Episode 1036 Scott Adams： White-Looking Jesus, Fake News Being More Shameless Than Usual, Presidential Tweets
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
147.77261
Summary
It's the dopamine hit of the day, and it's the thing that makes everything better. It's also the weirdest thing to get retweeted by the president, because it's simultaneously big and small at the same time.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hey anybody here today? Come on in. If I'm here you should be here. Yeah we got
00:00:14.220
stuff to talk about. Yes we do. And that will happen directly after the
00:00:19.560
simultaneous sip. I know you'll enjoy it. It's gonna be a good one. Now you might
00:00:26.160
wonder why I don't do the normal introduction to the simultaneous sip
00:00:30.960
today and there's a reason. I can't remember it. That's right. I read it every
00:00:35.920
single time. One of the tricks of writing is that things that you can read are
00:00:43.980
very different than things you read out loud. So if you're gonna write
00:00:48.240
something for the purpose of reading it out loud, if you're gonna be reading it
00:00:52.660
that's fine. But something you were gonna memorize and say, you might write it
00:00:57.040
differently. But we're gonna enjoy the simultaneous sip right now. Do you have a
00:01:04.840
cup? A mug? It's the dopamine hit of the day. The thing that makes everything
00:01:08.620
better. And you're getting ready for it. Now go. Good stuff. So last night I was
00:01:26.060
getting ready to go to sleep. Winding down. I was in bed and I thought to myself, I'll
00:01:33.100
check Twitter one more time. Here's what you should never do if you're trying to
00:01:39.100
wind down and go to sleep. Don't ever check Twitter right before you go to
00:01:44.800
sleep. It's a very bad sleep strategy. And so I open up Twitter and I see
00:01:53.800
somebody's making a comment that's referring to the president retweeting me,
00:01:58.580
which he did the day before yesterday. And I thought, oh, they're still talking
00:02:02.820
about this. This was the day before yesterday. But then I looked at the
00:02:06.500
comment. I thought, well, this doesn't seem like it's about that one. So I click on
00:02:10.160
it and he had retweeted me again. So it was the second retweet in two days. And I'm
00:02:17.100
thinking, well, aren't I pretty special? And then I saw another one. I thought, are you
00:02:24.820
kidding me? He retweeted me three times in two days? But it wasn't true. It was not
00:02:33.660
true that I got retweeted three times in two days by the president because it was
00:02:39.020
four. He tweeted me four times in the last 48 hours. We'll talk about those. And I got
00:02:47.820
to tell you, it's the weirdest experience to get retweeted by the president because
00:02:54.020
it's simultaneously big and small at the same time. So the big part is that he's the most
00:03:00.520
important politician on the planet. And even if it were not just the job of the president,
00:03:07.280
he's also the biggest personality and the biggest job. I mean, it's Trump, right? And
00:03:14.300
so when he tweets about you and he referred to me as interesting guy, I'm not sure if that's
00:03:19.940
my forever name yet. It doesn't have the crisp, insulting quality of his other nicknames.
00:03:28.680
So I don't know if I can call myself an interesting guy. It just needs to be a little more insulting.
00:03:35.820
So maybe I can ask him for that later. Can you give me a nickname that's just a little bit
00:03:40.080
derogatory? Because I don't think I can go with this one. It's not going to work. Anyway,
00:03:45.160
so that's the big part is that it's the biggest, you know, the most important personality in
00:03:49.460
the world who is apparently, I caught his attention four times in 48 hours. So that's
00:03:56.620
the big part. The small part is that when I'm experiencing it, it's just me and my phone.
00:04:04.160
You know, Christine is in another room. And it's just like, ah, just me and my phone. That's
00:04:10.540
it. So it's the weird combination of things. And then I woke up and saw a lot of comments
00:04:16.440
that other people saw. So we'll talk about those things in a minute. I tweeted yesterday
00:04:24.180
that if I ever become president, seems unlikely, but if I ever become president, I want to do
00:04:30.000
such a good job that the news is about stuff like drinking water with two hands, walking
00:04:40.160
down a ramp, tweeting about stuff. Have you noticed that the criticisms about Trump are
00:04:50.020
completely off topic of his job performance? Have you noticed that it happens kind of subtly
00:04:56.820
because we get so drawn into each story? It's hard to to look at the larger trend, you
00:05:02.320
know, you get lost in the details. But if you just rise up for a minute and look at the
00:05:06.760
headlines, let me call up. Let's just call up CNN randomly. Let's see. You see the types
00:05:15.060
of stories that are anti Trump. There's something about Breonna Keillor confronts Trump Trump campaign
00:05:25.520
saying, are dead Americans funny to you? All right. So the best, the best they could do is that
00:05:35.240
there's a campaign official who laughed about a joke. Okay. Here's another one. Trump takes first
00:05:43.500
trip to the border. So that's a nothing. First trip to the border in 2020. Okay. How about
00:05:50.580
fact checking Trump's mail-in vote fraud claims? All right. Let's check that. So John Avalon is
00:06:00.700
checking Trump's mail-in fraud claims. And as his source, he uses PolitiFact. So he refers
00:06:07.580
to PolitiFact and they have this little logo, you've probably seen it, that shows the meter
00:06:13.020
going from, you know, false to true. And if it's really false, it's like it's on fire. You know,
00:06:19.320
it's a lie. So PolitiFact is their source for CNN to fact check the president. So I thought to
00:06:25.840
myself, well, I wonder how credible they are. So I thought, I'll check the one thing that I know
00:06:32.540
what the truth is. And it's the fine people hoax. And everybody who reads the transcript knows the
00:06:40.020
truth. So this one's easy. You don't have to wonder what the truth is, because it's just
00:06:45.420
written right in front of you. There's no interpretation. It's pretty obvious. So you
00:06:50.400
should go to PolitiFact, presumably, if it's a credible outfit. And it will have this little
00:06:56.380
meter, which it does for all of its facts. And that fact will say the fine people hoax,
00:07:02.460
or the fine people story that the allegation of the president called the marching Nazis, fine
00:07:08.520
people, it should have a big flaming false, right? If PolitiFact is credible, that's what it would
00:07:16.580
be. So I look it up. And I'm looking for the logo. And it's not there. It's not there. The logo,
00:07:26.940
the little flaming truth-o-meter, is the primary branding thing that they do. They put it on every
00:07:32.920
story. So every story has that, except for the fine people hoax. Instead of telling you it was true or
00:07:40.920
false, they said, we're just going to show it to you in context. Here's the transcript. Why would a
00:07:48.420
fact-checking organization not check the fact on the most important fact of the entire presidency?
00:07:56.940
In my opinion, it's the most important fact. Because more than anything, it's what's behind the
00:08:01.840
imagination that the president is a obvious racist and everybody knows it. And here's the evidence
00:08:07.940
because of this fine people hoax. Think about it. PolitiFact left their fact-checking off the biggest
00:08:16.660
lie in politics. Didn't say it was true. Didn't say it was false. They just left it off. Think about
00:08:24.420
that. And that's the source. The CNN uses to fact-check them. So the CNN claim is that mail-in
00:08:33.780
ballots would not be a massive fraud opportunity. They might be debating some of the details of
00:08:40.740
that. And I would imagine the president is speaking quite approximately, as he often does.
00:08:47.520
So he may not be true on every fact. But is there any thinking person who believes that mail-in
00:08:57.580
ballots are not an opportunity for fraud? I can't even wrap my head around the opposing argument.
00:09:04.720
I really can't. So that's weird. Here's what else they say. Trump falsely accuses Obama of treason.
00:09:17.000
So again, here's one of the biggest, the worst criticism they could find of Trump's job performance.
00:09:23.260
That has nothing to do with his job. It's just something he said about Obama in a political season.
00:09:28.260
And he exaggerated, perhaps used treason when really he meant bad behavior, you know, not technically
00:09:36.300
treason. Is that a story? Again, if I run for president and become president, the best you could
00:09:44.860
do is to have your biggest critics have nothing to say about your actual performance on the job and
00:09:52.340
only talk about your personality. Talk about some unimportant things that you said that might have
00:09:58.660
been wrong. That's it. That's the worst they have on Trump. Are they talking about the economy?
00:10:06.200
Do you know what November 3rd is going to look like? Here's what November 3rd is going to look like.
00:10:13.380
The economy is going to be roaring back at record percentages, which will be misleading because
00:10:20.460
we're coming off a low base. So just as Obama's performance with the economy was misleading because
00:10:27.080
he too was coming off a depressed base, everything looks good from there. Trump is going to get that
00:10:32.640
same imaginary benefit. He's going to be able to say, hey, look, we had a coronavirus and things are
00:10:39.960
up X percentage. Somebody says the Dow is screaming up. I'll bet it is. So the president's going to have
00:10:48.540
an economy that's coming back. I don't think people will blame him for the president, for the economy
00:10:54.120
being depressed, but they might credit him for it coming back. And I think that would be fair because
00:10:59.520
he has been pushing for it to come back even at maybe greater risk for health problems.
00:11:04.880
And so the economy will look good. What else we got? Let's take China. How is the president going to
00:11:15.680
look in terms of China trade? Well, I think China's reputation is so bad that because Trump has been
00:11:23.600
tough on China in general, he's going to look smart because he was tough on China. And it looks like
00:11:30.800
his instincts about China have been completely proven true. So that's what about ISIS? ISIS is
00:11:41.460
gone. ISIS is completely gone. Do you remember ISIS? Wasn't there a time you were worried that ISIS
00:11:48.260
was going to conquer the world? It's gone, basically. I mean, at least territorially, it'll never be gone
00:11:55.080
as an idea, I suppose. So you can kind of go down the line if you were to if you take whatever you
00:12:00.580
think are the top five things, right? Take the top five issues. He looks pretty good. There was a
00:12:10.000
that said that something like 24% of black likely voters, so it's not the entire population,
00:12:21.860
it's just the likely voters who are also black Americans, strongly approve of their president's
00:12:28.660
job approval. Do you believe that? So this is Rasmussen. Now, Rasmussen, I think, was the
00:12:35.860
most accurate poll of the major polls, the most accurate in 2016. And they're saying that
00:12:43.000
about a quarter of black likely voters approve or strongly approve of the president's performance.
00:12:51.860
Do you think that's true? I think it is, actually. Just anecdotally, and of course,
00:13:00.980
you know, anecdotally doesn't mean much. But it is my impression that he may have doubled his
00:13:06.540
support in the black community. And why wouldn't he? Why wouldn't he? Right? Because I think the
00:13:13.700
black community is looking at the same stuff everybody else is looking at. Do you think the
00:13:19.300
black community likes crime? No. Do you think the black community likes a bad economy? No.
00:13:28.900
Do you think the black, you know, community likes, you know, bad trade deals? No.
00:13:33.800
No. So, yeah. Why wouldn't he have doubled support, even against all the bad press? Seems like he
00:13:41.780
would have. All right. Some other things. So one of the things that the president retweeted
00:13:50.940
was my tweet in which I was tweeting about Sean King. Now, you all know Sean King. He's an activist,
00:13:59.760
one of the most famous ones. And he's a black. Would you say he's a black activist? Or he's an
00:14:08.300
activist for black issues? Now, the reason I ask that is that the, and I can't tell the story
00:14:14.300
without this. All right. So when I start giving you this context, the first thing you should say is,
00:14:20.740
how is that relevant to the story? Yeah, you're seeing it in the comments. So he is an activist for
00:14:27.980
the black community who has the interesting distinction of not appearing to be black.
00:14:36.160
Now, I'm not going to, I have no opinion of what his DNA is, right? So I'm not going to go there.
00:14:41.420
I'm just saying that the public opinion, other people, not me, look at him and say,
00:14:47.680
dude, you don't even look black. I don't think you're black. Now, I don't know what he is.
00:14:52.700
I'm not going to give you an opinion on that. I just think it's, it's, uh, it's sort of obnoxious
00:14:58.180
to tell other people what they are. So, uh, uh, so I'm not going to, I'm not going to get into
00:15:04.380
that argument. I will simply, I'll simply note that the most famous thing about Sean King is that
00:15:12.540
he's not black enough, according to his critics. Okay. And when I say not black enough, I mean,
00:15:19.820
he looks like a white guy. Again, nothing wrong with that. I'm not saying he's white. I don't know
00:15:25.620
anything about his DNA. I don't even have an opinion. I don't even care. Right. I literally
00:15:30.760
couldn't care about any of that, but it's important to this anecdotal story here.
00:15:37.320
So he was asked about whether, uh, the depictions of Jesus, who looks sort of white and European in
00:15:45.300
most depictions, if he thought that that needed to be changed to be more historically accurate. And
00:15:53.000
let's say incorporating the assumption that Jesus was, uh, less European looking and probably more
00:16:00.560
middle Eastern looking. And this is what Sean King tweeted. He said, yes, I think the statues of the
00:16:06.560
white European they claim is Jesus should also come down, meaning like the statues and stuff.
00:16:11.860
They're a form of white supremacy. Always have been in the Bible. When the family of Jesus wanted to
00:16:18.220
hide and blend in, guess where they went Egypt, not Denmark, tear them down. So that was Sean King's
00:16:27.580
tweet. Now here is the fascinating psychological part of this. The fascinating part is that when you see
00:16:36.600
this tweet, isn't your first impression that the slippery slope, you know, started with one statue
00:16:43.660
and then it was lots of statues and then it's, and then it's, uh, you know, Teddy Roosevelt and,
00:16:50.160
you know, and the next thing, you know, it's going to be Jesus. Is that your first impression that you
00:16:56.220
started with something that wasn't that big a deal? It was just a statue, one statue in a world full of
00:17:00.900
statues, but then it was lots of statues. And now it's my God, they're coming from my religion.
00:17:06.920
That's what it feels like, right? But let me suggest that if this had been the first and only issue,
00:17:14.340
if you'd never heard about any statues, there was, there were no protests going on. If the only thing
00:17:20.020
you heard of was just this point, Hey, why is Jesus always depicted looking European?
00:17:26.880
Wouldn't you think that was actually pretty reasonable as a complaint? Seriously, if it was the only one
00:17:34.980
you weren't judging it as a continuation of something, maybe you've got a problem with. If it was just by
00:17:42.160
itself in isolation, it's actually the most reasonable, it's the most reasonable complaint, which is what I
00:17:49.460
said. So when I retweeted Sean King, I thought to myself, you know, um, you know, in these times,
00:17:56.880
of great division and stuff like this, I don't disagree with that even a little bit. In fact,
00:18:02.460
I've thought that all my life. When I went to Sunday school as a kid, you know, I'm 10 years old,
00:18:07.720
and I'm looking at white Jesus, and I'm looking at the Middle East, and I'm 10. And I'm thinking,
00:18:13.860
how's this work? How'd you get this European guy born and born in the Middle East? So,
00:18:22.800
and then Sean King's characterization of it, it says it's a form of white supremacy. Now, if you've
00:18:30.680
been watching me for a while, you know that I've been criticizing anybody who uses the word white
00:18:37.020
supremacy, because it's just hyperbole, and it's really not in a lot of the examples that people
00:18:43.380
are using. In terms of how white people are thinking about it, anyway, it has nothing to do with
00:18:48.680
any of that. So I think most of that is just overblown. But in this particular example,
00:18:53.680
I've got to say, he's got kind of a point here. Because religion is, you know, what's more important
00:19:00.700
than religion? And Christianity being one of the big two, I guess, religions, it's super,
00:19:08.900
super important in the world and in people's lives. And sure enough, the racial identity of historical
00:19:17.040
Jesus was changed to make it white-like. How is that good? And somebody in the comments is saying
00:19:27.700
he was a Jew, and they could look any number of ways. Well, I think that that's a fair statement
00:19:34.080
that there are people who look all different ways. But I don't think anybody would disagree
00:19:38.680
that the artistic renderings of Jesus were intended to look like a European. Okay, I'm not saying it's
00:19:47.240
impossible that somebody could look a certain way, and it's different from the other people.
00:19:51.680
But I think you would agree that they intended to make him European. Don't you feel that that's a
00:19:56.900
safe statement? I mean, I'm not a historian, but it feels like that's safe, right? So I think Sean
00:20:03.340
King was just right, right? I will be happy to criticize him in places where I think he's wrong.
00:20:12.560
But why can't we just agree with him when he's right? And I think what's fascinating about this
00:20:17.320
is if you've taken the context away, you would say, yeah, you know, that's a pretty good point.
00:20:21.260
Maybe you should do something about that. Now, I'm not a believer, so it's not up to me. I'm not in
00:20:27.980
this fight at all. I don't, whichever way it goes is fine. I think, I think everybody should see Jesus
00:20:36.000
the way they want to, right? Why can't Jesus be exactly the Jesus you want to see? Why can't black
00:20:43.180
people have black Jesus? Why can't, you know, why can't the Chinese have Chinese Jesus? Because he is
00:20:51.020
Jesus, right? You're not exactly fitting into a, you know, fitting into a little box. There's only
00:20:58.060
one of them. So whatever, whatever the believers want to do with Jesus, that would be their business.
00:21:05.680
Here is a horrible little story. Oh, and so what's interesting about that is that the president
00:21:11.780
retweeted my comment, which was in, which was also agreeing. Part of the comment was, I said,
00:21:19.900
Trump just won 2020. Because if the protesters come after Jesus, that's the end of the election,
00:21:28.160
isn't it? Now, the Sean King thing probably will just stop with a, you know, one tweet. But imagine,
00:21:35.060
if you will, that it becomes a thing. Even if I agree with it being a reasonable thing that
00:21:41.640
should be discussed, it is the end of the election. Is there anybody who would disagree with that?
00:21:46.640
That if this Jesus thing became more of an issue than it is more than just a tweet,
00:21:52.460
it would be the end of the election. So President Trump retweets it. Do you see how clever that is?
00:22:02.100
Do you see how clever it is for the president to retweet that? Because in its, in its form as it was,
00:22:09.240
you know, just as a tweet, it's just a blue check person who tweeted something that has been said
00:22:15.840
before, not much to it. But because the president tweeted not only my comment that it would, that would
00:22:23.900
basically be the election, but he also tweeted the part where I agreed with Sean King. Think about it.
00:22:30.900
He didn't make a comment about it. He just tweeted it. So the fact that he would want to boost that signal
00:22:39.280
because it's good for his campaign is pretty clever. I'm going to say that was a, that was a well-chosen
00:22:45.360
retweet. Because if that gets bigger, the election's over. Here's a, I'll get back to some more Trump
00:22:56.040
retweets in a minute. There was an appalling story about something the New York Times did that is one
00:23:03.580
of the most despicable things you'll ever see in any entity, especially a news business. So the New
00:23:11.440
York Times decided to do a story about a fairly famous blogger who conceals his real identity.
00:23:20.080
And he blogged under the name of Scott Alexander, but that was actually his middle and his first and
00:23:28.160
middle name. So his real last name, he keeps secret because he, he's a psychiatrist and he doesn't
00:23:35.420
want his blogging, which can be a little more controversial to bleed into his real work. He could
00:23:40.200
get fired. His, his clients would have a problem with it. So the New York Times says they wanted,
00:23:45.340
they contact him to do a story about his blogging. Now I've talked about Scott Alexander's blog before.
00:23:51.780
It's one of the most brilliant and insightful things you've ever seen, like ever. That's a pretty big
00:23:59.940
statement, right? But it is one of the most insightful, smart, fresh views you've never seen before. I've
00:24:07.780
quoted him before. One of the most interesting thinkers in the world, really, and very well
00:24:15.360
informed. And the New York Times, of course, wants to do a story about it because he's so influential
00:24:20.580
and so good at it. But they decided they were going to dox him. They were going to do a complimentary
00:24:26.820
story about him because I guess the angle was he got a lot of stuff right about coronavirus before the
00:24:34.220
experts did. So it was going to be a complimentary story about how he got things right before the
00:24:40.160
experts were. And he's an influential, great blogger. And their policy is that they reveal real names.
00:24:47.700
And of course, he asked them not to. And they said, No, it's our policy. We have to reveal real names.
00:24:53.100
Now, they were going to write a positive story and destroy his life intentionally, knowing they were
00:25:04.380
doing it because it's just their policy. It's just their policy to use a real name. Yeah, we can't make
00:25:10.360
an exception because it's just our policy. And I don't know if they did or they're going to. I don't
00:25:18.560
know the status of this. I can't tell if but what what it caused him to do was to delete his entire
00:25:26.120
blog, not just a blog post, but the entire history of his blog, one of the most valuable contributions
00:25:34.300
to civilization. And he deleted it. He kept the backup. So it's not gone forever. But he deleted it
00:25:45.180
and, and wrote about it. Now, I could not hate the New York Times more than I do right now. It's
00:25:54.680
just evil. There isn't really any other way to spin this. If you're telling me that the New York
00:26:00.820
Times has a rule, and they just can't break that rule. Well, okay. But it's an evil rule. Do you know
00:26:09.000
who else had a rule? Hiller. He had a rule too. They weren't very good rules. We wish he didn't
00:26:16.420
have them. So New York Times, why don't you take your rules and shove them so far up your fucking
00:26:23.000
evil asses that we can see it in your eyes. You shouldn't even be able to stay in business after
00:26:32.260
something like this. Because it's one thing to do something accidentally. I'm very forgiving about
00:26:38.180
accidents. It's one thing to have a different opinion. I accept different opinions. It's one
00:26:47.000
thing to be political. It's one thing to be hyperbolic. It's one thing to fail the fact
00:26:51.260
checking. There are lots of ways to have bad behavior. But doxing a guy that you actually
00:26:57.260
like, and you're writing a story because of how much he's added to the world. And you know you're
00:27:03.060
going to destroy his life by revealing him, that is so fucking evil that I can't even wrap my head
00:27:11.200
around it. Amazing. And by the way, this guy isn't political. There's nothing political here. He's
00:27:18.600
literally just a helpful voice in the world. That's it. And they're destroying his whole fucking
00:27:25.960
life. Oh, it's worse than that. Because his patients will suffer. He's a psychiatrist with
00:27:31.720
a big group of patients. Do you think that they will be unaffected by this? No. No, they will be
00:27:37.680
affected. Fucking evil. All right. In the other thing that the president tweeted was just an article
00:27:48.120
I retweeted, which was that supposedly the only pollster to show Trump winning the state of
00:27:56.080
Michigan. So in other words, he has that distinction for accuracy in 2016, basically has a projection
00:28:06.180
that's completely different than the major polls. So you know, the major polls are showing Biden winning
00:28:11.040
by very large margins. And the guy who was the most accurate pollster on a state basis, at least for
00:28:17.980
some of the key states, says that his polling using a little different methodology, which has been
00:28:24.080
more accurate in the past, shows us neck and neck. It's neck and neck. And he suggests that there might
00:28:33.260
be more shy Trump supporters than 2016. That's right. It's neck and neck. And there might be twice as
00:28:44.220
many shy supporters who are not admitting who they're going to vote for than 2016.
00:28:52.580
So the president retweeted that because that obviously is good for him.
00:29:01.020
So let's see. Trump put a temporary hold on workers' visas from foreign countries. You know,
00:29:08.120
this is a topic I don't know a lot about. But I also don't understand why the tech workers are
00:29:14.980
being treated differently than other kinds of workers. I could see wanting to keep employment
00:29:23.040
good in this country if there were types of jobs that Americans could do and wanted to do. But in the
00:29:29.580
tech world, bringing people in from other countries, let's say India, if you bring in an engineer from
00:29:39.060
India, does that subtract from America or add to India or add to America? Well, have you ever met
00:29:48.880
any technical people from India? They're really good. I'm not saying that, you know, as a general
00:29:56.840
statement that every person from India is a technical expert, I'm saying that I've met a lot
00:30:01.580
of technical experts who were born in India. And they're really good. They've started companies,
00:30:09.140
some of the biggest companies in the country. Or at least people who were born in India started the
00:30:14.960
biggest countries, not necessarily just worker visa people. But my understanding of economics is that
00:30:22.600
the more people who have that kind of skill, the better. The more, the better. Because there's an
00:30:30.400
unlimited demand. There's no limit to the number of people who have money, and would like to do a
00:30:36.840
startup of some kind. And the main thing that's preventing them from doing that startup is that
00:30:41.700
they can't find a technical person to do the technical stuff. It's the number one problem. You
00:30:47.340
probably think the number one problem for startups is getting money, right? It's actually not, in my
00:30:53.960
opinion. Somebody might disagree with this. The number one problem is finding technical talent.
00:31:00.060
If you get that right, you can usually get money too. So I don't understand this, but I also haven't
00:31:06.600
heard the full argument. And it's a temporary restriction. We'll see if that becomes permanent
00:31:12.460
through the end of the year. I want to read you how CNN is currently characterizing the Russia
00:31:22.880
collusion coup against the president. So that's my characterization, that the Russia collusion
00:31:31.520
hoax was essentially a coup to remove the president. So that's the way I would call that.
00:31:36.840
So CNN, of course, you would say to yourself, well, they were certainly hugely embarrassed by covering
00:31:45.220
it as if it were true for, I don't know, two years or whatever, only to find out the entire thing was
00:31:50.180
was just a hoax and made up and the president didn't do anything wrong. And it was bad actors in
00:31:56.640
the government, etc. Exactly the opposite of what CNN reported for two years. So do they say, gosh,
00:32:03.680
we should have got that wrong? No, this is the way they're deciding. This is an opinion piece,
00:32:09.060
doesn't matter who it's on their, it's on CNN.com. And here's their characterization of that. I just
00:32:15.400
got to read you the sentence because it's hilarious. While quote, while some misconduct related to the
00:32:21.420
Russia investigations has been uncovered, that's just the first part of the sentence. Some misconduct.
00:32:27.100
Yeah, there has been some misconduct. A little bit. Hardly worth mentioning. You don't need any details.
00:32:35.520
But there was some misconduct related to the Russia investigation. It's been uncovered. Yeah.
00:32:42.060
And several former FBI officials have been chided for their handling of certain aspects of the probe.
00:32:49.060
chided. They have been chided. Now, CNN does not say that the FBI did very, very bad things as part of
00:33:00.880
what seemed to be a larger plot to remove the president who was legally elected. No, they say
00:33:07.720
that several former FBI officials have been chided. Oh, they've been chided. I don't even know where
00:33:15.840
you come up with the word chided. Could you come up with a softer word to criticize somebody? Let me see
00:33:24.400
if I can use these, this word. Joseph Goebbels, Goebbels, who was the Nazi propagandist. A number of
00:33:36.720
people have chided him for some of the things he did. Yeah, Joseph Goebbels, he was chided, got chided a
00:33:44.200
little bit. How about Ho Chi Minh? Killed millions of people. That's one way to say it. I mean,
00:33:52.800
if you were being unkind, you'd say, oh, yeah, he murdered millions of people. But if you were CNN,
00:33:58.560
you might say Ho Chi Minh has been chided for some of the things he did in office while he was in power.
00:34:05.720
All right. Let's see. Let's talk about the Bubba Wallace noose story. So the news, if you could
00:34:17.720
call it that, is that a rare NASCAR driver who was African American, apparently there are not many of
00:34:26.480
them. But Bubba Wallace claims that there was a noose hanging in the garage, the part of the garage
00:34:34.660
where his car was, I guess. And that was considered a racist act. And the NASCAR people got behind him
00:34:42.740
and really supported him, which was good. Now, I said to myself on day one, how many of you remember,
00:34:52.220
can you back me up on this? Because a big part of what I do is I make predictions based on persuasion
00:34:59.040
and then I check them. Right? Have I told you that you have to check your predictions because
00:35:07.140
otherwise you have no idea. You have no idea how well you understand the world. You don't know how
00:35:14.240
your filter on the world works unless you make predictions and then check how you did. What was
00:35:20.280
the first thing I said when I heard about the Bubba Wallace noose story in the comments? What was the
00:35:27.960
first thing I said? Where's the picture? Right? I told you that if there's no picture, it's a hoax.
00:35:37.660
We live in a world where we're bristling with camera equipment. Every single person, every one of you
00:35:43.880
has a camera within arm's reach, probably your phone, right? Are you telling me that people saw
00:35:51.280
a freaking hoax? I'm sorry, that they saw a noose hanging in the garage of a black NASCAR driver
00:35:58.860
and nobody took out a phone? Really? Nobody took out a phone? So that, so let me ask you this.
00:36:09.560
Who else told you at the beginning of the story that if you haven't seen the photo already,
00:36:15.960
it's probably fake? Now I have to say probably because if this is, if this turns out to be a real
00:36:21.180
story, let me be the first to say it's appalling. You know, it's a, it's a 10 and a 10. It's like a cross
00:36:29.380
burning on your lawn. We all condemn it. There's no, no hesitation, no equivocation, horrible,
00:36:36.400
horrible act if it's true, but without a photo. So two out of three, uh, uh, race stories like this
00:36:47.980
turned out to be false, according to the wall street journal, actually two out of three, it was
00:36:52.120
researched. So the odds are that any of these stories have a 67% chance of being false. If you
00:36:59.040
don't know, if you don't know for sure and you can't check it out yourself, that's the filter you
00:37:04.720
should put on it. Well, it'd be terrible if it's true, but there's a one in three chances true.
00:37:11.200
So there's been, uh, some of you are saying in the comments already, um, some people looked into it
00:37:16.840
and it turns out that there are photos and even live video, which is much harder to, to fake. It's,
00:37:24.360
it's possible, but you could do it, but it's harder. There's video of that same garage
00:37:29.660
with that, with a, a pull rope for the garage doors or a rope hangs down and you grab it and
00:37:37.440
you pull it to raise and lower the garage. Uh, I have exactly that in a utility garage where I have
00:37:44.500
a rope that I pull. Do you know what makes it easier to, to pull that rope? Just take a guess.
00:37:51.360
What would make it a little easier to, to grab the rope? Yeah, you put a little loop on the end
00:37:59.420
and there are actual videos from November, November of that same garage, garage number four
00:38:09.760
with the pull rope from the thing hanging down. And there in miniature about the size of a hand,
00:38:17.820
not the size of a neck, not the size of something that could go over a head, but more like the size
00:38:24.700
of something you put your hand through that was noose-like at the bottom. Now, if I hadn't seen it
00:38:34.460
on video, because somebody was just filming back in November and they were just filming the cars
00:38:38.960
and they go right by it and you see the, you see the thing hanging down and it's obviously just a pull
00:38:44.760
rope for the garage. Now, uh, somebody cut it off allegedly so that there are no photos that you
00:38:53.220
could take now because it was cut off. But back in November, you could, you could see it and it was
00:39:00.660
clearly just a, a, a pull rope. So that's the biggest, one of the biggest stories in the country.
00:39:06.300
And it's just so obviously debunked once you see the video, but how many people will see the video?
00:39:14.760
What percentage of the company of the country do you think we'll ever know that that was a,
00:39:20.040
that that's fake? Well, let's look at say CNN because, uh, let's see. I just, it's funny.
00:39:32.720
That story seems to have disappeared from the front page. Just checking, checking. All right.
00:39:40.820
Well, let me do a search on CNN and see if they've got any kind of a story. So all this new story,
00:39:51.180
see if there are any updates. Uh, nope. That story seems to have disappeared. I just did a search
00:39:59.320
on CNN's page and the story isn't even there. It doesn't exist as any kind of a story in a search.
00:40:07.400
Uh, unless they come up in the wrong order. We'll see. Oh, it is there, but it came up in the wrong
00:40:14.640
order. All right. Uh, I'll just quickly look at it and see if it mentions, if it mentions even the,
00:40:21.960
um, possibility that there are videos of this in the past, blah, blah, blah. People looking into it,
00:40:29.300
uh, strengthens our resolve. Uh, it's a horrible thing. Um, he set the race, blah, blah, blah. It's a
00:40:37.960
despicable act. This will not break me. Um, and by the way, somebody pointed out that the garages
00:40:46.540
in question have these, you know, multimillion dollar cars and tools in them. Of course they
00:40:51.640
have video. You know, they have video because, because it's like super expensive equipment and all
00:40:58.140
these garages. So there's video of all this. So we're going to know for sure. Uh, Phelps would
00:41:04.920
not say what, if any video cameras may have been recorded at the track. So the official won't say
00:41:11.300
if there was video recording. Why would you not say that? Is it for security purposes? No. It's
00:41:19.380
because somebody looked at the video and they know that there's nothing, there's nothing there. Uh,
00:41:24.960
people are enraged. Yeah. Okay. The sick person who perpetrated it must be found and exposed.
00:41:33.220
Yeah. So CNN does not make any reference to the fact that there exists video on YouTube,
00:41:41.380
which shows it in November as a handful. Do you, do you think that they ought to at least
00:41:50.080
mention that other outlets are treating it differently? So this is the world you live in
00:41:56.080
where the world is presented to you as completely fake. All right. So, uh, give credit to the last
00:42:06.460
refuge that I think did the most thorough job of showing photographs, you know, before and after
00:42:12.140
and debunking it. But there, there are other sources for that, but the last refuge seems to have been
00:42:17.860
all over it. All right. Um, and that's about all I wanted to talk about today. Um, some of you saw my
00:42:29.180
ring. I'll just say again, just for the purposes of completeness. I was supposed to get married
00:42:35.260
with Christina in May, but coronavirus delayed that and we rescheduled and rescheduled and we were
00:42:44.420
trying to figure out honeymoon and wedding date. And finally we decided that we would just call
00:42:50.920
ourselves married. We will actually get married, uh, within the next 30 days probably. Um, but we
00:43:01.020
decided that the government doesn't get to decide if we're married. You know what I mean? Uh, it's one
00:43:07.480
thing to say, okay, there's a process. Everybody has the same process. You have to go through these
00:43:12.240
things and then you're married. And I don't mind that if it's easy, if it's traditional,
00:43:17.360
if the bride wants it, if the family wants it, I don't mind doing any of that stuff.
00:43:22.380
But if the government is preventing me from getting married because, you know, there's a
00:43:29.680
coronavirus and it's just harder. I mean, it took us a long time just to get the paperwork, to get the
00:43:35.080
license because nothing's easy. You know, you can't go to the office in person and you got to do things
00:43:40.180
in the mail and there's a website, but it doesn't look like it worked. So you're not really sure if
00:43:45.320
it can through. And then you have to get a person who takes it in person down there for you and signs
00:43:50.120
it. It's like they've made it unnecessarily complicated. But does anybody know why the
00:43:55.500
ceremony matters? Does the ceremony matter just because you have a witness? I mean, I could get,
00:44:01.820
I could get a witness to sign a document. It doesn't need to be a ceremony. So here's the point.
00:44:06.700
Here's my point. I don't believe the government gets to tell me if I'm married. Do you agree with
00:44:14.380
me? Would you agree that the government is not in control of whether I am married? I'm married.
00:44:23.460
That's it. So it's not the government's decision. I don't want their opinion on it. When things are
00:44:30.340
back to normal, as soon as we can do the ceremony, we'll do it. So we'll wrap up the details. But don't
00:44:35.340
tell me I'm not married. I'm just not legally married. Somebody says, why at your age get
00:44:42.860
married? Just stay as domestic partners. Well, there are lots of reasons. But one of them,
00:44:48.360
and a lot of it has to do with the level of commitment you're showing to each other, etc.
00:44:52.940
But a lot of it is financial, right? Because you want to, you're both committing yourself,
00:44:59.100
and you have to know that there's a financial, you know, safety for both of you, etc. So that part's
00:45:04.940
just common sense. You have to get that taken care of. But the other part is just existing in a world
00:45:12.460
that requires labels. Yeah, the optics of it is exactly as somebody is saying. The ability to say
00:45:19.440
somebody is my wife is really convenient. It's really easy. It's clean. It says everything you need
00:45:26.160
to say. All those other words for it, this is my domestic partner, blah, blah, blah, blah. It just
00:45:34.660
seems to minimize the other person, and it just takes something away from it.
00:45:42.700
So, of course, it's a considered decision. But there are some just advantages to it. Just makes
00:45:49.920
everything a little bit cleaner in our current system.
00:45:55.940
Prenup, of course. Yes. Prenup is just pretty much standard business if you're my age and you have
00:46:05.520
assets. Somebody's asking about divorce and division of assets. No, don't worry. I'm an adult. I live in
00:46:14.100
the real world. I know all the risks. And we do what we needed to do.
00:46:26.040
Oh, did Project Veritas drop a new video? How about that? Let's look at it. Don't go away.
00:46:35.240
Don't go away. The best part of this periscope just happened. All right. So, remember I told you
00:46:44.760
last week that there would be some major red pills dropping? And I said, it's not one story. It's
00:46:52.900
going to be like a quilt in which there'll be squares of the quilt, which will be dropping from
00:47:00.260
the sky. And one of these squares may have just dropped. Let's say Facebook, Project Veritas,
00:47:15.120
and see what comes up. Project Veritas exposed CNN and Facebook. Is this the new one? No,
00:47:26.140
that's the old one. Let's see what Project Veritas has going. Project Veritas. All right. Why is this
00:47:39.080
not coming up? All right. Looks like this is the new one. Damn it. All right. We'll talk about this
00:47:48.820
tomorrow. But give me a chance to look it up. 623. Here it is. Daily Caller has it. Project Veritas
00:48:00.460
video shows Facebook content moderators discussing censoring conservatives reveals, quote, exception
00:48:08.380
given to Don Lemon for hate speech. So let me let me play it for you. Have you not heard it?
00:48:16.760
Let me play it for you. You don't have to see the faces because they're all sort of semi-concealed
00:48:36.400
It's simple. As you say, be brave. I am more brave than I am scared of any trouble that anybody
00:48:44.180
could give me for breaking some stupid NDA. I think the truth is more powerful than any
00:48:49.020
NDA. To stick up for the voice of the people. Facebook's notorious for it. And they say they
00:48:58.060
don't, but it's clear that people's content opens up because it's been defiltered off the
00:49:02.200
queue. It's a very progressive company who's very anti-MAGA. If you see a conservative country,
00:49:07.940
you just get rid of it. Right. I don't give a s***. I'll delete it. You're going to do
00:49:12.780
this. You're going to do this. You're going to do this. You're going to do this. You're
00:49:14.780
going to do it all. Zach McElroy came to Project Veritas because of what he saw at his job at
00:49:19.660
Facebook in Tampa, Florida. He saw and filmed evidence of structural and cultural bias inside
00:49:25.940
Facebook discriminating against Republicans and conservatives. McElroy's story raises serious
00:49:32.660
doubts about the under oath testimony of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to Congress, where he claimed
00:49:39.180
Facebook has no political bias. What percentage of the flagged posts in the civic harassment
00:49:47.460
queue, as it's called, were Republican conservative? I saw a stark contrast between Republicans versus
00:49:56.120
Democrats in that queue. I saw upwards of 75 to 80 percent of the posts in that queue were
00:50:01.520
from Republican pages, politicians, journalists, and pages that supported the president or supported
00:50:09.960
conservatives. What does that tell you about Facebook slash cognizance algorithm here? Well,
00:50:17.840
certainly the algorithm is not human, but it had to be made by a human. So for 75 to 80 percent of the
00:50:25.980
posts to be targeting Republicans and conservatives, you can say it was a bot, but somebody had to
00:50:31.500
design that algorithm. So really, somebody at Facebook. Some people on Capitol Hill have expressed
00:50:37.740
interest in this ratio that you speak of. Are you willing to potentially testify under oath that
00:50:45.740
three quarters of the posts that you saw flagged were in one political direction? To the best of my
00:50:51.900
knowledge and ability, yes. To me, censorship online is one of the biggest issues facing us in the lead up to
00:50:57.420
the 2020 election. Well, insofar as I was not somebody who was working behind the scenes on policy, but rather
00:51:08.620
as someone who was enforcing policy, I saw everybody around me and I saw myself and I did a little bit of
00:51:17.180
comparing and I thought, you know, there really are not very many conservatives here. And because there are not
00:51:23.420
very many conservatives, I really don't think there are very many people sticking up for the voice of
00:51:26.860
conservatives at a company that handles all the, at a company that handles the flow of conversations,
00:51:39.340
basically a large portion of the discourse online. And we are essentially in charge of what gets said and
00:51:47.580
what gets stifled. Uh, you mentioned the election and the cons can talk a little bit more about your
00:51:54.620
concerns as it pertains to Facebook meddling or being involved in the 2020 election. Well, we know
00:52:01.020
publicly and as someone, even before I started working there, we saw plenty of, we've seen plenty of
00:52:09.580
statements from Mark Zuckerberg, uh, publicly about how they don't want to meddle in the election. They want to
00:52:16.300
give everybody a free, you know, a platform for everybody to speak freely. But we know that privately
00:52:25.740
they have very different opinions and we've seen that with the previous Facebook story that you guys
00:52:30.220
published. And I had no doubt that what he said publicly is not what he means to do privately.
00:52:37.820
Let's go to the Trump cartoon. This one here, is this something that you, you, all right? I, it's a
00:52:49.420
little bit longer than I thought it was going to be, but I will call your attention to it and say you
00:52:55.100
should all watch it because today, but today might be a lot different than you thought it was going to be.
00:53:00.940
Okay. So, um, uh, I think you're going to find out a lot in this video. I haven't seen it all,
00:53:07.740
but, uh, it's going to be a fun day. All right. That's it for today. I'll talk to you tomorrow.