Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1213 Scott Adams： Biden's Coronavirus Plan, Swalwell's Chinese Spy, Pelosi Still a Steaming Pile of Feces

00:00:00.000 were you worried i wasn't gonna show up on time i see in the comments he's late he's late

00:00:10.900 it's still 7 a.m ish i'm within a minute that's not bad but if you'd like to maximize your

00:00:20.240 experience all you need is a cup or mug or glass of tanker chalces thine a canteen jugger flaska

00:00:25.680 vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the

00:00:34.140 unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day the thing that makes everything better except

00:00:39.780 joe biden's coronavirus plan it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now go

00:00:44.740 well there it was the best part of your day what uh would you like to hear a little persuasion

00:00:56.920 trick i'm gonna give you one i like to leave you with at least one little nugget every day 0.78

00:01:04.860 some tiny little thing that you didn't know before or or reinforce something you did know

00:01:10.440 and here's one so every day when i do the uh simultaneous sip i tell you that it's the best

00:01:18.700 part of your day now what do you think that does for most of you let's say 80 you say to yourself oh

00:01:27.740 that's just something he says it's not it's sort of a branding thing doesn't have any real value but i

00:01:34.900 can tell you as a trained hypnotist and a skilled persuader that approximately 20 percent of the

00:01:41.160 people listening to this minimum it could be a lot more but a minimum of 20 percent

00:01:46.200 will actually take that suggestion and it will become true how many of you would already admit

00:01:55.460 that this is your favorite favorite part of the day now if you don't think that simply telling

00:02:01.800 somebody how to feel or how they will feel works then you haven't studied persuasion 80 of the

00:02:09.580 time it doesn't work but if you're dealing with a big crowd you can simply say this is the best time

00:02:16.800 of the day and if you say it often enough and you repeat it and you mean it because it is the best

00:02:23.000 part of the day for me it actually becomes true so repetition simplicity and the fact that a big

00:02:31.800 crowd will always have 20 that can be persuaded of anything makes it very powerful now here's the

00:02:37.440 trick there there's there's an important trick to this it had to be something that you wanted to do

00:02:45.620 anyway so if i had been trying to convince 20 of the public to do something they didn't want to do

00:02:52.520 it was unpleasant in some way well i'm not going to have that much luck i'd have to be an amazing

00:02:57.820 persuader and have lots of time and really working on it to move anything but getting people to do

00:03:05.100 something that they would enjoy is actually pretty easy so if i told you to you know eat a cookie

00:03:12.720 20 of you would say i'm kind of hungry for a cookie i was thinking about a cookie just five minutes

00:03:20.680 ago i would happily eat a cookie and 80 would say i don't want a cookie so those are your uh that's

00:03:28.640 your persuasion tip for the day simply tell people what to feel and it'll work just not everybody

00:03:37.940 uh there's a suicide drone now so-called suicide drone uh which the military can launch uh like a

00:03:47.580 rocket and apparently it its wings flap out after it gets launched and that it will sort of fly over

00:03:54.460 its target and the military can see it on their ipad and they can see that the target is below it

00:04:00.600 and it's now at a point where the military can just point to the ipad and circle the target and the drone

00:04:08.300 goes and dive bombs and explodes and it's a suicide thing now if you're saying to yourself isn't that

00:04:17.380 kind of like what we've always had we we've had for a long time the ability to have a drone just

00:04:24.500 destroy something we've had for a long time yeah cruise missiles basically it would just be a little

00:04:29.260 cruise missile but here's what i think is different and something we'll have to look out for

00:04:36.180 uh i don't believe it's purely kinetic i believe the suicide drone actually does explode but here's

00:04:43.560 what's different it doesn't need to be controlled its entire path which is the really scary part

00:04:51.000 and this is part i predicted in my book uh the religion war back in i don't know 2003 or whatever it

00:04:59.780 was and i predicted that as soon as drones could be operated not by an operator but simply by a gps

00:05:08.340 coordinate that we're in big trouble and the time the moment that a terrorist anywhere in the city

00:05:16.340 can just toss a uh you know toss a drone in the air and just take out their ipad and go boop

00:05:25.060 and that and that drone will find its way there and you know weave through the buildings because

00:05:30.320 maybe it's got some some sensors on it ah what do you do about that what do you do about that

00:05:37.000 we'll figure it out but it's a good uh good challenge or a big challenge um yesterday i tried out some

00:05:46.520 new software called streamyard so streamyard allows you to just use your browser to have a guest in a

00:05:56.600 in a podcast but what's different about it is it can broadcast to both periscope and youtube so i

00:06:04.380 tried that out yesterday with author joel pollock he's got a new book out and uh look in my feed for

00:06:12.020 that so the book is uh about our elections whether they were fair and free so it's joel pollock it got

00:06:20.020 a hundred and i think it's nearly 180 000 views just on periscope which is uh gigantic numbers so i'm

00:06:29.240 wondering um thank you some people are saying they enjoyed it i'm wondering if i should do more

00:06:35.380 interviews because that one did spectacular it it don't performed anything i've done by myself

00:06:42.840 so i think i'll experiment with that maybe do a few more interviews i'll probably do them not in the

00:06:49.860 morning hour but i might do them at a different time and then they'll become permanent so all right

00:06:56.140 i'll do that elon musk is moving to texas moving down to california moving to texas

00:07:02.180 um i don't have much to say about that except it looks like texas is winning

00:07:09.720 and california is losing and honestly the only thing that doesn't the only reason i haven't already

00:07:18.260 moved to texas is you know you get a certain amount of uh roots and other other things so it makes it

00:07:25.540 hard to move but all things being equal i would leave tomorrow i believe i believe california is

00:07:31.940 just not the place to be anymore i don't know what texas thinks about legalizing marijuana so that

00:07:38.720 would be a problem too for me so that might might keep me away um keely mackinney tweeted i think

00:07:47.180 yesterday that uh and i believe this was part of their uh lawsuit that i think has already been

00:07:53.520 rejected by the supreme court we'll talk about that but there was a part of it where some calculations

00:07:59.540 were done and here's how she explained it so this she's paraphrasing from some statistician who

00:08:07.040 looked at the election and claimed this the chances of biden winning pennsylvania michigan georgia

00:08:13.620 wisconsin uh independently after uh trump had an early lead is less than one in a quadrillion

00:08:22.660 one in a quadrillion so the odds that the election was free and fair i'm using joel's term but he doesn't

00:08:35.300 use it so much in the fraud sense uh when joel's talking about fraud uh whether the election is free

00:08:42.620 and fair he's talking about everything from the social media influence to the bullying to the fake

00:08:47.940 news etc um but the odds that it wasn't fixed like literally just rigged according to one expert is

00:08:56.400 one in a quadrillion now do you believe that do you believe any statistician who says the odds of

00:09:05.960 something are one in a quadrillion i don't i think i think this is easily exaggerated by at least a hundred

00:09:13.620 percent so if we're being fair i think the odds that the election was stolen is not one in a quadrillion

00:09:20.420 maybe one and a half a quadrillion tops that's as high as i'm gonna go because i'm not gonna buy into

00:09:29.320 this hyperbole one in a quadrillion if it's over one and a half quadrillion i will eat my hat seriously

00:09:39.420 i feel like they exaggerated that it can't be more than one and a half one and a half a half a

00:09:45.220 quadrillion maximum one and of a quarter quadrillion is the most it could be okay i'll go one in a

00:09:55.440 billion that's that's as low as i'm gonna go one in a billion chance that the election was not rigged

00:10:04.640 all right one in a million i'll go i'll go one in a million because i don't like hyperbole

00:10:10.680 so i'll i'll reduce that all the way to there's a one in a million chance it was perfectly good

00:10:18.080 election now i'll say one in a thousand one in a thousand because you know it's just so easy to

00:10:25.820 exaggerate online and uh i feel that's you know maybe a little exaggeration so one in a thousand

00:10:31.680 there's a one in a thousand chance that we got a real election so you got to feel pretty good about

00:10:36.740 that a lot of you were thinking i don't think there's any chance that this election was rigged

00:10:43.180 no there is a chance statistician has shown you with all the math and stuff that there is a chance this

00:10:51.680 was a good election one in a quadrillion

00:10:55.140 so as i have been foreshadowing now for weeks and you didn't like it one bit and i was telling you

00:11:03.840 the following the supreme court won't care about the law when they decide on any of these election

00:11:12.460 things that's right if you didn't know this was going to happen it might have surprised you

00:11:18.540 because the pennsylvania lawsuit about the pennsylvania rules changes that didn't follow their

00:11:25.420 own process etc was kind of a slam dunk on the law right the law was as clear as it could be it was

00:11:34.340 the wrong entity that made a change clear as day here here's what the constitution of the state said

00:11:42.900 could happen and then here's what happened and it wasn't according to the constitution

00:11:48.240 so it'd be pretty easy right for the supreme court to say oh here's your rule here's what

00:11:54.380 you did it doesn't didn't follow the rule boom but as i told you the supreme court doesn't care

00:12:00.820 about the law they care about the law most of the time but when it comes to a situation where

00:12:06.720 the larger objective is to keep society together and i don't object to that being a valid thing that

00:12:16.300 they do all right that's why it's humans that's why it's our most trusted uh unbiased to the point

00:12:23.720 you know as much as you can be unbiased the reason that we put so much importance in the supreme court

00:12:31.360 is so they can do this all right it's not just so they can tell you what the law is and interpret it

00:12:38.820 it's also this this is really important they are the most i would say probably the most trusted

00:12:46.820 institution maybe the military but that doesn't count for this um and they needed to do the thing

00:12:54.440 that would help unify the country and hold us together and they decided to hold us together as

00:13:00.800 not a republic so a republic would be you know you know what that is there's the will of the people

00:13:07.600 and there's voting and transparency and all that but they did the supreme court decided it was more

00:13:14.440 important to you know to uh avoid social trouble than it was to be technically accurate and and perfect

00:13:25.220 in on these legal stuff so if you didn't see that coming i'm sorry but you should have been able to

00:13:31.600 see that coming from a mile away they were just going to ignore it and they and they uh decided to not

00:13:38.100 even entertain the uh the pennsylvania lawsuit so the cnn is reporting it's over it's over there is no

00:13:47.260 there's no doubt about it now you've got president-elect biden now unlike many of you i congratulate

00:13:55.180 him the first day that the press had a consensus in which they said he's the president-elect um which

00:14:04.060 does so in terms of tradition i decided to call him president-elect too because of tradition but uh i did

00:14:13.860 think there was still some reasonable possibility that it would get overthrown now i will say that the odds

00:14:19.940 of historians being positive it was a rigged election are close to 100 percent pretty close

00:14:27.560 to 100 percent i don't think there's really any serious possibility that five or ten years from now

00:14:34.720 you'll be reading about this election and everybody will say you know despite all of those claims

00:14:40.900 all this time has gone by and it looked like it was a pretty solid good election you're not going to

00:14:47.440 find that out you're going to find out that uh it was it was fixed i think you'll find out at the same

00:14:55.620 time that they've all been fixed but you can't fix them as accurately as you want to so i think trump

00:15:02.360 slipped through last time i think that's all it was my guess is that that's all it was now i was

00:15:08.760 watching uh robert barnes and uh uh people's pundit talking about what evidence there is of fraud

00:15:17.080 and uh barnes uh who does a great job of communicating on all this stuff by the way he probably is your best

00:15:25.020 voice for something that's real without the hyperbole so i would recommend him uh barnes b-a-r-n-e-s so

00:15:34.040 uh one of his points is that the strongest evidence of fraud is the the way it's always been detected

00:15:42.100 so there is a way that historically we've looked for fraud and when you see these signals historically

00:15:49.700 it means it's there and do we have those signals now and the answer is according to the people who

00:15:56.860 looked into it which would not include me yes the signals are unambiguous and the signals are this

00:16:04.180 uh and i'll see if i can explain it as as well as as uh barnes did but uh the signal is that if you

00:16:11.340 have two areas uh let's say within a state that are kindred in terms of their politics let's say

00:16:17.960 they're all republicans or they're all democrats there and they're kindred in terms of their uh demo

00:16:23.680 demographics so the the mix of of ethnicities and ages or whatever are kind of similar and you've

00:16:31.680 got two of them sitting next to each other or within the same state and let's say one of them

00:16:37.000 has an election turnout of i don't know 65 percent whatever is sort of ordinary or good and the other

00:16:44.940 one has a turnout of 85 percent that's fraud now could it be could it be that statistical aberrations

00:16:55.420 happen all the time and it was just a weird year and 85 percent of this one group literally voted

00:17:02.520 very unusual but they just had a big turnout is that possible sure totally possible if there were

00:17:11.820 only one of them what would be your conclusion it's sketchy but there's only one of them

00:17:19.440 and statistics do cluster for just coincidental reasons so it could be just a coincidence but

00:17:28.260 what if there are a whole bunch of them where you've got kindred places where there's just a

00:17:35.200 massive difference in the turnout well then you've discovered fraud you haven't discovered it in a

00:17:42.820 way you could necessarily prove it in court that's a different thing but you would know it's there

00:17:48.380 so apparently that's the the strongest bit of evidence right now and uh there's also i'm seeing

00:17:56.500 some reports that in georgia there were over 60 000 underage people who voted how in the world could

00:18:07.460 that claim be out there without us in 24 hours knowing if it's debunked because that's pretty

00:18:16.280 specific isn't it if somebody makes a claim that 60 000 whatever people too young to vote voted that

00:18:24.060 means they have the names you know they have the list how hard would it be for the media to say all

00:18:30.020 right we're just gonna spot check some names spot check 20 names and if you spot check 20 names and

00:18:36.760 indeed they're all real people and they're all underage and they shouldn't have voted well then you're

00:18:42.580 gonna have something right but it's been a day and i think that claim has been out there for a while

00:18:48.740 have you seen it debunked and or confirmed the the we're we're at a point where there can be these

00:18:57.780 amazingly sensational claims that just sort of get ignored either because i guess the news knows it's

00:19:05.980 bs or they don't care i don't know why but that's a really big story right now there were other

00:19:12.640 categories of uh illegal votes that are alleged but that one is so big that you just need to check

00:19:20.280 that one you don't need to check dead people you don't need to check people who moved down the state

00:19:25.700 just check that one thing because it's such a big number if if you pick 20 things on people on that

00:19:32.000 list and they really were underage voters and you picked them somewhat randomly i feel like we're done

00:19:37.980 here right i mean in terms of understanding that the election was stolen but not done in terms of

00:19:44.220 it changing the result i don't see anything changing the result yeah and as somebody's uh prompting me in

00:19:53.880 the comments we don't really have a media that does that sort of thing anymore so you know maybe there

00:20:02.520 could be a model where you just crowdfund somebody to do it you just say all right uh if we reach if

00:20:09.560 we get five thousand dollars or whatever the number is in the crowdfund uh i as a reporter will take this

00:20:16.540 list from the person who produced it and i'll call some of these people and i'll check 20 names

00:20:21.460 would you put ten dollars into that i would i would because i want to know i want to know if that

00:20:29.560 60 000 thing is real or a bs and i want to know pretty quickly right i want somebody to check that

00:20:35.700 for me and i don't want to know that at the end of today nobody checked that by the end of today

00:20:42.880 that would be the biggest news in the world if it were true so do you think that the mainstream news

00:20:51.740 will ignore what could be the biggest news in the world that there were 67 000 fake names

00:20:59.480 or fake votes i think they're just going to ignore it that's my guess i feel like it'll just

00:21:07.240 sort of not be in the news and nobody will double check it and it'll just stop being a thing

00:21:13.840 all right um apparently uh ali alexander caused caused some trouble on social media as as he uh sometimes

00:21:24.840 does with this quote in a tweet i am willing to give my life for this fight talking about the

00:21:31.500 stop the steal movement and arizona republicans then followed up i guess they have their own twitter

00:21:37.520 account by quoting it and saying he is are you and then critics said whoa whoa are you advocating violence

00:21:46.680 and if you say you're willing to give your life for the fight that doesn't say you're willing to kill

00:21:56.660 somebody that's sort of the opposite of indicating violence it's indicating that if violence happens to

00:22:04.380 you or there's a risk of violence it's not going to stop you from doing what you need to do but

00:22:09.760 there's no indication that uh that ali alexander is saying that you should be violent he's just saying

00:22:16.480 that if he has to sacrifice he will he will sacrifice whatever it takes so of course fake news

00:22:23.620 um so here's a tweet that got the most retweets i think i've ever had including ones that the president

00:22:33.980 has retweeted so that's how much people agree with the following thought and the thought was this

00:22:41.540 that i tweeted trump got impeached for allegedly withholding ukraine aid for political reasons

00:22:47.640 nancy pelosi withheld coronavirus aid from americans for political reasons 0.97

00:22:55.160 so she tried to impeach trump for allegedly withholding aid from ukraine

00:23:04.240 in the process of trying to get something done get some research about biden's work there to try to

00:23:13.620 get some work done that would have been good for the president's uh re-election but also would have

00:23:19.860 been good for the united states because as a citizen of the united states i very much

00:23:25.080 wanted to know if there was any biden problem in the ukraine so if the president was willing to

00:23:30.940 look into that it was good for his re-election but it was also good for the country that's the way

00:23:38.080 it's supposed to work you want your president doing things that are good for his re-election 0.75

00:23:43.760 wait for it because it's fucking good for the country that's how you get re-elected i don't know if 0.75

00:23:51.820 you knew that but one of the ways you get re-elected is doing things that are good for your re-election 0.96

00:23:58.720 that have this additional quality they're good for the country you know like helping the economy

00:24:06.720 creating peace in the middle east i think that president trump should be impeached there's very

00:24:14.120 little time left but i think we should do it he should be impeached for trying to get peace in the

00:24:19.520 middle east because the real reason he's doing it is not because he cares about people right because

00:24:26.380 the democrats have told us that he doesn't care about people he's trying to get re-elected that's

00:24:32.340 the whole motive doesn't care about peace just trying to get re-elected and i think he should be

00:24:39.640 impeached for that take the economy and that's just one example trump has tried to make the economy in 0.98

00:24:45.420 this country strong imagine that selfish narcissistic bastard who's trying to make the economy in the 0.98

00:24:54.400 country wrong why for re-election selfish re-election that's the only reason he wants to make the economy 1.00

00:25:05.480 good and make everybody happy he doesn't care about your happiness no he just wants to get re-elected

00:25:12.700 and i think he should be impeached for that anybody who tries to do something for this country 0.96

00:25:17.360 that's also good for re-election you have to stop that shit you don't want people doing stuff that's 0.99

00:25:26.060 good for the country just because they think it's going to get them votes what kind of a fucking system 1.00

00:25:31.000 is that working for votes so naturally nancy pelosi biggest pile of stinking shit in america 1.00

00:25:42.560 she decided that she would try to impeach the president for doing the job of the president 0.99

00:25:49.060 that just happens to be good for the president too so she never saw the irony that she is now doing 0.93

00:25:58.080 exactly the same fucking thing uh and yes you know mitch mcconnell is part of the process of negotiating 0.97

00:26:05.640 to blah blah blah but even bernie sanders threw her under the bus on this even bernie sanders said 0.98

00:26:13.060 yeah that was a mistake you shouldn't have held out you should have taken the deal there was a bigger

00:26:18.640 deal that was offered earlier and she did it and she admitted it in public that it was a political move

00:26:27.100 so if she is withholding aid from suffering americans for naked political reasons 1.00

00:26:36.620 how do we not impeach her despicable bony ass this is the worst thing i've seen in america 1.00

00:26:48.100 it's the worst thing i've seen in america now let me say for sure i've seen people make mistakes 1.00

00:26:56.380 so if you're going to say scott scott scott you know the president did whatever and it killed all

00:27:02.120 these people in coronavirus i would say that may or may not be a mistake meaning that it was either

00:27:09.580 preventable or it wasn't based on what the leadership did that's hard to know but at worst

00:27:15.620 it wasn't fucking intentional there was no point where the president of the united states said 0.99

00:27:23.200 i think i'll just fuck this whole country i think i'll just kill a hundred thousand two hundred thousand 0.99

00:27:28.700 people for what to get re-elected because it would be it wouldn't hurt the economy so maybe he'd get 1.00

00:27:36.780 re-elected the president never fucking intended anybody to die and i don't think he's too happy 0.97

00:27:45.400 about it pelosi intended to fuck the country or at least the people who are not getting a direct 1.00

00:27:54.720 payment and desperately need it she deliberately and in public and right in front of your fucking face 1.00

00:28:01.240 screwed the the the most vulnerable people in this country for naked political reasons and then 1.00

00:28:09.140 fucking told you right to your face fucking told you right to your face i've never seen anything worse 1.00

00:28:16.120 than this have you honestly can you think of anything worse now even if you say something like well scott 1.00

00:28:23.420 you know what about the gulf of tonkin that was pretty bad and that caused you know the vietnam war

00:28:30.580 and fifty thousand americans died that's much worse no it wasn't no it wasn't the people who did

00:28:36.820 the gulf of tonkin thought they were doing something good it turned down terrible but their intention

00:28:44.800 was clearly good how about the iraq war scott scott scott the iraq war was the biggest mistake

00:28:53.140 maybe this country's ever made so that's worse no it isn't no it isn't it might be worse in terms of 0.73

00:29:02.020 people who died but it was a fucking mistake there was no point when george bush said you know i think 0.99

00:29:11.200 i'll kill a bunch of fucking iraqis because it's good for re-election never happened he thought it was 1.00

00:29:17.760 the right thing to do he was wrong biggest mistake we've ever had and if you do a list of the biggest 1.00

00:29:23.480 mistakes i'd put that near the top but if you do a list of the most evil fucking thing that ever has 0.92

00:29:32.820 happened in this country what could you offer to top this in in the comments top it try to top it with 0.92

00:29:41.780 something that's not obviously just a mistake somebody who screwed the public just for re-election

00:29:48.480 purposes that's it somebody says slavery slavery was intentional and slavery was worse

00:29:57.780 yeah the trouble with slavery though is you've got that um you have to adjust for the times

00:30:06.820 because it's not entirely clear that even people who owned slaves were entirely sure that they were

00:30:13.520 bad people you know what i mean like by our current our current view looking backwards we can say well

00:30:20.240 they were the worst people in the world the slave owners but maybe they didn't think so 1.00

00:30:25.520 the difference is pelosi knows what she's doing she knows she's a bad person and she's doing it right

00:30:31.700 in front of you anyway all right so but i'll i'll take your uh i'll take slavery as a good exception to

00:30:40.220 my rule but you have to adjust it for the times um which is not an excuse for slavery that that's the

00:30:47.280 next thing will happen right there'll be a tweet in five minutes uh cartoonist think slavery was fine

00:30:53.220 no no cartoonist does not think slavery was fine um here's the biden plan for beating the coronavirus

00:31:02.540 and finally because i don't know about you but i am getting sick and tired of ignoring science

00:31:08.840 when it comes to beating the coronavirus if you don't follow the science well you're not even trying

00:31:16.160 so follow the science and here's the biden plan finally for beating the coronavirus there are three

00:31:23.080 parts and i think they're all strong and i'm glad that we finally have some leadership on this

00:31:28.640 coronavirus so step number one uh biden will use trump's plan for vaccinations okay well that's one

00:31:35.560 number two um biden will use trump's plan for reopening schools and number three biden will add some

00:31:44.800 non-binding yammering about masks no laws except for the minor minor federal buildings but that won't

00:31:52.920 change anything um but he's adding some non-binding yammering about masks now what do these three things

00:32:01.680 collectively collectively if you put them together let me read them again so you can get this you know

00:32:07.880 as a whole what does it tell you we finally figured out how to do all right trump's plans for vaccination

00:32:15.400 trump's plans for opening schools and some non-binding yammering about masks put them together and what do you

00:32:22.200 have what do you have that's right finally science finally we are not a bunch of clowns walking around 0.99

00:32:32.880 bumping in the buildings you know knocking our heads on stuff because we're so darn stupid and we don't 0.99

00:32:38.420 follow the science finally some serious adult leadership where they're going to follow the science 1.00

00:32:44.380 and take us out of this out of this horrible pandemic that trump caused in some way probably by a tweet

00:32:50.940 so that's all good news those of you following my very small problem with adobe photoshop where it

00:33:00.960 stopped being able to draw a straight line which is kind of important if you're a cartoonist because

00:33:07.620 the only kinds of lines that i draw are curvy lines and straight ones and straight lines just stop

00:33:15.740 working so what do you think happened when i tweeted about it and adobe was right on it they've got a

00:33:22.760 rapid response team and so they immediately tweeted back and said how can we help and in the process of

00:33:29.940 the back and forth with them as well as lots of other people weighing in and complimenting or commenting

00:33:35.200 i learned that you can you can draw a line still with photoshop and let me explain the process

00:33:44.120 so here's the old way the old way was you would select the line tool put your cursor somewhere and

00:33:50.760 then just draw it across and then there would be a line and that sounded like that was a good way but

00:33:56.220 they've upgraded so the process of just putting your pen down and drawing a line has changed to something

00:34:03.200 by analogy if i were to compare to something it'd be like say the manhattan project in terms of

00:34:11.120 complexity i believe there are 25 different variables that need to be set just right but also in the right

00:34:18.480 order in other words if you don't do this before that that won't work and you won't know and there

00:34:25.940 won't be any way to know but you know you got to clear these things and reset them but maybe if you go to

00:34:31.780 this menu and clear it and reset it and why don't you use a different tool and if you use a different

00:34:36.900 tool there are 25 things you need to set to make that work and make sure you hit escape before you hit

00:34:42.860 enter and before you do this so the bottom line is i'm pretty sure that photoshop just doesn't have

00:34:53.380 that capability anymore yeah they changed it to some kind of vector or layers sort of thing so they

00:35:00.420 just don't draw a line anymore but rather than simply admitting it oh it's half of what you need

00:35:07.200 to do your job but we just took it out of there we got rid of it instead of telling me that i've been

00:35:14.440 trying all these weird combinations of things and i'm pretty sure that i've determined that it just

00:35:20.440 doesn't it can't do any of those things so i'll use a different tool and oh or a different software

00:35:25.960 and i'll work through it but uh it's amazing how bad uh software is in this day and age it's just

00:35:36.440 amazing all right uh day whatever how long has it been since was it the remind me which state i get the

00:35:46.640 states mixed up was that the georgia uh ballot counting where they had the video camera that

00:35:52.520 appeared to make it look as though there was some mischief going on and then there was the woman who 1.00

00:35:58.160 gave the announcement and said hey everybody go home at least that's what they reported she said

00:36:04.380 and we still haven't heard from her have we so the only person who matters in the story

00:36:10.180 a gigantic story the only person who matters she hasn't talked yet now to be fair um you have lots

00:36:20.980 of accounts of what this person said but we all know that if you ask a hundred people what the boss

00:36:28.040 just said they're not all going to have the same story some will say he said stop working on

00:36:34.300 everything some will say well you have to understand the context he meant stop working on just

00:36:39.680 these things because obviously you're not going to start stop working on the other stuff

00:36:43.280 so what you need to get to any better certainty about what happened in that room you need to hear

00:36:51.500 the woman who made the announcement say these are the words i used as close as i can remember

00:36:57.920 and this was my intention and this is who i thought i was directing it to now she could be lying 0.98

00:37:05.380 right because humans lie she could be mistaken she may misremember but then you take her account and

00:37:12.900 you go back to all the witnesses and the witnesses say she told us to stop counting ballots that's their

00:37:19.360 story but what if she says i told this group to stop working and go home because you know the four of

00:37:27.300 us were going to stay and i didn't need to tell them that but i just told the envelope openers to go home

00:37:32.440 what if she says that then what do the witnesses say next the ones who said she told us the ballot

00:37:38.900 counting was over here's what i think will happen just a speculation i think the witnesses will say well

00:37:45.500 yeah she may have said that i don't remember what she said i only remember one of the envelope

00:37:53.180 openers told me the ballot counting is done because she said it so it's probably a somebody interpreting

00:37:59.480 and told somebody and somebody didn't hear it and they told somebody else that's probably what's

00:38:03.720 going on but until you hear it from the person who originally made the announcement about who should

00:38:10.580 go home you don't know anything you don't know anything yeah abc news and other other reports have said

00:38:18.600 that they heard x what's that worth to you in terms of uh evidence if abc news and even other

00:38:28.500 news organizations people that you imagine would tell you the truth if they told you that she said

00:38:34.560 a certain thing should you believe that not unless it's unrecorded and not until you've heard the other

00:38:42.320 story if you had heard her story and you had heard their story maybe you'd have something to judge

00:38:47.800 but until you hear her story the the credibility you should put on anybody else saying what she said

00:38:57.140 is zero not one percent not ten percent it should be exactly zero it has no no evidentiary value

00:39:07.600 whatsoever that's why uh that's why courts don't allow hearsay hearsay is somebody saying what somebody

00:39:16.140 else said that's hearsay it's more than that but that's the quick definition all right um

00:39:23.820 so my local representative eric swalwell is one of the people who was believed to be targeted by

00:39:32.000 a chinese spy an attractive young woman whose name uh original name is fang fang so her last name and 0.82

00:39:41.200 her first name are the same fang fang she called herself christine fang when she came to the united states

00:39:46.620 but she's fang fang now when the story first came out it was just that she was trying to get close to

00:39:54.120 swalwell when he was a a local uh councilman in my neighboring town and that she was part of a chinese

00:40:02.440 spy uh system where they try to get close to people who might become big in the future just to sort of

00:40:10.760 work with them now according to fox news and so here's another thing that you should put low

00:40:18.100 credibility in all right keeping in mind that eric swalwell is not my favorite politician

00:40:24.520 all right so you know where my bias is eric swalwell not my favorite politician i have met him a few

00:40:31.680 times by the way so in terms of uh full disclosure he's friends with some of my friends because you

00:40:38.980 small area in some ways and uh you know i've been to places where he is and chatted with him briefly

00:40:46.060 and stuff but he's not my favorite politician so when i say something to defend him now you'll know

00:40:53.160 it's not because of bias because my bias is in the other direction and on um on the fox news site but i

00:41:02.580 didn't see it on any other news site it said that uh that there was some uh the u.s intelligence

00:41:10.780 officials not named so this is anonymous sources okay anonymous sources allegedly in the u.s intelligence

00:41:19.040 agencies believe that fang had a sexual relationship with eric swalwell here's where i'm going to draw the

00:41:26.540 line i don't know if they had a sexual relationship or not neither do you and if the only source that

00:41:37.160 says this are anonymous sources let's be consistent right let's be consistent consistency says that if

00:41:47.120 you heard that anonymous sources said something about this about trump would you believe it would you

00:41:53.800 believe it even a little bit no you wouldn't so let's use the same standard um i don't know what

00:42:00.940 swalwell did or did not do but the suggestion that a fox news site was no friend of swalwell

00:42:07.780 uh says that somebody who is not named believes that they had a relationship you should give that zero

00:42:16.420 credibility now if on your own you say to yourself i'm just use my own my own judgment and life

00:42:23.760 i think that maybe something was there that's just you but don't pretend there's any evidence

00:42:29.500 there's no evidence of that okay you can't rule out anything but there's no evidence of it and i think

00:42:36.980 you have to be fair to swalwell that that's to me that's going too far honestly i don't think that

00:42:44.520 should have been reported with such uh low low credibility but there it is it's out there um

00:42:51.720 and here's my advice if you're thinking of having a sexual relationship with somebody named 0.99

00:43:00.320 fang fang leave out the oral sex that's all because you don't want to be twice bitten 1.00

00:43:09.500 by fang fang that's all i'm going to say about that now there is some question about how could 0.98

00:43:16.160 swalwell be on uh still on any important committees because isn't he on some important committees i think

00:43:24.900 you have to take him off all the committees but you have to do that regardless of whether there was a

00:43:31.720 sexual relationship of which there's no evidence there's no evidence of that i'll say that a hundred

00:43:37.960 times but the fact that there was a chinese spy that might have been a little too close to him i think

00:43:46.540 that's reason enough to take somebody off of any kind of a committee that would have confidential

00:43:52.000 anything but we'll see um i saw on cnn some uh some propaganda that was fun uh here's here's the

00:44:03.280 headline on cnn's page so it's the top left headline which means it's the one they consider

00:44:09.540 most important that's where they put it in the top left and this these are the exact words trump's

00:44:15.020 attempt to overthrow election reaches point of no return is that sentence true and accurate 0.96

00:44:22.900 yeah i'd say so i mean in in terms of the odds that he doesn't have a good chance of overthrowing it

00:44:31.060 but would you call this an attempt to overthrow the election is that the way you would have described

00:44:39.620 it because that's an opinion isn't it here's what here's how i would imagine it would be worded

00:44:46.120 if you were not trying to to turn the news into an opinion which news sites should not do if you take

00:44:53.840 the opinion out of it you would say that trump's team has lots of data that suggests that there's

00:45:01.040 a problem with the election and he's using his legal rights to challenge it doesn't that sound a

00:45:09.260 little bit different than he's attempting to overthrow an election attempting to overthrow an election

00:45:15.820 no i think he's trying to reverse a stolen election now

00:45:21.900 i don't mind the cnn believes it wasn't stolen because lots of people believe that

00:45:29.380 but to say that he's attempting to overthrow an election is really an opinion

00:45:36.100 right we only know what he's doing but making it well you know i made my point uh here's another one

00:45:44.460 to show you the the propaganda uh so i think it was aaron burnett was talking about the president

00:45:51.740 and she referred to president trump's made up allegations made up allegations have you ever heard

00:46:00.320 has anybody ever had to add made up to the word allegations do you know do you know why she had to

00:46:07.800 add made up to add made up to allegations because even though allegations mean nothing is confirmed

00:46:15.640 it's just a charge that was too strong for cnn so they didn't want that word allegation even to exist

00:46:24.060 so they had to turn it into made up allegations i mean this is just such uh over-the-top propaganda

00:46:32.500 it's incredible i think allegations would have done all the work that it needed to do you didn't need

00:46:39.160 the made up part we're hearing a little bit about the mrna vaccine so they're not all the mrna type

00:46:46.880 but apparently it hurts for a while after you get it so one person described it as like uh you know a few

00:46:55.360 minutes after you get it i guess it doesn't hurt while you're getting it so it's not the it's not the

00:47:00.400 needle that hurts so that's no worse than any other inoculation i believe but afterwards it starts

00:47:06.040 hurting like you got a punch in the arm and then you could have shaking and fevers and chills and

00:47:12.240 you could have kind of a bad night and you would have to do that twice i don't know if the second

00:47:18.120 one's as bad as the first guessing maybe not or maybe worse i don't know um but when you're looking

00:47:26.060 at a vaccination program that needs a lot of people to get it and 40 percent or something say

00:47:31.260 they're they're not too thrilled of it if it hurts a lot less people are going to get that

00:47:37.940 vaccination if it hurts and then there's also word that uh some other vaccination you can't take it if

00:47:46.080 you're highly allergic to stuff like me i'm pretty allergic to stuff all right i worry that the fact

00:47:53.220 that it hurts will be the biggest factor about whether people get it because i think you'd have

00:48:00.180 to take a day off of work right i feel like you'd have to schedule a day off after you got a shot

00:48:05.620 because you couldn't go to work all shaking and feverish um there's uh some studies that say that

00:48:12.920 if you have a little bit of neanderthal dna it might protect you from just a little bit it's not a

00:48:19.220 gigantic effect but it might protect you a little bit from the worst coronavirus covid infections

00:48:26.260 and that makes sense because it turns out that the people who have the most neanderthal dna are east

00:48:34.660 asians and east asia is doing the best in terms of controlling the coronavirus uh next down the list

00:48:43.580 would be europeans they've got some uh neanderthal but not nearly as much as asians and they're doing 1.00

00:48:49.960 worse in terms of infections and then the very worst would be uh africans so africans have close 1.00

00:48:59.020 to zero neanderthal uh but we've seen that uh black citizens of the united states at least are having the

00:49:06.660 worst outcomes so could it be that there's a bigger effect than we think because is it just a

00:49:13.680 coincidence that this neanderthal dna has some statistical effect it's not a gigantic effect they

00:49:20.940 say and yet it cleanly predicts each population's outcomes is that a is that a coincidence could be

00:49:30.100 right now i told you the other day that there's a uh a website i'll talk more about this i think i might

00:49:35.720 do an interview with with uh with the owners of that website which will uh take your dna you can

00:49:42.880 actually download your dna from 23andme or from a genealogy site just upload upload your dna data

00:49:50.160 into this website and they'll tell you what your relative risk is now of course it's not guaranteed

00:49:56.080 it's just a risk calculation but what they use is primarily these uh genetic uh lung differences so

00:50:04.780 there's some allele or something on your lungs that are different for some people and gives you more

00:50:09.500 risk so maybe they will be adding this neanderthal element to it to refine their model and that would

00:50:18.360 be interesting um have you ever noticed that biden acts mad about normal things it's it bugs me a lot

00:50:29.020 when you know president trump would act aggressive about lots of things he didn't like but he didn't

00:50:36.180 act mad joe biden looks like he's really mad about stuff that you don't need to be mad about like if he's

00:50:44.100 just describing something so this would be joe biden describing his breakfast i put cheerios in the bowl

00:50:53.460 i put the milk you got to put the milk on the cheerios

00:50:58.900 and you mix them you got to mix the milk in the cheerios

00:51:06.140 and then i put it on a spoon and you've got you've got to eat it you got to eat it

00:51:13.560 and i'm thinking why are you so mad you're just describing ordinary things

00:51:19.000 can you describe it in not mad dementia way how about just you know we should all wear masks i think

00:51:26.420 it's important not we must wear masks i'm so mad

00:51:29.620 um anyway i just thought you should know that

00:51:35.660 uh here's the funniest thing there's a uh

00:51:39.640 i guess it's the gel man amnesia theory but uh broadened a little bit

00:51:46.540 so i was just watching some exchange between two people debating about trump online this morning

00:51:52.720 and i watched as there was some troll critic would make a claim and then some trump supporter who

00:51:59.980 was well aware of all the hoaxes would come in behind and say ah that's a hoax the fine people hoax

00:52:06.500 for example then there was another one and the trump supporters said no that's a hoax

00:52:10.400 here's what here's what happened and then he mentions a third one and then it gets debunked

00:52:16.660 so within this little span of i don't know an hour or something this uh anti-trumper learned

00:52:24.900 that the first three things that he was willing to mention as the biggest you know concerns about

00:52:31.240 trump were all hoaxes all three of them and it was easy to debunk them you just you know the debunk

00:52:39.840 is pretty easy but do you think that this person having three three of his main beliefs debunked

00:52:47.800 within an hour do you think that the next thing he believes he has any doubt about no no the very

00:52:56.900 next thing whatever it is whatever is the next thing he thinks is true about trump he'll think that

00:53:03.220 one's probably pretty solid after three in a row get debunked has no impact on his confidence for

00:53:11.420 the fourth thing so it's just funny there's nothing to say about it except that it's funny

00:53:16.340 um so the house of representatives voted on the big defense authorization bill that um the president

00:53:27.100 said he would veto if it didn't uh get rid of section 230 which protects social media platforms

00:53:34.560 from being sued as publishers but i guess the house of representatives put a veto proof uh vote on it so

00:53:42.720 in other words the president won't have the option of vetoing it because they got too many votes and i think

00:53:49.380 to myself social media won why do you think politicians voted against doing this thing that would uh damage

00:54:00.060 the social media companies according to social media companies why do you think they voted against it in

00:54:05.480 like a big majority it's because the social media companies have so much freaking money that i don't know

00:54:13.620 if you could run for office if you had crossed them imagine imagine telling the social media companies

00:54:21.540 that you're going to be creating a law that would virtually put them out of business or they would

00:54:27.040 think so how would your uh algorithm behave after that if you were if you were a gop politician and you

00:54:36.320 came out strong against the social media platforms what would they do to your tweets

00:54:42.220 well uh i think you'd have the same concern that chuck schumer talked about when he said the president was

00:54:52.000 crossing the the intelligence community and they had uh what what do you say a thousand ways from

00:54:59.020 sunday to get back at you and you and we thought what an intelligence agency is going to get back at the

00:55:07.040 president that's a little concerning but don't you think that if you were a uh in congress and you

00:55:14.880 were promoting things that were bad for social media companies they would shut you down wouldn't they

00:55:20.400 now you could say to yourself no no no it'd be too obvious or whatever but when did obvious make

00:55:26.560 any difference all pretty much everything they do in terms of suppressing things is obvious

00:55:32.660 you always see it so i would think that politicians know they would not get the funding they needed to

00:55:39.980 get re-elected and their social media traffic would just go to hell and that would take them out of the 0.89

00:55:46.660 race too so the social media companies are so strong that congress can't fuck with them i think that's what 0.91

00:55:56.300 we just saw right now you could say that it was a principled vote and even the republicans who voted 0.77

00:56:02.540 not to do get rid of section 230 had economic reasons or maybe it was imperfect or maybe they

00:56:08.920 wanted to deal with it in a different way there could be reasons there might be reasons but i don't

00:56:14.300 think we can anymore think we live in a world where if these social media giants wanted the vote to go

00:56:21.860 this way that they couldn't just make it happen i think they could just make it happen i don't know

00:56:27.900 that congress is stronger than them and so uh there you go you don't live in a republic anymore

00:56:35.200 the republic is well dead congress seems to be you know captured by industry so so congress is

00:56:45.100 basically uh you know what would you call it uh an oligarchy oligarchy so the people in congress are

00:56:53.900 just voting whatever the big corporations tell them to vote so it's not really any kind of a

00:56:58.720 representative you know democracy situation certainly not a republic and we don't have uh confidence that

00:57:06.560 the vote was an actual vote meaning half of the country doesn't even think a vote happened they think

00:57:12.060 some kind of fraud happened not a vote so we are so far from living in the system that was

00:57:17.680 drawn up by the founders but so far the coffee tastes the same so i don't know why this isn't

00:57:26.160 causing a problem yeah i think there won't be social unrest as long as the uh the victims are

00:57:33.640 the conservatives because they just don't march in the street so much uh plutocracy yeah maybe

00:57:41.420 maybe maybe that's a good word for it um how does the simulation respond to the election

00:57:48.300 well i don't think we could have uh we could not have had an outcome that was more perfect to ai

00:57:58.540 meaning we got we ended up with the most contentious situation short of uh bloodshed now ahead of the vote

00:58:08.460 what did i tell you would be the the signal for ai meaning the algorithms of the social media

00:58:15.280 companies what would be the signal that they had already taken over control of civilization the signal

00:58:22.900 would be that you would have a an election that had the weird characteristics of maximum conflict

00:58:30.020 about who won just short of violence and that's what we got we got the maximum amount of clickbait

00:58:40.100 news and and drama and at the outcome not really any violence to speak of it's the perfect ai solution

00:58:51.080 now here's the interesting part have you noticed that the news has just turned so boring

00:58:58.220 that it's hard to read if you go to cnn there's basically no news anymore all they have is they're

00:59:06.440 they're mopping up you know little uh complaints about trump because you know he's still in the news

00:59:11.760 so they still have bad things to say about trump every day but they don't really have news anymore

00:59:18.980 it feels like it just turned into a couple of descriptions of unimportant things followed by

00:59:25.020 some extra insults of trump and that's all there is now that's about it um yeah i think the news

00:59:31.900 industry so here's here's the point of that if the news stays boring then ai didn't get what it wanted

00:59:39.600 ai if if you speculate and say that ai is already in control of civilization we just haven't realized it

00:59:46.740 yet what you should see is some new drama being inserted into the news business that kind of came

00:59:54.780 out of nowhere and it should be some drama that maybe isn't real so i'm not talking about an actual

01:00:00.840 crisis in the world that becomes the new story although of course there'll be some of those

01:00:05.740 i'm talking about a a here's my prediction i'll make this a prediction i predict that there will be

01:00:13.800 some issues that emerge after biden takes office and after trump is no longer important to the news

01:00:21.460 cycle at least in the way he was that there will be a new issue that is completely artificial

01:00:28.620 meaning that you can't hold it in your hand there's no video of it it's a concept and it's going

01:00:36.960 to get us all crazy arguing about the concept and it won't be real it just won't be real now no i'm not

01:00:46.020 talking about something like aliens i'm talking about a completely artificial psychological problem

01:00:51.760 that doesn't yet exist that will be designed and brought into life by the ai so that the news gets lots

01:00:59.780 of clicks the social media gets lots of clicks and the ai can reproduce so the way the ai reproduces

01:01:06.860 the way ai reproduces is by drama short of violence 0.98

01:01:13.700 somebody says scott adams denial what the fuck am i denying what the fuck i swear i don't have any 0.99

01:01:25.480 critics who criticize me for my actual fucking opinions i don't remember the last time somebody 0.99

01:01:31.800 disagreed with me what i actually fucking think what am i in denial of 0.98

01:01:37.260 oh god all right 0.88

01:01:43.360 um when trump said he was being sarcastic i started to vote for him let me tell you why i think trump said

01:01:52.060 he was being sarcastic about that uh injecting disinfectant thing i think that he first got the idea

01:02:00.280 probably by watching twitter because i i had tweeted about it lots of people had retweeted it so it

01:02:07.460 was a thing at the very time he was talking about that injecting disinfectant it was being trialed

01:02:13.520 at cedars-sinai it was a news story it was in the news now suppose he had seen that story

01:02:19.740 didn't remember where it came from or where he saw it it was just something he saw like many of us do

01:02:25.700 now he saw the story and then he gets in public and he repeats the story he goes you know hey maybe

01:02:32.040 there's some way to inject light uv light he wasn't as specific as i was but some way to use you know

01:02:39.240 light to disinfect within the body and that he's called on it by all the experts who say you crazy

01:02:45.480 person you can't inject disinfectant even though he was talking about light you can't do that now

01:02:52.700 what would you do if you were the president you kind of think you have remember seeing that as a story

01:03:00.820 but you don't know where you saw it and you can't find it again because it's actually kind of hard to

01:03:07.100 find you have to google you know the right the right things to get it so he's being asked why did

01:03:13.500 you bring this up and the and the defense would be well just look at this tweet i was talking about

01:03:19.560 this but you can't find it it's just sort of not practical to figure out where you saw it because it

01:03:27.020 wasn't in a big publication it wasn't in the new york times it wasn't in the washington post wasn't on

01:03:31.820 cnn but it was in the news smaller news so probably just speculating if you're trying to understand

01:03:41.820 why he would say he was being sarcastic when it should be obvious to every observer he wasn't

01:03:47.760 being sarcastic i think he just wanted it to go away and so he was trying to like just brush it away

01:03:54.980 i was being sarcastic don't take it too seriously so i don't think that he believed he was being

01:04:00.040 sarcastic i think he was just trying to make it go away because it was too hard to fight it and there

01:04:04.880 was no point to it that's my guess don't know um yes so this is why i call it speculation 0.96

01:04:15.140 if i had said that's what happened that would be mind reading and that would be you know dumb

01:04:22.540 but you can certainly speculate and say well you know i can i can think of three different

01:04:28.280 explanations and that's one of them all right uh you should put your books in the middle shelf so

01:04:35.160 your head isn't blocking them

01:04:36.360 there's my books all right that's all i got for now and i'll talk to you tomorrow

01:04:44.660 all right youtubers i'm still here

01:04:51.180 uh if it's just your guess it's not a hoax what guess are you talking about youtube is banning me

01:05:01.100 says see jack pasavik's tweet you are about to be censored by youtube really so let's see what that's

01:05:11.880 all about bear with me let's see if uh let's see what jack said jack p-o-s-o

01:05:24.420 uh

01:05:27.080 see what do you say about me

01:05:31.540 do do do bear with me least interesting thing you've

01:05:37.120 heard all day um

01:05:41.440 oh starting today they will remove content about election fraud even though there are court cases

01:05:49.960 about it

01:05:50.660 but i don't know if that applies to me right

01:05:58.240 because it's one thing

01:06:02.200 oh and also uh jack pasavik is reporting that the the swalwell report is far far worse

01:06:11.960 uh if you knew the whole report so there's some there's some uh talk that uh we have more

01:06:20.720 information about swalwell than has been released so maybe i just like the fact that they're using his

01:06:27.420 own trick against them to say yeah we've got lots of secret information this could be this could be released any moment

01:06:33.100 um

01:06:34.740 i don't know if i will be

01:06:37.400 uh

01:06:38.620 flagged on youtube there there are two ways to talk about

01:06:43.900 um

01:06:45.140 allegations of election fraud

01:06:47.340 the way i talk about it

01:06:49.360 is always in terms of probability

01:06:51.240 and what we know versus what we don't know

01:06:53.800 i would hope

01:06:55.480 that

01:06:57.000 if anybody actually looked at my content

01:06:59.060 and maybe just the algorithm guess it

01:07:00.720 but if anybody looked at my content

01:07:02.500 they should see

01:07:03.620 that no one has done more than i have done

01:07:06.520 to talk republicans

01:07:08.540 out of

01:07:09.480 specific claims

01:07:11.580 now i i'm well on board

01:07:14.040 of the concept

01:07:15.120 that if you have a system with lots of holes

01:07:18.060 there's always going to be fraud

01:07:19.560 so fraud has to exist

01:07:21.140 but when you're looking at the individual claims

01:07:23.500 i've debunked more of them than anybody probably

01:07:27.140 anybody who's also pro-trump

01:07:29.960 um

01:07:31.440 so i would think that that kind of discussion would be the good kind

01:07:35.940 um

01:07:37.000 asked about the texas supreme court suit

01:07:39.360 should be

01:07:40.360 i think that will be uh

01:07:41.920 rejected by the supreme court

01:07:44.420 the same way the pennsylvania suit was

01:07:46.600 i think it's the same suit

01:07:47.800 kind of right

01:07:48.720 and

01:07:50.200 poon fang

01:07:51.700 that's a bad pun

01:07:55.340 poon fang

01:07:57.040 but i appreciate it

01:07:59.260 when i say it's a bad pun

01:08:00.620 that's a compliment

01:08:02.100 that's how

01:08:02.900 that's how puns work

01:08:03.960 the badder the better

01:08:05.200 all right that's all for now

01:08:06.540 i'll talk to you later

01:08:07.360 okay

01:08:07.860 i'll talk to you later

01:08:10.960 tomorrow

01:08:12.000 and i'll talk to you later

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 09, 2020

Episode 1213 Scott Adams： Biden's Coronavirus Plan, Swalwell's Chinese Spy, Pelosi Still a Steaming Pile of Feces

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript