Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 11, 2020


Episode 1120 Scott Adams: Double-Nobel Prize Nominations, Antifa Allied With Shitler, NFL Cancels Itself, Mueller Phone Wipes


Episode Stats

Length

49 minutes

Words per Minute

136.39221

Word Count

6,724

Sentence Count

468

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

On this day every four years, we remember the lives lost in the attacks of September 11th, 2001, and the lessons we can learn from that day and the days that come after. Today's episode is about how important it is to remember that we are all on the same page.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody, go on in, come on in. There's time. Still time to get a good seat up front
00:00:17.160 for a smoky, because it's very smoky here in California, coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:25.280 I'm still alive, because I'm not going outdoors. I don't know how long I could survive outdoors.
00:00:32.740 I've decided that California now has three seasons. You got your sunny season, your rainy season,
00:00:39.540 and your smoky season. Because this, everything being on fire, seems to be now an annual thing.
00:00:47.900 So I think that's the way it's going to go. Anyway, I know what you're here for. You're
00:00:51.800 here for the simultaneous sip, and all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tankard chalice
00:00:57.040 or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask of a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:01:04.100 I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the
00:01:10.700 thing that makes everything better eventually. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens
00:01:16.920 now. Delightful. So it's September 11th, as you know. And you know how sometimes bad news
00:01:35.340 turns into accidental good news? You know, the bad part is still there, but there's something good
00:01:41.680 that comes out of it, and vice versa. You know, you never know what kind of unintended consequences
00:01:48.820 anything has. As horrible as 9-11 was, you know, we're all on the same page on that. As horrible
00:01:58.020 as 9-11 was, think about how important it is today. Like, literally today. Think about what
00:02:08.400 the United States is going through as it approaches the election. We are in full-out divisive mode.
00:02:18.400 And we're running at 100 miles an hour. Divisive, divisive, divisive. You know, it's like two muscle
00:02:26.220 cars doing a drag race. It's like vroom, vroom. And it's just two cars, and they're going 100 miles
00:02:32.000 an hour. Bam. It's 9-11. 9-11 hits, and all of your bullshit looks like bullshit. Now, tomorrow,
00:02:46.900 we'll go back to fighting. Tomorrow, we'll be divided along racial lines. We'll be divided along economic
00:02:54.800 lines. We'll be divided along gender lines, you know, as we like to be. But today? Not today. Nope. Not
00:03:07.060 today. So, think about the fact that just by historical coincidence, it didn't have to happen
00:03:13.800 this way. That September, September 11th, every four years, will just be that little pause
00:03:23.240 that reminds us, oh, wait a minute. Wait a minute. We're all on the same side. And you just need to
00:03:32.240 remember that every now and then. So, I'm just glad that September 11th happens in September,
00:03:38.200 because it's exactly the time that this country will need every four years. You know, obviously,
00:03:46.020 we'll be reminded every year. But every fourth year, it takes on a completely different meaning.
00:03:52.280 And I've never really felt that until this election, this being so divisive. But let's be
00:03:59.940 thankful that September 11th happened in September. It doesn't make any of those lives come back.
00:04:05.860 It doesn't make it any less of a tragedy. But if there's one thing that this country does well,
00:04:12.920 it's capitalizing on a crisis. We're really good at that. And we can find some value out of charred
00:04:21.920 embers. I mean, literally, we can say, oh, here's some charcoal. We'll make a barbecue. And, you know,
00:04:29.240 maybe we can maybe we can dig out some value of this, this September 11th, eventually. Now,
00:04:37.300 I was wondering what Joe Biden's morning looks like on a day like today. And so I was just trying to
00:04:48.940 picture it like the movie in my head of he wakes up. And at some point, probably there's an advisor
00:04:55.980 there pretty quickly. I'd imagine he's probably swarmed with advisors. And he probably says some
00:05:02.820 version of so what's the news? What's what's happening today? And I'm just imagining his advisor
00:05:09.460 saying, well, so today's not ideal, because it's September 11th. So all day today, you can't be a
00:05:19.540 dick. You're just you're just gonna have to take a day off from being a dick. And today would be a bad
00:05:25.340 day to, let's say, promote your race hoaxes that are the basis of your campaign. Because that's a
00:05:33.540 little divisive. And just not today. It's September 11th. So Joe says, all right, all right, well,
00:05:40.420 I guess I won't be making news. And he literally said that this morning to the news crew. He said,
00:05:46.200 I won't be making news today, because he just wanted to treat things seriously. Because it's
00:05:50.780 September 11th. Not a bad approach, you know, good role model kind of a thing. But, you know,
00:05:59.660 there might be a few other news things that pop up. And you could see him saying to his advisors,
00:06:06.080 all right, so it's September 11th. What else? Anything else happen today? Yeah. Yeah. A couple
00:06:13.940 other things happened today. Number one, remember how you thought it was a fluke when you saw that
00:06:21.020 first poll that showed that African American support for Trump was at record levels? And you knew that
00:06:29.820 couldn't be true, right? And remember how the second time you saw a poll that said the same thing,
00:06:37.260 you said to yourself, well, you know, that's just two. That can't really be real, can it? Well,
00:06:47.660 Rasmussen will have some numbers coming out today from North Carolina. And you might see,
00:06:55.180 you might see that there's an actual trend here. It turns out that this president probably will break a
00:07:06.480 record for black support. Did you see that coming? Now, when I say break a record for black support,
00:07:15.160 I mean of Republicans, Republican presidents, right? Obviously not for Democrats. But how many of you
00:07:24.300 would have predicted, how many of your filters would have predicted in 2015 or 16, that Trump would be
00:07:32.880 legendary, like not just do okay, but break records for black support? How many of you had a filter on
00:07:42.440 life that predicted that was likely? I did. Because I predicted it directly, publicly, many times. I said,
00:07:52.360 this president's going to break records for black support. Here we are. And then Joe Biden says to his
00:08:00.080 advisor in the morning, after he gets his coffee, oh, that's not good. It's 9-11, so I can't use my race
00:08:07.360 hoaxes today. So I'm kind of unarmed. And now you're telling me that the main reason that I even got
00:08:15.740 nominated is because I would have black support. And you're telling me that Trump will have more black
00:08:19.860 support than any Republican president, maybe ever? Except, you know, maybe Lincoln or something.
00:08:25.480 And then the advisor says, oh, just one more thing. Just one more thing. It's not a big deal.
00:08:38.940 But election is coming up, and your competitor, President Trump, he just got nominated for,
00:08:48.100 I don't know how to say this, a second Nobel Peace Prize for his Kosovo-Serbia agreement and helping
00:09:02.460 that get done. So you're running against a guy who will have the highest African American support of
00:09:10.940 any Republican president who just got nominated for two, two Nobel Peace Prizes. Now you say to
00:09:24.400 yourself, ah, anybody can get nominated. Being nominated doesn't mean you won. But if you look at the
00:09:32.820 details of why he got nominated, they're pretty solid. Nobody made anything up. Nobody's fact-checking
00:09:43.000 it. Nobody said, hey, there's no Kosovo-Serbia agreement. Nobody's saying that. Nobody's saying,
00:09:52.280 what UAE-Israel deal? That doesn't exist. Even the fake news doesn't say that. Apparently,
00:10:00.280 President Trump has earned two Nobel Peace Prize nominations. But I think if you look at the
00:10:15.020 details, whether or not he gets the actual prize, he earned the prizes. He earned two Nobel Peace
00:10:25.000 Prizes. And Joe Biden has to wake up in the morning and say, well, what am I running against? Oh,
00:10:31.680 are you kidding me? So in the history of presidents, nobody has ever run against somebody who had just
00:10:40.900 got nominated for, did I mention two Nobel Peace Prizes? Now, what I've been telling you that I think
00:10:54.040 the president's going to win in a landslide, but even I didn't think it was going to be this bad.
00:11:02.880 So if you take into account that he's starting to, depending on what polls you're looking at,
00:11:08.460 he's drawing even or pulling ahead in the battleground states. Biden continues to just decompose. And CNN had
00:11:17.140 lots of good things to say about Kamala Harris. Because, you know, Kamala Harris is considered not just the
00:11:24.100 vice presidential candidate, but because it's Biden, people think of her as almost a shadow president
00:11:29.620 situation. You know, maybe she'll be the real power right away or soon or something. And so you'd expect that the
00:11:37.200 people promoting her would have some good things to say about her, about her policies and her accomplishments and
00:11:45.360 stuff like that. So let me check the news. Let's see what CNN is saying about Kamala Harris. There's probably lots of
00:11:51.980 news about her accomplishments, I'm thinking. If not her accomplishments, then certainly there's going to be lots of
00:11:57.360 news about the policies that she promotes. Checking. Oh, here it is. There's a story about Kamala Harris on the front page of
00:12:05.500 CNN clicking that. People are talking about her footwear and her skinny jeans. Apparently, there's quite a bit of
00:12:17.800 excitement because she wears a particular kind of footwear, sort of a sneakerish situation. But there's probably,
00:12:27.220 that's just the lead in. Obviously, there's stuff here about her accomplishments and her
00:12:32.260 policies, looking, looking. No, it's still about her footwear.
00:12:41.120 Nope, that's all we got. That's all we got. So I don't know if I've mentioned yet, but President
00:12:48.000 Trump was nominated for two Nobel Peace Prizes, which he's earned, both of them. But he's got some
00:12:58.400 strong competition because on the other side, there's somebody who's wearing sneakers who lots of
00:13:06.120 people think is a good fashion statement. So that should be close. I would like to give you my
00:13:15.140 impression of every Democrat that I've been debating online. And they seem to be able to win arguments
00:13:25.680 by facial expressions and not arguing. And I'd like to give you my impression of Dale
00:13:33.340 representing every Democrat that I've debated with this week. And it goes like this. I'll first start in
00:13:40.620 my character, played by myself. You know, mathematicians say that two plus two equals four.
00:13:51.280 And then Dale, the Democrat, will come in to fact check me. And he'll fact check me this way.
00:13:58.260 Oh, why don't they just call you Dilbert's boss?
00:14:03.220 Did you see what I did there? Oh, yeah. Show me your sources. What sources? What college did
00:14:14.380 you go to? Look at this guy. Two plus two equals four. Idiot. Idiot. Oh, this is why you support
00:14:26.640 Trump. You're just thinking two plus two equals four. Oh, idiots. Idiots. I gotta say, I thought
00:14:42.280 somebody else was the dumbest person in the world. But now that I see you with your two plus
00:14:47.200 two stuff, I'm like, well, now you're the dumbest person in the world, obviously.
00:14:58.360 So, yeah, the wide-eyed tell. Did you see the interview with, I guess, one of the major
00:15:10.860 advisors for Joe Biden on his campaign, his name is Duck Low, spelled just like a duck,
00:15:18.900 D-U-C-K-L-O. That's his last name, Duck Low. So, Joe Biden, who literally was in a basement below
00:15:27.840 the ground ducking questions, his main advisor is Duck Low. I think the simulation is talking to us.
00:15:37.400 Maybe we can figure out what it means. But the funny part was that, I guess it was Brett Baer
00:15:42.880 who asked him directly, did Biden agree with the travel ban from China? And Duck Low, he gets the
00:15:53.440 wide-eyed look. Now, if I've taught you nothing, Democrats all lie with a similar liar face. It's
00:16:01.820 where their eyes get really big to try to convince you of something that didn't happen. And so, Duck Low
00:16:09.300 gets the big eyes, and he says, there is plenty of fact-checking, Brett Baer. I could give it to you.
00:16:17.680 I mean, I could send you the fact-checking that said that Joe Biden did not disagree with the travel
00:16:23.620 ban. And then Brett Baer says, just clarifying, so you're saying that Joe Biden agreed with the travel
00:16:30.860 ban when President Trump suggested it. You're saying he agreed with it. I'm saying I can send
00:16:39.280 you all the fact-checking. It's been debunked and debunked and fact-checked. And everybody knows
00:16:47.380 that Joe Biden did not disagree with it, Brett Baer says. Okay, but just clarifying, you haven't
00:16:55.760 quite answered the question. You've ducked low. Now, Brett Baer didn't say that, but I wish he had
00:17:01.900 ducked low. But that's not exactly the answer to the question. So I'll ask again, are you saying
00:17:10.320 that Joe Biden agreed with President Trump? Well, he didn't give an answer to that, as you might expect.
00:17:18.520 But he did give very big eyes, like that. If you are listening to this on audio only, you're
00:17:30.360 missing my tremendous impressions, in which I make big bug eyes, and, well, you're just
00:17:38.600 missing the best part. Police departments are trying to dispel the rumors that Antifa is
00:17:45.300 starting the wildfires in the West Coast. And I guess they're starting, I guess Antifa
00:17:55.020 is very particular, because wildfires don't destroy many black businesses. So I think Antifa
00:18:02.580 is more concentrated on burning up black businesses and urban centers. They don't say it that way,
00:18:08.660 but that's how it turns out. They burn other businesses, too. Just to be fair, to be fair,
00:18:15.140 they do burn other people's businesses. So in that way, you could say they are pursuing
00:18:22.020 equality, in a way. We'll talk a little more about Antifa in a moment. So India, this was
00:18:31.520 reported on CNN's website, that India may have a lot of problems with their reporting.
00:18:37.540 Apparently in India, most people die at home or somewhere that's not a hospital. So India
00:18:44.220 has a real trouble counting the number of coronavirus-related deaths, because so many people just die at home
00:18:51.200 or not under medical care. But here was an interesting statement. Again, it's important that this was
00:18:57.920 on a CNN website. And it says, and I quote, with more tests, authorities are detecting more cases.
00:19:05.920 What? What? This is CNN. CNN is stating that in India, if you test more, you'll detect more virus.
00:19:17.940 Huh. Because I'm sure that I have been mocked for suggesting that the president may have made sense
00:19:27.020 when he said that the more you test, the more virus you will detect, because that's why you test,
00:19:32.980 to detect virus. And all the smart people told me that didn't make sense. May I do an impression
00:19:38.500 of every smart person who's telling me why it's so dumb to think that if you test more,
00:19:44.540 you will detect more. Oh, look at this guy. Oh! Why don't you stay in your lane?
00:19:51.500 Pointy here, boss. Much. Oh! So that was the intellectual debate I've been getting on the question of
00:19:59.180 does testing find more cases? So did you watch the first NFL game last night? Did anybody watch that?
00:20:14.540 If you saw the stands, I don't know what, I don't know what kind of rules they have about
00:20:22.960 in person, but the stands were largely empty. There were people there, but there are lots of,
00:20:29.320 I don't know if that was just the social distancing rules or just not a people, a lot of people went or
00:20:34.340 what, but it wasn't well attended. And yet when, when the players locked arms to support
00:20:42.900 their social positions, there was a lot of booing, a lot of booing. For the fact that there weren't
00:20:52.100 many people there, it was a lot of booing for not many people in attendance, making me think that
00:20:59.600 there were more boos than there were supporters. Now, my take on it is that sports are not terribly
00:21:08.160 important just in general. I wouldn't care if all professional sports ended tomorrow. I just wouldn't
00:21:15.380 care. I stopped watching professional sports a while ago. But the real question is whether you need to mix
00:21:22.940 your social messaging in every product, or can you separate your social messaging from your product?
00:21:31.680 If the sports game is the product, does it make sense to always mix those? So without debating whether
00:21:41.200 it's good to talk about equality, of course it is. Without debating whether it's good to always
00:21:49.120 strive for a more equal society, of course it is. So the message, you know, the idea behind it,
00:21:55.380 of course it's fine. Everybody, I think everybody agrees with it in concept. But do you need to put
00:22:02.100 it in your sports? Does it have to be everywhere? And I saw the most scathing, if that's the deepest
00:22:11.740 cutting criticism of the NFL that I've ever seen. Are you ready for this? I don't believe anybody's
00:22:19.480 ever said anything worse about the NFL than what I'm going to, and I didn't write down who said it,
00:22:25.840 but it was a Twitter user, and said that, you know, the, why can I never remember all the victims' names?
00:22:36.760 I think I'm supposed to remember all the victims. But the gentleman who got shot seven times but
00:22:42.720 survived, and he was alleged to have been a sexual assaulter. And somebody on Twitter commented
00:22:52.840 that there's a real woman in the United States, a living real woman, not a conceptual woman,
00:23:01.380 not in principle somebody might exist that, but an actual woman with a name and a life,
00:23:08.200 who someday will turn on TV and see the name of her rapist written on the helmets of the football
00:23:16.740 players. Imagine that. Imagine that you are literally a victim of a sex crime, and you have to watch
00:23:27.420 the NFL, all these multi-millionaires, write the name of your attacker, allegedly, on their helmet,
00:23:36.600 and then play a game in front of the whole country. Think about that. That's actually the most
00:23:45.540 cutting criticism I think I've ever heard. Maybe the worst criticism I've ever heard of any
00:23:54.260 professional league for doing anything, not even on this topic. You could say any topic.
00:24:00.720 Putting that guy's name on their helmets, I would say you'd have to nominate that for one of the
00:24:08.540 worst things anybody's ever done. Not just in sports, but if you don't count actual physical
00:24:18.980 violence to stuff, that's the worst stuff. But of things that are not physically violent,
00:24:25.060 but are, let's say, socially or psychologically devastating, just imagine that you were a victim
00:24:34.380 of a crime, and you see the perpetrator's name, according to you, on the helmets of the NFL.
00:24:42.340 If you ever watch another NFL game, I don't know why you would, really. I just don't know why you
00:24:49.420 would. Because they've completely thrown, you know, women and Me Too under the bus. And I don't think
00:24:57.740 they could be further from social justice warriors, which is what they'd like to be. They'd like to be,
00:25:05.300 you know, if I could use that term, they'd like to be on the right side of history. They'd like to be
00:25:09.640 on the right side of justice. But boy, did they miss it. You know, I think the players' intentions are
00:25:16.280 great. I wouldn't, I don't even, you know, I don't fault any of the players for doing what they need
00:25:22.800 to do, freedom of speech, blah, blah, blah. But man, did they miss their, they missed the target by a
00:25:29.780 mile. There's another story in the news that is so mind-boggling that you can't actually hold it in
00:25:38.180 your mind for long. In other words, there's something that if you could accept that it's true,
00:25:45.160 and it is true, there's no, there's no argument about whether it's true, if you can accept that
00:25:49.920 it's true, you just can't process it in your brain to do something about it. And here's the story,
00:25:57.840 that apparently several dozen phones associated with the Mueller investigation were accidentally
00:26:05.860 wiped of all their data so that when the, who was it, the department, the inspector general wanted
00:26:15.360 to review them, that they were not available. And the excuses they gave were physical damage in a few
00:26:21.960 cases, but that they'd forgotten their own passwords, and they tried their password too many times and it
00:26:27.980 deleted their phone. Now, have you ever tried entering the wrong password in your phone? It makes
00:26:35.800 you wait to do it again if you do it too many times. You'd have to really work hard to delete your
00:26:41.620 data, like it would have to be a project where you'd come back to it every several hours, say, all right,
00:26:47.640 put in one more password, time out, I'll come back to this hours later. Now, I don't think there's
00:26:56.160 anybody dumb enough to think that these are real accidents and these are obviously excuses. They're
00:27:02.120 transparent excuses for people who wiped the data that could have been relevant to the inspector
00:27:08.980 general. Now, that is so mind-bogglingly big that nothing will happen. Do you get that? The idea of it,
00:27:20.860 you almost can't hold it in your brain. Like, I can't conceive that there were dozens, several
00:27:30.080 dozen, several dozen phones, people deleted evidence, and these were people working in a legal field for
00:27:40.280 the United States, and they were looking for crimes of exactly this nature. They were looking for this
00:27:51.700 kind of crime, obstruction of justice. Now, I don't know how you could see it any other way, but destroying
00:28:00.420 evidence that they knew could be later discoverable because it might be relevant feels to me exactly like
00:28:07.820 obstruction of justice and not a little bit. I'm talking about coordinated, because obviously there
00:28:14.840 must have been some coordination. I'm talking about massive, obvious, direct. You almost can't hold it in
00:28:23.340 your mind. And because, and I mean this literally, that you can't hold it as true because it's just too
00:28:30.060 ridiculous. Too ridiculous. And because your brain can't quite process it, I think they actually will just
00:28:37.280 get away with it. It's kind of a weird situation that is so unusual, you just can't really process it.
00:28:45.440 That's what I think. All right. I drew out a bunch of, a bunch of trolls, as I like to do. They were all
00:28:57.700 confused about what I was saying and what I was doing. But I made a tweet that I said that, you know,
00:29:04.040 Antifa, I'll paraphrase my own tweet, the Antifa would be surprised to learn that the original Antifa
00:29:11.300 fought on the same side with Hitler against the Weimar Republic. And now, I can tell you because
00:29:23.860 you're my insiders. So let me tell you what I was thinking and why I sent that tweet. Number one,
00:29:31.820 do I think it's relevant that a German organization in the 30s had the same name as, you know, at least
00:29:40.840 translated, it's the same name as Antifa in Portland in 2020. Do I think that that matters? No.
00:29:49.580 No. Oh, I don't think that matters. It has nothing to do with anything. I also don't think it matters
00:29:56.000 that the KKK used to be, you know, more of a Democrat kind of a thing. Because if it's not
00:30:04.920 relevant to 2020, I don't care. It's just history. It's not history that matters. It's just a fact
00:30:11.040 that doesn't matter. You know, because all that matters is today. And so the first tongue-in-cheek
00:30:20.140 that people should have known, it should have been a red flag, how serious I was about this.
00:30:26.580 The first flag should have been, is he serious that this unrelated group, because there's no
00:30:34.060 connection through time, they're unrelated. And I guess it was a Swedish group that was also some
00:30:39.280 kind of Antifa that was separate from both Germany, separate from the current one, separate one,
00:30:44.820 separate from the modern version of Antifa in Europe. So I think there are at least four versions
00:30:50.660 of Antifa. I guess the US one has some connection to Europe. But no, I was not serious, not even a
00:30:59.960 little bit serious, that it matters what Antifa in Germany in 1930s did. I don't think it matters.
00:31:09.040 It's just a different group, different circumstance. But I knew it would bring out the trolls.
00:31:14.560 And here's the next part. Just to be provocative, I said that Antifa in Germany in the 30s was
00:31:22.700 allied with Hitler. Now, is that an overclaim? I gave people the link on Wikipedia. And it will tell
00:31:33.140 you that the German Antifa and Hitler's group fought each other, which is not like allies, right? That
00:31:41.060 would be the opposite, because they were fighting each other. But at the same time, they were both
00:31:46.500 fighting the common government that they both wanted to overthrow. Now, the government was overthrown.
00:31:53.280 Hitler came to power. And one of the first things he did was get rid of Antifa, because they were
00:31:59.720 useful fighting the government. But as soon as Hitler was in power, they were no longer useful. And
00:32:05.400 so he dealt with them harshly. So the historians are coming after me and saying, Scott, Scott, Scott,
00:32:12.200 you idiot, you pointy-haired idiot. Read some history. Where are you making up these stories about
00:32:17.560 Antifa being allied with the Nazis? And then I do this. Are you waiting for the second part?
00:32:25.760 I say, well, I get why you might not like that word allied. But they were fighting on the same side,
00:32:34.680 meaning that they were both opposed to the government. We'd agree on that. Historians will
00:32:40.060 agree on that. We also agree that they fought each other a little bit. Doesn't remove from the fact
00:32:48.120 that they had a common enemy. But here's the thing. It's a lot like 2020 Antifa and Black Lives
00:32:56.340 Matter. Here's why it's similar. Have you seen Antifa and Black Lives Matter get into any scuffles?
00:33:04.560 I think you have. I think you have. Now, they've been minor. And primarily, BLM and Antifa are opposed to
00:33:14.360 the current government, current, you know, systems, I guess. But what would happen if they prevailed?
00:33:24.580 Suppose, suppose Antifa and Black Lives Matter overthrew the government. I don't think it's going
00:33:31.740 to happen. But imagine they did, just like Antifa and Hitler overthrew the German government. What
00:33:38.180 would happen if Black Lives Matter and Antifa somehow came to power? Would they say,
00:33:44.360 I'm glad we're all on the same side? Let's form a government that's part Antifa and part Black
00:33:50.580 Lives Matter? No! Antifa is against governments. No, Antifa are anarchists. They don't want to be
00:33:59.720 part of a government. Black Lives Matter, they're Marxists, etc. But even they like a Bernie Sanders
00:34:08.020 kind of capitalism. But they still want a capitalist system. I think most of them do. You know, maybe
00:34:16.760 some of the leaders are radical. But most of Black Lives Matter, you know, rank-and-file kind
00:34:22.140 of people, they're not looking to get rid of Bernie Sanders socialism. They kind of like it. Antifa?
00:34:30.900 Antifa? They can't live with any kind of capitalism. Even a Bernie Sanders capitalism is way too much.
00:34:39.060 So Black Lives Matter and Antifa are allied only because they have a common enemy. But they are not
00:34:45.980 on the same team. And if they ever came to power, they would have to fight. Who would win? Well, I'd bet on
00:34:54.840 Black Lives Matter, frankly. In part because, do you know who would be on the same side as Black Lives
00:35:00.100 Matter if they ever decided to turn on Antifa? Republicans. Republicans. Black Lives Matter would
00:35:10.180 have plenty of allies because they're the people who want capitalism. Now, of course, all of this is
00:35:16.600 silly and will never happen. But what I wanted to do was to get people to think through the analogy
00:35:22.680 and just make them uncomfortable about the current situation because of how they feel about the
00:35:30.360 other one. Now, here was the other thing that I learned while looking into this. Apparently,
00:35:35.520 Antifa in Germany, the original 1930s version, when they used the word fascist, all it meant was
00:35:43.960 capitalism. That's it. It didn't matter if you had, you know, classic fascist elements.
00:35:52.680 If you were a capitalist, that's just fascist by definition. So when the Antifa people say to me,
00:36:00.140 I have to get my Dale beard again to say this, as they do often,
00:36:04.700 Scott, anti-fascist? It's in the name? How could you be confused? It's in the name. Did I mention
00:36:17.360 it's in the name? Anti means opposed? Are you following me so far? Anti means opposed to? Second
00:36:25.540 word, fascist. Fascist. Opposed to fascist. Therefore, Antifa is opposed to fascist. Scott, do you not
00:36:36.000 understand? Am I talking too fast? Do you not following this yet? To which I say, what did it mean in
00:36:45.920 Germany? Didn't mean that. So it is obvious from the original Antifa that the word fascist sort of
00:36:55.440 means just anybody who's making money, basically, capitalism. If you're making money in any way,
00:37:04.160 you're a fascist. So all I wanted to get out of this was to sort of stir the thinking pot and just
00:37:14.920 make people uncomfortable and maybe they would shift in their opinions over time.
00:37:20.540 So it's just a little context that I thought was fun. I'm being accused of being the dumbest guy
00:37:26.880 in the world. In the world. For that tweet. But people don't realize that it was more mischievous
00:37:35.160 than historical. All right. So Lindsay, Lindsay Graham says there's a big surprise coming in 10 to 12
00:37:48.220 days about the situation with Russia collusion and the investigation about how that went down.
00:37:56.300 So something big coming in 10 to 12 days. Now, I don't know if it'll be 10 to 12 days, but the fact
00:38:02.440 that the Durham investigation looks like it might wrap up before the election, that is an interesting
00:38:11.360 coincidence. In France, the hospitalization rates are up for coronavirus, COVID-19. And I use this as
00:38:23.100 further evidence that leadership is an illusion, or at least leadership as a major variable in how people
00:38:32.220 are doing with coronavirus is probably just an illusion. And the illusion goes like this. If you're
00:38:37.640 Democrats and you're not good at analyzing stuff, President Trump didn't do enough testing.
00:38:45.840 Okay. What was he supposed to test with? Was the president supposed to do lots of testing
00:38:52.440 with the test kits that didn't exist? And that even the people who are responsible for the test kits
00:38:59.020 didn't know they didn't exist because they had test kits. They just didn't know they were defective.
00:39:04.080 So was the president supposed to magically make test kits or magically know they needed to be made
00:39:10.980 when the experts themselves didn't know that? And where were all the test kits from the Obama
00:39:16.820 administration that he could just use? What about all that time he lost in preparation where he could
00:39:22.520 have been getting PPE ready? Wait a minute. Why would Trump have to need time to get a bunch of PPE
00:39:32.360 when Obama had a gigantic storehouse of it just in case? Oh, did I get that wrong? Wait, are you
00:39:41.860 telling me that Obama and Biden, when they were in office, they didn't have a gigantic national supply
00:39:48.480 of PPE? I don't know why they didn't have that since they knew this pandemic was coming and they knew
00:39:54.540 they would need it. Can you explain to me why they were so aware of it coming and yet we did not have
00:40:00.980 warehouses full of PPE to be to be ready? Huh? So it's only people who are and then the third point
00:40:09.620 there is that testing and contact tracing only works if you have a small group of infections and maybe a
00:40:19.660 an island situation or a small country. If you get it early, maybe, maybe you can tamp it down. But if you're
00:40:28.060 the United States and people are driving in and walking in and flying in from every direction and
00:40:34.040 you're one of the main destinations on planet Earth and it's just impossible to stop at all. I mean,
00:40:39.940 even if you stop travel from China, still people walking across the border, still coming in from
00:40:45.420 Canada who came from China. So the United States never really had the option in a realistic way
00:40:52.460 of doing contact tracing and stopping it while it was small. You can fantasize that that was possible
00:41:00.480 but it wasn't. It wasn't. Was it possible in New Zealand? I think so. I think it was. If President
00:41:09.760 Trump had been the leader of New Zealand, could he have done the same thing that the leader of New Zealand
00:41:15.580 did, which seems to be effective? Probably. Do you think the leader of New Zealand just made her own
00:41:22.680 decisions? Or, or, do you think she talked to her experts and the experts said, well, we're a small
00:41:31.360 country, don't have many infections. I think we can test our way through this because we do have enough
00:41:36.720 tests to do that. And then she said, well, I don't have a better idea. Well, I'm not the expert.
00:41:42.540 If that's what you say will work, let's do that. Now replace her with President Trump.
00:41:49.680 Experts come up and they say, we've got enough test kits. We're a small country. We can test.
00:41:54.340 Let's do it. Does President Trump then say, ah, no, I don't think so? No, no. He says the same thing
00:42:04.680 that the leader of New Zealand said. Yeah, let's do that. You're the experts. Let's do that.
00:42:09.940 So if you are unsophisticated and you don't have much experience in life, or you've never read the
00:42:17.720 Dilbert comic strip, you might still be suffering the illusion that leadership is a big variable in
00:42:24.320 how things turn out. It really isn't. Because most of life in big organizations is people at lower
00:42:32.740 levels surfacing their expertise. And then the leader says yes or no. But it's not really the
00:42:38.840 leader deciding. Because it's very rare for the leader to say, well, there's your expert opinion.
00:42:44.060 I'm going to go a different direction. Because if you make a mistake that way, you're done.
00:42:49.420 So as long as everybody's following directions from the experts, and the experts largely were
00:42:55.540 in agreement around the world, it's not like there was one country where all the experts
00:43:00.640 were on a different page. That didn't happen. So we should see that the most predictable thing
00:43:08.980 that you could see is that hypothetically, if you could just switch all the leaders, you
00:43:14.520 know, just snap your fingers, and all the leaders go into different countries. And they're just as
00:43:18.920 smart, just as capable as before. But now, magically, they know the language and the culture and stuff.
00:43:25.800 So you've just replaced the leaders. How do those countries turn out in terms of coronavirus?
00:43:32.820 Exactly the same. Exactly the same. So the big illusion that the fake news and the people who don't
00:43:40.900 have experience in big companies are selling you is that the leadership is the big variable.
00:43:47.480 And then, you know, they all had a menu of tools. So it's how you decided to use those tools,
00:43:54.480 your leadership, that is the big, you know, the differentiator between who gets a good result
00:44:00.220 and who gets a bad result. Nothing like that's happening. That is just an illusion. They were all
00:44:07.120 just following expert advice. Experts largely gave the same advice. Some countries faster,
00:44:13.140 some slower. Some had hydroxychloroquine supplies, some didn't. So some had options that others didn't.
00:44:20.200 But it's not leadership that you're seeing here. That's not the main filter. All right.
00:44:25.300 All right. I'm not in favor of raising taxes, just in general. You know, if there's any way you can not
00:44:35.520 raise taxes, you should do it. But let's say you wanted to mess with Bernie Sanders. And let's say you
00:44:44.820 wanted to, what's the word, where you co-opt or you somehow take somebody else's policy. There's a
00:44:54.520 better word for that. Suppose President Trump, this is not going to happen. This is purely a thought
00:45:00.060 experiment. So don't get hung up on, that'll never happen. Because I'm telling you, this will never
00:45:06.040 happen. But it's a good thought experiment. It goes like this. Tax the monopoly digital companies,
00:45:15.620 you know, your Facebooks, your Googles, you could throw a few more names in there. Amazon, maybe.
00:45:20.720 And you tax them specifically to pay for health care and free college for anybody who doesn't have
00:45:28.700 it yet. So I'm not talking about paying for health care for the whole country. I'm talking about they
00:45:34.200 would cover the gap for those people who can't get health care. They would cover the gap for anybody
00:45:39.300 who wanted to go to college but couldn't afford it, that sort of thing. And here's the beauty of the
00:45:45.120 idea. It would basically be a sin tax. Because social media is sort of like liquor and cigarettes, in the sense
00:45:54.060 that it's not good for you. You know it's not good for you. But it's a free country, so we're not going to get
00:45:59.380 rid of it. And because it's not healthy, in a variety of different ways, it does make sense that you tax the
00:46:06.780 things that are least healthy. And then you use that money, we have a tradition for this, cigarette taxes, for
00:46:12.240 example. Then you use that sin tax money to do something that's very healthy for the public.
00:46:18.200 What would be healthier for the public than getting everybody good health care?
00:46:22.340 Nothing. What would be healthier for the public than making sure they could get good educations?
00:46:29.020 Nothing. I mean, it's probably one of the best things you can do for your health
00:46:33.180 is to have an education and therefore a good chance for a good economic situation.
00:46:39.420 And there's a big difference. The richer you are, the better your health. It's pretty direct.
00:46:45.780 So in a practical sense, nothing like that would happen. But here's the interesting part of the idea.
00:46:55.700 If the big digital companies realized that only they were being taxed for this very special kind of tax
00:47:02.840 for health care and for education, now it doesn't have to be college education, it could also be maybe school
00:47:09.480 choice, etc. What would they do? Well, the first thing they'd do is they'd say, wait a minute, I'm paying a billion
00:47:17.080 dollars a year for these things, or however many billions, but if I can make the cost of providing health care
00:47:24.840 go down, so too would my taxes. If I can make the cost of going to college, just how it's done, the whole process of
00:47:33.040 education, if I could alter that and make it less expensive, I could lower my own taxes. So you would create a
00:47:40.900 situation where the companies most capable of solving health care, most capable of solving education, would have
00:47:49.460 an enormous financial incentive to do it, and suddenly you don't mind so much, those big companies.
00:47:56.520 Because
00:47:56.940 I think you would agree with the following statement.
00:48:02.200 If
00:48:02.760 a big company is super important to the country itself,
00:48:08.620 you're a little bit more forgiving if there are some
00:48:11.560 rough edges to that company, wouldn't you say?
00:48:14.740 Just a general statement. As long as you're providing
00:48:17.720 some enormous benefit, you can be a little more forgiving about any
00:48:22.640 things that are imperfect about it.
00:48:26.260 So if those big companies, which are suffering quite a
00:48:29.440 reputation hit, if they wanted to fix two of the biggest problems in the country
00:48:34.800 and tie it to their own self-interest, and it is pretty tied to their self-interest,
00:48:41.060 that might be a healthy situation. It might be a situation where the public says,
00:48:45.860 you know, I was mad about Amazon for whatever reason yesterday, but now I see that they're
00:48:53.780 helping give health care to poor people and educating people. I'm like, well,
00:48:58.520 well, I like that part. So there you go.
00:49:02.660 Somebody says private would be better. Well, you know, who knows if the solution would look
00:49:07.400 more private or public to be determined. All right. That's all I got for now. And I will talk to you tomorrow.