Playing to Win


PTW # 98 - Dr. Orion Taraban - The Value of Others


Summary

In this episode of Playing to Win, I'm joined by Dr. Ryan Tarabrand to talk about his new book, The Value of Others, which was recently released on Amazon and is already a top bestseller in a number of Amazon categories.


Transcript

00:00:00.980 And we are live. So guys, welcome to another Playing to Win episode. The last one was actually
00:00:07.260 Dr. Ryan Taraband's recording from my 1% Forum in Toronto back in January that I released.
00:00:13.500 We have him live today and we're going to talk about his book, The Value of Others, which
00:00:17.420 was recently just published and released on Amazon. You should have your copy. If you
00:00:23.100 don't, you're going to want to get it after this podcast. You must have been busy putting
00:00:28.080 this book together and doing a bit of a podcast for right now. How are things with you?
00:00:33.240 Well, first of all, Rich, it's great to see you again. Thanks for having me back on the
00:00:36.580 show. The book has absolutely kept me preoccupied. It was kind of my third job after my private
00:00:43.760 practice and all of the content creation I do on YouTube. So in my spare time when I wasn't
00:00:48.960 doing those two things, I've been working on the book for the past year or so. It took
00:00:53.580 me about eight or nine months to write the content and then another three months to get
00:00:57.640 it all formatted and ready for launch. And it came out less than two weeks ago and I'm
00:01:02.340 just super stoked with the response that it's received thus far, especially considering that
00:01:07.020 I don't have an agent. I don't have a publishing house. I don't have a sales team. I don't have
00:01:10.320 a marketer. And it's a number one bestseller in a number of Amazon categories right now, which
00:01:16.700 is just phenomenal that that's possible, right? And no small part due to some of the advice
00:01:22.220 that you gave me. I thanked you in the book and I'll thank you here on the book as well.
00:01:26.900 Yeah. I skipped to the end to get the shadow because a friend of mine, I don't know if
00:01:31.360 you know Jason Hartman, but he's in real estate business. He sent me a WhatsApp message. He's
00:01:35.980 like, hey, I gave you a shout out at the end of the book. I just skipped to the acknowledgements,
00:01:39.320 but I'm only at chapter five because I'm a very slow listener when it comes to audio books.
00:01:44.760 But thus far, it's been good. So I wanted to go through a couple of chapters, maybe
00:01:49.060 get you to summarize them a little bit, give the viewers some insight, maybe talk a little
00:01:53.080 bit about why they should get the book, who the book is for. Maybe, is there a demographic
00:01:59.540 that you would say the book is not for? Like, have you had any challenges from anybody on
00:02:04.560 it?
00:02:05.700 Well, I wrote the book for everybody, but I'm sure not everyone will be for the book.
00:02:10.260 That's kind of the way I put it. It's not explicitly for men, at least not exclusively.
00:02:14.760 I mentioned that in the preface. And I think that's because any kind of sustainable solution
00:02:21.480 in the sexual marketplace has to be palatable to both men and women. And I think that prioritizing
00:02:28.420 one side's needs and wants unduly over the other is not really a recipe for long-term
00:02:33.560 success.
00:02:34.760 That said, I can imagine that the book would be challenging for folks who have a more romanticized
00:02:40.260 view of relationships. I mean, the subtitle is understanding the economic model of relationships
00:02:44.980 and putting the word economic that close to relationship already ruffles a lot of people's
00:02:49.720 feathers.
00:02:51.500 Have you, have you had any negative reviews or any hate for anybody, like anybody in your
00:02:55.520 professional community at all? I was actually curious as I was listening to it, how they would
00:02:59.720 have received that had they gone through the whole thing?
00:03:03.560 No, not yet. Hopefully not ever. Um, I think it would require a lot of investment to go through
00:03:11.900 a 400 page book that you dislike and then to leave a negative review. So I think that's just
00:03:18.080 a barrier to entry that most people who disagree with the message aren't willing to cross.
00:03:21.780 Hopefully.
00:03:22.220 So, so far the response has been overwhelmingly positive.
00:03:25.700 Yeah. You'll get, you'll get called a misogynist at some point if it hasn't happened yet.
00:03:29.800 It's, it's, it's.
00:03:30.320 Oh, I've been called that just not in response to the book.
00:03:33.120 Yeah. Um, so a few of the chapters here, and again, I've only had the opportunity to
00:03:39.420 get to a chapter five. Um, I was on a road trip the other week with my daughter and I did
00:03:43.920 ask, I was like, you know, would this be, did you put it on 50? No, I didn't. No, I didn't.
00:03:47.660 Um, I got another book instead. I got Suzanne Vanker's, um, like something along the lines
00:03:53.960 of how to win at life. And it was actually a reasonable, uh, sequence of ideas dispense
00:04:01.200 for women, which I thought were pretty good. Um, I got to reach out to her, maybe get her
00:04:06.080 on a podcast in the future. There's a couple of things that I would definitely challenge
00:04:09.060 her on, uh, like things around money and, uh, uh, some, some of the advice she dispensed
00:04:14.980 around dating, but I want to come back to your stuff here.
00:04:17.020 Um, so I've gotten to chapter five, you start talking about negotiation. Um, let's, let's
00:04:26.620 kind of enter this with the economic models and the value on the sexual marketplace.
00:04:32.160 What do you mean by our value as humans on the sexual marketplace in the book as it's
00:04:38.460 written?
00:04:39.400 Well, I don't usually say our value as humans. I explicitly talk about our value in the sexual
00:04:43.840 marketplace, which is very contextually defined. It's obviously a very touchy subject to start
00:04:50.100 talking about people's intrinsic or fundamental value as people. And so that's why I don't
00:04:54.800 do that. Um, but in a marketplace, things have prices and in general, people trade all kinds
00:05:04.680 of things of comparable value. And that's sort of the basis of exchange is that we trade unequal
00:05:10.680 things of comparable value. And if the things are too different with respect to their valuations,
00:05:17.320 no transaction occurs. And my fundamental premise is that people have needs. People want things from
00:05:24.840 other people. And so the pro-social solution that human beings have created over tens of thousands of
00:05:30.680 years is to move towards each other and attempt to give other people what they might want in exchange
00:05:35.960 for what they want in return. And that's the basis of society. And that's the basis of relationships.
00:05:41.160 And when that occurs and both people are more or less getting what they need and want, then
00:05:46.520 individuals, relationships, and societies thrive. And for whatever reason, if that exchange is not
00:05:52.120 possible, no relationship exists. And to my mind, this helps explain why some people are rich in
00:05:59.160 relationship opportunities of all kinds, whether they're romantic or professional friendships,
00:06:04.280 and other people are not, it's not the good people. It's not the loving people. It's not
00:06:08.840 the virtuous people who are rich in relationship opportunities. It's the people that other people
00:06:14.280 want things from. And the more that you have what more people more want, it's a little awkward,
00:06:20.360 but it works. Um, the more likely you're going to have relationship opportunities of all kinds.
00:06:25.480 Did you get into, in the book, how to establish one's sexual marketplace value for men and women?
00:06:31.720 Yeah. Chapter three is all about sexual marketplace value, which I had to sort of define because the
00:06:39.080 whole book is about value, right? And sexual marketplace value is something that people are
00:06:45.720 understandably very sensitive about. At least when it's applied to themselves, everyone makes use of it
00:06:53.240 to some degree when selecting for relationships, even if it's just a quantity, as opposed to like
00:06:59.800 a numeric value. When people tell women that they could do better, they're making use of sexual
00:07:05.240 marketplace value as a quantity, if not as a specific number. And the economic principle is that you have
00:07:12.280 limited time, energy, attention. Most people are looking for a monogamous relationship, which means that
00:07:19.000 if they're exchanging that commitment to one person, they're not giving it to any other person on the
00:07:23.400 planet. So they understandably want to be sure that they're transacting with their perceived best
00:07:32.520 option. They're getting the most for what they're willing to give in return. And sexual marketplace value
00:07:38.520 is generally how people determine what their perceived best option is when they're looking to mate and date.
00:07:43.640 Is there a sequence of steps or this plus this will sort of equal your SMV? Is there a way that the average
00:07:52.680 man or woman can establish what their value looks like and where their opportunities lie to improve?
00:07:57.800 Yeah, it's really tough. Sexual marketplace value is actually a fairly complicated subject. That's why I talk
00:08:04.760 about that there's three different kinds. There's what I call normalized sexual marketplace value, perceived
00:08:09.560 sexual marketplace value and transacted sexual marketplace value. Normalized sexual marketplace
00:08:14.280 value is basically how much a given man or woman models the archetype of attractiveness held out by
00:08:20.840 his or her culture. This is both culturally informed and biologically determined. So this is sort of like
00:08:27.720 the more a woman looks like a supermodel, the more conventionally attractive she is, the more a man looks
00:08:32.520 like a Hollywood movie star and has that kind of status and success, the higher his normalized sexual
00:08:38.280 marketplace value would be. The issue with that is that people do have individual tastes and preferences
00:08:45.880 that deviate from those conventional norms. And some of this is socially desirable responses. People say, oh,
00:08:54.040 money doesn't matter to me or height doesn't matter to me, et cetera, et cetera. It's hard to, you can trust that
00:08:59.720 to a point. I think that a lot of people are afraid of coming off as too superficial or materialistic and so they cover
00:09:06.200 their preferences. But people generally do have legitimate differences in tastes. And that is what
00:09:15.080 perceived sexual marketplace value is. Value doesn't exist objectively. It exists in the mind of the
00:09:20.760 valuer. And ultimately that's what determines whether two people enter into a relationship is that I see you
00:09:29.000 as a high value woman, you see me as a high value man, et cetera. And then ultimately,
00:09:36.440 value is created at the point of transaction. Like nothing is worth anything until somebody is
00:09:41.320 actually willing to pay for it and the other party accepts that payment, at which point in time that
00:09:47.080 thing is worth exactly what it was transacted for. And so transacted sexual marketplace value has to do with
00:09:53.400 with examining the types of relationships that men and women have entered into in the past to sort of do
00:10:00.680 a comparable comparison to their current sexual marketplace value in the same way that houses
00:10:08.280 are generally valued by comparing the value at which comparable house is the same size in the same
00:10:16.600 neighborhood but recently sold at. And so for men that transacted sexual marketplace value has to do
00:10:22.840 with how attractive the women are that he was able to sleep with. And for women that transacted sexual
00:10:28.040 marketplace values, how attractive those men are that she was able to achieve commitment from.
00:10:34.360 So they're gendered and they're gendered in the way that it's typically harder for them to get. Like
00:10:39.560 it's easier for women to get sex than commitment because they're the gatekeepers of sex. And it's generally
00:10:44.040 harder for men to get sex than commitment. And so each gender is more or less measured based on the
00:10:50.920 good that it's harder for them to achieve. Do you think that the differences that exist between men
00:10:58.520 and women, like for example, it's been said that men are success objects to women and women are beauty
00:11:02.520 objects to men. Do you think that that rings true? Sure. In a lot of different ways. Now that's obviously,
00:11:08.360 it's changing to a certain extent given women's relative material success in 2024.
00:11:16.280 You talked about all these women that now have boats.
00:11:18.680 Oh, really? There's some boat captains out there?
00:11:23.400 Oh, you're talking about it in my book. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. So a lot of women do have their own
00:11:29.960 boats. They're captains of their own ships. And generally what people want is what people lack. In fact,
00:11:37.480 that word want has two meanings. One is to desire and one is to lack. Like when we talk about extreme
00:11:44.520 want, we talk about extreme poverty. And it makes sense that what you lack is precisely what you would
00:11:49.800 desire because you'd like to fill that void, whatever that is. And generally the more people have, the
00:11:55.880 harder it is to find what they might want because they lack less and less. That said, I think women still
00:12:05.000 want to enter into relationships that will significantly improve their standard of living.
00:12:10.440 And because they're doing so well, that diminishes the pool of potential candidates that they're likely
00:12:16.040 to mate with. I think you've done videos on this where you talk about like how women have priced
00:12:20.360 themselves out of the data market. And there's this sort of chasm that exists where you have all these
00:12:24.200 female captains now. And then you have male captains and male captains don't really need a female
00:12:29.560 captain. They certainly don't want their boat if they have a better boat. So it's like, what is the
00:12:34.360 solution to this, to this, uh, like void that like this chasm that's being created, you know, between
00:12:41.640 men and women, because women have been told, go out there, you know, put off having a family,
00:12:46.200 climb the corporate ladder, get a degree. Is there, is there anybody out there talking to women
00:12:52.280 and giving them useful, actionable advice so that they can get what they want earlier on in life?
00:12:59.720 With respect to their long-term goals, not that I'm aware of most of the content that I'm aware
00:13:05.240 that's directed towards women is about getting what they want at that stage in their life,
00:13:09.800 which when their twenties is generally not about starting a family and finding a long-term partner
00:13:15.640 for better or for worse. I don't think they would listen to the advice, even if they had somebody
00:13:19.560 shouting at the top of a building, would they? They might not. I mean, I certainly got some
00:13:23.640 good advice when I was a young man that I didn't follow on some level. People do have to make their
00:13:27.560 own mistakes. Yeah. Fortunately. Yeah. There's a lot of truth to that. Yeah. It's like, you know,
00:13:33.320 Moff and I were doing this ladies night, uh, series for well over a year now. And it's like,
00:13:37.320 one of the things that we just found popped up over and over again was the gals were just,
00:13:42.280 they would come to the acceptance and the realization by the time they hit usually thirties,
00:13:47.240 definitely forties for sure. Uh, having that conversation in their twenties was very rare.
00:13:52.600 There was only a very, very small contingent, maybe less than 5% of women that we had on the show,
00:13:58.200 uh, that were willing to hear the narrative, like, you know, preserve your value. You know,
00:14:02.600 it's a good idea if you want to have a family to start looking at, you know, locking a guy down and
00:14:06.280 this is how you do it. And this is what men are attracted to. But the vast majority of them are just like,
00:14:11.160 YOLO going to go out and have some fun and you know, we'll deal with that one later.
00:14:16.520 Um, you talk about negotiation in the book and there's a few people I think that might take issue
00:14:23.560 with the notion of negotiating a relationship. Um, it's been said that, um, you know, if you start to
00:14:31.160 negotiate terms of a relationship, it sort of leads down the path of obligated compliance and then
00:14:38.200 resentment, you know, sort of, you know, as you travel down that I don't, I didn't take it as you
00:14:43.720 talk in, in that sense or regard, but what did you mean when, when it, when it came to the point in
00:14:49.400 the book about negotiating that the, almost like the terms of that relationship?
00:14:53.640 Mm-hmm. Yeah. I think that when it gets to the point where you're using your words to
00:14:59.000 explicitly negotiate the terms of relationships, that's actually generally a suboptimal outcome.
00:15:05.080 That doesn't necessarily mean that relationships aren't negotiated in nonverbal and indirect means
00:15:11.880 all the time. And that's generally what the courtship is for. In general, men go to the
00:15:17.480 sexual marketplace to exchange resources for sexual opportunity and women are attempting to
00:15:21.800 exchange their sexual opportunity for resources. All things being equal, both sides want to maximize
00:15:26.680 their gain and minimize their loss, which means that most men would ideally get a lot of sexual
00:15:31.720 opportunity very cheaply. It doesn't cost them a lot of time, energy, and money to do so. Whereas
00:15:37.080 vice versa for women, they would prefer to get as much as they can and to not necessarily give much
00:15:42.120 in return. It's that kind of selfishness and self-interest that drives competitive negotiation.
00:15:48.520 So this can be explicitly discussed between men and women, but it's usually discussed behaviorally and
00:15:54.200 nonverbally. Like for example, if a woman makes a man wait certain number of dates or a certain period
00:16:03.320 of time before she has sex with him, even if that's not like explicitly negotiated, what is behaviorally
00:16:10.600 taking place is they're both deciding that the value of my sexual opportunity is worth this much time,
00:16:18.520 this much attention, this much courtship. And that sets kind of a standard for the basis the
00:16:23.400 relationship moving forward. Like the longer that a woman makes a man wait, the higher she's pricing
00:16:29.240 her sexual opportunity. And that becomes an anchor point for the, the sexual relationship moving
00:16:35.640 forward with that man. But that, but that negotiation, as you put it, could be completely different for a
00:16:42.760 guy that she's got a strong draw to could happen on the first date, right? Absolutely. Women want different
00:16:48.280 things from different men at different times, which is not very satisfying, but it is true.
00:16:54.600 And that also changes. It's not even just different times in their life. It's also different times of
00:16:59.800 the month for them as well, because they're obligatory shift too, right? I have sympathy for that, man.
00:17:04.200 It's like if my hormones were all over the place too, I would have a tough time. Yeah.
00:17:08.120 Yeah. Um, you talk about, uh, the most powerful player wins the game. What do you mean by that?
00:17:16.040 Well, I conceive of negotiation as a game. It's a, it's the game of getting what you want from other
00:17:22.840 people. And that game can be played out in lots of different ways in lots of different contexts between
00:17:29.160 lots of different people. But ultimately the one who wins the game of negotiation is the more powerful
00:17:34.280 player. Power is also kind of tricky to define because there's lots of what I call power proxies.
00:17:42.520 These are things like being physically strong or rich or high status. These things are often confused
00:17:48.840 with power, but are not technically power. If those things were technically power, then nobody weaker
00:17:54.760 or lower status or poorer should ever be able to defeat a strong, physically stronger, higher status,
00:18:02.600 richer person. And we see that all the time. Kings get toppled, politicians careers are ruined,
00:18:08.360 and that shouldn't be possible if the less powerful people were really less powerful.
00:18:15.800 Now, the reason for that is power is the ability to get other people to do what you want in so many
00:18:23.160 words, which means that power is ultimately psychological. It's my ability to reach into you
00:18:30.280 in some way, generally with my words or with my incentives, to motivate you to forget what you
00:18:35.720 want and do what I want instead. They're all functionally forms of emotional manipulation.
00:18:41.800 And that is actually the lever of power that gets people to move, is that something is incited inside
00:18:48.040 of themselves that compels them or incites them to move in your chosen direction. And you can do that
00:18:55.400 without being physically strong, you can do that without having a lot of money, and you can do that
00:18:59.800 without being high status. Obviously, it's easier to impel motivation in others with those things,
00:19:06.600 and those things are good in and of themselves, but they only work to the extent that they can
00:19:14.840 excite that emotional motivation inside of other people. Does that make sense?
00:19:19.720 Yeah. What do you think of Robert Greene's book, The 48 Laws of Power, since we were talking about
00:19:24.600 power?
00:19:24.840 Yeah. I'm actually about 75% of the way through it now. It's my first read through. I'm
00:19:32.360 embarrassed to admit it's a fantastic book.
00:19:35.240 Yeah. It's like drinking from the fire hose. There's a lot in there.
00:19:37.560 Yeah. And it takes a long time to digest. It's clearly a very well thought out, beautiful,
00:19:43.160 interesting book. I wish I had read it a long time ago. And he has a lot of principles of power,
00:19:52.200 obviously, in that book. I haven't read anything that I really disagreed with. The difficulty,
00:19:58.760 though, with that book is it's sometimes hard to know who the more powerful player is because so many
00:20:04.600 of those principles are covert. They're inside of the person. It's hard to look at a person and know
00:20:11.640 who might be more powerful in a given interaction. And so when I talk about, in my book, my principles
00:20:16.840 of power, I list out 10 of them. And they're all principles that are overt and obvious, and you can
00:20:25.000 see and measure to some extent. Can you give us the 10 principles of power?
00:20:30.120 I don't know if I can list them all off off the top of my head, but I can try to rattle off a few of
00:20:34.440 them. One of them is, in general, the more powerful player is the one who moves less. So this is one of
00:20:41.560 the easiest ones to see in a given relationship. Think about a king's court. A king sits on his
00:20:47.560 throne. The whole court revolves around him. If you want an audience with the king, you come to the
00:20:53.400 king. And the further you travel, the more respect you're paying to that person. The king doesn't go
00:21:00.440 to you, and he certainly doesn't meet halfway. Do you understand? So when it comes to romantic
00:21:05.720 relationships, you can tell who moves less by examining, well, who initiates contact more
00:21:12.360 frequently? What is the length and tone of those communications? Just compare your emails to your
00:21:21.240 boss with your boss's emails to you. Your boss generally takes longer to respond, uses fewer words,
00:21:29.800 sometimes doesn't respond at all, because that's the prerogative of power.
00:21:33.880 If you were the lower status person and you try to dispense with some of those formalities,
00:21:38.280 it would come off as insubordinate. You wouldn't be able to pull it off.
00:21:42.600 The ability to move less is a prerogative of power. And so if you're concerned about who might
00:21:49.320 have more power in a relationship, just examine who moves to whom.
00:21:53.880 Yeah, let's talk about that element of power, because I find that fascinating. I mentioned it
00:22:01.560 in my book, if you're going to date, it's ideal or it's a stronger show of her interest in you if
00:22:08.440 she'll come to your front door rather than you go into her front door. And I saw a video that you
00:22:13.080 published in the last few weeks where you were talking about the notion of a date really boils down
00:22:19.320 to a sexual opportunity. And that's going to require access to somebody's place where the
00:22:25.720 sexual opportunity can take place. And I think your recommendation, and you can correct me,
00:22:31.240 obviously, was that they come to you so that you have access to your place, you know, down the
00:22:37.080 street. It's certainly one of the strongest indicators of genuine burning desire in my eyes.
00:22:43.960 Anyway, if she's willing to literally drive an hour, two hours to come and see you basically at
00:22:50.360 your front door, it doesn't necessarily have to be at your house. It could be at a bar or restaurant
00:22:53.880 down the street from your house. But the further she has to travel to make the effort to come and
00:22:57.640 see you, the greater the interest. And I always find it's interesting because one of the complaints
00:23:01.560 that I hear from a lot of guys when I talk to them is, oh, you know, I had this date, you know,
00:23:05.400 lined up and there's about an hour's distance, you know, between us and we were going to meet halfway
00:23:10.120 and she flaked on me because of the 30 minute drive. And it's just like, yeah, you don't have
00:23:15.640 better options. And she figured that it wasn't worth her while. Does that sound about right to you,
00:23:21.320 you know, with that notion of power and them coming to your? Absolutely.
00:23:24.920 And I think you summarized some of my ideas very well. What I generally say is that a date
00:23:30.200 is connection plus sexual opportunity, right? You need both. And that's why it's God's perfect
00:23:36.600 creation because when everything goes well, both the man and the woman get what they want.
00:23:40.600 The woman gets her connection. She gets attended to, she gets her emotional stimulation. She gets
00:23:46.520 her attention. Uh, she, she gets the dinner and the affection. And if everything goes right,
00:23:53.160 the man gets his sexual experience, which is pretty self-explanatory. And in general,
00:23:58.840 it's the man's responsibility to direct the relationship in the direction of a sexual encounter.
00:24:07.960 Like it's pretty rare for a woman to do that. She has to be very, very attracted and sort of like
00:24:14.920 fed up with the man's, uh, unwillingness to lead. And then she does it more or less
00:24:20.520 out of desperation. Uh, in general, men have to move the encounter in the direction of a sexual
00:24:26.840 relationship. And that's why it's generally useful to schedule the logistics of dates around
00:24:34.280 a man's place because if you're halfway, well, where do you go? Are you going to rent a hotel?
00:24:40.360 Are you going to get on a subway and go to their house? Well, you can't really invite yourself into
00:24:45.800 their space anyway. And so it's useful to have the space that you can invite the woman back to
00:24:52.760 so that when the date is going well, it's actually fairly effortless to guide the interaction
00:24:59.160 in that direction. Does that make sense? Yeah. The opportunity to escalate needs to
00:25:03.000 exist. Otherwise it's just an interview, isn't it? That's what I say. Yeah, absolutely. And I
00:25:07.640 don't want to sign up for an interview. I mean, that sounds really lame. No, it is. No, it's absolutely
00:25:12.280 true. And guys need to get it through their heads. Like, you know, the point of a date is to lead to
00:25:16.680 more to escalation at some point, not just sit there back to back doing interviews, feeding women and
00:25:22.520 never having the opportunity to see them again or to escalate. Um, so a lot of women are bad at this.
00:25:29.000 And I talk about this in the book a little bit later is I understand the impulse to want to
00:25:33.800 interview a man. They're trying to do their due diligence to see who is this guy? What's he about?
00:25:38.840 Are we compatible, et cetera? But one of the worst ways to figure that out is by asking direct questions.
00:25:44.680 Like if a woman asks both an honest and a dishonest man, are you honest? She's going to be told yes by
00:25:52.200 both men. That is a bad question because it functionally doesn't differentiate between those two classes of
00:25:57.720 individuals. This is why successful companies, they don't simply or even ever rely on structured
00:26:05.560 interviews to hire. They give them actual tasks that they're expected to perform in the course of
00:26:12.280 their duties. Like lateral creative problem solving things to test their divergent thinking and their
00:26:20.040 creativity. They invite them to dinner with the other partners of the firm so that you know if they're
00:26:27.160 a decent guy and can get along with the other partners of the firm. It's like there's lots you
00:26:33.880 call the, their previous employers and their references. You, you do a lot of indirect due diligence
00:26:39.480 and that's generally a better way of figuring out who you're dealing with than simply asking them to
00:26:45.240 tell you about themselves. Yeah. It's like the whole stated preferences usually conflict with the
00:26:51.320 observed behavior. Sure. And it's also not a lot of fun to just answer a bunch of questions.
00:26:59.080 It's not fun for the women and it's not fun for the men. And generally what happens is when these women
00:27:05.400 enter into dates with that interview mentality, well, they just get a lot of factual information when the
00:27:10.840 man complies with it, which doesn't make her feel anything. And so she leaves the date with a lot
00:27:16.680 of information, but no feeling, which she's going to use to inform her decision about whether or not
00:27:21.160 to see that man again. And if she kind of feels nothing really, then there's probably not going to be a
00:27:27.640 second date. Yeah, absolutely. Um, sorry. Okay. So we were talking about a bunch of the power plays.
00:27:34.280 What were a few more? If you can recall, you said there was 10, we covered one of them.
00:27:38.040 One of them is the willingness to transgress. So these principles of power are sort of
00:27:48.120 value neutral. I'm not advocating for any of these things. I'm just sort of relating what tends to be
00:27:55.640 associated with power. And one of them is the willingness to transgress. Basically those who are
00:28:00.760 willing to violate not only just like the laws, but most people are shackled internally. They're
00:28:10.120 shackled internally by their ideal self that was usually put into their minds by their parents,
00:28:18.920 their culture, and their early relationships. And so lots of people are playing in a much smaller field
00:28:26.520 of play than they really have to, which makes it more difficult for them to maneuver. Like if you
00:28:32.680 can only zig, but I can zig and zag, it's going to be hard for you to beat me. I have more space to
00:28:39.800 play. I have more maneuvers. And so it's going to be more difficult for you to go head to head with me.
00:28:46.680 So for better or for worse, those who operate under a larger field of play and are more willing to
00:28:55.320 execute more varied maneuvers generally have a larger playbook, which is often associated with
00:29:01.880 greater success. Howling is also part of the game. That's another thing to consider is that every game
00:29:08.920 has a set of rules and usually violation of those rules is very clearly defined as also the penalties
00:29:15.080 associated with them. But like, if you wanted to be a, a top ranked tennis player and to never ever
00:29:25.160 have a ball go out of bounds, like good luck with that. If you want to be an NBA player and never
00:29:29.720 commit a personal foul, like good luck with that. You'd have to be so much better than anybody else
00:29:34.920 you're playing against to restrict yourself in that way. And that just wouldn't be possible because
00:29:39.240 at those highest levels of performance, the difference between the first place and the hundredth
00:29:44.600 place is actually very small. Sometimes it's measured in, you know, seconds, milliseconds,
00:29:50.680 even you wouldn't be able to win.
00:29:52.760 Why is attractiveness the key to power and sexual relationships?
00:30:00.440 Well, attractiveness is the key to power because
00:30:06.520 generally it helps attractive people get more of what they want across all three phases of the
00:30:12.360 relationship, which I say is attraction, negotiation and maintenance. Attractive people are more
00:30:18.440 likely to be selected. If they're attractive passengers, captains can see them more obviously
00:30:24.520 among the group of folks in front of his ship. And attractive captains are targeted more often by
00:30:30.200 passengers for passage on their ships. Attractive people can negotiate better terms for themselves.
00:30:37.560 They generally get more of what they want and less of what they don't, whether that's fair or not.
00:30:42.120 And they're more likely to maintain their relationships if they so desire, because one,
00:30:47.400 they generally have more optionality than the person they're dealing with, which means that they're also
00:30:53.800 more powerful and the other person might be more invested in the relationship.
00:31:00.120 Yeah. Maintenance also allows them to defend their relationship against their intrasexual competition
00:31:06.680 more readily. So if you're a more attractive option, people generally aren't going to leave
00:31:12.280 you for a less attractive option. Let's put it that way.
00:31:14.600 So the maintenance phase, I think is a tough phase for...
00:31:20.280 It's actually not the tough phase, I would say. It's the most often neglected phase.
00:31:25.000 Mm-hmm.
00:31:25.960 Would you agree with that?
00:31:26.840 Yeah, I talk about that in the book. And the reason for that is you have to go...
00:31:31.560 You have to successfully navigate the attraction and the negotiation phase to get to the maintenance
00:31:36.440 phase. And there's attrition at every level of the sales funnel, right? So fewer people end up in
00:31:41.560 the maintenance phase by definition.
00:31:43.080 The maintenance phase is interesting because it's different for men and women. I mean, if you get into
00:31:48.680 a situation where you've gotten married or you live in a way that looks like marriage to the state,
00:31:56.840 you still have an obligation as a man to a woman to maintain and ideally become a better version of
00:32:03.160 yourself than you were five, six years ago when you perhaps met her. The flip side of that though is
00:32:09.400 women don't necessarily have that same obligation because the tolerances that men and women have for
00:32:14.840 each other in the maintenance phase are quite different, aren't they?
00:32:19.080 It can be. I've heard the jokes say that men get married hoping that the woman will never change
00:32:24.680 and women get married hoping that the man will.
00:32:26.520 Yeah.
00:32:27.080 And I think one way around that, it's certainly not a guarantee. Nothing is a guarantee with
00:32:32.840 relationships or with women. But one of the strongest indicators of that is to get involved in
00:32:38.520 a long-term relationship with somebody with a growth mindset. And some women do have that.
00:32:43.400 And they do value bettering themselves and maintaining their appearance and
00:32:50.440 broadening and enriching their experience. They find that intrinsically valuable. But if you don't
00:32:55.160 have a woman like that, it's going to require a lot of cajoling or ultimatums or
00:33:03.560 other kinds of nastiness. There's not much you can do about it.
00:33:07.720 Why does love have nothing to do with relationships?
00:33:11.400 Oh yeah. That's my favorite chapter in the book. Love doesn't have anything to do with relationships
00:33:16.200 because relationships are fundamentally about the transaction of value, right? People need and
00:33:22.440 want things from other people and they trade those things. And the value of those things emerges out of
00:33:30.040 the trading. The issue is that love, like loyalty and friendship, can't be bought or earned. It's
00:33:35.880 always given spontaneously at the pleasure of the giver with no strings attached, which means that it's
00:33:41.560 kind of valueless or invaluable. Because even if the price tag is exorbitant, things that have a value
00:33:50.760 can be bought. You know what I'm saying? But love can't ever be bought, which means that there's
00:33:56.280 nothing that you can do to earn it. There's nothing that you can do to get it, if that's what you're
00:34:01.400 looking for. It's always just given at the mysterious pleasure of the giver. We also know that it's not
00:34:07.480 necessary to have a relationship to love. People every day love people that they're not in relationships.
00:34:14.440 And often they're in relationships with people that they don't love. So if both of those things are true,
00:34:20.120 I don't see how we can say that the basis of relationships is love. People generally don't
00:34:26.440 end up with the people who love them the most. It's not like love always wins in the end. Life is
00:34:32.200 not a romantic comedy. Now this is not to say that people in relationships can't love each other, but
00:34:37.400 that has nothing to do with really what they're giving each other. That's almost like a happy
00:34:43.240 coincidence. If that love were based on what they were receiving in the relationship, then that love
00:34:48.280 would have a value, the value of what they were receiving, which would make love transactional,
00:34:53.080 which I don't think it is. So that's kind of why I think that love doesn't have anything to
00:34:56.600 do with relationships. I had an interesting conversation with a guy yesterday. I did a
00:35:04.920 live Twitter X space, whatever you want to call them. And this guy was mentioning that the last,
00:35:13.080 I don't know, five or six gals that he's been with, and it happened with every single one of them
00:35:19.400 within a span of about, he said four to five weeks or so, but they would profess being in love with him
00:35:26.600 very rapidly, which is genuinely unusual. It's like, you know, I've, I think most guys experience with that
00:35:35.160 is that it's like constipation. Women really struggle to get it out and they like to hold it back.
00:35:39.480 And when, and when it's out, it's like, you know, okay, it's, it's, it's obvious like, you know,
00:35:44.520 she definitely loves this guy. And I asked him, I said to him, I go, you know, is it, is it like,
00:35:49.160 I love you or kind of like, I love your guts, you know, sort of thing. Like, it's a casual sort of
00:35:53.800 like friendly, playful way about it. But no, it's like, I am in love with you. And that's a very strong
00:35:59.800 come on for most guys within a span of like four or five weeks of meeting a woman. What's your take on
00:36:05.320 that? It is possible. Like I've worked closely with some men who were very, very good at cultivating
00:36:12.440 that kind of emotional reaction in women. And they generally did this by playing up the romantic
00:36:19.720 dimensions of the relationship. They did it by really pitching them a dream. And those men very
00:36:28.360 early on, were talking about a future that they saw with this woman, or that this woman was the,
00:36:34.360 the most beautiful, the most amazing person that they've ever met. And maybe they even met in a
00:36:40.520 previous life and that there's some sort of deep karmic cosmic connection between the two of them.
00:36:46.360 And they sweep them off their feet and take them to Michelin star restaurants. And it's almost like
00:36:52.600 you're the girl who gets the attention from the prince in the movie. It's like you're whisked
00:36:59.560 very suddenly into this entirely new world from a attractive, successful man who seems to be
00:37:07.080 unilaterally and intensely devoted to you. That will make a woman fall in love in four to five weeks.
00:37:13.960 Now, was that the guys admitting the strategy or was that the women telling the story of their
00:37:19.080 experience about how they felt? No, this is the men telling me when they didn't always or ever mean
00:37:28.680 those things in the way that the woman received them. And when I spoke with a number of these guys,
00:37:34.760 we discovered that that strategy on their part, which was very effective, was designed to protect
00:37:42.920 themselves because they felt that if they could get a woman to love them at that level of intensity,
00:37:50.440 well, that woman wouldn't be leaving him and that he would be protected against her rejection.
00:37:57.240 Generally, though, what happened was the man in question was unable to sustain that level of interest
00:38:04.040 and passion and courtship. And the woman first becomes a little confused and then a little
00:38:12.440 disappointed and then a little irate or a lot irate. And she kind of sees through it. And often these
00:38:20.440 relationships that burn really bright really fast also burn out very quickly in extravagant ways.
00:38:26.600 You have another chapter in the book that's titled People Really Don't Want Relationships. And again,
00:38:33.320 guys, I haven't gotten that far in the book yet, so I'm very curious as to the story behind that one
00:38:38.920 as well. Sure. I mean, the basis of that chapter, which I think is the last chapter in the book,
00:38:44.120 was actually spelled out on the first page, which is that people enter into relationships because they
00:38:49.160 want things from other people. And one way that they've discovered to get those things
00:38:54.360 things is by exchanging unequal goods of comparable value in relationship. But that generally means,
00:39:01.400 technically, that people don't want relationships. They want the value that is transacted in those
00:39:07.080 relationships. And entering into a relationship is just one way that people have discovered of getting
00:39:12.760 that value. If those people find ways that are safer, cheaper, or easier to get the same value,
00:39:21.000 they're going to prefer those ways to entering into relationships with men and women. And that's,
00:39:26.280 I think, precisely what we're seeing. We are in the midst of a relationship crisis, Rich, as you know,
00:39:32.680 like in the last 10 years, the number of men and women who are getting married,
00:39:39.960 entering into relationships, or even hooking up, have dropped precipitously, in some cases,
00:39:45.800 to historically unprecedented lows, like the marriage rate in America's lowest it's ever been
00:39:50.040 in recorded history, for instance. And I think that has to do with the fact that we now have some
00:39:57.400 possibilities of getting what we want, or at least something very similar to it, more easily,
00:40:03.400 more cheaply, and more safely elsewhere than dealing with the opposite sex. And that's precisely what
00:40:08.520 is happening. And it's kind of rational. Like very few people are going to choose a more expensive,
00:40:15.160 riskier, and more inaccessible solution over one that's safer, cheaper, and easier.
00:40:21.000 What if the, you know, like in your practice itself, dealing with your clients, what are the biggest
00:40:28.360 grievances that men express that are that much different from the ones that women are expressing?
00:40:34.280 Like, what are the differences in the sexes there? From where you're sitting?
00:40:40.920 It's going to sound bad, but a lot of men, they come to me and they really want to know
00:40:47.640 what a woman wants. Like, help me figure out women. And I think on the whole, that's because
00:40:55.000 they're good faith actors in relationships. They're like, okay, clearly, I've had some issues
00:41:01.080 attracting or maintaining relationships with women. Maybe if I get better at understanding
00:41:05.480 what women really want, and I can get better at giving it to them, maybe I can have more
00:41:09.720 satisfying relationships with women in the future. When I talk to women, they're not concerned about
00:41:16.520 what men want. They're concerned about how do I get what I want? Both men and women are trying to
00:41:22.840 figure out how to give women women what they want. Interesting. And that's, in my experience,
00:41:29.560 the biggest difference between my consultations with, between men and women. I've never had a
00:41:33.640 woman come to me and say, Orion, help me understand men so I can give them more of what they want,
00:41:37.880 because I understand that that could be the secret of a successful relationship, which it is.
00:41:43.000 Like, when two people are effortlessly and reciprocally getting their needs met, that's a good
00:41:49.480 relationship. When people say, I love this, it's because they're getting a lot of what they want
00:41:55.400 and a little of what they don't. And that love, that positive emotionality, in my opinion, isn't
00:42:00.520 technically love. It's the satisfaction of being gratified. And that's generally what people are
00:42:05.080 looking for when they enter into relationships. Yeah, it's interesting when you sort of merit on a
00:42:13.800 on that soundbite for a bit, because it's like, you know, guys are trying to give women what they
00:42:18.520 want to attract and retain them. And women are trying to get what they want from guys,
00:42:23.960 not that concerned with what guys want. And when the women come to me and say,
00:42:28.360 how can I get more of what I want? And I start to explain, well, you have to understand what men want.
00:42:33.080 And by giving men more of what they want, you have the best chance of getting what you want.
00:42:37.160 How do they like that? That's a tough sell. A lot of them are like, that's interesting. I don't really
00:42:40.760 want to do that, though. Yeah, it's, I can't remember where I heard this. It was definitely
00:42:45.480 my youth. But there's, it was a line something along the soundbite of, you know, you can get
00:42:50.040 anything in the world that you want, if you help as many people get what they want. And I think that
00:42:53.640 guys definitely subscribe to that, especially when it comes to attracting and retaining women.
00:42:57.320 It doesn't always work, Rich. You know, as you know, sometimes people can work very hard to be
00:43:03.560 taken advantage of or taken for granted. But absolutely, that's probably the best chance
00:43:08.920 that you have of becoming successful, broadly defined, is being used by other people in a way
00:43:15.080 that's important and necessary for their needs and desires. You have to allow yourself to be used. As a
00:43:22.680 guy, we understand that. You can't expect to get paid if you're not used in terms of your time,
00:43:27.640 your energy, and your skill set. Expecting the paycheck without being used is absurd.
00:43:32.920 Yeah, you're very honest in that, especially when you break it down in your videos. Like,
00:43:38.120 I love the way that you break it down in the videos. It's just so clear and concise. Let me
00:43:42.680 just grab this over here. It says, Ryan's work is applied. EvoPsych, Rich's work is raw truth.
00:43:47.800 Thanks to both of you. My life is not just better. It's perfect. Eternally grateful.
00:43:52.920 Right on.
00:43:53.320 Let's, uh, I don't know what a BNG is or what country that's from, but, uh, thank you Zornitska.
00:43:59.560 I think I'm pronouncing that right.
00:44:00.600 Lovely. Thank you.
00:44:01.160 Um, yeah, it's, you know, it's really interesting. Like you gotta take all these different perspectives
00:44:06.840 and sort of weigh them out. And, you know, like your book is, is, is very dead sleep packed with,
00:44:13.320 um, useful and expensive words. Um, I'm, I'm, I'm again, halfway through it. And it's one of those
00:44:21.480 books that I know that I'm going to have to go through twice and start to bookmark, you know,
00:44:25.080 the stuff as I'm doing it. Um, it's, it's a, it's a greater, how can I sell this? Your videos are like
00:44:34.440 an introduction to the ideas that the book sort of expands on in a lot more depth. Like when you did the
00:44:40.360 talk on the sailboat thing, um, at my forum back in January here in Toronto, I thought the way that
00:44:46.600 you went into the analogy and how that works, you know, differences, you know, between men and women,
00:44:52.840 you got like right into the weeds. So it's like, if you like Orion's videos and you think that the,
00:44:58.520 uh, the value that you're getting out of them is, is right there, you're going to go even further
00:45:03.320 down the rabbit hole if you get the book. And I do recommend it. It's, it's going to go on my
00:45:08.920 recommended reading list to the guys that I talked to for sure. Um, congratulations on
00:45:14.360 the bestseller, you know, everything that's going on with it. Is there a follow-up coming?
00:45:18.600 Like, are you going to work on another one or have you had enough?
00:45:21.240 I would like to write another book. I had so much fun writing this one actually. Um,
00:45:25.560 but it just was released two weeks ago. I'm going to be doing a lot of appearances to promote it.
00:45:30.760 Of course.
00:45:31.160 I might need a break before I start another project. And I think my next goal might be to create some sort of
00:45:38.040 community before I focus on building, uh, writing another book. But yeah, I have lots of ideas,
00:45:43.800 lots of things I'd like to talk about. It's not a casual book like you were getting at. It generally
00:45:49.240 requires your concentration and attention and some things you might have to sit with, um, before they
00:45:54.280 start to make sense. I did try to explain everything as clearly and simply as I could. And if I failed
00:46:01.480 in that, that's really my fault. Um, the, it's also a different medium. Like the YouTube is
00:46:06.920 it's for a more popular audience. It's I think more casual. It's the spoken word. Whereas a book,
00:46:12.760 this is something that I hope might still be relevant in a hundred years. That was my goal in
00:46:17.720 writing it. I didn't want to make something that was just, um, a, a pamphlet that might have been a
00:46:24.040 quick cash grab because of my internet celebrity. And I also didn't want to write something that in a
00:46:29.560 couple of years would be obsolete because it was just speaking about the popular moment today,
00:46:36.200 which will change as soon as it's identified. Yeah. I think it'll be evergreen for a while.
00:46:41.720 I hope so. That's my intention anyway. And it's one of those ones that even if you
00:46:45.800 listen to audio books, guys, I would recommend getting the print version just so you can highlight
00:46:49.800 it and underline stuff. Cause it's one of those ones where you're going to, you know, dog ear the
00:46:53.720 pages. You're going to start to mark it up and it's worthwhile doing that. Cause I mean, if you ever
00:46:58.200 have somebody that needs, um, you know, that type of content and they're not the sort that sort of
00:47:05.160 will go out and buy a book or whatever, you can just hand them your copy and you'll have what they
00:47:09.320 need out of it as well too. So there's that. Um, what's up and coming for you, man. You were,
00:47:14.840 you were talking about a few things there. Uh, the channel has been very successful. You know,
00:47:18.840 I think you're going to hit a million subs probably within the next 12 months for sure.
00:47:22.120 Uh, the book knocked it out of the park. So congrats on, on that. Um, what else is up and
00:47:28.120 coming for you? Well, I'm going to a number of different podcast appearances these days. I was
00:47:35.880 just on Michael Sartain's podcast. Uh, we recorded this past weekend. I think the episode drops
00:47:42.520 tomorrow. Did you do it with Rolo too, or just Michael? It was just, it was just Michael. I haven't
00:47:47.000 met Rolo yet. And I was on diary of a CEO a few days ago as well. That guy's interesting. He's
00:47:54.120 a very good interviewer. He's an excellent interviewer. I had a wonderful time. He was
00:47:58.840 empathic and authentic and very well informed. He clearly takes what he does very seriously.
00:48:05.400 And his team was also excellent. Uh, he has like 10 people at least who are working and
00:48:11.560 they're all very friendly and competent. And I had a great experience.
00:48:15.640 Awesome. Cool. All right. Well guys, we'll wrap it up on that note. You can find it on Amazon.
00:48:20.120 Um, you know, it's a self published, uh, copy. It's Orion. Uh, yeah, show them the cover. There
00:48:25.720 you go. So it's easy to find. It's right on the best sellers list. It's, uh, hand moffs here in the
00:48:31.240 chat. How do I get a signed copy of the book? Um, a few people have requested that and I'm still
00:48:36.520 trying to figure out how I can logistically offer that. Um, well, probably you have a suggestion,
00:48:42.840 rich. Well, I was going to suggest, you know, we talked offline about, um, you know, doing,
00:48:46.920 do my event next May. So if you're going to be there, um, you know, maybe one of the things I
00:48:51.000 can do is, uh, grab a box of your books and maybe you can sign a few for some people.
00:48:55.240 Oh, that would be wonderful. Yeah. And I can't wait, man. I had such a good time
00:49:00.040 at your conference in January. I was really impressed by your community and what you've been able to build.
00:49:05.720 And it was a lot of fun getting to meet the other presenters and also the attendees.
00:49:10.600 I had a, I had a wonderful experience. Yeah. You guys will want to be on my email
00:49:14.680 list to get notified, uh, when the tickets go on sale, but we're just working at the
00:49:17.960 details right now. It's going to be in the Bahamas in May of 2025.
00:49:21.880 So much nicer than Toronto in January. Thank you for doing that.
00:49:24.680 Yeah. I, you know, Toronto was sort of a test venue. I wanted to see what was going to happen.
00:49:29.160 If people were even had the appetite to buy a ticket and the flying sort of thing, but Bahamas is a,
00:49:34.600 it's a much nicer venue and it's a, it's a nicer place to be. So, um, keep an eye out for that one.
00:49:40.520 But again, thanks for popping in guys, grab a copy of the book, Orion, uh, all the best with your
00:49:44.920 future endeavors and success with this book. Thanks, Rich. Thanks.