RadixJournal - February 20, 2026


Jeremy Carl Screws the Pooch

Hosted by
Richard Spencer
Mentioned
Jeremy Carl Jonathan Kieperman Dinesh D'Souza Jared Taylor Andrew Boga Chris Ruffo
AOC's Curious Nationalism Love and Marriage

Episode Stats


Length

4 minutes

Words per minute

173.03

Word count

695

Sentence count

57

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

18

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode, I talk about white identity, identity politics, and identity politics in general. I also talk about the new candidate for the Supreme Court, Jeremy Carl, and why he might not get on the ballot. And I talk a little bit about Dinesh D'Souza.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 So I was thinking about these things as well when I saw, I believe his name is Jeremy Carl, who is some sort of Claremont person who got put up for, is he, they haven't voted on him yet, but he might very well not make it.
00:00:14.620 He was asked all these questions about, you know, is there anti-white discrimination and bigotry?
00:00:19.860 And he couldn't define the white race.
00:00:22.440 And he wrote the book.
00:00:24.380 He literally wrote the book about white discrimination. 1.00
00:00:28.000 Imagine me, you put, bitch, put me before Congress. 1.00
00:00:31.060 I could give it to him. 1.00
00:00:32.300 Imagine me after all these years of talking shit, you put me before Congress and they're like, well, what is a woman? 1.00
00:00:38.060 No, this is the best you fucking got. 1.00
00:00:40.280 This is why I check out, hold on really quick. 0.97
00:00:41.800 Also, not to be arrogant here, but I don't know if you even saw this.
00:00:45.740 I put out like a 10 minute discussion that I had on AOC and identitarianism and what is white in Europe and so on.
00:00:55.820 That is so compelling.
00:00:59.380 It directly communicates an idea to the masses.
00:01:03.700 Anyone can understand that.
00:01:04.860 I'm not speaking in arcane language or anything like that.
00:01:08.060 Again, like not to be resentful here, but isn't it interesting that there are people like, forget me.
00:01:16.340 There are people like Jared Taylor, who's just been talking about this for 40 years.
00:01:20.900 And oh, no, we can't deal with him.
00:01:22.900 We have to get our guy, Jeremy Carl.
00:01:24.900 And he goes up there and strikes out and poops all over home plate, basically. 0.99
00:01:31.140 And then we have these fucking faggots like Jonathan Keeperman and Andrew Beck and all these other Claremont associate people. 1.00
00:01:37.840 He'll be like, actually, he did great and he's a patriot and you should buy his book, actually. 0.99
00:01:41.780 And it's like he didn't do great book. 0.98
00:01:43.800 I need him in fucking power to do the right thing. 0.97
00:01:45.640 But guess what? 0.99
00:01:46.480 You know what he also said during that hearing?
00:01:48.000 Yeah, we need to stop the anti-Semitism in the UN.
00:01:51.100 And the UN is super anti-Semitic.
00:01:53.160 And I love Israel. 1.00
00:01:54.120 It's like, oh, that shit he got out without a fucking hitch. 1.00
00:01:56.340 He didn't stumble over his words with that one. 1.00
00:01:58.020 Exactly.
00:01:59.220 They will replace us is basically what happened.
00:02:02.820 And so what you get is this botched version of white identitarianism, which actually can be spoken about very lucidly and concisely. 0.75
00:02:12.780 You don't have to stumble over things.
00:02:14.240 It's very easy to define these things, but he can't.
00:02:17.180 But I also noticed something else, which is that he's playing this game.
00:02:22.460 I haven't read his book, nor probably will I at this point.
00:02:25.420 But he's playing this game where he's using the logic of the civil rights movement in order to justify white identity.
00:02:36.200 And so it's like and some of the things he says are true, which is that, you know, there's affirmative action regimes.
00:02:43.000 There's DEI regimes.
00:02:44.360 There's harassing people through the HR department.
00:02:46.640 There's admissions to universities.
00:02:48.200 I could go on and on.
00:02:49.220 These are, if not directly anti-white, they in effect are discriminating against whites as a class. 0.93
00:03:00.280 It's harder to get into Harvard if you're a white guy as opposed to being a black woman. 1.00
00:03:06.280 Period in a statement. 0.91
00:03:07.720 It's very clear.
00:03:09.080 And I understand where he's coming from.
00:03:10.960 The problem is, this is the thing that Chris Ruffo does, this thing that Dinesh D'Souza did for decades.
00:03:17.500 It's not new.
00:03:18.960 This is all they do, which is that the Civil Rights Act must apply to white people. 0.91
00:03:24.660 And now we're being discriminated.
00:03:26.820 There's a Supreme Court decision on affirmative action, which seemed to go down this line.
00:03:31.380 Now whites and Asians are being discriminated against.
00:03:34.840 And I guess I would say this, I guess I am more of a intentionalist or originalist in the sense of what is the intent of that law.
00:03:45.660 You can discover that imperfectly, but you can discover it.
00:03:49.900 And that is the key thing.
00:03:51.900 That's where the rubber hits the road.
00:03:53.460 The Civil Rights Act is about protecting blacks first and then women from being discriminated against.