The Inevitable Empire
Episode Stats
Length
2 hours and 17 minutes
Summary
In this episode, I talk about the rise and fall of Donald Trump and the role of the Reform Party in the election of 2000, and how it changed the face of politics in America. I also talk about how the reform party emerged, and what it meant to run for president in the late 80s and early 90s.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
one of the uh one of the little things i stumbled on a while back that maybe of interest to some
00:00:05.420
people uh you've heard of the uh the lawyer alan dursovich right sure he's a he's a kind of hot
00:00:11.820
shot uh uh lawyer i think he does defamation cases and things like that but uh he's been
00:00:18.520
around for a long time and he's he's often on television a lot um and obviously alan dursovich
00:00:24.320
is you know is jewish um one of the little things i stumbled on i was uh i was writing a piece for
00:00:31.500
chronicles which ended up well i ended up basically saying i can't i basically just can't run this
00:00:40.160
piece because of the stuff i ran into one of the things i discovered is that literally for about
00:00:45.140
20 years alan dursovich would write an article in which he called pat pucannon a nazi i mean literally
00:00:54.040
you know four or five times a year he'd use his you know he had he had a long running column
00:00:59.500
he tried to get uh pucannon taken off air he tried so i mean he would he just he just attacked pucannon
00:01:06.100
a lot and called him an anti-semite and a fascist and all the rest of it one of the things i couldn't
00:01:12.920
help but notice is that his record on donald trump was quite different he had a literally the opposite
00:01:20.500
record of defending trump whenever he whenever really he had a chance and he represented him a
00:01:27.160
few times if you remember um it like he was the only lawyer his impeachment trial yes yeah he he uh
00:01:33.660
first impeachment one yeah he he represented and i thought well that's in that's in that made me wonder
00:01:39.280
actually because um back in 2000 if you remember trump was thinking about running
00:01:44.440
and it did make me wonder whether part of trumpism was to kind of kill the buchananism if you want um
00:01:57.120
uh paul gottfried seemed to think not but uh i mean what do you think uh i think so i mean look if
00:02:04.000
you go back this is the remarkable like story of trumpism which is just filled with ironies and
00:02:11.320
contradictions and so on but when he was running for the reform party so the reform party emerged um
00:02:18.680
and i it might very well be still around but it's a husk of its former self but it emerged with uh
00:02:25.040
ross perot's campaign in the 90s and ross perot was a really interesting figure he he ran against um
00:02:33.600
george herbert walker bush and bill clinton in 1992 and i can remember myself back in in those days
00:02:41.260
i mean i was quite young i guess i was um uh what was i 12 or 14 or something like that um just kind
00:02:49.320
of being instinctively enthusiastic about ross perot because he was going against the system he was
00:02:54.760
putting himself out there but it was a lot of doom and gloom uh uh deficit hawkery i guess um with you
00:03:02.560
know but he he was also against free trade um and and he was a man of the era right after the um
00:03:10.460
the fall of the soviet union along with pat buchanan who these are former cold warriors who are
00:03:16.340
basically saying come home america i mean that was the title uh literally of one of pat buchanan's
00:03:22.120
essays and the national interest of we did the cold war thing it's over we won now it's time to totally
00:03:28.860
rethink um the what what america is and um again he he kind of lost that argument as it were to
00:03:36.840
fukuyama or charles krauthammer talking about the unipolar world and and the the uh first iraq war
00:03:44.880
the second iraq war and onward america is an empire um and uh so anyway this thing existed which the reform
00:03:53.000
party that expressed a certain incoherent though viscerally powerful middle american rage
00:04:02.580
you could say you know like something is going wrong we don't quite know what it is but we need
00:04:10.560
some outsider to come in and fix it and you know i i i'm being a little bit sarcastic and depicting it
00:04:20.400
that way but but that that's also a real thing you know that that emotion um and it's a powerful one
00:04:27.220
and trump um got involved in the reform party because he's been he's been talking about running
00:04:31.980
for president since the late 80s i believe um he was involved in the reform party and he was he
00:04:38.820
himself was calling pat buchanan a nazi so pat buchanan ran in in 92 on the republican ticket he ran
00:04:45.820
again in 96 and then he ran this kind of even more hopeless campaign in 2000 he had a black female
00:04:52.780
running mate and that that that created the 2000 uh issue um of the hanging chads because all of these
00:05:02.240
uh uh all of these jews in like miami were voting for pat buchanan uh because of like the uh the
00:05:11.500
butterfly ballot it did all these just kind of funny things uh that come back and it is kind of amusing
00:05:17.820
that there was a ballot issue you know uh jews retiring former new york city jews living in
00:05:24.800
miami we're like i can't believe i voted for pap you can't it's kind of now of course richard that
00:05:31.780
is literally ronda sentence's base right that same group the same group yeah next generation yes
00:05:38.040
and uh so anyway he called trump in the 2000 was suggesting that oprah be his running mate to take
00:05:48.640
the reform party ticket and he was explicitly calling out buchanan as a nazi like we've got to
00:05:55.020
reform the reform party it shouldn't be about this and things like that and um yeah so and and and that
00:06:03.440
stuff's on the record i mean it's very real and he called i think he actually also said we need to get
00:06:09.500
rid of the buchanons and the dukes of the world and you notice if you if you fast forward to 2016
00:06:15.480
he claimed extremely implausibly that he had no idea who david duke is
00:06:20.980
even though he called him out by name a mere 15 years earlier and so there is this there is this kind
00:06:28.680
of interesting way in which trump is able to kind of like channel that energy which is very real
00:06:35.220
and but then but then kind of almost pacify it and play with it so i mean i think this is where
00:06:41.520
trump is so kind of contradictory and it is a kind of trump v trump you know effect uh where i mean
00:06:49.160
and someone in this group who might even be on this call articulated it really well he said isn't it
00:06:55.420
amazing that the most fearsome zionist and the most fearsome anti-semites vote for the same candidate
00:07:05.100
you know so david duke and alan dershowitz both voted for trump
00:07:11.180
and isn't that remarkable now that has something to do with the party structure of like you know big
00:07:17.820
tent two big tents you bring in lots of different people but i think it's actually deeper than that i i
00:07:23.900
think you could plausibly make an argument that you know it's it's like this this energy out there
00:07:31.920
which is incohate and incoherent this populist energy is out there and it can spill over into
00:07:38.660
certain directions many of them are it could spill over into anti-zionism it could spill over into
00:07:43.300
outright anti-semitism it could spill over into white nationalism it could kind of do all these things
00:07:48.160
and we we kind of need to like create a good channel for that for that inner you know that water
00:07:54.440
they you know water will just flow you can kind of like re-channel the river and flow it into something
00:08:00.620
else and i i think a really intelligent jew like alan dershowitz maybe grasped that and a a less
00:08:11.200
less intelligent jew like uh you know someone reading the new york times and things like that
00:08:16.680
sees trump as just this you know oh my gosh he this is literally hitler and you know blah blah blah
00:08:23.300
maybe someone like alan dershowitz is is a little bit smarter than many of his um contemporaries you know
00:08:29.780
um you know hardcore israeli nationalists um you know like the sort of people who'd vote for
00:08:36.380
netanyahu for example right they see i mean i guess at this point you might call it like populism
00:08:43.480
inc i'm thinking like salvini in italy le pen um you know all of them all of the all of the kind of
00:08:52.000
quote-unquote nationalists around the world they see them as their natural allies and you know i've had
00:08:58.860
the thought more than once um that i mean if i think of various figures from various scenes you
00:09:06.400
know there's that there's that canadian outlet um what's it called rebel media yeah um there was
00:09:13.620
tommy robinson in the uk who also strangely loved loved the nation of israel and i it did make me think
00:09:22.160
more than once that if you're if you're if you're a hardcore israeli nationalist you're probably seeing
00:09:30.180
globalism ultimately as as an enemy in the long run right um and and so from a certain point maybe
00:09:40.420
it's doomed you know regardless of that it you know it's gonna the season will pass yeah so i guess
00:09:47.220
what i'm saying is from a certain point of view for the fault line to be globalism versus nationalism
00:09:52.300
kind of will you know it kind of plays into their nationalism when you when you start to think of
00:09:58.980
israel and i don't know if uh we could use this maybe to segue into the other thing we were going
00:10:04.620
to talk about but in in a strange way like it israel is like a like a facsimile of like a 1930s
00:10:13.320
european nation state right which which had a short which really in the in the overall scheme of
00:10:20.040
history is a short-run phenomena like i mean literally from about 1850 till
00:10:25.280
the end of world 14 yeah yeah yeah um so yeah i mean that that is uh that is a thought i've had
00:10:34.020
more than once uh that um there's there's a kind of natural fault line there which which
00:10:40.440
maybe i mean makes more sense if you see a like a genuine split between the hollywood types and the
00:10:48.540
you know the hardcore israeli types but i don't know if mark has more uh kind of developed views
00:10:54.340
on on this sort of thing because i i don't spend a huge amount of time trying to pass it because
00:11:00.100
after a certain amount of time i just give up you know i i kind of uh it becomes opaque to me you know
00:11:06.800
so i i uh you know i saw i i tend to look at other things but uh yeah yeah jump in mark oh sure in
00:11:16.940
terms of what aspect um are you referring to well yeah the creation of caducean relationship between
00:11:23.640
nationalism and globalism that is supported by you know not even all israelis i i think we should be
00:11:31.500
specific here but but um lakud uh most prominently yeah no i mean well you know i think that there is
00:11:40.140
there is a line of course uh that they won't cross but i mean i think you know i think if we look at
00:11:46.980
um israel uh vis-a-vis ukraine in a kind of earnest way i think that probably the sentiment there is
00:11:55.740
it it's it's they've tried to be neutral right and i think the reason that they've tried to be
00:12:01.320
neutral is because of the the danger inherent to the situation right they don't want to antagonize
00:12:06.380
putin um because they don't want that to create conflicts in the middle east with syria or whatever
00:12:11.820
the case might be um so i think that they've been very cagey in their public face as it concerns that
00:12:19.080
war but if i had to imagine this sort of the larger sentiment is in favor of ukraine um and they have
00:12:26.220
shown some support to ukraine um they've sold them weapons um so they to the extent that they've shown
00:12:32.940
favor to either side they've shown favor to ukraine but they've been careful um but ukraine of course
00:12:38.240
uh you know is known famously for these nazi regimens that it has right uh the azob uh so how does that
00:12:46.800
work right how how is israel a country uh for jews supporting um a country that uh has these uh
00:12:54.760
ostensibly nazi regimens in the field but i i think what it is it's it relates to i mean i think that
00:13:01.520
they are very practical very utilitarian people and this is probably something that's kind of
00:13:06.840
imitable on some level i don't think that they i mean i think that those sort of those nazi regimens
00:13:12.940
are probably drawn from kind of white ghettos in ukraine effectively so they were basically
00:13:18.240
skinheads uh on some level and you know they're not all skinheads obviously uh but they're tapping
00:13:25.340
into some a kind of culture there that is martial and that is venerating you know adolf hitler or
00:13:31.880
whatever the case may be um in the nazi regime and they're they're exploiting that instinct among a
00:13:38.060
kind of lower class group just to be frank um and kind of um you know channeling that energy
00:13:45.160
in a direction that's useful for them but they don't you know there's no reason that they should
00:13:50.060
they would be feel threatened by you know basically a group that again has been basically harvested from
00:13:57.720
white ghettos uh it's not so it's not a group that would otherwise without the sort of organization
00:14:03.240
of the ukrainian government it's it's not a group that would otherwise be threatening or dangerous to
00:14:08.180
them so they're very um you know they're very intelligent in this regard um i think that at
00:14:13.960
when uh something like white nationalism reaches a certain level though it's not something that they
00:14:19.180
can kind of it's not something that can be played with as it were right um the famous example being
00:14:25.380
national socialism in germany right so that that that was a problem uh that had to be dealt with
00:14:32.420
on a global level um but i did play with it early on there there was a kind of transfer agreement and
00:14:39.880
yeah and there were there were jews for it there were jews for hitler right it's uh you know we agree
00:14:45.640
you know jews need to leave you know germany i mean and and this gets to the um like a fundamental
00:14:51.320
contradiction within um zionism itself which it on one level it kind of reinforces nationalism it is
00:15:00.320
basically you know at its origins 19th century origins it is a declaration that we cannot
00:15:05.900
assimilate it's never going to work and we need to get out of here and uh with hertzel and so on these
00:15:12.940
are you know highly sophisticated secular atheists um who are making this type of argument um and it and
00:15:22.620
it and it kind of works there there's also a lot of very religious protestants who wanted to
00:15:28.720
you know reenact the bible basically who supported science there's just a lot of kind of countervailing
00:15:34.680
and in seemingly contradictory winds that are all kind of blowing into
00:15:40.700
the this the creating a kind of tornado or vortex in in in palestine
00:15:46.540
yeah i was i was also i mean one of just to go back to ukraine at a moment one of the things i've
00:15:54.620
been kind of interested in is the extent to which the american empire will
00:16:01.860
kind of have an allowable nationalism on its frontiers um and uh the case i would point to is
00:16:11.560
actually in poland do you remember when trump gave that speech in poland and everybody was like oh i
00:16:16.760
can't believe you know trump is speaking to the like the evil right-wingers in poland and so on
00:16:23.460
well if you notice all of that talk has gone away because it it's actually quite useful to have
00:16:28.420
a nationalist oriented poland against the russians right so i do wonder how much it's a deliberate
00:16:35.960
strategy to to kind of allow these nationalisms on the frontier because it's uh it's controlled
00:16:43.420
it's contained it's within the it's within their sphere of influence if you want so yeah i mean
00:16:48.900
definitely remember when he gave that speech i believe it was in 2017 and that coincided with
00:16:54.980
the uh funding and implementation of missile systems uh defense i think defensive but you know uh
00:17:02.780
basically pointed at russia on the frontier and trump gave a blood and soil speech about you know
00:17:10.520
we love poland you know christians nations like this is what we're about you know kind of thing
00:17:16.900
and um so yeah i mean i i think your your instinct is absolutely right you you kind of it's it's not
00:17:25.100
strategically effective to just completely suppress something that is real and and it you know a lot
00:17:32.840
of nationalism is kind of incoherent and you know emotional you know i i mean that that's kind of the
00:17:39.240
nature of the beast is that you you feel something powerful and you want to do something liberalism is
00:17:45.720
more technocratic and rational and and so on nationalism is emotional and so you you know do
00:17:53.340
you want to just suppress that and say you know you're a bad person for feeling this or do you want
00:17:59.600
to to channel it you know in a proper way and and and i i think there are definitely people who want
00:18:06.400
to do this with nationalism that's occurring right now i mean the the national conservatism stuff
00:18:13.320
that uh you know peter peter teal was speaking at these meetings presumably funding them some degree
00:18:20.780
i don't know um at least speaking at them and you have a like literally an ancient hebrew scholar
00:18:28.620
arzoni who came out of the woodwork and is um the guru of these types of meetings um i mean it's very
00:18:37.820
it's kind of remarkable when i think about my own career um that that did involve paleo conservatism
00:18:45.520
for for a time and you know if when you would go to these meetings i mean we were not getting funded
00:18:51.820
by peter teal we didn't have a you know hebrew scholar in our midst you know talking to us and
00:18:57.420
it was much more marginal you could say and and um shoestring or bootstrap kind of thing and you know
00:19:05.580
if you if you scratched anyone there you would find the alt-right or the dissident right i mean you
00:19:12.240
you wouldn't have to scratch too deep in fact and it is fascinating that paleo conservatism has been
00:19:19.180
professionalized and and funded beyond the wildest dreams of people who were involved in it at the time
00:19:26.200
and it's but but again it's it's been created in this way that it's at least from our perspective
00:19:34.840
neutered and and kind of channeled in the right direction so it's you know this is what we're
00:19:40.080
about this is what it means to be a paleo conservative you're uh we're a nationalist we
00:19:44.620
respect other nations and israel is a nation that we respect among among many others and we're going to
00:19:51.440
be somewhat russia philic but not too much you know goldilocks just right and it it is i think it's a
00:19:59.900
very intelligent strategy when you look at it even if it is a strategy a strategy that's inimical to
00:20:06.100
me and you know other people i can still kind of respect my enemy they're not going to invite me to
00:20:12.740
speak national conservatism let's just put it that way or mark i mean my i'm probably more likely
00:20:18.720
uh but uh but they you know it's it's smart it it's it's dialectical and it's and it's it's i i
00:20:30.000
respect them for for what they've done because they're they're taking something that could be
00:20:34.940
a danger and they're turning it into a benefit and that's that's it's eligible yeah contain i mean i i
00:20:43.060
would call it containment myself but this is what this is what power has always done really it's
00:20:47.280
kind of uh it's able to turn its own descent into a into a into a benefit uh right if i i don't
00:20:55.420
know if you ever seen any documentaries uh by uh adam curtis i mean you know he's got a certain style but
00:21:04.020
um but i i remember there was one where he actually went into the extent to which vladimir
00:21:08.920
putin has done this like actively funded his own his own protesters um which is you know remarkable
00:21:16.240
in a way that the dissident group even the dissident groups in russia are secretly controlled by putin
00:21:21.620
um you know which else i mean if you're not you'll you're gonna end up in jail or with poison in your
00:21:29.860
belly you know yeah or flat killed you know right right i think people like us we need to learn
00:21:37.420
something because they you know if we were in power we we might be tempted down the brutal road of like
00:21:44.320
you know if you criticize me i'm just gonna kill you or something uh and i can see that kind of
00:21:50.680
type of energy in a lot of right-wingers in general but it's not the smart move it's you know the best
00:21:57.880
opposition is the one you can is the one that you control this is what this is why i spend so much
00:22:02.920
time studying uh studying tony blair believe it or not because i just think he is of the of all of
00:22:09.120
the kind of political operators in the world he is the person who understood this most right is that
00:22:14.560
the way to defeat the right was to absorb the right to say oh well i i've heard you you know yes
00:22:21.200
blacks do do more more crime uh yes we're going to be tough on the causes of crime and we're going to
00:22:26.680
be tough and you know basically to say yeah i've listened to you and i'm going to do all the things
00:22:31.760
that like uh you know like a quote-unquote right-wing government would do and that basically takes
00:22:39.500
the energy out of it and means you own the entire space um and it's one of the things that are our
00:22:45.480
current elites uh certainly certainly america they they seem to be going down a rather different path
00:22:52.520
a much more uh belligerent path where they're not making any of the obvious obvious moves i mean
00:23:01.740
to me the the obvious the obvious move to do in america uh i mean as much as this may horrify you
00:23:07.760
and some of your listeners is just uh just just allow the right to win a few times you know just
00:23:12.100
like put put trump or de santis in and make a show of um dealing with immigration they might actually
00:23:18.680
have to deal with it but that would get the buy-in of millions of americans who've uh opted out of the
00:23:27.300
institutions and who no longer trust their government and who you know it would just take
00:23:32.500
the wind out of the sails of all of it instead they keep on doing the opposite i mean trump could
00:23:38.420
be arrested tonight which is just in my mind just insane and and and also arrested over something
00:23:45.040
that's really defensible i mean it's it's actually a misdemeanor i mean look okay i i remember it's a
00:23:50.820
little bit of a funny story my my mother she's told me this story many times she grew up in louisiana
00:23:56.440
and um so louisiana is uh famous for being corrupt it's it's almost uh charmingly corrupt in fact
00:24:06.000
and um when she was speaking with one of her college roommates or something who was outside of
00:24:11.380
louisiana she was talking about um a judge who got some payoff or something she was like self-righteously
00:24:17.620
horrified and my mother she was like okay so the judge got paid off by the the the the alcohol interest
00:24:25.940
so what's your point like what she was like what's the point of being a judge and my my mother is a
00:24:33.620
very moral person it's just when you're around louisiana politics you just inherently become a
00:24:39.300
cynic uh but you know it's like when i when i look at the stormy daniel stuff i mean look it's just like
00:24:46.300
for goodness sakes yeah of course trump had sex with a porn star when he was a 60 year old like
00:24:52.140
i i on it's gross i guess but i just fundamentally don't care and i'm not surprised by it and of
00:24:58.840
course they paid off this floozy to not talk about it while he was winning the republican nomination at
00:25:05.160
least who who cares and they're they're doing they're they're going to get him on this i have to say i
00:25:10.080
think on multiple levels i don't think these new york the da and the attorney general um uh they're
00:25:17.620
they're really smart about this because they're they're feeding into trumpism and they're i and i i
00:25:24.740
think they're going to gift him the nomination at the very least i think they're going to create a
00:25:28.840
kind of fanaticism where the alvin bragg i actually listened to an interview um of of alvin bragg uh
00:25:37.460
yesterday and it was about a 30 minute interview and i i it was a you know puff piece you know here
00:25:43.000
this is your platform to shine you know like please show us how smart you are the guy is just
00:25:49.380
not very sophisticated and they they fire their first shot which is you paid off a porn star to shut up
00:25:58.580
it's just it it is going i mean it is the wrong move 100 if what you want is to suppress trumpism
00:26:09.020
and you're gonna you're going to make it seem like a witch hunt you're going to inspire his
00:26:15.440
most fanatical supporters and even fairweather supporters are are gonna i mean look i'm expressing
00:26:21.720
sympathy for him for god's sake and i you know i mean it it's just i don't think they're sophisticated
00:26:28.860
and so we we we have this like you know enemy group the elites the liberal elites and we almost
00:26:36.860
i i think we're we're giving them too much credit to think that they're actually they actually
00:26:42.720
understand what they're doing i i think they're kind of shooting from the hip and it's going to
00:26:46.820
uh backfire really horribly and it doesn't have to i've often had the thought richard that if
00:26:53.580
somebody like edward bernays just to pick an example could come back he'd just be horrified at the
00:26:59.340
like he just he'd spend his entire life just telling everybody off like every hollywood producer
00:27:04.880
every like he'd be like we were so much better better at everything than you guys are now um
00:27:11.500
but uh i mean i taunt them you know like letitia james so the this past weekend so much happens
00:27:18.240
letitia james who's the attorney general of new york excuse me the da the district attorney is alvin
00:27:26.620
bragg attorney general of new york state i believe is letitia james correct me if i'm wrong she hosted
00:27:32.440
a drag queen story hour like she was there and of course the the the proud boys like protested it
00:27:41.320
and of course the police fought off the proud boys and you don't when you're winning it's not the time
00:27:48.980
to rub it in the face of your opponent you know like if you've if you're you're up by three touchdowns
00:27:56.380
that's not the time to like spike the ball and and yell at the other side i mean that that's the
00:28:02.460
time to be more of a sportsman and they don't get it this is actually something that uh because i
00:28:10.760
spend a lot of time watching uh tony blair interviews that like 100 people watch and me right
00:28:17.680
100 people and me um and i you know and i i uh i stream them as well but something he always talks
00:28:24.560
about is that the first rule of politics that he learned was say no to your own radicals right so
00:28:31.140
if you're the if you're the leader of the of the labor party as he was or let's say you're joe biden
00:28:37.180
you're the leader of the democrats you basically have to spend all your time shutting down the
00:28:42.120
birdie bros shutting down the insane the radical left and so on because the people you're trying to win
00:28:48.820
are the people who might vote tory or might vote republican you know they're the kind of undecided
00:28:55.380
people in the middle and broadly speaking their instincts are small small c conservative right
00:29:01.080
so you need to make a big show of getting those and and saying no to the likes of jeremy corbyn and
00:29:06.840
so on and so forth so that you capture that center ground and then when you've got the power
00:29:12.820
you can completely transform the country as tony blair did right um and i think a lot of people
00:29:19.740
i mean kirtis yavin was one of them maybe you were another one may may have had the thought that
00:29:25.720
biden might do this right that they they might go back to kind of late 90s like because clinton
00:29:31.920
clinton did similar sorts of things right he spent a lot of his time in power basically doing things
00:29:38.800
that if a republican had done then they'd have been called a fascist um uh and maybe the thought
00:29:44.840
was that biden might do this and i'm but i'm still waiting for it to happen i mean they're just not
00:29:49.560
i mean has biden done any i think he has i i okay i think i think you might have a bit of a
00:29:59.320
colored or lens because you're from outside the u.s and you're you're and you you you're looking at it
00:30:07.580
with too much influence from like the dissident right i i think biden himself
00:30:13.180
has attempted in his own way biden's not as sophisticated at least rhetorically as tony
00:30:21.840
blair bill clinton or something although those guys are you know extremely apt um uh i i think he
00:30:28.900
i think he genuinely wants to bring things together and he wants to uh you know he he ends
00:30:37.620
every speech saying god bless the troops i mean he he's he's an old man he's an old white guy from a
00:30:44.960
different generation he's not even a boomer he's a silent generation guy uh and i and i think those
00:30:51.860
are his political instincts and i think he has been relatively successful i i think the the entire
00:31:00.660
like left in general just can't help themselves and he has to he can't really he can he can discipline
00:31:13.940
his own side to some degree by just kind of de-emphasizing stuff or talking about the dangers
00:31:20.560
of matt maga extremism and things like that um uh but he can't really he he can't do much more than
00:31:30.320
that and he's not willing to do so you can find interviews of him like embracing transgender therapy
00:31:37.540
and for children i mean he's kind of caught in a in a hard place but i don't think he i think the
00:31:43.360
depiction of him as like aggressive or something is is is totally wrong right yeah i mean maybe maybe
00:31:52.160
he's just um doesn't have the wherewithal now to do all the tony blair moves or the bill clinton
00:31:59.180
moves essentially like he doesn't because that requires like a kind of certain strength and dynamism
00:32:03.660
right to be on top of and and this is something that i think the the left has i mean i say the left
00:32:11.300
the regime has lost big time within its own you know within our lifetimes which is um what they
00:32:18.040
used to call message discipline right they used to be very good at having key lines they'd say um
00:32:24.900
whereas now on now you i mean i don't know if it's because of social media or just because of the
00:32:30.840
quality of people in place or so on they're all over the shop they just don't know it's like a
00:32:36.080
kind of on any given week it's like a scattergun where you know there are five or six different
00:32:40.940
lines and you're not sure what's going on and nobody's quite sure i mean they look for a while
00:32:46.560
like cnn was dialing it back for a bit and now they're going all all in on this arrest thing i mean
00:32:53.020
it's just like it feels like it feels like they don't have coherent strategy which again i guess is a sign
00:32:59.800
of a of a kind of late late stage elite i suppose uh who need well i i think cycled out yeah i i do
00:33:08.000
think it's a it's a late stage elite and i and i don't think we're really offering something to the
00:33:14.320
world about being in an in the in being a part of the american empire and and i think that actually
00:33:20.060
is a fatal issue um uh sorry i'm just getting a text message here i might have to respond to that but
00:33:27.280
um but let me let me make this point so i i have this very long article now it's extremely long
00:33:33.520
uh on u2 of all things i actually wrote this around a year ago i revisited it's doubled in size but
00:33:41.680
um i i talk about a lot of different things in that article including the concept of even better than
00:33:48.680
the real thing but one of the things i talk about is is the way in which u2 which is a deeply americanized
00:33:56.460
band um they they they almost they prophesied the end of the cold war but i i think they even
00:34:05.820
on some level caused it and and i mean and i mean that it caused the end of the the end of the cold war
00:34:14.340
this is a bold claim i i totally understand that and it's fine to chuckle um but i'm also very
00:34:22.700
serious when i say that and what i mean by that is when you you can some ways speak something into
00:34:30.260
being and what u2 did in a song like new year's day is they offered this new world of togetherness
00:34:39.100
that would happen and that song was directly about the polish protest actually um where we could be
00:34:45.800
as one one is that fundamental u2 notion what we are one but not the same which is actually he that
00:34:54.400
line came from bono who was invited to speak at a conference by the dalai lama on oneness and he said
00:35:01.380
i'm not sure i can do this because we're one but we're not the same um that became a line in the
00:35:07.080
octoon baby album so on i'm i'm i'm going maybe too far afield in my u2 fandom uh uh get ready for
00:35:15.300
the big depeche mode uh depeche mode or the ultimate expressions of protestantism that's coming
00:35:20.360
uh i'm i'm willing to to make these crazy arguments but um back to you too so when you
00:35:28.820
when you offer some vision of what we can that we're that we're torn into we can be one tonight
00:35:36.380
that you almost cause the what you're you cause what you're depicting because you're you're
00:35:43.920
offering a vision of what the world could be afterward and so it's cultural propaganda but
00:35:50.760
but uh sting it did something similar we had a song called uh russians and one of the kind of uh
00:35:59.120
repeating choruses or phrases in it is that the russians love their children too i don't remember if
00:36:04.740
you remember that song i vaguely i'll have to go look at that song it was a popular song i mean
00:36:10.680
they were playing it on the radio uh 1985 uh was when the song was released and it was kind of in
00:36:17.500
there were there were these sort of countervailing anti-russian forces in the media as well at the
00:36:21.940
time remember uh rocky had a uh drago was rocky's opponent so he was a kind of anti-russian symbol
00:36:29.740
look you could you could make a similarly ridiculous argument that rocky four caused
00:36:36.120
the cold war remember in rocky four in that battle um dragos is like he's a rooting for him yeah he is
00:36:43.720
made of steel or something and the the um they start rooting for rocky which is just when you think
00:36:51.580
about the notion of a home team rooting for the other side i don't know if that's ever happened
00:36:57.720
since since the greeks started the olympic games like yeah and there also grew this impression that
00:37:03.800
the russian athletes are the only ones that have done steroids right which i don't think which we've
00:37:09.480
seen is is absolutely false right right but that was the sort of impression that that grew from that
00:37:14.640
propaganda or propaganda like that but but but hey mark you don't remember the uh you don't remember
00:37:20.600
the east german swim team that's true yeah yeah oh yeah well i i'm not i'm not defending their abuse
00:37:29.480
of steroids i think that they were absolutely using steroids but i think that americans were also using
00:37:34.340
steroids and have been using steroids since you know i mean i was just i was gonna say to to richard's
00:37:41.420
point that it was certainly in the in in the ether in the in the mid 80s there i always remember the uh
00:37:48.360
the queen song one vision remember that uh yeah where uh i mean it's uh i mean the lyrics are you
00:37:55.920
know i pulled them up here one man one goal one mission one heart one soul just one solution um
00:38:04.740
no right no wrong i'm going to tell you there's no black and no white no blood no stain all we need is
00:38:10.660
one worldwide vision and it was it was definitely around um right right through the kind of pop music of
00:38:18.140
the of the uh of the uh of the 80s and 90s the the classic kind of post beatles music that that was
00:38:27.740
extremely influential and kind of global in a way i mean you two has always been an alternative act but
00:38:33.820
it's been it's kind of like the the one global band there's another aspect of the christianity so um
00:38:39.880
you two were members of this uh protestant sect called shalom um that they uh i'm kind of giving
00:38:48.220
away the article here but uh they they actually met a man named christopher rowe at a mcdonald's
00:38:53.680
in dublin so it was kind of like the the perfect they or they met his church they met uh one of his
00:38:59.440
emissaries at a mcdonald's in dublin so it was almost like the ultimate expression of like
00:39:03.880
americanization in the cold war and so on the band is named after an american spy plane um and uh but
00:39:11.440
anyway it was this kind of judaizing um as the name implies hyper protestant missionary group and
00:39:18.780
they were very much influenced by this and uh i i do think the the vision that they offered was
00:39:26.000
was kind of rock and roll christianity so there another lyric that's forgotten in in uh sunday bloody
00:39:32.280
sunday which is ostensibly about the um uh uh 1972 i believe um attacks uh where british uh paratroopers
00:39:44.040
shot a dozen people or something like that you can correct me if i'm wrong um but it's it's about so
00:39:50.280
much more than that and it's about how this is i'm not going to heed the battle call this is not the
00:39:56.120
battle we should be fighting this this nationalist stuff and as as bono said this is not a rebel song
00:40:01.740
and at the the the last chorus while the band singing sunday bloody sunday um he says the real
00:40:08.300
battle's just begun to claim the victory jesus won so and you don't hear that it's often missed but
00:40:15.020
it's explicitly saying that like we we could all be one tonight through rock music and through this
00:40:21.220
dionysian you know revelry of being at a concert and being drunk and and listening to rock and roll
00:40:27.420
that kind of stuff um but he he also placed in it this is the victory that jesus won that that that's
00:40:33.940
the victory that we need to battle for is a one world culture um based on in bono's imagination
00:40:42.240
christianity i mean bono all of bono and the edge were members of this cult they've never denounced
00:40:46.460
it they are clearly christians they're global christians and they're kind of offering that i guess
00:40:51.820
the the point that i was making before was that you know say what you will about that that kind of
00:40:58.620
stuff and i and i'm sure you know people in this group will have various criticisms and and so on
00:41:03.960
that are accurate but it was a vision it was a kind of offering to the eastern block come take part in
00:41:15.260
coca-cola and mcdonald's and levi's jeans and rock music and hollywood films and and we're we're one but
00:41:22.820
not the same so you know it it was a kind of offer to to go there and i i do think that the american
00:41:30.320
empire in our kind of late stage we're we're inwardly directed and we're attacking one another
00:41:36.320
and what does it mean like what does it mean to win this conflict with russia you know what what
00:41:45.080
does it really mean how how what kind of dream are you going to dream now that you're out from under
00:41:52.080
the boot of the kremlin and you know again i'm as i've made clear i'm like i'm i'm very sympathetic
00:42:00.040
towards the nato side and to the ukrainian side but i i kind of i do recognize the limitations i mean
00:42:07.240
in some ways this this is a kind of like rehearsal of something but but not the real thing you know
00:42:15.960
it's it's like they're we're not really offering them something new it's it's more of just russia bad
00:42:22.600
and and russia in a way has done i i think better propaganda in this way not not all nato propaganda
00:42:31.200
has been bad i i've seen some some good stuff but it's been kind of absent and russia has engaged in
00:42:38.240
on the cheap what is actually really powerful propaganda that is appealing to the right in
00:42:44.340
the united states by saying you know we don't we don't like transsexuals marriage is between man and a
00:42:50.440
woman uh we're based we're christians you know all of those things can be disputed you know i could
00:42:58.000
show you you know statistics on drug use and in russia statistics on divorce statistics on abortions
00:43:04.640
statistics on all sorts of things russia has a lot of problems a lot of problems as trump might say
00:43:10.020
but it it doesn't matter because it it is something that they're offering the world where
00:43:16.620
a right winger could have a stake in that battle and and you know they could say we're we're fighting
00:43:23.060
for for for based orthodoxy right now that's what that's why what what is nato offering you know
00:43:30.700
like russia bad that just gets old increasingly i think a lot of the a lot of the i guess uh perception
00:43:39.900
of what the american empire stands for unfortunately is you know it's it's the pride flag and affirmative
00:43:46.020
action policies for you know the the colored third world i mean that's that's increasingly what
00:43:53.240
it seems like america stands for um and it doesn't have to be that way i mean i'm i i'm old enough to
00:44:00.880
remember the messaging that i that i received as a young man in uh you know from ronald reagan's
00:44:07.400
america and that was you know it was still mcdonald's and coca-cola but it was kind of masculine as
00:44:12.400
well you know it was kind of like fighter jets and he-man and wwf wrestling i mean these are all
00:44:18.420
these were all kind of um i guess masculine or rocky if you want i mean they were all expressions of
00:44:25.560
um you know it's still the same neocon gender it's just got a different clothing um whereas there's not
00:44:33.160
a lot really there for young men to get excited about and unless of course young men are excited
00:44:39.480
about sleeping with the transsexuals or whatever you know well uh is also the case perhaps we
00:44:46.800
shouldn't underestimate that appeal but um uh uh but nevertheless i i completely agree it it's
00:44:53.280
i i i have seen something maybe something like top gun maverick which was filmed in 2019
00:45:01.080
interestingly but maybe there's some there there i mean that that was the most popular film
00:45:07.440
of um of 2021 and um or 2022 i guess and it was you know 80s nostalgia tom cruise
00:45:17.200
a diversity but it was kind of almost like we're one and the same or we're many in the same because
00:45:23.600
there were everyone there was diverse faces there were brown faces and so on but everyone is kind
00:45:29.180
of american and badass you know even i i remember um kind of a surprise i mean i don't know how much
00:45:37.120
of a hit it was but i enjoyed it immensely was uh quentin tarantino's last film it's called once
00:45:42.000
upon a time in hollywood and it was just a kind of you know it was just uh an opportunity to watch
00:45:48.280
like leonardo dicaprio and brad pitt be bad badass for a while they beat bruce lee up at one point which
00:45:54.400
was controversial but it was still like a cool film you know oh yeah and they they just mutilated the
00:46:00.760
manson hippie yeah they just as well they absolutely uh you know did uh you know did some kind of
00:46:06.880
tarantino-esque ultra violence at the at the end but it wouldn't take that the point is is it wouldn't
00:46:14.660
really take that much to i guess go back to a to a mode of a more robust american propaganda that
00:46:21.140
actually that actually appeals to people um it rather than rather than kind of what they've been
00:46:29.360
doing which is you know let's face it just irritating their fan bases in the in the name of um in the name
00:46:38.120
of wokeism or whatever uh you know i mean it's very tired to all of us but you know just the abcs of
00:46:46.620
like good i mean all of all of the movies you would mark uh reviewed back in the day like uh karate kid
00:46:52.740
or jaws or whatever i mean this was effective propaganda and it became like people's parts of
00:46:58.540
people's childhoods and things and those are the those are the things that um a kind of mass empire like
00:47:04.820
this has to has to use um yeah my my view is that it in basically necessity will
00:47:15.700
force it back because ultimately if they want to maintain an empire they need to have young men sign
00:47:24.760
up for the army period um so that i i feel like you know there's some aspect of um the people in
00:47:36.260
charge who kind of uh i mean let me put it a different way i'll put it i'll just i'll put this
00:47:43.040
to you do you believe that if the regime as uh we sometimes call it really didn't want elon must
00:47:53.340
to control twitter that they would have been able to stop him that's that's that's a genuine question
00:47:58.280
i will i'll ask um or if they really didn't want ron de santis controlling florida as an example do you
00:48:05.840
think they could have just put that away because because my my my sense is that we have seen what
00:48:12.300
they're like when they really really don't want something out there um and i don't get that
00:48:18.940
impression with when it comes to likes of musk or to sound like if i feel like they want those voices
00:48:25.160
out there or um or they want anti-woke to be like a to be a mainstream narrative otherwise why is it
00:48:33.780
why is it everywhere i mean it's a it's a vote it's a vote winning line even for the tory party
00:48:38.720
here now so right um that's a genuine question i had i had for everybody uh because i i kind of feel
00:48:46.040
like they want it to happen i would say that yeah i i think they it's an interesting question because
00:48:53.440
it's very complicated i do think that there are some absorption kind of instincts where you know
00:49:00.860
we want to have a little bit of you know we again it's a smart instinct it's it don't destroy
00:49:05.640
your opponent kind of let him beat him but kind of let him come back and absorbed into your polity
00:49:13.280
um uh i i would hold i think musk it's opening up a can of worms because i i think musk might be
00:49:24.040
not long for this world for many different reasons not not not in terms of dying but in terms of um
00:49:32.060
uh uh being involved in some really kind of shady shit and and so on um i i think it is a very it again
00:49:42.820
it it is a very good question i i think with someone like desantis um he's not he's not really
00:49:50.500
pushing that hard but you know i've made the argument as well like and i'll get to you johnny
00:49:56.640
you raise your hand like if you if you think about the the roe v wade decision um so the supreme court
00:50:06.400
is the inner sanctum of inner sanctums and it might be symbolic in many ways but it is
00:50:14.300
if you want to kind of come up with an elite this is it and why they allowed the roe v way decision
00:50:24.900
to be overturned or they they encouraged it and no one really stopped it and we'll see what happens
00:50:32.880
a lot of this depends on elections and public mood but i could definitely envision a world in which
00:50:39.200
abortion is basically banned nationwide in fact um there are moneyed interests that want to do this
00:50:47.680
the federal society received a donation in the billions of dollars i mean it's it's incredible
00:50:52.760
in fact um they were given a business by barry side that's a multi-billion dollar business anyway
00:50:59.360
um i could see that and maybe is it that the there there's a portion of the elite that actually
00:51:07.260
does worry about demographics and wants to kind of force the issue and say you know this has actually
00:51:14.920
gone too far we we we're gonna we immigration can't actually solve this problem for among other reasons
00:51:22.120
these other countries have that same immigrant demographic collapse as well mexico's undergoing a
00:51:27.080
demographic collapse and we don't and and immigration creates its own problems so maybe we kind of need
00:51:33.580
to force americans to have children um and we can dress it up in legalism i'm not positive this is
00:51:42.820
what happened but i i am positive that this is an in a way how elites can operate that's that's
00:51:53.260
interesting richard because i i remember there's a in in the absolutely massive book by pareto which is
00:51:59.440
it's about three million words long so okay don't ask me where this is but at some point
00:52:04.000
he he points out he says listen could pareto has this idea that ideology is bullshit right
00:52:11.240
uh that most of the time um the uh the elites are driven by more practical concerns and they justify it
00:52:19.180
after the fact right um or they're driven by like gut level instincts and then and then all of the
00:52:26.180
kind of uh i get super structural residues are kind of things grafted on top but he has this passage
00:52:33.820
somewhere he says like listen when the birth rate is uh when when there's overpopulation the elites will
00:52:40.780
will give you arguments to reduce the birth rate somehow right uh to increase the birth rate
00:52:46.740
rate somehow um and they'll link they'll have policies that encourage the population to procreate
00:52:52.920
and when um and when you know when it's the opposite of that then you'll get all the arguments
00:52:59.280
coming out for reducing the birth rate or you know culling the population etc etc um it's kind of
00:53:07.060
interesting to to to think about that our current elites would do it in such a way where the actual
00:53:14.720
issue is hidden so it's done under the guise of you know the abortion debate in america but
00:53:21.040
actually it's just the real thing driving it is you know it is uh is that and in fact he gives
00:53:29.020
he gives several examples of where uh you know it elites in the same country within the space of like
00:53:35.420
60 or 70 years make the opposite argument based on what the population is doing at that time so
00:53:41.900
kind of interesting thing to think about yeah it is um johnny do you want to jump in sure uh thanks
00:53:48.940
richard i was in regards to like elon musk and uh desantis i just from my perspective liberalism is
00:53:57.080
the liberal system we we live under it's sort of like a fragile system so any type of diversion into
00:54:04.720
like illiberalism whether you put the screws to musk or you put the screws to desantis legally
00:54:09.180
or you know financially i just think it creates a recipe for the breakdown of the current order
00:54:15.240
does that make sense we're like liberalism has to operate under ostensibly quote law and order or
00:54:22.080
else it just sort of falls apart it can sort of collapse in on itself even with like the iron laws
00:54:26.840
of institutions and all that stuff i just don't think that if you start acting in an illiberal fashion
00:54:33.460
our elites i just think it's a recipe for disaster does that make sense because i mean even like in
00:54:40.020
even in the u.s in the far right to show themselves in a way i mean right they would have to take off
00:54:46.140
the velvet glove right they would have to reveal the fact that that there are you know there are more
00:54:52.300
there are higher interest than allowing a free flow of money and ideas and i they're they're generally
00:55:01.320
speaking not eager to do that um i think they they like an idea where we think that you know it's
00:55:09.320
mccarthy versus pelusi and you know desantis and and aoc is it's it's a kind of battle between these
00:55:17.440
these figures that you know you don't have to be terribly cynical to define these figures as as
00:55:24.360
really largely symbolic the thing that interests me though is that those those two figures musk and
00:55:31.320
desantis are easily way more true to kind of american liberalism than their opponents are
00:55:38.560
um if you read the uh one of the articles i did a while back on my substack was i went through the uh
00:55:45.180
the stop woke act i mean the stop woke act is basically something that wouldn't be a place in like
00:55:51.120
communist russia or something or uh or in this country we have something called the um
00:55:56.600
the equality act 2010 i mean the stop woke act is i mean it might as well just say i ban racism in
00:56:04.100
florida right i mean he's doing it he's like desantis is doing that um with the idea of stopping crt and so
00:56:13.100
on but it's all under the rubric of anti-racism and of a quality and of asserting equality and of um
00:56:22.880
doing away with i guess the idea of voluntary association like you you just like you have
00:56:30.380
to be friends with people of all different races you know i'm glad you brought this up yeah i'll need
00:56:36.900
to don't operate under the rubric of liberalism all right it's still operating under liberalism
00:56:42.100
oh no quite it's almost operating under a hyper liberalism because i i mean let me let me go into
00:56:49.340
this just a little bit i mean there there was a there was actually an article in the new york times
00:56:54.420
last week or this weekend on how one of these textbooks does not want to be divisive and so
00:57:02.320
they're struggling and the textbook industry is multi-multi billions um as you can imagine with
00:57:08.040
you know the number of public schools that all that are making huge orders of tens of thousands of
00:57:13.300
textbooks um and uh they they were having they were struggling to talk about rosa parks because
00:57:19.680
they almost wanted they almost wanted to do it in a non-racial way and i i almost find myself
00:57:26.900
taking the side of the 1619 project or something on on a lot of these issues like it wasn't like the
00:57:35.000
the civil war was fundamentally about slavery and it was actually that that was the not the
00:57:41.680
there are other causes but that was the primary one and that was one that could not be removed if
00:57:49.040
it were removed the civil war would never have taken place and all of the many other causes flowed from
00:57:54.880
that basic issue and i think even you could even say that it wasn't so much about slavery as just race
00:58:00.740
itself and the status of these things but um anyway um the there there's this weird way in which i do think
00:58:10.560
the like left are more are far more accurate in this way in the sense that they're willing to go there
00:58:18.900
and discuss this matter and i think you know when there's an issue as you probably saw on twitter about you
00:58:25.760
know how do you define wokeness and some poor young girl who wrote a book on wokeness was asked what is
00:58:32.600
woke and she was just standing there you know she can't answer it it's kind of funny in a way but it
00:58:38.820
is obviously the term is overused and it's used for anything you know it's like you you want to take
00:58:43.560
away gas stoves that's woke or whatever you know it's obviously misused overused but i i think
00:58:49.760
one way to define it is is demoralizing in a way so when you know desantis wants a vision and other
00:59:00.580
conservatives they want a patriotic but also post-racial or egalitarian vision of america so
00:59:08.580
we had this you know and ted cruz used these terms exactly he's like our original sin was slavery so he's
00:59:14.460
using you know christian language so we we had this there were some bad people once upon a time
00:59:20.600
but there are no more bad people and we got rid of the bad people and we we kind of overcame this into
00:59:27.040
a post-racial liberal community and that from their standpoint is moralizing and i think the the woke
00:59:33.700
people are are saying things that they probably do rub us the wrong way i mean we you know but but
00:59:41.440
they they're not they're they are historically accurate of kind of like well actually slavery
00:59:47.560
didn't really end and you know it it it there was no the plantation system went away eventually but
00:59:54.540
the the basic structure of society and hierarchies was maintained for a long time even maintained after
01:00:00.940
the civil rights movement and if you look at just a basic kind of ethnic nepotism when it comes to
01:00:08.820
starting a business or who do you go to church with or who do you give priority to and and so on
01:00:14.240
we're still racist you know in many ways and they're they're kind of poking at american society not
01:00:20.160
letting them have their dream yeah i'm i'm glad i'm glad you mentioned this richard because from my
01:00:26.700
from my point of view probably all of the worst scholarship ever ever published ever produced by anybody
01:00:34.580
is basically like center-right mainstream history from like 19 from like 1960 to now right i mean
01:00:44.260
stuff that will be put out by the hoover institute or like you know the latest biography of winston
01:00:50.000
churchill or whatever it is i mean i there i mean i've said this before like the left get a lot wrong
01:00:57.000
but what they get right they get more right than the the current center right who who's basically
01:01:03.280
the entire worldview is built on lies on trying to maintain a kind of a kind of fiction right uh and
01:01:11.180
of trying to um trying to like i mean i give you an example right i mean i was asked to to um uh to do
01:01:19.440
a piece on uh thomas carlisle a while back and i've got lots and lots of books of thomas carlisle
01:01:24.080
on thomas carlisle yeah thomas carlisle uh supported slavery right he wrote a uh a famous pamphlet
01:01:32.320
which caused him to fall out with j.s mill um called an occasional discourse on the end question
01:01:38.300
right um he uh he you know he supported uh he had like authoritarian views he had the great man view
01:01:47.580
of history he he refused uh honors from benjamin disraeli because he didn't like the group that
01:01:53.980
benjamin disraeli came from like this was who he was right and it's part and parcel of his thought
01:02:01.120
if you pick up a textbook on thomas carlisle written in like i don't know like let's say like 1976 or
01:02:08.600
whatever by some like conservative intellectual who's trying to like rescue carlisle
01:02:13.420
they do this horrible thing of trying to like white wash it or trying to so actually thomas carlisle
01:02:20.660
wasn't racist or whatever he was right he and not only was he it's part like it's it's really important
01:02:27.600
to understand why he was as well right i mean he's got a fantastic essay on um on on haiti where he says
01:02:34.700
listen i'll make you a prediction right in the next 200 years haiti will still be exactly where it is right
01:02:41.880
now and uh i mean we can well we can look at haiti today right um and in a strange way the left
01:02:48.940
because of their willingness to to actually tackle these topics in an honest way get more right than
01:02:56.000
they get wrong it's just where they're coming from on it right is it you know i i often i often
01:03:02.660
do this thing of um you know i was trained as a as a literary scholar marxists used to love to do this thing
01:03:09.800
of like reading a text against the grain well you can pick up a lot of leftist kind of scholarship
01:03:16.860
and just read it against the rain and suddenly it becomes like quite quite based in a strange way
01:03:22.540
have you ever done that like you can just kind of read it upside down it's like oh hold on a second
01:03:27.100
this is actually that's a really good point and i have discovered some great stuff through through
01:03:32.740
left-wing scholarship because they alert you to things you wouldn't have been aware of and then you
01:03:38.200
think oh i wonder what the real story was and you just dig a little bit deeper and it's like all
01:03:42.320
right okay um i mean i give you an example i saw that uh of exactly this issue right there's this guy
01:03:49.300
matt walsh i'm sure you're all familiar with him yes he's like a uh you know he's got like 1.5 million
01:03:55.440
followers i think he uh yeah he currently on um on uh twitter calling himself the transphobe of the year
01:04:02.800
right um well he did a tweet yesterday saying uh oh ridiculous grand valley state university is
01:04:10.280
holding five segregated graduation celebrations singling out asian black lgbt hispanic and native
01:04:16.760
american graduates right so this this college is doing an asian graduation ceremony a black graduation
01:04:24.320
ceremony a latino one um and it's doing a native one right and there's no there's no one for straight
01:04:32.360
white people is what uh matt walsh's point but i'm thinking uh i don't know like in a strange sort
01:04:39.880
of way i don't like maybe like if they all want to do their own graduation ceremonies like you know
01:04:46.380
i mean you understand what i'm saying yeah it's this weird way we're conservatives what it's like we're no
01:04:53.980
longer colorblind and so we're we based our conservatism on a colorblind concept which we reluctantly
01:05:02.280
accepted and now you're moving on to identitarianism and we don't know what to say like we're we don't
01:05:09.960
we we want the old lies back and we're gonna kind of just force our will upon the the population so
01:05:18.580
that we can live in this dream that race just doesn't matter and we're gonna kind of focus on
01:05:24.700
sex we're gonna focus on the trans transsexual issue and you know we we've kind of it's like we've
01:05:30.840
we solved that problem we reached a compromise and now you guys want to go back and talk about
01:05:36.860
racial identity well you know it that i think that is getting to the the mindset but yeah obviously from
01:05:43.800
our standpoint if asians want to have an asian graduation ceremony why would we want to stop that
01:05:52.240
you know i mean that's wrong or something i mean no they they want to have have a experience of
01:05:59.800
togetherness and good on them conservatives pick the worst hills to die on it's like
01:06:06.940
yeah well that that is definitely true i think there's an inner martyrdom concept within them exactly
01:06:15.980
and they i've noticed too they they seem at least in the u.s i can't speak to the conservative movement
01:06:21.200
in other countries but they seem to like revel in losing and complaining about it you know and
01:06:27.080
they'll try it out like the double standard like you know what if the shoe was on the other foot i'm
01:06:31.480
just like is that all you got yeah it is all they got yeah um i i think also to go back into this of
01:06:42.340
the 1619 project um i i think it would be interesting to look at the influence of slavery and and from a
01:06:52.720
kind of revisionist standpoint the influence of slavery even in the american revolution of because
01:06:58.800
the the american revolution had in a way two parts i mean we we like to remember the declaration of
01:07:06.720
independence and all this kind of heady language from jefferson there there was a more northeastern
01:07:12.580
kind of more rabble-rousing you know revolution the glorious cause was taking place before that and
01:07:20.100
a lot of the i wonder the degree to which slave plantation owners slave owners got on board under the threat
01:07:28.640
of ending that system um by george the third and um and and all these other kind of like
01:07:37.020
little things there's there's actually a good book by um george wills who's a former conservative who
01:07:43.100
kind of renounced all these things um on thomas jefferson called the negro president and i think it's
01:07:49.020
called a negro power something like that i'll have to go negro president jefferson and the slave power
01:07:54.160
but i remember learning in middle school about the so so-called three-fifths clause and it was
01:08:01.860
basically saying that we're treating africans african-americans as three-fifths of a human being
01:08:08.380
i can't believe we did that well that is a total distortion of what was actually going on so
01:08:14.720
at what it said basically was that african the african-american population would be counted at
01:08:21.400
three-fifths of its total southerners actually wanted to treat african-americans as one once as
01:08:28.880
one people and to count them in the population it was actually the yankees who didn't uh they wanted
01:08:35.660
to count them as none so effectively african-americans obviously did not have a rights as as citizens that
01:08:45.200
were enjoyed by you know white citizens uh but they were counted in the population totals that determined
01:08:52.580
the house of representatives and uh and so on and so we have this secession of um with maybe john adams
01:09:01.100
as a as a counterexample but of but a plantation owning presidents early on in the history and southern
01:09:08.200
presidents so much of that was that citizens were in effect being over counted due to the negro power
01:09:16.060
demographic power um so all of these again like all of these kind of quaint ideas that we have
01:09:25.200
about america they are just that they are pretty little wise and a lot of those kind of like you
01:09:32.340
know i don't think if i what i just said would i would probably be fired as a high school teacher
01:09:37.360
if i said that in ron de santis's florida you know i'm going against teaching i'm woke history
01:09:45.240
exactly but i i don't know i mean it's it's it's the truth and maybe there's something good about
01:09:54.860
woke woke the metaphor of woke is is awakening so you know when you and you can understand that a few
01:10:01.460
different ways but that awareness that you have that there's something that was hiding in plain
01:10:07.160
sight and now you're able to see it and it is in many ways a kind of awakening to an identitarianism
01:10:15.860
of some kind and you know again there's there's plenty in the left that i that rubs me the wrong
01:10:22.140
way the rubs that i find ridiculous it rubs i don't even need to say it rubs everyone on this call the wrong
01:10:26.620
way but i i to just assume that the right is on our side or something i i think is is completely
01:10:34.800
incorrect um i i think you could make an argument that we will benefit by kind of writing out this
01:10:42.660
woke transition and that it can it could possibly kind of lead places that many of its current
01:10:50.000
supporters aren't expecting yeah i mean i always remember a jonathan bowden speech from uh back in
01:10:56.420
the day i can't remember exactly which one it was where he starts talking about um i mean obviously
01:11:03.080
this was quite a long you know quite a long time ago but he talks about um how a lot of what we're
01:11:09.800
seeing is almost like kind of training for white people to become a minority and to think of
01:11:15.480
themselves as a group again right i mean he does highlight that it's not much fun right uh because
01:11:22.720
you have to fight for your piece of the cultural pie as opposed to just being the de facto the majority
01:11:29.840
um yeah so but i i i it's always stuck with me that little line that uh bowden had i think there's
01:11:37.720
something in it especially in america especially in america um i think that that the net effect of all
01:11:45.560
of this really is is a kind of racial awakening uh among white people to be aware whether whether it's
01:11:54.080
through the the kind of woke guilt or through the right wing thing right it is this awareness that
01:12:01.680
whites are a thing right whereas um back in the back in the 90s i always call it uh you know back to
01:12:11.940
fresh prince back in the 90s it was like well i watched the fresh prince of bel-air you know i like
01:12:17.160
uncle phil and therefore i'm not racist we're all the same well that's not the message anymore so um
01:12:23.600
i do i do wonder if it's basically inevitable at this point that um you will get a kind of white
01:12:32.680
identitarianism uh at the moment it's still kind of hiding itself or speaking in dog whistles or
01:12:37.540
whatever but um it seems like they haven't dialed it down they haven't dialed it down it has to be an
01:12:44.280
identitarianism because i i think the the santus vision of like i won't wake up you know i i am
01:12:53.380
anti-woke like we we will not wake up to this reality we will continue to sleep you know like
01:12:59.800
uncle phil is a great man he's an american i mean i i have a theory you take this away from me to go back
01:13:09.560
to go back to what we talked about right by the star of the core i've had a long-standing theory
01:13:14.760
that the that the bid to uh put woke away um it's largely driven by the you remember we talked about
01:13:26.060
the uh the big retiree group in florida who background de santis um and uh you know israeli
01:13:32.620
nationalists and so on i i i i have a i have a kind of it seems to me that
01:13:39.880
a large part of the anti-woke agenda is also driven by that group who um perceive perhaps rightly
01:13:49.980
that their place on the progressive stack doesn't count for anything anymore
01:13:53.660
and basically the writing's on the wall i mean again this is something that mark may have may have
01:13:59.680
uh may have looked at but in this country there's a comedian called david baddiel
01:14:05.140
um not a particularly great comedian it has to be said he he's famous for writing a football song
01:14:11.040
called uh three lions on a shirt right with a with a guy called frank skinner um but he he's also he's
01:14:18.160
also jewish and he's a comedian and he wrote a book called jews don't count um and the ostensible
01:14:25.920
target of that he wasn't thinking of the quote unquote far right he was thinking of the corbynista
01:14:32.940
left if you remember jeremy corbyn basically was ousted over claims that he was uh he was anti-semitic um
01:14:40.140
um but it it really comes down to this idea that in the current kind of uh milestone of left-wing
01:14:51.400
politics there's no there's no place at the table for could you use anymore i have read uh pieces in
01:14:58.580
um tablet magazine where they're you know uh worrying over it's like oh no the the ivy league
01:15:06.560
percentage uh may reduce from like 30 to 20 over the next 10 years um this is a problem you know
01:15:13.720
things like this um so i mean it does seem true i think that's true that jews increasingly don't
01:15:22.120
count in in the multi-culti uh uh um table you know they don't have a seat at that table i think
01:15:29.640
this is a kind of historical problem for them as well because they had the you know the martin
01:15:34.680
luther king alliance of the the jewish black alliance i think got got freeders have got pieces
01:15:38.680
on this somewhere but that broke down that broke down around the time of the you know of the rise
01:15:45.360
of the neocons and so on um and and then they tried to like put it all back together in the in the 90s
01:15:51.640
and it feels like it's breaking down again you know yeah it's it's sort of it's a bit of the story of the
01:15:57.520
uh golem of prague right um so they create something that ultimately turns against them um christianity
01:16:05.700
being one example as well which is intermittently turned against them but i think that it's for the
01:16:11.120
most part um uh accommodated them or has been beneficial for them uh you know during its its
01:16:18.040
existence i mean i think we're seeing that we're seeing the end of christianity or at least among
01:16:22.180
europeans through the white world um but i think that uh so i think that that's true i think it's
01:16:27.960
it's multiculturalism kind of fits into a similar or same category uh you could even say it's a kind
01:16:34.820
of continuation or realization of christianity on some level as well um but uh so yeah it will
01:16:42.740
it will turn on them uh as communism turned on them as well right um any so in they they have this
01:16:50.800
habit and it's it's sort of their will to power and i think this is a very ancient uh phenomena that
01:16:56.660
goes into uh the ancient world before jews appear on the scene among these cults that i would call
01:17:03.460
proto-jewish but there is this instinct to push uh egalitarianism right in that egalitarianism or
01:17:10.620
equality becomes a kind of will to power for jews uh but in then the consequence of the success of
01:17:17.420
those movements is that they see themselves in privileged positions right but once they're in
01:17:22.380
privileged positions then they are also the enemy right if everyone else is is an egalitarian or
01:17:29.020
everyone else is um you know part of this uh this idealized equality then they also become the enemy
01:17:36.840
um because they they've sort of ascended above it i mean oh please one of the one of the big things
01:17:44.880
i've noticed that chain that has changed you know in the years that i've been on online like you know
01:17:49.700
from 2016 to now basically is the sheer prevalence of um black violence videos that do the round on
01:17:59.080
twitter right um and they they you know they they they're shared with a kind of real frequency now
01:18:06.340
and there was one that came across my timeline a couple of weeks back where a guy is um like a
01:18:14.280
homeless guy was shot like in the street now i i didn't share that because i've got a like a you
01:18:19.640
know i don't like to to see like actual actual killings and things on my timeline but i i look
01:18:26.520
to see like well who who's sharing this and um i was absolutely stunned to discover that ben shapiro
01:18:33.220
retweeted that i mean ben shapiro would never have done that in kind of like his uh polite national
01:18:41.300
review kind of 2016 mold but now he's like actively drawing attention to um kind of kind of black
01:18:51.340
violence and things like this which were never really really talking points of the daily of the
01:18:57.100
daily wire so why is that happening well i have to say i i wrote about this 10 years ago um i believe
01:19:05.940
it was 2012 maybe maybe it was 2014 but it was a little while ago and john darbyshire was fired from
01:19:14.320
national review um for for writing an article that uh i mean to be fair uh was was pretty harsh he kind
01:19:22.440
of had a bit of a scott adams like moment and was was giving the talk to his white children saying you
01:19:30.160
should avoid uh african americans and you know a bit much he was actually going through cancer at the
01:19:36.080
time and and so on but um what i noticed was that you have this like vehement denunciation of
01:19:45.780
darbyshire he's fired from national review he was and other people were pissing on his grave and all that
01:19:51.100
kind of stuff um with very few exceptions if any but at the same time there was this embrace
01:19:59.920
on breitbart media at the time so i don't think what you're describing is new i think it's been
01:20:05.840
amplified with social media because now everything takes place on social media whereas previously
01:20:11.440
things were taking place at like webzines and things like that but breitbart would have like
01:20:16.220
full color stories about danish tourists visiting detroit and getting their clothes stolen and beaten up and
01:20:25.040
all this just ritualistic humiliation of people and the the irony of course is that everyone sees
01:20:33.520
that image of a danish tourist for example getting beaten up in detroit everyone knows what that that's
01:20:39.340
about you know it's just it's it's race crime blacks you know etc but you don't you don't say it
01:20:47.420
and so but darbyshire actually came out and just said it so i i think there is a way it's been going
01:20:55.980
on longer than in the just the past four or five years of these types of people kind of channeling
01:21:02.120
that energy to get to go back to a theme that we were discussing earlier of you know we we kind of
01:21:07.040
can't fight this and we can actually use this uh to promote our stuff i mean i i and i think this this
01:21:14.040
has some like very kind of weird effects um i i think someone like scott adams um i mean look is
01:21:22.360
in terms of you should avoid blacks or something i mean look that that's something that whites have
01:21:29.160
been doing for for decades upon decades at this point you don't need to talk about it you just need to
01:21:35.040
find a good school and you know a good neighborhood etc um but i think he was a guy who kind of got
01:21:43.060
radicalized by this immediacy of social media so he was seeing all this stuff all the time
01:21:48.100
and he in in many ways kind of mischaracterizes blacks as a hate group and out to get him or
01:21:56.320
something but i i think his brain kind of got fried by this where where the the boomer who was colorblind
01:22:03.140
learns to hate through social media you see a lot of other conservatives who are when they depict blm
01:22:09.740
it's like they burn down our cities and so on well that that's a bit of an exaggeration and you
01:22:16.920
in your iowa suburb you were fine there there was probably some mild blm thing with a bunch of people
01:22:24.420
holding signs but via social media and in this intimacy and immediacy that we can achieve in a way
01:22:31.480
they did burn down their cities in a way antifa was in their backyard because that's the consciousness
01:22:37.580
that we have is that you know salacious video that you see on facebook
01:22:42.660
yeah i guess the point i was making is that ben shapiro now uses language like anti-white
01:22:50.640
yeah and um and his outlet which i think is daily wire correct me if i'm wrong now leans into
01:22:58.820
that sort of language which even a few years back was the kind of uh you know that was part of the
01:23:08.060
lexicon of what the alt-right used to be and now they're now they're kind of like ben shapiro talking
01:23:13.200
points and i i'm just wondering like if i was part of the same group as ben shapiro
01:23:18.960
um i'll be thinking like you know who where do i make my alliance and what's my bet for the future
01:23:28.560
i i guess and i and i just see a certain a certain element of the uh of the american elite let's just
01:23:36.920
say is probably thinking like well i don't know like when when the board is like now replaced with
01:23:44.600
like you know half half of them are mexican and half of them are black for example or now like
01:23:50.900
the entire governorship of my state is run by like that the guy from new york that you were talking
01:23:56.380
about are they going to have my back in the same way that somebody i'd want to send this is going to
01:24:00.920
have my back you understand totally no i completely understand i think there there's an element of of
01:24:08.640
jews who are making that bet and um you know bibi netanyahu is laying down with very hardcore
01:24:19.160
nationalist in israel and and i think this is kind of part of the the problem that he's he's facing
01:24:25.460
right now there's a protest talk of civil war and so on um and i i do think that yeah and on a funny
01:24:34.420
way the alt-right kind of won in the sense like if you look at someone like matt walsh in i can
01:24:39.940
remember him from 2015 he was the ultimate cock he was anti-trump people were lambasting him he's a
01:24:45.540
hipster christian silly boy or whatever now he is the ultimate baddie you know the guy who will just
01:24:54.280
call out transsexuals to their face um far right fat i think at one point on his twitter he he like
01:25:01.900
bragged about you know theocratic fascist or something was like his description you know
01:25:07.040
this is an ironic thing i mean matt walsh probably says way more radical stuff than either you or i
01:25:13.680
would oh yeah i mean you know uh it's it's a it's it's a strange dynamic that is uh and isn't it kind
01:25:22.640
of infuriating that they would they denounce people like us you know four years ago and then they use our
01:25:29.800
then you know idioms and and and slogans and so it you know it it feels kind of feels like we got used
01:25:38.180
well we'll contain we'll contain this yeah but i think it's also assigned to me i mean the lesson
01:25:47.480
that i learned as well is that you you don't want to be assimilated like you know for instance i i don't
01:25:55.220
know the last time i tweeted about transsexuals or something you know i mean it's like look
01:26:00.180
we get it you know like i don't i don't need to to to retweet libs of tiktok to to to to to say that
01:26:09.000
like this person is is kind of ill you know i mean we get it it's sad in many ways i i just don't do it
01:26:16.780
but i i i think it they're the challenge that that i see as well is you you have to put yours you you
01:26:24.600
have to put yourself on a level where you kind of can't be assimilated and and that is showing that
01:26:31.100
you are getting at something important and powerful you know like so much of the so-called dissident right
01:26:37.000
and so on is is they're saying the same thing that matt walsh is saying there's no they're saying it on
01:26:42.380
a more polite way in in many cases so what's the point you know you you you've gotta if you are a
01:26:50.960
real dissident and and you know and in at least like in terms of civilization of politeness i'm not
01:26:59.440
a dissident i'm not i'm not out throwing molotov cocktails at people or trying to undermine the
01:27:05.320
system or you know i i think but we are trying to kind of undermine the system morally and and that
01:27:11.220
means that you have to go to a different place and you do need to start talking about things you
01:27:17.460
could go to a different place on one level of you know being an outright skinhead or crazy person or
01:27:23.620
flat earther or whatever i obviously we don't want to go there um it's it's dumb but you you want to go
01:27:30.240
to another place where they they can't assimilate you that that it that it is too radical or too
01:27:36.740
potentially damaging and demoralizing to the system and i think that's the place we need to go
01:27:42.680
i don't i don't think you know direct action i've learned my lesson i mean i never
01:27:48.200
engaged in direct action you know in the sense of like i'm i'm trying to uh cease the functioning of
01:27:56.080
the government or i was not at j6 nor was i invited nor that i you know i i'm not going to try
01:28:01.160
to confront the government in any in any way but in you know but we were you know something like
01:28:09.520
charlottesville that that was out there in your face you know we're here you know uh you're gonna
01:28:15.080
have to force us to leave well you ultimately can get bulldozed in that way so i i don't i think
01:28:20.660
that's a losing strategy but i do think that we need to like the the process of of demoralizing the
01:28:29.940
system in in offering an alternative to the system you you have to go in a way where matt
01:28:36.860
walsh is you have to go where matt walsh won't follow you yeah i mean i i mean it might be one
01:28:43.880
of the things that kind of likes of us need to do really is the complete um i guess you'd like the
01:28:50.500
complete intellectual demolition of the post-war center right would be a nice place to start right
01:28:56.160
um because in many ways they're the ultimate they are the ultimate enemy right and a lot of the a
01:29:05.020
lot of the stuff we see okay i mean right nobody wants to see their own children um you know uh
01:29:14.220
brainwashed by transgender ideology or whatever right but ultimately these are issues the system is
01:29:23.700
uncomfortable discussing that's why you're there on your feet 24 7 right there are ever more
01:29:31.760
fundamental things that we need to to get at in a way um and this is really what i'm i mean but the
01:29:41.260
i'm writing a trilogy of books you know i had the populist delusion was my kind of a attack on the idea
01:29:47.680
of democracy liberal democracy liberalism um this next book i have coming out which is called the
01:29:54.820
prophets of doom is really a uh a kind of um it it's getting at the idea of linear progressive history
01:30:03.060
and trying to trying to undermine that and knock it out from like so these are kind of really basic
01:30:10.900
assumptions that nobody even thinks about um you know what is the shape of history i mean i i think
01:30:18.060
there's utility for us in having a cyclical view of history rather than a linear progressive one
01:30:23.860
and then the third book i want to write at some point uh when i when i recover from just having
01:30:31.160
handed in this manuscript it's called the boomer truth regime where i want to really my target is
01:30:38.560
basically individualism it's it's individualism um yeah uh by which i mean like kind of boomer or even
01:30:47.360
or even more importantly like gen x individualism right this idea that um uh so i feel like knocking
01:30:56.480
those sorts of things out these are the kinds of um these are the kinds of things that are that are so
01:31:03.360
um um buried so deep in your kind of social conditioning that it takes a lot to uh see them
01:31:13.940
within yourself right and and in a way what i want people are you know people in our little
01:31:19.360
vanguard to do if you want is to kind of is to kind of uh kill that boomer within themselves if that
01:31:29.640
makes any sense um which is which is very difficult to do which is almost impossible to do by the way
01:31:35.400
um uh which is which is something i something i discuss in this book which is so it's like well
01:31:40.860
you have to also come to peace with you have to come to peace with the fact that you are
01:31:44.920
like you're never gonna like you're never gonna completely get rid of all your liberal priors because
01:31:51.700
you are thoroughly the product of your time and your place right but you have to be able to see its
01:31:58.120
limitations and how it how it is um can i put it uh how it has been used um to stymie what the
01:32:09.720
quote-unquote right has been able to do i mean i don't even know if you want to use the term left
01:32:14.640
and right but a kind of political force that would would be effective against uh you know against the
01:32:22.080
enemy um so that's uh kind of what what i see the mission as at the moment yeah yeah i can't wait i
01:32:29.960
can't wait for all this go ahead i would say uh regarding shapiro though um it does seem that um
01:32:35.840
because it's one thing to say that you're anti-white and it's another and maybe quite another thing to say
01:32:41.380
that you're pro-white um but that may be in the offing presumably it is in the offing right so then
01:32:49.160
what does shapiro what does shapiro do and we we're familiar with all these conversations having
01:32:54.960
been in the dr you know since 2004 richard earlier um so in some of that becomes well okay it's you can
01:33:04.160
be proud of being scottish or you can be proud of being english but you can't be proud of being what
01:33:09.360
we we start to enter into that territory right um but but ultimately the question is you know can
01:33:16.480
you be pro-white and isn't it good to be pro-white and i think that that is a question that's going
01:33:21.200
to be emerging um even among the elite you know it's it's in even the kind of foreseeable future
01:33:28.120
uh so where does shapiro go then you know i mean and um so it'll be interesting to think to see and he
01:33:35.940
might you know people like shapiro maybe not shapiro exactly but someone uh similar to shapiro
01:33:42.360
occupying a similar cultural role in the future may have to concede yeah you can be pro-white right
01:34:14.420
yeah i'm i'm still here okay okay yes yeah i mean i think my whole zoom uh shut down and then
01:34:23.960
restarted i don't know what happened there but we're still recording so yeah i mean i think he
01:34:29.200
would i think i mean to answer your question i think he would weasel a little bit with the question
01:34:34.520
but i think that he would i think he would say that he's a white guy um but i i think that that's
01:34:41.800
not you know um that's not a totally truthful answer of course right because his strongest uh
01:34:48.040
fealty and identity is being jewish um you know i mean the guy you don't think there could be like a
01:34:55.760
white identitarianism where likes of a shapiro or somebody like him might try to install themselves
01:35:02.580
at the head of it uh because i mean when i well i mean when i look at the discourse probably some of
01:35:08.740
the most outspoken like quote-unquote pro-white voice i mean i think it was someone like amy wax
01:35:14.220
right i mean you know there's currently a call to get her like her tenure removed you know she's a
01:35:22.700
she's like a law professor uh i met i met it once amy wax uh but like you know you you do get these
01:35:29.980
kind of straight talking jewish intellectuals who are kind of you know they basically you know repeat
01:35:39.720
to all the same sort of talking points that someone like steve sailor would make um you know you know
01:35:44.380
definitely so so i guess that's my question for you mark like why wouldn't they try to uh i guess
01:35:53.140
like get ahead of the game and like become you know become the spokesman for whatever that new
01:35:59.420
identitarianism is well i think that they would but i just i think that there's a there's a line or
01:36:04.900
there's a there's probably a bridge that they won't cross ultimately um and the reason that they
01:36:10.100
would position position themselves there is to lead the opposition as it were i don't think that
01:36:14.780
their interest is in a revival of white racialism it's just sort of where the tide is pushing right
01:36:21.020
uh so that they would want to be um they would want to be they want to they would want to get ahead
01:36:26.980
of it as it were and to um control control that sort of caducean dialectic um but yeah i mean but
01:36:37.000
again i think i would say further i i agree with you that there's a big difference between calling out
01:36:43.700
anti-whites and saying you're pro-white but i wouldn't i could see these forces maybe not ben shapiro
01:36:53.920
himself but maybe ben shapiro declaring themselves to be pro-white um i mean this is kind of where it's
01:37:02.320
leading and yeah and in some ways they've already done this i mean the judeo-christian i mean all of
01:37:08.040
that the religious right came directly out of uh of uh dc the desegregation battle which which was
01:37:16.680
lost basically by these people i mean jerry falwell's paradigmatic in the sense of a outright
01:37:22.580
segregationist who went back to his study and kind of changed his terminology and came out five
01:37:28.980
years later and says you know ah it's about abortion now um so i mean in some ways they've
01:37:34.480
done this in all but name and i could see them like locking that tightrope in a way i i understand
01:37:42.640
that it's threatening but in a way like you know one of the reasons why i'm attracted to your ideas
01:37:51.720
is that you recognize that our message can't just be about we like white people you know like what
01:38:02.440
we're what you know what does that mean what what does it mean to be white what does it mean to be
01:38:07.920
arian and who are you talking about because it seems like a lot of so-called pro-white people
01:38:14.460
aren't necessarily pro-white they're pro-republican voting rural and suburban whites
01:38:21.300
and they're they're not necessarily pro-white and they want you know they talk about that that whole
01:38:27.500
national divorce thing that's been in the air in white nationalism i can remember it 15 years ago
01:38:33.800
and you know and it's you know it's basically defining the white race in terms of red states
01:38:40.420
you know the white race is republican basically i am against that and i think that what we need to do
01:38:48.600
is a spiritual message i think that's going to be more powerful i mean i can imagine and i i grant
01:38:56.360
i grant you that it's kind of outrageous to even think about this i can imagine ben sapiro saying uh
01:39:03.460
well you know and no one here supports uh slavery or or or segregation and um but you know uh we did
01:39:10.200
have a white demographic for some time and um whites are very good uh uh corporate uh busybodies
01:39:16.600
and uh they uh don't commit crime and uh you know i i pro-white in that sense you know uh the white
01:39:22.600
people they uh they uh they sure buy a lot of daily wire subsurption so uh you know we'll i'll give
01:39:28.080
them that i could see that i could never possibly see him embrace apolloism sure sure but that is not
01:39:38.100
in the realm of possibilities that's why that's the that that is how radical we must be in order to
01:39:45.380
you know we we can't touch that the old movement needs to be left behind i mean we need to go to a
01:39:53.560
place that can't be assimilated no i agree and i think that we're going there or we're already there
01:40:00.340
so it's not but what i'm saying though is that uh i did only richard drop or no i'm still here okay
01:40:08.780
um something funny is going on with my someone just see i've been sorry about this i've been
01:40:15.260
experimenting with some apps on zoom and so um so that we could have kind of like a jumbotron or people
01:40:23.540
could um uh could add stuff like someone is doing here anyway i'm sorry this is more of a distraction
01:40:31.240
than it is anything in the moment i'll try to um yeah just just uh mark the time code or whatever
01:40:37.720
yeah yeah but yeah no so what i would say is that okay so if they're if they're at the point now where
01:40:44.480
they're denouncing anti-white then we can say well uh they can start speaking in sort of pro-white
01:40:50.380
sentiments that's sort of foreseeable in the offing um but then once they get there the
01:40:56.160
conversation becomes okay well what are some pro-white policies right and pro-white policies
01:41:02.420
would include uh deportations africans having their own homeland this sort of thing right and
01:41:08.500
that's when i think that guys like um you know guys like shapiro i mean i just i wonder how far
01:41:15.840
they'll be willing to go and and we know that um history shows that they will be going they will
01:41:21.020
be willing to go pretty far right uh yeah what what what what one of the things that i uh it was
01:41:29.300
kind of a horrifying thought really that i had when i was writing prophets of doom uh you know like
01:41:34.840
spengler has this notion that the western the western civilization is um what he calls faustian right
01:41:41.300
faustian um what it seems to me that i mean one of the one of the reasons that i don't i don't talk
01:41:50.760
about uh you know jewish stuff a lot is because once you kind of see the pattern of their kind of
01:42:00.900
modus operandi in a way um to me it gets a bit to me it's like a little bit like kind of
01:42:07.300
parochial and like self-serving in a way it's just like kind of you know a version of ethnic
01:42:12.880
narcissism or something like that um if you think of like the true spirits of like what
01:42:19.900
christianism is it's kind of like um you know at the start of the call you you talked about the tech
01:42:26.800
you know a group that we might call the techno globalists right i mean i i would i would say that
01:42:32.900
uh tony blair would belong belong to this sort of group or certain members of the davos crowd
01:42:39.200
and the world economic forum uh or even even even someone like elon musk in his own strange way
01:42:46.220
um and and there's there's this kind of separate um uh kind of intellectual strand that would uh
01:42:57.260
you know i think of people like hg wells or um you know it's it's kind of this uh this kind of
01:43:04.280
genuinely universal genuinely futuristic genuinely technocratic and globalist one world government in
01:43:13.320
fact with a one world and and and the horrifying thought i had really is that i mean maybe not
01:43:20.020
or maybe uh maybe not depending on your point of view but i mean i was wondering like whether
01:43:27.060
that is actually the truth like the true expression of what it means to be quote unquote white is to
01:43:33.680
embody like the kind of um you know the kind of uber technocratic davos vision of the world uh because
01:43:42.160
i i've spent a lot of time looking at looking at uh their materials and like uh you know tony blair
01:43:51.500
institute stuff they don't really talk about like racist issues or like feminism or woke stuff
01:43:56.980
it's all it's all about um you know like picturing what the future will be like in 2050 and like
01:44:04.800
um you know massive all-encompassing digital architecture that triages all of africa all of
01:44:13.700
europe all of america and and like from a certain point of view this is kind of like the whitest thing
01:44:20.580
to be doing right now um and i and i mean like for whatever reason i i don't find i find those
01:44:28.220
things kind of scary but maybe that's because like i'm you know naturally conservative or something
01:44:33.740
uh and not like a true faustian but i i did that thought crossed my mind more than once and um one of
01:44:43.200
the other writers i look at arnold toynbee he kind of leans into that a little bit more and basically
01:44:49.340
says like yeah this is basically like the destiny of europe ultimately is to is to give birth to some
01:44:55.660
new religion right that is like truly global in this way um i mean i i don't like it but just just
01:45:04.280
a thought what do you think richard i yeah yes we're yeah i i doesn't the world ultimately want
01:45:15.460
to come together i mean we're we're speaking over zoom we're we're bringing so many people together
01:45:22.280
through technology in this way um the english language acting as a kind of lingua franca
01:45:28.720
globally speaking and i i i would say at the very least this and and i do think that and i'm not just
01:45:36.780
saying this out of nostalgia i i do think that it's it's kind of inhuman to lose any kind of local
01:45:43.460
character like they're they're just and in these things won't be lost you know there's always going
01:45:49.940
to be some strudel you can get or a wiener schnitzel or uh um a crap or something like i don't i don't
01:45:58.120
think they have a good evolutionary model people like that regionalism so it's it they yeah it survives
01:46:05.320
and in in in many ways it doesn't need us to defend defend it it will defend itself because it is
01:46:11.600
good and it's just deeply human to care about your neighbors and to you know speak in a regional
01:46:18.960
dialect or etc i don't i think those things in a way don't need to be defended um but yeah i mean it
01:46:26.920
it does is the right at this point only presenting itself as a kind of roadblock as a as a speed maybe even
01:46:35.680
a speed bump as just the this nay saying right of you know we don't want you know you're too powerful
01:46:43.900
you you you're you actually are gonna win we're just gonna throw a wrench in your gears to stop you
01:46:49.740
but what is that you know i mean like it i think we all agreed that the right just completely lacks of
01:46:57.240
a vision that that it can present as an alternative so like is it you know globalists of the past have
01:47:07.520
not necessarily been liberals as we use the term today hg wells being an excellent example isn't
01:47:14.620
there just a natural tendency towards you to uniting the planet i mean and i'll offer another example like
01:47:21.240
so much of this duganism which has been taken up by the kremlin in fact in their uh overt propaganda
01:47:30.900
on the web is about multi-polarity so we're gonna have a multi-polar world and there's actually a
01:47:36.200
recent tweet of uh meeting with africans and so on so no one will be in charge and and uh you'll have
01:47:43.780
your own little realm we won't harm each other this just strikes me as moralism dressed up as
01:47:50.540
geopolitics you know it's it's not there's no there's not any reason to believe that that that's
01:47:59.340
actually better or that there won't be expansions of some kind of system whether it's americanism or
01:48:06.040
communism or russianism or africanism uh potentially so it's just this kind of morality of you know you
01:48:14.800
don't tread on me i don't tread on you but all that is is just moral claptrap there's no
01:48:20.480
you see yeah i mean what what while dugan's saying that sort of stuff and while you know
01:48:25.740
people are arguing about you know chinese on twitter or whatever you know i i mean i hate to
01:48:32.260
keep on bringing it back to to tony blair but people don't people don't understand how active this guy is
01:48:38.340
just this week he's met about six different african presidents for example right in each one of those
01:48:44.020
meetings he sets up a deal where he says like listen you pay us some money we'll come in and advise you
01:48:49.800
um and now basically we own the entire digital infrastructure of your country for the next like
01:48:57.220
hundred years um so from a certain point of view it's like well okay yeah tony blair tech you know
01:49:04.840
technocrat and globalist and so on but in a strange way it's also like cecil rhodes do you know what i mean
01:49:10.640
like i mean this is like empire this is like true empire building um it in a way that ensures that
01:49:17.440
you know if if our guys are there like if tony blair's guys are there it's not the chinese running
01:49:24.220
you know literally exactly botswana or chad or you know i mean you name it like they're there they're
01:49:32.160
they're in every single country and that's right just wants to have nostalgia the right is like oh the
01:49:38.020
the great british empire of yesteryear it was fantastic we just don't have anything like that
01:49:43.640
today they're just engaging in nostalgia whereas someone like tony blair is actually building the
01:49:48.820
future right but but it's not just building it he gets to it like none of those things that they're
01:49:56.300
not just doing it as charity they control the infrastructure and they basically then through the
01:50:01.940
backdoor control the policies of that country and and so when he wants to bring in his you know uh you
01:50:09.980
know multi multi national digital id stuff it's all there it's all like he already owns the the network
01:50:19.160
if that makes any sense right and he's got his ngos on the ground you know to uh quote unquote advise the
01:50:26.220
various governments i mean it's all this stuff is not that hidden they do it in broad daylight because
01:50:31.220
nobody bloody nobody watches them nobody cares nobody you know everybody is everybody's looking
01:50:37.240
at this thing over here so yeah um you know and i i kind of i kind of oscillate between thinking like
01:50:43.200
this is like you know watching how like evil operates or whatever but also like i have a certain
01:50:49.440
degree of admiration that you know these are people who are you know they're doing the genuine
01:50:55.860
world building that um i imagine their 19th century forebears would kind of in some strange way approve of
01:51:04.940
does that make sense absolutely yes i mean look mark has been very you know outrageous you could say
01:51:13.860
in in talking about this as a global project i mean we're a global people we need a global project
01:51:19.980
and we need a global religion and this this is always deeply appealed to me and much more so than
01:51:28.980
any sort of nationalism which does seem to be just retreating back to some older paradigm that is just
01:51:37.460
kind of obviously outmoded and where the the only like chance that you can succeed is also dangerous
01:51:44.980
it's also dangerous richard i mean as we're seeing today it's dangerous sort of petty nationalism is
01:51:50.260
dangerous uh how do you mean that exactly well i mean uh just the example of the uh conflict with
01:51:58.060
russia right i mean you you know you say uh it would be better or you have said it would be better if
01:52:03.980
they were part of nato i think um so i think it or something along those lines no doubt they never
01:52:11.760
would have been invaded if ukraine were part of nato 10 years ago yeah and there's no doubt that
01:52:15.360
it would never have been invaded yeah i think that like a one world government it should be a kind of
01:52:19.640
ideal to be honest with you i don't i think it would be resisted of course but i think that that um
01:52:25.900
i think that that should be the goal and i think in a way it is it's always kind of the de facto reality
01:52:33.360
in the sense that you always have a dominant global power uh and then you have other weaker powers that
01:52:39.460
are servile and some that are resistant to it but that ultimately you know history shows that it you
01:52:46.180
know for a period the greeks dominated than the romans that there is a kind of uh you know unipolarity to
01:52:52.920
the world um and but i think it should just be i think it could become more uh expansive explicit
01:53:02.200
useful um helpful and uh sustainable and and have uh bigger uh and bolder goals uh that uh would
01:53:12.820
benefit you know all of humanity essentially yeah i mean i i can remember my own kind of ron paul days
01:53:19.940
when when i was a lot younger because so much you know i'm a young gen xer but i i am a gen xer at heart
01:53:25.560
and so much of my own political consciousness came out of opposing uh george w bush and opposing the
01:53:35.600
iraq war and so on and i i think i was right to do that and and i think most of the critiques of the
01:53:41.720
iraq war were correct and so on but at the heart beyond the critique at the heart of the vision
01:53:48.440
was a kind of ron paul multi-polarity clap trap not dissimilar to dugan's clap trap which is basically
01:53:57.620
well you know no we we won't have military bases abroad and we'll be nice to everyone we'll just
01:54:04.360
kind of trade and maybe maybe we could have some protectionism but mostly just about free free love
01:54:10.660
around the world basically and america it's big bad america won't be bombing people anymore and and
01:54:17.300
etc and you know there there's certain kernels of truth to this i i think the america being a being
01:54:23.440
an american we i am in some ways complicit with the deaths of children in yemen and and and the deaths
01:54:31.820
of a million people in iraq i i get that but i also am a citizen of this empire and i recognize that
01:54:41.080
without america enforcing basically global waterways and enforcing a certain kind of rules-based order
01:54:52.160
as they say that the world would be a much worse place and that you take away the american empire and
01:55:00.400
you don't uncover free love and friendship of the peoples you uncover chaos and petty nationalist
01:55:08.620
violence and uh and other things you also leave open a vacuum for other empires to insert their
01:55:18.620
vision of the world i mean islam i i don't think has a compelling vision to intelligent people but it
01:55:27.240
absolutely has a global vision uh china ditto i i don't think the chinese way of life is going to be
01:55:36.340
uh is not particularly compelling there's no kind of chinese dream or or chinese u2 that's that's
01:55:45.160
inspiring people of other nations uh but they absolutely have some sort of vision of a chinese
01:55:51.980
order and i don't want to live in that world i definitely don't want to live in the islamic one
01:55:58.300
i don't want to live in the chinese one i don't want to live in the ron paul chaos globe that would be
01:56:04.120
created once we remove american military bases and all you know all things said and done i i don't
01:56:12.380
think the american global order is actually that bad and there are at the very least just tangible
01:56:20.360
benefits that we all have and and i think as i get older and you know i i understand this more and
01:56:29.580
more and i i i hope a kind of more mature and nuanced view of this it's it's not that i want to be a
01:56:35.880
shill for america or shill for biden but i do recognize that america is hegemonic for a reason
01:56:44.780
and that it's not all that bad and you know yes we should offer something even better but to offer a
01:56:55.820
purely negative vision of let's tear down the current world order and you know and and free
01:57:03.820
love and friendship will rise in its place that's just pure silliness
01:57:08.360
yeah yeah i mean this is this is something that as i was writing uh prophets of doom it really um
01:57:18.080
i was thinking of like some of the arguments that certain nationalists have made um i mean sorry to
01:57:26.080
name names but greg johnson is somebody who who springs to mind where where it's almost like they have this
01:57:33.380
idea that there are going to be all the different nations of the world and each each group gets their
01:57:42.360
own little country and they're all going to leave each other alone and i i've always wanted to root
01:57:49.560
my analysis in in in realism right i mean that's that's that's the thing that i think is really
01:57:54.600
important because if it's not realistic it's not going to happen right and i look across history and
01:58:00.840
think look when when was this time where you just had all the different nations of the world who left
01:58:06.440
each other alone i mean i i i just don't see that i i there's always and it it's always the rise and
01:58:13.660
fall of empires i mean even even the nations of europe that you think of i mean germany didn't exist
01:58:19.280
until the 1850s italy didn't exist as a nation for you know hundreds of years um even france really up
01:58:28.640
until napoleon didn't really exist as france per se um you know pretty much the only country that
01:58:38.300
existed as a as a quote-unquote nation state recognizably was probably brissom which was a
01:58:46.120
which which was a which was an island right right an island and then an empire yeah but that was an
01:58:52.020
empire and of course there was a huge i mean as a shakespeare scholar i can i can speak to this a
01:58:58.280
little bit um shakespeare himself was it was involved in basically national myth making yeah
01:59:04.820
whereby they had to they had to incorporate the different elements that the scottish and the welsh
01:59:11.380
and they that they drew on they drew on uh certain myths that uh likes of jeffrey of monmouth had
01:59:19.480
written and um you know they they create and they you know he wrote he slandered my namesake as as we
01:59:26.280
know but but but but you understand yeah yeah i mean yeah but all of this is myth is national
01:59:33.800
myth making right that you have like good kings like henry the fifth and bad kings like richard
01:59:39.520
the third and so on which were which were basically encouraging people to think of the the country as
01:59:46.440
a nation um you know you get like guys like walter raleigh who like literally literally writing kind of
01:59:53.040
like proto-nationalist propaganda in a way saying like well why should we have like frank products
01:59:59.380
over here we need to enact like kind of keynesian and protectionism before that had been invented you
02:00:05.380
know uh but all of that is in all of that then um basically is the kind of uh preparatory ground for
02:00:16.180
um britain as a country to enter the world or england as a nation to enter the world stage
02:00:23.860
right to enter i mean this is how like spengler and toinby and some of these writers they talk about
02:00:29.220
nations uh or people if you want entering world history right um toinby has this very strange idea
02:00:39.220
that uh there are these periods of withdrawal so he argues that for a certain like a couple of
02:00:46.900
hundred years there uh england as a nation withdrew into itself in order to build up this kind of
02:00:54.380
collective identity that we're talking about and then at a certain moment it was ready to burst out
02:01:00.660
and enter world history um this this is really the only scope for actual nationalism that we as we'd
02:01:10.000
recognize it uh you know kind of existing in the in the overall scheme of civilizational history
02:01:16.540
yeah there's a kind of short-run phenomena that um um inculcates uh they called it a bassia you know
02:01:25.020
a kind of collective feeling but it's only a it's only a small period that that that happens and it's
02:01:32.300
usually because there are some natural frontiers like being an island or like having um like a river
02:01:38.600
or mountains or something that stop an invader coming in right i would take this further actually
02:01:46.280
because i i would so i i have two points one's geographic but i'll talk about the the hegemonic
02:01:54.600
one as well i i think the paradigm of the nation state that emerged in the 19th century i think i
02:02:00.420
think was connected to a certain kind of uh romanticism and it was a reaction to other forms
02:02:07.380
of empire i mean german nationalism was a reaction to napoleon's invasion um uh legendarily but i i think
02:02:14.280
actually in fact um you know uh beethoven wrote his uh third symphony it was dedicated to napoleon the
02:02:21.560
eroica symphony and then he he supposedly was scratching it out of the uh published uh scores
02:02:28.340
after the um after uh the uh emperor invaded uh so it's a it's a reaction to empire but then also
02:02:37.180
nationalism can emerge as a a kind of underling of empire so i i've dwelled on this quite a bit um
02:02:46.560
in in in previous talks but uh so much of the that paradigm of the nation state was in wilsonianism
02:02:54.100
after the first world war and i think it was in many ways a kind of counter vision to bolshevism so
02:03:02.880
after the first world war in the paris peace conference of 1919 mostly remember due to the
02:03:09.800
versailles peace treaty but it was a larger conference where the world was redrawn um there
02:03:16.320
there was bolshevism kind of a over the way and wilson you know who was a professor an intellectual
02:03:24.540
highly sophisticated person was offering a competing vision which was an american order with the nation
02:03:31.440
state as it as it's kind of functioning pieces to it and so poland for instance was revived um uh you had
02:03:41.900
other nation states that were created the um kingdom of croats and serbs and and all of these kinds of
02:03:48.900
things but all of those those things were only possible within an american order so they were only
02:03:55.560
possible underneath an imperial structure they and yes they had the everything everything that's an
02:04:03.860
ideal has some basis in reality obviously i believe there's a a sense of checkness that that exists and
02:04:11.500
there was a sense of a concept of of germanness that existed you know well before the germany was
02:04:21.440
unified through prussia um so there's a real basis for everything but but there these things can only
02:04:28.020
come into reality in a certain way when when when powers in a way desire it and are willing to
02:04:35.840
articulate it as such and so all of this talk of of nationalism it's like you're they're they're
02:04:42.300
embracing these these paradigms that historically only came into being in imperial scenarios
02:04:49.240
and so they're they're just they're kind of in say i i i would kind of suggest that there's no real
02:04:57.720
basis for these things and and they're thus by singing the praises of the nation or something or
02:05:03.360
talking about how we would all respect one another don't tread on me i won't tread on you
02:05:07.500
it is just kind of intellectual masturbation at the end of the day because it doesn't it's blind
02:05:14.020
to its historical reality and it's blind to the just the power realities that have to exist
02:05:20.800
in these cases no i agree i agree i agree with everything you said there yeah spot on
02:05:26.980
russia is also interesting i mean what what is russia's and it's it's a huge geographic space
02:05:33.920
that has to be managed by um some kind of imperial force and and you have to push people
02:05:41.540
uh all over the place in order to kind of protect the borders of of this big thing very very similar
02:05:48.980
it's russia and the united states are are um very similar in that way they're kind of inherently
02:05:54.420
imperial um we had this idea of you know go west young man you know keep going to the frontier so that
02:06:02.200
we can control this continent and it's it's it's a very different perspective to say a a prussian
02:06:11.960
who's like you know we need we need to guard our little plot here and we've got enemies on all sides
02:06:17.100
and so on even you know frederick jackson turner pointed this out and i i think it's one of the most
02:06:22.160
brilliant observations i've ever read in fact it's that the frontier that that word frontier which
02:06:29.820
exists in plenty of european languages it means the opposite in american english that it does in
02:06:37.440
in its european context so if you think of like um what is it um uh doctors without borders uh it's
02:06:46.100
it's medicine medicine sans frontières they mean it in the sense of doctors going across borders
02:06:53.400
that notion of the frontier is a line that separates you from a potential hostile enemy
02:06:58.780
in american english frontier means the exact opposite frontier means an open space that you can go out
02:07:08.420
into frontier in the american context means an open space that you can go out into and conquer
02:07:15.660
as opposed to a line that separates you from your enemy so there in that sense uh the american
02:07:23.400
mentality was fundamentally different than a european mentality and you know and you can view
02:07:30.080
that through language so anyway that that's that that's kind of going in a different direction but um
02:07:37.800
but i i do think the united states and russia kind of have similar uh sentiments in that sense
02:07:44.200
yeah absolutely yeah i'd i'd agree i've talked about the frontier the frontier as a fundamental american
02:07:54.340
idea um as well i mean what one of the what a huge i mean i'm gonna i'm gonna have to go in a minute by
02:08:00.120
the way richard because my i have to do my show but um one of the things that has really uh struck me
02:08:06.460
is about a difference uh between europeans and americans when it comes when it comes to the idea of the
02:08:12.820
frontier is the whole is the whole idea of white flight which we were talking about earlier on right
02:08:18.940
yeah this idea that you just get up and leave and go and lead somewhere else uh i i read a statistic
02:08:25.440
before that the average american i think moves 14 times in their lifetime which which seems like
02:08:31.880
extraordinarily high to me um whereas of course in this country you just can't do that right you have
02:08:38.600
to like you know this village which has been here for like 800 years i mean there isn't another one
02:08:44.540
you can't just pick up on you you can't just drive 200 miles down there there is no 200 miles doing so
02:08:51.220
you have to kind of stay here um i'm not saying white flight doesn't happen in europe obviously it does
02:08:56.180
i'm just saying that it's um it seems like a fundamentally american idea and i don't a lot a lot of what i think
02:09:03.280
happens at the moment and i this is why i think there's uh i guess increased anti-american sentiment
02:09:10.440
in europe at the moment is that because america is a is a kind of global hegemon in a strange way
02:09:16.900
it exports its own forms tries to like we start reproducing itself yeah in in places where some of
02:09:24.680
its kind of basic assumptions are alien um and uh this is kind of what i think this has been happening
02:09:33.340
where it's trying to remake europe in its own in its own image in a way uh but yeah anyway i go on
02:09:43.760
sorry no johnny i i i i i'm currently in italy i grew up in the u.s but i moved to italy because my
02:09:49.940
family's here and i can attest to that that you sort of see this amorphous blob of like american
02:09:56.060
ideology being imported and it's like completely alien to the continent does that make sense
02:10:01.640
just like some of the political ideologies even even in the right wing here you just see them sort
02:10:08.560
of like importing this like american brand of ideology and it's completely strange it's very
02:10:14.160
strange because it hasn't taken but they're making attempts to do it yeah i mean and the most the
02:10:21.820
most visible one is the is is is the racial politics i mean especially in a country like italy or germany
02:10:27.260
whatever the the racial politics of those places or even in this country um are different you know we
02:10:34.640
don't have the the kind of it's just a different um just a different understanding of all of these
02:10:42.520
things so when that when they start getting in when they start being imported here um it has a kind
02:10:50.720
of different flavor and i i think that's it basically ends up with a kind of resentment of a you know it's
02:10:56.280
just like well this is not us this is being brought here by you know uh by the hegemon which is which is
02:11:03.680
why which is why i actually think that you as time goes on we'll see even more increased anti-american
02:11:09.060
sentiment from um the europeans as they get less out less ostensibly out of the deal um yeah
02:11:17.340
they need to sort of get out from under in europe they really need to get out from under
02:11:22.500
because i mean it seems like being america's friend is worse than being its enemy at this point if
02:11:28.340
you're sitting in europe quite frankly so i just well i mean from the american point of view there has to
02:11:34.620
be a better offering to to something i agree yeah but i i kind of disagree with this i i think we're
02:11:40.600
i i think there are a lot of there there are many forces that are bringing us together i i think the
02:11:48.380
russia ukraine conflict is is certainly one of them um i i think we're gonna do this together
02:11:55.860
actually and i i i think there i i do think that there needs to be something new but um i i i don't
02:12:05.180
i i i've heard this as well from from right wingers and and so on of you know if only europe could get
02:12:12.540
out from under america then it would just be like crazy nationalism would just immediately rise or think
02:12:19.040
i i i don't i don't buy that and i you know you have to you kind of have to wonder about europe i
02:12:25.940
mean understandably and and i think we should show a lot of sympathy towards the absolute devastation
02:12:32.820
of both world wars uh on the european population um the the russian experience is incredible a very
02:12:41.860
large percentage of young men through a few generations just don't simply exist
02:12:47.760
uh but why is it that you haven't been able to get out from under american idea americanism i mean
02:12:56.040
is it just the military bases or is it also the fact that we're in your heads and that we offer a
02:13:02.900
more even today and and i've i've said i've stated flatly that i think we're we're losing it we're we're
02:13:09.280
we're not you know we're we're too inter returning to ourselves and so on but like there there's there
02:13:15.680
needs to be what is the european vision that is more powerful than americanism what is it
02:13:23.520
right i mean i could tell you i mean the leadership here i mean really isn't better than the leadership
02:13:29.620
in the u.s i mean the political class here is just utterly incompetent these people have no vision
02:13:33.880
um they just sort of it's sort of a very sterile type of ideology quite frankly and um yeah i just don't
02:13:42.880
know where it's headed especially italy um it's sort of depressing sometimes just watching these
02:13:46.820
people on television i i always um i i'm gonna have to go in a minute but i always remember reading
02:13:52.900
the uh a neocon book from back in the early 2000s um by a chap called robert kagan i'm sure you're
02:14:02.040
familiar with it it's called uh mars and venus right yeah um it was paradise and power of paradise and power
02:14:07.720
it was called where where it basically argued that since the second world war europeans have got to
02:14:13.400
live um uh in in a post-modern paradise right um which is underpinned by american power which means
02:14:22.680
that americans have to live in the real world of like realpolitik or even you know macked politic
02:14:29.240
like power politics um and european basically just gets it like sit around being decadent basically
02:14:36.800
talking about whatever and going to anti-war process and so on um now even though i'm not a
02:14:43.560
neocon um uh i do think there's still an underlying truth to that analysis and you know to use the
02:14:52.340
language of spengler or time b europe as a whole has basically withdrawn from world history uh since
02:15:00.960
the second world war and it hasn't re-entered the stage yet i mean i don't know if it will re-enter the
02:15:06.020
stage but um you know at some point maybe europe will be back and we'll we'll come back to world
02:15:12.180
history but at the moment the stage is america's and you know to the extent that any european nations
02:15:19.040
have a place on it i mean you know that there's there's a kind of bit part for various british
02:15:24.640
players i suppose as a as a kind of supporting act or whatever but uh really this is america's show at
02:15:30.860
the moment um so i mean in my mind the political leadership of uh most of europe you might as well
02:15:40.400
be talking about uh i don't know the the african political leadership under the under the british
02:15:47.020
empire or something like that right they're not you know these are the leaders yeah these are
02:15:52.700
spineless people a lot of them quite frankly yeah well i would you know the other thing i would say
02:15:59.460
too is that um i mean i think that america is i i think it's correct we are the empire in the world
02:16:06.300
as you've described um and i think that we're also the kind of natural seat of the next
02:16:12.780
phase or transformation of the american empire but of a kind of western global empire right so i like to
02:16:21.040
think of us as not um exclusively americanists and um and i like to think also of europe kind of
02:16:29.360
sharing our destiny but of us being part of the same kind of global destiny as it were
02:16:34.920
um but that's you know i don't know if that and i don't think that that's just rhetoric i think that's
02:16:40.860
i think that it would be intelligent for us to kind of include all those elements and to kind of break
02:16:46.520
down those barriers and to include them as part of our project i mean i think it would be a kind of
02:16:51.840
sound intelligent and diplomatic uh gesture certainly um but i also i think it'd be a kind
02:16:59.260
of reconnecting with our brothers in europe um and uh i i'm against uh so in other words the
02:17:08.120
apollonian project as it were is a globalist project so it's something that goes beyond america
02:17:13.460
now we're americans uh primarily um you know there are european apollonians as well um and again this
02:17:21.560
could be the sort of seat of change or transformation that we're seeking um but uh i you know i if if it
02:17:29.700
were to happen in europe through some fluke or uh then i would be happy i would be equally happy with