Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1179 Scott Adams： Election System Claims and Accusations. Are Any Credible？

00:00:00.000 Hey, everybody, come on in. It's time. It's time for Coffee with Scott Adams, the best

00:00:16.040 part of the day, every single time. Haven't been wrong yet. And if you'd like to enjoy

00:00:24.040 this broadcast to the maximum possible extent, well, you know what you need. You need a

00:00:30.160 cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:36.400 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:43.100 the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better except vote counting.

00:00:49.100 It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.

00:00:54.040 Hmm. I feel the transparency on this election improving. We'll get to the whiteboard in a

00:01:03.820 moment. Don't read ahead. Don't read ahead. Okay. All right. I think you understand.

00:01:10.100 I would like to begin by bragging about my wife, Christina, who got her pilot's license yesterday

00:01:18.720 in record time. Apparently, uh, it's either rare or unheard of to be able to get all of your

00:01:27.280 requirements done that quickly. But even more impressively, she learned to fly on, uh, tailwheel

00:01:34.780 planes, the kind that do aerobatics often. And they're much harder to fly. In fact, people who have been

00:01:42.760 professional pilots their whole career, try to fly these, uh, tailwheel planes. It means it has a

00:01:50.540 little, little wheel at the tail, which is different than a regular plane like a Cessna.

00:01:55.460 They would have three wheels and it's much easier to land, which is the hard part.

00:02:01.900 And, uh, so Christina did her check ride yesterday and she's an official pilot. So just had to brag

00:02:08.840 about that a little bit. Um, is it just me or is there a little bit of a mixed, uh, a mixed feeling

00:02:19.100 about the, the idea that Trump might not become president for the second term? Now, on one hand,

00:02:28.460 he was my, uh, clear choice and preference, but you know, rarely are there things that are only good

00:02:35.500 or they're only bad. Most things are some kind of a mix of good and bad. And when things don't go my

00:02:43.100 way, I like to find the good. So if it turned out, and I'll tell you later that it's by no means

00:02:51.520 certain that, uh, Biden became president, I'm being completely honest. I know this will sound like I'm

00:02:58.900 joking, but I'm not joking. I will find great entertainment in watching him try to do the job.

00:03:06.620 And I don't know if I've ever thought that about another president. Generally, by the time somebody

00:03:11.060 gets elected president, even if you don't like their policies, you say to yourself, well, Bill Clinton

00:03:17.540 was very capable. President Obama, very capable. Um, but president Biden,

00:03:28.900 you know, the, one of the big points of having a campaign is that the campaign is so grueling and

00:03:38.560 really tests the, the, everything from the stamina to the, the mental strength, uh, and the mental

00:03:46.300 acuity of your candidates. Biden is the only candidate who proved he couldn't do it. And he

00:03:54.960 got elected anyway, if the vote count holds, and by the way, don't assume it will. We'll talk about

00:04:01.100 that in a minute. Um, and I think, have we ever had this situation where somebody proved he can't do

00:04:08.840 the job by the lids and the, the low, the low amount of effort he could, he could put into it. And when

00:04:15.860 he did, it looked a little shaky. So I don't know we've ever had this situation where somebody proved

00:04:22.720 they're not physically capable to do the job, because it's a grueling job. And somebody humorously asked

00:04:30.640 on Twitter, I forgot to write down their name, so I can't give you credit. Somebody said that everybody

00:04:36.260 knows that the presidency ages you quickly. And somebody said, I shouldn't laugh about this.

00:04:46.660 It's terrible. But somebody said, how much, uh, how much cushion does Biden have if the presidency

00:04:53.220 ages you quickly? He might be 15 minutes on out. Now, I don't think it's an exaggeration to say

00:05:01.940 that it might be dicey that he even makes it to January nomination. I mean, because he's that age,

00:05:10.740 and because, again, he proved to us in the campaign that he can't handle a full schedule.

00:05:16.360 What happens when he goes from campaign mode, which is, let me tell you how, how hard campaign mode is.

00:05:23.080 If you're Joe Biden, here's the thing somebody wrote for you. Here's you reading it exactly the same

00:05:29.660 every time. And close your eyes. Imagine him coming out of the fields, eyes bulging, veins popping.

00:05:39.540 And he's just reading it. It's just the same stuff he reads, you know, his stump speech.

00:05:43.780 Now, I said during the campaign that by the end of the campaign, Biden was really good

00:05:50.120 at delivering that stump speech. And the speech itself, although it was, you know, filled with lies,

00:05:56.560 as all political speeches are, it was persuasive. He actually was quite, quite good. And I'm being

00:06:04.360 serious about that. Because I think it's important that you do compliment the people on the other

00:06:10.500 team for things they do well, because it gives you credibility when later you insult them. And so I

00:06:17.980 think that it was only at the end that Biden got that little speech really tight. In the beginning,

00:06:23.300 it was a little shaky. But how in the world is he going to actually go do the job? I don't know.

00:06:32.500 I heard a story, I don't know, a few years ago, there was some city official who ended up getting,

00:06:40.520 I think he went to jail for this, or at least he got convicted of changing some votes. So after the

00:06:47.140 election, he got into the votes, and he had access to them, and he changed them, and he got caught.

00:06:52.880 And this raises an interesting question, doesn't it? Because I said to myself,

00:07:00.160 does every city have a guy, or a woman, let's just say guy for keeping it simple,

00:07:09.400 does every city have a guy who has access to the votes, and can just change them?

00:07:16.240 What is it on a spreadsheet or something? What did you just change the numbers? How the hell did

00:07:21.580 that happen? Now, and don't you ask the same question? If there is one city in which there

00:07:29.020 was one guy whose job it was to have access, it included having access to the votes, and he could

00:07:36.160 just go in and change the number. Does every city have one of those guys? And what was it that got him

00:07:43.180 caught? Because obviously he thought he wouldn't get caught, or he wouldn't have done it. So I don't know

00:07:48.640 if they caught him by a coincidence, or was it an accident? If there had, and again, I don't know the

00:07:55.920 details, but was it obvious he would get caught? Was there somebody whose job it was to audit things,

00:08:03.820 and then they saw this, they said, ah, obviously, we always check this. And sure enough, this number

00:08:09.780 doesn't match this number. So somebody changed the number. Did that happen? Because I'd like to know that

00:08:15.280 at least if there are just one or two people who have access to the votes in each city, I'd like to

00:08:21.340 know that there's somebody else who wanted some every time, you know, not once in a while.

00:08:28.580 That's a big question, Mark. Wouldn't you like to know that? And here's another question I have.

00:08:34.560 If it was your intention to send a signal that you are not rigging an election, and that's why you

00:08:42.080 wanted everybody to think, hey, everybody, I'm totally not rigging this election. Isn't there a

00:08:49.200 certain way that you would act that would be compatible with what you're saying, the words

00:08:55.560 coming out of your mouth? So if the words coming out of your mouth say, we definitely did not do any

00:09:03.520 rigging, and I certainly want you to believe it. There was no rigging. I want to do everything I can

00:09:10.460 to convince you there was no rigging. Would you act the way Democrats are acting? Because it doesn't

00:09:17.160 seem compatible with the notion that they would like you to know that the election was so secure

00:09:24.900 and so well done. You can look at it all. Transparency? Of course. Of course you could have

00:09:31.840 transparency. Why not? The election was perfectly legitimate. So it's not proof of mischief that

00:09:44.320 people won't let you look at the details. There could be other reasons. You could imagine other

00:09:49.060 reasons for each of their decisions. One of the reasons you can easily imagine is that the news is

00:09:56.000 fake. So for example, did you hear the story that Republicans were barred from being close to the

00:10:06.500 vote counting so that they were told to be behind some barrier that's too far away with binoculars and

00:10:12.980 they can't even use their binoculars? You saw that, right? It was on all the news, at least it was on

00:10:19.220 Fox News. So the news reported consistently. It was all over social media. So it's just a fact, right?

00:10:25.760 It's a fact. The Republicans were not allowed close to the voting so they couldn't watch it.

00:10:31.940 Except I just watched a report on Fox News where they, looks like they corrected their own reporting.

00:10:39.340 It was true that Republicans were prevented and they were too far away to actually watch.

00:10:45.920 But this was an incomplete story, apparently. The real story is that there were Republicans who were

00:10:56.220 allowed to stand shoulder to shoulder and they were there and they were watching. There were other

00:11:01.880 people who were not part of the core group who are shoulder to shoulder who were not allowed to watch

00:11:07.560 and that included both Democrats and Republicans. So there were two rings of watchers. The close watchers

00:11:14.860 who were close and could watch. And then there were the other people who were behind the line just so

00:11:20.940 they didn't get, probably just so they didn't interfere. Now, is that the story you heard?

00:11:26.320 Is that how it was first reported? Nope. So remember what I told you yesterday if you were here

00:11:33.700 for my live stream yesterday. A good rule of thumb in this fog of war situation where there's news coming

00:11:42.200 out all over the place and you don't know whether to trust it. It's a good general rule of thumb that 95%

00:11:50.920 of these stories, maybe 100, but at least 95% of the stories will be fake news. Do you know that? That

00:11:59.320 whether you heard there was a van full of ballots or you heard there was a Sharpie thing that the Sharpies

00:12:05.980 didn't work and only Republicans got them. If you heard that, yeah, there was somebody was throwing out

00:12:13.720 a bunch of ballots, you know, all these stories, the anecdotes, they're just flowing right now. If you

00:12:21.200 look at any one of those anecdotes, the odds of it being true, just that one thing, 95% chance it's not

00:12:29.640 true. And you should use that filter on every one of these things, right? Now, at the same time, I can

00:12:37.660 say easily and quite confidently that 95% of those individual stories is fake. I can say at the same

00:12:45.800 time, and there's no conflict between these two things, that there's 100% chance there's fraud in

00:12:51.940 the election. Those are different. The individual cases are just the things people notice, and it's

00:12:58.220 confirmation bias, and, you know, it gets reported because it's exciting. Those are almost certainly

00:13:03.680 fake. But I will dig into a little bit why I say that the election certainly has fraud. We just don't

00:13:12.780 know how much. And you probably won't see much of the real examples in these news and social media

00:13:20.140 reports and tweets. But let me, here's a funny factoid that, again, you should not put too much,

00:13:29.700 we'll talk about the hammer and scorecard in a minute, you shouldn't put too much weight on this

00:13:36.300 following fact. But it's a fun fact. So for entertainment, I'll tell you anyway. Apparently,

00:13:43.220 if you search on Google, to look for trends and searches, you'll find that around October,

00:13:50.140 in the swing states, the states where the elections were closest, there was a lot of searches,

00:13:58.220 and an unusual amount of searches, for finding out what the penalty is for election fraud.

00:14:05.980 So what's funny is, you could imagine there would be lots of reasons that people would be looking for

00:14:12.320 election fraud information, and it doesn't necessarily mean that they were trying to avoid getting caught.

00:14:20.140 But it suggests that. So there's, it suggests, but does not prove that there were people

00:14:28.500 thinking about doing a little election fraud and thought to themselves, before I do my election fraud,

00:14:35.640 maybe I should take 10 seconds to Google how much jail time I'll get for it.

00:14:40.600 So we don't know if that's why they're Googling it, but it's funny. Here's a little factoid that's

00:14:48.500 hard to get out of my head. So Biden allegedly is going to have a 4 million person popular vote

00:14:56.500 victory, if the numbers come out the way they're heading. And that would mean that he got more votes

00:15:03.760 substantially than even Obama. Do you believe that? Does it sound reasonable that there could be more

00:15:11.460 votes for Biden? The least interesting candidate of all time? Now, of course, people were voting

00:15:20.740 against Trump, and he creates a lot of energy. So it's not impossible. It's not impossible that

00:15:29.160 Biden would get more votes just because they're voting against Trump and has nothing to do with

00:15:34.280 Biden. But do you believe it? I mean, it feels, it feels improbable, doesn't it? But we did have

00:15:43.840 record turnout. So you can't rule it out. Now, no matter how many of these improbable things you see,

00:15:50.320 that doesn't mean that there's fraud. Because if you were to look at any big complicated situation,

00:15:58.100 you would find every time a whole bunch of seemingly too coincidental sorts of things happening.

00:16:09.440 So the fact that this election has a whole bunch of things that make your eyebrow go up

00:16:13.960 doesn't mean it's fraud because of that. It just means that any complicated situation

00:16:21.100 will be filled with confirmation bias. All right? So again, I'll get to the actual

00:16:28.580 fraud allegations in a minute. But I'm just saying in general, no matter how many of these individual

00:16:35.380 pieces of, well, that's suspicious, they don't all add up to anything. They just don't. And that

00:16:43.260 doesn't mean there's no fraud. And it doesn't mean there is fraud. I'm just saying as a general

00:16:48.700 statement that has nothing to do with the election. Specifically, it doesn't matter how many pieces of

00:16:54.840 evidence you see. It should not persuade you even a little bit. There will always be lots of that,

00:17:02.240 just because it's a big, rich, complicated situation with lots of people involved.

00:17:07.140 So if you see 20 examples of weird coincidences,

00:17:12.880 it means nothing. It really doesn't. It doesn't mean anything.

00:17:17.100 It could. It doesn't mean it means nothing. But you shouldn't make a certain

00:17:22.100 conclusion from it.

00:17:26.140 Let me tell you what I see that you don't see.

00:17:28.900 And I'm going to tell you this to make you feel better if you're a Trump supporter.

00:17:35.460 And there's something I observe, because I just have a different window into some things.

00:17:42.900 You know, everybody has different access to information. Because I do this now, I have more

00:17:48.660 access to stuff that's happening before it gets in the news than many of you do. Now, not more than,

00:17:55.660 let's say, other blue check people on Twitter, I don't have any super secret extra access. But I

00:18:01.840 have more than most of you. And it just is sort of a natural result of lots of people knowing that I

00:18:07.580 do this for a living, or at least it's part of what I do. And here's how I see the world.

00:18:14.400 Much like a movie that I've talked about before called Underworld. Now, Underworld is one of my

00:18:21.200 favorite movies, and not because the acting or the writing are so great. Although I liked it all.

00:18:29.060 What I like about Underworld is the concept. And the concept is that although the humans don't know

00:18:34.620 it, there's been this centuries-long pitched war between the lichens, the werewolves, werewolves,

00:18:43.320 and the vampires. And that they do their fighting literally underground in abandoned subway places and

00:18:52.420 tunnels and stuff. And I got to tell you, and I guess Harry Potter has the same kind of setup,

00:19:00.720 where there are wizards having these wizard battles, but the muggles, you know, the human beings don't

00:19:05.600 even know what's happening. So it's all sort of invisible to their perception. And there's something

00:19:11.780 like that happening right now with this election. So the vampires and the werewolves are really

00:19:20.240 fighting it out. And I've been watching the fight. And what I mean by that is that the result not going

00:19:29.120 Trump's way activated an army of autists. Now, I say this, I might be the only person who could use

00:19:40.060 autism as a compliment. All right. Now, of course, the spectrum is gigantic. And there are people,

00:19:46.900 you know, of all types all over it. But probably, there are more people on the spectrum who are

00:19:53.300 Dilbert fans, because Dilbert's an engineer. And, you know, you can imagine he might be on the spectrum,

00:19:59.400 too. So I probably have more, I've probably had more contact with people on the spectrum than anybody

00:20:06.340 on earth, because they kind of rally around me. They think I'm on the spectrum, too. And maybe I am.

00:20:15.860 So when I talk about autism, if anybody sees me tweet about it, just assume that my take on it is

00:20:24.740 affection, meaning that I have a great affection for this part of the population, because it's sort of a

00:20:31.760 mutual affection situation. But some of the folks who could be, let's say, considered to be on that

00:20:39.180 spectrum are the high functioning math data analysis types, and they've been activated.

00:20:47.060 So right now, some of the smartest people on the planet earth have banded together

00:20:53.900 and are working through the data on this election. Now, we don't have good, available,

00:21:01.820 accurate data on everything we'd want. But there's quite a bit. So you could look at the people who

00:21:07.140 have, you know, died and compare that to the people who voted. You can do all kinds of clever analyses to

00:21:14.640 see if the data is normal for what you would expect to be random. So there's a whole bunch of stuff you

00:21:21.560 can do with the, either public or at least you can get it, data. And so while you're watching nothing

00:21:30.500 happening except politicians talking to each other, I got to tell you that there's a deep, let's say,

00:21:37.520 external audit happening. Meaning that if there's anything in the data that's going to suggest

00:21:44.700 something happened, they're going to find it. Because below the ground, there's a battle going on

00:21:53.920 that is awesome. All right? It's awesome. It's literally the smartest people in the world

00:22:00.180 for this kind of stuff. You know, everybody's got a different kind of smartness, right? Smartness could

00:22:06.860 be talent, it could be musical. But for this kind of stuff, you have people who are not ordinary.

00:22:14.700 Trust me. These are not ordinary people looking into this. These are people who have never been

00:22:21.680 activated or motivated like this before. Yeah, somebody's talking about, was it Benham's Law?

00:22:30.860 There's a number of schemes for finding data that's not normal, to find data that's been tampered with.

00:22:37.660 So, the thing that you can rely on is if there's anything in the data anywhere that's Benford's,

00:22:49.100 Benford's Law, I guess it's called. If there's anything in the data, they're going to find it.

00:22:56.280 They're going to find it. And I don't know if anybody's tried that before. I don't know if anybody has ever

00:23:03.280 weaponized the public intelligence and aimed it at this thing. And not only are they working on it,

00:23:11.800 but they have found each other. So, they're actually organized at this point, semi-organized,

00:23:17.920 if you will. So, here's what could happen. What could happen is this army of geniuses will find

00:23:28.540 enough problems in the vote that they can take it to the Supreme Court and say,

00:23:33.700 hey, Supreme Court, it looks like our vote is not credible because we found these anomalies that

00:23:41.140 can't be explained by a fair vote. And then what's the Supreme Court going to do? Are they going to

00:23:48.140 look into the data? Well, they don't really have that capability. They would have to listen to experts,

00:23:54.720 et cetera. And would the experts agree? Nope. They never do. So, if it went to the Supreme Court,

00:24:02.460 you'd have two sets of experts. See if everything I'm saying so far sounds like it makes sense.

00:24:11.680 If it gets to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, not being technical experts themselves,

00:24:16.720 would have to have witnesses. If they do that, I guess they would. And the witnesses would be an expert,

00:24:23.380 let's say, on each side, at least one. And they would listen to the experts, and one expert would

00:24:29.060 say, yeah, this analysis shows there's definitely a problem. We don't know it's a problem, because

00:24:36.180 you'd have to really dig into it. But there's enough here to show that the credibility of the election

00:24:41.600 cannot be trusted. Then the other expert would say, they're completely wrong. They're looking in the

00:24:47.540 wrong place. They made the wrong assumptions. You can't really draw this conclusion. So, we say

00:24:53.920 everything's fine, and their analysis that there's a problem is flawed. Now, you're the Supreme Court.

00:25:00.680 You've heard experts that you don't understand arguing things that you can't possibly confirm,

00:25:07.940 and the elections on the line. If they decide, we'll side with this group, it might put Trump in office.

00:25:19.060 If we side with the other group, Biden's the president. Does the Supreme Court want to pick

00:25:25.680 your president? No, they do not. They do not. There's nothing the Supreme Court wants less

00:25:33.680 than to be blamed for picking your president. They're going to need at least a little bit of

00:25:40.780 distance from the decision, so they can maintain their credibility. So, what would they do?

00:25:46.980 Faced with this situation, the balance of the republic is on the line. Their experts have weighed in,

00:25:53.700 and they can't tell who's right, because they're judges. They're not technical experts. They just know

00:26:00.360 there's a dispute, and they can't tell who's right. What would they do? Well, I'm no legal expert,

00:26:07.460 but I'll give you the sort of the common sense direction it would go. If I were the Supreme Court,

00:26:14.920 I would rule to kick it back to the states, and kick it back to the state legislatures,

00:26:23.140 who pick the electors, who become the electoral college voters, and I would say we, the Supreme

00:26:31.020 Court, have determined that the claim of fraud is at least credible enough that you should not just

00:26:40.020 have the election, you know, just count the votes and proceed. You should kick it back to your state

00:26:46.680 legislatures, because that's how it was designed. The reason that we have an electoral college,

00:26:53.840 I don't know if it's the only reason, but among them, is this. This is based on what I read. I'm not

00:27:00.960 some, you know, constitutional scholar, so you should fact check anything I say about the constitution,

00:27:06.520 for sure. But my understanding is that the reason there is an electoral college is because you couldn't

00:27:12.560 trust the popular vote in every case. So the electoral college people, they're somewhat

00:27:20.540 morally bound to go with the voters and vote the way the vote actually went, but they are not legally

00:27:28.340 required. They're not legally required. Now, if somebody says that the Supreme Court could ask for a

00:27:35.500 do-over or a revote. True. But could that be, could that be completed before January, before whatever

00:27:44.680 legal, I think there's a legal time when you have to have a decision. So it might not be practical to

00:27:52.060 do a second vote. And if you did a second vote, what would make the second one more credible than the

00:27:57.840 first, depending on what issues they found. So I think there's a non-zero chance that the following

00:28:04.280 will happen. There will be enough doubt about the outcome in just these few states that matter.

00:28:11.980 There'll be enough doubt that the Supreme Court can't tell the difference if the vote was fair or

00:28:17.640 not. They will kick it to the states. The state legislatures are Republican, and they will say under

00:28:24.440 this unique situation, we would never do this in normal times, but under this unique situation,

00:28:31.140 the Constitution has given us a tool, and we're going to use it because that's why it was created.

00:28:38.740 The tool was for this, when you don't trust the result. So I don't think it would be a good thing for

00:28:49.440 the health of the country if the election does not go the way the vote goes. That's a pretty unstable

00:28:56.300 thing. But it could happen. So if you're thinking that this vote is over because Biden will have more

00:29:02.800 votes counted, I would say that the Trump legal path is way better than you think it is.

00:29:12.880 We don't have visibility on it. So it's possible that all the analysis in the world comes up with

00:29:19.920 nothing, right? Isn't that possible? So that's possible. We'll see. You know, one big advantage

00:29:28.400 that Biden had in the election and in the campaign is that a lot of dead voters really related to him.

00:29:37.540 So I think that's why he got all the dead votes. All right, I'm just kidding. Now, when you see on

00:29:43.420 social media that a whole bunch of dead people voted, probably not true. It's probably true. Well,

00:29:52.660 I'll say definitely. It's definitely true that somewhere in the United States, a dead person

00:29:57.700 voted. Do we all agree that it happened at least once? You know, now probably it did not happen enough

00:30:06.160 to change the votes. But it looks like some places where it looks like dead people voted,

00:30:13.800 what really happened, and we have one anecdote that's probably, it could be representative of the

00:30:19.240 rest. And the one anecdote is that in some cases where a voter, they did not have that person's

00:30:27.640 birthday in their database, the database would default to 1901, I think. And so it looked like a whole

00:30:35.400 bunch of old people had registered and voted, who would be actually so old that they're probably

00:30:40.020 not even alive. But it was just a database irregularity, and it didn't change anything.

00:30:47.600 They were real people who really voted. But they looked like they were 110 years old, because the

00:30:52.740 data was wrong. So I think that a lot of the dead people voting, at least in terms of the large

00:30:58.820 numbers of them, probably not true. The odds that some dead people voted, probably 100%.

00:31:04.960 But were there enough dead people voting to change an election? Well, we don't know.

00:31:13.500 Let's go to the whiteboard. Yes, we're going to the whiteboard.

00:31:19.320 Yeah, let's change my camera view a little bit. Sorry.

00:31:24.280 Okay. So I don't think my graph is necessarily accurate. So think of it more as a conceptual

00:31:32.800 way to approach things. So let's say if you were going to do some election fraud,

00:31:39.280 and each of the things that you considered had a different risk of getting caught. But also each

00:31:45.620 thing you considered had a limit to how many votes you could influence. So let's say if you had something

00:31:52.240 that was like fake ballots, and you were going to deliver a van full of fake ballots, and that's

00:31:58.600 how you were going to cheat. Well, how many fake ballots can you introduce into a system

00:32:04.660 before somebody notices? It's kind of hard to get away with that one, isn't it? If you were going to

00:32:10.980 put, let's say, a handful of ballots, I've got a little handful of ballots. I'm going to sneak them

00:32:18.180 in the pile. Nobody will be the wiser. What are the odds you could get away with that? A little

00:32:24.540 handful of ballots that were faked? Well, I think, you know, there's a number of ways that the mail-in

00:32:30.540 ballots are checked, you know, the signatures are checked, etc. But let's say you could get away with

00:32:35.080 it. You probably couldn't change many votes that way. Because if you do it big, you're going to get

00:32:42.380 caught. It would just be too obvious. If you do it small, it doesn't change enough votes. So it's

00:32:48.800 barely worth doing. Although you should assume somebody's trying to do it somewhere. But how about

00:32:53.740 the dead voter thing? Your risk of detection, if you had too many dead voters, is close to 100%.

00:33:01.460 Right? And indeed, we know that because we've found a bunch of dead voters on the polls. So depending on

00:33:10.700 how many people you're trying to get away with, your risk of detection goes way up. Let's say more

00:33:16.540 people voted than there are people living in the district. Well, too many dead voters. It'd be

00:33:23.620 obvious. So if you're looking for fraud, this is just a general statement about it. If you're looking

00:33:30.500 for fraud, the only place you really need to look is someplace where you have the lowest risk of

00:33:37.300 detection, with the highest possible number of votes changed. And the only thing I can think of,

00:33:45.480 and again, that doesn't mean it's the only thing, because it's the only thing my imagination can come

00:33:50.120 up with, is software, a hack. Now, how could you hack a bunch of different states? That'd be pretty hard,

00:34:00.140 right? It's got to be hard to hack even one state. How would you hack a bunch of states?

00:34:05.280 And it'd be pretty hard, right? Unless, unless there was one common piece of software that was part of the

00:34:16.200 voting election process in those states, that was all the same. And it was used by all the states. Now, if that

00:34:25.040 were the case, then that means there would be one place that you could make a change, and it would ripple

00:34:30.780 through the whole system, and that would definitely get you enough, so that satisfies you could get

00:34:36.980 enough to change an election, especially because software could be smart enough to only change votes

00:34:43.240 where it's needed. In other words, it wouldn't change all the votes in the country. It would change them

00:34:48.700 only in those states where you knew in advance it was going to be close, and it mattered. That's it.

00:34:54.440 And it would pick a couple votes from this precinct, and a couple votes from this, and just bump them up

00:35:00.340 a little bit. So you wouldn't see anything on a whack. It would just look like you had a really good

00:35:06.340 vote. A lot of people came out to vote. That's all it would look like. So what are the odds?

00:35:14.420 Somebody says, are you making this up? Yeah, everything I'm saying now is only descriptive of

00:35:19.900 what's possible. Nothing I'm talking about in terms of the hacking is a report of something

00:35:25.680 happening, as far as I know. I'm not aware of anything that's, you know, been definitive like

00:35:31.440 that. But let me go to the, let me go to the, and just because I'm seeing it in the comments so

00:35:38.640 often, I want you to know that I do know that the software is called Dominion. That's the name of the

00:35:45.380 software that all of the swing states, the ones that are problematic, they all use the same

00:35:51.300 software. So it's a, it's an outside company, a private company, or it might be public, but it's

00:35:57.580 an outside company that makes this software called Dominion, or it's the company or the software,

00:36:03.480 I don't know. I think it's the company named Dominion. But, so Dominion makes the software that

00:36:09.800 goes into all of these states. Hypothetically, and again, this isn't an allegation, I'm just saying

00:36:16.080 hypothetically, if somebody changed just the Dominion software, or I assume it goes into some

00:36:22.920 databases somewhere, there's probably at least two places that you could capture the vote and change

00:36:28.420 it. If that happened, would anybody know? Now, you say to yourself, Scott, Scott, Scott,

00:36:35.920 if these governments are using software for the election, the most important, vital thing,

00:36:44.460 and a third party, an outside company is providing the software, the minimum you can be sure happened

00:36:50.800 is that the states have access to the code, and they can look at the software, and they can make sure

00:36:58.020 that there's no weird stuff in the software, right? That's what you're, if you've lived in the world

00:37:05.220 at all, you know that that's an obvious thing that's going to happen. Obviously, the states are

00:37:10.940 going to have access to the software, they're going to look at every line of code, and they're going to

00:37:15.340 make sure that there's nothing sketchy in that code, right? It's obvious, right? Of course they're going

00:37:23.520 to do that. Except, except the company says their code is proprietary, which means they can't. It's

00:37:35.640 proprietary. They don't want their secret code to get out because the states looked at it. So now this

00:37:43.200 company, somebody's telling me Dominion is a private company out of Canada. I think that's right. Fact

00:37:50.240 checked that for me. So now we have a company that makes the software that because it's proprietary,

00:37:58.000 nobody in our government knows what's in it. Now I ask you a further question. How many people within

00:38:08.300 the company, Dominion, I don't know how many employees they have, but how many of the people

00:38:12.820 who work for the company do you think have access to their own software and understand it and have access

00:38:21.880 to all of it? How many total people in that company would you guess can see all the software and understand

00:38:30.220 it? Here's my guess based on my experience in the world and being around software development a lot,

00:38:37.520 et cetera. Maybe two. Maximum. Maybe two. Again, I'll ask for a fact check on that. But I've never

00:38:49.240 seen a big complicated software program where there were more than two people who knew everything about

00:38:55.660 it. Do you think that the algorithms used by the big tech platforms, Twitter, Facebook, Google,

00:39:03.520 do you think there's, do you think there's even one employee who can have access to the entire

00:39:09.660 algorithm and understands how each of the pieces work? No, no, that person doesn't exist because the

00:39:18.620 algorithm is too complicated. There are people who know parts of it and there are people who have

00:39:23.900 access to it, but there is nobody. And I say this without being close to it, but just logically,

00:39:30.120 I don't think anybody who knows this space would disagree with me. Maybe. I'll take a fact check

00:39:37.020 if you have it. But here's the thing. It comes down to maybe one or two people on the planet Earth

00:39:47.400 who had access to the software that's deciding who is the president of the United States.

00:39:53.520 If you want to fact check something, fact check that. That there are only maybe two people,

00:39:59.460 maximum. There might not even be two. At this company, Dominion, who would be the only ones in

00:40:06.100 the world, and they might be Canadians, we don't know, who would have access to the whole code and

00:40:11.700 know if it has anything in there that's bad. Now, the rumor, of course, that you've heard from

00:40:16.800 Sidney Powell, attorney for General Flynn, and from lots of other people you've heard say,

00:40:25.840 that there are these software programs called Scorecard and Hammer. I don't know if it's two

00:40:32.400 softwares or one is the project name and one is the software, but they work together. And allegedly,

00:40:39.660 our intelligence services has used it successfully to change the votes in other countries.

00:40:46.800 Which is a hell of a thing to know, but I guess that's, you know, it seems likely.

00:40:52.560 You know, if we're not trying to hack the voting systems of other countries, what the hell is our CIA

00:40:58.880 doing? That's sort of their job. We should be trying to hack them just like they're trying to hack us.

00:41:05.220 That's sort of what they do. So do we think, just with what we know of the world, do we think that

00:41:13.660 our intelligence agencies have ever developed software which has had the intention of changing

00:41:21.340 the vote in other countries? Well, I don't know. But wouldn't you assume that they did? And if they

00:41:27.920 didn't, what the hell is wrong with them? They should all be fired if they didn't do it, because

00:41:32.780 it's the most obvious thing that they should be doing. Of course, our intelligence people should be

00:41:38.240 looking to build software that could change elections in other countries. Why the hell wouldn't

00:41:43.140 we? All right. Now, once it's built, can you keep software in a bottle? Is it the only way it can be

00:41:52.420 built is by intelligence professionals for the government? No. If they can build it, it can be built.

00:42:00.080 So it doesn't mean that that very same code was used against our own voting machines, but it does

00:42:07.820 suggest that such a program can be built and it would be undetectable. Are you with me so far? That

00:42:15.880 it could be done and it would be undetectable, and certainly we've at least tried to do it to influence

00:42:22.680 other countries. It's almost a guarantee. Now, given that there's only one place I can think of

00:42:31.500 where you can move enough votes and still be completely undetected, it would be in software,

00:42:37.420 and it would be a hack, and we have no visibility of it. Let's say you go to the Supreme Court and you

00:42:43.860 say the following. I can demonstrate that there is such software as Scorecard and Hammer. I'm guessing

00:42:51.840 we can prove that exists, even if it only exists in a special place and has only been used once or

00:42:58.800 something, but demonstrating that such a thing exists, I feel like that could be done. If you

00:43:05.520 demonstrate that it exists and you demonstrate that all of the software for these key states that

00:43:11.520 were close is run by a company who doesn't give you access to their code, and you take that to the

00:43:18.220 Supreme Court and you say to them, the only thing we know for sure is that we can't depend on this

00:43:23.260 software. And so we have a vote which many people question for a variety of reasons. It could be

00:43:29.800 confirmation bias, but the question is out there, so it matters. And we can't check it because it's

00:43:36.680 proprietary software and it's already done, right? They could always change the software after the fact

00:43:41.800 anyway. So would the Supreme Court say, well, you're right. We actually can't tell if we have a good

00:43:49.340 election here. So let's kick it over to the state legislators and let them pick electoral college

00:43:58.800 candidates who will do what they think is right given this horrible situation. I don't know that that

00:44:05.580 will happen, but it could. Now the Supreme Court is in a weird situation where they have two objectives,

00:44:12.720 I would say, that are compete. One is they want to be compatible with the Constitution. But the other

00:44:20.820 thing is they need to keep the Republic coherent, right? So if you have a case where being true to the

00:44:30.380 Constitution would coincidentally destroy the country, just because of some weird situation,

00:44:36.940 then I think they would choose to not be true to the Constitution because their higher objective is

00:44:42.400 to keep the country credible and keep our systems working and stuff like that. So I don't know if

00:44:48.820 the Supreme Court would ever want to change a result, even if they could and even if they thought they

00:44:54.820 ought to. They might still just not do it because they'd rather have a... It might be better to have

00:45:00.320 a fake vote result than to destroy the credibility of the system. It just might be a better choice.

00:45:09.060 Legitimately, it might be a better choice. All right, let me finish up about the hacking of the

00:45:15.000 systems. I'm going to make, let's call it Adam's Rule. I'll just name it after myself because I haven't

00:45:22.040 heard anybody else say it, but it goes like this. Any software system that has the capability of

00:45:28.860 changing an election will eventually be compromised by the intelligence services of at least one country?

00:45:38.600 It could be your own country, right? So it could be the CIA compromising it, you know, for reasons that

00:45:45.560 they hope are good for the country. Or it could be a foreign country compromising it. Because all they

00:45:52.040 need to do is compromise the one or two people who have access to the code. How hard would it be for the

00:45:58.080 intelligence services of any country to compromise one or two people? It's what they do. It's literally

00:46:09.840 their job. Compromising ordinary citizens is... That's just a Tuesday. So don't think that that's even hard.

00:46:19.600 It's easy. All they have to do is find out enough about these people until they find something that

00:46:26.160 they've done that's blackmailable or something that they need that they can't get any other way.

00:46:32.460 And you can always find that. Or you can just bribe them. All right? Bribery works almost every time.

00:46:39.960 So here's the Adam's Rule. That in a situation where you've got something that can be compromised,

00:46:46.260 it's physically possible. Because you just need to get to the programmers and corrupt them. If it's

00:46:52.580 possible, the security or the intelligence agencies from every major country that has an interest

00:47:01.840 will be attempting to do it. Now, will they succeed? You would have to think on any individual attempt,

00:47:10.020 they would fail. They would fail this time. They might fail at the next election. They might fail at the

00:47:15.880 one after. But here's Adam's Rule. Eventually, they will succeed. 100% of the time. You just have to,

00:47:25.880 just as a question of how long it takes, it might take 10 years of trying with no success. It could

00:47:32.320 take 25 years of trying with no success. But there's 100% chance that if enough intelligence agencies,

00:47:41.340 keep in mind that also political parties might be trying to get into it, and various billionaires who

00:47:47.660 have interests. So there could be a lot of people who are trying to corrupt this thing. And they're

00:47:52.280 going to keep trying year after year. Maybe those two programmers who are the ones that everybody's

00:47:57.460 trying to corrupt, maybe they're changed down eventually. And then new intelligence agencies

00:48:01.840 start working on these new couple of programmers. But over time, 100% of the time,

00:48:09.140 an intelligence agency is going to break through. So it's very much like,

00:48:16.880 well, I don't need to give you a bad example. I'll just tell you that they have such a big interest,

00:48:22.680 and they have the capability, and they have no reason to ever stop trying, that they will just keep

00:48:27.980 trying until they get lucky. Somebody is going to break through. Somebody is going to get that blackmail

00:48:33.900 going. Somebody is going to get a bribe together that works. It's going to happen. You just don't know if it

00:48:40.500 happened yet. So let me say this about the voting system that we have. I do not have evidence, me

00:48:48.420 personally. I have not seen convincing evidence that our election system is compromised. Can I say that as

00:48:57.400 clearly as possible? Because on social media, I'm being criticized because people imagine I'm saying

00:49:04.520 the opposite. I've seen a whole bunch of stories and reports and anecdotal reports of things which look

00:49:11.620 like election fraud. So far, I believe zero of them. So that's my take. My take so far is that none of

00:49:23.080 them are true and also big. Lots of them could be true but small and they didn't change anything.

00:49:29.860 But none of them that I'm aware of, just personally, are big enough that it would change the election

00:49:35.400 and also look true, as far as I know. That doesn't mean there's nothing out there. It just means I

00:49:42.120 haven't seen it in any way that would be credible to me. But there's a hundred percent chance it either

00:49:48.560 has happened or will happen in your lifetime. A hundred percent. There's no way you can keep

00:49:55.840 this sort of thing safe from all the people who want to get at it. It just can't happen in the real

00:50:01.520 world. That's not even a thing. So the fact that we don't have transparency on that code,

00:50:07.920 it's a big problem and one that really needs to get fixed.

00:50:11.920 So it turns out some of the Democrats, believing that Biden has won, are talking about what lists

00:50:21.220 they're going to put together of people who supported Trump and so that those people who

00:50:26.920 supported him can be punished in a variety of ways to keep them from ever getting jobs again,

00:50:33.680 for example. So AOC wants such a list. And, uh, Jennifer Rubin said, uh, any Republicans now promoting

00:50:43.760 rejection of an election or calling to not follow the will of voters, um, baseless allegations,

00:50:51.840 blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, uh, should never be able to find a, uh, to never serve in an office,

00:50:58.580 join a corporate board, find a faculty position, or be accepted into polite society.

00:51:03.660 Then she says, we have a list. So now they're, I don't know if it's the same list or two different

00:51:09.760 lists of bad Trump supporters. So in both cases, I immediately tweeted at them that, uh, I would

00:51:17.260 like to be added to the list. Somebody says, you're not looking. Somebody says, you're totally wrong.

00:51:28.020 Somebody says, loads of ballot dumps all for Biden. Here's what, here, let me make a prediction.

00:51:33.660 So some of you believe that in the middle of the night, uh, thousands of Biden only ballots

00:51:41.340 have been dumped at these places. I'm going to bet that never happened.

00:51:48.380 Anybody want to take the bet? And the bet will be, have nothing to do with the specific reports

00:51:54.480 or even how credible the people are who saw it and say their witnesses, et cetera. I'm going to bet

00:52:01.700 the 95% that it doesn't matter what you saw or what source it was from or how absolutely believable

00:52:10.540 it looked. 95% of all of those things are not true. You just don't know which ones are in the 5%.

00:52:19.120 So if you're saying I'm totally wrong because there's such good evidence, the vans full of

00:52:26.860 Biden only votes showed up in the middle of the night, I would bet against that. Not 100%,

00:52:33.820 but 95%. If you think the opposite, you're not dealing with the odds. You could be right because

00:52:42.140 sometimes the 5% happens. That's how odds work. 95% chance that they're fake doesn't mean they are

00:52:49.480 fake. Just means you ought to look into it. Now, am I saying we shouldn't look into that? No,

00:52:55.580 no. You should look into that as hard as you can look into something. So let me be clear. The

00:53:03.920 question of whether there's enough there to look into it, 100%. 100%. We've got to look into those

00:53:11.700 stories. There's no wiggle room whatsoever. We've got to get to the bottom of those stories. But my

00:53:18.640 guess is there'll be nothing there. And part of it is because it would be hard to do that crime

00:53:22.740 without detection. The hacking is something you could do without detection. And you could get

00:53:28.240 enough votes for sure that way. So it's a whole different level of risk there. All right. So I want

00:53:34.620 to be on all these lists of bad Trump behavior people. So you should volunteer too. I'm wondering if

00:53:45.180 one of the big stories coming out of this election that once things settle down, we'll talk about

00:53:50.420 is I wonder if black people made themselves politically irrelevant. It seems like that,

00:53:57.300 right? Did black voters become politically irrelevant? Because Democrats didn't do a damn

00:54:04.180 thing for them, and they still elected Biden. I feel like they proved that you don't need to do

00:54:12.900 anything for them. Now, I'm not saying that's how things should go. I'm saying that strategically,

00:54:19.740 and, you know, in terms of whether they're getting what they want, I think they took a really big step

00:54:26.140 in the wrong direction. Because what the hell would Democrats do for the black population?

00:54:32.320 They have no reason. They just don't have a reason.

00:54:35.000 And so Trump did a lot. You know, you don't, I don't have to go through the list of everything

00:54:42.960 from prison reform to funding historically black colleges and opportunity zones and the platinum

00:54:48.880 plan and all that. So Trump did a lot and lost anyway. Why would the next Republican do anything

00:54:57.660 for the black population? Because Trump proved it doesn't make a difference. I mean, he did get,

00:55:04.440 you know, a higher percentage than any Republicans gotten in a long time, but it wasn't enough.

00:55:10.420 So it didn't, it didn't, you know, make the difference. So I think both Republicans and Democrats

00:55:16.580 got a lesson out of this election that is a really bad one if you happen to be black,

00:55:22.300 because it kind of made the black voters politically irrelevant. But at the same time,

00:55:31.140 the Hispanic voters who came out for Trump in big numbers, I feel like they became much more

00:55:38.580 politically relevant, right? Because if you're a Republican, what did you learn from this election?

00:55:45.480 You just learned that with a little bit of help, if you're just a little bit good to the Hispanic

00:55:52.520 voters, they're going to turn out. Because they turned out without much really going for them,

00:56:00.640 right? I mean, the Republicans didn't try to target them. They just said, hey, we like law and order.

00:56:06.260 And it turns out, surprise, surprise, other people like law and order too. So the Hispanics

00:56:12.000 came out big for that and probably liked some of his international policies as well.

00:56:18.840 I believe that if you were to look at, you know, what are the reasons that the election came out the

00:56:24.640 way it's coming out, assuming it finishes with a Biden victory, which is possible. It's going to be

00:56:32.560 because of the fine people hoax and the bleach hoax. I believe that if you were to change just those

00:56:40.100 two things, Trump would be reelected easily. And everybody's going to have their own list of one

00:56:48.880 or two things that caused the election. None of them are really sensible, because for an election to

00:56:54.320 go the way it went, everything had to happen the way it happened. So if you say, well, the reason Biden

00:57:00.580 won was this one variable, that's just nonsense. Sure, if you changed one variable, maybe he would

00:57:08.380 have lost. But there were probably lots of those variables that if you changed it just a little bit,

00:57:14.940 he would have lost. So all the articles that you will definitely see, where all these pundits will say,

00:57:20.240 the reason it went this way is because of this one thing. They're all ridiculous. But I do think

00:57:27.440 that one of those variables that had to go the way it went was the fake news. And then if you

00:57:34.000 change that one thing, which is the fake news, I think Trump would have been elected. And

00:57:40.780 I also have another theory that the closer the election is with the regular natural votes,

00:57:48.580 the less the public matters to the outcome. So if you have an election that's so close,

00:57:54.860 like in some of the states we're going to see, as soon as the election is close,

00:58:00.320 the will of the people becomes irrelevant. Because the people couldn't decide they were

00:58:05.260 close to 50-50. So instead, since the people's will is irrelevant, it was a tie, effectively,

00:58:14.140 it ends up being lawyers and political operatives and judges and dirty tricksters and pranksters.

00:58:21.860 So those are the people who will determine the election. So we built, you know, the founders

00:58:27.760 built a system that depends entirely upon, you know, good people using their judgment and voting and,

00:58:33.920 you know, participating and all that. And that sounded good on paper. But the only time it doesn't work

00:58:41.580 is when the population is naturally split. As soon as you have a population that likes to vote

00:58:48.180 close to 50-50 on their presidential elections. And you know that in advance, right? Four years from

00:58:54.520 now, do you want to predict the election outcome four years from now? I can. It's going to be close

00:59:00.260 to 50-50, just like always, recently. Now, under those conditions, we don't have a democracy.

00:59:09.040 Because the closer the election is, the less it matters what the people care about.

00:59:13.260 It only cares what the operatives care about after that point. Because they're going to be battling

00:59:18.500 about, you know, the fraud and the elections and the constitution and the rules. And you and I don't

00:59:24.500 get a vote. How much are you doing? How much are you doing on the legality of ballots? Nothing.

00:59:33.820 Nothing. Maybe you voted, but your vote just got thrown away. Every vote in any of those cities that's

00:59:41.040 really, really close. Flush them down the toilet. Republican votes, Democrat votes,

00:59:48.160 independents, whatever. Flush them all down the toilet. The voter's will is no longer part of the

00:59:55.520 process. And that's only a unique situation where the vote is naturally close. It just takes the public

01:00:01.580 out of it. So that's an absurd situation that we seem to have accepted as if it's normal.

01:00:07.820 So allegedly, and of course, all news is fake. So I don't know if this is true, but it was in the

01:00:15.360 news. The Republicans rejected several election reform bills from the Democrats. So apparently,

01:00:25.500 Republicans have been the problem for reforming the election. There was some rumor that it was

01:00:33.280 because they didn't want Trump's election to be questioned. Because if you questioned how good the

01:00:40.200 election process was by trying to reform it, it would bring into question Trump's election. So there's

01:00:46.840 some thought that that's the reason. But if Republicans failed to reform the election process,

01:00:54.360 and then Democrats said, let me get this straight. We're asking you to get rid of all the ways that

01:01:01.800 people could cheat in the election. And you're saying that you don't want to do that. That's

01:01:07.020 right. That's what we're saying. Okay, you know what's going to happen next, right? Because if you

01:01:14.300 don't fix those holes that we're clearly telling you you need to get fixed, we're going to use those

01:01:20.500 holes. And we're going to get our president because you failed to fix the election process. And we're just

01:01:28.300 going to walk through this big hole that we told you we'd like to close. But you assholes said you

01:01:33.880 don't want to close it. So watch this. We're just going to walk right through it. And I think maybe

01:01:40.560 they did. I feel like that's what happened. I feel like the Republicans took a run at reforming

01:01:47.860 the election process. Republicans said no for political reasons. And Democrats said, fine, fine, we'll just

01:01:57.220 walk right through this hole and get our president. And maybe they did. Can't rule it out. But I don't know.

01:02:06.180 All right, those are the things that I wanted to talk about. Somebody says, I don't buy this. Which part?

01:02:12.720 Which part don't you buy? All right, I'm just going to take a look at some of your

01:02:21.760 comments. So somebody's saying dark times ahead. I don't think so. I don't think so. You know,

01:02:30.140 I use this word a lot, the zeitgeist, which is just the feel in the room or the general mood that the

01:02:38.480 country has. And correct me if I'm wrong. I see just no interest in a revolution. I see no interest

01:02:49.620 in a civil war. If you gave most Americans, 95% of them, a chance to say, okay, even if, you know,

01:02:59.280 you don't like things, would you rather just let it go? Let it go for four years and, you know,

01:03:04.560 take another run at it. I think almost all Americans are on the same page, which is we can

01:03:10.780 hate the outcome. That's not the end of the world. Yeah, we'll just go four years and take another run

01:03:17.040 at it. So I don't see the slightest chance that it's going to be a bloody civil war. And I just don't

01:03:27.240 see any chance of that at all. And it doesn't matter who won, really. Whichever way it goes,

01:03:34.040 I think we're going to have a peaceful transition, because people want it. Look at the stock market.

01:03:39.300 Stock market was fine. They didn't care. Apparently, the stock market didn't care if it was Trump or

01:03:43.980 Biden. They just chugging along. Somebody in the comments is asking me if I'm in Mensa.

01:03:53.940 The answer is no, but I used to be. So you're not in Mensa unless you pay the dues. And I didn't see

01:04:02.500 any reason to pay the dues. But I was in Mensa for a year or two. Somebody says, I experienced very

01:04:14.120 dark times during Obama. I can't tell if you're making a bad joke or not. Somebody says, if Biden

01:04:25.320 goes hard for the guns, war will break out. Well, of course it would. Yeah, if they tried to take away

01:04:30.460 your guns at your home, war would break out. But I don't think the odds of that are very high. I don't

01:04:36.000 see Biden trying to take your guns away. You know, that sounds like something he'd talk about,

01:04:41.480 but wouldn't do. Stage three of acceptance. No, I don't think we're at acceptance yet.

01:04:48.880 You know, like I said, the army of vampires and werewolves are fighting it out. And we don't know

01:04:56.540 which way that's going to go yet. But I'd bet on the vampires. Will Trump prevail? My last estimate

01:05:05.400 was 60-40 yes. And I don't think any of this is predictable. Probably I would reverse that right

01:05:15.620 now. And I would say 60-40 that Biden will take the job. But there is a solid 40%. That's a pretty big

01:05:25.600 percentage. A solid 40% that the vampires and the werewolves who are fighting it out will find

01:05:35.580 enough problems with the data. Possibly a hack. I don't know if you could put odds on that, but

01:05:43.080 possibly. And that that'll be enough to throw it back to the electoral college and then anything

01:05:49.360 could happen. So somebody says to look into what somebody on Twitter is calling out as a problem.

01:05:59.620 So if you missed that first part, let me reiterate. If you see somebody on Twitter calling out a specific

01:06:06.020 fraud situation, and it looks really, really convincing, it's a 95% chance it's false.

01:06:14.260 And it doesn't even matter what it is. Just in general, no matter how convincing it looks,

01:06:20.580 if it's an individual situation, 95% chance you're not seeing the whole story. But still 100% chance

01:06:28.300 that somebody's doing fraudulent stuff somewhere. We just don't know where.

01:06:31.900 All right. I think we've done what we need to do. And that's all for now. And I will talk to you tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 07, 2020

Episode 1179 Scott Adams： Election System Claims and Accusations. Are Any Credible？

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript