Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1185 Scott Adams： How Biden Will Destroy the Democrat Party by 2024

00:00:00.000 hey everybody come on in it's so good to see you it's the best part of my day every single time

00:00:12.460 and i know it's going to be a great one today whoa is it going to be a great one it's going

00:00:18.020 to start out slow and then it's going to build into a crescendo or possibly not but it will

00:00:26.540 still be the best part of your day and all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or gels or

00:00:36.780 a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join

00:00:46.260 me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything

00:00:53.240 better it's called the simultaneous sip and it's going to happen to you right now go

00:00:58.680 sublime all right a number of you said that my periscope live stream those of you watching on

00:01:12.500 periscope did not get a notification on twitter yesterday i believe i have solved that problem

00:01:20.140 so you should have gotten one today and i think the problem is that when my ipad reboots it

00:01:28.280 disconnects twitter from periscope in other words they're separate apps owned by the same company

00:01:34.320 but if they're not connected to each other uh twitter does not automatically send out a notification

00:01:41.260 so they got they got unconnected during a system update on my ipad i reconnected them everything's

00:01:47.520 good it wasn't suppression in case you wondered i have a entertainment recommendation for you

00:01:54.120 you ready don't you need more laughs wouldn't your life be better if you could laugh your way through

00:02:00.900 the pandemic well if you haven't already watched it and you're a south park fan i don't recommend this

00:02:09.980 if you've never watched south park before and you might be offended by stuff

00:02:15.380 so the following recommendation is with the caveat that if you know you like south park you're really

00:02:24.420 going to like the pandemic special that they did so just google south park pandemic special i was

00:02:30.920 crying i mean i was just crying watching that thing and the the great thing about south park there's a lot

00:02:39.380 great things about it but the humor is you know sophomoric you know kind of just naughty humor and

00:02:48.360 by all by all rights it should be not clever all right it should be just this ah you know i could have

00:02:58.860 made that joke when i was 12 but it's clever as hell and when you add the the sophomoric humor

00:03:05.680 to extraordinary cleverness i mean really first rate you know best in the world kind of cleverness

00:03:12.880 that combination just never fits which is what makes it hilarious you know that the the artwork

00:03:20.460 being so you know crude by design on top of the humor being so crude by design and then you add to it

00:03:28.160 really really really intelligent writing and it's just it's a freaking masterpiece but you have to like

00:03:35.780 south park to to enjoy it here's something else i've mentioned this before but i finished watching it

00:03:42.020 what we do in the shadows i hope i got the right name for that it's about vampires now i've said before

00:03:50.420 that humor is largely dead as an art form because our senses of humors are are so distorted by political

00:03:59.320 correctness and everything else so one of the genius things that south park does is during the course of

00:04:06.860 the show this this won't ruin it it'll you know this is not a spoiler they deal with the fact that doing a

00:04:14.940 pandemic comedy during the middle of a pandemic when people are dying by the hundreds of thousands

00:04:20.420 is clearly inappropriate right making jokes about the pandemic is clearly inappropriate and when you

00:04:30.360 watch the way that south park deals with that head-on it's just it's just brilliant um but the other

00:04:39.200 thing that you can enjoy during the pandemic and it's a very rare exception to the fact that nothing's

00:04:46.200 funny anymore at least intentionally i've said before that scripted comedies are being replaced by the news

00:04:53.320 because the news is hilarious and entertaining in a whole you know very rich way and when i watch the

00:05:00.600 news i do it for the laughs and that's not a joke it's not i'm not saying that for a fact i actually do it

00:05:06.980 for the laughs and it delivers but watch uh what we do in the shadows it's about vampires and it's

00:05:13.860 really really clever here's another recommendation one of the great things about youtube is that you

00:05:22.540 can uh it will make recommendations and then just keep playing the recommendations automatically if you

00:05:28.100 set it up that way um one of the things that i've discovered and probably you've all already

00:05:36.400 discovered it and i'm just the last one to know but if you watch a youtube about a personality

00:05:43.000 it will it will automatically queue up other content about the same person and you can effectively

00:05:50.060 create a mini series about somebody that you think is interesting and most of the comment

00:05:56.860 most of the uh the content does not overlap so you can just listen to a whole bunch of shows about one

00:06:04.260 person so i did that with paul mccartney and john lennon it was really entertaining because i'm interested

00:06:10.800 in them you would pick you would pick the people that you would be interested in i did uh a few other

00:06:17.800 people but uh most recently my favorite and here's my recommendation is uh norm mcdonald

00:06:24.920 go to youtube and just look at any any video that features norm mcdonald and then youtube will do the

00:06:34.960 rest it'll start recommending other norm mcdonald stuff so if you just put it on norm mcdonald you can

00:06:41.340 listen all day long and it never gets less funny and it doesn't really repeat there's just a ton of

00:06:49.060 content with norm mcdonald talking either you know on a talk show or his own show or people talking

00:06:57.400 about him and even the interviews of people talking about him are freaking hilarious and here's here's

00:07:04.860 the takeaway i didn't realize this until i saw a bunch of them all at the same time if you watch one

00:07:13.020 clip of norm mcdonald you like it or not like it but you don't get the you don't get the big picture

00:07:18.440 and the big picture is this i didn't quite realize it although i had a hint

00:07:23.220 that norm mcdonald's humor is not like other people's humor in a variety of ways but the important

00:07:30.040 way is that the joke is on the audience or if he's talking to somebody let's say on a talk show

00:07:38.500 the joke is on the audience and the other guests and maybe the host and what he's doing is

00:07:45.380 entertaining himself in front of you and once you realize that's what he's doing

00:07:51.420 you'll just cry in laughter every time you see him do it if you see it individually and you pull up

00:08:00.000 one clip here's what you might see you might see a joke that makes you think wait a minute

00:08:07.160 is he a racist or something because the way you told that joke i mean it's not racist but it's

00:08:15.200 it's close to it and if you hear one you think oh i'm a little worried about norm there maybe he's

00:08:23.020 you know got some thoughts that are not so pleasant but then you watch a whole bunch of them and you

00:08:29.640 realize that that's that's what he's doing he's making the listener uncomfortable because you're supposed

00:08:36.220 to be thinking i don't know if i can laugh at that i think it's just a joke but i'm not positive

00:08:44.480 and once you realize he's doing that to the audience and he's doing it to you and he's doing it to the

00:08:50.720 other people he's talking to and you and you get in that vein where you realize what's going on

00:08:56.460 it is freaking hilarious and i was just watching that yesterday and just crying so funny all right

00:09:02.800 those are my recommendations for fun have you noticed that everything became about china

00:09:07.300 now of course the coronavirus came from china probably the coronavirus changed the election

00:09:18.160 result i think smart people will conclude that now it's not like one thing ever makes the election

00:09:24.380 what it is you need lots of factors but one of the variables that everybody would agree is gigantic

00:09:31.000 is that we had more mail-in ballots and there is some science to suggest the democrats are going to be

00:09:39.260 more mail-in ballot centric and therefore would have an advantage that probably happened it's hard

00:09:48.320 to tell but probably china determined who our president is think about that not necessarily intentionally

00:09:56.660 but yeah i'm not i'm not going to buy the idea that china intentionally launched a pandemic i don't

00:10:04.000 believe it was intentional i think they could have handled it better but so now our biggest issues in

00:10:10.980 this country are all just china and what did we do in response to the fact that china destroyed our 1.00

00:10:18.660 economy hopefully temporarily uh infected and killed you know quarter million americans

00:10:26.200 and effect it affected our election again they weren't necessarily trying to do it a lot of you were

00:10:35.560 thinking it was intentional but it would be a weird thing to do intentionally i guess you can't rule

00:10:40.220 out anything but it feels pretty unlikely to me that it was intentional so i don't think you can convince

00:10:46.200 me to that without more evidence but everything's about china and what did we do as a as a response to

00:10:55.200 the fact that china basically is controlling both our political process our economy and our health care 1.00

00:11:04.500 system and our trade right which is part of the economy but and what did we do when we found

00:11:15.800 ourselves in a situation where china is totally the dog wagging us like a little tail we elected the most 1.00

00:11:24.200 friendly china person which is kind of the opposite of maybe where we should have been which is maybe we

00:11:32.020 should have china not affecting everything in this country maybe they should have less effect but 0.89

00:11:38.860 instead it looks like they'll have more which is an odd way to go historically let me tell you the

00:11:46.940 uh maybe the saddest thing that's going on here joe biden is not really a friend to black people

00:11:56.220 but i think if you're black you can't you can't see it not because you're black it's not a racial comment

00:12:04.280 but rather anybody who's in a political bubble it's really hard to get out of your bubble no matter

00:12:10.600 who you are this this includes you includes everybody so everybody's in their bubble and i believe that

00:12:17.220 once you get it in your head that there's an idea that's just true and let's say the idea in this

00:12:23.460 example is that democrats are the party that are going to be best for the black population of this

00:12:30.640 country so once you've accepted that that's true for decades whether it's true or not you're accepting

00:12:37.360 it as true you really can't see counter evidence so confirmation bias by its nature will make it

00:12:45.140 invisible to you if there's anything that would you know be fighting against your worldview let me give

00:12:52.400 you an example of some of the things that biden uh says he will do and now imagine you're a black 0.53

00:12:59.460 uh voter in this country so you just elected this guy and then he's telling you what he's going to do

00:13:06.680 and he's not hiding it he's telling you directly i plan to do these things right away top priority

00:13:13.840 stuff all right you're a black voter and he tells you top priority we're going to stop building the wall 0.97

00:13:20.340 and loosen up on immigration all right so you're a black citizen in the country do you like that do you

00:13:28.240 like that joe biden has decided that you're going to have a lot more competition for jobs

00:13:33.500 because the immigration problem does hit the black population harder than other parts of the population

00:13:43.100 because the competition for jobs at the at the lower end because unfortunately that's you know that's

00:13:51.460 our situation so is that good for black voters did they want more competition for the jobs i would

00:13:59.900 think they would want the opposite but biden is promising them and that and if he is uh takes the job

00:14:06.220 if he ends up being the president he will give black people more competition for jobs 0.99

00:14:12.560 okay how about the green new deal he promises to do that is that uh good if you're black 0.73

00:14:18.920 nope nope it's the worst thing in the world if you're black is it good if you're rich and white it might 1.00

00:14:27.640 be it might be if you're rich and white you can afford a little extra taxes and maybe you maybe you

00:14:34.780 want to reduce the chance of climate change disruption etc so maybe if you're rich and you're white it 0.90

00:14:40.920 could be good for you but one thing that's true all the time is that your energy situation in your

00:14:49.700 country largely drives your economy you can't really have a successful economy without a robust energy

00:14:58.520 program or being a special case right you could be a special case but in the united states our energy

00:15:05.300 program is central to the health of our economy and if you liked ultra low uh unemployment under the

00:15:15.940 trump administration before coronavirus do you like that the green new deal guarantees that the

00:15:24.020 economy will suffer because they'll you know they'll be tough on fracking they'll be doing the green new

00:15:30.500 deal so if you're at the lower end of the economic um situation the green new deal is just bad for you

00:15:38.740 maybe good in the long run maybe good in 80 years it might be but if you're poor today do you care about

00:15:48.840 the green new deal in 80 years or do you want to make sure that you get a job today i feel like this is

00:15:54.460 terrible for black people the green new deal even if it's good for the world which is a separate 1.00

00:16:00.760 argument it's definitely bad for poor people right away um how about biden looking to uh put into place

00:16:10.600 people who are part of these school unions and that's what he's looking for for his education

00:16:16.760 you know cabinet member probably that's that's the rumor anyway which would indicate no school choice

00:16:23.760 what is the single biggest source of systemic racism nothing comes close to this thing

00:16:32.040 nothing which is that if you're black in america your odds of getting a quality uh education are way

00:16:40.520 less than if you're you know white in america way less one way you could fix that and maybe the only

00:16:47.660 way would be school choice and market competition because that kind of works all the time

00:16:53.520 whereas government having a monopoly doesn't work all the time it can work in some cases

00:16:59.600 so biden is doing all of that so immigration is bad for black population green new deal is bad for

00:17:08.580 everybody who's in the lower income including black population and then school choice is like a 1.00

00:17:14.060 holocaust in this country i mean it guarantees that you have more systemic racism it guarantees it

00:17:21.720 whereas if you said school choice let's go crazy with school choice let's fix this one thing nobody

00:17:28.900 gets a bad education because they have a choice of where to go you could you could take a gigantic bite

00:17:35.860 out of systemic racism if you let's just define it for convenience as starting from behind

00:17:43.120 and then the ripple effect that that has in 12 years you know the length of school in 12 years you

00:17:51.320 could completely transform the black population of this country economically by making sure that 1.00

00:17:57.760 everybody got a good education biden is guaranteed that that won't happen because the system he supports

00:18:04.740 we know that can't get you there it won't change that fast here's another one suppose you were a

00:18:11.040 successful black entrepreneur or just successful in general and you're making a lot of money

00:18:17.620 so you're a black person in this country you beat the odds you you overcame whatever discrimination

00:18:25.760 systemic racism you overcame maybe starting from behind you just overcame everything

00:18:32.480 like you you figured it out like you you figured it out and now you're making a million dollars a year

00:18:37.900 in your business or your your salary or whatever and you're killing it and you did that under the old

00:18:44.720 rules the old rules were what the tax rates used to be and the the way the law used to be and you

00:18:51.680 succeeded against all odds you won and then joe biden says i'm going to raise your taxes to about 80 percent

00:18:59.900 if you add everything from state income taxes and states like mine california to federal at 39

00:19:08.360 percent 12 for the state you add your sales tax your property tax your payroll tax other things that

00:19:15.780 are like taxes and suddenly um your successful black entrepreneur just use that as an example

00:19:24.440 suddenly everything that you worked for joe biden could come and take a bunch of it away

00:19:31.980 is that cool are you cool with working your whole life under the old rules you win and then somebody

00:19:40.780 changes the rules after you win you're cool with that i sure wouldn't be cool with it but i can't speak

00:19:49.340 for anybody else and i'm definitely not cool with it my own case because i earned all of my money i

00:19:54.500 didn't inherit anything i literally inherited zero i worked for it now joe biden says let's change the

00:20:02.980 rules let's take that away from you not cool so uh certainly i have a great empathy toward the uh the black

00:20:11.660 opinion that i imagine they would have if you if you were highly successful you'd have the same opinion

00:20:18.020 i'm guessing don't really know um i think the fake news is already missing trump do you see all the

00:20:24.660 complaining about him not coming out in public so my understanding is that trump is doing a lot i mean

00:20:33.260 he's making phone calls and stuff he seems to be more engaged with the election stuff but i feel like

00:20:39.680 the news is already thinking uh-oh what are we going to talk about if if trump doesn't come out and say

00:20:46.980 something in public pretty soon we're just going to run out of news because we might have to go look

00:20:52.260 for news instead of just reporting about what the president tweeted um

00:20:56.980 former cia director john brennan tells cnn's wolf blitzer that he's more worried than ever about trump

00:21:09.160 trying to you know stage a coup or something like that uh because i guess trump is replacing some of the

00:21:16.120 civilian uh defense people with loyalists they say which is making people think he's going to try to

00:21:24.020 stay in office somehow with a coup or whatever that's not going to happen let me say it as clearly as

00:21:33.200 possible here's what's not going to happen the president running a military coup to stay in office

00:21:40.140 the odds of that happening are zero they're not it's not like well there's a long shot chance

00:21:47.840 no the odds of that is zero and here's why number one the military would never go for it

00:21:54.140 there isn't the slightest chance in my opinion that he could get a even a loyalist to order some kind of a

00:22:02.100 military coup in the united states so it's beyond ridiculous that that could happen because the

00:22:08.560 military just won't do it and there's no there's not the slightest indication that they would follow

00:22:13.400 those kinds of orders and there's lots of indications that they wouldn't but there's a

00:22:18.540 factor beyond that i i'm gonna i'm gonna make this assumption and see if you agree with it i believe there

00:22:26.720 are 20 people in the world who if those 20 people said you know it's time for trump to concede

00:22:36.140 we've supported trump in the past you know vigorously but now we 20 people or so see that

00:22:43.940 it's over hypothetically it's definitely not over but if they did there's 20 people who could

00:22:52.580 absolutely guaranteed make trump not the president let me give you an example if sean hannity decided

00:23:02.620 that he'd seen enough information i don't think this is going to happen i'm just walking you through

00:23:06.880 the thinking here if sean hannity decided that he'd looked at all the information and said you know i

00:23:12.240 love the president but i'm looking at the information and even with a little fraud it's not enough to

00:23:19.000 change the result the process has been served and i think it's time for the the president you know my

00:23:26.660 friend that i've supported to just concede so sean hannity is certainly one of the 20 or so people

00:23:35.680 who if they decided that trump is out of office he couldn't stay in office because he would need that

00:23:43.960 20 and the people who follow that 20 which is you know the bigger force he would need all of them on

00:23:50.260 his side to have the slightest chance of working any gray areas that could keep him in office

00:23:57.080 all right rush limbaugh would have to be in favor of trump staying on or he couldn't right maybe not

00:24:05.500 by himself right if it was an individual important person who who was a rogue you could ignore him but

00:24:13.800 there are about 20 maybe fewer it could be 10 people in the whole united states who would you know have

00:24:23.260 that kind of influence or or audience to do it i don't know if i'm one of them but i would nominate

00:24:30.500 myself as who you should look for in this decision there will be a time when as trump supporters many of

00:24:39.720 you are you will have to decide have we seen enough is there no evidence or have we decided

00:24:47.880 we're going to move on i don't think we're there i don't think we're there because um i am i'm aware

00:24:56.400 not not in great detail but i'm aware that there's more to come in other words what you've seen so far

00:25:03.100 about the credibility of the election is not the good stuff right i i warned you early on that all

00:25:11.120 of these little anecdotes you were going to see 95 of them would be debunked but don't let that

00:25:18.800 fool you because confirmation bias guaranteed there would be lots of false false claims that was

00:25:26.280 guaranteed it was work it was just part of the setup that that had to happen because of the way our

00:25:32.520 brains work but no matter how many are debunked that doesn't tell you anything about the ones you

00:25:39.520 haven't seen once you see them if they also get debunked well that's when you start saying okay

00:25:48.680 you know maybe we've looked into it maybe we know everything we need to do here's why i would here's

00:25:54.800 why i submit that you should listen to my opinion you don't have to take it of course but on the

00:26:02.000 decision of whether it's time or not time to either support um that biden got elected you know

00:26:11.340 at least support the outcome of the election or to keep keep digging here's why i think you should

00:26:18.220 listen to me you know that especially those who've been watching me for a while you know that i can turn

00:26:24.720 on you right you know that you could have an opinion you really really care about and you think i'm on

00:26:31.940 your side and then you hear that opinion you're like what the hell what the hell is that i thought

00:26:38.040 you were going to agree with everything that trump did nope nope i've never agreed with everything trump

00:26:44.660 has done and i tell you quite often to your distress when it happens i'm not even a republican

00:26:51.520 nor am i conservative i describe myself as left of bernie but better at math so his programs don't

00:26:59.160 make sense because of the math but i like his objectives i like to get to full health care

00:27:06.320 availability in this country so you know i like lefty stuff if they can figure out some practical way

00:27:13.000 to get there which is always where they they fall apart so here's the point you know me to favor

00:27:20.240 systems over goals and i could promise you and i think you could trust this that if it ever came

00:27:29.660 down to supporting an individual let's say trump for example over the integrity of the system i will

00:27:38.140 always pick the system if i had to throw trump under the bus love him as i do i yeah i like trump

00:27:47.580 i've met him enjoyed talking to him i think he's done a great job for the country but i would throw him

00:27:55.540 under the bus so fast if the election system indicates that that makes sense right so i'm going to go with

00:28:07.120 what makes sense i'm going to follow the system and i would like to have a good american system when

00:28:15.020 we're done even if here's the important part you ready even if it means trump isn't president

00:28:22.400 i would absolutely choose the integrity of the system over any one president all right it's not even

00:28:32.100 close i won't even i'm not even going to weigh them as even being in the same category the system is

00:28:39.160 everything the individual is not and and that's that would be the approach i would take so if you're

00:28:49.920 listening to somebody who's clearly just in the bag for the president will agree with whatever he says

00:28:54.540 you're not going to get anything credible you know the fake news isn't going to tell you anything

00:28:59.600 useful it's all lies because it's the news they don't do the truth you know the politicians are not

00:29:05.500 going to be unbiased you know your fellow voters and neighbors are not going to be unbiased the one

00:29:12.240 thing i can promise you is that i will apply reason i will imply i will give you an uh an estimate of

00:29:21.260 the odds of any facts that i'm incorporating and i'll tell you if it's time to move on um i see no reason

00:29:29.760 that you should listen to me to be honest i see no reason you should listen to me but who else are

00:29:37.620 you going to listen to um years ago uh i'm going to tell you something that maybe it was a private

00:29:45.740 conversation so maybe i shouldn't but i'm going to do it anyway all right uh several years ago i was

00:29:53.500 talking to my friend naval ravikant and i told him that my objective because a lot of people ask me

00:30:02.100 why am i getting involved in politics and why am i why am i even in this field and i told him at the

00:30:09.660 time that it was my goal to be the most credible person in the country credible doesn't mean right

00:30:16.360 very important distinction credible doesn't mean that i'm right credible means that you know what

00:30:25.680 my intentions are and that i put in the work and there was enough transparency where i showed you

00:30:32.540 why i'm thinking what i'm thinking how i reasoned it what facts i thought were credible what percentage

00:30:38.440 i put it on it i can give you that so i've spent years trying to develop um to develop let's say a

00:30:47.800 platform in which what whether you hated me or loved me you would say damn it at least he's credible

00:30:57.780 let me give you an example of somebody i consider credible michael moore right that doesn't mean you

00:31:06.820 agree with him it doesn't mean he's right all the time because that's not what credible is nobody's

00:31:12.180 right all the time but when michael moore says uh hey democrats i don't think you're listening and trump

00:31:19.600 is to the to the voters michael moore is kind of credible right maybe not on every topic but when he

00:31:27.580 says stuff like that you know he can he's capable of leaving you know leaving the politics and saying uh

00:31:35.040 but people are dying here and only one person is listening to him maybe you should listen to him

00:31:39.420 a little bit better too pretty credible pretty credible all right i don't know if i'm hitting my

00:31:46.840 mark but just so you know that's what i'm shooting for is to be a useful a useful component of the

00:31:54.040 country in a world in which every one of our systems has lost credibility so who are you going to

00:32:00.280 believe and i think that uh like i said i'm not alone there are probably 20 people who could

00:32:07.580 who could basically cause the president to have no hope of of holding on to the office are we there

00:32:16.160 yet nope nope we are definitely not there yet and i don't know if we will be but i'll give you my

00:32:23.940 prediction here's what i think is going to happen i think the president will make his case

00:32:28.320 that uh that fraud happened i believe that he will eventually and unfortunately it might take

00:32:36.560 too long i think eventually again probably it'll take too long we will know that the election was

00:32:46.140 maybe or definitely illegitimate and could have gone or should have gone to trump and that will create

00:32:53.600 a situation in which even after he has conceded if that happens that we would consider him still

00:33:01.780 the president because he got elected even though he's not in the job so you're going to have a

00:33:08.040 situation where you have two presidents one official and then one sort of in absentia if you will

00:33:15.440 almost like a venezuela situation so that's what we're heading for because everything's lined up for

00:33:22.800 that to happen um i don't know how long that'll last all right uh and the only reason that you know

00:33:30.740 that biden won if that's what you think happened is that the most corrupt institutions in the country

00:33:37.220 told you it was so right tell me who told you that biden won who is also credible nobody you haven't

00:33:48.600 heard it from anybody credible you've heard it from the news fake news they're all liars you've heard it

00:33:55.660 from politicians you can't trust them and they obviously are playing the game who told you that biden won

00:34:03.480 who is not already corrupt and non-credible all right um i took a stand in favor of uh jeffrey

00:34:14.460 toobin who was fired by the new yorker um i don't know if cnn will uh yank him off the air

00:34:21.300 um but i said in a tweet apparently he got fired by the new yorker where he also worked as a writer

00:34:29.760 and i tweeted that i strongly disagree with this firing i don't want to live in a world i don't want

00:34:36.860 to live in that world so what do you think people said when i said that i disagree with jeffrey toobin

00:34:45.340 being fired because i don't want to live in a world in which you can get fired for what is obviously a

00:34:51.420 mistake now do you think that people have correctly interpreted what i said no no this is this is the

00:34:58.740 real world where people misinterpret so uh claire cullen tweets back at me and she says you dot dot

00:35:06.500 dot want to live in a world where men masturbate on camera and work zoom meetings with no consequences 0.91

00:35:13.600 weird and then she also tweeted separately what a hill to die on quote and then she makes up a quote

00:35:22.140 as if i said it so it has quote marks around it but i never said this right i want to live in a world

00:35:28.200 where men can masturbate on camera on work zoom calls free of consequences 0.69

00:35:32.720 did i say that

00:35:36.360 is there anything i said

00:35:40.320 that would sound like i'm in favor of men masturbating on zoom 0.61

00:35:44.660 no

00:35:46.140 no

00:35:47.400 that would be a misinterpretation of what i said a straw man if you will

00:35:52.420 i'm

00:35:53.380 the facts that we have

00:35:56.020 are that it was an accident

00:35:57.920 so

00:35:59.200 am i okay

00:36:01.000 with a man or woman

00:36:02.960 having an accident

00:36:05.080 which caused them great embarrassment

00:36:07.120 but it was just an accident

00:36:08.960 nobody got hurt

00:36:10.400 no victims

00:36:11.320 highly unlikely to ever happen again

00:36:14.040 under those conditions

00:36:15.960 man or woman

00:36:17.240 democrat or republican

00:36:19.240 i don't care

00:36:19.940 i just don't want to live in a world

00:36:22.480 where a dumb mistake

00:36:24.500 that had no consequences

00:36:26.820 it really didn't

00:36:28.400 let's let's be honest

00:36:29.660 the

00:36:29.920 the women who were on the call 0.56

00:36:32.240 or men or whoever else were on there

00:36:33.780 they weren't scarred for life

00:36:35.820 because it wasn't personal

00:36:37.520 it was just like an image on the screen

00:36:40.140 it wasn't meant for them

00:36:41.640 it wasn't about them

00:36:42.820 it was weird

00:36:44.120 it was funny

00:36:44.900 they're part of history

00:36:46.120 i don't want to live in a world

00:36:48.160 where

00:36:48.560 where

00:36:49.120 a simple technical error

00:36:51.540 can

00:36:53.220 can lose a good job

00:36:54.680 so

00:36:54.940 i am

00:36:55.660 completely

00:36:56.260 sincere

00:36:57.080 in saying

00:36:57.680 that the

00:36:58.800 new yorker

00:36:59.620 made a mistake

00:37:00.620 in my opinion

00:37:01.340 they should hire him back

00:37:03.560 and cnn

00:37:04.940 should not

00:37:05.740 keep him off the air

00:37:07.160 indefinitely

00:37:07.720 a little time out

00:37:09.260 might make sense

00:37:10.280 for everybody

00:37:10.900 but i don't think

00:37:12.440 anybody should lose a job

00:37:13.520 for that

00:37:13.960 um

00:37:15.340 douglas carr

00:37:16.240 weighed in on this conversation

00:37:18.380 and said

00:37:18.940 uh

00:37:20.260 douglas said

00:37:21.400 quote

00:37:21.720 i've never

00:37:22.420 unintentionally played

00:37:23.820 with myself at work

00:37:25.200 or intentionally

00:37:26.460 so douglas claims

00:37:28.520 that he has never

00:37:29.300 uh

00:37:29.880 gone full tubing at work

00:37:32.200 whether anybody was watching or not

00:37:34.440 to which i replied

00:37:36.260 well

00:37:37.020 maybe douglas

00:37:38.540 maybe you're just

00:37:39.520 not that into yourself

00:37:40.760 because

00:37:42.080 you know

00:37:42.540 there are times when

00:37:43.840 i just can't resist myself

00:37:45.380 i don't know about you

00:37:46.220 but

00:37:46.500 i am so into myself

00:37:48.540 but douglas

00:37:49.860 douglas has rejected himself

00:37:51.860 to the point where

00:37:53.160 he's not even interested

00:37:54.320 in

00:37:54.700 in himself

00:37:55.580 um

00:37:56.980 apparently

00:37:58.820 president trump

00:37:59.580 has told friends

00:38:00.620 allegedly

00:38:01.640 who knows if this is true

00:38:03.320 that he wants

00:38:04.360 this is from axios

00:38:05.400 that he wants to start

00:38:06.560 a digital media company

00:38:07.820 to clobber fox news

00:38:09.540 uh

00:38:10.840 although

00:38:11.160 so it might not be a

00:38:12.500 cable channel

00:38:13.400 it might be just an

00:38:14.740 internet only thing

00:38:15.800 to clobber fox news

00:38:17.860 what are the odds of that

00:38:18.860 well

00:38:19.700 if he's not president

00:38:21.180 pretty high

00:38:24.040 don't you think

00:38:26.180 you'd watch it

00:38:26.860 i don't know how

00:38:28.220 you would not watch it

00:38:29.160 how would you not watch

00:38:30.880 president trump

00:38:32.360 dunking on biden

00:38:33.520 for four years

00:38:34.380 i don't think i'd watch

00:38:36.040 anything else

00:38:36.760 i don't know what could

00:38:38.540 be more interesting

00:38:39.260 than that

00:38:39.840 um

00:38:41.180 so that might happen

00:38:42.280 again

00:38:44.760 trump has two ways

00:38:46.320 to win

00:38:46.720 one is he

00:38:47.820 somehow

00:38:48.500 prevails with his

00:38:50.180 legal challenges

00:38:50.900 and becomes president

00:38:51.820 for a second term

00:38:53.160 and the second way

00:38:53.920 is he doesn't become

00:38:54.800 president

00:38:55.220 and he makes

00:38:56.720 you know

00:38:57.200 billions of dollars

00:38:58.060 as the most interesting

00:38:59.720 conservative

00:39:00.780 uh

00:39:01.500 channel

00:39:02.380 so

00:39:03.640 uh

00:39:04.680 i've been asked

00:39:05.240 to talk about

00:39:05.880 dr shiva's

00:39:07.100 analyses

00:39:08.300 of the election

00:39:09.360 and so i will

00:39:11.460 here's my problem

00:39:12.880 trying to analyze

00:39:14.080 anything that dr shiva

00:39:16.060 does or claims

00:39:18.040 i can't

00:39:19.180 i don't have those skills

00:39:20.720 i can't look at

00:39:22.000 anything he does

00:39:22.920 and say

00:39:24.020 oh well i agree with that

00:39:25.400 or don't agree with that

00:39:26.160 what the hell do i know

00:39:27.360 that's him working

00:39:29.100 in a domain

00:39:29.880 in which he's an expert

00:39:31.340 has several degrees

00:39:32.560 that are all relevant

00:39:34.080 to this

00:39:34.620 so

00:39:35.680 if he says he's done

00:39:37.420 the analysis

00:39:38.040 and it tells him

00:39:38.940 something

00:39:39.320 i don't know

00:39:40.620 otherwise

00:39:41.020 i don't know

00:39:42.500 if it's right

00:39:43.100 but i don't know

00:39:43.740 if it's wrong

00:39:44.260 i just don't know

00:39:45.380 so we need

00:39:47.180 people

00:39:48.540 you know

00:39:49.240 on both sides

00:39:50.320 to be looking

00:39:50.820 at this stuff

00:39:51.520 so the claim

00:39:52.780 from dr shiva

00:39:53.920 is roughly this

00:39:55.420 i'll paraphrase it

00:39:56.320 that he can determine

00:39:58.080 on a graph

00:39:58.940 that the votes

00:40:00.440 coming in

00:40:00.960 for biden

00:40:01.460 and trump

00:40:02.140 were

00:40:02.640 somehow

00:40:04.100 typical

00:40:05.020 and appropriate

00:40:05.940 based on

00:40:07.560 everything we know

00:40:08.380 about the past

00:40:09.280 and even what was

00:40:10.540 happening in the election

00:40:11.480 so far

00:40:12.080 and then they would

00:40:13.300 go along

00:40:13.820 in what would be

00:40:14.340 a normal way

00:40:15.160 and then suddenly

00:40:16.060 just like somebody

00:40:17.460 turned a switch

00:40:18.820 as in a software

00:40:20.880 thing

00:40:21.760 then suddenly

00:40:22.980 it just became

00:40:24.120 all by

00:40:24.620 could there be

00:40:26.120 a natural reason

00:40:27.000 for it

00:40:27.480 i don't know

00:40:28.280 i imagine that's

00:40:29.200 what the

00:40:29.700 other side would claim

00:40:31.400 but until

00:40:32.780 lots of people

00:40:33.540 have looked at it

00:40:34.180 it's hard to know

00:40:34.820 so i don't have

00:40:36.100 an opinion

00:40:36.500 about how

00:40:37.240 true it is

00:40:38.020 because i don't

00:40:38.920 have the qualifications

00:40:39.960 to judge

00:40:40.980 that sort of thing

00:40:41.820 and that's why

00:40:42.520 i wouldn't want

00:40:43.160 to have him

00:40:43.660 on as a guest

00:40:44.600 to talk about

00:40:45.860 that sort of thing

00:40:46.860 because you should

00:40:47.600 only do it

00:40:48.040 if you've got

00:40:48.460 somebody who can

00:40:49.180 you know

00:40:50.040 ask the right

00:40:50.680 questions

00:40:51.140 and that's not me

00:40:51.960 apparently

00:40:54.740 pennsylvania

00:40:56.160 asked the

00:40:58.200 dominion software

00:40:59.260 people

00:40:59.800 to make some

00:41:01.560 changes before

00:41:02.300 the election

00:41:02.760 and one of

00:41:03.220 the requested

00:41:04.740 changes

00:41:05.340 would give

00:41:06.560 control to

00:41:07.540 an operator

00:41:08.840 of the software

00:41:09.640 to mark

00:41:12.620 blank ballots

00:41:14.480 any way they

00:41:15.940 wanted

00:41:16.240 and then just

00:41:16.960 put them in the

00:41:17.480 system

00:41:17.760 so they actually

00:41:20.300 asked for the

00:41:21.260 ability

00:41:21.660 to fill in

00:41:22.880 blank ballots

00:41:23.700 in writing

00:41:24.720 that's actually

00:41:26.100 a software

00:41:26.900 request

00:41:27.500 and i think

00:41:28.460 dominion

00:41:29.080 gave them

00:41:29.960 that ability

00:41:30.540 so basically

00:41:31.560 it's just

00:41:32.120 that an

00:41:32.760 operator

00:41:33.260 has the

00:41:33.720 ability

00:41:34.020 to do

00:41:34.440 what they

00:41:34.740 want

00:41:35.060 with a

00:41:35.420 ballot

00:41:35.700 as opposed

00:41:36.820 to the

00:41:37.180 system

00:41:37.500 somehow

00:41:37.840 having all

00:41:38.400 the control

00:41:38.920 so

00:41:40.060 don't we need

00:41:42.220 to know more

00:41:42.700 about whoever

00:41:43.220 had access

00:41:43.880 to that

00:41:44.860 feature

00:41:45.320 how many

00:41:46.520 people in

00:41:47.020 pennsylvania

00:41:47.600 had access

00:41:49.300 to a feature

00:41:50.060 where they

00:41:50.460 could go in

00:41:51.040 and just

00:41:51.480 change the

00:41:52.800 vote

00:41:53.020 wouldn't you

00:41:54.720 like to

00:41:55.540 know

00:41:55.780 i'd like

00:41:57.860 to know

00:41:58.220 apparently

00:42:02.520 biden is

00:42:03.180 not getting

00:42:03.620 security

00:42:04.200 briefings

00:42:04.840 from the

00:42:05.260 current

00:42:05.500 administration

00:42:06.240 and the

00:42:07.380 reasoning is

00:42:08.080 that he's

00:42:08.500 not officially

00:42:09.220 the president

00:42:10.200 elect

00:42:10.640 but in the

00:42:11.900 past that

00:42:12.460 hasn't mattered

00:42:13.200 however i think

00:42:14.720 in this case

00:42:15.400 it's humorously

00:42:16.700 appropriate

00:42:17.260 it's not

00:42:18.560 appropriate

00:42:19.120 government

00:42:20.100 wise

00:42:20.600 you know

00:42:21.960 if you want

00:42:22.680 to just good

00:42:23.200 government you

00:42:23.860 should probably

00:42:24.420 let him have

00:42:25.220 some briefings

00:42:25.900 just in case

00:42:27.000 because he

00:42:28.320 may not

00:42:28.800 become the

00:42:29.780 president

00:42:30.140 elect

00:42:30.660 officially

00:42:31.300 but i don't

00:42:32.780 think there's

00:42:33.320 any risk

00:42:34.020 of somebody

00:42:35.300 in his

00:42:35.940 position

00:42:36.420 joe biden

00:42:37.120 having been

00:42:38.140 at the

00:42:38.580 you know

00:42:38.880 top security

00:42:40.220 clearance for

00:42:41.000 what decades

00:42:42.080 probably

00:42:42.460 i don't think

00:42:43.420 there's any

00:42:43.780 risk of

00:42:44.360 letting him

00:42:44.840 get some

00:42:45.400 some briefings

00:42:46.980 but because

00:42:48.380 the obama

00:42:49.680 administration

00:42:50.440 had screwed

00:42:52.100 with trump

00:42:52.800 that way

00:42:53.340 and not

00:42:53.860 given him

00:42:54.440 the right

00:42:55.140 briefings

00:42:55.700 and they

00:42:56.180 were pretending

00:42:56.960 as if he

00:42:57.560 was a

00:42:57.900 security

00:42:58.260 risk

00:42:58.680 i love

00:43:00.480 from a humor

00:43:01.440 perspective

00:43:02.080 that trump

00:43:03.740 is not giving

00:43:04.480 biden

00:43:04.880 security

00:43:06.100 briefings

00:43:07.240 because you

00:43:08.680 could argue

00:43:09.220 you could argue

00:43:10.760 that he's in the

00:43:11.440 pocket of china

00:43:12.160 right that was

00:43:13.720 the argument

00:43:14.120 for not giving

00:43:14.860 trump

00:43:15.600 security

00:43:16.780 briefings

00:43:17.280 as he might

00:43:17.740 be in the

00:43:18.320 pocket of

00:43:19.220 russia

00:43:19.520 so trump

00:43:21.020 has 100%

00:43:22.800 reasonable

00:43:26.180 reason to

00:43:27.840 not give

00:43:28.400 biden

00:43:28.820 this

00:43:29.240 this

00:43:29.860 clearance

00:43:30.280 now i think

00:43:31.820 it's more

00:43:32.660 funny and

00:43:33.380 f you than

00:43:34.160 it is

00:43:34.660 useful

00:43:35.260 as a citizen

00:43:36.500 i think he

00:43:37.160 should have

00:43:37.540 those briefings

00:43:38.780 but as an

00:43:39.900 observer of

00:43:40.960 politics

00:43:41.600 it is kind

00:43:42.680 of funny

00:43:43.060 it is kind

00:43:44.320 of funny

00:43:44.700 so i

00:43:45.880 appreciate it

00:43:46.440 that one

00:43:47.040 all right i

00:43:47.820 think that we're

00:43:48.300 watching the

00:43:49.040 slow motion

00:43:50.020 self-immolation

00:43:51.280 of the

00:43:51.760 democrat

00:43:52.360 democratic party

00:43:54.100 and here is my

00:43:56.240 argument which i

00:43:57.420 have not yet

00:43:58.000 made and it

00:43:58.900 goes like this

00:43:59.660 if you're going

00:44:00.600 to predict what

00:44:01.340 would happen

00:44:01.940 if biden

00:44:03.260 eventually does

00:44:04.840 get into the

00:44:05.440 job as

00:44:05.980 president

00:44:06.320 what would

00:44:07.600 happen between

00:44:08.260 now and

00:44:08.980 2024

00:44:09.640 what is

00:44:11.380 obviously going

00:44:12.440 to happen

00:44:12.940 between now

00:44:13.700 and 2024

00:44:14.300 so here's a

00:44:15.060 few things

00:44:15.500 keep in mind

00:44:17.960 that trump

00:44:18.540 did something

00:44:19.800 that nobody

00:44:20.440 thought was

00:44:20.900 even possible

00:44:21.600 he unified

00:44:22.940 the republican

00:44:23.720 party

00:44:24.200 now prior

00:44:26.680 to trump

00:44:27.440 being president

00:44:28.060 i was telling

00:44:28.860 you he's so

00:44:29.660 persuasive he

00:44:30.560 has these

00:44:30.940 persuasive

00:44:31.520 qualities and

00:44:32.740 people kept

00:44:33.220 saying well

00:44:33.580 why is he

00:44:34.020 not persuading

00:44:34.920 democrats

00:44:35.560 well we don't

00:44:36.720 live in that

00:44:37.340 world anymore

00:44:38.140 we don't live

00:44:39.240 in a world

00:44:39.640 where you

00:44:40.060 persuade the

00:44:40.940 other side

00:44:41.620 that's not

00:44:42.660 even a thing

00:44:43.360 you just

00:44:44.280 persuade your

00:44:44.920 own team

00:44:45.400 and if

00:44:45.620 you can

00:44:45.880 get 100%

00:44:46.660 of them

00:44:47.020 or close

00:44:47.540 on your

00:44:48.500 side

00:44:48.760 that might

00:44:49.500 be enough

00:44:49.820 to be

00:44:50.080 president

00:44:50.440 so the

00:44:51.540 president

00:44:51.900 had unusual

00:44:53.160 skills

00:44:53.700 and he

00:44:54.520 could get

00:44:55.040 96%

00:44:56.360 republican

00:44:57.360 support

00:44:57.920 do you

00:44:59.320 think that

00:44:59.680 biden has

00:45:00.320 those skills

00:45:01.120 given that

00:45:03.520 he's dealing

00:45:03.880 with the

00:45:04.180 green new

00:45:04.560 deal

00:45:04.820 people and

00:45:06.260 the squad

00:45:06.800 well i

00:45:09.180 don't think

00:45:09.680 that biden

00:45:10.340 has the

00:45:10.880 skills

00:45:11.260 that trump

00:45:12.400 has

00:45:12.740 trump

00:45:13.560 could

00:45:13.980 do

00:45:15.220 things

00:45:15.720 that other

00:45:16.320 people

00:45:16.600 can't

00:45:17.100 and he

00:45:17.380 got his

00:45:17.880 team

00:45:18.300 completely

00:45:18.800 on his

00:45:19.120 side

00:45:19.360 biden

00:45:20.300 probably

00:45:20.860 isn't going

00:45:21.300 to do

00:45:21.560 that

00:45:21.940 because he

00:45:22.440 doesn't have

00:45:22.920 that kind

00:45:23.360 of game

00:45:23.920 so the

00:45:24.740 first thing

00:45:25.220 that will be

00:45:25.580 different

00:45:25.960 is he won't

00:45:26.920 be able to

00:45:27.400 unify the

00:45:28.040 party

00:45:28.360 so this is

00:45:28.960 my prediction

00:45:29.560 so that's

00:45:30.800 trouble

00:45:31.220 secondly

00:45:32.300 the things

00:45:33.560 he's pushing

00:45:34.080 for are

00:45:34.660 higher taxes

00:45:35.560 not withdrawing

00:45:37.280 troops

00:45:37.760 more systemic

00:45:39.380 racism

00:45:39.960 the examples

00:45:41.440 that i gave

00:45:41.920 you earlier

00:45:42.400 like no

00:45:43.460 school choice

00:45:44.140 etc that's

00:45:45.020 pro systemic

00:45:45.920 racism

00:45:46.480 and more

00:45:48.260 lockdowns

00:45:49.160 now even if

00:45:49.740 lockdowns are

00:45:50.360 good they're

00:45:50.840 unpopular

00:45:51.360 right so

00:45:52.320 even if you

00:45:52.860 said oh

00:45:53.260 they're necessary

00:45:53.980 the public

00:45:54.920 doesn't like

00:45:55.520 them so the

00:45:56.760 public isn't

00:45:57.320 going to like

00:45:57.720 any of this

00:45:58.320 higher taxes

00:45:59.240 more war

00:46:00.040 systemic racism

00:46:01.160 lockdowns

00:46:02.040 then there's

00:46:03.640 talk that you

00:46:04.380 might want to

00:46:04.880 share the

00:46:05.560 pfizer vaccine

00:46:06.620 overseas before

00:46:08.000 everybody in

00:46:08.680 america gets 0.65

00:46:09.340 it because that

00:46:10.320 would be fair

00:46:11.000 and it might

00:46:12.320 be you know

00:46:13.360 if you're being

00:46:13.900 a citizen of

00:46:15.420 the world

00:46:15.920 does it make

00:46:17.520 sense that

00:46:18.600 maybe you share

00:46:19.440 your limited

00:46:20.820 vaccine with

00:46:21.640 the rest of

00:46:22.080 the world

00:46:22.420 i think you

00:46:23.300 could make an

00:46:23.800 argument for

00:46:24.420 that the

00:46:25.480 argument would

00:46:26.180 not be

00:46:26.680 america first

00:46:27.740 it would be

00:46:28.420 the opposite

00:46:28.860 of that

00:46:29.260 but could

00:46:30.400 you make a

00:46:31.040 philosophical

00:46:31.660 argument

00:46:32.240 and maybe

00:46:33.360 this will

00:46:33.820 happen

00:46:34.140 that the

00:46:35.400 that any

00:46:36.260 vaccine that's

00:46:37.240 so important

00:46:37.800 it's a world

00:46:38.500 problem that we

00:46:39.820 should not

00:46:40.340 hog it all

00:46:41.200 you can make

00:46:42.600 that argument

00:46:43.060 but it won't

00:46:44.620 be popular

00:46:45.240 you know the

00:46:46.760 people in the

00:46:47.300 united states

00:46:48.100 are going to

00:46:48.680 complain

00:46:49.060 so that's

00:46:50.880 you know not

00:46:51.840 going to look

00:46:52.200 good in 2024

00:46:53.020 i think you'll

00:46:54.260 get more

00:46:54.640 riots

00:46:55.140 anybody who

00:46:55.900 thought that

00:46:56.340 the rioting

00:46:57.320 would decrease

00:46:58.740 under biden

00:46:59.440 they're probably

00:47:00.040 asking themselves

00:47:00.940 what happened

00:47:01.860 so biden is

00:47:03.320 going to have

00:47:03.640 that i don't

00:47:04.960 think that

00:47:06.960 you've got a

00:47:07.540 nuclear problem

00:47:08.620 a nuclear energy

00:47:09.920 problem biden i

00:47:11.460 believe is at

00:47:13.040 least nuclear

00:47:15.040 curious if not

00:47:16.760 flat out pro

00:47:18.480 nuclear at least

00:47:20.540 keeping the ones

00:47:21.240 we have he's

00:47:22.840 going to run

00:47:23.260 right into the

00:47:23.940 squad on that

00:47:24.800 and the green

00:47:25.380 new deal so

00:47:26.360 what happens

00:47:26.900 if biden is

00:47:28.280 pro-nuclear

00:47:28.940 and the squad

00:47:30.240 is not

00:47:30.760 what happens

00:47:32.840 if biden has

00:47:33.620 age-related

00:47:34.720 problems

00:47:35.360 do you think

00:47:36.840 there's any

00:47:37.300 chance in the

00:47:37.920 next four years

00:47:38.680 he'll have

00:47:39.140 age-related

00:47:40.160 problems

00:47:40.720 and it'll make

00:47:41.700 democrats say

00:47:42.500 uh what did

00:47:43.360 we do here

00:47:43.960 it seemed like

00:47:45.500 a good idea

00:47:46.080 at the time

00:47:46.680 what happens

00:47:47.800 when you take

00:47:48.520 president trump

00:47:50.080 out of the

00:47:50.800 equation

00:47:51.300 and and biden 0.59

00:47:53.040 no longer has

00:47:53.840 this enemy

00:47:54.680 that everybody

00:47:55.240 can get behind

00:47:56.420 as the same

00:47:57.400 enemy

00:47:57.680 if he loses

00:47:59.240 his common

00:47:59.980 enemy

00:48:00.400 who's the

00:48:01.800 enemy

00:48:02.120 if you don't

00:48:03.200 have an enemy

00:48:03.740 it's hard to

00:48:04.220 keep your team

00:48:04.780 together right

00:48:05.420 at least trump

00:48:07.680 had you know

00:48:08.500 socialism as

00:48:09.560 his enemy

00:48:10.080 you know he

00:48:11.520 had that

00:48:12.040 so biden will

00:48:14.980 lose his enemy

00:48:15.820 maybe

00:48:16.300 what happens if

00:48:17.780 there's a terror

00:48:18.560 attack in this

00:48:19.340 country and it

00:48:20.380 could be traced

00:48:21.020 back to uh

00:48:22.780 biden reversing

00:48:24.160 the ban

00:48:24.920 on those

00:48:26.240 countries that

00:48:26.900 don't have

00:48:27.320 good record

00:48:27.940 keeping so

00:48:28.540 you don't know

00:48:29.140 who is

00:48:29.660 migrating 0.86

00:48:30.160 immigrating 0.82

00:48:30.900 what happens

00:48:32.160 in four years

00:48:33.560 four years is

00:48:35.180 a long time

00:48:35.700 what are the

00:48:36.060 odds there

00:48:36.460 would be at

00:48:36.820 least one

00:48:37.540 domestic terror

00:48:39.160 attack

00:48:39.620 because of

00:48:41.100 that decision

00:48:41.780 to let people

00:48:43.420 in from those

00:48:44.140 countries that

00:48:44.820 are a little

00:48:45.160 bit more

00:48:45.540 risk

00:48:45.860 i don't know

00:48:46.920 what the odds

00:48:47.340 are but it

00:48:48.300 could happen

00:48:48.740 what if he

00:48:49.660 does something

00:48:50.160 with gun

00:48:50.640 legislation

00:48:51.280 etc so

00:48:52.480 you could

00:48:52.800 imagine a

00:48:53.480 whole bunch

00:48:54.120 of bad

00:48:54.620 things happening

00:48:55.400 if he raises

00:48:56.060 taxes

00:48:56.600 it's hard to

00:48:57.560 imagine the

00:48:58.120 economy doing

00:48:58.840 too well

00:48:59.420 under that

00:49:00.400 situation

00:49:01.060 so i've got

00:49:02.860 a feeling that

00:49:03.720 you're going

00:49:05.260 to see

00:49:05.760 if biden

00:49:07.880 takes the

00:49:08.460 job it

00:49:09.240 could be the

00:49:09.760 beginning of

00:49:10.660 a real bad

00:49:12.120 problem for

00:49:13.320 democrats

00:49:14.220 because i think

00:49:14.840 they would lose

00:49:15.460 the next

00:49:15.980 presidency

00:49:16.600 if he if

00:49:19.280 things go the

00:49:19.820 way i think

00:49:20.320 he would lose

00:49:21.420 presidency next

00:49:22.380 time 2024

00:49:23.220 maybe lose

00:49:24.660 the house

00:49:25.240 you know the

00:49:28.060 senate might 0.56

00:49:28.520 stay with the

00:49:29.000 republicans

00:49:29.540 and you might

00:49:30.360 have the

00:49:30.760 republicans in

00:49:31.500 charge of

00:49:31.960 everything

00:49:32.460 that really

00:49:34.200 could happen

00:49:34.880 in 2024

00:49:36.160 so we'll

00:49:38.080 see

00:49:38.300 why does it

00:49:40.680 seem to me

00:49:41.140 that when

00:49:41.520 democrats talk

00:49:42.800 about taxing

00:49:43.980 the rich

00:49:44.540 it doesn't

00:49:45.740 sound like

00:49:46.260 an economic

00:49:47.000 plan

00:49:47.480 it sounds

00:49:48.680 like punishment

00:49:49.400 for being

00:49:50.080 successful

00:49:50.800 doesn't it

00:49:51.700 now some

00:49:52.520 people inherited

00:49:53.320 so or got

00:49:55.140 lucky or

00:49:55.680 whatever so

00:49:56.280 you know

00:49:57.200 that seems

00:49:58.440 different but

00:49:59.880 when i hear

00:50:01.060 the democrats

00:50:01.660 talk about

00:50:02.940 taxing the

00:50:03.620 rich it

00:50:04.720 just doesn't

00:50:05.620 feel like it's

00:50:06.400 because it's a

00:50:07.760 good idea

00:50:08.380 it feels like

00:50:09.860 because it's

00:50:11.300 revenge

00:50:11.960 right

00:50:13.060 is it just

00:50:14.380 me maybe it's

00:50:15.380 because it's

00:50:15.900 personal but it

00:50:17.340 feels like it's

00:50:18.020 personal it

00:50:19.120 doesn't even

00:50:19.560 feel like

00:50:19.960 they're trying

00:50:20.800 too hard to

00:50:22.040 make it sound

00:50:22.580 like economics

00:50:23.500 that maybe

00:50:24.560 it's just

00:50:24.880 me

00:50:25.120 have you

00:50:29.440 ever wondered

00:50:29.860 why businesses

00:50:30.740 are still

00:50:31.260 boarded up

00:50:31.940 i mean we

00:50:33.080 have a

00:50:33.400 president

00:50:33.720 biden

00:50:34.140 right

00:50:34.420 so racism

00:50:36.400 is over

00:50:36.940 we got a

00:50:38.440 democrat in

00:50:39.140 control

00:50:39.620 shouldn't we

00:50:41.040 be onboarding

00:50:41.960 those businesses

00:50:42.660 see the problem

00:50:44.480 turns out

00:50:45.600 that

00:50:45.980 you know

00:50:47.920 probably a

00:50:48.400 new president

00:50:48.860 won't make

00:50:49.320 any difference

00:50:49.820 to those

00:50:50.300 riots or

00:50:51.260 protests

00:50:51.720 all right

00:50:53.020 i'm going to

00:50:53.700 ask my

00:50:54.280 my friend

00:50:55.860 dale to

00:50:56.400 come in

00:50:56.800 and to

00:50:57.800 explain to

00:50:58.400 us

00:50:58.700 exactly how

00:51:00.020 it is

00:51:00.520 that this

00:51:02.740 election is

00:51:03.620 not rigged

00:51:04.480 so if

00:51:06.840 you've met

00:51:07.180 dale before

00:51:07.800 he's the

00:51:08.380 anti-trumper

00:51:09.200 in some ways

00:51:10.300 he looks like

00:51:10.940 me but he

00:51:11.360 has a goatee

00:51:12.120 that's how you

00:51:12.820 know he's

00:51:13.220 not me

00:51:13.720 and so

00:51:16.180 dale if

00:51:17.460 you could

00:51:17.700 just come

00:51:18.000 over i

00:51:18.320 just have

00:51:18.760 a quick

00:51:19.060 question

00:51:19.420 there have

00:51:21.220 been a

00:51:21.700 number of

00:51:22.480 allegations of

00:51:23.580 fraud in

00:51:24.320 the elections

00:51:24.840 what do you

00:51:26.380 think about

00:51:26.720 that there

00:51:29.040 has been no

00:51:29.780 widespread fraud

00:51:32.200 in the election

00:51:32.820 yeah i know

00:51:34.180 nobody's saying

00:51:35.280 there's widespread

00:51:36.500 fraud the

00:51:37.820 allegation is

00:51:38.620 that it's

00:51:39.220 targeted to

00:51:40.240 just the places

00:51:41.100 where it would

00:51:41.640 make a

00:51:42.000 difference so

00:51:43.260 do you think

00:51:43.760 that happened

00:51:44.280 how many

00:51:46.140 times do i

00:51:46.860 need to

00:51:47.180 tell you

00:51:47.640 there's not

00:51:48.920 any widespread

00:51:50.040 fraud

00:51:51.420 okay i don't

00:51:52.940 know what's

00:51:53.240 happening here

00:51:53.880 um i'll try

00:51:55.500 it again

00:51:55.840 nobody is

00:51:57.900 making the

00:51:58.340 allegation of

00:51:59.080 widespread fraud

00:52:00.520 so when you

00:52:02.880 say there is

00:52:03.520 none we're

00:52:04.100 in agreement

00:52:04.580 on that

00:52:05.180 because nobody

00:52:06.160 is saying

00:52:06.900 that so

00:52:08.100 but what do

00:52:08.560 you think

00:52:08.780 about the

00:52:09.520 targeted fraud

00:52:10.500 why do you

00:52:12.740 think there's

00:52:13.280 widespread fraud

00:52:14.620 what the hell

00:52:17.260 is happening

00:52:17.800 here

00:52:18.180 do you not

00:52:20.000 understand what

00:52:20.900 what i'm even

00:52:22.520 talking about

00:52:23.300 i mean

00:52:24.340 i i don't know

00:52:26.500 what's happening

00:52:26.940 here

00:52:27.660 scott scott

00:52:29.740 scott

00:52:30.120 let me explain

00:52:31.800 it to you

00:52:32.220 in the past

00:52:33.960 there have

00:52:35.600 been recounts

00:52:36.680 many times in

00:52:38.080 the past

00:52:38.360 there have

00:52:38.600 been recounts

00:52:39.320 those recounts

00:52:40.800 few hundred

00:52:41.600 votes

00:52:42.020 does not

00:52:43.620 change the

00:52:44.400 outcome

00:52:44.860 scott scott

00:52:46.340 scott

00:52:46.660 you fool

00:52:47.760 okay but

00:52:51.580 dale the

00:52:52.380 argument here

00:52:53.180 is not

00:52:55.440 that this

00:52:56.400 this year

00:52:57.340 would be just

00:52:58.160 like other

00:52:58.740 years

00:52:59.240 nobody's making

00:53:01.060 that claim

00:53:01.700 the claim

00:53:02.680 is that

00:53:03.480 after four

00:53:04.080 years of

00:53:04.700 this president

00:53:05.260 being compared

00:53:06.200 to hitler

00:53:07.720 that the

00:53:09.400 incentive

00:53:09.900 this election

00:53:11.480 was to get

00:53:13.300 rid of him

00:53:13.740 at all

00:53:14.180 costs

00:53:14.640 even at

00:53:15.660 the cost

00:53:16.100 of breaking

00:53:16.500 the law

00:53:17.040 because that

00:53:17.900 would be

00:53:18.240 morally

00:53:18.640 and ethical

00:53:19.460 ethically

00:53:20.580 supported

00:53:22.780 if you were

00:53:24.360 really doing

00:53:24.960 something to

00:53:25.480 get rid of

00:53:25.940 hitler

00:53:26.200 and that is

00:53:27.040 exactly what

00:53:27.840 your fake

00:53:28.320 news has

00:53:28.860 told democrats

00:53:30.200 they were

00:53:30.740 doing

00:53:31.140 so under

00:53:32.000 that very

00:53:32.460 specific

00:53:33.300 situation

00:53:34.120 the claim

00:53:35.180 is that

00:53:35.640 it's not

00:53:36.180 at all

00:53:36.700 comparable

00:53:37.760 to any

00:53:38.600 prior year

00:53:39.340 and that

00:53:40.300 looking at

00:53:40.820 prior years

00:53:41.540 could only

00:53:42.760 be misleading

00:53:43.760 because they

00:53:45.300 don't have

00:53:45.700 enough in

00:53:46.120 common

00:53:46.560 with this

00:53:47.600 very special

00:53:48.640 election

00:53:49.380 that had a

00:53:50.800 weird situation

00:53:51.920 with a

00:53:52.260 president trump

00:53:52.940 who was

00:53:53.740 compared to

00:53:54.300 hitler for

00:53:54.800 four years

00:53:55.360 so really

00:53:56.520 it's only

00:53:57.240 about this

00:53:58.000 election

00:53:58.460 that the

00:53:59.340 claim is

00:53:59.840 being made

00:54:00.520 i don't

00:54:03.840 think you

00:54:04.300 understand

00:54:04.820 scott

00:54:05.260 there have

00:54:06.320 been recounts

00:54:07.140 in the

00:54:07.360 past

00:54:07.800 they don't

00:54:09.860 find anything

00:54:10.820 a few

00:54:11.460 hundred votes

00:54:12.040 that's it

00:54:12.780 what the hell

00:54:14.140 is going on

00:54:14.900 here

00:54:15.200 what the hell

00:54:16.920 is going

00:54:17.540 on

00:54:18.060 are any

00:54:19.140 of my

00:54:19.520 words

00:54:20.060 that come

00:54:21.120 out of my

00:54:21.520 mouth

00:54:21.880 penetrating

00:54:23.360 your skull

00:54:24.300 we're in

00:54:25.380 agreement

00:54:25.940 no prior

00:54:27.580 year

00:54:28.200 is similar

00:54:29.000 to this

00:54:29.600 one

00:54:30.000 and

00:54:33.680 scene

00:54:34.260 so that's

00:54:35.400 what you

00:54:35.700 see on

00:54:36.020 tv

00:54:36.240 is just

00:54:36.720 a whole

00:54:36.980 bunch

00:54:37.200 of

00:54:37.340 dales

00:54:37.680 pretending

00:54:38.340 that you're

00:54:38.840 in a

00:54:39.100 different

00:54:39.340 argument

00:54:39.760 and

00:54:41.120 what do

00:54:42.580 you do

00:54:42.860 with people

00:54:43.360 who pretend

00:54:44.000 they're in a

00:54:44.500 different

00:54:44.740 argument

00:54:45.180 they're not

00:54:47.180 even addressing

00:54:47.920 anything that's

00:54:48.700 coming out of

00:54:49.180 your mouth 0.72

00:54:49.660 and they

00:54:50.220 act like

00:54:51.080 they are

00:54:51.580 it's the

00:54:52.820 weirdest

00:54:53.100 damn thing

00:54:53.740 isn't it

00:54:54.580 alright

00:54:55.760 here are

00:54:57.700 some things

00:54:58.260 that you

00:54:58.900 would have

00:54:59.260 to believe

00:54:59.840 in order

00:55:00.680 to believe

00:55:01.340 that there's

00:55:02.500 definitely

00:55:03.140 no

00:55:04.620 no problems

00:55:07.220 with the

00:55:07.560 election

00:55:07.860 alright

00:55:08.320 so you

00:55:09.380 would have

00:55:09.660 to believe

00:55:10.240 the following

00:55:11.060 things

00:55:11.720 okay

00:55:12.940 now I'm

00:55:13.680 not

00:55:14.000 if anybody

00:55:15.500 is joining

00:55:16.200 late

00:55:16.580 I do

00:55:17.420 not make

00:55:17.940 the claim

00:55:18.540 I do

00:55:19.620 not make

00:55:20.160 the claim

00:55:20.700 that widespread

00:55:22.200 or even

00:55:23.100 targeted

00:55:23.560 fraud

00:55:24.060 has yet

00:55:25.220 been

00:55:25.500 demonstrated

00:55:26.260 factually

00:55:27.520 in public

00:55:28.900 I don't

00:55:29.960 make that

00:55:30.320 claim

00:55:30.600 I do

00:55:31.620 make the

00:55:32.000 claim

00:55:32.320 that you

00:55:32.800 haven't

00:55:33.100 seen the

00:55:33.460 good stuff

00:55:33.940 yet

00:55:34.240 now whether

00:55:35.500 that makes

00:55:36.840 a difference

00:55:37.300 or not

00:55:37.800 we'll see

00:55:39.620 but here's

00:55:41.680 what you

00:55:41.960 would have

00:55:42.260 to believe

00:55:42.820 to believe

00:55:43.900 that there's

00:55:44.360 no problem

00:55:44.920 with the

00:55:45.280 election

00:55:45.620 that's big

00:55:46.220 enough

00:55:46.560 that could 0.68

00:55:47.880 change

00:55:48.200 things

00:55:48.540 first of all

00:55:49.680 you'd have

00:55:50.040 to wonder

00:55:50.440 why there

00:55:50.940 are no

00:55:51.240 data scientists

00:55:52.100 on the

00:55:52.640 democratic

00:55:53.100 side

00:55:53.620 who are

00:55:54.660 debunking

00:55:55.400 the data

00:55:56.260 scientists

00:55:56.880 who say

00:55:57.660 hey I'm

00:55:58.260 looking at

00:55:58.680 this data

00:55:59.200 and it

00:55:59.900 looks like

00:56:00.240 there's a

00:56:00.600 lot of

00:56:00.840 trouble

00:56:01.080 here

00:56:01.360 where are

00:56:02.720 those

00:56:02.960 people

00:56:03.300 so your

00:56:04.420 first thing

00:56:04.820 you have

00:56:05.060 to ask

00:56:05.380 yourself

00:56:05.640 is

00:56:05.900 where are

00:56:07.080 all our

00:56:07.500 data

00:56:07.940 scientists

00:56:08.660 because I

00:56:10.000 can't tell

00:56:10.500 if Dr.

00:56:11.180 Shiva

00:56:11.440 has a

00:56:12.860 good point

00:56:13.420 but maybe

00:56:14.660 our top

00:56:15.780 data scientists

00:56:16.900 can

00:56:17.220 maybe they

00:56:18.400 should weigh

00:56:18.800 in

00:56:19.060 where are

00:56:20.080 they

00:56:20.420 all right

00:56:21.320 so that's

00:56:21.660 the first

00:56:22.020 thing you're

00:56:22.480 going to have

00:56:22.660 to wonder

00:56:22.980 is like

00:56:23.260 where are

00:56:24.240 your experts

00:56:25.080 the other

00:56:27.180 thing is

00:56:27.720 when your

00:56:28.780 news reports

00:56:29.780 that they

00:56:30.380 can't find

00:56:31.160 any of

00:56:32.600 this alleged

00:56:33.400 fraud

00:56:34.120 where are

00:56:35.700 they looking

00:56:36.280 exactly

00:56:36.880 if I

00:56:38.540 tell you

00:56:38.960 that I

00:56:39.300 looked in

00:56:39.680 my pants

00:56:40.260 pocket

00:56:40.660 for diamonds

00:56:41.360 and I

00:56:42.220 didn't find

00:56:42.700 any

00:56:42.980 have I

00:56:44.100 proven

00:56:44.520 that diamonds

00:56:45.260 don't exist

00:56:46.180 no not

00:56:47.680 really

00:56:48.060 I've only

00:56:48.780 proven that

00:56:49.440 where I

00:56:49.880 looked

00:56:50.300 I didn't

00:56:51.020 find any

00:56:51.680 and they're

00:56:52.560 trying to

00:56:53.000 sell this

00:56:53.480 to the

00:56:53.900 idiots

00:56:54.320 in the

00:56:54.680 public

00:56:55.060 as if

00:56:55.940 that means

00:56:56.520 there are

00:56:57.080 no problems

00:56:57.780 yeah if I

00:56:58.720 look in

00:56:59.040 the wrong

00:56:59.380 place

00:56:59.840 no problem

00:57:01.360 how about

00:57:02.640 looking at

00:57:03.620 the right

00:57:04.100 place

00:57:04.560 which would

00:57:05.340 be an

00:57:05.660 audit of

00:57:06.320 let's say

00:57:06.720 this

00:57:07.000 dominion

00:57:07.580 software

00:57:08.080 when the

00:57:09.260 New York

00:57:09.540 Times says

00:57:10.140 there's no

00:57:10.580 evidence of

00:57:11.260 fraud

00:57:11.600 does that

00:57:12.620 mean that

00:57:13.020 they have

00:57:13.360 personally

00:57:13.860 audited the

00:57:14.780 code of

00:57:15.720 dominion

00:57:16.160 software

00:57:16.600 or does

00:57:17.980 it mean

00:57:18.300 that they

00:57:18.620 looked in

00:57:19.080 all the

00:57:19.400 places where

00:57:20.060 there probably

00:57:20.620 isn't any

00:57:21.300 fraud and

00:57:22.300 then they

00:57:22.640 didn't find

00:57:23.140 any

00:57:23.420 you have to

00:57:24.880 ask yourself

00:57:25.600 why are

00:57:26.900 your sources

00:57:27.860 of news

00:57:28.640 looking in

00:57:29.940 the wrong

00:57:30.340 places

00:57:30.980 so that

00:57:33.420 would be a

00:57:33.760 question

00:57:34.100 why would

00:57:35.940 you think

00:57:36.340 that this

00:57:36.880 year or

00:57:37.640 this election

00:57:38.300 would be

00:57:38.820 anything like

00:57:39.540 prior elections

00:57:40.600 in terms of

00:57:41.360 the degree

00:57:41.940 of fraud

00:57:42.600 I think

00:57:43.260 everybody agrees

00:57:44.100 there's a

00:57:44.420 little bit of

00:57:44.800 fraud all

00:57:45.240 the time

00:57:45.660 but why

00:57:47.020 would this

00:57:47.460 year be

00:57:48.320 comparable

00:57:48.820 as Dale

00:57:51.020 is arguing

00:57:51.600 it wouldn't

00:57:52.400 be

00:57:52.620 so if you're

00:57:53.760 thinking that

00:57:54.360 the fraud of

00:57:55.140 the past

00:57:55.700 and the

00:57:56.060 recounts of

00:57:56.920 the past

00:57:57.460 are indicative

00:57:58.700 of what we're

00:57:59.460 likely to find

00:58:00.200 this year

00:58:00.640 that's just

00:58:01.480 batshit

00:58:01.960 crazy

00:58:02.360 if you

00:58:03.520 think

00:58:03.920 that this

00:58:04.940 is

00:58:05.180 just like

00:58:06.440 other years

00:58:07.160 you don't

00:58:08.460 have a leg

00:58:08.940 to stand

00:58:09.360 on

00:58:09.720 Biden's

00:58:12.420 chief of

00:58:12.800 staff

00:58:13.160 this guy

00:58:13.580 Ron

00:58:14.060 Klain

00:58:14.520 back in

00:58:15.680 2014

00:58:16.900 and of

00:58:17.480 course

00:58:17.760 it doesn't

00:58:18.760 take long

00:58:19.220 for people

00:58:19.760 to find out

00:58:20.300 what people

00:58:20.760 have said

00:58:21.080 in the

00:58:21.320 past

00:58:21.660 he responded

00:58:23.740 to a tweet

00:58:24.360 by Vox

00:58:25.200 that said

00:58:25.940 they did a

00:58:26.380 survey and

00:58:26.860 found that

00:58:27.200 68% of

00:58:28.220 Americans

00:58:28.700 think elections

00:58:29.780 are rigged

00:58:30.560 this is

00:58:31.460 2014

00:58:32.100 right

00:58:32.720 so in

00:58:33.540 2014

00:58:34.140 68%

00:58:35.680 of Americans

00:58:36.260 thought

00:58:36.620 elections

00:58:37.140 are rigged

00:58:37.740 what did

00:58:38.740 Biden's

00:58:39.400 now selected

00:58:40.460 chief of

00:58:41.180 staff

00:58:41.480 say

00:58:41.860 on his

00:58:43.380 tweet

00:58:43.720 he said

00:58:44.900 because

00:58:46.300 they are

00:58:46.960 so

00:58:48.340 Biden's

00:58:49.520 own

00:58:49.780 chief of

00:58:50.240 staff

00:58:50.620 has said

00:58:51.360 in public

00:58:51.940 that he

00:58:52.720 agrees

00:58:53.200 with the

00:58:53.580 statement

00:58:53.960 that elections

00:58:55.260 are rigged

00:58:56.440 do you think

00:58:57.980 it got

00:58:58.300 fixed

00:58:58.740 since

00:58:59.280 2014

00:58:59.960 do you

00:59:01.000 think

00:59:01.200 that somebody

00:59:01.740 who is

00:59:02.420 connected

00:59:03.020 enough

00:59:03.640 to politics

00:59:04.500 to be

00:59:05.380 selected

00:59:05.820 as

00:59:06.320 Biden's

00:59:06.980 chief

00:59:07.260 of

00:59:07.440 staff

00:59:07.760 as

00:59:07.980 president

00:59:08.400 do you

00:59:09.320 think

00:59:09.500 that such

00:59:10.000 a person

00:59:10.480 is close

00:59:11.380 enough

00:59:11.840 and connected

00:59:13.240 enough

00:59:13.720 with the

00:59:14.340 machinery

00:59:15.620 of elections

00:59:16.660 that when

00:59:17.760 he says

00:59:18.260 in public

00:59:18.780 that elections

00:59:19.620 are rigged

00:59:20.860 do you think

00:59:21.380 he's

00:59:21.640 guessing

00:59:22.040 probably

00:59:24.600 not

00:59:24.980 guessing

00:59:25.560 probably

00:59:27.040 not

00:59:27.500 you would

00:59:30.940 also have

00:59:31.440 to believe

00:59:31.940 if you

00:59:32.340 believe

00:59:32.640 that there's

00:59:33.100 definitely

00:59:33.520 not any

00:59:34.220 widespread

00:59:35.080 or significant

00:59:36.180 fraud that

00:59:36.740 would change

00:59:37.160 the election

00:59:37.620 you would

00:59:38.640 have to

00:59:38.960 believe

00:59:39.220 that both

00:59:39.680 Rudy Giuliani

00:59:40.700 and Trump

00:59:41.800 himself

00:59:42.400 have not

00:59:44.860 seen

00:59:45.420 better evidence

00:59:46.900 than you

00:59:47.440 have so far

00:59:48.140 seen

00:59:48.520 do you

00:59:49.720 believe that

00:59:50.240 do you believe

00:59:51.200 you've seen

00:59:51.700 all the good

00:59:52.220 stuff

00:59:52.640 because they're

00:59:54.180 telling you

00:59:54.700 you haven't

00:59:55.460 and

00:59:57.200 would

00:59:58.180 Rudy

00:59:58.780 go

01:00:00.040 that far

01:00:00.780 out on a

01:00:01.320 limb

01:00:01.580 if he didn't

01:00:02.660 think he had

01:00:03.220 the goods

01:00:03.760 let me ask

01:00:05.060 you this

01:00:05.540 who can

01:00:06.680 sniff out

01:00:07.360 corruption

01:00:07.940 and fraud

01:00:09.960 better than

01:00:11.360 Rudy Giuliani

01:00:12.380 do you think

01:00:14.740 there's anybody

01:00:15.240 who has a

01:00:15.720 better nose

01:00:16.560 for fraud

01:00:17.860 than Rudy

01:00:18.920 Giuliani

01:00:19.480 and if he

01:00:20.560 were to be

01:00:21.060 doing this

01:00:21.580 whole big

01:00:22.080 effort

01:00:22.440 and it's

01:00:23.360 based on

01:00:23.820 nothing

01:00:24.220 would he

01:00:26.140 do it

01:00:26.540 and would

01:00:27.600 he know

01:00:27.920 he was

01:00:28.240 doing it

01:00:28.620 based on

01:00:29.060 nothing

01:00:29.340 well I

01:00:30.220 think he

01:00:30.560 would know

01:00:31.140 if there's

01:00:32.380 something there

01:00:33.080 I feel he

01:00:34.540 would know

01:00:34.980 I feel the

01:00:36.160 things we've

01:00:36.660 seen so far

01:00:37.360 might be a

01:00:38.080 stalling move

01:00:39.400 meaning that

01:00:40.620 they're keeping

01:00:41.520 the question

01:00:43.020 of fraud

01:00:43.620 alive with

01:00:44.540 these less

01:00:45.340 credible

01:00:45.860 accusations

01:00:46.600 because it

01:00:47.500 just keeps

01:00:47.900 the topic

01:00:48.400 alive

01:00:48.840 then

01:00:50.000 should they

01:00:51.100 come in

01:00:51.440 with better

01:00:51.880 information

01:00:52.380 you have

01:00:52.880 a live

01:00:53.320 topic

01:00:53.700 you don't

01:00:54.040 have to

01:00:54.340 resurrect

01:00:54.700 it

01:00:55.040 so I

01:00:55.780 think what

01:00:56.320 you're

01:00:56.500 seeing

01:00:56.800 is the

01:00:57.720 weaker

01:00:58.080 claims

01:00:58.700 you know

01:00:59.800 just sort

01:01:00.220 of softening

01:01:00.920 up the

01:01:01.260 room

01:01:01.640 they'll

01:01:02.740 probably be

01:01:03.380 debunked

01:01:04.040 but the

01:01:04.460 strong stuff

01:01:05.120 would come

01:01:05.620 later

01:01:05.960 if it

01:01:08.420 does

01:01:08.660 all right

01:01:09.080 so do you

01:01:10.160 believe that

01:01:10.600 Giuliani and

01:01:11.560 Trump would

01:01:12.140 do what

01:01:12.520 they're doing

01:01:12.900 now if

01:01:13.460 they hadn't

01:01:13.960 seen better

01:01:14.700 evidence

01:01:15.320 than you

01:01:16.760 have seen

01:01:17.100 so far

01:01:17.600 and then

01:01:20.180 of course

01:01:20.460 you'd have

01:01:20.780 to believe

01:01:21.200 that the

01:01:21.720 most corrupt

01:01:22.540 institutions

01:01:23.300 in the

01:01:24.000 country

01:01:24.320 this time

01:01:25.920 are telling

01:01:26.280 you the

01:01:26.600 truth

01:01:26.920 they've

01:01:28.700 never told

01:01:29.180 you the

01:01:29.460 truth

01:01:29.720 before

01:01:30.200 but you

01:01:31.300 would have

01:01:31.580 to believe

01:01:31.940 that this

01:01:32.320 time

01:01:32.640 this time

01:01:34.000 they decided

01:01:34.500 to tell

01:01:34.840 the truth

01:01:35.180 so

01:01:36.580 it's not

01:01:37.780 impossible

01:01:38.460 it's definitely

01:01:39.520 not impossible

01:01:40.280 that the

01:01:41.060 election will

01:01:41.620 stand

01:01:42.100 and it will

01:01:42.900 stand because

01:01:43.520 there wasn't

01:01:43.980 enough fraud

01:01:44.600 to change

01:01:45.880 anything

01:01:46.200 totally

01:01:46.920 possible

01:01:47.380 but if

01:01:48.580 you think

01:01:48.960 there's no

01:01:49.540 chance

01:01:50.060 that this

01:01:51.600 election was

01:01:52.520 rigged at a

01:01:53.280 sufficient level

01:01:53.960 to actually

01:01:54.360 change it

01:01:54.880 if you think

01:01:55.740 the answer

01:01:56.120 to that is

01:01:56.720 zero

01:01:57.700 you're a

01:01:59.340 fucking

01:01:59.660 idiot

01:02:00.140 sorry

01:02:03.260 there's no

01:02:04.800 way around

01:02:05.200 that

01:02:05.480 if you think

01:02:07.100 it could have

01:02:07.940 happened

01:02:08.300 or you think

01:02:09.280 it's unlikely

01:02:09.980 those are all

01:02:11.140 reasonable

01:02:11.580 opinions

01:02:12.120 maybe it

01:02:13.100 happened

01:02:13.460 maybe it

01:02:14.140 didn't

01:02:14.440 pretty reasonable

01:02:15.260 if you think

01:02:16.740 that the

01:02:17.240 absence

01:02:17.660 of proof

01:02:18.660 so far

01:02:19.820 is all

01:02:22.520 you need

01:02:22.900 to know

01:02:23.360 about this

01:02:24.600 being a

01:02:24.980 fair election

01:02:25.540 you're a

01:02:26.620 fucking

01:02:26.880 idiot

01:02:27.220 you're a

01:02:28.260 fucking

01:02:28.520 idiot

01:02:28.860 there's no

01:02:29.780 way around

01:02:30.200 that

01:02:30.520 because we

01:02:31.640 don't know

01:02:31.960 how this

01:02:32.300 will turn

01:02:32.620 out

01:02:32.900 that's the

01:02:34.120 point

01:02:34.360 nobody knows

01:02:35.580 how it

01:02:35.840 will turn

01:02:36.120 out

01:02:36.400 and if

01:02:36.980 you think

01:02:37.340 there

01:02:37.520 couldn't

01:02:37.960 have

01:02:38.140 been

01:02:38.460 enough

01:02:39.540 fraud

01:02:40.100 you're

01:02:41.260 just a

01:02:41.540 fucking

01:02:41.760 idiot

01:02:42.120 all right

01:02:44.880 that's

01:02:47.800 about all

01:02:48.460 I need

01:02:48.920 to say

01:02:49.580 on this

01:02:50.940 I think

01:02:51.420 I've said

01:02:52.040 everything

01:02:52.340 I need

01:02:52.760 to say

01:02:53.240 probably

01:02:55.020 I think

01:02:56.380 I have

01:02:56.740 checking

01:02:57.520 my notes

01:02:58.020 looking good

01:02:59.180 all right

01:02:59.680 that's all

01:02:59.960 I have

01:03:00.220 for today

01:03:00.620 somebody

01:03:02.140 said

01:03:02.440 did you

01:03:02.760 just

01:03:03.060 insult

01:03:03.460 my

01:03:03.700 ex-wife

01:03:04.220 perhaps

01:03:05.900 I did

01:03:06.560 you're

01:03:07.260 welcome

01:03:07.560 somebody

01:03:09.500 says

01:03:09.840 the facts

01:03:10.360 say

01:03:10.620 I'm

01:03:10.940 not

01:03:11.120 an

01:03:11.280 idiot

01:03:11.560 which

01:03:12.760 facts

01:03:13.100 are

01:03:13.240 those

01:03:13.560 so

01:03:14.860 basically

01:03:15.360 90%

01:03:16.120 of the

01:03:16.380 media

01:03:16.640 no

01:03:17.000 actually

01:03:17.480 the

01:03:18.180 media

01:03:18.500 is

01:03:18.700 just

01:03:18.900 lying

01:03:19.380 the

01:03:20.440 people

01:03:21.000 in the

01:03:21.960 professional

01:03:23.000 jobs

01:03:24.140 the

01:03:24.480 professional

01:03:25.040 media

01:03:25.420 they know

01:03:26.420 that

01:03:26.760 this

01:03:28.200 election

01:03:28.780 could be

01:03:29.200 fraudulent

01:03:29.760 I refuse

01:03:30.960 to believe

01:03:31.640 there's

01:03:32.040 anybody

01:03:32.380 on CNN

01:03:32.940 or MSNBC 0.85

01:03:34.140 who's

01:03:35.460 a high

01:03:36.260 level

01:03:36.620 person

01:03:37.140 who's

01:03:37.400 been around

01:03:37.820 the real

01:03:38.240 world

01:03:38.600 long

01:03:38.900 enough

01:03:39.200 and

01:03:39.380 seen

01:03:40.080 enough

01:03:40.400 real

01:03:40.660 news

01:03:41.080 I don't

01:03:41.760 think

01:03:41.960 there's

01:03:42.180 anybody

01:03:42.520 on CNN

01:03:43.080 who

01:03:43.860 thinks

01:03:44.180 it's

01:03:44.400 impossible

01:03:45.020 there are

01:03:46.860 a lot

01:03:47.100 of people

01:03:47.380 on CNN

01:03:47.840 who

01:03:48.820 hope

01:03:49.500 it's

01:03:49.800 true

01:03:50.080 that

01:03:50.880 there

01:03:51.040 wasn't

01:03:51.340 that

01:03:51.540 much

01:03:51.800 fraud

01:03:52.160 and

01:03:52.880 there

01:03:53.000 are

01:03:53.080 plenty

01:03:53.280 of

01:03:53.400 people

01:03:53.600 who

01:03:53.780 know

01:03:54.000 it

01:03:54.180 hasn't

01:03:54.480 happened

01:03:54.700 in the

01:03:54.960 past

01:03:55.360 or at

01:03:55.820 least

01:03:55.980 identified

01:03:56.640 and

01:03:58.000 there

01:03:58.240 are

01:03:58.340 plenty

01:03:58.540 of

01:03:58.680 people

01:03:58.860 who

01:03:59.060 want

01:03:59.240 you

01:03:59.360 to

01:03:59.560 believe

01:03:59.880 it's

01:04:00.160 not

01:04:00.380 true

01:04:00.660 but

01:04:01.860 no

01:04:02.380 I

01:04:02.680 don't

01:04:02.960 believe

01:04:03.420 that

01:04:03.760 the

01:04:04.160 Jake

01:04:04.880 Tappers

01:04:05.500 the

01:04:05.920 Don

01:04:06.160 Lemons

01:04:06.560 I

01:04:07.140 do

01:04:07.320 not

01:04:07.600 believe

01:04:07.940 they

01:04:08.160 fall

01:04:08.440 into

01:04:08.640 the

01:04:08.840 category

01:04:09.320 of

01:04:09.760 idiots

01:04:10.360 the

01:04:11.520 idiots

01:04:11.980 would

01:04:12.240 be

01:04:12.360 the

01:04:12.540 public

01:04:13.040 who

01:04:13.840 believe

01:04:14.240 what

01:04:14.480 they're

01:04:14.660 saying

01:04:14.980 the

01:04:16.040 people

01:04:16.340 who

01:04:16.560 are

01:04:16.700 saying

01:04:17.080 things

01:04:17.480 that

01:04:17.760 even

01:04:18.040 they

01:04:18.280 don't

01:04:18.500 believe

01:04:18.880 are

01:04:19.800 not

01:04:20.020 idiots

01:04:20.480 there's

01:04:21.260 something

01:04:21.520 else

01:04:21.780 going

01:04:22.020 on

01:04:22.360 right

01:04:22.900 they're

01:04:23.460 persuading

01:04:24.100 they're

01:04:24.560 taking

01:04:24.900 a team

01:04:25.460 side

01:04:25.840 maybe

01:04:26.500 they

01:04:26.700 think

01:04:26.900 they're

01:04:27.060 helping

01:04:27.300 the

01:04:27.480 world

01:04:27.760 but

01:04:28.640 what

01:04:28.840 is

01:04:29.040 not

01:04:29.300 happening

01:04:29.660 is

01:04:29.860 stupidity

01:04:30.440 in

01:04:31.300 their

01:04:31.500 case

01:04:31.840 but

01:04:32.560 they

01:04:32.820 are

01:04:33.140 talking

01:04:33.580 to

01:04:33.780 idiots

01:04:34.180 and

01:04:34.520 they

01:04:34.640 are

01:04:34.800 convincing

01:04:35.440 idiots

01:04:35.940 so

01:04:37.040 that's

01:04:37.500 definitely

01:04:37.780 happening

01:04:38.180 all

01:04:39.060 right

01:04:39.300 you

01:04:40.120 seen

01:04:40.320 a lot

01:04:40.540 of

01:04:40.640 trolls

01:04:40.920 on

01:04:41.140 this

01:04:41.400 broadcast

01:04:42.180 I

01:04:42.780 don't

01:04:42.900 see

01:04:43.080 too

01:04:43.280 many

01:04:43.520 it's

01:04:44.480 not

01:04:44.680 as

01:04:44.840 bad

01:04:45.040 as

01:04:45.180 it

01:04:45.320 could

01:04:45.660 be

01:04:45.860 I

01:04:46.660 would

01:04:46.820 say

01:04:47.000 that

01:04:47.200 the

01:04:47.400 trolling

01:04:47.980 is

01:04:48.640 way

01:04:49.280 less

01:04:49.780 this

01:04:50.320 election

01:04:50.740 not

01:04:51.160 even

01:04:51.420 close

01:04:52.060 the

01:04:52.860 amount

01:04:53.240 of

01:04:53.600 paid

01:04:54.200 trolls

01:04:54.640 in

01:04:55.020 2016

01:04:55.640 was

01:04:56.080 just

01:04:56.280 crazy

01:04:56.760 the

01:04:57.540 amount

01:04:57.840 of

01:04:58.040 trolls

01:04:58.420 that

01:04:58.680 came

01:04:58.900 after

01:04:59.160 me

01:04:59.380 this

01:04:59.640 year

01:04:59.880 kind

01:05:01.520 of

01:05:01.640 trivial

01:05:02.000 now

01:05:02.800 I

01:05:03.060 think

01:05:03.780 some

01:05:04.140 of

01:05:04.280 it

01:05:04.400 is

01:05:04.560 because

01:05:04.880 I

01:05:05.080 learned

01:05:05.360 how

01:05:05.520 to

01:05:05.640 block

01:05:05.920 them

01:05:06.140 better

01:05:06.400 but

01:05:07.200 I

01:05:07.320 think

01:05:07.460 there

01:05:07.580 just

01:05:07.760 weren't

01:05:08.020 as

01:05:08.160 many

01:05:08.420 all

01:05:10.500 right

01:05:10.660 that's

01:05:11.600 all

01:05:11.720 I

01:05:11.800 got

01:05:11.920 for

01:05:12.080 now

01:05:12.380 and

01:05:13.520 I

01:05:13.700 will

01:05:13.880 talk

01:05:14.140 to

01:05:15.860 more

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 12, 2020

Episode 1185 Scott Adams： How Biden Will Destroy the Democrat Party by 2024

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript