postyX - Political Malpractice

00:00:00 Hello, everybody, and welcome back to another non-live episode of Maple Syrup and Mayhem.

00:00:06 And the reason why I'm doing this non-live, hold on, let me just make sure I turn the mic up just in case the sound is off,

00:00:13 because as you guys all know, my sound is always fucked up, but we're working on it.

00:00:17 The last stream I did on the weekend on Saturday, we talked about the trade issues in Canada, 0.62

00:00:24 and we kind of touched on briefly, you know, why are we looking to trade with China? Why is Canada

00:00:32 looking to make China one of their biggest trade partners when we already do 80% of our trade with

00:00:37 the U.S.? They're our neighbor, and the U.S. has not been accused or being investigated into

00:00:43 foreign interference like China is constantly being investigated by CSIS or the Canadian

00:00:49 Security Intelligence Agency. So I wanted to go back and give a little bit of history on

00:00:53 mark carney because i've been since then i've been watching even more kind of political commentary

00:01:00 on carney and what's going on here in canada and it seems that i haven't even haven't even touched

00:01:06 the surface as far as the destruction of canada so we're going to call this political malpractice

00:01:14 because there was and i'm going to put it in here there was an interview with the whoever's doing

00:01:19 the trade negotiations in the u.s his name will come to me but i'm going to put the video in so

00:01:23 you'll see it anyway. And he basically said that what Carney is doing is nothing short of

00:01:29 political malpractice. And I thought that was a great word for it. So that's what we're going

00:01:33 with. I'll say is that the countries that are led by serious leaders, and I'll say President

00:01:39 Scheinbaum is a serious leader in Mexico. When we came in and we were talking, Ambassador Greer was

00:01:43 just there, we're talking to Mexico about this, and the president has spoken directly about this.

00:01:49 they've been very serious. Look, we know the United States is our most important economic partner,

00:01:54 that it is the policy of President Scheinbaum that the United States and Mexico will have a

00:02:00 positive economic relationship, and that we know that we'll have some friction and we'll have to

00:02:04 figure it out, but we're going to figure it out, right? This is the bottom line. There are other

00:02:09 economies who decided to make it personal. Economies who decided to make it personal.

00:02:19 and you know I think Carney has made it personal I think it's political

00:02:24 malpractice for the Prime Minister of a Canadian you know of Canada to to pit

00:02:31 politically himself against any president I don't care what the president

00:02:35 is who the president is what party they represent it's political malpractice

00:02:38 Canada is dependent upon the US economy that's just a fact right that's not a

00:02:43 hubris that's not something that Canada needs to be concerned about it's not

00:02:47 something Canada can change. The fundamental fact is geography wins out. Canada is located

00:02:54 where it's located. They can't move shop. They can have a weak economy that is underperforming

00:03:01 and not doing well, and Carney can feel superior, or they can have an economy that participates

00:03:07 as a partner of the U.S. economy, and Carney can do what a grown-up should do, which is figure it

00:03:13 out and come like President Scheinbaum and decide that the United States and Canada will have a

00:03:18 positive economic relationship. It's my job as a person who's supposed to protect Canadian jobs,

00:03:22 Canadian citizens, and the Canadian economy to not let my ego and my feelings dictate what's

00:03:28 best for my own economy. So I wanted to go down, like I said, the deeper rabbit hole of Canada's

00:03:33 current prime minister and the Trump trade war. But the truth that the mainstream media is not

00:03:40 going to tell you, you'll never hear from them, is that Canada didn't just wander into this mess.

00:03:45 It wasn't the U.S. It wasn't Trump coming in and saying, you know, I don't like Canada. We're going

00:03:49 to slap these tariffs on them. You know, I get maybe there was some of that motivation, but

00:03:54 that's not really what the issue was. This was an ongoing issue prior to even Trump's first

00:04:00 presidency. And this is now his second. The man currently steering this ship, Prime Minister

00:04:08 Mark Carney is obviously making it worse every single day, and you think he would want to make

00:04:13 it better, given that the U.S. is an Anglo nation like us. They're our closest neighbor, and we've,

00:04:20 you know, done business with each other for many, many years, and it hasn't really been an issue.

00:04:26 Now, conservatives, I guess, and the right have been warning about this for years. I was maybe

00:04:34 not a full advocate of it, but I did at least a year and a half ago, was concerned about this,

00:04:38 when it was made known that Carney was coming to become the Prime Minister.

00:04:43 It's basically weak liberal leadership, backroom globalist deals,

00:04:48 and of course us regular, ordinary, tax-paying Canadians are paying the ultimate price for it.

00:04:55 So to break it down a little bit, the big lie obviously we're going to debunk

00:05:00 is that Trump started the trade war.

00:05:02 Now that is wrong.

00:05:03 canada in the match of trade wars years ago long before trump slapped tariffs on steel aluminum

00:05:13 auto lumber um look at the evidence it comes straight from the u.s national trade estimate

00:05:19 report and you know they keep a lot better statistics than we do in canada uh the report

00:05:24 and the cusma which is the canadian u.s mexico i guess trade agreement that's the new name for

00:05:30 NAFTA, I'm assuming. It says it right in the text itself. Provinces, almost all of them liberal run

00:05:37 except Alberta and Saskatchewan and obviously Ontario, because Ontario is a conservative, but

00:05:45 in name only. Yanked American liquor off the shelves while keeping, you know, Canadian bottles

00:05:54 front and center. That's a straight-up violation of the CUSMA Article 2.3 on national treatment

00:06:00 and Article 22.4 on state enterprises like the LCBO. Carney himself tried to tie lifting the

00:06:09 ban to Trump dropping tariffs, but the timeline doesn't lie. This discrimination was already

00:06:15 baked in, so they started this a long time ago. And of course, let's not even talk, we're going

00:06:19 to talk about it, but like there's the dairy, okay? We all know there's a dairy cartel in Canada. 0.86

00:06:24 the us won a formal dispute panel ruling that canada's tariff rate quotas were rigged against

00:06:29 the american farmers and reserved access for our processors instead of playing fair canada made

00:06:36 you know cosmetic tweaks and basically called it a day which is kind of indicative of the entire

00:06:41 way the canadian government especially in the last 15 years or so um definitely the last 10

00:06:48 does things right it's just uh they tweak things they call it a day they just change things they

00:06:52 They never actually abolish anything or they never kind of turf something.

00:06:56 They just kind of tweak it and do it because nothing is going to stop their, you know, globalist goals, right?

00:07:02 Now, of course, that doesn't like the U.S. doesn't feel like that's partnership.

00:07:06 That's not partnership. That's basically cheating.

00:07:08 And in Bill C-18, the Online Streaming Act, let's not forget about that.

00:07:13 That was rammed through in 2023 and it forced foreign streamers to hand over 5% of Canadian revenue.

00:07:19 Well, Canadian companies got a pass.

00:07:22 They didn't have to, right?

00:07:23 So they're not having to pay the same in the U.S. for the same benefits.

00:07:28 Chapter 19 of CUSMA explicitly bans that kind of digital discrimination.

00:07:33 And we did sign this agreement.

00:07:35 The U.S. trade representative laid it out in a congressional testimony.

00:07:38 Dairy wine spirits forced labor imports, even fruits and vegetables.

00:07:43 Canada has been stalking the deck for years under Biden and now under Carney.

00:07:48 Trump's tariffs aren't the opening, you know, salvo.

00:07:51 They're not the opening song, okay?

00:07:54 They're enforcement after Canada ignored the dispute settlement process that is in Article 31.

00:08:01 Conservatives have always said that fair trade means reciprocal trade.

00:08:05 And you respect the deal, we respect the deal.

00:08:07 You scratch our back, I scratch yours. 1.00

00:08:08 We all know that fucking analogy or saying. 0.99

00:08:12 But Liberals, you know, love to lecture about the rule-based international order. 0.99

00:08:16 Sound a little bit suspicious?

00:08:18 Well, bending every single rule that hurts their donors or their ideology.

00:08:23 When U.S. Ambassador Jameson Greer testified that Canada wasn't acting constructively,

00:08:28 what was the response from Ottawa?

00:08:30 It was crickets, literally crickets.

00:08:33 Followed by more anti-Trump rhetoric, which is all that they can do nowadays,

00:08:37 to whip up the base, to basically get, and this is how I'm convinced this is,

00:08:41 you know, a large part in why Kearney won, whipping up the anger of conservative politicians,

00:08:47 i.e. Trump. They're linking, you know, Pierre to kind of Trump's ideology because Trump said

00:08:52 something nice about Pierre at one point in time. And Canadians, especially the boomers, 0.56

00:08:56 are so obsessed with American politics that they don't even care about their own. You know what 0.94

00:09:01 I mean? They're so obsessed with it and so obsessed with not being linked to the bad orange man

00:09:04 that they will sell our soul, sell our future, sell our kids' future to, you know, avoid that.

00:09:11 to avoid being in any way, shape, or form linked to Donald Trump.

00:09:16 And, of course, the rhetoric, that's not diplomacy,

00:09:19 that's domestic policies dressed up as a foreign policy.

00:09:24 Now, let's talk about how Carney is handling this fire

00:09:28 that he helped fan or, you know, helped stoke up.

00:09:31 In the CBC roundtable, you hear Polyev hammering the prime minister.

00:09:37 You've had a year. What's the plan?

00:09:38 And, of course, Carney's answer is talks will take some time.

00:09:42 And the U.S. actions are a rupture, not normal negotiation.

00:09:47 There was a lot to be said about this.

00:09:49 Again, stating that the talks, like a rupture to me, and there was a lot of, I think he came back and kind of tried to clarify what he meant by rupture.

00:09:59 Most people know what the dictionary definition is of rupture.

00:10:03 And he said it means a change.

00:10:05 No, it means things are getting blown the fuck up.

00:10:07 That's what it means.

00:10:08 But anyways, so that's not really something you would want to say if you were in negotiations or you're trying to have negotiations with another country.

00:10:18 And not just that, like I said, he doesn't have a plan.

00:10:21 Pierre, as much as I dislike Pierre for being weak and soft on everything and not really conservative enough, he's right on one point and that there is no plan.

00:10:30 Like, it's been a year now, and we were told that this was going to get fixed, and it was going to be handled, and it's been a year, and there's still no plan.

00:10:38 The only plan we get is no plan, and that is basically just, we're working on it.

00:10:44 We're talking about it.

00:10:44 We're negotiating.

00:10:45 Well, okay, well, how long does this need to go on? 1.00

00:10:48 Yes, I need, bitch. 1.00

00:10:49 I need for you to do your fucking job. 1.00

00:10:52 Mexico, you know, signed a deal with the U.S. 1.00

00:10:55 It happened pretty quickly.

00:10:57 so my opinion um and this is just coming from a behavioral perspective i believe that much like

00:11:04 most politicians carney is a narcissist and they don't like to be insulted they don't like to be

00:11:10 made to look bad or embarrassed so i feel like this is it's coming down to more of a personal issue

00:11:15 the whole thing with trading with china um is kind of like he thinks it's going to be a slap

00:11:22 in the face to the to donald trump like a personal um thing to donald trump and i i mean i don't even

00:11:28 think it's going to go through as far as like i don't know how the u.s would even allow it we've

00:11:32 seen many things that have gotten kiboshed in canada because of u.s pressure so when carney

00:11:38 comes back to pierre in this round table and says you know there uh the talks will take some time

00:11:45 you know pierre snaps back with saying that uh we're losing losing losing and of course that

00:11:51 right to a certain degree that Carney's team keeps redefining terms. Trade is suddenly a weakness

00:11:57 one day and mutually beneficial partnership the next. So these were two different

00:12:02 interviews that Carney did in saying two different things. So one minute it's a rupture,

00:12:08 the next it's transition, right? So redefining the words that he used. And he did in the first one

00:12:14 look very flustered. And I think that it's because he's kind of like a child that's not

00:12:18 getting their way so he's kind of pulling a tantrum now obviously this is not a strategy it's

00:12:23 a word salad which nobody should be surprised about because that's literally what they give

00:12:28 us all the time that's how they win their elections it's all ad hominem attacks and

00:12:32 word salad of stuff that people are too brainless to actually look into for themselves um this can

00:12:38 also be tied to and a lot of times we've talked about this i've probably talked about this before 0.94

00:12:42 I've talked about this on Spaces that we do, is the tendency for boomers to just absolutely fucking love television programs, like the news on television.

00:12:53 They don't go on the internet. 0.95

00:12:55 They don't check Twitter. 0.99

00:12:56 They don't check any independent news sources to find out if any of this shit is true. 0.99

00:13:00 They literally just believe what CBC tells them. 0.98

00:13:02 And this comes from a time when they were, you know, growing up and coming of age where you could trust the media.

00:13:08 And the media was exposing a lot of corruption and stuff like that.

00:13:11 But the media has obviously been compromised and captured now.

00:13:13 And you can't really tell a boomer that.

00:13:16 And it's like the old dog, new tricks analogy.

00:13:18 You can't teach an old dog, new tricks.

00:13:19 So this is a huge problem in this country.

00:13:22 And I think we're not going to get any headway until the last of the boomers that think that way anyways die off.

00:13:31 So one of the videos that I watched, and I actually gathered some of this data from, was called the Elevate Report.

00:13:36 So they dropped some receipts on why Carney might not want to deal at all.

00:13:40 And this kind of goes along the lines, a little bit deeper than what I said, but kind of goes along the lines of what I think.

00:13:46 And that is that, you know, it's just a personal, he feels like it's a personal insult.

00:13:50 It's not business.

00:13:51 But anyways, they dropped some receipts about his old Brookfield ties, his investments, the way a strong Canada-US partnership might actually hurt the value of assets that he's positioned to cash out on once he's done in Ottawa.

00:14:05 So a lot of people may not know, but he, you know, was in charge of the Bank of England.

00:14:10 I've said this before and, you know, kind of fucked things up there. 0.61

00:14:13 He's a he's a businessman. 0.55

00:14:15 He has tons of investments in Brookfield, which, you know, has ties to the other big

00:14:21 one in the U.S. that and it'll come to me that owns pretty much everything.

00:14:25 So he's he's set to have a lot of money and he wants to make sure of that because I anticipate

00:14:31 he doesn't think he's going to be in Ottawa longer than the four years.

00:14:34 but he's obviously like a typical boomer trying to cash you know make sure he cashes out on his 1.00

00:14:39 you know all these different things he has before shit hits the fan or the fucking market crashes 0.99

00:14:44 like entirely the point they point to a pattern in that video that they neuter they've neutered 0.95

00:14:50 stats can right so we all kind of know that like stats can does not keep a lot of detailed data

00:14:56 anymore especially regarding race statistics especially regarding government funding and

00:15:00 stuff like that they've replaced some watchdogs stalked committees they pushed censorship bills

00:15:05 we all know that um so all the like a lot of these things like what i talked about the what

00:15:13 the chinese are doing or being accused of doing is dumping with their stuff there used to be

00:15:17 committees that would investigate these kinds of things like to trade stuff and that but they've 0.62

00:15:21 kind of you know neutered them and and replaced them with their own people where they're just 0.97

00:15:26 kind of going to ignore the shit, you know, as it was. And then manufacturing obviously 0.99

00:15:33 pretty much died. It's still sitting at 2007 levels, even though the population has obviously

00:15:39 exploded due to immigration. The factories have been closing, no new tool and dye shops. And

00:15:45 these, I think people need to understand how much it costs to restart these things. Once they're

00:15:50 gone that's it they're gone for good it's very unlikely to convince an investor to dedicate that

00:15:56 kind of money into a new setting up a new trade shop or factory or tool and die shop or whatever

00:16:01 like that in Canada considering you know the tax rates and the there's not really much benefit to

00:16:07 it so once they're gone that's it they're gone right just like the car manufacturing

00:16:11 um inter-provincial trade barriers was another thing they're still strangling um we're they're

00:16:19 sorry strangling our own economy is what they had said that was the quote they used uh and of course

00:16:24 Carney's solution is to blame the Americans which I hear from so many people that it's Trump's fault

00:16:28 and it's one of the things that probably triggers me the most because he's only been the president

00:16:34 for less than what is it just over two years or almost coming up on two years now um and he hasn't

00:16:39 done a whole lot for Americans down there so like how can he be fucking the country up the Iran war

00:16:44 is another thing they blame on which only started again a few months ago um so it has nothing to do 0.98

00:16:49 the economy is set months in advance kind of thing like it's speculation and shit 0.99

00:16:55 um he blames the weather you know he blames anything at source except liberal mismanagement 0.99

00:17:00 um and he's a bad summer everybody anticipates that a bad summer is coming

00:17:05 um and that scapes goats he's lining up the scapegoats right so obviously somebody a liberal

00:17:10 cabinet minister or something whoever's doing the you know trade talks or whatever is going to take

00:17:15 a take get hit by the bus is basically going to take take one for the team i guess you could say

00:17:21 and carney's going to throw them under the bus so that he can make sure he also gets his pension

00:17:26 by the time of uh he's finished in ottawa finished up our country

00:17:32 now this of course if anybody knows a lot or a decent amount about the liberal government they

00:17:38 They know that this is textbook liberal governance.

00:17:40 They create the crisis, control the narrative, enrich the insiders.

00:17:44 We know we went through this with COVID.

00:17:45 It should be no surprise to anybody that tons of politicians made tons of money during COVID

00:17:51 when the rest of us were trying to make ends meet.

00:17:53 So that should be already put you in a suspicious kind of frame of mind.

00:17:59 Now, while Canadian steel workers, auto parts workers, lumber workers, they watch their livelihoods literally bleed out.

00:18:07 Carney is, you know, jetting off, skips Parliament, lectures about climate and globalism, taking his plane.

00:18:12 And this is kind of why I think Doug Ford wanted to buy the plane as well.

00:18:15 I think he had a little bit of FOMO, like a little bit of fear of missing out because, you know, Carney's jet set in all over the world, supposedly trying to make trade deals.

00:18:22 He's going to Australia. He's going to fucking Europe. He's, you know, going to China. 0.99

00:18:26 He's going all over the place to try to make trade deals when he's literally made zero so far.

00:18:31 And this is what his goal is. This is the globalist goal, right, is to be able to.

00:18:35 that's why they don't want borders they want to be able to travel wherever they want and not have 0.54

00:18:39 the you know the hassle of going through customs and and all this other shit they want it just to

00:18:43 be you know one world that benefits them and of course the best part is he's traveling around 0.60

00:18:51 um you know talking about globalism but you know people may think he's against it but no he's not

00:18:56 he's there to encourage globalism now they the podcast that i listen to they're conservative so

00:19:04 they do support PP again I'm not gonna this is not my own literally you know support of him but

00:19:10 I'm just kind of reiterating what they said or summarizing what they said they are claiming that

00:19:15 Pierre Polyev is the only leader saying what every conservative knows in their bones that

00:19:19 Canada's greatest strength is our geography and our partnership with the United States

00:19:23 and not as subordinates no lies detected there right he is right it's not that I think he is

00:19:30 totally off base pierre but i just feel like he is too weak uh we need at this point in time in

00:19:35 the country a really strong conservative leader with strong conservative values and he's none of

00:19:40 those but this we want to be thought of thought of as by the americans as sovereign equals right

00:19:48 um but we also should be wanting to be known for sovereign equals who keep their word and stuff

00:19:55 You know, Mexico got a deal. Why can't we? And it's because we actually stop acting like serious people and made this a personal attack as far as I'm concerned.

00:20:06 Now, the right wing or conservatives, they believe in free market capitalism.

00:20:10 But, you know, free market requires fair dealing, obviously, if you want to keep your business going.

00:20:15 We believe in energy dependence, pipelines, not pipelines to nowhere or virtue signals.

00:20:21 So this is the conservative kind of take on what they believe, the right wing.

00:20:25 You know, and even though I'm not wouldn't fall into the conservative category, I do believe in energy independence. And this is something that we could be doing to create a boom in our economy and give Canadian white Canadian people a job, a good job, and help build these infrastructures so that we don't have to depend on this. 0.62

00:20:45 And this was my whole point when Trump slapped the tariffs off and all the older people were screaming and crying about, you know, how it's going to destroy the country. 0.70

00:20:52 Well, why are we in a position where we can be destroyed by tariffs?

00:20:55 We shouldn't we shouldn't be depending on another country for that.

00:20:58 And we didn't at one point in time, not to the degree we do now.

00:21:01 So, you know, they cave to U.S. pressure.

00:21:03 They cave to globalist pressure, whatever it is, and to line their own pockets and to and to turn turned rather Canadians economy, manufacturing and all this stuff,

00:21:13 basically into an economy of real estate and the service industry and that's literally all we do

00:21:17 here in canada um conservatives also believe that they should cut the red tape that kills

00:21:24 manufacturing that is also another thing there's a lot of red tape and permits that are required to

00:21:28 open up a business or manufacturing um and of course liberal ads liberals rather their ideology

00:21:34 is to add tolls and barriers and this is why nothing ever gets done but you know the conservatives

00:21:38 aren't a hundred like aren't that much better like there is still a lot of red tape regardless

00:21:43 and the conservatives never seem to remove any of that stuff um the conservatives position on this

00:21:50 is that they believe canadian workers come first not davos donors not brookfield balance sheets not

00:21:55 the latest wef talking points that carney seems to recite on autopilot and i'm not sure what anybody

00:22:01 thought was going to happen um when you put somebody who has been a long-term you know

00:22:06 person or long-term supporter of the world economic forum has been on many councils boards whatever

00:22:12 totally has bought in and sold been bought in and sold on the whole one world government kind of 0.54

00:22:18 shit so i i guess the people that are having a surprised pikachu face right now i kind of have 0.97

00:22:24 no respect for because this is we've been told this we we've been told all this stuff beforehand 0.98

00:22:28 and people still voted him in despite i know record low voting turnouts

00:22:33 still enough people you know um decided to vote for him and thought that and and even now the

00:22:41 elbows up crowd like look how many there are out there and they just have no they have a gold

00:22:46 goldfish memory i guess you could say the july 1st cusma i don't know if it's supposed to be

00:22:54 called cusma is that the short word for it review deadline is staring us in the face so we have a

00:22:59 deadline of July 1st. This is upcoming. Midterms in the U.S. could, of course, shift this, depending

00:23:04 on how the midterms turn out. But we don't really have time to wait for the American politics to

00:23:08 save us. And this is another big problem with Canadians. We're so used to being interdependent 0.99

00:23:14 or dependent on the U.S., even when it comes to military and defense. So we're in a position now

00:23:21 where it doesn't matter what we want to say. If the U.S. really wanted to, they could easily

00:23:27 take over canada i mean we are so dependent on them and we never should have got to that point

00:23:31 um and everybody in canada all these you know that want it fifty first staters or whatever they

00:23:36 just want they don't want to have to do the work they don't want to have to do too much speaking

00:23:40 up other than speaking on their you know digital platforms and stuff like that to actually save the

00:23:46 country um they want america to save us because they're so demoralized and everybody kind of 0.99

00:23:51 knows at this point in time canada ain't saving anybody can't even save their own fucking people 0.99

00:23:55 And they don't want to. 0.99

00:23:56 They don't have a desire to. 0.99

00:24:00 We need a government that walks into those rooms with a clear list, 0.99

00:24:04 removes the tariffs, enforces the dairy and liquor rules we already agreed to,

00:24:08 scrap the discriminatory digital tax,

00:24:11 and get back to the business of building wealth on both sides of the border.

00:24:15 Again, I don't understand why you wouldn't want to.

00:24:17 The U.S. is a good trading partner to have, and it's a good neighbor to have.

00:24:21 so the conservative vision summed up here is secure border secure supply chain secure jobs

00:24:29 for Canadian families it sounds like a lot of lip service and it is it really is because I never

00:24:34 even the conservatives point of view doesn't exactly give out how they would do that like

00:24:40 doesn't explain how they would do that other than some platitudes about you know bringing back

00:24:43 industry and that but they never tell you how they're going to do that and what that's going

00:24:46 to look like uh so to me it's just lip service really like unless you have a solid plan on how 0.97

00:24:51 you're going to do this you're just talking out your ass um not endless negotiations that end in 0.98

00:24:57 a rupture and higher grocery bills not selling out our sovereignty for a pat on the head from 0.99

00:25:03 globalist forums so you know i think more people should talk about this you know we should be

00:25:10 demanding accountability in the house not that we're going to get it but we should still demand

00:25:15 it. You know, and again, I don't know, obviously, what the solution would be as far as people who

00:25:21 still want to vote. You know, I would, if it was me, I would literally until unless they get a

00:25:27 strong conservative leader that has the talking points that the right are pushing, then I really

00:25:35 don't care to vote conservative either. But we definitely have to make a difference. If you're

00:25:40 if you're going to vote, if you're stuck on voting, then I would vote for one of the other

00:25:43 parties and independent or something and I guess if enough people did that yeah one of the parties

00:25:47 is still going to win but they would know how many votes they got and if it's a huge decline

00:25:53 in the number of support they normally get possibly that could make some changes I highly

00:25:59 doubt it because I don't really think that voting is going to be the solution at the end of the day

00:26:02 but there's a lot of people that do believe in the democratic system so you know good on you

00:26:08 I guess but yeah I wouldn't vote for unless the conservatives were able to show us something that

00:26:14 you know we haven't seen before then it's pointless really to vote for either one

00:26:19 in my opinion and again I'm not a political expert so but I you know talking about Mark

00:26:25 Carney obviously I wanted to kind of go a little bit deeper into how he even like became like he

00:26:31 was a nobody he came into the Canadian political scene out of nowhere literally and he's now

00:26:36 helping to accelerate the decline. So like, where is his experience coming from? So I did a little

00:26:42 bit of a deep dive into the networks shaping Canada's leadership, or him, you know, because

00:26:47 he is our leader currently. He has a lot of globalist ties. He kind of embodies the archetype

00:26:55 of the modern globalist elite. And you can see that by the way he carries himself. You know,

00:26:59 he had a career that basically blended high finance with banking, central banking, international

00:27:06 bureaucracies and of course the big one is the climate focused institutions he was very big on 0.75

00:27:11 this green bullshit now these ties they prioritize supranational agendas um net zero transitions 0.72

00:27:25 multilateral governance one world government and of course the elites over the narrow national 0.98

00:27:31 interests rather, like security, manufacturing, revival, getting it back going, and of course

00:27:38 reciprocal trade with the U.S. Some of the key affiliations and roles that Mr. Carney has is,

00:27:46 of course, like we've been talking about, the World Economic Forum. He's a long-time foundation

00:27:51 board member, at least until early 2025, and of course he was a regular participant, is a regular

00:27:57 participant in Davos when they do their little summit. He has spoken at multiple annual meetings

00:28:03 including a notable 2026 address framing the current global order as a rupture, he seems to

00:28:08 like that word, rupture and urging middle powers to diversify away from over-reliance on any signal

00:28:14 partner and of course this is taken as being a jab on the U.S. which it is clearly. He has openly

00:28:20 embraced the aspects of a global coordination on climate and finance. Another globalist organization

00:28:28 that he was part of, he was appointed the UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance

00:28:34 from 2019 to 2025. This role he pushed for trillions, trillions, in redirected capital

00:28:41 towards net zero goals that helped shape the international climate finance commitments. 0.99

00:28:45 all this carbon tax and shit like that this is all him this was all his fucking planning with 0.93

00:28:52 some of the other globalists uh he was also part of the glasgow financial alliance for net zero so 0.98

00:28:58 he's really really loves these green globalist policies and you know people might think oh well 0.98

00:29:04 maybe he just cares about the environment no he doesn't it's all because he's making fucking bank 0.97

00:29:08 on it okay all these scams these you know climate scams and all this stuff it's same as the somalis 0.96

00:29:13 and the daycare scam in the U.S.

00:29:15 It's all, you know, just laundering money.

00:29:18 That's it.

00:29:18 It's literally laundering money.

00:29:19 It does nothing.

00:29:20 They have nothing to show for what they're doing.

00:29:22 No data that has shown that it's improved.

00:29:25 I mean, we all know that Canada has no carbon footprint

00:29:28 because it's canceled out by the amount of forests that we have.

00:29:32 So they don't like to tell you that, clearly,

00:29:34 because they want to take your money.

00:29:36 But, and furthermore, we contribute less than one,

00:29:41 And like we would contribute if it wasn't for our forests, if you want to get down to the, you know, nitty gritty, I guess, our global footprint is less than 1% of the entire world.

00:29:51 It mostly comes from India and China. And those two places are not being, you know, forced or not participating in anything.

00:29:58 So why should the rest of the world who contributes less than probably 10% total than those two places have to suffer because they're getting money for it.

00:30:07 these leaders are getting money for it. So like I said, he was the co-chair for the

00:30:14 Glasgow Financial Allowance. It was a massive coalition of financial institutions, or it is

00:30:21 rather. It's aimed at decarbonizing the global economy, but it aligns private finance with the

00:30:26 Paris Agreement targets. So the Paris Accord. Now, one of the big ones that we mentioned already was

00:30:34 the Brookfield Asset Management. He's the vice chair and head of the ESG or impact investing.

00:30:39 Do you guys know what ESG is? So yeah, ESG stands for environmental, social and governance. And a

00:30:45 lot of companies participated in this. They got ESG scores from, you know, these elite companies.

00:30:52 So Brook, okay, so he's Brookfield managed over 1 trillion in assets with major funds,

00:30:57 global transition funds focused on renewable energy and net zero infrastructure. Again,

00:31:01 And somebody's making money for all this stuff.

00:31:03 None of it has worked, by the way.

00:31:05 And you can't have, there's been numerous studies that have showed that we cannot have in certain places of the world, namely North America.

00:31:13 You can't have this kind of stuff because we have weather.

00:31:16 We have the different kinds of weather and climate and stuff like that, that you cannot have a country run on green initiatives.

00:31:22 It just can't happen.

00:31:25 Carney helped raise billions for these different funds.

00:31:28 And of course, conservatives are highlighting the potential conflicts like the investments in China.

00:31:35 Brookfield has a ton of investments in China.

00:31:37 Their real estate practices, the alleged indigenous rights, environmental issues in multiple countries. 0.97

00:31:43 Again, I could care less about that.

00:31:45 And use of tax havens like Bermuda.

00:31:47 So he doesn't even have his money here.

00:31:49 He avoids the taxes that the rest of us all pay by putting his money in an offshore account.

00:31:55 upon entering politics his assets went into a blind trust and it had ethics screens but of

00:32:02 course scrutiny is still persisting over this over unvested options and post influence and I believe

00:32:07 most recently I just read I think it was today or yesterday that they've told him that he has to

00:32:12 sell off his assets so I mean he's not going to sell them and put them in an account in his wife's 0.74

00:32:17 name or fucking somebody else there will be some sort of scam now he's also tied to the Goldman 0.96

00:32:21 Goldman Sachs, well Goldman Sachs, he was a former executive there, chair of the Financial 0.99

00:32:26 Stability Board, member of the Bilderberg, we all know what that is, the Group of 30,

00:32:30 Bloomberg, Peterson Institute, and of course more informal advisor to Justin Trudeau during the

00:32:36 Convid scam. Carney from this right wing, I guess conservative perspective, I wouldn't even say

00:32:44 it's right wing conservative, I think it should be from everybody's perspective, but I would say

00:32:47 from non-liberal perspective anyways his career basically showcases a worldview that it elevates

00:32:54 global climate architecture so this is probably stuff that he's heavily invested in stakeholder

00:33:00 capitalism elite multilateralism above above the sovereign priorities so again not caring about

00:33:07 the sovereignty of canada and what makes us sovereign what keeps us sovereign more interested 0.97

00:33:11 in how we can become part of this global homo one world government and he can get rich he pushed for 0.98

00:33:17 the carbon pricing he pushed for transition investing and diversification away from u.s 0.94

00:33:22 dependence calling it a weakness in 2026 this aligns with the davos and the u.n priorities but

00:33:29 of course it clashes with the propaganda that elbows up canada first energy development resource

00:33:36 extraction and pragmatic bilateral deals so he's talking out of both sides of his mouth

00:33:40 critics will point to the net zero focus like i said this is impossible to achieve billions

00:33:48 funneled through brookfield towards green projects while canadian manufacturing stagnates and energy

00:33:52 exports face hurdles perceived conflicts brookfield's global footprint they have china

00:33:57 deals they have qatar investments this of course raises questions about the policy impartiality

00:34:03 and of course he's an elite so he has this disconnect right a trajectory from central

00:34:08 banks to asset management to pm without prior elected office so he wasn't even basically he

00:34:13 didn't steal the prime minister's office but he didn't get it via the normal method he wasn't you

00:34:19 know didn't follow a trajectory of politics um he didn't have any prior elected office to being you

00:34:25 know placed in trudeau's position and this is seen as emblematic of the technocratic governance and

00:34:30 And this is a huge thing because I do believe that we're getting into a technocratic kind of society.

00:34:37 Communist, technocratic, whatever they want to use the new term for.

00:34:40 But it's common. It's modern day communism.

00:34:43 Defenders emphasize that Carney's crisis management, how he managed the 2008 financial crisis and, of course, Brexit era.

00:34:51 And argued that blind trust plus public service ethics mitigate any of these conflicts he has. 0.99

00:34:56 Bullshit. Absolute fucking garbage. Bullshit. 1.00

00:34:59 They frame his networks as standard for experienced global financiers needed in turbulent times. 1.00

00:35:05 He fucked up, okay, the Bank of England.

00:35:09 So I'm not sure why we think he's going to be successful in a larger role. 0.98

00:35:14 In the context of ongoing U.S. trade tensions and the July 2026 deadline of CUSMA,

00:35:21 Carney's globalist resume fuels debate.

00:35:24 Is it actually going to equip us, Canada, with negotiate hard-headed reciprocity?

00:35:33 Or does it predispose toward lectures on international order while domestic vulnerabilities, like over-reliance on other countries, persist?

00:35:42 His Davos emphasis on middle power alliances and this principled pragmatism was one of the quotes that he has said, suggests a hedging strategy.

00:35:53 So he's hedging his bets. He's diversifying partners, which should start with fixing rules-based deals closer to home rather than, or it should. The conservatives are arguing, the conservatives are countering that this should start with fixing rules-based deals closer to home rather than chasing abstract global resets. Again, it doesn't really matter what we want, right?

00:36:16 um so he also has Brookfield Conflicts this is you know the company that he is the um 0.99

00:36:25 what did we say oh yeah he's the head vice chair and head of fucking ESG or global shit 0.99

00:36:35 uh impact investing 0.97

00:36:38 so his four-year stint at brookfield asset management this went on from 2020 to 2025

00:36:49 as the vice chair chair and head of transition investing left him with deep financial and

00:36:54 professional ties to the global behemoth um blackrock that's the name i couldn't think of

00:36:59 blackrock uh he he was managing over one trillion in assets and brookfield's portfolio spans

00:37:05 infrastructure, real estate, renewables, private equity, major Canadian industries,

00:37:10 probably fast food, from energy and mining to nuclear and shipping.

00:37:16 His constant or ongoing financial exposure to the firm has sparked intense scrutiny

00:37:21 with conservatives arguing it creates an unprecedented web of conflicts that the

00:37:25 current ethics rules simply cannot contain. And we just also saw, was released today,

00:37:31 that he's creating some sort of fund, the, you know, Canada fund or something, which he's likely

00:37:38 going to invest in, you know, different things because he thinks he's this big time money

00:37:42 investor, money man. So that's probably going to result badly for people who hold pensions that

00:37:48 invest in this and all that kind of stuff. So that's an interesting turn. And this is what's

00:37:53 going to happen because he has a majority government now. So it doesn't really matter

00:37:56 what we want what we think he's just going to push it through anyways because what the fuck

00:38:01 can we do about it his financial stake um he had stock options and deferred compensation as of

00:38:09 december 31st 2024 he held approximately 6.8 million u.s dollars in unexercised brookfield

00:38:15 stock stock options these are performance tied and directly linked to the company's success

00:38:20 So what would be his motive, I wonder, to have that company be successful?

00:38:27 It is unclear if they were exercised before the blind trust, but their long-term value means Kearney's personal wealth rises when Brookfield thrives.

00:38:35 And his pre-office disclosures listed holdings in over 500 to around, well, 574 entities, most intersecting with Brookfield's vast ecosystem.

00:38:46 so it's in Brookfield so he benefits from investing in these kinds of things and there's like you can

00:38:52 go down a huge huge fucking rabbit hole of all the ties that Brookfield has to the things like

00:38:58 everything in Canada so anything you invest in it's like it's probably has Brookfield's hand in 0.98

00:39:02 it somewhere so anything that gets done these companies and stuff like that that you know get

00:39:07 created these all these different things he's throwing funding at they're all to benefit

00:39:11 Brookfield in the end which it would be him. Now these safeguards supposedly that you know he set

00:39:20 up that the critics are saying are they failed. He placed his marketable securities in a blind

00:39:26 trust like we said earlier and agreed to a conflict of interest screen covering Brookfield

00:39:31 asset management the Brookfield Corporation Stripe where he was also a director if you're

00:39:36 wondering why people get banned on the internet for saying mean things or they can't take payment

00:39:41 that's Stripe, and roughly 100 to 103 owned or controlled companies, his chief of staff and the

00:39:48 Privy Council administer it, barring him from being briefed on or participating in matters

00:39:53 directly involving these entities. So they say. Now the 95% loophole is Brookfield COO Justin

00:40:01 Bebber, not Bieber, Bebber, testified before the House Ethics Committee that the screen covers only

00:40:06 about five percent of brookfield's companies leaving 1900 others untouched kearney can still

00:40:11 participate in general or sector-wide policy decisions this could be things such as carbon

00:40:16 pricing infrastructure spending energy transition housing or major projects that benefit brookfield

00:40:23 broadly this is why it's a problem conservatives call this a textbook appearance of conflict it's

00:40:29 a conflict of interest if brookfield profits so does kearney um ethics experts like duff

00:40:35 Conacher, who is part of Democracy Watch. And Parliamentary Committee testimony emphasizes that

00:40:41 the Prime Minister's role is too powerful for these workarounds. And I believe that's why he's

00:40:45 been ordered to sell his shares. Oh, yeah, here it is. April, I did clip that. A landmark April

00:40:53 2026 Ethics Committee report recommends, so they're not forcing him, they're recommending

00:40:59 mandatory divestment for PMs and top officials within 60 days of taking office, explicitly

00:41:05 citing Carney's situation. It calls blind trusts and partial screens insufficient. No shit.

00:41:11 So the other thing was the tax havens and global footprint, because we did touch on this 0.99

00:41:16 briefly earlier. He did co-chair Brookfield funds worth 25 plus billion registered in Bermuda and

00:41:24 the Cayman Islands. And these, of course, are tax havens. This obviously avoids paying tax in

00:41:30 Canada it reduces tax revenue for Canada well of course the ordinary taxpayers we get to take we

00:41:35 get to foot the bill because we got all kinds of money right he defends it Carney defends it as a 0.85

00:41:41 standard for attracting global capital again word fucking salad including Canadian pension funds 0.98

00:41:47 and efficient structuring with taxes paid downstream by beneficiaries I don't fucking 0.99

00:41:53 believe any of that shit critics counter that it exemplifies the elites one set of rules for them 0.99

00:41:57 another for us. So rules for thee and not for me. Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice 0.99

00:42:04 I am willing to make. This is going to be our future, guys. This is literally going to be our

00:42:09 future. Now, their Brookfield, who, again, he's the vice chair of, they add fuel to the fire,

00:42:18 their investments, or rather international dealings. They have documentized the Chinese 0.97

00:42:23 state-linked entities. They have investments in China under Carney's watch and high-level

00:42:27 meetings with CCP officials. This was reported via the Ethics Committee. Conservatives argue

00:42:33 that this creates geopolitical risk. I said that in the last stream. And it adds more tension

00:42:41 rather to the US trade war or whatever it is that we're going on. And of course, Carney's net zero

00:42:47 focus aligns neatly with Brookfield's massive transition investing platform. So my guess here

00:42:54 is that because they have an ethics committee

00:42:57 and I have a feeling that

00:42:58 because they recommended that this,

00:43:00 he's probably going to dissolve the ethics committee

00:43:02 in a short order.

00:43:04 But I think it's important that we all know

00:43:06 and I wish more people were willing

00:43:08 to kind of look into things

00:43:10 before they decide what they're,

00:43:11 who they're going to vote for,

00:43:12 who they're going to support

00:43:13 or what their ideology is going to be

00:43:16 or their vision for Canada

00:43:17 because none of these people,

00:43:19 like it just gets more and more blatant by the day, 0.95

00:43:23 more and more obvious and more and more people fucking ignore it like there's it just we don't 0.93

00:43:28 even have a political opposition party that is willing to stand up against it and say something 0.91

00:43:33 he you know puts out all these platitudes and stuff like that but he's not willing to

00:43:38 make the decisions you know that we need and of course I don't believe that our like I believe

00:43:44 a lot of our economical issues yes Kearney's definitely going to make them worse but I believe

00:43:48 that most of them do stem from mismanagement but a lot of them current times stem from the 0.96

00:43:52 massive uh immigration that we're seeing and that they're putting here on purpose and i believe that 0.96

00:43:57 it is to destabilize the country to make it so that you know we're going to be reliant not on 0.88

00:44:02 the u.s but some other you know country probably china um to keep us going and stuff like that and

00:44:09 this is what he wants this is part of the globalist id you know ideology and stuff like that

00:44:14 so they want us to kind of split from the u.s which is going to be an impossible 0.66

00:44:17 thing considering we share fucking the land border with them i i don't think it's not like

00:44:22 a small European country, it's going to be, I personally think, next to impossible to 0.95

00:44:26 cut ties and throw a hissy fit, throw a successful hissy fit and not do any kind of trade or do very

00:44:33 minimal trade with the U.S. It's not going to go well for us. And we need, what we need is a strong

00:44:40 opposition leader that comes up, says what we need, remigration, number one. And number two is, 0.99

00:44:46 you know, we're not dealing with any of these, we're not dealing with the WEF, we're not dealing 0.98

00:44:51 with all these globalist entities we're not doing any of this shit we're going to go back to being 0.98

00:44:55 canada first canadians first and that's fucking it anyways that was my little rant thanks for 0.91

00:45:01 watching guys i will see you live on wednesday um not sure what we're going to talk about but 0.89

00:45:06 we'll figure something out see ya 0.99

00:45:08 fucking soft mate dead set fucking soft 1.00

`witch hunt`	Both words, anywhere in the episode.
`"witch hunt"`	The exact phrase.
`witch OR hunt`	Either word.
`"alpha male" -"high value"`	The first phrase, but not the second.
`(feminist OR feminism) AND (marriage OR divorce)`	Parentheses group alternatives.
`"decline civilization"~5`	Both words within 5 words of each other.

`misogyn*`	Any word starting with "misogyn": misogyny, misogynist, misogynistic…
`feminizm~1`	Words one letter off: catches typos and transcription errors.

`person:"Andrew Tate"`	Episodes where they host, guest, or are mentioned.
`host:"Glenn Beck"`	Episodes they host.
`guest:"Jordan Peterson"`	Episodes they appear on as a guest.
`mentioned:"Andrew Tate" -host:"Andrew Tate"`	Talked about on other people's shows.
`show:"Bannon's War Room"`	Episodes from one show.

`topics:abortion`	Episodes tagged with a topic (see the Topics page).
`summary:"Andrew Tate"`	Words in the episode summary. Summaries are machine-written and can be wrong.

`"great replacement" AND episode_date:[NOW-1YEAR TO NOW]`	From the past 12 months.
`lockdown AND episode_date:[2020-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2020-12-31T23:59:59Z]`	From one year. Dates need the full time, as shown.
`"high value" AND misogyny_count:[100 TO *]`	Episodes with 100 or more sentences flagged as misogynistic. Also: hate_speech_count, toxicity_count, word_count.

postyX - April 27, 2026

Political Malpractice

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript