Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 12, 2020


Episode 1025 Scott Adams: Why the Protests are a Huge Success, How to Solve Racism


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 3 minutes

Words per Minute

153.66226

Word Count

9,770

Sentence Count

266

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

In this episode of the podcast, I sit down with a friend to talk about racism and white privilege. We talk about the term "white privilege" and why it's an insult to white people, and how it should be banned.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, come on in.
00:00:16.280 Have you been feeling a little bit tense lately?
00:00:20.900 Are you feeling that your world is spitting apart?
00:00:25.220 Well, boy, did you come to the right place at the right time.
00:00:28.900 Well, because I'm going to tell you how everything is way better than you think it is.
00:00:34.900 Way, way better.
00:00:36.840 I'm going to tell you how everything is going to work out fine.
00:00:40.880 Because it will.
00:00:42.860 And I'm going to tell you how the country is going to come out stronger fairly quickly.
00:00:49.240 But first, we've got to get ready.
00:00:52.320 Got to get ready for all of this.
00:00:54.140 And one way to do it is with a simultaneous sip.
00:00:57.280 Yes.
00:00:58.220 And all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:01:05.900 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:01:07.800 I like coffee.
00:01:09.360 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:01:16.880 From the pandemic to the economy, to racism, you name it.
00:01:22.720 It's getting better as we sip.
00:01:24.740 Simultaneous sip coming at you now.
00:01:26.640 Go.
00:01:30.940 Yes.
00:01:31.680 Yes.
00:01:32.000 So, let's start out with a few little items here.
00:01:40.040 On Twitter, I was just teasing this Periscope.
00:01:45.060 And if you wondered why I say, you know where to find me, instead of providing a link, does anybody know why I do that?
00:01:53.580 So, on Twitter, when I tell people that I'm going to be on Periscope, I don't tell them where to find me.
00:02:00.560 I just say, you know where to find me.
00:02:03.020 And if you look at the comments, people are saying, where do I find you?
00:02:06.540 Where do I find you?
00:02:07.360 Now, this, of course, is a persuasion slash marketing technique.
00:02:13.340 Because I'm trying to make people think that there's some exclusivity about it.
00:02:19.620 And there is.
00:02:21.000 There is.
00:02:21.600 It's real.
00:02:22.580 Because if you don't know where to find me, you can't find me.
00:02:27.760 So, it's not that hard.
00:02:29.100 All they'd have to do is Google it or ask somebody on Twitter.
00:02:32.540 But I like making it a little bit hard.
00:02:34.740 So, I intentionally don't tell people how to find me.
00:02:38.780 I make them work at it a little bit.
00:02:40.860 Now, if you can make somebody work at it a little bit, and then they find you,
00:02:45.280 the odds of feeling like they want to continue watching you are much higher.
00:02:51.160 So, that's a little marketing trick for you.
00:02:53.740 Now, that wouldn't work if you weren't already popular in some way.
00:02:59.280 So, you don't want to make it hard to find you if you're not desirable to find, right?
00:03:08.260 So, you have to have something about you that makes people curious.
00:03:12.500 And then, in some cases, you could use that trick of acting like you're a little bit hard to find.
00:03:17.780 All right.
00:03:22.000 I would like to continue pointing out, for anybody who hasn't heard it yet,
00:03:26.020 that the phrase white privilege is, in my opinion, an insult to white people and should be banned.
00:03:33.080 So, that's my version of the N-word.
00:03:35.140 While I am completely on board with not using offensive terms that any group finds offensive,
00:03:43.900 and they let you know, hey, don't use that term, totally on board with that.
00:03:48.460 A hundred percent, by the way.
00:03:49.960 There's no joke.
00:03:51.380 If somebody is offended by a certain phrase or words, why in the world would I want to use them?
00:03:57.800 How would that help me?
00:03:59.780 There's nothing in it for me to insult people for no reason.
00:04:03.760 And I would like to request the same respect.
00:04:10.240 So, in my opinion, the phrase white privilege implies that somebody who succeeds and they're white
00:04:17.260 maybe didn't deserve it, which is just offensive.
00:04:23.460 So, I can't make anybody say anything.
00:04:27.000 Of course, you have freedom of speech, so you can do anything you want.
00:04:29.420 But in terms of information, I think it'd be helpful for people to know that when I hear the term white privilege,
00:04:38.160 and I would imagine this is common, but you can speak for yourselves.
00:04:41.840 I don't speak for anybody else.
00:04:44.360 That white privilege is an offensive term.
00:04:47.160 It's just completely offensive.
00:04:48.380 Now, that's not to say there isn't something to it.
00:04:52.180 Things can be true and offensive at the same time.
00:04:55.200 Would you agree?
00:04:56.580 Would you agree that we're not talking whether it's true?
00:05:00.940 Because things can be true and offensive.
00:05:03.940 There's nothing, there's no conflict there.
00:05:05.800 All right, there are five days left in my one-week challenge for somebody to explain to me in a coherent way
00:05:15.820 what systemic racism is with a current example.
00:05:20.660 So, it's the example part that's the fun part.
00:05:24.260 I've had, as we went through this yesterday, people will give you analogies,
00:05:28.560 they'll give you historical examples that don't apply, like redlining, things that are currently illegal.
00:05:34.220 They'll tell you that there are statistical differences, let's say, in education and incarceration.
00:05:42.800 And those things are all true, but they don't seem to get towards systemic, as I understand the word.
00:05:50.480 So, we're still waiting for that.
00:05:52.500 At the end of the week, well, let's say, here's what we've learned already.
00:05:57.300 So, I cannot yet conclude that it doesn't exist.
00:06:03.200 That there's no such thing as systemic racism.
00:06:06.940 In fact, I would assume, just based on living, I would assume that there are examples of it.
00:06:15.680 And that those examples are perfectly clear.
00:06:18.780 And when presented to me, even I would say, being skeptical as I am,
00:06:23.720 that even I would say, oh yeah, that's a pretty good example.
00:06:26.080 I'm with you, I see that.
00:06:29.900 But I'm not getting it, weirdly enough.
00:06:33.100 I expect it, because there's still five days left, so I would expect this would not be hard.
00:06:37.720 But here's what we know for sure.
00:06:39.060 So, it is way too soon to say anything like that systemic racism doesn't exist.
00:06:50.840 So, I'm not making that claim.
00:06:52.740 Way too early to say that, because there's five days left of the test.
00:06:57.640 What we can say with complete certainty, though, is that people don't agree what it is,
00:07:01.980 and there's no common definition.
00:07:05.200 Would you say that?
00:07:06.280 Would you say that we can say with some certainty
00:07:08.560 that the idea of systemic racism,
00:07:12.680 separate from the question of whether it exists at all,
00:07:15.980 I assume it does.
00:07:16.900 I'm just waiting for better explanations.
00:07:19.060 But we can conclude that people don't agree what it is.
00:07:23.780 If you ask for examples, it'll be all over the board.
00:07:26.960 Most of them will not be something that somebody else would say,
00:07:29.860 well, that's not so systemic.
00:07:32.220 That's just an example of somebody being a racist.
00:07:35.700 And we all know that exists.
00:07:37.240 There's no debate on whether or not racism exists.
00:07:43.540 So, we're still waiting on that.
00:07:45.280 So, we'll see how that goes.
00:07:46.740 Have you seen the, there's a new viral video going around
00:07:53.240 about coronavirus and hydroxychloroquine and vitamin C and ventilators.
00:07:58.620 And there's, many of you have seen it by now.
00:08:01.460 And it features an interview with one,
00:08:04.820 or at least the part that I saw,
00:08:06.580 was one very charismatic nurse.
00:08:09.680 I think she's a nurse, based on the context.
00:08:12.600 Now, I say charismatic because that's a big part of what makes this video so viral.
00:08:20.240 The person who's doing the talking and being interviewed,
00:08:24.700 the person we assume is a nurse,
00:08:26.420 she's not wearing nurse clothes.
00:08:28.280 Oh, yeah, but I think there was a follow-up that confirmed she's a nurse.
00:08:32.240 Anyway, she's saying, among other things,
00:08:34.760 her claim is that ventilator misuse is killing people.
00:08:40.400 We're primed to think that's true.
00:08:43.020 She says hydroxychloroquine, I think with zinc,
00:08:46.720 basically works every time.
00:08:48.820 Meaning that in her experience,
00:08:52.980 every person who's gotten it has lived.
00:08:54.880 That doesn't mean it's true, right?
00:08:59.640 So it's very important.
00:09:00.720 It doesn't mean it's true.
00:09:02.540 But there is a video of one nurse saying that
00:09:05.260 she's seen lots and lots of people come through
00:09:07.940 because she works in that area with the coronavirus.
00:09:11.460 And we don't know which hospital,
00:09:13.040 but according to her,
00:09:15.140 the hydroxychloroquine works basically every time
00:09:17.800 in the narrow sense of keeping you from dying.
00:09:23.060 That is not a clinical study.
00:09:25.880 Here's what I would say about that.
00:09:28.580 I don't find it credible, okay?
00:09:32.820 And I think that you could easily be fooled
00:09:35.420 because the nurse in the video who's being interviewed
00:09:39.380 is insanely charismatic,
00:09:42.480 as in you wonder why she's not working in the movie business.
00:09:46.960 So there's something a little too perfect about her
00:09:50.300 in this context.
00:09:52.220 She's just a little bit too good on camera.
00:09:54.880 So that part makes me think that maybe
00:09:59.540 it's getting more attention than it would just for the details.
00:10:04.020 But secondly,
00:10:05.120 I just don't see the statistical scientific weight behind it.
00:10:12.660 It's purely anecdotal.
00:10:14.520 And it feels like it agrees too much
00:10:17.320 with what a lot of people would want to hear.
00:10:20.320 So here's my bottom line to this.
00:10:24.640 I'm not going to say that any of it is wrong
00:10:27.220 because I don't know.
00:10:29.280 It could be that everything she says is completely accurate.
00:10:32.400 And actually, she comes off as being honest,
00:10:37.060 which is different from being right.
00:10:39.540 So my reading of her as a human being is that she's sincere.
00:10:50.760 And my reading of her as a human is that she's telling the truth as she understands it.
00:10:57.420 So I think she's credible in that sense.
00:10:59.220 But she's also not telling you scientific studies.
00:11:03.880 It's anecdotal.
00:11:05.360 So I would just put this filter on it and say,
00:11:08.680 I just don't trust any of the scientific conclusions,
00:11:12.880 especially when she talked about vitamin C.
00:11:15.720 that just felt like maybe she had gone a little bit further
00:11:21.540 than her anecdotal experience would take her.
00:11:26.280 So just be careful of that one.
00:11:28.400 It's interesting, and I would recommend it.
00:11:31.520 I recommend you watch it if you see it.
00:11:33.580 But just have a little skepticism on that.
00:11:38.380 I've been asked,
00:11:40.060 what would Trump do or should he do in this current situation?
00:11:43.520 If you were the president, what would you do,
00:11:46.900 given all the protests and the temperature of the country, etc.?
00:11:51.820 How would you handle it?
00:11:53.080 Would you do a big speech on bringing the world together?
00:11:58.440 I think most people,
00:12:00.140 if they think the president should do anything,
00:12:03.020 they think he should do some kind of big unifying speech.
00:12:06.880 Here's my opinion of that.
00:12:09.860 It'll only make things worse.
00:12:13.520 Now, should the president make a unifying speech?
00:12:18.100 Kind of has to, right?
00:12:20.580 It's the job of the president.
00:12:22.740 You sort of have to do that.
00:12:25.100 If you don't even try,
00:12:27.860 you're not going to look like much of a president.
00:12:29.980 So I think the president has to make
00:12:31.760 more than one, probably.
00:12:34.840 And I think there's a plan for one comment.
00:12:37.380 Some kind of a unifying speech.
00:12:39.460 But I don't think there's any chance
00:12:41.840 that won't make things worse.
00:12:43.800 Do you?
00:12:45.020 There's nothing the president can say
00:12:46.760 that won't just give his critics new ammunition.
00:12:50.980 Because CNN doesn't need much.
00:12:54.200 What was the one they were doing today?
00:12:58.040 Oh, yeah.
00:13:00.220 So here's something the president said recently
00:13:02.360 that CNN found a criticism with.
00:13:05.560 So the president said this, quote,
00:13:07.680 we have to work together
00:13:08.800 to confront bigotry and prejudice
00:13:10.920 wherever they appear.
00:13:13.060 So far, so good, right?
00:13:15.100 What could you complain about that?
00:13:17.160 Yeah, work together,
00:13:18.160 confront bigotry and prejudice
00:13:19.560 wherever they appear.
00:13:20.860 Good so far.
00:13:22.400 But we'll make no progress
00:13:23.700 and heal no wounds
00:13:24.960 by falsely labeling
00:13:26.560 the tens of millions of decent Americans
00:13:28.460 as racists or bigots,
00:13:30.600 Trump said.
00:13:31.200 So CNN pulls that out
00:13:33.520 and criticizes him
00:13:36.200 for saying that we should not
00:13:37.740 be bigots and prejudiced.
00:13:42.820 That's what he said.
00:13:44.460 Don't be a bigot in any way.
00:13:47.420 Don't be a bigot against black people.
00:13:49.280 Don't be a bigot against Republicans.
00:13:51.060 Just don't be a bigot.
00:13:53.120 And CNN calls that out
00:13:55.980 as a gigantic criticism
00:13:57.540 of how bad he is
00:13:59.600 for not wording it right.
00:14:03.040 Did he not word this right?
00:14:05.000 No, he did.
00:14:05.780 He worded it perfectly
00:14:06.820 because he included everyone.
00:14:09.860 He said, no bigotry,
00:14:11.660 no prejudice.
00:14:12.680 We should work together
00:14:13.840 to get rid of it.
00:14:14.860 And by the way,
00:14:15.560 we should get rid of all of it.
00:14:17.280 Not just most of it.
00:14:18.860 Let's get rid of all of it,
00:14:20.000 including bigotry against
00:14:22.220 Republicans, basically.
00:14:24.520 So is there any chance
00:14:28.340 that if the president
00:14:29.180 did a perfect speech
00:14:31.320 that it would be regarded
00:14:33.540 as a perfect speech?
00:14:34.880 No.
00:14:36.100 No.
00:14:37.200 Even this week,
00:14:38.240 I think three or four times,
00:14:39.540 CNN has repeated
00:14:40.620 the fine people hoax
00:14:42.680 out of Charlottesville
00:14:43.640 as if the president
00:14:45.220 praised neo-Nazis,
00:14:46.660 which didn't happen.
00:14:48.120 The opposite happened.
00:14:49.020 He condemned them.
00:14:50.360 So if you think that
00:14:51.640 saying the right things
00:14:52.980 can help,
00:14:54.380 you haven't been
00:14:55.060 paying attention.
00:14:56.580 Saying the right things
00:14:57.420 won't help at all.
00:14:59.340 It will make things worse.
00:15:01.160 No, he has to do it anyway
00:15:02.220 because, you know,
00:15:04.440 you basically have
00:15:05.260 two bad choices.
00:15:06.800 Say nothing,
00:15:08.220 that's really bad.
00:15:10.140 Say something,
00:15:11.600 still bad,
00:15:12.880 but not as bad
00:15:14.240 as saying nothing.
00:15:15.960 So those are the choices
00:15:18.280 that the smart people
00:15:19.840 are giving the president.
00:15:20.760 Two ways to lose.
00:15:22.140 I don't think he likes that.
00:15:24.160 So instead of
00:15:24.820 two ways to lose,
00:15:26.740 how about something else?
00:15:29.140 How about
00:15:29.660 instead of two ways to lose,
00:15:32.300 we give him
00:15:33.980 a more productive path?
00:15:36.740 And let me suggest this.
00:15:39.540 Suppose the president
00:15:40.580 came out and,
00:15:41.700 you know,
00:15:41.880 he has to say
00:15:42.460 all the right things
00:15:43.140 about coming together.
00:15:44.240 That won't work,
00:15:45.260 but he has to say them.
00:15:47.160 But then suppose
00:15:48.180 he emphasized
00:15:49.100 coming together on data.
00:15:51.260 Interesting, huh?
00:15:55.740 Has anybody done that before?
00:15:57.860 Has any leader said,
00:15:59.540 look,
00:16:00.200 we can't do a thing
00:16:01.780 until we agree on the data.
00:16:04.380 So let's agree on the data.
00:16:06.260 Let's put a whole bunch of work
00:16:08.420 into gathering as much data
00:16:10.760 as we can
00:16:11.320 about institutional,
00:16:13.460 systemic racism,
00:16:15.580 regular racism,
00:16:17.300 cops mistreating anybody.
00:16:19.580 Every cop incident,
00:16:20.880 let's get the,
00:16:21.660 let's get the ethnicity,
00:16:23.440 let's get the city,
00:16:24.460 let's,
00:16:24.880 let's study this thing up.
00:16:26.980 And here's why
00:16:27.900 that's important.
00:16:29.320 I think
00:16:30.280 if we agreed on the data,
00:16:32.680 the problem would go away.
00:16:35.740 Now,
00:16:36.320 not right away,
00:16:37.100 but at least
00:16:37.700 if you had the same data,
00:16:39.280 everybody would be
00:16:39.980 on the same page.
00:16:40.740 The problem is
00:16:42.380 most of the problems
00:16:43.720 in life,
00:16:44.960 almost all of our
00:16:45.920 political problems,
00:16:47.340 they're all because
00:16:48.440 the data is bad.
00:16:50.120 And when I say
00:16:50.820 the data is bad,
00:16:52.600 I mean,
00:16:56.400 when I say the data,
00:16:57.700 I'm going to make a note,
00:16:58.680 somebody said something here
00:17:00.020 I want to get back to.
00:17:00.680 The data is bad
00:17:02.100 for climate science,
00:17:04.680 the data is bad
00:17:05.600 for the economy,
00:17:07.200 the data is bad
00:17:07.960 for racism,
00:17:09.940 the data is bad
00:17:10.840 for who the police
00:17:12.220 are stopping and killing.
00:17:14.040 Basically,
00:17:14.800 every big issue,
00:17:16.980 the data is bad.
00:17:18.480 Right?
00:17:19.300 Can you think of anything
00:17:20.600 that Republicans
00:17:22.400 and Democrats
00:17:23.940 disagree on
00:17:25.100 in which we also
00:17:27.120 agree on the data?
00:17:28.700 I don't know,
00:17:31.700 there might be one,
00:17:32.680 maybe abortion,
00:17:34.760 because I think
00:17:35.280 in abortion
00:17:35.780 we agree on the data,
00:17:38.300 but then people
00:17:40.020 disagree on
00:17:40.660 whether it's a good
00:17:41.260 idea or not.
00:17:42.740 So,
00:17:43.180 but I would say
00:17:44.180 in general,
00:17:45.120 if you look at
00:17:45.740 the things that are
00:17:46.360 most in the headlines
00:17:47.420 recently,
00:17:48.460 it's because we can't
00:17:49.400 agree on the data.
00:17:50.600 So could the president
00:17:51.780 make any headway
00:17:52.960 by saying,
00:17:53.520 look,
00:17:54.320 let's just start
00:17:55.120 where we all agree.
00:17:57.260 is there anybody
00:17:58.840 out there
00:17:59.420 who doesn't think
00:18:00.700 we need to better
00:18:01.500 understand the data
00:18:02.780 when it comes to racism?
00:18:05.180 Raise your hand
00:18:05.980 if you don't want
00:18:06.800 better data.
00:18:07.780 Nobody raises their hand.
00:18:09.560 So you find at least
00:18:10.540 this tiny little thing
00:18:12.280 that you all agree on.
00:18:14.460 We need better data
00:18:15.480 and we should put it
00:18:16.580 all in one place
00:18:17.440 so everybody can look at it
00:18:18.540 and we'll be on the same page.
00:18:20.540 So that's one thing
00:18:21.900 the president could do
00:18:22.800 that I don't think
00:18:23.520 would get pushback.
00:18:25.060 Study it
00:18:25.760 and make sure
00:18:27.200 that there's some
00:18:27.880 real effort
00:18:28.720 and muscle
00:18:29.240 and money
00:18:30.480 behind really
00:18:31.420 understanding it
00:18:32.400 in all of its complexity.
00:18:37.640 Here's another thing
00:18:38.540 the president could do.
00:18:39.660 He could say,
00:18:40.520 as I've been saying,
00:18:42.120 racism is a problem.
00:18:43.280 We should do everything
00:18:43.920 we can do to reduce it.
00:18:45.420 You have to say that.
00:18:46.460 Everybody agrees with that.
00:18:48.020 But you have to also
00:18:49.960 be realistic.
00:18:52.220 We're a certain type
00:18:53.660 of people.
00:18:54.100 We have pattern
00:18:54.860 recognition brains.
00:18:56.200 You're never really
00:18:57.160 going to get rid of it.
00:18:59.220 So you should,
00:19:00.520 in addition to trying
00:19:01.480 to stamp it down
00:19:02.720 or tamp it down
00:19:03.700 to the smallest thing
00:19:04.720 it could be,
00:19:05.600 it's never going to be zero.
00:19:07.480 But you want to get a small.
00:19:08.820 That's good.
00:19:09.820 But in addition,
00:19:10.960 there's an entirely
00:19:11.980 neglected area
00:19:13.540 which is learning
00:19:15.160 how to deal with it.
00:19:17.340 Ideally, you'd want
00:19:18.280 to have none,
00:19:19.400 but you can't get there.
00:19:20.700 I mean, realistically,
00:19:21.460 you can't really get there.
00:19:23.160 Not all the way
00:19:24.220 to no racism.
00:19:25.780 We're humans.
00:19:26.980 Just not going to happen.
00:19:29.100 But you can develop
00:19:30.260 strategies that make it
00:19:32.160 so irrelevant
00:19:34.540 that you barely notice.
00:19:36.420 One of the strategies,
00:19:37.580 for example,
00:19:38.200 is just having
00:19:38.820 a better idea that,
00:19:41.240 let's say,
00:19:41.660 if you're a young black person,
00:19:43.940 to know that corporate America
00:19:45.880 wants to hire you.
00:19:48.380 Strategically,
00:19:48.900 if you developed
00:19:50.060 a skill stack
00:19:51.020 that aimed
00:19:52.340 toward a corporate job,
00:19:54.020 your odds of success
00:19:55.380 are basically 100%.
00:19:57.780 So would you still
00:19:59.600 have racism?
00:20:00.460 Probably.
00:20:01.560 In your daily life?
00:20:02.860 Probably.
00:20:04.440 But would it stop
00:20:05.320 your career?
00:20:06.380 Nope.
00:20:07.120 Your career would do great.
00:20:09.140 Racism isn't going
00:20:10.000 to stop your career
00:20:10.980 if you have
00:20:12.240 the right strategy,
00:20:13.480 if you have
00:20:13.920 a talent stack
00:20:14.660 that works.
00:20:15.900 So the president
00:20:17.420 could tell people
00:20:18.400 to work on strategy
00:20:20.240 and there's a lot
00:20:23.140 that could be done there.
00:20:25.520 He could also emphasize
00:20:27.040 something I'm going
00:20:28.480 to be talking about
00:20:29.180 in a minute.
00:20:30.100 A-B testing.
00:20:30.980 In other words,
00:20:31.880 the president doesn't
00:20:32.880 have to say
00:20:33.480 this is a good idea
00:20:34.600 and this is a bad idea.
00:20:36.240 The president can say,
00:20:38.020 we've got a big country,
00:20:40.240 let's test some stuff.
00:20:42.340 Let's just see what works.
00:20:43.460 Who would be opposed
00:20:45.300 to testing some things small?
00:20:48.900 Just try a town
00:20:50.280 with no police.
00:20:51.880 Just try it.
00:20:52.900 See what happens.
00:20:54.140 Try police
00:20:55.040 plus some other change.
00:20:57.140 Try mostly police
00:20:58.660 but you've also funded
00:20:59.700 some other things.
00:21:01.240 Just try some stuff.
00:21:02.660 Who's against that?
00:21:06.920 All right.
00:21:08.980 Oh, if all goes well,
00:21:11.240 I'll be on Tucker Carlson tonight.
00:21:13.460 So if you want
00:21:14.020 to see more of me,
00:21:15.600 I guess there's a big move
00:21:16.860 to cancel Tucker
00:21:17.880 for all the usual reasons
00:21:21.180 that the left hates anybody.
00:21:25.160 And I guess they're getting
00:21:26.360 some success
00:21:27.420 in getting some of his advertisers
00:21:29.640 to pull back.
00:21:32.000 So far, Fox News
00:21:33.160 is backing him
00:21:33.960 as far as I know.
00:21:34.640 going on Tucker's show
00:21:39.600 at the moment
00:21:40.400 when he's the focus
00:21:42.320 of the entire country's,
00:21:44.220 at least the left,
00:21:45.340 not the entire country,
00:21:46.340 but the left's entire focus
00:21:48.180 of cancellation
00:21:48.860 is Tucker.
00:21:51.020 To go on his show,
00:21:53.600 simply being on his show
00:21:55.320 would be supportive,
00:21:56.320 of course.
00:21:56.820 To go on his show
00:21:59.160 at the very moment
00:22:01.200 the white-hot
00:22:02.220 fire of cancellation
00:22:05.460 is on him
00:22:06.320 is, of course,
00:22:07.560 career suicide
00:22:08.380 on my part,
00:22:09.820 which is what makes
00:22:10.760 it attractive to me.
00:22:11.760 I don't know
00:22:14.920 what's wrong with me.
00:22:16.180 I swear to God
00:22:17.020 I don't know
00:22:17.400 what's wrong with me,
00:22:18.180 but sometimes you need
00:22:19.760 a little danger
00:22:20.460 in your life
00:22:21.120 just to feel alive.
00:22:23.300 Do you ever have
00:22:23.820 that feeling?
00:22:24.980 It's like you really
00:22:25.540 can't go through life
00:22:26.680 with no danger,
00:22:28.780 but everybody has
00:22:29.800 their own preferred
00:22:30.500 kind of danger.
00:22:31.380 I'm not a big fan
00:22:32.540 of extreme sports
00:22:34.660 and physical danger
00:22:35.800 because if you get
00:22:36.780 that wrong
00:22:37.280 you're in big trouble,
00:22:38.760 but I kind of like
00:22:40.240 social danger.
00:22:42.240 Not every kind
00:22:43.400 and not all the time,
00:22:45.160 but now and then
00:22:45.880 there are things
00:22:46.420 that are just so tantalizing
00:22:47.820 and the thought of
00:22:49.620 that I would increase
00:22:51.540 my chance of being canceled
00:22:52.840 just by going on
00:22:53.760 Tucker's show
00:22:54.420 that sealed it for me
00:22:56.740 that I was going to go
00:22:57.720 because I'm turning down
00:22:59.280 most things this summer.
00:23:00.920 Most invitations
00:23:02.640 to go on shows
00:23:03.680 and do interviews
00:23:04.480 I'm going to start
00:23:05.580 turning down
00:23:06.320 just because I have
00:23:07.480 other things to do,
00:23:08.920 but as soon as I realized
00:23:10.880 that Tucker
00:23:11.780 is the focus
00:23:12.500 of all this
00:23:13.120 cancellation energy
00:23:14.660 I thought to myself
00:23:16.120 you know,
00:23:17.260 I'd like to be right
00:23:17.980 in the middle of that.
00:23:20.400 What is wrong with me?
00:23:22.040 There's something wrong
00:23:22.920 with me
00:23:23.160 because I want to be
00:23:23.800 in the middle of that
00:23:24.580 because I want to
00:23:25.820 feel that fire
00:23:27.660 focused on me
00:23:29.520 for a little while
00:23:30.200 just to feel something.
00:23:33.020 It's a weird thing
00:23:33.900 about humans
00:23:34.500 that we need to quit.
00:23:36.700 The first time
00:23:37.400 I ever heard this
00:23:38.020 was my philosophy
00:23:39.560 instructor in college
00:23:41.200 and he talked about
00:23:42.500 how if you have
00:23:43.140 a loose tooth
00:23:43.960 you know when you're a kid
00:23:44.780 you're going to lose a tooth
00:23:45.760 if you wiggle it around
00:23:48.020 it hurts
00:23:48.600 but what do you do
00:23:50.340 all day long
00:23:51.120 if you have a loose tooth?
00:23:53.000 You wiggle it around
00:23:54.220 and it hurts
00:23:55.680 and then you keep
00:23:57.000 wiggling it around
00:23:57.740 and it hurts
00:23:58.180 and there's no
00:23:58.640 nothing good comes from it
00:23:59.860 but it's one of those things
00:24:01.640 that sometimes you can't
00:24:02.800 you just can't help yourself.
00:24:04.060 You go toward pain.
00:24:05.980 I don't know what this is
00:24:06.760 about people.
00:24:07.940 Anyway, so I'll be on that.
00:24:09.680 I don't know the exact time
00:24:10.860 because
00:24:11.600 and it could change.
00:24:13.300 Those of you
00:24:13.960 who have been watching me
00:24:14.680 for a while
00:24:15.100 you know
00:24:15.580 when I go on book tours
00:24:17.160 I get booked on things
00:24:18.680 and I don't like to tell you
00:24:19.920 too far in advance
00:24:21.160 because those things
00:24:22.360 get changed
00:24:23.140 half the time.
00:24:25.640 You know, they get changed
00:24:26.440 so often
00:24:27.160 that
00:24:27.780 you can never guarantee them.
00:24:30.900 All right.
00:24:34.980 Here's some other things
00:24:36.320 that the enemy of the people
00:24:37.520 is telling you.
00:24:42.540 So
00:24:43.020 I guess the
00:24:44.820 the Fed chairman
00:24:46.120 Jerome Powell
00:24:47.260 his remarks
00:24:48.460 made the market
00:24:49.240 go down yesterday
00:24:50.060 and by the way
00:24:51.520 you should always expect
00:24:52.800 there's going to be
00:24:53.400 a 5% pullback.
00:24:55.600 You know
00:24:55.760 anytime the market
00:24:56.600 goes up as much
00:24:57.500 as it has
00:24:58.160 there's pretty much
00:25:00.400 a guarantee
00:25:00.980 that there'll be
00:25:02.380 like a 5% pullback
00:25:03.980 at least once
00:25:05.160 probably more than once
00:25:06.340 today
00:25:07.220 it's
00:25:07.520 some of the
00:25:08.260 pullback
00:25:08.860 was halved
00:25:10.520 but you should expect
00:25:12.260 more of that
00:25:12.780 that's just normal stuff
00:25:13.800 I wouldn't worry about it at all.
00:25:17.540 So they're reporting
00:25:18.640 that the
00:25:19.400 Federal Reserve chairman
00:25:21.060 said
00:25:21.500 that
00:25:22.700 what everyone
00:25:23.720 already knew
00:25:24.460 so
00:25:25.420 according to CNN
00:25:26.340 this is what
00:25:27.180 everyone already knew
00:25:28.280 so ask yourself
00:25:29.580 if this is what
00:25:30.260 you already knew
00:25:30.960 that the global
00:25:32.340 economy is in a bad
00:25:33.300 place
00:25:33.660 and there won't
00:25:34.260 be a quick
00:25:34.880 rebound
00:25:35.380 now
00:25:36.620 what did I tell you
00:25:37.920 about the
00:25:38.900 psychology of
00:25:39.800 economics
00:25:40.440 now it is
00:25:42.580 true
00:25:43.220 that the world
00:25:44.400 economy
00:25:44.860 took a big hit
00:25:46.200 so yes
00:25:47.700 we do all know
00:25:48.480 that
00:25:48.760 but when you're
00:25:50.360 the head of the
00:25:51.180 Federal Reserve
00:25:51.860 and you tell people
00:25:53.220 that there won't be
00:25:54.040 a quick rebound
00:25:55.020 what does quick
00:25:56.720 mean
00:25:57.080 and why do you
00:25:58.580 know that
00:25:59.120 you don't really
00:26:00.620 know that
00:26:01.220 what would be
00:26:02.760 more helpful
00:26:03.380 is to be
00:26:04.300 what Trump is
00:26:05.360 which is
00:26:06.060 a cheerleader
00:26:06.800 because nobody
00:26:08.480 knows if it's
00:26:09.240 going to be good
00:26:09.780 or bad
00:26:10.300 or how quickly
00:26:11.020 it will rebound
00:26:11.720 nobody knows
00:26:12.620 so if you don't
00:26:14.080 know
00:26:14.460 the only smart
00:26:15.720 and responsible
00:26:16.540 thing to say is
00:26:17.580 could be quicker
00:26:18.800 than you think
00:26:19.500 it could be great
00:26:21.520 because it's that
00:26:22.920 optimism that
00:26:23.660 actually fuels it
00:26:24.660 it's what makes
00:26:25.360 it actually
00:26:25.960 capable of working
00:26:27.600 so I would say
00:26:29.200 that the Federal
00:26:29.920 Reserve chair
00:26:30.880 I would call
00:26:32.300 that an error
00:26:33.080 because given
00:26:34.980 that he can't
00:26:35.880 predict
00:26:36.360 he shouldn't
00:26:37.360 and he can't
00:26:38.880 predict how
00:26:39.580 quickly the
00:26:40.240 rebound will
00:26:40.780 happen
00:26:41.100 he can't
00:26:42.280 nobody can
00:26:42.920 it's just
00:26:43.260 unpredictable
00:26:43.940 so to make
00:26:45.400 a prediction
00:26:45.980 about something
00:26:46.700 that's unpredictable
00:26:47.560 and it's a
00:26:49.040 prediction that
00:26:49.620 hurts the outcome
00:26:50.840 well that's
00:26:51.900 just a mistake
00:26:52.700 now Trump
00:26:54.040 also can't
00:26:55.040 predict
00:26:55.420 because nobody
00:26:56.420 can
00:26:56.720 nobody knows
00:26:57.920 where things
00:26:58.340 are going
00:26:58.700 with the economy
00:26:59.440 it's just
00:26:59.900 true all the
00:27:01.200 time with
00:27:01.920 everybody
00:27:02.320 but Trump
00:27:04.120 plays it smart
00:27:05.180 if you don't
00:27:06.580 know where
00:27:06.980 the economy
00:27:07.580 is going
00:27:08.120 and you're
00:27:09.120 a leader
00:27:09.640 head of the
00:27:11.000 head of the
00:27:11.800 National Reserve
00:27:12.920 you know
00:27:13.380 or the Fed
00:27:14.200 I mean
00:27:14.540 of course
00:27:15.500 is a leader
00:27:16.540 of sorts
00:27:17.020 you should
00:27:18.820 talk in
00:27:19.280 optimistic terms
00:27:20.240 even if you're
00:27:20.840 not sure
00:27:21.340 because that's
00:27:22.820 what leadership
00:27:23.400 is
00:27:23.860 this is just
00:27:24.400 a mistake
00:27:24.980 in my
00:27:25.720 opinion
00:27:26.000 and I
00:27:26.720 think if
00:27:27.140 Trump were
00:27:28.440 to call
00:27:29.000 out Powell
00:27:29.920 on that
00:27:30.580 I would
00:27:31.420 agree
00:27:31.680 that's just
00:27:32.220 an error
00:27:32.880 that's just
00:27:33.900 not doing
00:27:34.300 a good job
00:27:34.940 he should be
00:27:36.800 more optimistic
00:27:37.880 here's something
00:27:39.200 that I wish
00:27:40.700 I'd thought
00:27:41.120 of myself
00:27:41.860 you know
00:27:42.820 the cop
00:27:43.980 what's his name
00:27:46.040 Chavain or
00:27:46.780 whatever
00:27:47.020 the cop
00:27:48.040 who killed
00:27:48.580 George Floyd
00:27:49.500 as was
00:27:51.500 pointed out
00:27:52.020 by Kevin
00:27:52.660 Erbanowitz
00:27:53.880 on Twitter
00:27:54.840 and he said
00:27:56.120 this
00:27:56.320 he called
00:27:56.660 him murder
00:27:57.120 cop
00:27:57.540 which I
00:27:58.000 think is
00:27:58.460 funny that
00:27:59.720 the cop
00:28:00.380 has his
00:28:00.800 own tag
00:28:01.460 now
00:28:01.720 did murder
00:28:02.760 cop have
00:28:03.340 a social
00:28:03.720 media history
00:28:04.440 or voting
00:28:05.100 record
00:28:05.480 I feel
00:28:06.820 like if
00:28:07.260 he was
00:28:07.640 a big
00:28:07.940 Trump
00:28:08.320 or MAGA
00:28:08.880 guy
00:28:09.240 CNN
00:28:10.080 would have
00:28:10.620 told us
00:28:11.360 feels like
00:28:12.500 a dog
00:28:12.880 not barking
00:28:13.520 so from
00:28:16.220 Sherlock Holmes
00:28:17.080 the dog
00:28:17.540 that doesn't
00:28:18.120 bark
00:28:18.440 also tells
00:28:19.540 you something
00:28:20.000 because it
00:28:20.400 means there
00:28:20.720 was nobody
00:28:21.140 in that area
00:28:21.840 otherwise the
00:28:22.640 dog would have
00:28:23.060 barked
00:28:23.460 so the
00:28:25.200 dog that's
00:28:25.720 not barking
00:28:26.240 is that's
00:28:27.800 a little
00:28:28.180 suspicious
00:28:28.840 isn't it
00:28:29.780 that we
00:28:30.300 haven't heard
00:28:30.780 anything about
00:28:31.380 the politics
00:28:32.180 of this
00:28:32.880 police officer
00:28:34.280 who's accused
00:28:34.940 when was
00:28:36.220 the last
00:28:36.600 time somebody
00:28:37.200 was accused
00:28:37.900 of murdering
00:28:38.840 a black
00:28:39.960 man and
00:28:40.980 we didn't
00:28:41.500 immediately
00:28:42.120 find out
00:28:43.000 his political
00:28:44.200 leanings
00:28:44.900 I'm watching
00:28:47.920 the comments
00:28:48.580 it's blowing
00:28:49.400 your mind
00:28:49.860 isn't it
00:28:50.760 people are
00:28:51.440 going
00:28:51.700 oh my god
00:28:53.220 that's such
00:28:53.680 a good
00:28:53.960 point
00:28:54.240 yeah it's
00:28:54.860 missing
00:28:55.240 it's very
00:28:57.060 missing
00:28:57.500 because we
00:28:58.500 don't know
00:28:58.860 the politics
00:28:59.500 of the cop
00:29:00.240 do you
00:29:01.460 assume that
00:29:02.100 he's a
00:29:02.500 Trump supporter
00:29:03.280 because you
00:29:05.260 probably did
00:29:06.040 didn't you
00:29:06.500 if you're
00:29:07.840 a racist
00:29:08.500 you probably
00:29:09.540 did
00:29:09.920 but I
00:29:11.680 didn't
00:29:11.980 I didn't
00:29:12.440 assume it
00:29:12.820 one way
00:29:13.140 or another
00:29:13.420 I don't
00:29:13.760 think I
00:29:14.060 even thought
00:29:14.460 of it
00:29:14.720 weirdly
00:29:15.020 enough
00:29:15.380 surprisingly
00:29:16.760 I don't
00:29:17.560 think it
00:29:17.860 ever
00:29:18.100 came across
00:29:19.440 my
00:29:19.840 you know
00:29:21.860 my skeptical
00:29:22.820 part of my
00:29:23.420 brain
00:29:23.700 but it's a
00:29:25.000 really good
00:29:25.520 question
00:29:26.040 wouldn't you
00:29:27.220 like to know
00:29:27.820 his political
00:29:28.560 leanings
00:29:29.100 just a little
00:29:29.840 bit
00:29:30.220 I think
00:29:31.160 you would
00:29:31.640 now I'd
00:29:32.640 love to
00:29:33.060 know
00:29:33.440 I mean
00:29:34.220 wouldn't
00:29:34.480 you love
00:29:34.960 to hear
00:29:35.540 that
00:29:36.940 let's say
00:29:37.540 it turns out
00:29:38.040 he is a
00:29:38.520 Trump supporter
00:29:39.120 how happy
00:29:40.420 would you
00:29:40.860 be
00:29:41.240 if it
00:29:42.760 had not
00:29:43.140 leaked
00:29:43.500 because that's
00:29:45.220 how the
00:29:45.500 system is
00:29:46.020 supposed to
00:29:46.560 work right
00:29:47.040 if it turns
00:29:48.280 out he's a
00:29:48.920 Trump supporter
00:29:49.600 and I'm
00:29:50.780 guessing he's
00:29:51.360 not
00:29:51.760 but if it
00:29:52.780 turned out
00:29:53.180 that way
00:29:53.680 wouldn't you
00:29:54.720 be impressed
00:29:55.480 if that
00:29:57.340 didn't leak
00:29:57.980 all the way
00:29:58.460 through the
00:29:58.820 trial
00:29:59.120 I'd be
00:30:00.000 really
00:30:00.280 impressed
00:30:00.820 because I
00:30:01.920 don't think
00:30:02.160 there's a
00:30:02.480 chance that's
00:30:02.980 going to
00:30:03.180 happen
00:30:03.440 but that's
00:30:04.940 the way
00:30:05.120 it's supposed
00:30:05.520 to work
00:30:06.000 so maybe
00:30:07.200 maybe we're
00:30:08.000 seeing something
00:30:08.520 really good
00:30:09.080 happening here
00:30:09.640 which is
00:30:10.140 a system
00:30:11.060 working the
00:30:11.580 way it's
00:30:11.860 supposed to
00:30:12.240 work without
00:30:12.720 leaks
00:30:13.160 but I doubt
00:30:14.440 it
00:30:14.760 but I doubt
00:30:15.900 it
00:30:16.700 I'm wondering
00:30:19.500 if the job
00:30:20.160 of ambassador
00:30:20.860 to the
00:30:21.440 autonomous zone
00:30:22.340 in Seattle
00:30:22.880 has been
00:30:23.240 taking
00:30:23.560 because I
00:30:24.520 think I
00:30:24.820 would be
00:30:25.060 an excellent
00:30:25.600 ambassador
00:30:26.320 so I'd
00:30:28.940 like to put
00:30:29.300 my hat
00:30:30.700 in the ring
00:30:31.080 there
00:30:31.300 I hear the
00:30:33.120 autonomous
00:30:33.580 zone
00:30:33.900 is being
00:30:34.340 described
00:30:35.060 as more
00:30:35.440 like a
00:30:35.820 block
00:30:36.120 party
00:30:36.460 atmosphere
00:30:37.020 by the
00:30:37.760 governor
00:30:38.880 and of course
00:30:40.500 others
00:30:41.040 including CNN
00:30:41.900 are calling
00:30:42.320 it a
00:30:42.640 terrorist
00:30:43.080 atmosphere
00:30:43.640 with a
00:30:44.020 warlord
00:30:44.480 the warlord
00:30:45.720 of course
00:30:46.260 that's probably
00:30:47.460 overstatement
00:30:48.300 of his
00:30:48.800 actual roles
00:30:49.660 but the
00:30:50.760 funniest thing
00:30:51.280 about the
00:30:51.940 autonomous
00:30:54.340 zone
00:30:54.800 is that
00:30:56.100 it immediately
00:30:56.800 needed an
00:30:57.380 armed police
00:30:58.080 force
00:30:58.520 or if you
00:31:00.960 don't think
00:31:01.440 that they
00:31:01.820 agree
00:31:02.220 that they
00:31:03.420 need an
00:31:04.000 armed
00:31:04.440 security
00:31:05.260 force
00:31:05.720 this
00:31:06.160 rapper
00:31:07.540 named
00:31:07.880 Raz
00:31:08.860 even if
00:31:09.940 you think
00:31:10.260 they don't
00:31:10.660 agree
00:31:10.920 they need
00:31:11.480 it
00:31:11.700 they do
00:31:13.320 agree
00:31:13.600 that the
00:31:13.940 guy with
00:31:14.260 the guns
00:31:14.640 is the
00:31:15.240 security
00:31:15.600 force
00:31:16.020 right
00:31:17.000 so I
00:31:17.600 think they
00:31:17.920 just learned
00:31:18.580 that if you
00:31:19.660 have an
00:31:19.900 area that
00:31:20.300 doesn't have
00:31:20.740 guns
00:31:21.200 it only
00:31:22.600 takes one
00:31:23.080 guy with
00:31:23.440 a gun
00:31:23.800 to take
00:31:24.280 over the
00:31:24.620 area
00:31:24.960 correct me
00:31:26.840 if I'm
00:31:27.120 wrong
00:31:27.400 but the
00:31:27.880 people with
00:31:28.320 guns
00:31:28.780 are kind
00:31:30.060 of running
00:31:30.520 the
00:31:30.780 autonomous
00:31:32.460 zone
00:31:33.000 because if
00:31:34.300 the people
00:31:34.680 who don't
00:31:35.180 have the
00:31:35.540 guns
00:31:36.000 get into
00:31:37.420 let's say
00:31:38.180 a major
00:31:38.940 disagreement
00:31:39.540 with the
00:31:40.080 people who
00:31:40.500 have the
00:31:40.940 guns
00:31:41.260 which way
00:31:42.560 do you
00:31:42.760 think it's
00:31:43.160 going to
00:31:43.400 go
00:31:43.620 who's going
00:31:45.040 to win
00:31:45.320 the guns
00:31:46.540 or the
00:31:47.400 no guns
00:31:48.040 so I
00:31:49.880 think there's
00:31:50.280 a lesson
00:31:50.660 being learned
00:31:51.280 there
00:31:51.620 all right
00:31:53.700 let me tell
00:31:54.160 you why
00:31:54.540 I think
00:31:55.080 everything
00:31:55.720 let me tell
00:31:58.000 you why
00:31:58.400 I think
00:31:58.880 the
00:31:59.220 protests
00:32:00.560 have been
00:32:00.880 successful
00:32:01.480 and things
00:32:02.520 are better
00:32:02.880 than you
00:32:03.220 think
00:32:03.520 all right
00:32:06.120 number one
00:32:07.500 I give
00:32:07.920 the government's
00:32:08.740 handling of
00:32:09.420 the protests
00:32:10.280 an A plus
00:32:11.300 that's not
00:32:13.040 what you
00:32:13.360 think is it
00:32:14.080 don't you
00:32:14.600 think you're
00:32:15.100 that every
00:32:15.840 part of the
00:32:16.780 government
00:32:17.080 messed up
00:32:17.760 you think
00:32:18.580 the mayors
00:32:19.440 blew it
00:32:20.480 you think
00:32:20.840 the president
00:32:21.480 should have
00:32:21.840 been more
00:32:22.200 involved
00:32:22.720 what's up
00:32:23.660 with those
00:32:24.060 governors
00:32:24.520 right
00:32:25.660 because we're
00:32:26.980 fed a
00:32:27.520 non-stop
00:32:28.400 diet
00:32:29.720 of our
00:32:31.860 politicians
00:32:32.460 messed up
00:32:33.240 and you're
00:32:33.960 always watching
00:32:34.460 your favorite
00:32:35.500 news source
00:32:36.240 and each
00:32:37.240 news source
00:32:37.780 is picking
00:32:38.260 on different
00:32:38.800 politicians
00:32:39.400 but the
00:32:40.420 theme that
00:32:41.300 overall is
00:32:42.420 all the
00:32:42.820 politicians
00:32:43.240 are doing
00:32:43.700 everything
00:32:44.040 wrong all
00:32:44.500 the time
00:32:44.860 basically
00:32:45.300 that was
00:32:46.180 the coverage
00:32:46.680 let me tell
00:32:48.120 you the
00:32:48.580 opposite view
00:32:50.000 and why I
00:32:50.920 would give
00:32:51.300 all of the
00:32:51.840 politicians
00:32:52.300 from mayor
00:32:53.600 all the
00:32:54.120 way through
00:32:54.860 A plus
00:32:56.160 now I'm
00:32:56.560 only talking
00:32:57.180 about how
00:32:57.600 they handled
00:32:58.180 the looting
00:32:58.740 and the
00:32:59.040 protests
00:32:59.520 right I'm
00:33:00.760 not talking
00:33:01.240 about other
00:33:02.120 policies
00:33:02.660 so this is
00:33:03.840 not an A
00:33:04.420 plus for all
00:33:05.220 their performance
00:33:05.980 it's not an A
00:33:07.240 plus for all
00:33:07.680 the things they
00:33:08.160 said or anything
00:33:08.900 like that
00:33:09.380 just the
00:33:10.000 outcome
00:33:10.340 what would
00:33:12.260 have been
00:33:12.500 the best
00:33:12.960 outcome
00:33:13.300 from all
00:33:14.500 of these
00:33:15.000 protesters
00:33:15.840 and looters
00:33:16.920 well the
00:33:17.520 best outcome
00:33:18.200 is that the
00:33:19.180 police did
00:33:20.580 not kill
00:33:21.040 anybody else
00:33:21.880 who didn't
00:33:22.880 deserve it
00:33:23.460 you know
00:33:23.720 it wasn't
00:33:24.320 wasn't part
00:33:24.980 of something
00:33:25.340 that's legitimate
00:33:25.980 so the
00:33:27.760 fact so
00:33:28.840 here are the
00:33:29.260 things that I
00:33:29.820 think you
00:33:30.120 should look
00:33:30.460 for for
00:33:31.040 the again
00:33:31.640 the dog
00:33:32.120 not barking
00:33:32.800 the entire
00:33:35.160 protests in
00:33:36.000 my opinion
00:33:36.560 were a giant
00:33:37.660 provocation
00:33:38.560 for the
00:33:39.160 police
00:33:39.560 in other
00:33:40.640 words the
00:33:41.120 police the
00:33:41.940 National Guard
00:33:42.600 the president
00:33:43.280 all the
00:33:44.260 politicians
00:33:44.720 were being
00:33:45.300 pushed to
00:33:46.920 overreact
00:33:47.940 would you
00:33:49.800 agree that
00:33:51.120 a major
00:33:51.720 risk slash
00:33:53.320 even goal
00:33:54.200 of some
00:33:54.900 percentage of
00:33:55.520 the protesters
00:33:56.080 not all of
00:33:56.760 them clearly
00:33:57.200 but some
00:33:58.280 percentage of
00:33:58.940 the protesters
00:33:59.540 wanted a
00:34:01.220 provocation and
00:34:02.140 they wanted
00:34:02.500 an overreaction
00:34:03.520 would you say
00:34:04.060 that that's
00:34:04.460 true did
00:34:06.180 any of the
00:34:07.260 governments give
00:34:08.040 them an
00:34:08.460 overreaction
00:34:09.460 no they
00:34:12.460 really didn't
00:34:13.140 so you
00:34:14.080 know like
00:34:14.420 a whole
00:34:16.040 bunch I
00:34:16.720 guess scores
00:34:17.540 of police
00:34:18.920 and see and
00:34:19.860 secret service
00:34:20.760 at the White
00:34:21.200 House were
00:34:22.180 injured and
00:34:23.400 some of them
00:34:23.900 badly injured
00:34:24.780 terrible injuries
00:34:26.560 we're talking
00:34:27.120 about head
00:34:27.600 injuries lots
00:34:28.460 of them and
00:34:30.200 with all of
00:34:31.000 that no
00:34:32.640 overreaction
00:34:33.620 anywhere no
00:34:35.800 overreaction
00:34:36.880 anywhere not
00:34:39.980 in the city
00:34:40.700 not well
00:34:43.240 mostly it was
00:34:43.800 in the cities
00:34:44.280 but not
00:34:44.800 anywhere a
00:34:46.480 plus if we
00:34:48.140 you know we're
00:34:49.140 not done yet
00:34:49.780 right there
00:34:50.180 could still be
00:34:50.720 some some
00:34:51.400 bad stuff
00:34:51.880 happening but
00:34:52.740 we've gotten
00:34:53.260 pretty far
00:34:54.260 into this we're
00:34:56.100 a lot closer to
00:34:56.980 the end of
00:34:57.700 least the street
00:34:58.620 protest part of
00:34:59.420 it than we are
00:34:59.900 at the beginning
00:35:00.340 and I don't
00:35:01.940 think we
00:35:03.940 messed up at
00:35:04.580 all this is
00:35:06.580 one of the
00:35:06.980 greatest success
00:35:07.980 stories I've
00:35:09.600 ever seen I
00:35:10.820 mean I am so
00:35:11.660 impressed by the
00:35:13.280 restraint of
00:35:15.340 everyone everyone
00:35:17.280 not only did the
00:35:19.880 armed Americans in
00:35:21.180 this country not
00:35:22.160 take out their
00:35:22.780 weapons oh they
00:35:24.280 bought weapons
00:35:25.080 they cleaned
00:35:26.320 weapons they
00:35:27.560 loaded weapons
00:35:28.580 they made sure
00:35:30.020 they knew where
00:35:30.540 their weapons
00:35:31.160 were but they
00:35:33.300 didn't use them
00:35:33.860 didn't use them
00:35:35.800 you didn't see
00:35:37.000 anybody shooting
00:35:38.040 a protester
00:35:38.660 and here's the
00:35:40.380 weird part you
00:35:41.020 didn't see even
00:35:41.960 the protesters
00:35:42.800 arm themselves
00:35:44.140 and use the
00:35:44.880 use the guns
00:35:45.680 you see people
00:35:46.800 doing you know
00:35:47.620 lots of things
00:35:49.200 for the for the
00:35:50.040 cameras you know
00:35:50.760 people had guns
00:35:51.620 hold guns but
00:35:53.220 for the most part
00:35:54.240 we're the most
00:35:55.220 armed country in
00:35:56.840 the world and we
00:35:58.900 chose not to use
00:35:59.740 them it's remarkable
00:36:02.240 on a level that I
00:36:04.140 don't think we'll
00:36:04.640 ever be fully
00:36:05.380 appreciated one
00:36:06.280 of the most
00:36:06.600 remarkable human
00:36:08.420 accomplishments is
00:36:10.240 that we just went
00:36:10.900 through the last
00:36:11.440 couple of weeks
00:36:12.200 not done yet but
00:36:14.120 it's looking good
00:36:14.920 I think we did
00:36:16.500 something close to
00:36:17.320 impossible really
00:36:18.880 so a plus because
00:36:23.120 I think there was a
00:36:23.980 strategy to it and
00:36:24.940 I think the strategy
00:36:25.820 was perfect and
00:36:28.420 the strategy was to
00:36:30.340 listen I think that
00:36:32.640 happened I think the
00:36:34.180 entire country
00:36:34.920 listened no question
00:36:36.800 about it and drain
00:36:38.200 the energy out of
00:36:39.100 it slowly because I
00:36:40.800 think there was an
00:36:41.580 understanding that
00:36:42.520 there was an energy
00:36:43.480 problem just too much
00:36:44.920 pent-up energy years
00:36:47.020 of you know grievances
00:36:49.600 you know that are
00:36:51.360 real and I don't want
00:36:53.160 to make the mistake
00:36:53.920 of some in giving
00:36:54.980 somebody the chance to
00:36:56.120 misinterpret this the
00:36:58.500 protest didn't happen
00:36:59.680 because it was warm
00:37:01.200 it didn't happen
00:37:02.500 because of the
00:37:03.900 coronavirus it didn't
00:37:05.600 happen because of the
00:37:07.240 lockdown it didn't
00:37:08.900 happen just because of
00:37:10.340 a video it needed all
00:37:12.300 of those things
00:37:13.080 including the you know
00:37:14.380 the history and the
00:37:16.480 grievances that are
00:37:17.420 built up all of it had
00:37:19.000 to happen the way it
00:37:19.860 did but once it
00:37:21.020 happened by far the
00:37:23.060 best strategy was to
00:37:25.120 just hold hold hold
00:37:28.740 hold hold hold hold
00:37:32.000 hold there's no second
00:37:34.740 part of the strategy
00:37:35.540 it's just a hold
00:37:36.860 strategy and just drain
00:37:38.700 the energy out of it
00:37:39.780 while respecting it
00:37:41.520 respecting it's pretty
00:37:43.100 important because I
00:37:44.280 think the entire
00:37:44.900 country respects at
00:37:46.600 least the point you
00:37:48.240 know the entire
00:37:48.980 country is at least on
00:37:50.040 the page that you know
00:37:51.480 we all saw the video of
00:37:52.600 George Floyd being
00:37:53.360 killed I think every
00:37:55.100 person of every type
00:37:56.580 had a horrified reaction
00:37:58.940 in a weird way it
00:38:00.640 brought the country
00:38:01.240 together at least at
00:38:02.640 least on that limited
00:38:03.900 question of whether that
00:38:05.300 was out of bounds and
00:38:07.340 so a plus every every
00:38:09.960 governor every mayor and
00:38:11.460 the president of the
00:38:12.140 United States good job
00:38:15.340 now was it perfect no
00:38:18.460 no nothing's perfect but
00:38:20.820 man really good all
00:38:23.980 right I think that we
00:38:25.100 have reached a deeper
00:38:25.960 understanding we're not
00:38:28.340 there yet a lot of work
00:38:29.720 to be done you know as
00:38:31.160 I said understanding what
00:38:32.860 the systemic racism the
00:38:34.360 thing is in a way that
00:38:35.780 white people can know
00:38:36.660 what the what the hell
00:38:37.740 you've been talking
00:38:38.340 about would be a big
00:38:40.120 step we're not there
00:38:42.000 but it looks like there
00:38:42.840 is real interest in
00:38:43.740 getting there I have real
00:38:45.080 interest in getting there
00:38:45.960 by the way you know I
00:38:47.220 don't do this for jokes I
00:38:49.040 do it because I have a
00:38:50.180 real interest I would
00:38:51.100 like to understand you
00:38:53.320 know the black
00:38:53.840 experience better I
00:38:55.280 would like them to
00:38:56.020 understand my experience
00:38:57.300 better that's all good
00:38:59.440 so I would say that the
00:39:01.620 amount of focus that was
00:39:03.000 put on the question of
00:39:04.000 racism a plus if I'm
00:39:07.560 going to if I'm going to
00:39:08.380 grade the protesters for
00:39:09.800 getting attention a plus
00:39:12.680 there's you can't you
00:39:14.320 can't take that away from
00:39:15.280 them right but how about
00:39:17.700 getting something done
00:39:18.860 that's practical I and
00:39:20.420 among I and many other
00:39:21.800 people have noted
00:39:23.240 accurately that there's
00:39:24.660 no unified set of
00:39:26.320 requests and I've said
00:39:29.240 that it would be a
00:39:30.120 mistake to try to offer
00:39:31.620 things because then
00:39:33.360 you're negotiating with
00:39:34.360 yourself that's a term of
00:39:36.280 art for negotiating and
00:39:37.760 it's considered a mistake
00:39:39.040 it's a negotiating mistake
00:39:41.060 to say all right all right
00:39:42.920 you're not asking for
00:39:43.760 anything in particular but
00:39:44.820 what if I gave you a
00:39:46.080 million dollars and then
00:39:48.440 there's no response here's
00:39:50.480 the mistake okay okay you
00:39:52.440 didn't respond to my
00:39:53.280 million dollars and you're
00:39:54.400 not asking for any
00:39:55.320 particular amount how about
00:39:57.220 two million that's the
00:39:58.960 mistake you never negotiate
00:40:01.620 with yourself if you don't
00:40:03.840 get a counter offer you
00:40:05.520 stop you walk away because
00:40:07.600 that's not a negotiation so
00:40:09.820 since the protest was sort of
00:40:11.900 a semi spontaneous semi
00:40:14.900 organized at least in small
00:40:17.140 cells I guess you could call
00:40:18.820 them you know groups let's
00:40:20.240 say it doesn't have a
00:40:22.760 unified leadership and so it
00:40:24.940 didn't have the capability of
00:40:26.440 saying okay here's our 10
00:40:27.640 stuff 10 10 things but even
00:40:31.300 though I criticize that as not
00:40:33.560 good negotiating look what's
00:40:35.940 happening if I'm being honest
00:40:37.740 it's working because you see
00:40:41.040 new legislation being
00:40:42.500 proposed quite seriously
00:40:44.680 Rand Paul just came out on
00:40:47.940 Twitter I think he's actually
00:40:49.320 sponsoring some or co-sponsoring
00:40:51.000 some legislation I don't know
00:40:53.000 exactly his involvement but he's
00:40:54.820 supporting it for getting rid of
00:40:58.060 no-knock warrants now I didn't
00:41:01.080 even know about no-knock warrants I
00:41:04.240 didn't even know that was a thing
00:41:05.520 right did you know that no-knock
00:41:07.740 warrants were a thing well if
00:41:09.940 you were following you know a
00:41:11.400 specific case of racial injustice
00:41:14.220 as as many people believe it to
00:41:16.800 be you knew about it in that one
00:41:19.140 case but I think most of us are
00:41:21.100 getting this new understanding
00:41:22.360 about what's this what's that
00:41:25.180 what's a no-knock warrant because
00:41:28.260 you and I have never experienced a
00:41:29.940 no-knock warrant but apparently it
00:41:33.420 could be deadly if you're black you
00:41:35.380 know more so than you know other
00:41:37.500 groups or so that is the concern
00:41:39.940 again if we had better data we would
00:41:43.180 know what is what is true and what
00:41:45.100 isn't but that's the concern now and
00:41:48.400 that's just Rand Paul now he's he is
00:41:50.740 more associated with the right of
00:41:52.340 course but on the left they also have
00:41:54.280 a number of legislative things going
00:41:58.880 through the system so I forget
00:42:01.520 everything that's on Kamala Harris's
00:42:03.400 list but they all look pretty good to
00:42:06.120 me you know I'm no expert and I can't
00:42:10.100 tell you exactly what you do and do
00:42:11.700 not need in this realm but I looked at
00:42:13.940 her list of stuff and it was things
00:42:15.440 like you know training or national
00:42:18.560 standards for cops and there were
00:42:20.940 things like you know build a better
00:42:22.540 database for police incidents and I
00:42:25.400 looked at the list and I said reasonable
00:42:27.820 you know I would want to hear the
00:42:29.980 experts weigh in on those things
00:42:32.660 because I'm not but as a citizen I look
00:42:35.800 at the list and I think reasonable
00:42:37.940 quite reasonable now the whole defund the
00:42:40.600 police well I don't think you can take
00:42:42.300 that too seriously really you know
00:42:44.740 unless you're Biden say I'm going to
00:42:46.420 defund the police I wouldn't take it
00:42:49.520 too seriously I think defund the police
00:42:52.360 is turning into Trump's plan of funding
00:42:56.700 the police fully but also there might
00:42:59.520 be some other things that are worth
00:43:00.940 funding because when the protesters say
00:43:03.860 defund the police it's not so much that
00:43:07.060 they need you know them to be defunded
00:43:09.860 it's just a conceptual thing to say that
00:43:12.380 that money could be maybe more productive
00:43:14.920 in these other areas of social concern
00:43:17.780 if it turns out that what happens is the
00:43:21.320 police are mostly funded except in some
00:43:23.480 places where they're experimenting
00:43:24.840 that's not bad if it turns out there's
00:43:28.400 some things that should have been
00:43:29.480 funded got funded we'll see could be
00:43:33.360 good too I'm actually completely in favor
00:43:36.820 of the autonomous zone I know I make fun
00:43:40.320 of it because it's it's just such a
00:43:42.400 perfect fodder for humor I mean it's got
00:43:45.940 for God's sakes it's got a charismatic
00:43:48.740 rapper who's become a warlord and of
00:43:52.420 course when we say warlord that's a
00:43:55.000 little bit for humorous purposes he does
00:43:57.400 have guns and he does seem to be
00:43:59.620 handling security warlord is just a
00:44:02.280 funny term for it but it even though
00:44:05.140 it's hilarious and funny and it can't
00:44:07.020 last forever because they don't have a
00:44:08.680 structure to support them I would say
00:44:12.660 we're gonna learn something from this I
00:44:15.600 think that the that the end the end
00:44:19.240 product of this is we're gonna learn
00:44:21.840 something and when I say we I don't
00:44:24.720 mean you and I don't mean me I mean the
00:44:28.620 protesters I mean the protesters are
00:44:31.220 gonna learn something from it don't you
00:44:33.100 think they're gonna have some fun because
00:44:35.680 right now it's just sort of fun but they
00:44:38.080 do have to worry about security they have
00:44:41.580 started infighting because they don't
00:44:43.540 have a common enemy anymore the common
00:44:45.480 enemy was the police so remember the
00:44:48.360 governments did this brilliant thing and
00:44:50.800 I would say that even the Seattle
00:44:52.160 governor is playing this brilliantly you
00:44:56.400 don't think so do you because I'll bet
00:44:58.820 every one of you disagrees with that
00:45:00.520 statement the the governor from
00:45:04.200 Washington is playing it brilliantly she's
00:45:08.020 described it as closer to a block party
00:45:10.520 than a than terrorism I think she's
00:45:13.800 three-quarters right right she's more
00:45:16.180 right than wrong I would say based on the
00:45:18.160 pictures I've seen she's more right than
00:45:20.540 wrong but whether or not it's fully a
00:45:23.380 block party or there's something to worry
00:45:25.480 about also I think the way she is trying
00:45:28.200 to frame it is perfection she's framing it
00:45:33.180 as peaceful which helps you treat it that
00:45:36.980 way which will let the energy just
00:45:39.460 dissipate on its own going in there hard
00:45:42.900 with any kind of force huge mistake
00:45:46.380 huge mistake now eventually they might
00:45:50.140 need to send in some kind of uniformed
00:45:53.460 force to mop up but I don't think the
00:45:57.440 protests can last that long meaning they
00:46:00.280 need food they're they're not going to
00:46:02.720 want to stay there they want to go home
00:46:04.660 to you know they're going to have to go
00:46:06.500 home to see their pets and stuff you just
00:46:09.680 let the energy die out and see what you
00:46:11.940 learn and I think people will learn that
00:46:14.520 running running their own running their
00:46:17.620 own autonomous zones not so easy might be
00:46:20.440 useful I would say that the protests led
00:46:23.740 to reopening the country faster most of you
00:46:26.120 would agree right because it sort of made a
00:46:29.700 joke of the thought that we shouldn't
00:46:31.420 leave the house the protesters just made a
00:46:34.320 mockery of the whole coronavirus medical
00:46:37.780 recommendation now part of it was luck
00:46:40.800 because the virus was starting to wind down
00:46:44.060 and we're getting smarter about how to treat
00:46:46.420 it and ventilators and all that stuff so
00:46:48.780 some of it was luck but I think you would
00:46:50.300 agree that the protest hastened the economic
00:46:53.360 reopening in a way that's irreversible we're
00:46:57.460 not going to go back to lock up we're
00:46:59.660 just not so I mean that was an unintended
00:47:02.280 consequence and I think that the country
00:47:06.100 will be stronger once we've gotten through
00:47:08.840 all of this that has less to do with the
00:47:10.860 protests and more to do with just good
00:47:12.980 news because we shook the box of basically
00:47:14.960 everything and that kind of energy and
00:47:18.040 disruption in a country full of
00:47:20.520 entrepreneurs should unleash just amazing
00:47:24.560 amounts of progress now let me tell you
00:47:27.700 how we can solve all this racism problem if
00:47:30.280 we wanted to solve problems but we don't
00:47:33.900 you know we don't when I say we I mean not
00:47:37.360 everyone you might want to solve a problem I
00:47:40.580 might want to solve a problem but the
00:47:42.840 leadership of groups that are let's say
00:47:46.240 active they don't necessarily want to
00:47:48.820 solve a problem because in politics if you
00:47:51.760 solve the problem you have to find another
00:47:53.920 job right maybe so politicians don't
00:47:58.320 always want to solve problems sometimes it
00:48:01.440 benefits them to keep that problem running
00:48:03.460 a little bit likewise the leaders of any
00:48:06.300 kind of provocative groups so the
00:48:08.860 leadership may be out of sync with the
00:48:12.880 people they're leading who might want
00:48:14.540 solutions leadership it's a little less
00:48:19.220 less certain so but imagine if you will
00:48:21.940 there were no leadership and all you
00:48:24.340 wanted to do was solve problems what
00:48:27.560 would that look like given that people
00:48:29.720 have very different views of the world
00:48:31.400 how could you solve it here's my take on
00:48:34.400 it I would say that if you looked at the
00:48:36.100 political left and the political right that
00:48:37.980 they focus in different places this part
00:48:40.500 I've told you before which is the left
00:48:42.980 seems to focus on the end state they'd
00:48:45.540 like equal justice and equal pay and no
00:48:48.100 bigotry and free health care and free
00:48:49.600 college now they also believe that there
00:48:53.480 are systems that need to be in place to
00:48:55.780 get there but they focus on the end
00:48:59.840 state right so the emphasis is on getting
00:49:04.140 to this you know more equal you know more
00:49:08.700 moral place I would say the political
00:49:11.780 right also likes all this stuff but
00:49:14.840 doesn't know how to get it instead they
00:49:17.380 say you know we don't know how to get
00:49:18.700 all that stuff you could talk about it
00:49:20.720 all day long but nobody knows how to get
00:49:23.120 there in the way that the math works in
00:49:25.620 the country would accept so instead the
00:49:28.540 best we can do is have these systems that
00:49:30.620 are equal for everybody as best we can do
00:49:32.860 it so because you have to tweak these
00:49:35.080 things to make sure they're equal over
00:49:36.560 time but the constitutional laws and
00:49:39.360 educational system you know the family
00:49:42.120 process and even mentoring and throwing
00:49:44.420 that in there because that's important so
00:49:47.080 let's say these are systems but again both
00:49:50.320 the left and the right they both have
00:49:53.160 goals and they both think that you need a
00:49:56.360 system to get there it's just a difference
00:49:58.920 in emphasis there's more emphasis on goals
00:50:01.820 on this side and more emphasis on process
00:50:04.700 and systems with less emphasis on the
00:50:07.660 outcomes because who can guarantee you an
00:50:09.560 outcome nobody can guarantee you an
00:50:11.980 outcome but we can work really hard to
00:50:14.320 make sure that everybody's got the same
00:50:15.980 rules and the same game so given this
00:50:20.820 situation how would you solve it well if
00:50:22.960 there were no politics and there were no
00:50:25.400 leaders it's kind of easy this would be
00:50:28.660 really easy to solve if there were no
00:50:31.500 political leaders I mean really easy
00:50:34.380 because there's no problem here in the
00:50:36.280 first place here's why the solution is
00:50:39.620 really easy number one you agree on the
00:50:42.520 aspirations let's call them goals is there
00:50:45.220 any is there anybody on the right who if it
00:50:48.900 were free would not want everybody to have
00:50:52.020 health care if it's free like it's not
00:50:54.420 free but imagine imagine if you know there
00:50:57.140 were magic so let's say magic exists hey
00:51:00.840 magic exists and you go to a Republican
00:51:03.620 hey we just discovered that magic exists and
00:51:06.920 we can give everybody health care for free
00:51:08.960 are you in is there any Republican who
00:51:12.340 would say no no even though it's magic and
00:51:16.100 it's not going to cost me anything it's
00:51:17.520 not going to cost anybody anything and
00:51:18.940 there's no downside I don't want other
00:51:21.280 people to have health care said nobody
00:51:24.040 said nobody right if it were free yeah
00:51:29.140 everybody be on the same page so given
00:51:32.560 that you've got these two points of view I
00:51:35.220 think we could agree on the aspirations
00:51:37.020 there's no Republican who would not agree
00:51:39.120 if the if we had a way to get there we
00:51:42.440 don't but if we had a way to get there I'd
00:51:45.340 like all of this stuff so you could agree
00:51:48.100 in the aspirations no problem I think you
00:51:50.960 could get there you could also agree on
00:51:54.600 the metrics in other words what are you
00:51:56.800 measuring to know if you've got a
00:51:59.700 problem and what are you measuring to
00:52:01.440 know if what you're doing is working well
00:52:03.860 that would be easy do you think anybody
00:52:06.140 would disagree on the the concept of of
00:52:10.380 coming together over what you're measuring
00:52:12.440 to know if it works I think you could make
00:52:14.660 you could get together on that that's not
00:52:16.320 a problem then then here's the part
00:52:19.580 that's the the heart of it making a b
00:52:22.060 testing more common now a b testing is
00:52:25.380 literally just testing something small
00:52:27.320 see if it works and if it works you do
00:52:30.400 more of that and if it doesn't work you
00:52:32.100 try something else and then you just
00:52:33.380 keep testing but it's a continuous
00:52:35.700 testing situation why do I like the
00:52:39.400 autonomous zone in Seattle because it's a
00:52:42.240 test it's a test we're going to learn
00:52:45.460 something about the auto zone we don't
00:52:47.960 know what but we're definitely going to
00:52:49.940 learn something now it's not the kind of
00:52:52.000 a to be testing I'm talking about because
00:52:54.240 if you do it right you plan it so it could
00:52:57.120 be more lasting and you do your best job
00:52:59.360 of planning it the Seattle autonomous zone
00:53:02.900 was not planned and therefore it doesn't
00:53:05.020 have any structure to support it so we kind
00:53:07.840 of know where it's going to end up you
00:53:09.640 know in the long run it's going to be
00:53:11.220 dismantled but we're going to learn a lot
00:53:14.380 and I think that genuinely it's going to
00:53:16.540 be useful and then once you've learned
00:53:19.480 something for your testing you revise
00:53:21.020 your systems so suppose suppose we get an
00:53:25.200 idea from this autonomous zone and
00:53:27.120 somebody says you know the biggest
00:53:29.200 problem is you didn't plan it and also
00:53:32.040 that it belonged to somebody else that's
00:53:34.540 a pretty big problem that that zone that
00:53:36.920 they've occupied that belongs to other
00:53:39.960 people so that's a problem so but suppose
00:53:44.300 somebody said hey maybe maybe we just
00:53:47.620 need two systems within one country would
00:53:51.760 it be a problem for you you personally
00:53:55.020 would you have a problem if somebody said
00:53:57.520 hey we found some private funding and we
00:54:00.220 and we found some land for sale we'd like
00:54:02.640 to build a little experiment here in the
00:54:05.200 middle of Idaho or doesn't matter where
00:54:07.160 just find some friendly place say we're
00:54:09.580 going to build this thing we're going to
00:54:10.960 try an experiment for a few years with
00:54:13.380 private money and we're going to try no
00:54:15.620 cops so that's part of the experiment no
00:54:18.160 police we're going to try to build a place
00:54:20.160 that's really inexpensive so you don't
00:54:22.660 have to be a millionaire and and we'll make
00:54:25.680 sure everybody's trained and educated we'll
00:54:27.620 have some kind of health care so in other
00:54:29.460 words we'll just test something see if it
00:54:31.940 works whatever we learn from that will
00:54:34.160 will become the next test or maybe
00:54:36.740 legislation so if you had no politicians
00:54:41.920 it would be easy to merge these because
00:54:45.460 they are two halves of the whole having
00:54:49.740 goals without good systems is useless
00:54:52.100 because you can't get to your goal having
00:54:54.960 systems with no aspirations or no end state
00:54:59.760 that you're trying to get to borders on
00:55:02.180 immoral that's not the intention I mean
00:55:05.460 there's nobody on the right who's trying
00:55:07.080 to do anything immoral nobody thinks of
00:55:09.300 it that way but if you have processes that
00:55:12.360 don't have a pretty distinct end state in
00:55:16.400 mind that's better for everybody if you're
00:55:18.980 not heading towards something good what are
00:55:22.420 you doing you have to add these together to
00:55:25.280 have anything so if we didn't have leaders
00:55:28.640 we would just add those things together we
00:55:31.380 would agree that we don't know as much as
00:55:33.340 we think we know about anything so we
00:55:35.820 would just test them somebody says next
00:55:39.880 time communism will work I tell you it
00:55:42.440 hasn't ever been tried so everybody who
00:55:46.300 takes a good idea and then exaggerates it
00:55:49.280 into a stupid one to make a point is
00:55:52.480 really just surrendering all right so so
00:55:55.700 whoever said that you just surrendered your
00:55:57.800 point because if you have to take a good
00:56:01.460 suggestion and turn it into something
00:56:03.740 stupid just to criticize it then you've
00:56:06.580 accepted that there wasn't enough to
00:56:08.220 criticize of the idea itself so I don't
00:56:11.500 believe anybody has suggested communism I
00:56:14.940 haven't heard that suggestion I've heard
00:56:18.540 socialism if you think they're the same
00:56:21.080 again same problem you've you've you've
00:56:25.020 surrendered if you're going to call
00:56:26.960 communism and socialism the same thing
00:56:29.120 well you've surrendered because if you
00:56:31.680 can't criticize socialism on its own
00:56:33.840 without turning it into some other thing
00:56:36.260 called communism so you can criticize it
00:56:38.560 well you've you've surrendered you've
00:56:42.060 said there's nothing to criticize with
00:56:43.480 socialism otherwise you would just
00:56:44.920 criticize it you wouldn't have to turn it
00:56:46.940 into something else all right people are
00:56:51.760 giving me examples of other countries
00:56:53.780 that have already tried things again let
00:56:57.800 me say this as clearly as possible if
00:57:00.100 somebody wanted to try something in just
00:57:02.040 a small community and it wasn't your
00:57:05.620 money why would you object I know you say
00:57:10.480 you don't think the experiment would work
00:57:12.280 if it let's say it's too heavily socialist I
00:57:15.260 hear you but you also hear that other
00:57:17.880 people think it might right so all that I
00:57:21.800 need to convince you is that there are
00:57:24.680 people have different opinions that's all
00:57:27.860 if people have different opinions and it
00:57:31.540 can be tested and it doesn't cost you
00:57:34.640 anything you personally no risk why not
00:57:39.160 why not all right the US has never had
00:57:48.360 socialism the US is a socialist country
00:57:51.580 we have lots of socialism we just do it
00:57:55.720 in a you know specific way are you talking
00:58:00.200 about Chaz with Tucker tonight well I don't
00:58:03.840 know yet so the way the process usually works
00:58:06.240 is so people who go on TV a lot such as
00:58:11.880 myself know this process so sometime today a
00:58:16.660 producer for Tucker show will probably
00:58:19.140 contact me and say the topics we want to
00:58:22.980 talk about are you know maybe three
00:58:25.340 questions now even if we talk about that
00:58:29.540 topic the host will usually change the
00:58:32.580 questions so so even if I know the questions
00:58:35.620 in advance it's pretty rare to be asked
00:58:38.140 exactly that question usually you know the
00:58:41.320 the more talented hosts are gonna put their
00:58:45.460 own spin on the question which is fine so you
00:58:49.540 can never be completely prepared because you
00:58:52.600 don't know what the host is gonna you know
00:58:54.780 improvise also that list of let's say three
00:59:00.420 things that you might talk about on the show
00:59:02.340 gets revised every hour until the show
00:59:05.680 typically because they're always looking at
00:59:08.960 the the hottest news and say okay okay we're
00:59:11.900 gonna drop this third one because something
00:59:13.660 just happened we'll throw that on top but
00:59:15.660 the other two are still there and then by the
00:59:17.620 time you get to the show who knows you know
00:59:19.880 there's so much happened in one day that you
00:59:23.060 don't know all right let me just make sure I
00:59:25.940 hit all my points oh Microsoft just announced
00:59:29.100 it will not sell facial recognition tell
00:59:32.020 technology to the police I don't know how
00:59:37.520 they're gonna get away with that how in the
00:59:40.080 world do you get away with just denying
00:59:42.060 selling something to the police if it's a
00:59:45.080 tool and what exactly does facial recognition
00:59:48.340 do that is so evil we're gonna be talking a lot
00:59:54.640 more about that and I'll tell you why so I'll
00:59:58.400 have an announcement in that in that zone that
01:00:03.780 I'll be talking to you about later so so wait for
01:00:08.500 that all right I think I hit all my oh let's talk
01:00:14.800 about the statues I'm completely in favor of
01:00:19.180 getting rid of all the racist statues I've told
01:00:21.600 you that before I'd get rid of Columbus I'd get
01:00:25.180 rid of all the slave owners I'd get rid of all
01:00:28.100 the Confederate generals now I know you disagree
01:00:31.360 and I respect that so I want you to know that if
01:00:35.420 you would like to keep all those statues and the
01:00:38.060 reason that you'd like to keep them is that you
01:00:40.260 understand that they offend some people but you
01:00:42.560 think they have historical value and that and that
01:00:45.960 that context can be maintained that's a very
01:00:49.260 respectable opinion but it is nonetheless a fact
01:00:54.140 that something like half of the country is offended
01:00:57.100 by them and for me they're just decorations and if
01:01:01.520 your decorations are offending you know a quarter of
01:01:04.740 your guests or half of your guests you don't need a
01:01:08.220 better reason I'm not gonna I'm not gonna reason
01:01:11.400 through the logic of it and the Constitution and my
01:01:14.180 rights and the laws I'm not going to talk about the
01:01:16.820 details of it if half the country is offended by it and
01:01:21.900 it's basically a decoration because the history is in the
01:01:24.960 history books you know I don't know anybody who learned
01:01:27.880 history from a statue in my whole life I've never heard
01:01:31.380 anybody's well I didn't go to school but I did a tour of
01:01:34.500 statues so I got the same education I wouldn't worry about
01:01:38.640 losing history because you lost a decoration it doesn't work
01:01:41.980 that way yeah Columbus was a huge racist he was one of the
01:01:46.360 biggest ones and if you don't know that just just google it
01:01:50.360 maybe a lot of people don't understand that basically Columbus
01:01:55.560 was he was basically Hitler you know he wasn't far off from
01:02:01.420 Hitler literally you know if you if you google it you'll find
01:02:05.100 out yourself so I think that I think it's healthy for a country
01:02:12.740 to reboot and refresh and I don't think there's anything wrong
01:02:18.600 with looking at our historical founders in their full context and if
01:02:23.660 we don't want to promote people who were half awesome and half
01:02:29.100 horrible we don't have to why bother so uh so I say you know if
01:02:39.060 somebody wants to protect the statues and you know handle them differently I
01:02:43.260 completely respect that I just think my this is this has this isn't even a
01:02:48.720 policy decision let me put it in let me put it in personal terms as a policy
01:02:54.960 decision I don't know I'm not really that interested as a personal decision of a
01:03:01.640 citizen who lives in the country I personally choose not to offend other
01:03:06.940 citizens of my country deeply offend them over something that's not important to
01:03:13.160 me so it's that that's like a personal decision in terms of policy well that gets
01:03:19.260 into free speech and bigger things and frankly I'm not that interested but if you
01:03:23.540 want to know what I think about it personally I wouldn't use I wouldn't
01:03:27.600 offend anybody for no reason so that's me that's all for me and I will talk to
01:03:33.440 you tomorrow