Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1185 Scott Adams： How Biden Will Destroy the Democrat Party by 2024

00:00:00.000 hey everybody come on in it's so good to see you it's the best part of my day every single time

00:00:12.460 and i know it's going to be a great one today whoa is it going to be a great one it's going

00:00:18.020 to start out slow and then it's going to build into a crescendo or possibly not but it will

00:00:26.540 still be the best part of your day and all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or gels or

00:00:36.780 a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join

00:00:46.260 me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything

00:00:53.240 better it's called the simultaneous sip and it's going to happen to you right now go

00:00:58.680 sublime all right a number of you said that my periscope live stream those of you watching on

00:01:12.500 periscope did not get a notification on twitter yesterday i believe i have solved that problem

00:01:20.140 so you should have gotten one today and i think the problem is that when my ipad reboots it

00:01:28.280 disconnects twitter from periscope in other words they're separate apps owned by the same company

00:01:34.320 but if they're not connected to each other uh twitter does not automatically send out a notification

00:01:41.260 so they got they got unconnected during a system update on my ipad i reconnected them everything's

00:01:47.520 good it wasn't suppression in case you wondered i have a entertainment recommendation for you

00:01:54.120 you ready don't you need more laughs wouldn't your life be better if you could laugh your way through

00:02:00.900 the pandemic well if you haven't already watched it and you're a south park fan i don't recommend this

00:02:09.980 if you've never watched south park before and you might be offended by stuff

00:02:15.380 so the following recommendation is with the caveat that if you know you like south park you're really

00:02:24.420 going to like the pandemic special that they did so just google south park pandemic special i was

00:02:30.920 crying i mean i was just crying watching that thing and the the great thing about south park there's a lot

00:02:39.380 great things about it but the humor is you know sophomoric you know kind of just naughty humor and

00:02:48.360 by all by all rights it should be not clever all right it should be just this ah you know i could have

00:02:58.860 made that joke when i was 12 but it's clever as hell and when you add the the sophomoric humor

00:03:05.680 to extraordinary cleverness i mean really first rate you know best in the world kind of cleverness

00:03:12.880 that combination just never fits which is what makes it hilarious you know that the the artwork

00:03:20.460 being so you know crude by design on top of the humor being so crude by design and then you add to it

00:03:28.160 really really really intelligent writing and it's just it's a freaking masterpiece but you have to like

00:03:35.780 south park to to enjoy it here's something else i've mentioned this before but i finished watching it

00:03:42.020 what we do in the shadows i hope i got the right name for that it's about vampires now i've said before

00:03:50.420 that humor is largely dead as an art form because our senses of humors are are so distorted by political

00:03:59.320 correctness and everything else so one of the genius things that south park does is during the course of

00:04:06.860 the show this this won't ruin it it'll you know this is not a spoiler they deal with the fact that doing a

00:04:14.940 pandemic comedy during the middle of a pandemic when people are dying by the hundreds of thousands

00:04:20.420 is clearly inappropriate right making jokes about the pandemic is clearly inappropriate and when you

00:04:30.360 watch the way that south park deals with that head-on it's just it's just brilliant um but the other

00:04:39.200 thing that you can enjoy during the pandemic and it's a very rare exception to the fact that nothing's

00:04:46.200 funny anymore at least intentionally i've said before that scripted comedies are being replaced by the news

00:04:53.320 because the news is hilarious and entertaining in a whole you know very rich way and when i watch the

00:05:00.600 news i do it for the laughs and that's not a joke it's not i'm not saying that for a fact i actually do it

00:05:06.980 for the laughs and it delivers but watch uh what we do in the shadows it's about vampires and it's

00:05:13.860 really really clever here's another recommendation one of the great things about youtube is that you

00:05:22.540 can uh it will make recommendations and then just keep playing the recommendations automatically if you

00:05:28.100 set it up that way um one of the things that i've discovered and probably you've all already

00:05:36.400 discovered it and i'm just the last one to know but if you watch a youtube about a personality

00:05:43.000 it will it will automatically queue up other content about the same person and you can effectively

00:05:50.060 create a mini series about somebody that you think is interesting and most of the comment

00:05:56.860 most of the uh the content does not overlap so you can just listen to a whole bunch of shows about one

00:06:04.260 person so i did that with paul mccartney and john lennon it was really entertaining because i'm interested

00:06:10.800 in them you would pick you would pick the people that you would be interested in i did uh a few other

00:06:17.800 people but uh most recently my favorite and here's my recommendation is uh norm mcdonald

00:06:24.920 go to youtube and just look at any any video that features norm mcdonald and then youtube will do the

00:06:34.960 rest it'll start recommending other norm mcdonald stuff so if you just put it on norm mcdonald you can

00:06:41.340 listen all day long and it never gets less funny and it doesn't really repeat there's just a ton of

00:06:49.060 content with norm mcdonald talking either you know on a talk show or his own show or people talking

00:06:57.400 about him and even the interviews of people talking about him are freaking hilarious and here's here's

00:07:04.860 the takeaway i didn't realize this until i saw a bunch of them all at the same time if you watch one

00:07:13.020 clip of norm mcdonald you like it or not like it but you don't get the you don't get the big picture

00:07:18.440 and the big picture is this i didn't quite realize it although i had a hint

00:07:23.220 that norm mcdonald's humor is not like other people's humor in a variety of ways but the important

00:07:30.040 way is that the joke is on the audience or if he's talking to somebody let's say on a talk show

00:07:38.500 the joke is on the audience and the other guests and maybe the host and what he's doing is

00:07:45.380 entertaining himself in front of you and once you realize that's what he's doing

00:07:51.420 you'll just cry in laughter every time you see him do it if you see it individually and you pull up

00:08:00.000 one clip here's what you might see you might see a joke that makes you think wait a minute

00:08:07.160 is he a racist or something because the way you told that joke i mean it's not racist but it's

00:08:15.200 it's close to it and if you hear one you think oh i'm a little worried about norm there maybe he's

00:08:23.020 you know got some thoughts that are not so pleasant but then you watch a whole bunch of them and you

00:08:29.640 realize that that's that's what he's doing he's making the listener uncomfortable because you're supposed

00:08:36.220 to be thinking i don't know if i can laugh at that i think it's just a joke but i'm not positive

00:08:44.480 and once you realize he's doing that to the audience and he's doing it to you and he's doing it to the

00:08:50.720 other people he's talking to and you and you get in that vein where you realize what's going on

00:08:56.460 it is freaking hilarious and i was just watching that yesterday and just crying so funny all right

00:09:02.800 those are my recommendations for fun have you noticed that everything became about china

00:09:07.300 now of course the coronavirus came from china probably the coronavirus changed the election

00:09:18.160 result i think smart people will conclude that now it's not like one thing ever makes the election

00:09:24.380 what it is you need lots of factors but one of the variables that everybody would agree is gigantic

00:09:31.000 is that we had more mail-in ballots and there is some science to suggest the democrats are going to be

00:09:39.260 more mail-in ballot centric and therefore would have an advantage that probably happened it's hard

00:09:48.320 to tell but probably china determined who our president is think about that not necessarily intentionally

00:09:56.660 but yeah i'm not i'm not going to buy the idea that china intentionally launched a pandemic i don't

00:10:04.000 believe it was intentional i think they could have handled it better but so now our biggest issues in

00:10:10.980 this country are all just china and what did we do in response to the fact that china destroyed our

00:10:18.660 economy hopefully temporarily uh infected and killed you know quarter million americans

00:10:26.200 and effect it affected our election again they weren't necessarily trying to do it a lot of you were

00:10:35.560 thinking it was intentional but it would be a weird thing to do intentionally i guess you can't rule

00:10:40.220 out anything but it feels pretty unlikely to me that it was intentional so i don't think you can convince

00:10:46.200 me to that without more evidence but everything's about china and what did we do as a as a response to

00:10:55.200 the fact that china basically is controlling both our political process our economy and our health care

00:11:04.500 system and our trade right which is part of the economy but and what did we do when we found

00:11:15.800 ourselves in a situation where china is totally the dog wagging us like a little tail we elected the most

00:11:24.200 friendly china person which is kind of the opposite of maybe where we should have been which is maybe we

00:11:32.020 should have china not affecting everything in this country maybe they should have less effect but

00:11:38.860 instead it looks like they'll have more which is an odd way to go historically let me tell you the

00:11:46.940 uh maybe the saddest thing that's going on here joe biden is not really a friend to black people

00:11:56.220 but i think if you're black you can't you can't see it not because you're black it's not a racial comment

00:12:04.280 but rather anybody who's in a political bubble it's really hard to get out of your bubble no matter

00:12:10.600 who you are this this includes you includes everybody so everybody's in their bubble and i believe that

00:12:17.220 once you get it in your head that there's an idea that's just true and let's say the idea in this

00:12:23.460 example is that democrats are the party that are going to be best for the black population of this

00:12:30.640 country so once you've accepted that that's true for decades whether it's true or not you're accepting

00:12:37.360 it as true you really can't see counter evidence so confirmation bias by its nature will make it

00:12:45.140 invisible to you if there's anything that would you know be fighting against your worldview let me give

00:12:52.400 you an example of some of the things that biden uh says he will do and now imagine you're a black

00:12:59.460 uh voter in this country so you just elected this guy and then he's telling you what he's going to do

00:13:06.680 and he's not hiding it he's telling you directly i plan to do these things right away top priority

00:13:13.840 stuff all right you're a black voter and he tells you top priority we're going to stop building the wall

00:13:20.340 and loosen up on immigration all right so you're a black citizen in the country do you like that do you

00:13:28.240 like that joe biden has decided that you're going to have a lot more competition for jobs

00:13:33.500 because the immigration problem does hit the black population harder than other parts of the population

00:13:43.100 because the competition for jobs at the at the lower end because unfortunately that's you know that's

00:13:51.460 our situation so is that good for black voters did they want more competition for the jobs i would

00:13:59.900 think they would want the opposite but biden is promising them and that and if he is uh takes the job

00:14:06.220 if he ends up being the president he will give black people more competition for jobs

00:14:12.560 okay how about the green new deal he promises to do that is that uh good if you're black

00:14:18.920 nope nope it's the worst thing in the world if you're black is it good if you're rich and white it might

00:14:27.640 be it might be if you're rich and white you can afford a little extra taxes and maybe you maybe you

00:14:34.780 want to reduce the chance of climate change disruption etc so maybe if you're rich and you're white it

00:14:40.920 could be good for you but one thing that's true all the time is that your energy situation in your

00:14:49.700 country largely drives your economy you can't really have a successful economy without a robust energy

00:14:58.520 program or being a special case right you could be a special case but in the united states our energy

00:15:05.300 program is central to the health of our economy and if you liked ultra low uh unemployment under the

00:15:15.940 trump administration before coronavirus do you like that the green new deal guarantees that the

00:15:24.020 economy will suffer because they'll you know they'll be tough on fracking they'll be doing the green new

00:15:30.500 deal so if you're at the lower end of the economic um situation the green new deal is just bad for you

00:15:38.740 maybe good in the long run maybe good in 80 years it might be but if you're poor today do you care about

00:15:48.840 the green new deal in 80 years or do you want to make sure that you get a job today i feel like this is

00:15:54.460 terrible for black people the green new deal even if it's good for the world which is a separate

00:16:00.760 argument it's definitely bad for poor people right away um how about biden looking to uh put into place

00:16:10.600 people who are part of these school unions and that's what he's looking for for his education

00:16:16.760 you know cabinet member probably that's that's the rumor anyway which would indicate no school choice

00:16:23.760 what is the single biggest source of systemic racism nothing comes close to this thing

00:16:32.040 nothing which is that if you're black in america your odds of getting a quality uh education are way

00:16:40.520 less than if you're you know white in america way less one way you could fix that and maybe the only

00:16:47.660 way would be school choice and market competition because that kind of works all the time

00:16:53.520 whereas government having a monopoly doesn't work all the time it can work in some cases

00:16:59.600 so biden is doing all of that so immigration is bad for black population green new deal is bad for

00:17:08.580 everybody who's in the lower income including black population and then school choice is like a

00:17:14.060 holocaust in this country i mean it guarantees that you have more systemic racism it guarantees it

00:17:21.720 whereas if you said school choice let's go crazy with school choice let's fix this one thing nobody

00:17:28.900 gets a bad education because they have a choice of where to go you could you could take a gigantic bite

00:17:35.860 out of systemic racism if you let's just define it for convenience as starting from behind

00:17:43.120 and then the ripple effect that that has in 12 years you know the length of school in 12 years you

00:17:51.320 could completely transform the black population of this country economically by making sure that

00:17:57.760 everybody got a good education biden is guaranteed that that won't happen because the system he supports

00:18:04.740 we know that can't get you there it won't change that fast here's another one suppose you were a

00:18:11.040 successful black entrepreneur or just successful in general and you're making a lot of money

00:18:17.620 so you're a black person in this country you beat the odds you you overcame whatever discrimination

00:18:25.760 systemic racism you overcame maybe starting from behind you just overcame everything

00:18:32.480 like you you figured it out like you you figured it out and now you're making a million dollars a year

00:18:37.900 in your business or your your salary or whatever and you're killing it and you did that under the old

00:18:44.720 rules the old rules were what the tax rates used to be and the the way the law used to be and you

00:18:51.680 succeeded against all odds you won and then joe biden says i'm going to raise your taxes to about 80 percent

00:18:59.900 if you add everything from state income taxes and states like mine california to federal at 39

00:19:08.360 percent 12 for the state you add your sales tax your property tax your payroll tax other things that

00:19:15.780 are like taxes and suddenly um your successful black entrepreneur just use that as an example

00:19:24.440 suddenly everything that you worked for joe biden could come and take a bunch of it away

00:19:31.980 is that cool are you cool with working your whole life under the old rules you win and then somebody

00:19:40.780 changes the rules after you win you're cool with that i sure wouldn't be cool with it but i can't speak

00:19:49.340 for anybody else and i'm definitely not cool with it my own case because i earned all of my money i

00:19:54.500 didn't inherit anything i literally inherited zero i worked for it now joe biden says let's change the

00:20:02.980 rules let's take that away from you not cool so uh certainly i have a great empathy toward the uh the black

00:20:11.660 opinion that i imagine they would have if you if you were highly successful you'd have the same opinion

00:20:18.020 i'm guessing don't really know um i think the fake news is already missing trump do you see all the

00:20:24.660 complaining about him not coming out in public so my understanding is that trump is doing a lot i mean

00:20:33.260 he's making phone calls and stuff he seems to be more engaged with the election stuff but i feel like

00:20:39.680 the news is already thinking uh-oh what are we going to talk about if if trump doesn't come out and say

00:20:46.980 something in public pretty soon we're just going to run out of news because we might have to go look

00:20:52.260 for news instead of just reporting about what the president tweeted um

00:20:56.980 former cia director john brennan tells cnn's wolf blitzer that he's more worried than ever about trump

00:21:09.160 trying to you know stage a coup or something like that uh because i guess trump is replacing some of the

00:21:16.120 civilian uh defense people with loyalists they say which is making people think he's going to try to

00:21:24.020 stay in office somehow with a coup or whatever that's not going to happen let me say it as clearly as

00:21:33.200 possible here's what's not going to happen the president running a military coup to stay in office

00:21:40.140 the odds of that happening are zero they're not it's not like well there's a long shot chance

00:21:47.840 no the odds of that is zero and here's why number one the military would never go for it

00:21:54.140 there isn't the slightest chance in my opinion that he could get a even a loyalist to order some kind of a

00:22:02.100 military coup in the united states so it's beyond ridiculous that that could happen because the

00:22:08.560 military just won't do it and there's no there's not the slightest indication that they would follow

00:22:13.400 those kinds of orders and there's lots of indications that they wouldn't but there's a

00:22:18.540 factor beyond that i i'm gonna i'm gonna make this assumption and see if you agree with it i believe there

00:22:26.720 are 20 people in the world who if those 20 people said you know it's time for trump to concede

00:22:36.140 we've supported trump in the past you know vigorously but now we 20 people or so see that

00:22:43.940 it's over hypothetically it's definitely not over but if they did there's 20 people who could

00:22:52.580 absolutely guaranteed make trump not the president let me give you an example if sean hannity decided

00:23:02.620 that he'd seen enough information i don't think this is going to happen i'm just walking you through

00:23:06.880 the thinking here if sean hannity decided that he'd looked at all the information and said you know i

00:23:12.240 love the president but i'm looking at the information and even with a little fraud it's not enough to

00:23:19.000 change the result the process has been served and i think it's time for the the president you know my

00:23:26.660 friend that i've supported to just concede so sean hannity is certainly one of the 20 or so people

00:23:35.680 who if they decided that trump is out of office he couldn't stay in office because he would need that

00:23:43.960 20 and the people who follow that 20 which is you know the bigger force he would need all of them on

00:23:50.260 his side to have the slightest chance of working any gray areas that could keep him in office

00:23:57.080 all right rush limbaugh would have to be in favor of trump staying on or he couldn't right maybe not

00:24:05.500 by himself right if it was an individual important person who who was a rogue you could ignore him but

00:24:13.800 there are about 20 maybe fewer it could be 10 people in the whole united states who would you know have

00:24:23.260 that kind of influence or or audience to do it i don't know if i'm one of them but i would nominate

00:24:30.500 myself as who you should look for in this decision there will be a time when as trump supporters many of

00:24:39.720 you are you will have to decide have we seen enough is there no evidence or have we decided

00:24:47.880 we're going to move on i don't think we're there i don't think we're there because um i am i'm aware

00:24:56.400 not not in great detail but i'm aware that there's more to come in other words what you've seen so far

00:25:03.100 about the credibility of the election is not the good stuff right i i warned you early on that all

00:25:11.120 of these little anecdotes you were going to see 95 of them would be debunked but don't let that

00:25:18.800 fool you because confirmation bias guaranteed there would be lots of false false claims that was

00:25:26.280 guaranteed it was work it was just part of the setup that that had to happen because of the way our

00:25:32.520 brains work but no matter how many are debunked that doesn't tell you anything about the ones you

00:25:39.520 haven't seen once you see them if they also get debunked well that's when you start saying okay

00:25:48.680 you know maybe we've looked into it maybe we know everything we need to do here's why i would here's

00:25:54.800 why i submit that you should listen to my opinion you don't have to take it of course but on the

00:26:02.000 decision of whether it's time or not time to either support um that biden got elected you know

00:26:11.340 at least support the outcome of the election or to keep keep digging here's why i think you should

00:26:18.220 listen to me you know that especially those who've been watching me for a while you know that i can turn

00:26:24.720 on you right you know that you could have an opinion you really really care about and you think i'm on

00:26:31.940 your side and then you hear that opinion you're like what the hell what the hell is that i thought

00:26:38.040 you were going to agree with everything that trump did nope nope i've never agreed with everything trump

00:26:44.660 has done and i tell you quite often to your distress when it happens i'm not even a republican

00:26:51.520 nor am i conservative i describe myself as left of bernie but better at math so his programs don't

00:26:59.160 make sense because of the math but i like his objectives i like to get to full health care

00:27:06.320 availability in this country so you know i like lefty stuff if they can figure out some practical way

00:27:13.000 to get there which is always where they they fall apart so here's the point you know me to favor

00:27:20.240 systems over goals and i could promise you and i think you could trust this that if it ever came

00:27:29.660 down to supporting an individual let's say trump for example over the integrity of the system i will

00:27:38.140 always pick the system if i had to throw trump under the bus love him as i do i yeah i like trump

00:27:47.580 i've met him enjoyed talking to him i think he's done a great job for the country but i would throw him

00:27:55.540 under the bus so fast if the election system indicates that that makes sense right so i'm going to go with

00:28:07.120 what makes sense i'm going to follow the system and i would like to have a good american system when

00:28:15.020 we're done even if here's the important part you ready even if it means trump isn't president

00:28:22.400 i would absolutely choose the integrity of the system over any one president all right it's not even

00:28:32.100 close i won't even i'm not even going to weigh them as even being in the same category the system is

00:28:39.160 everything the individual is not and and that's that would be the approach i would take so if you're

00:28:49.920 listening to somebody who's clearly just in the bag for the president will agree with whatever he says

00:28:54.540 you're not going to get anything credible you know the fake news isn't going to tell you anything

00:28:59.600 useful it's all lies because it's the news they don't do the truth you know the politicians are not

00:29:05.500 going to be unbiased you know your fellow voters and neighbors are not going to be unbiased the one

00:29:12.240 thing i can promise you is that i will apply reason i will imply i will give you an uh an estimate of

00:29:21.260 the odds of any facts that i'm incorporating and i'll tell you if it's time to move on um i see no reason

00:29:29.760 that you should listen to me to be honest i see no reason you should listen to me but who else are

00:29:37.620 you going to listen to um years ago uh i'm going to tell you something that maybe it was a private

00:29:45.740 conversation so maybe i shouldn't but i'm going to do it anyway all right uh several years ago i was

00:29:53.500 talking to my friend naval ravikant and i told him that my objective because a lot of people ask me

00:30:02.100 why am i getting involved in politics and why am i why am i even in this field and i told him at the

00:30:09.660 time that it was my goal to be the most credible person in the country credible doesn't mean right

00:30:16.360 very important distinction credible doesn't mean that i'm right credible means that you know what

00:30:25.680 my intentions are and that i put in the work and there was enough transparency where i showed you

00:30:32.540 why i'm thinking what i'm thinking how i reasoned it what facts i thought were credible what percentage

00:30:38.440 i put it on it i can give you that so i've spent years trying to develop um to develop let's say a

00:30:47.800 platform in which what whether you hated me or loved me you would say damn it at least he's credible

00:30:57.780 let me give you an example of somebody i consider credible michael moore right that doesn't mean you

00:31:06.820 agree with him it doesn't mean he's right all the time because that's not what credible is nobody's

00:31:12.180 right all the time but when michael moore says uh hey democrats i don't think you're listening and trump

00:31:19.600 is to the to the voters michael moore is kind of credible right maybe not on every topic but when he

00:31:27.580 says stuff like that you know he can he's capable of leaving you know leaving the politics and saying uh

00:31:35.040 but people are dying here and only one person is listening to him maybe you should listen to him

00:31:39.420 a little bit better too pretty credible pretty credible all right i don't know if i'm hitting my

00:31:46.840 mark but just so you know that's what i'm shooting for is to be a useful a useful component of the

00:31:54.040 country in a world in which every one of our systems has lost credibility so who are you going to

00:32:00.280 believe and i think that uh like i said i'm not alone there are probably 20 people who could

00:32:07.580 who could basically cause the president to have no hope of of holding on to the office are we there

00:32:16.160 yet nope nope we are definitely not there yet and i don't know if we will be but i'll give you my

00:32:23.940 prediction here's what i think is going to happen i think the president will make his case

00:32:28.320 that uh that fraud happened i believe that he will eventually and unfortunately it might take

00:32:36.560 too long i think eventually again probably it'll take too long we will know that the election was

00:32:46.140 maybe or definitely illegitimate and could have gone or should have gone to trump and that will create

00:32:53.600 a situation in which even after he has conceded if that happens that we would consider him still

00:33:01.780 the president because he got elected even though he's not in the job so you're going to have a

00:33:08.040 situation where you have two presidents one official and then one sort of in absentia if you will

00:33:15.440 almost like a venezuela situation so that's what we're heading for because everything's lined up for

00:33:22.800 that to happen um i don't know how long that'll last all right uh and the only reason that you know

00:33:30.740 that biden won if that's what you think happened is that the most corrupt institutions in the country

00:33:37.220 told you it was so right tell me who told you that biden won who is also credible nobody you haven't

00:33:48.600 heard it from anybody credible you've heard it from the news fake news they're all liars you've heard it

00:33:55.660 from politicians you can't trust them and they obviously are playing the game who told you that biden won

00:34:03.480 who is not already corrupt and non-credible all right um i took a stand in favor of uh jeffrey

00:34:14.460 toobin who was fired by the new yorker um i don't know if cnn will uh yank him off the air

00:34:21.300 um but i said in a tweet apparently he got fired by the new yorker where he also worked as a writer

00:34:29.760 and i tweeted that i strongly disagree with this firing i don't want to live in a world i don't want

00:34:36.860 to live in that world so what do you think people said when i said that i disagree with jeffrey toobin

00:34:45.340 being fired because i don't want to live in a world in which you can get fired for what is obviously a

00:34:51.420 mistake now do you think that people have correctly interpreted what i said no no this is this is the

00:34:58.740 real world where people misinterpret so uh claire cullen tweets back at me and she says you dot dot

00:35:06.500 dot want to live in a world where men masturbate on camera and work zoom meetings with no consequences

00:35:13.600 weird and then she also tweeted separately what a hill to die on quote and then she makes up a quote

00:35:22.140 as if i said it so it has quote marks around it but i never said this right i want to live in a world

00:35:28.200 where men can masturbate on camera on work zoom calls free of consequences

00:35:32.720 did i say that

00:35:36.360 is there anything i said

00:35:40.320 that would sound like i'm in favor of men masturbating on zoom

00:35:44.660 no

00:35:46.140 no

00:35:47.400 that would be a misinterpretation of what i said a straw man if you will

00:35:52.420 i'm

00:35:53.380 the facts that we have

00:35:56.020 are that it was an accident

00:35:57.920 so

00:35:59.200 am i okay

00:36:01.000 with a man or woman

00:36:02.960 having an accident

00:36:05.080 which caused them great embarrassment

00:36:07.120 but it was just an accident

00:36:08.960 nobody got hurt

00:36:10.400 no victims

00:36:11.320 highly unlikely to ever happen again

00:36:14.040 under those conditions

00:36:15.960 man or woman

00:36:17.240 democrat or republican

00:36:19.240 i don't care

00:36:19.940 i just don't want to live in a world

00:36:22.480 where a dumb mistake

00:36:24.500 that had no consequences

00:36:26.820 it really didn't

00:36:28.400 let's let's be honest

00:36:29.660 the

00:36:29.920 the women who were on the call

00:36:32.240 or men or whoever else were on there

00:36:33.780 they weren't scarred for life

00:36:35.820 because it wasn't personal

00:36:37.520 it was just like an image on the screen

00:36:40.140 it wasn't meant for them

00:36:41.640 it wasn't about them

00:36:42.820 it was weird

00:36:44.120 it was funny

00:36:44.900 they're part of history

00:36:46.120 i don't want to live in a world

00:36:48.160 where

00:36:48.560 where

00:36:49.120 a simple technical error

00:36:51.540 can

00:36:53.220 can lose a good job

00:36:54.680 so

00:36:54.940 i am

00:36:55.660 completely

00:36:56.260 sincere

00:36:57.080 in saying

00:36:57.680 that the

00:36:58.800 new yorker

00:36:59.620 made a mistake

00:37:00.620 in my opinion

00:37:01.340 they should hire him back

00:37:03.560 and cnn

00:37:04.940 should not

00:37:05.740 keep him off the air

00:37:07.160 indefinitely

00:37:07.720 a little time out

00:37:09.260 might make sense

00:37:10.280 for everybody

00:37:10.900 but i don't think

00:37:12.440 anybody should lose a job

00:37:13.520 for that

00:37:13.960 um

00:37:15.340 douglas carr

00:37:16.240 weighed in on this conversation

00:37:18.380 and said

00:37:18.940 uh

00:37:20.260 douglas said

00:37:21.400 quote

00:37:21.720 i've never

00:37:22.420 unintentionally played

00:37:23.820 with myself at work

00:37:25.200 or intentionally

00:37:26.460 so douglas claims

00:37:28.520 that he has never

00:37:29.300 uh

00:37:29.880 gone full tubing at work

00:37:32.200 whether anybody was watching or not

00:37:34.440 to which i replied

00:37:36.260 well

00:37:37.020 maybe douglas

00:37:38.540 maybe you're just

00:37:39.520 not that into yourself

00:37:40.760 because

00:37:42.080 you know

00:37:42.540 there are times when

00:37:43.840 i just can't resist myself

00:37:45.380 i don't know about you

00:37:46.220 but

00:37:46.500 i am so into myself

00:37:48.540 but douglas

00:37:49.860 douglas has rejected himself

00:37:51.860 to the point where

00:37:53.160 he's not even interested

00:37:54.320 in

00:37:54.700 in himself

00:37:55.580 um

00:37:56.980 apparently

00:37:58.820 president trump

00:37:59.580 has told friends

00:38:00.620 allegedly

00:38:01.640 who knows if this is true

00:38:03.320 that he wants

00:38:04.360 this is from axios

00:38:05.400 that he wants to start

00:38:06.560 a digital media company

00:38:07.820 to clobber fox news

00:38:09.540 uh

00:38:10.840 although

00:38:11.160 so it might not be a

00:38:12.500 cable channel

00:38:13.400 it might be just an

00:38:14.740 internet only thing

00:38:15.800 to clobber fox news

00:38:17.860 what are the odds of that

00:38:18.860 well

00:38:19.700 if he's not president

00:38:21.180 pretty high

00:38:24.040 don't you think

00:38:26.180 you'd watch it

00:38:26.860 i don't know how

00:38:28.220 you would not watch it

00:38:29.160 how would you not watch

00:38:30.880 president trump

00:38:32.360 dunking on biden

00:38:33.520 for four years

00:38:34.380 i don't think i'd watch

00:38:36.040 anything else

00:38:36.760 i don't know what could

00:38:38.540 be more interesting

00:38:39.260 than that

00:38:39.840 um

00:38:41.180 so that might happen

00:38:42.280 again

00:38:44.760 trump has two ways

00:38:46.320 to win

00:38:46.720 one is he

00:38:47.820 somehow

00:38:48.500 prevails with his

00:38:50.180 legal challenges

00:38:50.900 and becomes president

00:38:51.820 for a second term

00:38:53.160 and the second way

00:38:53.920 is he doesn't become

00:38:54.800 president

00:38:55.220 and he makes

00:38:56.720 you know

00:38:57.200 billions of dollars

00:38:58.060 as the most interesting

00:38:59.720 conservative

00:39:00.780 uh

00:39:01.500 channel

00:39:02.380 so

00:39:03.640 uh

00:39:04.680 i've been asked

00:39:05.240 to talk about

00:39:05.880 dr shiva's

00:39:07.100 analyses

00:39:08.300 of the election

00:39:09.360 and so i will

00:39:11.460 here's my problem

00:39:12.880 trying to analyze

00:39:14.080 anything that dr shiva

00:39:16.060 does or claims

00:39:18.040 i can't

00:39:19.180 i don't have those skills

00:39:20.720 i can't look at

00:39:22.000 anything he does

00:39:22.920 and say

00:39:24.020 oh well i agree with that

00:39:25.400 or don't agree with that

00:39:26.160 what the hell do i know

00:39:27.360 that's him working

00:39:29.100 in a domain

00:39:29.880 in which he's an expert

00:39:31.340 has several degrees

00:39:32.560 that are all relevant

00:39:34.080 to this

00:39:34.620 so

00:39:35.680 if he says he's done

00:39:37.420 the analysis

00:39:38.040 and it tells him

00:39:38.940 something

00:39:39.320 i don't know

00:39:40.620 otherwise

00:39:41.020 i don't know

00:39:42.500 if it's right

00:39:43.100 but i don't know

00:39:43.740 if it's wrong

00:39:44.260 i just don't know

00:39:45.380 so we need

00:39:47.180 people

00:39:48.540 you know

00:39:49.240 on both sides

00:39:50.320 to be looking

00:39:50.820 at this stuff

00:39:51.520 so the claim

00:39:52.780 from dr shiva

00:39:53.920 is roughly this

00:39:55.420 i'll paraphrase it

00:39:56.320 that he can determine

00:39:58.080 on a graph

00:39:58.940 that the votes

00:40:00.440 coming in

00:40:00.960 for biden

00:40:01.460 and trump

00:40:02.140 were

00:40:02.640 somehow

00:40:04.100 typical

00:40:05.020 and appropriate

00:40:05.940 based on

00:40:07.560 everything we know

00:40:08.380 about the past

00:40:09.280 and even what was

00:40:10.540 happening in the election

00:40:11.480 so far

00:40:12.080 and then they would

00:40:13.300 go along

00:40:13.820 in what would be

00:40:14.340 a normal way

00:40:15.160 and then suddenly

00:40:16.060 just like somebody

00:40:17.460 turned a switch

00:40:18.820 as in a software

00:40:20.880 thing

00:40:21.760 then suddenly

00:40:22.980 it just became

00:40:24.120 all by

00:40:24.620 could there be

00:40:26.120 a natural reason

00:40:27.000 for it

00:40:27.480 i don't know

00:40:28.280 i imagine that's

00:40:29.200 what the

00:40:29.700 other side would claim

00:40:31.400 but until

00:40:32.780 lots of people

00:40:33.540 have looked at it

00:40:34.180 it's hard to know

00:40:34.820 so i don't have

00:40:36.100 an opinion

00:40:36.500 about how

00:40:37.240 true it is

00:40:38.020 because i don't

00:40:38.920 have the qualifications

00:40:39.960 to judge

00:40:40.980 that sort of thing

00:40:41.820 and that's why

00:40:42.520 i wouldn't want

00:40:43.160 to have him

00:40:43.660 on as a guest

00:40:44.600 to talk about

00:40:45.860 that sort of thing

00:40:46.860 because you should

00:40:47.600 only do it

00:40:48.040 if you've got

00:40:48.460 somebody who can

00:40:49.180 you know

00:40:50.040 ask the right

00:40:50.680 questions

00:40:51.140 and that's not me

00:40:51.960 apparently

00:40:54.740 pennsylvania

00:40:56.160 asked the

00:40:58.200 dominion software

00:40:59.260 people

00:40:59.800 to make some

00:41:01.560 changes before

00:41:02.300 the election

00:41:02.760 and one of

00:41:03.220 the requested

00:41:04.740 changes

00:41:05.340 would give

00:41:06.560 control to

00:41:07.540 an operator

00:41:08.840 of the software

00:41:09.640 to mark

00:41:12.620 blank ballots

00:41:14.480 any way they

00:41:15.940 wanted

00:41:16.240 and then just

00:41:16.960 put them in the

00:41:17.480 system

00:41:17.760 so they actually

00:41:20.300 asked for the

00:41:21.260 ability

00:41:21.660 to fill in

00:41:22.880 blank ballots

00:41:23.700 in writing

00:41:24.720 that's actually

00:41:26.100 a software

00:41:26.900 request

00:41:27.500 and i think

00:41:28.460 dominion

00:41:29.080 gave them

00:41:29.960 that ability

00:41:30.540 so basically

00:41:31.560 it's just

00:41:32.120 that an

00:41:32.760 operator

00:41:33.260 has the

00:41:33.720 ability

00:41:34.020 to do

00:41:34.440 what they

00:41:34.740 want

00:41:35.060 with a

00:41:35.420 ballot

00:41:35.700 as opposed

00:41:36.820 to the

00:41:37.180 system

00:41:37.500 somehow

00:41:37.840 having all

00:41:38.400 the control

00:41:38.920 so

00:41:40.060 don't we need

00:41:42.220 to know more

00:41:42.700 about whoever

00:41:43.220 had access

00:41:43.880 to that

00:41:44.860 feature

00:41:45.320 how many

00:41:46.520 people in

00:41:47.020 pennsylvania

00:41:47.600 had access

00:41:49.300 to a feature

00:41:50.060 where they

00:41:50.460 could go in

00:41:51.040 and just

00:41:51.480 change the

00:41:52.800 vote

00:41:53.020 wouldn't you

00:41:54.720 like to

00:41:55.540 know

00:41:55.780 i'd like

00:41:57.860 to know

00:41:58.220 apparently

00:42:02.520 biden is

00:42:03.180 not getting

00:42:03.620 security

00:42:04.200 briefings

00:42:04.840 from the

00:42:05.260 current

00:42:05.500 administration

00:42:06.240 and the

00:42:07.380 reasoning is

00:42:08.080 that he's

00:42:08.500 not officially

00:42:09.220 the president

00:42:10.200 elect

00:42:10.640 but in the

00:42:11.900 past that

00:42:12.460 hasn't mattered

00:42:13.200 however i think

00:42:14.720 in this case

00:42:15.400 it's humorously

00:42:16.700 appropriate

00:42:17.260 it's not

00:42:18.560 appropriate

00:42:19.120 government

00:42:20.100 wise

00:42:20.600 you know

00:42:21.960 if you want

00:42:22.680 to just good

00:42:23.200 government you

00:42:23.860 should probably

00:42:24.420 let him have

00:42:25.220 some briefings

00:42:25.900 just in case

00:42:27.000 because he

00:42:28.320 may not

00:42:28.800 become the

00:42:29.780 president

00:42:30.140 elect

00:42:30.660 officially

00:42:31.300 but i don't

00:42:32.780 think there's

00:42:33.320 any risk

00:42:34.020 of somebody

00:42:35.300 in his

00:42:35.940 position

00:42:36.420 joe biden

00:42:37.120 having been

00:42:38.140 at the

00:42:38.580 you know

00:42:38.880 top security

00:42:40.220 clearance for

00:42:41.000 what decades

00:42:42.080 probably

00:42:42.460 i don't think

00:42:43.420 there's any

00:42:43.780 risk of

00:42:44.360 letting him

00:42:44.840 get some

00:42:45.400 some briefings

00:42:46.980 but because

00:42:48.380 the obama

00:42:49.680 administration

00:42:50.440 had screwed

00:42:52.100 with trump

00:42:52.800 that way

00:42:53.340 and not

00:42:53.860 given him

00:42:54.440 the right

00:42:55.140 briefings

00:42:55.700 and they

00:42:56.180 were pretending

00:42:56.960 as if he

00:42:57.560 was a

00:42:57.900 security

00:42:58.260 risk

00:42:58.680 i love

00:43:00.480 from a humor

00:43:01.440 perspective

00:43:02.080 that trump

00:43:03.740 is not giving

00:43:04.480 biden

00:43:04.880 security

00:43:06.100 briefings

00:43:07.240 because you

00:43:08.680 could argue

00:43:09.220 you could argue

00:43:10.760 that he's in the

00:43:11.440 pocket of china

00:43:12.160 right that was

00:43:13.720 the argument

00:43:14.120 for not giving

00:43:14.860 trump

00:43:15.600 security

00:43:16.780 briefings

00:43:17.280 as he might

00:43:17.740 be in the

00:43:18.320 pocket of

00:43:19.220 russia

00:43:19.520 so trump

00:43:21.020 has 100%

00:43:22.800 reasonable

00:43:26.180 reason to

00:43:27.840 not give

00:43:28.400 biden

00:43:28.820 this

00:43:29.240 this

00:43:29.860 clearance

00:43:30.280 now i think

00:43:31.820 it's more

00:43:32.660 funny and

00:43:33.380 f you than

00:43:34.160 it is

00:43:34.660 useful

00:43:35.260 as a citizen

00:43:36.500 i think he

00:43:37.160 should have

00:43:37.540 those briefings

00:43:38.780 but as an

00:43:39.900 observer of

00:43:40.960 politics

00:43:41.600 it is kind

00:43:42.680 of funny

00:43:43.060 it is kind

00:43:44.320 of funny

00:43:44.700 so i

00:43:45.880 appreciate it

00:43:46.440 that one

00:43:47.040 all right i

00:43:47.820 think that we're

00:43:48.300 watching the

00:43:49.040 slow motion

00:43:50.020 self-immolation

00:43:51.280 of the

00:43:51.760 democrat

00:43:52.360 democratic party

00:43:54.100 and here is my

00:43:56.240 argument which i

00:43:57.420 have not yet

00:43:58.000 made and it

00:43:58.900 goes like this

00:43:59.660 if you're going

00:44:00.600 to predict what

00:44:01.340 would happen

00:44:01.940 if biden

00:44:03.260 eventually does

00:44:04.840 get into the

00:44:05.440 job as

00:44:05.980 president

00:44:06.320 what would

00:44:07.600 happen between

00:44:08.260 now and

00:44:08.980 2024

00:44:09.640 what is

00:44:11.380 obviously going

00:44:12.440 to happen

00:44:12.940 between now

00:44:13.700 and 2024

00:44:14.300 so here's a

00:44:15.060 few things

00:44:15.500 keep in mind

00:44:17.960 that trump

00:44:18.540 did something

00:44:19.800 that nobody

00:44:20.440 thought was

00:44:20.900 even possible

00:44:21.600 he unified

00:44:22.940 the republican

00:44:23.720 party

00:44:24.200 now prior

00:44:26.680 to trump

00:44:27.440 being president

00:44:28.060 i was telling

00:44:28.860 you he's so

00:44:29.660 persuasive he

00:44:30.560 has these

00:44:30.940 persuasive

00:44:31.520 qualities and

00:44:32.740 people kept

00:44:33.220 saying well

00:44:33.580 why is he

00:44:34.020 not persuading

00:44:34.920 democrats

00:44:35.560 well we don't

00:44:36.720 live in that

00:44:37.340 world anymore

00:44:38.140 we don't live

00:44:39.240 in a world

00:44:39.640 where you

00:44:40.060 persuade the

00:44:40.940 other side

00:44:41.620 that's not

00:44:42.660 even a thing

00:44:43.360 you just

00:44:44.280 persuade your

00:44:44.920 own team

00:44:45.400 and if

00:44:45.620 you can

00:44:45.880 get 100%

00:44:46.660 of them

00:44:47.020 or close

00:44:47.540 on your

00:44:48.500 side

00:44:48.760 that might

00:44:49.500 be enough

00:44:49.820 to be

00:44:50.080 president

00:44:50.440 so the

00:44:51.540 president

00:44:51.900 had unusual

00:44:53.160 skills

00:44:53.700 and he

00:44:54.520 could get

00:44:55.040 96%

00:44:56.360 republican

00:44:57.360 support

00:44:57.920 do you

00:44:59.320 think that

00:44:59.680 biden has

00:45:00.320 those skills

00:45:01.120 given that

00:45:03.520 he's dealing

00:45:03.880 with the

00:45:04.180 green new

00:45:04.560 deal

00:45:04.820 people and

00:45:06.260 the squad

00:45:06.800 well i

00:45:09.180 don't think

00:45:09.680 that biden

00:45:10.340 has the

00:45:10.880 skills

00:45:11.260 that trump

00:45:12.400 has

00:45:12.740 trump

00:45:13.560 could

00:45:13.980 do

00:45:15.220 things

00:45:15.720 that other

00:45:16.320 people

00:45:16.600 can't

00:45:17.100 and he

00:45:17.380 got his

00:45:17.880 team

00:45:18.300 completely

00:45:18.800 on his

00:45:19.120 side

00:45:19.360 biden

00:45:20.300 probably

00:45:20.860 isn't going

00:45:21.300 to do

00:45:21.560 that

00:45:21.940 because he

00:45:22.440 doesn't have

00:45:22.920 that kind

00:45:23.360 of game

00:45:23.920 so the

00:45:24.740 first thing

00:45:25.220 that will be

00:45:25.580 different

00:45:25.960 is he won't

00:45:26.920 be able to

00:45:27.400 unify the

00:45:28.040 party

00:45:28.360 so this is

00:45:28.960 my prediction

00:45:29.560 so that's

00:45:30.800 trouble

00:45:31.220 secondly

00:45:32.300 the things

00:45:33.560 he's pushing

00:45:34.080 for are

00:45:34.660 higher taxes

00:45:35.560 not withdrawing

00:45:37.280 troops

00:45:37.760 more systemic

00:45:39.380 racism

00:45:39.960 the examples

00:45:41.440 that i gave

00:45:41.920 you earlier

00:45:42.400 like no

00:45:43.460 school choice

00:45:44.140 etc that's

00:45:45.020 pro systemic

00:45:45.920 racism

00:45:46.480 and more

00:45:48.260 lockdowns

00:45:49.160 now even if

00:45:49.740 lockdowns are

00:45:50.360 good they're

00:45:50.840 unpopular

00:45:51.360 right so

00:45:52.320 even if you

00:45:52.860 said oh

00:45:53.260 they're necessary

00:45:53.980 the public

00:45:54.920 doesn't like

00:45:55.520 them so the

00:45:56.760 public isn't

00:45:57.320 going to like

00:45:57.720 any of this

00:45:58.320 higher taxes

00:45:59.240 more war

00:46:00.040 systemic racism

00:46:01.160 lockdowns

00:46:02.040 then there's

00:46:03.640 talk that you

00:46:04.380 might want to

00:46:04.880 share the

00:46:05.560 pfizer vaccine

00:46:06.620 overseas before

00:46:08.000 everybody in

00:46:08.680 america gets

00:46:09.340 it because that

00:46:10.320 would be fair

00:46:11.000 and it might

00:46:12.320 be you know

00:46:13.360 if you're being

00:46:13.900 a citizen of

00:46:15.420 the world

00:46:15.920 does it make

00:46:17.520 sense that

00:46:18.600 maybe you share

00:46:19.440 your limited

00:46:20.820 vaccine with

00:46:21.640 the rest of

00:46:22.080 the world

00:46:22.420 i think you

00:46:23.300 could make an

00:46:23.800 argument for

00:46:24.420 that the

00:46:25.480 argument would

00:46:26.180 not be

00:46:26.680 america first

00:46:27.740 it would be

00:46:28.420 the opposite

00:46:28.860 of that

00:46:29.260 but could

00:46:30.400 you make a

00:46:31.040 philosophical

00:46:31.660 argument

00:46:32.240 and maybe

00:46:33.360 this will

00:46:33.820 happen

00:46:34.140 that the

00:46:35.400 that any

00:46:36.260 vaccine that's

00:46:37.240 so important

00:46:37.800 it's a world

00:46:38.500 problem that we

00:46:39.820 should not

00:46:40.340 hog it all

00:46:41.200 you can make

00:46:42.600 that argument

00:46:43.060 but it won't

00:46:44.620 be popular

00:46:45.240 you know the

00:46:46.760 people in the

00:46:47.300 united states

00:46:48.100 are going to

00:46:48.680 complain

00:46:49.060 so that's

00:46:50.880 you know not

00:46:51.840 going to look

00:46:52.200 good in 2024

00:46:53.020 i think you'll

00:46:54.260 get more

00:46:54.640 riots

00:46:55.140 anybody who

00:46:55.900 thought that

00:46:56.340 the rioting

00:46:57.320 would decrease

00:46:58.740 under biden

00:46:59.440 they're probably

00:47:00.040 asking themselves

00:47:00.940 what happened

00:47:01.860 so biden is

00:47:03.320 going to have

00:47:03.640 that i don't

00:47:04.960 think that

00:47:06.960 you've got a

00:47:07.540 nuclear problem

00:47:08.620 a nuclear energy

00:47:09.920 problem biden i

00:47:11.460 believe is at

00:47:13.040 least nuclear

00:47:15.040 curious if not

00:47:16.760 flat out pro

00:47:18.480 nuclear at least

00:47:20.540 keeping the ones

00:47:21.240 we have he's

00:47:22.840 going to run

00:47:23.260 right into the

00:47:23.940 squad on that

00:47:24.800 and the green

00:47:25.380 new deal so

00:47:26.360 what happens

00:47:26.900 if biden is

00:47:28.280 pro-nuclear

00:47:28.940 and the squad

00:47:30.240 is not

00:47:30.760 what happens

00:47:32.840 if biden has

00:47:33.620 age-related

00:47:34.720 problems

00:47:35.360 do you think

00:47:36.840 there's any

00:47:37.300 chance in the

00:47:37.920 next four years

00:47:38.680 he'll have

00:47:39.140 age-related

00:47:40.160 problems

00:47:40.720 and it'll make

00:47:41.700 democrats say

00:47:42.500 uh what did

00:47:43.360 we do here

00:47:43.960 it seemed like

00:47:45.500 a good idea

00:47:46.080 at the time

00:47:46.680 what happens

00:47:47.800 when you take

00:47:48.520 president trump

00:47:50.080 out of the

00:47:50.800 equation

00:47:51.300 and and biden

00:47:53.040 no longer has

00:47:53.840 this enemy

00:47:54.680 that everybody

00:47:55.240 can get behind

00:47:56.420 as the same

00:47:57.400 enemy

00:47:57.680 if he loses

00:47:59.240 his common

00:47:59.980 enemy

00:48:00.400 who's the

00:48:01.800 enemy

00:48:02.120 if you don't

00:48:03.200 have an enemy

00:48:03.740 it's hard to

00:48:04.220 keep your team

00:48:04.780 together right

00:48:05.420 at least trump

00:48:07.680 had you know

00:48:08.500 socialism as

00:48:09.560 his enemy

00:48:10.080 you know he

00:48:11.520 had that

00:48:12.040 so biden will

00:48:14.980 lose his enemy

00:48:15.820 maybe

00:48:16.300 what happens if

00:48:17.780 there's a terror

00:48:18.560 attack in this

00:48:19.340 country and it

00:48:20.380 could be traced

00:48:21.020 back to uh

00:48:22.780 biden reversing

00:48:24.160 the ban

00:48:24.920 on those

00:48:26.240 countries that

00:48:26.900 don't have

00:48:27.320 good record

00:48:27.940 keeping so

00:48:28.540 you don't know

00:48:29.140 who is

00:48:29.660 migrating

00:48:30.160 immigrating

00:48:30.900 what happens

00:48:32.160 in four years

00:48:33.560 four years is

00:48:35.180 a long time

00:48:35.700 what are the

00:48:36.060 odds there

00:48:36.460 would be at

00:48:36.820 least one

00:48:37.540 domestic terror

00:48:39.160 attack

00:48:39.620 because of

00:48:41.100 that decision

00:48:41.780 to let people

00:48:43.420 in from those

00:48:44.140 countries that

00:48:44.820 are a little

00:48:45.160 bit more

00:48:45.540 risk

00:48:45.860 i don't know

00:48:46.920 what the odds

00:48:47.340 are but it

00:48:48.300 could happen

00:48:48.740 what if he

00:48:49.660 does something

00:48:50.160 with gun

00:48:50.640 legislation

00:48:51.280 etc so

00:48:52.480 you could

00:48:52.800 imagine a

00:48:53.480 whole bunch

00:48:54.120 of bad

00:48:54.620 things happening

00:48:55.400 if he raises

00:48:56.060 taxes

00:48:56.600 it's hard to

00:48:57.560 imagine the

00:48:58.120 economy doing

00:48:58.840 too well

00:48:59.420 under that

00:49:00.400 situation

00:49:01.060 so i've got

00:49:02.860 a feeling that

00:49:03.720 you're going

00:49:05.260 to see

00:49:05.760 if biden

00:49:07.880 takes the

00:49:08.460 job it

00:49:09.240 could be the

00:49:09.760 beginning of

00:49:10.660 a real bad

00:49:12.120 problem for

00:49:13.320 democrats

00:49:14.220 because i think

00:49:14.840 they would lose

00:49:15.460 the next

00:49:15.980 presidency

00:49:16.600 if he if

00:49:19.280 things go the

00:49:19.820 way i think

00:49:20.320 he would lose

00:49:21.420 presidency next

00:49:22.380 time 2024

00:49:23.220 maybe lose

00:49:24.660 the house

00:49:25.240 you know the

00:49:28.060 senate might

00:49:28.520 stay with the

00:49:29.000 republicans

00:49:29.540 and you might

00:49:30.360 have the

00:49:30.760 republicans in

00:49:31.500 charge of

00:49:31.960 everything

00:49:32.460 that really

00:49:34.200 could happen

00:49:34.880 in 2024

00:49:36.160 so we'll

00:49:38.080 see

00:49:38.300 why does it

00:49:40.680 seem to me

00:49:41.140 that when

00:49:41.520 democrats talk

00:49:42.800 about taxing

00:49:43.980 the rich

00:49:44.540 it doesn't

00:49:45.740 sound like

00:49:46.260 an economic

00:49:47.000 plan

00:49:47.480 it sounds

00:49:48.680 like punishment

00:49:49.400 for being

00:49:50.080 successful

00:49:50.800 doesn't it

00:49:51.700 now some

00:49:52.520 people inherited

00:49:53.320 so or got

00:49:55.140 lucky or

00:49:55.680 whatever so

00:49:56.280 you know

00:49:57.200 that seems

00:49:58.440 different but

00:49:59.880 when i hear

00:50:01.060 the democrats

00:50:01.660 talk about

00:50:02.940 taxing the

00:50:03.620 rich it

00:50:04.720 just doesn't

00:50:05.620 feel like it's

00:50:06.400 because it's a

00:50:07.760 good idea

00:50:08.380 it feels like

00:50:09.860 because it's

00:50:11.300 revenge

00:50:11.960 right

00:50:13.060 is it just

00:50:14.380 me maybe it's

00:50:15.380 because it's

00:50:15.900 personal but it

00:50:17.340 feels like it's

00:50:18.020 personal it

00:50:19.120 doesn't even

00:50:19.560 feel like

00:50:19.960 they're trying

00:50:20.800 too hard to

00:50:22.040 make it sound

00:50:22.580 like economics

00:50:23.500 that maybe

00:50:24.560 it's just

00:50:24.880 me

00:50:25.120 have you

00:50:29.440 ever wondered

00:50:29.860 why businesses

00:50:30.740 are still

00:50:31.260 boarded up

00:50:31.940 i mean we

00:50:33.080 have a

00:50:33.400 president

00:50:33.720 biden

00:50:34.140 right

00:50:34.420 so racism

00:50:36.400 is over

00:50:36.940 we got a

00:50:38.440 democrat in

00:50:39.140 control

00:50:39.620 shouldn't we

00:50:41.040 be onboarding

00:50:41.960 those businesses

00:50:42.660 see the problem

00:50:44.480 turns out

00:50:45.600 that

00:50:45.980 you know

00:50:47.920 probably a

00:50:48.400 new president

00:50:48.860 won't make

00:50:49.320 any difference

00:50:49.820 to those

00:50:50.300 riots or

00:50:51.260 protests

00:50:51.720 all right

00:50:53.020 i'm going to

00:50:53.700 ask my

00:50:54.280 my friend

00:50:55.860 dale to

00:50:56.400 come in

00:50:56.800 and to

00:50:57.800 explain to

00:50:58.400 us

00:50:58.700 exactly how

00:51:00.020 it is

00:51:00.520 that this

00:51:02.740 election is

00:51:03.620 not rigged

00:51:04.480 so if

00:51:06.840 you've met

00:51:07.180 dale before

00:51:07.800 he's the

00:51:08.380 anti-trumper

00:51:09.200 in some ways

00:51:10.300 he looks like

00:51:10.940 me but he

00:51:11.360 has a goatee

00:51:12.120 that's how you

00:51:12.820 know he's

00:51:13.220 not me

00:51:13.720 and so

00:51:16.180 dale if

00:51:17.460 you could

00:51:17.700 just come

00:51:18.000 over i

00:51:18.320 just have

00:51:18.760 a quick

00:51:19.060 question

00:51:19.420 there have

00:51:21.220 been a

00:51:21.700 number of

00:51:22.480 allegations of

00:51:23.580 fraud in

00:51:24.320 the elections

00:51:24.840 what do you

00:51:26.380 think about

00:51:26.720 that there

00:51:29.040 has been no

00:51:29.780 widespread fraud

00:51:32.200 in the election

00:51:32.820 yeah i know

00:51:34.180 nobody's saying

00:51:35.280 there's widespread

00:51:36.500 fraud the

00:51:37.820 allegation is

00:51:38.620 that it's

00:51:39.220 targeted to

00:51:40.240 just the places

00:51:41.100 where it would

00:51:41.640 make a

00:51:42.000 difference so

00:51:43.260 do you think

00:51:43.760 that happened

00:51:44.280 how many

00:51:46.140 times do i

00:51:46.860 need to

00:51:47.180 tell you

00:51:47.640 there's not

00:51:48.920 any widespread

00:51:50.040 fraud

00:51:51.420 okay i don't

00:51:52.940 know what's

00:51:53.240 happening here

00:51:53.880 um i'll try

00:51:55.500 it again

00:51:55.840 nobody is

00:51:57.900 making the

00:51:58.340 allegation of

00:51:59.080 widespread fraud

00:52:00.520 so when you

00:52:02.880 say there is

00:52:03.520 none we're

00:52:04.100 in agreement

00:52:04.580 on that

00:52:05.180 because nobody

00:52:06.160 is saying

00:52:06.900 that so

00:52:08.100 but what do

00:52:08.560 you think

00:52:08.780 about the

00:52:09.520 targeted fraud

00:52:10.500 why do you

00:52:12.740 think there's

00:52:13.280 widespread fraud

00:52:14.620 what the hell

00:52:17.260 is happening

00:52:17.800 here

00:52:18.180 do you not

00:52:20.000 understand what

00:52:20.900 what i'm even

00:52:22.520 talking about

00:52:23.300 i mean

00:52:24.340 i i don't know

00:52:26.500 what's happening

00:52:26.940 here

00:52:27.660 scott scott

00:52:29.740 scott

00:52:30.120 let me explain

00:52:31.800 it to you

00:52:32.220 in the past

00:52:33.960 there have

00:52:35.600 been recounts

00:52:36.680 many times in

00:52:38.080 the past

00:52:38.360 there have

00:52:38.600 been recounts

00:52:39.320 those recounts

00:52:40.800 few hundred

00:52:41.600 votes

00:52:42.020 does not

00:52:43.620 change the

00:52:44.400 outcome

00:52:44.860 scott scott

00:52:46.340 scott

00:52:46.660 you fool

00:52:47.760 okay but

00:52:51.580 dale the

00:52:52.380 argument here

00:52:53.180 is not

00:52:55.440 that this

00:52:56.400 this year

00:52:57.340 would be just

00:52:58.160 like other

00:52:58.740 years

00:52:59.240 nobody's making

00:53:01.060 that claim

00:53:01.700 the claim

00:53:02.680 is that

00:53:03.480 after four

00:53:04.080 years of

00:53:04.700 this president

00:53:05.260 being compared

00:53:06.200 to hitler

00:53:07.720 that the

00:53:09.400 incentive

00:53:09.900 this election

00:53:11.480 was to get

00:53:13.300 rid of him

00:53:13.740 at all

00:53:14.180 costs

00:53:14.640 even at

00:53:15.660 the cost

00:53:16.100 of breaking

00:53:16.500 the law

00:53:17.040 because that

00:53:17.900 would be

00:53:18.240 morally

00:53:18.640 and ethical

00:53:19.460 ethically

00:53:20.580 supported

00:53:22.780 if you were

00:53:24.360 really doing

00:53:24.960 something to

00:53:25.480 get rid of

00:53:25.940 hitler

00:53:26.200 and that is

00:53:27.040 exactly what

00:53:27.840 your fake

00:53:28.320 news has

00:53:28.860 told democrats

00:53:30.200 they were

00:53:30.740 doing

00:53:31.140 so under

00:53:32.000 that very

00:53:32.460 specific

00:53:33.300 situation

00:53:34.120 the claim

00:53:35.180 is that

00:53:35.640 it's not

00:53:36.180 at all

00:53:36.700 comparable

00:53:37.760 to any

00:53:38.600 prior year

00:53:39.340 and that

00:53:40.300 looking at

00:53:40.820 prior years

00:53:41.540 could only

00:53:42.760 be misleading

00:53:43.760 because they

00:53:45.300 don't have

00:53:45.700 enough in

00:53:46.120 common

00:53:46.560 with this

00:53:47.600 very special

00:53:48.640 election

00:53:49.380 that had a

00:53:50.800 weird situation

00:53:51.920 with a

00:53:52.260 president trump

00:53:52.940 who was

00:53:53.740 compared to

00:53:54.300 hitler for

00:53:54.800 four years

00:53:55.360 so really

00:53:56.520 it's only

00:53:57.240 about this

00:53:58.000 election

00:53:58.460 that the

00:53:59.340 claim is

00:53:59.840 being made

00:54:00.520 i don't

00:54:03.840 think you

00:54:04.300 understand

00:54:04.820 scott

00:54:05.260 there have

00:54:06.320 been recounts

00:54:07.140 in the

00:54:07.360 past

00:54:07.800 they don't

00:54:09.860 find anything

00:54:10.820 a few

00:54:11.460 hundred votes

00:54:12.040 that's it

00:54:12.780 what the hell

00:54:14.140 is going on

00:54:14.900 here

00:54:15.200 what the hell

00:54:16.920 is going

00:54:17.540 on

00:54:18.060 are any

00:54:19.140 of my

00:54:19.520 words

00:54:20.060 that come

00:54:21.120 out of my

00:54:21.520 mouth

00:54:21.880 penetrating

00:54:23.360 your skull

00:54:24.300 we're in

00:54:25.380 agreement

00:54:25.940 no prior

00:54:27.580 year

00:54:28.200 is similar

00:54:29.000 to this

00:54:29.600 one

00:54:30.000 and

00:54:33.680 scene

00:54:34.260 so that's

00:54:35.400 what you

00:54:35.700 see on

00:54:36.020 tv

00:54:36.240 is just

00:54:36.720 a whole

00:54:36.980 bunch

00:54:37.200 of

00:54:37.340 dales

00:54:37.680 pretending

00:54:38.340 that you're

00:54:38.840 in a

00:54:39.100 different

00:54:39.340 argument

00:54:39.760 and

00:54:41.120 what do

00:54:42.580 you do

00:54:42.860 with people

00:54:43.360 who pretend

00:54:44.000 they're in a

00:54:44.500 different

00:54:44.740 argument

00:54:45.180 they're not

00:54:47.180 even addressing

00:54:47.920 anything that's

00:54:48.700 coming out of

00:54:49.180 your mouth

00:54:49.660 and they

00:54:50.220 act like

00:54:51.080 they are

00:54:51.580 it's the

00:54:52.820 weirdest

00:54:53.100 damn thing

00:54:53.740 isn't it

00:54:54.580 alright

00:54:55.760 here are

00:54:57.700 some things

00:54:58.260 that you

00:54:58.900 would have

00:54:59.260 to believe

00:54:59.840 in order

00:55:00.680 to believe

00:55:01.340 that there's

00:55:02.500 definitely

00:55:03.140 no

00:55:04.620 no problems

00:55:07.220 with the

00:55:07.560 election

00:55:07.860 alright

00:55:08.320 so you

00:55:09.380 would have

00:55:09.660 to believe

00:55:10.240 the following

00:55:11.060 things

00:55:11.720 okay

00:55:12.940 now I'm

00:55:13.680 not

00:55:14.000 if anybody

00:55:15.500 is joining

00:55:16.200 late

00:55:16.580 I do

00:55:17.420 not make

00:55:17.940 the claim

00:55:18.540 I do

00:55:19.620 not make

00:55:20.160 the claim

00:55:20.700 that widespread

00:55:22.200 or even

00:55:23.100 targeted

00:55:23.560 fraud

00:55:24.060 has yet

00:55:25.220 been

00:55:25.500 demonstrated

00:55:26.260 factually

00:55:27.520 in public

00:55:28.900 I don't

00:55:29.960 make that

00:55:30.320 claim

00:55:30.600 I do

00:55:31.620 make the

00:55:32.000 claim

00:55:32.320 that you

00:55:32.800 haven't

00:55:33.100 seen the

00:55:33.460 good stuff

00:55:33.940 yet

00:55:34.240 now whether

00:55:35.500 that makes

00:55:36.840 a difference

00:55:37.300 or not

00:55:37.800 we'll see

00:55:39.620 but here's

00:55:41.680 what you

00:55:41.960 would have

00:55:42.260 to believe

00:55:42.820 to believe

00:55:43.900 that there's

00:55:44.360 no problem

00:55:44.920 with the

00:55:45.280 election

00:55:45.620 that's big

00:55:46.220 enough

00:55:46.560 that could

00:55:47.880 change

00:55:48.200 things

00:55:48.540 first of all

00:55:49.680 you'd have

00:55:50.040 to wonder

00:55:50.440 why there

00:55:50.940 are no

00:55:51.240 data scientists

00:55:52.100 on the

00:55:52.640 democratic

00:55:53.100 side

00:55:53.620 who are

00:55:54.660 debunking

00:55:55.400 the data

00:55:56.260 scientists

00:55:56.880 who say

00:55:57.660 hey I'm

00:55:58.260 looking at

00:55:58.680 this data

00:55:59.200 and it

00:55:59.900 looks like

00:56:00.240 there's a

00:56:00.600 lot of

00:56:00.840 trouble

00:56:01.080 here

00:56:01.360 where are

00:56:02.720 those

00:56:02.960 people

00:56:03.300 so your

00:56:04.420 first thing

00:56:04.820 you have

00:56:05.060 to ask

00:56:05.380 yourself

00:56:05.640 is

00:56:05.900 where are

00:56:07.080 all our

00:56:07.500 data

00:56:07.940 scientists

00:56:08.660 because I

00:56:10.000 can't tell

00:56:10.500 if Dr.

00:56:11.180 Shiva

00:56:11.440 has a

00:56:12.860 good point

00:56:13.420 but maybe

00:56:14.660 our top

00:56:15.780 data scientists

00:56:16.900 can

00:56:17.220 maybe they

00:56:18.400 should weigh

00:56:18.800 in

00:56:19.060 where are

00:56:20.080 they

00:56:20.420 all right

00:56:21.320 so that's

00:56:21.660 the first

00:56:22.020 thing you're

00:56:22.480 going to have

00:56:22.660 to wonder

00:56:22.980 is like

00:56:23.260 where are

00:56:24.240 your experts

00:56:25.080 the other

00:56:27.180 thing is

00:56:27.720 when your

00:56:28.780 news reports

00:56:29.780 that they

00:56:30.380 can't find

00:56:31.160 any of

00:56:32.600 this alleged

00:56:33.400 fraud

00:56:34.120 where are

00:56:35.700 they looking

00:56:36.280 exactly

00:56:36.880 if I

00:56:38.540 tell you

00:56:38.960 that I

00:56:39.300 looked in

00:56:39.680 my pants

00:56:40.260 pocket

00:56:40.660 for diamonds

00:56:41.360 and I

00:56:42.220 didn't find

00:56:42.700 any

00:56:42.980 have I

00:56:44.100 proven

00:56:44.520 that diamonds

00:56:45.260 don't exist

00:56:46.180 no not

00:56:47.680 really

00:56:48.060 I've only

00:56:48.780 proven that

00:56:49.440 where I

00:56:49.880 looked

00:56:50.300 I didn't

00:56:51.020 find any

00:56:51.680 and they're

00:56:52.560 trying to

00:56:53.000 sell this

00:56:53.480 to the

00:56:53.900 idiots

00:56:54.320 in the

00:56:54.680 public

00:56:55.060 as if

00:56:55.940 that means

00:56:56.520 there are

00:56:57.080 no problems

00:56:57.780 yeah if I

00:56:58.720 look in

00:56:59.040 the wrong

00:56:59.380 place

00:56:59.840 no problem

00:57:01.360 how about

00:57:02.640 looking at

00:57:03.620 the right

00:57:04.100 place

00:57:04.560 which would

00:57:05.340 be an

00:57:05.660 audit of

00:57:06.320 let's say

00:57:06.720 this

00:57:07.000 dominion

00:57:07.580 software

00:57:08.080 when the

00:57:09.260 New York

00:57:09.540 Times says

00:57:10.140 there's no

00:57:10.580 evidence of

00:57:11.260 fraud

00:57:11.600 does that

00:57:12.620 mean that

00:57:13.020 they have

00:57:13.360 personally

00:57:13.860 audited the

00:57:14.780 code of

00:57:15.720 dominion

00:57:16.160 software

00:57:16.600 or does

00:57:17.980 it mean

00:57:18.300 that they

00:57:18.620 looked in

00:57:19.080 all the

00:57:19.400 places where

00:57:20.060 there probably

00:57:20.620 isn't any

00:57:21.300 fraud and

00:57:22.300 then they

00:57:22.640 didn't find

00:57:23.140 any

00:57:23.420 you have to

00:57:24.880 ask yourself

00:57:25.600 why are

00:57:26.900 your sources

00:57:27.860 of news

00:57:28.640 looking in

00:57:29.940 the wrong

00:57:30.340 places

00:57:30.980 so that

00:57:33.420 would be a

00:57:33.760 question

00:57:34.100 why would

00:57:35.940 you think

00:57:36.340 that this

00:57:36.880 year or

00:57:37.640 this election

00:57:38.300 would be

00:57:38.820 anything like

00:57:39.540 prior elections

00:57:40.600 in terms of

00:57:41.360 the degree

00:57:41.940 of fraud

00:57:42.600 I think

00:57:43.260 everybody agrees

00:57:44.100 there's a

00:57:44.420 little bit of

00:57:44.800 fraud all

00:57:45.240 the time

00:57:45.660 but why

00:57:47.020 would this

00:57:47.460 year be

00:57:48.320 comparable

00:57:48.820 as Dale

00:57:51.020 is arguing

00:57:51.600 it wouldn't

00:57:52.400 be

00:57:52.620 so if you're

00:57:53.760 thinking that

00:57:54.360 the fraud of

00:57:55.140 the past

00:57:55.700 and the

00:57:56.060 recounts of

00:57:56.920 the past

00:57:57.460 are indicative

00:57:58.700 of what we're

00:57:59.460 likely to find

00:58:00.200 this year

00:58:00.640 that's just

00:58:01.480 batshit

00:58:01.960 crazy

00:58:02.360 if you

00:58:03.520 think

00:58:03.920 that this

00:58:04.940 is

00:58:05.180 just like

00:58:06.440 other years

00:58:07.160 you don't

00:58:08.460 have a leg

00:58:08.940 to stand

00:58:09.360 on

00:58:09.720 Biden's

00:58:12.420 chief of

00:58:12.800 staff

00:58:13.160 this guy

00:58:13.580 Ron

00:58:14.060 Klain

00:58:14.520 back in

00:58:15.680 2014

00:58:16.900 and of

00:58:17.480 course

00:58:17.760 it doesn't

00:58:18.760 take long

00:58:19.220 for people

00:58:19.760 to find out

00:58:20.300 what people

00:58:20.760 have said

00:58:21.080 in the

00:58:21.320 past

00:58:21.660 he responded

00:58:23.740 to a tweet

00:58:24.360 by Vox

00:58:25.200 that said

00:58:25.940 they did a

00:58:26.380 survey and

00:58:26.860 found that

00:58:27.200 68% of

00:58:28.220 Americans

00:58:28.700 think elections

00:58:29.780 are rigged

00:58:30.560 this is

00:58:31.460 2014

00:58:32.100 right

00:58:32.720 so in

00:58:33.540 2014

00:58:34.140 68%

00:58:35.680 of Americans

00:58:36.260 thought

00:58:36.620 elections

00:58:37.140 are rigged

00:58:37.740 what did

00:58:38.740 Biden's

00:58:39.400 now selected

00:58:40.460 chief of

00:58:41.180 staff

00:58:41.480 say

00:58:41.860 on his

00:58:43.380 tweet

00:58:43.720 he said

00:58:44.900 because

00:58:46.300 they are

00:58:46.960 so

00:58:48.340 Biden's

00:58:49.520 own

00:58:49.780 chief of

00:58:50.240 staff

00:58:50.620 has said

00:58:51.360 in public

00:58:51.940 that he

00:58:52.720 agrees

00:58:53.200 with the

00:58:53.580 statement

00:58:53.960 that elections

00:58:55.260 are rigged

00:58:56.440 do you think

00:58:57.980 it got

00:58:58.300 fixed

00:58:58.740 since

00:58:59.280 2014

00:58:59.960 do you

00:59:01.000 think

00:59:01.200 that somebody

00:59:01.740 who is

00:59:02.420 connected

00:59:03.020 enough

00:59:03.640 to politics

00:59:04.500 to be

00:59:05.380 selected

00:59:05.820 as

00:59:06.320 Biden's

00:59:06.980 chief

00:59:07.260 of

00:59:07.440 staff

00:59:07.760 as

00:59:07.980 president

00:59:08.400 do you

00:59:09.320 think

00:59:09.500 that such

00:59:10.000 a person

00:59:10.480 is close

00:59:11.380 enough

00:59:11.840 and connected

00:59:13.240 enough

00:59:13.720 with the

00:59:14.340 machinery

00:59:15.620 of elections

00:59:16.660 that when

00:59:17.760 he says

00:59:18.260 in public

00:59:18.780 that elections

00:59:19.620 are rigged

00:59:20.860 do you think

00:59:21.380 he's

00:59:21.640 guessing

00:59:22.040 probably

00:59:24.600 not

00:59:24.980 guessing

00:59:25.560 probably

00:59:27.040 not

00:59:27.500 you would

00:59:30.940 also have

00:59:31.440 to believe

00:59:31.940 if you

00:59:32.340 believe

00:59:32.640 that there's

00:59:33.100 definitely

00:59:33.520 not any

00:59:34.220 widespread

00:59:35.080 or significant

00:59:36.180 fraud that

00:59:36.740 would change

00:59:37.160 the election

00:59:37.620 you would

00:59:38.640 have to

00:59:38.960 believe

00:59:39.220 that both

00:59:39.680 Rudy Giuliani

00:59:40.700 and Trump

00:59:41.800 himself

00:59:42.400 have not

00:59:44.860 seen

00:59:45.420 better evidence

00:59:46.900 than you

00:59:47.440 have so far

00:59:48.140 seen

00:59:48.520 do you

00:59:49.720 believe that

00:59:50.240 do you believe

00:59:51.200 you've seen

00:59:51.700 all the good

00:59:52.220 stuff

00:59:52.640 because they're

00:59:54.180 telling you

00:59:54.700 you haven't

00:59:55.460 and

00:59:57.200 would

00:59:58.180 Rudy

00:59:58.780 go

01:00:00.040 that far

01:00:00.780 out on a

01:00:01.320 limb

01:00:01.580 if he didn't

01:00:02.660 think he had

01:00:03.220 the goods

01:00:03.760 let me ask

01:00:05.060 you this

01:00:05.540 who can

01:00:06.680 sniff out

01:00:07.360 corruption

01:00:07.940 and fraud

01:00:09.960 better than

01:00:11.360 Rudy Giuliani

01:00:12.380 do you think

01:00:14.740 there's anybody

01:00:15.240 who has a

01:00:15.720 better nose

01:00:16.560 for fraud

01:00:17.860 than Rudy

01:00:18.920 Giuliani

01:00:19.480 and if he

01:00:20.560 were to be

01:00:21.060 doing this

01:00:21.580 whole big

01:00:22.080 effort

01:00:22.440 and it's

01:00:23.360 based on

01:00:23.820 nothing

01:00:24.220 would he

01:00:26.140 do it

01:00:26.540 and would

01:00:27.600 he know

01:00:27.920 he was

01:00:28.240 doing it

01:00:28.620 based on

01:00:29.060 nothing

01:00:29.340 well I

01:00:30.220 think he

01:00:30.560 would know

01:00:31.140 if there's

01:00:32.380 something there

01:00:33.080 I feel he

01:00:34.540 would know

01:00:34.980 I feel the

01:00:36.160 things we've

01:00:36.660 seen so far

01:00:37.360 might be a

01:00:38.080 stalling move

01:00:39.400 meaning that

01:00:40.620 they're keeping

01:00:41.520 the question

01:00:43.020 of fraud

01:00:43.620 alive with

01:00:44.540 these less

01:00:45.340 credible

01:00:45.860 accusations

01:00:46.600 because it

01:00:47.500 just keeps

01:00:47.900 the topic

01:00:48.400 alive

01:00:48.840 then

01:00:50.000 should they

01:00:51.100 come in

01:00:51.440 with better

01:00:51.880 information

01:00:52.380 you have

01:00:52.880 a live

01:00:53.320 topic

01:00:53.700 you don't

01:00:54.040 have to

01:00:54.340 resurrect

01:00:54.700 it

01:00:55.040 so I

01:00:55.780 think what

01:00:56.320 you're

01:00:56.500 seeing

01:00:56.800 is the

01:00:57.720 weaker

01:00:58.080 claims

01:00:58.700 you know

01:00:59.800 just sort

01:01:00.220 of softening

01:01:00.920 up the

01:01:01.260 room

01:01:01.640 they'll

01:01:02.740 probably be

01:01:03.380 debunked

01:01:04.040 but the

01:01:04.460 strong stuff

01:01:05.120 would come

01:01:05.620 later

01:01:05.960 if it

01:01:08.420 does

01:01:08.660 all right

01:01:09.080 so do you

01:01:10.160 believe that

01:01:10.600 Giuliani and

01:01:11.560 Trump would

01:01:12.140 do what

01:01:12.520 they're doing

01:01:12.900 now if

01:01:13.460 they hadn't

01:01:13.960 seen better

01:01:14.700 evidence

01:01:15.320 than you

01:01:16.760 have seen

01:01:17.100 so far

01:01:17.600 and then

01:01:20.180 of course

01:01:20.460 you'd have

01:01:20.780 to believe

01:01:21.200 that the

01:01:21.720 most corrupt

01:01:22.540 institutions

01:01:23.300 in the

01:01:24.000 country

01:01:24.320 this time

01:01:25.920 are telling

01:01:26.280 you the

01:01:26.600 truth

01:01:26.920 they've

01:01:28.700 never told

01:01:29.180 you the

01:01:29.460 truth

01:01:29.720 before

01:01:30.200 but you

01:01:31.300 would have

01:01:31.580 to believe

01:01:31.940 that this

01:01:32.320 time

01:01:32.640 this time

01:01:34.000 they decided

01:01:34.500 to tell

01:01:34.840 the truth

01:01:35.180 so

01:01:36.580 it's not

01:01:37.780 impossible

01:01:38.460 it's definitely

01:01:39.520 not impossible

01:01:40.280 that the

01:01:41.060 election will

01:01:41.620 stand

01:01:42.100 and it will

01:01:42.900 stand because

01:01:43.520 there wasn't

01:01:43.980 enough fraud

01:01:44.600 to change

01:01:45.880 anything

01:01:46.200 totally

01:01:46.920 possible

01:01:47.380 but if

01:01:48.580 you think

01:01:48.960 there's no

01:01:49.540 chance

01:01:50.060 that this

01:01:51.600 election was

01:01:52.520 rigged at a

01:01:53.280 sufficient level

01:01:53.960 to actually

01:01:54.360 change it

01:01:54.880 if you think

01:01:55.740 the answer

01:01:56.120 to that is

01:01:56.720 zero

01:01:57.700 you're a

01:01:59.340 fucking

01:01:59.660 idiot

01:02:00.140 sorry

01:02:03.260 there's no

01:02:04.800 way around

01:02:05.200 that

01:02:05.480 if you think

01:02:07.100 it could have

01:02:07.940 happened

01:02:08.300 or you think

01:02:09.280 it's unlikely

01:02:09.980 those are all

01:02:11.140 reasonable

01:02:11.580 opinions

01:02:12.120 maybe it

01:02:13.100 happened

01:02:13.460 maybe it

01:02:14.140 didn't

01:02:14.440 pretty reasonable

01:02:15.260 if you think

01:02:16.740 that the

01:02:17.240 absence

01:02:17.660 of proof

01:02:18.660 so far

01:02:19.820 is all

01:02:22.520 you need

01:02:22.900 to know

01:02:23.360 about this

01:02:24.600 being a

01:02:24.980 fair election

01:02:25.540 you're a

01:02:26.620 fucking

01:02:26.880 idiot

01:02:27.220 you're a

01:02:28.260 fucking

01:02:28.520 idiot

01:02:28.860 there's no

01:02:29.780 way around

01:02:30.200 that

01:02:30.520 because we

01:02:31.640 don't know

01:02:31.960 how this

01:02:32.300 will turn

01:02:32.620 out

01:02:32.900 that's the

01:02:34.120 point

01:02:34.360 nobody knows

01:02:35.580 how it

01:02:35.840 will turn

01:02:36.120 out

01:02:36.400 and if

01:02:36.980 you think

01:02:37.340 there

01:02:37.520 couldn't

01:02:37.960 have

01:02:38.140 been

01:02:38.460 enough

01:02:39.540 fraud

01:02:40.100 you're

01:02:41.260 just a

01:02:41.540 fucking

01:02:41.760 idiot

01:02:42.120 all right

01:02:44.880 that's

01:02:47.800 about all

01:02:48.460 I need

01:02:48.920 to say

01:02:49.580 on this

01:02:50.940 I think

01:02:51.420 I've said

01:02:52.040 everything

01:02:52.340 I need

01:02:52.760 to say

01:02:53.240 probably

01:02:55.020 I think

01:02:56.380 I have

01:02:56.740 checking

01:02:57.520 my notes

01:02:58.020 looking good

01:02:59.180 all right

01:02:59.680 that's all

01:02:59.960 I have

01:03:00.220 for today

01:03:00.620 somebody

01:03:02.140 said

01:03:02.440 did you

01:03:02.760 just

01:03:03.060 insult

01:03:03.460 my

01:03:03.700 ex-wife

01:03:04.220 perhaps

01:03:05.900 I did

01:03:06.560 you're

01:03:07.260 welcome

01:03:07.560 somebody

01:03:09.500 says

01:03:09.840 the facts

01:03:10.360 say

01:03:10.620 I'm

01:03:10.940 not

01:03:11.120 an

01:03:11.280 idiot

01:03:11.560 which

01:03:12.760 facts

01:03:13.100 are

01:03:13.240 those

01:03:13.560 so

01:03:14.860 basically

01:03:15.360 90%

01:03:16.120 of the

01:03:16.380 media

01:03:16.640 no

01:03:17.000 actually

01:03:17.480 the

01:03:18.180 media

01:03:18.500 is

01:03:18.700 just

01:03:18.900 lying

01:03:19.380 the

01:03:20.440 people

01:03:21.000 in the

01:03:21.960 professional

01:03:23.000 jobs

01:03:24.140 the

01:03:24.480 professional

01:03:25.040 media

01:03:25.420 they know

01:03:26.420 that

01:03:26.760 this

01:03:28.200 election

01:03:28.780 could be

01:03:29.200 fraudulent

01:03:29.760 I refuse

01:03:30.960 to believe

01:03:31.640 there's

01:03:32.040 anybody

01:03:32.380 on CNN

01:03:32.940 or MSNBC

01:03:34.140 who's

01:03:35.460 a high

01:03:36.260 level

01:03:36.620 person

01:03:37.140 who's

01:03:37.400 been around

01:03:37.820 the real

01:03:38.240 world

01:03:38.600 long

01:03:38.900 enough

01:03:39.200 and

01:03:39.380 seen

01:03:40.080 enough

01:03:40.400 real

01:03:40.660 news

01:03:41.080 I don't

01:03:41.760 think

01:03:41.960 there's

01:03:42.180 anybody

01:03:42.520 on CNN

01:03:43.080 who

01:03:43.860 thinks

01:03:44.180 it's

01:03:44.400 impossible

01:03:45.020 there are

01:03:46.860 a lot

01:03:47.100 of people

01:03:47.380 on CNN

01:03:47.840 who

01:03:48.820 hope

01:03:49.500 it's

01:03:49.800 true

01:03:50.080 that

01:03:50.880 there

01:03:51.040 wasn't

01:03:51.340 that

01:03:51.540 much

01:03:51.800 fraud

01:03:52.160 and

01:03:52.880 there

01:03:53.000 are

01:03:53.080 plenty

01:03:53.280 of

01:03:53.400 people

01:03:53.600 who

01:03:53.780 know

01:03:54.000 it

01:03:54.180 hasn't

01:03:54.480 happened

01:03:54.700 in the

01:03:54.960 past

01:03:55.360 or at

01:03:55.820 least

01:03:55.980 identified

01:03:56.640 and

01:03:58.000 there

01:03:58.240 are

01:03:58.340 plenty

01:03:58.540 of

01:03:58.680 people

01:03:58.860 who

01:03:59.060 want

01:03:59.240 you

01:03:59.360 to

01:03:59.560 believe

01:03:59.880 it's

01:04:00.160 not

01:04:00.380 true

01:04:00.660 but

01:04:01.860 no

01:04:02.380 I

01:04:02.680 don't

01:04:02.960 believe

01:04:03.420 that

01:04:03.760 the

01:04:04.160 Jake

01:04:04.880 Tappers

01:04:05.500 the

01:04:05.920 Don

01:04:06.160 Lemons

01:04:06.560 I

01:04:07.140 do

01:04:07.320 not

01:04:07.600 believe

01:04:07.940 they

01:04:08.160 fall

01:04:08.440 into

01:04:08.640 the

01:04:08.840 category

01:04:09.320 of

01:04:09.760 idiots

01:04:10.360 the

01:04:11.520 idiots

01:04:11.980 would

01:04:12.240 be

01:04:12.360 the

01:04:12.540 public

01:04:13.040 who

01:04:13.840 believe

01:04:14.240 what

01:04:14.480 they're

01:04:14.660 saying

01:04:14.980 the

01:04:16.040 people

01:04:16.340 who

01:04:16.560 are

01:04:16.700 saying

01:04:17.080 things

01:04:17.480 that

01:04:17.760 even

01:04:18.040 they

01:04:18.280 don't

01:04:18.500 believe

01:04:18.880 are

01:04:19.800 not

01:04:20.020 idiots

01:04:20.480 there's

01:04:21.260 something

01:04:21.520 else

01:04:21.780 going

01:04:22.020 on

01:04:22.360 right

01:04:22.900 they're

01:04:23.460 persuading

01:04:24.100 they're

01:04:24.560 taking

01:04:24.900 a team

01:04:25.460 side

01:04:25.840 maybe

01:04:26.500 they

01:04:26.700 think

01:04:26.900 they're

01:04:27.060 helping

01:04:27.300 the

01:04:27.480 world

01:04:27.760 but

01:04:28.640 what

01:04:28.840 is

01:04:29.040 not

01:04:29.300 happening

01:04:29.660 is

01:04:29.860 stupidity

01:04:30.440 in

01:04:31.300 their

01:04:31.500 case

01:04:31.840 but

01:04:32.560 they

01:04:32.820 are

01:04:33.140 talking

01:04:33.580 to

01:04:33.780 idiots

01:04:34.180 and

01:04:34.520 they

01:04:34.640 are

01:04:34.800 convincing

01:04:35.440 idiots

01:04:35.940 so

01:04:37.040 that's

01:04:37.500 definitely

01:04:37.780 happening

01:04:38.180 all

01:04:39.060 right

01:04:39.300 you

01:04:40.120 seen

01:04:40.320 a lot

01:04:40.540 of

01:04:40.640 trolls

01:04:40.920 on

01:04:41.140 this

01:04:41.400 broadcast

01:04:42.180 I

01:04:42.780 don't

01:04:42.900 see

01:04:43.080 too

01:04:43.280 many

01:04:43.520 it's

01:04:44.480 not

01:04:44.680 as

01:04:44.840 bad

01:04:45.040 as

01:04:45.180 it

01:04:45.320 could

01:04:45.660 be

01:04:45.860 I

01:04:46.660 would

01:04:46.820 say

01:04:47.000 that

01:04:47.200 the

01:04:47.400 trolling

01:04:47.980 is

01:04:48.640 way

01:04:49.280 less

01:04:49.780 this

01:04:50.320 election

01:04:50.740 not

01:04:51.160 even

01:04:51.420 close

01:04:52.060 the

01:04:52.860 amount

01:04:53.240 of

01:04:53.600 paid

01:04:54.200 trolls

01:04:54.640 in

01:04:55.020 2016

01:04:55.640 was

01:04:56.080 just

01:04:56.280 crazy

01:04:56.760 the

01:04:57.540 amount

01:04:57.840 of

01:04:58.040 trolls

01:04:58.420 that

01:04:58.680 came

01:04:58.900 after

01:04:59.160 me

01:04:59.380 this

01:04:59.640 year

01:04:59.880 kind

01:05:01.520 of

01:05:01.640 trivial

01:05:02.000 now

01:05:02.800 I

01:05:03.060 think

01:05:03.780 some

01:05:04.140 of

01:05:04.280 it

01:05:04.400 is

01:05:04.560 because

01:05:04.880 I

01:05:05.080 learned

01:05:05.360 how

01:05:05.520 to

01:05:05.640 block

01:05:05.920 them

01:05:06.140 better

01:05:06.400 but

01:05:07.200 I

01:05:07.320 think

01:05:07.460 there

01:05:07.580 just

01:05:07.760 weren't

01:05:08.020 as

01:05:08.160 many

01:05:08.420 all

01:05:10.500 right

01:05:10.660 that's

01:05:11.600 all

01:05:11.720 I

01:05:11.800 got

01:05:11.920 for

01:05:12.080 now

01:05:12.380 and

01:05:13.520 I

01:05:13.700 will

01:05:13.880 talk

01:05:14.140 to

01:05:15.860 more

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 12, 2020

Episode 1185 Scott Adams： How Biden Will Destroy the Democrat Party by 2024

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript