Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 18, 2020


Episode 1191 Scott Adams: Show us the Kraken or Maybe we Stop Believing it is Coming


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per Minute

139.98805

Word Count

9,368

Sentence Count

562

Misogynist Sentences

5

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

Coffee with Scott Adams and a special guest to talk about a printer that won't print, a deal with Mexico to pay for a border wall repair, and why the news is boring without Trump. Plus, a story about a guy who thinks the generals are right about troop levels.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum
00:00:07.000 Hey everybody! Come on in. It's time. Yeah, it's time for Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:14.120 Best time of the day and we'll be looking for the Kraken today.
00:00:17.980 Yes we will. But first I would like your opinion.
00:00:22.120 I've been trying to print my notes for today to my printer.
00:00:26.600 My printer has decided not to print my notes.
00:00:32.680 It doesn't give me an error message, doesn't tell me what to do, has plenty of paper and plenty of ink, but it just won't print.
00:00:40.560 And what I need for you is an opinion.
00:00:43.860 Should I rip it out of the wall and throw it off of my balcony so we can watch it crash in pieces on my sidewalk below?
00:00:52.260 Or should I just calm down and let it go?
00:00:57.860 So I'll leave it to you.
00:00:59.680 Should I destroy it on camera?
00:01:02.040 Or should I let it go?
00:01:04.140 But first, in order to enjoy this day to the maximum,
00:01:08.340 you're going to need a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or gel,
00:01:10.540 just not a canteen jug or a flask or vessel of any kind.
00:01:13.700 And fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:01:15.580 And join me now for the ultimate.
00:01:21.320 It's the dopamine hit of the day.
00:01:22.940 It's the thing that makes everything better, except the cracking.
00:01:26.920 And it happens now. It's called the simultaneous sip.
00:01:29.520 Go.
00:01:33.700 Ooh.
00:01:34.880 Yep.
00:01:36.400 That's pretty good.
00:01:37.400 All right. Well, let me look at my little notes on my tiny little phone,
00:01:42.460 because I can't print them out,
00:01:44.420 because my printer just isn't getting it done today.
00:01:51.240 Yes, I did restart it. That didn't work.
00:01:53.460 All right.
00:01:54.220 Have you noticed that the news is boring without Trump?
00:01:59.040 Is there anybody who's noticed that yet?
00:02:00.780 You know, all Trump has to do is dial back his own public efforts by, you know,
00:02:08.920 30 percent or whatever, and suddenly there's no news.
00:02:12.940 Because the news industry completely stopped, you know, looking for actual news,
00:02:18.740 and they just started reporting on whatever Trump said and then insulting him.
00:02:23.900 And that was it.
00:02:25.380 That was the whole thing.
00:02:26.480 So, all right, there are enough people telling me that I should recycle my printer,
00:02:35.900 that I'm going to do it, but only to show you that it doesn't work, okay?
00:02:39.980 Hold on. Hold on right there.
00:02:55.040 All right, I'm back.
00:02:56.480 So, I'm going to recycle my printer.
00:02:59.100 If that doesn't work, maybe we'll throw it off the balcony.
00:03:03.440 All right.
00:03:06.460 We'll let that reboot for a moment.
00:03:12.860 So, it looks like the United States is getting money from Mexico for the wall.
00:03:22.020 Not directly.
00:03:23.020 My printer is making noise now.
00:03:27.360 Not directly, but apparently we have some kind of deal with Mexico that if somebody tries to destroy the wall to get through it,
00:03:37.460 that they will be fined to pay for the repair, and Mexico will collect that fine and give it to the United States.
00:03:43.500 And apparently that's actually happening.
00:03:45.420 So, if a Mexican wannabe illegal migrant hurts the wall, we get paid to fix the wall.
00:03:57.600 That's not nothing.
00:03:58.440 Better than nothing.
00:04:00.260 But it's not Mexico paying for the wall, of course.
00:04:03.020 Another big story is the president wants to draw down forces in Afghanistan and maybe other places.
00:04:11.640 And somebody says, where did I go?
00:04:18.280 Oh, you saw me go off screen.
00:04:20.040 And here's a little story that is good context for deciding whether the president or the generals and the pundits are the ones who are right about troop levels.
00:04:33.700 And here's my story.
00:04:36.200 Years ago, I used to be a budget guy at a big bank and then the phone company.
00:04:41.860 And at the phone company, my job was to go to all the individual departments and say, how much budget do you need for next year?
00:04:51.060 And then I would sum up all of their detailed requests and take it to the big boss.
00:04:56.920 So, I summed up all the individual budget requests, took it to the boss, and it was too much.
00:05:03.240 The budget was higher than he could afford.
00:05:05.580 So, I thought that what would happen next is he would look at each of the individual department requests,
00:05:11.820 and then each one individually he would look at and say, okay, they're asking for a little bit too much,
00:05:18.140 or this one's a higher priority than this one, so we'll cut this one, but we'll fund this one.
00:05:24.580 None of that happened.
00:05:27.300 Instead, the big boss looked at me and he said, cut everybody's budget by 10%.
00:05:33.240 And I said, well, that doesn't make any sense.
00:05:36.580 That would be completely irrational because all of these managers have done detailed studies
00:05:41.400 to find out exactly what budget they need to do the job that you've told them they have to do.
00:05:46.200 So, you can't just cut it 10%, because some people probably padded it, maybe some people didn't ask for enough.
00:05:55.480 It's completely irrational to just cut it 10% across the board.
00:06:01.400 And so, I made my argument that that didn't make sense, and the big boss looked at me and he said,
00:06:07.780 just cut it all by 10%, just cut it all by 10%, and watch everybody make it work.
00:06:13.720 So, I did.
00:06:15.520 I cut everybody's budget by 10%, and what do you think happened?
00:06:21.200 They made it work.
00:06:23.340 Didn't make any difference.
00:06:24.600 So, 100% of the underlings complained bitterly because their detailed budget was just ignored.
00:06:34.600 And they just said, I just give them 10% less than last year.
00:06:38.120 That was it.
00:06:39.100 And it worked out fine.
00:06:42.380 There wasn't a single problem that happened because of that decision.
00:06:46.620 Now, when Trump says to his generals, you need to draw down these forces, what do the generals say?
00:06:54.280 No way.
00:06:55.580 We've done a detailed study, and we can't possibly operate without this many people.
00:07:02.480 We're at the bare minimum.
00:07:04.240 In fact, you should be adding people, not subtracting people in Afghanistan.
00:07:09.000 And what does a good, experienced, big boss say in that situation?
00:07:16.800 When all of the experts, all of them, every general, every person who's fought there,
00:07:22.900 every one of them says, no, you can't cut those forces.
00:07:27.280 Cut it anyway.
00:07:29.280 Cut it anyway.
00:07:31.680 Here, we'll take care of you so you don't have to suffer.
00:07:36.160 Problem solved.
00:07:37.000 So, if you've ever worked in a big company, you know that the president is the one who's
00:07:47.260 playing the smart game with Afghanistan.
00:07:50.700 Nobody knows how many people we need there.
00:07:54.240 But less, at least, is leadership, right?
00:07:58.540 At least if you say, my goal is to get rid of all of them, and I'm going to do it as fast
00:08:03.860 as I possibly can.
00:08:05.000 At least it's leadership.
00:08:07.000 And I feel like the generals, et cetera, will make it work.
00:08:12.760 So, apparently, he's going to draw down some forces, and they will make it work.
00:08:18.000 Amazon is going into the pharmacy business, which could be a gigantic deal.
00:08:25.540 Because I feel as if Amazon should be your doctor.
00:08:31.100 I took some blood tests and urine tests the other day.
00:08:37.360 So, I got a full panel of, you know, just generic blood tests.
00:08:43.040 Now, everything's fine.
00:08:44.560 So, that's the good news.
00:08:45.740 There was nothing to worry about.
00:08:47.160 But when I get the report, it's sent to me as the patient.
00:08:50.960 And it goes to my little online account.
00:08:53.680 And I take out my app, and I look at it.
00:08:55.620 And it's two pages of things that make no sense to me as a consumer.
00:09:01.340 Because I don't know what these little, you know, these various figures mean.
00:09:06.600 Now, it does tell you if you're within the field or not.
00:09:12.060 But it doesn't tell you if you had too much of this or too little of it, what would it mean?
00:09:17.700 Because some of the values are sort of, you know, toward the edge of the field.
00:09:22.260 Now, if they had made it friendly and simply said, look, here's your test.
00:09:27.920 And you can read it.
00:09:29.100 And if anything is confusing, just click on it.
00:09:32.220 And you can see a full description of what may be problems you might have if this indication is too high or whatever.
00:09:39.540 And it's completely useless the way it is.
00:09:43.940 Now, what is it that Amazon does amazingly well?
00:09:49.900 User interface, right?
00:09:51.840 The user interface for Amazon is just crazy.
00:09:55.840 It's so good.
00:09:56.900 And Apple does a good job of that stuff, too.
00:09:59.200 So if you see Amazon getting into the health business, the first thing you should say to yourself is,
00:10:06.280 are they going to make it simpler?
00:10:08.900 Shouldn't I be able to get a blood test anytime I want?
00:10:12.380 Because all they do is draw blood and send it off.
00:10:15.220 Shouldn't I be able to get that myself?
00:10:17.860 Pay $25 and just get one anytime I want.
00:10:21.840 And get results that I don't even need a doctor to look at.
00:10:25.840 That I can just read it and say, oh, this one says you should cut down on dessert and maybe exercise more because you're a little pre-diabetic.
00:10:33.900 I could completely understand that if they put it in English, but they put it in medical terms, so I can't.
00:10:40.380 Anyway, so if the only thing that Amazon did is start turning the medical field into something that has a good user interface that you could actually understand what you're looking at,
00:10:52.920 that would be gigantic and would certainly help the competitive situation.
00:10:59.160 So President Trump fired the homeland security cyber chief, Christopher Krebs, because Krebs had announced publicly that this was the most secure election ever.
00:11:13.360 And I guess if you're working for Trump at the moment and you say the election is the most secure one ever, you're going to get fired.
00:11:25.340 So he got fired.
00:11:28.100 And it's also being reported that the election officials in each state had been contacted, I think by the New York Times.
00:11:37.880 New York Times contacted all the election officials in each state and said, has there been any fraud or problems this year?
00:11:44.400 And every single state said, no problem.
00:11:50.940 So that's pretty good, right?
00:11:53.640 All the people who were in charge of the elections in each of these states have reported, and I think we can believe them,
00:12:01.500 that the people who were in charge of the elections did a great job, according to the people who were in charge of the elections.
00:12:09.820 And the New York Times asked the people who were in charge of the elections if the people in charge of the elections did a good job.
00:12:19.680 And the people in charge of the elections said, yes, the people in charge of the elections did a great job, maybe the best one ever.
00:12:27.840 It's possible that nobody's ever done a good job this good.
00:12:30.960 And the New York Times printed that like that was telling you something that you needed to know.
00:12:36.740 So here's a little experiment.
00:12:41.160 Go into any prison and ask the prisoners if they're guilty.
00:12:45.560 Some will say yes.
00:12:46.960 But you'll be amazed how many people in prison will tell you that they're innocent.
00:12:51.340 And they must be innocent, because you're asking the person who knows, right?
00:12:56.500 I mean, the person in prison, they have the most information,
00:13:01.080 the most credible information about whether they committed the crime.
00:13:04.440 Because they were a direct witness to whether they committed it or not.
00:13:08.880 So just ask them.
00:13:10.140 And if they say they're innocent, well, I think you have to free them.
00:13:13.980 Because that makes sense, right?
00:13:16.000 You ask the people who would be incriminating themselves if they answered one way.
00:13:22.000 You could trust that.
00:13:23.100 So when the guy who's in charge of making sure that our elections are fair
00:13:28.360 says that he did a terrific job, and it might be the best election fairness you've ever had,
00:13:34.340 fire that asshole.
00:13:37.260 You should fire that asshole.
00:13:40.780 Because he does not get to say,
00:13:44.320 the election is great because it was my job to make it great,
00:13:48.220 so trust me and give me a big promotion.
00:13:50.140 It just doesn't work that way.
00:13:53.520 If there wasn't somebody auditing him, you don't know, right?
00:13:59.660 Because the last person you should trust is that guy.
00:14:04.600 He's the one person in the whole country that you shouldn't believe.
00:14:09.880 Because if you go to any employee and say,
00:14:12.840 how'd you do?
00:14:14.380 Have you ever done an employee performance review?
00:14:17.280 Did you ever have your employee come in for an employee performance review?
00:14:22.000 You say, how'd you do?
00:14:24.020 And the employee says, you know, wasn't my best year.
00:14:27.900 I've had better years, honestly.
00:14:30.500 I feel like I didn't work very hard,
00:14:32.820 and everything I tried was a failure.
00:14:36.060 Has that ever happened?
00:14:38.460 No.
00:14:40.180 Nope.
00:14:40.700 And it never will happen.
00:14:43.280 Because if you ask people if they did a good job,
00:14:46.420 they're kind of going to say yes pretty much every time.
00:14:51.060 So we can't listen to any of the people who were in charge
00:14:54.560 to ask them if they did a good job.
00:14:57.440 The reason that you have a special,
00:15:00.320 what is it, a special counsel, Durham or whatever,
00:15:02.720 looking into the Department of Justice,
00:15:05.080 it's because you can't ask the Department of Justice
00:15:08.600 if they did a good job.
00:15:11.200 Because do you know what they'll say?
00:15:13.120 Yeah.
00:15:14.360 Yeah, we did great.
00:15:16.180 Best year ever.
00:15:19.440 So if you don't have a special counsel or an audit,
00:15:23.460 you don't have anything.
00:15:26.180 All right.
00:15:27.280 So that was a good firing.
00:15:29.080 Here's something that should have been in the news,
00:15:31.820 but instead it came to me in a DM on Twitter.
00:15:36.200 And so I need you to fact check me on this.
00:15:39.580 All right.
00:15:40.080 Because I should not be getting better information
00:15:42.500 from people on Twitter
00:15:45.020 than I should be from the professional news organizations.
00:15:49.140 I don't think what I'm going to read is correct.
00:15:52.880 So, you know, don't put too much faith in it
00:15:57.840 until you see some fact checking in the comments.
00:15:59.920 But, according to Kyle, who messaged me this morning,
00:16:07.020 he believes that he has seen in the news so far
00:16:09.720 four errors out of Georgia
00:16:11.620 because they're doing the recount there.
00:16:14.160 And in the following counties,
00:16:16.280 he says that the recount has had the following changes.
00:16:21.820 Floyd County, 800 more votes to Trump.
00:16:25.800 Fayette, 449 to Trump.
00:16:28.140 Walton, 176 to Trump.
00:16:31.860 And then DeKalb, if this is true,
00:16:34.640 9,626 to Trump.
00:16:38.200 Now, I need a fact check on that.
00:16:40.600 Is it true that there are four different counties
00:16:44.340 with problems in Georgia
00:16:45.880 and that the numbers I just read are...
00:16:50.940 Okay.
00:16:52.040 Let me pause.
00:16:53.060 I'll call it DeKalb, okay?
00:16:56.220 Instead of DeKalb, DeKalb, DeKalb.
00:17:00.240 Is that the correct pronunciation?
00:17:02.720 Do you think I care how they pronounce their county?
00:17:05.560 I don't.
00:17:07.320 If you put an extra letter in the spelling of your county,
00:17:13.020 I'm going to pronounce it any fucking way I want.
00:17:15.740 And I'm going to pronounce it with the L.
00:17:17.520 Get rid of the L.
00:17:18.340 If you don't want me to pronounce it the wrong way,
00:17:21.160 get the L out of there.
00:17:24.920 Anyway, so are there four counties?
00:17:28.420 And would the total of those four counties
00:17:30.880 be over 11,000 votes that have switched to Trump
00:17:35.380 and that Biden only won by 14,000?
00:17:39.540 Are my numbers right?
00:17:44.980 So that would give you only another 3,000
00:17:48.680 that you would have to find that switched
00:17:51.120 or that would be switched to Trump
00:17:54.560 to put him over the top in Georgia?
00:17:56.780 Are those numbers right?
00:17:57.740 Okay, I'm just looking at your answers.
00:18:08.440 So give me a fact check on that
00:18:10.660 because at the very least,
00:18:13.980 why did the news not give me a summary
00:18:16.580 of these changes in Georgia?
00:18:19.400 Why do I have to get it from a DM, right?
00:18:23.560 It's the craziest thing.
00:18:24.940 The news is so defective
00:18:26.920 that this little bit of summary,
00:18:29.860 which is the only thing
00:18:30.720 that puts any of it in context,
00:18:32.620 because you don't know if Georgia is going well
00:18:34.640 or poorly for the president,
00:18:36.240 unless you see the summary.
00:18:38.100 Why do I have to get it from individual on Twitter
00:18:41.660 and not the news?
00:18:42.820 I mean, it's just crazy.
00:18:48.460 Yeah, so the 9,600 were taken away from Biden
00:18:51.140 but not added to Trump.
00:18:54.940 Somebody says,
00:18:58.600 DeKalb votes were only switched in recount,
00:19:01.900 which means what?
00:19:05.400 Because I'm seeing something about
00:19:07.000 the numbers that will be reported
00:19:09.120 are not the recount numbers,
00:19:10.820 but the original.
00:19:12.020 And I don't even understand that story.
00:19:14.520 Why would you report the original numbers
00:19:16.280 if you're doing a recount?
00:19:17.940 That doesn't make sense.
00:19:18.760 Most of the news doesn't make
00:19:21.640 any damn sense, does it?
00:19:25.200 I swear that all the context
00:19:27.100 is left out of all the stories.
00:19:29.260 So you read the story
00:19:30.160 and you can kind of understand
00:19:31.400 what it's saying,
00:19:32.740 but it doesn't make any damn sense
00:19:34.820 because everything's missing.
00:19:37.600 So how in the world does it make sense?
00:19:39.700 Well,
00:19:40.860 change the topic.
00:19:43.120 All right.
00:19:46.260 About half of all Republicans,
00:19:48.440 according to a new poll,
00:19:49.900 Reuters,
00:19:52.400 Ipsos poll,
00:19:54.280 I don't know who Ipsos is,
00:19:56.960 but about half of all Republicans
00:19:58.500 believe that Trump
00:19:59.940 won the election,
00:20:02.360 rightfully,
00:20:03.320 in terms of votes,
00:20:05.360 and that voter fraud
00:20:07.360 is the only reason
00:20:08.380 that Joe Biden won.
00:20:10.440 Now, do you believe that?
00:20:11.360 Do you believe that half
00:20:12.600 of all Republicans
00:20:14.540 believe that the election
00:20:16.460 was fraudulent?
00:20:18.480 Half?
00:20:19.060 Does that sound right?
00:20:21.200 I don't know where they get half
00:20:22.860 because I don't know anybody
00:20:25.240 who thinks it was
00:20:26.020 a fair election.
00:20:27.660 Do you?
00:20:28.720 Have you met anybody
00:20:29.760 who thinks the election was fair?
00:20:31.880 I mean that literally.
00:20:34.120 I have not met anybody
00:20:35.280 who was a Trump supporter.
00:20:37.180 I've not met any
00:20:38.380 who think that the election
00:20:39.540 was credible and fair.
00:20:42.600 Have you?
00:20:43.920 Where do they come up
00:20:45.400 with 50% of people
00:20:46.620 who thought the election
00:20:47.380 was fair?
00:20:50.300 Now, it's possible
00:20:51.520 that it was.
00:20:52.900 I like to say this,
00:20:54.720 you know,
00:20:54.980 I like to drop that in
00:20:56.060 every now and then,
00:20:57.220 because if you don't
00:20:58.040 keep open the possibility
00:20:59.600 that all of the reports
00:21:02.060 are just BS,
00:21:03.400 that maybe it was just fine,
00:21:05.360 or maybe the problems
00:21:06.980 are there,
00:21:07.700 but they're small.
00:21:09.100 It's possible.
00:21:10.180 You can't rule out yet,
00:21:12.380 can't rule out
00:21:13.740 that either one of them won.
00:21:16.660 They're both possibilities
00:21:17.920 at this point.
00:21:19.580 All right.
00:21:21.920 I'm seeing a horrible trend,
00:21:24.740 which is the Democrats
00:21:26.840 are all talking about
00:21:27.980 prosecuting the Trump family,
00:21:30.620 and they don't even
00:21:32.260 talk about for what.
00:21:35.260 Think about that.
00:21:36.660 There are multiple stories
00:21:38.520 about Democrats saying,
00:21:42.320 yeah, when Trump's
00:21:43.080 out of office,
00:21:43.740 let's prosecute him
00:21:44.740 and prosecute the whole family.
00:21:46.560 And what they leave out
00:21:47.780 of all those stories
00:21:49.020 is for what?
00:21:52.200 Are you aware
00:21:54.580 of any crimes
00:21:55.520 that are even alleged
00:21:56.980 against anybody
00:21:58.780 in the Trump circle?
00:22:00.620 Now, I know
00:22:01.340 that there are
00:22:02.200 some kinds of
00:22:04.860 investigations going on,
00:22:07.100 but have we heard
00:22:08.040 anything about
00:22:08.940 any of those
00:22:09.720 that would tell you
00:22:10.820 that there's something
00:22:11.520 out there?
00:22:12.400 I've heard zero reports
00:22:14.380 of anything
00:22:15.920 that would look
00:22:16.640 like a crime
00:22:17.500 that any of the Trump
00:22:21.460 members were involved in.
00:22:23.200 Why are we talking
00:22:24.160 about it like it's a given
00:22:25.420 that there are
00:22:26.600 some crimes out there
00:22:27.720 and if he's not president
00:22:28.920 he'll be prosecuted?
00:22:30.620 What crimes?
00:22:32.200 Are you telling me
00:22:32.940 that four years
00:22:33.880 of looking for crimes
00:22:35.040 and you can't find any
00:22:36.620 but you're going to find
00:22:38.500 him the minute
00:22:39.000 he's out of office?
00:22:41.020 Maybe.
00:22:42.020 I don't know.
00:22:42.540 But it doesn't look
00:22:47.020 like people
00:22:47.780 trying to find
00:22:49.880 justice.
00:22:51.420 It doesn't have
00:22:52.400 that feel to it,
00:22:53.420 does it?
00:22:54.140 It feels like
00:22:55.160 hate
00:22:55.580 and revenge
00:22:57.280 and that's all.
00:23:00.140 It just feels like
00:23:01.180 hate and revenge.
00:23:02.280 So the same impulse
00:23:03.240 that makes people
00:23:04.620 want to hunt down
00:23:05.480 Trump supporters
00:23:06.380 and punish them
00:23:07.300 for their
00:23:08.520 political opinions,
00:23:09.540 opinions.
00:23:10.860 It's just more
00:23:12.020 of that
00:23:12.540 except directed
00:23:14.220 at the Trump family.
00:23:16.220 So this is the worst
00:23:17.540 of humanity here.
00:23:19.760 Apparently Biden himself
00:23:21.040 to his credit
00:23:22.100 is hesitant
00:23:23.720 to want
00:23:25.780 to prosecute
00:23:26.560 Trump
00:23:26.960 and he should be
00:23:27.640 because if you make
00:23:29.240 that your standard
00:23:30.120 it's coming
00:23:31.440 for you.
00:23:33.000 If you're the president
00:23:34.460 if you get elected
00:23:36.460 president
00:23:36.920 the worst
00:23:37.620 thing you can do
00:23:38.800 is go after
00:23:40.140 the person you beat.
00:23:42.180 Do not do that
00:23:43.660 because if you go
00:23:45.160 after the person
00:23:45.960 you beat
00:23:46.560 whoever replaces you
00:23:48.960 is going to do
00:23:50.160 the same thing.
00:23:51.520 The only thing
00:23:52.340 that protects
00:23:52.880 a president
00:23:53.400 after office
00:23:54.240 is that the president
00:23:55.720 in office
00:23:56.340 doesn't want to be
00:23:57.140 treated that way
00:23:57.920 and so you know
00:23:59.580 maybe takes a little
00:24:01.240 easy or pardons
00:24:02.300 or whatever
00:24:02.840 they have to do.
00:24:03.680 All right.
00:24:05.400 Did you see the video
00:24:06.620 of this guy
00:24:07.220 Ned Stabler?
00:24:08.440 He's a Democrat
00:24:09.240 and I think it's Michigan
00:24:10.280 and he was on a Zoom call
00:24:12.460 that got recorded
00:24:13.220 and he's threatening
00:24:14.740 two other county officials
00:24:16.720 Republicans I think
00:24:18.000 who didn't want
00:24:19.380 to certify the vote.
00:24:21.100 Now it turns out
00:24:21.720 that they got talked
00:24:22.960 into it
00:24:23.420 or threatened into it
00:24:24.480 so they did certify it
00:24:25.740 but when you listen
00:24:27.440 to this guy
00:24:27.960 Ned Stabler
00:24:28.800 and the hate
00:24:31.420 that he has
00:24:33.000 for his fellow humans
00:24:34.440 it's not about
00:24:35.640 policy at all.
00:24:39.080 It doesn't seem
00:24:40.120 to be about
00:24:40.660 differences of opinion.
00:24:42.520 It just seems
00:24:43.620 to be hate
00:24:44.280 and so I say again
00:24:46.540 we need to get
00:24:47.800 some hate crimes
00:24:49.100 on the books
00:24:49.800 for Trump supporters
00:24:51.760 meaning that
00:24:53.160 if you're targeted
00:24:53.900 for being a Trump supporter
00:24:55.360 and let's say
00:24:57.120 if you're being
00:24:57.880 if you're called
00:24:58.720 a racist
00:24:59.220 just for being
00:25:00.920 a Trump supporter
00:25:01.920 should you be fired
00:25:03.260 from your job
00:25:05.060 and or
00:25:06.720 prosecuted.
00:25:09.560 I don't know
00:25:10.400 if you could be
00:25:10.820 prosecuted for an insult
00:25:11.920 but let's say
00:25:13.200 could you be fired
00:25:15.560 from your job
00:25:16.480 for saying
00:25:17.920 that a Trump supporter
00:25:18.960 let's say
00:25:19.380 a co-worker
00:25:20.040 is a racist
00:25:21.560 because they're
00:25:22.920 a Trump supporter
00:25:23.660 with no other
00:25:24.460 evidence needed
00:25:26.480 to make the case.
00:25:27.660 I feel like
00:25:29.460 that's a hate crime
00:25:30.320 and that if
00:25:32.220 your co-worker
00:25:32.880 accused you
00:25:33.600 of being a racist
00:25:34.520 for supporting
00:25:36.060 Trump
00:25:36.860 you should be fired.
00:25:38.680 The person
00:25:39.240 making the accusation
00:25:40.260 should be fired
00:25:41.240 because how would
00:25:42.080 that be different
00:25:42.660 than a racist
00:25:43.780 accusation?
00:25:45.760 It's all based on
00:25:46.800 it's basically
00:25:48.460 just racism
00:25:49.420 that's all it is.
00:25:51.940 So
00:25:52.000 so as we're
00:25:55.860 looking at
00:25:56.300 what mattered
00:25:56.980 in this election
00:25:58.080 it turns out
00:25:59.420 that calling
00:26:00.200 for defunding
00:26:01.700 the police
00:26:02.360 while the news
00:26:04.000 is showing
00:26:04.500 non-stop rioting
00:26:05.800 on television
00:26:06.480 doesn't
00:26:08.240 doesn't help
00:26:09.020 your candidates
00:26:10.480 on the down ticket.
00:26:13.180 So
00:26:13.820 no big surprise
00:26:15.740 that
00:26:16.920 most people
00:26:17.820 like police.
00:26:20.680 But I did
00:26:21.700 see a story
00:26:22.260 that said
00:26:22.640 the coronavirus
00:26:23.340 wasn't that
00:26:24.360 big of a decision.
00:26:25.520 Do you think
00:26:26.680 that's true?
00:26:28.040 Do you think
00:26:28.580 that people's
00:26:29.380 decision about
00:26:30.380 who they wanted
00:26:31.180 for president
00:26:31.940 didn't have
00:26:33.620 much to do
00:26:34.320 with
00:26:34.700 coronavirus?
00:26:36.420 Because I was
00:26:37.300 feeling
00:26:37.740 ahead of the
00:26:38.360 election
00:26:38.680 I was feeling
00:26:39.300 that might
00:26:39.780 be the case
00:26:40.500 and partly
00:26:41.900 because
00:26:42.600 the coronavirus
00:26:44.380 is going to
00:26:46.320 sort of
00:26:46.680 take care
00:26:47.140 of itself.
00:26:48.460 In other words
00:26:49.220 whether Trump's
00:26:50.000 in office
00:26:50.420 or Biden's
00:26:51.500 in office
00:26:52.020 you kind of
00:26:53.240 know where
00:26:53.680 it's going to
00:26:54.140 go at this
00:26:54.740 point,
00:26:55.120 right?
00:26:55.740 You know
00:26:56.140 we're going
00:26:56.440 to have
00:26:56.600 a really
00:26:56.980 ugly winter
00:26:57.800 and our
00:26:58.380 health care
00:26:59.060 workers will
00:27:00.340 be stretched
00:27:01.460 to the max.
00:27:03.060 Doesn't matter
00:27:03.600 if it's Biden,
00:27:04.300 doesn't matter
00:27:04.660 if it's Trump,
00:27:05.380 our hospitals
00:27:06.380 are going to
00:27:06.740 be full
00:27:07.200 this winter.
00:27:08.340 There's
00:27:08.580 basically no
00:27:09.640 way around
00:27:10.100 it.
00:27:11.000 And we
00:27:11.680 know that
00:27:12.060 the vaccine
00:27:12.880 is promising
00:27:15.100 and almost
00:27:15.800 certainly by
00:27:16.800 the end
00:27:18.180 of 2021
00:27:18.980 things should
00:27:20.260 be looking
00:27:20.660 good no
00:27:21.140 matter who
00:27:22.160 the president
00:27:22.720 is.
00:27:23.580 So I have
00:27:24.320 a feeling
00:27:24.700 that when
00:27:25.040 people voted
00:27:25.720 and this is
00:27:26.560 the way I
00:27:27.140 would have
00:27:27.460 processed it
00:27:28.200 I would have
00:27:29.120 said to myself
00:27:29.820 you're not
00:27:31.020 really voting
00:27:31.620 for the past
00:27:32.460 so even if
00:27:34.280 you think
00:27:34.820 Trump should
00:27:36.000 have handled
00:27:36.460 coronavirus
00:27:37.040 differently
00:27:37.880 it's the
00:27:39.280 past.
00:27:40.460 You can't
00:27:41.180 go back.
00:27:42.420 You can't
00:27:42.740 go fix it.
00:27:44.200 You know
00:27:44.480 Joe Biden
00:27:45.400 said that he
00:27:45.960 would have
00:27:46.240 handled the
00:27:46.780 crime bill
00:27:47.600 from the
00:27:48.380 90s.
00:27:49.180 He said he
00:27:49.840 would have
00:27:50.100 done that
00:27:50.500 differently.
00:27:50.920 But he
00:27:52.360 can't go
00:27:52.740 back.
00:27:54.060 Right?
00:27:54.340 He doesn't
00:27:54.720 have the
00:27:55.080 option of
00:27:55.520 going back.
00:27:56.740 So you've
00:27:57.260 got two
00:27:57.660 people who
00:27:58.280 both had
00:27:58.940 you know
00:27:59.540 a little
00:27:59.920 let's say
00:28:01.340 some baggage
00:28:02.140 according to
00:28:03.440 their critics
00:28:04.140 of something
00:28:05.340 that happened
00:28:05.880 before.
00:28:07.000 But if those
00:28:07.840 things are not
00:28:08.500 likely to come
00:28:09.280 up again
00:28:09.860 and they
00:28:11.300 don't seem
00:28:11.840 representative
00:28:12.580 of you know
00:28:13.380 who they are
00:28:13.900 as leaders
00:28:14.360 you can kind
00:28:15.500 of discount
00:28:15.960 them a little
00:28:16.520 bit.
00:28:17.420 You can kind
00:28:17.920 of say I
00:28:18.480 don't think
00:28:18.880 we're going
00:28:19.120 to have a
00:28:19.460 second pandemic
00:28:20.340 and if
00:28:21.480 we did
00:28:21.880 we'd be
00:28:22.340 fairly ready
00:28:23.360 for it
00:28:23.800 I think.
00:28:24.660 We had
00:28:25.020 some practice.
00:28:26.580 So probably
00:28:27.820 people are
00:28:28.320 saying some
00:28:28.980 version of
00:28:29.720 what do we
00:28:30.920 need the
00:28:31.280 president for
00:28:32.040 for the
00:28:32.460 next four
00:28:33.140 years not
00:28:33.780 the last
00:28:34.240 four years.
00:28:36.040 And on
00:28:36.920 that basis
00:28:37.460 you could
00:28:37.880 probably say
00:28:38.900 coronavirus
00:28:39.640 isn't your
00:28:41.320 number one
00:28:41.820 thing that
00:28:42.220 you're voting
00:28:42.640 on.
00:28:44.500 Whereas
00:28:45.020 defunding the
00:28:45.760 police definitely
00:28:46.780 is going to
00:28:47.280 affect you in
00:28:47.820 the next four
00:28:48.320 years if it
00:28:48.880 happens.
00:28:49.200 I saw a
00:28:51.580 couple of
00:28:51.920 studies about
00:28:52.740 masks.
00:28:54.120 So we
00:28:54.880 now have the
00:28:55.760 definitive word
00:28:57.160 on masks.
00:28:58.080 We've been
00:28:58.380 talking about
00:28:58.920 it for months
00:28:59.440 and months.
00:29:00.560 Do masks
00:29:01.320 work?
00:29:02.560 Do they not
00:29:03.320 work?
00:29:03.880 And now we
00:29:04.360 have two
00:29:04.840 studies and
00:29:06.080 finally we
00:29:06.980 can say with
00:29:07.900 certainty that
00:29:10.100 one of the
00:29:10.500 studies says
00:29:11.180 that masks
00:29:12.020 do work and
00:29:14.120 the other one
00:29:14.640 says they
00:29:15.100 don't.
00:29:15.520 so trust
00:29:18.780 science is
00:29:19.520 what I
00:29:19.860 say.
00:29:21.100 Trust
00:29:21.340 science.
00:29:22.520 And science
00:29:23.020 says unambiguously
00:29:25.180 that those
00:29:26.640 masks definitely
00:29:27.660 work and
00:29:28.940 also, also
00:29:30.680 true, they
00:29:32.040 definitely don't.
00:29:33.900 So science
00:29:34.580 is spoken and
00:29:36.440 I think unless
00:29:37.200 you are a
00:29:37.800 bunch of
00:29:38.200 unscientific
00:29:40.940 flat earthers,
00:29:41.720 you should
00:29:43.340 believe science
00:29:44.200 when it tells
00:29:45.100 you that
00:29:45.500 masks totally
00:29:46.980 work and
00:29:48.580 also, also
00:29:50.420 at the same
00:29:50.980 time, totally
00:29:52.120 don't.
00:29:53.680 So it's both
00:29:54.400 true.
00:29:55.460 Listen to
00:29:56.000 science.
00:29:57.700 So both of
00:29:58.340 those happened
00:29:58.800 today.
00:30:02.380 Even Jake
00:30:03.400 Tapper says
00:30:04.260 that the
00:30:05.100 speed with
00:30:06.400 which the
00:30:06.920 vaccines have
00:30:07.840 been created
00:30:08.440 is, quote,
00:30:09.640 this is an
00:30:10.960 unmitigated
00:30:11.800 success and
00:30:13.320 we should
00:30:13.680 acknowledge
00:30:14.080 that, said
00:30:15.160 Jake
00:30:15.400 Tapper, which
00:30:16.840 I agree and
00:30:20.080 appreciate.
00:30:21.220 I think, you
00:30:22.180 know, as we
00:30:24.980 move into the
00:30:25.760 future, I
00:30:27.040 think Trump's
00:30:28.220 warp speed
00:30:29.360 thing here is
00:30:30.100 going to start
00:30:30.760 looking a little
00:30:31.280 bit like a
00:30:31.820 moonshot.
00:30:33.380 And it might
00:30:34.080 become the
00:30:34.680 model that
00:30:35.280 people talk
00:30:35.900 about for
00:30:37.140 how federal
00:30:37.780 government can
00:30:38.580 make, you
00:30:39.260 know, make
00:30:39.620 the country do
00:30:40.380 something that
00:30:41.120 even the
00:30:42.240 country didn't
00:30:42.820 think it
00:30:43.200 could do.
00:30:44.620 So I have
00:30:45.640 a feeling that's
00:30:46.340 really going to
00:30:46.840 last the test
00:30:47.660 of time in
00:30:48.940 terms of good
00:30:49.740 leadership, even
00:30:51.100 if other things
00:30:52.080 that he did
00:30:53.240 do not.
00:30:55.120 Sweden is
00:30:56.140 throwing us a
00:30:56.840 curveball.
00:30:58.260 Of course,
00:30:58.860 little Sweden
00:30:59.440 was always fun
00:31:00.220 to talk about
00:31:00.960 because they
00:31:01.660 did everything
00:31:02.280 differently.
00:31:03.380 They didn't
00:31:03.900 do a severe
00:31:04.720 shutdown.
00:31:06.060 They took
00:31:06.800 their lumps,
00:31:07.560 had a high
00:31:08.260 death count,
00:31:09.040 but then the
00:31:09.960 death count
00:31:10.400 went down to
00:31:11.040 practically
00:31:11.460 nothing.
00:31:12.600 And people
00:31:12.960 said, whoa,
00:31:14.320 Sweden, smart
00:31:15.860 little Sweden,
00:31:16.580 you must have
00:31:17.040 done something
00:31:17.480 right.
00:31:18.540 You're non-shutdown,
00:31:21.000 non-lockdown.
00:31:23.500 Maybe you got
00:31:24.300 some kind of
00:31:24.880 herd immunity
00:31:26.180 going, we don't
00:31:26.960 know what, but it
00:31:27.940 worked, whatever
00:31:28.480 you did, so maybe
00:31:29.940 we should be using
00:31:30.680 this Sweden
00:31:31.280 model.
00:31:32.380 Oh, except
00:31:33.580 update.
00:31:36.000 Sweden decided
00:31:37.040 to lock
00:31:37.640 down.
00:31:39.340 So Sweden
00:31:40.300 is not going
00:31:41.600 to be as
00:31:42.300 locked down
00:31:43.080 as maybe
00:31:44.060 European countries
00:31:45.080 or even
00:31:45.560 us in a
00:31:47.020 few weeks,
00:31:47.940 I'm guessing.
00:31:49.260 But Sweden
00:31:50.420 is getting
00:31:50.940 tougher, so
00:31:51.740 they are
00:31:52.640 putting lots
00:31:53.320 of limits
00:31:53.840 on public
00:31:55.900 gatherings,
00:31:56.620 et cetera.
00:31:57.600 Now, I think
00:31:58.160 that they're
00:31:58.540 still a little
00:31:59.120 looser than
00:31:59.660 most places,
00:32:00.260 but apparently
00:32:02.400 Sweden decided
00:32:04.320 that they don't
00:32:05.060 want to be
00:32:05.440 like Sweden.
00:32:06.600 So let me
00:32:07.020 put it this
00:32:07.460 way.
00:32:08.580 If you were
00:32:09.440 in the United
00:32:10.040 States and
00:32:10.840 you were an
00:32:11.280 American and
00:32:12.020 you said to
00:32:12.500 yourself,
00:32:13.440 why can't
00:32:14.020 we be more
00:32:14.660 like Sweden?
00:32:17.100 Congratulations.
00:32:18.540 You're now
00:32:19.100 just like
00:32:19.640 Sweden.
00:32:21.260 Because they're
00:32:21.900 doing what
00:32:22.280 we're doing.
00:32:23.360 So if Sweden
00:32:24.240 was a big
00:32:25.400 success story,
00:32:26.880 which many
00:32:27.900 Americans were
00:32:28.580 saying,
00:32:28.940 can you
00:32:30.260 explain that
00:32:30.980 to Sweden?
00:32:32.180 Because
00:32:32.700 apparently
00:32:33.060 Sweden has
00:32:33.920 not noticed
00:32:34.680 that their
00:32:35.840 old plan
00:32:36.640 was so
00:32:37.100 successful
00:32:37.680 because they
00:32:38.540 decided to
00:32:39.360 shit-can their
00:32:40.200 old plan
00:32:40.760 and do what
00:32:41.620 everybody else
00:32:42.220 is doing,
00:32:43.400 which is
00:32:43.880 lock down
00:32:44.900 and put
00:32:45.240 restrictions
00:32:45.720 on,
00:32:46.200 et cetera.
00:32:47.280 So if
00:32:48.240 Sweden
00:32:48.680 doesn't think
00:32:49.420 Sweden
00:32:49.800 was doing
00:32:51.320 it right,
00:32:53.040 should you?
00:32:55.320 Really?
00:32:56.220 I mean,
00:32:57.180 wouldn't you
00:32:57.720 expect that if
00:32:58.480 anybody were
00:32:59.360 going to
00:32:59.740 take credit
00:33:00.300 and say,
00:33:00.740 yeah,
00:33:00.960 we did
00:33:01.300 it right,
00:33:02.220 it would
00:33:02.660 be Sweden.
00:33:04.500 And Sweden
00:33:05.020 doesn't think
00:33:05.660 they did it
00:33:06.140 right or
00:33:06.600 they wouldn't
00:33:07.040 have completely
00:33:08.540 changed their
00:33:09.240 strategy.
00:33:12.480 There was
00:33:13.080 an article in
00:33:13.660 Time by
00:33:14.260 Michael Mina,
00:33:15.180 I think he
00:33:15.900 wrote it,
00:33:16.420 and he's the
00:33:16.840 one who
00:33:17.160 always talks
00:33:17.780 about we
00:33:18.800 could get
00:33:19.400 on top of
00:33:19.920 this pandemic
00:33:21.460 if we had
00:33:22.200 rapid testing
00:33:23.100 that was cheap
00:33:23.980 and people
00:33:24.700 could do it
00:33:25.120 at home
00:33:25.460 as much as
00:33:26.460 they wanted.
00:33:27.760 We do
00:33:28.300 have an
00:33:28.640 approval for
00:33:29.460 a relatively
00:33:31.620 inexpensive
00:33:32.320 at-home
00:33:33.360 test that
00:33:34.820 you don't
00:33:35.100 have to
00:33:35.460 mail it
00:33:35.820 anywhere,
00:33:36.200 you can
00:33:36.440 get a
00:33:36.700 result pretty
00:33:37.320 quickly,
00:33:37.960 but you
00:33:38.600 need a
00:33:38.920 prescription
00:33:39.400 for it.
00:33:41.660 It's like
00:33:42.260 we can't
00:33:42.700 do anything
00:33:43.280 completely
00:33:43.900 right.
00:33:45.260 The whole
00:33:45.920 point of
00:33:47.000 these at-home
00:33:47.620 tests is
00:33:48.960 that you
00:33:49.220 want to be
00:33:49.620 able to do
00:33:50.020 them like
00:33:50.820 popping a
00:33:51.740 breath mint.
00:33:52.420 You want to
00:33:52.740 be able to
00:33:53.060 take them
00:33:53.460 any time,
00:33:54.660 anybody,
00:33:55.360 any time,
00:33:56.740 just make
00:33:57.400 it as
00:33:57.680 available as
00:33:58.400 a pack of
00:33:58.960 gum.
00:33:59.800 Then it
00:34:01.580 doesn't matter
00:34:02.100 that they're
00:34:02.600 a little bit
00:34:03.440 less accurate
00:34:04.520 than other
00:34:04.980 tests because
00:34:06.280 you'd be doing
00:34:06.760 so much
00:34:07.160 testing you'd
00:34:07.860 get everything
00:34:08.480 pretty quickly.
00:34:10.740 We could be
00:34:11.320 done with
00:34:11.760 this by
00:34:12.160 Christmas if
00:34:13.800 we had
00:34:14.320 these cheap
00:34:15.100 tests.
00:34:16.060 The math
00:34:16.560 certainly
00:34:18.380 indicates that.
00:34:19.620 Here's my
00:34:20.160 problem with
00:34:20.940 the Biden
00:34:22.380 administration,
00:34:23.740 future
00:34:24.160 potential
00:34:24.780 administration,
00:34:25.700 we don't
00:34:26.000 know yet,
00:34:27.260 and also
00:34:29.080 the Trump
00:34:29.660 administration
00:34:30.280 on coronavirus.
00:34:31.800 I've said
00:34:32.480 before that
00:34:33.660 there might
00:34:34.220 be an
00:34:34.620 argument against
00:34:35.760 this method.
00:34:37.440 There might
00:34:37.860 be some
00:34:38.380 argument that
00:34:39.020 says,
00:34:39.380 no,
00:34:40.020 this idea
00:34:40.600 of using
00:34:41.020 these super
00:34:41.580 cheap tests
00:34:42.780 at home
00:34:43.440 won't get
00:34:44.700 you what
00:34:45.020 you think
00:34:45.380 it will
00:34:45.640 get you.
00:34:46.620 But I
00:34:47.220 haven't heard
00:34:47.660 it.
00:34:48.800 I've not
00:34:49.260 heard anybody
00:34:49.840 make the
00:34:50.240 argument.
00:34:50.940 In fact,
00:34:51.420 100% of
00:34:52.160 the people
00:34:52.480 I've heard
00:34:53.080 talk about
00:34:54.440 this idea
00:34:55.240 fall into
00:34:56.780 one of
00:34:57.580 two categories.
00:34:58.960 Either they
00:34:59.480 don't understand
00:35:00.300 it, or
00:35:02.320 they think
00:35:02.760 it's terrific.
00:35:04.380 There's
00:35:04.940 nobody who
00:35:05.540 understands
00:35:06.300 it and
00:35:07.980 also thinks
00:35:08.600 it's a bad
00:35:09.120 idea that
00:35:09.840 I've seen.
00:35:11.160 Surely such
00:35:11.940 people exist,
00:35:12.760 but I haven't
00:35:13.100 seen any.
00:35:14.220 So here's
00:35:15.240 my problem
00:35:15.720 with both
00:35:16.180 Trump
00:35:16.500 administration
00:35:17.040 and whatever
00:35:18.040 Biden's
00:35:19.080 planning.
00:35:19.420 why aren't
00:35:21.420 we hearing
00:35:21.860 about this?
00:35:23.440 We should
00:35:24.120 at least
00:35:24.640 be hearing
00:35:25.180 why they
00:35:25.600 don't want
00:35:26.120 to do
00:35:26.380 it, or
00:35:27.420 we should
00:35:27.800 be hearing
00:35:28.280 how soon
00:35:29.000 they can
00:35:29.500 do it,
00:35:30.480 or we
00:35:31.720 should be
00:35:32.080 hearing a
00:35:32.600 lot of
00:35:32.960 conversation
00:35:33.600 about it.
00:35:35.420 But we're
00:35:36.080 not.
00:35:37.020 It's like
00:35:37.400 Michael
00:35:37.720 Meena writes
00:35:38.280 an article
00:35:38.700 or tweets,
00:35:39.560 you know,
00:35:39.780 we boost
00:35:40.560 it, I
00:35:40.960 boost it,
00:35:41.980 and then it
00:35:42.520 just sort
00:35:43.160 of doesn't
00:35:44.580 go anywhere.
00:35:45.160 Now I
00:35:46.100 know that
00:35:46.520 his concept
00:35:47.980 of the
00:35:48.420 cheap
00:35:48.840 testing,
00:35:50.020 which is
00:35:50.860 different than
00:35:51.380 just cheap
00:35:51.940 testing,
00:35:52.480 right?
00:35:52.720 It's a
00:35:53.220 specific kind
00:35:54.020 of cheap
00:35:54.360 testing.
00:35:56.000 His idea
00:35:56.680 I know has
00:35:57.260 gotten to
00:35:57.840 the task
00:35:59.440 force,
00:36:00.480 so I know
00:36:01.200 that they've
00:36:01.740 looked at it,
00:36:02.380 I know that
00:36:02.820 they have
00:36:04.120 seen it,
00:36:05.300 I can say
00:36:06.220 that for sure
00:36:06.920 just personally.
00:36:09.180 Where is
00:36:09.900 their comment
00:36:10.580 on it?
00:36:11.240 Where is
00:36:11.640 their timeline,
00:36:12.680 their response,
00:36:13.600 something?
00:36:16.320 And the
00:36:17.220 lack of
00:36:17.700 that,
00:36:18.680 I don't
00:36:19.080 know,
00:36:19.500 I can't
00:36:20.180 see it as
00:36:20.620 competence.
00:36:22.420 So to
00:36:23.940 me it
00:36:24.220 looks like
00:36:24.680 the task
00:36:27.220 force is
00:36:27.800 dropping the
00:36:28.400 ball really
00:36:29.660 big on the
00:36:30.540 rapid testing.
00:36:31.960 Like really
00:36:32.500 big.
00:36:33.740 Like really,
00:36:34.580 really big.
00:36:35.860 I would
00:36:36.420 say that
00:36:37.040 even if
00:36:38.820 you give
00:36:39.220 Trump full
00:36:39.880 credit for
00:36:40.540 the vaccines,
00:36:41.760 and of course
00:36:42.200 we probably
00:36:42.760 should,
00:36:43.600 falling down
00:36:47.400 on this
00:36:47.900 testing stuff,
00:36:50.320 I don't
00:36:51.020 know how
00:36:51.900 you explain
00:36:52.360 that.
00:36:53.740 Like can
00:36:54.720 you give
00:36:55.080 me any
00:36:55.560 explanation
00:36:56.240 that doesn't
00:36:57.660 make it look
00:36:58.240 like criminal
00:36:59.180 incompetence?
00:37:00.400 Because it
00:37:01.040 looks like
00:37:01.440 criminal
00:37:01.820 incompetence
00:37:02.540 to me,
00:37:03.320 even if
00:37:04.500 it's not
00:37:05.580 a good
00:37:05.840 idea.
00:37:06.380 You should
00:37:06.600 at least
00:37:06.860 tell us
00:37:07.300 why it's
00:37:07.620 not a
00:37:07.920 good idea.
00:37:09.920 All
00:37:10.080 right.
00:37:10.260 shall we
00:37:13.340 talk about
00:37:13.760 the election?
00:37:15.560 I believe
00:37:16.360 you want
00:37:16.700 to.
00:37:17.800 So,
00:37:18.460 where's
00:37:19.820 the
00:37:19.980 kraken?
00:37:22.640 In the
00:37:23.320 comments,
00:37:24.260 somebody says
00:37:24.940 the kraken
00:37:25.940 was lacking.
00:37:27.600 Yeah,
00:37:27.960 I think the
00:37:28.380 cracking is
00:37:29.000 lacking.
00:37:30.060 So I told
00:37:30.640 you that
00:37:31.160 you would
00:37:32.220 see some
00:37:33.140 of the
00:37:33.400 good stuff
00:37:34.140 probably this
00:37:36.120 week.
00:37:37.100 I did
00:37:37.720 give myself
00:37:38.260 a little
00:37:38.660 bit of
00:37:38.980 a fudge
00:37:39.460 and I
00:37:39.660 said,
00:37:39.900 well,
00:37:40.060 it's
00:37:40.180 probably
00:37:40.400 this
00:37:40.620 week,
00:37:40.920 might be
00:37:41.260 next
00:37:41.500 week,
00:37:42.420 but I'm
00:37:42.680 thinking it
00:37:43.060 was this
00:37:43.340 week.
00:37:44.420 Have you
00:37:44.820 seen
00:37:45.280 anything
00:37:45.800 that you
00:37:46.640 would
00:37:46.820 consider
00:37:47.300 the
00:37:47.700 good
00:37:47.940 stuff?
00:37:49.720 I have
00:37:50.340 not,
00:37:50.800 not in
00:37:51.200 the public.
00:37:52.460 So I've
00:37:53.180 got some
00:37:53.540 questions
00:37:54.000 whether such
00:37:55.040 good stuff
00:37:55.700 exists,
00:37:57.120 and I feel
00:37:57.720 as if I
00:37:58.400 would give
00:37:58.700 you this
00:37:59.000 guideline.
00:37:59.960 It's the
00:38:00.220 same kind
00:38:01.620 of thinking
00:38:02.080 I would
00:38:02.440 use for
00:38:03.060 hydroxychloroquine.
00:38:05.020 Remember I
00:38:05.440 told you that
00:38:05.960 when we
00:38:06.300 first heard
00:38:06.960 good news
00:38:07.540 about
00:38:07.880 hydroxychloroquine
00:38:09.040 working,
00:38:10.440 I said,
00:38:11.060 well,
00:38:11.500 so many
00:38:12.120 people say
00:38:12.660 it works
00:38:13.200 even without
00:38:14.400 a good
00:38:14.980 controlled
00:38:16.140 randomized
00:38:16.620 study.
00:38:17.940 It seems
00:38:18.700 there's so
00:38:19.260 much anecdotal
00:38:20.200 that it just
00:38:21.140 makes sense
00:38:21.660 to try it
00:38:22.500 because the
00:38:23.140 downside is
00:38:23.920 small risk.
00:38:25.980 And then I
00:38:27.240 told you
00:38:27.700 that as we
00:38:29.160 got into
00:38:29.600 the spring
00:38:30.280 and then
00:38:30.940 through the
00:38:31.380 summer,
00:38:32.220 that every
00:38:32.700 day that
00:38:33.220 went by
00:38:33.880 that you
00:38:34.800 didn't get
00:38:35.300 a confirmation
00:38:36.100 that hydroxychloroquine
00:38:37.420 works,
00:38:38.320 you should
00:38:38.980 reduce your
00:38:40.060 confidence
00:38:40.780 that it
00:38:41.620 does.
00:38:42.380 So I
00:38:42.780 started out
00:38:43.340 with,
00:38:43.640 I don't
00:38:43.800 know,
00:38:44.020 it looks
00:38:44.220 like 75%
00:38:45.640 chance you've
00:38:46.260 got something
00:38:46.720 here.
00:38:47.420 But then
00:38:48.040 time would
00:38:48.580 go by
00:38:49.060 and it
00:38:49.560 wouldn't
00:38:49.900 be validated.
00:38:52.000 Couldn't
00:38:52.520 quite see
00:38:53.820 it clearly
00:38:54.540 happening in
00:38:55.280 the real
00:38:55.600 world.
00:38:56.060 I'm like,
00:38:56.300 ah,
00:38:57.000 50-50,
00:38:57.860 30,
00:39:01.660 maybe 20%,
00:39:03.420 I would
00:39:03.920 put it
00:39:04.180 down to
00:39:04.460 maybe 10%
00:39:05.260 now.
00:39:06.160 Every day
00:39:06.700 that goes
00:39:07.080 by,
00:39:08.020 if they
00:39:08.800 can't show
00:39:09.320 it works,
00:39:10.100 it's probably
00:39:10.960 because it
00:39:11.600 doesn't.
00:39:13.000 Probably.
00:39:14.560 Likewise,
00:39:15.400 as you're
00:39:15.820 watching all
00:39:16.340 of the
00:39:16.660 claims come
00:39:17.440 out about
00:39:18.060 the election,
00:39:19.540 on day
00:39:20.020 one,
00:39:20.700 you know,
00:39:21.060 there's a
00:39:21.340 bunch of
00:39:21.620 claims,
00:39:22.220 and you
00:39:22.420 don't know.
00:39:23.200 They could
00:39:23.560 be good,
00:39:24.180 they could
00:39:24.460 be bad.
00:39:25.480 What
00:39:25.680 estimate did
00:39:26.480 I give
00:39:26.900 you ahead
00:39:27.840 of time?
00:39:28.920 You may
00:39:29.320 remember that
00:39:31.020 I said to
00:39:31.960 beware of
00:39:32.580 all the
00:39:32.880 individual
00:39:33.440 anecdotal
00:39:34.240 claims of
00:39:34.900 fraud because
00:39:35.520 95% of
00:39:36.560 them will
00:39:36.860 not be
00:39:37.300 true.
00:39:38.760 At least
00:39:39.580 95% of
00:39:40.960 them are
00:39:41.320 not true.
00:39:42.600 Can you
00:39:43.000 agree that
00:39:44.400 my original
00:39:45.040 estimate,
00:39:46.460 that 95%
00:39:47.460 of the
00:39:47.760 claims would
00:39:48.520 eventually be
00:39:49.180 debunked?
00:39:51.000 Doesn't it
00:39:51.680 look like
00:39:52.020 that's exactly
00:39:52.660 what's
00:39:52.920 happening?
00:39:53.860 Wouldn't
00:39:54.140 you say?
00:39:55.380 Because I
00:39:55.800 would say
00:39:56.240 closer to
00:39:57.240 maybe 100%.
00:39:58.280 Now,
00:39:59.500 there are
00:39:59.800 some things
00:40:00.300 that are
00:40:00.680 real that
00:40:01.980 are smaller
00:40:02.720 than what
00:40:03.580 it would
00:40:03.820 take to
00:40:04.200 overthrow
00:40:04.600 the election.
00:40:05.780 So there
00:40:06.160 are a bunch
00:40:06.500 of real
00:40:06.900 things.
00:40:07.620 I'm not
00:40:07.920 saying there's
00:40:08.340 no real
00:40:08.860 stuff.
00:40:09.740 It's just
00:40:10.240 we have
00:40:10.960 not found
00:40:11.500 real stuff
00:40:12.160 big enough
00:40:12.720 to change
00:40:13.280 the election
00:40:14.040 outcome.
00:40:15.500 Have you
00:40:15.900 seen any?
00:40:16.620 I haven't
00:40:17.020 seen any
00:40:17.440 in the
00:40:18.480 public.
00:40:19.560 So today
00:40:20.480 is sort
00:40:20.980 of the
00:40:21.220 day where
00:40:22.500 you start
00:40:23.140 with whatever
00:40:23.800 your percentage
00:40:24.680 number was.
00:40:26.240 I think
00:40:26.460 there's
00:40:26.840 I would
00:40:28.280 say I
00:40:28.580 would start
00:40:28.960 with a
00:40:29.420 95%
00:40:31.720 chance
00:40:32.400 personal
00:40:33.440 opinion
00:40:33.920 that the
00:40:35.040 election
00:40:35.400 was
00:40:36.020 stolen.
00:40:39.100 By the
00:40:40.000 end of
00:40:40.360 today,
00:40:41.520 if I
00:40:41.980 have not
00:40:42.360 seen
00:40:42.860 the goods
00:40:44.080 from either
00:40:44.860 Sidney Powell
00:40:45.620 or Giuliani
00:40:47.160 or something,
00:40:48.020 my 95%
00:40:49.280 certainty
00:40:49.780 is going to
00:40:50.860 start to
00:40:51.360 reduce.
00:40:51.840 so it'll
00:40:53.080 be lower
00:40:54.200 tomorrow
00:40:54.800 and then
00:40:56.140 if we
00:40:56.420 go yet
00:40:56.820 another
00:40:57.140 day
00:40:57.480 and I
00:40:57.800 haven't
00:40:58.020 seen
00:40:58.260 any
00:40:58.480 good
00:40:58.720 evidence,
00:40:59.640 I'm going
00:40:59.880 to lower
00:41:00.180 it again.
00:41:01.820 That's a
00:41:02.460 good model
00:41:03.220 for you to
00:41:03.700 keep in
00:41:04.060 mind,
00:41:04.460 right?
00:41:05.400 At about
00:41:06.020 today,
00:41:07.220 if you're
00:41:08.660 not seeing
00:41:09.160 some good
00:41:09.660 stuff,
00:41:11.120 you have
00:41:12.240 to wonder
00:41:12.620 if it's
00:41:13.020 going to
00:41:13.260 come,
00:41:13.920 right?
00:41:16.180 You can
00:41:17.060 certainly
00:41:17.400 say,
00:41:18.000 you know,
00:41:18.360 give the
00:41:18.980 people who
00:41:19.420 are looking
00:41:19.780 into it a
00:41:20.320 few weeks
00:41:20.800 to do
00:41:21.620 the data.
00:41:22.160 They need
00:41:22.440 some time.
00:41:24.060 So the
00:41:24.340 first week
00:41:24.980 or so
00:41:25.500 that people
00:41:25.900 are looking
00:41:26.280 into it
00:41:26.680 doesn't mean
00:41:27.080 anything.
00:41:28.280 Second week,
00:41:29.320 maybe that
00:41:29.940 doesn't mean
00:41:30.400 anything either.
00:41:32.420 But we're
00:41:33.180 now at the
00:41:34.040 point where
00:41:35.940 if we go
00:41:36.460 too much
00:41:37.080 further with
00:41:37.860 just claims
00:41:38.880 without a
00:41:40.680 photograph or
00:41:41.740 the witness
00:41:42.660 who signed
00:41:43.500 an affidavit
00:41:44.300 or something,
00:41:45.280 I would just
00:41:46.980 dismiss all
00:41:47.740 of it.
00:41:49.100 Pretty much
00:41:49.540 all of it.
00:41:50.320 All right.
00:41:57.880 And the
00:41:59.040 Dominion
00:41:59.460 software thing
00:42:00.260 looks a
00:42:00.860 lot messier
00:42:02.560 than you
00:42:02.960 thought because
00:42:03.960 now there are
00:42:04.620 denials about
00:42:05.760 whether the
00:42:07.360 Smartmatic
00:42:08.080 software was
00:42:09.240 ever used
00:42:10.140 with Dominion.
00:42:12.740 There's just
00:42:13.640 there's now
00:42:15.000 some credible
00:42:16.020 doubt about
00:42:17.500 every part of
00:42:18.380 the story
00:42:18.800 from top to
00:42:19.520 bottom.
00:42:20.320 Here's one
00:42:20.940 thing that I
00:42:21.500 feel I can
00:42:22.580 say with
00:42:23.020 certainty.
00:42:24.700 The election
00:42:25.820 was not
00:42:27.100 secure.
00:42:29.680 Do you think
00:42:30.620 we can say
00:42:31.160 that with
00:42:31.520 certainty?
00:42:32.880 Now you
00:42:33.460 can certainly
00:42:34.280 say it's
00:42:35.320 not proven
00:42:36.060 that the
00:42:36.560 election was
00:42:37.120 stolen.
00:42:37.880 But can't
00:42:38.740 we say with
00:42:39.500 certainty
00:42:39.920 that it
00:42:41.000 wasn't secure?
00:42:41.760 right?
00:42:43.320 Does that
00:42:44.920 seem fair?
00:42:45.940 That even
00:42:46.760 if you
00:42:47.100 believe it
00:42:47.580 wasn't
00:42:47.980 stolen,
00:42:48.940 it definitely
00:42:49.680 wasn't
00:42:50.080 secure.
00:42:51.580 Because just
00:42:52.620 take one
00:42:53.060 example,
00:42:53.640 the thumb
00:42:54.920 drives that
00:42:55.640 were found
00:42:56.080 that weren't
00:42:56.560 uploaded.
00:42:58.020 What kind
00:42:58.620 of a crappy
00:42:59.260 system would
00:43:01.060 allow you to
00:43:01.900 get to this
00:43:02.460 point in the
00:43:03.040 process without
00:43:04.400 knowing that
00:43:05.220 all of the
00:43:05.980 precincts had
00:43:07.440 even reported?
00:43:10.840 Really?
00:43:11.620 Seriously?
00:43:12.140 How do you
00:43:12.440 get this far
00:43:13.140 without knowing
00:43:14.560 if you've even
00:43:15.180 collected the
00:43:15.880 information?
00:43:16.400 if there are
00:43:19.020 gaps in the
00:43:20.180 information you've
00:43:20.920 collected?
00:43:21.660 How do you
00:43:22.260 get this far?
00:43:23.840 Now obviously
00:43:24.700 if there had
00:43:25.780 not been a
00:43:26.240 recount and
00:43:27.040 all this stuff,
00:43:27.920 we wouldn't
00:43:28.420 have even
00:43:28.840 noticed that
00:43:30.060 a whole bunch
00:43:30.620 of people
00:43:31.000 voted, it
00:43:32.120 was put on
00:43:32.700 a flash drive
00:43:33.520 and then
00:43:33.820 somebody stuck
00:43:34.560 it in a
00:43:34.940 desk drawer
00:43:35.380 somewhere or
00:43:35.980 wherever the
00:43:36.300 hell it was.
00:43:37.480 So all those
00:43:38.120 people voted
00:43:38.780 and their vote
00:43:39.400 was just
00:43:39.880 completely wasted
00:43:41.740 because it
00:43:42.760 just got put
00:43:43.300 on a disk
00:43:43.780 drive and
00:43:44.240 didn't go
00:43:44.680 anywhere.
00:43:44.920 So the
00:43:50.980 disk drive
00:43:51.660 stories alone
00:43:52.720 tell you that
00:43:53.940 whoever put
00:43:54.660 the system
00:43:55.240 together didn't
00:43:56.640 have basic
00:43:57.780 controls.
00:43:59.260 Because the
00:43:59.720 most basic
00:44:00.360 control is to
00:44:02.200 find out that
00:44:03.100 the number of
00:44:03.780 people who
00:44:04.220 voted ended
00:44:05.880 up in the
00:44:06.660 total.
00:44:08.540 That's pretty
00:44:09.380 basic, even
00:44:10.620 if the votes
00:44:11.720 got changed
00:44:12.340 or something.
00:44:14.920 I always
00:44:23.460 get blamed
00:44:24.000 for pacing
00:44:24.720 and leading.
00:44:25.780 You know,
00:44:26.300 it looks like
00:44:26.880 pacing and
00:44:27.460 leading if you
00:44:28.300 just give a
00:44:28.940 balanced
00:44:29.460 presentation.
00:44:31.980 So if you
00:44:32.760 allow that the
00:44:34.260 other side has
00:44:35.040 an argument and
00:44:36.000 you simply
00:44:36.480 express it at
00:44:37.840 the same time
00:44:38.440 you show the
00:44:38.900 other argument
00:44:39.440 and make a
00:44:39.980 decision, it
00:44:40.820 looks like you're
00:44:41.420 pacing, but
00:44:42.600 sometimes it's
00:44:43.220 just telling the
00:44:43.820 whole story.
00:44:46.560 Now I'm
00:44:47.240 seeing people
00:44:47.860 accuse Rudy
00:44:49.120 Giuliani of
00:44:50.600 making a
00:44:51.900 tremendous amount
00:44:52.780 of money from
00:44:54.580 working on the
00:44:55.480 campaign's legal
00:44:56.960 stuff.
00:44:58.300 And some people
00:44:59.220 are thinking that
00:44:59.820 he's just making
00:45:00.540 up stuff and
00:45:01.300 throwing spaghetti
00:45:02.160 against the wall.
00:45:03.020 That's the phrase
00:45:03.800 that the Democrats
00:45:04.480 are using.
00:45:06.440 But do you
00:45:07.140 think that you
00:45:07.740 could get Rudy
00:45:08.900 Giuliani,
00:45:12.080 Lynn Wood,
00:45:13.720 and Sidney
00:45:15.020 Powell, all
00:45:15.920 top famous
00:45:18.560 lawyers, do
00:45:19.700 you think that
00:45:20.160 they would all
00:45:20.840 be willing to
00:45:21.580 just completely
00:45:23.020 lie and make
00:45:24.380 stuff up?
00:45:25.960 It doesn't feel
00:45:26.960 like that.
00:45:28.220 You know, you
00:45:28.800 can imagine any
00:45:29.620 one person doing
00:45:30.720 that, no matter
00:45:32.400 who it is.
00:45:33.000 You can imagine
00:45:33.520 anybody lying.
00:45:34.820 But that's a lot
00:45:35.620 of liars.
00:45:37.200 How do you get
00:45:37.720 that many people
00:45:38.460 willing to tell
00:45:39.400 whoppers of
00:45:41.500 that size?
00:45:42.980 I mean, how would
00:45:43.420 you ever live that
00:45:44.160 down?
00:45:45.160 If you were
00:45:46.020 Sidney Powell,
00:45:47.560 let's say Sidney
00:45:48.380 Powell doesn't
00:45:49.880 deliver anything.
00:45:51.680 And let's say we
00:45:52.580 never find any
00:45:53.440 problem with the
00:45:54.180 software or
00:45:55.280 whatever in the
00:45:56.380 long run.
00:45:56.780 what does that
00:45:58.520 do to her
00:45:59.220 credibility?
00:46:01.320 You know, her
00:46:01.740 future ability to
00:46:04.700 get work.
00:46:05.260 It's kind of a
00:46:05.940 big hit.
00:46:07.260 I don't feel like
00:46:08.440 you would make a
00:46:09.160 claim like that
00:46:10.240 unless you were
00:46:11.920 pretty, pretty
00:46:13.220 confident that you
00:46:14.480 had the goods.
00:46:16.220 So I feel like
00:46:17.540 they think there's
00:46:18.440 something there.
00:46:20.560 When do we get
00:46:21.500 to see it?
00:46:21.960 All right.
00:46:26.420 Oh, Sidney just
00:46:27.220 tweeted a link to
00:46:28.440 exhibits of
00:46:29.360 evidence.
00:46:31.300 Well, let's look
00:46:32.640 at that right now.
00:46:34.340 Let's look at that
00:46:35.320 link.
00:46:35.840 I'll bet, without
00:46:36.700 looking at it, I'm
00:46:37.980 just going to make
00:46:38.580 a guess that it
00:46:40.980 will be something
00:46:41.780 that I can't tell
00:46:43.060 is real or not.
00:46:46.320 What do you want
00:46:47.400 to bet?
00:46:48.360 That I'll look at
00:46:49.080 the evidence and
00:46:50.100 I'll say, I don't
00:46:51.200 know.
00:46:52.580 Could be real.
00:46:53.580 I can't tell by
00:46:54.520 looking at it.
00:46:55.740 It's probably just
00:46:56.260 going to, all right,
00:46:56.960 so here it is.
00:47:00.820 No, that's a
00:47:01.680 freedom of speech
00:47:02.480 thing.
00:47:04.200 So it looks like
00:47:05.080 what she retweeted
00:47:06.140 was evidence of
00:47:07.600 the big, no,
00:47:11.280 she did not
00:47:12.820 retweet evidence
00:47:13.840 of fraud.
00:47:15.380 Yeah, I would like
00:47:20.960 to see the
00:47:21.680 signature
00:47:22.600 verification
00:47:23.480 story.
00:47:26.480 Do you think
00:47:27.400 the software can
00:47:28.480 check signatures?
00:47:31.400 Because I think
00:47:32.240 that's what they're
00:47:32.880 claiming, right?
00:47:33.800 The software is
00:47:35.080 checking the
00:47:35.660 signatures or
00:47:36.380 can.
00:47:37.560 Do you think
00:47:38.180 it can?
00:47:38.620 I don't know.
00:47:41.400 I feel as if I
00:47:42.420 don't sign my
00:47:43.120 name enough the
00:47:44.240 same way that
00:47:45.080 somebody could,
00:47:46.740 the software could
00:47:47.580 necessarily tell if
00:47:48.620 I signed it.
00:47:49.200 So Michael
00:47:54.820 Yahn is talking
00:47:55.620 about a civil
00:47:56.220 war coming.
00:47:57.120 I don't think
00:47:57.760 you have to worry
00:47:58.240 about a civil
00:47:58.760 war.
00:47:59.740 I just don't see
00:48:00.720 that happening.
00:48:01.740 I think that in
00:48:03.680 order to have a
00:48:04.280 civil war, you
00:48:06.460 have to have a
00:48:07.040 lot of people
00:48:07.560 who want one.
00:48:08.920 And we don't
00:48:09.420 have that.
00:48:11.160 The main
00:48:12.520 requirement for a
00:48:13.600 civil war is
00:48:14.420 missing.
00:48:15.500 The main
00:48:16.080 requirement,
00:48:17.640 somebody has to
00:48:18.360 want one.
00:48:19.760 Right?
00:48:20.620 Have you met
00:48:21.400 anybody who
00:48:22.060 actually wants a
00:48:23.260 civil war?
00:48:25.240 Not really.
00:48:26.780 Right?
00:48:27.560 If you talk to
00:48:28.640 people on the
00:48:29.240 left and you
00:48:29.940 said, all right,
00:48:31.120 you know, you
00:48:31.780 Antifa people,
00:48:33.100 what if you
00:48:34.260 could get your
00:48:34.800 wish?
00:48:35.900 Full-out civil
00:48:37.020 war.
00:48:37.740 Are you down?
00:48:39.160 How many people
00:48:39.960 even in Antifa
00:48:41.140 would want a
00:48:42.020 real civil war?
00:48:43.620 Because they're
00:48:44.280 not going to
00:48:44.760 win.
00:48:46.260 That's the first
00:48:47.020 problem.
00:48:47.820 So I got a
00:48:48.400 feeling that the
00:48:49.000 left doesn't
00:48:50.340 really want a
00:48:52.100 civil war, and
00:48:54.580 I know the
00:48:55.100 right doesn't
00:48:55.620 want it.
00:48:56.280 I've heard
00:48:56.860 exactly zero
00:48:57.860 people talking
00:48:58.800 in any kind
00:48:59.740 of a, you
00:49:01.060 know, a
00:49:01.620 positive way
00:49:02.480 that a civil
00:49:03.200 war will fix
00:49:04.060 everything.
00:49:05.100 You have to
00:49:06.360 have somebody
00:49:07.420 who's in
00:49:08.680 favor of it.
00:49:09.740 It just can't
00:49:10.640 happen without
00:49:11.180 that.
00:49:12.200 Right?
00:49:12.600 We don't have
00:49:13.400 leaders who are
00:49:14.240 in favor of it.
00:49:15.700 Do we?
00:49:16.380 Can you name
00:49:17.580 one leader on
00:49:18.980 the left or
00:49:19.500 the right who
00:49:20.600 is in favor
00:49:21.300 of a civil
00:49:22.740 war?
00:49:23.340 None.
00:49:24.240 None.
00:49:25.040 Can you think
00:49:25.880 of anybody,
00:49:27.080 even at the
00:49:28.540 marching level,
00:49:30.720 who will say
00:49:31.720 out loud,
00:49:32.900 yes, civil
00:49:34.080 war?
00:49:35.220 No.
00:49:36.140 No.
00:49:37.220 Now, you
00:49:37.560 might get
00:49:37.900 these, like,
00:49:38.600 nonviolent
00:49:39.520 color revolution
00:49:41.440 things that feel
00:49:42.380 like a slow
00:49:43.080 motion civil
00:49:44.420 war all the
00:49:45.120 time, but
00:49:46.180 a shooting
00:49:46.700 war?
00:49:48.300 No chance.
00:49:49.500 There's just
00:49:49.900 no chance.
00:49:50.700 You have to
00:49:51.200 have at least
00:49:51.740 one person
00:49:52.620 who wants
00:49:53.840 a civil
00:49:54.240 war.
00:49:54.680 We don't
00:49:54.940 have that.
00:49:56.580 Do we?
00:49:57.680 Think about
00:49:58.200 it.
00:49:58.740 Think about
00:49:59.260 the fact that
00:49:59.860 you've been
00:50:00.280 convinced that
00:50:01.700 there might
00:50:02.060 be a civil
00:50:02.640 war and
00:50:04.140 nobody wants
00:50:04.860 one.
00:50:06.120 There's not
00:50:06.780 going to be
00:50:07.060 a civil war.
00:50:08.440 There just
00:50:08.860 won't be.
00:50:09.500 Not even
00:50:09.920 close.
00:50:11.000 It's not
00:50:11.400 going to be
00:50:11.760 a near miss.
00:50:13.040 It's not
00:50:14.220 going to be
00:50:14.520 a close
00:50:14.980 call.
00:50:16.360 There's
00:50:16.820 going to
00:50:16.960 be nothing.
00:50:18.320 Just the
00:50:19.000 way I
00:50:19.340 predicted that
00:50:20.160 even if
00:50:21.240 Trump lost
00:50:22.080 the election,
00:50:23.540 and certainly
00:50:24.280 that's the
00:50:24.680 way it's
00:50:24.920 being reported
00:50:25.560 by the
00:50:26.180 news,
00:50:28.660 didn't you
00:50:29.220 think, or
00:50:30.040 not you,
00:50:30.860 but didn't
00:50:31.420 people say,
00:50:32.140 it's going
00:50:32.320 to be a
00:50:32.600 civil war,
00:50:34.420 no matter
00:50:35.560 what?
00:50:37.360 Zero
00:50:37.880 conservatives
00:50:39.260 showed any
00:50:40.680 interest in
00:50:41.240 the civil
00:50:41.600 war.
00:50:41.900 did you
00:50:42.840 see any
00:50:43.280 of the
00:50:43.540 militias
00:50:44.140 activate?
00:50:45.920 Did any
00:50:46.960 conservative
00:50:47.760 militia
00:50:48.540 activate?
00:50:51.240 Not that
00:50:51.840 I know
00:50:52.160 of.
00:50:53.240 I don't
00:50:53.800 think so.
00:50:55.740 So I
00:51:00.340 wouldn't
00:51:00.480 worry about
00:51:00.820 the civil
00:51:01.140 war.
00:51:03.360 All right.
00:51:03.840 I'm just
00:51:10.320 looking at
00:51:10.820 the article
00:51:11.560 that just
00:51:12.000 got sent
00:51:12.400 to me.
00:51:15.780 All right.
00:51:18.280 I don't
00:51:18.900 think I have
00:51:19.380 much else.
00:51:20.580 And the
00:51:22.020 proud boys,
00:51:23.140 you know,
00:51:23.780 the proud
00:51:24.400 boys are
00:51:25.800 hard to
00:51:26.280 talk about
00:51:27.040 because you
00:51:28.260 want to
00:51:28.660 pigeonhole
00:51:29.780 them and put
00:51:30.440 them in a
00:51:30.820 category.
00:51:31.260 category,
00:51:31.740 but they
00:51:32.380 just sort
00:51:32.980 of defy
00:51:33.720 categories.
00:51:35.200 Because you
00:51:35.780 want to say,
00:51:36.300 ah, it's a
00:51:36.720 bunch of
00:51:36.960 racists, but
00:51:38.180 then you
00:51:38.460 find out it's
00:51:39.320 a multi-ethnic
00:51:40.180 group.
00:51:41.120 You're like,
00:51:41.820 oh, okay,
00:51:42.560 that didn't
00:51:43.000 quite explain
00:51:44.420 who they
00:51:44.800 are.
00:51:45.620 And then you
00:51:46.140 say it's,
00:51:47.540 they like to
00:51:48.840 fight.
00:51:51.000 I think that's
00:51:51.900 probably true.
00:51:52.640 They probably
00:51:53.020 like to fight.
00:51:54.160 That might be
00:51:54.780 the only thing
00:51:55.340 that defines
00:51:56.960 them.
00:52:02.840 Yeah, I've
00:52:03.520 been having
00:52:03.840 quite a bit
00:52:04.920 of trouble
00:52:05.380 breathing in
00:52:06.400 public with
00:52:07.240 a mask on.
00:52:09.920 Like, does
00:52:10.560 anybody get
00:52:11.100 mask breathing
00:52:12.380 panic?
00:52:13.500 Does that
00:52:14.020 happen to
00:52:14.380 any of you?
00:52:15.200 Where you
00:52:15.900 feel like a
00:52:16.680 little twinge
00:52:18.680 of panic,
00:52:20.260 basically, that
00:52:20.980 you can't
00:52:21.380 breathe just
00:52:22.480 because you're
00:52:22.800 wearing a
00:52:23.160 mask?
00:52:23.440 I get
00:52:25.440 that every
00:52:25.920 time I put
00:52:26.380 a mask on.
00:52:28.100 Usually I
00:52:28.740 can fight
00:52:29.220 through it,
00:52:29.800 but it's
00:52:30.760 not pleasant.
00:52:33.260 Yeah, I'm
00:52:33.660 seeing some
00:52:34.080 others say
00:52:34.480 yes.
00:52:36.720 What did
00:52:37.320 you hear
00:52:37.620 about the
00:52:38.080 kraken
00:52:38.540 privately?
00:52:39.980 Well, I
00:52:41.200 can't tell you
00:52:41.740 what I've
00:52:42.080 seen privately,
00:52:43.060 but I will
00:52:43.400 tell you that
00:52:44.200 there's a
00:52:45.540 data argument
00:52:46.440 that I
00:52:47.980 haven't seen
00:52:48.460 made yet.
00:52:49.660 And I
00:52:50.000 don't know
00:52:50.360 if that's
00:52:50.760 because the
00:52:51.240 people who
00:52:51.760 are preparing
00:52:52.320 it have
00:52:53.300 given it
00:52:53.780 to the
00:52:54.060 lawyers and
00:52:54.540 we haven't
00:52:54.860 seen it,
00:52:55.680 or maybe
00:52:56.300 they found
00:52:56.760 out it
00:52:57.080 wasn't as
00:52:57.500 strong as
00:52:58.060 it could
00:52:58.580 have been.
00:52:59.020 I don't
00:52:59.260 know the
00:52:59.620 details of
00:53:00.280 that.
00:53:01.040 But I
00:53:01.320 will tell
00:53:01.660 you that
00:53:02.000 there is
00:53:02.580 a strong
00:53:03.200 argument that
00:53:04.000 exists that
00:53:06.120 the public
00:53:06.600 has not
00:53:07.000 seen.
00:53:07.880 And every
00:53:08.560 day that
00:53:09.040 you don't
00:53:09.460 see that,
00:53:10.940 you have
00:53:11.480 to reduce
00:53:12.580 your certainty
00:53:13.320 that it
00:53:13.760 even exists.
00:53:15.220 In other
00:53:15.540 words, I
00:53:16.060 think I've
00:53:16.480 seen it.
00:53:17.600 I believe
00:53:18.080 I've seen
00:53:18.480 it with my
00:53:18.860 own eyes,
00:53:19.520 but you can't
00:53:20.420 really look at
00:53:20.860 a bunch of
00:53:21.220 data and know
00:53:21.880 that it's
00:53:22.340 accurate, you
00:53:23.320 can't know
00:53:23.720 that the
00:53:24.100 context is
00:53:24.820 right, you
00:53:25.700 can't really
00:53:26.100 know what
00:53:26.460 you saw.
00:53:27.820 So it's
00:53:28.560 possible that
00:53:29.460 the things
00:53:30.020 I've seen
00:53:30.580 are not
00:53:31.700 as persuasive
00:53:33.940 as they
00:53:34.440 should be.
00:53:35.100 all right.
00:53:40.180 Yeah, and
00:53:40.820 the other
00:53:41.040 thing I
00:53:41.700 would say
00:53:42.120 about our
00:53:44.600 experience with
00:53:45.740 this election
00:53:46.320 is there
00:53:48.420 are so
00:53:49.020 many opportunities
00:53:50.040 for mischief
00:53:51.420 in an
00:53:52.000 election, I
00:53:52.680 had no
00:53:53.100 idea how
00:53:54.220 many different
00:53:54.820 ways that
00:53:55.540 cheating could
00:53:56.180 happen.
00:53:57.100 So if it
00:53:57.560 didn't happen,
00:53:58.260 it would be
00:53:58.680 pretty amazing.
00:53:59.560 somebody says
00:54:03.120 yes.
00:54:04.480 Oh yeah, a
00:54:05.080 lot of
00:54:05.280 people have
00:54:05.640 that mask
00:54:06.480 panic.
00:54:08.180 Now, I
00:54:08.700 have asthma,
00:54:10.320 so anything
00:54:11.460 that reminds
00:54:13.980 me of
00:54:14.480 breathing
00:54:14.920 difficulty
00:54:15.680 gets right
00:54:17.000 into my
00:54:17.500 lizard brain
00:54:18.240 right away.
00:54:19.100 So I
00:54:19.740 can't process
00:54:20.420 that rationally
00:54:22.680 because an
00:54:24.720 inability to
00:54:25.480 breathe goes
00:54:26.140 right to
00:54:26.520 your survival
00:54:27.620 mechanism.
00:54:28.480 So it's
00:54:29.300 tough to be
00:54:29.760 rational about
00:54:30.480 that.
00:54:34.120 All right, so
00:54:34.920 there's a
00:54:35.420 claim that
00:54:36.000 there are
00:54:36.320 places with
00:54:37.180 more votes
00:54:38.160 than
00:54:38.600 registered
00:54:39.240 voters.
00:54:41.320 I feel
00:54:42.240 that that
00:54:42.720 claim will
00:54:45.060 be debunked
00:54:45.980 if it
00:54:46.280 hasn't been
00:54:46.880 because
00:54:47.740 wouldn't that
00:54:48.440 be the
00:54:48.800 end of the
00:54:49.240 story?
00:54:50.640 You know,
00:54:50.880 if you had
00:54:51.360 seen data
00:54:51.900 that there
00:54:52.720 are more
00:54:53.400 votes than
00:54:54.920 registered
00:54:55.540 voters,
00:54:56.820 and it
00:54:57.120 was more
00:54:57.560 than, let's
00:54:58.100 say, you
00:54:58.640 know, one
00:54:59.020 county or
00:54:59.600 something that
00:55:00.040 might have
00:55:00.300 been a
00:55:00.540 mistake,
00:55:01.320 that would
00:55:02.080 tell you a
00:55:02.460 lot.
00:55:02.720 Wouldn't
00:55:02.900 that be
00:55:03.260 sort of the
00:55:03.760 end of
00:55:04.040 the game
00:55:04.420 if you
00:55:05.420 knew that
00:55:05.760 that were
00:55:06.060 the case?
00:55:06.920 And I've
00:55:07.420 heard those
00:55:07.800 stories, but
00:55:09.260 yet I'm
00:55:10.940 not seeing
00:55:11.420 credible
00:55:12.000 information on
00:55:12.880 that, that
00:55:14.020 that's a
00:55:14.820 widespread
00:55:15.240 thing.
00:55:15.800 It could
00:55:16.060 be.
00:55:20.660 They may
00:55:21.380 not advance
00:55:22.080 a data
00:55:22.420 argument for
00:55:23.160 the sake
00:55:23.640 of the
00:55:23.940 country.
00:55:24.800 No, the
00:55:26.460 one thing I
00:55:27.000 can tell you
00:55:27.620 is that the
00:55:28.160 people doing
00:55:28.960 the data
00:55:29.460 arguments will
00:55:30.700 advance them.
00:55:32.160 So there's
00:55:32.960 nobody on the
00:55:33.880 data side who's
00:55:35.600 going to sit on
00:55:36.380 anything for the
00:55:37.140 good of the
00:55:37.560 country, because
00:55:38.920 I don't think
00:55:39.300 they think that
00:55:39.880 that's necessarily
00:55:41.200 the good of
00:55:42.020 the country.
00:55:43.140 Yeah, somebody
00:55:43.640 said that
00:55:44.240 CodeMonkeyZ is
00:55:46.060 going to release
00:55:46.760 some evidence
00:55:48.820 today.
00:55:49.340 So I think
00:55:50.240 today's the
00:55:50.840 day, all
00:55:52.240 right?
00:55:52.720 If you don't
00:55:53.460 see some good
00:55:54.200 stuff today, I'd
00:55:57.280 start worrying.
00:55:58.200 I'd start worrying
00:55:59.040 after today,
00:56:00.600 certainly after
00:56:01.260 tomorrow.
00:56:01.860 If we get to
00:56:02.520 the end of the
00:56:03.000 week and you
00:56:03.460 haven't seen
00:56:03.900 anything, I
00:56:05.340 would reduce my
00:56:06.500 odds that you
00:56:07.180 will ever see
00:56:07.940 something to
00:56:08.840 50%.
00:56:10.540 So I'm at
00:56:12.500 95% that the
00:56:14.800 election was
00:56:15.420 stolen and we
00:56:16.340 can prove it.
00:56:17.320 if it's the
00:56:18.860 end of the
00:56:19.240 week and I
00:56:19.820 still haven't
00:56:20.900 seen it, at
00:56:22.000 least in public
00:56:22.600 I haven't seen
00:56:23.140 it, I'm going
00:56:24.240 to lower that
00:56:24.680 to 50%.
00:56:25.600 But we've got
00:56:27.600 a few days,
00:56:28.220 we'll see.
00:56:36.120 Did Scott
00:56:37.160 strike out?
00:56:38.900 Strike out on
00:56:39.680 what?
00:56:41.980 The link to
00:56:42.760 the initial
00:56:43.200 evidence is on
00:56:44.140 Len Wood's
00:56:44.860 timeline.
00:56:45.760 All right, I'll
00:56:47.340 take a look at
00:56:47.860 that.
00:56:48.220 So somebody says
00:56:48.880 Len Wood has
00:56:49.980 a link to
00:56:51.800 it.
00:56:53.760 Do you have
00:56:54.400 to be registered
00:56:55.100 to vote?
00:56:57.120 I don't know.
00:56:58.620 I mean, I know
00:56:59.260 there were some
00:56:59.700 places that let
00:57:00.480 you register and
00:57:01.620 then vote, so
00:57:03.520 you could do
00:57:04.000 same-day
00:57:04.480 registration in
00:57:05.360 some places.
00:57:08.900 So I don't
00:57:09.560 know.
00:57:09.880 I don't know if
00:57:10.760 you were not a
00:57:12.160 citizen.
00:57:13.740 Could you vote
00:57:14.400 in some places?
00:57:15.060 I just don't
00:57:15.620 know.
00:57:17.140 The story about
00:57:18.040 the German
00:57:18.600 server is, I
00:57:19.980 would say, highly
00:57:20.940 unlikely to be
00:57:22.400 true.
00:57:23.480 If you were to
00:57:24.400 rank all of the
00:57:25.360 stories we're
00:57:25.960 hearing in
00:57:27.120 terms of, well,
00:57:28.860 on first look,
00:57:32.740 how likely are
00:57:33.660 they to be
00:57:34.120 true?
00:57:34.560 I would put at
00:57:35.180 the top of my
00:57:35.980 list of fake
00:57:37.560 news, the
00:57:38.260 German server.
00:57:39.900 That would be
00:57:40.620 number one as
00:57:42.720 the least likely
00:57:43.740 thing to be
00:57:44.360 true.
00:57:46.080 The most
00:57:47.120 likely thing to
00:57:48.060 be true is
00:57:49.140 any small
00:57:49.900 story where
00:57:51.600 one person
00:57:52.500 voted and
00:57:53.320 their vote
00:57:53.760 didn't get
00:57:54.260 counted or
00:57:55.620 they find one
00:57:56.720 flash drive that
00:57:58.140 wasn't loaded.
00:57:58.940 So the small
00:58:00.500 ones at least
00:58:01.080 have a good
00:58:01.520 chance of being
00:58:02.140 true.
00:58:02.940 The big one,
00:58:03.840 like the German
00:58:04.680 server, I
00:58:07.480 don't know.
00:58:09.200 I think that
00:58:09.980 one's pretty
00:58:10.400 unlikely.
00:58:10.820 somebody says
00:58:13.540 they bet the
00:58:14.140 German server
00:58:15.100 story is true.
00:58:15.980 I would take
00:58:16.400 that bet.
00:58:19.640 Am I being
00:58:20.540 hunted yet?
00:58:21.720 Well, I have
00:58:22.380 been threatened
00:58:23.220 at my home,
00:58:24.980 you know, by
00:58:27.580 some stranger.
00:58:29.860 And, you
00:58:32.080 know, I'm
00:58:32.580 continually
00:58:33.160 bullied online
00:58:36.680 by people
00:58:37.440 saying I will
00:58:38.300 pay and
00:58:39.020 karma is going
00:58:39.620 to get me
00:58:40.200 and, you
00:58:41.220 know, it'll
00:58:41.900 all come
00:58:42.280 back to
00:58:42.620 me, etc.
00:58:44.180 So not
00:58:45.100 directly as
00:58:46.680 in I would
00:58:47.580 have to act
00:58:48.140 on it.
00:58:54.320 Somebody
00:58:54.800 says no
00:58:55.400 because they
00:58:55.920 are not
00:58:56.220 checking this
00:58:56.960 year.
00:58:57.280 Checking
00:58:57.580 what?
00:58:57.940 Registration?
00:59:01.060 Somebody
00:59:01.580 says Google
00:59:02.360 Proud Boys
00:59:03.200 and Iran.
00:59:04.480 If I
00:59:05.200 Google the
00:59:05.740 Proud Boys
00:59:06.340 and Iran,
00:59:07.700 will I find
00:59:08.520 out that Iran
00:59:09.380 is funding
00:59:09.900 the Proud
00:59:10.360 Boys?
00:59:10.980 That doesn't
00:59:12.080 seem likely
00:59:12.680 to me.
00:59:14.440 Because the
00:59:15.280 Proud Boys
00:59:15.740 are primarily
00:59:17.800 patriots.
00:59:20.200 So whatever
00:59:21.080 that Iran
00:59:21.760 connection is
00:59:22.580 that is alleged
00:59:23.380 there, that
00:59:24.560 doesn't sound
00:59:25.100 real to me.
00:59:27.220 Somebody
00:59:27.760 says Scott
00:59:28.380 failed bigly on
00:59:29.480 election predictions.
00:59:31.060 Did I?
00:59:32.460 Did I?
00:59:33.060 The weird
00:59:35.580 thing about
00:59:36.060 this election
00:59:36.740 is that you
00:59:38.440 could guess
00:59:39.240 or predict
00:59:40.240 who got
00:59:41.320 elected
00:59:42.060 incorrectly
00:59:43.580 and still
00:59:44.200 be the best
00:59:44.840 predictor.
00:59:47.040 You know
00:59:47.680 how that's
00:59:48.040 possible,
00:59:48.480 right?
00:59:49.160 So in my
00:59:50.240 case, I
00:59:51.040 predicted that
00:59:51.760 the professional
00:59:53.160 polls, the
00:59:54.800 ones that
00:59:55.400 showed a big
00:59:55.980 difference,
00:59:56.500 were all
00:59:57.240 fake.
00:59:58.220 That's a
00:59:58.960 pretty big
00:59:59.920 prediction,
01:00:02.240 isn't it?
01:00:02.760 That's a
01:00:03.080 pretty bold
01:00:03.580 prediction,
01:00:04.760 that the
01:00:05.380 main polls
01:00:07.140 are just
01:00:07.660 fake, that
01:00:08.920 they're not
01:00:09.200 even close.
01:00:10.200 Was I
01:00:10.680 right that
01:00:12.100 the polling
01:00:12.620 was atrocious?
01:00:14.460 Yeah.
01:00:15.460 And that was a
01:00:16.200 pretty bold
01:00:16.700 prediction.
01:00:17.820 Now, that
01:00:19.160 did get the
01:00:19.700 election at
01:00:20.380 least, you
01:00:20.860 know, close.
01:00:22.260 So the
01:00:23.580 people who
01:00:24.020 thought that
01:00:24.460 Biden would
01:00:25.060 walk away
01:00:25.660 from it,
01:00:26.320 even in the
01:00:27.320 battlefield
01:00:28.860 states, they
01:00:30.500 were very
01:00:31.020 wrong.
01:00:32.020 So the
01:00:32.420 people who
01:00:32.880 said that
01:00:33.360 Biden would
01:00:34.060 win, but
01:00:35.320 he would
01:00:35.720 win by
01:00:36.140 this much,
01:00:37.920 were wrong
01:00:38.760 by this
01:00:40.060 much.
01:00:41.020 If you're
01:00:41.460 listening to
01:00:41.980 this on
01:00:42.360 audio, I'm
01:00:43.500 holding my
01:00:44.020 hands at a
01:00:44.600 certain
01:00:44.840 distance.
01:00:46.400 Now, I
01:00:47.900 guessed the
01:00:48.460 president wrong,
01:00:50.000 but in
01:00:50.660 terms of how
01:00:51.400 wrong I
01:00:51.960 was, I
01:00:52.900 was only
01:00:53.380 wrong this
01:00:53.980 much, because
01:00:55.360 the vote
01:00:56.080 was close.
01:00:57.660 So even
01:00:57.980 though I
01:00:58.460 guessed the
01:01:00.340 wrong winner
01:01:01.120 in terms of
01:01:01.700 the first
01:01:02.180 draft of
01:01:02.840 the count,
01:01:04.060 even though I
01:01:04.660 got that
01:01:05.020 wrong, I
01:01:06.760 was pretty
01:01:07.320 close.
01:01:08.640 The people
01:01:09.120 who got the
01:01:09.660 right president
01:01:10.440 were off by
01:01:11.620 a mile,
01:01:12.300 because they
01:01:12.640 thought the
01:01:13.040 polls were
01:01:13.520 right.
01:01:14.340 In other
01:01:14.620 words, Van
01:01:16.160 Jones correctly
01:01:17.320 thought that
01:01:18.040 Biden would
01:01:18.600 win, but
01:01:19.960 he missed
01:01:20.620 how much he
01:01:21.500 would win
01:01:21.820 by a mile.
01:01:23.460 I thought
01:01:24.000 Trump would
01:01:24.540 win, but
01:01:26.980 it was kind
01:01:28.160 of close
01:01:28.640 election, so
01:01:29.760 I was actually
01:01:30.240 closer while
01:01:32.100 being wrong,
01:01:33.300 which is very
01:01:34.080 similar to
01:01:34.880 what Nate
01:01:36.460 Silver would
01:01:37.040 say of
01:01:37.400 2016, which
01:01:38.760 is in the
01:01:39.180 end the
01:01:39.600 polls were
01:01:40.020 actually kind
01:01:40.540 of close.
01:01:41.600 So you can
01:01:42.140 always make an
01:01:42.700 argument with
01:01:43.280 the data that
01:01:43.900 you weren't as
01:01:44.540 bad as you
01:01:45.840 looked.
01:01:46.420 Now, I would
01:01:46.920 also say that
01:01:47.680 it is my
01:01:48.320 personal belief
01:01:49.680 as of
01:01:50.300 Wednesday that
01:01:51.880 the election
01:01:52.340 was stolen.
01:01:53.700 So if you
01:01:54.220 say that I
01:01:55.600 was wrong in
01:01:56.340 my prediction,
01:01:57.780 I don't know
01:01:58.820 that I was
01:01:59.200 wrong.
01:02:00.540 Now, my
01:02:01.220 more current
01:02:01.880 prediction,
01:02:03.620 the most
01:02:04.740 recent one,
01:02:05.900 was that in
01:02:06.920 this coin flip
01:02:07.860 the answer
01:02:09.260 would be
01:02:09.760 edge.
01:02:11.140 I did a
01:02:11.820 comic about
01:02:12.420 this a long
01:02:13.040 time ago.
01:02:14.000 I think it
01:02:14.320 was Dogbert,
01:02:15.000 or Dilbert,
01:02:16.200 I can't
01:02:16.420 remember.
01:02:16.980 They did a
01:02:17.460 coin flip and
01:02:18.060 one of them
01:02:18.520 guessed it
01:02:19.000 would land
01:02:19.380 on its
01:02:19.740 edge, and
01:02:21.220 he guessed
01:02:21.800 correctly.
01:02:22.860 I guessed
01:02:23.640 that this
01:02:24.220 election would
01:02:25.460 turn into
01:02:25.940 nobody won,
01:02:27.140 or both of
01:02:27.800 them won.
01:02:28.300 In other
01:02:28.580 words, they
01:02:28.900 would both
01:02:29.300 be claimed
01:02:29.780 as the
01:02:30.120 president.
01:02:31.480 That was
01:02:32.160 a pretty
01:02:32.480 bold prediction.
01:02:34.680 Has anybody
01:02:35.480 ever predicted
01:02:36.520 that the
01:02:37.600 winner of the
01:02:38.160 presidential election
01:02:39.240 would be
01:02:39.720 both?
01:02:41.260 Nobody ever
01:02:41.980 predicted that
01:02:42.600 before, but
01:02:44.020 I did.
01:02:45.000 And I think
01:02:45.960 we're there.
01:02:47.100 To me, it
01:02:47.860 looks like we
01:02:48.340 have two
01:02:48.700 presidents who
01:02:49.540 both have a
01:02:50.180 claim, and
01:02:51.400 they're both
01:02:52.360 pretty good.
01:02:54.360 Biden's claim,
01:02:55.320 of course, is
01:02:55.820 strong, but I
01:02:57.600 think Trump's
01:02:58.180 claim is pretty
01:02:59.520 darn strong and
01:03:00.620 might get
01:03:00.980 stronger.
01:03:02.120 So I'm still
01:03:03.760 going to go
01:03:04.240 with history
01:03:05.580 will record that
01:03:06.660 Trump won on
01:03:07.860 votes, but it
01:03:09.680 might record that
01:03:10.680 Biden took the
01:03:11.740 job because
01:03:13.320 the media
01:03:15.800 can just make
01:03:16.480 whatever reality
01:03:17.260 it wants, and
01:03:17.960 it looks like
01:03:18.440 that's the
01:03:18.800 reality they
01:03:19.300 want.
01:03:20.280 All right,
01:03:20.540 that's all I
01:03:20.880 got for now.
01:03:21.580 Somebody said,
01:03:23.500 how did Trump
01:03:24.120 win again if
01:03:26.240 the election was
01:03:26.920 stolen?
01:03:28.200 Simple.
01:03:29.420 And I will
01:03:29.860 talk to you
01:03:30.460 tomorrow.
01:03:33.840 All right,
01:03:34.580 Periscope is
01:03:35.300 gone.
01:03:36.160 Any of you
01:03:36.760 YouTubers have
01:03:37.500 any questions
01:03:38.140 for me?
01:03:43.640 Yeah, so
01:03:44.560 Laurie is
01:03:45.080 agreeing with
01:03:45.620 me that
01:03:46.040 history will
01:03:46.980 record that
01:03:47.660 they both
01:03:48.140 won.
01:03:53.020 What did
01:03:53.720 you hear about
01:03:54.220 the Kraken
01:03:54.800 privately?
01:03:55.820 Well, the
01:03:56.280 things that I've
01:03:57.220 heard privately
01:03:58.220 are data
01:03:59.320 arguments.
01:04:00.580 So in other
01:04:00.980 words, there
01:04:02.580 are alleged
01:04:04.400 a number of
01:04:05.400 irregularities that
01:04:06.660 really couldn't
01:04:07.500 be explained
01:04:08.180 by anything
01:04:08.720 but fraud.
01:04:09.860 There just
01:04:10.400 isn't any
01:04:10.920 second explanation
01:04:12.960 for it.
01:04:17.400 Why am I
01:04:18.240 giving YouTubers
01:04:19.020 special treatment?
01:04:20.920 Don't you
01:04:21.560 deserve it?
01:04:24.060 Trump's chance
01:04:25.160 of a shadow
01:04:25.820 presidency.
01:04:27.780 Well, the
01:04:28.900 scariest Trump
01:04:30.100 would be
01:04:30.640 Trump in
01:04:31.380 charge of a
01:04:32.020 media entity.
01:04:35.100 Now, think
01:04:36.400 about the
01:04:36.820 fact that
01:04:37.300 CNN is
01:04:38.200 for sale
01:04:38.740 and Trump
01:04:41.600 might be
01:04:42.060 looking to
01:04:42.860 own some
01:04:43.840 media entity.
01:04:45.660 Trump could
01:04:46.380 literally buy
01:04:47.780 CNN with
01:04:49.720 investors,
01:04:50.940 et cetera,
01:04:51.560 and he could
01:04:52.660 fire all the
01:04:53.440 CNN people
01:04:54.200 he doesn't
01:04:54.660 like and
01:04:55.640 just use the
01:04:56.220 network for
01:04:56.720 his own
01:04:57.020 network and
01:04:58.360 just turn it
01:04:58.960 into a
01:04:59.560 conservative
01:05:00.460 network.
01:05:01.740 That would be
01:05:03.260 the ultimate
01:05:03.880 revenge,
01:05:05.240 buying CNN
01:05:05.960 and firing
01:05:06.900 everybody that
01:05:07.560 didn't like
01:05:08.040 him.
01:05:10.180 I don't
01:05:10.720 think that's
01:05:11.880 going to
01:05:12.080 happen, by
01:05:12.480 the way.
01:05:13.020 It would
01:05:13.340 make more
01:05:13.700 sense for
01:05:14.100 him to
01:05:14.320 just start
01:05:14.760 his own
01:05:15.040 thing.
01:05:20.480 Give you
01:05:20.980 an example
01:05:21.500 of the good
01:05:22.060 stuff?
01:05:23.480 Well, I
01:05:25.340 don't want to
01:05:25.740 do that
01:05:26.140 because I
01:05:27.760 don't want to
01:05:28.220 tell you more
01:05:29.140 than I should,
01:05:29.700 but it's a
01:05:31.000 data argument.
01:05:31.960 Let's put it
01:05:32.320 that way.
01:05:35.440 What if
01:05:36.040 Biden tries to
01:05:36.880 take guns?
01:05:37.900 Civil war
01:05:38.700 then?
01:05:39.660 It just
01:05:40.340 won't happen
01:05:41.140 because there
01:05:42.820 is not going
01:05:44.120 to be a
01:05:44.520 situation where
01:05:45.260 somebody knocks
01:05:45.980 on your door
01:05:46.520 to take your
01:05:47.080 gun.
01:05:47.800 It's just not
01:05:48.380 going to
01:05:48.560 happen.
01:05:49.680 It would be
01:05:50.320 too dangerous.
01:05:51.340 I could see
01:05:51.840 a situation
01:05:52.420 where he would
01:05:52.960 say you
01:05:53.380 can't buy
01:05:53.960 one.
01:05:56.600 That might
01:05:57.020 happen, but
01:05:58.120 it would also
01:05:58.680 guarantee that
01:06:00.280 Republicans
01:06:01.340 take the
01:06:02.240 Congress in
01:06:02.820 2022.
01:06:06.680 So I
01:06:07.260 think that
01:06:07.560 whatever Biden
01:06:08.200 does might
01:06:08.800 be a short
01:06:09.460 term situation
01:06:10.980 because I
01:06:12.380 feel as
01:06:12.920 though the
01:06:14.200 writing is on
01:06:15.100 the wall at
01:06:15.600 this point.
01:06:16.240 The Republicans
01:06:16.960 will take over
01:06:17.780 the Congress
01:06:18.300 in 2022 or
01:06:20.260 2024.
01:06:20.980 Yes, Cindy,
01:06:30.160 you're right.
01:06:30.680 There will
01:06:30.960 not be.
01:06:32.220 Somebody says
01:06:32.900 you live in a
01:06:33.560 gated community.
01:06:34.420 I don't,
01:06:34.960 actually.
01:06:35.380 I do not
01:06:35.920 live in a
01:06:36.380 gated community.
01:06:37.040 I have a
01:06:37.560 choice to
01:06:38.320 live in a
01:06:38.680 gated community,
01:06:39.400 but I don't
01:06:41.040 like it because
01:06:42.960 the gate is
01:06:43.620 such a gigantic
01:06:44.580 pain in the
01:06:45.920 butt.
01:06:46.980 So I'm
01:06:47.740 pretty secure
01:06:48.440 here, so I
01:06:49.840 don't need a
01:06:50.280 gate.
01:06:51.080 All right,
01:06:51.540 that's all I
01:06:52.480 got for today
01:06:53.180 and I will
01:06:53.600 talk to you
01:06:54.180 tomorrow.