Yankee Go Home!
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
164.86035
Summary
In this episode, the panel discusses Yoram Shavuosi's trip to Europe and his attempt to Americanize European nationalism, and why this is a bad idea. The panel is moderated by Tyler Cowen and Alex Blumberg.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Final issue, Yankee Go Home. The panel discusses Yoram Hazoni and his attempt to Americanize
00:00:08.040
European nationalism. Hazoni. All right, we'll just jump right into it. February 4th, Rome,
00:00:17.840
Italy. There is a major conference on national conservatism. I guess my first question is,
00:00:26.660
I mean, certainly we will be invited. I mean, we're some of the major nationalist thinkers on the
00:00:35.400
scene. I mean, perhaps even Ed Dutton is guest of honor. No, psych, nothing like that is happening.
00:00:44.680
This is the latest attempt by a man named Yoram Hazoni, who actually recently published a book
00:00:55.140
on in defense of nationalism. And he had a major event in Washington, D.C. at the Ritz-Carlton,
00:01:03.600
in which, among others, John Bolton and Tucker Carlson and some collected paleo-conservatives
00:01:09.580
attended. And now he is going on the tour of Europe. And none less than Prime Minister Victor
00:01:17.900
Orban and Matteo Salvini from Italy, who I guess is out of power now, but will be in attendance.
00:01:25.760
I'll just mention this real quickly. I was obviously being sarcastic when I said that we would be
00:01:30.960
invited. I'm sure we would be expelled if we got within 10 feet of the conference. But as many of
00:01:40.020
you will remember, and I don't want to make this all about me, but I do think this is significant.
00:01:45.180
In 2014, I actually co-organized a conference in Budapest, Hungary. And it was a kind of pan-European
00:01:56.100
event. There were many nationalists and identitarians who were invited, some interesting controversial
00:02:04.000
figures as well, who were all meeting in Budapest. Everything was going well. And about a week before
00:02:10.840
the event, it became a big thing in the press in Hungary. And Victor Orban denounced it. We had all
00:02:19.480
these things canceled. We went through with it. And so most of the attendees were actually there. We got
00:02:26.940
to meet up in a pub. But we were being surveilled by the Hungarian police. And I ended up spending a
00:02:33.540
weekend in a Hungarian prison. It was quite an ordeal. The prison life was interesting. I'm glad I
00:02:42.760
went through with it. But it was a real, genuine attempt to have... I mean, it wasn't even a rally.
00:02:49.460
I mean, it was an academic conference. It was obviously peaceful and lawful. We were tourists in a
00:02:56.260
foreign land. But it was cracked down upon hard. And by Victor Orban, who is viewed by many as a savior
00:03:05.100
of Europe. Now he is the guest of honor at this kind of conference that it's the conference that
00:03:12.080
would or should have been our event. And now he's speaking at a conference that is, you know, hosted
00:03:20.200
by this Israeli Hebraic scholar. And it seems to me to be an attempt at Americanization. The subtitle
00:03:31.540
of the conference is God Honor Country, President Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II, and the Freedom
00:03:37.360
of Nations. It is an attempt to basically integrate European nationalism within an American context.
00:03:49.980
And I have to be honest, I find it all rather sad. So Tyler, you've talked a lot about Hazoni. What do
00:04:01.360
you think about this event? Yeah, well, I got two points to make. The first point is that Hazoni
00:04:07.360
has explicitly stated that his project is to claim nationalism from the distant right and put out a
00:04:13.660
deracialized version of it. Now, if you read the book, The Virtue of Nationalism that he put out,
00:04:18.960
he contains extended arguments for the interests of Israel and expansionism, as well as arguments
00:04:25.680
that could be interpreted in favor of the American unilateral order. And so while he argues in the book
00:04:31.980
that I'm trying to overthrow a global liberalism in which everything is the same, he still argues that
00:04:38.020
in order to have a nationalism, and he doesn't say it this way, of course, but it's still a global order of
00:04:43.620
nation states that needs to be enforced. And so there's arguments in there, you know, some nation
00:04:48.120
might not be quite ready to be nationalist, so we're going to have to give him that little push.
00:04:52.540
And so he inserts within his political realism, a certain amount of intervention that could be
00:04:58.720
justified and taken to be an American internationalist line, right? And the second point I would make is that
00:05:06.860
when it comes to this conference, I saw you had a debate, it was yesterday about this conference,
00:05:12.360
and it was about whether or not Hezoni is being successful. And the point came up, well, his book
00:05:16.660
is not outselling, say, Bronze Age Pervert. But the fact of the matter is, it doesn't matter. And the
00:05:22.520
reason it doesn't matter is because he is clearly speaking to elites and people actually make the
00:05:27.940
decisions in these countries. And he's pushing a petty divide and conquer little nation state model,
00:05:33.740
which is not going to be an effective bulwark against American power. It's dividing Europe
00:05:38.600
further into these little nation states that are not going to be able to uphold any defense against
00:05:43.040
that system. And in fact, if you don't deal with the American problem first, any nationalism you're
00:05:47.680
going to put is either going to be subservient to America, or if you don't want to go along with
00:05:52.280
American imperial interests, then you're going to get destroyed, probably economically. So he's clearly
00:05:59.180
successful. He's speaking to elites. It doesn't matter how famous or well known he is in the
00:06:03.600
media or how his books are doing. But he is speaking to the people that make decisions and
00:06:07.760
the people that we want to incentivize. He's pushing us out of the discourse.
00:06:12.500
Yes, we have been deplatformed. I mean, I MPI hosted three or four, I guess, four major conferences
00:06:20.900
in Washington, DC. We had, you know, Guillaume Fay, Alain de Benoit, myself, you know, all these
00:06:28.660
other people speaking at these events that were actually quite hoity-toity or fairly expensive.
00:06:34.120
We were in the nation's capital, suit and tie, really serious events. You know, I attempted a
00:06:40.860
pan-European event, which was not about integrating a bunch of nation states into the American order,
00:06:46.140
but was about the future of Europe, Europe as an independent force, even as a countervailing force
00:06:53.280
to the United States. All of these things have, in some way, been deplatformed. And the person
00:07:01.000
who is doing, I mean, again, I'm speaking from jealousy, you could say doing what I should be
00:07:06.540
doing, is having some level of success. And so there are two ways of dealing with the dissident
00:07:14.240
right. The first is the hard way. And that is, we deplatform them. We call them all Nazi lunatics.
00:07:22.100
We, you know, basically try to demoralize them and just erase them from the sphere.
00:07:29.620
Hazoni is taking a much more insidious, but you could also say brilliant tactic, and that is that
00:07:35.820
we become them. And we integrate them into what we've always wanted to do. So, I mean, at that
00:07:41.920
conference, you had Tucker Carlson. And Tucker Carlson, to his credit, has been, you know, against
00:07:47.900
the Iran, you know, escapade, has said some powerful stuff on demographics and so on. I mean,
00:07:56.560
he's, you know, I'm more critical of Tucker than most, but he's been good. And he's, at the very
00:08:02.160
least, been interesting. He's standing there alongside John Bolton. He's standing there alongside some of
00:08:08.340
these kind of palatable paleo-conservatives, my old colleague Dan McCarthy and those people,
00:08:15.880
people like Paul Gottfried, maybe a little too edgy, was not invited. But it's this ability to
00:08:21.480
absorb those paleo-energies, which were present, the Buchananism, were present in the Donald Trump
00:08:28.760
campaign, and basically integrate them into what they've always wanted to do, which is
00:08:34.960
neoconservative foreign policy, you know, attacking states that are threats to Israel,
00:08:41.200
you know, low taxes and, you know, whatever, but just calling it nationalism now. And he has
00:08:48.260
successfully done that. And now he's looking at Europe again. Do you look at Europe and start
00:08:53.780
freaking out and saying, you know, this is Mussolini and Franco and Hitler on the rise again? Or do you
00:08:59.620
say, actually, they are not nearly that radical and potentially destabilizing? We can kind of absorb
00:09:09.060
them, as opposed to doing the religious right stuff in America, we'll do the Catholic traditionalist
00:09:15.380
stuff in Europe, we'll just kind of put a gloss on it, but we will basically promote Americanism in
00:09:21.920
Europe, we'll just call it nationalism. And the fact that they even mentioned Ronald Reagan,
00:09:27.120
I mean, it's just, I mean, it's just like, I don't know, if someone came to the United States,
00:09:32.580
and, you know, I don't know, did like, created the, I don't know, Conrad Adenauer Society or so,
00:09:38.680
I mean, I just, it's kind of like, get out of town, you know, like, even if I might have some
00:09:44.280
admiration for him, that it's not what we're about. And, you know, this is going to be a movement,
00:09:49.620
ultimately, that calls itself nationalist, that makes evocations of Catholicism, or whatever,
00:09:57.120
but is ultimately about the flat tax, and supporting American foreign policy. I mean,
00:10:02.140
you know, it is a, it's a cynical move on his part, but it's actually quite brilliant. But what
00:10:08.400
they will not integrate is a nation that is has, say, nuclear capabilities, or serious military
00:10:16.300
capabilities, that is in opposition to the American order. So you can be your happy little homeland
00:10:22.820
somewhere, so long as you are under the American umbrella, and to a large extent, the military
00:10:29.840
nuclear umbrella. The second you start messing with that, the second you're, you, you are a threat
00:10:36.440
to America and potentially support states that are threats to Israel, you are, again, literally Hitler
00:10:43.480
and a Nazi, and Hazoni will not invite you to a conference. So, I mean, this is what's happening.
00:10:51.160
I'm, you know, as I said, I'm jealous to some degree, in the sense that these are the kind of
00:10:55.400
pan-European events that we should be having. But I also see through it. And I think it's also like,
00:11:03.420
look at these people, there's a lot of, you know, fanboying of Viktor Orban, and, and other people
00:11:10.420
like that among the dissident right. And I think we should actually, in Matteo Salvini, I think we
00:11:16.640
should start to view these people much more skeptically. And this is just a sign that that
00:11:25.620
Yes, I think, I think that Salvini and particularly Viktor Orban have got a difficult tightrope to
00:11:31.800
walk, because they can't, they've got, for the good of their country's economies, and therefore their
00:11:36.140
own political interests, they've got to come across as reasonably cooperative with, with the,
00:11:41.520
well, frankly, the left, but whatever, let's call it the neoconservants, the neoconservants,
00:11:45.280
whatever. But, but, but on the other hand, I think there's a degree in which they know what
00:11:49.460
they want. And that, and that balance was struck as well with, with your conference. So I'm not too
00:11:54.280
concerned about that. I think maybe, maybe someone like Orban thinks it's good optics to go to
00:11:58.160
something like that. As for this guy, what's his name? The writer of the, Hazoni, yes. So I was
00:12:04.940
looking at his book, and he clearly explicitly states that nationalism is about what he calls
00:12:09.380
a tribe. Well, a tribe is inherently a genetic thing, a tribe, but that's, that's, it's a bunch
00:12:14.740
of clans. And then, of course, since then, because it doesn't look very good to say that, he's kind
00:12:19.720
of gone back on that. And now he talks about this concept of civic nationalism, and even Israel
00:12:24.600
not being an ethno state, and Israel being absolutely preposterous, if you think about
00:12:30.840
the way that the Ethiopian Jews are treated in Israel, and are not regarded as part of,
00:12:37.140
truly part of the ethno state. Of course, it's an ethno state. And consistent with that, Judaism
00:12:42.260
is generally by ethnic descent, rather than conversion. They don't accept conversion to converts to come
00:12:47.980
and live in the state of Israel. So that's nonsense. So again, as this whole phrase again, having
00:12:52.480
good cake and eating it, whatever you want to say, that he, he obviously supports Israel to be
00:12:57.340
an ethno state, but all other countries to be a civic nationalist state.
00:13:02.540
And it goes a little bit further, because one interesting thing in his book, and I don't,
00:13:07.220
I don't completely disagree with him. But an interesting thing in this book is that he
00:13:10.900
promotes the concept of nationalism as Judaic, as emanating from the Old Testament and being
00:13:17.700
opposed to Babel, which is an empire. And I actually don't even fully disagree. But the move
00:13:24.020
he's making is to place that little meme in the mind of any nationalist. Don't get out of hand.
00:13:32.240
Remember, everything that you're doing is Judaic. It's biblical. It's Judeo-Christian. And that you
00:13:39.840
can't have a coherent nationalism without recognizing that, because we Jews invented it. You know,
00:13:44.820
we invented the left, we also invented the right, and we invented the center, and we invented the
00:13:49.160
margin. And it's this kind of way of saying that, you know, you're being Jewish by being a nationalist,
00:13:56.660
and you have something at stake in Israel by being a nationalist. So it's this thing that's actually
00:14:03.240
not new. It's this kind of Judeo-Christian right, the anti-Islam right that we saw throughout the Bush
00:14:09.500
administration. It's being kind of, you know, reinvented here. But I would just, you know,
00:14:14.700
point this out. One thing that I gained from reading his book is that, to be frank, we've got
00:14:21.320
to get away from just pure tribalism. And we need to become Babel. And empire is good. And the way you
00:14:31.340
affect geopolitics is that you are a bigger group, a powerful state that can be badass and force your
00:14:40.000
will on the world. And that's not going to happen through little nation states without military
00:14:44.940
capabilities of a couple million people. I'm sorry, it's not gonna happen. He's pointing out
00:14:52.380
a threat, which is very interesting. He's pointing out the threat and attempting to neutralize it.
00:14:58.560
And I think we can kind of learn from our enemies in this sense.
00:15:01.380
That's true. That's true. The other thing is there's no, I mean, them calling themselves
00:15:04.920
nationalists is like one of these researchers like Gardner saying, oh, everyone has a different
00:15:08.940
kind of intelligence. It just means the concept of intelligence becomes meaningless and another
00:15:12.360
word is found. It's the same with nationalists. For them to call themselves nationalists, I was
00:15:15.480
looking into one of the groups that's involved in organizing this is a group called the Beau
00:15:19.160
Group. And this is a group that's based on the left of the Conservative Party. So former
00:15:26.280
chairmen include Leon Britton, who was Home Secretary under Margaret Thatcher, on the left of the
00:15:31.040
Conservative Party. Christopher Brockelbant Fowler, who defected from the Conservative Party to the
00:15:36.380
Social Democrats, which was a Labour breakaway group. Sam Guima, who was a Conservative MP who
00:15:42.520
then defected to the Liberal Democrats a couple of last year or a couple of years ago. So this is the
00:15:47.660
left of the Conservative Party, not just the right of the Conservatives, the left of the Conservative
00:15:51.760
Party. So there's nothing nationalistic about this. This is just conservatism dressed up in a
00:15:57.420
word that might possibly be attractive. Right. And they'll come up with another word in 10 years.
00:16:04.500
Oh, yeah. Identitarian. They'll even, they might even take identitarianism. I mean, it's just,
00:16:08.980
yeah, it's just putting, you know, it's like these debates with, there was this debate between Brett
00:16:15.480
Stevens and, and Harzoni, and it's, they're both just fighting for Israel. They're just like using
00:16:23.440
different words, you know, for like, what's good for Israel. It's just, it's not much of a debate.
00:16:38.440
Yeah, I was just gonna say the arguments in the book are fairly weak. I mean, I know,
00:16:42.400
for example, he talks about the tribe, and Ed said, okay, well, there's a genetic basis there.
00:16:46.200
But in the same book, he actually says he doesn't mean race. Like, he explicitly states that. He
00:16:51.320
says, okay, but you can also allow outsiders in, and they can become integrated into the tribe. And
00:16:55.740
so he does make that argument. And in many ways, there's parts of the book that are exceptionally
00:17:00.620
weak. But as Richard was saying, there's also parts of the book, where what he doesn't say ends up
00:17:05.580
making a stronger argument, for example, in favor of empire. I mean, he's arguing for an order of
00:17:09.680
nation states. At the end of the day, that is still an imperial order that's coming from somewhere.
00:17:13.640
And when you start getting into the realistic aspects of actually enforcing that, which he
00:17:18.380
does get into at the end of the book, so it starts looking more like an empire.
00:17:22.100
Who's the kahuna of the globe? Like, you know, you can have all these nation states, but at some
00:17:28.300
point, there's going to be that exceptional actor who enforces the borders of the nation. So, you know,
00:17:34.260
in order for there to be a league of nations, there has to be a superpower that can prevent,
00:17:39.720
you know, border disputes and, you know, wars, and etc. And, you know, who is that going to be?
00:17:46.220
So at the end of the day, Hezoni is just reinforcing the American order. And there's going to be a big
00:17:53.900
kahuna on the planet, which is going to be Washington or, you know, in competition with the
00:17:58.380
Soviet Union, now Washington alone. And you can have all these little nation states in the big
00:18:03.600
kahuna's shadow. And that is what he's won. That is what he ultimately wants, even though he's not
00:18:11.520
Yeah, I was going to say, there's a symmetry here between what we were talking about earlier with
00:18:15.300
the woke left versus the Bernie crowd. And now that they adopt a similar language, and they're
00:18:19.760
fighting over what that struggle actually is. Well, that's the same thing we're in here
00:18:23.460
with national conservatism, is they're adopting our language, but then they're
00:18:27.660
moving, kicking us out of our spaces and taking the attention. And so there needs to be, I think,
00:18:32.480
a stronger critical effort on our part to actually write books and combat this and hold conferences
00:18:38.120
and combat this. And there's no way that you can combat this without entering into the arena
00:18:45.600
Well, maybe we should hold a big conference in Jerusalem.
00:18:58.860
But yeah, I think that would be the analog to what he's doing, holding it in Rome. I think
00:19:05.000
the Rome aspect is utterly shocking. But we'll see.