Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1041 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About All the Fake News Today

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, come on in, come on in.

00:00:16.760 It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:19.620 The best coffee with Scott Adams of the weekend.

00:00:25.160 Yeah, it's going to be that good.

00:00:26.520 And a lot of it has to do with a thing called the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:33.200 And it goes like this.

00:00:35.720 All you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tanker, chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask of a vessel of any kind.

00:00:41.980 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:44.440 I like coffee.

00:00:46.620 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope meat hit of the day.

00:00:50.480 The thing that makes everything better, except for the news today.

00:00:57.020 Which is kind of stupid, but we'll talk about that.

00:01:00.620 Join me now for the Simultaneous Sip.

00:01:02.780 Go.

00:01:07.340 Ah.

00:01:07.900 Well, just when you thought things couldn't get any stupider, they did.

00:01:14.200 Took a new turn.

00:01:16.940 All right, here's my favorite story of the day.

00:01:20.000 We'll start with the funny stuff.

00:01:22.340 So, CNN, as you know, dislikes President Trump.

00:01:26.500 I don't know.

00:01:26.900 Is anybody aware of that?

00:01:28.640 Hasn't been covered much.

00:01:30.720 But, yeah, CNN doesn't like President Trump.

00:01:33.660 And so, when they run a story that could be favorable to him in any way whatsoever, watching how they word it is just fascinating.

00:01:42.840 So, here's a story about a team of researchers, doctors, who are looking at all the existing drugs that might work on coronavirus.

00:01:52.340 And they were doing a real detailed dive.

00:01:54.840 Apparently, this is something they've done before.

00:01:57.080 In which they look at all the existing things and see what might be repurposed.

00:02:00.840 So, I look at this study and I say to myself, huh, this is going to be a story that has to talk about hydroxychloroquine.

00:02:10.740 How will they speak of it?

00:02:12.900 So, I start at the top.

00:02:15.040 It's like, blah, blah, blah, this other drug, other drug, other drug, other drug, other drug, other drug.

00:02:21.180 Now, if this had been Fox News, they might have mentioned hydroxychloroquine a little bit sooner.

00:02:26.820 But, on CNN, you have to really look for it.

00:02:30.320 It's like, ah, I've got to read quite a bit to get down to this long article.

00:02:34.560 And there it was.

00:02:36.740 So, I have to read you the exact language to see how they make something that might be good sound like something that might be bad.

00:02:45.720 Are you ready?

00:02:48.300 Alright.

00:02:48.780 It says, one drug, the anti-malarial drug, hydroxychloroquine, has famously received a lot of boosterism from U.S. President Donald Trump.

00:03:00.700 Alright.

00:03:00.960 So, the setup is, this is President Trump's drug.

00:03:04.260 Alright.

00:03:04.840 So, here's the next thing they say about it.

00:03:06.560 But, in the published studies available for Feigenbaum's team to review, the drug hasn't outperformed others.

00:03:17.420 Hasn't outperformed others.

00:03:21.360 Is that what you say about a drug that doesn't work?

00:03:25.280 Do you say that it hasn't outperformed others?

00:03:29.540 And do you know what it says about the others?

00:03:32.880 Some of them might work.

00:03:34.160 That's right.

00:03:36.680 So, a study in which one of the main findings is that this inexpensive, widely available drug that President Trump likes apparently works.

00:03:46.620 Apparently works.

00:03:48.480 According to these researchers.

00:03:50.180 Not according to me, of course.

00:03:51.560 I don't know.

00:03:53.400 But, the way they have to word it is, the drug hasn't outperformed others.

00:03:59.220 But, the study, the whole study shows that some of them probably work.

00:04:04.400 Of course, it has to be tested further.

00:04:06.520 But, there's some indication of it.

00:04:08.560 And then it goes into this sort of tortured argument about why.

00:04:12.520 Well, the two French studies on hydroxychloroquine, they drew red flags for the University of Pennsylvania.

00:04:20.280 Alright.

00:04:20.540 So, these are the guys searching it.

00:04:22.100 It drew red flags.

00:04:24.500 Did it say that about any of the other drugs?

00:04:26.340 Did any of the other drugs draw any red flags?

00:04:28.380 Probably not.

00:04:31.020 Because of the time it takes to clear the body and blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:04:35.320 So, the two studies that were positive are not conclusive.

00:04:41.360 But, that would be true of just about all the studies, I would think.

00:04:44.060 Anyway, so that's how CNN covers good news.

00:04:48.720 The President is saying that since he imposed this new 10-year term for defacing statues, that it hasn't happened.

00:04:57.480 Is that true?

00:04:59.500 Have no statues been defaced since the President slapped a higher penalty on that?

00:05:06.420 And, I guess he tweeted 15 different times pictures of people who tried to deface the, I think it was the Andrew Jackson statue.

00:05:16.740 Do you think a 10-year prison term is going to stop him?

00:05:19.300 Because the President himself is tweeting the photos of the perpetrators.

00:05:23.580 He did 15 separate tweets of official wanted posters that show the faces of these people.

00:05:31.000 How many of them do you think have been caught by now?

00:05:34.300 So, probably a few.

00:05:36.780 Probably a few.

00:05:38.000 So, I would think that some of these people are going to jail for a long time.

00:05:42.880 Let's see if that cuts down on it.

00:05:46.380 So, the Trump campaign is probably over.

00:05:51.740 We'll know in about 30 minutes or so whether he's still running.

00:05:56.960 The story that this comes from is apparently the, not apparently, this happened, I saw it.

00:06:04.440 The President tweeted a video in which some senior citizens were protesting each other.

00:06:10.740 Some pro-Trump, some anti-Trump.

00:06:13.120 So, it's a bunch of old people yelling at each other. 1.00

00:06:15.240 But a prominent part of it is one of the old people who supports Trump yelling, white power, white power, some old man in a golf cart. 0.70

00:06:25.660 And the President tweeted that.

00:06:28.000 So, somebody says it's a hoax.

00:06:34.980 It's not a hoax that he tweeted it.

00:06:38.500 So, of course, this has CNN salivating.

00:06:40.780 But, I don't know, if that video is still up and the President hasn't said, oops, I didn't see that part, probably his campaign will be over in half an hour or so.

00:06:52.780 So, if you want to know what the slaughter meter says now, zero, zero.

00:07:00.440 So, the slaughter meter is set at zero while that video remains unexplained and still up.

00:07:06.540 There isn't any chance he could win at this point.

00:07:08.420 So, all right, and by the way, don't ask me to explain that one.

00:07:14.780 All right, we have to listen to the President's explanation if he gives one.

00:07:19.600 If he doesn't give one, then I would say that would be the end of his chance to get reelected.

00:07:27.820 All right, there is, here's a fun story.

00:07:32.720 All right, there are reports of an explosion in Iran's eastern mountains caused by a cyber attack.

00:07:41.080 Where would that have come from, a cyber attack against Iran?

00:07:44.900 It turned the facility on itself, destroying Iran's Shahab long-range missile force stored in the Qajir Tunnel Base Complex,

00:07:55.960 as well as a solid fuel production facility.

00:07:59.420 What?

00:08:00.760 A cyber attack just blew up a whole tunnel complex, somehow, in Iran,

00:08:09.820 and destroyed their Shahab long-range missile force?

00:08:14.560 But it's a little unclear, because it says the missile force stored in the tunnel,

00:08:20.620 but that's not necessarily the entire missile force, is it?

00:08:25.200 Did one cyber attack take out Iran's entire long-range missile capability?

00:08:30.460 That seems like a lot.

00:08:32.440 Why would they keep it all in one place?

00:08:33.900 Maybe they did.

00:08:34.540 I don't know.

00:08:34.780 So, we won't hear any more about that, I don't think,

00:08:39.640 because it was a secret operation by somebody.

00:08:43.120 Somebody.

00:08:44.380 Who could it be?

00:08:46.460 We don't know.

00:08:49.060 So, I guess there's some fake news from the New York Times today,

00:08:52.460 anonymous source, that the president had been briefed

00:08:56.240 that Russia was offering bounties to Afghanistan people to kill Americans. 0.86

00:09:03.740 And the story is that the president, you know, didn't do anything about that.

00:09:09.280 And, of course, the president says, fake news, nobody ever briefed any of us on that.

00:09:16.040 So, let's handicap this.

00:09:19.780 What do you think are the odds that an anonymous source from the New York Times

00:09:25.940 would have a story that's really bad for the president,

00:09:29.700 that involves Russia,

00:09:32.840 it involves Russia,

00:09:34.980 and nobody else in the room was aware of it?

00:09:39.140 Does that sound familiar in any way?

00:09:44.700 It is the least credible story of all stories.

00:09:48.400 If you were to rank stories from most credible to least,

00:09:53.700 where would you put a New York Times story in the summer before an election

00:09:57.880 with an anonymous source that involves Russia and nobody else in the room heard it?

00:10:04.880 Where would you put that on your list of credible stories?

00:10:08.880 At the bottom.

00:10:10.680 At the bottom.

00:10:11.900 Right.

00:10:12.240 There's nothing you'll hear today.

00:10:14.820 There's nothing you'll hear ever.

00:10:16.720 There would be less credible than something that has all of those qualities.

00:10:21.220 Nothing.

00:10:21.940 There's literally nothing less credible than that.

00:10:24.700 But, because it still has the name New York Times on it,

00:10:28.060 and people are sort of stuck in the past,

00:10:29.820 they imagine that that's news of some sort,

00:10:32.800 they still think it's news.

00:10:35.080 So, that'll be out there forever.

00:10:39.460 So, I've told you that it's always a big mistake

00:10:42.580 to check Twitter right before you try to go to sleep.

00:10:46.060 Have you ever made that mistake?

00:10:47.820 Because Twitter is designed,

00:10:50.380 well, I wouldn't say designed,

00:10:51.840 I'll say that it evolved to

00:10:54.700 a point where it gets you excited when you look at your tweets.

00:10:59.100 Right?

00:10:59.360 It jacks you up.

00:11:00.420 So, last night,

00:11:02.720 I'm getting ready to fall asleep.

00:11:05.660 I'm like,

00:11:06.020 I'll look at Twitter one more time.

00:11:10.480 Okay.

00:11:11.700 There's a death threat against me in public.

00:11:16.540 I don't think I'm going to sleep so well tonight.

00:11:20.140 So, that's the last fucking thing I look at

00:11:22.780 before I go to sleep is a death threat against me.

00:11:25.920 So,

00:11:26.740 now you might say to yourself,

00:11:28.360 Scott,

00:11:29.120 a death threat on Twitter.

00:11:31.600 I'm pretty sure that's against their policy.

00:11:34.480 Well,

00:11:34.980 we will find out.

00:11:36.240 Because I did report it.

00:11:38.180 And I'm going to tell you what I consider a death threat.

00:11:41.500 And then I want you to put your,

00:11:43.100 your opinion on it.

00:11:44.780 And we're going to look at the Twitter rules

00:11:46.840 that seem to be appropriate,

00:11:48.280 because I printed them out.

00:11:49.920 And then you tell me if this tweet should stay up.

00:11:53.680 It's a gray area.

00:11:54.680 It's a gray area.

00:11:57.160 So, here's the,

00:11:58.380 here's the tweet.

00:11:59.460 It's from somebody at,

00:12:01.280 headline zoo,

00:12:03.900 with three O's,

00:12:05.740 I guess.

00:12:06.520 Headline zoo,

00:12:07.440 all one word,

00:12:08.160 with three O's at the end.

00:12:09.260 And this is responding to that fake news,

00:12:13.220 New York Times story that I just mentioned.

00:12:15.620 Here's the tweet.

00:12:17.100 It should have been clear from the beginning,

00:12:19.580 Trump is a traitor.

00:12:21.680 What's to be said about his hashtag,

00:12:24.920 Vichy Republican enablers,

00:12:27.780 at real James Woods,

00:12:29.540 at Scott Adams says.

00:12:31.820 So,

00:12:32.500 here is somebody who has

00:12:33.780 declared that Trump is a traitor,

00:12:36.540 because of the fake news,

00:12:37.880 New York Times story that didn't happen.

00:12:40.140 And that two people in the world

00:12:42.120 should be called out

00:12:43.240 as being Vichy Republican enablers.

00:12:47.600 Now,

00:12:48.800 here's how I interpret that.

00:12:51.120 Yeah,

00:12:51.340 the Vichy,

00:12:52.820 meaning the,

00:12:53.580 this refers to World War II,

00:12:56.400 helped me with my history here.

00:12:57.820 So,

00:12:58.100 I'm just,

00:12:58.340 I'm just winging it.

00:13:00.860 It would be the,

00:13:01.800 the French pseudo-government

00:13:04.640 that was under the German control

00:13:06.720 in World War II,

00:13:08.080 essentially traitors to their own country, 0.88

00:13:10.500 because they were bowing to Germany

00:13:13.480 instead of being,

00:13:15.380 instead of joining the resistance,

00:13:17.960 I guess.

00:13:18.840 So,

00:13:19.780 what happened to the Vichy government

00:13:22.180 after Germany was defeated?

00:13:25.640 This is where I need a little help on my,

00:13:28.400 yeah,

00:13:28.940 I need a little help on my history here.

00:13:30.860 Did the government officials,

00:13:33.660 known as the Vichy,

00:13:35.480 the Vichy government,

00:13:37.320 were they rounded up

00:13:39.900 and fucking killed?

00:13:41.920 Just guessing.

00:13:43.540 When you call somebody

00:13:44.760 a Vichy Republican,

00:13:47.300 are you not saying,

00:13:49.160 by reference,

00:13:51.640 that they are in a category of people

00:13:53.880 that nobody would care,

00:13:55.800 and it might even be a good idea

00:13:57.420 to round them up

00:13:58.360 and kill them?

00:14:00.220 Right?

00:14:01.080 Yeah,

00:14:01.520 they were strung up.

00:14:02.280 They were all executed.

00:14:03.720 All right,

00:14:03.960 so,

00:14:05.040 is it fair to say

00:14:06.300 that somebody labeling me

00:14:08.100 in a category

00:14:09.240 that is,

00:14:11.200 even you would say,

00:14:12.540 might be executed?

00:14:13.720 Like,

00:14:14.020 even you would say,

00:14:14.880 you know,

00:14:15.640 those Vichy traders, 0.93

00:14:17.640 if they got executed,

00:14:18.880 well,

00:14:19.200 well,

00:14:19.660 good for the,

00:14:20.380 good for the people,

00:14:21.260 because that was probably

00:14:23.080 exactly what needed

00:14:24.360 to be done,

00:14:25.140 right?

00:14:26.260 So,

00:14:26.820 by putting me publicly

00:14:27.920 in a category

00:14:28.860 that not only lumps me

00:14:30.840 with James Woods,

00:14:32.280 who I blocked a long time ago

00:14:34.560 just for being a crazy dick, 0.99

00:14:36.860 and if you don't like that,

00:14:38.460 that's okay,

00:14:38.960 I don't care.

00:14:39.940 He's sort of a crazy dick,

00:14:41.400 and I blocked him

00:14:42.180 a long time ago.

00:14:43.440 Didn't want to see anything

00:14:44.360 that came out of his

00:14:45.420 tortured head anymore.

00:14:46.840 All right,

00:14:50.220 so I interpret this

00:14:51.540 as a death threat,

00:14:52.640 but let's see

00:14:54.000 if the Twitter rules

00:14:55.140 would ban this person.

00:14:58.860 Now,

00:14:59.180 I reported it last night,

00:15:01.300 and as of a few moments ago,

00:15:03.660 it's still live,

00:15:04.680 the account is.

00:15:06.240 So here are the rules,

00:15:07.480 Twitter rules,

00:15:08.460 and I'm just picking

00:15:09.080 a few rules

00:15:09.960 out of their many rules,

00:15:11.080 but these are the ones

00:15:11.720 I think apply.

00:15:13.120 Abuse harassment.

00:15:14.700 You may not engage

00:15:15.840 in the targeted

00:15:16.680 harassment of someone

00:15:17.960 or incite others

00:15:19.480 to do so.

00:15:20.860 This includes wishing

00:15:21.960 or hoping that someone

00:15:23.040 experiences physical harm.

00:15:25.940 Now,

00:15:26.380 would you say

00:15:27.040 that that tweet,

00:15:28.480 comparing me

00:15:29.180 to the Vichy Republic,

00:15:32.300 a group of people

00:15:33.120 who were strung up

00:15:34.800 by their own public,

00:15:37.300 justifiably,

00:15:39.280 I would say,

00:15:39.960 justifiably,

00:15:40.700 they were traitors,

00:15:42.100 do you think

00:15:43.500 that it is targeted?

00:15:44.800 First of all,

00:15:45.400 is it targeted

00:15:46.100 because she mentions

00:15:47.040 me by name?

00:15:48.020 Yes.

00:15:49.160 Is it harassment

00:15:50.300 of someone?

00:15:51.280 I wouldn't call it

00:15:52.080 harassment exactly,

00:15:53.460 although it is that,

00:15:55.180 of course.

00:15:55.660 Yeah,

00:15:55.860 it is harassment.

00:15:56.840 Of someone

00:15:57.580 or incite others

00:15:58.800 to do so.

00:16:00.220 Does that tweet

00:16:01.340 incite others

00:16:02.540 to be,

00:16:04.380 to act against me

00:16:06.260 in any harassing way?

00:16:07.240 Well,

00:16:07.380 of course it does.

00:16:08.140 Of course it does.

00:16:09.660 And this includes

00:16:10.960 wishing or hoping

00:16:11.820 that someone

00:16:12.240 experiences physical harm.

00:16:14.340 Well,

00:16:14.640 I think that's pretty clear.

00:16:16.560 If somebody compares you

00:16:18.760 to a Vichy government,

00:16:20.320 they are publicly

00:16:21.240 and explicitly

00:16:22.440 wishing or hoping

00:16:24.380 that someone

00:16:24.820 experiences physical harm.

00:16:27.020 Now,

00:16:27.520 I'm not a mind reader,

00:16:28.720 right?

00:16:29.480 But I don't know

00:16:30.540 how else you would

00:16:31.160 interpret it.

00:16:32.920 However,

00:16:33.760 however,

00:16:34.180 if this were

00:16:35.480 the only thing

00:16:36.180 that Twitter said,

00:16:37.500 then you'd say,

00:16:38.420 oh,

00:16:38.600 okay,

00:16:38.880 this is obviously

00:16:39.820 a violation.

00:16:41.380 But it's not

00:16:42.160 the only thing

00:16:42.640 Twitter says.

00:16:43.660 Because you have

00:16:44.440 to worry about

00:16:45.020 those times

00:16:45.600 when people

00:16:46.140 use words

00:16:46.980 hyperbolically

00:16:47.840 that everyone

00:16:49.020 knows has

00:16:50.040 no violent intent.

00:16:51.280 For example,

00:16:51.960 if I said,

00:16:53.000 I'll kill you

00:16:53.800 if you do that again,

00:16:55.740 everybody knows

00:16:56.740 you don't need

00:16:57.820 to kill them.

00:16:58.880 It's just a choice

00:16:59.780 of words.

00:17:00.640 So Twitter

00:17:01.260 has some more

00:17:01.900 language that goes

00:17:03.160 into that.

00:17:03.640 in a different

00:17:04.640 section.

00:17:05.560 You have to go

00:17:06.080 look for it,

00:17:06.620 but it's there.

00:17:07.740 It says,

00:17:08.120 statements that express

00:17:09.040 a wish or hope

00:17:09.820 that someone

00:17:10.240 experiences physical

00:17:11.540 harm.

00:17:12.080 Okay,

00:17:12.440 that's what we're

00:17:12.920 talking about.

00:17:14.200 Making vague

00:17:15.180 or indirect threats.

00:17:18.440 What's vague

00:17:19.240 or indirect?

00:17:20.060 It's kind of a

00:17:20.560 judgment call.

00:17:21.620 Or threatening

00:17:22.200 actions that are,

00:17:23.800 and here's the

00:17:24.320 key phrase,

00:17:25.540 unlikely to cause

00:17:26.680 serious or

00:17:27.580 lasting injury.

00:17:30.340 Or lasting

00:17:31.320 injury.

00:17:31.780 lasting injury?

00:17:34.940 What the hell

00:17:35.600 is lasting

00:17:36.160 injury?

00:17:37.240 If somebody

00:17:37.880 incites somebody

00:17:38.800 to punch me

00:17:39.500 in the face,

00:17:40.500 but I recover,

00:17:41.900 is that a

00:17:42.340 lasting injury?

00:17:43.840 How do you

00:17:44.420 define a

00:17:44.940 lasting injury?

00:17:46.120 That's a tough

00:17:46.720 one.

00:17:47.620 Kind of subjective.

00:17:49.300 So if it's

00:17:50.300 unlikely to cause

00:17:51.180 serious or

00:17:51.800 lasting injury,

00:17:53.060 are not

00:17:53.860 actionable under

00:17:54.740 this policy,

00:17:55.700 but may be

00:17:56.480 reviewed and

00:17:57.180 actioned under

00:17:58.360 those policies.

00:17:59.520 So they

00:17:59.900 reserve the

00:18:01.820 right to

00:18:02.320 review them,

00:18:03.260 but they

00:18:03.680 say we're

00:18:04.160 not automatically

00:18:04.980 bound,

00:18:06.720 essentially,

00:18:07.260 by our own

00:18:07.720 rules,

00:18:08.320 if it looks

00:18:09.100 like it's

00:18:09.680 not a real

00:18:11.280 thing.

00:18:11.800 Not real in

00:18:12.640 the sense that

00:18:13.280 it's unlikely

00:18:14.440 to translate

00:18:15.220 into any

00:18:15.900 kind of action.

00:18:17.180 Now here's

00:18:17.660 the problem.

00:18:18.920 Here's the

00:18:19.360 problem.

00:18:20.200 If you were

00:18:20.700 to look at

00:18:21.140 this one

00:18:21.700 person making

00:18:22.480 one tweet,

00:18:23.760 could you

00:18:24.220 make the

00:18:24.620 argument that

00:18:25.880 this by

00:18:26.420 itself is

00:18:27.860 likely to

00:18:28.500 cause me

00:18:29.060 any harm?

00:18:30.380 Well, even

00:18:30.920 I would say

00:18:31.580 that's pretty

00:18:32.540 unlikely.

00:18:33.960 Pretty unlikely.

00:18:39.560 Alright.

00:18:42.100 We'll take

00:18:43.260 care of a

00:18:43.780 few people

00:18:44.320 who seem

00:18:44.760 to be

00:18:45.040 suffering.

00:18:48.400 Let's see,

00:18:49.100 we'll get

00:18:49.340 rid of that

00:18:49.780 one.

00:18:50.900 We'll get

00:18:51.480 rid of that

00:18:51.960 one.

00:18:54.300 We'll get

00:18:54.960 rid of

00:18:55.800 anybody

00:18:56.200 else?

00:18:59.220 Anybody

00:18:59.740 else?

00:19:01.260 Alright.

00:19:01.820 So we got

00:19:02.260 rid of a

00:19:02.640 few trolls.

00:19:05.600 And so

00:19:06.740 here's my

00:19:07.720 point on

00:19:08.120 this.

00:19:08.600 If one

00:19:09.160 person refers

00:19:10.200 to you one

00:19:10.920 time on

00:19:11.600 Twitter as

00:19:12.200 being part

00:19:12.660 of a

00:19:12.980 Vichy

00:19:13.360 government,

00:19:16.480 there's no

00:19:17.180 real harm,

00:19:17.840 wouldn't you

00:19:18.080 say?

00:19:19.060 One person

00:19:20.040 one time

00:19:20.860 calls you

00:19:21.520 a traitor,

00:19:22.800 eh,

00:19:23.460 nothing.

00:19:24.220 But what

00:19:24.620 happens if

00:19:25.140 it becomes

00:19:25.560 part of

00:19:25.900 the

00:19:26.000 pattern?

00:19:26.980 Because you

00:19:27.300 know it

00:19:27.620 will.

00:19:29.320 When

00:19:29.800 Trump loses,

00:19:30.920 because at

00:19:31.440 this point,

00:19:32.120 if that

00:19:32.480 tweet is

00:19:32.860 still up

00:19:33.160 there,

00:19:33.320 he can't

00:19:33.580 possibly win.

00:19:35.080 When

00:19:35.560 Trump loses,

00:19:37.220 will people

00:19:37.860 actually come

00:19:38.700 after people

00:19:39.820 like me?

00:19:40.860 Well, if

00:19:41.720 there's more

00:19:42.220 of this,

00:19:42.640 yes.

00:19:43.780 So how do

00:19:44.320 you treat a

00:19:44.840 tweet that

00:19:45.720 this person

00:19:46.600 probably hopes

00:19:47.340 would become

00:19:47.900 popular?

00:19:48.900 If it

00:19:49.480 doesn't become

00:19:50.040 popular, it's

00:19:50.720 one tweet,

00:19:51.540 it's one

00:19:51.980 crazy person,

00:19:52.800 it really

00:19:53.000 doesn't make

00:19:53.400 much difference

00:19:53.920 to me or

00:19:54.360 anybody else.

00:19:55.880 But how

00:19:56.160 do you

00:19:56.340 judge this?

00:19:57.440 So I'll

00:19:58.200 give you an

00:19:58.580 update on

00:19:59.000 this.

00:19:59.280 In my

00:19:59.560 opinion,

00:20:00.160 this is a

00:20:00.680 call to

00:20:01.380 violence,

00:20:03.740 which by

00:20:04.520 itself is

00:20:05.120 weak, but

00:20:05.760 if it were

00:20:06.200 to gain

00:20:06.620 steam, it 0.72

00:20:07.320 would actually

00:20:07.760 kill me.

00:20:09.020 It would

00:20:09.460 actually kill

00:20:10.080 me.

00:20:10.980 I would

00:20:11.280 actually be

00:20:11.640 dead,

00:20:12.640 literally

00:20:13.100 dead,

00:20:13.960 if this

00:20:15.120 thought picked

00:20:16.640 up popularity.

00:20:17.640 Because sooner

00:20:17.980 or later,

00:20:18.420 somebody would

00:20:18.820 say, hey,

00:20:19.660 they really

00:20:20.080 mean this,

00:20:20.900 I'll take

00:20:21.300 a crack

00:20:21.680 at them.

00:20:23.220 Let me

00:20:24.000 say as

00:20:24.360 clearly as

00:20:24.880 I can to

00:20:25.400 anybody who

00:20:25.840 wants to

00:20:26.160 take a

00:20:26.520 crack at

00:20:26.960 me later,

00:20:27.940 it won't

00:20:28.380 go well.

00:20:30.620 So if

00:20:31.640 anybody decides

00:20:32.380 they want

00:20:32.740 to try to

00:20:33.660 take me

00:20:34.040 out today

00:20:35.520 or any

00:20:35.880 time in

00:20:36.200 the future,

00:20:37.280 my only

00:20:37.940 advice is

00:20:38.640 make sure

00:20:39.640 you get

00:20:39.940 it done,

00:20:40.460 because you

00:20:41.100 don't want

00:20:41.500 to miss,

00:20:43.380 because I

00:20:44.300 may not be

00:20:44.860 as inefficient

00:20:45.560 as you

00:20:46.200 are.

00:20:47.800 Justin

00:20:48.280 Welby,

00:20:48.800 the Archbishop

00:20:49.420 of Canterbury

00:20:50.180 and head

00:20:50.520 of the

00:20:50.760 Church of

00:20:51.080 England,

00:20:52.640 says they're

00:20:53.300 reconsidering

00:20:53.960 their portrayal

00:20:55.480 of Jesus

00:20:55.900 as a white

00:20:56.560 man.

00:20:57.600 So Jesus

00:20:58.160 is about

00:20:58.700 to get

00:21:02.360 a redo,

00:21:03.420 get a

00:21:03.740 remake.

00:21:05.020 Now,

00:21:05.540 the interesting

00:21:06.140 thing about

00:21:06.620 all these

00:21:07.040 stories of

00:21:07.620 the things

00:21:07.980 that have

00:21:08.260 to be

00:21:08.500 renamed

00:21:09.040 and changed

00:21:10.020 and stuff

00:21:10.420 is that

00:21:11.600 some of

00:21:12.040 them are

00:21:12.320 perfectly

00:21:12.720 reasonable,

00:21:13.400 in my

00:21:13.600 opinion.

00:21:14.620 In my

00:21:15.020 opinion,

00:21:16.120 remaking

00:21:16.800 historical

00:21:17.520 Jesus to

00:21:18.300 look like

00:21:18.740 the actual

00:21:19.280 person

00:21:19.740 would have

00:21:22.220 looked like

00:21:22.780 seems

00:21:24.280 reasonable.

00:21:25.460 I'm not

00:21:25.840 a believer,

00:21:26.500 so I

00:21:26.780 don't have

00:21:27.060 a vote.

00:21:28.140 I don't

00:21:28.360 care if

00:21:28.920 it gets

00:21:30.220 done,

00:21:30.560 I don't

00:21:30.760 care if

00:21:31.000 it doesn't

00:21:31.320 get done,

00:21:31.800 but it's

00:21:32.360 certainly

00:21:32.580 in the

00:21:32.920 reasonable

00:21:33.340 category.

00:21:36.120 So I

00:21:37.220 don't mind

00:21:37.520 that one,

00:21:38.020 but here are

00:21:38.320 some of the

00:21:38.680 fun ones.

00:21:42.780 Yale,

00:21:43.600 Harvard,

00:21:44.260 Columbia,

00:21:45.060 Princeton,

00:21:45.640 they're all

00:21:45.960 named after

00:21:46.520 basically

00:21:47.100 slave owners

00:21:48.160 or,

00:21:49.380 yeah,

00:21:49.860 basically

00:21:50.200 slave owners,

00:21:51.420 people who

00:21:51.960 were involved

00:21:52.720 in slavery,

00:21:53.380 Columbus,

00:21:54.480 Yale,

00:21:54.840 Harvard,

00:21:56.040 the prince

00:21:56.760 referred to

00:21:57.480 with Princeton

00:21:58.120 was King

00:21:58.660 William,

00:21:59.400 they all

00:21:59.960 had slaves.

00:22:02.340 So I

00:22:03.280 guess the

00:22:03.620 Woodrow

00:22:03.940 Wilson,

00:22:06.240 there was

00:22:08.040 something within

00:22:08.700 Princeton that

00:22:09.420 was called the

00:22:09.940 Woodrow Wilson

00:22:10.720 something,

00:22:11.540 they changed

00:22:12.080 that name

00:22:12.500 because Woodrow

00:22:13.180 Wilson was

00:22:13.780 a massive

00:22:14.960 racist.

00:22:16.520 Sure,

00:22:16.920 he did some

00:22:17.360 good stuff,

00:22:18.160 but he was

00:22:19.240 also a massive

00:22:19.840 racist.

00:22:21.560 And I'm

00:22:22.200 thinking to

00:22:22.580 myself,

00:22:23.140 I'd like to

00:22:23.700 suggest a

00:22:25.120 compromise.

00:22:26.780 And the

00:22:27.000 compromise is

00:22:27.740 this.

00:22:29.240 Instead of

00:22:29.940 changing the

00:22:30.660 names of

00:22:31.180 all these

00:22:31.720 slavers,

00:22:34.520 how about

00:22:35.100 we do

00:22:35.380 this?

00:22:36.080 We just

00:22:36.460 come up

00:22:36.780 with like

00:22:37.100 a copyright

00:22:37.820 symbol,

00:22:38.600 except instead

00:22:39.340 of copyright,

00:22:40.700 it would be

00:22:41.140 like a

00:22:41.480 little,

00:22:42.580 let's say

00:22:43.260 an S for 0.90

00:22:43.980 slavery.

00:22:45.680 I guess

00:22:46.620 R and C

00:22:47.700 are already

00:22:48.080 taken for

00:22:48.700 registered and

00:22:49.620 copyright.

00:22:50.700 So you'd

00:22:51.180 have some

00:22:51.460 kind of

00:22:51.700 like a

00:22:52.000 little letter

00:22:52.400 you put

00:22:52.720 after it.

00:22:53.840 Let's say

00:22:54.420 it's S

00:22:54.860 for slavers.

00:22:56.660 So it'd

00:22:56.960 be like

00:22:57.300 Harvard,

00:22:58.840 S.

00:23:00.000 Where'd

00:23:00.480 you go?

00:23:00.880 I went

00:23:01.260 to Princeton,

00:23:02.940 S.

00:23:04.700 Where'd

00:23:05.160 you get

00:23:05.360 your degree?

00:23:05.900 Yale,

00:23:06.940 S.

00:23:08.320 I'm just

00:23:08.960 kidding,

00:23:09.340 they'll never

00:23:09.640 do that.

00:23:10.060 But watching

00:23:12.680 this take

00:23:13.200 place is

00:23:13.920 quite

00:23:14.420 fascinating.

00:23:16.400 I gotta

00:23:17.060 say I

00:23:17.620 have mixed

00:23:18.140 opinions about

00:23:18.880 it all.

00:23:19.700 I have

00:23:19.960 mixed

00:23:20.220 opinions.

00:23:23.280 And the

00:23:23.920 mixed

00:23:24.140 opinions go

00:23:24.920 like this.

00:23:27.120 I think

00:23:27.920 that if we

00:23:28.560 were starting

00:23:29.040 from scratch

00:23:29.860 to name all

00:23:30.820 these things,

00:23:31.600 there's no

00:23:32.260 way in hell

00:23:32.700 we would

00:23:33.020 have named

00:23:33.300 everything

00:23:33.840 after slave

00:23:35.340 owners.

00:23:36.480 If nothing

00:23:37.600 had a name

00:23:38.260 and we

00:23:38.520 were saying

00:23:38.800 oh let's

00:23:39.180 just start

00:23:39.600 naming all

00:23:40.100 our buildings

00:23:40.660 and our

00:23:41.080 stuff.

00:23:42.100 We never

00:23:42.360 did that

00:23:42.700 before but

00:23:43.160 let's put

00:23:43.720 somebody's

00:23:44.060 name on

00:23:44.440 this stuff.

00:23:45.320 Let's build

00:23:45.780 a statue.

00:23:46.780 I don't

00:23:47.340 know that we

00:23:47.820 would do it

00:23:48.280 that way if

00:23:48.780 we started

00:23:49.200 today.

00:23:50.800 Do we

00:23:51.220 have a

00:23:51.540 right to

00:23:52.120 change

00:23:52.480 history?

00:23:53.160 Well here's

00:23:53.860 the thing.

00:23:55.540 Let me

00:23:55.820 give you a

00:23:58.560 little science

00:23:59.200 here to

00:24:00.380 red pill you

00:24:01.120 on these

00:24:01.680 statues and

00:24:02.780 such.

00:24:04.380 It goes

00:24:05.000 like this.

00:24:05.560 If you

00:24:06.760 think that

00:24:07.440 your physical

00:24:08.180 environment is

00:24:09.520 not programming

00:24:10.480 you, you're

00:24:11.560 wrong.

00:24:12.260 Your physical

00:24:12.920 environment is

00:24:13.820 part of the

00:24:14.380 everyday programming

00:24:15.440 of who you

00:24:16.000 become.

00:24:16.560 For example,

00:24:17.700 if you live

00:24:18.380 somewhere where

00:24:19.100 you don't have

00:24:19.600 much light,

00:24:21.200 you're programmed

00:24:22.060 to be in a

00:24:22.660 worse mood

00:24:23.160 because light

00:24:24.660 is good for

00:24:25.220 you.

00:24:25.460 It gives

00:24:25.580 you vitamin

00:24:25.980 D, helps

00:24:26.580 your mood,

00:24:27.120 helps your

00:24:27.420 health.

00:24:28.120 So simply

00:24:28.560 having a

00:24:29.000 house that

00:24:29.360 doesn't have

00:24:29.780 windows in

00:24:30.780 the right

00:24:31.060 place will

00:24:32.100 actually program

00:24:32.880 you to be

00:24:33.580 sad and

00:24:34.100 unhappy and

00:24:34.620 less successful.

00:24:35.560 And less

00:24:36.360 healthy.

00:24:37.340 It's that

00:24:37.820 simple.

00:24:38.820 You got

00:24:39.200 light, you're

00:24:40.020 a little bit

00:24:40.400 healthier and

00:24:40.840 happier.

00:24:41.280 You got no

00:24:41.720 light, you're

00:24:42.140 not.

00:24:43.060 But this

00:24:43.520 extends also

00:24:44.200 to things

00:24:44.620 like color

00:24:46.180 and design

00:24:47.160 and do you

00:24:49.260 feel claustrophobic?

00:24:50.640 Do you feel

00:24:51.020 creative?

00:24:53.260 If you're a 0.88

00:24:54.060 person who

00:24:54.460 needs order,

00:24:55.460 are you in a

00:24:55.980 messy environment?

00:24:57.360 Because imagine

00:24:57.880 being somebody

00:24:58.440 who really

00:24:58.760 needs something,

00:25:00.780 I don't know

00:25:01.500 if it would

00:25:01.700 be OCD,

00:25:02.460 but whatever

00:25:03.020 it is that

00:25:03.680 you need things

00:25:04.280 just where

00:25:04.720 they belong.

00:25:05.560 But you

00:25:06.260 unfortunately

00:25:06.980 don't have a

00:25:07.820 choice.

00:25:08.180 You live in a

00:25:08.580 house where

00:25:08.900 everything is

00:25:09.260 just a mess.

00:25:10.340 What would

00:25:10.660 that do to

00:25:10.980 your brain?

00:25:12.720 Imagine what

00:25:13.440 that does to 0.51

00:25:13.940 your brain.

00:25:15.060 Think about it.

00:25:15.700 It programs

00:25:16.420 you.

00:25:17.720 Now generalize

00:25:20.220 us from this.

00:25:20.620 We know that

00:25:21.280 everything in

00:25:22.020 your environment

00:25:23.160 can program

00:25:25.220 you and

00:25:25.780 pretty

00:25:26.240 immediately

00:25:27.280 and pretty

00:25:29.160 grossly.

00:25:30.040 Now let me

00:25:30.900 make up an

00:25:32.000 example that

00:25:32.660 isn't real.

00:25:34.520 Let's say

00:25:35.240 you're afraid

00:25:36.960 of dogs.

00:25:38.500 We'll just

00:25:38.900 take that as

00:25:39.480 a given.

00:25:40.000 Most of you

00:25:40.580 are not afraid

00:25:41.160 of dogs.

00:25:41.720 But let's

00:25:41.920 say you were

00:25:42.260 attacked by a

00:25:42.960 dog when you

00:25:43.420 were a kid

00:25:43.720 and you were

00:25:44.500 afraid of dogs.

00:25:46.000 Is that

00:25:46.520 reasonable?

00:25:46.920 Is it

00:25:47.440 reasonable for

00:25:48.040 a person to

00:25:48.520 be afraid of

00:25:49.080 dogs if they

00:25:49.820 were attacked

00:25:50.280 by dogs?

00:25:51.800 You would say

00:25:52.560 well it might

00:25:53.180 be irrational

00:25:53.880 but it's quite

00:25:55.040 reasonable that

00:25:55.980 they would be.

00:25:57.340 If you were

00:25:57.820 attacked by

00:25:58.520 something you'd

00:25:59.920 have a little

00:26:00.280 PTSD about it

00:26:01.300 wouldn't you?

00:26:01.720 I mean it just

00:26:02.000 makes sense.

00:26:02.980 People who go

00:26:03.420 through a war

00:26:05.100 will have some

00:26:05.640 PTSD.

00:26:06.840 So now imagine

00:26:07.440 you had some

00:26:08.420 PTSD about dogs

00:26:09.860 but you had to

00:26:11.060 live in the

00:26:12.240 dog museum.

00:26:14.120 It's like there

00:26:14.680 are pictures of

00:26:15.240 dogs on the

00:26:15.820 wall.

00:26:16.200 There's a

00:26:17.080 statue of a

00:26:17.780 dog.

00:26:19.020 There's audio

00:26:20.900 playing of dogs

00:26:22.020 barking.

00:26:23.000 You're living in

00:26:23.680 a dog museum

00:26:24.580 but you're

00:26:25.240 afraid of dogs

00:26:26.100 and you have a

00:26:27.060 good reason to

00:26:27.820 be afraid of

00:26:28.380 dogs because

00:26:28.940 one attacked

00:26:29.520 you once.

00:26:31.020 What does

00:26:31.440 that do to

00:26:31.840 you?

00:26:33.060 How do you

00:26:33.680 like that?

00:26:34.860 Do you like

00:26:35.260 living there?

00:26:36.360 The answer is

00:26:37.080 no.

00:26:38.120 No.

00:26:38.500 That would

00:26:38.840 program you

00:26:39.560 very negatively.

00:26:40.600 You wouldn't

00:26:40.880 be able to

00:26:41.540 perform in

00:26:42.800 life.

00:26:43.200 You couldn't

00:26:43.500 be as happy.

00:26:44.280 You'd just

00:26:44.560 never be happy.

00:26:45.280 So the

00:26:47.340 point is

00:26:47.980 that the

00:26:49.260 decorations

00:26:50.100 literally the

00:26:51.640 decorations

00:26:52.300 the choice of

00:26:53.720 color, the

00:26:54.560 choice of a

00:26:55.140 painting on

00:26:55.720 a wall, the

00:26:57.720 way the room

00:26:58.420 is organized

00:26:59.520 will program

00:27:01.660 you in real

00:27:02.440 time.

00:27:03.160 It will program

00:27:03.880 you in real

00:27:04.360 time.

00:27:05.160 Now those of

00:27:05.740 you who are

00:27:06.140 saying, if I

00:27:07.800 had to estimate

00:27:08.340 I'd say at

00:27:09.820 least 80% of

00:27:11.640 you listening to

00:27:12.380 this are saying

00:27:13.060 some form of

00:27:13.860 this, oh

00:27:15.060 my God

00:27:15.620 Scott, we

00:27:17.380 all have messy

00:27:18.280 rooms, we

00:27:19.280 all have to

00:27:19.740 go through

00:27:20.240 life, there's

00:27:22.400 no way this

00:27:23.080 is as powerful

00:27:23.880 as you're

00:27:24.420 making it out

00:27:25.060 to be.

00:27:26.120 We all have

00:27:27.220 to ride the

00:27:28.500 bus sometimes,

00:27:30.400 and the bus

00:27:31.020 is not pretty.

00:27:32.260 I get it

00:27:32.920 Scott, we'd

00:27:33.660 all like to

00:27:34.200 live in a

00:27:34.580 nice place

00:27:35.100 like you

00:27:35.580 do, but

00:27:36.940 that's life.

00:27:38.720 It's a

00:27:39.020 messy life,

00:27:40.340 we're all

00:27:41.000 affected the

00:27:41.560 same way,

00:27:42.360 don't make

00:27:42.660 a big thing

00:27:43.140 about it,

00:27:43.640 it's nothing.

00:27:44.920 And I think

00:27:45.360 you're completely

00:27:45.940 wrong.

00:27:47.060 I think that

00:27:47.640 the power

00:27:48.360 of your

00:27:49.300 physical

00:27:50.160 environment

00:27:50.740 is way

00:27:52.060 stronger

00:27:52.580 than you

00:27:53.740 think it

00:27:54.800 is.

00:27:55.660 Now of

00:27:56.040 course,

00:27:56.640 the analogy

00:27:57.360 that I

00:27:58.440 made to

00:27:58.740 the dog,

00:27:59.900 analogies

00:28:00.780 are not

00:28:01.160 persuasive,

00:28:02.020 so don't

00:28:02.500 look to the

00:28:02.960 analogy for

00:28:03.700 the persuasion.

00:28:04.900 That was

00:28:05.440 just to give

00:28:05.840 you an idea

00:28:06.220 of what I'm

00:28:06.480 talking about.

00:28:07.000 Here's the

00:28:07.420 persuasion.

00:28:07.920 If I

00:28:11.360 told you

00:28:11.980 you had to

00:28:12.500 live in a

00:28:12.940 space that

00:28:14.260 was very,

00:28:15.280 very unkind

00:28:16.080 to you

00:28:16.620 personally,

00:28:17.500 but it

00:28:18.060 wouldn't

00:28:18.320 bother me,

00:28:19.900 am I a

00:28:20.320 good person?

00:28:22.680 Am I a

00:28:23.400 good person

00:28:23.960 if I say,

00:28:25.040 hey, you're

00:28:25.880 a guest in

00:28:26.380 my house,

00:28:26.920 I've got

00:28:27.240 three bedrooms,

00:28:28.420 they're all

00:28:28.980 available for

00:28:29.740 you to use,

00:28:30.580 but I want

00:28:31.060 you to use

00:28:31.480 the one that

00:28:31.800 has the

00:28:32.080 dog pictures.

00:28:33.780 Use the

00:28:34.160 one with

00:28:34.400 the dog

00:28:34.760 pictures.

00:28:35.140 Yeah, I

00:28:35.480 know you're

00:28:35.900 afraid of

00:28:36.340 dogs, and

00:28:36.980 you'll be

00:28:37.640 traumatized,

00:28:38.400 you'll have

00:28:38.660 PTSD, and

00:28:39.420 you won't

00:28:39.640 be able to

00:28:40.000 sleep, but

00:28:40.980 it doesn't

00:28:41.360 bother me.

00:28:42.820 I'm not

00:28:43.380 afraid of

00:28:43.780 dogs.

00:28:44.800 So if I'm

00:28:45.620 not afraid of

00:28:46.220 dogs, I

00:28:48.480 don't care if

00:28:49.020 you sleep in

00:28:49.520 the dog

00:28:49.860 bedroom, even

00:28:50.540 though there

00:28:50.880 are two

00:28:51.160 other bedrooms

00:28:52.200 that don't

00:28:52.540 have dog

00:28:53.020 pictures in

00:28:53.720 them, why

00:28:54.360 do I care?

00:28:55.120 Because I'm

00:28:55.720 not afraid of

00:28:56.280 dogs.

00:28:59.140 That's sort

00:28:59.740 of what I'm

00:29:00.160 seeing.

00:29:01.020 So the

00:29:02.080 reason that I'm

00:29:02.920 anti-statue,

00:29:04.480 but I'm not

00:29:05.180 in favor of

00:29:05.980 taking them

00:29:06.640 down in

00:29:07.100 some

00:29:07.280 non-legal

00:29:08.220 riot way.

00:29:10.080 Everything has

00:29:10.860 to go through

00:29:11.340 the process

00:29:12.020 because that's

00:29:13.920 how we're

00:29:15.000 organized, that's

00:29:15.740 how society

00:29:16.240 works.

00:29:16.960 So I think

00:29:17.400 everything has

00:29:17.860 to go through

00:29:18.200 a legal

00:29:18.520 process, but

00:29:19.920 I think the

00:29:20.780 complaint overall

00:29:22.580 is quite real.

00:29:24.260 Now, has

00:29:24.960 anybody ever

00:29:26.340 been traumatized

00:29:27.460 by the names

00:29:28.220 Yale, Harvard,

00:29:29.540 Princeton, or

00:29:30.860 Columbia?

00:29:31.560 No.

00:29:33.460 No.

00:29:36.020 Nobody has

00:29:36.700 ever been

00:29:37.140 traumatized

00:29:37.900 because Harvard

00:29:38.960 is named

00:29:39.520 after a

00:29:40.000 slaver.

00:29:40.380 It just

00:29:40.560 hasn't

00:29:40.800 happened.

00:29:41.340 I don't

00:29:41.580 think anybody

00:29:41.960 knew until

00:29:42.440 this year.

00:29:42.940 I didn't

00:29:43.280 know.

00:29:44.060 Or at

00:29:44.400 least the

00:29:44.720 public didn't

00:29:45.200 know.

00:29:45.500 I didn't

00:29:45.800 know.

00:29:47.020 So certainly

00:29:48.980 things have

00:29:49.600 gone too

00:29:50.160 far.

00:29:51.400 But if you

00:29:52.460 ask me would

00:29:54.040 I want to

00:29:54.460 live in a

00:29:54.860 world where

00:29:55.480 there was a

00:29:56.040 statue to

00:29:56.840 slave owners

00:29:57.500 if I had

00:29:59.180 some generational

00:30:00.420 PTSD about

00:30:01.500 that, I'd

00:30:02.420 say, no, I'd

00:30:03.080 like to get

00:30:03.480 rid of those

00:30:03.880 statues.

00:30:05.220 But if you

00:30:05.620 told me to

00:30:06.060 change the

00:30:06.400 name of

00:30:06.640 these colleges,

00:30:07.340 I'd say

00:30:07.580 that's too

00:30:08.020 far, but

00:30:09.320 it's not up

00:30:09.780 to me.

00:30:11.160 So we'll

00:30:11.880 see if the

00:30:12.520 liberal

00:30:13.080 institutions

00:30:14.060 can live

00:30:14.620 with their

00:30:14.860 own rules.

00:30:17.040 Do you

00:30:17.560 remember

00:30:17.840 YouTuber

00:30:18.360 Jenna

00:30:18.780 Marbles?

00:30:19.460 Very, very

00:30:20.160 popular.

00:30:21.160 A blonde 1.00

00:30:22.140 woman who 0.99

00:30:22.760 did funny

00:30:23.360 YouTubes.

00:30:24.500 She was

00:30:24.900 gigantic.

00:30:25.380 She canceled

00:30:27.400 herself for

00:30:28.400 her own bad

00:30:29.060 behavior in

00:30:29.700 the past

00:30:30.120 because she

00:30:30.460 did black

00:30:30.900 face and

00:30:31.520 made tasteless

00:30:32.880 jokes.

00:30:34.240 Shane Dawson

00:30:35.020 was another

00:30:36.000 gigantic

00:30:36.680 YouTuber.

00:30:37.580 And by the

00:30:37.880 way, if you

00:30:38.280 have never

00:30:38.800 heard these

00:30:39.240 names, people

00:30:41.320 like Shane

00:30:42.280 Dawson and

00:30:43.040 Jenna Marbles

00:30:43.680 would be

00:30:44.120 like the

00:30:47.400 cast of

00:30:47.980 Friends

00:30:48.400 basically on

00:30:49.360 television.

00:30:50.520 That's how

00:30:51.100 popular they

00:30:51.760 are on

00:30:52.120 YouTube.

00:30:53.100 They're

00:30:53.240 gigantic

00:30:53.900 names on

00:30:54.780 YouTube.

00:30:55.380 But if

00:30:56.240 you're not

00:30:56.540 in that

00:30:56.820 world, you

00:30:57.200 haven't

00:30:57.400 heard of

00:30:57.660 them probably.

00:30:59.420 Gigantic

00:30:59.980 names.

00:31:00.660 One just

00:31:01.160 basically

00:31:02.220 apologized for

00:31:03.400 his entire

00:31:03.880 past.

00:31:06.400 But I

00:31:06.700 can't believe

00:31:07.280 that he

00:31:07.600 did black

00:31:09.420 face a

00:31:10.680 number of

00:31:11.220 times in

00:31:11.920 the YouTube

00:31:12.620 era and

00:31:15.500 he didn't

00:31:15.820 get canceled

00:31:16.400 for doing

00:31:16.920 black face a 0.95

00:31:17.900 number of

00:31:20.400 How many

00:31:20.840 times?

00:31:21.780 And Jenna

00:31:22.520 Marbles too.

00:31:23.720 How many

00:31:24.160 times can you

00:31:24.780 do black

00:31:25.260 face and

00:31:25.660 not get

00:31:26.020 canceled?

00:31:26.800 Is it

00:31:27.380 only this

00:31:27.820 year?

00:31:29.200 This is the

00:31:30.020 first year

00:31:30.460 people are

00:31:30.860 getting canceled

00:31:31.420 for this

00:31:31.780 stuff?

00:31:32.380 What's going

00:31:32.960 on with

00:31:33.300 that?

00:31:34.420 All right.

00:31:34.800 So it's

00:31:39.620 mostly fake

00:31:40.340 news and

00:31:41.000 coronavirus and

00:31:42.400 that video.

00:31:49.480 PTSD isn't

00:31:50.980 always about

00:31:51.700 being afraid.

00:31:53.020 That is

00:31:53.320 correct.

00:31:55.360 Somebody says

00:31:56.240 stop apologizing.

00:31:59.120 All right.

00:32:00.120 I'm going to

00:32:00.420 block you.

00:32:00.980 whoever said

00:32:01.660 stop apologizing

00:32:02.880 in capital

00:32:03.340 letters, I'm

00:32:04.280 going to

00:32:04.440 block you

00:32:04.860 now.

00:32:05.680 And here's

00:32:06.500 the thing.

00:32:07.060 Did you hear

00:32:07.460 me apologize?

00:32:09.020 Did anybody

00:32:09.440 hear anything

00:32:09.960 that sounded

00:32:10.400 like an

00:32:10.780 apology?

00:32:12.980 Nope.

00:32:14.840 I did not.

00:32:18.640 Now, I don't

00:32:19.040 know if that's

00:32:19.500 directed at me

00:32:20.140 or not, but I'm

00:32:20.740 sure somebody

00:32:21.160 will tell me.

00:32:22.720 I don't like it

00:32:23.540 when people

00:32:23.900 shout in

00:32:24.440 capitals on

00:32:25.000 my comments.

00:32:25.680 Why is

00:32:28.780 Trump losing

00:32:29.320 now?

00:32:29.740 Well, there's

00:32:30.380 a video in

00:32:31.300 which the

00:32:32.260 president retweeted

00:32:33.400 of a guy

00:32:35.120 yelling white

00:32:35.780 power.

00:32:37.260 Now, if

00:32:37.820 that's still

00:32:38.280 up, the

00:32:40.360 thing is, the

00:32:41.900 only defense

00:32:42.700 against that is

00:32:43.460 he didn't

00:32:43.760 really look at

00:32:44.400 it.

00:32:44.880 He didn't

00:32:45.300 really watch

00:32:45.780 the video

00:32:46.200 before he

00:32:46.680 tweeted.

00:32:47.400 Is there

00:32:47.660 anybody who's

00:32:48.160 ever tweeted

00:32:48.680 a video they

00:32:49.300 haven't actually

00:32:49.820 watched?

00:32:52.100 Maybe five

00:32:53.140 times a day?

00:32:54.660 That's right.

00:32:55.680 Yeah, people

00:32:56.420 tweet things

00:32:57.140 that they

00:32:57.480 have not

00:32:57.920 read and

00:32:59.340 videos they

00:32:59.860 have not

00:33:00.200 watched.

00:33:01.040 I do it

00:33:02.160 literally every

00:33:03.240 day.

00:33:04.400 Probably there

00:33:05.220 hasn't been a

00:33:05.980 single day of

00:33:07.980 tweeting, I'm

00:33:09.540 just guessing,

00:33:10.900 in four years

00:33:12.460 in which I

00:33:13.380 haven't tweeted

00:33:13.960 something I

00:33:14.600 haven't read

00:33:15.240 or I haven't

00:33:17.980 read it or

00:33:18.720 somebody says

00:33:19.860 it's down and

00:33:20.740 most of you are

00:33:21.360 saying it's

00:33:21.800 still up.

00:33:24.060 Yeah.

00:33:24.660 Now, if

00:33:29.800 it's still

00:33:30.460 up and I

00:33:32.440 don't hear

00:33:32.740 some real

00:33:33.520 good excuse,

00:33:35.500 I mean, I'm

00:33:36.180 out, obviously.

00:33:39.520 So I don't

00:33:40.380 think any of

00:33:40.860 you should

00:33:41.300 support him

00:33:41.940 if he keeps

00:33:42.440 that up.

00:33:44.460 Somebody says

00:33:45.160 you've taught

00:33:45.580 us not to

00:33:46.080 trust videos

00:33:46.700 exactly.

00:33:47.720 That's why

00:33:48.360 you should

00:33:49.060 wait to hear

00:33:49.620 what they

00:33:49.880 say.

00:33:50.880 You should

00:33:51.420 reserve your

00:33:52.040 judgment until

00:33:52.600 you hear the

00:33:53.580 full story.

00:33:55.160 But the

00:33:56.000 only explanation

00:33:58.320 I can imagine,

00:34:00.300 the only one

00:34:01.040 I can imagine,

00:34:02.000 is that he

00:34:02.500 didn't watch

00:34:02.980 it before he

00:34:03.460 tweeted it,

00:34:03.960 and nobody

00:34:04.340 did.

00:34:05.500 But it's

00:34:06.340 been up there

00:34:06.780 for a while,

00:34:07.380 hasn't it?

00:34:08.500 So it could

00:34:09.240 be that they

00:34:09.720 don't know how

00:34:10.200 to take it

00:34:10.680 down.

00:34:11.940 Meaning they

00:34:12.580 don't want to

00:34:12.980 just take it

00:34:13.460 down because

00:34:14.080 then it might

00:34:14.520 look like

00:34:15.040 they meant

00:34:15.860 it, but

00:34:16.260 they got

00:34:16.680 scared off

00:34:18.200 it, so

00:34:18.620 maybe they're

00:34:19.280 thinking of

00:34:19.740 some.

00:34:24.080 Don't agree

00:34:24.860 he's losing.

00:34:27.740 Somebody said

00:34:28.520 they weighed

00:34:28.960 in on this

00:34:29.460 and was

00:34:30.100 restricted for

00:34:32.040 59 seconds.

00:34:35.920 The racist

00:34:36.780 video is still

00:34:37.760 up.

00:34:39.040 You know,

00:34:39.480 it's going to

00:34:40.220 be an interesting

00:34:41.280 case if he

00:34:42.180 decides to

00:34:43.140 defend it.

00:34:45.020 I don't think

00:34:45.640 that's going to

00:34:46.100 happen, but

00:34:46.580 who knows,

00:34:47.220 whatever.

00:34:48.240 And here's

00:34:48.840 the question.

00:34:50.080 You know,

00:34:50.320 I've been

00:34:50.680 telling you

00:34:51.060 that because

00:34:51.920 the conversation

00:34:53.380 about race

00:34:54.320 and the police

00:34:55.020 in particular

00:34:55.620 has gotten

00:34:56.700 deeper,

00:34:58.280 there are

00:34:58.780 things that

00:34:59.320 you can say

00:35:00.200 that you

00:35:03.940 just couldn't

00:35:04.420 say before.

00:35:05.520 So you

00:35:05.860 actually can

00:35:06.420 say things

00:35:06.960 you weren't

00:35:07.200 saying.

00:35:08.300 So if

00:35:08.660 somebody says

00:35:09.160 the old guy

00:35:09.620 is joking

00:35:10.220 or sarcastic,

00:35:11.280 it doesn't

00:35:11.980 really matter,

00:35:12.580 does it?

00:35:14.000 I don't think

00:35:14.800 that would

00:35:15.080 matter in

00:35:15.500 any way.

00:35:16.500 Because there

00:35:17.580 are some

00:35:17.900 things that

00:35:18.280 you shouldn't

00:35:18.600 be joking

00:35:19.040 about.

00:35:22.100 So here's

00:35:23.100 the thing.

00:35:23.840 If the

00:35:24.380 old man

00:35:24.800 had yelled

00:35:25.440 Heil Hitler, 0.98

00:35:27.740 of course,

00:35:28.400 that would

00:35:28.980 be the

00:35:29.460 worst.

00:35:30.480 If he'd

00:35:30.920 yelled

00:35:31.260 white supremacy,

00:35:32.840 terrible,

00:35:33.480 white nationalism,

00:35:34.700 terrible.

00:35:35.540 But what if

00:35:36.020 he just

00:35:36.340 yelled white

00:35:36.820 power?

00:35:39.300 There might

00:35:40.220 be an

00:35:40.500 interesting

00:35:40.900 free speech

00:35:42.260 case here

00:35:43.060 and I

00:35:43.880 would be

00:35:44.180 fascinated

00:35:44.620 if the

00:35:45.260 president

00:35:45.600 decided to

00:35:46.700 back it.

00:35:49.460 Now,

00:35:49.860 I think it

00:35:50.220 would be

00:35:50.420 the end

00:35:50.700 of his

00:35:50.960 presidency,

00:35:51.560 but he

00:35:51.760 might anyway.

00:35:54.220 And that

00:35:55.040 would be

00:35:55.280 this.

00:35:55.720 Is there

00:35:56.020 any reason

00:35:56.440 that that

00:35:56.880 guy can't

00:35:57.360 yell white

00:35:57.760 power?

00:35:59.120 If there

00:36:01.000 are other

00:36:01.260 people yelling

00:36:01.860 black power

00:36:02.580 and other

00:36:04.020 slogans,

00:36:04.740 isn't that

00:36:05.080 just his

00:36:05.460 opinion?

00:36:06.600 Because it's

00:36:07.140 not racist

00:36:07.800 to say

00:36:09.260 that your

00:36:09.640 own group

00:36:10.040 is good,

00:36:10.680 is it?

00:36:11.960 To just

00:36:12.520 say that

00:36:12.960 you want

00:36:13.520 your group

00:36:14.240 to have

00:36:14.580 power?

00:36:15.920 It's kind

00:36:16.540 of interesting.

00:36:17.060 We'll see

00:36:17.340 if anybody

00:36:17.820 supports it.

00:36:19.320 I don't

00:36:19.620 think you

00:36:19.980 can go

00:36:20.400 there to

00:36:21.000 support it,

00:36:21.640 but I'd

00:36:22.040 love to

00:36:22.420 see what

00:36:23.360 other people

00:36:23.820 do about

00:36:24.280 it.

00:36:24.820 Now,

00:36:25.140 do I

00:36:25.520 personally

00:36:25.940 think that

00:36:27.100 an old

00:36:27.460 man has

00:36:28.080 the right

00:36:28.920 to yell

00:36:29.660 that phrase?

00:36:30.420 Of course.

00:36:31.840 Of course.

00:36:32.440 An old 0.80

00:36:32.760 man can

00:36:33.140 yell anything

00:36:33.620 he wants.

00:36:34.720 It wasn't

00:36:36.180 an insult

00:36:36.920 to anybody.

00:36:38.380 He was

00:36:38.680 just asserting

00:36:39.520 something about

00:36:42.180 white people,

00:36:43.120 and I think

00:36:43.780 you're allowed

00:36:44.240 to assert

00:36:44.760 things about

00:36:46.360 yourself if

00:36:47.080 you're not

00:36:47.380 claiming

00:36:47.660 superiority,

00:36:48.740 at least

00:36:49.840 in this

00:36:50.820 society.

00:36:52.680 So,

00:36:53.200 we'll see

00:36:53.640 where that

00:36:54.340 goes.

00:36:57.040 Somebody

00:36:57.560 says,

00:36:58.060 it's just

00:36:58.380 not great

00:36:58.900 judgment.

00:37:00.900 You know,

00:37:01.540 when you

00:37:01.900 reach a

00:37:03.160 certain

00:37:03.360 age,

00:37:04.020 I don't

00:37:04.460 know if

00:37:04.720 you care,

00:37:05.560 do you?

00:37:06.640 Because the

00:37:07.280 old man is

00:37:07.820 probably just

00:37:08.300 having a

00:37:08.720 great time

00:37:09.200 today.

00:37:09.760 He's probably

00:37:10.140 looking at

00:37:10.600 the news

00:37:10.940 and saying,

00:37:11.440 look what I

00:37:11.960 did.

00:37:12.840 Everybody,

00:37:13.360 hey,

00:37:13.520 you see

00:37:13.780 this?

00:37:14.620 The

00:37:14.840 president's

00:37:15.280 talking about

00:37:15.780 me.

00:37:16.140 Everybody's

00:37:16.460 talking about

00:37:16.920 me.

00:37:21.560 Somebody

00:37:22.000 says,

00:37:22.460 what if he

00:37:22.840 said black 0.51

00:37:23.580 power?

00:37:24.080 Yeah,

00:37:24.320 so the

00:37:24.680 point is,

00:37:25.820 if it had

00:37:26.840 been completely

00:37:27.500 legal to

00:37:28.200 say black 0.69

00:37:29.000 power,

00:37:29.840 will this

00:37:31.880 guy be

00:37:32.200 banned

00:37:32.500 forever for

00:37:33.720 saying white

00:37:34.240 power?

00:37:34.880 Now,

00:37:35.060 the difference,

00:37:35.620 of course,

00:37:36.000 is that there's

00:37:36.540 a presumed

00:37:37.200 difference in

00:37:37.880 power.

00:37:38.560 If you're the

00:37:39.360 one who

00:37:39.620 doesn't have

00:37:40.180 power,

00:37:41.200 or society

00:37:42.460 looks at it

00:37:43.360 that way,

00:37:44.380 then say,

00:37:45.020 hey,

00:37:46.400 Elbonian

00:37:46.960 power,

00:37:47.660 nobody cares

00:37:48.420 if you're

00:37:49.600 a low

00:37:50.140 power or

00:37:52.020 presumed to

00:37:52.660 be not

00:37:53.180 having enough

00:37:53.680 power.

00:37:54.560 But if you're

00:37:55.280 the one who

00:37:55.600 has power,

00:37:56.560 then it just

00:37:57.120 looks like a

00:37:57.620 dictator,

00:37:58.120 doesn't it?

00:37:58.920 So context

00:37:59.680 does matter.

00:38:01.860 Old lady 1.00

00:38:02.680 yelling Nazi,

00:38:04.520 is that

00:38:04.980 okay?

00:38:05.960 Oh,

00:38:06.400 good point.

00:38:07.460 Yeah,

00:38:07.940 so the

00:38:08.440 old lady 1.00

00:38:09.140 who was

00:38:09.500 yelling at

00:38:10.020 the guy

00:38:10.480 and calling

00:38:11.340 him a

00:38:11.880 Nazi, 0.69

00:38:12.880 yes,

00:38:13.240 she should

00:38:13.600 be condemned

00:38:14.280 equally,

00:38:15.520 I would say.

00:38:16.780 But when she

00:38:17.700 was a white

00:38:18.200 woman yelling

00:38:19.000 at a white

00:38:19.580 man,

00:38:20.800 I don't know,

00:38:21.320 it gets

00:38:21.500 complicated.

00:38:22.900 It gets

00:38:23.220 complicated.

00:38:23.660 he was

00:38:27.360 being called

00:38:27.820 a racist

00:38:28.260 for supporting

00:38:29.280 Trump,

00:38:30.280 and maybe

00:38:31.040 he responded

00:38:31.720 by yelling

00:38:32.220 white power 0.92

00:38:32.860 just to

00:38:33.420 bother her. 0.99

00:38:34.940 Maybe.

00:38:36.140 But,

00:38:36.540 you know,

00:38:38.520 it doesn't

00:38:39.840 matter what

00:38:40.220 his intentions

00:38:40.760 were,

00:38:41.140 does it?

00:38:41.860 I don't

00:38:42.260 think it

00:38:42.580 matters.

00:38:45.540 Trump

00:38:46.060 would be

00:38:46.640 up 10

00:38:48.540 if he

00:38:48.900 would just

00:38:49.200 put down

00:38:49.720 his phone,

00:38:50.800 somebody

00:38:51.080 says.

00:38:51.640 Yeah,

00:38:55.740 he just

00:38:56.040 ruined

00:38:56.380 Trump's

00:38:56.860 election,

00:38:57.360 but he's

00:38:57.700 having a

00:38:58.020 great day.

00:38:59.640 Scarborough

00:39:00.120 thinks Trump

00:39:00.860 is trying

00:39:01.320 to lose.

00:39:02.340 You know,

00:39:02.740 I've heard

00:39:03.760 a few

00:39:04.040 people say

00:39:04.560 that.

00:39:05.780 Didn't

00:39:06.100 Mike

00:39:06.720 Sertovich

00:39:07.080 ask the

00:39:07.760 question,

00:39:08.960 if Trump

00:39:09.480 were trying

00:39:10.080 to lose,

00:39:10.720 how would

00:39:11.000 it look

00:39:11.300 different?

00:39:13.240 Right?

00:39:13.900 How would

00:39:14.280 it look

00:39:14.860 different if

00:39:15.440 he were

00:39:15.660 trying to

00:39:16.200 lose?

00:39:17.260 And,

00:39:17.640 you know,

00:39:18.020 of course,

00:39:18.300 that's sort

00:39:18.880 of a trick

00:39:19.280 question,

00:39:19.840 because

00:39:20.080 you know,

00:39:22.960 you could

00:39:23.400 say the

00:39:23.720 same thing

00:39:24.060 about

00:39:24.260 Biden.

00:39:24.860 It looks

00:39:25.160 like Biden

00:39:25.600 is trying

00:39:25.980 to lose.

00:39:26.860 You could

00:39:27.100 probably say

00:39:27.460 it about

00:39:27.700 anybody.

00:39:29.240 All right.

00:39:31.780 Somebody

00:39:32.180 says,

00:39:32.640 oh my

00:39:32.860 God,

00:39:33.140 the sky

00:39:33.520 is falling

00:39:34.000 today.

00:39:35.360 Who knows?

00:39:36.220 You know,

00:39:36.760 there probably

00:39:37.440 will be 25

00:39:38.360 surprises between

00:39:39.460 now and

00:39:39.960 election day.

00:39:41.220 So,

00:39:41.940 you know,

00:39:42.220 we might not

00:39:42.720 even be talking

00:39:43.400 about this

00:39:43.840 by tomorrow.

00:39:44.680 We'll see.

00:39:48.060 But it

00:39:48.640 would be

00:39:48.960 really interesting

00:39:49.820 if Trump

00:39:50.760 decided to

00:39:51.420 say,

00:39:51.740 hey,

00:39:52.020 that guy

00:39:52.440 can yell

00:39:52.800 that.

00:39:53.560 If the

00:39:54.040 woman can 1.00

00:39:54.480 call him

00:39:54.820 a Nazi, 0.58

00:39:56.020 he can

00:39:56.420 yell anything

00:39:57.560 he wants

00:39:57.980 back.

00:39:59.340 Maybe.

00:40:00.900 If the

00:40:01.640 president is

00:40:02.300 keeping it

00:40:02.760 up there,

00:40:03.320 let me say

00:40:03.920 this.

00:40:04.640 If the

00:40:05.220 president

00:40:05.620 says,

00:40:06.980 yeah,

00:40:07.140 I can see

00:40:07.540 why that

00:40:07.880 would be

00:40:08.380 offensive,

00:40:09.000 but freedom

00:40:09.520 of speech,

00:40:10.960 then I would

00:40:11.500 actually back

00:40:12.080 him for it.

00:40:13.240 I think I

00:40:13.920 could actually

00:40:14.260 get behind

00:40:14.780 that.

00:40:15.600 As long

00:40:16.100 as he

00:40:16.380 said,

00:40:16.680 yeah,

00:40:17.240 I don't

00:40:17.900 buy the

00:40:18.520 statement,

00:40:18.940 but freedom

00:40:20.840 of speech,

00:40:22.080 I doubt I

00:40:24.660 could publicly

00:40:25.280 support that

00:40:26.180 too much,

00:40:26.780 but privately

00:40:27.760 I'd be saying

00:40:28.380 to myself,

00:40:29.000 well,

00:40:29.140 that's a good

00:40:29.480 point.

00:40:30.260 I don't have

00:40:30.920 to back

00:40:31.300 anybody,

00:40:31.820 but I can

00:40:32.180 back their

00:40:32.580 ability to

00:40:33.220 say obnoxious

00:40:35.420 things in

00:40:35.820 public.

00:40:40.620 Yeah,

00:40:41.100 so other

00:40:41.380 people say

00:40:41.840 he's acting

00:40:42.300 like he

00:40:42.640 wants to

00:40:43.180 lose.

00:40:44.460 Why would

00:40:45.060 he want

00:40:45.360 to lose?

00:40:47.420 Why would

00:40:48.000 he want

00:40:48.280 to lose?

00:40:48.680 It would

00:40:48.880 be quite

00:40:50.800 a change

00:40:52.720 from anything

00:40:53.200 we've seen

00:40:53.680 from him,

00:40:54.320 but the

00:40:55.020 only reason

00:40:55.420 I can

00:40:55.960 imagine he

00:40:56.440 would want

00:40:56.800 to lose

00:40:57.160 is if he

00:40:57.580 has some

00:40:57.940 health issues

00:40:58.520 we don't

00:40:58.860 know about.

00:41:00.080 If I were

00:41:00.720 that age and

00:41:01.300 I had some

00:41:01.660 health issues,

00:41:02.860 I'd say,

00:41:03.520 you know,

00:41:04.100 maybe he

00:41:04.700 would be

00:41:05.020 just as

00:41:05.720 well if I

00:41:06.560 went out

00:41:07.100 after one

00:41:07.880 term,

00:41:09.360 but we have

00:41:09.880 no indication

00:41:10.480 of anything

00:41:10.900 like that.

00:41:11.420 Unless I

00:41:12.440 heard a

00:41:12.740 reason,

00:41:14.040 and it

00:41:14.380 would have

00:41:14.660 to be a

00:41:14.960 health reason,

00:41:15.520 I think.

00:41:16.160 Anything short

00:41:16.820 of a health

00:41:17.180 reason,

00:41:17.580 I'm not

00:41:17.880 sure I

00:41:18.140 would believe.

00:41:23.780 Somebody in

00:41:24.440 the comments

00:41:24.840 says,

00:41:25.800 I just

00:41:26.140 awoke from

00:41:26.680 a coma

00:41:27.080 for the

00:41:27.480 past six

00:41:27.960 months.

00:41:28.400 What have

00:41:28.620 I missed?

00:41:30.100 That's

00:41:30.540 pretty funny.

00:41:33.440 All right.

00:41:36.140 Somebody

00:41:36.580 says,

00:41:37.100 I'm white

00:41:37.540 and I

00:41:37.860 don't feel

00:41:38.260 very powerful.

00:41:39.720 Well,

00:41:40.680 better crank

00:41:41.300 up your

00:41:41.620 white privilege

00:41:42.180 then.

00:41:42.600 What are

00:41:42.760 you missing?

00:41:46.380 That is

00:41:46.920 the speech

00:41:47.380 on the

00:41:47.840 streets.

00:41:51.360 All right.

00:41:51.920 Somebody

00:41:52.180 says,

00:41:52.500 I doubt

00:41:52.740 Trump is

00:41:53.240 making a

00:41:53.720 play here.

00:41:54.340 I doubt

00:41:54.640 it too,

00:41:55.240 but we'll

00:41:55.520 see how

00:41:55.820 it turns

00:41:56.120 out.

00:41:56.400 All right.

00:41:56.660 I got

00:41:56.860 nothing else

00:41:57.260 for you.

00:41:57.860 Go enjoy

00:41:58.380 your day.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 28, 2020

Episode 1041 Scott Adams： Let's Talk About All the Fake News Today

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript