Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1103 Scott Adams： The RNC Persuasion Masterpiece, Biden's Satanic Coincidences, BLM Terrorism, Suburban Warning Shots

00:00:00.000 Bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, hey everybody, come on in, it's time for Coffee

00:00:09.100 with Scott Adams, best part of the day, every single time, and today is going to be, I don't

00:00:18.580 like to brag, but it's going to be the best Coffee with Scott Adams since, I don't know,

00:00:25.800 yesterday at least, and what do you need to participate, what do you need, well, all you

00:00:33.220 need is a cup or a mug or a glass, you need a tanker, chalice, or stein, you could use

00:00:41.480 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, I like

00:00:48.900 coffee, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the

00:00:55.080 thing that makes everything better, it's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens, now, go.

00:01:08.580 Well, if you can't tell from looking behind me, I am not in my house in California, I've

00:01:15.580 escaped to Arizona for a couple days, the update on my house in California is that as of last

00:01:24.340 night, it's off the danger zone. So it looks like the fire department and all of their

00:01:32.200 volunteers made a stand, but also the weather miraculously changed. So if the weather forecast

00:01:40.580 had gone as forecast, with lots of dry lightning and lots of wind in the wrong direction, my house

00:01:50.220 may have gone up in smoke. It would have been happening right now, actually. But, got a little

00:01:58.360 text last night that says, the wind changed, and the conditions have softened, and my house

00:02:07.380 will not be burning down today. Now, I want to give you a little vacation tip. It's hard to take any kind

00:02:16.760 of a vacation. Arizona's kind of a free state, so we got to pop over here for a couple days.

00:02:23.500 And, if you've ever arranged to have a massage at the same time that your house may or may not be

00:02:34.340 burning down, I would recommend, and this is just sort of a travel tip, don't schedule a massage

00:02:41.760 massage at approximately the same time as your house might be on fire. Because those two activities,

00:02:50.560 they're not entirely compatible. It's hard to relax. I changed my, yeah, all the pets are okay. The

00:03:00.400 house is fine. And obviously, I have somebody at the house watching it, so there was no danger for the

00:03:06.760 pets. I have changed my hotel accommodations, as you can see. It's a little bit better than it was before.

00:03:19.340 Got a great view here today. The first place, the first place that we were staying, we always try to get a

00:03:27.240 place that's got at least two bathrooms, because we hate to overlap. I like my privacy in my bathroom, and it's just

00:03:35.560 good to have two bathrooms. So, it's one of my only serious luxuries in life. You know, I'm not too big on

00:03:43.820 collecting stuff, but I like to have two bathrooms when I travel. It's where I'd like to spend my money.

00:03:50.420 And the other place had two bathrooms, but one of them was like a dog's shower. I didn't realize that

00:03:55.880 until I tried to take a shower in it, and apparently it was just sort of for washing your dog.

00:04:00.780 It wasn't exactly what I was hoping for. But this place, quite good. It's actually a house. It's a rented

00:04:07.440 house. All right, let's talk about all the stuff. All the stuff. Enough about me. There's a big story

00:04:15.840 about Jerry Falwell Jr. in a sex scandal kind of situation. And for some reason, this is national

00:04:25.440 news. Now, I don't know why, because I'm not going to repeat the details of the allegations,

00:04:33.500 but they don't involve any victims. There's no victims. There's nobody, you know, underage.

00:04:40.000 There's nobody who cheated. There's nobody who lied. There's nobody who broke a commandment.

00:04:47.600 But there's this little private story about Jerry Falwell Jr. and his wife. And I'm thinking,

00:04:54.040 who exactly thinks this should be national news? I get that it's interesting. But making it national

00:05:01.900 news? That is just so wrong. And if you're on the left, I would think you would be especially eager

00:05:10.220 not to make this national news. Because isn't a big part of the left's philosophy, and by the way,

00:05:16.780 one that I buy into completely, that everybody's different? You know, aren't we trying to get away

00:05:23.240 from, you know, on the left anyway, trying to get away from everybody's fitting into one box? You're

00:05:29.620 either gay or you're either a man or a woman. You know, isn't the whole idea of the left that you

00:05:36.840 could be anywhere on the rainbow, anywhere on the spectrum, as long as you're not bothering anybody

00:05:42.020 in breaking the law? I thought that was their own philosophy. So if the people on the right care

00:05:48.800 about it, and I doubt it, I don't know why they would care. Because again, he didn't break a

00:05:54.780 commandment, didn't break a law. There are no victims. There was nothing dishonest in any of the

00:06:01.100 allegations. So under those situations, why is this news? It just, it's disgusting, really.

00:06:07.900 Okay. Let's talk about the RNC convention. Now, I sometimes watch the big events after the fact

00:06:17.660 so that I can see the highlight clips, without seeing the texture of the entire thing. The theory

00:06:23.900 for this is that most voters also will not see the entire event. What the voters will see is the

00:06:31.460 highlight clips and whatever, whatever comes out of it. So sometimes if I'm trying to evaluate how

00:06:37.740 persuasive it is, I will skip the event and look at what highlights came out of it. Because it's the

00:06:43.880 highlights that will persuade or not persuade. And it's good to see them without being biased by the

00:06:49.460 whole event, because the rest of the country is not going to be biased that way. They'll be biased by

00:06:54.460 the clips. This also assumes that anybody who watches the entire event has already decided,

00:07:02.140 right? If you watch that whole event, you're really into politics and you've already made up your mind

00:07:08.320 a long time ago. So here's what I took from the highlights. The RNC is really good at visual

00:07:17.800 persuasion, like really good. And I've never seen a better consistent example than how they paired up.

00:07:27.160 Now, let me tell you all the things they did right. Number one, I thought it was clever that they

00:07:32.520 went second. Because, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it in 2016, it seems like the DNC, the Democrats,

00:07:41.040 went second with their convention. Do I have that wrong? And that allowed them to label the RNC as dark.

00:07:51.220 So you remember, everybody says it was dark after Trump's first 2016 convention. And this time, the RNC

00:08:03.280 went first, or I'm sorry, the DNC went first. And so the Republicans immediately after the DNC, do you know

00:08:10.960 what they said? They said that, they said it was dark. So the Republicans, and Trump actually used this

00:08:19.240 too, cleverly got out there first and called the Democrat vision dark. You all heard that, right? And I

00:08:26.560 laughed every time I heard it, because what they were doing, quite obviously, is they were softening up

00:08:33.420 the message that they knew was going to come from the other, the other way. The Republicans knew in

00:08:39.360 advance that no matter what they did, the Democrats were going to say, well, that's dark. That's a dark

00:08:45.900 vision. And I think they don't have expert help this time. In 2016, I said, I think Godzilla is helping

00:08:53.460 them, because that word dark just sounds a little bit too well-designed, professional. But they're

00:09:00.620 reusing it. It's four years later, and they don't have a better play than saying it's dark. So they

00:09:07.340 signaled it from a mile away. The Republicans co-opted it and said, you guys are dark. We're not dark,

00:09:12.880 you're dark. And then, of course, after the Republican convention, you wake up and what did all the

00:09:18.200 Democrats say about the Republican event? It was dark. But doesn't it look stupid now? Don't they

00:09:27.740 look like clowns this time? Because the whole dark thing is just so overused and didn't really fit the

00:09:35.160 content. The content really, I don't think, was dark at all. So here's some pull quotes from stuff that

00:09:45.960 the Trump supporters said. And I want you to feel how visual this is. Okay? So I'll just give you

00:09:51.960 some quotes that were important enough, I guess, that they were pulled out for Twitter, and people

00:09:57.780 were mentioning them. So Charlie Kirk started out, and he said this line, Trump is the bodyguard of

00:10:06.380 Western civilization. Now think about that. If he had said he's the protector of Western civilization,

00:10:13.920 that's just a concept. Not bad, but not really good. But he said he's the bodyguard. The bodyguard.

00:10:23.740 That's visual. You can see him standing there literally just guarding. All right? So that's

00:10:29.420 Charlie Kirk opening, I think he was the opening speech. Then we get to Matt Gaetz. This is not in

00:10:37.040 any particular order. And here's something Gaetz said. He said, Donald Trump, like all builders,

00:10:43.920 is a visionary. Notice that vision is actually part of it. So he's, you know, you're activating your

00:10:50.260 visual part of your brain just by seeing that word. That which is built in the mind is even more

00:10:56.640 powerful than the brick and mortar that holds it together. Wow. Isn't that good writing? That's

00:11:04.600 unusually good writing for a speech. But think of a visual that is. He's saying what's built in the

00:11:12.800 mind, you see the mind, and then is more powerful than the brick and mortar, and then you see the

00:11:18.360 building. So you're seeing the vision of it in the mind, like a little movie playing in the mind.

00:11:23.700 Then you see another, you know, visual of the brick and mortar. Very visual. Hard to forget.

00:11:29.080 Gates went on to say, President Trump sometimes raises his voice and a ruckus. Now, the first part

00:11:38.700 of that, which I love, is he's reframing Trump's personality, if you will, into somebody who's

00:11:47.120 necessary. He's not somebody who's just making a lot of noise. He's raising his voice and raising a

00:11:54.800 ruckus. Ruckus is a good, unusual word. It draws your attention to it, because people don't use

00:12:00.460 ruckus too much. So when you see a word, you know what it means, but you don't see it often in this

00:12:06.640 context. It's you pause. That's good persuasion. Making you pause in the middle of somebody's

00:12:12.200 sentence and think about it, that's good stuff. It just nails you to the sentence.

00:12:17.800 And then Gates said, he says, he knows what it takes to raise an army of patriots who love America

00:12:25.740 and will protect her. An army of patriots. You can see them. You can see them in your head,

00:12:32.580 can't you? You know what they look like. They're an army of patriots. Everybody has their own vision,

00:12:38.720 so you're not thinking exactly the same thing. Some of you are seeing a militia. Some of you are

00:12:43.840 seeing your neighbors. They just happen to be armed or unarmed. It doesn't have to be armed

00:12:48.900 in this context. Then Herschel Walker said, this is less visual, but it was just well done.

00:12:59.000 So Herschel Walker apparently has been friends with Trump for decades. And Herschel Walker said

00:13:04.900 he's personally insulted that people would think he's had a decades-long relationship

00:13:09.940 with someone who is a racist. And then he said he's seen real racism and Donald Trump is not it.

00:13:17.280 And I thought, that is a really good way to frame that. I don't know if Herschel Walker

00:13:22.820 wrote his own speech. He's a smart guy. He probably did. But that is a really good way to phrase that.

00:13:30.400 He is personally insulted. That's different. It's different than talking politics. When you talk

00:13:36.220 personally, people respond to it differently than when you're talking politics, concept,

00:13:42.900 Republicans, blah, blah. I thought that was really strong. Then here's some more visual

00:13:49.040 persuasion from Donald Trump Jr. And this one, I think, wins the evening. If there's one you're

00:13:55.760 going to remember, listen to Don Jr.'s quote. He said, Joe Biden is basically the Loch Ness

00:14:04.220 monster of the swamp for the past century. He's been lurking around in there. Okay, that

00:14:10.380 is really good writing. Because it's funny. Anything funny is going to get your attention

00:14:17.140 and more likely will be quoted the next day. Sure enough, he wrote it funny. It was quoted

00:14:24.140 the next day. That's a home run in persuasion if you can get somebody to quote it. But he has

00:14:30.220 this Loch Ness monster so visual. You see the swamp, you see the Loch Ness monster, and then

00:14:37.440 he uses the word lurking. Again, perfect writing for persuasion. The word lurking is not normally

00:14:46.100 a, again, it's not normally a political word. So words like ruckus and lurking and Loch Ness

00:14:53.620 monster, when you airdrop those into a political context, they're the things you remember. Because

00:15:00.220 they don't belong. It's like, what thing doesn't belong with the other things? Loch Ness monster.

00:15:06.100 That doesn't belong there. That's why you remember it. It's perfect.

00:15:11.300 Then how about Amy Johnson Ford? She was a nurse practitioner. And she was applauding

00:15:18.680 Medicare and Medicaid coverage for telehealth. Now think about that. They bring a first responder.

00:15:25.900 So you, when a nurse shows up, you imagine the nurse working, right? It's visual the moment

00:15:33.280 a nurse shows up. Similar with a military or a police officer or any first responder. Anybody who's

00:15:41.140 a frontline first responder type, they take you right to the scene. You know, if somebody shows

00:15:47.440 up in uniform, let's say it's a firefighter, you see a firefighter in uniform, your brain

00:15:54.840 is immediately transported to the fire. You see a little movie in your head of that person

00:16:01.180 doing their thing. So having a nurse just in general is a good persuasion. But she talked

00:16:08.400 about the importance of telehealth. Now telehealth is, I don't care what you say about what you

00:16:17.720 do or do not like about President Trump. With a stroke of a pen, President Trump removed a useless

00:16:25.480 and destructive regulation that was costing the United States a lot. And it was the restriction

00:16:31.920 against telehealth. You know, having a video call with your doctor that if the doctor was across

00:16:37.240 straight lines, there may have been some other restrictions there. But Trump ran for office

00:16:43.060 saying, I'm going to get rid of red tape. There is no better example than getting rid of this

00:16:49.200 telehealth restriction. It is the ultimate example. It never, never had a good reason. Probably was just

00:16:57.020 because of some, you know, doctor, special interest group. But he just wiped it away. And who's complaining

00:17:03.680 about it? Who's on the other side saying, Oh, I wish we didn't have telehealth? Nobody, nobody. That's exactly

00:17:12.620 what Trump promised. When he said, I'm going to get rid of the red tape. He didn't say, I'm going to get rid

00:17:19.160 of things that some people like, and some people don't like. He said, I'm going to get rid of stuff that's

00:17:24.600 useless. Shouldn't have been there. Got rid of the telehealth restriction. Who's complaining?

00:17:32.800 Nobody. He actually launched an entire industry with a stroke of a pen. Let's get rid of this and

00:17:39.120 see what happens. You've seen all the advertisements for new telehealth businesses. They're just popping

00:17:44.100 up like crazy. And one of the most important changes in the country, and it was just one stroke

00:17:50.700 of the pen. And nobody else would have done that, I believe. I don't believe a Democrat would have

00:17:55.500 done that. Don't know, but I don't believe it. All right. Then also visual. Trump had, I guess it was

00:18:06.500 a recorded package where he was talking to a number of freed hostages, which caused even the, even the

00:18:14.240 press and pundits who don't like Trump, when they, when they saw him highlighting how many

00:18:19.820 hostages he is, he is freed from various regimes who had captured Americans. Even his, his critics

00:18:28.600 said, eh, okay, we got to give you that. We've got to give you that. When it comes to freeing

00:18:35.320 hostages, American hostages, that's one thing we just have nothing bad to say about. He did do

00:18:42.380 that. And apparently he's done it, you know, more aggressively and more successfully than anyone

00:18:48.460 since Reagan, which is pretty awesome. Now think of the power of this. Now, first of all, that was

00:18:54.200 visual as well, because the, the people who had been hostages in, in unfriendly countries were

00:19:00.260 sitting in the White House. They're sitting in the White House with the president who, who freed

00:19:04.600 them. That is visual. That hits you right in the, in the fields. And here's the important

00:19:11.860 part. You know how important it is in the military when the military has this rule that

00:19:17.960 they don't leave anybody behind. You know, if you're dead, you're wounded, we're coming

00:19:22.920 for you. And even if, even if we get killed coming for you, we're coming for you. So that

00:19:29.340 if you're, you know, if you're part of that, you know that you're always part of it. You

00:19:33.880 know, you're not, you're not the person who got left on the battlefield. You're still part

00:19:37.780 of it. No matter how separated you are, you don't have to wonder if they're coming for

00:19:43.260 you, right? If you're in the military and you're missing, you don't have to wonder if

00:19:48.360 they're looking for you. They're looking for you, right? So the president has created this

00:19:53.620 similar kind of thing with, with the hostages. He has made it clear that he will burn down

00:19:59.120 your whole damn country if you don't let them, let them loose. And I think he makes, it looks

00:20:05.200 like he makes the threat look real. Now imagine you are putting yourself in the mind of somebody

00:20:11.760 in another country and you get picked up by an unfriendly regime and you're jailed. You're

00:20:17.520 all alone. You're all alone in a, in a prison cell in a foreign unfriendly country. What did

00:20:25.640 you think when Obama was president? You thought I might get out. He might care. He might not.

00:20:35.200 Right? That's what you think. You would hope he was trying to get you out, but you wouldn't

00:20:39.180 have a lot of certainty about it. Now imagine that if president Trump is in the second term,

00:20:45.780 second term, second term, right? And you get picked up by another country and you're all

00:20:52.800 alone in a jail. What do you know? Here's what you know. That whole damn country is going

00:20:58.840 to burn down if they don't let you out. He will burn down the whole country, figuratively

00:21:03.540 speaking. I mean, he will, he will take their economy out. He'll, he'll, he'll take their

00:21:09.120 diplomats out. He will ruin them if they don't let you. And you're going to know that you're

00:21:15.500 going to be sitting all alone in some cell in some foreign country. And you're going to

00:21:20.580 sit there knowing that your president is dismantling that fricking country until they let you out.

00:21:26.620 That's powerful. Here's some more stuff. The McCloskeys were featured. Of course, that was

00:21:36.160 brilliant casting because they, they are visual. Again, there's nothing more visual than the

00:21:41.620 McCloskeys holding their guns, protecting their territory, their home. That was great. Now compare

00:21:49.160 that to what the Democrats offer. You saw spectacular visual excellence. If you compare that to what,

00:21:59.160 and the visual part, by the way, was often in your mind. The visual part wasn't just what you saw on

00:22:04.800 the screen. So what the Republicans did right, if I can put this in a tighter package, what the

00:22:12.060 Republicans did right is since the recorded, um, kind of non-live audience situation removes the

00:22:20.180 visual and, I don't know, kinesthetic, auditory, uh, it takes all that stuff away because there's no

00:22:26.480 live audience. They replaced it with, uh, mental visions. Think about that. They couldn't give you

00:22:36.120 so much on the screen because of the limitations of coronavirus. So instead, they made you think the

00:22:43.080 movies. When the McCloskeys got up, it was, you know, because there's no live audience and stuff.

00:22:49.140 Ordinarily, it would be kind of a dead, a dead segment. But because you remember them, you imagine

00:22:55.260 them, you, you see them with their weapons, it's a movie. So somehow the Republicans managed to show

00:23:02.640 movies while nothing was on the screen except people talking. That, ladies and gentlemen,

00:23:11.600 is good, good production. So the, whoever produced it, you know, if, if in fact they were encouraging

00:23:19.700 their, everybody to speak visually, oh my God, that's good. That's like as good as you can get

00:23:25.620 for the limitations that were imposed. And now look at, uh, one New York Times political

00:23:32.300 reporter. This would be a, uh, a counter or a criticism of the RNC event last night. And

00:23:40.920 this, I'm not even going to give his name. It's not worth it. But he's an anti-Trumper,

00:23:45.260 it looks like. And he says that Vernon Jones quickly goes to this, quote, the Democratic Party

00:23:51.320 does not want black people to leave their mental plantations. So what the Democrats have for a

00:23:57.220 complaint is sarcasm. No reason. It's just eye rolling. Oh, there they go again, complaining

00:24:05.340 about, uh, black people being not well served by the Democrats. And I'm thinking, that's all you

00:24:12.900 have? I would expect something more like a counter argument. If they have no counter argument,

00:24:20.280 they just give you sarcasm and eye rolling. It's like, uh, looks like the Republicans are

00:24:25.860 complaining because the cities are burning down again. Those old complaints about, it's

00:24:33.420 just same old thing from those Republicans. You're burning our cities, you're burning our

00:24:37.520 cities. And I'm thinking, you're going to have to do better than sarcasm because the Republicans

00:24:43.720 are just bulldozing you right now. This is not a fair fight at this moment. The Republicans

00:24:49.700 have like this army of bulldozers coming at you and the, and the Democrats are responding

00:24:57.560 to an army of bulldozers with eye rolling. There they go again. That's, that's typical.

00:25:05.180 That's it. They got nothing. All right. Uh, so we've got one, one side in the political spectrum

00:25:15.120 is opposed to burning our own cities. That would be the Republicans. If you're paying attention,

00:25:21.480 the Democrats appear to be on the side of the people who are burning the cities. I don't

00:25:29.060 think that plays very well. Burning your own cities, putting your own people and of work

00:25:36.140 doesn't feel like a good political thing to side with. And yet, uh, I was seeing a tweet from Joel

00:25:43.260 Pollack and he was mentioning that, uh, that Biden did not condemn the rioting and stuff of last

00:25:50.600 night. And I'm thinking you need to condemn that or you are not even close to being qualified to be the

00:25:57.740 leader of this country. If you can't condemn setting on fire, the stores of innocent people

00:26:03.600 and breaking cars and setting things on fire. If you can't condemn that, you are not qualified,

00:26:10.720 but worse. Well, we'll get to worse in a moment. Did you see the video of the homeowner? I think it

00:26:19.300 was in Milwaukee who, when the crowds, uh, came near his, his home or their home in the suburbs,

00:26:27.320 he fired a warning shot. Did you see that? So I guess there was a black lives matter

00:26:32.420 riot slash protest, more like a riot, I guess that came into this guy's neighborhood. He walks

00:26:39.440 outside with a, with some kind of a weapon and just fires off a warning round. And then you watch

00:26:44.380 all the, everybody scurry back into their cars. Like, all right, run, run. He's got a gun. He's got

00:26:48.460 a gun. And I thought to myself, what is the law on warning shots? Can somebody, can somebody give me a

00:26:56.460 fact check on that? Uh, I imagine it, it varies by state. So if you're in Wisconsin and you're in a

00:27:04.960 dangerous situation, you're a law abiding, let's, let's say it's a legally owned gun and you're on

00:27:10.500 your own property. Is it legal to fire a warning shot? Let's say the warning shot is nowhere near

00:27:17.040 the people. Let's say you, I don't know, is it dangerous to shoot it in the air? Cause that, that

00:27:21.820 bullet's got to come down somewhere, right? So it might be illegal to shoot in the air. I don't know

00:27:26.940 if he shot in the air. He could have shot, you know, he might've just shot his own lawn just to

00:27:30.940 make a point. So what exactly is legal? Because I need to know that because I would, I would shoot,

00:27:39.860 I would fire a warning shot if my house was, you know, was being, uh, uh, at risk. And so somebody

00:27:50.300 says a warning shot is illegal, uh, I'd really like a ruling on that. Yeah. Because wouldn't it

00:27:58.220 matter how much danger you're in? Cause I would think that if you're in imminent danger, a warning

00:28:04.360 shot would be the, um, the preferred method versus shooting at the people who are threatening you.

00:28:11.000 So I guess it depends. Yeah, it's unsafe. It's obviously unsafe to fire in the air. So I would

00:28:16.380 assume that's illegal. So somebody says it's illegal to discharge a firearm in most places,

00:28:22.560 but what if it's self-defense, you know, does a warning shot fit under self-defense? All right.

00:28:28.620 I have questions on that. Get back to me on that. Um, now here's something that's, uh, caught my

00:28:37.020 attention and I can't release on it. Uh, as you know, I'm not a believer in, um, any kind of a religious

00:28:45.160 anything, but I can't help noticing how many satanic coincidences there are with the Joe Biden

00:28:53.720 campaign. And they just have to be mentioned. Now, again, I'm not a believer, but it's becoming

00:29:00.760 a weird coincidence of how many things look satanic. For example, uh, Joe Biden is in favor of

00:29:09.480 what he said, bringing the light to the darkness. And what is happening as he's speaking, as he's

00:29:17.300 speaking and saying, I'll bring the light to the darkness. Cities are actually on fire. California

00:29:24.460 is on fire. I'm in Arizona and I'm watching the entire valley is full of smoke because some part of

00:29:32.100 the Phoenix area is on fire. So if you were Satan, wouldn't you expect the Satan would speak in

00:29:41.340 terms, which are true, but misleading, meaning he will bring you the light, but there's a catch.

00:29:49.520 It's fire and it's burning your stuff. That's exactly what Satan would say if Satan existed.

00:29:56.480 Now, I'm not saying that the Joe Biden is possessed by Satan. I'm just saying it would look exactly like

00:30:03.580 this. Now, are there any other clues? Well, how many people or entities do you know who prefer to live

00:30:11.880 underground? I can think of Satan living in hell. And what would be another person who prefers to live

00:30:23.660 underground? Could it be basement dwelling Biden? I only know two people who are famous for living

00:30:31.280 underground. Can you think of even a third one? I don't think so. I don't think so. So, but that could

00:30:39.620 be a coincidence, right? I mean, you know, there are coincidences. So if there was anything to this

00:30:46.860 satanic thing, you would see lots of little hints, because don't they say that Satan, his biggest trick

00:30:53.980 is telling you he doesn't exist? So you would, he would be hiding in plain sight, but there would be

00:31:00.320 lots of clues if you were not blinded by the satanic influences. For example, what is Joe Biden's

00:31:09.880 slogan? Build back better. Build back better. BBB. If you were going to imagine 666 and you wanted to

00:31:22.460 show it to people and disguise it at the same time, can you think of any letter that the numeral 6 would

00:31:31.320 fit inside completely? Only capital B. Capital B is the only letter that you could put a 6 on the inside

00:31:42.180 of it and it would be concealed. If you put a 6 over the number 1, you'd say, hey, why'd you write a 6

00:31:51.220 over the number 1? It would be obvious. But you could hide a 6 in a capital B. Could be a coincidence.

00:31:58.020 How about the name Joe Biden? Well, there's no 666 there, right? So Joe is, that's, you know, three

00:32:07.860 letters. Biden is five. You know, so there's no symbolism there. Except I was looking at it a little

00:32:14.520 bit closer. And do you know if you took the capital letter J, just imagine the capital letter J in your

00:32:22.980 mind. Now think of the next letter in Joe. It's an O. Now just move in your mind the O to the left

00:32:30.260 until it's on top of the J. It's a backward 6. So that's the J and the O in the form of backward 6.

00:32:38.420 Now suppose the next letter is the lowercase e. What does a lowercase e look like if you turn it

00:32:49.980 upside down? Well, it looks like a 6. So you've got the J and the O together. If you combine them,

00:32:55.860 it looks like a backward 6. You've got this lowercase e that looks like an upside down 6,

00:33:02.520 but that's just two 6s. 6-6 wouldn't mean anything, right? But the next letter is capital B

00:33:09.220 for Biden. And capital B is where you hide your 6. So even J-O-E-B is 6-6-6. But then you say to

00:33:20.800 yourself, Scott, Scott, Scott, you can find a pattern in anything. How do you explain the rest of the

00:33:25.900 word Biden? Like, you know, it's easy if you just, if you just cherry pick, if you just cherry pick,

00:33:32.780 you know, you know, you can get that. But what is the, what, what is left of the word Biden? If you

00:33:41.640 take out the B, because that's where the 6 is hiding, what's left of the word Biden? Are you ready

00:33:47.780 for this? I-D-E-N. I-D-E-N. Identity. 6-6-6. Identity. That's what Joe Biden's name actually

00:34:02.260 is. 6-6-6. Identity. Now you say to yourself, Scott, you could pick any complicated situation

00:34:10.260 and you could find all these random patterns and it's been proven a million times. And I say,

00:34:15.520 yeah, I agree. I'm not saying that he's possessed by Satan. I'm just saying there are a lot of

00:34:23.080 coincidences. So let's look at Kamala Harris, for example. Kamala Harris, you'd be looking

00:34:32.560 for the same sort of thing. So how many letters are there in Kamala? K-A-M-A-L-A. Well, 6. But

00:34:41.960 what are the odds that that means anything? How many letters in Harris? H-A-R-R-I-S. 6. All

00:34:49.680 right. So that, but that's just two sixes, right? Two sixes means nothing. And that's just a

00:34:54.620 coincidence. What is she running for? Vice President of the United States. So Kamala Harris, Vice

00:35:07.660 President of the United States, is three sixes. Is that a coincidence? Might be. Could be. So there's

00:35:18.680 one, there is one candidate, Joe Biden, who has a coincidental association with the number 666

00:35:28.260 in a variety of ways. He lives underground, exactly like Satan, and he talks exactly like Satan,

00:35:35.340 telling you he'll bring you good news, but it's really a trick of language that it's bad news. Is

00:35:40.840 he bringing you the light? Yeah, he is. Your house is going to burn down. You're welcome for all the

00:35:46.360 light. So I'm just putting that out there. As I said, I'm not a believer, so I don't believe in

00:35:53.580 either religion or Satan. I'm just pointing out there's a lot of coincidences going on. That's

00:36:00.840 all. I've got a final thought to you for leaving you today. And it goes like this. What happens

00:36:12.720 when a billion Chinese are put out of work by American robots? Because, oh, I'm seeing a lot

00:36:24.520 of you are getting into the, getting into the looking for clues on the Biden campaign. You're

00:36:29.960 going to find a lot more of them when you start looking. But it seems to me that the future looks

00:36:35.720 like this. The U.S. is wisely decoupling from China and pulling back manufacturing as quickly

00:36:43.160 as it can. And eventually our robots will be replacing jobs in the United States, but at

00:36:50.680 least we'll have a big robot business. Whoever owns the robots will be getting rich. So there

00:36:57.100 might be something producing money that if you taxed or had a UBI or something, we can get

00:37:02.280 by. But what happens in China? What happens in China when they lose a billion jobs to robots?

00:37:09.500 Because they can't make stuff for other countries because we can do that. Our robots will be more

00:37:14.540 efficient than their humans. So if we replace low-cost labor with American robots, America's

00:37:23.600 going to be looking pretty good. But China's going to have a really big problem because even

00:37:28.380 if they try to make robots for themselves, and of course they will, and even if they try to use

00:37:34.060 them, all they're going to be doing is putting a million Chinese on a business or a billion

00:37:37.660 on a work. So I don't know if China can go crazy with robots the way that we can in the United States.

00:37:45.060 So my prediction is that China is doomed. They're largely doomed. And I think technology is going to

00:37:54.600 be the cause of that. And decoupling from them so that we can keep our intellectual property and our

00:38:01.160 technology with us, the United States, is probably one of the most important things that will ever

00:38:06.840 happen in the United States. In the history, maybe in the history of humankind, it will be one of the

00:38:11.640 most important decisions. Which candidate will guarantee that we continue our decoupling with China?

00:38:18.080 It's not Biden. Biden's been very clear. That's not his goal. Trump has been very clear that if we

00:38:25.600 don't get a lot more than what we're getting from China, and we're not going to, we're not going to

00:38:30.600 get anything we want from China, that he'll decouple. And he will. He will do it. So I think China

00:38:40.400 has got a lot of problems coming, and it's going to be robots that take them out. All right.

00:38:48.480 Somebody says there's no light in Biden's eyes. Well, he's very squinty. I call him angry, squinty,

00:38:56.560 caring Joe. The caring being the part we can't be sure about, but he tells us that.

00:39:03.760 All right. That's all for now. And I will talk to you tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 25, 2020

Episode 1103 Scott Adams： The RNC Persuasion Masterpiece, Biden's Satanic Coincidences, BLM Terrorism, Suburban Warning Shots

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript