Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1116 Scott Adams： #BidenRiots, Vitamin D Saves the World, Celebrities Attack Me, UnAmerican Airlines, Polls

00:00:00.000 out my window from my office. What you should be seeing, instead of this whiteout conditions,

00:00:07.640 you should be seeing the town and a ridgeline and some hills, but instead you see nothing but smoke.

00:00:18.600 That's right, nothing but smoke. Let me close the blinds in here and that's what happens if I go

00:00:27.020 outside. Now, it's 110 degrees out there today, or it will be, same as yesterday. The air quality

00:00:34.620 is unbreathable and if I stay inside, I'm going to get the COVID. Everything's great, everything's

00:00:48.220 great. If you don't mind, 110 degrees, rolling blackouts, a little bit of COVID, and of course

00:00:58.000 you can't breathe the air and your house might burn down. But other than that, it's looking good.

00:01:06.060 So if I could, I hate to start out all negative, so let me put a positive spin on this. As I just

00:01:12.420 tweeted, there are really only two places in California that are dangerous. I don't think

00:01:18.580 you can say that about a lot of places, but in the entire state of California, only two dangerous

00:01:24.880 places. Those two places are indoors and outdoors. If you can stay away from either being indoors

00:01:34.020 or outdoors, you'll be safe in California. And the other thing that'll make you safe is the

00:01:41.060 simultaneous sip and all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein,

00:01:44.480 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee

00:01:50.640 and join you now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine to the end of the day. The thing

00:01:55.960 that makes everything better, except maybe California. It's called the simultaneous sip and

00:02:01.660 happens to go. Yeah, I can feel the temperatures starting to ease. There's a low pressure system

00:02:12.200 coming in from the east. Yeah, I think things are getting better. Somebody says, it sounds awful.

00:02:19.180 Why do you stay? Well, have you ever been anywhere else? I don't like to brag, but it is, it is just

00:02:31.940 the truth. I think this is just objective, objectively speaking. If you like good weather and you like

00:02:38.800 other stuff, California used to be like way up here compared to the second best place. If you like

00:02:47.680 weather and, you know, a fairly open society kind of situation, lots of resources. But that was then.

00:02:57.360 Now, I would say that that gap between California as a place to live and the second best place,

00:03:05.460 it's a lot, a lot of a gap got closed, but it's still just marginally better than a lot of other

00:03:13.940 places. Because if you move out of California, you might have to experience a thing called winter

00:03:19.660 or a thing called bugs. We've got bugs, but not many of them. Have you ever been in Florida during

00:03:31.000 the summer? It's a little muggy, a little bit muggy. They got some bugs. We don't have that.

00:03:36.900 So, you can take 40% off of the goodness of living in California, and I think that's kind

00:03:45.780 of where we're at. I would say that California is approximately 40% worse, all things considered

00:03:53.660 from taxes to forest fires and everything else. Probably 40% worse than it used to be, and

00:04:02.040 still competitive. That's just the truth. But it won't be that way much longer. Here's an

00:04:11.420 interesting factoid, a dog that's not barking. Do you remember how often I was on the news or

00:04:18.440 news-related channels in 2016? It was quite a bit. In 2016, I had a contrarian view that Trump would

00:04:28.940 win. Many of you had the same view, but among the people who actually said things out loud in public,

00:04:35.640 I was in the group that were kind of rare because I was saying he's definitely going to win.

00:04:42.060 Now, I'm still the same person. I might be even arguably more interesting now because I've spent

00:04:50.640 enough time talking about politics that I'm less of a freak show and maybe have something to say.

00:04:56.240 I have no interest from any of the news outlets except for, you know, I'll get a Breitbart radio or

00:05:06.400 Breitbart actually still has interest and Fox will occasionally have me on. But absolutely nobody

00:05:14.780 on the left is interested. Just complete lack of interest. And it might be because of what I would say.

00:05:23.160 They don't want their, I don't think they want their audience who's sort of locked into their

00:05:29.540 little news silo to hear anybody from the other silo who has anything to say. So it's interesting to me

00:05:38.520 that there's no interest in me. Now that I've been proven right more than wrong, you think there would

00:05:45.400 be more interest, don't you? All right, let's check in on the Biden riots. Hashtag Biden riots.

00:05:53.160 That hashtag is doing pretty well, by the way. Still, still zooming. And I guess we had some big

00:05:59.420 games in Rochester and Portland. If you have not yet seen any of the humorous videos from not last

00:06:07.860 night, but the night before, of the Antifa guy or Black Lives Matter, I can't tell, who got his feet

00:06:15.700 caught on fire in a Molotov cocktail situation of his own doing, I guess, or somebody else's. And he started

00:06:23.560 doing what looked like a funny dance to put it out. It wasn't funny if it was you who had their feet on

00:06:29.500 fire. But if you're just watching it, it was kind of funny. I hate to admit that. It doesn't speak

00:06:38.860 well of me, does it? But you're in the same boat. You laughed when you saw it. I can see you. I can see

00:06:47.340 you. You're smiling right now. You know that was funny. Tragic. Well, funny. And it's been put to

00:06:57.520 music by a number of clever people. If you haven't heard all of the different musical tracks, some of them

00:07:06.020 are really good. And I think they were all funny. But I want to point this out as a humor tip, so that you'll

00:07:13.180 be smarter after you're done with this Periscope on how to write humor. Now, some people put to music songs that

00:07:23.000 had fire in the lyrics. Like, was it Johnny Cash, who has a song called Ring of Fire? So it's very

00:07:32.760 funny to hear Johnny Cash singing, you know, ring of fire, and seeing the guy dancing with his feet on fire.

00:07:39.240 But that was not, and then there was also a Michael Jackson, a thriller, where they, they play the guy with the, the, the feet on fire. They play it in reverse. So it looks like he's moonwalking, moonwalking with flaming feet. And they play that to Michael Jackson's, I think it's Thriller. It was Thriller.

00:08:06.240 Or smooth criminal or something. I don't know. It was one of those. So that was pretty funny. But the funniest one by far was Footloose.

00:08:16.520 If you haven't seen the one, you should Google it. Just, you know, Google Antifa and Footloose and feet on fire, it'll probably come up.

00:08:25.400 And what's funny about Footloose is that the, the mood and tone of the song Footloose is, is happy and free. And it's sort of like a celebration of life and freedom and, and all that.

00:08:41.940 And it's, it's, it's being put to, put to a guy whose feet are on fire.

00:08:49.020 So here's your, here's your humor lesson of the day.

00:08:53.600 Humor, or the, the laugh reflex, happens when your brain can't process two things that don't fit together.

00:09:02.500 So if you can create a joke where you've put two things together that sort of fit in a, in a pseudo language, pseudo logic way, but your brain knows they don't go together, that your brain will just laugh because it's two things that don't belong together.

00:09:18.660 Now, once you see that rule, it becomes a lot easier to, to write humor or to know that you've written it correctly.

00:09:25.540 Because anytime you can make two things that don't fit together, fit together with a pseudo logic, people get that reflex and go, ah, and they laugh at it.

00:09:37.240 So listening to the happy Footloose song while the guy's dancing with his legs on fire, it shouldn't, it shouldn't be funny, but it is.

00:09:48.660 All right, speaking of funny, a man in France, I think this was on the Fox News site or CNN, I can't remember which one, but a man in France was injured Friday after he blew up part of his home while trying to kill a fly with an electric swatter.

00:10:08.140 Again, tragic. There's nothing funny about somebody blowing up their home unless they did it by using an electric fly swatter.

00:10:19.160 So the man was, the man was in his 80s, he was about to eat dinner and he saw this fly, so he took out his electric fly swatter.

00:10:29.360 I don't know what makes it electric, I guess it shocks the fly.

00:10:32.880 You would think that hitting the fly with a fly swatter would do enough, but no, he's got to add like an electric shocker to his fly swatter to really get the job done.

00:10:41.780 But he was unaware that a gas canister was leaking from the home, so as soon as he swatted the fly, his house blew up, which is not funny.

00:10:55.640 I'm laughing at a different joke that I thought of at the same time.

00:11:00.760 I don't know what's wrong with you. If you're laughing at this joke, this is a tragedy.

00:11:05.340 I think he was uninjured. I don't know how he blew up half of his home and was uninjured, but that's the good news.

00:11:12.300 All right. So while you were sleeping, the COVID-19 epidemic was solved.

00:11:21.440 What? You don't believe it? No, it was. It's all solved now.

00:11:27.100 So I might have a little bit of hyperbole in that statement, just a little bit, but listen to my evidence.

00:11:33.940 So yesterday or this morning, I guess we saw the result of a randomized clinical trial, also known as the good stuff.

00:11:44.680 We're not talking about observational study where you just look at things that already happened.

00:11:50.200 We're talking about randomized, where they did a controlled experiment where they randomly created two groups of people who were hospitalized but not yet in the ICU, and they gave them vitamin D.

00:12:06.360 Now, they also had hydroxychloroquine and zinc, which was part of their standard treatment for all of them.

00:12:12.960 So everybody who got treated was already on hydroxychloroquine and zinc.

00:12:18.620 Where is this, you might ask? Not the United States, surely.

00:12:22.360 That is correct. It was in Spain.

00:12:24.940 So it's a Spanish study, university study linked with a hospital, I think.

00:12:28.960 And they studied 76 people, and they divided them, you know, randomly, roughly in half.

00:12:36.840 And they found that the ones who are treated with this calcifediol, it's a, they call it a downstream product of vitamin D3.

00:12:46.280 So it's vitamin D3-ish, but it's not the same vitamin D that you're getting over the counter.

00:12:55.380 All right, so this is sort of a hyped up, beefed up, if you will, medical grade vitamin D.

00:13:04.420 So I want to be as clear as possible.

00:13:07.280 You don't get that vitamin D just by getting a pill over the counter.

00:13:12.160 The pill over the counter might be useful also, but we're talking about a strengthened version here.

00:13:19.680 And they gave it to people, and so it helped keep people out of the ICU by a factor of 25.

00:13:31.500 It was 25 times more helpful than the people who didn't get it.

00:13:39.040 I might be saying that wrong, but you know what I mean.

00:13:40.820 The difference was gigantic.

00:13:45.520 Out of the control group, exactly one person ended up in the ICU.

00:13:50.340 In the, I'm sorry, the group that got the vitamin D, the special kind of vitamin D, only one of them ended up in the ICU.

00:13:59.560 There were 25 or 26 of them.

00:14:02.180 Versus the half of the people in the other group, half of them ended up in the ICU.

00:14:08.440 So it went from half of them going to the ICU to just one.

00:14:14.320 Now, it's only 76 people.

00:14:16.880 That's not enough.

00:14:18.640 It is enough to get a statistically meaningful result, especially when the result is so different.

00:14:26.260 If the result had been closer, and you could just say, well, mathematically, there's a difference, but it's only 76 people, that's when you'd say, ah, it's only 76 people.

00:14:38.440 That's not nearly enough.

00:14:39.780 But if you get a difference of 25 times, then you still need a bigger, you still need a bigger trial.

00:14:49.720 Well, it is not 100% confirmed, because one trial that's even, it's a well-designed trial, but still 76 people.

00:14:59.140 That's not enough.

00:14:59.700 So, it is not 100% confirmed, but, and also there were some questions about whether the two randomized groups were truly as random as they could have been,

00:15:15.620 because there were a few more obese people in the group that didn't get the D3.

00:15:20.180 So, but even if you were to correct for all of those differences, it's still an overwhelming advantage that was shown in the study, if it holds to be true.

00:15:32.280 Now, at the same time, and by coincidence, there was another study, an observational study.

00:15:40.160 Now, the observational study is not the good kind, so it's not like the first kind I talked about, which is the gold standard kind,

00:15:47.820 just needed more people. That's, that's its main problem.

00:15:53.100 But the observational study, an Israeli group did this, and they also found a strong, strong correlation between how well people handle the COVID and how much vitamin D they have in them.

00:16:09.700 So, it found that if you had vitamin D levels that were near normal, you did well.

00:16:14.760 If you didn't, you did poorly.

00:16:16.420 Now, you're going to learn something about the difference between observational and randomized, and it goes like this.

00:16:26.080 The observational study can't tell you which way the cause and effect worked,

00:16:31.940 because it, because if you're just looking at what happened,

00:16:34.960 what you don't know is, is it because they didn't have vitamin D, and that's the reason they had poor outcomes,

00:16:42.420 or did they have poor outcomes because they were generally unhealthy,

00:16:47.420 and people who are generally unhealthy also have low vitamin D?

00:16:52.100 So, is the vitamin D just a coincidence of the fact that people who are unhealthy have bad outcomes,

00:17:01.020 or is there a causal thing?

00:17:04.440 The observational study won't tell you which direction it goes,

00:17:09.460 and you can't be entirely sure that you even have the correlation right if it's an observational study.

00:17:14.760 But, because there is also a randomized clinical trial,

00:17:21.800 that one will tell you the direction a little bit more reliably,

00:17:26.240 because the groups were chosen randomly.

00:17:30.000 So, if you choose people randomly,

00:17:32.540 you are not already selecting the sickest people,

00:17:36.280 just accidentally because you're a human being,

00:17:40.440 so maybe you treat the sickest people differently than the less sickest people.

00:17:45.560 So, I'm not sure if I explained that well,

00:17:47.680 but the point is that there are two pretty strong indicators

00:17:51.320 that vitamin D might be the silver bullet.

00:17:54.660 Because if you could keep 98% of the people who would have gone into ICU

00:17:59.560 out of the ICU,

00:18:02.620 if that holds 98% or some number like that,

00:18:06.840 we're done.

00:18:10.240 Because I don't think that this,

00:18:12.840 what would you call it,

00:18:15.760 medicine, chemical, vitamin,

00:18:17.420 I'm not sure what it's called,

00:18:19.000 but I don't think it's in short supply.

00:18:22.100 As far as I know, there's no shortage of it.

00:18:25.640 And it doesn't look like the kind of thing

00:18:27.460 that people would necessarily hoard for preventative reasons.

00:18:31.200 We could probably get there with just sun and supplements.

00:18:35.700 But, if this is true,

00:18:38.820 we could be done.

00:18:41.280 We could actually be done.

00:18:43.680 Now, it's going to take a little while

00:18:45.800 for these studies to work through the system.

00:18:48.820 People will critique them.

00:18:50.420 They could fall apart as other studies have fallen apart.

00:18:54.040 So, don't get too excited.

00:18:55.460 But, if the stock market doesn't go up by the end of today,

00:18:59.480 I'm going to be surprised.

00:19:01.760 Because it's looking to me as though

00:19:04.160 we're very close to maybe we haven't.

00:19:09.500 And that would be amazing.

00:19:11.520 Now, if this is true,

00:19:13.740 and if it turns out that the vitamin D is the big trick,

00:19:16.500 I would like to remind you

00:19:18.000 that you should always look back

00:19:20.800 and look at the people who predicted things correctly

00:19:23.680 and keep that in mind for their next prediction.

00:19:27.820 Is this somebody who got the last thing right

00:19:30.080 and the thing before that right?

00:19:31.740 Or have they never been right about anything?

00:19:34.900 It's a good thing to know.

00:19:36.020 Oh, market is closed today.

00:19:39.360 Darn it.

00:19:40.080 Yes, market's closed.

00:19:42.780 So, tomorrow.

00:19:43.800 We'll see what happens tomorrow.

00:19:47.300 But I would like to remind you

00:19:48.720 that the very first thing I ever said

00:19:51.120 about coronavirus was to take vitamin D.

00:19:53.980 Would you confirm

00:19:56.240 that it must have been January-ish?

00:20:01.620 Maybe it was the beginning of February

00:20:03.080 that I was saying right out of the gate,

00:20:05.900 take your vitamin D, take your vitamin D.

00:20:08.180 Now, that was before I'd noticed

00:20:10.500 any coincidences or correlations.

00:20:14.220 Later, a few months later,

00:20:16.300 I said to myself,

00:20:17.480 I wonder why some people are getting

00:20:20.760 the coronavirus and the COVID-19 really badly

00:20:24.060 and some people aren't.

00:20:25.800 And I started noticing a pattern.

00:20:28.820 Hey, black people are getting it worse.

00:20:31.340 What is it that they have in common?

00:20:34.300 Low vitamin D.

00:20:35.740 Hey, fat people,

00:20:38.380 people with diabetes,

00:20:44.740 people in certain places.

00:20:46.920 And when you start looking at all the groups

00:20:49.180 that performed badly,

00:20:50.900 they had one thing in common.

00:20:53.600 Kind of all were low vitamin D.

00:20:55.900 But again, the correlation could be backwards.

00:20:58.180 You don't know.

00:20:58.940 So I had suggested months ago

00:21:00.440 that vitamin D might be the magic bullet.

00:21:04.200 Can't say that it is yet,

00:21:05.920 but we're getting close to it.

00:21:07.860 And if we get to that,

00:21:08.880 just remember who was right and who wasn't.

00:21:11.060 All right.

00:21:13.520 Pete Buttigieg tweeted that

00:21:16.360 if you're used to voting Republican,

00:21:17.980 so he's giving advice to Republicans here,

00:21:21.380 years from now,

00:21:22.300 your grandkids will ask

00:21:23.480 what you did in this moment.

00:21:25.540 And you'll have to tell them

00:21:26.840 if you are a, quote,

00:21:28.600 John McCain Republican

00:21:29.940 or a, quote,

00:21:32.220 Donald Trump Republican.

00:21:35.020 And I tweeted back,

00:21:36.740 I'll tell them I stopped believing in fake news

00:21:39.000 after the fine people hoax.

00:21:41.280 Because here's the thing.

00:21:43.800 A lot of people didn't understand

00:21:46.680 that when Trump was talking about McCain

00:21:49.280 and, you know,

00:21:50.100 he said that I like people

00:21:51.160 who didn't get captured,

00:21:52.800 a lot of people didn't know

00:21:53.960 that was a joke.

00:21:55.380 One of the people

00:21:56.260 who didn't know that was a joke

00:21:57.520 was,

00:22:00.800 was,

00:22:04.200 let's see,

00:22:04.740 what's her name?

00:22:05.360 Daisy Fuentes Marx.

00:22:07.320 Now you might recognize

00:22:09.360 the name Daisy Fuentes

00:22:10.840 as an actress.

00:22:13.020 So she's an actress.

00:22:15.140 You'd recognize her from various things.

00:22:17.840 She's a blue checker.

00:22:19.540 And she tweeted out this,

00:22:22.980 talking about the McCain thing.

00:22:25.980 Two plus years ago,

00:22:27.520 this was a story.

00:22:28.420 It's on tape,

00:22:29.760 meaning what Trump said about McCain.

00:22:31.700 Like many other insane things he said,

00:22:35.600 that his blind zombie followers,

00:22:37.660 I think that's me.

00:22:39.080 I think I'm one of them.

00:22:40.820 Blind zombie followers ignore,

00:22:43.200 but it can't be denied.

00:22:45.020 He called Senator John McCain

00:22:47.180 a loser for being a POW.

00:22:50.060 This is typical Trump.

00:22:51.620 He's a dumb,

00:22:52.460 hate-filled liar and misogynist.

00:22:55.240 So when I saw that,

00:22:57.160 I commented back to Daisy Fuentes Marx

00:23:00.080 and I said,

00:23:01.420 Trump told a Chris Rock joke

00:23:03.380 about McCain

00:23:04.660 because Chris Rock actually

00:23:06.340 told that joke before Trump did.

00:23:10.320 But he didn't credit Rock.

00:23:13.980 And then I put in parentheses

00:23:15.580 the joke about preferring heroes

00:23:17.180 who didn't get caught.

00:23:18.020 It was the same joke.

00:23:18.840 They just worded it differently.

00:23:20.900 And then I said,

00:23:21.800 you literally want to overthrow the government

00:23:24.020 because you don't recognize the joke.

00:23:27.240 That's actually what happened.

00:23:28.880 This is somebody who wants

00:23:30.940 to overthrow the government

00:23:32.260 to the United States.

00:23:34.900 In other words,

00:23:35.560 get rid of Trump at any cost.

00:23:38.260 In part because she doesn't recognize a joke.

00:23:42.060 And so I said,

00:23:43.800 maybe the problem is on your end.

00:23:46.400 She responded,

00:23:47.440 as you might imagine,

00:23:49.540 this way.

00:23:51.500 BS circus with Trump's trained monkeys.

00:23:54.640 Again,

00:23:55.640 I think that's me.

00:23:57.020 I think I'm a trained monkey

00:23:58.160 in this telling of it.

00:24:00.320 Defending his stupidities.

00:24:02.180 What's wrong with you people?

00:24:04.080 Again,

00:24:04.560 that would be me.

00:24:05.740 Who cares if Chris Rock made a joke?

00:24:09.280 You see where this is going?

00:24:11.320 She has now acknowledged

00:24:13.080 that the president told the joke.

00:24:16.300 She did not know

00:24:18.360 until I explained it

00:24:20.060 that it was a joke.

00:24:22.460 So now she has to change

00:24:24.140 her objection

00:24:26.320 from being a horrible thing he said

00:24:29.200 to,

00:24:30.320 yeah,

00:24:30.500 it was a joke,

00:24:31.640 but it's still horrible

00:24:33.280 and here's why.

00:24:35.140 And she says,

00:24:35.820 a president must know better

00:24:37.140 than to say something like that.

00:24:39.460 There are many better things

00:24:40.640 to quote as president.

00:24:42.760 How do you fall for this crap?

00:24:44.720 Trump.

00:24:45.900 Now,

00:24:47.100 she also said that

00:24:48.240 Trump doesn't have

00:24:49.840 any sense of humor,

00:24:51.120 so therefore it couldn't

00:24:52.120 have been a joke earlier.

00:24:53.780 To which I pointed out

00:24:55.220 that Trump is the most successful

00:24:57.360 stand-up comedian

00:24:58.420 in the history of humanity.

00:25:02.320 Because his rallies,

00:25:04.060 which always have

00:25:04.920 gigantic audiences,

00:25:06.520 are literally stand-up comedy.

00:25:09.240 He does it to entertain.

00:25:11.440 He intentionally says funny things

00:25:13.440 and his audience laughs.

00:25:15.380 And they go there

00:25:16.320 because they know

00:25:17.020 he's going to say funny things

00:25:18.400 that will make them laugh.

00:25:20.580 He is literally

00:25:21.380 the most successful

00:25:23.100 stand-up comedian

00:25:25.100 in the history of civilization.

00:25:28.080 If you just look at

00:25:28.840 the number of people

00:25:29.640 who go in person

00:25:31.380 to watch him say funny things

00:25:33.820 and then laugh about it.

00:25:35.000 I mean,

00:25:35.220 he does other things,

00:25:36.060 but you have to admit

00:25:37.620 the reason that the crowd

00:25:38.760 is so big

00:25:39.540 is that he brings

00:25:40.940 the entertainment

00:25:41.600 and largely humor.

00:25:45.120 So how could you be

00:25:46.300 an informed voter,

00:25:48.360 as Daisy Fuentes Marx

00:25:50.280 would like to believe

00:25:51.140 she is, I think,

00:25:52.640 without knowing

00:25:53.500 that the president

00:25:54.200 is not only somebody

00:25:56.100 who does know

00:25:56.820 what a joke is,

00:25:58.020 he recognizes them,

00:25:59.560 but he's the most successful

00:26:01.820 humorist of all time

00:26:04.520 in terms of stand-up comedy,

00:26:07.240 you know,

00:26:07.580 in front of a live audience.

00:26:08.760 So when you catch

00:26:13.060 somebody off guard,

00:26:14.160 do they change their mind

00:26:15.400 when they get new information?

00:26:17.200 Well, I've never seen

00:26:18.020 it happen.

00:26:19.080 But here's a finance guy,

00:26:21.300 somebody who's not an artist,

00:26:23.380 who must be a Biden supporter,

00:26:26.140 and he repeated

00:26:28.400 the very fine people hoax

00:26:31.520 as if it were true.

00:26:33.200 So as I often do,

00:26:34.720 if somebody thinks

00:26:35.880 the fine people thing is true,

00:26:38.220 I go in and correct it.

00:26:40.280 And I said,

00:26:40.840 that's the low information

00:26:42.060 voter version.

00:26:43.020 I like to say that

00:26:43.840 because it puts people

00:26:44.620 on their heels.

00:26:45.760 If you tell somebody

00:26:46.640 they're a low information voter,

00:26:48.700 and then you tell them

00:26:49.460 what they missed,

00:26:50.640 it makes them pretty mad,

00:26:52.860 which is partly why I do it.

00:26:57.120 Now, who did he say

00:26:58.160 he specifically included

00:26:59.380 from the fine people group?

00:27:00.620 So I challenged him

00:27:01.440 to go back

00:27:01.900 and look at the transcript.

00:27:03.660 Now, I don't know

00:27:04.340 if he did,

00:27:05.680 but here's the setup.

00:27:06.800 So it's somebody

00:27:08.140 who's anti-Trump.

00:27:10.180 They're not an artist.

00:27:11.720 It's somebody

00:27:12.200 from some kind

00:27:12.980 of a finance background.

00:27:14.720 So it's somebody

00:27:15.300 who knows critical thinking

00:27:16.760 and risk management.

00:27:18.520 And I've just told them

00:27:19.700 that a central part

00:27:20.960 of their belief system,

00:27:22.680 this fine people thing,

00:27:24.400 didn't happen.

00:27:25.840 And I just,

00:27:26.460 I told them where to look

00:27:27.660 to confirm it.

00:27:28.900 Now, I don't know

00:27:29.580 if he looked,

00:27:30.840 or he just knew

00:27:31.680 that if he looked,

00:27:33.020 he would find out

00:27:33.760 he was wrong.

00:27:34.780 But here was his reaction.

00:27:37.020 He tweets me,

00:27:38.540 and he says,

00:27:39.580 I see Scott Adams says,

00:27:41.740 has gone from drawing comics

00:27:43.240 to randomly commenting

00:27:44.680 on Twitter,

00:27:45.980 defending Trump's racist behavior,

00:27:49.100 and thinks I'm a low-information voter.

00:27:51.900 Okay.

00:27:53.640 So what did I tell you?

00:27:56.100 It's always sarcasm.

00:27:58.100 So the artist will just say

00:28:00.720 stuff that's just

00:28:01.680 bad shit crazy.

00:28:03.360 And that's how you can tell

00:28:04.380 their artist.

00:28:05.460 Like,

00:28:05.940 well, you said

00:28:07.140 that's not even

00:28:08.740 logical.

00:28:11.180 But when the people

00:28:12.180 who actually do understand

00:28:13.780 reason and logic

00:28:14.820 and risk management

00:28:15.820 and stuff like that,

00:28:16.580 like this gentleman,

00:28:18.100 once you show them

00:28:19.340 that they've been duped

00:28:20.440 by their own

00:28:21.400 news sources,

00:28:22.900 which is what's happened,

00:28:24.080 these are smart people,

00:28:26.100 by and large,

00:28:26.840 smart person,

00:28:28.520 who has been fooled

00:28:30.180 by his news sources

00:28:31.760 because he thinks

00:28:32.680 they're still news.

00:28:34.340 There are a lot of people

00:28:34.960 who don't know

00:28:35.580 that any attempt

00:28:37.620 to display the news

00:28:39.500 in an objective way,

00:28:41.380 that's not really

00:28:43.060 current day.

00:28:44.640 That's a little bit

00:28:45.800 ten years ago.

00:28:48.000 And five years ago,

00:28:49.500 there was a big change.

00:28:51.280 So,

00:28:52.860 look for the

00:28:53.640 look for the

00:28:54.540 sarcasm tell.

00:28:55.420 one of the things

00:29:00.200 that happened

00:29:00.720 this week

00:29:01.960 is that

00:29:02.780 most of the

00:29:03.880 citizens of California

00:29:05.320 became

00:29:06.380 pro-nuclear

00:29:07.320 power.

00:29:08.980 Now,

00:29:09.740 they don't all know

00:29:10.920 that they're

00:29:11.320 pro-nuclear power,

00:29:13.280 but they will be

00:29:14.980 because

00:29:16.100 we don't have

00:29:17.820 electricity

00:29:18.440 in California

00:29:19.640 all day long

00:29:20.780 like you other people do.

00:29:21.940 and it's because

00:29:23.760 of bad

00:29:24.320 energy management

00:29:25.400 because we closed

00:29:26.420 down a nuclear

00:29:27.100 plant,

00:29:28.520 we're going to

00:29:28.980 close down

00:29:29.960 or have

00:29:30.440 some

00:29:30.920 gas

00:29:33.240 facility.

00:29:36.100 So,

00:29:36.760 we've

00:29:37.000 mismanaged

00:29:37.880 everything

00:29:38.460 and

00:29:39.780 I think

00:29:40.880 that a lot

00:29:41.320 of Californians

00:29:42.220 are going to

00:29:43.480 learn for the

00:29:44.220 first time,

00:29:45.340 okay,

00:29:45.680 okay,

00:29:45.940 I'm a little bit

00:29:46.760 desperate now

00:29:47.360 because I do

00:29:47.960 need electricity

00:29:48.800 need to live.

00:29:50.620 So,

00:29:51.460 can I get there

00:29:52.420 with solar panels?

00:29:54.320 No.

00:29:56.020 What would work?

00:29:58.040 And then I think

00:29:58.780 nuclear is

00:30:00.260 a guarantee

00:30:00.820 at this point.

00:30:02.500 So,

00:30:03.300 we can stop

00:30:04.220 selling nuclear,

00:30:05.060 I think it's sold.

00:30:06.480 We still have to

00:30:07.420 convince people,

00:30:08.600 not convince

00:30:09.440 because that

00:30:10.560 imagines that

00:30:12.340 you're not

00:30:13.380 using facts.

00:30:14.580 Some people

00:30:15.080 need to be

00:30:15.560 educated

00:30:16.140 that

00:30:17.800 what nuclear

00:30:19.000 energy is

00:30:19.740 in the year

00:30:20.160 2020

00:30:20.680 is by far

00:30:22.140 the safest

00:30:22.760 type of energy

00:30:23.760 source.

00:30:24.260 It's not even

00:30:24.640 close.

00:30:28.980 So,

00:30:30.820 Michael Cohen,

00:30:34.640 so there's

00:30:36.580 a new

00:30:37.600 CNN trick

00:30:38.600 that you're

00:30:39.440 seeing a lot

00:30:40.000 of.

00:30:41.040 So,

00:30:41.280 CNN will,

00:30:42.160 and other

00:30:42.640 disreputable

00:30:44.140 news places,

00:30:44.900 they'll do

00:30:45.960 a headline

00:30:46.700 that'll say

00:30:48.120 something like

00:30:48.840 Trump

00:30:50.080 bites the

00:30:51.020 head off

00:30:51.500 a puppy.

00:30:52.940 And you'll

00:30:53.540 think to

00:30:53.840 yourself,

00:30:54.220 my God,

00:30:55.600 Trump

00:30:55.940 bit the

00:30:56.580 head off

00:30:56.960 a puppy?

00:30:57.900 And then

00:30:58.400 you'll read

00:30:58.780 the article

00:30:59.260 and there'll

00:31:00.600 be nothing

00:31:01.140 like that.

00:31:02.180 It'll be

00:31:02.640 Trump

00:31:03.520 gently

00:31:04.900 tapped a

00:31:05.660 puppy on

00:31:06.040 the head

00:31:06.420 and said,

00:31:07.200 good doggie.

00:31:08.720 And you'll

00:31:09.380 look at the

00:31:09.780 title again

00:31:10.380 and it'll

00:31:10.740 say,

00:31:11.580 Trump

00:31:11.900 bit the

00:31:12.440 head off

00:31:12.800 a dog,

00:31:13.320 and then

00:31:13.560 you'll

00:31:13.720 say,

00:31:13.940 what's

00:31:15.140 happening?

00:31:15.680 And then

00:31:15.940 you'll

00:31:16.100 read the

00:31:16.360 article,

00:31:17.200 Trump

00:31:17.540 gently

00:31:18.240 pet a

00:31:18.680 dog.

00:31:20.700 And you

00:31:21.080 think to

00:31:21.400 yourself,

00:31:22.120 how is

00:31:23.840 this even

00:31:24.480 possible?

00:31:26.100 That the

00:31:26.680 headline,

00:31:27.900 or even

00:31:28.660 sometimes the

00:31:29.500 theme that

00:31:30.400 they introduce

00:31:31.020 in the first

00:31:31.520 paragraph or

00:31:32.120 two,

00:31:32.660 like what

00:31:33.140 the article

00:31:33.680 is about,

00:31:34.840 has no

00:31:35.500 resemblance

00:31:36.240 to the

00:31:37.160 information in

00:31:37.880 the article.

00:31:38.400 Here's the

00:31:38.740 best example.

00:31:39.940 You probably

00:31:40.300 saw the

00:31:40.660 story that

00:31:42.000 Trump

00:31:42.860 allegedly

00:31:43.480 hired an

00:31:44.500 Obama

00:31:44.900 look-alike

00:31:45.660 to be

00:31:46.920 filmed in

00:31:47.540 his office

00:31:48.160 getting

00:31:48.960 insulted by

00:31:49.760 Trump and

00:31:50.200 then fired.

00:31:52.080 You saw

00:31:52.900 that,

00:31:53.200 right?

00:31:53.900 You've

00:31:54.480 probably all

00:31:54.920 seen this

00:31:55.260 story.

00:31:56.320 That Trump

00:31:57.020 had such a

00:31:58.220 bad feeling

00:31:59.080 about Obama

00:31:59.980 that for

00:32:01.020 his own

00:32:01.440 entertainment

00:32:02.020 and no

00:32:03.060 other reason,

00:32:04.160 he hired a

00:32:04.820 look-alike just

00:32:05.680 so he could

00:32:06.200 insult somebody

00:32:07.260 to his face

00:32:08.840 who looked

00:32:09.340 like Obama.

00:32:10.040 That was

00:32:12.080 the story,

00:32:12.600 right?

00:32:13.580 But then

00:32:14.140 you read

00:32:15.280 the story

00:32:15.780 and it

00:32:16.980 goes on to

00:32:17.500 say that

00:32:17.960 the thing

00:32:19.980 was filmed

00:32:20.580 as a

00:32:21.580 humorous

00:32:22.040 little skit

00:32:22.720 that was

00:32:23.500 going to

00:32:23.740 play for

00:32:24.160 the RNC

00:32:24.960 but I

00:32:25.320 guess they

00:32:25.600 didn't use

00:32:26.040 it.

00:32:27.460 So that

00:32:28.560 is completely

00:32:29.360 different from

00:32:30.860 not only the

00:32:31.500 headline but

00:32:32.560 how they

00:32:32.920 introduced it

00:32:33.720 when they

00:32:34.040 started talking

00:32:34.580 about it

00:32:34.960 in the

00:32:35.280 body of

00:32:35.680 the story.

00:32:36.640 And you

00:32:36.820 have to

00:32:37.120 read like

00:32:37.820 halfway down

00:32:38.640 before you

00:32:39.600 get to

00:32:39.880 the part

00:32:40.200 where they

00:32:40.520 say oh

00:32:41.200 it was

00:32:41.380 actually

00:32:41.640 made for

00:32:42.120 the RNC

00:32:43.400 it had

00:32:43.660 nothing to

00:32:44.140 do with

00:32:44.560 Trump

00:32:45.580 needing to

00:32:46.400 fire Obama

00:32:48.900 for personal

00:32:49.760 reasons.

00:32:51.640 So you

00:32:52.540 see a lot

00:32:53.120 of that.

00:32:54.860 The other

00:32:55.520 CNN trick

00:32:56.500 Nancy Pelosi

00:32:57.980 described as

00:32:58.900 the wrap-up.

00:33:00.820 So there's

00:33:01.700 a video of

00:33:02.540 Pelosi

00:33:03.320 actually

00:33:03.840 describing

00:33:04.640 this technique

00:33:05.700 as a

00:33:07.000 political

00:33:07.540 dirty trick

00:33:08.400 while she's

00:33:09.840 using the

00:33:10.360 technique.

00:33:11.800 So there's

00:33:12.420 two different

00:33:12.900 times but

00:33:13.680 you can see

00:33:14.140 her describing

00:33:14.800 the dirty

00:33:15.320 trick and

00:33:16.380 then you

00:33:16.660 can watch

00:33:17.140 as the

00:33:18.260 Democrats

00:33:18.640 use that

00:33:19.140 dirty trick.

00:33:20.640 And the

00:33:22.340 way that

00:33:22.940 works is

00:33:23.660 that some

00:33:24.360 politician will

00:33:25.140 make a

00:33:25.560 claim and

00:33:27.300 by itself it

00:33:28.160 may not be

00:33:28.680 persuasive.

00:33:29.780 Then you

00:33:30.480 get somebody

00:33:31.060 to write a

00:33:31.620 story about

00:33:33.180 the politician

00:33:33.880 who made a

00:33:34.440 claim and

00:33:35.320 now you have

00:33:35.800 two sources.

00:33:36.540 it's really

00:33:38.620 just the

00:33:39.020 one person

00:33:39.520 who made

00:33:39.860 a claim

00:33:40.300 but now

00:33:41.300 it looks

00:33:41.620 like there's

00:33:42.040 also a

00:33:42.600 reporter who

00:33:43.340 dug into

00:33:43.820 it and

00:33:44.700 is backing

00:33:45.200 the claim

00:33:45.740 but really

00:33:46.440 they just

00:33:46.860 talked to

00:33:47.260 the first

00:33:47.560 person.

00:33:48.680 Now the

00:33:49.740 other media

00:33:50.660 will do

00:33:51.500 the story

00:33:52.040 about somebody's

00:33:52.980 reaction to

00:33:54.060 the story.

00:33:55.240 So now

00:33:55.560 you've got

00:33:56.040 just one

00:33:56.620 stupid claim

00:33:57.380 with no

00:33:57.740 evidence

00:33:58.180 turned into

00:33:59.300 a story

00:33:59.760 about the

00:34:00.180 stupid claim

00:34:00.880 that's two

00:34:01.480 sources and

00:34:02.480 now a bunch

00:34:02.980 of the media

00:34:03.520 starts writing

00:34:04.180 about it and

00:34:04.720 saying different

00:34:05.260 things all

00:34:06.520 based on the

00:34:07.080 one source

00:34:07.640 that's not

00:34:08.120 credible and

00:34:09.240 suddenly it's

00:34:10.040 national headlines

00:34:10.980 and you're

00:34:12.080 dealing with

00:34:12.640 the well

00:34:13.440 we're not

00:34:14.100 reporting it's

00:34:14.820 true exactly

00:34:15.740 which is the

00:34:17.080 dodge they use

00:34:17.840 we're not

00:34:18.160 saying it's

00:34:18.620 true we're

00:34:19.700 saying the

00:34:20.160 allegation is

00:34:20.920 out there and

00:34:21.880 that we asked

00:34:22.560 this politician

00:34:23.440 so it looks

00:34:24.800 slow hey

00:34:26.000 looks like they

00:34:27.260 have a new

00:34:27.580 feature on

00:34:28.400 Periscope where

00:34:29.240 it will put

00:34:30.520 you back into

00:34:31.240 the thing you

00:34:31.740 got kicked

00:34:32.200 out of which

00:34:32.740 would be a

00:34:33.080 great feature.

00:34:34.700 Yes so I

00:34:35.400 lost the

00:34:35.880 connection there

00:34:36.420 for a moment

00:34:36.840 but Periscope

00:34:37.640 now has a

00:34:38.460 feature that

00:34:39.240 allows me to

00:34:39.880 get back into

00:34:40.960 the same

00:34:41.320 Periscope which

00:34:42.060 is amazing.

00:34:43.300 I hope that's

00:34:43.740 what's happening.

00:34:44.260 All right let

00:34:45.200 me go on.

00:34:48.320 As we're

00:34:49.040 watching the

00:34:49.640 Black Lives

00:34:50.260 Matter protest

00:34:52.280 etc and as

00:34:53.480 we're thinking

00:34:54.040 more deeply

00:34:54.660 about everything

00:34:55.960 around there

00:34:56.500 I would like to

00:34:58.220 suggest that the

00:34:58.940 only standard we

00:35:00.160 should compare

00:35:00.820 people is by

00:35:02.460 similar strategies.

00:35:04.080 now maybe

00:35:05.360 similar starting

00:35:06.380 places you

00:35:07.720 know in other

00:35:08.100 words let's

00:35:09.400 compare a

00:35:10.380 poor white

00:35:10.980 kid to a

00:35:11.920 poor black

00:35:12.480 kid so let's

00:35:13.220 say they're

00:35:13.620 both starting

00:35:14.780 you know from

00:35:15.680 a deep hole.

00:35:18.380 What if they

00:35:18.820 use the same

00:35:19.480 strategy to

00:35:20.460 succeed?

00:35:21.500 Let's say they

00:35:22.020 both pay

00:35:22.460 attention in

00:35:23.120 school they

00:35:24.560 stay in

00:35:25.260 trouble they

00:35:25.800 stay off

00:35:26.240 drugs they

00:35:27.600 find a

00:35:28.180 mentor to

00:35:28.960 things that

00:35:29.460 would be

00:35:29.740 obvious good

00:35:30.560 life strategy.

00:35:31.460 if you were

00:35:32.320 to compare

00:35:32.900 then the

00:35:33.560 outcomes of

00:35:34.860 let's say the

00:35:35.600 poor black

00:35:36.300 kid who did

00:35:37.000 everything right

00:35:37.760 strategy wise

00:35:39.480 to the poor

00:35:40.460 white kid who

00:35:41.260 also did

00:35:41.780 everything right

00:35:42.500 how would that

00:35:43.780 look?

00:35:44.200 Which one

00:35:44.560 would get

00:35:44.980 the job?

00:35:46.360 Which one

00:35:46.680 would be doing

00:35:47.320 better in 10

00:35:47.980 years?

00:35:48.580 If you're not

00:35:49.300 looking at that

00:35:50.080 you're just

00:35:51.840 involved in

00:35:52.880 something that

00:35:53.960 isn't helpful

00:35:54.500 which is what

00:35:55.220 Black Lives

00:35:56.060 Matter is.

00:35:57.080 It's completely

00:35:57.940 unhelpful.

00:35:59.820 And so

00:36:00.420 unhelpful

00:36:00.900 that at

00:36:03.260 this point

00:36:03.800 American

00:36:04.840 Airlines said

00:36:05.640 that they

00:36:05.940 would allow

00:36:06.520 their people

00:36:07.960 to wear a

00:36:08.860 Black Lives

00:36:09.440 Matter pin

00:36:10.200 when they're

00:36:11.160 working but

00:36:12.440 they would not

00:36:12.960 be allowed to

00:36:13.540 wear let's

00:36:14.000 say a pro

00:36:14.620 Trump pin

00:36:15.400 or something

00:36:15.920 like that.

00:36:16.940 I think the

00:36:17.440 difference is

00:36:18.060 Trump is

00:36:18.900 political whereas

00:36:19.920 Black Lives

00:36:20.540 Matter is more

00:36:21.860 of a social

00:36:22.520 good would be

00:36:23.320 their thinking

00:36:23.940 but here's

00:36:25.360 what's different.

00:36:27.500 Just because

00:36:28.420 of the protests

00:36:29.220 and everything

00:36:29.760 we've learned

00:36:30.340 about Black

00:36:30.940 Lives Matter

00:36:31.420 being a

00:36:31.940 Marxist

00:36:32.400 organization

00:36:33.060 and what

00:36:34.660 we've seen

00:36:35.180 in terms of

00:36:35.760 their actual

00:36:36.260 actions the

00:36:36.940 members actions

00:36:37.640 you can say

00:36:39.200 now in

00:36:40.840 September of

00:36:42.500 2020 you

00:36:43.900 can say out

00:36:44.540 loud without

00:36:45.160 getting cancelled

00:36:46.100 that BLM

00:36:47.860 the organization

00:36:48.800 is a racist

00:36:50.120 organization.

00:36:50.780 now I

00:36:52.160 think I would

00:36:52.740 have been

00:36:52.940 cancelled for

00:36:53.580 that not

00:36:55.020 too many

00:36:55.400 months ago

00:36:55.960 but now

00:36:56.920 it's sort

00:36:57.720 of seeped

00:36:58.240 into the

00:36:58.900 understanding

00:36:59.940 of what's

00:37:00.440 going on

00:37:00.920 to the

00:37:01.180 point where

00:37:02.300 you really

00:37:02.660 can just

00:37:03.520 say it

00:37:03.820 out loud

00:37:04.320 hey American

00:37:05.740 airlines

00:37:06.260 if you let

00:37:08.260 your employees

00:37:09.220 wear a BLM

00:37:10.480 pin I would

00:37:11.800 personally consider

00:37:12.640 that racist.

00:37:13.300 now I get

00:37:15.360 that you

00:37:15.640 could disagree

00:37:16.180 with me

00:37:16.640 and I get

00:37:17.760 that you

00:37:18.080 could say

00:37:18.420 no no no

00:37:18.980 we're just

00:37:19.600 trying to make

00:37:20.800 things less

00:37:21.820 racist that's

00:37:22.660 the whole point

00:37:23.240 of Black

00:37:23.620 Lives Matter

00:37:24.140 but would

00:37:25.240 you accept

00:37:26.460 that everybody

00:37:27.560 gets to have

00:37:28.100 an opinion?

00:37:28.500 my personal

00:37:30.600 opinion is

00:37:31.320 that the

00:37:32.260 Black Lives

00:37:32.860 Matter movement

00:37:33.900 was well

00:37:35.080 intentioned by

00:37:36.120 most people

00:37:36.720 not necessarily

00:37:37.760 the organizers

00:37:38.540 but most

00:37:39.860 people involved

00:37:40.600 had good

00:37:40.960 intentions for

00:37:41.780 all the right

00:37:42.500 reasons

00:37:42.900 but nonetheless

00:37:44.240 it has evolved

00:37:46.260 and fairly

00:37:47.760 recently

00:37:48.220 into I would

00:37:49.460 say a straight

00:37:50.180 up racist

00:37:50.860 organization

00:37:51.640 so if you're

00:37:52.880 not looking at

00:37:53.660 comparing people

00:37:54.700 by life

00:37:55.320 strategies

00:37:56.040 you are just

00:37:57.380 being a racist

00:37:58.060 because if

00:38:00.400 you compared

00:38:00.920 people who

00:38:01.380 had exactly

00:38:01.940 the same

00:38:02.520 strategy

00:38:03.140 and you found

00:38:04.320 out they still

00:38:05.040 had different

00:38:05.520 outcomes

00:38:06.040 well there's

00:38:07.540 your racism

00:38:08.060 because once

00:38:09.320 you've eliminated

00:38:10.080 you know the

00:38:11.360 what you do

00:38:12.700 with your life

00:38:13.460 as being

00:38:14.360 different

00:38:14.800 and you've

00:38:15.940 really got

00:38:17.520 apples and

00:38:18.040 apples at that

00:38:18.660 point

00:38:18.940 if there's

00:38:20.220 still a big

00:38:20.660 difference

00:38:21.140 then I'd

00:38:21.900 have to say

00:38:22.380 the presumption

00:38:23.840 is racism

00:38:24.480 I'd like to

00:38:25.880 know how big

00:38:26.400 that is

00:38:26.900 but you

00:38:27.740 can't know

00:38:28.220 until you

00:38:28.640 compare people

00:38:29.320 by strategies

00:38:30.980 here's an

00:38:34.280 idea for you

00:38:35.000 oh well

00:38:36.220 let me just

00:38:36.700 mention this

00:38:37.260 I think it

00:38:39.240 was in a

00:38:39.680 Molly Hemingway

00:38:40.380 article

00:38:40.880 mentioned that

00:38:43.740 there's a

00:38:44.220 writer for the

00:38:44.740 Washington Post

00:38:45.560 named Dan

00:38:46.440 Balls

00:38:47.060 Dan Balls

00:38:49.600 spelled

00:38:49.980 B-A-L-Z

00:38:51.400 now

00:38:52.760 I'd never

00:38:54.200 heard of

00:38:54.500 Dan Balls

00:38:55.180 I've heard

00:38:56.540 of his

00:38:56.780 brother

00:38:57.060 Harry

00:38:57.520 Harry

00:38:59.120 Bowles

00:38:59.600 I didn't

00:39:02.140 really have

00:39:02.460 anything else

00:39:02.900 to say

00:39:03.160 about that

00:39:03.720 he just

00:39:04.860 should have

00:39:05.340 a brother

00:39:05.900 named Harry

00:39:06.440 all right

00:39:07.620 how about

00:39:09.940 this for

00:39:10.680 a tax

00:39:11.600 plan

00:39:12.280 are you

00:39:13.300 ready

00:39:13.520 so you've

00:39:16.580 heard every

00:39:16.940 kind of tax

00:39:17.560 plan in the

00:39:18.120 world

00:39:18.440 from tax

00:39:19.700 the rich

00:39:20.220 to flat

00:39:21.680 tax

00:39:22.240 to VAT

00:39:23.240 to every

00:39:23.720 other idea

00:39:24.580 but you

00:39:25.300 haven't

00:39:25.580 heard this

00:39:26.040 one

00:39:26.260 so this

00:39:27.420 is my

00:39:27.740 very own

00:39:28.220 invention

00:39:28.620 it goes

00:39:29.040 like this

00:39:29.560 suppose

00:39:30.920 you based

00:39:32.420 the tax

00:39:33.580 rate on

00:39:34.280 the top

00:39:34.680 1%

00:39:35.220 on the

00:39:36.880 outcomes

00:39:37.680 of the

00:39:38.460 bottom

00:39:38.720 10%

00:39:39.600 so

00:39:41.780 here in

00:39:42.900 rough terms

00:39:44.020 without working

00:39:45.040 out the

00:39:45.320 details it

00:39:45.940 would look

00:39:46.260 like this

00:39:46.780 your top

00:39:48.000 1%

00:39:48.500 has a

00:39:49.020 tax rate

00:39:49.580 of X

00:39:50.280 but

00:39:51.340 if the

00:39:52.700 bottom

00:39:53.020 10%

00:39:53.780 could

00:39:54.280 let's

00:39:54.600 say

00:39:54.880 increase

00:39:56.120 their

00:39:56.480 average

00:39:57.200 income

00:39:57.760 by

00:39:59.560 20%

00:40:00.440 that the

00:40:01.820 top 1%

00:40:02.620 get to

00:40:03.040 cut their

00:40:03.340 taxes

00:40:03.700 a little

00:40:04.680 bit

00:40:04.980 just a

00:40:05.640 little

00:40:05.740 bit

00:40:05.980 and if

00:40:07.920 they can

00:40:08.260 get let's

00:40:08.720 say

00:40:09.040 more of

00:40:10.080 the bottom

00:40:10.900 20%

00:40:11.960 to graduate

00:40:12.600 from school

00:40:13.500 if they

00:40:14.800 can get

00:40:15.480 unemployment

00:40:16.140 down to

00:40:16.700 some

00:40:16.980 really low

00:40:17.700 level

00:40:18.060 so the

00:40:19.100 point

00:40:19.340 would be

00:40:19.720 that the

00:40:20.120 top 1%

00:40:20.860 are not

00:40:21.440 like

00:40:21.700 everybody

00:40:22.340 else

00:40:22.720 what

00:40:24.300 Bill Gates

00:40:25.900 can do

00:40:26.620 or

00:40:27.860 any of the

00:40:29.940 billionaires

00:40:30.380 just name a

00:40:31.040 billionaire

00:40:31.320 Jeff Bezos

00:40:32.420 what a

00:40:33.280 Bezos or a

00:40:34.040 Gates can do

00:40:34.820 in the world

00:40:35.380 is so much

00:40:36.420 bigger

00:40:36.800 than what

00:40:38.080 you and I

00:40:38.500 can do

00:40:38.860 they can

00:40:40.140 actually

00:40:40.500 change

00:40:41.340 they can

00:40:42.800 change

00:40:43.400 society

00:40:44.300 by focusing

00:40:45.760 on the

00:40:46.160 right things

00:40:46.680 and pushing

00:40:47.320 the right

00:40:47.680 levers

00:40:48.000 so

00:40:48.940 wouldn't

00:40:49.440 you like

00:40:49.800 to see

00:40:50.120 that the

00:40:50.480 top 1%

00:40:51.400 and again

00:40:52.080 we're just

00:40:52.460 talking in

00:40:53.020 approximates

00:40:53.740 here

00:40:53.940 wouldn't

00:40:54.620 you like

00:40:54.920 to see

00:40:55.220 the top

00:40:55.600 1%

00:40:56.240 have a

00:40:57.400 self-interest

00:40:58.180 in helping

00:40:59.220 the bottom

00:40:59.700 10%

00:41:00.320 directly

00:41:00.860 because it

00:41:02.220 would lower

00:41:02.740 their own

00:41:03.460 taxes

00:41:03.980 if you get

00:41:06.440 incentives

00:41:07.160 right you get

00:41:07.740 everything right

00:41:08.360 if you know

00:41:08.900 how humans

00:41:09.500 work

00:41:09.820 if you say

00:41:10.680 to a

00:41:11.800 billionaire

00:41:12.120 I can

00:41:13.480 lower your

00:41:14.060 taxes by

00:41:14.800 2%

00:41:15.420 but you're

00:41:16.700 going to have

00:41:16.900 to figure out

00:41:17.560 some way

00:41:18.280 without the

00:41:18.880 government's

00:41:19.340 help to

00:41:20.300 fix all

00:41:20.760 this other

00:41:21.160 stuff

00:41:21.520 figure out

00:41:22.780 how to get

00:41:23.220 health care

00:41:23.880 for

00:41:24.160 maybe that's

00:41:25.380 it

00:41:25.500 figure out

00:41:25.940 how to get

00:41:26.280 health care

00:41:26.800 for everybody

00:41:27.440 do whatever

00:41:28.980 you want

00:41:29.420 but figure out

00:41:30.880 how to get

00:41:31.300 health care

00:41:31.700 for everybody

00:41:32.180 if you get

00:41:32.720 that

00:41:33.100 your tax rate

00:41:34.320 goes down

00:41:34.660 2%

00:41:35.200 just the top

00:41:36.260 1%

00:41:36.820 so

00:41:38.000 this is

00:41:39.120 not a

00:41:39.480 well thought

00:41:39.960 down

00:41:40.160 idea

00:41:40.500 but I

00:41:40.900 like the

00:41:41.240 idea

00:41:41.580 of the

00:41:42.160 most

00:41:43.480 successful

00:41:44.080 having it

00:41:45.260 as their

00:41:45.680 personal

00:41:46.240 burden

00:41:46.740 to make

00:41:47.780 the least

00:41:48.240 successful

00:41:48.780 at least

00:41:49.440 get up

00:41:50.140 to

00:41:50.340 the middle

00:41:52.000 range

00:41:52.340 if they

00:41:52.640 can

00:41:52.860 there's

00:41:56.520 some

00:41:57.400 polling

00:41:57.680 numbers

00:41:58.580 out of

00:41:58.840 Rasmussen

00:41:59.260 showing

00:42:01.200 a trend

00:42:02.100 which I

00:42:02.720 think is

00:42:03.420 going to be

00:42:03.780 more pronounced

00:42:04.620 so

00:42:05.440 Wisconsin

00:42:06.220 after

00:42:06.900 all the

00:42:09.000 recent

00:42:09.420 troubles

00:42:09.840 it looks

00:42:11.100 like

00:42:11.500 Trump

00:42:13.060 has a

00:42:13.480 slight

00:42:13.860 lead

00:42:14.260 not

00:42:14.700 statistically

00:42:15.440 important

00:42:16.160 but

00:42:17.080 close to a

00:42:17.780 tie

00:42:18.020 and a

00:42:18.340 slight

00:42:18.600 lead

00:42:18.960 in

00:42:19.500 men

00:42:19.800 so

00:42:20.880 if the

00:42:21.180 only

00:42:21.340 people

00:42:21.660 voting

00:42:22.100 in

00:42:22.300 Wisconsin

00:42:22.800 were

00:42:23.100 men

00:42:23.460 Trump

00:42:24.480 would

00:42:24.660 win

00:42:24.900 but

00:42:26.000 he's

00:42:26.740 getting

00:42:26.980 killed

00:42:27.460 on

00:42:27.820 women

00:42:28.120 so

00:42:29.340 where

00:42:29.660 he's

00:42:29.800 got

00:42:29.940 48%

00:42:30.680 of

00:42:30.880 men

00:42:31.140 he's

00:42:31.440 only

00:42:31.560 got

00:42:31.780 39%

00:42:32.720 of

00:42:32.860 women

00:42:33.100 so

00:42:34.600 that's

00:42:35.760 you know

00:42:36.500 big

00:42:36.780 difference

00:42:37.180 but

00:42:38.100 here's

00:42:38.460 the

00:42:38.580 interesting

00:42:38.960 part

00:42:39.440 according

00:42:40.200 to

00:42:40.400 Rasmussen

00:42:40.860 he's

00:42:41.820 got

00:42:41.980 support

00:42:42.420 of

00:42:42.600 26%

00:42:43.540 of

00:42:43.740 blacks

00:42:44.180 and

00:42:45.520 47%

00:42:49.060 of

00:42:49.480 other

00:42:49.880 other

00:42:50.740 meaning

00:42:51.160 neither

00:42:51.580 white

00:42:51.920 nor

00:42:52.140 black

00:42:52.580 so

00:42:53.900 those

00:42:54.520 would

00:42:54.660 be

00:42:54.800 more

00:42:55.080 minorities

00:42:55.660 so

00:42:56.180 he's

00:42:56.300 got

00:42:56.460 47%

00:42:57.500 of

00:42:58.040 non-white

00:42:58.720 people

00:42:59.960 and

00:43:00.260 26%

00:43:01.240 of

00:43:01.580 blacks

00:43:01.960 are

00:43:02.180 supporting

00:43:02.540 Trump

00:43:02.940 it

00:43:04.300 looks

00:43:04.740 like

00:43:05.180 the

00:43:06.440 black

00:43:06.880 men

00:43:07.380 I think

00:43:07.900 are

00:43:08.020 going

00:43:08.260 to

00:43:08.460 Trump

00:43:08.780 I

00:43:09.620 feel

00:43:09.940 like

00:43:10.140 that's

00:43:10.400 what's

00:43:10.620 happening

00:43:10.960 now

00:43:11.860 we'll

00:43:12.620 see

00:43:12.900 but

00:43:13.600 it's

00:43:13.780 starting

00:43:14.020 to

00:43:14.200 look

00:43:14.340 as

00:43:14.520 though

00:43:14.640 the

00:43:14.780 Democratic

00:43:15.200 party

00:43:15.620 is

00:43:15.900 becoming

00:43:16.240 a

00:43:16.520 party

00:43:16.860 dominated

00:43:18.140 by

00:43:18.560 and run

00:43:19.180 by

00:43:19.400 women

00:43:19.740 just

00:43:20.680 as

00:43:21.140 Black

00:43:21.540 Lives

00:43:21.840 Matter

00:43:22.140 is

00:43:22.780 dominated

00:43:23.620 by

00:43:24.040 and

00:43:24.700 effectively

00:43:25.220 run

00:43:25.600 by

00:43:25.800 women

00:43:26.120 now

00:43:27.180 if

00:43:27.600 you

00:43:27.720 don't

00:43:27.960 think

00:43:28.240 that

00:43:29.180 women

00:43:29.500 are

00:43:29.920 running

00:43:30.260 Black

00:43:30.680 Lives

00:43:30.980 Matter

00:43:31.260 just

00:43:31.740 look

00:43:31.960 at

00:43:32.120 the

00:43:32.520 street

00:43:32.800 action

00:43:33.120 it's

00:43:33.760 usually

00:43:34.020 a

00:43:34.260 woman

00:43:34.460 on

00:43:34.660 a

00:43:34.760 bullhorn

00:43:35.140 and

00:43:37.100 there

00:43:37.300 was

00:43:37.420 a

00:43:37.600 very

00:43:37.800 funny

00:43:38.120 video

00:43:38.520 I

00:43:39.520 forget

00:43:39.780 I

00:43:39.940 don't

00:43:40.100 know

00:43:40.480 which

00:43:40.640 city

00:43:40.860 it was

00:43:41.360 probably

00:43:41.640 Portland

00:43:42.320 or

00:43:42.760 maybe

00:43:43.340 Rochester

00:43:43.840 and

00:43:44.700 there

00:43:44.900 was

00:43:45.080 a

00:43:45.440 video

00:43:45.780 from

00:43:46.540 last

00:43:46.820 night

00:43:47.000 I

00:43:47.120 think

00:43:47.300 there

00:43:48.560 woman

00:43:48.800 in

00:43:49.060 her

00:43:49.200 car

00:43:49.520 and

00:43:50.080 she

00:43:50.400 gets

00:43:50.780 stopped

00:43:51.180 by

00:43:51.560 a bunch

00:43:51.880 of

00:43:52.020 protesters

00:43:52.520 now

00:43:53.420 from

00:43:54.460 the

00:43:54.660 camera

00:43:55.000 angle

00:43:55.480 that

00:43:55.740 I

00:43:55.920 had

00:43:56.420 couldn't

00:43:56.920 see

00:43:57.140 everybody

00:43:57.580 but

00:43:58.220 the

00:43:58.360 people

00:43:58.600 standing

00:43:59.020 directly

00:43:59.480 in

00:43:59.660 front

00:43:59.820 of

00:43:59.940 her

00:44:00.060 car

00:44:00.320 and

00:44:00.600 blocking

00:44:01.000 her

00:44:01.240 from

00:44:01.440 going

00:44:01.720 wherever

00:44:02.000 she

00:44:02.240 needed

00:44:02.460 to

00:44:02.640 go

00:44:02.840 might

00:44:03.120 have

00:44:03.200 been

00:44:03.300 home

00:44:03.620 looked

00:44:05.260 like

00:44:05.460 they

00:44:05.560 were

00:44:05.660 all

00:44:05.820 white

00:44:06.160 so

00:44:06.740 they

00:44:06.920 look

00:44:07.120 like

00:44:07.340 white

00:44:07.680 supporters

00:44:08.460 of

00:44:08.960 Black

00:44:09.260 Lives

00:44:09.520 Matter

00:44:09.800 and

00:44:10.500 they're

00:44:10.640 blocking

00:44:10.980 a

00:44:11.220 car

00:44:11.480 of

00:44:12.300 an

00:44:12.440 actual

00:44:12.860 black

00:44:13.220 person

00:44:18.560 black

00:44:20.080 woman

00:44:20.420 who

00:44:20.980 just

00:44:21.380 wants

00:44:21.660 to

00:44:21.820 get

00:44:21.960 home

00:44:22.320 or

00:44:22.640 gets

00:44:23.020 to

00:44:23.200 wherever

00:44:23.380 she

00:44:23.860 wants

00:44:24.060 to

00:44:24.200 go

00:44:24.360 somebody

00:44:25.080 says

00:44:25.400 it's

00:44:25.600 North

00:44:26.020 Portland

00:44:26.380 and

00:44:27.760 what do

00:44:28.460 you think

00:44:28.700 happened

00:44:29.080 so

00:44:30.360 here was

00:44:30.840 the

00:44:31.000 competition

00:44:31.560 there's

00:44:31.940 no

00:44:32.240 didn't

00:44:33.080 look like

00:44:33.440 there was

00:44:33.640 any

00:44:33.820 law

00:44:34.040 enforcement

00:44:34.440 anywhere

00:44:34.880 so

00:44:35.660 it's

00:44:35.860 one

00:44:36.300 lone

00:44:36.740 black

00:44:37.160 woman

00:44:37.480 who's

00:44:38.540 telling

00:44:38.820 these

00:44:39.060 people

00:44:39.320 to get

00:44:39.620 out of

00:44:39.880 the

00:44:39.940 way

00:44:40.200 quite

00:44:41.100 forcefully

00:44:41.660 and

00:44:42.940 a

00:44:43.220 bunch

00:44:43.460 of

00:44:43.780 white

00:44:44.580 Black

00:44:44.940 Lives

00:44:45.220 Matter

00:44:45.460 people

00:44:45.880 refusing

00:44:47.000 because

00:44:47.360 they

00:44:47.480 just

00:44:47.740 didn't

00:44:47.940 want

00:44:48.140 anybody

00:44:48.460 to

00:44:48.680 get

00:44:48.820 through

00:44:49.080 well

00:44:50.060 if

00:44:50.780 you

00:44:50.900 were

00:44:51.040 born

00:44:51.280 yesterday

00:44:51.760 you

00:44:52.080 might

00:44:52.280 say

00:44:52.460 to

00:44:52.580 yourself

00:44:52.940 huh

00:44:53.620 sounds

00:44:54.060 like

00:44:54.260 a

00:44:54.400 fair

00:44:54.560 competition

00:44:55.140 maybe

00:44:57.620 it'll

00:44:57.820 be a

00:44:58.080 standoff

00:44:58.600 no

00:44:59.960 it wasn't

00:45:00.700 a

00:45:00.860 standoff

00:45:01.420 because

00:45:02.260 in the

00:45:02.960 hierarchy

00:45:03.420 of the

00:45:04.040 Black Lives

00:45:04.680 Matter

00:45:04.980 world

00:45:05.720 a

00:45:06.520 black

00:45:07.020 woman

00:45:07.460 is

00:45:08.020 the

00:45:08.180 top

00:45:08.400 of

00:45:08.520 the

00:45:08.620 pile

00:45:08.880 a

00:45:09.880 black

00:45:10.240 woman

00:45:10.620 outranks

00:45:11.400 a

00:45:11.620 black

00:45:11.940 man

00:45:12.360 and

00:45:13.620 black

00:45:14.240 people

00:45:14.600 in

00:45:14.800 general

00:45:15.100 outrank

00:45:15.800 the

00:45:16.660 white

00:45:17.080 supporters

00:45:17.720 of

00:45:18.200 Black

00:45:18.440 Lives

00:45:18.680 Matter

00:45:18.960 and

00:45:19.800 I

00:45:19.960 think

00:45:20.180 everybody

00:45:20.560 would

00:45:20.760 agree

00:45:20.960 with

00:45:21.140 that

00:45:21.420 right

00:45:22.320 that

00:45:22.800 that's

00:45:23.140 the

00:45:23.420 rank

00:45:24.720 which

00:45:25.060 has

00:45:25.560 sort

00:45:25.760 of

00:45:25.880 evolved

00:45:26.340 and

00:45:26.860 I'm

00:45:27.000 not

00:45:27.160 arguing

00:45:27.500 that

00:45:27.740 there's

00:45:27.980 anything

00:45:28.200 wrong

00:45:28.500 with

00:45:28.640 that

00:45:28.860 you know

00:45:29.660 if it

00:45:29.980 sounded

00:45:30.240 like I

00:45:30.760 said

00:45:31.080 and that's

00:45:32.420 a big

00:45:32.680 mistake

00:45:33.100 or something

00:45:33.560 I'm not

00:45:33.960 saying anything

00:45:34.380 like that

00:45:34.820 I'm just

00:45:35.620 observing

00:45:36.080 I'm

00:45:36.880 simply

00:45:37.200 observing

00:45:37.720 that the

00:45:38.620 Black Lives

00:45:39.180 Matter

00:45:39.480 movement

00:45:39.840 is

00:45:40.140 primarily

00:45:40.860 female

00:45:42.440 dominated

00:45:42.980 as is

00:45:44.440 the

00:45:44.620 Democratic

00:45:45.000 Party

00:45:45.480 in

00:45:45.760 general

00:45:46.040 not

00:45:46.720 that

00:45:46.880 there

00:45:47.040 aren't

00:45:47.200 plenty

00:45:47.480 of

00:45:47.620 men

00:45:47.880 but

00:45:48.680 those

00:45:48.920 men

00:45:49.180 are

00:45:49.420 subservient

00:45:50.180 to

00:45:50.700 the

00:45:50.900 women

00:45:51.140 who

00:45:51.340 are

00:45:51.520 sort

00:45:51.820 of

00:45:51.920 running

00:45:52.180 the

00:45:52.380 show

00:45:52.600 and

00:45:53.560 you're

00:45:53.840 actually

00:45:54.340 seeing

00:45:55.020 a

00:45:56.440 trend

00:45:56.720 that I

00:45:57.060 predicted

00:45:57.500 a

00:45:57.700 while

00:45:57.860 ago

00:45:58.160 which

00:45:58.960 is

00:45:59.520 has

00:46:01.180 a lot

00:46:01.420 to do

00:46:01.660 with

00:46:01.800 how the

00:46:02.120 genders

00:46:02.600 relate

00:46:04.920 to each

00:46:05.400 other

00:46:05.640 and

00:46:06.400 who

00:46:06.580 wants

00:46:06.800 to be

00:46:07.040 in

00:46:07.160 charge

00:46:07.480 really

00:46:08.080 I

00:46:10.800 would

00:46:10.940 say

00:46:11.080 the

00:46:11.240 Republicans

00:46:11.700 are

00:46:12.240 more

00:46:12.860 more

00:46:14.820 practical

00:46:15.500 about

00:46:15.900 that

00:46:16.260 that is

00:46:17.480 to say

00:46:17.820 I don't

00:46:18.180 think

00:46:18.380 the

00:46:18.520 Republicans

00:46:18.940 have a

00:46:19.400 sense

00:46:19.660 of who

00:46:19.980 needs

00:46:20.320 to be

00:46:20.620 in

00:46:20.760 charge

00:46:21.100 I

00:46:22.260 think

00:46:22.600 if

00:46:23.520 you've

00:46:23.700 got

00:46:23.860 the

00:46:24.040 talent

00:46:24.360 you're

00:46:24.640 in

00:46:24.780 charge

00:46:25.220 if

00:46:26.300 you

00:46:26.440 work

00:46:26.700 hard

00:46:26.960 you're

00:46:27.160 in

00:46:27.300 charge

00:46:27.740 if

00:46:28.820 you

00:46:28.940 don't

00:46:29.200 you're

00:46:29.360 not

00:46:29.700 I

00:46:30.460 think

00:46:30.620 the

00:46:30.740 Republican

00:46:31.140 view

00:46:31.500 is

00:46:31.800 who

00:46:32.440 cares

00:46:32.860 it

00:46:33.900 just

00:46:34.120 doesn't

00:46:34.380 seem

00:46:34.560 to

00:46:34.700 be

00:46:34.920 important

00:46:35.820 and

00:46:37.000 the

00:46:37.220 Democrat

00:46:37.580 view

00:46:37.880 is

00:46:38.080 oh

00:46:38.340 it

00:46:38.480 matters

00:46:38.940 it

00:46:39.760 matters

00:46:40.260 all

00:46:41.500 right

00:46:41.660 that

00:46:42.760 is

00:46:43.260 what

00:46:43.400 I

00:46:43.520 wanted

00:46:43.680 to

00:46:43.840 say

00:46:44.000 today

00:46:44.380 if

00:46:49.880 you

00:46:50.020 haven't

00:46:50.260 watched

00:46:50.560 this

00:46:50.860 somebody

00:46:51.460 tweeted

00:46:52.520 and I

00:46:52.960 retweeted

00:46:53.440 it

00:46:53.600 that

00:46:54.340 their

00:46:54.600 favorite

00:46:54.940 entertainment

00:46:55.480 is

00:46:55.840 watching

00:46:56.200 the

00:46:56.440 police

00:46:56.800 take

00:46:57.220 back

00:46:57.500 a

00:46:57.680 street

00:46:57.960 because

00:46:58.940 there's

00:46:59.420 a

00:46:59.660 technique

00:47:00.060 that

00:47:00.360 the

00:47:00.540 police

00:47:00.840 use

00:47:01.320 that

00:47:02.120 I

00:47:02.300 don't

00:47:02.420 think

00:47:02.600 I'd

00:47:02.740 seen

00:47:02.940 before

00:47:03.320 which

00:47:03.860 is

00:47:04.020 interesting

00:47:04.420 when

00:47:05.180 the

00:47:05.380 big

00:47:05.920 group

00:47:06.240 of

00:47:06.420 police

00:47:06.740 form

00:47:07.060 a line

00:47:07.600 and

00:47:07.880 they

00:47:08.080 go at

00:47:09.420 once

00:47:09.740 and

00:47:09.960 attack

00:47:10.880 the

00:47:11.240 crowd

00:47:11.500 and

00:47:11.680 push

00:47:11.880 them

00:47:11.980 back

00:47:12.260 there's

00:47:13.080 a thing

00:47:13.380 the police

00:47:13.800 do

00:47:14.120 and I

00:47:14.520 don't know

00:47:14.780 again

00:47:15.180 I don't know

00:47:15.580 if this is part of training

00:47:16.720 or it's just a thing that they do

00:47:18.900 but they'll sometimes just push over a protester

00:47:22.120 like just push them off their feet

00:47:24.000 and have them fall backwards

00:47:25.140 and then the protester will get up again

00:47:27.220 and we'll just push them down

00:47:28.220 if you haven't seen the one that I tweeted

00:47:31.680 it's just hilarious every time you watch it

00:47:34.240 because you see this one police officer

00:47:36.940 push the protester down

00:47:39.020 and the protester jumps right up

00:47:40.580 and sort of gets

00:47:41.300 starts coming at the guy who pushed him

00:47:43.420 and then the guy pulls down

00:47:45.060 I think it's a taser

00:47:46.320 it looked like a taser

00:47:47.960 and he starts to like tase the guy

00:47:49.880 but before he can

00:47:51.120 his buddy

00:47:52.240 another law enforcement guy

00:47:53.680 runs right in front of him

00:47:55.000 and just pushes that guy down again

00:47:56.420 so it's hilarious to watch

00:47:59.220 it's funnier watching it

00:48:00.700 than in the telling

00:48:01.580 alright that's all I got for now

00:48:03.300 somebody says

00:48:05.700 Trump approval levels back to pre-COVID

00:48:08.600 that's a big problem for the Democrats isn't it

00:48:13.160 if this vitamin D thing is true

00:48:15.760 and it's looking good

00:48:17.600 we're done

00:48:19.920 if it's true

00:48:22.400 we're done

00:48:23.100 somebody's prompting me to talk about

00:48:25.460 Jake Tapper

00:48:26.460 so there's a story

00:48:28.060 the story goes that

00:48:29.880 Jake Tapper

00:48:30.940 talked to somebody

00:48:34.660 who was thinking of running

00:48:35.900 against a Democrat

00:48:37.920 that he liked

00:48:38.860 or something

00:48:39.660 and he talked him out of it

00:48:41.660 and so the person

00:48:44.080 the subject person

00:48:45.480 ran in a different race

00:48:47.300 so that the person

00:48:48.700 allegedly that Jake Tapper

00:48:50.460 liked a Democrat

00:48:51.360 would win in his race

00:48:53.340 here's the thing

00:48:55.280 so Jake has denied it

00:48:57.660 when asked directly

00:48:59.600 did you do this

00:49:00.500 he said no

00:49:01.100 there's other reporting

00:49:02.760 that said yes

00:49:03.780 this almost certainly

00:49:05.860 falls into that category

00:49:07.220 of

00:49:07.600 it sort of depends

00:49:09.040 subjectively

00:49:10.580 you know

00:49:11.980 if

00:49:12.160 I think if you were

00:49:13.460 if you heard

00:49:14.580 all the conversations

00:49:15.540 yourself

00:49:16.140 which you can't

00:49:17.120 it would probably

00:49:18.440 be closer to

00:49:19.740 a conversation

00:49:21.920 about the pros

00:49:22.580 and cons

00:49:23.120 which is different

00:49:24.900 from

00:49:25.340 you should drop

00:49:26.380 out of the race

00:49:26.960 and save my friend

00:49:28.000 so

00:49:29.440 I don't feel like

00:49:30.800 I can take sides

00:49:31.720 on this one

00:49:32.260 because you would

00:49:33.160 have to hear

00:49:33.720 all the conversation

00:49:35.120 to have a

00:49:35.840 good opinion

00:49:36.860 on that

00:49:37.360 and I haven't

00:49:38.440 so

00:49:39.180 I won't do

00:49:41.380 what the fake news

00:49:42.500 does

00:49:42.880 which is

00:49:44.280 have an opinion

00:49:44.820 on something

00:49:45.360 you couldn't

00:49:45.900 possibly know

00:49:46.660 the details

00:49:47.220 of what really

00:49:47.860 happened

00:49:48.220 alright

00:49:49.940 somebody calls

00:49:53.480 this my

00:49:53.860 encore

00:49:54.300 I think

00:49:55.980 you're right

00:49:56.460 no it didn't

00:50:02.220 blah blah blah

00:50:02.960 yeah

00:50:03.660 I'm not too

00:50:04.460 interested in

00:50:05.180 that story

00:50:05.680 frankly

00:50:06.080 oh

00:50:07.040 let's talk

00:50:07.480 about

00:50:07.700 Cardi B

00:50:08.260 Cardi B

00:50:10.020 and

00:50:10.420 Candace

00:50:11.300 so

00:50:12.600 Cardi B

00:50:13.300 has become

00:50:13.860 interested in

00:50:14.720 politics

00:50:15.120 you know

00:50:15.640 she interviewed

00:50:16.440 Joe Biden

00:50:17.400 you might also

00:50:19.000 know that

00:50:19.460 Candace Owens

00:50:20.500 had some

00:50:22.320 public back

00:50:23.560 and forth

00:50:23.940 with her

00:50:24.440 and Candace

00:50:25.480 suggested

00:50:27.120 that maybe

00:50:27.780 Cardi B

00:50:28.420 should educate

00:50:29.420 herself

00:50:29.900 on the

00:50:30.480 political

00:50:30.840 stuff

00:50:31.320 because

00:50:32.620 Candace

00:50:33.160 notes

00:50:33.620 that she

00:50:34.140 seems

00:50:34.560 under-informed

00:50:36.120 now

00:50:37.360 I will

00:50:38.140 I'll echo

00:50:39.700 what

00:50:40.000 Candace

00:50:41.500 said

00:50:41.800 which is

00:50:43.020 I respect

00:50:43.780 I tend to

00:50:44.560 respect

00:50:44.940 any artist

00:50:45.860 who

00:50:46.560 succeeds

00:50:47.140 so I'm

00:50:48.160 not a

00:50:48.420 big fan

00:50:48.860 of music

00:50:49.340 and I

00:50:50.200 couldn't

00:50:50.620 even tell

00:50:51.240 you any

00:50:51.700 song that

00:50:52.180 Cardi B

00:50:52.720 had ever

00:50:53.580 done

00:50:53.840 I don't

00:50:54.500 think I

00:50:54.900 would recognize

00:50:55.420 it if I

00:50:55.880 heard it

00:50:56.120 I just

00:50:56.400 don't listen

00:50:56.840 to much

00:50:57.140 music

00:50:57.500 but that

00:50:59.000 said

00:50:59.400 objectively

00:51:00.900 speaking

00:51:01.480 she's

00:51:01.900 sensationally

00:51:02.660 successful

00:51:03.800 so if

00:51:05.080 somebody is

00:51:05.600 sensationally

00:51:06.660 successful

00:51:07.220 with their

00:51:07.720 art

00:51:08.040 I say

00:51:09.040 that's

00:51:09.980 good art

00:51:10.440 it's good

00:51:11.860 because people

00:51:12.480 wanted it

00:51:12.980 it's good

00:51:13.700 because people

00:51:14.280 bought it

00:51:14.880 there's nothing

00:51:16.360 else you have

00:51:16.780 to discuss

00:51:17.400 art is not

00:51:19.200 objective

00:51:19.600 if a whole

00:51:20.220 bunch of

00:51:20.580 people want

00:51:21.000 to listen

00:51:21.300 to your

00:51:21.620 art

00:51:21.960 you're an

00:51:22.960 artist

00:51:23.300 end of

00:51:24.220 story

00:51:24.500 so Cardi B

00:51:25.780 I have

00:51:26.760 maximum

00:51:28.140 respect

00:51:28.860 for her

00:51:30.500 as an

00:51:30.860 artist

00:51:31.160 but I

00:51:32.440 will differ

00:51:32.960 a little

00:51:33.620 bit

00:51:33.960 with Candace

00:51:34.900 and maybe

00:51:35.360 not even

00:51:35.820 much

00:51:36.180 at all

00:51:36.560 maybe

00:51:36.860 none

00:51:37.120 at all

00:51:37.440 but I

00:51:39.060 like the

00:51:39.680 fact that

00:51:40.160 she's

00:51:40.400 involved

00:51:40.780 in

00:51:41.000 politics

00:51:41.540 I like

00:51:42.740 it

00:51:43.020 because

00:51:43.940 there's

00:51:44.380 nothing

00:51:44.640 about her

00:51:45.200 that suggests

00:51:45.940 that she's

00:51:46.860 done

00:51:47.120 learning

00:51:47.560 right

00:51:48.540 there's

00:51:49.020 nothing

00:51:49.240 about her

00:51:49.780 Cardi B

00:51:50.360 that would

00:51:50.680 suggest

00:51:51.120 she doesn't

00:51:52.440 want to

00:51:53.020 round out

00:51:53.840 her knowledge

00:51:54.420 of politics

00:51:55.540 so if she's

00:51:57.240 open to

00:51:57.980 making this

00:51:59.240 a continual

00:52:00.120 sort of

00:52:01.740 a system

00:52:02.440 in which

00:52:03.140 she's

00:52:03.460 getting

00:52:03.900 more informed

00:52:05.040 as she

00:52:05.420 goes

00:52:05.760 I say

00:52:07.100 more of

00:52:07.500 it

00:52:07.680 let me

00:52:08.600 let me

00:52:09.260 give you

00:52:09.740 this

00:52:10.780 thought

00:52:11.360 I've

00:52:13.020 talked

00:52:13.240 about

00:52:13.560 it would

00:52:14.360 be good

00:52:14.660 to have

00:52:14.960 more than

00:52:15.640 a debate

00:52:16.300 like on

00:52:16.940 TV

00:52:17.260 because the

00:52:17.880 debates

00:52:18.140 on TV

00:52:18.600 are too

00:52:19.000 limited

00:52:19.420 the people

00:52:20.140 have

00:52:20.340 they don't

00:52:20.680 have

00:52:20.820 enough

00:52:21.020 time

00:52:21.540 you got

00:52:22.340 to get

00:52:22.560 to the

00:52:22.820 next

00:52:23.040 question

00:52:23.660 you

00:52:24.320 basically

00:52:25.140 just

00:52:25.460 doesn't

00:52:25.800 work

00:52:26.140 but what

00:52:27.900 also

00:52:28.320 would not

00:52:28.820 work

00:52:29.240 is

00:52:29.760 giving

00:52:30.180 your

00:52:30.440 politicians

00:52:31.000 all the

00:52:31.600 time

00:52:31.840 that they

00:52:32.140 want

00:52:32.540 to

00:52:33.440 debate

00:52:33.760 and here's

00:52:35.000 why it

00:52:35.320 wouldn't

00:52:35.520 work

00:52:35.880 the

00:52:36.780 politicians

00:52:37.360 will just

00:52:38.020 lie

00:52:38.420 both of

00:52:39.640 them

00:52:39.820 doesn't

00:52:40.260 matter

00:52:40.440 who

00:52:40.600 they

00:52:40.740 are

00:52:40.980 both

00:52:41.360 sides

00:52:41.740 will

00:52:42.360 just

00:52:42.560 sit

00:52:42.760 there

00:52:43.040 and in

00:52:43.500 the

00:52:43.760 context

00:52:45.000 of a

00:52:45.560 debate

00:52:45.900 they

00:52:46.640 wouldn't

00:52:46.940 say a

00:52:47.360 single

00:52:47.700 thing

00:52:47.980 that was

00:52:48.260 true

00:52:48.520 because

00:52:49.460 the

00:52:49.720 truth

00:52:50.000 doesn't

00:52:50.440 work

00:52:50.700 as well

00:52:51.100 so if

00:52:52.140 you're

00:52:52.280 trying to

00:52:52.600 win a

00:52:52.900 debate

00:52:53.200 that's

00:52:53.520 televised

00:52:54.060 you're

00:52:54.700 just

00:52:54.820 going to

00:52:55.060 lie

00:52:55.320 through

00:52:55.520 your

00:52:55.720 teeth

00:52:56.020 because

00:52:56.300 it

00:52:56.440 works

00:52:56.640 better

00:52:56.900 and I

00:52:58.300 thought

00:52:58.500 to

00:52:58.620 myself

00:52:58.960 how

00:53:00.040 would

00:53:00.240 you

00:53:00.360 like

00:53:00.600 to

00:53:00.780 see

00:53:01.000 a

00:53:01.320 debate

00:53:02.260 between

00:53:03.360 Cardi B

00:53:04.060 and

00:53:04.980 Candace

00:53:05.520 because

00:53:06.980 presumably

00:53:07.900 Candace

00:53:08.520 would be

00:53:08.920 filling in

00:53:09.520 a lot

00:53:09.760 of

00:53:09.880 blanks

00:53:10.920 you know

00:53:11.200 just

00:53:11.400 background

00:53:12.000 knowledge

00:53:13.120 that would

00:53:13.440 be good

00:53:13.760 to have

00:53:14.260 to have

00:53:14.580 an opinion

00:53:14.960 and you

00:53:16.100 could watch

00:53:16.560 that happen

00:53:17.060 in real

00:53:17.460 time

00:53:17.860 with two

00:53:19.360 people who

00:53:19.880 actually want

00:53:20.580 good things

00:53:21.100 to happen

00:53:21.560 to the

00:53:22.660 black

00:53:22.880 community

00:53:23.300 and to

00:53:23.660 the

00:53:23.800 country

00:53:24.080 because

00:53:25.000 don't

00:53:25.220 you

00:53:25.360 believe

00:53:25.680 that

00:53:25.940 both

00:53:26.220 Cardi B

00:53:26.840 and

00:53:27.900 Candace

00:53:28.400 are

00:53:29.020 genuinely

00:53:29.780 interested

00:53:31.140 in the

00:53:31.620 well-being

00:53:32.040 of the

00:53:32.380 country

00:53:32.980 and

00:53:34.760 I think

00:53:36.000 it goes

00:53:36.340 without

00:53:36.600 saying

00:53:37.040 interested

00:53:37.580 in the

00:53:37.940 well-being

00:53:38.300 of the

00:53:38.600 black

00:53:38.800 community

00:53:39.260 goes

00:53:40.440 without

00:53:40.700 saying

00:53:41.060 I

00:53:42.420 would

00:53:42.560 love

00:53:42.740 to

00:53:42.920 see

00:53:43.060 them

00:53:43.240 debate

00:53:43.620 and

00:53:44.600 if

00:53:44.760 you

00:53:44.900 say

00:53:45.120 to

00:53:45.260 yourself

00:53:45.640 no

00:53:46.320 no

00:53:46.560 Scott

00:53:46.920 because

00:53:47.420 Cardi B

00:53:48.060 might

00:53:48.520 not

00:53:48.840 know

00:53:49.260 as

00:53:49.440 much

00:53:49.720 as

00:53:49.900 some

00:53:50.140 pundit

00:53:50.720 might

00:53:51.120 not

00:53:51.340 know

00:53:51.560 as

00:53:52.120 much

00:53:52.320 about

00:53:52.520 politics

00:53:52.980 as

00:53:53.180 some

00:53:53.380 professional

00:53:53.980 I

00:53:54.700 say

00:53:54.940 that's

00:53:55.280 okay

00:53:55.580 because

00:53:56.360 the

00:53:56.560 pundit

00:53:56.880 and the

00:53:57.160 professional

00:53:57.560 are

00:53:57.860 just

00:53:58.060 liars

00:53:58.560 they're

00:53:59.540 professional

00:54:00.240 liars

00:54:00.740 I

00:54:01.440 don't

00:54:01.660 need

00:54:01.920 to

00:54:02.100 see

00:54:02.260 a

00:54:02.400 debate

00:54:02.840 between

00:54:03.760 two

00:54:04.140 professional

00:54:04.660 liars

00:54:05.220 but

00:54:06.100 if

00:54:06.240 you

00:54:06.380 put

00:54:06.680 Candace

00:54:07.700 and

00:54:07.920 Cardi B

00:54:08.440 in front

00:54:08.820 of the

00:54:09.020 camera

00:54:09.320 and

00:54:09.880 just

00:54:10.080 turn

00:54:10.700 it

00:54:10.860 on

00:54:11.160 and

00:54:12.280 just

00:54:12.480 step

00:54:13.120 back

00:54:13.560 and

00:54:14.300 watch

00:54:14.600 what

00:54:14.800 happens

00:54:15.240 you're

00:54:16.040 going to

00:54:16.220 end up

00:54:16.500 smarter

00:54:16.920 because

00:54:18.160 you're

00:54:18.380 going to

00:54:18.520 hear

00:54:18.700 something

00:54:19.060 from

00:54:19.360 Candace

00:54:19.740 that

00:54:19.900 you'd

00:54:20.040 never

00:54:20.240 heard

00:54:20.460 before

00:54:20.840 and

00:54:21.580 you're

00:54:21.800 going to

00:54:21.880 say

00:54:22.120 really

00:54:22.700 you're

00:54:23.800 going to

00:54:23.900 look

00:54:24.040 it

00:54:24.140 up

00:54:24.380 and

00:54:25.180 you're

00:54:25.360 going to

00:54:25.440 find

00:54:25.640 out

00:54:29.540 Candace

00:54:30.860 let's

00:54:32.140 say

00:54:32.380 respectfully

00:54:33.320 because

00:54:33.760 I

00:54:33.900 think

00:54:34.040 she

00:54:34.200 would

00:54:34.400 do

00:54:34.540 it

00:54:34.660 respectfully

00:54:35.180 fill

00:54:38.620 in

00:54:38.800 the

00:54:38.940 blanks

00:54:40.200 for

00:54:40.480 Cardi B

00:54:41.140 would

00:54:42.560 be

00:54:42.720 really

00:54:43.080 good

00:54:43.440 that

00:54:44.160 wouldn't

00:54:44.400 even

00:54:44.600 be

00:54:44.840 just

00:54:45.180 worth

00:54:46.120 watching

00:54:46.600 that

00:54:47.720 would

00:54:47.960 be

00:54:48.300 the

00:54:48.880 best

00:54:49.280 thing

00:54:49.560 I

00:54:49.740 could

00:54:49.880 watch

00:54:50.360 this

00:54:51.200 month

00:54:51.560 not

00:54:52.840 counting

00:54:53.220 the

00:54:53.540 Biden

00:54:53.780 riots

00:54:54.140 which

00:54:54.380 are

00:54:54.480 very

00:54:54.720 entertaining

00:54:55.160 so

00:54:56.320 let's

00:54:57.940 do

00:54:58.120 it

00:54:58.400 who's

00:54:59.320 with

00:54:59.500 me

00:55:00.080 wouldn't

00:55:00.960 you

00:55:01.080 like

00:55:01.260 to

00:55:01.400 see

00:55:01.560 that

00:55:01.840 tell

00:55:03.340 me

00:55:03.480 the

00:55:03.640 truth

00:55:03.900 you

00:55:04.580 would

00:55:04.780 like

00:55:05.100 to

00:55:05.320 see

00:55:05.480 that

00:55:05.820 and

00:55:06.760 it

00:55:07.460 would

00:55:07.640 be

00:55:07.820 better

00:55:08.120 than

00:55:08.320 watching

00:55:08.600 the

00:55:08.820 politicians

00:55:09.300 because

00:55:09.660 they

00:55:09.780 would

00:55:09.900 just

00:55:10.040 be

00:55:10.180 liars

00:55:10.600 you

00:55:11.820 know

00:55:11.960 I

00:55:12.300 don't

00:55:12.660 think

00:55:12.880 Candace

00:55:13.380 I

00:55:14.840 don't

00:55:15.000 think

00:55:15.200 has

00:55:15.400 she

00:55:15.520 ever

00:55:15.680 been

00:55:15.860 accused

00:55:16.180 of

00:55:16.420 lying

00:55:16.920 I

00:55:18.080 mean

00:55:18.200 I'm

00:55:18.360 sure

00:55:18.520 everybody's

00:55:19.020 been

00:55:19.160 accused

00:55:19.460 of

00:55:19.640 lying

00:55:19.860 but

00:55:20.600 I

00:55:20.760 would

00:55:20.880 trust

00:55:21.760 Candace

00:55:22.220 to

00:55:22.420 come

00:55:22.620 with

00:55:22.800 the

00:55:22.940 truth

00:55:23.300 if

00:55:24.120 anything

00:55:28.400 lied

00:55:29.080 Cardi

00:55:30.280 B

00:55:30.480 I

00:55:31.160 see

00:55:31.420 no

00:55:31.660 reason

00:55:31.940 to

00:55:32.100 think

00:55:32.260 she

00:55:32.440 wouldn't

00:55:32.660 be

00:55:32.800 completely

00:55:33.220 honest

00:55:33.680 I

00:55:35.120 would

00:55:35.280 love

00:55:35.640 to

00:55:35.820 see

00:55:36.160 two

00:55:36.720 honest

00:55:37.140 people

00:55:37.460 have

00:55:37.680 a

00:55:37.800 debate

00:55:38.160 how

00:55:39.040 often

00:55:39.320 do

00:55:39.440 you

00:55:39.500 see

00:55:39.640 that

00:55:39.940 two

00:55:40.760 honest

00:55:41.220 people

00:55:41.560 who

00:55:42.100 actually

00:55:42.520 just

00:55:42.820 want

00:55:43.040 the

00:55:43.180 world

00:55:43.340 to

00:55:43.500 be

00:55:43.620 better

00:55:43.840 that

00:55:44.720 would

00:55:44.820 be

00:55:44.920 the

00:55:45.080 best

00:55:45.380 debate

00:55:45.760 of

00:55:47.140 the

00:55:47.260 whole

00:55:47.420 year

00:55:47.680 hands

00:55:48.740 down

00:55:49.000 so

00:55:49.200 let's

00:55:49.460 get

00:55:49.880 that

00:55:50.060 going

00:55:50.320 I

00:55:51.340 love

00:55:51.580 to

00:55:51.720 see

00:55:51.840 it

00:55:52.000 all

00:55:52.180 right

00:55:52.280 that's

00:55:52.500 all

00:55:52.600 for

00:55:52.700 now

00:55:52.880 talk

00:55:53.160 you

00:55:53.320 later

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 07, 2020

Episode 1116 Scott Adams： #BidenRiots, Vitamin D Saves the World, Celebrities Attack Me, UnAmerican Airlines, Polls

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript