Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1054 Scott Adams： I Unveil my Digital Bill of Rights, Talk About Roger Stone, Mock AOC, China Threat and More

00:00:00.000 Bum-bum-bum-bum-bum-bum

00:00:01.880 Hey everybody. Come on in.

00:00:12.880 Gather around. There's plenty of space.

00:00:16.600 Yes! It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams and the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:21.740 Now world-renowned, people all across the globe are enjoying the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:27.400 and you know why

00:00:29.980 yeah, it's the best part of the day

00:00:31.840 every single time

00:00:33.660 this will be no exception

00:00:35.200 and all you need

00:00:36.320 is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein

00:00:39.600 a canteen jug or a flask

00:00:40.700 a vessel of any kind

00:00:42.920 fill it with your favorite liquid

00:00:45.180 I like coffee

00:00:46.160 and join me now

00:00:48.140 for the unparalleled pleasure

00:00:51.360 the dopamine hit of the day

00:00:53.180 the thing that makes everything better

00:00:55.560 it's called the simultaneous sip

00:00:57.960 and it's going to happen now

00:00:59.460 go

00:01:00.120 yeah

00:01:04.560 yeah, everything's improving

00:01:06.400 all feels better now

00:01:09.780 well, let's talk about some of the news

00:01:12.200 is everybody buying their Goya

00:01:15.420 products

00:01:16.780 you know

00:01:19.700 the company's CEO

00:01:21.040 who said something nice about President Trump

00:01:23.600 and now he's going to get boycotted

00:01:24.960 I think a lot of people are

00:01:27.860 buying a little extra

00:01:30.480 Goya products

00:01:32.200 so I hope that turns out

00:01:33.540 turns into a plus for Goya

00:01:36.080 anyway

00:01:37.920 here's some crazy things

00:01:39.880 I love the fact that Mayor de Blasio

00:01:43.420 is not even trying to be

00:01:46.040 any kind of a

00:01:47.440 credible figure anymore

00:01:49.200 so he's

00:01:51.660 he's banning all large gatherings

00:01:53.260 except for a Black Lives Matter protest

00:01:55.280 also known as

00:01:57.120 the largest gatherings

00:01:58.320 now

00:01:59.580 I suppose that he's in favor of free speech

00:02:02.140 so that would be

00:02:04.760 a good reason to make an exception

00:02:06.360 because there's a constitutional

00:02:08.260 constitutional right

00:02:10.840 to free speech

00:02:12.200 but there's also a constitutional right

00:02:15.300 to religious expression

00:02:17.260 so

00:02:18.660 so that's

00:02:20.520 I usually don't like to talk about the hypocrisy stuff

00:02:23.520 because it's too boring

00:02:24.320 but

00:02:25.540 that one's just

00:02:26.680 sort of weird and funny

00:02:27.940 are we in a weird situation

00:02:33.060 where

00:02:33.500 the virus

00:02:36.040 infections are running out of control

00:02:38.760 correct me if I'm wrong

00:02:41.540 is it not obvious to everyone

00:02:43.600 that the reason

00:02:45.300 the infections are increasing

00:02:47.320 is because the lockdowns are over

00:02:50.280 we all know that right

00:02:52.580 because

00:02:53.160 when you watch the commentary

00:02:55.720 it's almost like

00:02:58.040 some people still don't believe

00:03:00.420 that social distancing works

00:03:03.140 which is weird at this point

00:03:05.980 isn't it

00:03:06.480 but am I wrong

00:03:07.740 that some people still think

00:03:09.000 social distancing

00:03:10.000 doesn't make any difference

00:03:11.260 when the data is now

00:03:13.300 overwhelmingly obvious

00:03:14.520 that it does

00:03:15.220 I don't know about that

00:03:18.100 it looks like

00:03:18.660 it looks like

00:03:19.800 there's still doubt on masks

00:03:21.660 and everything else

00:03:22.560 it's a

00:03:24.220 it's an amazing world

00:03:25.200 that there's no amount

00:03:26.280 of information

00:03:27.140 or experience

00:03:28.020 that can change people's minds

00:03:29.620 you can't be changed

00:03:31.620 with data

00:03:32.240 you can't be changed

00:03:33.880 with observation

00:03:34.800 reason

00:03:36.240 people just don't change

00:03:38.380 their minds

00:03:38.880 it's just not a thing

00:03:40.320 AOC had the

00:03:43.020 one of the most annoying

00:03:44.140 quotes of her life

00:03:45.420 tweets anyway

00:03:46.880 she's complaining

00:03:48.960 about the complaints

00:03:50.040 about cancel culture

00:03:51.240 now of course

00:03:53.020 she has to cancel

00:03:54.560 the complaints

00:03:55.280 against cancel culture

00:03:56.540 because cancel culture

00:03:58.420 works for her side

00:04:00.300 so here's what she said

00:04:02.320 she said

00:04:02.700 the term cancel culture

00:04:03.900 comes from entitlement

00:04:05.720 um

00:04:08.120 okay

00:04:09.820 cancel culture

00:04:12.020 comes from entitlement

00:04:13.400 alright

00:04:14.660 this is going to be

00:04:15.800 an insightful point

00:04:16.940 that follows

00:04:17.580 because I don't get it yet

00:04:19.020 and she says

00:04:20.620 alright

00:04:21.560 so cancel culture

00:04:22.460 comes from entitlement

00:04:23.580 as though the person

00:04:25.280 complaining

00:04:25.920 has the right

00:04:26.760 to a large

00:04:27.580 captive audience

00:04:28.580 and one is a victim

00:04:30.040 if people choose

00:04:31.160 to tune you out

00:04:32.180 I don't think

00:04:33.880 that's what people

00:04:34.600 are complaining about

00:04:35.720 AOC

00:04:37.740 seems a little bit

00:04:39.660 off point

00:04:40.460 I think people

00:04:42.920 are complaining

00:04:43.500 about losing

00:04:44.060 their jobs

00:04:44.900 losing their jobs

00:04:47.920 for having an opinion

00:04:49.220 that's

00:04:50.780 that's a cancellation

00:04:51.960 losing your job

00:04:54.100 um

00:04:55.560 but uh

00:04:56.980 beyond that

00:04:57.600 the real complaint

00:04:58.800 is that the people

00:04:59.500 getting cancelled

00:05:00.220 uh

00:05:01.480 are being cancelled

00:05:02.280 for reasons

00:05:03.240 that are not

00:05:03.820 appropriate

00:05:04.600 it doesn't

00:05:05.320 it has nothing

00:05:06.060 to do with entitlement

00:05:07.180 that's such a

00:05:09.040 a weird

00:05:09.640 take

00:05:10.340 um

00:05:12.240 and then she says

00:05:13.520 odds are you're not

00:05:14.560 actually cancelled

00:05:15.500 you're just being challenged

00:05:17.320 held accountable

00:05:18.500 or unliked

00:05:19.680 well

00:05:21.100 all of those things

00:05:22.820 are true

00:05:23.380 and then she goes on

00:05:24.300 to uh

00:05:25.020 paint herself

00:05:26.120 as a victim

00:05:26.720 of many complaints

00:05:28.400 it's just the most

00:05:30.520 confused opinion

00:05:31.800 of all time

00:05:33.160 is cancelling good

00:05:34.240 is it bad

00:05:35.040 we can't even tell

00:05:36.280 what she wants

00:05:36.960 all right

00:05:37.980 I tweeted out

00:05:39.400 a uh

00:05:40.240 speech

00:05:40.860 that was

00:05:41.780 um

00:05:42.740 captured in text

00:05:44.460 from director

00:05:45.980 ray

00:05:46.560 the fbi

00:05:47.360 talking about

00:05:48.720 all of the ways

00:05:49.780 china is stealing

00:05:51.480 intellectual property

00:05:52.740 from the united states

00:05:53.880 and I gotta tell you

00:05:55.620 even though you knew

00:05:56.660 it was bad

00:05:57.440 you know

00:05:58.760 you've been hearing it

00:05:59.660 china is stealing

00:06:00.900 our intellectual property

00:06:02.320 china is spying on us

00:06:04.820 you know

00:06:05.180 china is interfering

00:06:06.040 but until you hear him

00:06:07.840 do the whole list

00:06:09.160 with all the examples

00:06:11.340 of china

00:06:11.940 the things that china

00:06:12.980 is doing right now

00:06:14.200 we're not talking

00:06:15.420 about things they have

00:06:16.340 done in the past

00:06:17.060 although some of that's

00:06:17.900 there but the things

00:06:19.060 they're doing right now

00:06:20.280 it's a full-out war

00:06:21.440 it's a full-out

00:06:23.280 digital war with china

00:06:25.680 which even I was

00:06:27.580 surprised at the

00:06:28.720 extent of it

00:06:29.540 so apparently

00:06:30.720 it's it's a hot war

00:06:32.380 it's it's actually a hot

00:06:34.380 war and they're just

00:06:35.460 trying to steal their

00:06:36.280 stuff

00:06:36.660 you read that and you

00:06:38.340 can't even you can't

00:06:40.180 even doubt a little bit

00:06:41.760 that we you know we

00:06:43.540 just can't do business

00:06:44.400 with china

00:06:44.880 it just can't it can't

00:06:46.300 be done

00:06:46.640 so the decoupling I

00:06:48.400 think is guaranteed

00:06:49.160 if you think the

00:06:50.760 tiktok app is going to

00:06:52.220 last

00:06:52.680 I think you're going to

00:06:55.280 be surprised

00:06:56.080 the tiktok app is

00:06:58.480 definitely going to be

00:06:59.260 banned in the united

00:07:00.060 states

00:07:00.520 in my opinion

00:07:02.040 I don't think there's

00:07:03.320 the slightest chance

00:07:04.380 that that could remain

00:07:05.940 you saw a news item

00:07:07.400 that was yesterday

00:07:08.200 that was weird

00:07:08.880 there was a initial

00:07:10.680 report that was

00:07:11.600 immediately retracted

00:07:13.160 or fairly soon

00:07:14.400 but the initial report

00:07:15.940 was that amazon sent

00:07:17.300 out a menu memo

00:07:18.780 telling people to

00:07:20.740 take tiktok off their

00:07:22.580 phone if they were

00:07:24.220 amazon employees and

00:07:25.580 they used the phone

00:07:26.400 for amazon stuff I

00:07:27.520 guess

00:07:27.720 now amazon immediately

00:07:29.740 reversed that

00:07:30.700 but I'll bet it was

00:07:33.240 real at one point

00:07:34.380 I'll bet it was real

00:07:36.080 and I'll bet china

00:07:37.000 complained

00:07:37.620 don't you think

00:07:39.780 china complained

00:07:40.680 and maybe that's why

00:07:42.120 they reversed it

00:07:43.040 I'll bet it was

00:07:44.760 I'll bet china

00:07:46.360 actually has enough

00:07:47.340 control over amazon

00:07:49.000 that amazon changed

00:07:50.700 its policy

00:07:51.500 to allow spyware

00:07:54.800 on their employee

00:07:56.100 phones

00:07:56.760 now I don't know

00:07:58.300 if that's what

00:07:58.820 happened

00:07:59.220 it could be that

00:08:00.360 it was just a

00:08:01.160 you know

00:08:01.920 fake memo or

00:08:02.780 something

00:08:03.100 anything's possible

00:08:04.480 but it kind of

00:08:05.400 looks like that

00:08:06.040 initially

00:08:06.480 there was a study

00:08:10.320 that said that

00:08:11.280 people who complain

00:08:13.500 about being victims

00:08:15.820 are psychopathic

00:08:17.660 manipulative

00:08:18.440 and narcissistic

00:08:19.540 narcissistic

00:08:20.760 and they're frequent

00:08:23.960 signalers of

00:08:24.920 virtuous victimhood

00:08:26.320 says a new study

00:08:27.240 so in other words

00:08:28.760 the people who

00:08:29.480 complain about victims

00:08:30.600 are psychopaths

00:08:31.640 manipulative

00:08:32.200 and narcissistic

00:08:33.200 people

00:08:33.600 does that sound

00:08:35.180 right

00:08:35.460 I don't know

00:08:37.300 if you needed

00:08:37.800 to do a study

00:08:38.540 for that

00:08:39.020 just saying

00:08:40.240 you know

00:08:41.600 I think it makes

00:08:42.380 a difference

00:08:42.780 if you're the

00:08:43.360 actual victim

00:08:44.220 or if you're

00:08:44.960 protesting on

00:08:45.760 behalf of those

00:08:46.540 victims

00:08:46.940 if you're the

00:08:48.100 actual victim

00:08:48.940 well you probably

00:08:49.980 have something

00:08:50.420 real to complain

00:08:51.180 about

00:08:51.540 but if you're

00:08:53.160 but others

00:08:54.560 just like the

00:08:55.340 virtuous victimhood

00:08:56.860 root apparently

00:08:58.020 all right

00:08:59.960 here is my

00:09:01.160 new big

00:09:02.260 suggestion for

00:09:02.960 the day

00:09:03.400 are you ready

00:09:04.240 the news was

00:09:05.260 all boring

00:09:05.760 so there was

00:09:06.200 nothing really

00:09:06.640 to talk about

00:09:07.200 except Roger Stone

00:09:08.260 so let's do that

00:09:09.480 and then we'll get

00:09:10.020 to the big news

00:09:11.220 so Roger Stone

00:09:13.540 got his sentence

00:09:15.140 commuted

00:09:15.700 which means that

00:09:16.540 he can still

00:09:17.180 battle in the

00:09:18.160 legal system

00:09:18.860 to have his

00:09:19.740 name restored

00:09:20.760 but he doesn't

00:09:22.020 have to worry

00:09:22.400 about jail

00:09:22.920 from this

00:09:23.480 latest offense

00:09:24.580 now of course

00:09:26.460 the anti-Trumpers

00:09:27.560 are saying

00:09:27.980 it's an abuse

00:09:29.060 of power

00:09:29.780 my power

00:09:31.360 is abused

00:09:32.200 and he did

00:09:33.740 all these

00:09:34.300 terrible crimes

00:09:35.600 and of course

00:09:36.200 the Trump

00:09:36.580 administration

00:09:37.000 says

00:09:37.600 well the only

00:09:39.140 reason these

00:09:39.620 crimes happened

00:09:40.360 was because of

00:09:41.460 this fake

00:09:42.580 Russia collusion

00:09:44.140 hoax

00:09:44.700 and he got

00:09:45.800 sort of

00:09:46.540 pushed into

00:09:47.440 a place where

00:09:48.240 a person who

00:09:50.060 was likely to

00:09:50.940 be

00:09:51.180 let's put it

00:09:52.040 this way

00:09:52.420 if you are

00:09:53.880 known as a

00:09:54.540 fabulist

00:09:55.240 a person who

00:09:57.080 makes up stuff

00:09:57.900 and you are

00:09:58.920 forced into

00:09:59.580 saying things

00:10:01.220 on the record

00:10:02.200 you're probably

00:10:04.060 going to get

00:10:04.460 in trouble

00:10:04.900 it's the same

00:10:06.140 reason people

00:10:06.680 don't want

00:10:07.140 President Trump

00:10:07.840 to testify

00:10:08.560 under oath

00:10:09.320 you could see

00:10:10.900 some trouble

00:10:11.460 couldn't you

00:10:11.960 so

00:10:13.180 in my opinion

00:10:15.440 the pardon

00:10:16.140 of Roger Stone

00:10:17.380 is the cleanest

00:10:18.980 pardon you'll

00:10:19.680 ever see

00:10:20.180 in my opinion

00:10:21.400 I suppose it

00:10:22.560 could be

00:10:23.020 not a pardon

00:10:24.480 a commuting

00:10:25.200 of a sentence

00:10:25.800 I think it's

00:10:26.920 the cleanest

00:10:27.540 one I've ever

00:10:28.100 seen

00:10:28.440 because the

00:10:29.900 situation was

00:10:30.820 caused by

00:10:31.520 bad actors

00:10:32.500 in the

00:10:32.940 government

00:10:33.300 and I don't

00:10:34.620 think you

00:10:35.000 can ever

00:10:35.440 have

00:10:35.760 you can

00:10:36.660 ever feel

00:10:37.320 right about

00:10:37.880 your government

00:10:38.500 if somebody

00:10:39.960 went to jail

00:10:40.760 because of

00:10:41.440 bad behavior

00:10:42.200 by the

00:10:42.840 government

00:10:43.260 now you're

00:10:44.580 going to

00:10:44.700 say but

00:10:45.180 wait

00:10:45.520 the government

00:10:46.540 didn't force

00:10:47.400 him to lie

00:10:48.160 under oath

00:10:49.120 the government

00:10:50.160 didn't force

00:10:50.860 him to hide

00:10:51.420 emails or

00:10:52.080 whatever he's

00:10:52.640 accused of

00:10:53.200 doing

00:10:53.420 no the

00:10:54.200 government

00:10:54.560 didn't force

00:10:56.040 it

00:10:56.280 they simply

00:10:57.480 put him in

00:10:58.040 a position

00:10:58.620 where it was

00:10:59.680 likely to

00:11:00.320 happen

00:11:00.660 if you put

00:11:02.500 somebody in a

00:11:03.040 position where

00:11:03.660 they're likely

00:11:04.320 to commit a

00:11:04.940 crime and

00:11:05.900 they could

00:11:06.300 not have

00:11:06.700 been in that

00:11:07.100 position without

00:11:07.760 any other

00:11:08.500 outside force

00:11:09.820 that's not

00:11:12.100 exactly the

00:11:12.800 situations we're

00:11:13.640 looking to

00:11:14.120 punish people

00:11:14.840 for if the

00:11:16.300 government forces

00:11:17.320 them into

00:11:17.860 that even

00:11:19.660 though there's

00:11:20.100 free will and

00:11:20.940 blah blah blah

00:11:21.600 anyway so

00:11:22.720 I think the

00:11:23.480 Roger Stone

00:11:24.120 I think

00:11:26.480 commuting the

00:11:27.060 sentence has

00:11:27.720 more power

00:11:29.000 than just the

00:11:30.700 Roger Stone

00:11:31.480 story and

00:11:33.480 here's the

00:11:34.160 larger narrative

00:11:34.980 that it fits

00:11:35.580 into you ready

00:11:36.280 a lot of

00:11:37.320 people have

00:11:37.660 been complaining

00:11:38.720 that President

00:11:40.080 Trump has not

00:11:40.780 aggressively

00:11:41.400 protected his

00:11:43.000 base in other

00:11:44.500 words he's not

00:11:45.100 doing enough to

00:11:46.180 protect people

00:11:47.800 from getting

00:11:48.300 canceled from

00:11:49.140 being beaten

00:11:49.800 in public for

00:11:50.940 being you know

00:11:52.020 fired for their

00:11:52.940 views you know

00:11:54.580 a whole host of

00:11:55.300 things that

00:11:56.000 Republicans think

00:11:58.120 is happening to

00:11:58.840 their base and

00:11:59.600 are and they

00:12:01.640 think he's not

00:12:02.200 doing enough but

00:12:04.040 when you see the

00:12:04.760 Roger Stone

00:12:05.660 commutation you

00:12:08.020 say to yourself

00:12:08.800 oh wait maybe

00:12:11.140 the president is

00:12:12.100 willing to do

00:12:12.700 some things which

00:12:13.440 are not

00:12:14.720 necessarily

00:12:15.320 politically

00:12:16.020 great for him

00:12:18.400 but they do

00:12:19.900 show that he's

00:12:20.580 willing to take

00:12:21.360 some risk to

00:12:22.160 protect at least

00:12:23.840 some people who

00:12:24.460 have been you

00:12:25.000 know loyal to

00:12:25.600 his cause so

00:12:27.540 in terms of how

00:12:28.820 it feels to the

00:12:30.480 base really

00:12:32.300 right the way it

00:12:34.200 feels is really

00:12:35.880 right it's the

00:12:37.500 first time I

00:12:39.080 would be hard

00:12:40.460 pressed to come

00:12:41.060 up with another

00:12:41.680 example maybe you

00:12:43.040 could in which

00:12:44.540 Trump supporters

00:12:45.800 won one can

00:12:49.500 you think of

00:12:49.980 one maybe I'm

00:12:51.100 just having

00:12:51.480 selective memory

00:12:52.400 but it seems like

00:12:53.960 Trump supporters

00:12:54.660 are almost always

00:12:55.680 on the wrong end

00:12:56.500 of all of this

00:12:57.320 stuff you know

00:12:58.720 they're the ones

00:12:59.180 getting fired

00:12:59.800 getting beaten

00:13:00.460 up it just feels

00:13:02.100 like it's always

00:13:02.760 on the wrong end

00:13:03.520 it's probably just

00:13:04.880 selective memory

00:13:05.900 all right here's

00:13:06.760 my big thought

00:13:07.840 for the day

00:13:08.340 when the original

00:13:11.160 constitution was

00:13:12.040 written and the

00:13:12.560 bill of rights

00:13:13.140 we were a

00:13:14.160 primitive society

00:13:15.280 the founders of

00:13:16.840 the constitution

00:13:17.460 were literally

00:13:18.900 pooping into

00:13:19.700 holes in the

00:13:20.300 ground and

00:13:21.040 trying to create

00:13:22.100 a system for

00:13:22.980 all time

00:13:23.600 now that's tough

00:13:24.820 because they

00:13:25.320 didn't know the

00:13:25.820 internet would

00:13:26.600 come along

00:13:27.120 and lots has

00:13:28.660 changed so I'm

00:13:30.040 suggesting that

00:13:30.840 there should be

00:13:31.640 wait for it

00:13:33.120 the big idea

00:13:34.320 coming a digital

00:13:36.540 bill of rights

00:13:37.580 a new set of

00:13:39.360 rights that have

00:13:40.820 not existed before

00:13:42.000 that are only

00:13:43.620 necessary because

00:13:44.640 of the digital

00:13:45.460 age now I'm

00:13:46.880 going to read

00:13:47.280 you my first

00:13:48.460 draft of things

00:13:50.240 that would at

00:13:50.780 least be considered

00:13:51.660 so don't assume

00:13:53.480 that everything

00:13:53.980 that I say needs

00:13:55.460 to be on a

00:13:56.020 bill of rights

00:13:56.680 a digital bill

00:13:58.320 of rights but

00:13:59.620 assume it could

00:14:00.240 be in the

00:14:00.580 conversation and

00:14:01.600 I'll just run

00:14:02.120 through them

00:14:02.520 quickly so we

00:14:03.360 don't you know

00:14:04.200 spend too much

00:14:05.280 time with anyone

00:14:05.920 and some of

00:14:07.340 these are

00:14:07.640 designed to

00:14:08.600 be provocative

00:14:10.860 all right

00:14:11.980 here's number

00:14:13.060 one probably

00:14:13.880 the most

00:14:14.260 provocative

00:14:14.800 one video

00:14:17.140 evidence of

00:14:17.900 a crime is

00:14:19.940 not admissible

00:14:20.800 in court unless

00:14:22.820 both the

00:14:23.620 prosecution and

00:14:24.840 the defense

00:14:25.520 agree that it

00:14:27.120 shows what

00:14:27.700 happened in

00:14:29.840 other words

00:14:30.260 either the

00:14:30.800 prosecutor or

00:14:31.740 the defense

00:14:32.480 could say that

00:14:33.880 a video cannot

00:14:35.120 be shown in

00:14:35.960 court why

00:14:37.440 because we

00:14:38.620 now know that

00:14:39.340 videos are more

00:14:40.220 misleading than

00:14:41.800 clarifying we

00:14:43.680 know that because

00:14:44.580 the fake news has

00:14:45.460 proven that a

00:14:46.680 million times by

00:14:47.700 editing out the

00:14:49.260 beginning or the

00:14:50.080 end of a video so

00:14:51.540 that what you see

00:14:52.140 is out of context

00:14:53.020 likewise a video

00:14:55.120 is by definition

00:14:56.780 let's say an

00:14:59.540 editorial because

00:15:01.280 it shows one

00:15:02.120 angle of a

00:15:03.000 thing and it

00:15:04.000 can't by its

00:15:05.080 nature show all

00:15:05.880 the other angles

00:15:06.740 so in the same

00:15:08.500 way that a

00:15:10.780 lie detector is

00:15:12.020 not admissible in

00:15:13.320 court and yet

00:15:14.680 is widely used in

00:15:15.880 the real world

00:15:16.760 why is it that a

00:15:19.080 lie detector test is

00:15:20.940 not admissible in

00:15:22.360 court right

00:15:24.200 the reason a

00:15:25.300 lie detector test

00:15:26.280 is not admissible

00:15:27.360 in court is

00:15:28.820 that science

00:15:29.460 shows it

00:15:31.220 doesn't work

00:15:31.960 but it does

00:15:33.920 work well enough

00:15:34.640 that private

00:15:35.160 industry uses it

00:15:36.180 all the time

00:15:36.760 so there is a

00:15:38.560 different standard

00:15:39.140 for the law than

00:15:40.200 there is for

00:15:40.940 just daily life

00:15:42.720 and the law

00:15:44.080 says that a

00:15:45.360 lie detector test

00:15:47.620 is not reliable

00:15:48.560 enough to put

00:15:49.520 somebody in jail

00:15:50.240 over it

00:15:50.720 I would like to

00:15:51.900 add to that

00:15:52.520 that video

00:15:53.360 evidence

00:15:53.980 photographic

00:15:55.500 evidence

00:15:56.080 and audio

00:15:57.280 evidence

00:15:57.840 by themselves

00:15:59.340 should never

00:16:00.340 be the basis

00:16:01.320 for a prosecution

00:16:02.380 of any kind

00:16:03.460 unless the

00:16:04.840 defense and the

00:16:05.640 prosecution both

00:16:06.680 agree that

00:16:07.960 whatever is on

00:16:08.720 these digital

00:16:09.380 reproductions is

00:16:10.980 accurate enough

00:16:12.380 for the purposes

00:16:13.140 now you might

00:16:15.220 say to yourself

00:16:15.800 my god Scott

00:16:16.740 if you take

00:16:18.320 video evidence

00:16:19.240 out of it

00:16:19.860 a lot of

00:16:23.180 people are

00:16:23.540 going to get

00:16:23.860 away with a

00:16:24.340 lot of crimes

00:16:25.100 to which I

00:16:26.280 say this is

00:16:27.480 just for

00:16:27.920 discussion

00:16:28.420 maybe the

00:16:30.320 only thing

00:16:30.800 you use video

00:16:31.500 evidence for

00:16:32.220 is to determine

00:16:33.120 who was

00:16:33.780 involved

00:16:34.380 in other words

00:16:35.920 maybe you'd

00:16:36.400 say the only

00:16:36.960 thing you can

00:16:37.500 get from the

00:16:38.000 video is that

00:16:39.240 we can confirm

00:16:40.060 these people

00:16:40.740 were there

00:16:41.400 and that these

00:16:42.840 items were

00:16:44.120 involved

00:16:44.640 just throwing

00:16:45.900 it out there

00:16:46.400 it would be

00:16:48.540 immense problems

00:16:49.800 either way it

00:16:50.600 goes

00:16:50.980 so I'll be

00:16:52.160 honest about

00:16:52.720 that

00:16:53.280 how about

00:16:54.060 this

00:16:54.340 a maximum

00:16:55.020 five year

00:16:56.120 ban from

00:16:57.540 any digital

00:16:58.380 platform

00:16:59.040 regardless of

00:17:00.760 your offense

00:17:01.640 in other words

00:17:03.180 in other words

00:17:06.100 somebody says

00:17:06.820 it's a dumb

00:17:07.400 idea already

00:17:08.160 handled by the

00:17:08.940 court

00:17:09.220 but that would

00:17:10.240 be true for

00:17:11.320 lie detectors

00:17:12.540 too

00:17:13.000 if something

00:17:15.180 is not

00:17:15.740 accurate

00:17:16.320 and you know

00:17:17.360 in advance

00:17:17.840 it's not

00:17:18.240 accurate

00:17:18.620 can you

00:17:19.580 depend on

00:17:20.300 the court

00:17:20.860 to sort

00:17:22.880 out what

00:17:23.320 was accurate

00:17:23.940 about it

00:17:24.460 and what

00:17:24.780 was not

00:17:25.300 I think

00:17:27.240 you could

00:17:27.480 have a

00:17:27.700 deeper

00:17:27.880 discussion

00:17:28.360 on that

00:17:28.760 but I

00:17:30.120 do

00:17:30.360 acknowledge

00:17:31.040 that it

00:17:31.440 could go

00:17:31.820 either way

00:17:32.480 alright so

00:17:33.600 a maximum

00:17:34.060 five year

00:17:34.600 ban from

00:17:35.040 any platform

00:17:35.620 let's say

00:17:36.200 YouTube

00:17:37.520 or Twitter

00:17:39.060 or Facebook

00:17:39.760 or somebody

00:17:40.300 kicks you

00:17:40.800 off the

00:17:41.060 platform for

00:17:41.700 bad behavior

00:17:42.400 which you

00:17:43.360 totally had

00:17:44.140 coming

00:17:44.480 alright so

00:17:45.440 in this

00:17:45.740 we're assuming

00:17:46.440 that your

00:17:46.820 bad behavior

00:17:47.500 was in fact

00:17:48.840 bad behavior

00:17:49.480 you violated

00:17:50.320 the requirements

00:17:52.080 there should be

00:17:53.240 some kind of

00:17:53.760 a statute

00:17:54.260 of limitations

00:17:55.080 because these

00:17:56.440 public platforms

00:17:57.400 are too important

00:17:58.360 for daily life

00:17:59.600 to have somebody

00:18:00.820 block forever

00:18:01.700 but you still

00:18:02.820 probably need

00:18:03.380 some kind

00:18:03.820 of a penalty

00:18:04.360 so I would

00:18:05.600 suggest

00:18:06.060 and maybe

00:18:06.700 it could be

00:18:07.080 three years

00:18:07.740 but a five year

00:18:09.060 ban and then

00:18:10.100 you can come

00:18:10.820 back

00:18:11.200 if you do

00:18:12.080 the same

00:18:12.440 behavior

00:18:12.860 you're of

00:18:13.380 course

00:18:13.640 banned

00:18:14.200 again

00:18:14.560 alright so

00:18:16.280 that's another

00:18:16.720 one

00:18:17.040 how about

00:18:17.920 this one

00:18:18.360 and again

00:18:19.220 these are

00:18:19.860 brainstorming

00:18:20.700 don't assume

00:18:21.620 that these

00:18:22.040 are settled

00:18:23.420 proposals

00:18:24.240 here's another

00:18:25.580 one

00:18:25.820 you have

00:18:26.360 you must

00:18:26.880 know the

00:18:27.300 identity

00:18:27.780 or you

00:18:28.260 have the

00:18:28.540 right to

00:18:28.880 know the

00:18:29.180 identity

00:18:29.600 of your

00:18:30.180 online

00:18:30.740 accuser

00:18:31.940 how about

00:18:32.300 that

00:18:32.640 if somebody

00:18:33.820 puts a

00:18:35.200 tweet up

00:18:35.780 that says

00:18:36.580 Scott Adams

00:18:38.740 eats kittens

00:18:40.780 I should

00:18:42.320 have the

00:18:42.660 right

00:18:43.020 to petition

00:18:44.240 Twitter

00:18:44.940 through some

00:18:45.540 normal process

00:18:46.520 and say

00:18:46.940 can you

00:18:47.860 unveil that

00:18:48.600 person's

00:18:49.060 name and

00:18:49.380 identity

00:18:49.820 right

00:18:51.740 because in

00:18:52.660 the legal

00:18:53.040 system you

00:18:53.680 have a right

00:18:54.240 to know

00:18:54.620 who accuses

00:18:55.300 you

00:18:55.500 why is that

00:18:57.220 right restricted

00:18:58.460 online

00:18:59.040 why can

00:19:00.020 somebody know

00:19:00.640 my identity

00:19:01.440 but I can't

00:19:02.640 know their

00:19:02.980 identity

00:19:03.460 now if

00:19:04.960 they're not

00:19:05.260 doing anything

00:19:05.800 that bothers

00:19:06.340 me I don't

00:19:06.880 care why

00:19:07.740 would I need

00:19:08.180 to know

00:19:08.440 somebody's

00:19:08.860 identity if

00:19:10.060 they're not

00:19:10.400 bothering me

00:19:11.120 but if

00:19:11.820 somebody makes

00:19:12.320 an accusation

00:19:13.220 which can

00:19:14.040 change my

00:19:14.680 reputation

00:19:15.380 I have an

00:19:16.780 absolute right

00:19:17.620 to know who

00:19:18.140 they are right

00:19:18.860 away right

00:19:20.160 away and I

00:19:21.580 should be able

00:19:21.980 to just send

00:19:22.500 that tweet to

00:19:23.600 some kind of

00:19:24.600 decision-making

00:19:26.140 body and say

00:19:26.900 hey is this

00:19:28.200 person talking

00:19:28.920 about me

00:19:29.520 because if

00:19:30.520 they are I

00:19:31.980 would like them

00:19:32.540 unmasked

00:19:33.180 now of

00:19:35.700 course this

00:19:36.180 causes other

00:19:36.860 problems blah

00:19:37.680 blah blah

00:19:37.980 I'm just

00:19:38.720 putting these

00:19:39.140 out here for

00:19:39.560 discussion

00:19:39.980 how about

00:19:41.280 this one

00:19:41.700 48 hour

00:19:43.140 rule for

00:19:43.720 clarification

00:19:44.340 so this

00:19:45.500 wouldn't be

00:19:45.980 a law

00:19:46.780 per se

00:19:47.260 but just

00:19:47.680 a standard

00:19:48.320 that if

00:19:49.280 somebody

00:19:49.700 puts something

00:19:50.500 online and

00:19:51.280 somebody says

00:19:51.740 hey that

00:19:52.880 thing online

00:19:53.720 what about

00:19:54.280 that thing

00:19:54.740 online that

00:19:55.360 you did

00:19:55.820 you have

00:19:56.640 48 hours

00:19:57.440 to say

00:19:57.800 no no

00:19:58.140 no you're

00:19:58.460 taking it

00:19:58.800 wrong

00:19:58.980 it doesn't

00:20:00.360 mean that

00:20:00.840 it means

00:20:01.340 this

00:20:01.720 and we

00:20:02.540 you should

00:20:02.800 accept

00:20:03.260 the

00:20:03.620 clarification

00:20:04.280 because it

00:20:05.500 doesn't make

00:20:06.100 sense to

00:20:07.500 believe a

00:20:08.000 stranger's

00:20:08.680 opinion of

00:20:09.340 what your

00:20:09.720 opinion is

00:20:10.320 over me

00:20:11.120 telling you

00:20:11.520 my opinion

00:20:12.020 I'm the

00:20:13.260 only one who

00:20:13.780 should have

00:20:14.120 the right to

00:20:14.600 tell you

00:20:14.920 my opinion

00:20:15.740 how about

00:20:17.120 this one

00:20:17.560 no guilt

00:20:19.140 by digital

00:20:20.220 association

00:20:21.020 nobody can

00:20:24.280 be guilty

00:20:24.880 by digital

00:20:26.720 association

00:20:27.540 what I mean

00:20:28.700 by that is

00:20:29.280 if you

00:20:29.580 have a

00:20:29.900 photograph

00:20:30.320 standing

00:20:30.840 next to

00:20:31.300 the worst

00:20:31.660 person

00:20:32.060 in the

00:20:32.320 world

00:20:32.620 we just

00:20:34.520 ignore it

00:20:35.180 because

00:20:36.280 simply

00:20:36.880 standing

00:20:37.320 next to

00:20:37.880 or having

00:20:38.380 your photo

00:20:38.880 taken

00:20:39.240 with the

00:20:39.680 worst

00:20:39.900 person

00:20:40.260 in the

00:20:40.500 world

00:20:40.740 doesn't

00:20:41.860 make you

00:20:42.520 a bad

00:20:43.160 person

00:20:43.600 likewise

00:20:44.620 if you're

00:20:45.300 following

00:20:45.780 somebody

00:20:46.280 online

00:20:46.780 who is

00:20:47.100 a terrible

00:20:47.540 person

00:20:48.040 that doesn't

00:20:49.380 make you

00:20:50.080 a bad

00:20:50.880 person

00:20:51.300 if you

00:20:51.820 retweet

00:20:52.340 their content

00:20:53.060 that doesn't

00:20:54.260 make you

00:20:55.020 like the

00:20:56.220 person you

00:20:56.720 retweeted

00:20:57.400 we should

00:20:58.400 have a

00:20:58.760 complete

00:20:59.280 right

00:20:59.740 to not

00:21:00.860 be branded

00:21:01.500 by association

00:21:02.660 no matter

00:21:03.380 that association

00:21:04.280 so long

00:21:05.140 as it is

00:21:05.660 legal

00:21:06.320 how about

00:21:10.280 this one

00:21:10.720 this one

00:21:12.000 would be

00:21:12.180 really

00:21:12.420 controversial

00:21:13.060 and it's

00:21:14.160 and it

00:21:15.140 makes sense

00:21:15.620 today

00:21:16.000 how about

00:21:17.240 you cannot

00:21:17.920 be blamed

00:21:19.780 or lose

00:21:20.520 your job

00:21:21.000 for let's

00:21:21.520 say

00:21:21.700 anything

00:21:22.840 you said

00:21:23.540 under

00:21:24.400 an anonymous

00:21:25.300 context

00:21:27.820 if somebody

00:21:29.560 later

00:21:30.020 finds out

00:21:30.640 your real

00:21:31.340 identity

00:21:31.920 and you

00:21:33.280 would have

00:21:33.740 been in

00:21:34.180 trouble

00:21:34.420 for saying

00:21:35.020 that under

00:21:35.640 your real

00:21:36.380 identity

00:21:36.960 but you

00:21:38.520 didn't

00:21:39.080 you intentionally

00:21:40.480 said something

00:21:41.260 that you knew

00:21:41.800 would get you

00:21:42.260 in trouble

00:21:42.680 and you

00:21:43.540 did it

00:21:44.160 intentionally

00:21:45.100 anonymously

00:21:46.000 let's say

00:21:46.400 you used

00:21:46.720 an anonymous

00:21:47.220 account

00:21:47.720 but later

00:21:48.880 somebody

00:21:49.320 uncovered it

00:21:50.120 that can

00:21:51.140 never be

00:21:51.720 used

00:21:52.160 to penalize

00:21:53.360 you

00:21:53.560 in other

00:21:54.840 words

00:21:55.000 you can't

00:21:55.360 lose

00:21:55.560 your job

00:21:56.120 because you

00:21:56.800 said something

00:21:57.400 inappropriate

00:21:57.960 under an

00:21:58.880 alias

00:21:59.380 now I

00:22:00.200 suppose if

00:22:00.760 you're

00:22:00.940 threatening

00:22:01.240 somebody's

00:22:01.800 life or

00:22:02.280 it's a

00:22:02.540 crime

00:22:02.860 that's

00:22:03.180 different

00:22:03.520 so I'm

00:22:04.120 not talking

00:22:04.460 about a

00:22:04.740 crime

00:22:05.080 I'm talking

00:22:05.920 about really

00:22:06.520 unpleasant

00:22:07.100 things

00:22:08.580 and here's

00:22:09.740 the reasoning

00:22:10.180 for that

00:22:10.700 I believe

00:22:11.820 everybody says

00:22:12.780 things that

00:22:13.260 would get

00:22:13.560 them cancelled

00:22:14.200 privately

00:22:14.960 privately

00:22:16.680 everybody says

00:22:18.380 things that

00:22:18.840 would get

00:22:19.180 them cancelled

00:22:19.800 let me say

00:22:20.540 it again

00:22:20.920 privately

00:22:22.260 if you think

00:22:23.220 nobody's

00:22:23.660 listening

00:22:24.040 everybody says

00:22:25.880 things that

00:22:26.360 would get

00:22:26.700 them cancelled

00:22:27.260 I make it

00:22:29.100 an absolute

00:22:29.620 so you can

00:22:30.220 think

00:22:30.400 I'm sure

00:22:32.000 there's a

00:22:32.380 Puritan

00:22:32.700 somewhere

00:22:33.100 who doesn't

00:22:33.660 do that

00:22:34.100 okay

00:22:34.920 not everybody

00:22:35.980 but you

00:22:36.660 know what I

00:22:36.980 mean

00:22:37.160 it's just

00:22:38.300 not a

00:22:38.620 standard

00:22:38.940 that we

00:22:39.260 should have

00:22:39.600 in this

00:22:39.880 world

00:22:40.320 likewise

00:22:41.800 you should

00:22:42.380 not be

00:22:42.680 blamed

00:22:42.960 for any

00:22:43.560 digital

00:22:45.000 reproduction

00:22:45.760 of something

00:22:46.340 that happened

00:22:46.840 over 20

00:22:47.480 years ago

00:22:48.000 you could

00:22:48.500 argue about

00:22:49.240 the 20

00:22:50.100 year part

00:22:50.640 but I

00:22:52.480 think we

00:22:52.820 should just

00:22:53.260 ignore

00:22:53.720 that photo

00:22:54.880 from your

00:22:55.380 yearbook

00:22:55.940 that's

00:22:56.260 embarrassing

00:22:56.720 that

00:22:57.840 that

00:22:58.420 video

00:22:59.220 from 20

00:22:59.820 years ago

00:23:00.340 the audio

00:23:01.000 from 20

00:23:01.480 years ago

00:23:02.000 just if it's

00:23:02.920 20 years

00:23:03.400 ago

00:23:03.740 forget it

00:23:04.980 that's my

00:23:06.360 standard

00:23:06.820 likewise

00:23:08.620 you should

00:23:10.000 not be

00:23:10.400 cancelled

00:23:10.800 today for

00:23:11.460 something that

00:23:12.200 you did

00:23:12.820 in the

00:23:13.280 past

00:23:13.780 that would

00:23:14.760 not have

00:23:15.380 gotten you

00:23:16.100 cancelled

00:23:16.560 in the

00:23:17.160 past

00:23:17.640 so you

00:23:18.620 should

00:23:18.820 not be

00:23:19.280 punished

00:23:21.240 today

00:23:22.300 because of

00:23:23.720 something your

00:23:24.280 digital ghost

00:23:25.180 did

00:23:25.700 when I say

00:23:26.800 digital ghost

00:23:27.880 I mean

00:23:28.720 you don't

00:23:29.520 your past

00:23:30.220 doesn't exist

00:23:31.100 you exist

00:23:32.420 now

00:23:32.940 and you

00:23:33.780 probably will

00:23:34.460 exist in

00:23:34.960 the future

00:23:35.360 but your

00:23:36.380 past

00:23:37.000 doesn't

00:23:38.220 exist

00:23:38.960 like you

00:23:40.180 can't grab

00:23:40.800 a handful

00:23:41.300 of the

00:23:41.620 past

00:23:42.120 it's not

00:23:42.980 a thing

00:23:43.460 anymore

00:23:43.880 so

00:23:45.020 cancelling

00:23:46.920 somebody

00:23:47.340 for what

00:23:47.800 they did

00:23:48.280 in their

00:23:48.720 digital ghost

00:23:50.020 past

00:23:50.860 when they

00:23:51.780 didn't get

00:23:52.340 cancelled

00:23:52.720 in the

00:23:53.080 past

00:23:53.520 because in

00:23:54.500 those days

00:23:54.980 that wasn't

00:23:55.620 cancellable

00:23:56.440 that should

00:23:57.480 never

00:23:58.000 ever

00:23:59.100 cancel your

00:24:00.440 real life

00:24:01.080 body

00:24:01.540 that's living

00:24:02.240 today

00:24:02.720 because your

00:24:03.820 digital ghost

00:24:04.860 did something

00:24:05.980 that was fine

00:24:06.720 20 years ago

00:24:07.620 20 years ago

00:24:09.200 nobody raised

00:24:10.280 an eyebrow

00:24:10.660 about it

00:24:11.140 that doesn't

00:24:12.160 mean it's

00:24:12.480 right

00:24:12.860 it just means

00:24:13.640 you shouldn't

00:24:13.980 be cancelled

00:24:14.480 for something

00:24:15.060 that basically

00:24:15.680 a digital

00:24:16.820 ghost

00:24:17.340 did

00:24:17.800 or how

00:24:18.980 about this

00:24:19.440 you do

00:24:20.900 not need

00:24:21.320 to respond

00:24:21.840 this would

00:24:22.180 be more

00:24:22.480 like just

00:24:22.920 a standard

00:24:24.040 of behavior

00:24:24.800 you do

00:24:25.720 not need

00:24:26.120 to respond

00:24:26.640 to misrepresentations

00:24:28.160 of your opinion

00:24:28.900 online let's

00:24:29.840 say

00:24:30.000 you can simply

00:24:31.440 just note them

00:24:32.100 as misrepresentations

00:24:33.520 now

00:24:34.520 how useful

00:24:36.060 would that

00:24:36.500 be to you

00:24:37.040 it's kind

00:24:38.260 of useful

00:24:38.680 isn't it

00:24:39.380 because as soon

00:24:40.180 as you get

00:24:40.520 into a debate

00:24:41.320 about I

00:24:42.020 didn't say

00:24:42.440 that

00:24:42.760 yes you

00:24:43.380 did

00:24:43.720 I didn't

00:24:44.520 say that

00:24:44.960 well you

00:24:45.300 said this

00:24:45.640 other thing

00:24:46.160 I didn't

00:24:46.640 say that

00:24:47.120 you can

00:24:47.980 never really

00:24:48.540 win with

00:24:49.680 the people

00:24:50.060 who are

00:24:50.340 misrepresenting

00:24:51.140 you

00:24:51.320 you think

00:24:52.120 you can

00:24:52.660 because it

00:24:53.580 seems so

00:24:54.140 seductive

00:24:55.260 it's like

00:24:55.520 well you've

00:24:56.040 misrepresented me

00:24:57.040 watch me fix

00:24:58.420 this just by

00:24:59.720 putting up my

00:25:00.380 actual opinion

00:25:01.240 and then people

00:25:02.140 can see my

00:25:02.700 actual opinion

00:25:03.420 from me

00:25:04.000 they can see

00:25:05.080 how you

00:25:05.420 misrepresented me

00:25:06.500 and that I'm

00:25:07.400 all good

00:25:07.840 right

00:25:08.120 has never

00:25:09.380 worked in the

00:25:09.960 history of

00:25:10.460 humanity

00:25:11.860 it just

00:25:12.960 doesn't

00:25:13.320 work

00:25:13.700 you can't

00:25:14.600 make a

00:25:15.020 misinterpret

00:25:15.640 or stop

00:25:16.220 misinterpreting

00:25:16.980 they'll just

00:25:17.740 re-misinterpret

00:25:18.760 you

00:25:19.100 it's an

00:25:19.880 infinite loop

00:25:20.580 so instead

00:25:21.860 you should

00:25:22.700 just be able

00:25:23.140 to say

00:25:23.540 misrepresentation

00:25:24.720 move on

00:25:26.340 and anybody

00:25:27.180 who sees

00:25:27.620 that the

00:25:28.320 person that

00:25:29.040 they're talking

00:25:29.500 about

00:25:29.840 has labeled

00:25:30.940 it misrepresentation

00:25:32.360 can say

00:25:33.220 ah well I

00:25:34.100 don't know

00:25:34.300 what the real

00:25:34.680 story is here

00:25:35.420 but

00:25:35.680 obviously not

00:25:37.840 true

00:25:38.120 now again

00:25:39.860 that would

00:25:40.140 have lots

00:25:40.780 of negative

00:25:41.420 potential

00:25:42.680 you know

00:25:43.380 abuse

00:25:43.840 possibilities

00:25:45.160 but

00:25:45.580 we'll just

00:25:46.660 put these

00:25:47.040 out here

00:25:47.420 um how

00:25:48.820 about

00:25:49.200 no single

00:25:50.880 source

00:25:51.280 reporting

00:25:51.920 now this

00:25:53.360 is more

00:25:53.660 reporting

00:25:54.260 than

00:25:54.680 digital

00:25:55.600 bill of

00:25:56.000 rights

00:25:56.320 but it

00:25:57.200 feels

00:25:57.440 similar

00:25:57.820 because

00:25:58.160 it's

00:25:58.320 always

00:25:58.500 reported

00:25:58.980 digitally

00:25:59.480 you know

00:26:00.320 something

00:26:00.600 will appear

00:26:01.280 on my

00:26:01.640 phone

00:26:01.980 it'll be

00:26:02.480 somebody

00:26:03.600 who hasn't

00:26:04.280 given their

00:26:04.800 name

00:26:05.120 a single

00:26:05.660 source

00:26:06.140 says the

00:26:07.120 president

00:26:07.520 is punching

00:26:09.300 people in

00:26:10.080 the oval

00:26:10.460 office

00:26:10.940 you should

00:26:12.140 just

00:26:12.460 not be

00:26:13.780 able to

00:26:14.120 report

00:26:14.460 that

00:26:14.780 it just

00:26:15.800 shouldn't

00:26:16.080 be allowed

00:26:16.640 or

00:26:17.480 or it

00:26:18.180 should be

00:26:18.560 labeled

00:26:19.040 maybe

00:26:19.540 self

00:26:19.960 labeled

00:26:20.340 you should

00:26:21.360 be able

00:26:21.640 to

00:26:21.900 maybe

00:26:22.340 you can

00:26:22.720 report

00:26:23.140 it

00:26:23.360 because

00:26:23.680 freedom

00:26:24.060 of

00:26:24.200 speech

00:26:24.440 right

00:26:24.720 so you

00:26:25.380 can

00:26:25.520 report

00:26:25.880 it

00:26:26.200 but you

00:26:26.760 should

00:26:26.900 have

00:26:27.060 to

00:26:27.220 self

00:26:27.560 label

00:26:27.880 it

00:26:28.120 highly

00:26:28.880 non

00:26:29.360 credible

00:26:29.740 information

00:26:30.400 so

00:26:31.460 anytime

00:26:31.740 you see

00:26:32.200 a single

00:26:32.740 source

00:26:33.300 report

00:26:34.420 it always

00:26:35.240 needs

00:26:35.480 to be

00:26:35.760 flagged

00:26:36.700 no matter

00:26:37.160 where

00:26:37.380 it is

00:26:37.860 as

00:26:38.320 highly

00:26:39.160 not

00:26:39.940 credible

00:26:40.580 information

00:26:41.400 wouldn't

00:26:42.120 that help

00:26:42.580 as a

00:26:44.300 let's say

00:26:45.160 you're a

00:26:45.600 20 something

00:26:46.340 year old

00:26:47.500 consumer

00:26:47.960 you haven't

00:26:49.060 seen how

00:26:49.520 fake the

00:26:50.060 news is

00:26:50.520 yet

00:26:50.720 you still

00:26:51.160 believe

00:26:51.500 that it

00:26:51.800 might be

00:26:52.120 true

00:26:52.420 wouldn't

00:26:53.220 it help

00:26:53.600 you

00:26:53.800 to see

00:26:54.460 that

00:26:54.640 little

00:26:54.840 label

00:26:55.180 highly

00:26:56.420 non

00:26:57.040 credible

00:26:57.420 information

00:26:58.140 still run

00:26:59.360 the story

00:26:59.860 but just

00:27:00.920 label it

00:27:01.340 non

00:27:01.580 credible

00:27:01.940 how about

00:27:05.080 this

00:27:05.360 rule

00:27:05.920 any

00:27:06.800 corrections

00:27:07.600 to news

00:27:08.600 reports

00:27:09.040 have to

00:27:09.440 be as

00:27:09.740 prominent

00:27:10.260 as the

00:27:10.860 original

00:27:11.280 story

00:27:11.800 now it

00:27:12.980 would be

00:27:13.160 hard to

00:27:13.540 do

00:27:13.740 right

00:27:14.020 but what

00:27:14.480 I'm

00:27:14.600 talking

00:27:14.840 about

00:27:15.080 is

00:27:15.320 if

00:27:16.040 there's

00:27:16.280 a

00:27:16.460 fake

00:27:16.740 news

00:27:17.100 story

00:27:17.520 it'll

00:27:17.880 get

00:27:18.160 let's

00:27:18.900 say

00:27:19.060 30

00:27:19.520 million

00:27:19.860 clicks

00:27:20.440 when

00:27:21.580 the

00:27:21.780 correction

00:27:22.160 runs

00:27:22.620 and says

00:27:23.060 that was

00:27:23.940 all

00:27:24.120 fake

00:27:24.420 we just

00:27:25.200 found out

00:27:25.600 none

00:27:25.800 of it

00:27:26.020 was

00:27:26.180 real

00:27:26.400 the

00:27:27.060 correction

00:27:27.440 will

00:27:27.700 get

00:27:27.880 10,000

00:27:28.620 likes

00:27:29.520 or eyeballs

00:27:30.560 so the

00:27:31.760 correction

00:27:32.100 is always

00:27:32.520 tiny

00:27:32.960 compared to

00:27:33.560 the fake

00:27:33.960 news

00:27:34.380 so could

00:27:35.300 there be

00:27:35.700 a

00:27:36.060 digital

00:27:36.440 bill

00:27:36.720 of

00:27:36.920 rights

00:27:37.220 that says

00:27:37.800 the correction

00:27:38.780 has to

00:27:39.200 at least

00:27:39.540 be

00:27:39.760 attempted

00:27:40.260 a serious

00:27:41.680 attempt

00:27:42.160 to make

00:27:43.060 it as

00:27:43.360 prominent

00:27:43.900 as the

00:27:44.620 original

00:27:45.000 story

00:27:45.480 now what

00:27:46.700 that looks

00:27:47.120 like is

00:27:47.540 pretty

00:27:47.760 subjective

00:27:48.340 but let's

00:27:48.860 say

00:27:49.080 if it

00:27:49.800 was a

00:27:50.120 headline

00:27:50.440 story

00:27:51.060 that

00:27:51.880 something

00:27:52.160 was

00:27:52.400 true

00:27:52.700 the only

00:27:53.180 way you

00:27:53.520 could

00:27:53.680 correct

00:27:54.080 it

00:27:54.360 would be

00:27:55.300 with

00:27:55.520 another

00:27:55.900 primetime

00:27:56.620 headline

00:27:57.140 story

00:27:57.660 now maybe

00:27:58.500 you don't

00:27:58.840 have to

00:27:59.160 do

00:27:59.400 10

00:28:00.140 headlines

00:28:00.600 even

00:28:01.000 though

00:28:01.220 the

00:28:01.460 original

00:28:01.820 story

00:28:02.140 had 10

00:28:02.560 headlines

00:28:03.020 but at

00:28:04.020 least it's

00:28:04.380 comparable

00:28:04.900 it's a

00:28:05.520 headline

00:28:05.920 correction

00:28:06.360 to a

00:28:06.820 headline

00:28:07.080 story

00:28:07.600 and maybe

00:28:09.140 if you run

00:28:09.740 it as a

00:28:10.200 tweet

00:28:10.480 you have to

00:28:11.120 pin it

00:28:11.600 until it gets

00:28:12.220 enough

00:28:12.540 clicks

00:28:13.500 you can imagine

00:28:15.120 a number of

00:28:15.760 ways that you

00:28:16.400 could get

00:28:17.560 closer to that

00:28:18.360 standard

00:28:18.800 and by the way

00:28:19.480 I'm not kidding

00:28:20.160 myself that any of

00:28:21.200 these would be

00:28:21.640 easy to enforce

00:28:22.640 or that they

00:28:23.400 wouldn't have

00:28:23.840 any negative

00:28:25.020 consequences

00:28:25.780 I'm just putting

00:28:26.500 it out there

00:28:26.900 that something

00:28:27.600 like this

00:28:28.340 should be

00:28:29.320 considered

00:28:29.800 how about

00:28:30.940 this

00:28:31.300 if you

00:28:33.540 try to

00:28:34.000 organize a

00:28:34.600 boycott

00:28:35.080 against any

00:28:35.740 company

00:28:36.140 your own

00:28:37.940 identity

00:28:38.500 and where

00:28:39.380 you work

00:28:40.140 must be

00:28:41.720 public

00:28:42.200 so even

00:28:43.720 if you're

00:28:44.060 on twitter

00:28:44.420 and you

00:28:44.720 say

00:28:44.880 boycott

00:28:45.840 that

00:28:46.600 Goya

00:28:47.020 food

00:28:47.380 company

00:28:47.800 even if

00:28:49.060 you're just

00:28:49.420 a twitter

00:28:49.960 user

00:28:50.360 the only

00:28:51.520 way you

00:28:51.900 can do

00:28:52.220 that

00:28:52.540 is if

00:28:52.980 someone

00:28:53.260 else

00:28:53.520 has access

00:28:54.100 to know

00:28:54.540 where you

00:28:55.040 work

00:28:55.460 for mutual

00:28:56.840 assured

00:28:57.260 destruction

00:28:57.800 I'd also

00:28:59.120 like to

00:28:59.480 know where

00:28:59.960 you work

00:29:00.320 in the

00:29:00.520 future

00:29:00.820 same

00:29:02.100 reason

00:29:02.440 I don't

00:29:04.080 think that

00:29:04.480 people who

00:29:04.940 call for

00:29:05.360 boycotts

00:29:06.240 against

00:29:06.720 American

00:29:07.240 companies

00:29:07.960 should have

00:29:09.160 the advantage

00:29:10.660 of privacy

00:29:11.500 when the

00:29:12.940 target

00:29:13.380 does not

00:29:14.400 and the

00:29:15.620 privacy is

00:29:16.180 not just

00:29:16.720 who your

00:29:17.120 identity

00:29:17.540 is

00:29:17.820 because

00:29:17.980 lots of

00:29:18.300 times

00:29:18.480 you do

00:29:18.820 know

00:29:19.000 the

00:29:19.180 identity

00:29:19.560 of the

00:29:20.020 person

00:29:20.360 online

00:29:20.960 but you

00:29:21.860 don't

00:29:22.020 necessarily

00:29:22.540 know

00:29:22.840 where

00:29:23.020 they

00:29:23.160 work

00:29:23.560 I want

00:29:24.960 to know

00:29:25.160 where

00:29:25.300 they

00:29:25.460 work

00:29:25.860 who is

00:29:27.200 paying

00:29:27.600 somebody

00:29:28.100 who is

00:29:28.520 working

00:29:29.540 to destroy

00:29:30.320 another

00:29:30.640 company

00:29:31.080 I was

00:29:32.200 reading

00:29:32.480 there's

00:29:33.680 some

00:29:33.820 kind

00:29:34.060 of

00:29:34.200 disagreement

00:29:35.780 between

00:29:36.560 the

00:29:36.820 founders

00:29:37.320 or

00:29:37.620 co-founders

00:29:38.300 of

00:29:38.620 Sleeping

00:29:39.120 Giants

00:29:39.720 have you

00:29:40.000 ever heard

00:29:40.240 of them

00:29:40.480 so it's

00:29:41.540 sort of

00:29:41.800 an activist

00:29:42.420 group

00:29:42.940 it's

00:29:43.540 very small

00:29:44.200 mostly two

00:29:45.260 people I

00:29:45.720 guess

00:29:45.900 and

00:29:46.960 they would

00:29:48.180 go to

00:29:48.460 advertisers

00:29:48.980 and say

00:29:49.480 hey

00:29:49.760 you're

00:29:50.060 advertising

00:29:50.500 on a

00:29:50.860 bad

00:29:51.080 place

00:29:51.480 so they

00:29:52.280 try to

00:29:52.580 get rid

00:29:52.880 of the

00:29:53.060 advertisements

00:29:53.560 for

00:29:54.000 Tucker

00:29:54.800 Carlson

00:29:55.260 show

00:29:55.680 I think

00:29:56.460 they

00:29:56.660 succeeded

00:29:57.160 in getting

00:29:57.580 rid of

00:29:57.880 a lot

00:29:58.120 of the

00:29:58.320 ads

00:29:58.620 on

00:29:58.800 Breitbart

00:29:59.340 so they're

00:30:00.440 basically

00:30:00.840 a company

00:30:01.580 or a

00:30:02.500 group

00:30:02.860 that exists

00:30:04.220 to put

00:30:04.620 other groups

00:30:05.240 out of

00:30:05.500 business

00:30:05.900 and I'm

00:30:07.320 thinking

00:30:07.660 I don't

00:30:08.860 know

00:30:09.120 I feel

00:30:10.260 like we

00:30:10.660 should know

00:30:11.340 who's putting

00:30:12.380 companies out

00:30:13.100 of business

00:30:13.620 something you

00:30:15.140 ought to know

00:30:15.580 for boycott

00:30:16.240 at least in

00:30:16.860 the boycott

00:30:17.320 sense

00:30:17.680 all right

00:30:19.000 how about

00:30:20.300 this

00:30:20.640 it should be

00:30:22.040 illegal to

00:30:22.700 show a video

00:30:23.360 if you're

00:30:23.960 let's say

00:30:24.820 if you're a

00:30:25.480 news organization

00:30:26.420 not an

00:30:26.900 individual

00:30:27.340 but if

00:30:28.160 you're a

00:30:28.420 news organization

00:30:29.200 it should

00:30:29.580 be illegal

00:30:30.200 to show

00:30:30.600 a video

00:30:31.000 that's

00:30:32.340 edited to

00:30:33.040 change its

00:30:33.600 context

00:30:34.220 or meaning

00:30:35.000 in other

00:30:36.480 words

00:30:36.880 if you

00:30:37.980 showed the

00:30:38.760 Charlottesville

00:30:40.320 fine people

00:30:41.080 speech of the

00:30:41.700 president

00:30:42.080 but you only

00:30:43.480 showed the

00:30:43.940 part before

00:30:44.920 he clarified

00:30:45.620 that he

00:30:46.040 wasn't talking

00:30:46.600 about the

00:30:46.940 neo-nazis

00:30:47.640 which he did

00:30:49.400 in the second

00:30:49.900 part of his

00:30:50.360 statement

00:30:50.640 because he

00:30:51.440 wanted to

00:30:51.740 make sure

00:30:52.040 nobody would

00:30:52.680 misconstrue him

00:30:53.540 and think

00:30:53.860 he was

00:30:54.140 saying

00:30:54.400 that the

00:30:55.200 neo-nazis

00:30:55.880 were fine

00:30:56.380 people

00:30:56.720 so he

00:30:57.280 clarified

00:30:57.740 directly

00:30:58.200 no I'm

00:30:58.540 not talking

00:30:58.940 about the

00:30:59.340 neo-nazis

00:31:01.160 I'm talking

00:31:01.960 about other

00:31:02.840 people

00:31:03.160 so that would

00:31:04.860 just be

00:31:05.200 illegal in

00:31:06.120 the future

00:31:06.520 because the

00:31:07.760 news organizations

00:31:08.560 would certainly

00:31:09.240 be aware of

00:31:10.080 what they're

00:31:10.380 doing

00:31:10.680 you know

00:31:11.460 if you think

00:31:12.080 if you think

00:31:12.900 CNN doesn't

00:31:13.780 know that

00:31:15.020 they're showing

00:31:15.580 fake video

00:31:16.460 when they cut

00:31:17.040 off the

00:31:17.380 second part

00:31:17.980 oh they

00:31:18.980 know

00:31:19.400 trust me

00:31:21.300 they know

00:31:22.380 so

00:31:23.420 just be

00:31:24.900 a crime

00:31:25.820 alright so

00:31:26.740 those are some

00:31:27.300 of the things

00:31:27.620 I've put out

00:31:28.120 there

00:31:28.360 I think the

00:31:29.980 larger point

00:31:30.600 is that we

00:31:31.120 probably do

00:31:31.720 need some

00:31:32.360 kind of a

00:31:33.080 bill of

00:31:33.640 rights

00:31:34.000 or almost

00:31:35.840 like a

00:31:36.300 ten commandments

00:31:37.060 you know the

00:31:37.680 ten commandments

00:31:38.300 are not

00:31:38.740 necessarily tied

00:31:39.640 to actual

00:31:40.100 laws

00:31:40.700 some of them

00:31:41.720 are

00:31:42.020 shall not

00:31:43.060 murder for

00:31:43.560 example

00:31:43.900 but you

00:31:44.960 could have

00:31:45.320 a rule

00:31:46.400 of etiquette

00:31:47.120 ten commandments

00:31:48.300 a bill of

00:31:49.080 rights

00:31:49.540 some kind

00:31:50.920 of a structure

00:31:51.520 that says

00:31:52.020 alright alright

00:31:52.640 the world

00:31:53.840 is a different

00:31:54.420 place

00:31:54.860 we have to

00:31:56.080 deal with

00:31:56.540 cancel culture

00:31:57.400 and rumors

00:31:58.280 and fake

00:31:58.960 videos

00:31:59.400 and all

00:32:00.620 that

00:32:00.980 let's just

00:32:01.520 come up

00:32:01.900 with a new

00:32:02.240 set of

00:32:02.520 rules

00:32:02.780 alright

00:32:03.680 so

00:32:05.420 I'm just

00:32:06.320 looking at

00:32:06.760 your comments

00:32:07.920 on this

00:32:08.400 I see some

00:32:09.040 of you

00:32:09.280 like them

00:32:09.740 I think

00:32:10.800 you're

00:32:11.020 perfectly

00:32:11.460 right

00:32:12.020 to imagine

00:32:14.300 that

00:32:16.100 all

00:32:16.780 almost

00:32:17.380 everything

00:32:17.760 I mentioned

00:32:18.160 would be

00:32:18.720 problematic

00:32:19.420 you know

00:32:20.800 you'd have

00:32:21.140 to really

00:32:21.420 work through

00:32:21.820 the details

00:32:22.340 most of

00:32:22.900 them probably

00:32:23.240 wouldn't work

00:32:24.000 but some

00:32:24.560 of them

00:32:24.780 might

00:32:24.980 somebody

00:32:30.380 says

00:32:30.840 potato

00:32:31.480 stelter

00:32:32.040 would just

00:32:32.460 say he

00:32:32.780 didn't

00:32:33.060 realize

00:32:33.580 it was

00:32:34.040 edited

00:32:34.480 well I

00:32:35.480 think it

00:32:35.820 would be

00:32:36.080 enough

00:32:36.360 if the

00:32:36.800 law

00:32:37.020 required

00:32:37.560 you to

00:32:37.960 run

00:32:38.180 the

00:32:38.520 fully

00:32:39.340 edited

00:32:39.800 one

00:32:40.160 and

00:32:40.620 make

00:32:41.000 the

00:32:41.200 correction

00:32:41.620 so

00:32:42.680 I

00:32:42.880 don't

00:32:43.120 when I

00:32:43.640 say

00:32:43.840 that

00:32:44.060 something

00:32:44.320 should

00:32:44.620 be

00:32:44.880 illegal

00:32:45.480 in the

00:32:46.040 context

00:32:46.440 of this

00:32:46.960 proposed

00:32:47.700 digital

00:32:48.460 bill

00:32:48.740 of

00:32:48.920 rights

00:32:49.200 I

00:32:49.840 don't

00:32:50.040 mean

00:32:50.240 illegal

00:32:50.620 like

00:32:50.920 you

00:32:51.040 go

00:32:51.220 to

00:32:51.380 jail

00:32:51.680 because

00:32:52.680 most

00:32:52.940 of

00:32:53.080 these

00:32:53.200 don't

00:32:53.500 seem

00:32:53.780 like

00:32:53.980 go to

00:32:54.360 jail

00:32:54.560 kinds

00:32:54.880 of

00:32:55.000 problems

00:32:55.380 I

00:32:55.920 mean

00:32:56.120 illegal

00:32:56.540 as in

00:32:57.040 you need

00:32:57.520 to fix

00:32:57.980 it

00:32:58.220 so

00:32:59.340 if you

00:32:59.820 had

00:33:00.040 let's

00:33:00.860 say

00:33:01.120 you would

00:33:01.820 illegally

00:33:02.300 run

00:33:02.640 a

00:33:02.780 video

00:33:03.100 that

00:33:03.440 was

00:33:03.600 edited

00:33:03.960 to

00:33:04.260 change

00:33:04.640 its

00:33:04.840 context

00:33:05.420 the

00:33:06.340 law

00:33:06.640 would

00:33:06.860 require

00:33:07.260 that

00:33:07.500 you

00:33:07.760 run

00:33:08.600 it

00:33:08.780 in

00:33:08.920 the

00:33:09.060 same

00:33:09.300 time

00:33:09.620 space

00:33:10.100 you know

00:33:10.880 and

00:33:11.480 correct

00:33:11.840 it

00:33:15.480 enough

00:33:15.760 all

00:33:16.880 right

00:33:17.040 that

00:33:18.100 is

00:33:19.140 about

00:33:19.380 what

00:33:19.580 I

00:33:19.680 have

00:33:19.860 today

00:33:20.220 I've

00:33:21.780 got

00:33:21.940 some

00:33:22.140 things

00:33:22.420 I

00:33:22.580 need

00:33:22.760 to

00:33:22.900 do

00:33:23.060 today

00:33:23.420 oh

00:33:26.100 wow

00:33:26.400 thank

00:33:28.720 you

00:33:28.860 for

00:33:29.040 liking

00:33:29.300 my

00:33:29.560 broadcast

00:33:30.120 and

00:33:32.060 all

00:33:32.300 of

00:33:32.440 you

00:33:32.720 I

00:33:33.500 think

00:33:33.880 it's

00:33:34.060 hilarious

00:33:34.440 and

00:33:34.900 wonderful

00:33:35.360 that

00:33:35.840 the

00:33:36.160 conservative

00:33:36.960 Trump

00:33:38.360 supporting

00:33:38.820 public

00:33:39.280 is also

00:33:40.100 rallying

00:33:40.720 around

00:33:40.960 the

00:33:41.160 CEO

00:33:41.540 of

00:33:41.920 Goya

00:33:42.220 Foods

00:33:42.660 just

00:33:43.840 to

00:33:44.320 protect

00:33:44.700 his

00:33:44.960 freedom

00:33:45.280 of

00:33:45.460 speech

00:33:45.720 basically

00:33:46.220 protect

00:33:47.180 his

00:33:47.460 freedom

00:33:47.720 of

00:33:47.880 speech

00:33:48.140 as

00:33:48.340 well

00:33:48.780 as

00:33:48.940 our

00:33:49.080 own

00:33:49.320 so

00:33:50.120 buy

00:33:50.380 some

00:33:50.600 Goya

00:33:50.860 foods

00:33:51.420 buy

00:33:53.480 twice

00:33:53.800 as

00:33:53.980 much

00:33:54.260 and

00:33:56.060 somebody

00:33:58.440 says

00:33:58.760 66%

00:33:59.840 of

00:34:00.040 COVID

00:34:00.420 deaths

00:34:00.860 are

00:34:01.120 black

00:34:01.420 people

00:34:01.760 I

00:34:02.940 don't

00:34:03.100 think

00:34:03.280 that's

00:34:03.720 true

00:34:04.940 I

00:34:06.700 would

00:34:06.900 do

00:34:07.180 a

00:34:07.340 fact

00:34:07.560 check

00:34:07.800 on

00:34:07.960 that

00:34:08.220 oh

00:34:10.420 yeah

00:34:10.660 oh

00:34:10.960 one

00:34:11.660 other

00:34:11.860 thing

00:34:12.220 I'm

00:34:13.220 going

00:34:13.320 to

00:34:13.380 get

00:34:13.520 married

00:34:13.800 in

00:34:14.000 a

00:34:14.100 few

00:34:14.240 hours

00:34:14.660 so

00:34:15.820 I

00:34:15.940 thought

00:34:16.080 you

00:34:16.200 might

00:34:16.380 like

00:34:16.720 to

00:34:16.840 know

00:34:17.000 that

00:34:17.260 now

00:34:18.220 I

00:34:18.460 won't

00:34:18.620 be

00:34:18.760 giving

00:34:18.940 you

00:34:19.160 details

00:34:19.720 on

00:34:19.920 that

00:34:20.160 but

00:34:20.440 you

00:34:20.680 should

00:34:20.960 obviously

00:34:22.020 it

00:34:22.320 will

00:34:22.480 be

00:34:22.840 very

00:34:24.180 very

00:34:24.480 small

00:34:24.960 so

00:34:27.120 it'll

00:34:27.280 be

00:34:27.440 the

00:34:27.660 world's

00:34:28.680 smallest

00:34:29.800 wedding

00:34:30.240 so

00:34:31.880 we'll

00:34:32.240 have

00:34:32.360 the

00:34:32.480 world's

00:34:32.800 smallest

00:34:33.240 safest

00:34:33.780 wedding

00:34:34.240 I

00:34:35.340 don't

00:34:35.500 think

00:34:35.700 you'll

00:34:35.860 see

00:34:36.000 pictures

00:34:36.360 of

00:34:36.600 it

00:34:36.800 but

00:34:37.660 we'll

00:34:38.100 do

00:34:38.260 that

00:34:38.460 tonight

00:34:38.780 now

00:34:39.440 I

00:34:40.820 should

00:34:41.220 tell

00:34:41.440 you

00:34:41.600 that

00:34:41.880 getting

00:34:42.700 married

00:34:43.100 in the

00:34:43.520 age

00:34:43.740 of

00:34:43.900 coronavirus

00:34:44.460 is

00:34:45.380 really

00:34:45.800 really

00:34:46.060 hard

00:34:46.460 originally

00:34:47.340 it was

00:34:47.620 going

00:34:47.760 to

00:34:47.800 be

00:34:47.920 in

00:34:48.060 May

00:34:48.500 and

00:34:48.740 we

00:34:48.860 said

00:34:49.040 how

00:34:49.460 about

00:34:49.700 June

00:34:50.140 and

00:34:50.580 a

00:34:51.560 couple

00:34:51.720 of

00:34:51.840 different

00:34:52.060 dates

00:34:52.320 in

00:34:52.520 July

00:34:52.880 but

00:34:53.960 we

00:34:54.100 decided

00:34:54.500 on

00:34:54.840 today

00:34:55.600 on

00:34:56.600 June

00:34:57.840 11th

00:34:58.400 because

00:34:58.660 7-11

00:34:59.300 is

00:35:00.720 sort

00:35:00.920 of

00:35:01.040 convenience

00:35:01.600 if you

00:35:02.240 think

00:35:02.420 about

00:35:02.640 it

00:35:03.160 the

00:35:05.120 Wayfair

00:35:05.580 story

00:35:05.960 doesn't

00:35:06.320 interest

00:35:06.640 me

00:35:06.820 there's

00:35:07.060 some

00:35:07.220 fake

00:35:07.520 news

00:35:07.760 about

00:35:08.000 Wayfair

00:35:08.520 that

00:35:09.420 is

00:35:09.680 just

00:35:09.880 fake

00:35:10.120 news

00:35:10.520 so

00:35:12.040 yes

00:35:12.460 we'll

00:35:12.680 be

00:35:13.020 getting

00:35:13.660 married

00:35:14.000 later

00:35:14.940 today

00:35:15.360 I won't

00:35:17.000 tell you

00:35:17.260 the exact

00:35:17.640 time

00:35:18.020 but it'll

00:35:18.920 be

00:35:19.060 really

00:35:19.700 really

00:35:19.980 small

00:35:20.440 the

00:35:21.400 smallest

00:35:21.840 wedding

00:35:22.260 you

00:35:23.120 could

00:35:23.280 ever

00:35:23.480 imagine

00:35:23.920 and

00:35:24.940 very

00:35:25.140 safe

00:35:25.500 so

00:35:25.840 we'll

00:35:26.000 play

00:35:26.180 it

00:35:26.320 safe

00:35:26.600 all

00:35:27.000 right

00:35:27.160 that's

00:35:28.080 all

00:35:28.240 for

00:35:28.420 now

00:35:28.820 and

00:35:29.840 thank

00:35:30.380 you

00:35:30.580 those

00:35:30.940 who

00:35:31.100 are

00:35:31.320 congratulating

00:35:32.300 me

00:35:32.520 by the

00:35:33.140 way

00:35:33.280 we

00:35:33.480 Christina

00:35:34.120 and I

00:35:34.520 have

00:35:34.760 been

00:35:34.920 together

00:35:35.260 for

00:35:35.760 four

00:35:36.160 years

00:35:36.580 and

00:35:37.240 we

00:35:38.100 do

00:35:38.260 have

00:35:38.440 a

00:35:38.580 pretty

00:35:38.760 good

00:35:38.980 idea

00:35:39.340 that

00:35:39.580 it

00:35:39.700 works

00:35:40.100 so

00:35:40.600 in

00:35:41.100 case you

00:35:41.120 worry

00:35:41.420 somebody

00:35:45.120 somebody's

00:35:45.680 questioning

00:35:46.040 my

00:35:46.360 v-neck

00:35:47.220 here's

00:35:49.040 the rule

00:35:49.620 v-neck

00:35:51.200 sweater

00:35:51.800 means

00:35:52.960 your

00:35:53.300 wife

00:35:55.280 or your

00:35:55.740 girlfriend

00:35:56.140 bought it

00:35:56.600 for you

00:35:57.260 v-neck

00:35:58.420 t-shirt

00:35:59.140 that's just

00:36:00.300 a different

00:36:00.640 thing

00:36:00.940 I don't

00:36:02.620 think

00:36:02.800 v-necks

00:36:03.240 are in

00:36:03.500 anymore

00:36:03.800 but I

00:36:04.080 still have

00:36:04.440 a few

00:36:04.720 of them

00:36:04.920 in my

00:36:05.240 closet

00:36:05.500 so

00:36:05.820 that's

00:36:06.080 enough

00:36:06.220 for now

00:36:06.560 and I

00:36:08.180 will talk

00:36:08.600 to you

00:36:09.040 later

00:36:10.480 to

00:36:25.020 you

00:36:25.260 you

00:36:25.340 you

00:36:27.260 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 11, 2020

Episode 1054 Scott Adams： I Unveil my Digital Bill of Rights, Talk About Roger Stone, Mock AOC, China Threat and More

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript