Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1103 Scott Adams： The RNC Persuasion Masterpiece, Biden's Satanic Coincidences, BLM Terrorism, Suburban Warning Shots

00:00:00.000 Bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, hey everybody, come on in, it's time for Coffee

00:00:09.100 with Scott Adams, best part of the day, every single time, and today is going to be, I don't

00:00:18.580 like to brag, but it's going to be the best Coffee with Scott Adams since, I don't know,

00:00:25.800 yesterday at least, and what do you need to participate, what do you need, well, all you

00:00:33.220 need is a cup or a mug or a glass, you need a tanker, chalice, or stein, you could use

00:00:41.480 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, I like

00:00:48.900 coffee, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the

00:00:55.080 thing that makes everything better, it's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens, now, go.

00:01:08.580 Well, if you can't tell from looking behind me, I am not in my house in California, I've

00:01:15.580 escaped to Arizona for a couple days, the update on my house in California is that as of last

00:01:24.340 night, it's off the danger zone. So it looks like the fire department and all of their

00:01:32.200 volunteers made a stand, but also the weather miraculously changed. So if the weather forecast

00:01:40.580 had gone as forecast, with lots of dry lightning and lots of wind in the wrong direction, my house

00:01:50.220 may have gone up in smoke. It would have been happening right now, actually. But, got a little

00:01:58.360 text last night that says, the wind changed, and the conditions have softened, and my house

00:02:07.380 will not be burning down today. Now, I want to give you a little vacation tip. It's hard to take any kind

00:02:16.760 of a vacation. Arizona's kind of a free state, so we got to pop over here for a couple days.

00:02:23.500 And, if you've ever arranged to have a massage at the same time that your house may or may not be

00:02:34.340 burning down, I would recommend, and this is just sort of a travel tip, don't schedule a massage

00:02:41.760 massage at approximately the same time as your house might be on fire. Because those two activities,

00:02:50.560 they're not entirely compatible. It's hard to relax. I changed my, yeah, all the pets are okay. The

00:03:00.400 house is fine. And obviously, I have somebody at the house watching it, so there was no danger for the

00:03:06.760 pets. I have changed my hotel accommodations, as you can see. It's a little bit better than it was before.

00:03:19.340 Got a great view here today. The first place, the first place that we were staying, we always try to get a

00:03:27.240 place that's got at least two bathrooms, because we hate to overlap. I like my privacy in my bathroom, and it's just

00:03:35.560 good to have two bathrooms. So, it's one of my only serious luxuries in life. You know, I'm not too big on

00:03:43.820 collecting stuff, but I like to have two bathrooms when I travel. It's where I'd like to spend my money.

00:03:50.420 And the other place had two bathrooms, but one of them was like a dog's shower. I didn't realize that

00:03:55.880 until I tried to take a shower in it, and apparently it was just sort of for washing your dog.

00:04:00.780 It wasn't exactly what I was hoping for. But this place, quite good. It's actually a house. It's a rented

00:04:07.440 house. All right, let's talk about all the stuff. All the stuff. Enough about me. There's a big story

00:04:15.840 about Jerry Falwell Jr. in a sex scandal kind of situation. And for some reason, this is national

00:04:25.440 news. Now, I don't know why, because I'm not going to repeat the details of the allegations,

00:04:33.500 but they don't involve any victims. There's no victims. There's nobody, you know, underage.

00:04:40.000 There's nobody who cheated. There's nobody who lied. There's nobody who broke a commandment.

00:04:47.600 But there's this little private story about Jerry Falwell Jr. and his wife. And I'm thinking,

00:04:54.040 who exactly thinks this should be national news? I get that it's interesting. But making it national

00:05:01.900 news? That is just so wrong. And if you're on the left, I would think you would be especially eager

00:05:10.220 not to make this national news. Because isn't a big part of the left's philosophy, and by the way,

00:05:16.780 one that I buy into completely, that everybody's different? You know, aren't we trying to get away

00:05:23.240 from, you know, on the left anyway, trying to get away from everybody's fitting into one box? You're

00:05:29.620 either gay or you're either a man or a woman. You know, isn't the whole idea of the left that you 0.99

00:05:36.840 could be anywhere on the rainbow, anywhere on the spectrum, as long as you're not bothering anybody

00:05:42.020 in breaking the law? I thought that was their own philosophy. So if the people on the right care

00:05:48.800 about it, and I doubt it, I don't know why they would care. Because again, he didn't break a

00:05:54.780 commandment, didn't break a law. There are no victims. There was nothing dishonest in any of the

00:06:01.100 allegations. So under those situations, why is this news? It just, it's disgusting, really.

00:06:07.900 Okay. Let's talk about the RNC convention. Now, I sometimes watch the big events after the fact

00:06:17.660 so that I can see the highlight clips, without seeing the texture of the entire thing. The theory

00:06:23.900 for this is that most voters also will not see the entire event. What the voters will see is the

00:06:31.460 highlight clips and whatever, whatever comes out of it. So sometimes if I'm trying to evaluate how

00:06:37.740 persuasive it is, I will skip the event and look at what highlights came out of it. Because it's the

00:06:43.880 highlights that will persuade or not persuade. And it's good to see them without being biased by the

00:06:49.460 whole event, because the rest of the country is not going to be biased that way. They'll be biased by

00:06:54.460 the clips. This also assumes that anybody who watches the entire event has already decided,

00:07:02.140 right? If you watch that whole event, you're really into politics and you've already made up your mind

00:07:08.320 a long time ago. So here's what I took from the highlights. The RNC is really good at visual

00:07:17.800 persuasion, like really good. And I've never seen a better consistent example than how they paired up.

00:07:27.160 Now, let me tell you all the things they did right. Number one, I thought it was clever that they

00:07:32.520 went second. Because, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it in 2016, it seems like the DNC, the Democrats,

00:07:41.040 went second with their convention. Do I have that wrong? And that allowed them to label the RNC as dark.

00:07:51.220 So you remember, everybody says it was dark after Trump's first 2016 convention. And this time, the RNC

00:08:03.280 went first, or I'm sorry, the DNC went first. And so the Republicans immediately after the DNC, do you know

00:08:10.960 what they said? They said that, they said it was dark. So the Republicans, and Trump actually used this

00:08:19.240 too, cleverly got out there first and called the Democrat vision dark. You all heard that, right? And I

00:08:26.560 laughed every time I heard it, because what they were doing, quite obviously, is they were softening up

00:08:33.420 the message that they knew was going to come from the other, the other way. The Republicans knew in

00:08:39.360 advance that no matter what they did, the Democrats were going to say, well, that's dark. That's a dark

00:08:45.900 vision. And I think they don't have expert help this time. In 2016, I said, I think Godzilla is helping

00:08:53.460 them, because that word dark just sounds a little bit too well-designed, professional. But they're

00:09:00.620 reusing it. It's four years later, and they don't have a better play than saying it's dark. So they

00:09:07.340 signaled it from a mile away. The Republicans co-opted it and said, you guys are dark. We're not dark,

00:09:12.880 you're dark. And then, of course, after the Republican convention, you wake up and what did all the

00:09:18.200 Democrats say about the Republican event? It was dark. But doesn't it look stupid now? Don't they

00:09:27.740 look like clowns this time? Because the whole dark thing is just so overused and didn't really fit the

00:09:35.160 content. The content really, I don't think, was dark at all. So here's some pull quotes from stuff that

00:09:45.960 the Trump supporters said. And I want you to feel how visual this is. Okay? So I'll just give you

00:09:51.960 some quotes that were important enough, I guess, that they were pulled out for Twitter, and people

00:09:57.780 were mentioning them. So Charlie Kirk started out, and he said this line, Trump is the bodyguard of

00:10:06.380 Western civilization. Now think about that. If he had said he's the protector of Western civilization,

00:10:13.920 that's just a concept. Not bad, but not really good. But he said he's the bodyguard. The bodyguard.

00:10:23.740 That's visual. You can see him standing there literally just guarding. All right? So that's

00:10:29.420 Charlie Kirk opening, I think he was the opening speech. Then we get to Matt Gaetz. This is not in

00:10:37.040 any particular order. And here's something Gaetz said. He said, Donald Trump, like all builders,

00:10:43.920 is a visionary. Notice that vision is actually part of it. So he's, you know, you're activating your

00:10:50.260 visual part of your brain just by seeing that word. That which is built in the mind is even more

00:10:56.640 powerful than the brick and mortar that holds it together. Wow. Isn't that good writing? That's

00:11:04.600 unusually good writing for a speech. But think of a visual that is. He's saying what's built in the

00:11:12.800 mind, you see the mind, and then is more powerful than the brick and mortar, and then you see the

00:11:18.360 building. So you're seeing the vision of it in the mind, like a little movie playing in the mind.

00:11:23.700 Then you see another, you know, visual of the brick and mortar. Very visual. Hard to forget.

00:11:29.080 Gates went on to say, President Trump sometimes raises his voice and a ruckus. Now, the first part

00:11:38.700 of that, which I love, is he's reframing Trump's personality, if you will, into somebody who's

00:11:47.120 necessary. He's not somebody who's just making a lot of noise. He's raising his voice and raising a

00:11:54.800 ruckus. Ruckus is a good, unusual word. It draws your attention to it, because people don't use

00:12:00.460 ruckus too much. So when you see a word, you know what it means, but you don't see it often in this

00:12:06.640 context. It's you pause. That's good persuasion. Making you pause in the middle of somebody's

00:12:12.200 sentence and think about it, that's good stuff. It just nails you to the sentence.

00:12:17.800 And then Gates said, he says, he knows what it takes to raise an army of patriots who love America

00:12:25.740 and will protect her. An army of patriots. You can see them. You can see them in your head,

00:12:32.580 can't you? You know what they look like. They're an army of patriots. Everybody has their own vision,

00:12:38.720 so you're not thinking exactly the same thing. Some of you are seeing a militia. Some of you are

00:12:43.840 seeing your neighbors. They just happen to be armed or unarmed. It doesn't have to be armed

00:12:48.900 in this context. Then Herschel Walker said, this is less visual, but it was just well done.

00:12:59.000 So Herschel Walker apparently has been friends with Trump for decades. And Herschel Walker said

00:13:04.900 he's personally insulted that people would think he's had a decades-long relationship

00:13:09.940 with someone who is a racist. And then he said he's seen real racism and Donald Trump is not it.

00:13:17.280 And I thought, that is a really good way to frame that. I don't know if Herschel Walker

00:13:22.820 wrote his own speech. He's a smart guy. He probably did. But that is a really good way to phrase that.

00:13:30.400 He is personally insulted. That's different. It's different than talking politics. When you talk

00:13:36.220 personally, people respond to it differently than when you're talking politics, concept,

00:13:42.900 Republicans, blah, blah. I thought that was really strong. Then here's some more visual

00:13:49.040 persuasion from Donald Trump Jr. And this one, I think, wins the evening. If there's one you're

00:13:55.760 going to remember, listen to Don Jr.'s quote. He said, Joe Biden is basically the Loch Ness

00:14:04.220 monster of the swamp for the past century. He's been lurking around in there. Okay, that

00:14:10.380 is really good writing. Because it's funny. Anything funny is going to get your attention

00:14:17.140 and more likely will be quoted the next day. Sure enough, he wrote it funny. It was quoted

00:14:24.140 the next day. That's a home run in persuasion if you can get somebody to quote it. But he has

00:14:30.220 this Loch Ness monster so visual. You see the swamp, you see the Loch Ness monster, and then

00:14:37.440 he uses the word lurking. Again, perfect writing for persuasion. The word lurking is not normally

00:14:46.100 a, again, it's not normally a political word. So words like ruckus and lurking and Loch Ness

00:14:53.620 monster, when you airdrop those into a political context, they're the things you remember. Because

00:15:00.220 they don't belong. It's like, what thing doesn't belong with the other things? Loch Ness monster.

00:15:06.100 That doesn't belong there. That's why you remember it. It's perfect.

00:15:11.300 Then how about Amy Johnson Ford? She was a nurse practitioner. And she was applauding

00:15:18.680 Medicare and Medicaid coverage for telehealth. Now think about that. They bring a first responder.

00:15:25.900 So you, when a nurse shows up, you imagine the nurse working, right? It's visual the moment

00:15:33.280 a nurse shows up. Similar with a military or a police officer or any first responder. Anybody who's

00:15:41.140 a frontline first responder type, they take you right to the scene. You know, if somebody shows

00:15:47.440 up in uniform, let's say it's a firefighter, you see a firefighter in uniform, your brain

00:15:54.840 is immediately transported to the fire. You see a little movie in your head of that person

00:16:01.180 doing their thing. So having a nurse just in general is a good persuasion. But she talked 1.00

00:16:08.400 about the importance of telehealth. Now telehealth is, I don't care what you say about what you

00:16:17.720 do or do not like about President Trump. With a stroke of a pen, President Trump removed a useless 0.94

00:16:25.480 and destructive regulation that was costing the United States a lot. And it was the restriction

00:16:31.920 against telehealth. You know, having a video call with your doctor that if the doctor was across

00:16:37.240 straight lines, there may have been some other restrictions there. But Trump ran for office

00:16:43.060 saying, I'm going to get rid of red tape. There is no better example than getting rid of this

00:16:49.200 telehealth restriction. It is the ultimate example. It never, never had a good reason. Probably was just

00:16:57.020 because of some, you know, doctor, special interest group. But he just wiped it away. And who's complaining

00:17:03.680 about it? Who's on the other side saying, Oh, I wish we didn't have telehealth? Nobody, nobody. That's exactly

00:17:12.620 what Trump promised. When he said, I'm going to get rid of the red tape. He didn't say, I'm going to get rid

00:17:19.160 of things that some people like, and some people don't like. He said, I'm going to get rid of stuff that's

00:17:24.600 useless. Shouldn't have been there. Got rid of the telehealth restriction. Who's complaining?

00:17:32.800 Nobody. He actually launched an entire industry with a stroke of a pen. Let's get rid of this and

00:17:39.120 see what happens. You've seen all the advertisements for new telehealth businesses. They're just popping

00:17:44.100 up like crazy. And one of the most important changes in the country, and it was just one stroke

00:17:50.700 of the pen. And nobody else would have done that, I believe. I don't believe a Democrat would have

00:17:55.500 done that. Don't know, but I don't believe it. All right. Then also visual. Trump had, I guess it was

00:18:06.500 a recorded package where he was talking to a number of freed hostages, which caused even the, even the

00:18:14.240 press and pundits who don't like Trump, when they, when they saw him highlighting how many

00:18:19.820 hostages he is, he is freed from various regimes who had captured Americans. Even his, his critics

00:18:28.600 said, eh, okay, we got to give you that. We've got to give you that. When it comes to freeing

00:18:35.320 hostages, American hostages, that's one thing we just have nothing bad to say about. He did do 1.00

00:18:42.380 that. And apparently he's done it, you know, more aggressively and more successfully than anyone

00:18:48.460 since Reagan, which is pretty awesome. Now think of the power of this. Now, first of all, that was

00:18:54.200 visual as well, because the, the people who had been hostages in, in unfriendly countries were

00:19:00.260 sitting in the White House. They're sitting in the White House with the president who, who freed

00:19:04.600 them. That is visual. That hits you right in the, in the fields. And here's the important

00:19:11.860 part. You know how important it is in the military when the military has this rule that

00:19:17.960 they don't leave anybody behind. You know, if you're dead, you're wounded, we're coming

00:19:22.920 for you. And even if, even if we get killed coming for you, we're coming for you. So that 0.99

00:19:29.340 if you're, you know, if you're part of that, you know that you're always part of it. You

00:19:33.880 know, you're not, you're not the person who got left on the battlefield. You're still part

00:19:37.780 of it. No matter how separated you are, you don't have to wonder if they're coming for

00:19:43.260 you, right? If you're in the military and you're missing, you don't have to wonder if

00:19:48.360 they're looking for you. They're looking for you, right? So the president has created this

00:19:53.620 similar kind of thing with, with the hostages. He has made it clear that he will burn down

00:19:59.120 your whole damn country if you don't let them, let them loose. And I think he makes, it looks 0.99

00:20:05.200 like he makes the threat look real. Now imagine you are putting yourself in the mind of somebody

00:20:11.760 in another country and you get picked up by an unfriendly regime and you're jailed. You're

00:20:17.520 all alone. You're all alone in a, in a prison cell in a foreign unfriendly country. What did 1.00

00:20:25.640 you think when Obama was president? You thought I might get out. He might care. He might not.

00:20:35.200 Right? That's what you think. You would hope he was trying to get you out, but you wouldn't

00:20:39.180 have a lot of certainty about it. Now imagine that if president Trump is in the second term,

00:20:45.780 second term, second term, right? And you get picked up by another country and you're all 0.54

00:20:52.800 alone in a jail. What do you know? Here's what you know. That whole damn country is going

00:20:58.840 to burn down if they don't let you out. He will burn down the whole country, figuratively 1.00

00:21:03.540 speaking. I mean, he will, he will take their economy out. He'll, he'll, he'll take their

00:21:09.120 diplomats out. He will ruin them if they don't let you. And you're going to know that you're

00:21:15.500 going to be sitting all alone in some cell in some foreign country. And you're going to

00:21:20.580 sit there knowing that your president is dismantling that fricking country until they let you out. 0.93

00:21:26.620 That's powerful. Here's some more stuff. The McCloskeys were featured. Of course, that was 0.94

00:21:36.160 brilliant casting because they, they are visual. Again, there's nothing more visual than the

00:21:41.620 McCloskeys holding their guns, protecting their territory, their home. That was great. Now compare 0.97

00:21:49.160 that to what the Democrats offer. You saw spectacular visual excellence. If you compare that to what,

00:21:59.160 and the visual part, by the way, was often in your mind. The visual part wasn't just what you saw on

00:22:04.800 the screen. So what the Republicans did right, if I can put this in a tighter package, what the

00:22:12.060 Republicans did right is since the recorded, um, kind of non-live audience situation removes the

00:22:20.180 visual and, I don't know, kinesthetic, auditory, uh, it takes all that stuff away because there's no

00:22:26.480 live audience. They replaced it with, uh, mental visions. Think about that. They couldn't give you

00:22:36.120 so much on the screen because of the limitations of coronavirus. So instead, they made you think the

00:22:43.080 movies. When the McCloskeys got up, it was, you know, because there's no live audience and stuff.

00:22:49.140 Ordinarily, it would be kind of a dead, a dead segment. But because you remember them, you imagine

00:22:55.260 them, you, you see them with their weapons, it's a movie. So somehow the Republicans managed to show

00:23:02.640 movies while nothing was on the screen except people talking. That, ladies and gentlemen,

00:23:11.600 is good, good production. So the, whoever produced it, you know, if, if in fact they were encouraging

00:23:19.700 their, everybody to speak visually, oh my God, that's good. That's like as good as you can get

00:23:25.620 for the limitations that were imposed. And now look at, uh, one New York Times political

00:23:32.300 reporter. This would be a, uh, a counter or a criticism of the RNC event last night. And

00:23:40.920 this, I'm not even going to give his name. It's not worth it. But he's an anti-Trumper,

00:23:45.260 it looks like. And he says that Vernon Jones quickly goes to this, quote, the Democratic Party

00:23:51.320 does not want black people to leave their mental plantations. So what the Democrats have for a 0.92

00:23:57.220 complaint is sarcasm. No reason. It's just eye rolling. Oh, there they go again, complaining

00:24:05.340 about, uh, black people being not well served by the Democrats. And I'm thinking, that's all you 0.98

00:24:12.900 have? I would expect something more like a counter argument. If they have no counter argument,

00:24:20.280 they just give you sarcasm and eye rolling. It's like, uh, looks like the Republicans are

00:24:25.860 complaining because the cities are burning down again. Those old complaints about, it's

00:24:33.420 just same old thing from those Republicans. You're burning our cities, you're burning our

00:24:37.520 cities. And I'm thinking, you're going to have to do better than sarcasm because the Republicans

00:24:43.720 are just bulldozing you right now. This is not a fair fight at this moment. The Republicans

00:24:49.700 have like this army of bulldozers coming at you and the, and the Democrats are responding

00:24:57.560 to an army of bulldozers with eye rolling. There they go again. That's, that's typical.

00:25:05.180 That's it. They got nothing. All right. Uh, so we've got one, one side in the political spectrum

00:25:15.120 is opposed to burning our own cities. That would be the Republicans. If you're paying attention,

00:25:21.480 the Democrats appear to be on the side of the people who are burning the cities. I don't

00:25:29.060 think that plays very well. Burning your own cities, putting your own people and of work

00:25:36.140 doesn't feel like a good political thing to side with. And yet, uh, I was seeing a tweet from Joel

00:25:43.260 Pollack and he was mentioning that, uh, that Biden did not condemn the rioting and stuff of last

00:25:50.600 night. And I'm thinking you need to condemn that or you are not even close to being qualified to be the

00:25:57.740 leader of this country. If you can't condemn setting on fire, the stores of innocent people

00:26:03.600 and breaking cars and setting things on fire. If you can't condemn that, you are not qualified,

00:26:10.720 but worse. Well, we'll get to worse in a moment. Did you see the video of the homeowner? I think it

00:26:19.300 was in Milwaukee who, when the crowds, uh, came near his, his home or their home in the suburbs,

00:26:27.320 he fired a warning shot. Did you see that? So I guess there was a black lives matter 1.00

00:26:32.420 riot slash protest, more like a riot, I guess that came into this guy's neighborhood. He walks

00:26:39.440 outside with a, with some kind of a weapon and just fires off a warning round. And then you watch

00:26:44.380 all the, everybody scurry back into their cars. Like, all right, run, run. He's got a gun. He's got

00:26:48.460 a gun. And I thought to myself, what is the law on warning shots? Can somebody, can somebody give me a

00:26:56.460 fact check on that? Uh, I imagine it, it varies by state. So if you're in Wisconsin and you're in a

00:27:04.960 dangerous situation, you're a law abiding, let's, let's say it's a legally owned gun and you're on

00:27:10.500 your own property. Is it legal to fire a warning shot? Let's say the warning shot is nowhere near

00:27:17.040 the people. Let's say you, I don't know, is it dangerous to shoot it in the air? Cause that, that

00:27:21.820 bullet's got to come down somewhere, right? So it might be illegal to shoot in the air. I don't know

00:27:26.940 if he shot in the air. He could have shot, you know, he might've just shot his own lawn just to

00:27:30.940 make a point. So what exactly is legal? Because I need to know that because I would, I would shoot,

00:27:39.860 I would fire a warning shot if my house was, you know, was being, uh, uh, at risk. And so somebody

00:27:50.300 says a warning shot is illegal, uh, I'd really like a ruling on that. Yeah. Because wouldn't it

00:27:58.220 matter how much danger you're in? Cause I would think that if you're in imminent danger, a warning

00:28:04.360 shot would be the, um, the preferred method versus shooting at the people who are threatening you.

00:28:11.000 So I guess it depends. Yeah, it's unsafe. It's obviously unsafe to fire in the air. So I would 0.62

00:28:16.380 assume that's illegal. So somebody says it's illegal to discharge a firearm in most places,

00:28:22.560 but what if it's self-defense, you know, does a warning shot fit under self-defense? All right.

00:28:28.620 I have questions on that. Get back to me on that. Um, now here's something that's, uh, caught my

00:28:37.020 attention and I can't release on it. Uh, as you know, I'm not a believer in, um, any kind of a religious

00:28:45.160 anything, but I can't help noticing how many satanic coincidences there are with the Joe Biden

00:28:53.720 campaign. And they just have to be mentioned. Now, again, I'm not a believer, but it's becoming

00:29:00.760 a weird coincidence of how many things look satanic. For example, uh, Joe Biden is in favor of

00:29:09.480 what he said, bringing the light to the darkness. And what is happening as he's speaking, as he's

00:29:17.300 speaking and saying, I'll bring the light to the darkness. Cities are actually on fire. California

00:29:24.460 is on fire. I'm in Arizona and I'm watching the entire valley is full of smoke because some part of

00:29:32.100 the Phoenix area is on fire. So if you were Satan, wouldn't you expect the Satan would speak in

00:29:41.340 terms, which are true, but misleading, meaning he will bring you the light, but there's a catch.

00:29:49.520 It's fire and it's burning your stuff. That's exactly what Satan would say if Satan existed.

00:29:56.480 Now, I'm not saying that the Joe Biden is possessed by Satan. I'm just saying it would look exactly like

00:30:03.580 this. Now, are there any other clues? Well, how many people or entities do you know who prefer to live

00:30:11.880 underground? I can think of Satan living in hell. And what would be another person who prefers to live

00:30:23.660 underground? Could it be basement dwelling Biden? I only know two people who are famous for living

00:30:31.280 underground. Can you think of even a third one? I don't think so. I don't think so. So, but that could

00:30:39.620 be a coincidence, right? I mean, you know, there are coincidences. So if there was anything to this

00:30:46.860 satanic thing, you would see lots of little hints, because don't they say that Satan, his biggest trick

00:30:53.980 is telling you he doesn't exist? So you would, he would be hiding in plain sight, but there would be

00:31:00.320 lots of clues if you were not blinded by the satanic influences. For example, what is Joe Biden's

00:31:09.880 slogan? Build back better. Build back better. BBB. If you were going to imagine 666 and you wanted to

00:31:22.460 show it to people and disguise it at the same time, can you think of any letter that the numeral 6 would

00:31:31.320 fit inside completely? Only capital B. Capital B is the only letter that you could put a 6 on the inside

00:31:42.180 of it and it would be concealed. If you put a 6 over the number 1, you'd say, hey, why'd you write a 6

00:31:51.220 over the number 1? It would be obvious. But you could hide a 6 in a capital B. Could be a coincidence.

00:31:58.020 How about the name Joe Biden? Well, there's no 666 there, right? So Joe is, that's, you know, three

00:32:07.860 letters. Biden is five. You know, so there's no symbolism there. Except I was looking at it a little

00:32:14.520 bit closer. And do you know if you took the capital letter J, just imagine the capital letter J in your

00:32:22.980 mind. Now think of the next letter in Joe. It's an O. Now just move in your mind the O to the left

00:32:30.260 until it's on top of the J. It's a backward 6. So that's the J and the O in the form of backward 6.

00:32:38.420 Now suppose the next letter is the lowercase e. What does a lowercase e look like if you turn it

00:32:49.980 upside down? Well, it looks like a 6. So you've got the J and the O together. If you combine them, 0.51

00:32:55.860 it looks like a backward 6. You've got this lowercase e that looks like an upside down 6,

00:33:02.520 but that's just two 6s. 6-6 wouldn't mean anything, right? But the next letter is capital B

00:33:09.220 for Biden. And capital B is where you hide your 6. So even J-O-E-B is 6-6-6. But then you say to

00:33:20.800 yourself, Scott, Scott, Scott, you can find a pattern in anything. How do you explain the rest of the

00:33:25.900 word Biden? Like, you know, it's easy if you just, if you just cherry pick, if you just cherry pick,

00:33:32.780 you know, you know, you can get that. But what is the, what, what is left of the word Biden? If you

00:33:41.640 take out the B, because that's where the 6 is hiding, what's left of the word Biden? Are you ready

00:33:47.780 for this? I-D-E-N. I-D-E-N. Identity. 6-6-6. Identity. That's what Joe Biden's name actually

00:34:02.260 is. 6-6-6. Identity. Now you say to yourself, Scott, you could pick any complicated situation

00:34:10.260 and you could find all these random patterns and it's been proven a million times. And I say,

00:34:15.520 yeah, I agree. I'm not saying that he's possessed by Satan. I'm just saying there are a lot of

00:34:23.080 coincidences. So let's look at Kamala Harris, for example. Kamala Harris, you'd be looking 0.99

00:34:32.560 for the same sort of thing. So how many letters are there in Kamala? K-A-M-A-L-A. Well, 6. But

00:34:41.960 what are the odds that that means anything? How many letters in Harris? H-A-R-R-I-S. 6. All

00:34:49.680 right. So that, but that's just two sixes, right? Two sixes means nothing. And that's just a

00:34:54.620 coincidence. What is she running for? Vice President of the United States. So Kamala Harris, Vice 1.00

00:35:07.660 President of the United States, is three sixes. Is that a coincidence? Might be. Could be. So there's

00:35:18.680 one, there is one candidate, Joe Biden, who has a coincidental association with the number 666

00:35:28.260 in a variety of ways. He lives underground, exactly like Satan, and he talks exactly like Satan,

00:35:35.340 telling you he'll bring you good news, but it's really a trick of language that it's bad news. Is

00:35:40.840 he bringing you the light? Yeah, he is. Your house is going to burn down. You're welcome for all the

00:35:46.360 light. So I'm just putting that out there. As I said, I'm not a believer, so I don't believe in

00:35:53.580 either religion or Satan. I'm just pointing out there's a lot of coincidences going on. That's

00:36:00.840 all. I've got a final thought to you for leaving you today. And it goes like this. What happens

00:36:12.720 when a billion Chinese are put out of work by American robots? Because, oh, I'm seeing a lot 1.00

00:36:24.520 of you are getting into the, getting into the looking for clues on the Biden campaign. You're

00:36:29.960 going to find a lot more of them when you start looking. But it seems to me that the future looks

00:36:35.720 like this. The U.S. is wisely decoupling from China and pulling back manufacturing as quickly

00:36:43.160 as it can. And eventually our robots will be replacing jobs in the United States, but at

00:36:50.680 least we'll have a big robot business. Whoever owns the robots will be getting rich. So there

00:36:57.100 might be something producing money that if you taxed or had a UBI or something, we can get

00:37:02.280 by. But what happens in China? What happens in China when they lose a billion jobs to robots?

00:37:09.500 Because they can't make stuff for other countries because we can do that. Our robots will be more

00:37:14.540 efficient than their humans. So if we replace low-cost labor with American robots, America's 0.83

00:37:23.600 going to be looking pretty good. But China's going to have a really big problem because even 1.00

00:37:28.380 if they try to make robots for themselves, and of course they will, and even if they try to use

00:37:34.060 them, all they're going to be doing is putting a million Chinese on a business or a billion 0.99

00:37:37.660 on a work. So I don't know if China can go crazy with robots the way that we can in the United States.

00:37:45.060 So my prediction is that China is doomed. They're largely doomed. And I think technology is going to 0.97

00:37:54.600 be the cause of that. And decoupling from them so that we can keep our intellectual property and our

00:38:01.160 technology with us, the United States, is probably one of the most important things that will ever

00:38:06.840 happen in the United States. In the history, maybe in the history of humankind, it will be one of the

00:38:11.640 most important decisions. Which candidate will guarantee that we continue our decoupling with China? 0.94

00:38:18.080 It's not Biden. Biden's been very clear. That's not his goal. Trump has been very clear that if we

00:38:25.600 don't get a lot more than what we're getting from China, and we're not going to, we're not going to

00:38:30.600 get anything we want from China, that he'll decouple. And he will. He will do it. So I think China 0.99

00:38:40.400 has got a lot of problems coming, and it's going to be robots that take them out. All right.

00:38:48.480 Somebody says there's no light in Biden's eyes. Well, he's very squinty. I call him angry, squinty,

00:38:56.560 caring Joe. The caring being the part we can't be sure about, but he tells us that.

00:39:03.760 All right. That's all for now. And I will talk to you tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 25, 2020

Episode 1103 Scott Adams： The RNC Persuasion Masterpiece, Biden's Satanic Coincidences, BLM Terrorism, Suburban Warning Shots

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript