.380 book paid one-on-one consultations. They can join my exclusive member community. They can get access
01:22:35.940 to the paperback, the ebook or the audio book versions of my book. Uh, and I cut up some of the
01:22:42.220 episodes and put them on other socials like LinkedIn and Instagram, et cetera. But if you want the real
01:22:47.380 deal cause I don't really like shorts, I understand that they're kind of a necessary evil. Uh, but if
01:22:52.360 you want the full story, like check out the full length episodes on YouTube, they're definitely more
01:22:56.920 nuanced than just the 42nd clips that you see on Instagram. And even those are fairly, they're
01:23:02.220 relatively short. You know, I, I, you know, what, 10, 15, 20 minutes are some of the ones that I've
01:23:07.040 caught. Eight to 12 minutes is what I shoot for. Yeah. I don't want to bore people. Yeah. Well, I
01:23:10.980 appreciate it. We'll make sure we sync everything up, um, and get this information out to the guys
01:23:15.140 because this is valuable. And I got to say too, the way that you present it is refreshing. Um,
01:23:20.760 it's not this woo woo mentality where it's hard to really conceptualize. You bring a lot of solid
01:23:27.220 research and information to it, but not in a way that's boring or hard to understand. So I appreciate
01:23:32.860 your work and the effort you've put into making it consumable to other people. Thanks, man. I
01:23:37.300 appreciate it. I also am trying not to enrage men or alienate women. Those are my two goals. It's,
01:23:43.780 it's hard to do both the same time, but like, I like this, uh, modern times too. I want women to
01:23:49.940 succeed. And sometimes they're doing things that are at odds with their likelihood of success.
01:23:56.000 And so that's kind of where I'm coming from is that the more people have loving, stable,
01:24:01.160 satisfying relationships, the better this fucking world is going to be. And we can't really have
01:24:06.580 long-term solutions at the expense of any one sex. So let's kind of figure out what's standing in
01:24:11.800 the way and get on with the business of living and loving. That's how I see it.
01:24:15.100 Thanks, Orion. Appreciate you, man.
01:24:18.380 Gentlemen, there you go. Orion Terriban. I am really fascinated by the way this guy thinks.
01:24:23.900 Uh, I think some of the concepts can be controversial, but if you know where he's coming
01:24:28.140 from, which is to serve men and women in their relationship dynamics, I think it puts a new light
01:24:33.620 on his conversations and his perspective. And of course he's very well studied and researched
01:24:39.060 on these topics. So there's a lot of value there. I would highly suggest if you're interested in more
01:24:43.120 of this, check out his channel, psych hacks on YouTube, and then also pick up a copy of his book,
01:24:48.580 the value of others. Please make sure you tag me and him in anything that you share on social media.
01:24:54.480 And then also check out our exclusive brotherhood, the iron council. You can do that at order of man.com
01:24:59.980 slash iron council. All right, guys, those are your marching orders. We'll be back tomorrow for our
01:25:05.540 ask me anything until then go out there, take action and become the man you are meant to be.
01:25:14.620 Thank you for listening to the order of man podcast. You're ready to take charge of your life
01:25:19.220 and be more of the man you were meant to be. We invite you to join the order at order of man.com.