00:11:25.300So yeah, and the other thing she's not including is that before you didn't have to go through
00:11:33.400a four-year process in order to get married.
00:11:37.000A hundred years ago, it was three months.
1.00
00:11:38.940Now, bitches, we got to put in four years.
1.00
00:11:41.500This is good for the younger ladies to know.
1.00
00:11:44.140Yeah, this is good for the younger start, you know, start sooner because you got your ass has got four years before you get a ring on average.
1.00
00:11:55.580Now, you might get a guy that's, you know, does goes quicker than this.
00:12:01.100But for the guys that really know what's going on there, they're taking their sweet time because they have it.
01:13:15.720let me know nurturing which is what most people believe and what most religions cultures believe
01:13:25.360no that woman wasn't black you guys act like most abortions are done by white women
01:13:29.760i know black women do it at a higher rate but let's not pretend the white women are innocent
01:13:34.820here get the f out of my face it's like then what is the purpose of women the should is an
01:13:41.620important thing to talk about well should or is and that's that's what i'm asking i'm not asking
0.78
01:13:49.180is i'm not asking is i'm asking should so i would say it depends on the woman because that
1.00
01:13:54.480chick that we kicked out of fresh and fit i hope to god she never has children
0.99
01:13:58.260true yeah i hope to god i hope to like i pray to god that woman never has kids same thing same
0.96
01:14:05.000thing with the pedophiles that we catch on stream like i hope they don't have children either but
01:14:08.500the exception but we both agree but do you see that again
01:14:12.100bad information info makes women look bad so we have to bring it back to the men well
01:14:24.480but men are pedo well let's talk about the teachers i see something in the news every
1.00
01:14:31.180week of a female teacher screwing a student. Who are the real pedos? I'm not saying that men don't
01:14:39.260do it too. Every time I talk about a negative about women, you always have to counter it with
01:14:53.220a negative about men because we can't handle negative conversations about women. My point is
01:14:59.660saying like we shouldn't the exception does not make the rule right if you see one loud trees
1.00
01:15:04.040twerking on the podcast that shouldn't make up for all women just like how one pedophile on stream
1.00
01:15:08.420shouldn't make up for all men because no no because feminists make the same argument so
0.98
01:15:12.020again the data indicates it's more the rule than the exception that is what the data indicates
1.00
01:15:18.720most women are abusers or what most women are what um well you were talking about the chick
01:15:27.680on fresh and fit and you said that's the exception not the rule now i want to i want to show you guys
01:15:33.040put this down for one second well i'm going to show you guys why is this clary uh michael
01:15:41.300knowles aaron clary very very smart guy the marriageable women in america so i was on uh
01:15:51.720this is how the date is with pearl of just pearly things on her channel yesterday anyway uh and
01:15:57.500it uh became apparent to me that there's uh some confusion about the statistics i'm gonna 1.5x
01:16:05.740this sorry guys keep keep up calculated what percentage of women in america were marriageable
01:16:11.940uh and uh it's important to the conversation we're having and uh some big heavy hitters are
01:16:16.680coming in as well like uh daily wire guys uh starting to go mainstream michael knowles so i
01:16:21.940said who's he and i looked him up like oh he's got a million subscribers i'm like he might have an
01:16:26.660audience and uh i've also written several books not so much in the same genre but um math based
01:16:32.320and so what i decided to do is clarify this and following this will be an excerpt from the book
01:16:38.040of numbers analyzing the roi and the pursuit of women it goes through the three methodologies
01:16:42.920that i use to calculate the statistic um it's somewhat misquoted because people are using a
01:16:47.160chart that uh of one of the three methodologies uh we just take uh the the negative the multiple
01:16:54.520the traits there's eight and you say only this percent have this this percent have that this
01:16:58.860percent have this you multiply that times that and then you get a 0.5 percent percent of the
01:17:02.520population that does not have these deal-breaking variables but you have to back out co-correlation
01:17:06.180and so freder actuary did that but then there's also some confusion with another book i wrote
01:17:11.620called a world without men which does not necessarily talk about the percentage of
01:17:14.320marriageable women that talks about economics and so it would help to understand there are two
01:17:18.140distinct books one is called the book of numbers analyzing the roi and the pursuit of women that
01:17:23.000is what if you want to look it up and read more of the data and such that's the one you're talking
01:17:26.840about uh a world without men that that really doesn't address the percentage of women who are
01:17:31.680marriageable that goes on to discuss and uh opine what's going to happen if men and women don't get
01:17:37.060together and i'm glad we're having the conversation because it's it's very important ultimately to
01:17:41.120society and economics and the future of the human race uh everyone's right that if people don't
01:17:45.040start getting together and having kids we're in for a world of hurt but that ain't my problem
01:17:48.160that is not my provision your problem kathy because i don't have kids
01:17:50.980different argument in the meantime the following is an excerpt from the book of numbers analyzing
01:17:57.280the roi and the pursuit of women and it goes it explains the three methodologies and how it came
01:18:01.800i think it's a 2.7 sorry guys hold on marriageable rate for women 2.4 i'm actually i'm generous i'm
01:18:09.480generous i give it three it's 2.5 or marriageable if you had tried dating in the past 25 years you
01:18:15.960know that it has not only been difficult, but increasingly so. And while many people, both men
01:18:19.340and women, may date for fun, inevitably the majority of people date with the end goal of
01:18:22.460marriage and perhaps forming a family. But while men's and women's biological drives compel them
01:18:26.060towards this evolutionary goal, society, in a bevy of ways, has delayed, postponed, even outright
01:18:30.040obstructed men and women from achieving this goal. This has come in the form of making college an
01:18:33.300unnecessary condition of employment, crippling young people with student debt so they can't
0.53
01:18:36.300afford a family, indoctrinating young women to put more value on their careers and education than
01:18:39.620men-slash-children-slash-family-slash-love, obesity that has rendered 70% of people physically
0.76
01:18:43.560revolting and a war of the sexes that makes cancer seem friendly both sexes women for men and men for
01:18:48.480women have been ruined for each other by society resulting in abysmally few people who are marriage
01:18:52.140material and you didn't need a study to tell you that but how do you measure quote marriage material
0.87
01:18:56.520how can you super chat look at the best thing you can do is just go to my website
01:19:01.100and buy a monthly membership it's 10 bucks a month if you buy a membership and you screenshot
01:19:08.060it send it to me on x i'll read whatever you want um we're having issues with the website right now
01:19:14.220streaming on it because we're traveling get the year i'll be like yay it's 80 bucks for a year so
01:19:22.140you know please how do you determine whether a woman is of high enough caliber to marry
01:19:26.860and what traits would you consider to make this judgment there are no correct answers but this
01:19:30.140study employs three methods to estimate the percent of the female population that is marriageable
01:19:33.580One, the deal-breaker method, two, the online dating profile survey method, and three, the dates per marriage method.
01:19:40.900An average of all three will then be used for this piece of the ROI puzzle.
01:19:45.840Method number one, the deal-breaker method.
01:19:48.800The deal-breaker method attempts to measure, based on surveys, polling, and other data, what percent of the American female population has no major deal-breakers.
01:19:55.880What qualifies as a deal-breaker is certainly up for debate.
0.99
01:19:58.800Loudly smacking her chewing gum may be considered a deal-breaker for some,
01:20:01.760but not at the same level as, say, a woman with herpes.
0.67
01:20:04.460So, to determine what were critical deal-breakers that would indeed disqualify a woman from being marriage material,
01:20:08.600we had to focus on critical flaws that were not merely unlikable, but would make a happy marriage an impossibility.
01:20:14.040And while no doubt this list could be unlimited,
01:20:15.960we focused on eight deal-breakers deemed to be the most poignant, comprehensive, and relevant to the success of a happy marriage,
01:20:53.560Regardless, since physical beauty is a must, this eliminates the 59.6% of young American women who are obese or overweight as marriage material.
01:21:01.300Certainly, yes, many men are fat themselves.
01:21:03.540And yes, many men marry fat women, have wives who get fat on them, or even manage to have kids with them.
01:21:08.460But remember, the definition of success in this study is happily married, and you simply cannot be happily married to somebody you're not physically attracted to.
01:21:18.840While the world celebrates that there are now more women in college than men,
0.99
01:21:21.700nobody has bothered to ask whether it's for something sensible like accounting
0.77
01:21:24.220or a colossal waste of time like the liberal arts.
1.00
01:21:27.020And when you consider whether the degrees women are getting are worthwhile
1.00
01:21:29.360or merely an excuse to attend a very expensive four-year party,
1.00
01:21:32.440unfortunately, 80.5% of the time, it's an excuse to party.
01:21:36.840However, it is not so much the degree itself that excludes women from being marriage material
01:21:40.160as it is what it comprehensively says about them.
01:21:42.660First, it's a declaration as to how realistic and serious women are about their careers,
01:21:46.160their professions, and their work ethic.
0.88
01:21:47.880Yes, it would be nice to solve poverty, but usually when a young woman majors in the social sciences, it's to avoid real work or rigor.
1.00
01:21:54.020At minimum, a delusion to follow her heart and the money will follow.
0.99
01:21:57.080You will be subsidizing her life as she simply lacks the education and skills to command a self-supporting wage.
0.99
01:22:02.680Second, there are huge financial consequences for majoring in the wrong thing.
01:22:06.180Namely, the tonnage of student debt she's incurred and unable to pay off, making her a huge financial liability for any future suitor.
01:22:12.340Third, many of these worthless degrees are simply rank indoctrination,
1.00
01:22:15.500brainwashing women to value their careers, politics, feminism, educations, etc. above love,
1.00
01:22:20.120which is simply antithetical to marriage.
01:22:22.200If you marry someone with a gender studies degree,
01:22:24.240they are not going to be a loving or supporting wife,
1.00
01:22:26.000but likely an obstinate, nagging shrew that loves her cultish politics and career
1.00