Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1054 Scott Adams： I Unveil my Digital Bill of Rights, Talk About Roger Stone, Mock AOC, China Threat and More

00:00:00.000 Bum-bum-bum-bum-bum-bum 1.00

00:00:01.880 Hey everybody. Come on in.

00:00:12.880 Gather around. There's plenty of space.

00:00:16.600 Yes! It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams and the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:21.740 Now world-renowned, people all across the globe are enjoying the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:27.400 and you know why

00:00:29.980 yeah, it's the best part of the day

00:00:31.840 every single time

00:00:33.660 this will be no exception

00:00:35.200 and all you need

00:00:36.320 is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein

00:00:39.600 a canteen jug or a flask

00:00:40.700 a vessel of any kind

00:00:42.920 fill it with your favorite liquid

00:00:45.180 I like coffee

00:00:46.160 and join me now

00:00:48.140 for the unparalleled pleasure

00:00:51.360 the dopamine hit of the day

00:00:53.180 the thing that makes everything better

00:00:55.560 it's called the simultaneous sip

00:00:57.960 and it's going to happen now

00:00:59.460 go

00:01:00.120 yeah

00:01:04.560 yeah, everything's improving

00:01:06.400 all feels better now

00:01:09.780 well, let's talk about some of the news

00:01:12.200 is everybody buying their Goya

00:01:15.420 products

00:01:16.780 you know

00:01:19.700 the company's CEO

00:01:21.040 who said something nice about President Trump

00:01:23.600 and now he's going to get boycotted

00:01:24.960 I think a lot of people are

00:01:27.860 buying a little extra

00:01:30.480 Goya products

00:01:32.200 so I hope that turns out

00:01:33.540 turns into a plus for Goya

00:01:36.080 anyway

00:01:37.920 here's some crazy things

00:01:39.880 I love the fact that Mayor de Blasio

00:01:43.420 is not even trying to be

00:01:46.040 any kind of a

00:01:47.440 credible figure anymore

00:01:49.200 so he's

00:01:51.660 he's banning all large gatherings

00:01:53.260 except for a Black Lives Matter protest

00:01:55.280 also known as

00:01:57.120 the largest gatherings

00:01:58.320 now

00:01:59.580 I suppose that he's in favor of free speech

00:02:02.140 so that would be

00:02:04.760 a good reason to make an exception

00:02:06.360 because there's a constitutional

00:02:08.260 constitutional right

00:02:10.840 to free speech

00:02:12.200 but there's also a constitutional right

00:02:15.300 to religious expression

00:02:17.260 so

00:02:18.660 so that's

00:02:20.520 I usually don't like to talk about the hypocrisy stuff

00:02:23.520 because it's too boring

00:02:24.320 but

00:02:25.540 that one's just

00:02:26.680 sort of weird and funny

00:02:27.940 are we in a weird situation

00:02:33.060 where

00:02:33.500 the virus

00:02:36.040 infections are running out of control

00:02:38.760 correct me if I'm wrong

00:02:41.540 is it not obvious to everyone

00:02:43.600 that the reason

00:02:45.300 the infections are increasing

00:02:47.320 is because the lockdowns are over

00:02:50.280 we all know that right

00:02:52.580 because

00:02:53.160 when you watch the commentary

00:02:55.720 it's almost like

00:02:58.040 some people still don't believe

00:03:00.420 that social distancing works

00:03:03.140 which is weird at this point

00:03:05.980 isn't it

00:03:06.480 but am I wrong

00:03:07.740 that some people still think

00:03:09.000 social distancing

00:03:10.000 doesn't make any difference

00:03:11.260 when the data is now

00:03:13.300 overwhelmingly obvious

00:03:14.520 that it does

00:03:15.220 I don't know about that

00:03:18.100 it looks like

00:03:18.660 it looks like

00:03:19.800 there's still doubt on masks

00:03:21.660 and everything else

00:03:22.560 it's a

00:03:24.220 it's an amazing world

00:03:25.200 that there's no amount

00:03:26.280 of information

00:03:27.140 or experience

00:03:28.020 that can change people's minds

00:03:29.620 you can't be changed

00:03:31.620 with data

00:03:32.240 you can't be changed

00:03:33.880 with observation

00:03:34.800 reason

00:03:36.240 people just don't change

00:03:38.380 their minds

00:03:38.880 it's just not a thing

00:03:40.320 AOC had the

00:03:43.020 one of the most annoying

00:03:44.140 quotes of her life

00:03:45.420 tweets anyway

00:03:46.880 she's complaining 0.94

00:03:48.960 about the complaints

00:03:50.040 about cancel culture

00:03:51.240 now of course

00:03:53.020 she has to cancel

00:03:54.560 the complaints

00:03:55.280 against cancel culture

00:03:56.540 because cancel culture

00:03:58.420 works for her side

00:04:00.300 so here's what she said

00:04:02.320 she said

00:04:02.700 the term cancel culture

00:04:03.900 comes from entitlement

00:04:05.720 um

00:04:08.120 okay

00:04:09.820 cancel culture

00:04:12.020 comes from entitlement

00:04:13.400 alright

00:04:14.660 this is going to be

00:04:15.800 an insightful point

00:04:16.940 that follows

00:04:17.580 because I don't get it yet

00:04:19.020 and she says

00:04:20.620 alright

00:04:21.560 so cancel culture

00:04:22.460 comes from entitlement

00:04:23.580 as though the person

00:04:25.280 complaining

00:04:25.920 has the right

00:04:26.760 to a large

00:04:27.580 captive audience

00:04:28.580 and one is a victim

00:04:30.040 if people choose

00:04:31.160 to tune you out

00:04:32.180 I don't think

00:04:33.880 that's what people

00:04:34.600 are complaining about

00:04:35.720 AOC

00:04:37.740 seems a little bit

00:04:39.660 off point

00:04:40.460 I think people

00:04:42.920 are complaining

00:04:43.500 about losing

00:04:44.060 their jobs

00:04:44.900 losing their jobs

00:04:47.920 for having an opinion

00:04:49.220 that's

00:04:50.780 that's a cancellation

00:04:51.960 losing your job

00:04:54.100 um

00:04:55.560 but uh

00:04:56.980 beyond that

00:04:57.600 the real complaint

00:04:58.800 is that the people

00:04:59.500 getting cancelled

00:05:00.220 uh

00:05:01.480 are being cancelled

00:05:02.280 for reasons

00:05:03.240 that are not

00:05:03.820 appropriate

00:05:04.600 it doesn't

00:05:05.320 it has nothing

00:05:06.060 to do with entitlement

00:05:07.180 that's such a

00:05:09.040 a weird

00:05:09.640 take

00:05:10.340 um

00:05:12.240 and then she says

00:05:13.520 odds are you're not

00:05:14.560 actually cancelled

00:05:15.500 you're just being challenged

00:05:17.320 held accountable

00:05:18.500 or unliked

00:05:19.680 well

00:05:21.100 all of those things

00:05:22.820 are true

00:05:23.380 and then she goes on

00:05:24.300 to uh

00:05:25.020 paint herself

00:05:26.120 as a victim

00:05:26.720 of many complaints

00:05:28.400 it's just the most

00:05:30.520 confused opinion

00:05:31.800 of all time

00:05:33.160 is cancelling good

00:05:34.240 is it bad

00:05:35.040 we can't even tell

00:05:36.280 what she wants

00:05:36.960 all right

00:05:37.980 I tweeted out

00:05:39.400 a uh

00:05:40.240 speech

00:05:40.860 that was

00:05:41.780 um

00:05:42.740 captured in text

00:05:44.460 from director

00:05:45.980 ray

00:05:46.560 the fbi

00:05:47.360 talking about

00:05:48.720 all of the ways

00:05:49.780 china is stealing 1.00

00:05:51.480 intellectual property

00:05:52.740 from the united states

00:05:53.880 and I gotta tell you

00:05:55.620 even though you knew

00:05:56.660 it was bad

00:05:57.440 you know

00:05:58.760 you've been hearing it

00:05:59.660 china is stealing 1.00

00:06:00.900 our intellectual property

00:06:02.320 china is spying on us 0.98

00:06:04.820 you know

00:06:05.180 china is interfering 1.00

00:06:06.040 but until you hear him

00:06:07.840 do the whole list

00:06:09.160 with all the examples

00:06:11.340 of china

00:06:11.940 the things that china

00:06:12.980 is doing right now

00:06:14.200 we're not talking

00:06:15.420 about things they have

00:06:16.340 done in the past

00:06:17.060 although some of that's

00:06:17.900 there but the things

00:06:19.060 they're doing right now

00:06:20.280 it's a full-out war

00:06:21.440 it's a full-out

00:06:23.280 digital war with china 0.99

00:06:25.680 which even I was

00:06:27.580 surprised at the

00:06:28.720 extent of it

00:06:29.540 so apparently

00:06:30.720 it's it's a hot war

00:06:32.380 it's it's actually a hot

00:06:34.380 war and they're just

00:06:35.460 trying to steal their

00:06:36.280 stuff

00:06:36.660 you read that and you

00:06:38.340 can't even you can't

00:06:40.180 even doubt a little bit

00:06:41.760 that we you know we

00:06:43.540 just can't do business

00:06:44.400 with china

00:06:44.880 it just can't it can't

00:06:46.300 be done

00:06:46.640 so the decoupling I

00:06:48.400 think is guaranteed

00:06:49.160 if you think the

00:06:50.760 tiktok app is going to

00:06:52.220 last

00:06:52.680 I think you're going to

00:06:55.280 be surprised

00:06:56.080 the tiktok app is

00:06:58.480 definitely going to be

00:06:59.260 banned in the united

00:07:00.060 states

00:07:00.520 in my opinion

00:07:02.040 I don't think there's

00:07:03.320 the slightest chance

00:07:04.380 that that could remain

00:07:05.940 you saw a news item

00:07:07.400 that was yesterday

00:07:08.200 that was weird

00:07:08.880 there was a initial

00:07:10.680 report that was

00:07:11.600 immediately retracted

00:07:13.160 or fairly soon

00:07:14.400 but the initial report

00:07:15.940 was that amazon sent

00:07:17.300 out a menu memo

00:07:18.780 telling people to

00:07:20.740 take tiktok off their

00:07:22.580 phone if they were

00:07:24.220 amazon employees and

00:07:25.580 they used the phone

00:07:26.400 for amazon stuff I

00:07:27.520 guess

00:07:27.720 now amazon immediately

00:07:29.740 reversed that

00:07:30.700 but I'll bet it was

00:07:33.240 real at one point

00:07:34.380 I'll bet it was real

00:07:36.080 and I'll bet china 1.00

00:07:37.000 complained

00:07:37.620 don't you think

00:07:39.780 china complained

00:07:40.680 and maybe that's why

00:07:42.120 they reversed it

00:07:43.040 I'll bet it was

00:07:44.760 I'll bet china 1.00

00:07:46.360 actually has enough

00:07:47.340 control over amazon

00:07:49.000 that amazon changed

00:07:50.700 its policy

00:07:51.500 to allow spyware

00:07:54.800 on their employee

00:07:56.100 phones

00:07:56.760 now I don't know

00:07:58.300 if that's what

00:07:58.820 happened

00:07:59.220 it could be that

00:08:00.360 it was just a

00:08:01.160 you know

00:08:01.920 fake memo or

00:08:02.780 something

00:08:03.100 anything's possible

00:08:04.480 but it kind of

00:08:05.400 looks like that

00:08:06.040 initially

00:08:06.480 there was a study

00:08:10.320 that said that

00:08:11.280 people who complain

00:08:13.500 about being victims

00:08:15.820 are psychopathic

00:08:17.660 manipulative

00:08:18.440 and narcissistic 0.53

00:08:19.540 narcissistic

00:08:20.760 and they're frequent

00:08:23.960 signalers of

00:08:24.920 virtuous victimhood

00:08:26.320 says a new study

00:08:27.240 so in other words

00:08:28.760 the people who

00:08:29.480 complain about victims

00:08:30.600 are psychopaths

00:08:31.640 manipulative

00:08:32.200 and narcissistic 0.53

00:08:33.200 people

00:08:33.600 does that sound

00:08:35.180 right

00:08:35.460 I don't know

00:08:37.300 if you needed

00:08:37.800 to do a study

00:08:38.540 for that

00:08:39.020 just saying

00:08:40.240 you know

00:08:41.600 I think it makes

00:08:42.380 a difference

00:08:42.780 if you're the

00:08:43.360 actual victim

00:08:44.220 or if you're

00:08:44.960 protesting on

00:08:45.760 behalf of those

00:08:46.540 victims

00:08:46.940 if you're the

00:08:48.100 actual victim

00:08:48.940 well you probably

00:08:49.980 have something

00:08:50.420 real to complain

00:08:51.180 about

00:08:51.540 but if you're

00:08:53.160 but others

00:08:54.560 just like the

00:08:55.340 virtuous victimhood

00:08:56.860 root apparently

00:08:58.020 all right

00:08:59.960 here is my

00:09:01.160 new big

00:09:02.260 suggestion for

00:09:02.960 the day

00:09:03.400 are you ready

00:09:04.240 the news was

00:09:05.260 all boring

00:09:05.760 so there was

00:09:06.200 nothing really

00:09:06.640 to talk about

00:09:07.200 except Roger Stone

00:09:08.260 so let's do that

00:09:09.480 and then we'll get

00:09:10.020 to the big news

00:09:11.220 so Roger Stone

00:09:13.540 got his sentence

00:09:15.140 commuted

00:09:15.700 which means that

00:09:16.540 he can still

00:09:17.180 battle in the

00:09:18.160 legal system

00:09:18.860 to have his

00:09:19.740 name restored

00:09:20.760 but he doesn't

00:09:22.020 have to worry

00:09:22.400 about jail

00:09:22.920 from this

00:09:23.480 latest offense

00:09:24.580 now of course

00:09:26.460 the anti-Trumpers

00:09:27.560 are saying

00:09:27.980 it's an abuse

00:09:29.060 of power

00:09:29.780 my power

00:09:31.360 is abused

00:09:32.200 and he did

00:09:33.740 all these

00:09:34.300 terrible crimes

00:09:35.600 and of course

00:09:36.200 the Trump

00:09:36.580 administration

00:09:37.000 says

00:09:37.600 well the only

00:09:39.140 reason these

00:09:39.620 crimes happened

00:09:40.360 was because of

00:09:41.460 this fake

00:09:42.580 Russia collusion

00:09:44.140 hoax

00:09:44.700 and he got

00:09:45.800 sort of

00:09:46.540 pushed into

00:09:47.440 a place where

00:09:48.240 a person who

00:09:50.060 was likely to

00:09:50.940 be

00:09:51.180 let's put it

00:09:52.040 this way

00:09:52.420 if you are

00:09:53.880 known as a

00:09:54.540 fabulist

00:09:55.240 a person who

00:09:57.080 makes up stuff

00:09:57.900 and you are

00:09:58.920 forced into

00:09:59.580 saying things

00:10:01.220 on the record

00:10:02.200 you're probably

00:10:04.060 going to get

00:10:04.460 in trouble

00:10:04.900 it's the same

00:10:06.140 reason people

00:10:06.680 don't want

00:10:07.140 President Trump

00:10:07.840 to testify

00:10:08.560 under oath

00:10:09.320 you could see

00:10:10.900 some trouble

00:10:11.460 couldn't you

00:10:11.960 so

00:10:13.180 in my opinion

00:10:15.440 the pardon

00:10:16.140 of Roger Stone

00:10:17.380 is the cleanest

00:10:18.980 pardon you'll

00:10:19.680 ever see

00:10:20.180 in my opinion

00:10:21.400 I suppose it

00:10:22.560 could be

00:10:23.020 not a pardon

00:10:24.480 a commuting

00:10:25.200 of a sentence

00:10:25.800 I think it's

00:10:26.920 the cleanest

00:10:27.540 one I've ever

00:10:28.100 seen

00:10:28.440 because the

00:10:29.900 situation was

00:10:30.820 caused by

00:10:31.520 bad actors

00:10:32.500 in the

00:10:32.940 government

00:10:33.300 and I don't

00:10:34.620 think you

00:10:35.000 can ever

00:10:35.440 have

00:10:35.760 you can

00:10:36.660 ever feel

00:10:37.320 right about

00:10:37.880 your government

00:10:38.500 if somebody

00:10:39.960 went to jail

00:10:40.760 because of

00:10:41.440 bad behavior

00:10:42.200 by the

00:10:42.840 government

00:10:43.260 now you're

00:10:44.580 going to

00:10:44.700 say but

00:10:45.180 wait

00:10:45.520 the government

00:10:46.540 didn't force

00:10:47.400 him to lie

00:10:48.160 under oath

00:10:49.120 the government

00:10:50.160 didn't force

00:10:50.860 him to hide

00:10:51.420 emails or

00:10:52.080 whatever he's

00:10:52.640 accused of

00:10:53.200 doing

00:10:53.420 no the

00:10:54.200 government

00:10:54.560 didn't force

00:10:56.040 it

00:10:56.280 they simply

00:10:57.480 put him in

00:10:58.040 a position

00:10:58.620 where it was

00:10:59.680 likely to

00:11:00.320 happen

00:11:00.660 if you put

00:11:02.500 somebody in a

00:11:03.040 position where

00:11:03.660 they're likely

00:11:04.320 to commit a

00:11:04.940 crime and

00:11:05.900 they could

00:11:06.300 not have

00:11:06.700 been in that

00:11:07.100 position without

00:11:07.760 any other

00:11:08.500 outside force

00:11:09.820 that's not

00:11:12.100 exactly the

00:11:12.800 situations we're

00:11:13.640 looking to

00:11:14.120 punish people

00:11:14.840 for if the

00:11:16.300 government forces

00:11:17.320 them into

00:11:17.860 that even

00:11:19.660 though there's

00:11:20.100 free will and

00:11:20.940 blah blah blah

00:11:21.600 anyway so

00:11:22.720 I think the

00:11:23.480 Roger Stone

00:11:24.120 I think

00:11:26.480 commuting the

00:11:27.060 sentence has

00:11:27.720 more power

00:11:29.000 than just the

00:11:30.700 Roger Stone

00:11:31.480 story and

00:11:33.480 here's the

00:11:34.160 larger narrative

00:11:34.980 that it fits

00:11:35.580 into you ready

00:11:36.280 a lot of

00:11:37.320 people have

00:11:37.660 been complaining

00:11:38.720 that President

00:11:40.080 Trump has not

00:11:40.780 aggressively

00:11:41.400 protected his

00:11:43.000 base in other

00:11:44.500 words he's not

00:11:45.100 doing enough to

00:11:46.180 protect people

00:11:47.800 from getting

00:11:48.300 canceled from

00:11:49.140 being beaten

00:11:49.800 in public for

00:11:50.940 being you know

00:11:52.020 fired for their

00:11:52.940 views you know

00:11:54.580 a whole host of

00:11:55.300 things that

00:11:56.000 Republicans think

00:11:58.120 is happening to

00:11:58.840 their base and

00:11:59.600 are and they

00:12:01.640 think he's not

00:12:02.200 doing enough but

00:12:04.040 when you see the

00:12:04.760 Roger Stone

00:12:05.660 commutation you

00:12:08.020 say to yourself

00:12:08.800 oh wait maybe

00:12:11.140 the president is

00:12:12.100 willing to do

00:12:12.700 some things which

00:12:13.440 are not

00:12:14.720 necessarily

00:12:15.320 politically

00:12:16.020 great for him

00:12:18.400 but they do

00:12:19.900 show that he's

00:12:20.580 willing to take

00:12:21.360 some risk to

00:12:22.160 protect at least

00:12:23.840 some people who

00:12:24.460 have been you

00:12:25.000 know loyal to

00:12:25.600 his cause so

00:12:27.540 in terms of how

00:12:28.820 it feels to the

00:12:30.480 base really

00:12:32.300 right the way it

00:12:34.200 feels is really

00:12:35.880 right it's the

00:12:37.500 first time I

00:12:39.080 would be hard

00:12:40.460 pressed to come

00:12:41.060 up with another

00:12:41.680 example maybe you

00:12:43.040 could in which

00:12:44.540 Trump supporters

00:12:45.800 won one can

00:12:49.500 you think of

00:12:49.980 one maybe I'm

00:12:51.100 just having

00:12:51.480 selective memory

00:12:52.400 but it seems like

00:12:53.960 Trump supporters

00:12:54.660 are almost always

00:12:55.680 on the wrong end

00:12:56.500 of all of this

00:12:57.320 stuff you know

00:12:58.720 they're the ones

00:12:59.180 getting fired

00:12:59.800 getting beaten

00:13:00.460 up it just feels

00:13:02.100 like it's always

00:13:02.760 on the wrong end

00:13:03.520 it's probably just

00:13:04.880 selective memory

00:13:05.900 all right here's

00:13:06.760 my big thought

00:13:07.840 for the day

00:13:08.340 when the original

00:13:11.160 constitution was

00:13:12.040 written and the

00:13:12.560 bill of rights

00:13:13.140 we were a

00:13:14.160 primitive society

00:13:15.280 the founders of

00:13:16.840 the constitution

00:13:17.460 were literally

00:13:18.900 pooping into

00:13:19.700 holes in the

00:13:20.300 ground and

00:13:21.040 trying to create

00:13:22.100 a system for

00:13:22.980 all time

00:13:23.600 now that's tough

00:13:24.820 because they

00:13:25.320 didn't know the

00:13:25.820 internet would

00:13:26.600 come along

00:13:27.120 and lots has

00:13:28.660 changed so I'm

00:13:30.040 suggesting that

00:13:30.840 there should be

00:13:31.640 wait for it

00:13:33.120 the big idea

00:13:34.320 coming a digital

00:13:36.540 bill of rights

00:13:37.580 a new set of

00:13:39.360 rights that have

00:13:40.820 not existed before

00:13:42.000 that are only

00:13:43.620 necessary because

00:13:44.640 of the digital

00:13:45.460 age now I'm

00:13:46.880 going to read

00:13:47.280 you my first

00:13:48.460 draft of things

00:13:50.240 that would at

00:13:50.780 least be considered

00:13:51.660 so don't assume

00:13:53.480 that everything

00:13:53.980 that I say needs

00:13:55.460 to be on a

00:13:56.020 bill of rights

00:13:56.680 a digital bill

00:13:58.320 of rights but

00:13:59.620 assume it could

00:14:00.240 be in the

00:14:00.580 conversation and

00:14:01.600 I'll just run

00:14:02.120 through them

00:14:02.520 quickly so we

00:14:03.360 don't you know

00:14:04.200 spend too much

00:14:05.280 time with anyone

00:14:05.920 and some of

00:14:07.340 these are

00:14:07.640 designed to

00:14:08.600 be provocative

00:14:10.860 all right

00:14:11.980 here's number

00:14:13.060 one probably

00:14:13.880 the most

00:14:14.260 provocative

00:14:14.800 one video

00:14:17.140 evidence of

00:14:17.900 a crime is

00:14:19.940 not admissible

00:14:20.800 in court unless

00:14:22.820 both the

00:14:23.620 prosecution and

00:14:24.840 the defense

00:14:25.520 agree that it

00:14:27.120 shows what

00:14:27.700 happened in

00:14:29.840 other words

00:14:30.260 either the

00:14:30.800 prosecutor or

00:14:31.740 the defense

00:14:32.480 could say that

00:14:33.880 a video cannot

00:14:35.120 be shown in

00:14:35.960 court why

00:14:37.440 because we

00:14:38.620 now know that

00:14:39.340 videos are more

00:14:40.220 misleading than

00:14:41.800 clarifying we

00:14:43.680 know that because

00:14:44.580 the fake news has

00:14:45.460 proven that a

00:14:46.680 million times by

00:14:47.700 editing out the

00:14:49.260 beginning or the

00:14:50.080 end of a video so

00:14:51.540 that what you see

00:14:52.140 is out of context

00:14:53.020 likewise a video

00:14:55.120 is by definition

00:14:56.780 let's say an

00:14:59.540 editorial because

00:15:01.280 it shows one

00:15:02.120 angle of a

00:15:03.000 thing and it

00:15:04.000 can't by its

00:15:05.080 nature show all

00:15:05.880 the other angles

00:15:06.740 so in the same

00:15:08.500 way that a

00:15:10.780 lie detector is

00:15:12.020 not admissible in

00:15:13.320 court and yet

00:15:14.680 is widely used in

00:15:15.880 the real world

00:15:16.760 why is it that a

00:15:19.080 lie detector test is

00:15:20.940 not admissible in

00:15:22.360 court right

00:15:24.200 the reason a

00:15:25.300 lie detector test

00:15:26.280 is not admissible

00:15:27.360 in court is

00:15:28.820 that science

00:15:29.460 shows it

00:15:31.220 doesn't work

00:15:31.960 but it does

00:15:33.920 work well enough

00:15:34.640 that private

00:15:35.160 industry uses it

00:15:36.180 all the time

00:15:36.760 so there is a

00:15:38.560 different standard

00:15:39.140 for the law than

00:15:40.200 there is for

00:15:40.940 just daily life

00:15:42.720 and the law

00:15:44.080 says that a

00:15:45.360 lie detector test

00:15:47.620 is not reliable

00:15:48.560 enough to put

00:15:49.520 somebody in jail

00:15:50.240 over it

00:15:50.720 I would like to

00:15:51.900 add to that

00:15:52.520 that video

00:15:53.360 evidence

00:15:53.980 photographic

00:15:55.500 evidence

00:15:56.080 and audio

00:15:57.280 evidence

00:15:57.840 by themselves

00:15:59.340 should never

00:16:00.340 be the basis

00:16:01.320 for a prosecution

00:16:02.380 of any kind

00:16:03.460 unless the

00:16:04.840 defense and the

00:16:05.640 prosecution both

00:16:06.680 agree that

00:16:07.960 whatever is on

00:16:08.720 these digital

00:16:09.380 reproductions is

00:16:10.980 accurate enough

00:16:12.380 for the purposes

00:16:13.140 now you might

00:16:15.220 say to yourself

00:16:15.800 my god Scott

00:16:16.740 if you take

00:16:18.320 video evidence

00:16:19.240 out of it

00:16:19.860 a lot of

00:16:23.180 people are

00:16:23.540 going to get

00:16:23.860 away with a

00:16:24.340 lot of crimes

00:16:25.100 to which I

00:16:26.280 say this is

00:16:27.480 just for

00:16:27.920 discussion

00:16:28.420 maybe the

00:16:30.320 only thing

00:16:30.800 you use video

00:16:31.500 evidence for

00:16:32.220 is to determine

00:16:33.120 who was

00:16:33.780 involved

00:16:34.380 in other words

00:16:35.920 maybe you'd

00:16:36.400 say the only

00:16:36.960 thing you can

00:16:37.500 get from the

00:16:38.000 video is that

00:16:39.240 we can confirm

00:16:40.060 these people

00:16:40.740 were there

00:16:41.400 and that these

00:16:42.840 items were

00:16:44.120 involved

00:16:44.640 just throwing

00:16:45.900 it out there

00:16:46.400 it would be

00:16:48.540 immense problems

00:16:49.800 either way it

00:16:50.600 goes

00:16:50.980 so I'll be

00:16:52.160 honest about

00:16:52.720 that

00:16:53.280 how about

00:16:54.060 this

00:16:54.340 a maximum

00:16:55.020 five year

00:16:56.120 ban from

00:16:57.540 any digital

00:16:58.380 platform

00:16:59.040 regardless of

00:17:00.760 your offense

00:17:01.640 in other words

00:17:03.180 in other words

00:17:06.100 somebody says

00:17:06.820 it's a dumb

00:17:07.400 idea already

00:17:08.160 handled by the

00:17:08.940 court

00:17:09.220 but that would

00:17:10.240 be true for

00:17:11.320 lie detectors

00:17:12.540 too

00:17:13.000 if something

00:17:15.180 is not

00:17:15.740 accurate

00:17:16.320 and you know

00:17:17.360 in advance

00:17:17.840 it's not

00:17:18.240 accurate

00:17:18.620 can you

00:17:19.580 depend on

00:17:20.300 the court

00:17:20.860 to sort

00:17:22.880 out what

00:17:23.320 was accurate

00:17:23.940 about it

00:17:24.460 and what

00:17:24.780 was not

00:17:25.300 I think

00:17:27.240 you could

00:17:27.480 have a

00:17:27.700 deeper

00:17:27.880 discussion

00:17:28.360 on that

00:17:28.760 but I

00:17:30.120 do

00:17:30.360 acknowledge

00:17:31.040 that it

00:17:31.440 could go

00:17:31.820 either way

00:17:32.480 alright so

00:17:33.600 a maximum

00:17:34.060 five year

00:17:34.600 ban from

00:17:35.040 any platform

00:17:35.620 let's say

00:17:36.200 YouTube

00:17:37.520 or Twitter

00:17:39.060 or Facebook

00:17:39.760 or somebody

00:17:40.300 kicks you

00:17:40.800 off the

00:17:41.060 platform for

00:17:41.700 bad behavior

00:17:42.400 which you

00:17:43.360 totally had

00:17:44.140 coming

00:17:44.480 alright so

00:17:45.440 in this

00:17:45.740 we're assuming

00:17:46.440 that your

00:17:46.820 bad behavior

00:17:47.500 was in fact

00:17:48.840 bad behavior

00:17:49.480 you violated

00:17:50.320 the requirements

00:17:52.080 there should be

00:17:53.240 some kind of

00:17:53.760 a statute

00:17:54.260 of limitations

00:17:55.080 because these

00:17:56.440 public platforms

00:17:57.400 are too important

00:17:58.360 for daily life

00:17:59.600 to have somebody

00:18:00.820 block forever

00:18:01.700 but you still

00:18:02.820 probably need

00:18:03.380 some kind

00:18:03.820 of a penalty

00:18:04.360 so I would

00:18:05.600 suggest

00:18:06.060 and maybe

00:18:06.700 it could be

00:18:07.080 three years

00:18:07.740 but a five year

00:18:09.060 ban and then

00:18:10.100 you can come

00:18:10.820 back

00:18:11.200 if you do

00:18:12.080 the same

00:18:12.440 behavior

00:18:12.860 you're of

00:18:13.380 course

00:18:13.640 banned

00:18:14.200 again

00:18:14.560 alright so

00:18:16.280 that's another

00:18:16.720 one

00:18:17.040 how about

00:18:17.920 this one

00:18:18.360 and again

00:18:19.220 these are

00:18:19.860 brainstorming

00:18:20.700 don't assume

00:18:21.620 that these

00:18:22.040 are settled

00:18:23.420 proposals

00:18:24.240 here's another

00:18:25.580 one

00:18:25.820 you have

00:18:26.360 you must

00:18:26.880 know the

00:18:27.300 identity

00:18:27.780 or you

00:18:28.260 have the

00:18:28.540 right to

00:18:28.880 know the

00:18:29.180 identity

00:18:29.600 of your

00:18:30.180 online

00:18:30.740 accuser

00:18:31.940 how about

00:18:32.300 that

00:18:32.640 if somebody

00:18:33.820 puts a

00:18:35.200 tweet up

00:18:35.780 that says

00:18:36.580 Scott Adams

00:18:38.740 eats kittens

00:18:40.780 I should

00:18:42.320 have the

00:18:42.660 right

00:18:43.020 to petition

00:18:44.240 Twitter

00:18:44.940 through some

00:18:45.540 normal process

00:18:46.520 and say

00:18:46.940 can you

00:18:47.860 unveil that

00:18:48.600 person's

00:18:49.060 name and

00:18:49.380 identity

00:18:49.820 right

00:18:51.740 because in

00:18:52.660 the legal

00:18:53.040 system you

00:18:53.680 have a right

00:18:54.240 to know

00:18:54.620 who accuses

00:18:55.300 you

00:18:55.500 why is that

00:18:57.220 right restricted

00:18:58.460 online

00:18:59.040 why can

00:19:00.020 somebody know

00:19:00.640 my identity

00:19:01.440 but I can't

00:19:02.640 know their

00:19:02.980 identity

00:19:03.460 now if

00:19:04.960 they're not

00:19:05.260 doing anything

00:19:05.800 that bothers

00:19:06.340 me I don't

00:19:06.880 care why

00:19:07.740 would I need

00:19:08.180 to know

00:19:08.440 somebody's

00:19:08.860 identity if

00:19:10.060 they're not

00:19:10.400 bothering me

00:19:11.120 but if

00:19:11.820 somebody makes

00:19:12.320 an accusation

00:19:13.220 which can

00:19:14.040 change my

00:19:14.680 reputation

00:19:15.380 I have an

00:19:16.780 absolute right

00:19:17.620 to know who

00:19:18.140 they are right

00:19:18.860 away right

00:19:20.160 away and I

00:19:21.580 should be able

00:19:21.980 to just send

00:19:22.500 that tweet to

00:19:23.600 some kind of

00:19:24.600 decision-making

00:19:26.140 body and say

00:19:26.900 hey is this

00:19:28.200 person talking

00:19:28.920 about me

00:19:29.520 because if

00:19:30.520 they are I

00:19:31.980 would like them

00:19:32.540 unmasked

00:19:33.180 now of

00:19:35.700 course this

00:19:36.180 causes other

00:19:36.860 problems blah

00:19:37.680 blah blah 0.97

00:19:37.980 I'm just

00:19:38.720 putting these

00:19:39.140 out here for

00:19:39.560 discussion

00:19:39.980 how about

00:19:41.280 this one

00:19:41.700 48 hour

00:19:43.140 rule for

00:19:43.720 clarification

00:19:44.340 so this

00:19:45.500 wouldn't be

00:19:45.980 a law

00:19:46.780 per se

00:19:47.260 but just

00:19:47.680 a standard

00:19:48.320 that if

00:19:49.280 somebody

00:19:49.700 puts something

00:19:50.500 online and

00:19:51.280 somebody says

00:19:51.740 hey that

00:19:52.880 thing online

00:19:53.720 what about

00:19:54.280 that thing

00:19:54.740 online that

00:19:55.360 you did

00:19:55.820 you have

00:19:56.640 48 hours

00:19:57.440 to say

00:19:57.800 no no

00:19:58.140 no you're

00:19:58.460 taking it

00:19:58.800 wrong

00:19:58.980 it doesn't

00:20:00.360 mean that

00:20:00.840 it means

00:20:01.340 this

00:20:01.720 and we

00:20:02.540 you should

00:20:02.800 accept

00:20:03.260 the

00:20:03.620 clarification

00:20:04.280 because it

00:20:05.500 doesn't make

00:20:06.100 sense to

00:20:07.500 believe a

00:20:08.000 stranger's

00:20:08.680 opinion of

00:20:09.340 what your

00:20:09.720 opinion is

00:20:10.320 over me

00:20:11.120 telling you

00:20:11.520 my opinion

00:20:12.020 I'm the

00:20:13.260 only one who

00:20:13.780 should have

00:20:14.120 the right to

00:20:14.600 tell you

00:20:14.920 my opinion

00:20:15.740 how about

00:20:17.120 this one

00:20:17.560 no guilt

00:20:19.140 by digital

00:20:20.220 association

00:20:21.020 nobody can

00:20:24.280 be guilty

00:20:24.880 by digital

00:20:26.720 association

00:20:27.540 what I mean

00:20:28.700 by that is

00:20:29.280 if you

00:20:29.580 have a

00:20:29.900 photograph

00:20:30.320 standing

00:20:30.840 next to

00:20:31.300 the worst

00:20:31.660 person

00:20:32.060 in the

00:20:32.320 world

00:20:32.620 we just

00:20:34.520 ignore it

00:20:35.180 because

00:20:36.280 simply

00:20:36.880 standing

00:20:37.320 next to

00:20:37.880 or having

00:20:38.380 your photo

00:20:38.880 taken

00:20:39.240 with the

00:20:39.680 worst

00:20:39.900 person

00:20:40.260 in the

00:20:40.500 world

00:20:40.740 doesn't

00:20:41.860 make you

00:20:42.520 a bad

00:20:43.160 person

00:20:43.600 likewise

00:20:44.620 if you're

00:20:45.300 following

00:20:45.780 somebody

00:20:46.280 online

00:20:46.780 who is

00:20:47.100 a terrible

00:20:47.540 person

00:20:48.040 that doesn't

00:20:49.380 make you

00:20:50.080 a bad

00:20:50.880 person

00:20:51.300 if you

00:20:51.820 retweet

00:20:52.340 their content

00:20:53.060 that doesn't

00:20:54.260 make you

00:20:55.020 like the

00:20:56.220 person you

00:20:56.720 retweeted

00:20:57.400 we should

00:20:58.400 have a

00:20:58.760 complete

00:20:59.280 right

00:20:59.740 to not

00:21:00.860 be branded

00:21:01.500 by association

00:21:02.660 no matter

00:21:03.380 that association

00:21:04.280 so long

00:21:05.140 as it is

00:21:05.660 legal

00:21:06.320 how about

00:21:10.280 this one

00:21:10.720 this one

00:21:12.000 would be

00:21:12.180 really

00:21:12.420 controversial

00:21:13.060 and it's

00:21:14.160 and it

00:21:15.140 makes sense

00:21:15.620 today

00:21:16.000 how about

00:21:17.240 you cannot

00:21:17.920 be blamed

00:21:19.780 or lose

00:21:20.520 your job

00:21:21.000 for let's

00:21:21.520 say

00:21:21.700 anything

00:21:22.840 you said

00:21:23.540 under

00:21:24.400 an anonymous

00:21:25.300 context

00:21:27.820 if somebody

00:21:29.560 later

00:21:30.020 finds out

00:21:30.640 your real

00:21:31.340 identity

00:21:31.920 and you

00:21:33.280 would have

00:21:33.740 been in

00:21:34.180 trouble

00:21:34.420 for saying

00:21:35.020 that under

00:21:35.640 your real

00:21:36.380 identity

00:21:36.960 but you

00:21:38.520 didn't

00:21:39.080 you intentionally

00:21:40.480 said something

00:21:41.260 that you knew

00:21:41.800 would get you

00:21:42.260 in trouble

00:21:42.680 and you

00:21:43.540 did it

00:21:44.160 intentionally

00:21:45.100 anonymously

00:21:46.000 let's say

00:21:46.400 you used

00:21:46.720 an anonymous

00:21:47.220 account

00:21:47.720 but later

00:21:48.880 somebody

00:21:49.320 uncovered it

00:21:50.120 that can

00:21:51.140 never be

00:21:51.720 used

00:21:52.160 to penalize

00:21:53.360 you

00:21:53.560 in other

00:21:54.840 words

00:21:55.000 you can't

00:21:55.360 lose

00:21:55.560 your job

00:21:56.120 because you

00:21:56.800 said something

00:21:57.400 inappropriate

00:21:57.960 under an

00:21:58.880 alias

00:21:59.380 now I

00:22:00.200 suppose if

00:22:00.760 you're

00:22:00.940 threatening

00:22:01.240 somebody's

00:22:01.800 life or

00:22:02.280 it's a

00:22:02.540 crime

00:22:02.860 that's

00:22:03.180 different

00:22:03.520 so I'm

00:22:04.120 not talking

00:22:04.460 about a

00:22:04.740 crime

00:22:05.080 I'm talking

00:22:05.920 about really

00:22:06.520 unpleasant

00:22:07.100 things

00:22:08.580 and here's

00:22:09.740 the reasoning

00:22:10.180 for that

00:22:10.700 I believe

00:22:11.820 everybody says

00:22:12.780 things that

00:22:13.260 would get

00:22:13.560 them cancelled

00:22:14.200 privately

00:22:14.960 privately

00:22:16.680 everybody says

00:22:18.380 things that

00:22:18.840 would get

00:22:19.180 them cancelled

00:22:19.800 let me say

00:22:20.540 it again

00:22:20.920 privately

00:22:22.260 if you think

00:22:23.220 nobody's

00:22:23.660 listening

00:22:24.040 everybody says

00:22:25.880 things that

00:22:26.360 would get

00:22:26.700 them cancelled

00:22:27.260 I make it

00:22:29.100 an absolute

00:22:29.620 so you can

00:22:30.220 think

00:22:30.400 I'm sure

00:22:32.000 there's a

00:22:32.380 Puritan

00:22:32.700 somewhere

00:22:33.100 who doesn't

00:22:33.660 do that

00:22:34.100 okay

00:22:34.920 not everybody

00:22:35.980 but you

00:22:36.660 know what I

00:22:36.980 mean

00:22:37.160 it's just

00:22:38.300 not a

00:22:38.620 standard

00:22:38.940 that we

00:22:39.260 should have

00:22:39.600 in this

00:22:39.880 world

00:22:40.320 likewise

00:22:41.800 you should

00:22:42.380 not be

00:22:42.680 blamed

00:22:42.960 for any

00:22:43.560 digital

00:22:45.000 reproduction

00:22:45.760 of something

00:22:46.340 that happened

00:22:46.840 over 20

00:22:47.480 years ago

00:22:48.000 you could

00:22:48.500 argue about

00:22:49.240 the 20

00:22:50.100 year part

00:22:50.640 but I

00:22:52.480 think we

00:22:52.820 should just

00:22:53.260 ignore

00:22:53.720 that photo

00:22:54.880 from your

00:22:55.380 yearbook

00:22:55.940 that's

00:22:56.260 embarrassing

00:22:56.720 that

00:22:57.840 that

00:22:58.420 video

00:22:59.220 from 20

00:22:59.820 years ago

00:23:00.340 the audio

00:23:01.000 from 20

00:23:01.480 years ago

00:23:02.000 just if it's

00:23:02.920 20 years

00:23:03.400 ago

00:23:03.740 forget it

00:23:04.980 that's my

00:23:06.360 standard

00:23:06.820 likewise

00:23:08.620 you should

00:23:10.000 not be

00:23:10.400 cancelled

00:23:10.800 today for

00:23:11.460 something that

00:23:12.200 you did

00:23:12.820 in the

00:23:13.280 past

00:23:13.780 that would

00:23:14.760 not have

00:23:15.380 gotten you

00:23:16.100 cancelled

00:23:16.560 in the

00:23:17.160 past

00:23:17.640 so you

00:23:18.620 should

00:23:18.820 not be

00:23:19.280 punished

00:23:21.240 today

00:23:22.300 because of

00:23:23.720 something your

00:23:24.280 digital ghost

00:23:25.180 did

00:23:25.700 when I say

00:23:26.800 digital ghost

00:23:27.880 I mean

00:23:28.720 you don't

00:23:29.520 your past

00:23:30.220 doesn't exist

00:23:31.100 you exist

00:23:32.420 now

00:23:32.940 and you

00:23:33.780 probably will

00:23:34.460 exist in

00:23:34.960 the future

00:23:35.360 but your

00:23:36.380 past

00:23:37.000 doesn't

00:23:38.220 exist

00:23:38.960 like you

00:23:40.180 can't grab

00:23:40.800 a handful

00:23:41.300 of the

00:23:41.620 past

00:23:42.120 it's not

00:23:42.980 a thing

00:23:43.460 anymore

00:23:43.880 so

00:23:45.020 cancelling

00:23:46.920 somebody

00:23:47.340 for what

00:23:47.800 they did

00:23:48.280 in their

00:23:48.720 digital ghost

00:23:50.020 past

00:23:50.860 when they

00:23:51.780 didn't get

00:23:52.340 cancelled

00:23:52.720 in the

00:23:53.080 past

00:23:53.520 because in

00:23:54.500 those days

00:23:54.980 that wasn't

00:23:55.620 cancellable

00:23:56.440 that should

00:23:57.480 never

00:23:58.000 ever

00:23:59.100 cancel your

00:24:00.440 real life

00:24:01.080 body

00:24:01.540 that's living

00:24:02.240 today

00:24:02.720 because your

00:24:03.820 digital ghost

00:24:04.860 did something

00:24:05.980 that was fine

00:24:06.720 20 years ago

00:24:07.620 20 years ago

00:24:09.200 nobody raised

00:24:10.280 an eyebrow

00:24:10.660 about it

00:24:11.140 that doesn't

00:24:12.160 mean it's

00:24:12.480 right

00:24:12.860 it just means

00:24:13.640 you shouldn't

00:24:13.980 be cancelled

00:24:14.480 for something

00:24:15.060 that basically

00:24:15.680 a digital

00:24:16.820 ghost

00:24:17.340 did

00:24:17.800 or how

00:24:18.980 about this

00:24:19.440 you do

00:24:20.900 not need

00:24:21.320 to respond

00:24:21.840 this would

00:24:22.180 be more

00:24:22.480 like just

00:24:22.920 a standard

00:24:24.040 of behavior

00:24:24.800 you do

00:24:25.720 not need

00:24:26.120 to respond

00:24:26.640 to misrepresentations

00:24:28.160 of your opinion

00:24:28.900 online let's

00:24:29.840 say

00:24:30.000 you can simply

00:24:31.440 just note them

00:24:32.100 as misrepresentations

00:24:33.520 now

00:24:34.520 how useful

00:24:36.060 would that

00:24:36.500 be to you

00:24:37.040 it's kind

00:24:38.260 of useful

00:24:38.680 isn't it

00:24:39.380 because as soon

00:24:40.180 as you get

00:24:40.520 into a debate

00:24:41.320 about I

00:24:42.020 didn't say

00:24:42.440 that

00:24:42.760 yes you

00:24:43.380 did

00:24:43.720 I didn't

00:24:44.520 say that

00:24:44.960 well you

00:24:45.300 said this

00:24:45.640 other thing

00:24:46.160 I didn't

00:24:46.640 say that

00:24:47.120 you can

00:24:47.980 never really

00:24:48.540 win with

00:24:49.680 the people

00:24:50.060 who are

00:24:50.340 misrepresenting

00:24:51.140 you

00:24:51.320 you think

00:24:52.120 you can

00:24:52.660 because it

00:24:53.580 seems so

00:24:54.140 seductive

00:24:55.260 it's like

00:24:55.520 well you've

00:24:56.040 misrepresented me

00:24:57.040 watch me fix

00:24:58.420 this just by

00:24:59.720 putting up my

00:25:00.380 actual opinion

00:25:01.240 and then people

00:25:02.140 can see my

00:25:02.700 actual opinion

00:25:03.420 from me

00:25:04.000 they can see

00:25:05.080 how you

00:25:05.420 misrepresented me

00:25:06.500 and that I'm

00:25:07.400 all good

00:25:07.840 right

00:25:08.120 has never

00:25:09.380 worked in the

00:25:09.960 history of

00:25:10.460 humanity

00:25:11.860 it just

00:25:12.960 doesn't

00:25:13.320 work

00:25:13.700 you can't

00:25:14.600 make a

00:25:15.020 misinterpret

00:25:15.640 or stop

00:25:16.220 misinterpreting

00:25:16.980 they'll just

00:25:17.740 re-misinterpret

00:25:18.760 you

00:25:19.100 it's an

00:25:19.880 infinite loop

00:25:20.580 so instead

00:25:21.860 you should

00:25:22.700 just be able

00:25:23.140 to say

00:25:23.540 misrepresentation

00:25:24.720 move on

00:25:26.340 and anybody

00:25:27.180 who sees

00:25:27.620 that the

00:25:28.320 person that

00:25:29.040 they're talking

00:25:29.500 about

00:25:29.840 has labeled

00:25:30.940 it misrepresentation

00:25:32.360 can say

00:25:33.220 ah well I

00:25:34.100 don't know

00:25:34.300 what the real

00:25:34.680 story is here

00:25:35.420 but

00:25:35.680 obviously not

00:25:37.840 true

00:25:38.120 now again

00:25:39.860 that would

00:25:40.140 have lots

00:25:40.780 of negative

00:25:41.420 potential

00:25:42.680 you know

00:25:43.380 abuse

00:25:43.840 possibilities

00:25:45.160 but

00:25:45.580 we'll just

00:25:46.660 put these

00:25:47.040 out here

00:25:47.420 um how

00:25:48.820 about

00:25:49.200 no single

00:25:50.880 source

00:25:51.280 reporting

00:25:51.920 now this

00:25:53.360 is more

00:25:53.660 reporting

00:25:54.260 than

00:25:54.680 digital

00:25:55.600 bill of

00:25:56.000 rights

00:25:56.320 but it

00:25:57.200 feels

00:25:57.440 similar

00:25:57.820 because

00:25:58.160 it's

00:25:58.320 always

00:25:58.500 reported

00:25:58.980 digitally

00:25:59.480 you know

00:26:00.320 something

00:26:00.600 will appear

00:26:01.280 on my

00:26:01.640 phone

00:26:01.980 it'll be

00:26:02.480 somebody

00:26:03.600 who hasn't

00:26:04.280 given their

00:26:04.800 name

00:26:05.120 a single

00:26:05.660 source

00:26:06.140 says the

00:26:07.120 president

00:26:07.520 is punching

00:26:09.300 people in

00:26:10.080 the oval

00:26:10.460 office

00:26:10.940 you should

00:26:12.140 just

00:26:12.460 not be

00:26:13.780 able to

00:26:14.120 report

00:26:14.460 that

00:26:14.780 it just

00:26:15.800 shouldn't

00:26:16.080 be allowed

00:26:16.640 or

00:26:17.480 or it

00:26:18.180 should be

00:26:18.560 labeled

00:26:19.040 maybe

00:26:19.540 self

00:26:19.960 labeled

00:26:20.340 you should

00:26:21.360 be able

00:26:21.640 to

00:26:21.900 maybe

00:26:22.340 you can

00:26:22.720 report

00:26:23.140 it

00:26:23.360 because

00:26:23.680 freedom

00:26:24.060 of

00:26:24.200 speech

00:26:24.440 right

00:26:24.720 so you

00:26:25.380 can

00:26:25.520 report

00:26:25.880 it

00:26:26.200 but you

00:26:26.760 should

00:26:26.900 have

00:26:27.060 to

00:26:27.220 self

00:26:27.560 label

00:26:27.880 it

00:26:28.120 highly

00:26:28.880 non

00:26:29.360 credible

00:26:29.740 information

00:26:30.400 so

00:26:31.460 anytime

00:26:31.740 you see

00:26:32.200 a single

00:26:32.740 source

00:26:33.300 report

00:26:34.420 it always

00:26:35.240 needs

00:26:35.480 to be

00:26:35.760 flagged

00:26:36.700 no matter

00:26:37.160 where

00:26:37.380 it is

00:26:37.860 as

00:26:38.320 highly

00:26:39.160 not

00:26:39.940 credible

00:26:40.580 information

00:26:41.400 wouldn't

00:26:42.120 that help

00:26:42.580 as a

00:26:44.300 let's say

00:26:45.160 you're a

00:26:45.600 20 something

00:26:46.340 year old

00:26:47.500 consumer

00:26:47.960 you haven't

00:26:49.060 seen how

00:26:49.520 fake the

00:26:50.060 news is

00:26:50.520 yet

00:26:50.720 you still

00:26:51.160 believe

00:26:51.500 that it

00:26:51.800 might be

00:26:52.120 true

00:26:52.420 wouldn't

00:26:53.220 it help

00:26:53.600 you

00:26:53.800 to see

00:26:54.460 that

00:26:54.640 little

00:26:54.840 label

00:26:55.180 highly

00:26:56.420 non

00:26:57.040 credible

00:26:57.420 information

00:26:58.140 still run

00:26:59.360 the story

00:26:59.860 but just

00:27:00.920 label it

00:27:01.340 non

00:27:01.580 credible

00:27:01.940 how about

00:27:05.080 this

00:27:05.360 rule

00:27:05.920 any

00:27:06.800 corrections

00:27:07.600 to news

00:27:08.600 reports

00:27:09.040 have to

00:27:09.440 be as

00:27:09.740 prominent

00:27:10.260 as the

00:27:10.860 original

00:27:11.280 story

00:27:11.800 now it

00:27:12.980 would be

00:27:13.160 hard to

00:27:13.540 do

00:27:13.740 right

00:27:14.020 but what

00:27:14.480 I'm

00:27:14.600 talking

00:27:14.840 about

00:27:15.080 is

00:27:15.320 if

00:27:16.040 there's

00:27:16.280 a

00:27:16.460 fake

00:27:16.740 news

00:27:17.100 story

00:27:17.520 it'll

00:27:17.880 get

00:27:18.160 let's

00:27:18.900 say

00:27:19.060 30

00:27:19.520 million

00:27:19.860 clicks

00:27:20.440 when

00:27:21.580 the

00:27:21.780 correction

00:27:22.160 runs

00:27:22.620 and says

00:27:23.060 that was

00:27:23.940 all

00:27:24.120 fake

00:27:24.420 we just

00:27:25.200 found out

00:27:25.600 none

00:27:25.800 of it

00:27:26.020 was

00:27:26.180 real

00:27:26.400 the

00:27:27.060 correction

00:27:27.440 will

00:27:27.700 get

00:27:27.880 10,000

00:27:28.620 likes

00:27:29.520 or eyeballs

00:27:30.560 so the

00:27:31.760 correction

00:27:32.100 is always

00:27:32.520 tiny

00:27:32.960 compared to

00:27:33.560 the fake

00:27:33.960 news

00:27:34.380 so could

00:27:35.300 there be

00:27:35.700 a

00:27:36.060 digital

00:27:36.440 bill

00:27:36.720 of

00:27:36.920 rights

00:27:37.220 that says

00:27:37.800 the correction

00:27:38.780 has to

00:27:39.200 at least

00:27:39.540 be

00:27:39.760 attempted

00:27:40.260 a serious

00:27:41.680 attempt

00:27:42.160 to make

00:27:43.060 it as

00:27:43.360 prominent

00:27:43.900 as the

00:27:44.620 original

00:27:45.000 story

00:27:45.480 now what

00:27:46.700 that looks

00:27:47.120 like is

00:27:47.540 pretty

00:27:47.760 subjective

00:27:48.340 but let's

00:27:48.860 say

00:27:49.080 if it

00:27:49.800 was a

00:27:50.120 headline

00:27:50.440 story

00:27:51.060 that

00:27:51.880 something

00:27:52.160 was

00:27:52.400 true

00:27:52.700 the only

00:27:53.180 way you

00:27:53.520 could

00:27:53.680 correct

00:27:54.080 it

00:27:54.360 would be

00:27:55.300 with

00:27:55.520 another

00:27:55.900 primetime

00:27:56.620 headline

00:27:57.140 story

00:27:57.660 now maybe

00:27:58.500 you don't

00:27:58.840 have to

00:27:59.160 do

00:27:59.400 10

00:28:00.140 headlines

00:28:00.600 even

00:28:01.000 though

00:28:01.220 the

00:28:01.460 original

00:28:01.820 story

00:28:02.140 had 10

00:28:02.560 headlines

00:28:03.020 but at

00:28:04.020 least it's

00:28:04.380 comparable

00:28:04.900 it's a

00:28:05.520 headline

00:28:05.920 correction

00:28:06.360 to a

00:28:06.820 headline

00:28:07.080 story

00:28:07.600 and maybe

00:28:09.140 if you run

00:28:09.740 it as a

00:28:10.200 tweet

00:28:10.480 you have to

00:28:11.120 pin it

00:28:11.600 until it gets

00:28:12.220 enough

00:28:12.540 clicks

00:28:13.500 you can imagine

00:28:15.120 a number of

00:28:15.760 ways that you

00:28:16.400 could get

00:28:17.560 closer to that

00:28:18.360 standard

00:28:18.800 and by the way

00:28:19.480 I'm not kidding

00:28:20.160 myself that any of

00:28:21.200 these would be

00:28:21.640 easy to enforce

00:28:22.640 or that they

00:28:23.400 wouldn't have

00:28:23.840 any negative

00:28:25.020 consequences

00:28:25.780 I'm just putting

00:28:26.500 it out there

00:28:26.900 that something

00:28:27.600 like this

00:28:28.340 should be

00:28:29.320 considered

00:28:29.800 how about

00:28:30.940 this

00:28:31.300 if you

00:28:33.540 try to

00:28:34.000 organize a

00:28:34.600 boycott

00:28:35.080 against any

00:28:35.740 company

00:28:36.140 your own

00:28:37.940 identity

00:28:38.500 and where

00:28:39.380 you work

00:28:40.140 must be

00:28:41.720 public

00:28:42.200 so even

00:28:43.720 if you're

00:28:44.060 on twitter

00:28:44.420 and you

00:28:44.720 say

00:28:44.880 boycott

00:28:45.840 that

00:28:46.600 Goya

00:28:47.020 food

00:28:47.380 company

00:28:47.800 even if

00:28:49.060 you're just

00:28:49.420 a twitter

00:28:49.960 user

00:28:50.360 the only

00:28:51.520 way you

00:28:51.900 can do

00:28:52.220 that

00:28:52.540 is if

00:28:52.980 someone

00:28:53.260 else

00:28:53.520 has access

00:28:54.100 to know

00:28:54.540 where you

00:28:55.040 work

00:28:55.460 for mutual

00:28:56.840 assured

00:28:57.260 destruction

00:28:57.800 I'd also

00:28:59.120 like to

00:28:59.480 know where

00:28:59.960 you work

00:29:00.320 in the

00:29:00.520 future

00:29:00.820 same

00:29:02.100 reason

00:29:02.440 I don't

00:29:04.080 think that

00:29:04.480 people who

00:29:04.940 call for

00:29:05.360 boycotts

00:29:06.240 against

00:29:06.720 American

00:29:07.240 companies

00:29:07.960 should have

00:29:09.160 the advantage

00:29:10.660 of privacy

00:29:11.500 when the

00:29:12.940 target

00:29:13.380 does not

00:29:14.400 and the

00:29:15.620 privacy is

00:29:16.180 not just

00:29:16.720 who your

00:29:17.120 identity

00:29:17.540 is

00:29:17.820 because

00:29:17.980 lots of

00:29:18.300 times

00:29:18.480 you do

00:29:18.820 know

00:29:19.000 the

00:29:19.180 identity

00:29:19.560 of the

00:29:20.020 person

00:29:20.360 online

00:29:20.960 but you

00:29:21.860 don't

00:29:22.020 necessarily

00:29:22.540 know

00:29:22.840 where

00:29:23.020 they

00:29:23.160 work

00:29:23.560 I want

00:29:24.960 to know

00:29:25.160 where

00:29:25.300 they

00:29:25.460 work

00:29:25.860 who is

00:29:27.200 paying

00:29:27.600 somebody

00:29:28.100 who is

00:29:28.520 working

00:29:29.540 to destroy

00:29:30.320 another

00:29:30.640 company

00:29:31.080 I was

00:29:32.200 reading

00:29:32.480 there's

00:29:33.680 some

00:29:33.820 kind

00:29:34.060 of

00:29:34.200 disagreement

00:29:35.780 between

00:29:36.560 the

00:29:36.820 founders

00:29:37.320 or

00:29:37.620 co-founders

00:29:38.300 of

00:29:38.620 Sleeping

00:29:39.120 Giants

00:29:39.720 have you

00:29:40.000 ever heard

00:29:40.240 of them

00:29:40.480 so it's

00:29:41.540 sort of

00:29:41.800 an activist

00:29:42.420 group

00:29:42.940 it's

00:29:43.540 very small

00:29:44.200 mostly two

00:29:45.260 people I

00:29:45.720 guess

00:29:45.900 and

00:29:46.960 they would

00:29:48.180 go to

00:29:48.460 advertisers

00:29:48.980 and say

00:29:49.480 hey

00:29:49.760 you're

00:29:50.060 advertising

00:29:50.500 on a

00:29:50.860 bad

00:29:51.080 place

00:29:51.480 so they

00:29:52.280 try to

00:29:52.580 get rid

00:29:52.880 of the

00:29:53.060 advertisements

00:29:53.560 for

00:29:54.000 Tucker

00:29:54.800 Carlson

00:29:55.260 show

00:29:55.680 I think

00:29:56.460 they

00:29:56.660 succeeded

00:29:57.160 in getting

00:29:57.580 rid of

00:29:57.880 a lot

00:29:58.120 of the

00:29:58.320 ads

00:29:58.620 on

00:29:58.800 Breitbart

00:29:59.340 so they're

00:30:00.440 basically

00:30:00.840 a company

00:30:01.580 or a

00:30:02.500 group

00:30:02.860 that exists

00:30:04.220 to put

00:30:04.620 other groups

00:30:05.240 out of

00:30:05.500 business

00:30:05.900 and I'm

00:30:07.320 thinking

00:30:07.660 I don't

00:30:08.860 know

00:30:09.120 I feel

00:30:10.260 like we

00:30:10.660 should know

00:30:11.340 who's putting

00:30:12.380 companies out

00:30:13.100 of business

00:30:13.620 something you

00:30:15.140 ought to know

00:30:15.580 for boycott

00:30:16.240 at least in

00:30:16.860 the boycott

00:30:17.320 sense

00:30:17.680 all right

00:30:19.000 how about

00:30:20.300 this

00:30:20.640 it should be

00:30:22.040 illegal to

00:30:22.700 show a video

00:30:23.360 if you're

00:30:23.960 let's say

00:30:24.820 if you're a

00:30:25.480 news organization

00:30:26.420 not an

00:30:26.900 individual

00:30:27.340 but if

00:30:28.160 you're a

00:30:28.420 news organization

00:30:29.200 it should

00:30:29.580 be illegal

00:30:30.200 to show

00:30:30.600 a video

00:30:31.000 that's

00:30:32.340 edited to

00:30:33.040 change its

00:30:33.600 context

00:30:34.220 or meaning

00:30:35.000 in other

00:30:36.480 words

00:30:36.880 if you

00:30:37.980 showed the

00:30:38.760 Charlottesville

00:30:40.320 fine people

00:30:41.080 speech of the

00:30:41.700 president

00:30:42.080 but you only

00:30:43.480 showed the

00:30:43.940 part before

00:30:44.920 he clarified

00:30:45.620 that he

00:30:46.040 wasn't talking

00:30:46.600 about the

00:30:46.940 neo-nazis

00:30:47.640 which he did

00:30:49.400 in the second

00:30:49.900 part of his

00:30:50.360 statement

00:30:50.640 because he

00:30:51.440 wanted to

00:30:51.740 make sure

00:30:52.040 nobody would

00:30:52.680 misconstrue him

00:30:53.540 and think

00:30:53.860 he was

00:30:54.140 saying

00:30:54.400 that the

00:30:55.200 neo-nazis

00:30:55.880 were fine

00:30:56.380 people

00:30:56.720 so he

00:30:57.280 clarified

00:30:57.740 directly

00:30:58.200 no I'm

00:30:58.540 not talking

00:30:58.940 about the

00:30:59.340 neo-nazis

00:31:01.160 I'm talking

00:31:01.960 about other

00:31:02.840 people

00:31:03.160 so that would

00:31:04.860 just be

00:31:05.200 illegal in

00:31:06.120 the future

00:31:06.520 because the

00:31:07.760 news organizations

00:31:08.560 would certainly

00:31:09.240 be aware of

00:31:10.080 what they're

00:31:10.380 doing

00:31:10.680 you know

00:31:11.460 if you think

00:31:12.080 if you think

00:31:12.900 CNN doesn't

00:31:13.780 know that

00:31:15.020 they're showing

00:31:15.580 fake video

00:31:16.460 when they cut

00:31:17.040 off the

00:31:17.380 second part

00:31:17.980 oh they

00:31:18.980 know

00:31:19.400 trust me

00:31:21.300 they know

00:31:22.380 so

00:31:23.420 just be

00:31:24.900 a crime

00:31:25.820 alright so

00:31:26.740 those are some

00:31:27.300 of the things

00:31:27.620 I've put out

00:31:28.120 there

00:31:28.360 I think the

00:31:29.980 larger point

00:31:30.600 is that we

00:31:31.120 probably do

00:31:31.720 need some

00:31:32.360 kind of a

00:31:33.080 bill of

00:31:33.640 rights

00:31:34.000 or almost

00:31:35.840 like a

00:31:36.300 ten commandments

00:31:37.060 you know the

00:31:37.680 ten commandments

00:31:38.300 are not

00:31:38.740 necessarily tied

00:31:39.640 to actual

00:31:40.100 laws

00:31:40.700 some of them

00:31:41.720 are

00:31:42.020 shall not

00:31:43.060 murder for

00:31:43.560 example

00:31:43.900 but you

00:31:44.960 could have

00:31:45.320 a rule

00:31:46.400 of etiquette

00:31:47.120 ten commandments

00:31:48.300 a bill of

00:31:49.080 rights

00:31:49.540 some kind

00:31:50.920 of a structure

00:31:51.520 that says

00:31:52.020 alright alright

00:31:52.640 the world

00:31:53.840 is a different

00:31:54.420 place

00:31:54.860 we have to

00:31:56.080 deal with

00:31:56.540 cancel culture

00:31:57.400 and rumors

00:31:58.280 and fake

00:31:58.960 videos

00:31:59.400 and all

00:32:00.620 that

00:32:00.980 let's just

00:32:01.520 come up

00:32:01.900 with a new

00:32:02.240 set of

00:32:02.520 rules

00:32:02.780 alright

00:32:03.680 so

00:32:05.420 I'm just

00:32:06.320 looking at

00:32:06.760 your comments

00:32:07.920 on this

00:32:08.400 I see some

00:32:09.040 of you

00:32:09.280 like them

00:32:09.740 I think

00:32:10.800 you're

00:32:11.020 perfectly

00:32:11.460 right

00:32:12.020 to imagine

00:32:14.300 that

00:32:16.100 all

00:32:16.780 almost

00:32:17.380 everything

00:32:17.760 I mentioned

00:32:18.160 would be

00:32:18.720 problematic

00:32:19.420 you know

00:32:20.800 you'd have

00:32:21.140 to really

00:32:21.420 work through

00:32:21.820 the details

00:32:22.340 most of

00:32:22.900 them probably

00:32:23.240 wouldn't work

00:32:24.000 but some

00:32:24.560 of them

00:32:24.780 might

00:32:24.980 somebody

00:32:30.380 says

00:32:30.840 potato

00:32:31.480 stelter

00:32:32.040 would just

00:32:32.460 say he

00:32:32.780 didn't

00:32:33.060 realize

00:32:33.580 it was

00:32:34.040 edited

00:32:34.480 well I

00:32:35.480 think it

00:32:35.820 would be

00:32:36.080 enough

00:32:36.360 if the

00:32:36.800 law

00:32:37.020 required

00:32:37.560 you to

00:32:37.960 run

00:32:38.180 the

00:32:38.520 fully

00:32:39.340 edited

00:32:39.800 one

00:32:40.160 and

00:32:40.620 make

00:32:41.000 the

00:32:41.200 correction

00:32:41.620 so

00:32:42.680 I

00:32:42.880 don't

00:32:43.120 when I

00:32:43.640 say

00:32:43.840 that

00:32:44.060 something

00:32:44.320 should

00:32:44.620 be

00:32:44.880 illegal

00:32:45.480 in the

00:32:46.040 context

00:32:46.440 of this

00:32:46.960 proposed

00:32:47.700 digital

00:32:48.460 bill

00:32:48.740 of

00:32:48.920 rights

00:32:49.200 I

00:32:49.840 don't

00:32:50.040 mean

00:32:50.240 illegal

00:32:50.620 like

00:32:50.920 you

00:32:51.040 go

00:32:51.220 to

00:32:51.380 jail

00:32:51.680 because

00:32:52.680 most

00:32:52.940 of

00:32:53.080 these

00:32:53.200 don't

00:32:53.500 seem

00:32:53.780 like

00:32:53.980 go to

00:32:54.360 jail

00:32:54.560 kinds

00:32:54.880 of

00:32:55.000 problems

00:32:55.380 I

00:32:55.920 mean

00:32:56.120 illegal

00:32:56.540 as in

00:32:57.040 you need

00:32:57.520 to fix

00:32:57.980 it

00:32:58.220 so

00:32:59.340 if you

00:32:59.820 had

00:33:00.040 let's

00:33:00.860 say

00:33:01.120 you would

00:33:01.820 illegally

00:33:02.300 run

00:33:02.640 a

00:33:02.780 video

00:33:03.100 that

00:33:03.440 was

00:33:03.600 edited

00:33:03.960 to

00:33:04.260 change

00:33:04.640 its

00:33:04.840 context

00:33:05.420 the

00:33:06.340 law

00:33:06.640 would

00:33:06.860 require

00:33:07.260 that

00:33:07.500 you

00:33:07.760 run

00:33:08.600 it

00:33:08.780 in

00:33:08.920 the

00:33:09.060 same

00:33:09.300 time

00:33:09.620 space

00:33:10.100 you know

00:33:10.880 and

00:33:11.480 correct

00:33:11.840 it

00:33:15.480 enough

00:33:15.760 all

00:33:16.880 right

00:33:17.040 that

00:33:18.100 is

00:33:19.140 about

00:33:19.380 what

00:33:19.580 I

00:33:19.680 have

00:33:19.860 today

00:33:20.220 I've

00:33:21.780 got

00:33:21.940 some

00:33:22.140 things

00:33:22.420 I

00:33:22.580 need

00:33:22.760 to

00:33:22.900 do

00:33:23.060 today

00:33:23.420 oh

00:33:26.100 wow

00:33:26.400 thank

00:33:28.720 you

00:33:28.860 for

00:33:29.040 liking

00:33:29.300 my

00:33:29.560 broadcast

00:33:30.120 and

00:33:32.060 all

00:33:32.300 of

00:33:32.440 you

00:33:32.720 I

00:33:33.500 think

00:33:33.880 it's

00:33:34.060 hilarious

00:33:34.440 and

00:33:34.900 wonderful

00:33:35.360 that

00:33:35.840 the

00:33:36.160 conservative

00:33:36.960 Trump

00:33:38.360 supporting

00:33:38.820 public

00:33:39.280 is also

00:33:40.100 rallying

00:33:40.720 around

00:33:40.960 the

00:33:41.160 CEO

00:33:41.540 of

00:33:41.920 Goya

00:33:42.220 Foods

00:33:42.660 just

00:33:43.840 to

00:33:44.320 protect

00:33:44.700 his

00:33:44.960 freedom

00:33:45.280 of

00:33:45.460 speech

00:33:45.720 basically

00:33:46.220 protect

00:33:47.180 his

00:33:47.460 freedom

00:33:47.720 of

00:33:47.880 speech

00:33:48.140 as

00:33:48.340 well

00:33:48.780 as

00:33:48.940 our

00:33:49.080 own

00:33:49.320 so

00:33:50.120 buy

00:33:50.380 some

00:33:50.600 Goya

00:33:50.860 foods

00:33:51.420 buy

00:33:53.480 twice

00:33:53.800 as

00:33:53.980 much

00:33:54.260 and

00:33:56.060 somebody

00:33:58.440 says

00:33:58.760 66%

00:33:59.840 of

00:34:00.040 COVID

00:34:00.420 deaths

00:34:00.860 are

00:34:01.120 black

00:34:01.420 people

00:34:01.760 I

00:34:02.940 don't

00:34:03.100 think

00:34:03.280 that's

00:34:03.720 true

00:34:04.940 I

00:34:06.700 would

00:34:06.900 do

00:34:07.180 a

00:34:07.340 fact

00:34:07.560 check

00:34:07.800 on

00:34:07.960 that

00:34:08.220 oh

00:34:10.420 yeah

00:34:10.660 oh

00:34:10.960 one

00:34:11.660 other

00:34:11.860 thing

00:34:12.220 I'm

00:34:13.220 going

00:34:13.320 to

00:34:13.380 get

00:34:13.520 married

00:34:13.800 in

00:34:14.000 a

00:34:14.100 few

00:34:14.240 hours

00:34:14.660 so

00:34:15.820 I

00:34:15.940 thought

00:34:16.080 you

00:34:16.200 might

00:34:16.380 like

00:34:16.720 to

00:34:16.840 know

00:34:17.000 that

00:34:17.260 now

00:34:18.220 I

00:34:18.460 won't

00:34:18.620 be

00:34:18.760 giving

00:34:18.940 you

00:34:19.160 details

00:34:19.720 on

00:34:19.920 that

00:34:20.160 but

00:34:20.440 you

00:34:20.680 should

00:34:20.960 obviously

00:34:22.020 it

00:34:22.320 will

00:34:22.480 be

00:34:22.840 very

00:34:24.180 very

00:34:24.480 small

00:34:24.960 so

00:34:27.120 it'll

00:34:27.280 be

00:34:27.440 the

00:34:27.660 world's

00:34:28.680 smallest

00:34:29.800 wedding

00:34:30.240 so

00:34:31.880 we'll

00:34:32.240 have

00:34:32.360 the

00:34:32.480 world's

00:34:32.800 smallest

00:34:33.240 safest

00:34:33.780 wedding

00:34:34.240 I

00:34:35.340 don't

00:34:35.500 think

00:34:35.700 you'll

00:34:35.860 see

00:34:36.000 pictures

00:34:36.360 of

00:34:36.600 it

00:34:36.800 but

00:34:37.660 we'll

00:34:38.100 do

00:34:38.260 that

00:34:38.460 tonight

00:34:38.780 now

00:34:39.440 I

00:34:40.820 should

00:34:41.220 tell

00:34:41.440 you

00:34:41.600 that

00:34:41.880 getting

00:34:42.700 married

00:34:43.100 in the

00:34:43.520 age

00:34:43.740 of

00:34:43.900 coronavirus

00:34:44.460 is

00:34:45.380 really

00:34:45.800 really

00:34:46.060 hard

00:34:46.460 originally

00:34:47.340 it was

00:34:47.620 going

00:34:47.760 to

00:34:47.800 be

00:34:47.920 in

00:34:48.060 May

00:34:48.500 and

00:34:48.740 we

00:34:48.860 said

00:34:49.040 how

00:34:49.460 about

00:34:49.700 June

00:34:50.140 and

00:34:50.580 a

00:34:51.560 couple

00:34:51.720 of

00:34:51.840 different

00:34:52.060 dates

00:34:52.320 in

00:34:52.520 July

00:34:52.880 but

00:34:53.960 we

00:34:54.100 decided

00:34:54.500 on

00:34:54.840 today

00:34:55.600 on

00:34:56.600 June

00:34:57.840 11th

00:34:58.400 because

00:34:58.660 7-11

00:34:59.300 is

00:35:00.720 sort

00:35:00.920 of

00:35:01.040 convenience

00:35:01.600 if you

00:35:02.240 think

00:35:02.420 about

00:35:02.640 it

00:35:03.160 the

00:35:05.120 Wayfair

00:35:05.580 story

00:35:05.960 doesn't

00:35:06.320 interest

00:35:06.640 me

00:35:06.820 there's

00:35:07.060 some

00:35:07.220 fake

00:35:07.520 news

00:35:07.760 about

00:35:08.000 Wayfair

00:35:08.520 that

00:35:09.420 is

00:35:09.680 just

00:35:09.880 fake

00:35:10.120 news

00:35:10.520 so

00:35:12.040 yes

00:35:12.460 we'll

00:35:12.680 be

00:35:13.020 getting

00:35:13.660 married

00:35:14.000 later

00:35:14.940 today

00:35:15.360 I won't

00:35:17.000 tell you

00:35:17.260 the exact

00:35:17.640 time

00:35:18.020 but it'll

00:35:18.920 be

00:35:19.060 really

00:35:19.700 really

00:35:19.980 small

00:35:20.440 the

00:35:21.400 smallest

00:35:21.840 wedding

00:35:22.260 you

00:35:23.120 could

00:35:23.280 ever

00:35:23.480 imagine

00:35:23.920 and

00:35:24.940 very

00:35:25.140 safe

00:35:25.500 so

00:35:25.840 we'll

00:35:26.000 play

00:35:26.180 it

00:35:26.320 safe

00:35:26.600 all

00:35:27.000 right

00:35:27.160 that's

00:35:28.080 all

00:35:28.240 for

00:35:28.420 now

00:35:28.820 and

00:35:29.840 thank

00:35:30.380 you

00:35:30.580 those

00:35:30.940 who

00:35:31.100 are

00:35:31.320 congratulating

00:35:32.300 me

00:35:32.520 by the

00:35:33.140 way

00:35:33.280 we

00:35:33.480 Christina

00:35:34.120 and I

00:35:34.520 have

00:35:34.760 been

00:35:34.920 together

00:35:35.260 for

00:35:35.760 four

00:35:36.160 years

00:35:36.580 and

00:35:37.240 we

00:35:38.100 do

00:35:38.260 have

00:35:38.440 a

00:35:38.580 pretty

00:35:38.760 good

00:35:38.980 idea

00:35:39.340 that

00:35:39.580 it

00:35:39.700 works

00:35:40.100 so

00:35:40.600 in

00:35:41.100 case you

00:35:41.120 worry

00:35:41.420 somebody

00:35:45.120 somebody's

00:35:45.680 questioning

00:35:46.040 my

00:35:46.360 v-neck

00:35:47.220 here's

00:35:49.040 the rule

00:35:49.620 v-neck

00:35:51.200 sweater

00:35:51.800 means

00:35:52.960 your

00:35:53.300 wife

00:35:55.280 or your

00:35:55.740 girlfriend

00:35:56.140 bought it

00:35:56.600 for you

00:35:57.260 v-neck

00:35:58.420 t-shirt

00:35:59.140 that's just

00:36:00.300 a different

00:36:00.640 thing

00:36:00.940 I don't

00:36:02.620 think

00:36:02.800 v-necks 0.94

00:36:03.240 are in

00:36:03.500 anymore

00:36:03.800 but I

00:36:04.080 still have

00:36:04.440 a few

00:36:04.720 of them

00:36:04.920 in my

00:36:05.240 closet

00:36:05.500 so

00:36:05.820 that's

00:36:06.080 enough

00:36:06.220 for now

00:36:06.560 and I

00:36:08.180 will talk

00:36:08.600 to you

00:36:09.040 later

00:36:10.480 to

00:36:25.020 you

00:36:25.260 you

00:36:25.340 you

00:36:27.260 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 11, 2020

Episode 1054 Scott Adams： I Unveil my Digital Bill of Rights, Talk About Roger Stone, Mock AOC, China Threat and More

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript