Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 28, 2020


Episode 1041 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About All the Fake News Today


Episode Stats

Length

41 minutes

Words per Minute

146.28278

Word Count

6,141

Sentence Count

433

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

A story about an anti-malarial drug that might work on coronavirus, and a story about how CNN makes something that might be good sound like it might be bad. Plus, a new term for defacing statues.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, come on in, come on in.
00:00:16.760 It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:19.620 The best coffee with Scott Adams of the weekend.
00:00:25.160 Yeah, it's going to be that good.
00:00:26.520 And a lot of it has to do with a thing called the Simultaneous Sip.
00:00:33.200 And it goes like this.
00:00:35.720 All you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tanker, chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask of a vessel of any kind.
00:00:41.980 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:44.440 I like coffee.
00:00:46.620 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope meat hit of the day.
00:00:50.480 The thing that makes everything better, except for the news today.
00:00:57.020 Which is kind of stupid, but we'll talk about that.
00:01:00.620 Join me now for the Simultaneous Sip.
00:01:02.780 Go.
00:01:07.340 Ah.
00:01:07.900 Well, just when you thought things couldn't get any stupider, they did.
00:01:14.200 Took a new turn.
00:01:16.940 All right, here's my favorite story of the day.
00:01:20.000 We'll start with the funny stuff.
00:01:22.340 So, CNN, as you know, dislikes President Trump.
00:01:26.500 I don't know.
00:01:26.900 Is anybody aware of that?
00:01:28.640 Hasn't been covered much.
00:01:30.720 But, yeah, CNN doesn't like President Trump.
00:01:33.660 And so, when they run a story that could be favorable to him in any way whatsoever, watching how they word it is just fascinating.
00:01:42.840 So, here's a story about a team of researchers, doctors, who are looking at all the existing drugs that might work on coronavirus.
00:01:52.340 And they were doing a real detailed dive.
00:01:54.840 Apparently, this is something they've done before.
00:01:57.080 In which they look at all the existing things and see what might be repurposed.
00:02:00.840 So, I look at this study and I say to myself, huh, this is going to be a story that has to talk about hydroxychloroquine.
00:02:10.740 How will they speak of it?
00:02:12.900 So, I start at the top.
00:02:15.040 It's like, blah, blah, blah, this other drug, other drug, other drug, other drug, other drug, other drug.
00:02:21.180 Now, if this had been Fox News, they might have mentioned hydroxychloroquine a little bit sooner.
00:02:26.820 But, on CNN, you have to really look for it.
00:02:30.320 It's like, ah, I've got to read quite a bit to get down to this long article.
00:02:34.560 And there it was.
00:02:36.740 So, I have to read you the exact language to see how they make something that might be good sound like something that might be bad.
00:02:45.720 Are you ready?
00:02:48.300 Alright.
00:02:48.780 It says, one drug, the anti-malarial drug, hydroxychloroquine, has famously received a lot of boosterism from U.S. President Donald Trump.
00:03:00.700 Alright.
00:03:00.960 So, the setup is, this is President Trump's drug.
00:03:04.260 Alright.
00:03:04.840 So, here's the next thing they say about it.
00:03:06.560 But, in the published studies available for Feigenbaum's team to review, the drug hasn't outperformed others.
00:03:17.420 Hasn't outperformed others.
00:03:21.360 Is that what you say about a drug that doesn't work?
00:03:25.280 Do you say that it hasn't outperformed others?
00:03:29.540 And do you know what it says about the others?
00:03:32.880 Some of them might work.
00:03:34.160 That's right.
00:03:36.680 So, a study in which one of the main findings is that this inexpensive, widely available drug that President Trump likes apparently works.
00:03:46.620 Apparently works.
00:03:48.480 According to these researchers.
00:03:50.180 Not according to me, of course.
00:03:51.560 I don't know.
00:03:53.400 But, the way they have to word it is, the drug hasn't outperformed others.
00:03:59.220 But, the study, the whole study shows that some of them probably work.
00:04:04.400 Of course, it has to be tested further.
00:04:06.520 But, there's some indication of it.
00:04:08.560 And then it goes into this sort of tortured argument about why.
00:04:12.520 Well, the two French studies on hydroxychloroquine, they drew red flags for the University of Pennsylvania.
00:04:20.280 Alright.
00:04:20.540 So, these are the guys searching it.
00:04:22.100 It drew red flags.
00:04:24.500 Did it say that about any of the other drugs?
00:04:26.340 Did any of the other drugs draw any red flags?
00:04:28.380 Probably not.
00:04:31.020 Because of the time it takes to clear the body and blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:04:35.320 So, the two studies that were positive are not conclusive.
00:04:41.360 But, that would be true of just about all the studies, I would think.
00:04:44.060 Anyway, so that's how CNN covers good news.
00:04:48.720 The President is saying that since he imposed this new 10-year term for defacing statues, that it hasn't happened.
00:04:57.480 Is that true?
00:04:59.500 Have no statues been defaced since the President slapped a higher penalty on that?
00:05:06.420 And, I guess he tweeted 15 different times pictures of people who tried to deface the, I think it was the Andrew Jackson statue.
00:05:16.740 Do you think a 10-year prison term is going to stop him?
00:05:19.300 Because the President himself is tweeting the photos of the perpetrators.
00:05:23.580 He did 15 separate tweets of official wanted posters that show the faces of these people.
00:05:31.000 How many of them do you think have been caught by now?
00:05:34.300 So, probably a few.
00:05:36.780 Probably a few.
00:05:38.000 So, I would think that some of these people are going to jail for a long time.
00:05:42.880 Let's see if that cuts down on it.
00:05:46.380 So, the Trump campaign is probably over.
00:05:51.740 We'll know in about 30 minutes or so whether he's still running.
00:05:56.960 The story that this comes from is apparently the, not apparently, this happened, I saw it.
00:06:04.440 The President tweeted a video in which some senior citizens were protesting each other.
00:06:10.740 Some pro-Trump, some anti-Trump.
00:06:13.120 So, it's a bunch of old people yelling at each other.
00:06:15.240 But a prominent part of it is one of the old people who supports Trump yelling, white power, white power, some old man in a golf cart.
00:06:25.660 And the President tweeted that.
00:06:28.000 So, somebody says it's a hoax.
00:06:34.980 It's not a hoax that he tweeted it.
00:06:38.500 So, of course, this has CNN salivating.
00:06:40.780 But, I don't know, if that video is still up and the President hasn't said, oops, I didn't see that part, probably his campaign will be over in half an hour or so.
00:06:52.780 So, if you want to know what the slaughter meter says now, zero, zero.
00:07:00.440 So, the slaughter meter is set at zero while that video remains unexplained and still up.
00:07:06.540 There isn't any chance he could win at this point.
00:07:08.420 So, all right, and by the way, don't ask me to explain that one.
00:07:14.780 All right, we have to listen to the President's explanation if he gives one.
00:07:19.600 If he doesn't give one, then I would say that would be the end of his chance to get reelected.
00:07:27.820 All right, there is, here's a fun story.
00:07:32.720 All right, there are reports of an explosion in Iran's eastern mountains caused by a cyber attack.
00:07:41.080 Where would that have come from, a cyber attack against Iran?
00:07:44.900 It turned the facility on itself, destroying Iran's Shahab long-range missile force stored in the Qajir Tunnel Base Complex,
00:07:55.960 as well as a solid fuel production facility.
00:07:59.420 What?
00:08:00.760 A cyber attack just blew up a whole tunnel complex, somehow, in Iran,
00:08:09.820 and destroyed their Shahab long-range missile force?
00:08:14.560 But it's a little unclear, because it says the missile force stored in the tunnel,
00:08:20.620 but that's not necessarily the entire missile force, is it?
00:08:25.200 Did one cyber attack take out Iran's entire long-range missile capability?
00:08:30.460 That seems like a lot.
00:08:32.440 Why would they keep it all in one place?
00:08:33.900 Maybe they did.
00:08:34.540 I don't know.
00:08:34.780 So, we won't hear any more about that, I don't think,
00:08:39.640 because it was a secret operation by somebody.
00:08:43.120 Somebody.
00:08:44.380 Who could it be?
00:08:46.460 We don't know.
00:08:49.060 So, I guess there's some fake news from the New York Times today,
00:08:52.460 anonymous source, that the president had been briefed
00:08:56.240 that Russia was offering bounties to Afghanistan people to kill Americans.
00:09:03.740 And the story is that the president, you know, didn't do anything about that.
00:09:09.280 And, of course, the president says, fake news, nobody ever briefed any of us on that.
00:09:16.040 So, let's handicap this.
00:09:19.780 What do you think are the odds that an anonymous source from the New York Times
00:09:25.940 would have a story that's really bad for the president,
00:09:29.700 that involves Russia,
00:09:32.840 it involves Russia,
00:09:34.980 and nobody else in the room was aware of it?
00:09:39.140 Does that sound familiar in any way?
00:09:44.700 It is the least credible story of all stories.
00:09:48.400 If you were to rank stories from most credible to least,
00:09:53.700 where would you put a New York Times story in the summer before an election
00:09:57.880 with an anonymous source that involves Russia and nobody else in the room heard it?
00:10:04.880 Where would you put that on your list of credible stories?
00:10:08.880 At the bottom.
00:10:10.680 At the bottom.
00:10:11.900 Right.
00:10:12.240 There's nothing you'll hear today.
00:10:14.820 There's nothing you'll hear ever.
00:10:16.720 There would be less credible than something that has all of those qualities.
00:10:21.220 Nothing.
00:10:21.940 There's literally nothing less credible than that.
00:10:24.700 But, because it still has the name New York Times on it,
00:10:28.060 and people are sort of stuck in the past,
00:10:29.820 they imagine that that's news of some sort,
00:10:32.800 they still think it's news.
00:10:35.080 So, that'll be out there forever.
00:10:39.460 So, I've told you that it's always a big mistake
00:10:42.580 to check Twitter right before you try to go to sleep.
00:10:46.060 Have you ever made that mistake?
00:10:47.820 Because Twitter is designed,
00:10:50.380 well, I wouldn't say designed,
00:10:51.840 I'll say that it evolved to
00:10:54.700 a point where it gets you excited when you look at your tweets.
00:10:59.100 Right?
00:10:59.360 It jacks you up.
00:11:00.420 So, last night,
00:11:02.720 I'm getting ready to fall asleep.
00:11:05.660 I'm like,
00:11:06.020 I'll look at Twitter one more time.
00:11:10.480 Okay.
00:11:11.700 There's a death threat against me in public.
00:11:16.540 I don't think I'm going to sleep so well tonight.
00:11:20.140 So, that's the last fucking thing I look at
00:11:22.780 before I go to sleep is a death threat against me.
00:11:25.920 So,
00:11:26.740 now you might say to yourself,
00:11:28.360 Scott,
00:11:29.120 a death threat on Twitter.
00:11:31.600 I'm pretty sure that's against their policy.
00:11:34.480 Well,
00:11:34.980 we will find out.
00:11:36.240 Because I did report it.
00:11:38.180 And I'm going to tell you what I consider a death threat.
00:11:41.500 And then I want you to put your,
00:11:43.100 your opinion on it.
00:11:44.780 And we're going to look at the Twitter rules
00:11:46.840 that seem to be appropriate,
00:11:48.280 because I printed them out.
00:11:49.920 And then you tell me if this tweet should stay up.
00:11:53.680 It's a gray area.
00:11:54.680 It's a gray area.
00:11:57.160 So, here's the,
00:11:58.380 here's the tweet.
00:11:59.460 It's from somebody at,
00:12:01.280 headline zoo,
00:12:03.900 with three O's,
00:12:05.740 I guess.
00:12:06.520 Headline zoo,
00:12:07.440 all one word,
00:12:08.160 with three O's at the end.
00:12:09.260 And this is responding to that fake news,
00:12:13.220 New York Times story that I just mentioned.
00:12:15.620 Here's the tweet.
00:12:17.100 It should have been clear from the beginning,
00:12:19.580 Trump is a traitor.
00:12:21.680 What's to be said about his hashtag,
00:12:24.920 Vichy Republican enablers,
00:12:27.780 at real James Woods,
00:12:29.540 at Scott Adams says.
00:12:31.820 So,
00:12:32.500 here is somebody who has
00:12:33.780 declared that Trump is a traitor,
00:12:36.540 because of the fake news,
00:12:37.880 New York Times story that didn't happen.
00:12:40.140 And that two people in the world
00:12:42.120 should be called out
00:12:43.240 as being Vichy Republican enablers.
00:12:47.600 Now,
00:12:48.800 here's how I interpret that.
00:12:51.120 Yeah,
00:12:51.340 the Vichy,
00:12:52.820 meaning the,
00:12:53.580 this refers to World War II,
00:12:56.400 helped me with my history here.
00:12:57.820 So,
00:12:58.100 I'm just,
00:12:58.340 I'm just winging it.
00:13:00.860 It would be the,
00:13:01.800 the French pseudo-government
00:13:04.640 that was under the German control
00:13:06.720 in World War II,
00:13:08.080 essentially traitors to their own country,
00:13:10.500 because they were bowing to Germany
00:13:13.480 instead of being,
00:13:15.380 instead of joining the resistance,
00:13:17.960 I guess.
00:13:18.840 So,
00:13:19.780 what happened to the Vichy government
00:13:22.180 after Germany was defeated?
00:13:25.640 This is where I need a little help on my,
00:13:28.400 yeah,
00:13:28.940 I need a little help on my history here.
00:13:30.860 Did the government officials,
00:13:33.660 known as the Vichy,
00:13:35.480 the Vichy government,
00:13:37.320 were they rounded up
00:13:39.900 and fucking killed?
00:13:41.920 Just guessing.
00:13:43.540 When you call somebody
00:13:44.760 a Vichy Republican,
00:13:47.300 are you not saying,
00:13:49.160 by reference,
00:13:51.640 that they are in a category of people
00:13:53.880 that nobody would care,
00:13:55.800 and it might even be a good idea
00:13:57.420 to round them up
00:13:58.360 and kill them?
00:14:00.220 Right?
00:14:01.080 Yeah,
00:14:01.520 they were strung up.
00:14:02.280 They were all executed.
00:14:03.720 All right,
00:14:03.960 so,
00:14:05.040 is it fair to say
00:14:06.300 that somebody labeling me
00:14:08.100 in a category
00:14:09.240 that is,
00:14:11.200 even you would say,
00:14:12.540 might be executed?
00:14:13.720 Like,
00:14:14.020 even you would say,
00:14:14.880 you know,
00:14:15.640 those Vichy traders,
00:14:17.640 if they got executed,
00:14:18.880 well,
00:14:19.200 well,
00:14:19.660 good for the,
00:14:20.380 good for the people,
00:14:21.260 because that was probably
00:14:23.080 exactly what needed
00:14:24.360 to be done,
00:14:25.140 right?
00:14:26.260 So,
00:14:26.820 by putting me publicly
00:14:27.920 in a category
00:14:28.860 that not only lumps me
00:14:30.840 with James Woods,
00:14:32.280 who I blocked a long time ago
00:14:34.560 just for being a crazy dick,
00:14:36.860 and if you don't like that,
00:14:38.460 that's okay,
00:14:38.960 I don't care.
00:14:39.940 He's sort of a crazy dick,
00:14:41.400 and I blocked him
00:14:42.180 a long time ago.
00:14:43.440 Didn't want to see anything
00:14:44.360 that came out of his
00:14:45.420 tortured head anymore.
00:14:46.840 All right,
00:14:50.220 so I interpret this
00:14:51.540 as a death threat,
00:14:52.640 but let's see
00:14:54.000 if the Twitter rules
00:14:55.140 would ban this person.
00:14:58.860 Now,
00:14:59.180 I reported it last night,
00:15:01.300 and as of a few moments ago,
00:15:03.660 it's still live,
00:15:04.680 the account is.
00:15:06.240 So here are the rules,
00:15:07.480 Twitter rules,
00:15:08.460 and I'm just picking
00:15:09.080 a few rules
00:15:09.960 out of their many rules,
00:15:11.080 but these are the ones
00:15:11.720 I think apply.
00:15:13.120 Abuse harassment.
00:15:14.700 You may not engage
00:15:15.840 in the targeted
00:15:16.680 harassment of someone
00:15:17.960 or incite others
00:15:19.480 to do so.
00:15:20.860 This includes wishing
00:15:21.960 or hoping that someone
00:15:23.040 experiences physical harm.
00:15:25.940 Now,
00:15:26.380 would you say
00:15:27.040 that that tweet,
00:15:28.480 comparing me
00:15:29.180 to the Vichy Republic,
00:15:32.300 a group of people
00:15:33.120 who were strung up
00:15:34.800 by their own public,
00:15:37.300 justifiably,
00:15:39.280 I would say,
00:15:39.960 justifiably,
00:15:40.700 they were traitors,
00:15:42.100 do you think
00:15:43.500 that it is targeted?
00:15:44.800 First of all,
00:15:45.400 is it targeted
00:15:46.100 because she mentions
00:15:47.040 me by name?
00:15:48.020 Yes.
00:15:49.160 Is it harassment
00:15:50.300 of someone?
00:15:51.280 I wouldn't call it
00:15:52.080 harassment exactly,
00:15:53.460 although it is that,
00:15:55.180 of course.
00:15:55.660 Yeah,
00:15:55.860 it is harassment.
00:15:56.840 Of someone
00:15:57.580 or incite others
00:15:58.800 to do so.
00:16:00.220 Does that tweet
00:16:01.340 incite others
00:16:02.540 to be,
00:16:04.380 to act against me
00:16:06.260 in any harassing way?
00:16:07.240 Well,
00:16:07.380 of course it does.
00:16:08.140 Of course it does.
00:16:09.660 And this includes
00:16:10.960 wishing or hoping
00:16:11.820 that someone
00:16:12.240 experiences physical harm.
00:16:14.340 Well,
00:16:14.640 I think that's pretty clear.
00:16:16.560 If somebody compares you
00:16:18.760 to a Vichy government,
00:16:20.320 they are publicly
00:16:21.240 and explicitly
00:16:22.440 wishing or hoping
00:16:24.380 that someone
00:16:24.820 experiences physical harm.
00:16:27.020 Now,
00:16:27.520 I'm not a mind reader,
00:16:28.720 right?
00:16:29.480 But I don't know
00:16:30.540 how else you would
00:16:31.160 interpret it.
00:16:32.920 However,
00:16:33.760 however,
00:16:34.180 if this were
00:16:35.480 the only thing
00:16:36.180 that Twitter said,
00:16:37.500 then you'd say,
00:16:38.420 oh,
00:16:38.600 okay,
00:16:38.880 this is obviously
00:16:39.820 a violation.
00:16:41.380 But it's not
00:16:42.160 the only thing
00:16:42.640 Twitter says.
00:16:43.660 Because you have
00:16:44.440 to worry about
00:16:45.020 those times
00:16:45.600 when people
00:16:46.140 use words
00:16:46.980 hyperbolically
00:16:47.840 that everyone
00:16:49.020 knows has
00:16:50.040 no violent intent.
00:16:51.280 For example,
00:16:51.960 if I said,
00:16:53.000 I'll kill you
00:16:53.800 if you do that again,
00:16:55.740 everybody knows
00:16:56.740 you don't need
00:16:57.820 to kill them.
00:16:58.880 It's just a choice
00:16:59.780 of words.
00:17:00.640 So Twitter
00:17:01.260 has some more
00:17:01.900 language that goes
00:17:03.160 into that.
00:17:03.640 in a different
00:17:04.640 section.
00:17:05.560 You have to go
00:17:06.080 look for it,
00:17:06.620 but it's there.
00:17:07.740 It says,
00:17:08.120 statements that express
00:17:09.040 a wish or hope
00:17:09.820 that someone
00:17:10.240 experiences physical
00:17:11.540 harm.
00:17:12.080 Okay,
00:17:12.440 that's what we're
00:17:12.920 talking about.
00:17:14.200 Making vague
00:17:15.180 or indirect threats.
00:17:18.440 What's vague
00:17:19.240 or indirect?
00:17:20.060 It's kind of a
00:17:20.560 judgment call.
00:17:21.620 Or threatening
00:17:22.200 actions that are,
00:17:23.800 and here's the
00:17:24.320 key phrase,
00:17:25.540 unlikely to cause
00:17:26.680 serious or
00:17:27.580 lasting injury.
00:17:30.340 Or lasting
00:17:31.320 injury.
00:17:31.780 lasting injury?
00:17:34.940 What the hell
00:17:35.600 is lasting
00:17:36.160 injury?
00:17:37.240 If somebody
00:17:37.880 incites somebody
00:17:38.800 to punch me
00:17:39.500 in the face,
00:17:40.500 but I recover,
00:17:41.900 is that a
00:17:42.340 lasting injury?
00:17:43.840 How do you
00:17:44.420 define a
00:17:44.940 lasting injury?
00:17:46.120 That's a tough
00:17:46.720 one.
00:17:47.620 Kind of subjective.
00:17:49.300 So if it's
00:17:50.300 unlikely to cause
00:17:51.180 serious or
00:17:51.800 lasting injury,
00:17:53.060 are not
00:17:53.860 actionable under
00:17:54.740 this policy,
00:17:55.700 but may be
00:17:56.480 reviewed and
00:17:57.180 actioned under
00:17:58.360 those policies.
00:17:59.520 So they
00:17:59.900 reserve the
00:18:01.820 right to
00:18:02.320 review them,
00:18:03.260 but they
00:18:03.680 say we're
00:18:04.160 not automatically
00:18:04.980 bound,
00:18:06.720 essentially,
00:18:07.260 by our own
00:18:07.720 rules,
00:18:08.320 if it looks
00:18:09.100 like it's
00:18:09.680 not a real
00:18:11.280 thing.
00:18:11.800 Not real in
00:18:12.640 the sense that
00:18:13.280 it's unlikely
00:18:14.440 to translate
00:18:15.220 into any
00:18:15.900 kind of action.
00:18:17.180 Now here's
00:18:17.660 the problem.
00:18:18.920 Here's the
00:18:19.360 problem.
00:18:20.200 If you were
00:18:20.700 to look at
00:18:21.140 this one
00:18:21.700 person making
00:18:22.480 one tweet,
00:18:23.760 could you
00:18:24.220 make the
00:18:24.620 argument that
00:18:25.880 this by
00:18:26.420 itself is
00:18:27.860 likely to
00:18:28.500 cause me
00:18:29.060 any harm?
00:18:30.380 Well, even
00:18:30.920 I would say
00:18:31.580 that's pretty
00:18:32.540 unlikely.
00:18:33.960 Pretty unlikely.
00:18:39.560 Alright.
00:18:42.100 We'll take
00:18:43.260 care of a
00:18:43.780 few people
00:18:44.320 who seem
00:18:44.760 to be
00:18:45.040 suffering.
00:18:48.400 Let's see,
00:18:49.100 we'll get
00:18:49.340 rid of that
00:18:49.780 one.
00:18:50.900 We'll get
00:18:51.480 rid of that
00:18:51.960 one.
00:18:54.300 We'll get
00:18:54.960 rid of
00:18:55.800 anybody
00:18:56.200 else?
00:18:59.220 Anybody
00:18:59.740 else?
00:19:01.260 Alright.
00:19:01.820 So we got
00:19:02.260 rid of a
00:19:02.640 few trolls.
00:19:05.600 And so
00:19:06.740 here's my
00:19:07.720 point on
00:19:08.120 this.
00:19:08.600 If one
00:19:09.160 person refers
00:19:10.200 to you one
00:19:10.920 time on
00:19:11.600 Twitter as
00:19:12.200 being part
00:19:12.660 of a
00:19:12.980 Vichy
00:19:13.360 government,
00:19:16.480 there's no
00:19:17.180 real harm,
00:19:17.840 wouldn't you
00:19:18.080 say?
00:19:19.060 One person
00:19:20.040 one time
00:19:20.860 calls you
00:19:21.520 a traitor,
00:19:22.800 eh,
00:19:23.460 nothing.
00:19:24.220 But what
00:19:24.620 happens if
00:19:25.140 it becomes
00:19:25.560 part of
00:19:25.900 the
00:19:26.000 pattern?
00:19:26.980 Because you
00:19:27.300 know it
00:19:27.620 will.
00:19:29.320 When
00:19:29.800 Trump loses,
00:19:30.920 because at
00:19:31.440 this point,
00:19:32.120 if that
00:19:32.480 tweet is
00:19:32.860 still up
00:19:33.160 there,
00:19:33.320 he can't
00:19:33.580 possibly win.
00:19:35.080 When
00:19:35.560 Trump loses,
00:19:37.220 will people
00:19:37.860 actually come
00:19:38.700 after people
00:19:39.820 like me?
00:19:40.860 Well, if
00:19:41.720 there's more
00:19:42.220 of this,
00:19:42.640 yes.
00:19:43.780 So how do
00:19:44.320 you treat a
00:19:44.840 tweet that
00:19:45.720 this person
00:19:46.600 probably hopes
00:19:47.340 would become
00:19:47.900 popular?
00:19:48.900 If it
00:19:49.480 doesn't become
00:19:50.040 popular, it's
00:19:50.720 one tweet,
00:19:51.540 it's one
00:19:51.980 crazy person,
00:19:52.800 it really
00:19:53.000 doesn't make
00:19:53.400 much difference
00:19:53.920 to me or
00:19:54.360 anybody else.
00:19:55.880 But how
00:19:56.160 do you
00:19:56.340 judge this?
00:19:57.440 So I'll
00:19:58.200 give you an
00:19:58.580 update on
00:19:59.000 this.
00:19:59.280 In my
00:19:59.560 opinion,
00:20:00.160 this is a
00:20:00.680 call to
00:20:01.380 violence,
00:20:03.740 which by
00:20:04.520 itself is
00:20:05.120 weak, but
00:20:05.760 if it were
00:20:06.200 to gain
00:20:06.620 steam, it
00:20:07.320 would actually
00:20:07.760 kill me.
00:20:09.020 It would
00:20:09.460 actually kill
00:20:10.080 me.
00:20:10.980 I would
00:20:11.280 actually be
00:20:11.640 dead,
00:20:12.640 literally
00:20:13.100 dead,
00:20:13.960 if this
00:20:15.120 thought picked
00:20:16.640 up popularity.
00:20:17.640 Because sooner
00:20:17.980 or later,
00:20:18.420 somebody would
00:20:18.820 say, hey,
00:20:19.660 they really
00:20:20.080 mean this,
00:20:20.900 I'll take
00:20:21.300 a crack
00:20:21.680 at them.
00:20:23.220 Let me
00:20:24.000 say as
00:20:24.360 clearly as
00:20:24.880 I can to
00:20:25.400 anybody who
00:20:25.840 wants to
00:20:26.160 take a
00:20:26.520 crack at
00:20:26.960 me later,
00:20:27.940 it won't
00:20:28.380 go well.
00:20:30.620 So if
00:20:31.640 anybody decides
00:20:32.380 they want
00:20:32.740 to try to
00:20:33.660 take me
00:20:34.040 out today
00:20:35.520 or any
00:20:35.880 time in
00:20:36.200 the future,
00:20:37.280 my only
00:20:37.940 advice is
00:20:38.640 make sure
00:20:39.640 you get
00:20:39.940 it done,
00:20:40.460 because you
00:20:41.100 don't want
00:20:41.500 to miss,
00:20:43.380 because I
00:20:44.300 may not be
00:20:44.860 as inefficient
00:20:45.560 as you
00:20:46.200 are.
00:20:47.800 Justin
00:20:48.280 Welby,
00:20:48.800 the Archbishop
00:20:49.420 of Canterbury
00:20:50.180 and head
00:20:50.520 of the
00:20:50.760 Church of
00:20:51.080 England,
00:20:52.640 says they're
00:20:53.300 reconsidering
00:20:53.960 their portrayal
00:20:55.480 of Jesus
00:20:55.900 as a white
00:20:56.560 man.
00:20:57.600 So Jesus
00:20:58.160 is about
00:20:58.700 to get
00:21:02.360 a redo,
00:21:03.420 get a
00:21:03.740 remake.
00:21:05.020 Now,
00:21:05.540 the interesting
00:21:06.140 thing about
00:21:06.620 all these
00:21:07.040 stories of
00:21:07.620 the things
00:21:07.980 that have
00:21:08.260 to be
00:21:08.500 renamed
00:21:09.040 and changed
00:21:10.020 and stuff
00:21:10.420 is that
00:21:11.600 some of
00:21:12.040 them are
00:21:12.320 perfectly
00:21:12.720 reasonable,
00:21:13.400 in my
00:21:13.600 opinion.
00:21:14.620 In my
00:21:15.020 opinion,
00:21:16.120 remaking
00:21:16.800 historical
00:21:17.520 Jesus to
00:21:18.300 look like
00:21:18.740 the actual
00:21:19.280 person
00:21:19.740 would have
00:21:22.220 looked like
00:21:22.780 seems
00:21:24.280 reasonable.
00:21:25.460 I'm not
00:21:25.840 a believer,
00:21:26.500 so I
00:21:26.780 don't have
00:21:27.060 a vote.
00:21:28.140 I don't
00:21:28.360 care if
00:21:28.920 it gets
00:21:30.220 done,
00:21:30.560 I don't
00:21:30.760 care if
00:21:31.000 it doesn't
00:21:31.320 get done,
00:21:31.800 but it's
00:21:32.360 certainly
00:21:32.580 in the
00:21:32.920 reasonable
00:21:33.340 category.
00:21:36.120 So I
00:21:37.220 don't mind
00:21:37.520 that one,
00:21:38.020 but here are
00:21:38.320 some of the
00:21:38.680 fun ones.
00:21:42.780 Yale,
00:21:43.600 Harvard,
00:21:44.260 Columbia,
00:21:45.060 Princeton,
00:21:45.640 they're all
00:21:45.960 named after
00:21:46.520 basically
00:21:47.100 slave owners
00:21:48.160 or,
00:21:49.380 yeah,
00:21:49.860 basically
00:21:50.200 slave owners,
00:21:51.420 people who
00:21:51.960 were involved
00:21:52.720 in slavery,
00:21:53.380 Columbus,
00:21:54.480 Yale,
00:21:54.840 Harvard,
00:21:56.040 the prince
00:21:56.760 referred to
00:21:57.480 with Princeton
00:21:58.120 was King
00:21:58.660 William,
00:21:59.400 they all
00:21:59.960 had slaves.
00:22:02.340 So I
00:22:03.280 guess the
00:22:03.620 Woodrow
00:22:03.940 Wilson,
00:22:06.240 there was
00:22:08.040 something within
00:22:08.700 Princeton that
00:22:09.420 was called the
00:22:09.940 Woodrow Wilson
00:22:10.720 something,
00:22:11.540 they changed
00:22:12.080 that name
00:22:12.500 because Woodrow
00:22:13.180 Wilson was
00:22:13.780 a massive
00:22:14.960 racist.
00:22:16.520 Sure,
00:22:16.920 he did some
00:22:17.360 good stuff,
00:22:18.160 but he was
00:22:19.240 also a massive
00:22:19.840 racist.
00:22:21.560 And I'm
00:22:22.200 thinking to
00:22:22.580 myself,
00:22:23.140 I'd like to
00:22:23.700 suggest a
00:22:25.120 compromise.
00:22:26.780 And the
00:22:27.000 compromise is
00:22:27.740 this.
00:22:29.240 Instead of
00:22:29.940 changing the
00:22:30.660 names of
00:22:31.180 all these
00:22:31.720 slavers,
00:22:34.520 how about
00:22:35.100 we do
00:22:35.380 this?
00:22:36.080 We just
00:22:36.460 come up
00:22:36.780 with like
00:22:37.100 a copyright
00:22:37.820 symbol,
00:22:38.600 except instead
00:22:39.340 of copyright,
00:22:40.700 it would be
00:22:41.140 like a
00:22:41.480 little,
00:22:42.580 let's say
00:22:43.260 an S for
00:22:43.980 slavery.
00:22:45.680 I guess
00:22:46.620 R and C
00:22:47.700 are already
00:22:48.080 taken for
00:22:48.700 registered and
00:22:49.620 copyright.
00:22:50.700 So you'd
00:22:51.180 have some
00:22:51.460 kind of
00:22:51.700 like a
00:22:52.000 little letter
00:22:52.400 you put
00:22:52.720 after it.
00:22:53.840 Let's say
00:22:54.420 it's S
00:22:54.860 for slavers.
00:22:56.660 So it'd
00:22:56.960 be like
00:22:57.300 Harvard,
00:22:58.840 S.
00:23:00.000 Where'd
00:23:00.480 you go?
00:23:00.880 I went
00:23:01.260 to Princeton,
00:23:02.940 S.
00:23:04.700 Where'd
00:23:05.160 you get
00:23:05.360 your degree?
00:23:05.900 Yale,
00:23:06.940 S.
00:23:08.320 I'm just
00:23:08.960 kidding,
00:23:09.340 they'll never
00:23:09.640 do that.
00:23:10.060 But watching
00:23:12.680 this take
00:23:13.200 place is
00:23:13.920 quite
00:23:14.420 fascinating.
00:23:16.400 I gotta
00:23:17.060 say I
00:23:17.620 have mixed
00:23:18.140 opinions about
00:23:18.880 it all.
00:23:19.700 I have
00:23:19.960 mixed
00:23:20.220 opinions.
00:23:23.280 And the
00:23:23.920 mixed
00:23:24.140 opinions go
00:23:24.920 like this.
00:23:27.120 I think
00:23:27.920 that if we
00:23:28.560 were starting
00:23:29.040 from scratch
00:23:29.860 to name all
00:23:30.820 these things,
00:23:31.600 there's no
00:23:32.260 way in hell
00:23:32.700 we would
00:23:33.020 have named
00:23:33.300 everything
00:23:33.840 after slave
00:23:35.340 owners.
00:23:36.480 If nothing
00:23:37.600 had a name
00:23:38.260 and we
00:23:38.520 were saying
00:23:38.800 oh let's
00:23:39.180 just start
00:23:39.600 naming all
00:23:40.100 our buildings
00:23:40.660 and our
00:23:41.080 stuff.
00:23:42.100 We never
00:23:42.360 did that
00:23:42.700 before but
00:23:43.160 let's put
00:23:43.720 somebody's
00:23:44.060 name on
00:23:44.440 this stuff.
00:23:45.320 Let's build
00:23:45.780 a statue.
00:23:46.780 I don't
00:23:47.340 know that we
00:23:47.820 would do it
00:23:48.280 that way if
00:23:48.780 we started
00:23:49.200 today.
00:23:50.800 Do we
00:23:51.220 have a
00:23:51.540 right to
00:23:52.120 change
00:23:52.480 history?
00:23:53.160 Well here's
00:23:53.860 the thing.
00:23:55.540 Let me
00:23:55.820 give you a
00:23:58.560 little science
00:23:59.200 here to
00:24:00.380 red pill you
00:24:01.120 on these
00:24:01.680 statues and
00:24:02.780 such.
00:24:04.380 It goes
00:24:05.000 like this.
00:24:05.560 If you
00:24:06.760 think that
00:24:07.440 your physical
00:24:08.180 environment is
00:24:09.520 not programming
00:24:10.480 you, you're
00:24:11.560 wrong.
00:24:12.260 Your physical
00:24:12.920 environment is
00:24:13.820 part of the
00:24:14.380 everyday programming
00:24:15.440 of who you
00:24:16.000 become.
00:24:16.560 For example,
00:24:17.700 if you live
00:24:18.380 somewhere where
00:24:19.100 you don't have
00:24:19.600 much light,
00:24:21.200 you're programmed
00:24:22.060 to be in a
00:24:22.660 worse mood
00:24:23.160 because light
00:24:24.660 is good for
00:24:25.220 you.
00:24:25.460 It gives
00:24:25.580 you vitamin
00:24:25.980 D, helps
00:24:26.580 your mood,
00:24:27.120 helps your
00:24:27.420 health.
00:24:28.120 So simply
00:24:28.560 having a
00:24:29.000 house that
00:24:29.360 doesn't have
00:24:29.780 windows in
00:24:30.780 the right
00:24:31.060 place will
00:24:32.100 actually program
00:24:32.880 you to be
00:24:33.580 sad and
00:24:34.100 unhappy and
00:24:34.620 less successful.
00:24:35.560 And less
00:24:36.360 healthy.
00:24:37.340 It's that
00:24:37.820 simple.
00:24:38.820 You got
00:24:39.200 light, you're
00:24:40.020 a little bit
00:24:40.400 healthier and
00:24:40.840 happier.
00:24:41.280 You got no
00:24:41.720 light, you're
00:24:42.140 not.
00:24:43.060 But this
00:24:43.520 extends also
00:24:44.200 to things
00:24:44.620 like color
00:24:46.180 and design
00:24:47.160 and do you
00:24:49.260 feel claustrophobic?
00:24:50.640 Do you feel
00:24:51.020 creative?
00:24:53.260 If you're a
00:24:54.060 person who
00:24:54.460 needs order,
00:24:55.460 are you in a
00:24:55.980 messy environment?
00:24:57.360 Because imagine
00:24:57.880 being somebody
00:24:58.440 who really
00:24:58.760 needs something,
00:25:00.780 I don't know
00:25:01.500 if it would
00:25:01.700 be OCD,
00:25:02.460 but whatever
00:25:03.020 it is that
00:25:03.680 you need things
00:25:04.280 just where
00:25:04.720 they belong.
00:25:05.560 But you
00:25:06.260 unfortunately
00:25:06.980 don't have a
00:25:07.820 choice.
00:25:08.180 You live in a
00:25:08.580 house where
00:25:08.900 everything is
00:25:09.260 just a mess.
00:25:10.340 What would
00:25:10.660 that do to
00:25:10.980 your brain?
00:25:12.720 Imagine what
00:25:13.440 that does to
00:25:13.940 your brain.
00:25:15.060 Think about it.
00:25:15.700 It programs
00:25:16.420 you.
00:25:17.720 Now generalize
00:25:20.220 us from this.
00:25:20.620 We know that
00:25:21.280 everything in
00:25:22.020 your environment
00:25:23.160 can program
00:25:25.220 you and
00:25:25.780 pretty
00:25:26.240 immediately
00:25:27.280 and pretty
00:25:29.160 grossly.
00:25:30.040 Now let me
00:25:30.900 make up an
00:25:32.000 example that
00:25:32.660 isn't real.
00:25:34.520 Let's say
00:25:35.240 you're afraid
00:25:36.960 of dogs.
00:25:38.500 We'll just
00:25:38.900 take that as
00:25:39.480 a given.
00:25:40.000 Most of you
00:25:40.580 are not afraid
00:25:41.160 of dogs.
00:25:41.720 But let's
00:25:41.920 say you were
00:25:42.260 attacked by a
00:25:42.960 dog when you
00:25:43.420 were a kid
00:25:43.720 and you were
00:25:44.500 afraid of dogs.
00:25:46.000 Is that
00:25:46.520 reasonable?
00:25:46.920 Is it
00:25:47.440 reasonable for
00:25:48.040 a person to
00:25:48.520 be afraid of
00:25:49.080 dogs if they
00:25:49.820 were attacked
00:25:50.280 by dogs?
00:25:51.800 You would say
00:25:52.560 well it might
00:25:53.180 be irrational
00:25:53.880 but it's quite
00:25:55.040 reasonable that
00:25:55.980 they would be.
00:25:57.340 If you were
00:25:57.820 attacked by
00:25:58.520 something you'd
00:25:59.920 have a little
00:26:00.280 PTSD about it
00:26:01.300 wouldn't you?
00:26:01.720 I mean it just
00:26:02.000 makes sense.
00:26:02.980 People who go
00:26:03.420 through a war
00:26:05.100 will have some
00:26:05.640 PTSD.
00:26:06.840 So now imagine
00:26:07.440 you had some
00:26:08.420 PTSD about dogs
00:26:09.860 but you had to
00:26:11.060 live in the
00:26:12.240 dog museum.
00:26:14.120 It's like there
00:26:14.680 are pictures of
00:26:15.240 dogs on the
00:26:15.820 wall.
00:26:16.200 There's a
00:26:17.080 statue of a
00:26:17.780 dog.
00:26:19.020 There's audio
00:26:20.900 playing of dogs
00:26:22.020 barking.
00:26:23.000 You're living in
00:26:23.680 a dog museum
00:26:24.580 but you're
00:26:25.240 afraid of dogs
00:26:26.100 and you have a
00:26:27.060 good reason to
00:26:27.820 be afraid of
00:26:28.380 dogs because
00:26:28.940 one attacked
00:26:29.520 you once.
00:26:31.020 What does
00:26:31.440 that do to
00:26:31.840 you?
00:26:33.060 How do you
00:26:33.680 like that?
00:26:34.860 Do you like
00:26:35.260 living there?
00:26:36.360 The answer is
00:26:37.080 no.
00:26:38.120 No.
00:26:38.500 That would
00:26:38.840 program you
00:26:39.560 very negatively.
00:26:40.600 You wouldn't
00:26:40.880 be able to
00:26:41.540 perform in
00:26:42.800 life.
00:26:43.200 You couldn't
00:26:43.500 be as happy.
00:26:44.280 You'd just
00:26:44.560 never be happy.
00:26:45.280 So the
00:26:47.340 point is
00:26:47.980 that the
00:26:49.260 decorations
00:26:50.100 literally the
00:26:51.640 decorations
00:26:52.300 the choice of
00:26:53.720 color, the
00:26:54.560 choice of a
00:26:55.140 painting on
00:26:55.720 a wall, the
00:26:57.720 way the room
00:26:58.420 is organized
00:26:59.520 will program
00:27:01.660 you in real
00:27:02.440 time.
00:27:03.160 It will program
00:27:03.880 you in real
00:27:04.360 time.
00:27:05.160 Now those of
00:27:05.740 you who are
00:27:06.140 saying, if I
00:27:07.800 had to estimate
00:27:08.340 I'd say at
00:27:09.820 least 80% of
00:27:11.640 you listening to
00:27:12.380 this are saying
00:27:13.060 some form of
00:27:13.860 this, oh
00:27:15.060 my God
00:27:15.620 Scott, we
00:27:17.380 all have messy
00:27:18.280 rooms, we
00:27:19.280 all have to
00:27:19.740 go through
00:27:20.240 life, there's
00:27:22.400 no way this
00:27:23.080 is as powerful
00:27:23.880 as you're
00:27:24.420 making it out
00:27:25.060 to be.
00:27:26.120 We all have
00:27:27.220 to ride the
00:27:28.500 bus sometimes,
00:27:30.400 and the bus
00:27:31.020 is not pretty.
00:27:32.260 I get it
00:27:32.920 Scott, we'd
00:27:33.660 all like to
00:27:34.200 live in a
00:27:34.580 nice place
00:27:35.100 like you
00:27:35.580 do, but
00:27:36.940 that's life.
00:27:38.720 It's a
00:27:39.020 messy life,
00:27:40.340 we're all
00:27:41.000 affected the
00:27:41.560 same way,
00:27:42.360 don't make
00:27:42.660 a big thing
00:27:43.140 about it,
00:27:43.640 it's nothing.
00:27:44.920 And I think
00:27:45.360 you're completely
00:27:45.940 wrong.
00:27:47.060 I think that
00:27:47.640 the power
00:27:48.360 of your
00:27:49.300 physical
00:27:50.160 environment
00:27:50.740 is way
00:27:52.060 stronger
00:27:52.580 than you
00:27:53.740 think it
00:27:54.800 is.
00:27:55.660 Now of
00:27:56.040 course,
00:27:56.640 the analogy
00:27:57.360 that I
00:27:58.440 made to
00:27:58.740 the dog,
00:27:59.900 analogies
00:28:00.780 are not
00:28:01.160 persuasive,
00:28:02.020 so don't
00:28:02.500 look to the
00:28:02.960 analogy for
00:28:03.700 the persuasion.
00:28:04.900 That was
00:28:05.440 just to give
00:28:05.840 you an idea
00:28:06.220 of what I'm
00:28:06.480 talking about.
00:28:07.000 Here's the
00:28:07.420 persuasion.
00:28:07.920 If I
00:28:11.360 told you
00:28:11.980 you had to
00:28:12.500 live in a
00:28:12.940 space that
00:28:14.260 was very,
00:28:15.280 very unkind
00:28:16.080 to you
00:28:16.620 personally,
00:28:17.500 but it
00:28:18.060 wouldn't
00:28:18.320 bother me,
00:28:19.900 am I a
00:28:20.320 good person?
00:28:22.680 Am I a
00:28:23.400 good person
00:28:23.960 if I say,
00:28:25.040 hey, you're
00:28:25.880 a guest in
00:28:26.380 my house,
00:28:26.920 I've got
00:28:27.240 three bedrooms,
00:28:28.420 they're all
00:28:28.980 available for
00:28:29.740 you to use,
00:28:30.580 but I want
00:28:31.060 you to use
00:28:31.480 the one that
00:28:31.800 has the
00:28:32.080 dog pictures.
00:28:33.780 Use the
00:28:34.160 one with
00:28:34.400 the dog
00:28:34.760 pictures.
00:28:35.140 Yeah, I
00:28:35.480 know you're
00:28:35.900 afraid of
00:28:36.340 dogs, and
00:28:36.980 you'll be
00:28:37.640 traumatized,
00:28:38.400 you'll have
00:28:38.660 PTSD, and
00:28:39.420 you won't
00:28:39.640 be able to
00:28:40.000 sleep, but
00:28:40.980 it doesn't
00:28:41.360 bother me.
00:28:42.820 I'm not
00:28:43.380 afraid of
00:28:43.780 dogs.
00:28:44.800 So if I'm
00:28:45.620 not afraid of
00:28:46.220 dogs, I
00:28:48.480 don't care if
00:28:49.020 you sleep in
00:28:49.520 the dog
00:28:49.860 bedroom, even
00:28:50.540 though there
00:28:50.880 are two
00:28:51.160 other bedrooms
00:28:52.200 that don't
00:28:52.540 have dog
00:28:53.020 pictures in
00:28:53.720 them, why
00:28:54.360 do I care?
00:28:55.120 Because I'm
00:28:55.720 not afraid of
00:28:56.280 dogs.
00:28:59.140 That's sort
00:28:59.740 of what I'm
00:29:00.160 seeing.
00:29:01.020 So the
00:29:02.080 reason that I'm
00:29:02.920 anti-statue,
00:29:04.480 but I'm not
00:29:05.180 in favor of
00:29:05.980 taking them
00:29:06.640 down in
00:29:07.100 some
00:29:07.280 non-legal
00:29:08.220 riot way.
00:29:10.080 Everything has
00:29:10.860 to go through
00:29:11.340 the process
00:29:12.020 because that's
00:29:13.920 how we're
00:29:15.000 organized, that's
00:29:15.740 how society
00:29:16.240 works.
00:29:16.960 So I think
00:29:17.400 everything has
00:29:17.860 to go through
00:29:18.200 a legal
00:29:18.520 process, but
00:29:19.920 I think the
00:29:20.780 complaint overall
00:29:22.580 is quite real.
00:29:24.260 Now, has
00:29:24.960 anybody ever
00:29:26.340 been traumatized
00:29:27.460 by the names
00:29:28.220 Yale, Harvard,
00:29:29.540 Princeton, or
00:29:30.860 Columbia?
00:29:31.560 No.
00:29:33.460 No.
00:29:36.020 Nobody has
00:29:36.700 ever been
00:29:37.140 traumatized
00:29:37.900 because Harvard
00:29:38.960 is named
00:29:39.520 after a
00:29:40.000 slaver.
00:29:40.380 It just
00:29:40.560 hasn't
00:29:40.800 happened.
00:29:41.340 I don't
00:29:41.580 think anybody
00:29:41.960 knew until
00:29:42.440 this year.
00:29:42.940 I didn't
00:29:43.280 know.
00:29:44.060 Or at
00:29:44.400 least the
00:29:44.720 public didn't
00:29:45.200 know.
00:29:45.500 I didn't
00:29:45.800 know.
00:29:47.020 So certainly
00:29:48.980 things have
00:29:49.600 gone too
00:29:50.160 far.
00:29:51.400 But if you
00:29:52.460 ask me would
00:29:54.040 I want to
00:29:54.460 live in a
00:29:54.860 world where
00:29:55.480 there was a
00:29:56.040 statue to
00:29:56.840 slave owners
00:29:57.500 if I had
00:29:59.180 some generational
00:30:00.420 PTSD about
00:30:01.500 that, I'd
00:30:02.420 say, no, I'd
00:30:03.080 like to get
00:30:03.480 rid of those
00:30:03.880 statues.
00:30:05.220 But if you
00:30:05.620 told me to
00:30:06.060 change the
00:30:06.400 name of
00:30:06.640 these colleges,
00:30:07.340 I'd say
00:30:07.580 that's too
00:30:08.020 far, but
00:30:09.320 it's not up
00:30:09.780 to me.
00:30:11.160 So we'll
00:30:11.880 see if the
00:30:12.520 liberal
00:30:13.080 institutions
00:30:14.060 can live
00:30:14.620 with their
00:30:14.860 own rules.
00:30:17.040 Do you
00:30:17.560 remember
00:30:17.840 YouTuber
00:30:18.360 Jenna
00:30:18.780 Marbles?
00:30:19.460 Very, very
00:30:20.160 popular.
00:30:21.160 A blonde
00:30:22.140 woman who
00:30:22.760 did funny
00:30:23.360 YouTubes.
00:30:24.500 She was
00:30:24.900 gigantic.
00:30:25.380 She canceled
00:30:27.400 herself for
00:30:28.400 her own bad
00:30:29.060 behavior in
00:30:29.700 the past
00:30:30.120 because she
00:30:30.460 did black
00:30:30.900 face and
00:30:31.520 made tasteless
00:30:32.880 jokes.
00:30:34.240 Shane Dawson
00:30:35.020 was another
00:30:36.000 gigantic
00:30:36.680 YouTuber.
00:30:37.580 And by the
00:30:37.880 way, if you
00:30:38.280 have never
00:30:38.800 heard these
00:30:39.240 names, people
00:30:41.320 like Shane
00:30:42.280 Dawson and
00:30:43.040 Jenna Marbles
00:30:43.680 would be
00:30:44.120 like the
00:30:47.400 cast of
00:30:47.980 Friends
00:30:48.400 basically on
00:30:49.360 television.
00:30:50.520 That's how
00:30:51.100 popular they
00:30:51.760 are on
00:30:52.120 YouTube.
00:30:53.100 They're
00:30:53.240 gigantic
00:30:53.900 names on
00:30:54.780 YouTube.
00:30:55.380 But if
00:30:56.240 you're not
00:30:56.540 in that
00:30:56.820 world, you
00:30:57.200 haven't
00:30:57.400 heard of
00:30:57.660 them probably.
00:30:59.420 Gigantic
00:30:59.980 names.
00:31:00.660 One just
00:31:01.160 basically
00:31:02.220 apologized for
00:31:03.400 his entire
00:31:03.880 past.
00:31:06.400 But I
00:31:06.700 can't believe
00:31:07.280 that he
00:31:07.600 did black
00:31:09.420 face a
00:31:10.680 number of
00:31:11.220 times in
00:31:11.920 the YouTube
00:31:12.620 era and
00:31:15.500 he didn't
00:31:15.820 get canceled
00:31:16.400 for doing
00:31:16.920 black face a
00:31:17.900 number of
00:31:18.360 times already.
00:31:20.400 How many
00:31:20.840 times?
00:31:21.780 And Jenna
00:31:22.520 Marbles too.
00:31:23.720 How many
00:31:24.160 times can you
00:31:24.780 do black
00:31:25.260 face and
00:31:25.660 not get
00:31:26.020 canceled?
00:31:26.800 Is it
00:31:27.380 only this
00:31:27.820 year?
00:31:29.200 This is the
00:31:30.020 first year
00:31:30.460 people are
00:31:30.860 getting canceled
00:31:31.420 for this
00:31:31.780 stuff?
00:31:32.380 What's going
00:31:32.960 on with
00:31:33.300 that?
00:31:34.420 All right.
00:31:34.800 So it's
00:31:39.620 mostly fake
00:31:40.340 news and
00:31:41.000 coronavirus and
00:31:42.400 that video.
00:31:49.480 PTSD isn't
00:31:50.980 always about
00:31:51.700 being afraid.
00:31:53.020 That is
00:31:53.320 correct.
00:31:55.360 Somebody says
00:31:56.240 stop apologizing.
00:31:59.120 All right.
00:32:00.120 I'm going to
00:32:00.420 block you.
00:32:00.980 whoever said
00:32:01.660 stop apologizing
00:32:02.880 in capital
00:32:03.340 letters, I'm
00:32:04.280 going to
00:32:04.440 block you
00:32:04.860 now.
00:32:05.680 And here's
00:32:06.500 the thing.
00:32:07.060 Did you hear
00:32:07.460 me apologize?
00:32:09.020 Did anybody
00:32:09.440 hear anything
00:32:09.960 that sounded
00:32:10.400 like an
00:32:10.780 apology?
00:32:12.980 Nope.
00:32:14.840 I did not.
00:32:18.640 Now, I don't
00:32:19.040 know if that's
00:32:19.500 directed at me
00:32:20.140 or not, but I'm
00:32:20.740 sure somebody
00:32:21.160 will tell me.
00:32:22.720 I don't like it
00:32:23.540 when people
00:32:23.900 shout in
00:32:24.440 capitals on
00:32:25.000 my comments.
00:32:25.680 Why is
00:32:28.780 Trump losing
00:32:29.320 now?
00:32:29.740 Well, there's
00:32:30.380 a video in
00:32:31.300 which the
00:32:32.260 president retweeted
00:32:33.400 of a guy
00:32:35.120 yelling white
00:32:35.780 power.
00:32:37.260 Now, if
00:32:37.820 that's still
00:32:38.280 up, the
00:32:40.360 thing is, the
00:32:41.900 only defense
00:32:42.700 against that is
00:32:43.460 he didn't
00:32:43.760 really look at
00:32:44.400 it.
00:32:44.880 He didn't
00:32:45.300 really watch
00:32:45.780 the video
00:32:46.200 before he
00:32:46.680 tweeted.
00:32:47.400 Is there
00:32:47.660 anybody who's
00:32:48.160 ever tweeted
00:32:48.680 a video they
00:32:49.300 haven't actually
00:32:49.820 watched?
00:32:52.100 Maybe five
00:32:53.140 times a day?
00:32:54.660 That's right.
00:32:55.680 Yeah, people
00:32:56.420 tweet things
00:32:57.140 that they
00:32:57.480 have not
00:32:57.920 read and
00:32:59.340 videos they
00:32:59.860 have not
00:33:00.200 watched.
00:33:01.040 I do it
00:33:02.160 literally every
00:33:03.240 day.
00:33:04.400 Probably there
00:33:05.220 hasn't been a
00:33:05.980 single day of
00:33:07.980 tweeting, I'm
00:33:09.540 just guessing,
00:33:10.900 in four years
00:33:12.460 in which I
00:33:13.380 haven't tweeted
00:33:13.960 something I
00:33:14.600 haven't read
00:33:15.240 or I haven't
00:33:17.980 read it or
00:33:18.720 somebody says
00:33:19.860 it's down and
00:33:20.740 most of you are
00:33:21.360 saying it's
00:33:21.800 still up.
00:33:24.060 Yeah.
00:33:24.660 Now, if
00:33:29.800 it's still
00:33:30.460 up and I
00:33:32.440 don't hear
00:33:32.740 some real
00:33:33.520 good excuse,
00:33:35.500 I mean, I'm
00:33:36.180 out, obviously.
00:33:39.520 So I don't
00:33:40.380 think any of
00:33:40.860 you should
00:33:41.300 support him
00:33:41.940 if he keeps
00:33:42.440 that up.
00:33:44.460 Somebody says
00:33:45.160 you've taught
00:33:45.580 us not to
00:33:46.080 trust videos
00:33:46.700 exactly.
00:33:47.720 That's why
00:33:48.360 you should
00:33:49.060 wait to hear
00:33:49.620 what they
00:33:49.880 say.
00:33:50.880 You should
00:33:51.420 reserve your
00:33:52.040 judgment until
00:33:52.600 you hear the
00:33:53.580 full story.
00:33:55.160 But the
00:33:56.000 only explanation
00:33:58.320 I can imagine,
00:34:00.300 the only one
00:34:01.040 I can imagine,
00:34:02.000 is that he
00:34:02.500 didn't watch
00:34:02.980 it before he
00:34:03.460 tweeted it,
00:34:03.960 and nobody
00:34:04.340 did.
00:34:05.500 But it's
00:34:06.340 been up there
00:34:06.780 for a while,
00:34:07.380 hasn't it?
00:34:08.500 So it could
00:34:09.240 be that they
00:34:09.720 don't know how
00:34:10.200 to take it
00:34:10.680 down.
00:34:11.940 Meaning they
00:34:12.580 don't want to
00:34:12.980 just take it
00:34:13.460 down because
00:34:14.080 then it might
00:34:14.520 look like
00:34:15.040 they meant
00:34:15.860 it, but
00:34:16.260 they got
00:34:16.680 scared off
00:34:18.200 it, so
00:34:18.620 maybe they're
00:34:19.280 thinking of
00:34:19.740 some.
00:34:24.080 Don't agree
00:34:24.860 he's losing.
00:34:27.740 Somebody said
00:34:28.520 they weighed
00:34:28.960 in on this
00:34:29.460 and was
00:34:30.100 restricted for
00:34:32.040 59 seconds.
00:34:35.920 The racist
00:34:36.780 video is still
00:34:37.760 up.
00:34:39.040 You know,
00:34:39.480 it's going to
00:34:40.220 be an interesting
00:34:41.280 case if he
00:34:42.180 decides to
00:34:43.140 defend it.
00:34:45.020 I don't think
00:34:45.640 that's going to
00:34:46.100 happen, but
00:34:46.580 who knows,
00:34:47.220 whatever.
00:34:48.240 And here's
00:34:48.840 the question.
00:34:50.080 You know,
00:34:50.320 I've been
00:34:50.680 telling you
00:34:51.060 that because
00:34:51.920 the conversation
00:34:53.380 about race
00:34:54.320 and the police
00:34:55.020 in particular
00:34:55.620 has gotten
00:34:56.700 deeper,
00:34:58.280 there are
00:34:58.780 things that
00:34:59.320 you can say
00:35:00.200 that you
00:35:03.940 just couldn't
00:35:04.420 say before.
00:35:05.520 So you
00:35:05.860 actually can
00:35:06.420 say things
00:35:06.960 you weren't
00:35:07.200 saying.
00:35:08.300 So if
00:35:08.660 somebody says
00:35:09.160 the old guy
00:35:09.620 is joking
00:35:10.220 or sarcastic,
00:35:11.280 it doesn't
00:35:11.980 really matter,
00:35:12.580 does it?
00:35:14.000 I don't think
00:35:14.800 that would
00:35:15.080 matter in
00:35:15.500 any way.
00:35:16.500 Because there
00:35:17.580 are some
00:35:17.900 things that
00:35:18.280 you shouldn't
00:35:18.600 be joking
00:35:19.040 about.
00:35:22.100 So here's
00:35:23.100 the thing.
00:35:23.840 If the
00:35:24.380 old man
00:35:24.800 had yelled
00:35:25.440 Heil Hitler,
00:35:27.740 of course,
00:35:28.400 that would
00:35:28.980 be the
00:35:29.460 worst.
00:35:30.480 If he'd
00:35:30.920 yelled
00:35:31.260 white supremacy,
00:35:32.840 terrible,
00:35:33.480 white nationalism,
00:35:34.700 terrible.
00:35:35.540 But what if
00:35:36.020 he just
00:35:36.340 yelled white
00:35:36.820 power?
00:35:39.300 There might
00:35:40.220 be an
00:35:40.500 interesting
00:35:40.900 free speech
00:35:42.260 case here
00:35:43.060 and I
00:35:43.880 would be
00:35:44.180 fascinated
00:35:44.620 if the
00:35:45.260 president
00:35:45.600 decided to
00:35:46.700 back it.
00:35:49.460 Now,
00:35:49.860 I think it
00:35:50.220 would be
00:35:50.420 the end
00:35:50.700 of his
00:35:50.960 presidency,
00:35:51.560 but he
00:35:51.760 might anyway.
00:35:54.220 And that
00:35:55.040 would be
00:35:55.280 this.
00:35:55.720 Is there
00:35:56.020 any reason
00:35:56.440 that that
00:35:56.880 guy can't
00:35:57.360 yell white
00:35:57.760 power?
00:35:59.120 If there
00:36:01.000 are other
00:36:01.260 people yelling
00:36:01.860 black power
00:36:02.580 and other
00:36:04.020 slogans,
00:36:04.740 isn't that
00:36:05.080 just his
00:36:05.460 opinion?
00:36:06.600 Because it's
00:36:07.140 not racist
00:36:07.800 to say
00:36:09.260 that your
00:36:09.640 own group
00:36:10.040 is good,
00:36:10.680 is it?
00:36:11.960 To just
00:36:12.520 say that
00:36:12.960 you want
00:36:13.520 your group
00:36:14.240 to have
00:36:14.580 power?
00:36:15.920 It's kind
00:36:16.540 of interesting.
00:36:17.060 We'll see
00:36:17.340 if anybody
00:36:17.820 supports it.
00:36:19.320 I don't
00:36:19.620 think you
00:36:19.980 can go
00:36:20.400 there to
00:36:21.000 support it,
00:36:21.640 but I'd
00:36:22.040 love to
00:36:22.420 see what
00:36:23.360 other people
00:36:23.820 do about
00:36:24.280 it.
00:36:24.820 Now,
00:36:25.140 do I
00:36:25.520 personally
00:36:25.940 think that
00:36:27.100 an old
00:36:27.460 man has
00:36:28.080 the right
00:36:28.920 to yell
00:36:29.660 that phrase?
00:36:30.420 Of course.
00:36:31.840 Of course.
00:36:32.440 An old
00:36:32.760 man can
00:36:33.140 yell anything
00:36:33.620 he wants.
00:36:34.720 It wasn't
00:36:36.180 an insult
00:36:36.920 to anybody.
00:36:38.380 He was
00:36:38.680 just asserting
00:36:39.520 something about
00:36:42.180 white people,
00:36:43.120 and I think
00:36:43.780 you're allowed
00:36:44.240 to assert
00:36:44.760 things about
00:36:46.360 yourself if
00:36:47.080 you're not
00:36:47.380 claiming
00:36:47.660 superiority,
00:36:48.740 at least
00:36:49.840 in this
00:36:50.820 society.
00:36:52.680 So,
00:36:53.200 we'll see
00:36:53.640 where that
00:36:54.340 goes.
00:36:57.040 Somebody
00:36:57.560 says,
00:36:58.060 it's just
00:36:58.380 not great
00:36:58.900 judgment.
00:37:00.900 You know,
00:37:01.540 when you
00:37:01.900 reach a
00:37:03.160 certain
00:37:03.360 age,
00:37:04.020 I don't
00:37:04.460 know if
00:37:04.720 you care,
00:37:05.560 do you?
00:37:06.640 Because the
00:37:07.280 old man is
00:37:07.820 probably just
00:37:08.300 having a
00:37:08.720 great time
00:37:09.200 today.
00:37:09.760 He's probably
00:37:10.140 looking at
00:37:10.600 the news
00:37:10.940 and saying,
00:37:11.440 look what I
00:37:11.960 did.
00:37:12.840 Everybody,
00:37:13.360 hey,
00:37:13.520 you see
00:37:13.780 this?
00:37:14.620 The
00:37:14.840 president's
00:37:15.280 talking about
00:37:15.780 me.
00:37:16.140 Everybody's
00:37:16.460 talking about
00:37:16.920 me.
00:37:21.560 Somebody
00:37:22.000 says,
00:37:22.460 what if he
00:37:22.840 said black
00:37:23.580 power?
00:37:24.080 Yeah,
00:37:24.320 so the
00:37:24.680 point is,
00:37:25.820 if it had
00:37:26.840 been completely
00:37:27.500 legal to
00:37:28.200 say black
00:37:29.000 power,
00:37:29.840 will this
00:37:31.880 guy be
00:37:32.200 banned
00:37:32.500 forever for
00:37:33.720 saying white
00:37:34.240 power?
00:37:34.880 Now,
00:37:35.060 the difference,
00:37:35.620 of course,
00:37:36.000 is that there's
00:37:36.540 a presumed
00:37:37.200 difference in
00:37:37.880 power.
00:37:38.560 If you're the
00:37:39.360 one who
00:37:39.620 doesn't have
00:37:40.180 power,
00:37:41.200 or society
00:37:42.460 looks at it
00:37:43.360 that way,
00:37:44.380 then say,
00:37:45.020 hey,
00:37:46.400 Elbonian
00:37:46.960 power,
00:37:47.660 nobody cares
00:37:48.420 if you're
00:37:49.600 a low
00:37:50.140 power or
00:37:52.020 presumed to
00:37:52.660 be not
00:37:53.180 having enough
00:37:53.680 power.
00:37:54.560 But if you're
00:37:55.280 the one who
00:37:55.600 has power,
00:37:56.560 then it just
00:37:57.120 looks like a
00:37:57.620 dictator,
00:37:58.120 doesn't it?
00:37:58.920 So context
00:37:59.680 does matter.
00:38:01.860 Old lady
00:38:02.680 yelling Nazi,
00:38:04.520 is that
00:38:04.980 okay?
00:38:05.960 Oh,
00:38:06.400 good point.
00:38:07.460 Yeah,
00:38:07.940 so the
00:38:08.440 old lady
00:38:09.140 who was
00:38:09.500 yelling at
00:38:10.020 the guy
00:38:10.480 and calling
00:38:11.340 him a
00:38:11.880 Nazi,
00:38:12.880 yes,
00:38:13.240 she should
00:38:13.600 be condemned
00:38:14.280 equally,
00:38:15.520 I would say.
00:38:16.780 But when she
00:38:17.700 was a white
00:38:18.200 woman yelling
00:38:19.000 at a white
00:38:19.580 man,
00:38:20.800 I don't know,
00:38:21.320 it gets
00:38:21.500 complicated.
00:38:22.900 It gets
00:38:23.220 complicated.
00:38:23.660 he was
00:38:27.360 being called
00:38:27.820 a racist
00:38:28.260 for supporting
00:38:29.280 Trump,
00:38:30.280 and maybe
00:38:31.040 he responded
00:38:31.720 by yelling
00:38:32.220 white power
00:38:32.860 just to
00:38:33.420 bother her.
00:38:34.940 Maybe.
00:38:36.140 But,
00:38:36.540 you know,
00:38:38.520 it doesn't
00:38:39.840 matter what
00:38:40.220 his intentions
00:38:40.760 were,
00:38:41.140 does it?
00:38:41.860 I don't
00:38:42.260 think it
00:38:42.580 matters.
00:38:45.540 Trump
00:38:46.060 would be
00:38:46.640 up 10
00:38:48.540 if he
00:38:48.900 would just
00:38:49.200 put down
00:38:49.720 his phone,
00:38:50.800 somebody
00:38:51.080 says.
00:38:51.640 Yeah,
00:38:55.740 he just
00:38:56.040 ruined
00:38:56.380 Trump's
00:38:56.860 election,
00:38:57.360 but he's
00:38:57.700 having a
00:38:58.020 great day.
00:38:59.640 Scarborough
00:39:00.120 thinks Trump
00:39:00.860 is trying
00:39:01.320 to lose.
00:39:02.340 You know,
00:39:02.740 I've heard
00:39:03.760 a few
00:39:04.040 people say
00:39:04.560 that.
00:39:05.780 Didn't
00:39:06.100 Mike
00:39:06.720 Sertovich
00:39:07.080 ask the
00:39:07.760 question,
00:39:08.960 if Trump
00:39:09.480 were trying
00:39:10.080 to lose,
00:39:10.720 how would
00:39:11.000 it look
00:39:11.300 different?
00:39:13.240 Right?
00:39:13.900 How would
00:39:14.280 it look
00:39:14.860 different if
00:39:15.440 he were
00:39:15.660 trying to
00:39:16.200 lose?
00:39:17.260 And,
00:39:17.640 you know,
00:39:18.020 of course,
00:39:18.300 that's sort
00:39:18.880 of a trick
00:39:19.280 question,
00:39:19.840 because
00:39:20.080 you know,
00:39:22.960 you could
00:39:23.400 say the
00:39:23.720 same thing
00:39:24.060 about
00:39:24.260 Biden.
00:39:24.860 It looks
00:39:25.160 like Biden
00:39:25.600 is trying
00:39:25.980 to lose.
00:39:26.860 You could
00:39:27.100 probably say
00:39:27.460 it about
00:39:27.700 anybody.
00:39:29.240 All right.
00:39:31.780 Somebody
00:39:32.180 says,
00:39:32.640 oh my
00:39:32.860 God,
00:39:33.140 the sky
00:39:33.520 is falling
00:39:34.000 today.
00:39:35.360 Who knows?
00:39:36.220 You know,
00:39:36.760 there probably
00:39:37.440 will be 25
00:39:38.360 surprises between
00:39:39.460 now and
00:39:39.960 election day.
00:39:41.220 So,
00:39:41.940 you know,
00:39:42.220 we might not
00:39:42.720 even be talking
00:39:43.400 about this
00:39:43.840 by tomorrow.
00:39:44.680 We'll see.
00:39:48.060 But it
00:39:48.640 would be
00:39:48.960 really interesting
00:39:49.820 if Trump
00:39:50.760 decided to
00:39:51.420 say,
00:39:51.740 hey,
00:39:52.020 that guy
00:39:52.440 can yell
00:39:52.800 that.
00:39:53.560 If the
00:39:54.040 woman can
00:39:54.480 call him
00:39:54.820 a Nazi,
00:39:56.020 he can
00:39:56.420 yell anything
00:39:57.560 he wants
00:39:57.980 back.
00:39:59.340 Maybe.
00:40:00.900 If the
00:40:01.640 president is
00:40:02.300 keeping it
00:40:02.760 up there,
00:40:03.320 let me say
00:40:03.920 this.
00:40:04.640 If the
00:40:05.220 president
00:40:05.620 says,
00:40:06.980 yeah,
00:40:07.140 I can see
00:40:07.540 why that
00:40:07.880 would be
00:40:08.380 offensive,
00:40:09.000 but freedom
00:40:09.520 of speech,
00:40:10.960 then I would
00:40:11.500 actually back
00:40:12.080 him for it.
00:40:13.240 I think I
00:40:13.920 could actually
00:40:14.260 get behind
00:40:14.780 that.
00:40:15.600 As long
00:40:16.100 as he
00:40:16.380 said,
00:40:16.680 yeah,
00:40:17.240 I don't
00:40:17.900 buy the
00:40:18.520 statement,
00:40:18.940 but freedom
00:40:20.840 of speech,
00:40:22.080 I doubt I
00:40:24.660 could publicly
00:40:25.280 support that
00:40:26.180 too much,
00:40:26.780 but privately
00:40:27.760 I'd be saying
00:40:28.380 to myself,
00:40:29.000 well,
00:40:29.140 that's a good
00:40:29.480 point.
00:40:30.260 I don't have
00:40:30.920 to back
00:40:31.300 anybody,
00:40:31.820 but I can
00:40:32.180 back their
00:40:32.580 ability to
00:40:33.220 say obnoxious
00:40:35.420 things in
00:40:35.820 public.
00:40:40.620 Yeah,
00:40:41.100 so other
00:40:41.380 people say
00:40:41.840 he's acting
00:40:42.300 like he
00:40:42.640 wants to
00:40:43.180 lose.
00:40:44.460 Why would
00:40:45.060 he want
00:40:45.360 to lose?
00:40:47.420 Why would
00:40:48.000 he want
00:40:48.280 to lose?
00:40:48.680 It would
00:40:48.880 be quite
00:40:50.800 a change
00:40:52.720 from anything
00:40:53.200 we've seen
00:40:53.680 from him,
00:40:54.320 but the
00:40:55.020 only reason
00:40:55.420 I can
00:40:55.960 imagine he
00:40:56.440 would want
00:40:56.800 to lose
00:40:57.160 is if he
00:40:57.580 has some
00:40:57.940 health issues
00:40:58.520 we don't
00:40:58.860 know about.
00:41:00.080 If I were
00:41:00.720 that age and
00:41:01.300 I had some
00:41:01.660 health issues,
00:41:02.860 I'd say,
00:41:03.520 you know,
00:41:04.100 maybe he
00:41:04.700 would be
00:41:05.020 just as
00:41:05.720 well if I
00:41:06.560 went out
00:41:07.100 after one
00:41:07.880 term,
00:41:09.360 but we have
00:41:09.880 no indication
00:41:10.480 of anything
00:41:10.900 like that.
00:41:11.420 Unless I
00:41:12.440 heard a
00:41:12.740 reason,
00:41:14.040 and it
00:41:14.380 would have
00:41:14.660 to be a
00:41:14.960 health reason,
00:41:15.520 I think.
00:41:16.160 Anything short
00:41:16.820 of a health
00:41:17.180 reason,
00:41:17.580 I'm not
00:41:17.880 sure I
00:41:18.140 would believe.
00:41:23.780 Somebody in
00:41:24.440 the comments
00:41:24.840 says,
00:41:25.800 I just
00:41:26.140 awoke from
00:41:26.680 a coma
00:41:27.080 for the
00:41:27.480 past six
00:41:27.960 months.
00:41:28.400 What have
00:41:28.620 I missed?
00:41:30.100 That's
00:41:30.540 pretty funny.
00:41:33.440 All right.
00:41:36.140 Somebody
00:41:36.580 says,
00:41:37.100 I'm white
00:41:37.540 and I
00:41:37.860 don't feel
00:41:38.260 very powerful.
00:41:39.720 Well,
00:41:40.680 better crank
00:41:41.300 up your
00:41:41.620 white privilege
00:41:42.180 then.
00:41:42.600 What are
00:41:42.760 you missing?
00:41:46.380 That is
00:41:46.920 the speech
00:41:47.380 on the
00:41:47.840 streets.
00:41:51.360 All right.
00:41:51.920 Somebody
00:41:52.180 says,
00:41:52.500 I doubt
00:41:52.740 Trump is
00:41:53.240 making a
00:41:53.720 play here.
00:41:54.340 I doubt
00:41:54.640 it too,
00:41:55.240 but we'll
00:41:55.520 see how
00:41:55.820 it turns
00:41:56.120 out.
00:41:56.400 All right.
00:41:56.660 I got
00:41:56.860 nothing else
00:41:57.260 for you.
00:41:57.860 Go enjoy
00:41:58.380 your day.