Is Atheism Even Possible? [Live-stream]
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 48 minutes
Words per Minute
180.45644
Summary
In this episode of Radix Live, we're joined by Ed Dutton and Devin Perla to talk about faith, religion, and the degeneration of the western culture, and how religion might be a symptom of that, or maybe a cause.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
All right. Good morning, good afternoon, good night, wherever you are. Very happy that you
00:00:08.260
are joining us live. We have Ed Dutton, of course, and then we have Devin. Atheism is
00:00:16.080
Unstoppable joining us, and we're going to have a broad conversation about, I think we'll probably
00:00:26.260
talk about everything, but we'll talk about faith, what atheism kind of means in the West,
00:00:31.680
degeneration of the West, how atheism might be a part of that or a symptom of that, maybe a cause
00:00:37.320
of that. But before I introduce everyone, I want to suggest that if you would like to join the
00:00:49.120
conversation via Super Chats, that you do it through entropy. So it's entropystream.live
00:00:55.780
slash radixlive. And that way you can ask us a question. All questions that are Super Chats are
00:01:03.280
definitely right on air. You can join the conversation. We will read all Super Chats,
00:01:07.860
even those that are exceedingly stupid and insultingly embarrassing. You're welcome.
00:01:13.500
First off, special guest, Devin, how are you? Welcome.
00:01:19.020
Oh my God. How did I get here? How did it all come to this, Richard?
00:01:24.100
Well, the way I did it is that I said that I'm Lauren Southern, and I would like to have a
00:01:29.200
conversation with you about the future of the Republican Party. And you bought it, and now here
00:01:37.140
Well, I'm glad I can join you on your show because I'm penciled in later for Derek Chauvin's
00:01:42.580
podcast. So it's good to get this out of the way first.
00:01:51.460
Exactly. I've known of you for quite some time. And I guess I'll just get the formalities out of
00:01:55.760
the way. I'm sure everyone has to give the caveats. Richard Spencer is the personification
00:02:01.500
of evil and is the devil reincarnated. And I disavow everything he says. And I, yeah. Now,
00:02:10.940
Yeah. Your being on here is like an act of resistance in many ways. Yeah.
00:02:18.480
Everyone thinks that if you associate with Richard Spencer, then you're a white supremacist. I'm not a
00:02:29.960
Yeah. Have you noticed that the Nazis get called white supremacists? And I always was tickled by
00:02:35.100
that because clearly they burrowed down and could care less about whiteness. Life is a little bit
00:02:42.380
more complicated, but apparently not in America because that's where it gets flattened out. But
00:02:45.800
I don't want to spoil. I'll let you lead the dance. Go ahead.
00:02:49.220
Sure. Well, I'm interested in the topic of atheism. This is something that Ed and I have talked about. And
00:02:59.280
I think I was joking before we went live that Ed's a self-hating- Well, I joked that he's a self-hating
00:03:07.360
atheist. And Ed's response was that- Ed, do you want to give your response?
00:03:12.480
Ed Well, I said that I'm perfectly happy to be an atheist to the extent that I am one, but I would
00:03:23.280
I don't want to be in a world where other people are atheists. I'm content most of the time. I've always
00:03:30.560
said I believe in God sometimes. So very occasionally I find myself having religious belief, but most of
00:03:35.500
the time there's nothing particularly there. But I don't want other people to feel like that.
00:03:40.500
And when I was younger, I was a screaming out and out atheist. I was known as Atheist Ed. That was
00:03:47.920
my nickname at university. I was an evangelical atheist. And I was in opposition to these
00:03:54.920
fundamentalist Christians, these evangelicals and whatever. And as I've got older, the more I've
00:04:00.060
realized that it is those people who are nice and pleasant and kind and who you can rely on and who
00:04:06.140
have a sense of meaning and who are happy and who are content. And it is the atheists, and the data
00:04:11.940
bears me out on this, who tend to be physically ill, mentally ill, narcissistic malcontents and
00:04:18.860
generally unpleasant people. And they have now taken over society. And look, be careful what you've
00:04:24.740
wished for. I've got my dream that I have at my Catholic boys school when I was younger. I've got my dream
00:04:30.300
of an atheistic society. And I think it's a lot worse than the society that preceded it. So that's
00:04:36.460
why I say I'm happy for me to be an atheist, but I don't want anybody else to be an atheist.
00:04:42.940
That is a very grim portrait of atheism. But I will say, when I used to talk about atheism,
00:04:48.200
that was one of the sticking points that I believe religious people would kind of stab into us,
00:04:53.100
into our flank and twist the knife, which was, I think atheists commit suicide more. I think that
00:05:00.300
Yeah. And I guess the rebuttal to that is, I mean, I don't think self-delusion is an answer. I grant
00:05:08.000
you it's better than suicide. But I think, look, atheists, we're looking into the abyss. We're
00:05:13.460
looking into that terror, and we're facing the demons of our situation. So we're basically,
00:05:19.740
you know, we're looking down the barrel of the existential crisis of mortality. And it's not easy.
00:05:26.320
There's no easy fix. So when people say, what are we going to replace Christianity with,
00:05:30.080
the religion with, it's clearly not atheism. That's not even an answer to that.
00:05:33.940
Right. Well, then, so that's what I mean. So it's, I mean, it is, it is spreading negative social
00:05:42.380
epistasis. It is spreading negative feelings. It is also an evolutionary mismatch. We are evolved
00:05:50.940
under harsh conditions to believe in God. It's an instinct. I agree with that.
00:05:54.800
It's been at times of stress. It's associated with positive feelings. It's associated with being
00:06:01.480
pro-social. It's associated with binding society together. It's associated with physical health.
00:06:06.020
It's associated with mental health. It underpins ethnocentrism. Indeed, it's been shown that being
00:06:11.560
group-oriented, it's the same part of the brain that is stimulated when you think about God and
00:06:17.360
things like this. So it's this thing we're highly evolved to. So if you take it away, you put people
00:06:22.040
in an evolutionary mismatch, like, I don't know, locking a dog in a room and never taking it for
00:06:26.680
a walk. And you, and you send them mad. And I think that's, that's what we're seeing. So it's a,
00:06:32.680
it's, it seems to me, it's a, it's a very bad thing. Most people live a lie. Most people get
00:06:39.900
through life by living a lie of many levels. And it seems to me that if there's one thing that is an
00:06:47.180
example of a positive big lie, it's even if, I mean, maybe there is a God, I don't know,
00:06:52.920
but assuming you're right that there isn't, is this, because people don't lay down their lives
00:06:58.600
for, you know, rational, logical belief, most people, but they will, they can be induced to
00:07:04.820
do so for their people. And if they think their people are God's people, I think there's all kinds
00:07:08.180
of positive things to other people believing in God. I just think that there's got to be a way
00:07:15.380
that we push forward instead of going backwards. So I hear a lot of sort of nostalgia for the days
00:07:21.700
of religion, or I wish other people were religious, but like, you're not going to convince people who
00:07:26.440
have, I mean, we're through the looking glass here. And I am willing to grant that atheists,
00:07:31.960
just because we're right, or let's say we are correct about the, the God prospect, that doesn't
00:07:37.600
mean we're not lying to ourselves on a variety of other fronts. So we have socially constructed
00:07:42.900
So why do you, why do you, why do you want to tell the truth on this one then?
00:07:46.280
Just because I think it's the most important one. I think it's of paramount concern. And I think that
00:07:51.940
it's, it's disrespectful to ourselves individually and as a species to not fully grasp our situation.
00:08:00.720
But we're not meant to grasp it. That's the thing. We, we, as a species, if you look at the,
00:08:05.600
and this, this cycle happens over and over again, we reach a certain, we are this homo-religiousness
00:08:12.540
species. We evolve under religiousness. Religiousness is selected for, because it's associated with
00:08:18.540
physical health, mental health, group orientation, whatever. We select for this. And then eventually
00:08:24.400
we reach a certain level of luxury or whatever it happens to be, where, where this, this dysphoria
00:08:31.700
is, is created, where we lose our, our belief in God because we're very, very low in stress
00:08:38.560
or whatever. And so, so selection among intelligent people, selection pressure is weakened. They
00:08:43.400
become bored. They become despondent. They start advocating atheism. It spreads. Everything
00:08:49.180
is undermined. Everything that holds society together, belief in aristocracy, belief in, in
00:08:53.820
patriarchy, absolutely everything is on belief in your uniqueness of the people. You get exactly
00:08:59.280
the same thing in the winter. You always get it. You get atheism, you get feminism, you get
00:09:03.260
immigration, you get whatever, you get people not breeding, you get declining IQ, and you get
00:09:07.800
collapse. And, and so having atheism is an expression that we're in our winter. And it just makes that
00:09:17.340
winter worse, I think. Grant, go ahead. Well, let me, I kind of want to go on this because
00:09:23.920
I, I, I think there are a lot of interesting topics. First off, like Ed, I, I think in our
00:09:29.680
last, um, discussion, I mentioned that I attended church, Episcopalian church for Easter and that
00:09:37.400
I was kind of happy there in a way. Like I, I don't, I, I, I hope that I don't have a kind
00:09:44.440
of spiteful, uh, visceral, uh, attack on the kind of remnants of culture and, and community.
00:09:53.640
And I do think that there are many atheists who are like that, that would see, um, basically
00:10:00.300
Episcopalian white people gathering together, feeling a sense of community and, uh, want to
00:10:07.760
annihilate that as, as just, you know, that's, you know, you know where that leads kind of
00:10:11.960
thing. I don't, I'm obviously not like that. I I'm, I'm the reverse. Um, but I, there are
00:10:17.900
a couple of different things going on here. I mean, first off, I think there are different
00:10:21.320
types of atheism and, um, one of there, there's a, there's a certain kind of happy atheism.
00:10:27.960
I don't think it's right to say that the Richard Dawkins type people are maladjusted or, or so on.
00:10:35.620
Um, they, they seem to be rather optimistic kind of liberal types. Um, atheism is associated
00:10:41.780
with high intelligence as Ed has detailed. Uh, so high intelligence is generally speaking
00:10:48.620
associated with good health, although that does, um, at the extremes that can be a little
00:10:53.960
tenuous. Uh, so I, I, I think there is a certain type of well-adjusted person who really does
00:11:00.600
want to see reality as it is. And that that's a, that's a sign of health. I think there's
00:11:05.660
also a kind of, let's call them the Dostoevsky and atheist or, or, or maybe even Nietzschean
00:11:11.200
atheist where you're gazing at the abyss and realizing that it's all for nothing. And maybe
00:11:17.080
you might come out of that with a kind of Nietzschean sense that we must, you know, bring meaning to
00:11:22.080
the world and so on, overcome nihilism. But I, I don't think most human beings undergo that
00:11:28.560
kind of existential despair. Um, I would say that the way that I would describe contemporary
00:11:35.000
people, when, when you go to your average target or Costco, I don't think that everyone in there
00:11:41.360
is gazing into the abyss and, you know, hoping that some Dostoevsky and inquisitor will, you know,
00:11:49.040
bring them out of it with a, you know, I, they seem to be, there's a kind of certain kind
00:11:55.360
of passive nihilism as Nietzsche described it in the sense of we go about our life.
00:12:02.680
We might believe in some kind of big fuzzy man in the sky. Who's the big liberal in the
00:12:08.840
sky is basically how I think people understand God at this point. He's not Yahweh anymore.
00:12:13.340
He's, he's a big liberal in the sky. He's like, um, uh, he's like a big Joe Biden type figure
00:12:20.040
going, come on, man. Are you, why are you being racist? I mean, come on. He's, he's,
00:12:27.400
he's Morgan Freeman. He's Morgan Freeman. Yeah. Uh, so something like that, uh, the big liberal
00:12:34.220
out there. And that's obviously not the God of the Jews, Yahweh. That's not the God of Plato.
00:12:40.200
That's not all of these things. But I, I think in some ways what we face is a kind of passive
00:12:45.880
nihilism where there is no God, but it doesn't ultimately even matter. And even those people
00:12:52.320
who are, uh, enthusiastically Christian, Christian suffer from the same type of nihilism. I mean,
00:13:00.780
they're not really fighting for the truth or fighting for meaning on this planet. Um, they
00:13:07.040
have, you know, like, um, reach out and touch faith. Like, like I, you know, Jesus died for
00:13:12.920
me and like, I can call him up any night and he's there for me. You know, it's this just
00:13:16.760
kind of deeply personal, deeply shallow, uh, just connection with your personal friend
00:13:25.140
named Jesus. And I think what kind of, what kind of Christian you're, well, I'm talking about
00:13:31.580
the overwhelmingly popular version of Christianity and I don't know what you're talking about.
00:13:36.620
Well, I'm not talking about that. I mean, you've got to talk about it as a phenomenon
00:13:41.420
and not just, I'm interested in the kinds of Christians that have children. That's what
00:13:45.180
interests me. Well, we want to create more of this. It, having children seems we're creating
00:13:51.120
a lot more. And look, I've had children. I have a reproductive instinct clearly, but we
00:13:56.720
we're, we don't want to just create more cattle for the cowboys. Like you're just perpetuating
00:14:02.900
nihilism. And in defense of what Devin was saying, we like, if we're a, you, you shouldn't
00:14:09.240
make a description, a, um, uh, prescription in the sense that, yes, I, I have no doubt that
00:14:17.920
religiosity of some kind is deeply involved, evolved now is the platonic version of God,
00:14:26.080
which you find among kind of, um, higher educated, high intelligent Christians who, who don't,
00:14:32.100
who aren't really actually biblical Christians. They're kind of platonic Christians. Uh, is
00:14:37.500
that evolved? I'm not so sure. Um, and, uh, so, but I agree that there, there has to be some
00:14:43.600
kind of supernatural bonding mechanism where you can't order everyone around. You can't force
00:14:50.540
someone to bond and you, you all, and you also can't, you're not always dealing with like your
00:14:54.980
son or your mother or your sister or something. You, you, you have to have some kind of bonding
00:14:59.700
force that builds a community. And that's what religion does now is our current state of
00:15:04.340
religiosity evolved. I don't think so. And also, I think we should, it is, I think, I think we
00:15:11.500
should, uh, again, but if I, if I refer back to what I was saying about the winter of civilization,
00:15:15.840
you, you find this in, in late Rome. So what's going on with religion now, i.e. that you've got
00:15:23.120
these sorts of ersatz religions that are basically nihilistic, the same multiculturalism where you
00:15:30.620
worship this, that, and the other. It's basically a religion, but it's ultimately, it's nihilistic.
00:15:34.100
And it's saying that life is bad. The world is bad. Everyone's bad. You're bad. Uh, undermine
00:15:39.200
everything and destroy everything. And for God's sake, you know, get out as early as you can and don't
00:15:43.200
have any kids yourself. This, this kind of attitude. And that was the attitude that was
00:15:47.400
found among the Gnostics in the, in the third and fourth century. It was very, very, very similar.
00:15:51.920
And, and what's comparable across both, both, uh, both time periods is that it was very, very
00:15:56.980
weak selection pressures. We have very weak selection pressure now. It's very warm, um, compared to what
00:16:02.000
it has been in the past. And of course we have industrialization. They didn't have industrialization
00:16:05.920
in the third, third century, but it was warm. It was very, very warm. And that allows this,
00:16:10.800
this, this, the, the, the gene pool to grow and thus the increase in mutation basically,
00:16:15.900
and thus things that are maladapted and can take off. And I think that's what we're, uh,
00:16:20.900
what we're seeing, um, now and that atheism would rise for, well, a variety of reasons.
00:16:26.880
One, it would rise because people would be in a high state of luxury, which would mean they
00:16:32.280
would be low in stress, which would mean that the religious, religion instinct wouldn't
00:16:35.820
hit in as easily. And so therefore they're more inclined to be atheistic. Two, we, there would,
00:16:40.500
it would be the rise in just mutation, which would mean that atheism is associated with
00:16:44.940
mutation, particularly with autism. Uh, autism is the big predictor of, of, uh, of, of being
00:16:50.660
atheistic and basically just testosterone. I mean, we, we did a study, I mean, a colleague
00:16:55.220
recently where we showed that, um, uh, um, religious men have a more feminine intelligence
00:17:03.180
profile than atheistic men. So, so they're, they're, they're, they're more verbally tilted
00:17:08.820
and less mathematically tilted and basically just like less autistic. And that makes sense
00:17:13.440
because what the opposite of autism is, is empathy. And what religious belief is, is a
00:17:17.080
kind of hyper empathy. Um, and so, uh, and so you would expect this rise and then that would
00:17:22.860
cause ultimately this just to tip over into individualism, into questioning everything,
00:17:27.120
into questioning tradition, one of which is the traditional gardens. Then we have this replacement
00:17:31.000
religion of multicultural nonsense, which overtly says it's atheist, although it's got many,
00:17:36.500
many religious dimensions to it. And, uh, obviously I'd, I've, I've far more time for a, a rational,
00:17:42.680
sceptical atheist than I have an atheist that tacks atheism onto multiculturalism because he
00:17:47.180
thinks belief in God is, you know, that's just what the city right wing people think. Um, but,
00:17:52.100
but, um, nevertheless, I don't, I don't think it has done, it has done good for society. I mean,
00:17:57.300
in terms of the arguments for the existence of God, I have to say, I would concur. I don't find
00:18:02.400
any of the arguments for the existence of God convincing at all. Uh, and they're arguing for
00:18:07.800
a platonic God, like they're, they're arguing for a creator, the Elohim from Genesis one is what
00:18:14.600
the, or, or the God of Plato basically is what they're arguing for. Um, and it's just a kind of
00:18:19.900
circular airy, you know, you agree with it or you don't. It's just, yeah, you've got the five,
00:18:26.320
the Thomas five ways. You've got the ontological argument, which is just a playing with words,
00:18:31.960
um, sort of intellectual sleight of hand. Um, you, you, you've got this argument that,
00:18:37.900
oh, there's, there's uncertainty at the subatomic level. And therefore there must be a metaphysical
00:18:42.820
universe, which I just think is just an appeal to complexity. And it's just silly. Uh, and, uh,
00:18:48.040
and so there seems to be no arguments for it. And the only one that I find remotely,
00:18:51.940
I didn't say convincing, but that I have some sympathy for is the sort of William Jamesian
00:18:56.140
argument, which is that, um, almost like you should ask yourself this, do you value civilization?
00:19:03.420
Yes, you do. Is it therefore necessary? Is it good for civilization to have some level of religious
00:19:08.480
belief? Yes, it is. Therefore you should force yourself to believe this sort of Kevin
00:19:13.920
McDonnell effortful control in much the same way that we force ourselves to believe that in free
00:19:18.780
will. I mean, we know logically there's no, there's no room for free will. Where's the free
00:19:22.340
will? How does this free will happen? Rubbish. No. There's no free will. It's a rationalization
00:19:26.900
of, of decisions that you're driven to make. Exactly. Yeah. We also, we also don't believe in free
00:19:32.660
because you can't live without believing in free will. You can't, but you, you can live without
00:19:36.920
believing in God. Devin, do you want to jump in? Yeah. Yeah. You guys are verbose. It's
00:19:43.620
interesting, but, um, yeah, you guys have many thoughts on it. I've, I've listened to you guys
00:19:47.420
speak on this before, and I'm hearing some themes come up. Um, one thing I would say as an atheist,
00:19:51.740
it's interesting because you're almost pitting these thoughts against each other. I don't think
00:19:57.260
atheists are suggesting that an atheistic world is necessarily better. It's simply a statement about
00:20:03.300
the truth claims made by religion. And really, if we could just get rid of the supernatural crap,
00:20:09.620
I mean, Richard, you talked about, we need a supernatural thing to bond over almost as if
00:20:14.920
we're trying to wield that as a, as a threat, you know, like, Hey, you better stay, um, behave
00:20:20.780
while you're alive. Otherwise, you know, something's going to happen, but this is a primitive way
00:20:24.760
of thinking. I mean, clearly we can extract the good things from religion, or at least acknowledge
00:20:29.700
what those are and recreate them in a slightly more dignified manner than believing in ancient
00:20:35.480
nonsense. So no, no atheist is saying, Hey, community and purpose and meaning is stupid.
00:20:41.600
I mean, maybe some are, but I don't, I don't know. Some, well, some are, but I, I agree. I don't
00:20:45.680
want to straw man them, but doesn't, isn't that kind of an implication? I mean, in the sense that,
00:20:51.780
you know, I mean, even the community that I saw among Episcopalians, when I, you know, re-entered
00:20:58.120
the cave as it were, um, of my youth, I mean, that is, that's something, but that's not really
00:21:05.300
what we're talking about. And I mean, I guess I'll put my cards on the table as I usually do. Um,
00:21:11.900
I'm not really talking about making people behave in some kind of bourgeois fashion. I mean, I'm,
00:21:18.520
I'm talking about dominance and conquest and maybe even of a planetary scale. And for that,
00:21:26.060
we need, we need, we need strong gods. Okay. But explain that a bit more. I mean,
00:21:32.720
are we talking space travel? Are you talking about this planet? What, what sort of planetary
00:21:36.400
domination? Yeah. Well, there's no, what is the point? I mean, I guess I am more of a Dostoevsky
00:21:41.980
and kind of person. And so I'm kind of like, life is all about suffering and it's really tedious and
00:21:49.220
it's full of anxiety and angst and it's ultimately not good. That's kind of the problem with it.
00:21:55.540
So therefore we need to radically, well, it's, it's ultimately not.
00:22:05.020
So we, so we ultimately need through a tremendous force of will, we need to inject meaning into the
00:22:15.000
earth. I would agree. I think it is our responsibility. I love the question. What is
00:22:19.940
the meaning of life? As if there's an answer to that. And as if that answer is supposed to come from
00:22:24.460
someone else. Well, what would you think about the idea then, Devon, that in the, in the church
00:22:31.260
of England, a hundred years ago or more people would, in the Episcopalian church, a lot of these
00:22:37.420
high level priests, you know, they, they knew they didn't, they didn't believe this stuff. Really?
00:22:42.180
They didn't believe this stuff, but they thought that it was for the good of the population that these
00:22:47.960
conversations not happen publicly because, because they need to have a sense of eternity.
00:22:53.580
They need to be directed towards war, interplanetary conflict, whatever. And that is an argument
00:22:58.620
for not, for not publicly espousing atheism. Now, the problem with that argument, of course,
00:23:03.680
is it can be reversed. You could have somebody in the British government now saying, oh, well,
00:23:08.640
well, I've read all this research indicating there are race differences in intelligence and I had sex
00:23:13.260
differences and whatever. And yes, this is clearly true, but it wouldn't be good for society for this
00:23:18.060
to happen in public. So it's dangerous for this to happen in public. So it shouldn't happen in public.
00:23:21.700
That's of course the problem with that argument. And that, and that's the, uh, the horns of the
00:23:26.380
dilemma that I'm on. I mean, broadly speaking, yeah, from a purely rational and scientific perspective,
00:23:30.500
there is no room for God. And those that say there, there is come up with the most convoluted arguments
00:23:37.300
I've ever heard in an attempt to say that. So, so it's a mechanic, we're talking about a mechanical
00:23:43.280
system. Uh, and so, well, I hear what you're saying, but I, I feel like you are sort of willfully
00:23:51.240
infantilizing all of humanity. I mean, this is the sort of idea that we should just sedate ourselves
00:23:57.000
with whatever lie, just so long as we can avoid the horror of facing reality. Now this is, this is
00:24:02.760
what children, yes, that's correct. Right. And what me as a, someone who's trying to be slightly
00:24:09.440
more enlightened as an atheist, I would hope that we could get out of the infancy of our species.
00:24:15.100
Good luck with that. If anything, it's going to get, if anything, it's going to get worse. I mean,
00:24:17.700
you, you, you could argue that, uh, 150 years ago, we probably had an IQ that was 20 points higher
00:24:22.800
than we have now. So you, you, if you were preaching to people 150 years ago, but they weren't as
00:24:28.480
stressed about child mortality and death and illness and whatever,
00:24:32.180
as they were then, then you might, you might be able to do this, but our intelligence is
00:24:36.200
declining and it's declining at quite a rapid rate. Um, it's going to be, it's kind of, if we,
00:24:40.380
if we tack it currently at a hundred, it's going to be 85 among white people in America by the end
00:24:44.860
of the century, which is the current IQ of black people in America. So that's going to be the IQ
00:24:48.620
of white people by the end of the century. So the average IQ of America will be the same as the
00:24:53.020
average IQ of like Guatemala. Wait, is that like a reverse Flynn effect? What's going on?
00:24:57.560
Yes. There is a reverse Flynn effect. Forget the Flynn effect. Explain this. Um, this is interesting
00:25:02.160
for our audience and, and Devin might, it's interesting for Devin as well. Explain that
00:25:07.020
Ed, the Flynn effect in general. What happens with the Flynn effect is basically an IQ test is not a
00:25:11.800
perfect measure of intelligence. So you've got the, the, the intelligence can be conceived as like a
00:25:16.980
pyramid at the base that you've got these intelligence abilities, like tying your shoelaces or counting
00:25:21.740
backwards or something like that, which are weakly associated with intelligence. Then you have the big
00:25:25.720
three verbal, spatial, and mathematical that are more strongly associated with intelligence.
00:25:30.560
When then you have the thing that underpins them all, this is G general intelligence. The IQ test
00:25:35.020
does measure general intelligence, but it also measures other things, um, that are weakly associated
00:25:40.120
with intelligence. And so the problem with it is if those things at the base of the pyramid go up
00:25:44.400
really quickly, uh, really, really substantially, then it could come across as an IQ gain despite people
00:25:51.280
not actually getting cleverer. In fact, despite people getting stupider. And that's what was happening.
00:25:56.060
So there was this very narrow part of the IQ test called, uh, to do with categorization. And that was super
00:26:02.940
pushed up by our increasingly scientific society. And so, and this was on the most, um, environmentally
00:26:08.520
sensitive components of the IQ test. And then that reached a peak in about 1998. And since then, we've been in
00:26:14.200
decline on the, so there has been a reverse Flynn effect. And that's been on the more genetic components of the IQ test.
00:26:19.900
And so what's been happening is that at the genetic level, intelligence has been going down, but it's, it's come
00:26:24.680
across as a rise in IQ tests across generations, but there's the IQ tests are not measurement invariant
00:26:29.820
across generations. And so therefore you have this illusion of the Flynn effect. So we've probably been getting
00:26:39.700
Okay. Well, yeah, a couple of points here. One, what you guys are describing and what Richard was mentioning, you sound like
00:26:46.740
the character from the matrix who betrays his friends and wants to live in the matrix. He wants to go back to the matrix.
00:26:52.600
You know, you know, the guy who wants to taste the taste of steak and he just doesn't care. I don't care if it's a lie.
00:26:57.900
I'm not sure I'm that bad, but, um, I, I think you could make some interesting comparisons. Um, I, with my supporters,
00:27:05.840
we're actually reading Plato very carefully. And the, the matrix is basically based on the myth of the cave. Um,
00:27:14.800
there's this idea that all people are bound actually in a cave, um, with chains in fact,
00:27:21.360
and they're staring at the wall and they're these, you could call them priests behind them that are
00:27:28.440
puppet masters as they're described in the Republic. And they're, they're kind of shy. They're, they're,
00:27:34.040
they're creating shadows on the wall basically. And, um, Plato's vision is basically you, you somehow
00:27:42.460
break out of that and you look and you see the sun. And so you see the kind of the, the, the context for
00:27:50.020
all good. The, the idea of the idea of good, you see reality, but the problem is you, you reenter the
00:27:56.460
cave and people think you're mad and crazy because you've seen truth. And, uh, how do you break them
00:28:05.020
out? And I guess the question that I asked that is kind of, I find the most tantalizing question
00:28:11.180
is who are those people putting the shadows on the wall? Who are the puppet masters? Are they not
00:28:17.880
just as enlightened as the man who breaks three free and sees the sun? Are they not perhaps more
00:28:24.500
enlightened than the man who breaks free and wants to save humanity? That's, that's a very interesting
00:28:31.580
thought. It's kind of profound, but I mean, look, the truth is ugly and the truth is very harsh. And
00:28:37.940
I understand the desire to sort of sugar coat or delude. Like when I was a child, when I was five,
00:28:44.900
I've, I lost my mother, she died. And I was told that she was in heaven and I was going to see her
00:28:49.440
again. And she loves me and she's watching over me. Now I soon realized that wasn't true. And that's
00:28:55.440
ugly. Now, would it have been smart for my super edgy fedora tipping atheist father to say, uh, actually
00:29:02.400
she's an oblivion and life sucks. And you should probably like, uh, weep about it and shell up.
00:29:08.640
No, obviously not. But what you're recommending is ignorance is bliss. That's the philosophy that
00:29:14.320
you're basically espousing here. And I just don't know if that's the best way to go about this. And
00:29:20.200
also another factor, which we haven't mentioned, if you just perked my point yourself, but I mean,
00:29:25.500
look, I, you know, would I not be a demon incarnate if I went up to you at age five?
00:29:31.180
By the way, these people who do embrace the void, um, often, um, religion is a coping mechanism,
00:29:40.380
which, um, both reflects mental health, i.e. people that are religious do seem to have lower
00:29:45.260
mutational load and they're less likely to have specific, uh, gene forms that are associated with
00:29:50.260
depression, but also alleviates depression. So people that go to church and do these kinds of
00:29:55.580
things and believe in God and whatever are more mentally healthy. And so if you don't, if you take
00:30:00.300
this away, then what you tend to get, I mean, and any, this is very noticeable is yes, people that
00:30:06.160
are atheistic and more likely to be mental, have mental illness, have mental health problems,
00:30:09.900
uh, because, because if this, if it is, if you really believe it, if you really feel it to be
00:30:14.760
true, if you feel it to be true, really that life has no meaning and it's no, but that's, that's,
00:30:19.540
I mean, that is depression. Um, and, and so then they have to take antidepressants or medicate
00:30:24.600
themselves or kill themselves or whatever, or, or have, or have religious experiences and complete
00:30:30.220
breakdowns or, or manufacture extreme identities to give themselves a sense, a sense of something.
00:30:35.680
So, um, I don't, I can see, I don't think we will ever, we'll ever solve this. I don't,
00:30:40.460
Plato tried to solve it. It's a fundamental problem that yeah, you're reason wise, you're probably
00:30:47.400
right. Yeah. But the, the, it's so bad for society. And the thing is it's, it's only possible to have a
00:30:54.660
society where there is the freedom to, and the space to, for people to go around pontificating
00:31:01.560
about atheism and believing in atheism by virtue of having a society that is optimally sort of group
00:31:08.140
oriented and, and has people that defend it from enemies at the gate and, and, you know, keep this,
00:31:13.960
this freedom, which you didn't used to have. I mean, if we would go back 500 years, they just burn
00:31:18.060
you for saying this stuff. Um, but, but so, so you, you, you could only have this society by virtue of
00:31:23.980
having a society that has this optimum sort of religious balance between group oriented and
00:31:28.820
individual oriented values, but then ultimately having it, having atheism, spreading it seems to
00:31:35.000
push a society, reflect and create a society that is more individualistic, which is what we have now,
00:31:40.360
so that there is then less space to say your opinion. And what eventually happens is we'll just go
00:31:45.880
back to a society and we are going, I'm sure, I'm sure of this. We will go back to a society that is
00:31:49.840
group oriented and religious and Christian again, and where you can't be an atheist anymore.
00:31:54.020
So I almost see this. I would add this though. I, I, I, what you're saying is very compelling,
00:32:00.120
but I, I would add this. I, I don't think religiosity ever goes away. And I, I don't think
00:32:06.460
there's ever going to be a society without it. And I, and I think even what Devin was saying in the
00:32:12.220
sense of like atheism, isn't a thing it's a theism it's, it's a not and not an is, um, so to speak,
00:32:20.100
and that it can't really, it's almost like a bridge to something else. I, I do, I think,
00:32:26.500
and you would agree with me that I think contemporary society with America being a full expression of
00:32:32.980
this is a deeply religious society. I think we're just moving to a kind of new state and I think
00:32:39.140
calling it a secular world is an illusion. You've got the group select group oriented religion,
00:32:47.180
whatever that is, the cult of Rome or whatever, you know, Christianity, whatever that is on the
00:32:52.220
decline and the individualistic basically religion is on the up and there's an optimum period of time
00:32:59.020
where you're free, which, uh, we've passed, we've passed that because let me, let me go on this just
00:33:06.020
a little bit. So you, you know, I was, I was talking with someone just the other day and we were, we were
00:33:12.040
at a, um, uh, kind of pub like place and, and we were just thinking about the employees who are
00:33:18.500
actually earning $15 an hour, but are, are, are, you know, working class type people, what would get
00:33:24.260
them fired from their job? What would get them fired? If one came out as a Buddhist, would he be
00:33:29.200
fired? Absolutely not. If he came out as an atheist, would he be fired? Absolutely not. If he came out as a
00:33:36.420
Antifa, would he be fired? Maybe that's kind of an edge case, but probably not. If he can, if he just so
00:33:44.000
happened to drop the N word at some point or question some very basic conceptions of like, you know, human
00:33:53.300
equality in terms of, uh, psychology and intelligence, would he be fired? Yes, he would be fired in an
00:33:59.520
instant for those things. Those are fireable offense. So we live in a world in which heresy is a thing and we
00:34:07.220
live in a, and, and I guess you're, we might be using collective individualism and so on in different ways
00:34:13.400
here. Um, so I don't want to get into a semantic dispute, but there, there is a collective bonding
00:34:20.420
mechanism that is going on right now. Our leaders, if you want to call them the puppet masters of the
00:34:27.940
cave analogy have cracked this nut. There is a religiosity that inflects contemporary society.
00:34:36.260
There is a heresy that is in contemporary society. I think we're all in it. Basically we're all heretics
00:34:41.540
of varying degrees. Uh, and so, I mean, I guess the, the, the question that I have, it's, it's not
00:34:47.640
really, you know, Oh, are we going to go back to Christianity? And so I don't think we're going to
00:34:52.360
go back to Christianity. I think that there has been a, a withering critique of Christianity begin
00:34:58.900
that has been going on for actually hundreds of years. Um, and I'm not sure we're going to go back
00:35:03.600
to it. Um, I think that there is disturbingly a kind of staying power to this religion that has
00:35:12.960
been generated now, uh, in which, you know, the, the treatment of African-Americans or maybe the
00:35:19.940
Holocaust or something like this is a kind of exit from Eden, a, a, a, a primal guilt, the fall,
00:35:27.880
original sin, whatever metaphor you want to have. And that these people kind of have kind of
00:35:33.500
special powers. They will inherit the earth at some point. They are building right now,
00:35:38.760
a kind of POC elite coalition. Um, interestingly, 68% of, uh, American citizens who are in the class
00:35:48.080
of Princeton, the freshman class of Princeton right now identifies POC. So they've, they flipped it.
00:35:54.440
The, the majority of elite institutions is POC and you can join this elite structure. Now,
00:35:59.880
maybe all this stuff is just based on lies and silliness, and it's going to collapse
00:36:05.040
totally reasonable to say that, but we have a new, there is a kind of new religion
00:36:12.140
and binding collective that is, that has emerged. And I think it's being created now. And I think this
00:36:22.120
is some, one of the reasons why conservatives or race realist or what have you are always kind of
00:36:28.100
banging their head up against the wall because they're, they're bringing a knife to a gunfight.
00:36:32.680
They're bringing acts to a religious dispute and they just don't matter.
00:36:37.900
So POC is this American term. It means person of color, right?
00:36:41.960
So 68% of the freshmen at Princeton are, are persons of color.
00:36:46.680
68% of American citizens. And I think it's probably more than that because that's not counting
00:36:55.380
I mean, I, I agree with you, um, unquestionably with regard to what you're saying about multiculturalism
00:37:01.240
being a new religion. I mean, I think that's now clear. That's the, it's the Christianity.
00:37:04.200
It's the Christianity of the winter of our civilization. That's what it is. It's the, it's the,
00:37:08.620
the second religiousness that was prognosticated by, by, um, uh, Oswald Spengler, but, but it's,
00:37:16.080
it's, it's, it's, it's maladaptive rather than adaptive. And I've set out why I think it's transient,
00:37:21.820
but it's very powerful. Fine. If that happens though, and that's the interesting thing about
00:37:26.040
these, these liberals, they, they, these left-wing people, they think in a much more, um, black and
00:37:32.160
white way than conservatives. They're much more essentialists than, than they are nominalists.
00:37:37.200
There's, that's been demonstrated. There's a number of studies on this. They, their thinking
00:37:40.120
is more resistant to, um, to, to logical critique. Uh, they're more attached to their dogmas.
00:37:46.740
And so it's very interesting if they have done that because they don't, they see something
00:37:52.060
like prestige as set in stone. So their attitude is Oxford and Cambridge are prestigious. So for
00:37:59.140
the good of equality, we need to have more black people there, more Asian people there,
00:38:04.100
more children from lower class backgrounds there that, you know, it's fascistic to demand
00:38:08.580
people can spell properly that these kinds of things in the interest of equality. But what
00:38:13.660
they don't understand is that if you do that, then prestige just goes somewhere else. Prestige goes
00:38:20.080
where rich people go and where the nobility go. And that's where prestige goes. So if you, if you,
00:38:26.780
if you cut them out of Oxford and Cambridge, and this is already happening, um, uh, the, the
00:38:32.100
universities like Durham and Bristol seem to have risen in prestige as Oxford and Cambridge have become
00:38:37.600
more politically correct because the aristocracy just goes somewhere else. So it, it, it, it's a
00:38:43.940
self-defeating to do that. It's very, I might agree with the liberals on this one. Um, I don't, I mean
00:38:49.540
the Durham, all of those other universities will be taken over by the same forces. Eventually it might
00:38:56.640
just be years later. And there's something to be said for, yeah, there's something to be said for if you
00:39:04.260
really want to, you know, generate a new society, you do it top down, you take over the elite
00:39:09.460
institutions and you know, Harvard is that, I mean, yeah, a lot of conservatives now say, oh,
00:39:14.360
Harvard's a joke or whatever. Well, is it though? I mean, literally every Supreme court justice,
00:39:21.260
I guess with the exception of Amy Comely Barrett went to an Ivy league school. Um, I mean, I don't
00:39:27.320
know what to say. Why would it last forever? I mean, there was a time. It won't last forever.
00:39:32.120
The Scottish universities, because they did science and things and they were open to new
00:39:36.840
stuff, um, were more prestigious than Oxford and Cambridge. That, that, that there was a time
00:39:41.620
in the early night until like really the, I suppose the mid 19th century when the Scottish
00:39:46.700
universities were more prestigious, uh, were more scientific and were more based around reason
00:39:52.700
than Oxford and Cambridge. And then there was change and it, and there was a time when these
00:39:57.520
Ivy league universities weren't that prestigious. They were just universities where rich people went
00:40:01.420
that lived in that area. And it was in, I think, uh, Charles Murray traces this in one
00:40:06.340
of the books that he did where the change from, from how you're the clever person born in
00:40:10.780
Mississippi. So you go to the university of Mississippi to you're the clever person born
00:40:14.500
in Mississippi. You go to Harvard. Right. And that change happened in the twenties or something
00:40:18.640
like that. Rich people are still trying to get into Ivies, but, um, Devin, we're, we're,
00:40:23.240
we're dominating the conversation too much. You are our guest. That's fine. I have many
00:40:29.120
thoughts floating through my head. Um, you guys are talking about, uh, colleges and whatnot. And
00:40:34.060
yeah, for me, they're always kind of a pompous fart huffing joke and it happened for a while. So
00:40:39.780
it's a little bit pretentious, but I think even more important is, um, in the media and specifically
00:40:44.820
in the news, because the other day I was doing some research on a murder from 1987 and I went back
00:40:50.760
and I had to research a clip and it was a news segment and I believe it was Peter Jennings.
00:40:54.660
And I'm sitting there listening to this man looking at him and I was overcome with a sense
00:41:00.140
of trust, which was nostalgic for me. And I was like, oh my God, do you remember looking at the
00:41:05.500
news and trusting the man talking back at you? Yeah. Now maybe I was ignorant, maybe I was naive,
00:41:11.740
but to see the decline of that institution to where it is today, I mean, that is a true debacle.
00:41:18.540
And so I think if you're talking about the shifting, uh, sense of prestige, I mean, God,
00:41:24.960
the news, it's no worse example than what's going on in the news. I agree. This is a tremendously
00:41:30.540
important phenomenon and I don't know where it leads because I, you know, we're all in our forties.
00:41:35.920
Um, and so we're, we're kind of in that in between period where we can kind of, we might not remember
00:41:41.980
Walter Cronkite, uh, or the equivalent in Britain, but we, but we do kind of remember Peter Jennings
00:41:47.440
or Tom Brokaw, like this is straight news. This is the truth. This is reasonableness personified.
00:41:53.180
Um, and I, I think, you know, just look at these pollings. They're shocking. I mean, the,
00:41:57.800
the trust is going down and I mean, I think the Trump phenomenon was an expression of this
00:42:03.260
in this interesting way where Trump, he, you know, he had the alt right as his kind of wild and crazy
00:42:10.020
meme propaganda factory and all quasi intellectual force going on, but he was reaching just average
00:42:20.020
normies via Facebook and Twitter. And so they were getting their news from social media before they
00:42:28.540
got it from any top down source. And again, a lot of people, we kind of think that this is a good
00:42:35.100
thing. Um, I, at the same time, this can lead to situations like QAnon. I mean, QAnon among other
00:42:43.440
things, I think QAnon is its own religiosity, but among other things, it expresses the breakdown
00:42:49.180
of that propaganda structure described by Jocky Lule that top down, this is the news. This is real.
00:42:56.940
This is how you act, uh, uh, uh, the type of, of structure. And we're now creating these new
00:43:04.240
structures that people are gravitating to, but you know, they can be kind of toxic in their own way
00:43:12.240
or ridiculous in their own way. I think we're in this place where I think elites kind of don't know
00:43:18.520
what to do. They don't know how to handle this thing. They don't know whether they want to get
00:43:23.200
social media on their side, you know, or they don't know if they just want to shut down social
00:43:28.260
media altogether. Because at one point they're saying to us, oh, there's no such thing as race,
00:43:33.020
race is a social construct. And you have very mainstream things saying that. And then in the
00:43:37.620
same breath, they're saying, oh, the concept of BMI, they're now trying to get rid of this BMI is a
00:43:43.240
problem because it persuades black people that they're fat when black and elevates, um, anorexia
00:43:51.440
among black girls by telling them that they're fat because their BMI is too high when they're not.
00:43:55.460
Why is that? Why does BMI not work with black people? Why? Because they have a different
00:43:59.680
modal body type. That's why. That's why BMI, it's designed for white people. And so of course,
00:44:05.720
it doesn't work as well with other races. And so therefore race is real. All but no, race is not
00:44:09.900
real. And they don't know what they want to do. And this whole situation is so reminiscent,
00:44:14.660
as Paul Goldfried has argued, of the early church where you've just got all these people
00:44:18.280
believing all these different things. The Roman cult has broken down. Yes, you've got the new
00:44:22.700
multiculturalism, but there's new strands within that rather like Gnosticism that's self-destroying
00:44:28.300
and self-eating and fighting, you know. Um, and then, and then you've got QAnon, which is quite
00:44:33.120
Gnostic in its own way as well, the belief in the conspiracy devil behind the events. Um, and so there's
00:44:39.020
just total breakdown and split up of coming apart, as Charles Murray said. Um, is it safe to say,
00:44:45.700
gentlemen, that the situation as we see it now is a complete clusterfuck? I mean, what I'm hearing
00:44:51.440
is like, we live in the information age, but it's more like a food fight with information.
00:44:55.820
There's far too many microphones. There's far too many chefs in the kitchen. When I'm listening
00:45:00.160
to Peter Jennings, he didn't cut away and say, now let's hear the random opinion from this total
00:45:05.160
idiot from the street or from some e-thought model who happens to have big tits. Like these people are
00:45:11.080
popular accidentally. And this is an unintended consequence of that popularity. No one planned
00:45:16.880
out by the way, what the internet was going to do to society. This is a one-time, uh, real life
00:45:24.060
experiment that's playing out in real time. And it's a disaster. I mean, the suicide rate has gone
00:45:30.380
up 25% since the year 2000 in America. Wow. I was against the internet from the beginning,
00:45:35.620
from the very beginning. I got quite clear. I opposed it. I, for the whole time I was at university,
00:45:40.160
I didn't, as an undergraduate, I didn't use it. And I insisted on things being sent to me by letter.
00:45:45.380
Well, it's also though, like, couldn't you say this? Like, there's obviously many good things
00:45:49.500
that it has brought, but it's almost a race between us taking those negative aspects and
00:45:55.060
having it destroy us, uh, before it's almost like the, um, the weapons race. So we get more
00:45:59.820
technology. What do we do? We create nukes, but we also create many, you know, we cure cancer or
00:46:04.360
whatever. We, we do good things with tech too. And it's like us versus ourselves. And I don't know
00:46:09.280
who's winning, but it doesn't seem like the good guys are winning at this stage.
00:46:12.720
No, indeed. And one thing that is a problem is that they report what happens on Twitter. So you
00:46:16.700
get the Twitter mob and you can like lose your job over what people on Twitter are saying.
00:46:21.980
And I think that's a serious problem. I think Twitter should be designated as like down the pub
00:46:25.880
and people should no more in newspapers report on it than they would report on random stuff.
00:46:30.860
They overheard down the pub. It should be the down the pub space.
00:46:34.660
Yeah. The thing that's alarming for me, I never wanted to be smarter than the president. I don't
00:46:40.280
want to be more moral than the guy on the news or have more integrity. I definitely don't want to be
00:46:46.160
more well-researched than the guy on the news. You know, I don't want to be a better pilot than my
00:46:50.420
pilot. And so this is what's alarming when you grow up and become an adult and you realize,
00:46:54.860
holy shit, no one is steering the ship. Yeah. And I think we're right in that spot right now.
00:47:00.860
Oh, I'm kind of an anti-conspiracy theorist in the sense that I think in some ways the real problem
00:47:08.180
is like the lack of puppet masters or the puppet masters are clueless or unenlightened. Like I
00:47:14.480
think this isn't just some game that we're watching or some show that we're watching. I think we're
00:47:21.480
not, it's not a show. I think it actually is. That's how they see life. They haven't been these
00:47:27.460
people. We're now in generations like our own. When Prince Philip died, by the way, I'm quite
00:47:32.540
shocked that we didn't begin this by paying tribute to his royal highness. Well, the good news is that
00:47:38.300
he was reincarnated as a deadly virus that will... That's what he wanted. That was his dying wish.
00:47:44.740
That was his dying wish. He's his savior. That's a good guy. Is it true that Prince Philip was twice as
00:47:50.600
old as DMX? It might be true. That's kind of incredible. Yeah. 99, almost a hundred. Yes,
00:47:58.340
but it was, yeah. But the, um, uh, you made me completely lose my point now and it was very
00:48:04.060
profound. Um, yes, they kept saying that he was, oh, he was from a tougher generation. He
00:48:09.620
was, he was tougher and that's true. That's very true. It was tougher. You were brought up.
00:48:13.880
Life isn't a game. Life is serious and it's serious for you and it's serious for your people.
00:48:18.580
And it's all very, very serious. And, you know, and, and now people are brought up as
00:48:22.700
almost as if life is a game, as if it's a, it's a rehearsal, as if it doesn't matter.
00:48:26.960
It doesn't matter. It's not important. It's not serious. And so therefore they, and therefore
00:48:31.060
we get to this point where we don't even promote our best. That's what Bruce Charlton
00:48:35.060
did this book, not even trying. Once you get these dogmas of equality, which are of course
00:48:38.960
empirically wrong, then you start not promoting the best. You don't promote the best
00:48:42.920
people. You get put them in Princeton because they're POC rather than because they're
00:48:46.920
clever or whatever. You don't promote the best. And then you end up undermining everything,
00:48:51.360
undermining medicine. You're going to soon get people trained as medics in America that
00:48:54.640
don't know how to do basic medical stuff, but they know all about structures of oppression.
00:48:58.500
And the worst thing is you get short women police officers. And that was, and that was the reason
00:49:05.000
they were able to invade the Capitol was that they fundamentally were able to push over a short
00:49:10.040
woman police officer, get past her. And they were in, that's what happened. And so it was
00:49:15.340
because of this and I saw it and I don't know why it wasn't commented on very much that there
00:49:19.360
were these group of police officers stopping them from getting through. One of them was
00:49:21.900
a short woman. She couldn't stand up for them. She fell over. They were, they were it.
00:49:27.000
There were a lot of male cops that got run over too. And one of the people leading that
00:49:32.980
So what? The point is that if it had been a tall, muscular police officer, if they shouldn't,
00:49:37.600
police officers should be six foot tall. That used to be the rule.
00:49:41.500
Then it wouldn't happen. I don't care what they should be.
00:49:44.440
This is kind of sailor-esque. I, yeah, I, it's fun to talk. I, yeah, there were some men
00:49:52.460
who were, who got surrounded. There were men fighting at the gate. It was a man who shot
00:50:00.200
One of the things, when you guys were talking about religion and comparing the new woke cult
00:50:04.560
to religion, one thing came to mind, which I hadn't thought about before, but this connection
00:50:09.760
to history, I think is one of the selling points of religion. So put aside the eternal life and the
00:50:15.460
universe was created with you in mind. It's, you are connected to thousands of years of human history
00:50:20.920
and that feels good. You are nested in the warmth of that understanding. And this is when I hear woke
00:50:28.060
people, specifically blacks who I call bleeps, but I guess, where are we? Odyssey. Okay. I'll say
00:50:33.300
you can call them blacks. You can use the B word. Yes. A hard P. So the bleeps talk about 400 years
00:50:42.000
and I was always taken aback. What did they mean? Why are they including 400 years as some random
00:50:47.180
arbitrary starting point of their coming into North America? They weren't there for that. Why is that
00:50:54.240
their thing? You don't get those 400 years, but then I realized they want to be connected to the past
00:51:00.400
because there's, there's a bond there and there's, I mean, there is a purpose for that. And I see that
00:51:07.380
in that parallel. And I'm just wondering if we could somehow- That's why it's going to win. And because
00:51:12.100
look at the opposition to it. I mean, who, there's this guy that I follow on Twitter and he annoys the
00:51:18.360
hell out of me. I think his name is David Lindsay. He wrote a book called Cynical Theories on
00:51:23.060
Apparently the Frankfurt School were cynics. That was the issue with them. Um, but he's always
00:51:28.620
basically just saying like, let, you know, in the words of Kylo Ren, like let the past die. Like it's,
00:51:34.500
it's just, it's just kind of like, we're just individuals right here. Why are you attacking
00:51:38.720
us as white males? That's so unfair. That kind of attitude is, is almost atheistic in a, in a way,
00:51:46.420
because it is ending that component of religion, which is connecting you to the past and connecting
00:51:52.380
you to a larger story. There is no story. We're just a bunch of individuals sending out resumes
00:51:57.680
and tweeting and, and that will lose. That might hold sway for a little while. That will lose
00:52:04.860
to a dogma that connects you with the past. And so that African-American who has no identity
00:52:12.540
from contemporary life, you know, who's just kind of like buying, selling stuff, what life sucks,
00:52:18.900
whatever. Oh no, actually I was on a slave ship and I'm kind of connected to that experience and story
00:52:26.460
that is infinitely more powerful. Similar things with, uh, whatever. Yeah. And all that. Yeah. And one
00:52:38.240
thing interesting, I've noticed this in recent years is the use of the word back in. So people
00:52:44.040
say, Oh, back in the 1950s. And what they're, what they're implying by saying that is it's, Oh,
00:52:49.580
it's a different era. We're not connected to it. It's something else. And I've noticed that there's
00:52:54.100
an increase in the use of the word back in, and there's also an increase in how recently people,
00:52:59.540
they say back in 2016, five years ago, for God's sake. And it's actually that that's, if you,
00:53:06.020
if you live in a society where you're bonded to the past and there's this profound bond between
00:53:10.500
you and the past, it's not back in. Right. It only becomes back in if that, if that bond is
00:53:15.660
somehow weakened, um, or if, or if we're living in a revolution and change is so radical that a
00:53:20.940
couple of years ago seems like a millennia ago, or if you're becoming stupider and your time horizons
00:53:25.880
are lower. And so therefore your sense of time sort of slows down. Um, but, but it's interesting.
00:53:31.940
I've seen it all the time now. I, the most recent I heard was back in 2016, back in 2016.
00:53:37.840
You know, I think there's something so comforting about this connection to the past. And it reminds
00:53:42.760
me of people who are, if you're suffering right now, if you're depressed, it could be a myriad of
00:53:47.660
reasons why, but typically it's because you are disconnected from other human beings. You are not
00:53:52.780
belonging to a group. So you might be ostracized for whatever reason. You might be a geek. You might be
00:53:57.720
autistic. You might be a shut-in, whatever it is. The solution to that tends to be getting out there,
00:54:03.520
forming connections, having humans around you, belonging to a group of humans. But this also
00:54:07.720
applies on a historical level. So on a grander scale. And that's why things like religion are so
00:54:14.760
attractive because it puts you in a meaningful context and this makes you feel good about yourself.
00:54:21.160
And you guys talked about how religiosity is an evolutionary thing and it's part of us and it's in
00:54:25.620
our DNA essentially. And this, what we've seen today is essentially a modern version of ancestor
00:54:30.740
worship. They are trying to tie themselves to some greater family of people. And that's why,
00:54:37.000
by the way, the concept of race, what is race but a large extended family?
00:54:43.440
And that's why you get, you do get some people that are atheists that will involve themselves in
00:54:47.960
religion. I mean, there was a, there was a priest in England in the nineties called,
00:54:51.780
what was his name? And he wrote a book called God in Us, Anthony Freeman, that was his name.
00:54:55.900
And he basically argued that what, he was a priest in some village church in Essex or somewhere.
00:55:02.300
And he basically said, look, what these people are doing, it's like this society called the
00:55:06.000
sealed knot, which is where people get together and they reenact civil war, English civil war
00:55:10.660
battles in the clothes. They're redoing what their ancestors did. And that's what these people
00:55:15.240
are doing in this church. They're doing, going through these rituals that their ancestors
00:55:18.680
went through in order to commune with their ancestors and commune with each other. And
00:55:22.240
that's the point of it. And he basically said, he doesn't believe in God. He's a priest.
00:55:26.660
He said to ask whether God exists is like asking what kind of the wind is, you know, it's like
00:55:31.260
asking, is the wind green? It's a meaningless question. It's, it's, it's, it's, it's a matter
00:55:35.400
of bonding us with our ancestors and going through rituals that our ancestors did because that's
00:55:40.760
what we should do. And he was defrocked the day after that book was published for saying
00:55:44.640
this, but I, I think he made some very, some very reasonable points. And, um, Andrew Fraser,
00:55:49.880
who is a Australian Canadian lawyer, academic, uh, argues a similar thing. He's done a book
00:55:56.220
called something like, something like Dissident Dispatches, Christianity for the Alt-Right, um,
00:56:01.340
which has a picture of the, that frog on it, the cover with the, Peppy the Frog with a, with
00:56:11.680
We don't do that anymore. That was, you know, I'm thinking of another thing that religion
00:56:19.260
provides and it's not just this connection to the past and inserting yourself into a
00:56:24.040
grand story. It is, um, it's a glorious story. This is not just a long period of time. You
00:56:30.760
are a hero in this story and you will ascend to even more heroics out in heaven or in, you
00:56:37.180
know, in eternity. And so I compare that to the black experience in America. Their history
00:56:42.680
is the exact opposite of a glorious one. It is one filled with humiliation. Their own
00:56:47.260
names are often not essentially their own names. So they're not connected to a successful story
00:56:53.180
or a story at all. And so in lieu of that, I think this is why this cult of wokeism is
00:56:58.700
even more attractive because it not only connects them and bonds them in a group. It's trying to
00:57:03.540
say, look, you guys are beautiful. You have black pride. You have, um, you know, you're,
00:57:08.780
you would be Wakandans. You are great. This is a message that humans like to hear, especially
00:57:14.620
if they're suffering from, you know, an inferiority complex or just a lack of a good feeling about
00:57:22.060
I don't feel that like as a white guy, when was the last time you guys have referenced
00:57:26.300
something that white people did 400 years ago? Well, you guys are historically, uh, well-versed,
00:57:30.640
so you might have, but I've never been like, Hey, for 400 years back in 1600, a white guy
00:57:35.240
did this. And I'm going to talk about that. And that has relevance to me somehow. Never.
00:57:39.820
You said back in again. That's what I'm saying. Let's not say back in 1600. Let's say we're
00:57:44.540
connected in an unbroken line to these people from 1600.
00:57:48.520
Here's the problem as I see it is that you do see this to a, to a degree among conservatives
00:57:58.340
and let's go back to, sorry, uh, let's return to the 1776 project, which came late in the
00:58:07.060
Trump administration and they put forth a kind of national religion in this thing. It was a
00:58:14.860
kind of cringe inducing document, but it, that was, that's what it was attempting to do is trying
00:58:19.700
to create order, create a sense of pride in the nation that actually involves everyone and the
00:58:25.840
way they describe America. What, what, what does it really mean? Put aside money, put aside, we won
00:58:33.420
wars, whatever. What does it really mean? And it's a creedal nation that isn't based on this long
00:58:41.060
story and it, and it, and it's a kind of severing away from the European story. I mean, that's how
00:58:46.520
I would boil it down. You can see this in heritage foundation put out all of these statements that,
00:58:51.540
you know, America is unique. Uh, they're quoting Chesterton, actually not my favorite person,
00:58:57.260
but, uh, America's unique. It's based on a creed and not a race. And so the problem I, as I see it,
00:59:05.620
I think conservatives kind of naturally tend towards some kind of religious like understanding
00:59:11.620
of who they are and where they are in the world. But there's this, this poison that is injected
00:59:19.160
into conservatism from the very beginning. So what it means to be an American is to believe in this
00:59:26.620
system and to be an individualist and, and so on. And so I think all of this, we, we can't change all
00:59:35.420
of these things, but we can look and criticize the kind of new religion that is developing,
00:59:40.480
whether you want to call it multiculturalism or POC or whatever, um, wokeism, but until you change,
00:59:48.240
until you offer a real alternative, it's radical. Kauffman looked at this though, this thing about
00:59:55.820
America being based around certain values and enlightenment ideas, that's only really become
01:00:00.520
popular since the sixties. I mean, before that it was, we are Anglo-Saxon people. And indeed we are
01:00:07.540
more Anglo-Saxon than the Anglo, than the English. We're the real Anglo-Saxons. We've inherited these
01:00:12.020
liberties and freedoms that the Anglo-Saxons didn't have, uh, in England, that they became taken over
01:00:18.020
by the Normans or whatever. And we're not, we're the real Anglo-Saxons with these real freedoms.
01:00:23.300
We're the real Indo-Europeans. This is Madison Grant, Theodore Roosevelt. This is the kind of myth
01:00:30.740
that they were trying to create. The, the problem is they did lose. And for, for a number of different
01:00:38.960
reasons, they, they lost out in academia, the Boazians won academia. The problem came really in
01:00:45.640
the 1950s. And I'm sorry if I'm going to get divisive here, but the problem came with the onset of the,
01:00:51.620
of conservatism, the conservative movement surrounding, um, Catholics. I mean, it, you,
01:00:58.360
you went away from the Anglo, a kind of Anglo-Saxon supremacy, which is clearly present in Madison
01:01:05.340
Grant, who is wildly popular for a time, Theodore Roosevelt, who's president and writer and icon.
01:01:12.920
Uh, you went to a new conservative movement that was largely Catholic in inflection and, and Jewish
01:01:20.320
to also a very strong extent. And they created this poison, poisonous myth in which America is based
01:01:29.740
on kind of vague religiosity and creed, a creed and a creed that involves individualism. And that we are
01:01:38.120
still paying the price for the birth of the conservative movement. And I think this is a problem
01:01:45.420
that's just really underestimated and is not put into kind of, let's say, just racial terms in a way,
01:01:52.420
which is how we have to understand it. It, the conservatism as it developed was a usurpation
01:01:56.840
and what happens in America reverberates around the world. I mean, that kind of conservatism that I
01:02:01.560
described, you can see, uh, articulated in, in current British conservatism, et cetera.
01:02:08.460
And it's a real problem and it needs to be destroyed, uh, before anything new can come into
01:02:15.820
the world. I'm trying to understand why anyone today, or maybe in the past, it was easier to
01:02:22.600
understand this. Why would anyone care about national identity? Like, does it, it, at this stage,
01:02:29.320
it couldn't mean less if it tried. I mean, we are totally at each other's throats. I don't care that
01:02:36.980
I'm American. And it's just such a lazy cop-out of a thing to put meaning into for, because you did
01:02:42.760
not create America. So first, first of all, what's the attraction? The attraction, I guess,
01:02:46.280
is similar to what we've been talking about. It is an extended family. It is a connection to other
01:02:50.540
people. It is, um, it also, America has a glorious history. So we win all the wars. We have a bunch of
01:02:56.480
great people who have done a bunch of great things. I agree with that. Well, but it wasn't you
01:03:01.780
that did any of that. And so it's, but it was because we are them. Okay. But no, not literally.
01:03:08.160
I mean that you're being poetic. Actually kind of literally in the sense that we're, we're kind of
01:03:14.000
a race is just a kind of reincarnation. You could say that, that we just kind of pop up here and there
01:03:22.580
and we're, we're connected to our fathers and ancestors. I agree. I agree with the kind of,
01:03:28.280
you hear this a lot among liberals where they'll show a picture of like the proud boys and these
01:03:33.580
guys are like short and fat and ugly and whatever. And they'll be like, Oh yeah, look at these white
01:03:38.540
supremacists. You know, I, I kind of get that, but it is. And in some ways you shouldn't just rest on
01:03:46.240
our laurels, so to speak. We shouldn't just be like America's great. We don't, you know, we can just
01:03:50.280
sit back and enjoy it, but that is a proper understanding of like we are us. Like we are them.
01:03:57.540
We, the, our ancestors are living in us now. We are not an individual. We are just a kind
01:04:04.260
of current expression of a biological entity that is eternal, that actually persists across
01:04:14.680
millennia. We are just the latest kind of flower and we'll die.
01:04:19.840
If I could interject, um, do you have children, Devon? No, no. If your child does something and
01:04:31.060
you're proud of it, um, if you were to have a child, why are you proud of it? Well, let's think
01:04:36.420
about why you might be proud of it. You're proud of it because it's that child is 50% you. So there's
01:04:42.120
an extent to which it's, it's your genetics and your evolution, your decisions and perhaps
01:04:49.720
your nurturing as well, although this is also an expression part of your genetics that has
01:04:54.300
helped to create that. So you're proud of something that your child has done. And similarly
01:04:59.940
with the, uh, the, the, we divide into these clusters, these genetic clusters, whatever you
01:05:05.920
want to call them, races, ethnic groups, clans, tribes, whatever. And they create an environment
01:05:11.140
in which a person can or cannot achieve things. And so if, uh, if, uh, if there's something
01:05:16.920
about the nature of a tribe, which you're part, which helps to ensure that that tribe dominates
01:05:22.340
the world or that tribe achieves amazing things, then there's a degree to which you're playing
01:05:26.820
a part in it. And so you can understand how there would be an element of pride, uh, involved
01:05:31.540
in being even the lowliest member of a tribe that produces some of the greatest people
01:05:36.060
the world has ever known. So I think that's where, um, the pride in, in nation comes from.
01:05:41.200
Yeah, but we're kind of swapping from national identity to racial. I mean, Richard.
01:05:46.120
Well, it doesn't matter. We could say national, we could say racial, we could say tribal, we
01:05:49.420
could say clant. It doesn't matter. The point is it's a collective group that's people that
01:05:53.980
But isn't this the point? I mean, Richard started talking about us and he said, our, this, us,
01:05:59.220
but you have to acknowledge that this is a completely arbitrary social construct and
01:06:08.460
No, absolutely not arbitrary. No, I'm talking about in the sense that everything's a construct.
01:06:14.200
I mean, no, but, but this is the point. This is you playing the puppet master. You are setting
01:06:17.980
the rules now and you're saying us. And so you went from national identity, which, you know,
01:06:22.960
America has all the races to then just discussing whites. But are we talking about Slavics? Are we
01:06:27.320
talking about all these other groups? At some point you have to draw lines. And this is just
01:06:33.560
I endorse being a puppet master as I've kind of, in my sinister fashion said, but beyond
01:06:41.100
that, you, you, I'm not creating something that has like no basis in reality. I'm saying
01:06:48.620
something that is real and that, that is like deeply felt by, by proto humans. I mean, this
01:06:58.000
I understand and agree that there is a lot of major kernels of truth to this. For example,
01:07:03.100
like, I mean, if somebody in your family, your immediate family does something, you take
01:07:06.480
pride in it. You see the through line there. This is part of your team, your thing. The
01:07:12.000
further though you extend that outwards, there's like not a lot of diminishing returns, but it
01:07:17.260
just becomes less and less of an actual authentic connection.
01:07:21.240
But it's still, it's still, it's still, it's still an evolutionary issue, isn't it? So
01:07:26.400
you, you invest the most in yourself, then your immediate family, then your, your, whatever
01:07:31.760
you want to call it, your extended family, your kin, then your ethnic group and the ethnic
01:07:36.560
group. I mean, it's been demonstrated. Frank Salter has done this research where he has
01:07:40.140
shown how many people, let's say, who are banned to would have to emigrate to England for
01:07:47.340
it to be the equivalent of each English person losing a child, right? In, in terms of, in
01:07:52.980
like genetic terms. So these things actually, these things matter. And then from that, you
01:07:57.320
could extend it to the ethnic group and from that to the race and from that to the, a group
01:08:01.420
of related races and from that to the species and from that to beyond the species.
01:08:07.320
And they're all, they're all levels of relatedness. There's no, there's no black and white line
01:08:12.700
between, um, you know, family and, uh, ethnic group.
01:08:16.660
And I think in the contemporary world, it really is race where we draw those lines. I
01:08:21.400
mean, I, I agree that those lines, those concentric circles might've been drawn closer at different
01:08:27.480
periods, but I mean, there's an interesting passage in, um, beyond good and evil and which
01:08:33.060
Nietzsche is talking about this European man that is developing. And we, we, you know, and
01:08:39.540
even in his day, we, we have train travel, there's, there's telegraphs, there's postal
01:08:45.000
service. I mean, all these technologies that kind of led to where we are now, where we're,
01:08:49.240
we're talking to you halfway across the world on, you know, the internet and whatever, all
01:08:54.640
those things existed to the, and we have English as a technology, as a lingua franca, as a Latin
01:08:59.840
that is connecting everyone. I could have this conversation with you. I could have this
01:09:04.480
conversation with a, a Frenchman, a German, a Hungarian, a Venezuelan, um, that, so we
01:09:11.380
are kind of becoming a real entity. And a lot of those dividing lines, um, are fading
01:09:20.380
away. I think what conservatism is trying to do, and this is why I find conservatism to be
01:09:26.720
the enemy is that they are trying to create a line based on like credalism. I, either the church
01:09:36.000
writ large, um, or believing in Americanism or free markets or whatever, that is a competing entity
01:09:44.680
to what we are trying to do. Um, but in terms of like ethnicity, kind of breaking down through
01:09:51.460
intermarriage through technology and travel, that is really happening to a point where I think the
01:09:56.680
nation state as it is, is just kind of this artifact of, of a previous era and where we really need
01:10:05.680
now are, are racial states. That is the thing that makes sense. Well, it's funny that you're talking
01:10:13.080
about that or you're bringing out the big guns, but when you said race is this biological truth that
01:10:18.680
connects us and bonds us and it does so organically, when I heard you say something to that effect,
01:10:23.520
that is true for how people of color view race and they do it unabashedly and they celebrate this
01:10:30.660
and applauded for it. You might believe that as a white man, but there are very few other white
01:10:36.160
people who actually believe that sentiment. They don't view their whiteness as something to be
01:10:41.660
celebrated or as something to even identify as. So this is not their tribe. In fact, they reject the
01:10:47.560
tribe. This is the great contradiction where kind of whites are the enemy of what we're trying to
01:10:54.780
achieve here. I agree that this is a contradiction. Maybe that contradiction is not a right word. Maybe
01:11:00.180
irony is the right word. I have a question that I'd like to pose to you too. And it's, I thought of it
01:11:04.900
and it's, we're talking about size. I think there's a size issue here. If your conception of us gets too
01:11:12.080
big, how big can it get before it will automatically be pointless and just not even serve you as an
01:11:19.060
abstract thought? Well, I think the multiculturalists have to deal with that question much more than I
01:11:24.460
do. First off, they're in power and I'm not, but beyond that, they are the ones trying to expand this
01:11:30.360
even, maybe even beyond the species in terms of like animal rights and so on. Um, and I think if
01:11:37.700
anything will give us hope that their new religion and their, the world that they have instituted will
01:11:44.500
fail, it is that. Because there is power in size. So I get that for anything, for business, money,
01:11:52.440
just teamwork. I mean, you're not going to kill a woolly mammoth without a few other guys on your
01:11:56.900
side. So, and yet if you get too big, it becomes pointless. There's division. It's so watered down that
01:12:04.100
it doesn't even mean anything at that point. So what is the perfect size of a tribe?
01:12:08.100
It depends on, it depends on the nature of the enemy. So, you know, I would be a poor humanity as
01:12:13.240
a whole should unite in the face of an alien invasion. Okay. And it would be in their interests
01:12:18.620
to do so. Although you would definitely get some, some groups that would probably collaborate with
01:12:23.500
the aliens or something. I can imagine that happening. But, but, but, but, um, um, even, even so,
01:12:28.160
it depends on where you are as, as a rule, if you are in, uh, if there is conflict within Europe,
01:12:34.500
then obviously your, you, you, you, you identify with your ethnic group. If there's conflict between
01:12:39.720
Europe and the Islamic world as there was in the 1600s, then it becomes a more united Europe as
01:12:45.380
indeed did happen, uh, around about the time of the siege of Vienna, people put aside their, uh,
01:12:50.120
ethnic rivalries to, uh, to deal with the common enemy. So it depends on what the nature of the
01:12:54.680
enemy is. Well, it's interesting that you even bring up enemy and I understand why you
01:12:58.480
did, because that's been the, the story of human history. But my first instinct is to say,
01:13:03.720
well, why do we need an enemy? Which there's an answer to that, but the enlightened person,
01:13:09.180
we're a species and we're, and we're compete, we're competing, we're competing for resources
01:13:14.740
and for survival, um, with other people, there's always enemies, you call them opponents, you call
01:13:19.500
them competitors, but ultimately they're enemies. But this is the worst version of tribalism.
01:13:23.520
This is like just cave people fighting someone else. And I understand that you can rally behind
01:13:28.380
a common enemy and that's how, you know, life has worked and I get the competition factor,
01:13:32.940
but shouldn't our goal be to not have enemies and to bond over more positive, constructive
01:13:37.720
things? You can't, you can't not have it. If you, if that's the way you see things,
01:13:40.400
then you just get out, out-repeated and get, you get destroyed. That's what happens with Bushmen.
01:13:44.560
Bushmen cooperate with the blacks. Well, I acknowledge too, by the way, that this woke cult,
01:13:49.400
they have a common enemy. And you know who that is? Yes.
01:13:54.500
Yeah. I think you might. Everyone, everyone on this podcast, I mean, yeah.
01:13:58.940
So when you, when you see Asians have, you know, stop Asian hate and they're doing a rally with
01:14:04.620
black lives matter, there is a big bad wolf in that speech and it is white people or white supremacy.
01:14:10.460
So they are unifying behind a common enemy, which I find interesting, but I'm saying that's primitive
01:14:15.620
and not constructive and to be avoided. Well, good luck arguing that with them,
01:14:21.760
you know, but you're going to go down in flames. I mean, I say that, you know, with, with the best
01:14:27.760
will, we, we need to recognize that and, and, and bring that into ourselves. So I, I really hate it
01:14:36.300
when conservatives are kind of centrist, like attack BLM for being tribal or something like,
01:14:42.500
Oh gosh, you know, they have a sense of their race and they're, they're, they're focused on
01:14:46.300
this as opposed to rationality or something. Um, that that's, what's powerful about BLM. That
01:14:51.160
that's, what's admirable about BLM. But why, wait a minute, because they're exaggerating.
01:14:56.120
That wins. Yes. Okay. I, there's nothing, nothing else matters.
01:15:01.040
Well, they thrive off it. It makes money. It generates, uh, outrage and fear and they
01:15:05.840
bond over the enemy. And I, I know that that dynamic is, you know, completely real. I guess
01:15:11.880
what I'm suggesting is, Oh man. I mean, look here, here's one thing I'd like to say is I think
01:15:18.480
it's important sometimes when we talk about these things to quantify or at least attempt to quantify
01:15:23.260
things. Like, so when I ask someone if they're depressed, I don't just want to hear flowery
01:15:27.520
terminology. I say on a scale of one to 10, how are you feeling? 10 being, uh, you're perfectly
01:15:32.500
blissful. One being you're suicidal. And so when I get a number, I can get a truer sense
01:15:36.320
when it comes to our enemies right now. I think there's two ways to indicate it through numbers.
01:15:41.760
And these two are the percentage of people that think OJ Simpson is innocent of the double murder
01:15:47.360
and the percentage of people who are in favor of reparations. Now we know those numbers. We have
01:15:52.340
polled people and those numbers, you know, are obviously lopsided depending on the race,
01:15:57.080
but it's about what? 75% of people are against reparations, something like that.
01:16:01.960
Or, or maybe it's a little less. I don't know. It's 85% of blacks are in favor of it.
01:16:06.940
And 15% of whites, uh, want it. So those, that percentage of white people, those I would view
01:16:13.720
as an enemy to a lot of causes. Um, if you view the percentage of white people, is it what
01:16:19.800
percentage? At least 15, maybe, no, maybe it's 25 actually. I think it could be 25. Yeah.
01:16:24.600
That would fit. Yeah. That would fit with, you know, so you, there would be, yeah. Cause
01:16:28.480
once you get, once you get about 20% of people that are, uh, that say individualists, then
01:16:33.480
the whole society flips over and we let those people take basically take charge. Oh, and
01:16:38.040
I'm not against that percentage is completely consistent with the research. I'm not against
01:16:43.040
the idea of, I don't shy away from enemies. I don't shy away from, uh, conflict. In fact,
01:16:47.900
somebody told me that they said, Devin, you've made so many videos and you have some
01:16:51.060
people like you, some people hate you. And I'm like, good. That's the point.
01:16:54.340
If I, if people didn't hate me, I am either doing nothing or I'm doing it wrong. So I, I'm
01:16:59.600
not saying that to avoid the battle here. Obviously there are people out there that have interests
01:17:04.260
that are counter to, to your own, to, to someone else. So it's just, I'm trying to figure out
01:17:10.560
the path forward because what they are doing works, a common enemy, but I don't know, this
01:17:16.980
idea of us seems so, so vague and so arbitrary. I'd love to hear your thoughts as to who that should
01:17:24.060
be. And why, well, we can ask our enemies. I mean, we can just rely on them. They've defined
01:17:31.100
the battle lines. They are in power and we are not. Uh, so we don't have really any choice,
01:17:42.320
Well, you know what I think the new us could potentially be is just anti-woke. Um, that's
01:17:48.460
not drawn down racial lines, but it's, I don't think it's beneficial to, uh, turn people away
01:17:54.560
at the door if you have reason to ally with them. I think that is going to be the Republican
01:18:03.340
political engineering strategy for the next 10 years is a so-called anti-woke coalition.
01:18:10.540
And I think that will be, um, they won't do anything policy wise because they can't,
01:18:15.760
they're too lazy and stupid, but they will win elections based on anti-wokeness effectively as,
01:18:23.100
as they turned out millions for Donald Trump, who was a, you know, kind of bombastic, vulgar
01:18:30.760
buffoon on some level through ultimately saying anti-woke, the left hates you. The left is crazy,
01:18:37.780
unhinged, mad. Uh, I think that will be a thing, but I, I think there has to be some people who
01:18:43.440
recognize limitations to that, that we're on the, you know, we're, we're going for a kind
01:18:49.880
of civilizational project and, and not just kind of impotently raging against the left, because I
01:18:57.380
would say this, I think woke is sovereign, you know, to go back to that, um, anecdote that I told
01:19:04.020
you about, you know, these people working here in the pub, what would get them fired? Would being a
01:19:08.760
sexual pervert get them fired? No. Would, uh, being a Buddhist get them fired? Would being an atheist get
01:19:14.940
them fired? Of course not. But, you know, casually expressing racism that they'll be fired in a
01:19:22.000
second. That is what sovereignty is. That is the exceptional moment. Uh, wokeness is sovereign.
01:19:28.380
Therefore, all of these Republicans raging against it, rage all you like, you are going to lose to that.
01:19:35.160
And it might be successful kind of as electoral strategy, but it's going to lose. So I think we
01:19:40.060
need to recognize that and start, even if we're kind of on the margins or whatever, we, we need to
01:19:47.460
start building up a, a bigger civilizational project that that's kind of our mission.
01:19:55.080
Yeah. And, and who does that include? I mean, cause you can see what they are doing. They are
01:19:58.800
trying to gain numbers and gain power. And so doing, it reminds me of like game of Thrones when the Stark
01:20:04.460
tried to go and fight his brother and he's like summoning all the clans and he's trying to,
01:20:08.660
that's why you have the term people of color. This is a totally artificial fabricated term
01:20:13.180
trying to unite indigenous people with blacks and Asians. When is that last time an indigenous
01:20:18.420
person, a black and an Asian walked into a bar? Like this doesn't happen. And yet they're trying
01:20:22.460
to force this tribe into being. And why? Because they have to compete. This is why there's a European
01:20:29.220
union because they've said together, you know, apes together, strong, you got to unify. And meanwhile,
01:20:34.860
half the white people out there, 99% of the white people don't even realize that they are being
01:20:40.280
dogpiled upon. They are being vilified constantly and they're in a war. It takes one party to enter
01:20:46.660
a war. I mean, it's like, we didn't have to agree when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor to being at a war,
01:20:53.100
we were in a war. And so I think people are just asleep at the wheel and they don't even realize
01:20:57.720
that this is ramping up. I would call it exponentially. I mean, since when? Yes. 2015?
01:21:03.580
Well, you were in that war because President Roosevelt fancied the crown princess of Norway and did
01:21:09.460
things for her. What kind of dick pics? What was he up to? Yeah, something like that. Whatever. I think
01:21:15.140
they probably snogged. I don't think it went further from snogging, but it was kind of an affair,
01:21:21.000
affair of the heart anyway, between President Roosevelt and the crown princess of Norway.
01:21:24.860
At the moment, and I think probably for the next 25 years, upper level, more intelligent whites feel
01:21:33.820
like they can be the managers of this system. And so they will vilify themselves, in fact,
01:21:40.240
and enjoy it and manage the POC. And in some ways, let's be honest here, the POC coalition needs
01:21:47.540
managers. They need people kind of behind the camera, giving you visions of diversity.
01:21:54.160
In Hollywood and so on. So I think for a long time, maybe for the rest of our lives, whites will
01:22:03.420
think that they can be the managers of this system and they feel like they will benefit from it.
01:22:09.020
And to a certain extent, they will be benefiting from it. So I think what we need to understand is
01:22:16.700
they have to have a better vision so that they can manage something else.
01:22:24.960
Do you think that the moral panic we're going through right now in regards to racism is worse
01:22:30.640
than the Red Scare and McCarthyism? And if so, to what degree?
01:22:34.740
Yeah, I think it probably is much worse. I didn't live through the Red Scare or McCarthyism,
01:22:40.400
separated by a couple of decades. But yeah, I think it is more widespread. It's more radical.
01:22:48.220
I mean, I don't think if you told me even five years ago that the transgender ideology would be
01:22:56.660
seeping into lower schools, I mean, I would just be like, oh, that's not going to happen. That's just
01:23:02.240
too insane. And now that this is like a norm, you have, you know, old Joe Biden, you know,
01:23:08.900
just kind of going along with it. I mean, it's wokeness is sovereign at this point. And it's not
01:23:17.780
The worst thing about it is it's never, because left-wing people are mentally ill,
01:23:22.580
it's never secure in its sovereignty. It's never like, okay, I'm sovereign. That's it. It's always
01:23:27.040
more, always more, always wanting, needs more power just to reassure itself. It always believes,
01:23:32.240
ironically, that its enemies, the evil white racists or whatever, are really in power and
01:23:37.420
they have to be forcing us. So it's an eternal revolution. It's much worse. If you were working
01:23:43.420
in a bar during the Red Scare, could you be sacked for expressing left-wing opinions?
01:23:51.940
I mean, it's up there with the Salem Witch Trial, I think, at this point. I mean, it's getting
01:23:57.880
I see your point, Ed, but I think actually there was a point where if you were a commie,
01:24:02.280
you'd get fired from being a bartender. But your point stands.
01:24:06.040
I'd like to put you on record, Richard, and just have you explain it. I think you've explained
01:24:09.980
it to me before. The notion that what's wrong with white people, if you don't like that you're
01:24:16.500
being demonized and people have negative feelings towards you, why not just do what you and I have
01:24:21.060
done, which is you live in Montana, which is 90% white. I live in Berlin, which is 90%
01:24:34.880
Yeah. We got – I mean, it includes Slavs and Russians.
01:24:40.900
Well, we got – yeah, there's a chunk of Turks. But outside of that, it's –
01:24:45.620
Right. No, we're not counting that. I kicked them out of the white race, in fact. But what
01:24:50.580
is wrong with that as a solution for, I would say, the near term, but for the duration of
01:24:55.440
your life? Why not just go to where you're comfortable?
01:24:58.060
I think that is a solution. I think there's a kind of internal migration that is happening.
01:25:03.840
I mean, this is a kind of – I think I mentioned this before. This is just a funny anecdote.
01:25:09.480
There were supposedly 30,000 new vehicle registrations in the Flathead Valley recently. Like everyone
01:25:18.020
from – you get all this migration from Texas, from California. And so you meet all these
01:25:25.100
people that you'll say, oh, I grew up in Texas. I grew up in Houston or something. And I think there's an
01:25:30.800
internal migration going. And I think that could be a good thing if that leads to something
01:25:37.260
If it's 153,000 people left California in 2019, just that year.
01:25:43.660
But I mean, what I'm saying is why even LARP and pretend that there's a political viable
01:25:48.020
solution in terms of some ethno-state that's never going to happen when you essentially live
01:25:51.780
in an ethno-state right now and it's like, you know, why put yourself up against an unconquerable
01:25:59.900
Well, because I know that's not the ultimate solution. And so when I talk – I mean, first
01:26:05.460
off, what I talk about in my dreamier moments do have historical precedents. And I would go
01:26:14.640
back to that just unquenchable, maybe unspeakable drive that you have to have. I don't want to
01:26:22.880
run a small business or just get on in life. I want to be part of a much bigger project. I think I
01:26:33.240
have a kind of thumos, if you want to call it that. There's some spiritedness that infects
01:26:41.580
people who are engaging in this. And maybe it's a kind of contrarian. You want to kind of poke holes
01:26:48.520
in the system or whatever. But I think that's part of it, I guess. But there's a kind of spirit
01:26:53.280
that you want something better. I don't want us to just merely survive. I mean, that's almost kind
01:27:01.080
horrifying in a way. We have to flourish and move higher. And only we can do that. And we have that
01:27:10.400
mission as a people to improve the entire planet and ultimately explore the galaxy. That is what we
01:27:19.580
are here. If we don't have that mission, then why are we bothering with life? Because at the end of
01:27:25.280
the day, life is no good. You can go move to the suburbs. You can go move to Montana and it's fine.
01:27:31.860
But it's ultimately tedious drudgery. Life is no good unless you inject some meaning into it.
01:27:40.340
Okay. It sounds like you seek glory. It sounds like you would have been a guy that got on a ship
01:27:45.360
and went out to the new world. You want the adventure. I've heard you use the word
01:27:49.320
conquest and conquer. Well, that's what your ancestors did in both cases. That's what your
01:27:55.260
ancestors did. They got on a ship and went out to the new world. Most definitely.
01:27:58.820
And then you've branched out. You've gone back to the old world, which is, I suppose,
01:28:02.880
the new world from your perspective. Oh, no. Literally, my family is part of the British
01:28:08.080
Empire. We did it all. We went out and did it all. But the question would be, what is left to conquer?
01:28:13.680
What is the final frontier? I mean, you've brought up space. Are you literally thinking that this is
01:28:19.080
a project that you're going to take part in in your lifetime? Probably not, sadly. But there needs to
01:28:26.000
be people pushing towards that for that to ultimately happen. I do think that we are in a state,
01:28:34.760
we're kind of in an age of anxiety, very similar to the age at the end of the Roman Empire.
01:28:40.600
Ed and I actually talked about the Bronze Age collapse in the last podcast. I mean,
01:28:44.080
there are these periods of anxiety and degeneration and collapse that seem to recur
01:28:51.000
about every 500 to 1,000 years. I think we are in that point right now. And yeah.
01:29:01.920
I cut you off. I apologize. You think life is better when you have a goal,
01:29:07.040
when you're moving towards something. And if you don't do that, you described it as boring. It's
01:29:12.740
tedious. And essentially, you're just going to look, stare into the void, and it's going to laugh back at
01:29:17.340
you. And you're going to die. And so, okay. And I think that there's some logic to that. And I would
01:29:23.700
agree. I guess the next question would be, what are the projects? What are the goals? And have we
01:29:27.980
kicked the tires on those goals? And are we sure about them?
01:29:33.120
Those are very good questions that need to be addressed. I mean, I think what we are doing right
01:29:39.480
now is kind of talking about those projects and, and kicking the tires of them. And I think in some
01:29:46.300
ways, one of the challenges right now is to have kind of intermediate goals where we have the big
01:29:53.600
picture, but we need to kind of have some more pragmatic goals. I mean, there's not really a
01:30:00.820
institution for this type of thinking. There are multiple BLM institutions. BLM is at Yale. BLM is
01:30:07.700
the actual BLM. BLM is, you know, these institutions exist. I think one of the problems with the alt-right,
01:30:16.640
if we want to still use that term, is that it's kind of personal brands, maybe a webzine. It's kind
01:30:22.780
of a bunch of cynics and contrarians just throwing stuff out to the ether. I think that is actually a
01:30:31.420
real big problem. And we need to start working as a team. When we were working as a team,
01:30:39.740
that really created a tremendous amount of anxiety among our enemies. And that was interesting. And we
01:30:49.620
have to get there. Now, the way we did it back in 2016, obviously did not work. I've admitted that.
01:30:57.780
I mean, I faced reality. You just have to. There has to be a different way of doing it.
01:31:05.100
And I think some of those ways we can talk about publicly, some of those ways we shouldn't talk
01:31:09.320
about publicly. But I think we kind of need some more intermediate goals at this point. I think
01:31:14.940
that's actually a challenge for us right now. Yeah. I have to go soon. If you have any of these
01:31:20.700
private, these chats or anything. Oh, let's read the super chats. Yeah. I've been messaging
01:31:24.640
you for the last half hour telling you. Oh, yeah. I haven't. I haven't been looking at
01:31:28.660
that whatsoever. Okay. Um, so, uh, let's go here first. What are the consequences of higher
01:31:38.280
school? Oh, that was from yesterday. Um, uh, I agree with Ed about, um, okay, this is the
01:31:46.940
first one. So this is Yehuda Finkelstein, um, uh, prolific donor. I agree with Ed about
01:31:53.740
not wanting most people to be atheist. Why are militant atheists such jerks?
01:32:00.540
There's a variety of reasons for that. I mean, I'm a, uh, what I call a true blood atheist.
01:32:06.020
So like I was born an atheist. I've never came from religion. And so I don't have a chip on my
01:32:11.740
shoulder. I'm not trying to dunk on Christians. I'm not trying to convince myself that I'm
01:32:16.820
right. So there's no hard feelings in other words. Um, but there are a lot of atheists
01:32:21.060
who are not in that boat and they can be cunts. There are cunts of all around the world of
01:32:25.340
all different stripes. That is true. Um, okay. Uh, I've never heard an American use that word
01:32:34.660
before. Oh, well, I'm, I'm first generation American. I was named after Devonshire. So
01:32:40.740
interesting. Uh, Shulgyi for 25. Thanks for the live stream, Richard. Keep up the great work.
01:32:47.620
Thanks for everything you do. Well, thank you for that. I, I agree. This is a fantastic conversation.
01:32:53.100
Um, Yehuda Finkelstein again, Ed, should Harry and Megan be barred from Prince Philip's funeral?
01:32:59.260
I think I would like to put a poll on Twitter, which is, should Harry and Megan be allowed to go to the
01:33:07.880
funeral and then be taken to the tower of London for treason? Or should they be simply immediately
01:33:13.260
arrested at the port of entry and taken to the tower of London for treason? What if Harry,
01:33:17.440
what if he showed up dressed as Adolf Hitler, like he once did?
01:33:22.620
Or naked, as he also once did. Turned up naked or dressed as Adolf Hitler, because that's the
01:33:27.380
kind of thing he does. So, so Harry, what a Chad mind has been overthrown. It's, it's, he, he seemed
01:33:35.460
to have real, like he was, I don't think he was an intelligent guy, but he, he seemed to have kind
01:33:40.080
of real rambunctious Chad, like instincts. He went into the military. He was, I wasn't there rumors
01:33:45.820
like he was going to Vegas and just like, you know, banging all these chicks or whatever. I mean,
01:33:51.000
not that I endorse that, but yeah, but, but yeah, just this, the cucking of Harry, it's, it's,
01:33:59.180
you hate to see it. He succumbed to his gingerness, I think. It's a shame.
01:34:03.740
He did. They are very high in estrogen ginger people.
01:34:07.660
That's the real difference. That's why they get cancer of the rectum. It correlates with estrogen.
01:34:12.560
Wow. You're not just joking. That's real. No, no, no, no. Okay. James Madison, Richard,
01:34:25.480
what are your thoughts on Richard Nixon? Like Trump, he was clearly disliked by the powers
01:34:31.400
that be, but also made some bad appointments like Kissinger. Would things be better if he
01:34:38.660
had beat JFK? That is a interesting question. So he, he things, he did beat JFK, I guess,
01:34:46.880
stopped the steal 1960 version. There was, there was actually, I think most mainstream historians
01:34:53.800
kind of agree that there was tremendous amount of fraud, I think in Illinois and Texas. So he kind
01:34:57.700
of did beat JFK, although it was a razor thin. Yeah. I mean, I think Nixon was one of these people.
01:35:04.600
I, I'm, I'm probably less hostile to Kissinger than maybe the super chatter is. I think Nixon
01:35:11.320
and Kissinger were developing a kind of post cold war realist strategy or that was very interesting.
01:35:20.420
And I think the outreach to China was an example of that, that they were kind of getting over
01:35:25.980
the hyper moralism all or nothing of the cold war and, and, and, and, you know, kind of creating
01:35:33.000
certain factions and, and treating people as equal and not judging them on their domestic behavior,
01:35:39.160
but judging them, treating an enemy, not as a hostile enemy that he must destroy, which is the
01:35:44.820
rhetoric of the cold war, but, but treating them as real meeting with them. And so on, I think there's
01:35:48.760
actually a lot of positives. Uh, then election of 72 was just an absolute landslide. It was as if it
01:35:55.400
was like the election of 2020 that, that is activated, you know, middle America, but then we didn't have
01:36:03.720
all of this immigration in between and you just had this landslide election. I don't think Nixon was
01:36:09.720
able to have a vision, a policy vision or, or to implement something. Um, but I think he did kind of much
01:36:16.840
like Trump kind of represented, uh, uh, a certain, you know, back to America kind of back to normalcy type
01:36:24.840
thing. I've used that in, in, with Joe Biden, but I'm using it a different way here. Um, but, uh, yeah, I, I think
01:36:32.200
he's an interesting kind of tragic, uh, figure. Um, personally I've listened to, this is a while ago. I listened to
01:36:40.360
this long biography of Nixon, just his whole personal life and being a kind of underdog and, you know,
01:36:46.840
tackling dummy on the football team, not going to the Ivies and being kind of having a certain
01:36:51.960
resentment and chip on his shoulders. Fascinating guy. Um, also though, we know what would have
01:36:57.560
happened if he had won because it's featured in the movie, the Watchmen and that whole comic
01:37:01.640
franchise. Oh, that's true. Yes. Parallel history or alternate history. It's pretty interesting.
01:37:07.720
Yeah. Ozymandias nationalism. That's I guess what I'm kind of promoting. Um, okay. Evan McLaren,
01:37:14.600
my good friend, he's now in Norway, um, with family. Nietzsche viewed Rome versus Judea as the
01:37:20.680
salient conflict running throughout history, uh, but was also critical of anti-Semites. He said that
01:37:27.800
they are driven fundamentally by resentment. Can you unpack that a little? Yeah. Um, it's kind of
01:37:33.560
interesting. I, I, I was joking with some, uh, when I do these private, uh, lives, when they're not,
01:37:39.080
I guess they're live streams. You want to call them that we were joking about that, where when Nietzsche
01:37:43.480
praises Jews, they almost get uncomfortable. And then when Nietzsche, um, Nietzsche did attack
01:37:50.840
anti-Semites and German nationalism as just, you know, beer guzzling Christian resentment.
01:37:55.080
Uh, but then when Nietzsche will really go really be critical of Jews, uh, Jews really get uncomfortable.
01:38:02.840
He, he's a, a very interesting person. I mean, he kind of in this Nietzschean way, he'll kind of
01:38:08.200
look at both sides of the issue. I mean, Jews were the, the slave caste to end all slave caste.
01:38:14.520
I mean, it was the, the notion in the ancient world that this people of all people have the
01:38:20.760
one true God who invented the universe was just treated as absolute silliness. I mean, these were,
01:38:26.760
uh, this just, just banned, not even racially coherent band of liars and malcontents. I mean,
01:38:33.800
they, they, they, they were viewed extremely negatively in the ancient world. They were
01:38:38.280
not viewed as high intelligent as they are now. Um, correctly. I think the intelligence came later.
01:38:43.880
Um, but at the same time, Nietzsche saw them as creating kind of morality in the grand style.
01:38:49.000
And so in a way we became deeper, you could say by ultimately adopting this resentment slave morality.
01:38:57.880
So there, Nietzsche is a very nuanced person and I, I could go into him at length, but I, I think I'll
01:39:05.560
leave it at that. So he, he saw kind of the morality in the grand style, uh, that, that is world denying
01:39:12.040
and nihilistic, but it can ultimately kind of flip over into something else. And, um, yeah.
01:39:19.400
By the way, Richard, uh, you might get a kick out of the ADL's recent public statement about
01:39:24.680
Tucker Carlson's latest episode where he's talking about white replacement, or he wasn't talking
01:39:28.680
about, he was talking about Republican replacement theory. Yeah. Yeah. They put out a letter trying
01:39:33.640
to get him fired to Fox news. And I think they mentioned white supremacy 20 times in like three,
01:39:40.040
three paragraphs. It's incredible. Yeah. I definitely took note of that. I did a little
01:39:45.960
video on that last night. Um, I, I, it is, he was, he talks about it in the wrong way. It becomes
01:39:52.600
Republican replacement, as you said, you know, we're, we're diluting, you know, and, and I don't
01:39:57.720
think it's necessarily even right. I think in this weird way, I mean, this is kind of my hot take on
01:40:02.920
the matter in this weird way, Hispanics were very attracted to Trump. I think Hispanics might very
01:40:09.400
well be attracted to an anti-woke coalition. And I think they're not quite a part of this new ruling
01:40:17.560
structure that we see. They're not, you know, it's like black, the black history, the black
01:40:23.000
experience, that's the original sin. That's those are the people who get moralized and the new POC
01:40:29.000
ruling class are like people, you know, it's not really Hispanics. Well, Hispanic silence is deafening.
01:40:36.280
I mean, there are huge in the country and they're really not going on the shows and they're not,
01:40:41.400
they're not even going one way or the other. So I don't even know if I give them a pass,
01:40:45.720
like they should be standing up and being actually anti-racist and pulling it out, but they don't.
01:40:51.320
They don't. And so I think, I think it's actually kind of complicated. Um, and I, and I don't think
01:40:56.600
Tucker was able to get it. And I think Tucker is also just kind of playing these games, you know,
01:41:00.360
of like, this isn't about race. It's a voting rights issue. It's like, you know, come on,
01:41:06.280
come on, man. But he's a political wonk. It probably was him just talking about voting rights. He has no
01:41:11.320
ambition to, to get into that fire. That might be true. And it's good Republican when me get more
01:41:18.840
money basically. Um, okay. The us AIU, uh, wants to know about is a new Aryan centric religion,
01:41:28.600
hail Apollo. That's from Steven louder for three. Uh, yeah, that, that is my big, uh, well, that's my
01:41:35.880
big project with, um, Brahmin and so on where, um, we're, we're going to bring back the gods and, uh,
01:41:43.400
we will, we will worship the sun. Yeah. I mean, that, I mean, I know this sounds outlandish or silly
01:41:47.800
or like, oh, we're doing Scientology. It's not, it's not a superstitious faith. Um, and it is a,
01:41:53.960
it is a rational faith and a faith of intelligence. And it's also a moralizing faith. And I think a
01:41:59.240
faith that's going to appeal to those, to Thumos and the best of us. Um, okay. Let me go on here.
01:42:06.760
This is the, I think this might be the last one. This was for eight. Oh no, we've had some more.
01:42:12.840
I'll read these pretty quickly. I can't read this name. It's not that it's a bad word. It's just
01:42:17.560
weird letters. Um, as Christianity took a thousand years to annex Europe while incorporating pagan
01:42:24.600
practices with new meaning, what aspect of current order could be recycled with new meaning? Perhaps,
01:42:31.400
um, I can answer that real quickly. Um, the new order is going to be Christian and they are going
01:42:38.680
to, uh, they have adopted the structure of Christianity that, that is original sin. Uh,
01:42:45.640
it is a guilt religion, fundamentally white guilt, the dangers of white supremacy. And it,
01:42:52.200
and it envisions a kind of new world. It's not, it's not, it is pretty much the meek shall inherit
01:42:57.560
the earth, but it's a new kind of meek. It's not necessarily the poor or the working class. It's,
01:43:02.520
it's a kind of new POC that will, that will take power. So when we are opposing this wokeness or
01:43:09.640
something, we are opposing Christianity's latest evolution and maybe, maybe even how it was at the
01:43:15.800
beginning. I mean, it kind of almost neo-Christian returning to origin, so to speak.
01:43:20.600
You know, to add to that, uh, when one religion takes over from another, uh, often it would adopt
01:43:25.720
the holidays and just sort of modify them, but they keep the day because people were just used
01:43:30.680
to practicing whatever holiday on that day. So now you get the 4th of July. Well, for the woke,
01:43:36.360
that's fuck America day, a Christopher Columbus day. I mean, don't even start. Um, there's multiple
01:43:41.960
holidays throughout president's day. They're like, Oh, those are all slave owners. Fuck you whites.
01:43:45.800
So they're going to make, take those holidays and then commandeer them and then just spin them to
01:43:50.760
their own ends. Yes. Uh, I totally agree with that. That's insightful TL. Um, when is Spencer
01:43:58.760
getting his blue check mark? Well, I had a blue check mark and then they took it away. Um, I don't
01:44:05.000
know what they're going to do with me. I don't know. I don't think I'm going to be kicked off Twitter
01:44:09.000
because I more or less behave, but, um, I, they still, they still, I'm not, not as much as they
01:44:16.680
did, but they still kind of want to talk about me, but I've kind of thrown up all these smoke screens
01:44:21.640
and so on where it's like, wait, he's a Biden supporter. He doesn't like Tucker Carlson.
01:44:27.280
So I, I'm kind of engaging in a certain, a certain crypts as you could say. Um, that's where
01:44:33.960
we need to be right now. Um, Mike are for 50. Thank you. Um, what would the, this is for Ed.
01:44:41.320
What would the world look like if English princes never married American divorcees?
01:44:50.680
Um, well, the, the, the first time round, it would mean that George the fourth, sorry, George
01:44:57.080
the sixth would never have been King. So it would have been Edward that was King and assuming that
01:45:03.120
nothing else changed. Um, uh, he married Morris Simpson and he remained, uh, uh, then Edward
01:45:09.920
would have been King during the war and Edward was a Nazi sympathizer. So in that, in that sense,
01:45:15.960
perhaps the world could have been quite different because he may well have used his influence to
01:45:20.640
steer England away from the war and to ensure that, uh, we, we didn't go to war with Germany.
01:45:27.200
So, uh, but it was marrying an American divorcee, which meant that he didn't do that because he
01:45:32.360
abdicated. So it could have been quite different. That reminds me of one of my favorite films
01:45:36.920
remains of the day, which looks at German appeasement and some elites meeting at this
01:45:42.220
great manor house to go over those things, uh, starring Superman before he had his horse accident.
01:45:48.260
I don't know if that short answer I just gave you justifies the very generous donation that you gave,
01:45:53.200
but, um, uh, I don't know what more detail I can, I can go into. I it's quite possible because a lot
01:45:58.700
of people didn't want him to abdicate. He was very, very popular. And so he was very popular.
01:46:04.060
And so, and, and he did her. And so if he hadn't married her and he would have become King
01:46:08.460
and nothing else and remain King and nothing else changed, then we would have had a King who was
01:46:14.400
very, very much as a sympathizer with the Nazis and the King ultimately can decide who you appoint
01:46:19.700
as prime minister. And, um, and he was, he made it quite clear that he was prepared to,
01:46:24.820
there's all of these theoretical powers that the Royals have, which that Elizabeth, for example,
01:46:29.740
or George the six never use. So the, the, the tradition is you do this. So you do it. You don't
01:46:34.800
have to do it, but you just do. And he broke with those traditions. He didn't appoint the natural
01:46:39.640
successor as his private secretary. He appointed someone he wanted. He didn't appoint so that the
01:46:44.780
person that was expecting the job as so-and-so he appointed just someone he wanted. He did what he
01:46:48.780
wanted. So it's quite possible he would have interfered in politics. So again, I stress it would
01:46:53.080
have been pretty, these American divorcees, uh, have a lot to answer for it. It's a disturbing
01:47:00.560
trend. There's no, no question. Uh, gents, um, fantastic conversation. I'm not just saying
01:47:08.360
that this was, I think really enlightening and wide ranging. Um, so I'd love to do it again.
01:47:14.380
And, um, Devin, if you, if you want me to denounce you so that you could save face, I'm more than
01:47:20.160
happy. Richard, I wasn't here. I wasn't even here, but it's, it's very good to have these
01:47:27.480
conversations. I I'm, I'm glad that people can be brave enough to kind of push through
01:47:31.680
the taboo and, and have the conversations. Cause I think this is enlightening to me and
01:47:36.360
I know that it was enlightening to the audience as well. Uh, so thanks. Why don't you do some
01:47:41.220
plugs? Just tell everyone where they can find you. Yeah. Well, I was kicked off YouTube
01:47:45.380
because essentially George Floyd, I mean, I had been banned from YouTube twice before
01:47:50.400
and managed to get my channel back because it was all bullshit. But in fact, one of the
01:47:54.420
times I got banned was for showing the ass of Jesus Christ from a scene from the life
01:47:59.840
of Brian. I'm not, but, um, George Floyd was the final straw because, you know, everyone
01:48:06.280
had to go. And so, uh, yeah, in fact, I think, weren't you not banned recently?
01:48:10.840
Well, I think we were banned at the same time, weren't we? There was a big purge in
01:48:15.660
July or something like that. Yeah. My last video was like, what the hell? They've
01:48:18.860
banned all these other people. This is messed up. And then I was gone, but I'm
01:48:22.220
over at censored TV. Um, I, it's a platform. I post my stuff up. You can sign up
01:48:28.080
using AIU as a coupon code. I get a few shekels that way and I could say whatever
01:48:33.660
I want. I churn out content and I'm happy as a clam, happy to have a home on the
01:48:38.380
internet post YouTube. Very good. All right. Um, let us put a bookmark in
01:48:45.400
it. Great conversation. Thank you, Devin. Thank you, Ed, as always. And, uh, we'll