Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1078 Scott Adams： Defund the Police a Smart Way, Fauci Misdirection, How to do a Convention, HCQ

00:00:00.000 Bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum. 0.98

00:00:11.740 Well, I was asked the other day, why do I always do this three times?

00:00:19.320 And it's because I do this first on live stream.

00:00:22.700 A lot of people will see it in replay.

00:00:24.020 But those of you on live stream will feel a sense of,

00:00:28.040 It's almost like on your computer when you're watching a progress, you know, the little progress monitor.

00:00:34.800 Don't you feel better when you can see progress that your computer program is working?

00:00:40.520 Well, that's what this is.

00:00:41.940 I do this at the same routine so that as soon as you get on, you say to yourself,

00:00:47.560 oh, I got in about the paper shuffling time or he's taking a simultaneous sip.

00:00:54.900 Speaking of which, I've got a special guest in a moment.

00:00:58.620 But first, first, it's a simultaneous sip.

00:01:02.260 And it's the thing you do before a great day happens.

00:01:06.160 And today is going to be a great day.

00:01:09.620 You don't know it yet, and maybe not for everybody, but it's going to be a great day.

00:01:15.860 And all you need to get this day going is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein,

00:01:21.100 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:26.800 I like coffee.

00:01:29.100 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,

00:01:33.020 the thing that makes everything better.

00:01:35.580 Traffic, pandemics, fleas, you name it, everything.

00:01:40.760 Go.

00:01:40.940 Go.

00:01:41.000 Sublime.

00:01:48.860 Now, if technology serves me, we'll have a quick guest here,

00:01:55.580 and it looks like this is going to work.

00:01:57.340 So, very excited.

00:01:59.120 It's always fun when it works.

00:02:04.200 David Middleband, are you there?

00:02:07.640 From Othram. 0.75

00:02:09.420 Now, those of you who have been watching my Periscopes, you are familiar.

00:02:14.600 I think you've heard of Othram, O-T-H-R-A-M. 1.00

00:02:17.940 And can you explain what Othram does for those who haven't heard?

00:02:21.080 Just a quick summary of what the company does.

00:02:23.380 Yeah, what we do at Othram is we're a forensics laboratory that develops identities for people

00:02:31.640 that are either victims or perpetrators of crimes.

00:02:35.160 And we can analyze a crime scene sample, look at the DNA, figure out who is involved in the crime,

00:02:41.000 even if they're not in the FBI CODIS system or the traditional forensic database.

00:02:47.380 So, the basic idea is that the regular police have a database of people who have been arrested or convicted.

00:02:57.460 Generally, you end up in the CODIS system if you've been convicted.

00:03:00.920 And, you know, it varies from state to state.

00:03:04.000 Sometimes you're convicted, but you still don't make it into the database.

00:03:07.600 And sometimes there's ways to get the database upon arrest.

00:03:11.720 So, the police have this very small, limited database.

00:03:15.520 And if they get lucky, they get some DNA at a crime scene.

00:03:19.380 And by chance, it's somebody who already committed a crime, already was convicted,

00:03:24.500 and they had their DNA, and they got in the database, and they checked it.

00:03:29.460 But with your company, you have a broader net.

00:03:34.120 And describe just as quickly why you can get more DNA samples than the police.

00:03:39.580 Why do you have access to more stuff?

00:03:42.260 We use a different process.

00:03:43.780 The police, as you noted, the FBI system indexes you on a few markers and then tracks folks that commit repeat crime.

00:03:52.560 What we're able to do is we're able to get all the genomic information from a crime scene sample and then use that to do related testing

00:03:59.640 and look even for distant relatives that might be connected to help us figure out where the unknown person might fit on the family tree.

00:04:07.180 So, you can imagine that even the smallest scrap of information can be useful in finding someone that is even remotely connected to you.

00:04:14.620 And any of those relationships can help us essentially triangulate or reverse engineer an identity, or at least a nearest relative.

00:04:21.640 All right.

00:04:21.820 Now, let me tie this into the headlines to make this relevant to all of you.

00:04:26.060 The big conversation in the news is defunding the police.

00:04:29.620 And that sounds crazy, right?

00:04:31.240 Who wants less police when you have just as much crime?

00:04:34.300 But I think that actually there is a smart way to do it.

00:04:38.840 And the smart way to do it is to create situations in which getting away with a crime is effectively impossible.

00:04:47.140 So, as you drive toward it's impossible to get away with it, in theory, the number of people who try a crime that they know they'll get caught for should go down,

00:04:57.820 and therefore the number of police you need should go down.

00:05:00.680 So, this is one of – there are probably a dozen technologies in private companies that police do not have direct access to,

00:05:07.720 everything from facial recognition to drone things and now DNA technologies.

00:05:13.980 But there are a number of technologies that could drive the ability to get away with a crime really close to zero.

00:05:21.580 And I don't think you'd have to get all the way to Big Brother.

00:05:24.180 I see some comments saying that.

00:05:25.900 And this is relevant because in the news, Ivanka Trump is spearheading a – I guess an effort to try to solve a bunch of cold cases specifically for the Native American community and the Alaskan Natives

00:05:41.900 because I guess it's an underserved community and they have all these DNA and cold case samples that they can't solve.

00:05:49.760 So, how many of these cold cases in the sense of – if they have some DNA from the case – what percentage of all these cases that Ivanka is targeting to get some resolution to,

00:06:04.680 what percentage of those do you think Othram could solve if you were brought into this?

00:06:09.360 I think that on the upfront side, you would probably solve, you know, somewhere close to 75 percent and then it will converge very closely on over 90 percent.

00:06:20.640 And that's in contrast to what you would see with like a typical system right now where sex assault reveals identity through code as 15 percent of the time.

00:06:29.780 Identified remain is like 1 percent of the time.

00:06:31.940 All right. Now, put yourself in the head of a criminal and you've got two possibilities.

00:06:37.720 The old way is that there was a 15 percent chance of getting caught for, let's say, some violent crime that would leave your DNA.

00:06:45.800 But what happens if it goes to 90 or 100 percent?

00:06:49.760 Are you exactly as likely to do the crime?

00:06:52.240 Well, if it's a crime of passion or you're crazy or it's revenge or something, maybe yes.

00:06:56.060 But I got to think that if there were a steady stream of reports of cold cases being solved, what does that do to your mental understanding of risk?

00:07:11.020 So, David, would you imagine that there will be lots of stories coming out of the kind you're describing where a really cold case that couldn't be solved suddenly is easy to solve?

00:07:22.660 And what's that going to do to the criminal mind? Is something like that coming?

00:07:27.280 Yeah. I mean, there's been a steady flow of cases that are that are that are being solved.

00:07:31.120 We've got dozens that are that are going to be announced in the next month or two.

00:07:34.400 And I think I think what that does is, you know, people have argued, do we have stricter punishment?

00:07:39.320 Do we have, you know, what demotivates people to commit crime?

00:07:42.800 And I think I think severity of punishment hasn't been very effective.

00:07:46.360 But I think knowing that you're going to get caught, you know, I think is a huge deterrent.

00:07:50.420 And at this point, if you're going to leave, whether on purpose or by accident, DNA somewhere, there's almost a certainty that you'll be caught.

00:07:58.860 If not immediately, very soon, the technology continues to develop.

00:08:02.400 And so I think it's going to make people think twice.

00:08:04.740 Certainly, it's going to retire the idea of I think I think repeat crime or serial crimes will probably converge on extinction.

00:08:12.440 Yeah. Well, that's interesting. Serial crimes will converge on extinction.

00:08:20.700 That's that's that's a phrase that you couldn't even imagine before.

00:08:25.200 But that sounds entirely practical to me. All right.

00:08:28.320 Thanks. I just wanted to get a quick hit on that and try to connect some things I've been trying to connect.

00:08:33.860 But just more generally, I think that defunding the police, if you change that into your mind, into how do you make less crime happen in the first place, then you get to defunding the police indirectly.

00:08:47.320 Thank you, David. David Middleman from Othram, O-T-H-R-A-M.

00:08:53.360 Thank you for coming. All right.

00:08:54.580 All right. You're going to see more on that in the coming months in the news, I think, as cold cases get solved.

00:09:04.540 Raul Davis on Twitter had a great idea. I'll just put this out there.

00:09:10.300 Probably. I don't know if it's practical, but you decide.

00:09:14.020 So Raul Davis, CEO, branding expert.

00:09:17.020 He's on Twitter and he said that any convention that's smart would make it a national event.

00:09:22.340 To rent out drive-in theaters across the country and project their candidate on the big screen.

00:09:28.500 So think of this idea. You do a bunch of pop-up drive-ins.

00:09:32.680 You don't have to use existing drive-ins. There aren't that many.

00:09:36.120 But you could do a pop-up.

00:09:37.560 You know, just put up a screen or project against a white wall or something.

00:09:43.040 And it would be pretty easy to live stream and project something.

00:09:47.140 That's really common and cheap and easy to do.

00:09:49.700 So you could have a drive-in theater situation where you've got a virtual convention that happens all over the country at the same time.

00:09:58.340 And imagine that you're sitting there.

00:10:00.260 You're watching the convention on TV.

00:10:02.900 It's streamed. There's no live audience.

00:10:05.700 And you hear the horns honking.

00:10:08.680 Wherever you were, you'd hear honking for applause or whatever.

00:10:13.640 And it'd be fun.

00:10:15.500 It'd be really fun, wouldn't it?

00:10:16.740 Now, I don't know if you can keep it safe enough with bathrooms and whatever you need to do.

00:10:21.480 But I believe there are drive-in theaters that are open.

00:10:25.820 So I know they've figured out the bathroom and whatever else they have to figure out.

00:10:30.740 So that would be – the thing I like about this idea almost has nothing to do with politics.

00:10:38.420 And I don't care who does it, you know, Democrats or Republicans.

00:10:41.220 It has more to do with the fact that Americans just want to participate.

00:10:46.500 We just want to get in the car.

00:10:48.860 We just want to go somewhere.

00:10:50.740 We want to be at an event.

00:10:52.400 We want to see some other people.

00:10:54.140 We just need to get out of the house, you know, in some safe, productive way.

00:10:58.180 So that idea does both.

00:11:00.320 I love that.

00:11:00.740 There's a lot of conversation, and I haven't weighed into it much at all, about mail-in votes.

00:11:09.980 And the reason that I haven't talked about it is I don't quite understand it, meaning that there's something about the argument about why the – what are the two categories?

00:11:22.560 There's the absentee ballots, which we've had forever, and they seem to work fine, but everybody voting by mail is more of a problem.

00:11:33.040 And I think that has to do with the fact that if everybody just gets a ballot, whether they want it or not, a lot of people will – it will be mailed to the wrong place.

00:11:42.320 It will be mailed to a dead person.

00:11:44.540 Somebody else will pick up the mail and fill it out for you.

00:11:48.060 You know, so you can imagine a whole bunch of problems like that.

00:11:50.780 And I've got to say, it's a tough one, because I certainly understand why states want to do it, and I completely understand how open to fraud it would be.

00:12:01.500 But here's the question I have.

00:12:03.380 Is there any way to test that ahead of time?

00:12:06.520 And I couldn't think of one, but you can smell it before you can see it sometimes.

00:12:12.100 Sometimes I feel as if there's somebody who would be smart enough to say, well, why don't we just test 1,000 sample votes?

00:12:21.700 But I just don't know that you could design the test so it would be good enough.

00:12:25.200 But I hope somebody is smart enough, because we have enough time.

00:12:29.960 So if you could do – let me describe the bad version of it.

00:12:33.760 And so when you hear this idea and you say to yourself, well, Scott, there's an obvious flaw in your idea, I know that.

00:12:40.180 I know that.

00:12:40.800 This is the bad version.

00:12:42.180 I'm just trying to inspire somebody else to say, well, I could fix that problem, and maybe I can make this into something.

00:12:49.260 So the bad version would be this.

00:12:52.060 Do you do a test of 1,000 citizens?

00:12:54.180 I don't know.

00:12:54.580 Are they random?

00:12:55.380 Or do you have to tell them they're in the test?

00:12:57.500 I'm not sure which makes sense.

00:12:59.200 And you just see if the process can flow from actually receiving it to filling it out to mailing it.

00:13:08.540 But I guess you'd have the problem that nobody would be trying to cheat.

00:13:12.780 So if it's a test, there's nobody trying to thwart the test.

00:13:16.680 So it may be impossible.

00:13:19.040 But I would put that out there to people who are smarter than I am about anything to see if there is a way to test that.

00:13:27.360 I just wonder.

00:13:27.960 Now, I saw there was a news report of a local correspondent.

00:13:33.120 I think he did a local test of mailing some ballots, and he discovered that there were some problems in the post office.

00:13:39.880 I think three out of 100 ballots didn't make the whole process, which is way too many.

00:13:46.880 Imagine an election in which you were pretty sure 3% of the votes got lost.

00:13:52.400 And that wouldn't be much of an election, given how close our elections are.

00:13:56.640 So I would say my opinion on all of this is I'm just as concerned as other people.

00:14:05.500 But I think we have the weirdest situation in the world here in which I don't know that we have an opportunity to have a credible vote this time.

00:14:18.000 Because there's so much going on and so many accusations on both sides of irregularities and voter suppression and mail-in votes and every other thing,

00:14:29.240 that I don't even know if we have the option of a fair election.

00:14:33.840 It just might not even be an option.

00:14:36.720 So what do you do if you can't have a fair election for president?

00:14:42.100 What do you do?

00:14:42.980 So here's what I think we would do.

00:14:47.520 In a normal year, it doesn't make that much difference who's president, right?

00:14:52.760 If you looked in the past, that was the thing that pundits said all the time.

00:14:58.080 Well, it doesn't matter who you elect.

00:14:59.860 They just raise your taxes anyway.

00:15:01.680 Well, Democrat, Republican, doesn't matter.

00:15:04.940 You still end up in a war.

00:15:06.000 But I don't know that that's true in 2020.

00:15:09.860 The difference between Biden and Trump, that might be the biggest difference we've ever seen.

00:15:16.540 You know, the difference between Hillary Clinton and Trump, you could argue was, well, that's a pretty big difference.

00:15:22.780 But it's not gigantic, right?

00:15:25.020 The country would still look like the United States if Hillary Clinton had been elected. 1.00

00:15:30.220 You might not like elements of it, but still the United States.

00:15:34.540 If Biden gets elected, you know, he would be the most progressive candidate.

00:15:40.620 And I'm not going to have an opinion on whether that's good or bad.

00:15:44.240 I'm just saying it's the most different from what Trump offers.

00:15:49.140 So this time, the result really could change the fate of the country.

00:15:53.560 In my opinion, given that it's such a big difference, Trump is probably the safest in terms of risk management,

00:16:03.020 simply because you know what the last four years look like.

00:16:06.660 And even if you didn't like those last four years, you'd have to admit that if you subtracted the pandemic, look pretty good.

00:16:15.100 Look pretty good.

00:16:16.000 We didn't start any big wars.

00:16:18.760 We ended some wars.

00:16:19.960 We wound down that.

00:16:21.040 The economy was good.

00:16:21.800 So if you were even a little bit objective and you said to yourself, you know, I don't know what's going on here.

00:16:29.060 Biden could be a big problem and we wouldn't even know who got elected, really.

00:16:34.000 And then the progressive stuff is sufficiently big enough changes.

00:16:39.280 Yeah, I'm not going to say radical because that's just politicizing the speech.

00:16:43.220 It's a big enough change that any big change introduces a new set of risks.

00:16:48.320 So there is a different risk profile, and I would argue that the Biden risk is far bigger because it's an unknown and also a big change.

00:16:58.540 Trump is closer to a known if he gets reelected.

00:17:02.820 You're going to see some tweets you don't like.

00:17:05.700 There are going to be some fact checking that doesn't look good.

00:17:09.500 You know, there will be world leaders who say some bad things about Trump.

00:17:14.300 You know, it's guaranteed what that looks like 90%, right?

00:17:18.920 Always some surprises, but you kind of know what a Trump president's going to look like.

00:17:23.620 So if you have this much uncertainty about the result, you have basically one way to get a safe outcome that doesn't drive the country apart.

00:17:36.720 And it's a landslide election for Trump.

00:17:39.200 Now, that might happen anyway, but the republic is going to be a little bit at risk if we go the other way.

00:17:50.560 It's impossible to know exactly risk, but I would say that doing, you know, the, what's the saying?

00:17:57.700 The evil that you know is better than the evil you don't know.

00:18:01.440 So even if you don't like Trump as president, you kind of know what you're getting.

00:18:05.720 That's my point.

00:18:07.380 Apparently, Trump said on Air Force One that he's planning to ban TikTok in the United States.

00:18:14.200 How about that?

00:18:15.540 So TikTok, as you know, is the app that is owned by a Chinese company, and therefore the assumption is,

00:18:22.660 and it's been determined that the code actually does this,

00:18:25.780 it's collecting a lot of information on Americans and kids in particular, and so that will be banned.

00:18:33.880 The decoupling of the United States from China, I think it's just, it's a thing now, 1.00

00:18:41.700 meaning that you don't have to wonder if it's happening.

00:18:45.200 And I don't think it was, this was hard to imagine a year ago, wasn't it?

00:18:49.040 Imagine a year ago that we would be sitting here saying that we are actively decoupling our economy from China. 0.79

00:18:56.380 It was hard to imagine.

00:18:58.580 I was asking for it a year ago, and I was pretty early on the banned TikTok train,

00:19:05.040 so things are going the way that I want them to go.

00:19:10.200 Have you ever noticed that almost everything in the United States goes the way I want it to go in the long run?

00:19:19.200 It's the weirdest coincidence, isn't it?

00:19:21.100 It's something I noticed in my 20s.

00:19:23.440 So when I was in my 20s, I wasn't talking publicly about politics or big, big events,

00:19:29.980 but I would have preferences, and then I would watch, and I'd think, oh, that's interesting.

00:19:35.640 The very thing I was hoping would happen, it happened.

00:19:39.160 It happened so often that it's sort of freaky.

00:19:45.780 I mean, seriously, a year ago, I was lobbying as hard as you possibly could to decouple from China, 1.00

00:19:53.100 and then banning the TikTok, but even I didn't think it was necessarily going to happen.

00:19:58.740 It felt like quite a reach.

00:20:02.800 Here we are.

00:20:05.180 What about opening schools?

00:20:06.760 I continue to say that education is a national security matter, especially if you're doing it wrong.

00:20:18.220 If you're doing it wrong, the federal government has to fix it because it's national security.

00:20:23.920 You can let the states experiment and let the states do the thing

00:20:27.240 and let the states take the lead on education in normal times.

00:20:32.040 As long as they're getting the job done, let the states educate the kids.

00:20:37.380 Take the lead.

00:20:38.780 But if the states stop educating the kids, it's a national security problem

00:20:45.840 because educated kids create a good economy.

00:20:48.960 A good economy allows you to have a good military and protect yourself in a variety of ways.

00:20:53.600 So certainly we're reaching a point where the federal government might need to take control in some fashion.

00:21:03.780 I would certainly like to see an executive order that limited the power of the teacher unions.

00:21:09.880 That would be one thing that might be productive.

00:21:13.000 And because the teachers unions apparently are the, I would say,

00:21:18.760 they're the base problem for every problem in the United States right now.

00:21:22.920 And that's a big claim, right?

00:21:25.060 That the teachers unions are the base problem for every big problem in the United States.

00:21:31.600 But it's true.

00:21:33.200 Because if you educated children better, if there were more options,

00:21:39.820 and it's the teachers unions that limit the options,

00:21:43.160 so you can't have competition and a free market for teaching.

00:21:46.660 Therefore, it can't evolve in the way that it naturally would to its best form.

00:21:50.940 And kids who are in bad school systems are just trapped, don't have an option.

00:21:56.480 So as long as that situation exists, there's a national security issue there.

00:22:02.160 And that needs to get resolved.

00:22:05.360 Now, at the same time, I'm completely on board with the notion

00:22:08.960 that teachers did not sign up to be frontline healthcare workers,

00:22:14.180 or they didn't volunteer to be on the front line of a war.

00:22:19.080 Now, can we force them to do it just because it's a national security concern?

00:22:25.520 Well, maybe, sort of, kind of.

00:22:28.020 But we do have a volunteer military.

00:22:31.360 So we should have, and we have a voluntary medical community.

00:22:35.960 We should have a voluntary teacher situation if the danger goes, you know, is high like it is.

00:22:43.040 Well, it's not high.

00:22:43.980 But if there's a danger, it just has to be voluntary, in my opinion.

00:22:50.940 So how can you best open schools and keep everybody safe?

00:22:54.520 Let me give you this suggestion.

00:22:56.800 The kids themselves seem pretty safe.

00:22:58.640 If it's the teachers who are worried, I would offer this option,

00:23:02.960 that teachers could have an in-class physical body who is either a young person

00:23:10.120 or somebody who has recovered from coronavirus and, therefore, has presumably some protection,

00:23:17.760 and that you could have the regular teacher on video all the time,

00:23:23.860 and, you know, they do the class plans and the decision-making.

00:23:28.640 But you have a physical human being in the classroom just to make sure that anything physical

00:23:34.060 gets taken care of, et cetera.

00:23:36.640 So that would be one model.

00:23:38.040 I don't know if anybody's considered that.

00:23:40.880 I do also like the pod teaching model where the kids will get together in little groups

00:23:47.420 and do some stuff at home.

00:23:50.800 I do like the pod idea.

00:23:53.420 But as I've often said, and let me put it in this context,

00:23:57.640 I think the pandemic, as horrible and tragic as it is,

00:24:01.620 and the lines for people in my town who are lining up just to get food,

00:24:07.380 you know, food that's delivered by some form of government,

00:24:12.060 it's getting pretty long.

00:24:13.760 I live in a high-end neighborhood,

00:24:16.480 and there was a pretty long line for food yesterday, for food.

00:24:21.840 So let's not forget that's still top priority.

00:24:26.540 But that said, there's a saying in business that if you don't cannibalize your own products,

00:24:33.840 your competition will.

00:24:35.960 So if you don't make your next version of your product so good

00:24:39.460 that all of your customers don't want the last version,

00:24:43.520 that's what your competitor will do.

00:24:45.180 They'll make the version your customers go to.

00:24:47.300 And you need to continually destroy what you have in regular business to build the new thing.

00:24:56.100 So for a company like Apple, destruction and creation happen at the same time.

00:25:02.640 They're destroying their old products by creating the new products.

00:25:07.100 School isn't like that.

00:25:08.880 School is just sort of ossified, and it is what it is,

00:25:12.280 and it's hard to change, and there's not much competition.

00:25:14.500 If you could change that so that schools could destroy themselves

00:25:18.960 while they're creating something better,

00:25:21.720 in other words, free market, free competition,

00:25:24.840 best one survives, the bad one doesn't,

00:25:27.640 that situation, how much better could school be?

00:25:30.840 How much better?

00:25:32.200 Probably a lot.

00:25:34.640 What is your guess of how much better,

00:25:37.680 and of course this is like a conceptual number,

00:25:39.680 but do you think that the free market would make education 10% better?

00:25:46.180 Because 10% would be quite a big impact,

00:25:50.720 you know, on the size of the economy.

00:25:52.440 It would be quite, quite big, a 10% improvement.

00:25:55.960 But is it more than 10%?

00:25:58.400 Maybe it's 50%.

00:25:59.820 Maybe it's 400%.

00:26:02.460 All right?

00:26:04.060 Because imagine if you had a better learning experience,

00:26:07.000 somehow you got rid of the bullies,

00:26:08.680 you never had a bad teacher,

00:26:10.980 and you learned the right things in the right way.

00:26:16.360 I feel like it's a 4x benefit.

00:26:20.080 It doesn't feel like a 10% benefit to me.

00:26:23.180 To me, it feels like a 400% kind of situation.

00:26:28.260 And again, we're talking about national security.

00:26:31.420 You know, we're talking about the economy in the future,

00:26:33.700 because the kids drive the economy in the future.

00:26:35.780 I think this is one of the biggest opportunities this country's ever had.

00:26:43.300 And this will be maybe a contrarian.

00:26:45.460 No, I think it's not a contrarian.

00:26:47.420 A lot of people are coming around to this.

00:26:49.300 That the pandemic, nobody would have asked for it,

00:26:52.580 but it might fix the big country.

00:26:54.780 Yeah, and I say this all the time,

00:26:58.360 that the schools are even, in my opinion,

00:27:00.700 and therefore the teachers' unions,

00:27:03.220 are the cause of systemic racism in this country.

00:27:07.480 Now, I'm playing a little loose with the wording here.

00:27:10.640 When I say the cause,

00:27:12.100 I mean the cause of it being a problem.

00:27:14.920 So systemic racism,

00:27:16.040 it really is built into the fabric of everything.

00:27:18.960 You know, there's a ripple from slavery.

00:27:20.640 That's real.

00:27:21.980 But is it bothering Oprah?

00:27:25.260 No.

00:27:26.280 Because if you're successful and you have money

00:27:28.040 and, you know, your life is working well,

00:27:31.840 systemic racism isn't hurting you much.

00:27:35.980 So if you can simply improve education,

00:27:39.360 improve the economics of anybody who's a person of color,

00:27:43.020 isn't that going to change their situation

00:27:45.000 and how they feel about systemic racism,

00:27:48.900 even if it's still there.

00:27:50.980 It'll be kind of like background noise.

00:27:55.060 All right.

00:27:57.960 I've decided I want to see if I can reclaim some of my humanity

00:28:02.400 by being less of a jerk on Twitter.

00:28:07.480 If you follow me on Twitter,

00:28:09.080 most of you do, I think,

00:28:10.660 you know that I can be a jerk sometimes.

00:28:15.400 And I'm not proud of it.

00:28:17.800 I was reading an article yesterday

00:28:19.420 about how social media

00:28:21.620 sort of takes our humanity

00:28:24.740 into a conceptual place

00:28:26.520 where when I'm zinging somebody on Twitter,

00:28:31.000 the sensation I get is as if it's a video game.

00:28:35.040 And that is really dangerous.

00:28:37.660 That's really dangerous.

00:28:39.300 I mean, think about that.

00:28:41.080 And let me put this in context.

00:28:43.260 When I started out on Twitter,

00:28:44.840 I had zero followers.

00:28:47.860 And I made it sort of my mission

00:28:50.540 not to cheat too much

00:28:52.760 and use the Dilber thing

00:28:53.920 to grow my Twitter account.

00:28:56.180 I wanted to see if I could grow it

00:28:57.840 by doing things that you do on Twitter.

00:29:00.800 And I wanted to talk about politics.

00:29:03.080 And I wanted to see if I could grow users,

00:29:06.540 followers, not users, but followers,

00:29:08.680 because I was doing the right things

00:29:11.160 and giving them something they wanted.

00:29:13.020 So I sort of made a point of it

00:29:15.080 to grow organically.

00:29:17.900 And so now I've got over half a million followers.

00:29:21.500 And the thing that I'm cautioning myself about

00:29:25.560 is that when I had a hundred followers,

00:29:34.520 if I weighed in on a Twitter thread

00:29:36.660 and insulted somebody

00:29:38.020 or said something about them,

00:29:41.000 no impact, right?

00:29:42.260 A hundred followers, no impact.

00:29:43.620 But I lost sight of the fact

00:29:46.120 that my impact is fairly enormous now

00:29:49.280 because it happened gradually.

00:29:50.980 You know, you can just lose sight of it.

00:29:53.320 And I realized a few times

00:29:54.820 that I saw something I didn't like on Twitter

00:29:57.940 from somebody, somebody I don't know.

00:30:00.660 And I would just, you know,

00:30:02.520 throw a little slap out there, 0.99

00:30:05.320 you know, like a little Twitter slap.

00:30:06.660 And I'd realized I had much bigger impact

00:30:10.620 than I wanted

00:30:12.080 because a lot of followers will pile on.

00:30:15.040 And then suddenly there's some poor person

00:30:17.320 I've never even met

00:30:18.300 whose only offense

00:30:19.960 is that they said something I didn't like.

00:30:22.600 And now they're being dumped on

00:30:23.780 by half a million people

00:30:24.880 or thousands.

00:30:27.420 And I'm going to pull back a little bit.

00:30:30.040 Now, I'm going to go just as hard

00:30:32.540 against the professionals, right?

00:30:35.140 So the professionals still get the full treatment.

00:30:39.200 And I would expect that I would also receive

00:30:41.720 the full dehumanizing treatment

00:30:44.260 because I'm a professional.

00:30:46.180 You know, I'm doing this

00:30:47.280 in a professional sense.

00:30:49.400 So I'm not asking anybody to lighten up on me

00:30:52.440 because the people who go into battle

00:30:54.900 knowing that that's what they're doing,

00:30:56.480 you know, you know what you're getting.

00:30:58.280 But I'm going to make an effort

00:31:00.320 and I don't think this is going to be

00:31:02.320 100% successful.

00:31:03.620 I don't think so.

00:31:05.880 But I'm going to try

00:31:06.740 to be a little kinder

00:31:10.240 to civilians.

00:31:13.600 Right?

00:31:14.460 So a little kinder to civilians.

00:31:16.340 We'll see if that works out.

00:31:19.100 And let me tell you

00:31:20.760 that the reason

00:31:22.200 that I'm doing this

00:31:23.940 is as much...

00:31:26.260 I'll tell you the insight

00:31:27.540 I had about this.

00:31:28.600 Not just the insight

00:31:29.640 that we're dehumanizing ourselves

00:31:31.400 on social media.

00:31:33.120 But the insight is

00:31:33.900 that I get

00:31:34.760 continuous flow

00:31:37.200 of messages

00:31:39.520 from people

00:31:40.060 who tell me

00:31:40.600 that I've changed their life

00:31:41.940 in some positive way.

00:31:43.740 Because, you know,

00:31:44.160 a lot of my books

00:31:44.880 are about

00:31:45.360 how to live your life better,

00:31:46.760 how to think better,

00:31:47.980 how to be more persuasive,

00:31:49.240 how to get what you want.

00:31:50.680 And so a lot of people

00:31:51.600 have read my books

00:31:52.240 and actually got what they want.

00:31:54.040 I tweeted one this morning

00:31:56.600 of somebody

00:31:57.080 whose life

00:31:57.980 was completely changed

00:31:59.260 just by a brief appearance

00:32:01.580 on my Periscope.

00:32:03.120 And when I see

00:32:04.480 how much I can change

00:32:05.560 people's lives

00:32:06.320 in the positive

00:32:07.180 with the smallest amount

00:32:09.040 of effort,

00:32:10.180 the smallest amount

00:32:11.440 of effort

00:32:11.840 and changes people's lives

00:32:13.660 completely,

00:32:14.820 I say to myself,

00:32:16.400 what have I done

00:32:17.520 accidentally

00:32:18.340 that actually damaged

00:32:20.220 somebody's life?

00:32:21.200 Because I just wasn't thinking.

00:32:22.880 I was just careless.

00:32:24.040 And so I'm going to be

00:32:25.000 less careless about that.

00:32:26.980 Well, that's my intention.

00:32:28.020 We'll see if I can do it.

00:32:32.100 This morning,

00:32:32.900 I sent off

00:32:33.480 a very angry tweet

00:32:34.780 that I later deleted.

00:32:37.260 Man, did it make me angry.

00:32:38.940 And I'll tell you

00:32:39.400 what made me angry about it

00:32:40.760 and then why it was wrong.

00:32:42.100 And it was a video clip

00:32:44.060 about Dr. Fauci.

00:32:45.820 He was responding

00:32:46.740 to a member of Congress

00:32:48.160 who was asking him

00:32:49.220 about the Henry Ford study

00:32:51.660 on the Henry Ford

00:32:54.200 whatever medical facility

00:32:55.580 study about

00:32:56.620 hydroxychloroquine

00:32:58.380 and zinc.

00:32:59.840 And the congressman

00:33:01.300 said that

00:33:02.020 the study showed

00:33:03.080 that it was effective

00:33:03.960 and therefore

00:33:05.620 the implication is

00:33:07.340 why don't we use it?

00:33:08.640 And Dr. Fauci said

00:33:10.500 that

00:33:12.040 that that was not

00:33:13.500 a valid study

00:33:14.400 for a few reasons.

00:33:15.760 Number one,

00:33:16.640 it was not a

00:33:17.460 what do they call it?

00:33:20.220 A randomized

00:33:21.460 placebo trial.

00:33:23.840 It did not have

00:33:24.980 a control group

00:33:26.020 with a placebo.

00:33:27.720 It was not studied

00:33:28.840 in the

00:33:29.420 you know,

00:33:30.280 the way that you would

00:33:31.240 get a gold standard result.

00:33:33.240 So the first thing

00:33:34.080 he said was

00:33:34.660 it did not

00:33:35.300 meet that standard.

00:33:37.340 Now,

00:33:37.720 I'm going to tell you

00:33:38.600 in a moment

00:33:39.000 why that's

00:33:40.180 I think that's

00:33:42.140 what triggered me.

00:33:42.900 because

00:33:44.340 it turns out

00:33:46.260 that the study

00:33:46.860 actually is garbage.

00:33:48.900 So here's the first thing.

00:33:50.480 And the reason

00:33:50.940 I deleted the tweet

00:33:52.140 is that

00:33:52.820 as soon as I looked

00:33:53.640 at what he said

00:33:54.540 he is right.

00:33:59.040 So I did

00:34:00.280 this scathing

00:34:01.180 you know,

00:34:02.320 insulting tweet

00:34:03.380 to Fauci

00:34:04.220 because of the first

00:34:05.560 thing I read

00:34:06.360 and then I looked

00:34:07.560 at his claim

00:34:08.300 and I thought

00:34:09.620 okay,

00:34:11.620 this is a little more

00:34:12.280 than I thought.

00:34:13.280 So the reason

00:34:14.200 he said that

00:34:14.740 he gave two reasons

00:34:18.200 to not believe

00:34:19.080 the study.

00:34:20.040 One of them

00:34:20.680 is that it wasn't

00:34:21.360 the gold standard

00:34:22.380 type of study

00:34:23.080 which I'm going

00:34:24.540 to argue

00:34:24.840 in a minute

00:34:25.380 he's misleading you.

00:34:27.640 But the other

00:34:28.500 is that it was

00:34:29.400 combined

00:34:30.640 with

00:34:31.760 another drug

00:34:34.560 that we know

00:34:35.340 works.

00:34:37.380 So if you

00:34:38.340 combine hydroxychloroquine

00:34:39.880 with a drug

00:34:41.200 that we already

00:34:42.340 know works

00:34:43.160 and you get

00:34:44.660 a good result

00:34:45.460 you've literally

00:34:47.040 found out

00:34:47.580 nothing

00:34:47.900 because it was

00:34:49.760 the other drug

00:34:50.440 that made it work.

00:34:52.300 Now

00:34:52.420 I didn't know

00:34:53.660 that

00:34:54.120 and I feel

00:34:56.260 a little bit

00:34:57.660 stupid. 0.90

00:34:59.720 You know,

00:35:00.220 I feel like

00:35:00.600 it's a little bit

00:35:01.100 my fault

00:35:01.640 but a little bit

00:35:02.340 the media fault

00:35:03.180 because this is

00:35:04.180 a really big

00:35:05.340 point.

00:35:06.720 So apparently

00:35:07.080 the other drug

00:35:07.960 was

00:35:08.760 what was it

00:35:09.940 some kind

00:35:10.500 of

00:35:10.820 some kind

00:35:13.980 of steroid

00:35:14.680 I guess

00:35:15.160 that they give

00:35:15.640 you if you're

00:35:16.340 hospitalized

00:35:17.440 some kind

00:35:19.280 of anti-inflammatory

00:35:20.340 steroid

00:35:21.200 I forget

00:35:21.580 what the

00:35:22.040 name of it is

00:35:22.940 but

00:35:23.960 here's what

00:35:25.840 triggered me.

00:35:26.940 So

00:35:27.060 Fauci says

00:35:28.260 that

00:35:29.200 you don't know

00:35:30.200 if the hydroxychloroquine

00:35:31.460 worked in that study

00:35:32.700 because it was given

00:35:34.060 in combination

00:35:34.800 with the drug

00:35:35.520 that you do know

00:35:36.240 works

00:35:36.640 and the result

00:35:38.480 of the outcome

00:35:39.240 thank you

00:35:40.980 in the comments

00:35:41.620 I'm being reminded

00:35:43.120 that the drug

00:35:43.840 that was with

00:35:44.480 the hydroxychloroquine

00:35:45.680 was

00:35:46.600 dexamethasone

00:35:48.320 and apparently

00:35:49.560 that is

00:35:50.260 as I'm learning

00:35:51.180 already

00:35:52.200 a common

00:35:52.920 treatment

00:35:53.440 so it's a

00:35:54.800 common treatment

00:35:55.540 and it works.

00:35:59.040 So if you know

00:35:59.580 it works

00:36:00.220 and you get

00:36:01.300 effectively

00:36:02.020 the same

00:36:02.540 result

00:36:02.980 with hydroxychloroquine

00:36:05.120 added to it

00:36:05.980 as you would have

00:36:06.800 gotten without it

00:36:07.660 and I think

00:36:08.060 that's actually

00:36:08.540 what happened

00:36:09.000 then there is

00:36:11.460 no evidence

00:36:12.020 that the hydroxychloroquine

00:36:13.260 worked.

00:36:14.120 So Dr. Fauci

00:36:15.440 okay

00:36:16.700 you win

00:36:17.720 this

00:36:18.020 this round

00:36:19.300 this round

00:36:20.880 goes to Fauci

00:36:22.100 but

00:36:23.240 this raises

00:36:24.580 some questions

00:36:25.520 were you aware

00:36:27.320 that there was

00:36:27.920 a drug

00:36:28.340 that would cut

00:36:29.080 death rates

00:36:30.540 in half

00:36:31.060 because

00:36:32.740 that's

00:36:33.220 what we

00:36:33.640 learned

00:36:33.980 that this

00:36:34.680 dexamethasone

00:36:36.060 is widely

00:36:37.660 in use

00:36:38.280 and cuts

00:36:39.520 the death

00:36:40.000 rate

00:36:40.340 in half

00:36:41.300 how come

00:36:43.380 I didn't

00:36:43.700 know that

00:36:44.200 did you know

00:36:45.300 that

00:36:45.600 because we've

00:36:46.300 heard about

00:36:46.680 remdesivir

00:36:47.460 we've heard

00:36:47.840 about

00:36:48.140 everything else

00:36:48.940 but did

00:36:49.980 you know

00:36:50.480 that if you

00:36:52.020 get this

00:36:52.480 particular drug

00:36:53.360 which is

00:36:53.760 widely available

00:36:54.620 you know

00:36:55.060 standard

00:36:55.500 kind of

00:36:55.960 a drug

00:36:56.360 then it

00:36:57.520 cuts your

00:36:57.880 death rate

00:36:58.620 in half

00:36:59.220 so some

00:37:01.220 of you

00:37:01.440 are saying

00:37:01.840 you heard

00:37:02.480 of it

00:37:02.700 some of you

00:37:03.160 not

00:37:03.420 the fact

00:37:04.720 that as

00:37:06.080 much as

00:37:06.520 I've studied

00:37:07.140 this stuff

00:37:07.760 you know

00:37:08.200 as a lay

00:37:08.960 person

00:37:09.240 not as

00:37:09.660 a scientist

00:37:10.140 but as

00:37:10.920 much as

00:37:11.260 I've

00:37:11.480 looked

00:37:11.680 into

00:37:11.880 this

00:37:12.260 why is

00:37:13.440 today

00:37:13.820 the first

00:37:14.280 time

00:37:14.520 I'm

00:37:14.700 hearing

00:37:14.880 about

00:37:15.160 this

00:37:15.500 which

00:37:16.740 should

00:37:17.620 be a

00:37:17.920 wake

00:37:18.140 up

00:37:18.320 call

00:37:18.640 about

00:37:20.460 how

00:37:20.880 uninformed

00:37:21.580 we are

00:37:22.120 about

00:37:22.500 all of

00:37:22.980 it

00:37:23.180 this

00:37:24.320 is

00:37:24.540 such

00:37:24.920 a

00:37:25.240 big

00:37:25.580 missing

00:37:26.120 piece

00:37:26.620 in

00:37:27.400 what

00:37:27.600 I

00:37:27.760 knew

00:37:28.000 about

00:37:28.260 the

00:37:28.440 whole

00:37:28.600 situation

00:37:29.200 that

00:37:30.400 it

00:37:30.640 was

00:37:30.800 sort

00:37:31.240 of

00:37:31.340 mind

00:37:31.560 blowing

00:37:31.840 and

00:37:32.260 also

00:37:32.520 very

00:37:32.820 humbling

00:37:33.320 it

00:37:34.200 also

00:37:34.580 reminds

00:37:35.140 me

00:37:35.320 that

00:37:35.500 I'm

00:37:35.680 a

00:37:35.800 jerk

00:37:36.120 because

00:37:36.860 I

00:37:37.120 went

00:37:37.420 after

00:37:37.780 Fauci

00:37:38.220 in

00:37:39.060 public

00:37:39.460 on

00:37:40.720 Twitter

00:37:41.040 being

00:37:42.660 wrong

00:37:43.060 you know

00:37:43.860 I tried

00:37:44.160 to correct

00:37:44.600 it

00:37:44.800 but

00:37:45.040 I

00:37:45.380 was

00:37:45.500 wrong

00:37:45.780 now

00:37:46.720 here's

00:37:47.140 but I

00:37:47.840 do

00:37:47.940 have

00:37:48.120 some

00:37:48.440 Fauci

00:37:49.320 criticisms

00:37:49.840 and I

00:37:50.920 think

00:37:51.320 what

00:37:51.540 actually

00:37:52.000 triggered

00:37:52.400 me

00:37:52.720 is

00:37:53.580 that

00:37:53.840 it

00:37:54.080 was

00:37:54.280 obvious

00:37:54.780 he

00:37:55.040 was

00:37:55.240 lying

00:37:55.900 but

00:37:57.020 it

00:37:57.120 wasn't

00:37:57.360 about

00:37:57.580 this

00:37:57.980 so

00:37:58.700 what

00:37:58.880 he

00:37:58.960 said

00:37:59.140 about

00:37:59.320 the

00:37:59.520 dexamethasone

00:38:00.300 I

00:38:00.980 think

00:38:01.180 he's

00:38:01.360 completely

00:38:01.900 right

00:38:02.320 but

00:38:03.840 it

00:38:04.200 also

00:38:04.480 tells

00:38:04.820 you

00:38:05.020 that

00:38:05.260 the

00:38:05.480 Henry

00:38:05.720 Ford

00:38:05.980 study

00:38:06.380 was

00:38:07.000 with

00:38:07.280 hospitalized

00:38:07.840 patients

00:38:08.560 which

00:38:09.660 again

00:38:10.340 is

00:38:11.140 not

00:38:11.340 the

00:38:11.540 point

00:38:11.880 right

00:38:12.780 it

00:38:13.600 wouldn't

00:38:13.980 matter

00:38:14.320 if

00:38:14.760 the

00:38:14.920 study

00:38:15.220 he

00:38:15.400 said

00:38:15.740 was

00:38:16.120 debunked

00:38:16.840 was

00:38:17.700 a

00:38:17.840 good

00:38:18.020 study

00:38:18.360 or

00:38:18.500 not

00:38:18.900 because

00:38:19.620 I

00:38:19.760 wouldn't

00:38:19.940 have

00:38:20.040 believed

00:38:20.260 it

00:38:20.440 anyway

00:38:20.760 because

00:38:21.580 the

00:38:21.780 whole

00:38:21.960 point

00:38:22.280 of

00:38:22.420 it

00:38:22.560 is

00:38:22.760 to

00:38:22.880 use

00:38:23.080 it

00:38:23.200 early

00:38:23.500 and

00:38:23.820 the

00:38:23.940 Henry

00:38:24.140 Ford

00:38:24.400 study

00:38:24.720 was

00:38:24.900 hospitalized

00:38:25.340 people

00:38:25.900 and

00:38:26.520 to

00:38:26.720 hospitalize

00:38:27.360 people

00:38:27.660 that

00:38:28.000 other

00:38:28.480 drug

00:38:29.000 we

00:38:29.380 know

00:38:29.720 works

00:38:30.340 and

00:38:31.480 have

00:38:32.020 you

00:38:32.160 seen

00:38:32.360 any

00:38:32.600 national

00:38:33.060 reporting

00:38:33.720 on

00:38:35.200 who

00:38:36.120 doesn't

00:38:36.520 use

00:38:36.760 the

00:38:36.900 drug

00:38:37.180 because

00:38:37.880 what

00:38:38.080 I

00:38:38.180 was

00:38:38.300 wondering

00:38:38.620 who

00:38:39.100 was

00:38:39.320 the

00:38:39.500 control

00:38:39.900 group

00:38:40.320 who

00:38:43.860 was

00:38:44.140 the

00:38:44.320 control

00:38:44.660 group

00:38:45.020 if

00:38:47.480 we

00:38:47.660 know

00:38:47.880 that

00:38:48.100 this

00:38:48.340 drug

00:38:48.700 that

00:38:48.860 was

00:38:49.020 in

00:38:49.180 combination

00:38:49.660 of

00:38:49.920 hydroxychloroquine

00:38:51.020 cuts

00:38:52.260 the

00:38:52.500 death

00:38:52.740 rate

00:38:52.980 in

00:38:53.120 half

00:38:53.520 who

00:38:54.380 was

00:38:54.600 the

00:38:54.760 group

00:38:54.940 that

00:38:55.140 didn't

00:38:55.400 get

00:38:55.600 it

00:38:55.840 right

00:38:57.840 can

00:38:59.060 you

00:38:59.280 how

00:39:00.500 do

00:39:00.640 we

00:39:00.760 know

00:39:00.920 that

00:39:01.100 this

00:39:01.300 drug

00:39:01.540 cuts

00:39:01.860 the

00:39:02.120 death

00:39:02.420 rate

00:39:02.600 in

00:39:02.740 half

00:39:03.100 unless

00:39:03.600 there's

00:39:03.940 somebody

00:39:04.200 not

00:39:04.500 getting

00:39:04.800 it

00:39:05.080 and

00:39:06.120 if

00:39:06.840 we

00:39:06.960 know

00:39:07.120 it

00:39:07.240 works

00:39:07.560 why

00:39:07.900 would

00:39:08.060 anybody

00:39:08.340 not

00:39:08.640 get

00:39:08.880 it

00:39:09.100 so

00:39:09.980 maybe

00:39:12.540 we

00:39:12.820 have

00:39:13.100 a

00:39:13.300 history

00:39:13.700 of

00:39:14.740 people

00:39:15.000 who

00:39:15.180 didn't

00:39:15.440 get

00:39:15.620 it

00:39:15.740 before

00:39:16.180 but

00:39:17.460 I

00:39:17.720 would

00:39:17.900 be

00:39:18.040 really

00:39:18.420 suspicious

00:39:19.080 of

00:39:20.500 any

00:39:20.740 data

00:39:21.120 before

00:39:21.540 we

00:39:21.780 were

00:39:21.900 really

00:39:22.140 looking

00:39:22.360 into

00:39:22.640 it

00:39:22.840 did

00:39:22.980 it

00:39:23.100 come

00:39:23.260 from

00:39:23.440 another

00:39:23.720 country

00:39:24.220 my

00:39:25.120 guess

00:39:25.520 is

00:39:25.780 that

00:39:25.980 in

00:39:26.120 this

00:39:26.320 country

00:39:26.680 people

00:39:27.040 were

00:39:27.220 probably

00:39:27.500 getting

00:39:27.780 it

00:39:27.940 from

00:39:28.100 day

00:39:28.300 one

00:39:28.660 and

00:39:29.920 was

00:39:30.160 there

00:39:30.300 a

00:39:30.440 point

00:39:30.720 where

00:39:30.980 the

00:39:31.160 death

00:39:31.400 rate

00:39:31.760 went

00:39:32.680 from

00:39:33.140 way

00:39:34.140 high

00:39:34.500 to

00:39:34.740 half

00:39:35.040 as

00:39:35.200 much

00:39:35.580 when

00:39:36.700 that

00:39:36.940 drug

00:39:37.220 started

00:39:37.540 being

00:39:37.800 widely

00:39:38.160 used

00:39:38.520 or

00:39:38.640 was

00:39:38.800 it

00:39:38.900 always

00:39:39.080 widely

00:39:39.360 used

00:39:39.600 anyway

00:39:39.860 I

00:39:40.080 have

00:39:40.200 lots

00:39:40.380 of

00:39:40.460 questions

00:39:40.780 here's

00:39:41.320 my

00:39:41.560 Fauci

00:39:42.260 criticism

00:39:43.480 you

00:39:45.040 do

00:39:45.300 want

00:39:45.700 as

00:39:46.180 Dr.

00:39:46.580 Fauci

00:39:46.880 continuously

00:39:47.700 reminds

00:39:48.300 us

00:39:48.520 if

00:39:48.760 you

00:39:48.880 really

00:39:49.160 want

00:39:49.540 to

00:39:49.920 be

00:39:50.240 certain

00:39:51.680 at

00:39:52.140 least

00:39:52.380 as

00:39:52.540 certain

00:39:52.740 as

00:39:52.920 you

00:39:53.020 can

00:39:53.160 be

00:39:53.320 about

00:39:53.520 a

00:39:53.660 drug

00:39:53.940 you

00:39:54.780 have

00:39:55.100 to

00:39:55.260 do

00:39:55.480 the

00:39:55.900 the

00:39:57.380 RPT

00:39:58.880 trial

00:39:59.320 the

00:39:59.820 you know

00:40:01.160 the one

00:40:01.440 with the

00:40:01.740 placebo

00:40:02.140 and

00:40:02.720 randomized

00:40:03.920 so

00:40:05.120 does that

00:40:06.900 apply in

00:40:07.340 every

00:40:07.560 case

00:40:08.080 here's

00:40:09.300 the

00:40:09.460 problem

00:40:09.880 if

00:40:11.040 you

00:40:11.220 had

00:40:11.420 a

00:40:11.560 drug

00:40:11.840 that

00:40:12.020 was

00:40:12.180 brand

00:40:12.540 new

00:40:12.800 let's

00:40:13.180 say

00:40:13.380 a

00:40:13.620 vaccine

00:40:14.100 something

00:40:14.740 that

00:40:14.960 never

00:40:15.280 existed

00:40:15.680 before

00:40:16.160 you

00:40:17.000 would

00:40:17.180 need

00:40:17.460 to

00:40:17.800 know

00:40:18.000 three

00:40:18.400 things

00:40:18.820 about

00:40:19.120 it

00:40:19.360 you

00:40:20.240 would

00:40:20.400 need

00:40:20.580 to

00:40:20.740 know

00:40:20.980 the

00:40:21.280 cost

00:40:21.800 because

00:40:22.820 that

00:40:23.220 makes

00:40:24.020 a

00:40:24.120 difference

00:40:24.440 you

00:40:24.960 would

00:40:25.100 need

00:40:25.220 to

00:40:25.340 know

00:40:25.440 if

00:40:25.580 it

00:40:25.660 hurts

00:40:25.940 people

00:40:26.300 in

00:40:26.880 the

00:40:27.020 short

00:40:27.300 run

00:40:27.560 and

00:40:27.840 the

00:40:28.000 long

00:40:28.200 run

00:40:28.440 and

00:40:29.260 you

00:40:29.380 would

00:40:29.500 need

00:40:29.940 to

00:40:30.040 know

00:40:30.200 if

00:40:30.360 it

00:40:30.520 was

00:40:30.800 beneficial

00:40:31.760 at

00:40:32.240 all

00:40:32.520 to

00:40:32.840 the

00:40:32.980 thing

00:40:33.140 you're

00:40:33.300 trying

00:40:33.500 to

00:40:33.680 treat

00:40:33.980 under

00:40:34.880 those

00:40:35.220 conditions

00:40:35.820 when

00:40:36.180 you're

00:40:36.360 trying

00:40:36.560 to

00:40:36.760 learn

00:40:37.020 all

00:40:37.420 three

00:40:37.700 things

00:40:38.200 what's

00:40:39.300 it

00:40:39.380 going

00:40:39.500 to

00:40:45.680 benefit

00:40:46.080 under

00:40:46.940 those

00:40:47.420 conditions

00:40:48.180 you

00:40:49.020 absolutely

00:40:49.780 need

00:40:50.280 what

00:40:50.740 dr

00:40:51.220 fauci

00:40:51.780 says

00:40:52.260 you

00:40:52.440 need

00:40:52.700 you

00:40:53.960 need

00:40:54.220 the

00:40:54.380 double

00:40:54.600 blind

00:40:54.940 you

00:40:55.180 need

00:40:55.380 the

00:40:55.520 gold

00:40:55.740 standard

00:40:56.220 or

00:40:56.820 don't

00:40:57.160 put

00:40:57.360 that

00:40:57.540 in

00:40:57.660 anybody's

00:40:58.100 body

00:40:58.400 it's

00:40:58.700 just

00:40:58.960 a

00:40:59.200 bad

00:40:59.540 idea

00:40:59.980 if

00:41:00.600 you

00:41:00.680 haven't

00:41:00.920 tested

00:41:01.220 but

00:41:02.280 that's

00:41:02.860 not

00:41:03.060 our

00:41:03.260 situation

00:41:03.820 is

00:41:04.060 it

00:41:04.280 our

00:41:05.180 situation

00:41:05.720 is

00:41:06.040 that

00:41:06.260 hydroxychloroquine

00:41:07.360 in

00:41:08.200 low

00:41:08.600 dosage

00:41:09.100 which

00:41:09.460 is

00:41:09.620 the

00:41:09.780 only

00:41:09.940 thing

00:41:10.160 that's

00:41:10.400 recommended

00:41:10.840 for

00:41:11.140 the

00:41:11.340 early

00:41:12.380 symptoms

00:41:13.660 people

00:41:14.200 that

00:41:15.240 that

00:41:15.500 actually

00:41:15.900 doesn't

00:41:16.320 have

00:41:16.620 a

00:41:16.780 risk

00:41:17.180 because

00:41:17.900 let

00:41:19.840 me

00:41:20.000 not

00:41:20.580 speak

00:41:20.900 in

00:41:21.080 absolutes

00:41:21.760 rather

00:41:22.620 it's

00:41:23.000 one

00:41:23.200 of

00:41:23.300 the

00:41:23.460 safest

00:41:23.720 drugs

00:41:24.200 of

00:41:24.460 all

00:41:24.660 time

00:41:25.140 has

00:41:25.720 been

00:41:25.860 around

00:41:26.080 65

00:41:26.520 years

00:41:26.960 as

00:41:27.180 you

00:41:27.280 all

00:41:27.400 know

00:41:27.560 it's

00:41:27.720 been

00:41:27.880 tested

00:41:28.180 to

00:41:28.420 death

00:41:28.640 so

00:41:29.340 given

00:41:29.620 that

00:41:29.820 the

00:41:29.940 drug

00:41:30.120 exists

00:41:30.760 and

00:41:31.220 has

00:41:31.420 been

00:41:31.600 tested

00:41:32.000 50%

00:41:33.400 of

00:41:33.740 what

00:41:33.920 you're

00:41:34.100 trying

00:41:34.320 to

00:41:34.540 learn

00:41:34.900 in

00:41:35.960 one

00:41:36.140 of

00:41:36.240 these

00:41:36.440 gold

00:41:36.860 standard

00:41:37.260 trials

00:41:37.740 is

00:41:38.000 unnecessary

00:41:38.540 right

00:41:39.640 so

00:41:40.520 you

00:41:40.660 don't

00:41:40.900 need

00:41:41.260 the

00:41:43.140 gold

00:41:43.540 standard

00:41:43.980 to

00:41:44.380 find

00:41:44.620 out

00:41:44.780 half

00:41:45.140 of

00:41:45.280 what

00:41:45.460 you're

00:41:45.620 trying

00:41:45.760 to

00:41:45.900 find

00:41:46.100 out

00:41:46.300 you

00:41:46.460 already

00:41:46.660 know

00:41:46.940 under

00:41:48.140 those

00:41:48.480 conditions

00:41:48.960 when

00:41:49.780 the

00:41:49.900 hydroxychloroquine

00:41:50.780 is very

00:41:51.240 cheap

00:41:51.640 I mean

00:41:52.220 so cheap

00:41:52.900 it's like

00:41:53.600 candy

00:41:53.940 and you

00:41:56.080 know it's

00:41:56.480 safe

00:41:56.780 enough

00:41:57.280 right

00:41:58.180 nothing's

00:41:58.620 100%

00:41:59.160 but

00:41:59.460 better

00:42:00.200 than

00:42:00.520 Advil

00:42:01.040 if

00:42:02.160 if

00:42:02.180 you

00:42:02.260 know

00:42:02.400 it's

00:42:02.560 that

00:42:02.700 safe

00:42:03.100 and

00:42:03.660 that

00:42:03.840 cheap

00:42:04.180 and

00:42:05.620 you

00:42:05.720 know

00:42:05.860 it

00:42:05.980 might

00:42:06.300 work

00:42:06.760 because

00:42:07.740 there's

00:42:07.980 lots

00:42:08.260 of

00:42:08.400 indication

00:42:08.920 that

00:42:09.220 it

00:42:09.300 will

00:42:09.440 work

00:42:09.800 short

00:42:10.620 of

00:42:10.800 proof

00:42:11.140 this

00:42:12.540 is a

00:42:12.820 no

00:42:12.980 brainer

00:42:13.420 Dr.

00:42:14.280 Fauci

00:42:14.580 right

00:42:15.520 so

00:42:16.160 when

00:42:16.520 I

00:42:16.660 saw

00:42:16.880 Dr.

00:42:17.340 Fauci

00:42:17.720 insist

00:42:19.020 on

00:42:19.360 the

00:42:19.680 gold

00:42:20.820 standard

00:42:21.420 to test

00:42:24.180 it

00:42:25.300 looked

00:42:25.600 like

00:42:25.880 lying

00:42:26.360 lying

00:42:27.720 by

00:42:28.000 omission

00:42:28.620 and

00:42:29.760 what

00:42:30.000 I

00:42:30.140 mean

00:42:30.300 by

00:42:30.460 that

00:42:30.720 is

00:42:30.960 if

00:42:31.280 he

00:42:31.440 wasn't

00:42:31.800 willing

00:42:32.060 to

00:42:32.460 express

00:42:33.200 the

00:42:34.120 view

00:42:34.360 that

00:42:34.580 I

00:42:34.740 just

00:42:35.000 gave

00:42:35.480 and

00:42:37.580 either

00:42:37.820 debunk

00:42:38.300 it

00:42:38.500 or

00:42:38.680 embrace

00:42:39.040 it

00:42:39.280 I

00:42:39.980 feel

00:42:40.260 like

00:42:40.500 that's

00:42:40.800 lying

00:42:41.380 meaning

00:42:43.060 that

00:42:43.420 if

00:42:43.720 he

00:42:43.900 can't

00:42:44.320 give

00:42:44.560 this

00:42:44.780 to

00:42:44.960 the

00:42:45.120 public

00:42:45.480 the

00:42:46.160 same

00:42:46.460 way

00:42:46.680 that

00:42:46.880 I

00:42:47.140 told

00:42:47.400 it

00:42:47.540 to

00:42:47.680 you

00:42:47.900 or

00:42:48.720 to

00:42:49.460 tell

00:42:49.680 you

00:42:49.860 why

00:42:50.080 the

00:42:50.240 way

00:42:50.400 I

00:42:50.600 told

00:42:50.840 it

00:42:50.980 to

00:42:51.140 you

00:42:51.300 is

00:42:51.540 clearly

00:42:51.940 wrong

00:42:52.480 which

00:42:53.000 could

00:42:53.300 be

00:42:53.420 the

00:42:53.540 case

00:42:53.840 he's

00:42:55.180 lying

00:42:55.620 because

00:42:56.760 every

00:42:57.220 one

00:42:57.420 of

00:42:57.560 you

00:42:57.700 listens

00:42:58.040 to

00:42:58.260 him

00:42:58.420 talking

00:42:58.800 and

00:42:59.080 says

00:42:59.420 but

00:43:00.460 it's

00:43:00.660 really

00:43:00.900 cheap

00:43:01.380 we

00:43:01.900 know

00:43:02.180 it's

00:43:02.440 safe

00:43:02.840 and

00:43:03.520 I

00:43:03.680 hear

00:43:04.160 what

00:43:04.320 you're

00:43:04.480 saying

00:43:04.780 that

00:43:05.040 it

00:43:05.200 might

00:43:05.480 not

00:43:05.700 work

00:43:06.000 because

00:43:06.280 it

00:43:06.400 hasn't

00:43:07.220 passed

00:43:07.660 all

00:43:07.920 these

00:43:08.160 high

00:43:08.560 levels

00:43:09.000 of

00:43:09.280 standards

00:43:09.600 that

00:43:09.960 we'd

00:43:10.220 all

00:43:10.360 like

00:43:10.600 to

00:43:10.780 see

00:43:11.080 but

00:43:12.300 there's

00:43:12.700 a

00:43:12.920 whole

00:43:13.440 lot

00:43:14.240 of

00:43:14.480 suggestive

00:43:15.620 evidence

00:43:17.320 so

00:43:18.840 the

00:43:19.060 risk

00:43:19.380 management

00:43:19.880 clearly

00:43:20.640 is

00:43:21.500 weighted

00:43:21.800 in

00:43:22.020 one

00:43:22.220 direction

00:43:22.640 I

00:43:23.100 mean

00:43:23.240 overwhelmingly

00:43:24.140 so

00:43:25.420 Dr.

00:43:26.120 Fauci

00:43:26.460 unless

00:43:26.880 you

00:43:27.160 can

00:43:27.320 tell

00:43:27.500 me

00:43:27.660 why

00:43:27.940 the

00:43:28.340 risk

00:43:28.660 management

00:43:29.160 as

00:43:29.600 I

00:43:29.760 described

00:43:30.200 it

00:43:30.440 is

00:43:30.720 wrong

00:43:31.140 I

00:43:32.500 don't

00:43:32.700 want

00:43:32.900 to

00:43:33.000 hear

00:43:33.160 you

00:43:33.360 say

00:43:33.660 that

00:43:34.420 you

00:43:34.560 need

00:43:34.920 a

00:43:35.320 gold

00:43:35.580 standard

00:43:36.080 test

00:43:37.340 because

00:43:38.220 that

00:43:38.500 feels

00:43:39.080 to me

00:43:39.620 like

00:43:40.140 a

00:43:40.360 lie

00:43:40.760 it's

00:43:42.300 a

00:43:42.440 lie

00:43:42.700 by

00:43:42.940 omission

00:43:43.340 and

00:43:44.860 when

00:43:45.480 I

00:43:45.620 heard

00:43:45.800 him

00:43:45.940 do

00:43:46.120 that

00:43:46.400 it

00:43:46.620 triggered

00:43:46.940 me

00:43:47.300 and

00:43:48.340 then

00:43:48.740 I

00:43:48.960 you

00:43:49.520 know

00:43:49.700 I

00:43:50.600 over

00:43:51.160 tweeted

00:43:51.560 so

00:43:53.360 I

00:43:53.520 apologized

00:43:54.120 to

00:43:54.620 Dr.

00:43:55.020 Fauci

00:43:55.520 for

00:43:55.880 the

00:43:56.140 tweet

00:43:57.220 that

00:43:57.480 I

00:43:57.600 think

00:43:57.780 was

00:43:58.100 over

00:44:00.200 the

00:44:00.380 line

00:44:00.640 in

00:44:00.900 my

00:44:01.040 case

00:44:01.320 all

00:44:03.280 right

00:44:03.460 I

00:44:05.680 think

00:44:05.920 the

00:44:06.100 election

00:44:06.440 is

00:44:06.720 largely

00:44:07.100 over

00:44:07.700 and

00:44:09.980 I

00:44:10.240 think

00:44:10.480 Biden

00:44:11.020 is

00:44:11.420 a

00:44:11.700 dead

00:44:11.940 man

00:44:12.180 walking

00:44:12.580 and

00:44:13.340 I

00:44:13.480 say

00:44:13.660 that

00:44:13.880 because

00:44:14.260 of

00:44:14.480 a

00:44:14.740 political

00:44:15.380 ad

00:44:15.820 I

00:44:16.120 saw

00:44:16.420 yesterday

00:44:17.000 now

00:44:18.040 you

00:44:18.280 may

00:44:18.440 say

00:44:18.620 to

00:44:18.740 yourself

00:44:19.080 Scott

00:44:19.740 Scott

00:44:20.020 Scott

00:44:20.380 political

00:44:21.620 ads

00:44:22.120 don't

00:44:22.460 really

00:44:22.800 move

00:44:23.120 the

00:44:23.300 ball

00:44:23.520 that

00:44:23.780 much

00:44:24.240 you

00:44:24.900 know

00:44:25.140 not

00:44:25.760 that

00:44:26.020 much

00:44:26.380 but

00:44:27.620 it's

00:44:27.900 not

00:44:28.040 so

00:44:28.220 much

00:44:28.380 the

00:44:28.620 ad

00:44:29.060 which

00:44:29.400 was

00:44:29.580 actually

00:44:29.840 very

00:44:30.100 good

00:44:30.360 but

00:44:31.120 the

00:44:31.280 idea

00:44:31.720 so

00:44:32.520 the

00:44:32.700 ad

00:44:33.680 carried

00:44:34.260 an

00:44:34.560 idea

00:44:34.980 that

00:44:35.940 I

00:44:36.080 hadn't

00:44:36.400 seen

00:44:36.660 exactly

00:44:37.180 expressed

00:44:37.780 and

00:44:38.160 when

00:44:38.340 I

00:44:38.520 saw

00:44:38.740 it

00:44:38.920 I

00:44:39.080 said

00:44:39.340 oh

00:44:40.480 I

00:44:40.800 think

00:44:40.980 it's

00:44:41.140 over

00:44:41.460 and

00:44:42.800 the

00:44:42.940 ad

00:44:43.220 was

00:44:43.600 in

00:44:44.400 it

00:44:45.020 was

00:44:45.140 in

00:44:45.440 Spanish

00:44:45.980 so

00:44:47.560 it

00:44:47.860 was

00:44:47.960 a

00:44:48.100 campaign

00:44:48.440 ad

00:44:48.780 for

00:44:49.420 the

00:44:49.580 United

00:44:49.820 States

00:44:50.180 in

00:44:50.520 Spanish

00:44:50.980 in

00:44:51.760 which

00:44:51.920 it

00:44:52.060 showed

00:44:52.280 a

00:44:52.440 number

00:44:52.680 of

00:44:53.260 Hispanic

00:44:54.820 famous

00:44:55.540 people

00:44:55.860 like

00:44:56.120 AOC

00:44:56.520 and

00:44:57.540 there

00:44:57.720 were

00:44:58.140 some

00:44:58.340 people

00:44:58.560 on

00:44:58.740 the

00:44:58.840 left

00:44:59.080 some

00:44:59.360 people

00:44:59.580 on

00:44:59.720 the

00:44:59.820 right

00:45:00.060 so

00:45:00.600 basically

00:45:01.020 famous

00:45:01.720 successful

00:45:03.100 Hispanic

00:45:04.220 Americans

00:45:04.700 and

00:45:05.960 then

00:45:06.140 it

00:45:06.300 said

00:45:06.580 Joe

00:45:07.240 Biden

00:45:07.580 why

00:45:09.620 did

00:45:10.140 you

00:45:10.280 say

00:45:10.540 that

00:45:10.800 you

00:45:10.920 were

00:45:11.040 going

00:45:11.220 to

00:45:11.400 pick

00:45:11.700 a

00:45:12.620 black

00:45:13.480 vice

00:45:14.020 president

00:45:14.460 and

00:45:15.460 they

00:45:15.660 say

00:45:16.800 Hispanics

00:45:18.420 are

00:45:18.720 more

00:45:20.100 than

00:45:20.260 18%

00:45:20.880 of the

00:45:21.300 country

00:45:21.660 the

00:45:23.220 black

00:45:23.500 population

00:45:24.040 is

00:45:24.300 13

00:45:24.740 ish

00:45:25.200 and

00:45:26.320 so

00:45:26.600 the

00:45:27.340 Hispanics

00:45:27.860 are

00:45:28.000 saying

00:45:28.340 in

00:45:29.020 the

00:45:29.160 ad

00:45:29.440 what's

00:45:31.640 wrong

00:45:31.820 with

00:45:32.000 us

00:45:32.340 why

00:45:34.100 would

00:45:34.320 you

00:45:34.440 not

00:45:34.680 consider

00:45:35.520 Latino

00:45:38.300 Latinx

00:45:39.900 what's

00:45:41.020 the

00:45:41.500 woke

00:45:41.800 way

00:45:42.000 to

00:45:42.120 say

00:45:42.280 it

00:45:42.480 you

00:45:43.180 know

00:45:43.280 I've

00:45:43.440 never

00:45:43.600 figured

00:45:43.840 out

00:45:44.040 by the

00:45:44.300 way

00:45:44.480 the

00:45:45.020 difference

00:45:45.340 between

00:45:45.780 Hispanic

00:45:46.840 and

00:45:47.480 Latino

00:45:47.980 Latina

00:45:48.500 Latinx

00:45:50.460 I

00:45:52.040 always

00:45:52.600 think

00:45:52.840 I'm

00:45:53.020 going

00:45:53.120 to

00:45:53.180 know

00:45:53.320 the

00:45:53.460 difference

00:45:53.780 so

00:45:54.100 I'm

00:45:54.340 going

00:45:54.420 to

00:45:54.460 say

00:45:54.600 Hispanic

00:45:55.040 I

00:45:55.260 hope

00:45:55.360 we're

00:45:55.440 not

00:45:55.680 insulting

00:45:56.420 anybody

00:45:56.800 today

00:45:57.220 but

00:46:00.060 so

00:46:00.540 forget

00:46:01.240 about

00:46:01.460 the

00:46:01.640 fact

00:46:01.860 that

00:46:02.080 it

00:46:02.180 was

00:46:02.300 in

00:46:02.480 Spanish

00:46:02.860 forget

00:46:03.120 about

00:46:03.340 the

00:46:03.500 fact

00:46:03.700 that

00:46:03.840 it

00:46:03.880 was

00:46:03.960 a

00:46:04.120 campaign

00:46:04.380 ad

00:46:04.800 and

00:46:05.220 people

00:46:05.940 don't

00:46:06.220 get

00:46:06.400 too

00:46:06.620 influenced

00:46:07.020 by

00:46:07.240 them

00:46:07.460 in

00:46:07.640 my

00:46:07.800 opinion

00:46:08.100 but

00:46:09.360 that

00:46:10.720 idea

00:46:11.280 that

00:46:12.900 Joe

00:46:13.160 Biden

00:46:13.540 is

00:46:14.000 flat

00:46:14.440 out

00:46:14.660 racist

00:46:15.220 is

00:46:17.580 really

00:46:18.000 strong

00:46:18.600 because

00:46:19.820 can

00:46:21.200 you

00:46:21.360 think

00:46:21.580 of

00:46:21.720 any

00:46:21.920 time

00:46:22.200 that

00:46:22.440 Trump

00:46:22.880 has

00:46:23.800 ever

00:46:24.060 made

00:46:24.440 a

00:46:24.740 government

00:46:25.160 decision

00:46:25.740 based

00:46:26.160 on

00:46:26.520 entirely

00:46:27.480 race

00:46:28.020 I

00:46:29.520 suppose

00:46:29.960 you

00:46:30.160 could

00:46:30.300 say

00:46:30.640 helping

00:46:31.340 the

00:46:31.620 funding

00:46:31.980 of

00:46:32.280 the

00:46:32.500 of

00:46:33.860 the

00:46:34.040 traditional

00:46:34.500 historically

00:46:35.560 black

00:46:36.120 colleges

00:46:36.800 but

00:46:38.180 I

00:46:38.760 think

00:46:38.940 people

00:46:39.180 are

00:46:39.320 mostly

00:46:39.600 on

00:46:39.820 board

00:46:40.040 with

00:46:40.240 that

00:46:40.480 that's

00:46:40.780 pretty

00:46:40.960 popular

00:46:41.380 I

00:46:41.580 would

00:46:41.700 guess

00:46:42.000 but

00:46:43.380 Biden

00:46:43.740 saying

00:46:44.180 that

00:46:44.440 he

00:46:44.660 would

00:46:44.900 definitely

00:46:46.640 pick a

00:46:47.260 black

00:46:47.680 vice

00:46:48.060 president

00:46:48.480 when

00:46:49.340 18%

00:46:50.220 of the

00:46:50.520 country

00:46:50.800 is

00:46:51.060 Hispanic

00:46:51.500 we

00:46:52.200 just

00:46:52.480 had

00:46:52.780 not

00:46:53.260 just

00:46:53.740 but

00:46:54.000 not

00:46:54.380 too

00:46:54.560 recently

00:46:54.860 we

00:46:55.740 had

00:46:56.080 two

00:46:56.940 terms

00:46:57.440 of

00:46:57.720 Obama

00:46:58.200 and

00:46:59.820 you're

00:47:00.040 not

00:47:00.200 even

00:47:00.420 going to

00:47:00.780 consider

00:47:01.300 for a

00:47:02.000 vice

00:47:02.320 president

00:47:02.760 somebody

00:47:04.060 who's

00:47:04.400 in

00:47:04.520 18%

00:47:05.280 of

00:47:05.560 the

00:47:05.740 population

00:47:06.340 and

00:47:07.020 here's

00:47:07.260 the

00:47:07.380 thing

00:47:07.560 that

00:47:07.720 blew

00:47:07.900 my

00:47:08.100 head

00:47:08.300 off

00:47:08.600 and

00:47:09.220 I

00:47:09.340 think

00:47:09.580 you

00:47:11.860 might

00:47:12.640 have

00:47:12.820 the

00:47:12.960 same

00:47:13.180 impression

00:47:13.620 if

00:47:14.840 you're

00:47:15.180 a

00:47:15.460 white

00:47:15.720 person

00:47:16.140 in

00:47:16.440 America

00:47:16.840 you've

00:47:18.100 sort

00:47:18.560 of

00:47:18.680 come

00:47:18.940 to

00:47:19.140 accept

00:47:19.620 maybe

00:47:20.000 you

00:47:20.140 don't

00:47:20.280 like

00:47:20.560 it

00:47:20.800 but

00:47:21.200 you've

00:47:21.400 come

00:47:21.580 to

00:47:21.760 accept

00:47:22.200 that

00:47:23.500 it

00:47:23.840 can't

00:47:24.140 be

00:47:24.300 racist

00:47:24.700 against

00:47:25.180 white

00:47:25.500 people

00:47:25.820 now

00:47:26.760 of

00:47:26.940 course

00:47:27.200 in

00:47:27.500 your

00:47:27.660 private

00:47:27.980 thoughts

00:47:28.380 you're

00:47:28.560 thinking

00:47:28.780 of

00:47:29.000 course

00:47:29.180 it

00:47:29.320 can

00:47:29.420 be

00:47:29.560 racist

00:47:32.760 by

00:47:34.060 race

00:47:34.540 is

00:47:35.480 racist

00:47:35.820 by

00:47:36.080 definition

00:47:36.600 but

00:47:37.540 we

00:47:37.700 also

00:47:38.080 understand

00:47:39.020 that

00:47:39.620 if

00:47:39.820 you're

00:47:40.120 a

00:47:40.820 white

00:47:41.040 person

00:47:41.340 in

00:47:41.540 America

00:47:41.840 you're

00:47:42.360 part

00:47:43.160 of

00:47:43.280 a

00:47:43.480 traditional

00:47:44.060 class

00:47:45.220 that

00:47:45.420 had

00:47:45.600 some

00:47:45.780 advantages

00:47:46.340 not

00:47:46.840 all

00:47:47.120 of

00:47:47.240 you

00:47:47.420 of

00:47:47.680 course

00:47:48.020 but

00:47:48.940 many

00:47:49.680 had

00:47:50.080 advantages

00:47:50.580 and

00:47:51.280 so

00:47:51.480 you

00:47:51.680 sort

00:47:52.120 of

00:47:52.260 understand

00:47:53.180 the

00:47:53.540 thinking

00:47:54.000 even

00:47:54.320 if

00:47:54.520 you

00:47:54.640 don't

00:47:54.860 like

00:47:55.280 it

00:47:55.480 right

00:47:55.780 you're

00:47:56.480 like

00:47:56.640 I

00:47:57.480 think

00:47:57.820 racism

00:47:58.660 should

00:47:59.060 be

00:47:59.220 about

00:47:59.460 everybody

00:48:00.000 but

00:48:00.800 I

00:48:00.960 get

00:48:01.180 it

00:48:01.460 that

00:48:02.280 if

00:48:02.460 you're

00:48:02.740 at

00:48:03.400 the

00:48:03.700 lower

00:48:04.140 end

00:48:04.360 of

00:48:04.500 the

00:48:04.620 economic

00:48:05.240 pole

00:48:06.200 it's

00:48:06.780 different

00:48:07.680 right

00:48:08.460 it's

00:48:09.660 just

00:48:09.840 not

00:48:10.200 really

00:48:10.520 the

00:48:10.740 same

00:48:11.100 to

00:48:11.700 say

00:48:11.900 that

00:48:12.220 to

00:48:13.400 use

00:48:13.660 my

00:48:13.920 very

00:48:14.680 own

00:48:14.920 example

00:48:15.340 I've

00:48:15.920 lost

00:48:16.380 several

00:48:18.160 jobs

00:48:18.600 for being

00:48:19.060 a

00:48:19.340 white

00:48:19.560 male

00:48:19.820 many

00:48:21.140 of

00:48:21.300 you

00:48:21.400 know

00:48:21.560 my

00:48:21.760 stories

00:48:22.080 about

00:48:22.320 that

00:48:22.560 but

00:48:23.460 it's

00:48:24.340 not

00:48:24.500 the

00:48:24.620 end

00:48:24.760 of

00:48:24.860 the

00:48:24.940 world

00:48:25.140 for

00:48:25.340 me

00:48:25.560 because

00:48:26.200 I

00:48:26.340 had

00:48:26.540 plenty

00:48:27.040 of

00:48:27.240 opportunities

00:48:27.800 things

00:48:28.400 went

00:48:28.680 fine

00:48:29.080 so

00:48:30.600 when

00:48:31.440 people

00:48:32.160 say

00:48:32.500 that

00:48:32.740 anybody

00:48:33.100 is

00:48:33.380 being

00:48:33.620 racist

00:48:34.180 against

00:48:34.640 white

00:48:34.960 people

00:48:35.300 I

00:48:36.980 have

00:48:37.340 some

00:48:37.520 thoughts

00:48:37.980 about it

00:48:38.440 but it's

00:48:38.740 not the

00:48:39.060 end of

00:48:39.300 the world

00:48:39.660 but I'm

00:48:42.460 also not

00:48:43.000 Hispanic

00:48:43.620 imagine if you

00:48:45.940 were Hispanic

00:48:46.460 and you

00:48:48.100 were not

00:48:48.560 traditionally

00:48:49.400 the

00:48:49.820 dominant

00:48:50.540 ethnic

00:48:51.520 group

00:48:51.920 of the

00:48:52.200 United

00:48:52.440 States

00:48:52.720 in terms

00:48:53.140 of

00:48:53.300 economics

00:48:53.860 and the

00:48:55.460 vice

00:48:55.700 president

00:48:56.080 just said

00:48:56.720 or the

00:48:58.260 president

00:48:58.740 the candidate

00:49:00.260 for president

00:49:00.800 Joe Biden

00:49:01.320 you're

00:49:02.300 president

00:49:02.740 of your

00:49:03.340 country

00:49:03.820 you're a

00:49:05.240 citizen

00:49:05.620 of the

00:49:06.040 United

00:49:06.400 States

00:49:06.940 just like

00:49:08.600 everybody

00:49:08.980 else

00:49:09.400 and the

00:49:10.500 guy who

00:49:11.000 wants to

00:49:11.320 run for

00:49:11.660 president

00:49:12.140 of your

00:49:12.800 country

00:49:13.340 just told

00:49:14.600 you

00:49:14.860 that

00:49:15.960 you're

00:49:16.140 not

00:49:16.320 good

00:49:16.540 enough

00:49:16.760 to be

00:49:17.040 vice

00:49:17.300 president

00:49:17.660 and that's

00:49:18.560 what the

00:49:18.800 ad said

00:49:19.260 that's

00:49:19.600 the way

00:49:19.740 they phrased

00:49:20.180 it

00:49:20.340 why

00:49:20.580 are we

00:49:21.480 not

00:49:21.700 good

00:49:21.940 enough

00:49:22.280 to be

00:49:23.320 a

00:49:23.440 vice

00:49:23.640 president

00:49:24.040 because

00:49:25.100 we have

00:49:25.420 the

00:49:25.580 numbers

00:49:26.080 we have

00:49:27.640 the

00:49:27.780 numbers

00:49:28.220 and we

00:49:29.620 are not

00:49:30.300 an

00:49:30.620 historically

00:49:31.120 advantaged

00:49:32.180 population

00:49:33.200 now

00:49:34.300 obviously

00:49:35.260 it did

00:49:35.560 not come

00:49:35.940 through

00:49:36.160 the

00:49:36.480 pathway

00:49:38.000 of

00:49:38.260 slavery

00:49:38.620 so that's

00:49:39.120 a whole

00:49:39.360 other

00:49:39.540 story

00:49:39.940 so you

00:49:42.060 can make

00:49:42.340 the argument

00:49:42.800 but here's

00:49:43.760 the only

00:49:44.020 thing

00:49:44.240 I'm

00:49:44.440 going to

00:49:44.600 add

00:49:44.860 if that

00:49:45.760 point

00:49:46.420 gets

00:49:48.260 emphasized

00:49:48.800 I think

00:49:50.300 it will

00:49:50.720 that's

00:49:52.360 really

00:49:52.720 strong

00:49:53.280 and I

00:49:54.820 would be

00:49:55.140 curious

00:49:55.600 to hear

00:49:56.540 from

00:49:57.380 anybody

00:49:57.940 who's

00:49:58.500 a

00:49:58.720 Hispanic

00:49:59.200 American

00:49:59.660 who saw

00:50:00.160 that ad

00:50:00.760 or just

00:50:01.360 hears the

00:50:01.740 argument

00:50:02.040 how do

00:50:03.040 you feel

00:50:03.360 about it

00:50:03.820 because

00:50:05.240 maybe you

00:50:05.660 don't care

00:50:06.080 it could

00:50:06.620 be that

00:50:06.980 the people

00:50:07.320 who made

00:50:07.580 the ad

00:50:08.020 hoped

00:50:08.880 other people

00:50:09.620 would care

00:50:10.120 and they

00:50:10.560 just don't

00:50:12.020 and here's

00:50:14.660 something else

00:50:15.120 to blow 0.56

00:50:15.740 your mind

00:50:16.160 a little

00:50:16.440 bit

00:50:16.680 I feel

00:50:18.040 as though

00:50:18.560 the

00:50:19.720 Hispanic

00:50:20.320 Americans

00:50:20.880 have been

00:50:21.700 the

00:50:22.780 quietest

00:50:23.720 about

00:50:24.880 systemic

00:50:25.880 racism

00:50:26.400 it feels

00:50:27.960 that way

00:50:28.300 to me

00:50:28.720 right

00:50:29.320 it feels

00:50:30.060 like the

00:50:30.480 lead is

00:50:30.960 being taken

00:50:31.520 by both

00:50:32.100 black and

00:50:32.840 white

00:50:33.180 activists

00:50:33.920 that's

00:50:35.760 what I

00:50:36.040 see

00:50:36.240 anyway

00:50:36.520 I'm not

00:50:36.900 sure if

00:50:37.180 that's

00:50:37.360 true

00:50:37.520 but that's

00:50:37.820 what I

00:50:38.040 see

00:50:38.180 and

00:50:39.040 somebody

00:50:40.760 said to

00:50:41.220 me

00:50:41.380 yesterday

00:50:41.780 that the

00:50:42.220 reason is

00:50:42.700 that the

00:50:43.080 Hispanic

00:50:43.500 community

00:50:44.100 just cares

00:50:45.980 less

00:50:46.460 they're just

00:50:47.680 sort of

00:50:47.960 not invested

00:50:48.780 as much

00:50:49.980 in the

00:50:50.280 whole racism

00:50:51.000 racism

00:50:51.560 racism

00:50:52.260 thing

00:50:52.640 they're not

00:50:53.560 siding with

00:50:54.420 anybody

00:50:54.820 they're just

00:50:55.280 trying to get

00:50:55.880 their work

00:50:56.240 done

00:50:56.520 have their

00:50:56.960 life

00:50:57.300 you know

00:50:58.100 just stay

00:50:58.560 out of the

00:50:58.820 way

00:50:59.060 and not

00:51:00.240 get into

00:51:00.660 a fight

00:51:01.080 that's not

00:51:01.500 their fight

00:51:02.060 don't have

00:51:03.360 as much

00:51:03.840 you know

00:51:04.520 investment

00:51:05.160 in it

00:51:05.500 for some

00:51:05.820 reason

00:51:06.080 so the

00:51:07.580 thing I

00:51:07.900 don't

00:51:08.100 know

00:51:08.440 and I

00:51:09.620 be real

00:51:10.000 curious to

00:51:10.600 learn this

00:51:11.040 in the next

00:51:11.460 week or

00:51:11.960 so if

00:51:12.720 anybody wants

00:51:13.340 to tweet

00:51:14.740 at me or

00:51:15.280 send me a

00:51:15.700 message

00:51:15.980 if you

00:51:16.740 are

00:51:17.100 Hispanic

00:51:17.800 American

00:51:19.240 how does

00:51:20.440 it make

00:51:20.700 you feel

00:51:21.200 to know

00:51:21.880 that anybody

00:51:23.160 like you

00:51:24.000 can't be

00:51:24.620 vice president

00:51:25.260 under Joe

00:51:26.400 Biden

00:51:26.700 how does

00:51:27.220 that make

00:51:27.480 you feel

00:51:27.880 because as

00:51:29.980 a white

00:51:30.320 person I

00:51:31.140 say well

00:51:32.140 you know

00:51:32.540 if Biden's

00:51:34.000 there and

00:51:34.700 there have

00:51:35.020 been plenty

00:51:35.440 of white

00:51:35.780 presidents

00:51:36.360 I don't

00:51:37.240 care

00:51:37.460 fine with

00:51:38.880 me

00:51:39.160 but I

00:51:41.280 wouldn't

00:51:41.460 feel the

00:51:41.800 same if

00:51:42.120 I were

00:51:42.320 Hispanic

00:51:42.740 I think

00:51:43.680 I just

00:51:44.240 don't

00:51:44.480 know

00:51:44.760 Dr.

00:51:47.540 Fauci says

00:51:48.260 that the

00:51:48.900 reason that

00:51:49.400 Europe has

00:51:50.140 been able to

00:51:50.740 contain the

00:51:51.420 virus better

00:51:52.000 than the

00:51:52.280 United States

00:51:52.760 is that they

00:51:53.260 closed down

00:51:53.940 95% of

00:51:55.720 their economies

00:51:56.380 while the

00:51:57.880 US only

00:51:58.500 shut down

00:51:59.020 50%

00:51:59.780 so who

00:52:01.840 who's the

00:52:02.520 idiot there

00:52:03.060 so Trump

00:52:04.980 closed the

00:52:06.200 economy

00:52:06.520 only 50%

00:52:07.640 and then

00:52:08.120 had more

00:52:09.160 deaths

00:52:09.660 per capita

00:52:10.820 but in

00:52:12.400 Europe

00:52:12.740 those smart

00:52:14.140 Europeans

00:52:14.620 they went

00:52:15.420 all the way

00:52:15.820 to 95%

00:52:16.740 shutdown

00:52:17.120 and got a

00:52:20.000 better death

00:52:21.200 rate

00:52:21.420 so they're

00:52:23.240 the smart

00:52:23.660 ones right

00:52:24.120 yay Europe

00:52:25.440 they won

00:52:26.020 I don't

00:52:27.920 think so

00:52:28.480 here's my

00:52:30.200 take on

00:52:30.660 this

00:52:30.900 from the

00:52:32.140 beginning

00:52:32.540 Trump

00:52:33.460 described the

00:52:34.160 pandemic

00:52:34.580 as a war

00:52:35.480 in wars

00:52:37.440 you take

00:52:38.360 casualties

00:52:38.980 in battle

00:52:39.700 with the

00:52:40.840 hope that

00:52:41.200 you'll win

00:52:42.020 the larger

00:52:42.840 war

00:52:43.360 Trump's

00:52:44.800 approach

00:52:45.260 and he

00:52:45.820 said it

00:52:46.100 directly

00:52:46.480 and he

00:52:46.820 said it

00:52:47.080 a lot

00:52:47.320 of times

00:52:47.780 is that

00:52:48.420 it's a

00:52:48.720 war

00:52:49.060 at the

00:52:51.500 end of

00:52:51.760 the war

00:52:52.180 who won

00:52:53.580 let's say

00:52:54.560 let's say

00:52:55.100 that both

00:52:55.580 Europe and

00:52:56.040 the United

00:52:56.340 States get

00:52:56.980 to the end

00:52:57.460 of the

00:52:57.680 pandemic

00:52:58.080 whenever

00:52:58.560 that is

00:52:59.080 and our

00:53:00.760 death rate

00:53:01.260 is higher

00:53:01.780 but our

00:53:03.860 economy

00:53:04.380 is better

00:53:05.400 right

00:53:06.700 so our

00:53:07.460 death rate

00:53:07.940 is higher

00:53:08.480 but our

00:53:09.720 economy

00:53:10.220 is better

00:53:10.840 who won

00:53:12.200 the war

00:53:12.680 the war

00:53:14.220 is with

00:53:14.620 China

00:53:15.020 right

00:53:16.380 the pandemic

00:53:17.140 is just

00:53:17.680 sort of

00:53:18.960 you know

00:53:19.240 part of

00:53:19.600 the war

00:53:19.940 but the

00:53:20.940 long-term

00:53:21.540 war

00:53:22.060 is with

00:53:23.100 China

00:53:23.420 and whoever

00:53:24.700 has the

00:53:25.240 strongest

00:53:25.600 economy

00:53:26.340 is going

00:53:27.060 to have

00:53:27.200 the strongest

00:53:27.660 defense

00:53:28.680 and the

00:53:29.740 most

00:53:30.120 ability

00:53:30.580 to survive

00:53:31.940 in the

00:53:32.280 future

00:53:32.560 so we

00:53:33.900 don't know

00:53:34.260 how Europe

00:53:35.060 and the

00:53:35.780 US will

00:53:36.260 come out

00:53:36.640 of this

00:53:36.940 but I

00:53:37.620 would argue

00:53:38.020 that if

00:53:39.020 the US

00:53:39.740 economy

00:53:40.300 goes up

00:53:42.700 like a

00:53:43.020 whole

00:53:43.220 level

00:53:43.640 something

00:53:44.620 that's

00:53:45.000 really

00:53:45.340 obvious

00:53:46.060 and measurable

00:53:46.900 and sustained

00:53:48.940 if it goes

00:53:49.960 up a level

00:53:50.540 and Europe

00:53:51.100 let's say

00:53:51.600 goes down

00:53:52.160 or doesn't

00:53:52.600 go up

00:53:53.020 and it

00:53:53.840 causes

00:53:54.160 like a

00:53:54.760 permanent

00:53:55.680 situation

00:53:56.340 of more

00:53:57.100 American

00:53:57.540 economic

00:53:58.360 power

00:53:59.600 relative

00:54:00.080 to Europe

00:54:00.660 who

00:54:02.080 was

00:54:02.700 smarter

00:54:03.040 even if

00:54:05.520 we had

00:54:05.940 a pretty

00:54:06.900 grotesquely

00:54:07.740 higher

00:54:08.180 death rate

00:54:08.880 let's say

00:54:09.760 we lost

00:54:10.400 I don't know

00:54:11.920 50,000

00:54:12.960 people

00:54:13.400 that we

00:54:14.660 didn't need

00:54:15.120 to lose

00:54:15.520 if we

00:54:15.880 had done

00:54:16.120 it the

00:54:16.400 European

00:54:16.740 way

00:54:17.120 how long

00:54:18.340 would it

00:54:18.680 take

00:54:19.020 for us

00:54:19.600 to recoup

00:54:20.360 the 50,000

00:54:22.020 dead

00:54:22.700 people

00:54:23.180 obviously

00:54:23.660 they don't

00:54:24.100 pop back

00:54:24.620 to life

00:54:25.060 but a

00:54:25.860 strong

00:54:26.180 economy

00:54:26.700 can keep

00:54:27.300 other people

00:54:27.800 alive

00:54:28.200 who would

00:54:28.540 have

00:54:28.660 otherwise

00:54:29.280 perished

00:54:30.120 and can

00:54:30.860 keep the

00:54:31.260 country

00:54:31.520 safe

00:54:31.980 from

00:54:32.660 external

00:54:33.200 threats

00:54:33.640 in a way

00:54:34.060 that you

00:54:34.320 can't

00:54:34.660 if you

00:54:34.880 don't

00:54:35.040 have

00:54:35.220 money

00:54:35.520 so

00:54:36.760 I

00:54:38.060 feel

00:54:38.460 as if

00:54:39.000 Trump

00:54:40.320 told us

00:54:41.320 it was

00:54:41.660 a war

00:54:42.140 told us

00:54:43.820 there would

00:54:44.200 be

00:54:44.400 casualties

00:54:45.080 kept

00:54:47.560 kept the

00:54:48.180 economy

00:54:48.640 you know

00:54:49.220 open

00:54:49.700 ish

00:54:50.440 and

00:54:51.660 basically

00:54:53.480 went to

00:54:53.960 war

00:54:54.260 and

00:54:55.940 as

00:54:57.200 commander

00:54:57.660 in chief

00:54:58.200 he knew

00:54:59.440 he would

00:54:59.780 take

00:55:00.040 casualties

00:55:00.680 in the

00:55:01.900 short

00:55:02.120 term

00:55:02.420 but the

00:55:02.960 point of

00:55:03.520 it is

00:55:03.820 to win

00:55:04.120 the war

00:55:04.600 not the

00:55:05.680 individual

00:55:06.160 battles

00:55:06.700 every time

00:55:07.360 and I

00:55:08.660 feel as

00:55:09.100 though

00:55:09.380 when this

00:55:10.420 is all

00:55:10.740 said and

00:55:11.160 done

00:55:11.400 and we're

00:55:11.800 looking back

00:55:12.400 at it

00:55:12.700 in five

00:55:13.100 years

00:55:13.460 if the

00:55:14.720 U.S.

00:55:15.000 economy

00:55:15.560 got a

00:55:16.820 permanent

00:55:17.220 sustained

00:55:18.060 bump

00:55:18.580 from

00:55:19.120 relative

00:55:20.160 to

00:55:21.240 Europe

00:55:21.580 I'm

00:55:22.660 going to

00:55:22.840 say

00:55:22.980 Trump

00:55:23.300 won

00:55:23.600 and I'm

00:55:24.620 going to

00:55:24.760 say

00:55:24.900 Europe

00:55:25.120 lost

00:55:25.440 the

00:55:25.600 war

00:55:25.760 but we

00:55:27.120 don't

00:55:27.260 know

00:55:27.420 that

00:55:27.560 that will

00:55:27.800 happen

00:55:28.060 I'm

00:55:28.920 just

00:55:29.080 setting

00:55:29.360 that up

00:55:29.780 right

00:55:30.300 now

00:55:30.860 so

00:55:34.260 of course

00:55:34.820 Republicans

00:55:35.360 and Democrats

00:55:36.620 are

00:55:37.100 arguing

00:55:37.760 about

00:55:38.040 the

00:55:38.220 coronavirus

00:55:38.760 relief

00:55:41.120 bill

00:55:41.520 which

00:55:42.080 means

00:55:42.300 the

00:55:42.460 checks

00:55:42.680 aren't

00:55:42.900 going

00:55:43.120 out

00:55:43.500 which

00:55:44.140 means

00:55:44.400 that

00:55:44.560 people

00:55:44.800 will

00:55:45.160 be

00:55:45.460 unable

00:55:45.960 to

00:55:46.280 eat

00:55:46.700 and

00:55:46.900 pay

00:55:47.060 the

00:55:47.220 rent

00:55:47.480 and

00:55:49.340 here's

00:55:50.480 what

00:55:50.620 I

00:55:50.760 would

00:55:50.900 suggest

00:55:51.360 given

00:55:53.360 that

00:55:53.800 the

00:55:55.780 total

00:55:56.160 amount

00:55:56.500 of

00:55:56.700 printed

00:55:57.020 money

00:55:57.360 and

00:55:57.600 new

00:55:57.860 debt

00:55:58.320 if you

00:55:58.640 will

00:55:58.860 that

00:56:00.700 we've

00:56:00.920 already

00:56:01.160 done

00:56:01.480 don't

00:56:02.460 we owe

00:56:02.760 something

00:56:03.000 like

00:56:03.240 28

00:56:03.680 trillion

00:56:04.040 dollars

00:56:04.520 at

00:56:05.320 this

00:56:05.520 point

00:56:05.740 the

00:56:05.900 national

00:56:06.220 debt

00:56:06.520 the

00:56:07.520 difference

00:56:08.700 between

00:56:09.320 the

00:56:10.200 smaller

00:56:10.620 number

00:56:11.040 or

00:56:11.900 even

00:56:12.380 the

00:56:12.860 difference

00:56:13.180 in how

00:56:13.460 they

00:56:13.580 want

00:56:13.760 to

00:56:13.880 spend

00:56:14.120 it

00:56:14.320 I

00:56:15.240 would

00:56:15.420 recommend

00:56:15.920 that you

00:56:16.340 just

00:56:16.540 give

00:56:16.860 both

00:56:17.320 the

00:56:17.520 Democrats

00:56:17.920 and

00:56:18.320 the

00:56:18.460 Republicans

00:56:18.920 everything

00:56:19.500 they've

00:56:19.840 asked

00:56:20.060 for

00:56:20.360 because

00:56:21.420 it's

00:56:21.560 not

00:56:21.720 going

00:56:21.840 to

00:56:21.920 make

00:56:22.140 much

00:56:24.180 difference

00:56:24.660 so

00:56:25.360 in

00:56:25.480 other

00:56:25.640 words

00:56:25.880 Democrats

00:56:26.460 and

00:56:26.700 Republicans

00:56:27.100 they

00:56:28.440 have

00:56:28.980 different

00:56:29.600 ideas

00:56:30.660 of how

00:56:31.040 much

00:56:31.220 to spend

00:56:31.760 on each

00:56:32.180 category

00:56:32.760 of

00:56:33.000 thing

00:56:33.280 I

00:56:34.380 would

00:56:34.540 say

00:56:34.720 take

00:56:34.980 the

00:56:35.200 biggest

00:56:35.480 number

00:56:35.880 that

00:56:36.580 either

00:56:36.940 one

00:56:37.180 of

00:56:37.340 them

00:56:37.500 have

00:56:37.840 for

00:56:38.200 every

00:56:38.500 category

00:56:38.960 and

00:56:39.240 pick

00:56:39.440 it

00:56:39.660 just

00:56:40.360 pick

00:56:40.600 the

00:56:40.780 biggest

00:56:41.080 number

00:56:41.480 that

00:56:42.500 the

00:56:42.680 Republicans

00:56:43.160 want

00:56:43.600 for

00:56:43.860 let's

00:56:44.320 say

00:56:44.540 tax

00:56:45.020 cuts

00:56:45.340 and

00:56:46.100 the

00:56:46.300 biggest

00:56:46.580 number

00:56:46.940 that

00:56:47.320 the

00:56:48.320 Democrats

00:56:49.680 want

00:56:50.100 for

00:56:50.360 social

00:56:51.160 services

00:56:51.720 just

00:56:52.840 take

00:56:53.380 the

00:56:53.560 biggest

00:56:53.920 number

00:56:54.300 and

00:56:55.040 just

00:56:55.260 freaking

00:56:55.660 get

00:56:55.900 it

00:56:56.040 done

00:56:56.300 so

00:56:56.860 you

00:56:56.960 can

00:56:57.100 feed

00:56:57.380 some

00:56:57.600 people

00:56:57.900 because

00:56:58.800 that

00:56:59.500 difference

00:56:59.960 to our

00:57:00.360 total

00:57:00.640 national

00:57:01.120 debt

00:57:01.460 at

00:57:01.720 this

00:57:01.940 point

00:57:02.280 is

00:57:04.740 sort

00:57:05.020 of

00:57:05.140 lost

00:57:05.400 in

00:57:05.580 the

00:57:05.700 rounding

00:57:06.040 unfortunately

00:57:06.620 you know

00:57:07.480 somebody

00:57:08.920 says

00:57:09.180 100

00:57:09.480 trillion

00:57:09.880 what

00:57:11.960 was

00:57:12.340 28

00:57:12.840 trillion

00:57:13.240 was

00:57:13.560 28

00:57:14.020 trillion

00:57:14.420 not

00:57:16.140 this

00:57:16.540 year

00:57:17.000 right

00:57:17.520 that

00:57:18.440 would

00:57:18.740 be

00:57:18.880 too

00:57:19.040 big

00:57:19.300 all

00:57:20.060 right

00:57:20.160 so

00:57:20.300 I

00:57:20.400 don't

00:57:20.500 have

00:57:20.680 any

00:57:20.820 of

00:57:20.920 my

00:57:21.020 numbers

00:57:21.300 right

00:57:21.520 but

00:57:21.680 the

00:57:21.900 basic

00:57:22.640 idea

00:57:23.020 is

00:57:23.420 the

00:57:24.040 way

00:57:24.220 to

00:57:24.360 solve

00:57:24.620 this

00:57:24.900 difference

00:57:25.360 in

00:57:25.600 congress

00:57:25.940 is

00:57:26.200 to

00:57:26.360 give

00:57:26.540 both

00:57:26.820 sides

00:57:27.100 everything

00:57:27.520 give

00:57:28.520 both

00:57:28.940 sides

00:57:29.400 everything

00:57:30.260 and

00:57:32.200 just

00:57:32.400 feed

00:57:32.640 the

00:57:32.760 people

00:57:33.040 because

00:57:33.420 otherwise

00:57:33.660 people

00:57:34.000 die

00:57:34.340 from

00:57:34.520 starvation

00:57:35.100 and

00:57:35.360 stuff

00:57:35.640 like

00:57:36.440 you know

00:57:37.120 I'm

00:57:37.380 I'm

00:57:37.400 not

00:57:37.500 going

00:57:37.600 to

00:57:37.620 argue

00:57:37.840 about

00:57:38.120 another

00:57:38.540 3%

00:57:40.000 on

00:57:40.280 the

00:57:40.580 national

00:57:42.340 debt

00:57:42.720 if

00:57:43.460 people

00:57:43.700 are

00:57:43.860 starving

00:57:44.240 so

00:57:45.540 the

00:57:50.580 debt

00:57:50.960 yeah

00:57:51.620 I need

00:57:52.100 to check

00:57:52.420 my numbers

00:57:52.860 I don't

00:57:53.120 know

00:57:53.280 enough

00:57:53.520 about

00:57:53.760 national

00:57:54.140 debt

00:57:54.420 20

00:57:56.780 trillion

00:57:57.100 I'm

00:57:57.320 seeing

00:57:57.500 people

00:57:57.840 throwing

00:57:58.480 some

00:57:58.700 numbers

00:57:58.960 out

00:57:59.160 in

00:57:59.380 the

00:57:59.580 comments

00:58:00.460 somebody

00:58:04.240 says

00:58:04.620 you

00:58:04.880 do

00:58:05.280 28

00:58:05.840 trillion

00:58:06.140 is

00:58:06.420 the

00:58:06.640 current

00:58:07.180 total

00:58:08.200 debt

00:58:08.760 current

00:58:10.340 total

00:58:10.880 debt

00:58:11.220 so

00:58:11.960 that's

00:58:12.220 not

00:58:12.420 annual

00:58:12.780 that's

00:58:13.220 how

00:58:13.520 much

00:58:13.740 we've

00:58:14.020 racked

00:58:14.320 up

00:58:14.480 over

00:58:14.880 time

00:58:15.300 so

00:58:17.040 if

00:58:17.380 you're

00:58:17.560 going

00:58:17.660 to

00:58:17.760 add

00:58:18.060 to

00:58:18.440 your

00:58:18.700 28

00:58:19.340 trillion

00:58:19.900 total

00:58:20.740 debt

00:58:21.160 one

00:58:22.280 more

00:58:22.540 trillion

00:58:22.960 than

00:58:24.600 you

00:58:24.800 wanted

00:58:25.060 to

00:58:25.300 I

00:58:26.460 think

00:58:26.720 if

00:58:26.960 this

00:58:27.320 is

00:58:27.460 the

00:58:27.600 time

00:58:27.800 to

00:58:27.960 do

00:58:28.120 it

00:58:28.320 just

00:58:28.880 throw

00:58:29.160 it

00:58:29.300 in

00:58:29.400 there

00:58:29.600 throw

00:58:31.300 it

00:58:31.480 in

00:58:31.580 there

00:58:31.760 and

00:58:32.140 see

00:58:32.400 if

00:58:32.540 that

00:58:32.680 helps

00:58:32.980 all

00:58:33.800 right

00:58:33.960 I

00:58:36.300 think

00:58:36.560 I've

00:58:36.760 talked

00:58:36.960 about

00:58:37.200 everything

00:58:37.560 that

00:58:37.800 matters

00:58:38.120 today

00:58:38.580 somebody

00:58:43.360 says

00:58:43.740 people

00:58:44.080 should

00:58:44.460 be

00:58:44.640 able

00:58:44.840 to

00:58:45.060 sue

00:58:45.440 their

00:58:45.680 employers

00:58:46.200 if

00:58:46.580 they

00:58:46.740 get

00:58:46.960 sick

00:58:47.420 I

00:58:49.640 don't

00:58:49.920 know

00:58:50.220 maybe

00:58:52.120 I

00:58:53.620 don't

00:58:53.720 know

00:58:53.820 I'd

00:58:54.000 have

00:58:54.100 to

00:58:54.200 think

00:58:54.380 about

00:58:54.580 that

00:58:54.740 one

00:58:54.940 because

00:58:55.680 that's

00:58:55.960 got

00:58:56.320 some

00:58:56.520 real

00:58:56.700 trade

00:58:56.960 offs

00:58:57.240 somebody

00:59:01.760 says

00:59:02.100 not

00:59:02.360 hearing

00:59:02.740 or

00:59:03.020 seeing

00:59:03.380 hunger

00:59:03.820 reported

00:59:04.480 other

00:59:05.400 than

00:59:05.620 here

00:59:05.880 yeah

00:59:06.820 so

00:59:08.760 far

00:59:09.240 it's

00:59:10.140 my

00:59:10.340 understanding

00:59:10.920 that

00:59:11.860 nobody

00:59:12.160 starved

00:59:12.580 to

00:59:12.720 death

00:59:12.940 and

00:59:13.900 I

00:59:14.060 think

00:59:14.200 we

00:59:14.340 have

00:59:14.460 to

00:59:14.580 pat

00:59:14.780 ourselves

00:59:15.080 on

00:59:15.260 the

00:59:15.360 back

00:59:15.580 a little

00:59:15.860 bit

00:59:16.040 for

00:59:16.160 that

00:59:16.380 as

00:59:16.700 as

00:59:17.240 America

00:59:17.940 because

00:59:18.960 remember

00:59:19.420 early

00:59:19.740 on

00:59:20.100 when

00:59:21.160 we

00:59:21.580 first

00:59:22.040 we

00:59:22.800 first

00:59:23.100 were

00:59:23.420 presented

00:59:23.960 with

00:59:24.160 the

00:59:24.260 pandemic

00:59:24.640 and

00:59:25.420 I

00:59:25.560 was

00:59:25.700 trying

00:59:25.920 to

00:59:26.160 calm

00:59:26.840 the

00:59:27.200 fears

00:59:27.640 of

00:59:28.280 my

00:59:28.460 audience

00:59:28.920 and

00:59:29.340 I

00:59:29.500 said

00:59:29.860 we're

00:59:30.680 not

00:59:30.900 going

00:59:31.040 to

00:59:31.100 run

00:59:31.240 out

00:59:31.380 of

00:59:31.520 food

00:59:31.920 so

00:59:33.040 I

00:59:33.240 said

00:59:33.660 that

00:59:33.940 as

00:59:34.720 hard

00:59:35.040 as

00:59:35.360 I

00:59:35.500 possibly

00:59:35.900 could

00:59:36.240 that

00:59:37.020 we're

00:59:37.160 not

00:59:37.360 going

00:59:37.500 to

00:59:37.580 run

00:59:37.740 out

00:59:37.940 of

00:59:38.140 food

00:59:38.900 and

00:59:40.220 so

00:59:40.460 far

00:59:40.640 not

00:59:40.960 so

00:59:41.860 I

00:59:42.160 think

00:59:42.680 that's

00:59:42.980 really

00:59:43.220 a

00:59:43.460 credit

00:59:43.720 to

00:59:43.920 us

00:59:44.160 you

00:59:44.580 see

00:59:45.240 everything

00:59:45.600 we

00:59:45.840 do

00:59:46.020 wrong

00:59:46.420 but

00:59:47.180 you

00:59:47.300 don't

00:59:47.480 see

00:59:47.680 the

00:59:47.840 things

00:59:48.080 we

00:59:48.240 did

00:59:48.460 right

00:59:48.780 so

00:59:49.820 let's

00:59:50.920 give

00:59:51.080 a

00:59:51.280 standing

00:59:51.720 ovation

00:59:52.260 to

00:59:52.660 the

00:59:52.960 food

00:59:54.000 supply

00:59:54.500 chain

00:59:54.840 in

00:59:55.060 the

00:59:55.180 United

00:59:55.420 States

00:59:55.840 just

00:59:56.320 a

00:59:56.540 tremendous

00:59:56.880 number

00:59:57.240 of

00:59:57.400 people

00:59:57.720 taking

00:59:58.780 risks

00:59:59.360 the

00:59:59.860 meat

01:00:00.360 packers

01:00:01.000 the

01:00:01.840 food

01:00:02.760 industry

01:00:03.920 in this

01:00:04.360 country

01:00:04.700 basically

01:00:05.800 went to

01:00:06.620 war

01:00:06.980 if you

01:00:08.360 think

01:00:08.560 about

01:00:08.780 it

01:00:09.000 the

01:00:09.560 food

01:00:10.200 workers

01:00:10.940 especially

01:00:12.020 the

01:00:12.320 meat

01:00:12.520 packers

01:00:12.880 were

01:00:13.040 exposed

01:00:14.120 they

01:00:14.880 went

01:00:15.080 to

01:00:15.240 war

01:00:15.600 they

01:00:16.760 didn't

01:00:16.920 want

01:00:17.140 to

01:00:17.340 I'm

01:00:17.900 sure

01:00:18.040 it

01:00:18.220 wasn't

01:00:18.720 their

01:00:18.880 first

01:00:19.120 choice

01:00:19.440 but

01:00:20.260 the

01:00:20.520 alternative

01:00:21.040 was

01:00:21.560 that

01:00:21.740 their

01:00:21.960 fellow

01:00:22.480 citizens

01:00:23.460 starved

01:00:24.160 to

01:00:24.300 death

01:00:24.500 so

01:00:25.560 it's

01:00:25.880 a little

01:00:26.040 different

01:00:26.260 than

01:00:26.440 teachers

01:00:26.800 you know

01:00:27.240 because

01:00:27.500 you

01:00:27.780 can

01:00:28.180 you

01:00:28.520 get

01:00:28.640 a little

01:00:28.880 bit

01:00:29.060 more

01:00:29.380 flexibility

01:00:31.260 with

01:00:31.920 education

01:00:32.580 but

01:00:33.760 the

01:00:34.160 food

01:00:34.920 workers

01:00:35.360 of

01:00:35.620 America

01:00:36.080 heroes

01:00:38.460 absolute

01:00:39.620 heroes

01:00:40.160 because

01:00:41.200 they

01:00:41.340 kept

01:00:41.580 us

01:00:41.760 fed

01:00:42.020 so

01:00:43.360 I

01:00:44.600 saw

01:00:45.180 somebody

01:00:45.460 ask

01:00:45.660 about

01:00:45.960 Dershowitz

01:00:46.620 I

01:00:46.760 understand

01:00:47.100 there's

01:00:47.380 an

01:00:47.520 interesting

01:00:47.900 interview

01:00:49.640 with

01:00:49.860 him

01:00:50.000 that

01:00:50.140 I

01:00:50.220 haven't

01:00:50.400 seen

01:00:50.600 yet

01:00:50.800 so

01:00:50.980 we'll

01:00:51.160 look

01:00:51.300 at

01:00:51.400 that

01:00:51.640 in a

01:00:52.000 bit

01:00:52.180 and

01:00:52.560 I

01:00:52.700 will

01:00:52.820 talk

01:00:53.000 to

01:00:53.100 you

01:00:53.300 tomorrow

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 01, 2020

Episode 1078 Scott Adams： Defund the Police a Smart Way, Fauci Misdirection, How to do a Convention, HCQ

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript