Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 24, 2020


Episode 1229 Scott Adams: I'll Tell You What Keeps America Together and How the #GoldenAge Can't be Stopped

Topics
Hosted by
Mentioned
Episode 1228 Scott Adams: I Teach You How to Select the Correct Size For a COVID-19 Relief Check Episode 1231 Scott Adams: Merry Christmas and Pass the Pork. Trust Science and Pretend the Republic Still Exists

Episode Stats


Length

59 minutes

Words per minute

146.39

Word count

8,681

Sentence count

738

Harmful content

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

5

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Trump pardons innocent people, Congress rejects a $2,000 direct check to the poor on Christmas Eve, and Congress rejects the idea of sending a direct check on Christmas Day to the elderly, the disabled, and the elderly.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
Hosts, guests, and mentioned names generated with spaCy (en_core_web_sm), reconciled against Wikidata.
00:00:00.000 Well, happy Merry Christmas Eve. We made it. We made it at least to Christmas Eve. If 2020
00:00:12.560 wasn't the hardest year of your life, you've had some hard years. But we're here. We made it.
00:00:20.700 And let's see if we can make it to summer. Then we win. And if you would like to maximize your
00:00:26.740 experience of the best part of the day, what's the best part of the day? That's right. That's right.
00:00:31.980 It's this. This is the best part of the day. The rest of your day might be pretty good. Could be
00:00:38.300 excellent. In fact, the rest of your day might be extraordinary. But it won't be as good as this.
00:00:47.000 Are you ready? All you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen
00:00:54.040 jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite holiday liquid I like, coffee.
00:01:00.900 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes
00:01:05.120 the holidays extraordinary. It's called the simultaneous sip. Heard around the world. And
00:01:12.060 it happens now. Go.
00:01:12.900 Well, in the news, President Trump is issuing pardons. It's outrageous. Can you all join me
00:01:27.340 in being outraged at the people that the president is pardoning? Are we good? Are we done with the
00:01:37.800 outrage? There's something I've been explaining to people on Twitter this morning, and it goes
00:01:43.480 like this. You don't pardon innocent people. I mean, if you can, that's great. It would be
00:01:53.320 great if you knew someone were innocent, but they were in jail. Yeah, maybe pardoning them
00:01:58.120 would be the right thing. But that's not exactly what pardons are for. The pardon is to give the
00:02:05.320 president an unfettered ability to pardon. And a big part of that is you can't question it.
00:02:15.040 You can say to yourself, why are these people on the list? But that's going to be true for every
00:02:20.620 president. Probably there are favors involved or whatever. But our system allows us. And so I
00:02:25.960 refuse to be outraged by the system working exactly the way it was designed to work.
00:02:32.880 The president has this power. Had it been a different president, pardoning different people
00:02:40.520 who I liked more or less than this group? Same response. I'm not going to get outraged about
00:02:47.280 the system working the way it was designed. The other news is that apparently the GOP has rejected
00:02:53.140 the call for the $2,000 direct checks to people instead of the $600.
00:02:58.820 And I guess Trump vetoed the omnibus bill, but it looks like they have a veto proof.
00:03:06.900 They can override the veto, so it's going to happen anyway. But I would rank as the biggest mistake
00:03:12.520 of 2020, this, I don't even know if it's a decision, but this action by Congress to deny the $2,000
00:03:22.300 check on Christmas Eve. Just let that sink in. Now, many mistakes have been made in 2020 because
00:03:32.260 we're humans. And especially when you introduce the pandemic and you have this fog of war and
00:03:38.260 so many unknowns. And scientifically, we didn't exactly know what was right to do. It took us a
00:03:44.040 while to crawl our way through it and learn enough that we can get on top of the virus,
00:03:48.660 which were almost there. But here's the thing. There are some kinds of mistakes
00:03:56.000 that you can forgive quite easily. And I'll remind you again, and Christmas Eve is a good time for
00:04:02.560 this, that at the beginning of the pandemic, I said, we should forgive in advance all of our leaders.
00:04:10.300 We should forgive in advance all the mistakes that they are about to make. Because the mistakes
00:04:17.680 that they were going to make, and they did, you know, various leaders, experts made a variety of
00:04:24.140 mistakes. Up till this point, there'll be more. They weren't the kind of mistake that you should,
00:04:33.040 you know, want to destroy somebody over. They were the kind of mistake that you make because you don't
00:04:38.800 know what is the right thing to do. Now, if your mistakes are because you don't know what is the
00:04:43.440 right thing to do, you wish the mistake had not happened. But it's hard to criticize somebody
00:04:50.120 for trying hard and having the right intentions, but it didn't go well. That's not what's happening
00:04:56.400 here. With Congress rejecting the $2,000 checks, and yes, I understand that they didn't just reject the
00:05:05.260 checks. It was about the bulk of the rest of the stuff they didn't like, like foreign aid and
00:05:10.900 whatever else they didn't like in the bill. Those were the reasons, okay? But here's the thing.
00:05:18.520 You don't tease the public about maybe getting enough money before Christmas and then yank it back.
00:05:27.980 I get that there were reasons, and I'm not even going to argue that the reasons were good or bad.
00:05:33.260 I'm saying the entire situation, not just the rejecting of the $2,000 when it was rejected,
00:05:40.180 but the whole situation that Congress got us to where they would reject the bigger check
00:05:47.340 on Christmas Eve is the biggest mistake I've seen in 2020. And it's a year of a lot of mistakes.
00:05:57.160 Now, the reason it's the biggest mistake is that it's not because anybody didn't know something,
00:06:04.580 right? Pandemic mistakes were legitimate mistakes. People didn't know what to do.
00:06:11.460 There were smart people disagreeing on what to do. I forgive those mistakes. I don't forgive this
00:06:18.640 mistake. This is not the kind of mistake you forgive because they knew what they were doing.
00:06:24.480 Every single person involved knew the result of their actions would bring us here.
00:06:34.660 It's almost not even a mistake. It's almost just a slap in the face of the American public.
00:06:41.620 So congratulations, Congress. I didn't think you could be worse, but you did it. You got there.
00:06:50.960 You got to the only thing that could have been worse, yanking that money away from the people who
00:06:57.020 desperately need it on Christmas Eve. The only thing that's stopping me from massive profanity
00:07:03.840 is that I'm trying to keep things positive today. It's Christmas Eve. But unambiguously and without
00:07:11.520 without any question, the biggest mistake, blunder if you want to put it, is this. There's nothing even
00:07:18.680 close to this because of the intention problem. But let's talk about something a little bit more
00:07:23.960 positive. Are you with me? Would you like me to take it up a little bit? Come with me.
00:07:33.280 You'll like it. You'll like it. Here's a little bit of positivity that dropped recently. You've all
00:07:44.200 heard of Naval Ravikant. And what you might know is that his Twitter feed is unusually valuable.
00:07:51.780 So the things that he tweets and has tweeted over the recent years are so valuable that even my publisher
00:07:58.880 asked me to contact him and say, would you please convince him to do a book? Because if he ever does
00:08:05.020 a book of this content, it's so freaking good and useful, like actually directly changes your life kind
00:08:13.800 of information, that it would be the number one bestselling book in the world. And I think that
00:08:20.100 actually would be easily true, that if Naval wanted to make a book, it would be probably number one in the
00:08:26.820 world. I think it would be easy to predict. But he was not interested and is not interested in
00:08:33.160 a book. And his reasons support why you should pay attention to him.
00:08:42.520 Who could read? Can you think of any other situation in which someone knows they could have a number one
00:08:50.340 bestselling book with not really even a lot of work? Because the material exists, you could just have a
00:08:55.520 ghostwriter, assemble it, put your name on it, you're good to go. But there's something
00:09:02.460 about the value of, let's say, products or content, in his case, content. If you make something in the
00:09:12.240 world that a lot of people like and want, you could probably sell that thing and become rich.
00:09:19.800 So making something that's bad and nobody wants, well, nobody buys it and nobody's better off.
00:09:25.520 If you make something that's really good, people are going to pay a lot for it. And a lot of people
00:09:31.100 are going to pay a lot for it. But here's the weird part. If you make something even better than
00:09:37.380 that, something that somebody is willing to pay a lot for, if you make something that's even better
00:09:42.380 than that, you can't sell it because it would be immoral. It would be immoral to keep something
00:09:52.260 from the public that would have that much benefit. If you put a friction between this thing, whatever
00:10:00.780 it is, and the public, you're just not a good person. If the thing that keeps poor people from
00:10:07.640 Naval's content is that they can't afford the book, is that a place you want to be?
00:10:15.360 No. No. Naval's content is so valuable that he understood from the beginning that it would be
00:10:25.860 immoral to sell it. And so somebody, Eric Jorgensen, decided to put Naval's, I think with Naval's
00:10:36.960 approval, put it together in a book that is free. So it is a book. It's free. You can download it. It's
00:10:46.400 called the Navalmanac. N-A-V-A-L-M-A-N-A-C-K, like almanac. It's like a Naval almanac put together.
00:10:57.760 Navalmanac. And so this is available for download. And now everybody everywhere has the benefit of
00:11:08.580 this. There's another example of this. Can you think of another example of something that's a
00:11:13.600 product that's so good, you can't charge for it? Can you think of another one? The vaccinations.
00:11:21.500 Yeah, the coronavirus vaccinations are so important to society that you can't charge for them.
00:11:31.220 If we charged for those vaccinations, that would be the height of immorality. Nobody would be in
00:11:37.740 favor of that. So just look for that phenomenon. If something is too good, you can't charge for it.
00:11:45.220 You just can't. Now, I'd say that we've reached D-Day for vaccinations, meaning that the war against
00:11:57.240 the virus just turned into an offensive war. And you remember, well, maybe you don't remember,
00:12:04.340 but in World War II, the big swing in momentum was D-Day, the invasion of Normandy and the troops
00:12:13.640 coming in. And eventually that cleared out Europe of the Nazi scourge. And it seems to me that we've 0.91
00:12:20.880 reached D-Day. I don't know what day you want to call it the first vaccination, I guess. And now a
00:12:25.720 million people have already received it. A million people already got the vaccination. It's pretty good,
00:12:32.020 isn't it? You have to read a Sam Harris article that I tweeted. So it's in my Twitter feed from
00:12:39.080 yesterday. Sam Harris breaks down how the decision was made about who gets the shots and who doesn't.
00:12:48.160 And you really have to read that article. So this is, I would say this is Sam Harris doing a real solid
00:12:56.640 benefit for the country. Because I didn't really understand everything that went into deciding who
00:13:04.660 gets the shots first and who, you know, what the order is. But let me tell you, when you find out
00:13:10.840 how that was decided, you're not going to like it. You're not going to like it. But you have to see
00:13:17.760 Sam Harris's description of it. I don't want to ruin it. Just look at it. The bottom line is that
00:13:23.640 the determination of who got it first was not made based on saving the most lives.
00:13:33.940 It was made based on a wokeness. So you got to read the article. It's mind-boggling. 0.99
00:13:42.120 But the good news is that we're on the offensive now. It looks like the number of deaths,
00:13:47.620 according to one model, by April 1st, we could have 567,000 people died from the coronavirus.
00:13:59.780 That number is, it's so shocking that it's hard to even read it. Honestly, I didn't think it would
00:14:09.720 get that high. And I'm still optimistic it won't get that high. But I think we're going to blow
00:14:15.180 low past 400,000, no matter what. So let's think positively on that.
00:14:24.160 So Trump vetoed that defense bill. I'm kind of glad he did, because it was really on principle.
00:14:30.840 You know, it'll still get passed, because there's a veto-proof majority, I guess, for it. But I like
00:14:36.940 the fact that Trump vetoed it on principle, because it was filled with pork and crap. 0.99
00:14:43.420 There's a new poll from USA Today that says that history will judge Trump's presidency, 0.99
00:14:52.940 that 50% of people said that they thought he would be judged as a failed president,
00:14:58.280 which is suspiciously the number of Democrats who listen to fake news. But as I've said,
00:15:04.600 they are wrong. And the history, the further you get away from 2020,
00:15:09.760 the better Trump will look. And in 50 years, I think Trump will be regarded as one of the top
00:15:18.100 three presidents. But it might take a long time for us to get that kind of perspective. Because then
00:15:23.540 you're just looking at what he did. Your feeling about his personality and what you felt during this
00:15:29.980 year will fade over time. And simply the decisions he made and the things he accomplished will be left
00:15:35.680 behind. So his reputation is going to climb. Not right away, but it will. So Andrew Yang has
00:15:45.020 apparently filed to run for mayor of New York. That's one of the best things I've heard today.
00:15:54.300 Isn't that kind of cool? Can you think of anybody off the top of your head who would be a better
00:16:00.800 choice to be mayor of New York than Andrew Yang? I mean, you know, even if you're not the same party
00:16:07.900 as Andrew Yang, it's kind of a great choice. Because what we like about him, regardless of
00:16:14.020 your party affiliation, what people like about Andrew Yang is that he's not a dogmatic, you know,
00:16:20.960 he's not just going to make decisions because it's what the team does. He's actually someone who
00:16:28.660 looks at the facts and is smart and does reasonable things, doesn't seem to be tied to any specific
00:16:35.000 way of being. He just seems smart and capable. I think he'd be a great choice. We'll see how he
00:16:43.580 goes. Well, I'm going to go into my positive part of my live stream now, right? And I want to give
00:16:52.260 you a little story. Maybe some of you have heard it before, because I've told it before. I'm going to
00:16:56.680 give you a little story that's just the base, sort of setting the table for what I'll be telling you
00:17:02.520 next. All right. So later, I'll connect the stories, but I'll just start with this. So several years ago,
00:17:08.680 I was asked to give a speech for Salesforce. Now, Salesforce is a big multi-billion dollar fast
00:17:15.840 growing company created by entrepreneur and now CEO, Mark Benioff. And prior to giving the talk to
00:17:25.140 Salesforce, I got to hang out with Mark Benioff for a bit, and we were just sort of chatting.
00:17:32.880 And at some point, the conversation turned to, and I don't know how it got there, but sort of
00:17:39.260 methods for success. And Benioff told me his, I guess you'd say his main theme or principle for
00:17:49.780 success. And I'd never really heard it before in those terms. And the word he used was intentions.
00:17:57.720 And the way he, I think I'll try to explain it as best I can. Maybe I'll get it a little bit wrong.
00:18:02.760 But the idea is that it's one thing to want something, but it's more powerful to put your
00:18:09.700 intentions in a clear package and put it out in the world. And his kind of way of seeing the world is that
00:18:19.020 clear, clean intentions attract everything you need to make them work. So that people are attracted
00:18:27.520 to, let's say, confidence and certainty and intention well described. Because we live in this world that's
00:18:35.700 sort of ambiguous and, you know, you don't know exactly what's the right thing to do, what's going
00:18:42.140 to get you in trouble, what's going to work. So anytime you see somebody who's a leader, and a leader
00:18:48.340 gives you a clear intention, and it looks like a good one, and it's, and what they want is very
00:18:54.620 unambiguous, people are drawn to that. And so that was his secret. Now I would make the distinction
00:19:02.080 between intention and affirmations is whether you put it into the world. An affirmation is something
00:19:09.620 maybe that you're chanting or writing down about a something that you would like to accomplish.
00:19:15.100 That's sort of an internal process. So your affirmations are you talking to yourself.
00:19:21.860 An intention, if you do it right, is something you put into the universe, and other people see it,
00:19:28.580 and then they're drawn to it. Now I saw it, I saw him play out that theme minutes after we talked.
00:19:36.900 It was a dinner for the staff, and I got to sit at the table with the executives. And so while I was at
00:19:44.240 the table for dinner, one of the executives used his moment of access with the CEO to talk with him
00:19:51.680 about a PowerPoint presentation he was going to give to some important group. And so the top executive
00:19:57.980 shows Benioff the PowerPoint thing. And Benioff's first comment, and I'm going to paraphrase the
00:20:04.900 conversation so this is not exact words or anything. And Benioff looks at it, he goes,
00:20:10.120 put on the front page, on the top of it, make sure you tell the audience about our 1% plan.
00:20:19.040 Roughly speaking, they have this deal where Salesforce gives, I think, 1% of their profits to
00:20:24.580 charity, and the employees donate 1% of their time to charity, something like that. And so Benioff says,
00:20:32.000 put that on the front. And his executive says, oh, I've got that, I've got that information, and it's
00:20:39.700 in the body of the thing, I think it's page three or something. That's sort of the best place for it
00:20:44.880 to be, you know, given the flow of the presentation, it belongs in the body of it. And Benioff listens to
00:20:53.420 his explanation, and he says, put it on the first page. And then the executive tries again. He says,
00:21:01.320 yeah, it's very important, of course, and, you know, we've put it right in the best possible
00:21:05.400 place it could be in that third page. You know, that's the flow. And Benioff looks at him, and he
00:21:11.820 goes, put it on the first page. And he argued again, third time. The executive says, yeah, yeah,
00:21:19.840 it's right where it belongs. And Benioff looks at him for a third time and says, put it on the first
00:21:27.320 page. And you could see it finally hitting this guy. Intention. Benioff was very clearly saying,
00:21:37.440 no, our intention is to help the world. We're going to do that by making money. That's good for us too.
00:21:45.740 But our intention is to help the world. And that's going to be on the first page.
00:21:52.140 So our intention is to be good people, help the world. And we're going to do that by making money
00:21:56.820 and having a strong business. The executive wanted to show how the business was going to be great.
00:22:03.440 And because the business was great, hey, we'd make some extra money. We could do this 1% thing.
00:22:08.380 That was backwards. Intention was backwards. Benioff, unique among his people, I think,
00:22:19.820 understood the power of that. And that by putting the intention out, he could, you know, he could
00:22:25.320 attract what he needed. And sure enough, one of the fastest growing companies in the world,
00:22:30.120 amazing success. Hold this story in your mind. I'm going to circle back to it.
00:22:38.380 I've been asked a lot about my past prediction from over a year ago that we would be entering
00:22:44.540 the golden age. And then instead of the golden age, we entered a pandemic. That looks very
00:22:53.360 different from the golden age. In fact, it looks a little opposite. If you had to say,
00:22:59.620 what's a golden age? You would describe it very different from a pandemic.
00:23:03.400 So, am I wrong? Is the golden age not coming? I think it's definitely coming. I'm more certain
00:23:15.980 than at any point. And it's because every construction phase starts with demolition.
00:23:24.560 We're in the demolition phase. Was it possible to get to something that is extraordinarily better
00:23:32.140 without demolition? No, not if there's already a building there. If there's already a building
00:23:38.500 there, which is society as it's evolved, you can't build the new thing until you do something
00:23:45.520 about the old thing. They occupy the same space. So there is no such thing as upgrading a thing
00:23:54.760 unless you can destroy the old thing. Now, it was not our choice to destroy the old thing. The pandemic
00:24:02.440 made that choice for us in a way. But demolition had to happen. Don't think that the demolition is the
00:24:13.120 sign of where we're going. The demolition is your signal. And I'll make the case a little bit stronger
00:24:19.620 here. It's your signal that it is maybe the darkest before the dawn. And that the way you can tell
00:24:28.040 that something good might be coming often is because it looks really dark. And that's what happens before
00:24:35.240 good things happen quite often. So the fact that things look dark at the moment, do not take that as
00:24:41.820 a signal that that's the direction. We're going through a phase that had to happen. There wasn't any way
00:24:47.460 around it. There was no way around. We had to destroy what was there to build something better. Is that what
00:24:53.780 we're doing? Well, I can't speak to the experience for other countries. So I know we have an international
00:25:00.800 audience here. So I'll just speak to an American experience. I think you'll find maybe a lot of this
00:25:06.400 applies everywhere else. But there's a lot of things we learned this year. And when I tell you what I think we
00:25:16.160 learned, it might blow you away. Because you probably haven't thought of it in these terms before.
00:25:23.280 And it goes like this. If you had asked me a year ago, what is it that makes America, America?
00:25:31.660 What is it that binds us and holds us together? I would have given you answers such as, I would have said,
00:25:40.040 well, it's about the Constitution. It's about a shared values. I'd say it's about the way we've been
00:25:51.580 socialized. I might say something about a culture. Somebody might throw in religion.
00:25:58.760 But you'd probably have a big, complicated answer. Yeah, liberty. Somebody would say freedom.
00:26:07.080 You'd have a big, complicated answer of what it is that holds America together. Why doesn't America
00:26:13.640 just fly apart? For 200 years, we've not only held together, but gotten stronger. Why? What's the
00:26:22.780 glue? Now, here's what's mind-blowing. In the past year, everything that I would have said holds America
00:26:32.740 together, dissolved. All of the connecting structure, all of the glue that I believed was holding the
00:26:43.080 country together, just fell apart. For example, do we have a democracy, a democratic republic?
00:26:52.540 No, we don't. The Constitution just sort of failed this year. We don't have, because of the way the
00:27:00.740 system worked, nothing that you could identify as the will of the people being expressed in the form of
00:27:07.300 a republic that turns into a government. We don't have that. How about freedom of speech?
00:27:16.420 Nope. Apparently, social media censorship, if you go too far in the wrong direction, you don't have
00:27:24.300 freedom of speech anymore, at least in a practical sense. You have it in a legal sense, but you don't
00:27:28.900 have it in a practical sense. So we sort of lost our freedom of speech. How about our freedom in general?
00:27:35.880 Well, we kind of lost that too with the pandemic. So we found out that our press, which was one of the
00:27:43.820 most important parts of keeping our liberties together, the free press. We found out we don't
00:27:50.380 have a free press. I mean, it's free if you're not paying for it, but it's so illegitimate that you
00:27:59.760 can't even say we have a press in the way that, you know, we imagined it even a year ago, I would say.
00:28:06.820 So we don't have a press. We don't have an election process. We've got, you know, we don't have the same
00:28:17.260 shared beliefs. Even the idea of patriotism completely disappeared. There are still patriotic
00:28:24.980 people, but the idea that it was a shared value, that patriotism was something we all stood for the
00:28:30.820 flag, nobody knelt, doesn't exist. How about our shared history? At least we have a shared history,
00:28:37.780 right? Not anymore. Now we have the 1619 Project, which is an alternate history. I'm not saying it's
00:28:45.040 right or wrong. It's just saying it's a different history. So we don't have a history anymore. We don't
00:28:51.740 have the Constitution, you know, exists, but it's not really guiding us in the way we thought was
00:28:57.060 holding us together. We don't have a free press. We don't even have freedom. We don't have a freedom.
00:29:01.900 We don't have freedom of speech. So everything that I would have said is essential to holding America
00:29:09.340 together. But what happened? Did America fly apart? When everything that held it together, that you
00:29:21.660 thought held it together, and I thought held it together, it all disappeared in the last year.
00:29:27.560 And America got stronger. Everything that makes America, America disappeared. And America got stronger.
00:29:43.040 Now I'm saying stronger because if you look at the stock market, which I know doesn't represent all
00:29:48.100 people, but it's a good proxy for how strong the nation is, right? It gets reflected in the stock market.
00:29:55.240 So there's lots of work to do and to take care of people who are disadvantaged in every way,
00:30:00.300 especially during the pandemic. But the country got stronger. So what are we missing?
00:30:09.840 Apparently, and not even apparently, I'll say obviously, there is something that keeps America
00:30:16.340 together that was not those things. Now you could say it's the economy, maybe. But I haven't
00:30:25.220 a different opinion. I think what keeps America, America is intention. It's intention. When people
00:30:36.640 were talking about America is going to fly apart, and there's going to be a civil war, and I told you
00:30:44.220 there wouldn't be. I told you emphatically, there wouldn't be, and there can't be. And the reason that
00:30:53.420 there won't be, there won't be, and there can't be, I'm not talking about, you know, some unrest in
00:30:58.640 some city or something. But the reason that we won't go completely into anarchy and civil war
00:31:04.300 is we intend not to. That's it. The entire country, in my opinion, is held together by an intention.
00:31:19.900 Our intention is to stay together. That's it. Our intention is to stay together. Now, let me say a
00:31:28.480 little bit more about that. I've told you before that in your personal life, it doesn't matter what
00:31:35.320 you say you want. That's not the thing that will change your life. Your wants will not change your
00:31:42.260 life. But what you decide will. Your decisions are what does change your life. You decide it, and then
00:31:49.420 you do it. Wanting something is inactive. It's a decision. And that's also, the decision is also a
00:31:57.400 clear statement of intention. Because once you make a decision, your intention is solidified, right?
00:32:03.740 And I believe that all of us individually, for our own reasons, maybe, we have an explicit intention
00:32:15.120 to stay together. And so I would like to give my Christmas message to everyone here. This is my Christmas
00:32:25.300 message to the country. And it goes like this. So I'm speaking to, you know, America now. Now, the rest of
00:32:33.540 you, I know there's lots of international viewers. But just bear with me for a moment. Maybe some of this will
00:32:39.060 apply to your country as well. And I'm going to speak directly to black Americans. I'm going to speak
00:32:45.720 directly to Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, every other kind of ethnic Americans. Talking to all my
00:32:53.780 friends in the LGBTQ community and everybody else that I don't know in the LGBTQ community. Talking about
00:33:00.300 all Democrats, independents, Republicans, my friends, my critics, every religion, and every belief. I'm talking to
00:33:12.560 every single one of you right now. And I just have one thing to say. Just one message. I choose you. I choose you to be in
00:33:25.740 my country. Now, I don't mean it's up to me, obviously. I just mean that it's my intention to remain in this
00:33:32.780 country, an American, as part of an American country. It's my intention to be part of this great experiment
00:33:41.300 with everybody. No exceptions. Be you in jail, be you free, be you my critic or my enemy, it is my intention
00:33:53.060 to remain American. And I don't really ask anything in return. Because the moment you ask something in
00:34:03.920 return, you're doing it wrong. I don't ask anything in return. I just choose you. That's it. Anything more
00:34:15.660 than that makes it less, I think. So Christmas Eve is sort of a time for a gratitude. I think it's a good
00:34:25.940 reminder to be grateful. So I am grateful to all of you. I'm grateful to my critics for making me
00:34:34.060 stronger. I'm grateful to everybody who's ever disagreed with me for making me, you know, work a little bit
00:34:40.520 harder. I'm grateful to my audience. I'm grateful to all of you who have good intentions. Keep it that
00:34:49.240 way. And so I tell you that the golden age is not only coming, it can't be stopped. And we're in the
00:34:59.800 demolition phase. It's not the fun part. It's not the fun part. But we will get through this. And let me
00:35:08.160 tell you what's happening that maybe you've missed. Because you're looking at the coronavirus, you're
00:35:13.800 looking at whatever Trump is doing. But there's a lot of stuff happening that you're just not noticing.
00:35:19.600 It's slower. And it's taking us to the golden age in a way that is unstoppable. There's nothing that
00:35:28.840 can stop it. And let me say more about this. Of course, what the pandemic did was accelerate all
00:35:36.860 trends. That's the demolition phase. You've accelerated the trend toward things that were
00:35:41.940 going to go on a business and stop anyway. And so a lot changed. But there are some things
00:35:50.100 that I don't think you noticed. There has been a rewrite of the operating system
00:35:56.840 for the United States for sure. But I think maybe for people, maybe for reality. Here are some examples
00:36:06.080 of how the operating system of our entire reality has changed just in the last few years. Every bit
00:36:15.240 of this is newish in the last few years. Number one, when did you hear the idea of a talent stack?
00:36:25.160 Think about it. Think about the idea of a talent stack, the idea of combining talents so that you're not
00:36:31.420 the best in the world at any one thing. But you've collected some talents that work together well.
00:36:37.040 The way I collected my meager talents to be a cartoonist, I don't draw well. I'm not the funniest
00:36:42.560 person in the world. But there aren't too many people who can do all of that. So that was my talent
00:36:47.240 stack. So instead of trying to be the best in the world, have you noticed that the idea of a talent
00:36:53.620 stack has gone from something I wrote about in a book in 2013, how to fail at almost everything and
00:36:59.900 still win big, that one you see over my shoulder? From that book, have any of you noticed how influential
00:37:06.120 that's been? Have you noticed that the idea of a talent stack went from something in a book to something
00:37:14.440 like common knowledge in just a few years? And it's transformative. Because if you're, if you thought the
00:37:22.000 only way you could succeed was to be the best in the world at something and you knew you couldn't, and you
00:37:27.060 were right, because how many people can be the best in the world at anything, that was kind of
00:37:31.480 demotivating. But as soon as you realize that success is just a matter of assembling parts that
00:37:37.260 are available, skills, things you can learn quite easily, that's a whole new way of looking at the
00:37:43.640 world. How about the idea of systems versus goals? How many years ago was it that that wasn't a thing?
00:37:51.760 Now, I think people have talked about it in various ways forever, but when it came out in
00:37:57.020 that same book, how to fail at almost everything, it started to creep into the consciousness of the
00:38:03.460 world in a way that it had not until then. Now, part of that is because I'm a hypnotist as well as an
00:38:09.220 author. So if I write something, it has more chance of being influential just because I have the,
00:38:15.860 I've learned the skills in my skill stack of how to make things, you know, sticky. But have you noticed
00:38:22.840 that the idea of both talent stacks and systems being more important than goals have become
00:38:30.920 common knowledge? And when I say they've become common knowledge, I say that's when it becomes part
00:38:36.880 of the operating system. It's one thing when it's something that's in a book, but once it gets out of
00:38:42.740 the book and it, you know, takes over our minds, then it's the operating system. Now, what would the
00:38:50.140 world look like with just those two changes? That's it. Because before this, you had to, you had to have
00:38:57.460 enough money or whatever to get into a good school and college. And there were a few ways to succeed,
00:39:03.900 but they weren't available to everybody in the way that you'd want them to be. But now people know that
00:39:09.440 talent stacks and systems versus goals can be transformative, not just to society, but to
00:39:15.500 people. That's a big difference. How about this? A few years ago, you would have said facts are more
00:39:22.200 important than persuasion. Do you still say that? I think we understand now in 2020, something that I
00:39:31.260 said in 2013, and same book, had it failed almost everything. And it was, and in my book, Win Bigly, I said it
00:39:40.820 more clearly, and emphasize that persuasion is what is moving us, not facts. Facts, of course, are the most
00:39:48.860 important thing to the outcome. But we don't make decisions based on facts. We're just not that species. We
00:39:55.700 thought we were. 10 years ago, if I said, how do people make decisions? You'd say, well, they look at the facts,
00:40:01.000 they use their reason. What would you say today? Today, you'd say, well, they'll look at the facts,
00:40:06.680 and then they'll use their bias to make the decision, right? That's a big difference. We
00:40:11.960 understand now we are an irrational species in a way we didn't really know 10 years ago. I mean,
00:40:18.400 you always sort of knew it, but you thought it was other people, didn't you? Yeah, people are irrational,
00:40:24.520 specifically other people. But what you've learned recently is that, yeah, people are irrational,
00:40:29.760 you know, specifically other people, and also you, also you, also me. There's no, nobody gets an
00:40:39.640 exemption. We're all, we're all irrational. We're just trying to, we're trying to up our game. But
00:40:46.520 realizing you're irrational is the base requirement for improving your game, your thinking game, as it
00:40:54.740 were. That's a big difference. Imagine a world that went from thinking facts matter to our decision
00:41:00.460 to understanding they don't. How big is that? It's really big. It's really big. It's completely
00:41:08.060 transforms your entire experience of reality. How about this? How much do you trust your narrative
00:41:16.180 keepers? How much do you trust the news? You don't. 10 years ago, you probably said, well, if it's in the
00:41:24.680 news, it's probably true. Yeah, they can make some mistakes. But if it's in the news, it's probably
00:41:31.920 true. Now, what do you think? Now, you know, it's not true. You don't wonder if the news is accurate.
00:41:40.560 You know, it's not. And that's now common knowledge. President Trump did that for you.
00:41:47.460 President Trump took an illusion we were all under that the news was something like a legitimate
00:41:53.420 organization. And he taught us that it wasn't, that it was always an illusion, that the news is
00:42:01.120 a propaganda, you know, sort of experience. How about this? Do you trust science the way you used
00:42:12.120 to? Because I think what we've learned recently is that, yeah, you can, you can trust science as a
00:42:19.160 process. But number one, you don't know where you are in the process. It's a big problem, right?
00:42:25.380 We love science as a process of going from the unknown to, you know, learning something useful.
00:42:31.880 But you never quite know where you are on that journey. Are you in the middle, where you're still
00:42:38.540 confused, but it's different from where you started? Or have you reached the end, where you actually know,
00:42:44.720 you know what's going on, and it's not going to change? You don't really know. But there's a bigger
00:42:49.000 problem. We don't really trust science. We end up trusting scientists. And while I love science
00:42:58.720 as a process, what do we know about people who are explaining to us anything? Whether it's the news
00:43:06.840 they're explaining to us, or science they're explaining to us. Well, what we know now is that
00:43:11.100 it's being filtered through humans who are so flawed and so biased that it doesn't matter how good science
00:43:18.180 is, you're never going to know. Because the only thing you know is what a scientist tells you.
00:43:25.380 You don't know anything about science, unless you're directly involved in it. We know what the
00:43:30.920 scientists tell us. And we now learn to distinguish, right? I would say 10 years ago, you would have said
00:43:39.180 that the scientist and the science, while different concepts, you could treat them like they're the same,
00:43:45.480 right? Because if the scientists told you something 10 years ago, you'd say, oh, that's what
00:43:51.980 science says. What do you say now? Today, if a scientist tells you something, you're far more
00:43:59.720 likely to say, wait a minute, that's not necessarily science. That's a scientist who may be biased,
00:44:07.960 may be bought off, may be wrong, may disagree with people. But it's a different level of credibility.
00:44:13.520 And now we understand that. We didn't understand that before. Of course, there are big changes in
00:44:19.420 society. Commuting will never be the same. I don't think people will go back to the commuting ways
00:44:25.180 that they had, because it just was so unpleasant. The only reason that commuting was the thing that it
00:44:30.580 was, where it was not unusual for people to spend an hour each way to get to work at home,
00:44:36.740 two hours in many cases. I know people who commute two hours each way, every day. I think that's going
00:44:45.860 to go away, right? I mean, I don't see people going back to that. And here's the reason. I've taught you
00:44:51.880 before that one of the best ways to predict the future, just one of the things that's a good variable
00:44:57.500 to understand, is that people can get used to anything. If it sort of creeps up on you, you can
00:45:05.580 get used to it. It wasn't always that a commute took forever and you sat in traffic. You just sort of
00:45:11.520 got used to it. You hated it. You never got used to it in the sense that you didn't hate it.
00:45:17.440 But you sort of accepted it, because you got used to it. Then the pandemic comes,
00:45:23.260 and then suddenly you don't have to commute. Now you're not used to it, are you? Now commuting's
00:45:30.180 a big problem, because you're not used to it. After the pandemic's over, you're going to say to
00:45:35.280 yourself, what the heck did I ever, why was I doing that? It was crazy. I mean, now that we have the
00:45:42.520 right technology that you can work remotely, it just doesn't make any sense. So I don't see that ever
00:45:47.700 going back. Likewise, I don't see cities going back to what cities were. I don't know what cities
00:45:54.260 will become, but it doesn't make a lot of sense to live in one, especially because commuting doesn't
00:46:01.140 make sense either. So cities will change. I don't know how. But again, I'll go back to the Andrew Yang
00:46:08.000 running for, I think he's going to run for mayor of New York City. Nothing would be better for the
00:46:14.980 United States. And forget about what you think of Andrew Yang's, you know, party affiliation. Let's
00:46:20.880 say you're not a Democrat, so you just can't get on board with a Democrat thing. But who would be
00:46:28.940 smarter, better, more trusted, more qualified to do a little A-B testing and find out what a city can
00:46:36.340 become? Not what a city used to be, but what could a city become? What is the thing that's after the
00:46:43.280 pandemic? Can you think of anybody in the public domain who would be, who you would trust to wrestle
00:46:51.600 with that question? Because there's no right answer. Somebody's going to have to have some intuition,
00:46:56.920 some skills, some real ability to dig in and be creative and take some chances and all that stuff.
00:47:04.220 He's perfect. He's perfect. New York City, New York City, if you don't elect Andrew Yang,
00:47:11.200 you're crazy. You'd be absolutely crazy. I don't care who he's running against, 0.99
00:47:19.100 Republican or Democrat. I don't care who he's running against. You need to do this,
00:47:25.240 not just for New York City. You need to do it for the country. Because whatever New York City does,
00:47:31.240 everybody's going to watch, right? And it's the biggest thing. So if you can make it work in New
00:47:37.120 York City, there's a good reason you might be able to reproduce it. So I see just the fact that
00:47:43.420 there is an Andrew Yang, that he just exists. Just the fact that he exists and that he just paired
00:47:50.800 himself with this specific problem, one of the most important levers for the future.
00:47:56.820 You don't get to the golden age without re-engineering some basic stuff. As basic as UBI,
00:48:05.180 which, by the way, we just got used to. That's what the direct payments are for the coronavirus.
00:48:10.440 It's kind of a UBI, in a way. So that's coming. I think that the future, we will be able to beat
00:48:18.020 pandemics better. I think that what we learned from all of this, what we learned from the pandemic
00:48:24.420 probably will put us in really good shape for future pandemics, but also future viruses and
00:48:30.560 future collaborative science and collaborative medicine. I think we took a gigantic step forward
00:48:37.360 in terms of medical science, not to mention telehealth and things that changed because of
00:48:43.060 the pandemic. So now you can get a doctor on a video call, no matter what state you're in.
00:48:48.400 You know, shopping will always be different. Here's another big change. The rise of independent
00:48:55.880 voices. Let's say independent journalists, the Tim Pools of the world, independent voices,
00:49:03.420 the Joe Rogans of the world, independent... I'm not sure what you would call me. Does anybody have a
00:49:09.960 label for me? What would you call me? Tell me in the comments. I'll look for it. If you were to label me,
00:49:18.400 pundit? I'm not sure that pundit quite fits. Because when you say pundit, you're usually
00:49:25.400 thinking of somebody who's advocating one side or another. I don't know. Maybe that's me.
00:49:32.020 But the rise of independent voices to replace a broken corporate media is probably a really good
00:49:39.120 thing. It's probably a really good thing. And here's another thing that I don't think you quite
00:49:46.240 understand how important it is. Have you noticed that through my books and these live streams
00:49:54.400 primarily, that I've trained an army of better thinkers? I know that sounds like a pretty, I don't
00:50:03.760 know, egomaniac thing to say. But if you've experienced the last few years with me, I think
00:50:10.240 you'd agree. I think you would agree that I have succeeded in training a whole bunch of people. I
00:50:19.040 don't know how many. It's probably hundreds of thousands, if not millions. But at least hundreds
00:50:24.240 of thousands of people who have learned a different way to approach problems, and maybe a better way.
00:50:31.640 So I think that's bigger than you think. Because you don't have to get everybody on board to know
00:50:40.440 something is going to work. If you get a critical mass, and I think we're maybe there, of better
00:50:47.380 thinkers, that stuff will spread. So that's something to look forward to. I feel that television and
00:50:55.120 movies are being replaced by other entertainment, live stream, for example. On Christmas morning,
00:51:01.680 what will be the only live content that's new original content that's available for you to watch
00:51:10.540 on Christmas morning? Well, there'll be some news programs, right? But they're all going to be the
00:51:15.160 special holiday stuff you don't want to watch. But then there'll be me, because I'll be here
00:51:20.380 Christmas morning. I'll see you then. And I think that the independent people like me,
00:51:27.620 who just have some benefits that they can transmit, are a big deal in the world. Not just me, but
00:51:36.400 the whole idea of it. I think we're entering a phase where wokeness is jumping the shark like crazy.
00:51:44.160 Now, I'm in favor of wokeness. But like everything, there's such a thing as too much. I'm in favor of 0.93
00:51:55.620 ice cream. But if you ate a barrel of ice cream, you'd be sick and you might die. There's no such
00:52:02.120 thing, except for maybe money, I guess, or good looks. There are some things that you just can have
00:52:10.280 too much of. And wokeness is one of them. So I love the idea that any group of people can say,
00:52:19.700 hey, we would rather be referred to by this term. Please don't use this other term. We don't like
00:52:26.120 that. I'm okay with that. I think everybody should, just a basic element of respect is that
00:52:35.860 you should be able to be referred to in a respectful word or way that you like. But of
00:52:46.680 course, that can go too far and then it becomes coercive. And I think we're seeing that. So I think
00:52:51.260 the wokeness stuff is starting to hit the wall. It can't go forever. There's nothing that really
00:52:57.640 goes forever. Everything hits a resisting point. And I think the wokeness is near, but not at. 0.89
00:53:04.640 It's very near the point of resistance where it just won't go further than that because it can't. 1.00
00:53:10.620 It's just too stupid. So it's already reached a level of pure stupidity. And once everybody 1.00
00:53:18.320 realizes that, we'll say, all right, that's far enough. We like the fact that we don't have
00:53:23.540 insulting words for people, but let's keep it to that. But like I say, a lot of the wokeness 0.89
00:53:30.780 stuff is all positive. You just can't go too far with it. And then it becomes negative. We're also
00:53:35.580 entering a phase that I'll call a holographic reality, enhanced reality. We are right on the
00:53:41.880 cusp of merging the non-real and the real into one reality. It might be because you're wearing some
00:53:49.580 special glasses that show things in your reality that didn't exist. And it's going to change
00:53:55.460 everything. You'll be able to put on 3D glasses and attend a meeting almost in person. So those
00:54:02.520 technologies, which we always knew were coming, right? You know, 20 years ago, you knew all these
00:54:08.060 technologies were coming, but it just takes a while. We're almost there. This is sort of the coming
00:54:15.080 year. This enhanced reality and virtual reality stuff is going to go to another level. We also have
00:54:22.000 a shift of awareness about things such as the role of China in the world. Now we understand China as a
00:54:28.520 malign influence. I think we probably thought of them more as a, let's say, a friendly competitor or
00:54:35.900 something. And our understanding of what China really is and what their intentions are, because
00:54:43.000 they've made their intentions very clear too, unfortunately. Understanding that is a big, big
00:54:49.600 psychological and mental shift. But it was necessary to keep us safe.
00:54:57.400 And here's another one. Hallucinogens are being normalized, or in some cases legalized,
00:55:05.080 but at least normalized. Now, if you don't think it's a big deal that the safer kinds of hallucinogens are
00:55:14.660 being normalized and sort of being incorporated into medical science as well as our general
00:55:20.540 understanding of how to live, it's gigantic. It's gigantic. It's so gigantic, I don't even think I
00:55:30.940 can explain it. Because if you haven't experienced the hallucinogens, if you haven't experienced them,
00:55:40.340 to know what they do to your understanding of reality, it becomes permanent. And here's the way
00:55:46.700 I describe it. If you live a world, let's say you do mushrooms as an example, and you experience life
00:55:54.000 in a completely different subjective reality, while understanding that life didn't change.
00:56:00.640 That the actual stuff that was bothering you before, none of it changed. But you're a different
00:56:06.220 person for a while. Once you realize that you can live a completely different life with the same
00:56:12.940 world, it changes you permanently. Because then you understand how subjective your actual life is.
00:56:20.020 It's not the thing you're locked into. Your life, you are not locked into it, or the way you process it
00:56:26.680 in your mind. You can really change that. And that one experience teaches you that, and then that lesson
00:56:33.320 becomes something that reinforces itself through your life. So what seems like a smallish little
00:56:39.220 corner of the reality is, oh, by the way, some hallucinogens are being normalized. It's a little
00:56:45.960 bit at a time. Feels like not a big thing. It's a really big thing. It's a really big thing. And you
00:56:53.660 don't know. And by the way, if you want to find out how exaggerating, how much exaggeration there is
00:56:59.720 here, talk to somebody who has tried these things. That's all. Just talk to somebody who has the
00:57:06.960 experience and ask them if the change is permanent. And they'll probably tell you yes. They might not,
00:57:13.060 but they probably will. So this is what I would like to leave you with today. In summary,
00:57:22.680 in summary, United States is not held together by the stuff we thought held it together. It's not
00:57:33.140 because of the Constitution. It's not because of freedom. It's not because of our free press. It's
00:57:38.880 not because of any of it. We just intend to stay together as a country. And none of that's changed.
00:57:47.540 You know, you hear people talk about blah, blah, blah. Texas is going to spin off. But it doesn't want
00:57:53.860 to. Right? Not really. Texas doesn't really want to be its own country. It's something you say,
00:58:01.360 something you talk about. But given, you know, if the rest of the country just played fair,
00:58:08.520 Texas wants to be part of the United States. And keep this one message with you. The intentions
00:58:16.960 you put into the world will create your reality. And the intention that I put into the world right
00:58:24.980 now is that I want everybody in the United States, and again, you can generalize this to the world,
00:58:34.200 but let me just talk to Americans and in the United States. Black, Hispanic, Asian American,
00:58:42.940 old, young, rich or poor. LGBTQ, abled, disabled, differently abled. Every one of you. I choose you.
00:58:57.100 I hope you choose me. And that is my New Year's, actually Christmas Eve message for you.
00:59:05.920 Have a great Christmas. I will see you in the morning.
00:59:14.680 And that's all for you too, YouTube. I will see you tomorrow.