Pearl - How Wokeness in Family Courts is manipulating MEN

00:00:00.000 and has making any of these names public like i'm just wondering because

00:00:05.120 like if i was in texas can you go visit these judges they're elected officials aren't they

00:00:10.640 oh yeah i can go to their courts anytime yeah so do people because this got so much traction do

00:00:16.960 people i don't know call the judges about your case do i mean has has this impacted that like

00:00:24.880 do they have any idea how much traction this has gotten the case oh believe me they do judge

00:00:30.160 bloody mary brown had a protest that broke out in front of her house no way oh yeah oh yeah and she

00:00:36.960 lives in university park in texas the phone calls to judges about specific cases are actually illegal

00:00:45.120 and my case caused all the courts in texas to create reminders whenever you call the courts now

00:00:51.520 they have recorded messages telling you that it's a criminal offense to try to influence a judge on

00:00:56.480 a specific case so we need to probably change the laws to make make make it legal for people to to

00:01:05.520 let judges know if they're doing a bad job on a case but right now it's actually illegal to do that

00:01:11.600 so was the protest in front of her house was that illegal that was legal however university park is has

00:01:18.960 a lot of public officials that live there and they have a no specific protesting law so you can't

00:01:26.720 protest a specific house so all they did is they marched up and down the sidewalk in front of her

00:01:31.840 house you know so it wasn't a specific house her judge bloody mary brown's husband came out and cussed

00:01:37.600 out the protesters used the f word and created a big scene actually looks to me on the video like he

00:01:43.200 assaulted one of them i actually filed a recusal on that basis because they alleged that i led that

00:01:50.160 protest which i didn't and that it constituted ex parte communication the illegal kind that i'm

00:01:56.080 talking about and that's alleged in the pleadings in texas so in texas if a spouse if a judge's spouse

00:02:05.760 is a witness to any of the facts alleged in the pleading they can't sit on the case

00:02:10.080 so she should have recused herself but she didn't so i went up they brought in a judge emeritus who

00:02:15.920 said she doesn't have to accuse herself you can get the facts some other way totally illegal but

00:02:20.560 that's how it works in texas and what about the other one blackrock or blacklock justice blacklock did

00:02:27.280 people protest him did they no no i don't think people are even aware of what he's done one of the

00:02:36.240 things that our supreme court trades on is very low publicity campaigns and so but i assure you in his

00:02:43.680 next in his next run for office people will know i will make sure of that right when does he run

00:02:50.480 it's got uh two years from now okay and he's been wow okay he's a total scumbag he knew exactly what

00:02:57.520 he was doing he he was working for the donor class and get and the other thing too is you gotta understand

00:03:03.920 pearl i am a thorn in the side of the republican establishment here they did not want to pass that

00:03:09.360 transgender law they did not want because look when i passed that law it shut down a billion dollar

00:03:16.640 industry in texas it shut down all the gender clinics at children's hospitals in four major cities

00:03:21.840 so it was a major hit to the hospitals which are a large donor class within the state

00:03:28.720 so they were really upset with me one of the main reasons they let my ex-wife move to california is they

00:03:33.360 wanted me to move there too so i would leave the state and stop being a problem for them so that's

00:03:38.720 another thing that you know people i'll i know some other examples of this besides me the former mayor

00:03:45.760 of mineral wells for example the the political establishments are using family court as a weapon

00:03:52.080 against political enemies they'll take their kids and bankrupt them and they're also able to manufacture

00:03:58.800 all kinds of fake domestic violence claims and all kinds of things which hurt them in re-election

00:04:04.240 so family court is being used as a political weapon if you have an ex-wife and you run for office you

00:04:09.360 can be rest assured that your political enemies in the republican party will definitely go talk to your

00:04:14.480 ex-wife wow so they'll they'll talk to your ex-wife and get like a news story or something well

00:04:21.360 they'll get her they'll get her in texas the the law firm of choice for this is coons fuller

00:04:26.960 and they'll get your ex-wife they'll get your ex-wife a law firm and sue you and manufacture

00:04:31.760 a case against you to ruin your election wait say that one more time sorry sorry so it's coons they

00:04:37.600 will they will get your ex-wife a lawyer with the most expensive and most powerful law firm in texas

00:04:45.360 to manufacture a case against you in family court because they know the laws of evidence don't apply

00:04:50.320 there they can get any evidence and they want and create uh fake charges domestic violence charges

00:04:57.360 and then ruin your campaign so you can't get elected but they're the largest donor to judicial

00:05:01.920 campaigns in the state of texas they buy judges oh wow they never lose they never lose so their

00:05:07.520 retainers are enormous the retainer for coons fuller is like 175 000 so they run wow that's crazy so they

00:05:15.520 they fund the whoever like the judges campaigns yes they do and then they get your ex-wife to

00:05:24.480 yes sorry say that one more time they get your ex-wife to what they'll use your ex-wife and take

00:05:30.320 you into hearings and create trumped up facts and charges to that create a court record that's very

00:05:37.600 damaging that will be used against you when you run for office wow that's exactly what they did to me

00:05:43.760 actually that's so shocking that's so shocking because i really liked the guy that i met with

00:05:48.880 there like i'm actually so actually i i liked my opposing counsel in my case jessica johnson she's

00:05:54.880 very nice lady but coons fuller was a platinum sponsor of my judge's political campaign do you think

00:06:01.440 i could get a fair trial there absolutely no yeah they gave her tens of thousands of dollars and

00:06:07.280 that's perfectly legal in every all the 50 states really so the law firms give the judges money to run

00:06:13.520 and the judges essentially oh so they have to let them win and essentially because women generally i'm

00:06:22.720 sure that's their biggest client is women so yeah so obviously they're because women file first more

00:06:29.840 so if that happens then okay that makes sense then of course you're gonna rule that way yeah and let

00:06:38.000 me give you an example of how it works in my 2019 trial when i got 50 50 custody jessica janicek from

00:06:43.840 coons fuller you know she was shocked she fell out of her chair when i got 50 50 custody from this judge

00:06:50.320 it was judge kim cooks in the 255th district court coons fuller out of retribution i believe put in money

00:06:58.560 against her opponent the next time she ran for office and they took kim cooks off the off the bench

00:07:02.960 wow that's crazy so essentially how is that legal well okay it's a good question so here's how it's

00:07:09.600 legal because it wouldn't be legal in any other industry right it could just couldn't be it's legal

00:07:15.760 because the bar association it has a very special status in america it's a private organization that is

00:07:23.120 granted the legal status to essentially manage a discipline for state governments in california

00:07:30.400 it's gone so far that they're that they have actually ruled that the bar association a private

00:07:35.920 company the bar association has sovereign immunity just like the state government you can't sue it

00:07:42.000 so the bar associations are super powerful and they are the ones most responsible for legislation that

00:07:48.960 allows this stuff to happen they want to be able to buy cases when they need to win so they pass laws

00:07:54.240 that let them do it wow there's literally no organization in america that's probably as powerful

00:07:59.680 as the bar association and if you look at members of the bar in the state governments and the federal

00:08:05.360 governments prosecutors and judges are the most powerful lobby groups within the bar association

00:08:12.640 especially prosecutors and the reason is very simple i don't think people understand this either

00:08:17.840 prosecutors and judges like family court judges have absolute immunity meaning that even if you can

00:08:24.320 prove that they violated the law in the performance of their duties with the intention to harm a child

00:08:31.680 they still can't be prosecuted for the lawyer no the judges can't judges and prosecutors they cannot even

00:08:39.360 if they violated the law with the intention to harm a child they can't be prosecuted because of protections

00:08:45.920 from the bar association well it's it's actually absolute immunity in the case of judges is a judicial

00:08:53.360 doctrine that they invented for themselves for prosecutors it is statutory absolute immunity is a

00:08:59.200 wild concept if you think about it it basically means somebody's completely above the law in the

00:09:03.920 performance of their duties for the government you can't hold them responsible you know we just had

00:09:08.400 this big debate about whether the president should be held accountable for the law or have immunity you

00:09:14.640 prosecutors and judges have that all day every day so you know if a prosecutor for example in a

00:09:20.320 criminal trial intentionally withheld evidence to convict an innocent man and send him to death to

00:09:26.480 the death penalty he can't be prosecuted for that he has absolute immunity in the performance of his

00:09:31.280 duties so it's a huge flaw in the design of our judiciary and judges have the same thing yes they do

00:09:38.800 yeah that's why they're so powerful but how is that like i'm just i'm kind of baffled that how is that

00:09:45.440 legal it's because of the bar association that's what you're saying the the bar associations have

00:09:50.640 created laws that insulate lawyers and judges and prosecutors oh the rubber hits the road for lawyers

00:09:58.560 in front of judges and prosecutors they are the lobby group for those people and in the federal

00:10:05.600 judiciary the federal judges just invented this doctrine they said well we're just never going to

00:10:10.800 ever convict a judge as long as it was in the performance of his duties you won't be allowed to

00:10:16.000 bring a case against him in federal court so that's just how it is just like you know there's the

00:10:20.800 domestic exceptions domestic relations exception in federal court so a lot of people have asked me

00:10:26.160 Jeff why don't you go into federal court on civil rights claims or go and get your constitutional

00:10:31.520 rights upheld you know in federal court well they're the supreme court since the establishment of

00:10:38.080 family courts in the 80s created a rule called the domestic relations exception it's not a law it's

00:10:44.160 not a statute it's not even a court case it's just a rule promulgated by the u.s supreme court and it

00:10:50.640 says that they just won't take any cases out of family court from the states no matter how egregious they

00:10:54.800 are they just don't take them so every time you go out of family court and you say your constitutional

00:11:00.080 rights were violated as a parent they just dismiss the case you never can take your case up do you

00:11:05.120 foresee these names of these judges and prosecutors that do this sort of thing becoming public like do

00:11:11.920 you see the public potentially doing more protests similar to yours and do you see effective i hope they

00:11:19.520 do you know one of the things that prosecutors and judges have come to believe is that they they

00:11:26.880 should not be influenced by the people and that the people have no right to know what they're doing

00:11:31.840 they do not act like public officials you know with sunshine laws well we can see what our government's

00:11:37.600 doing you know in california they sealed my case and there's no law in california that allows them to do

00:11:43.120 that so the public was not allowed to attend my trial i can't give you the transcripts i can't

00:11:49.360 even give you the rulings that all those things are sealed even the appellate courts can't get so

00:11:54.720 this has all been a secret trial and judges have come to expect this kind of secrecy as a right of

00:12:00.400 theirs you know if you go into a lot of courtrooms you're not allowed to record the proceedings you

00:12:05.360 can't record them why would why would you not be allowed to record what's happening in a public you

00:12:11.040 know a public hearing if you go to a hearing of the legislature you go like i've been to the texas

00:12:15.760 legislature and the federal legislature many times you can just whip out whip out your phone and record

00:12:21.280 the the debates that are going on on the floor why can't you do that in a court the reason is very

00:12:26.080 simple the judge wants to control the record of what was done in the court and in family courts they

00:12:32.480 often lie i've had transcripts come back where they just put three dots and and there's no the answer to

00:12:39.840 the question isn't present you know jessica janicek from kunst fuller would ask me a question i would

00:12:45.120 reply and the record would reflect that i didn't give a reply there's no evidence there and the

00:12:50.800 court reporter just said well i couldn't hear what he said you see how they control the the control that

00:12:56.480 way they can control what's in the record for the appellate court so judges want to be in absolute

00:13:00.720 control of that and if you have a tape recorder you can prove that they're doing felonious acts on the

00:13:05.760 bench by manipulating public records and so they don't let you do that some judges don't even let

00:13:11.200 you take written notes of what's going on you can't even take notes and so if that happens the

00:13:18.320 judges still can't be sued they can't be go to jail because they're i forgot the word you said but they

00:13:25.280 essentially absolute immunity absolutely they have absolute immunity so they can't even be prosecuted for

00:13:30.800 these things that is correct wow police officers have qualified immunity which means if they

00:13:37.840 reasonably believed they were following the law they can't be prosecuted but judges have absolute

00:13:44.240 immunity which means even if they knew they were breaking the law they can't be prosecuted

00:13:49.040 okay guys please like the video on your way out and subscribe to the channel thank you so much for

00:13:53.600 watching and i will see you tomorrow three o'clock for another episode of pearl daily here on the audacity

00:14:00.400 network i'll see you

Pearl - November 25, 2024

How Wokeness in Family Courts is manipulating MEN ｜ Pearl Daily

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript