Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 25, 2020


Episode 1231 Scott Adams: Merry Christmas and Pass the Pork. Trust Science and Pretend the Republic Still Exists


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

149.77342

Word Count

7,139

Sentence Count

497

Misogynist Sentences

6

Hate Speech Sentences

13


Summary

Joe Biden's new catchphrase: "You're a one-horse pony." And a political system that's not quite as simple as you might think. Plus, a special Christmas edition of the dopamine hit: The Simultaneous Sip.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 I'm dreaming of a whiteboard Christmas.
00:00:10.560 Yep, that's why I'm a cartoonist and not a famous singer.
00:00:15.460 Because you wouldn't want to hear any more of that, let me tell you.
00:00:18.820 Merry Christmas. Merry, Merry Christmas. Ho, ho, ho, ho.
00:00:23.320 How's everybody doing?
00:00:25.300 It's an awesome day today.
00:00:26.960 And if you would like to participate in the very special Christmas version,
00:00:34.700 all you need is a cup or mug or glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:41.240 Today only, you can fill it with hot chocolate or eggnog.
00:00:45.900 But use your favorite beverage.
00:00:49.140 I still like coffee.
00:00:51.420 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,
00:00:56.160 the holiday sensation.
00:00:58.340 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it happens now.
00:01:01.320 Go.
00:01:05.620 Ah.
00:01:08.600 Did you hear angels singing?
00:01:12.840 I feel like...
00:01:15.000 Try that again. Hold on.
00:01:16.700 Try it again.
00:01:17.600 One more sip.
00:01:18.240 Ah.
00:01:18.280 Yeah, I think I heard it.
00:01:28.960 Angels sing every time you take a sip.
00:01:31.780 Amazing, really.
00:01:33.600 Well, we got news today.
00:01:35.980 Joe Biden, he's got a new saying, which he broke out at one of his events,
00:01:43.180 in which a journalist shouted a question, and Joe Biden said, and I quote,
00:01:50.460 you're a one-horse pony.
00:01:53.080 So that's going to be my new catchphrase.
00:01:56.060 Oh, yeah?
00:01:57.140 Well, you're a one-horse pony.
00:02:00.820 So that's the leader of the free world.
00:02:03.840 You're a one-horse pony.
00:02:05.960 Nothing to worry about.
00:02:07.020 Well, I wouldn't be worried about that at all.
00:02:11.080 Shall we go to the whiteboard?
00:02:13.520 Would you like to go right to it?
00:02:15.380 I know that's why you're here.
00:02:17.140 Come on.
00:02:18.180 You didn't come here for me.
00:02:19.240 You came here for the whiteboard.
00:02:20.620 Just admit it.
00:02:21.820 I think I can handle it.
00:02:23.600 Well, I was listening to a YouTube video from...
00:02:27.780 in which Phil Kline, a former Arkansas AG,
00:02:31.740 was talking about the election.
00:02:32.760 And he explained the election in a way that I thought
00:02:37.760 I would like to, let's say, find some inspiration from it
00:02:43.020 and put my own spin on it.
00:02:45.700 Okay?
00:02:46.840 By the way, those of you who are asking,
00:02:49.380 yes, I do still have my wedding ring.
00:02:52.940 I take it off to work because it's sort of bulky,
00:02:55.940 and when I type, it sort of moves my fingers in the wrong direction.
00:02:59.080 But, let us go to the whiteboard.
00:03:04.160 Let me tell you what kind of a system we have here
00:03:06.960 in these United States.
00:03:09.800 Some of this might apply to you, non-United States people.
00:03:14.460 So, apparently I don't know how to spell the word democracy,
00:03:21.360 but if you could pretend that I had spelled that correctly,
00:03:25.140 it would be a much better presentation.
00:03:27.180 Watch me write it with my left hand,
00:03:29.940 because if I use my right hand, I'm going to rip my microphone out.
00:03:33.860 All right.
00:03:36.300 Damn it.
00:03:37.560 It's all falling apart.
00:03:39.020 It's all falling apart.
00:03:42.020 Democracy.
00:03:46.580 Left-handed writing.
00:03:47.880 Come on.
00:03:48.320 It's the best I can do.
00:03:50.160 So, if you ask people in these United States,
00:03:53.000 you walked up to an average citizen,
00:03:54.540 and you said, hey, average citizen.
00:03:56.200 And that citizen would say back to you,
00:03:58.700 why are you calling me average?
00:04:00.720 And you say, it doesn't matter.
00:04:02.720 This is just a story.
00:04:04.300 You're not even real.
00:04:05.680 And then the guy says, okay, what's your question?
00:04:08.400 You say, well, average citizen,
00:04:10.400 what kind of a political system do you live in in the United States?
00:04:13.920 And that person would say,
00:04:15.880 a democracy.
00:04:17.740 Well, of course, you're all smart enough to know
00:04:20.360 it's not exactly a democracy,
00:04:22.820 because we have a republic,
00:04:24.600 meaning we elect representatives to make decisions for us.
00:04:28.380 So, really, we're one level away from a pure democracy.
00:04:33.660 But our democracy, our republic,
00:04:35.920 is determined by the electoral college vote,
00:04:38.260 not a direct vote.
00:04:40.360 So, the vote goes to the electoral college.
00:04:43.060 But the vote isn't really in our current system.
00:04:47.720 It's not really about all of the votes.
00:04:50.820 If you're in California,
00:04:53.060 your vote may not matter that much.
00:04:56.380 But if you're in a swing state,
00:04:58.140 it probably matters a lot.
00:04:59.940 So, it's really about the swing state votes.
00:05:02.160 They're the only ones that end up making a difference.
00:05:04.040 And, of course, the swing state votes
00:05:06.940 are mostly driven by voter turnout.
00:05:11.260 It's not driven by policies or politics, per se.
00:05:17.080 I mean, those are all part of the mix.
00:05:19.280 But it's really driven by turnout.
00:05:21.180 How many people physically vote.
00:05:24.020 And turnout, it turns out, at least this year,
00:05:27.220 was determined by rules changes.
00:05:30.420 So, there were a whole bunch of rule changes
00:05:33.320 about who can vote, where the ballot boxes are,
00:05:36.780 satellite voting stations that had different rules
00:05:39.380 than regular voting stations,
00:05:41.460 deadlines about, you know,
00:05:43.180 when the votes could be counted,
00:05:45.260 ballot boxes, where they could be placed,
00:05:47.500 how people can observe.
00:05:49.500 All of those things were the subject
00:05:52.260 of a bunch of rules changes,
00:05:54.680 which everybody who looks into it,
00:05:56.740 I think, would agree,
00:05:58.160 drove turnout,
00:05:59.380 which drove the swing state votes,
00:06:01.260 which caused the electoral college
00:06:02.660 to go the way it did,
00:06:04.000 which caused our republic
00:06:05.120 to have a presumptive president-elect Biden.
00:06:11.880 But it turns out,
00:06:12.920 I didn't know about this part.
00:06:14.320 This is the part that Phil Kline filled in for me.
00:06:17.300 I didn't realize that Zuckerberg
00:06:18.680 had donated over $400 million
00:06:21.440 to a number of, you know,
00:06:24.400 non-profit entities
00:06:25.460 who were behind the voting rule changes.
00:06:28.180 Did you know this?
00:06:31.380 I found this out this morning.
00:06:34.080 Now, I knew all of the parts,
00:06:37.180 but I didn't see them pulled together
00:06:39.100 until just this morning.
00:06:41.040 So I knew that Zuckerberg
00:06:42.660 had donated a bunch of money
00:06:44.080 and it had something to do with,
00:06:45.480 you know, election integrity.
00:06:47.640 And of course, I knew all these other parts,
00:06:49.980 but I didn't quite know
00:06:51.420 that the only thing
00:06:53.420 that caused the rules changes
00:06:55.020 was Zuckerberg and his money.
00:06:58.640 And the only thing
00:06:59.700 that caused the turnout,
00:07:01.680 the way it was,
00:07:03.640 was the voting rule changes.
00:07:05.760 In other words,
00:07:06.500 turnout includes mischief, right?
00:07:10.200 Because it's the number of votes that matter
00:07:12.560 and some of that might be mischief.
00:07:14.660 We don't know if it's a trivial amount.
00:07:17.100 We don't know if it's a big amount.
00:07:18.620 But we know that turnout
00:07:19.700 was driven by things like that
00:07:21.860 and targeting certain inner-city voters, etc.
00:07:25.480 So a lot of it,
00:07:26.720 a lot of the turnout
00:07:27.680 wasn't just rules changes.
00:07:29.880 This was a very big part of it.
00:07:31.720 But it wasn't all of it.
00:07:32.960 Some of it was just this money
00:07:34.200 went toward getting the turnout
00:07:36.220 and did a good job.
00:07:38.560 Now,
00:07:40.020 as some smart people said to me
00:07:43.160 when I said something like this on Twitter,
00:07:46.220 they said,
00:07:47.680 well, what about 2016?
00:07:49.020 You know, really?
00:07:51.720 2016 was a turnout election.
00:07:55.000 The only reason that Trump won
00:07:56.920 is he got this turnout right.
00:07:59.580 And the only reason he got the turnout right was
00:08:02.300 probably the way he campaigned,
00:08:06.160 maybe the way they directed their advertisement,
00:08:10.260 perhaps had something to do with better data.
00:08:15.260 Where do you see anywhere on here
00:08:17.300 the will of the people?
00:08:19.560 Right?
00:08:20.000 So I'm not saying that
00:08:21.140 I'm not saying that the Trump election
00:08:23.560 was good, bad, legitimate, illegitimate,
00:08:26.380 or anything else.
00:08:27.780 I'm just saying that he was also
00:08:29.780 part of a similar system
00:08:32.280 in which we are
00:08:33.180 six to seven layers away from a democracy.
00:08:37.520 We are six to seven layers
00:08:39.840 away from a democracy.
00:08:41.320 We're not even in the ballpark
00:08:42.700 of being a democracy
00:08:44.700 or a republic.
00:08:47.400 You know, on paper we are.
00:08:48.560 But in reality,
00:08:50.140 our election is really driven by,
00:08:51.960 say, a Zuckerberg
00:08:53.840 or a billionaire, etc.
00:08:55.540 Now,
00:08:56.660 that's what the political system
00:08:59.080 looks like.
00:09:00.220 But should we worry about
00:09:02.140 the political system at all?
00:09:04.780 Because if you think about it,
00:09:06.360 our politics should be
00:09:08.560 driven by experts.
00:09:10.980 So our politicians
00:09:13.100 shouldn't be just independently
00:09:14.860 making decisions
00:09:16.020 without consulting people.
00:09:18.160 And a lot of our decisions
00:09:19.100 are based on economics
00:09:20.220 and based on science.
00:09:23.460 So it shouldn't matter too much
00:09:25.920 what kind of system
00:09:28.040 gets you to your elected leaders
00:09:30.360 so long as
00:09:32.100 those elected leaders
00:09:33.820 are transparently following science.
00:09:37.240 Wouldn't you agree?
00:09:38.820 Would it matter if you had a Democrat
00:09:40.320 who followed the science
00:09:41.600 or a Republican
00:09:42.380 who followed the science?
00:09:43.600 As long as it was the same science,
00:09:45.700 they'd have the same decisions.
00:09:47.260 Same with economics.
00:09:49.060 If they followed the experts,
00:09:50.640 wouldn't it be kind of similar?
00:09:53.000 No.
00:09:54.380 No.
00:09:55.440 Of course not.
00:09:58.440 No.
00:09:59.460 Here's why.
00:10:01.920 Let's say you wanted
00:10:03.020 to trust the science.
00:10:05.220 Everybody tells you
00:10:06.140 you should trust the science, right?
00:10:07.440 But how do you trust the science?
00:10:09.760 You didn't do any science.
00:10:11.240 How much science
00:10:11.960 did you do this year?
00:10:13.420 Do you remember that
00:10:14.300 randomized control study
00:10:16.180 you set up
00:10:16.900 and operated on your own?
00:10:19.020 No.
00:10:20.040 I didn't do any science this year.
00:10:21.980 You didn't do any science.
00:10:22.980 I didn't even directly observe any.
00:10:25.040 Did you watch any science experiments
00:10:27.220 being conducted?
00:10:28.900 I didn't.
00:10:30.140 I've never seen any science.
00:10:32.120 Indeed, I would say
00:10:33.160 I've never seen science in my life.
00:10:35.020 Except maybe, you know,
00:10:37.100 in a science class in school
00:10:38.720 or something.
00:10:40.160 No.
00:10:40.480 What we see
00:10:41.180 is what these scientists
00:10:42.740 tell us
00:10:44.600 happened
00:10:45.760 when they were doing science.
00:10:47.500 So here's your problem.
00:10:49.600 Scientists are,
00:10:50.560 and a lot of you don't know this,
00:10:51.960 but they're actually human beings.
00:10:54.320 And human beings
00:10:55.380 are...
00:10:57.600 Okay.
00:10:57.960 Here's a little quiz.
00:10:59.640 Fill in the blank.
00:11:01.880 Human beings are,
00:11:03.240 and your two choices are,
00:11:04.940 A,
00:11:05.600 reliable,
00:11:07.220 or B,
00:11:09.300 unreliable.
00:11:11.340 Right?
00:11:11.820 There's your test.
00:11:13.020 Human beings are
00:11:14.260 reliable,
00:11:16.780 or B,
00:11:18.160 unreliable.
00:11:19.960 Yeah,
00:11:20.320 most of you got the right answer.
00:11:21.960 That's right.
00:11:22.840 They're unreliable.
00:11:24.880 Because they have biases,
00:11:26.540 they can be bribed,
00:11:27.620 they might be paid by somebody,
00:11:29.080 they could just be wrong.
00:11:30.800 Right?
00:11:31.700 So,
00:11:32.700 trust science,
00:11:34.640 except that the only view
00:11:36.140 that we're getting of science
00:11:37.560 are from the scientists,
00:11:39.580 and they're unreliable.
00:11:43.100 That's kind of bad,
00:11:45.100 but it's worse than that,
00:11:47.380 because I don't usually hear
00:11:49.060 from the scientists.
00:11:50.800 I hear from the journalists
00:11:52.440 who talk to the scientists.
00:11:55.740 Now, remember,
00:11:56.240 the scientists are unreliable.
00:11:58.900 Because why?
00:12:00.340 Because why?
00:12:01.000 Does anybody remember?
00:12:02.560 Why are these scientists
00:12:03.800 unreliable?
00:12:05.480 That's right.
00:12:06.100 They're humans.
00:12:07.280 They're human beings.
00:12:08.540 And human beings,
00:12:09.660 all of them,
00:12:10.900 are unreliable.
00:12:12.780 Now,
00:12:13.400 what happens if you take
00:12:14.380 an unreliable scientist,
00:12:16.600 and he tells his story
00:12:17.620 to an unreliable journalist
00:12:19.520 who,
00:12:20.320 and again,
00:12:21.120 a lot of you don't know this,
00:12:22.240 but journalists,
00:12:24.120 human beings.
00:12:25.360 Yeah.
00:12:25.680 It doesn't look like it sometimes.
00:12:27.860 Lots of times you'll look
00:12:28.740 at journalists and pundits
00:12:29.940 and you'll say,
00:12:31.040 I don't think that's even human.
00:12:33.560 But they are,
00:12:34.480 surprisingly.
00:12:35.760 As far as I know,
00:12:36.940 every journalist
00:12:37.720 is actually a human being.
00:12:39.580 There are no demons
00:12:40.940 or monsters
00:12:41.720 or animals
00:12:42.720 who have ever done
00:12:44.040 this job successfully.
00:12:46.380 So human beings.
00:12:48.500 So now you're two levels
00:12:49.720 of absurdity
00:12:51.040 away from this thing
00:12:52.400 called science,
00:12:53.080 which is pretty good.
00:12:55.100 As a process,
00:12:56.800 as a system,
00:12:57.680 science is pretty good.
00:12:58.640 We all like it.
00:13:00.400 Now,
00:13:01.140 the other part
00:13:02.000 that I didn't put here
00:13:02.880 is that
00:13:03.460 when you read
00:13:04.360 the journalists,
00:13:05.760 there's a third problem.
00:13:08.680 Right?
00:13:09.460 You've got this
00:13:10.440 unreliable human being
00:13:12.340 who happens to be
00:13:13.260 in the job of a scientist.
00:13:14.860 You've got this
00:13:15.540 unreliable human being
00:13:16.720 who's translating that.
00:13:19.080 So now it's been
00:13:19.760 translated twice.
00:13:21.480 Translated by a scientist,
00:13:22.700 translated by a journalist,
00:13:24.720 are we done?
00:13:26.500 No.
00:13:27.520 It gets worse
00:13:28.520 than you read it.
00:13:32.760 That's three humans
00:13:34.000 in this system so far.
00:13:36.080 How reliable are you
00:13:37.940 at reading things
00:13:40.140 and understanding them?
00:13:44.480 You know, right?
00:13:47.380 How many of you
00:13:49.660 are human beings?
00:13:51.320 Are there any human beings
00:13:52.640 watching this today?
00:13:54.860 Yeah.
00:13:55.440 Most of you.
00:13:56.480 Probably human.
00:13:57.740 If you're a human being,
00:13:59.200 are you
00:13:59.600 A,
00:14:00.820 reliable,
00:14:02.400 or B,
00:14:04.540 unreliable?
00:14:06.780 It's B.
00:14:07.820 It's B.
00:14:08.840 Even you.
00:14:10.760 Even me.
00:14:11.820 Have I ever read
00:14:14.020 something and
00:14:14.820 misinterpreted it?
00:14:16.900 Three times this morning
00:14:18.340 so far?
00:14:20.560 I feel like I'm
00:14:21.920 reasonably good
00:14:22.660 at interpreting things,
00:14:23.840 and I've already had
00:14:24.660 two or three
00:14:25.160 misinterpretations
00:14:26.220 this morning.
00:14:28.640 So,
00:14:29.640 trust the science
00:14:30.840 as described to you
00:14:32.760 by unreliable scientists,
00:14:34.680 as reported by
00:14:35.580 unreliable journalists,
00:14:37.200 as read and understood
00:14:38.320 by unreliable readers.
00:14:39.920 Are we good so far?
00:14:42.440 So far,
00:14:42.920 it's a pretty good system,
00:14:43.740 isn't it?
00:14:44.760 But,
00:14:45.700 do the journalists
00:14:46.840 tell you
00:14:47.940 their own opinion
00:14:49.240 of stories?
00:14:50.740 Well,
00:14:51.300 they can,
00:14:52.960 under the
00:14:53.520 special condition
00:14:54.760 that their own
00:14:56.240 opinion
00:14:56.680 of the story
00:14:58.120 matches their
00:15:00.040 corporate media
00:15:01.100 overlords.
00:15:02.480 Can a journalist
00:15:03.220 write a story
00:15:04.100 that their boss
00:15:05.780 would fire them for?
00:15:07.900 Well,
00:15:08.460 they can write it.
00:15:09.280 But they can't
00:15:10.500 get it published.
00:15:11.760 So,
00:15:12.400 it's really not
00:15:12.960 about the journalist
00:15:13.760 or the scientist
00:15:15.520 or the science.
00:15:17.360 It's really about
00:15:18.260 what the corporate
00:15:18.880 media will allow.
00:15:21.420 And who runs
00:15:22.440 the corporate media?
00:15:24.160 Oh,
00:15:24.440 look,
00:15:24.720 it's billionaires again.
00:15:26.460 It's billionaires again.
00:15:27.940 It's your
00:15:28.540 heads of the media.
00:15:30.420 And,
00:15:31.020 of course,
00:15:31.280 it's advertisers.
00:15:32.160 I'll just put
00:15:32.620 Big Pharma in there
00:15:33.600 as a representative
00:15:35.260 advertiser
00:15:36.060 for a lot of stuff.
00:15:37.780 So,
00:15:39.660 this is our system.
00:15:42.820 And what the Democrats
00:15:43.760 tell you every day
00:15:44.700 is that you should
00:15:45.340 trust science.
00:15:47.720 Trusting science
00:15:48.540 might be the dumbest
00:15:49.500 thing that's ever
00:15:50.980 been said.
00:15:52.240 You've never seen
00:15:53.060 science.
00:15:53.860 You've only seen
00:15:54.680 unreliable people
00:15:56.320 talk to other
00:15:57.020 unreliable people
00:15:58.080 that you've then
00:15:58.880 unreliably filtered
00:16:00.660 through your own brain.
00:16:02.200 And even that's
00:16:03.200 not anything
00:16:03.780 because it came
00:16:04.400 from the corporate
00:16:04.980 media,
00:16:05.340 so you don't
00:16:05.900 even see
00:16:06.220 the whole story.
00:16:08.320 Right?
00:16:08.920 So,
00:16:09.380 that's your system.
00:16:11.220 Let us review.
00:16:13.260 We've got a
00:16:14.040 political system
00:16:14.980 in which the
00:16:16.300 will of the people
00:16:16.960 is completely
00:16:18.080 irrelevant.
00:16:20.280 In this
00:16:20.940 particular example,
00:16:22.180 Zuckerberg
00:16:22.840 probably was
00:16:24.060 the only one
00:16:24.580 who voted
00:16:25.000 this year.
00:16:26.720 Let me say
00:16:27.380 that again.
00:16:28.500 In all likelihood,
00:16:30.260 from a practical
00:16:31.180 perspective,
00:16:31.840 the only person
00:16:33.760 who voted
00:16:34.100 this year
00:16:34.440 was Zuckerberg.
00:16:36.700 Let that sink
00:16:37.540 in.
00:16:38.400 I don't even
00:16:39.060 think that's
00:16:39.620 an exaggeration.
00:16:41.020 Is it?
00:16:41.960 Because if you
00:16:42.720 took him out
00:16:43.200 of the system,
00:16:44.280 you wouldn't
00:16:44.780 have had the
00:16:45.240 funding for
00:16:45.740 the rules
00:16:46.140 changes,
00:16:46.720 you wouldn't
00:16:46.960 have had the
00:16:47.360 turnout,
00:16:47.880 the swing
00:16:48.200 states,
00:16:48.680 the votes,
00:16:49.400 the whole
00:16:49.940 thing.
00:16:50.920 There was
00:16:51.200 only one
00:16:51.580 vote this
00:16:52.020 year.
00:16:53.640 The richest
00:16:54.380 guy in
00:16:54.800 America,
00:16:55.580 he voted
00:16:56.300 for you.
00:16:57.220 Now,
00:16:58.300 what do you
00:16:58.820 make of the
00:16:59.340 fact that,
00:17:00.340 in effect,
00:17:00.800 it's kind
00:17:03.800 of a
00:17:04.300 dictatorship,
00:17:06.100 right?
00:17:06.880 Because one
00:17:07.720 person voted
00:17:08.460 effectively.
00:17:11.020 Well,
00:17:12.320 there's a
00:17:12.840 really weird
00:17:13.400 red sky out
00:17:14.220 there.
00:17:14.420 That's scary
00:17:14.840 looking.
00:17:15.640 All right,
00:17:15.880 let's not
00:17:16.220 talk about
00:17:16.620 that yet.
00:17:20.120 Is that
00:17:20.760 bad?
00:17:22.120 You know,
00:17:22.640 what's interesting
00:17:23.180 about this is
00:17:23.900 I couldn't
00:17:24.300 decide how
00:17:25.040 much I
00:17:25.420 cared.
00:17:27.180 You know,
00:17:27.480 if you told
00:17:27.960 me generically,
00:17:29.100 hey,
00:17:30.000 you know,
00:17:30.360 a billionaire
00:17:30.820 is running
00:17:31.300 the country,
00:17:32.040 your republic
00:17:32.740 and your
00:17:33.280 democratic system
00:17:34.460 are all just
00:17:35.200 illusions.
00:17:36.140 If you told
00:17:36.820 me that
00:17:37.300 generically,
00:17:38.520 I'd say,
00:17:38.860 oh,
00:17:39.020 that's bad.
00:17:40.340 That's really
00:17:40.780 bad.
00:17:41.700 Because you
00:17:42.360 don't want a
00:17:42.800 billionaire,
00:17:43.860 like in
00:17:44.240 control of
00:17:44.840 everything.
00:17:45.920 But what if
00:17:46.660 the billionaire
00:17:47.140 happens to
00:17:47.880 be Mark
00:17:48.500 Zuckerberg?
00:17:49.940 You have a
00:17:50.780 specific
00:17:51.180 billionaire.
00:17:52.540 He's not
00:17:52.960 every billionaire,
00:17:53.820 he's just
00:17:54.140 Mark Zuckerberg.
00:17:56.160 Here's the
00:17:56.800 interesting thing
00:17:57.520 about that.
00:17:58.080 If the
00:17:59.160 country of
00:17:59.960 the United
00:18:00.400 States were
00:18:02.000 managed and
00:18:02.960 led as well
00:18:03.860 as Facebook,
00:18:05.520 would we be
00:18:06.180 better off or
00:18:06.860 worse off?
00:18:09.440 We'd be
00:18:10.100 better off.
00:18:11.620 I'm not saying
00:18:12.600 we should turn
00:18:14.060 over the country
00:18:14.780 to Mark
00:18:15.960 Zuckerberg.
00:18:17.460 That feels like
00:18:18.560 a little dangerous
00:18:19.220 idea, right?
00:18:19.940 So I'm not
00:18:20.360 advocating it.
00:18:22.200 But the truth
00:18:22.940 is, if you're
00:18:23.740 being a little
00:18:24.300 bit objective
00:18:25.800 about it,
00:18:26.840 if you had a
00:18:27.680 choice of two
00:18:28.500 systems, one,
00:18:30.580 our current
00:18:31.220 messy system
00:18:32.260 with God
00:18:33.420 knows what
00:18:33.880 flaws, or
00:18:35.420 you say,
00:18:36.620 just for a
00:18:37.160 while, maybe
00:18:38.160 not permanently,
00:18:39.620 but for a
00:18:40.140 while, Mark,
00:18:42.320 you're pretty
00:18:42.920 good at running
00:18:43.480 big organizations,
00:18:44.940 you're super
00:18:45.520 smart, I feel
00:18:47.200 as if you care
00:18:47.980 about the
00:18:48.380 country, could
00:18:49.960 you just run
00:18:50.520 it for a
00:18:50.860 while?
00:18:51.060 Well, what
00:18:54.240 would happen?
00:18:55.480 I don't know
00:18:56.280 that you'd get
00:18:56.760 a worse result.
00:18:57.980 So I'm not
00:18:58.540 sure that we
00:18:59.000 should panic
00:18:59.560 over any of
00:19:00.160 this, because
00:19:01.080 Mark Zuckerberg's
00:19:01.980 actually a
00:19:02.920 smart guy who
00:19:03.980 knows how to
00:19:04.480 get stuff done,
00:19:05.900 and I don't
00:19:06.480 think he has
00:19:07.060 bad intentions,
00:19:08.080 do you?
00:19:10.340 I see
00:19:11.320 somebody saying
00:19:12.180 in the comments,
00:19:12.820 I was expecting
00:19:13.500 this, China
00:19:14.400 owns Zuckerberg,
00:19:16.220 because China
00:19:16.840 might have
00:19:17.360 something to do
00:19:17.940 with their
00:19:18.360 fortunes, and
00:19:20.080 he's married to
00:19:20.840 a Chinese
00:19:21.400 American woman,
00:19:23.100 etc., blah, blah,
00:19:23.940 blah, but here's
00:19:24.680 what I think.
00:19:25.900 I don't think
00:19:26.620 China owns
00:19:27.720 Zuckerberg, he's
00:19:28.640 too rich, and
00:19:30.220 he's too smart.
00:19:31.740 I feel as if
00:19:32.760 they might try
00:19:33.320 to own him, I
00:19:34.660 just don't think
00:19:35.200 they can.
00:19:36.180 What are they
00:19:36.700 going to do
00:19:37.020 to him?
00:19:37.960 Cut his
00:19:38.460 fortune from a
00:19:40.040 gazillion dollars
00:19:40.920 to 90% of a
00:19:42.460 gazillion dollars?
00:19:43.500 I mean, what
00:19:44.500 exactly can
00:19:45.380 China even do
00:19:46.980 to Zuckerberg that
00:19:48.680 would make him
00:19:49.240 any less happy
00:19:49.960 than he is now?
00:19:50.600 Probably nothing.
00:19:51.780 He's actually
00:19:52.320 somewhat invulnerable
00:19:53.920 to everything,
00:19:56.240 relative to
00:19:57.160 everybody else
00:19:57.860 in the world.
00:19:58.780 Would you
00:19:59.080 rather have a
00:19:59.780 Joe Biden
00:20:00.400 in office,
00:20:01.380 running everything,
00:20:03.200 and whatever
00:20:03.900 influence China
00:20:04.920 has on Joe
00:20:05.600 Biden, or a
00:20:07.920 Mark Zuckerberg
00:20:08.660 running everything,
00:20:09.660 sort of a shadow
00:20:10.380 government situation,
00:20:12.140 but it's Zuckerberg,
00:20:13.160 and China's still
00:20:13.840 trying to, let's
00:20:14.560 say, influence him
00:20:15.680 because they would
00:20:16.280 influence everybody,
00:20:17.320 right?
00:20:17.480 China wouldn't
00:20:18.220 not try to
00:20:18.900 influence, so
00:20:20.080 whoever is in
00:20:20.740 charge, they're
00:20:21.200 going to try to
00:20:21.560 influence.
00:20:22.760 And I feel as if
00:20:24.600 Zuckerberg would
00:20:25.340 have way more
00:20:26.640 ability to resist
00:20:29.320 Chinese influence
00:20:30.520 than Biden would.
00:20:31.860 I don't think it
00:20:32.420 would be even close.
00:20:33.660 Do you?
00:20:34.760 I don't even think
00:20:35.720 you could say those
00:20:36.400 are in the same
00:20:36.980 neighborhood of being
00:20:38.360 a good idea.
00:20:39.580 I would much
00:20:40.740 rather take the
00:20:41.540 billionaire, put him
00:20:43.080 in office.
00:20:43.820 Now, the big
00:20:44.880 problem, of course,
00:20:45.640 is you don't want
00:20:46.260 one person having
00:20:47.120 that much power,
00:20:48.100 they become a
00:20:48.640 dictator, power
00:20:49.620 corrupts, etc.
00:20:52.760 I don't know.
00:20:54.840 It's not any worse
00:20:56.020 than our current
00:20:56.560 system.
00:20:57.480 I'm not recommending
00:20:58.660 it, but objectively,
00:21:00.300 it's hard to find
00:21:01.100 out what's wrong
00:21:01.640 with it compared
00:21:02.100 to the current
00:21:02.580 system.
00:21:03.420 I would like to
00:21:04.000 do the most
00:21:04.460 Christmassy thing
00:21:05.520 you've ever seen
00:21:06.320 in your whole life.
00:21:09.220 I'm going to
00:21:09.880 defend Dr. Fauci.
00:21:13.640 Yes.
00:21:14.880 Now, I know some
00:21:15.740 of you are not
00:21:16.840 fans of Dr. Fauci.
00:21:19.080 I get it.
00:21:19.920 I get it.
00:21:20.540 I know all the
00:21:21.460 complaints.
00:21:22.020 I've heard them
00:21:22.440 all.
00:21:23.140 They're not wrong,
00:21:24.600 but I'm going to
00:21:25.240 defend him on this
00:21:26.000 particular thing.
00:21:27.860 Apparently, he is
00:21:28.840 somewhat admitted
00:21:29.920 that he is
00:21:31.560 suspected for
00:21:32.300 some time that
00:21:33.080 the number of
00:21:33.880 people who would
00:21:34.640 have to get the
00:21:35.220 vaccination to
00:21:36.660 make it really
00:21:37.220 work could be
00:21:39.020 a lot higher than
00:21:40.440 60 or 70% of
00:21:41.760 the public.
00:21:43.180 Now, Fauci is
00:21:44.160 saying it might
00:21:45.000 be as high as
00:21:45.780 90%.
00:21:46.760 You might need
00:21:47.920 to get 90%.
00:21:48.860 And he said that
00:21:50.020 when people were
00:21:50.940 afraid of the
00:21:51.920 vaccination, early
00:21:53.220 on people were
00:21:53.960 saying maybe they
00:21:54.880 wouldn't take it,
00:21:56.160 he was sort of
00:21:57.540 downplaying his
00:21:59.960 pessimism.
00:22:01.620 But now that
00:22:02.480 people are much
00:22:03.240 more likely to
00:22:04.320 say that they
00:22:04.860 would take the
00:22:05.420 vaccination, and I
00:22:07.360 think the early
00:22:07.940 people who take it
00:22:08.800 will probably show
00:22:10.620 it's safe enough
00:22:11.620 that the later
00:22:12.300 people will get
00:22:12.880 talked into it.
00:22:14.000 So now Fauci is
00:22:14.820 saying that he
00:22:15.980 can be a little
00:22:16.560 bit more forthcoming
00:22:17.740 with his concerns,
00:22:19.500 and now he's
00:22:20.340 willing to say it
00:22:21.060 might be 90%, but
00:22:22.960 we also could get
00:22:24.080 there.
00:22:25.940 And people are
00:22:26.760 saying, Dr.
00:22:28.040 Fauci, you
00:22:29.600 horrible person,
00:22:31.140 because why would
00:22:32.900 you say the
00:22:33.440 science is
00:22:34.160 different?
00:22:35.560 Did the science
00:22:36.960 change, Dr.
00:22:38.600 Fauci, or are
00:22:39.720 you just being
00:22:40.700 political?
00:22:41.640 Are you
00:22:42.000 manipulating us
00:22:42.980 with your
00:22:43.340 messages?
00:22:44.400 Are you trying
00:22:44.940 to manage our
00:22:45.720 public opinion
00:22:46.600 instead of just
00:22:47.340 doing science?
00:22:48.940 Dr. Fauci, we
00:22:50.760 want the science,
00:22:51.960 and you just
00:22:52.980 admitted you
00:22:53.720 kind of lied
00:22:54.620 about the
00:22:55.080 science, right?
00:22:57.220 Do you trust
00:22:58.180 somebody who
00:22:59.020 lies to you
00:23:00.140 about science?
00:23:03.200 In this case,
00:23:03.880 it would be his
00:23:04.400 opinion of science,
00:23:05.620 his opinion that
00:23:06.800 we might need
00:23:07.640 more herd
00:23:08.380 immunity from
00:23:09.760 the vaccinations.
00:23:11.200 Here is my
00:23:11.920 defense of
00:23:13.260 Dr. Fauci.
00:23:14.820 Dr. Fauci is
00:23:15.720 not just a
00:23:17.240 scientist.
00:23:18.980 He is a
00:23:19.860 scientist, but
00:23:21.080 if you were
00:23:21.440 judging him on
00:23:22.140 the basis of a
00:23:22.960 scientist, that's
00:23:24.560 pretty bad, right?
00:23:26.440 If all he were
00:23:27.720 was a scientist,
00:23:29.340 that's all he
00:23:30.040 is, an
00:23:30.540 independent
00:23:31.000 scientist working
00:23:32.460 in a private
00:23:33.020 company or for
00:23:33.800 himself, then
00:23:35.000 lying about his
00:23:36.120 opinion of
00:23:36.960 science would
00:23:38.200 be pretty bad.
00:23:39.800 Would we agree
00:23:40.440 on that?
00:23:41.540 Do we agree so
00:23:42.500 far that if he
00:23:44.040 were in private
00:23:45.060 anything, and he
00:23:46.600 had said something
00:23:47.860 that wasn't
00:23:48.620 scientifically his
00:23:49.700 actual opinion,
00:23:51.360 it's pretty bad.
00:23:54.000 But Dr. Fauci is
00:23:56.140 not just a
00:23:57.220 scientist.
00:23:58.000 He is a
00:23:58.760 government-paid
00:23:59.840 scientist.
00:24:00.960 He has two
00:24:01.860 responsibilities, and
00:24:03.200 they are both
00:24:03.820 really important.
00:24:05.300 Number one is
00:24:05.960 the science.
00:24:07.400 Number two, he
00:24:09.020 has to manage
00:24:09.620 public opinion.
00:24:11.040 You don't think
00:24:11.920 that's his job?
00:24:13.140 If you're paid by
00:24:14.400 the government, it
00:24:15.900 is your job.
00:24:17.260 It is your job.
00:24:18.220 If the government
00:24:19.140 gives you your
00:24:19.880 paycheck, managing
00:24:21.900 the public opinion,
00:24:24.380 that's your job, in
00:24:26.100 addition to whatever
00:24:26.940 your main duties
00:24:27.940 are.
00:24:28.680 So judging Dr.
00:24:30.200 Fauci by the
00:24:30.940 standards of a
00:24:31.740 generic scientist
00:24:32.720 who is not being
00:24:33.460 paid by the
00:24:34.020 government, not
00:24:35.240 fair.
00:24:36.260 Is it a good
00:24:38.500 thing that Dr.
00:24:39.700 Fauci managed our
00:24:41.180 opinion of the
00:24:42.280 virus the way he
00:24:43.240 did?
00:24:43.900 I would say it's
00:24:45.720 very likely that he
00:24:46.820 played it just
00:24:47.600 right, meaning that
00:24:49.200 the ultimate thing
00:24:50.380 we need to
00:24:50.860 accomplish is to
00:24:51.780 get a lot of
00:24:52.220 people vaccinated,
00:24:53.640 per Fauci.
00:24:55.280 And if the way he
00:24:56.900 managed our
00:24:57.760 opinions, which he
00:24:59.940 is completely
00:25:00.760 transparent about
00:25:01.660 now, he's
00:25:02.640 telling us, I
00:25:04.520 just managed your
00:25:05.940 opinion back
00:25:06.540 there, but I
00:25:07.620 did it for your
00:25:08.200 own benefit.
00:25:10.920 What do you
00:25:11.600 think of that?
00:25:12.340 He just told us
00:25:13.280 honestly and in
00:25:14.320 public, I was
00:25:15.460 managing your
00:25:16.260 opinion, that
00:25:17.000 wasn't my exact
00:25:17.960 opinion, I was
00:25:18.560 just managing the
00:25:19.360 public opinion,
00:25:20.540 and I think it
00:25:21.720 worked.
00:25:22.820 I think we got a
00:25:23.880 better result because
00:25:25.360 I managed your
00:25:26.120 opinion.
00:25:26.840 Is that bad?
00:25:27.540 I don't think it
00:25:29.500 is.
00:25:30.100 I don't think it
00:25:30.600 is.
00:25:31.080 I think that he
00:25:31.900 had two
00:25:32.420 responsibilities and
00:25:33.480 I think he
00:25:33.840 balanced them just
00:25:34.720 right.
00:25:35.600 So while I respect
00:25:37.020 your opinion that
00:25:37.860 you don't like
00:25:38.380 that, I'm going to
00:25:39.820 say my personal
00:25:40.780 opinion is I'm
00:25:41.840 backing Dr.
00:25:42.780 Fauci because he
00:25:44.160 has two roles,
00:25:45.040 not one, and I
00:25:45.900 think he merged
00:25:46.820 them as well as
00:25:47.800 you could.
00:25:48.500 Here's a
00:25:48.920 correction on
00:25:50.100 yesterday's live
00:25:52.400 stream.
00:25:53.300 I said that Sam
00:25:54.300 Harris had written
00:25:55.060 an article I was
00:25:55.840 talking about losing
00:25:56.700 trust and
00:25:57.240 institutions, but
00:25:58.180 he had just
00:25:59.340 retweeted it.
00:26:00.980 It was actually
00:26:01.460 written by Yasha
00:26:02.620 Mouk, M-O-U-N-K.
00:26:05.620 So credit where
00:26:06.500 credit is due, it's
00:26:07.320 a good article.
00:26:08.000 It's in my Twitter
00:26:08.700 feed from yesterday
00:26:09.440 if you're looking
00:26:09.880 for it.
00:26:13.980 Let's see.
00:26:16.820 So the House
00:26:18.220 Republicans have
00:26:19.100 apparently blocked
00:26:20.200 this bill, the
00:26:22.680 coronavirus bill, and
00:26:24.580 the reason they
00:26:25.260 blocked it is because
00:26:27.380 it had a bunch of
00:26:28.080 pork in it, primarily.
00:26:31.340 So let's talk about
00:26:33.060 that.
00:26:34.440 Now, on social
00:26:36.000 media, social media
00:26:37.260 is ablaze with
00:26:38.920 people saying, why
00:26:39.920 don't we just make a
00:26:41.240 clean bill without
00:26:42.800 pork?
00:26:44.180 Why do we have pork
00:26:45.680 in bills?
00:26:46.900 Why don't we get the
00:26:48.240 names of all those
00:26:49.060 people, the politicians
00:26:50.300 who insisted on the
00:26:51.460 pork?
00:26:51.780 pork, we'll make a
00:26:53.000 list of all those
00:26:53.820 bad pork people, and
00:26:55.620 then we'll vote them
00:26:56.260 out.
00:26:58.540 Or, why don't we
00:27:00.060 just give a clean
00:27:01.140 bill with none of
00:27:02.720 the pork?
00:27:03.900 All those things are
00:27:04.840 in social media,
00:27:07.340 right?
00:27:08.140 Now, here's the
00:27:09.580 problem that people
00:27:10.920 are not understanding
00:27:11.960 about the pork.
00:27:14.060 The pork is not a
00:27:15.900 flaw on top of a
00:27:18.400 good system.
00:27:20.980 Because if you think
00:27:21.940 it is, then you'd
00:27:23.160 say, hey, we've got
00:27:24.120 a good system, except
00:27:25.100 for this pork.
00:27:26.760 Why don't we take
00:27:27.380 the pork out and
00:27:29.060 leave the good
00:27:29.680 system?
00:27:30.800 Makes sense, right?
00:27:33.180 Right?
00:27:34.340 Keep all the good
00:27:35.540 stuff.
00:27:36.620 Nobody likes pork.
00:27:38.080 I've never even met
00:27:39.840 one person who was
00:27:41.480 in favor of pork put
00:27:43.720 into bills.
00:27:44.480 Pork being the
00:27:45.260 things not related
00:27:46.040 to the main thing.
00:27:46.740 And, here's the
00:27:49.120 problem.
00:27:50.040 People don't
00:27:50.600 understand that the
00:27:52.140 pork is not a
00:27:53.320 flaw on top of a
00:27:55.260 good system.
00:27:56.720 The pork is the
00:27:59.040 system.
00:28:00.160 You can't get rid
00:28:01.040 of the pork and
00:28:02.600 keep the rest of
00:28:03.280 the system, because
00:28:03.900 the pork is the
00:28:04.580 system.
00:28:05.480 And here's why.
00:28:06.620 If people were
00:28:07.660 just going to vote
00:28:08.740 without pork, a
00:28:11.500 lot of politicians
00:28:12.300 whose votes you
00:28:13.200 needed to get
00:28:14.020 something through
00:28:14.720 would say, no,
00:28:16.080 that won't help
00:28:16.800 me get re-elected.
00:28:19.000 Now, how can you
00:28:20.060 expect somebody to
00:28:21.000 vote for something
00:28:21.800 if it won't help
00:28:23.460 them get re-elected?
00:28:24.460 Our system requires
00:28:25.540 people to try to
00:28:26.520 get re-elected.
00:28:27.660 We want that.
00:28:29.080 So the politician
00:28:30.040 says, no, I'm not
00:28:30.780 going to vote for it
00:28:31.500 because it will
00:28:32.000 lower my chances of
00:28:33.060 getting re-elected.
00:28:34.460 Then nothing gets
00:28:35.200 through.
00:28:36.540 Because there aren't
00:28:37.720 enough Democrats,
00:28:38.680 there aren't enough
00:28:39.180 Republicans.
00:28:39.860 If there were a
00:28:40.740 super majority of
00:28:41.640 either one, you'd be
00:28:42.340 fine.
00:28:42.620 But as long as
00:28:43.660 it's close, which
00:28:45.460 it is, you need
00:28:47.800 to bribe people to
00:28:50.080 vote against their
00:28:51.260 own interests.
00:28:53.380 So you need to say
00:28:54.440 to somebody, all
00:28:55.280 right, if you're
00:28:55.900 going to vote for
00:28:56.420 this, we know
00:28:56.980 that's bad for you
00:28:57.820 for elections, but
00:28:59.540 we'll give you this
00:29:00.460 other thing with the
00:29:01.340 pork so your state
00:29:02.560 will come out
00:29:03.320 ahead.
00:29:04.000 So we're going to
00:29:04.800 bribe you with some
00:29:05.620 pork and say, all
00:29:06.780 right, we hate this
00:29:07.560 pork.
00:29:08.320 We hate that it's
00:29:09.040 only for one state.
00:29:10.120 It's, you know, just
00:29:11.720 for this one deal.
00:29:13.340 We're going to put
00:29:14.020 it in there.
00:29:15.720 Now, the foreign
00:29:17.720 pork are based on
00:29:20.000 individual arguments
00:29:21.300 about, does it make
00:29:22.380 sense, can we
00:29:23.260 effectively bribe
00:29:24.280 this government with
00:29:25.780 this foreign money?
00:29:28.420 We as citizens never
00:29:30.040 hear those arguments.
00:29:31.820 Have you ever heard
00:29:32.580 the argument for
00:29:33.900 funding, was it
00:29:35.920 gender studies in
00:29:37.700 Pakistan?
00:29:38.080 When you heard
00:29:40.000 that we were
00:29:40.600 funding gender
00:29:41.600 studies in Pakistan
00:29:42.860 in a United States
00:29:44.600 coronavirus bill, what
00:29:47.100 did your brain do?
00:29:48.340 Your brain just
00:29:49.160 caught on fire, right?
00:29:50.440 Ah, that's
00:29:51.780 completely unrelated.
00:29:53.080 Ah.
00:29:54.740 But, suppose if you
00:29:58.200 heard it, there was
00:29:59.340 a good argument for
00:30:00.260 it.
00:30:00.800 Suppose if the CIA,
00:30:02.600 I'm just picking a
00:30:03.660 random example here,
00:30:04.880 suppose if you could
00:30:06.020 ask the CIA, why do
00:30:07.560 you want this thing?
00:30:08.820 They might say
00:30:09.700 something like, well,
00:30:11.280 it's actually just a
00:30:12.220 way to launder money
00:30:13.300 for bribes for some
00:30:15.340 key people we want to
00:30:16.440 control in Pakistan's
00:30:17.720 government, or their
00:30:19.320 military or something.
00:30:20.720 Now, suppose you'd
00:30:21.420 actually heard that
00:30:22.120 argument, and it made
00:30:23.760 sense.
00:30:24.680 You said, uh, yeah,
00:30:27.400 bribing some key
00:30:28.600 people in Pakistan might
00:30:29.900 actually keep us safer.
00:30:31.340 It's actually not a bad
00:30:33.020 use for that amount of
00:30:34.080 money.
00:30:34.600 It's not that much
00:30:35.340 money.
00:30:36.240 Now, if you had heard
00:30:37.220 that argument, you
00:30:38.600 might say yes, but it's
00:30:39.580 not a kind of argument
00:30:40.520 necessarily that can be
00:30:42.200 presented to you.
00:30:44.040 If the real reason is
00:30:45.420 they're just laundering
00:30:46.520 bribes to Pakistan, that
00:30:47.900 might be it.
00:30:48.940 And I don't know if that's
00:30:50.000 it, I'm just saying that
00:30:50.740 would be an example of
00:30:51.660 why you couldn't hear the
00:30:52.800 pork argument.
00:30:54.260 But it might be a good
00:30:55.180 one.
00:30:55.680 Now, how do you get that
00:30:56.660 passed?
00:30:57.560 Could the CIA do a
00:30:59.020 separate bill?
00:31:00.700 It's called the Pork for
00:31:02.320 Pakistan Bill to help them
00:31:03.980 with gender studies.
00:31:05.740 Nobody would vote for
00:31:06.800 that thing.
00:31:08.120 So there you would have
00:31:09.240 a, just hypothetically,
00:31:11.520 a CIA requirement,
00:31:13.740 something very important
00:31:14.660 for the health of the
00:31:15.440 country, and there
00:31:16.400 wouldn't actually be any
00:31:17.600 legislative way, none,
00:31:20.480 to get it done.
00:31:22.500 And so, to compensate
00:31:24.460 for the fact that there's
00:31:25.480 no way to do a thing
00:31:26.580 like that, it gets
00:31:28.040 tacked on to these
00:31:29.140 larger bills for other
00:31:31.080 purposes, so that people
00:31:32.740 can't say no, because
00:31:34.520 they'd say, if I got the
00:31:35.660 vote on this one, I
00:31:37.100 would say no, but I
00:31:38.960 don't get to vote on it
00:31:39.860 and I don't want to, you
00:31:41.240 know, kill the whole
00:31:41.900 package, so I've got to
00:31:44.460 say yes.
00:31:45.300 Now, does that mean that
00:31:46.080 all the pork in it makes
00:31:47.360 sense?
00:31:47.740 No.
00:31:48.520 It's bribes.
00:31:50.080 Do bribes make sense?
00:31:51.960 Well, if you have to
00:31:53.140 bribe a politician to get
00:31:54.500 any kind of bill passed,
00:31:56.580 it's suboptimal, but it's
00:31:58.740 the best of the two
00:31:59.860 options, because the
00:32:00.860 other option is you
00:32:01.620 don't get anything done.
00:32:03.200 So, you have to
00:32:04.260 understand that you
00:32:05.660 can't remove the pork
00:32:07.280 from the system, because
00:32:09.560 if you did, it wouldn't
00:32:11.740 work.
00:32:12.940 The system doesn't work
00:32:14.400 without the pork.
00:32:15.460 That's why it's there.
00:32:16.680 You could replace all of
00:32:17.940 the people, and the new
00:32:19.680 people would just say,
00:32:21.040 uh, I don't want to vote
00:32:22.900 for this, and then
00:32:24.080 somebody says, how about
00:32:25.160 if we give you this bribe
00:32:26.420 in the form of pork for
00:32:28.240 your state, and then the
00:32:29.840 politician says, all right,
00:32:31.000 I'll vote against my
00:32:31.900 party.
00:32:32.920 You got me.
00:32:34.280 So, if you don't
00:32:35.080 understand that, you're
00:32:36.020 confused about this whole
00:32:37.140 pork business.
00:32:38.580 And here's my issue.
00:32:40.460 Of course, Democrats in
00:32:42.340 Congress know how the
00:32:44.260 pork thing works.
00:32:45.240 Of course, the
00:32:45.980 Republicans know how the
00:32:47.420 pork thing works.
00:32:48.600 They all complain about it
00:32:50.040 in public because the
00:32:51.300 regular public is not
00:32:53.540 educated enough to know
00:32:55.000 that you can't really get
00:32:56.800 rid of it without getting
00:32:58.480 rid of the whole system,
00:32:59.460 essentially.
00:33:01.800 And so, the argument I've
00:33:04.460 heard for the Republicans
00:33:05.900 rejecting this package at
00:33:08.140 the last minute that would
00:33:09.220 have included either $600
00:33:10.600 or ideally $2,000 for
00:33:13.720 individual payments for
00:33:15.300 people who really need it,
00:33:17.280 the argument for opposing
00:33:21.200 it was that there's so
00:33:24.400 much pork in it that you
00:33:25.920 have to draw the line
00:33:26.980 somewhere.
00:33:28.560 You have to draw the line.
00:33:30.200 Too much pork.
00:33:32.280 That is not real.
00:33:34.840 It's not real.
00:33:36.420 It's not a real argument
00:33:37.560 because you can't get rid
00:33:39.640 of the pork, number one.
00:33:41.640 And number two, they had,
00:33:43.680 what, nine months to get
00:33:45.240 rid of the pork.
00:33:46.420 If getting rid of the pork
00:33:47.900 were a real thing, they had
00:33:49.620 nine months to do it.
00:33:51.060 If what happened was that
00:33:52.760 the Republicans painted
00:33:54.040 themselves into a corner
00:33:55.460 and now they're saying,
00:33:57.500 oh no, we don't like being
00:33:58.620 in this corner,
00:34:00.000 it's their own freaking
00:34:01.600 fault.
00:34:03.040 Because they painted
00:34:04.100 themselves in this corner
00:34:05.320 over the last nine months
00:34:06.860 by entertaining pork.
00:34:10.120 Right?
00:34:10.680 They probably put their own
00:34:11.600 pork in there too.
00:34:12.340 So, Republicans get
00:34:14.560 no pass.
00:34:16.160 This was the biggest
00:34:17.320 screw-up I've ever seen.
00:34:19.980 Certainly in 2020,
00:34:21.020 it's the biggest
00:34:21.660 political mistake.
00:34:23.160 What should they have done?
00:34:24.900 I heard some people say
00:34:26.180 you can't respond
00:34:27.280 to blackmail.
00:34:28.800 So, some people are saying
00:34:29.960 that the pork is sort of
00:34:31.240 a blackmail part.
00:34:32.680 It's like, if you want
00:34:33.480 your checks,
00:34:35.000 you're going to have to
00:34:35.880 accept all this other
00:34:37.000 stuff you don't want.
00:34:38.060 So, we're kind of
00:34:38.480 blackmailing you.
00:34:40.100 And somebody said,
00:34:41.380 you should never pay
00:34:42.560 a blackmailer.
00:34:45.180 Do you agree with that?
00:34:46.920 Do you agree you should
00:34:47.900 never pay a blackmailer?
00:34:49.220 You probably shouldn't
00:34:52.160 negotiate with a terrorist.
00:34:54.380 But is it the same
00:34:55.320 with a blackmailer?
00:34:56.980 Same kind of concept?
00:34:58.540 What do you think?
00:34:59.700 Let's see in the comments.
00:35:01.040 Should you never pay
00:35:03.640 a blackmailer?
00:35:05.260 Let's see your comments.
00:35:08.440 Somebody says,
00:35:09.400 yes, they'll come back.
00:35:12.000 Never pay them.
00:35:13.000 They'll just come back.
00:35:14.040 Never pay them.
00:35:14.940 Depends.
00:35:16.020 Thank you.
00:35:17.340 One person got
00:35:18.340 the right answer.
00:35:20.040 Two so far.
00:35:21.060 Depends.
00:35:22.320 Here's when you do
00:35:23.760 pay a blackmailer.
00:35:25.940 If paying the blackmailer
00:35:27.620 gets you what you want,
00:35:28.760 let's say your family
00:35:29.760 member is released
00:35:30.780 or you get whatever
00:35:31.540 it is you want.
00:35:33.100 So, that's the first
00:35:33.860 good part.
00:35:34.540 You've paid them
00:35:35.120 and you've got
00:35:35.520 what you wanted.
00:35:37.240 If, under this
00:35:38.360 special condition,
00:35:40.160 paying them allows you
00:35:41.440 to figure out
00:35:42.040 who they are,
00:35:43.620 which could often
00:35:44.360 be the case, right?
00:35:45.420 Because you might need
00:35:46.100 to write a check
00:35:46.740 to somebody.
00:35:47.340 I mean, there might be
00:35:47.940 something in the process
00:35:48.960 where you learn
00:35:50.080 the identity
00:35:50.680 of the blackmailer
00:35:51.640 or where they live.
00:35:53.140 Now, if you put me
00:35:54.220 in a situation
00:35:54.880 where I'm being blackmailed
00:35:56.600 and in order to
00:35:58.400 pay the blackmailer,
00:35:59.840 I will necessarily
00:36:01.320 learn their identity,
00:36:02.700 do I need to say
00:36:05.180 the rest?
00:36:06.860 Do I need to finish
00:36:08.280 where this is going?
00:36:09.740 I have indeed
00:36:11.640 been blackmailed.
00:36:13.380 I have been blackmailed.
00:36:15.220 I paid the blackmailer.
00:36:17.580 In so doing,
00:36:18.740 I learned the identity
00:36:20.220 of the blackmailer
00:36:21.180 and that person
00:36:23.520 might take a while,
00:36:26.760 but they're going to hear
00:36:28.280 from me.
00:36:29.380 Might be this year.
00:36:31.140 Might be next year.
00:36:32.840 Could be five years
00:36:33.680 from now.
00:36:34.680 But there is a blackmailer
00:36:36.100 who's going to have
00:36:37.360 a really bad day.
00:36:39.560 Nothing illegal.
00:36:40.680 I don't do illegal things.
00:36:43.060 But suffice to say
00:36:44.200 that if you can get
00:36:46.100 the identity
00:36:46.720 of your blackmailer,
00:36:48.440 that might be worth it.
00:36:49.860 You know what I mean?
00:36:50.960 Might be worth it.
00:36:53.100 So I wouldn't take it
00:36:54.060 as a given
00:36:54.480 that you don't pay
00:36:55.060 the blackmailer.
00:36:55.980 And in this case,
00:36:56.700 I would say that
00:36:57.380 what we should have done,
00:36:58.500 the Republicans,
00:36:59.060 which would have been
00:37:00.120 the smart play,
00:37:01.440 this horrible package
00:37:03.460 they should have voted for
00:37:05.020 because they put themselves
00:37:06.780 in that position.
00:37:08.080 They should have voted for it
00:37:09.180 because it's better
00:37:10.040 than the alternative
00:37:10.940 and they should have voted for it
00:37:12.800 to out the blackmailers.
00:37:15.020 In other words,
00:37:15.540 they should have said,
00:37:16.160 look,
00:37:16.780 the Democrats put us
00:37:17.800 in this position.
00:37:19.220 We're going to vote for it
00:37:20.280 so you get your,
00:37:21.000 let's say,
00:37:21.460 your $2,000 payment,
00:37:23.180 but here are the names
00:37:24.720 of the pork people
00:37:27.680 who put you in this position.
00:37:29.500 Here are their names,
00:37:31.040 the ones who supported this pork.
00:37:33.260 But it won't make a difference
00:37:34.400 because the pork has to exist
00:37:35.900 for the system to exist.
00:37:37.560 But since the Republicans
00:37:38.840 were put in that position,
00:37:40.720 they had a terrible choice,
00:37:42.380 which was to say yes
00:37:43.480 to a blackmail package.
00:37:45.300 That's a terrible choice.
00:37:47.300 But it's better than
00:37:48.460 putting your boot on the poor
00:37:50.000 and saying,
00:37:51.060 hey, we're going to torture the poor
00:37:53.360 more than you will.
00:37:55.400 That's the game, right?
00:37:57.120 The game in Congress right now
00:37:58.900 is who can torture the poor
00:38:01.000 the most without giving up.
00:38:06.060 At the moment,
00:38:07.660 the Republicans said,
00:38:08.860 oh, Democrats,
00:38:10.380 you think you can torture the poor?
00:38:12.300 Watch this.
00:38:13.500 We'll veto the whole damn bill.
00:38:15.900 You'll not only not get $600,
00:38:17.980 they won't get anything.
00:38:19.580 How about that?
00:38:20.220 We can torture the poor
00:38:21.220 better than you can.
00:38:22.540 But here's the problem.
00:38:23.560 Well, it's Christmas.
00:38:27.320 Republicans,
00:38:28.200 in one of the most stunning
00:38:30.140 displays of incompetence
00:38:32.520 I've ever seen,
00:38:34.300 decided to stand on principle
00:38:36.140 on Christmas
00:38:37.760 when that principle requires
00:38:40.440 poor people to get screwed.
00:38:44.720 On Christmas.
00:38:46.320 On Christmas.
00:38:46.920 If they had done this
00:38:48.400 in February,
00:38:50.080 would I feel the same?
00:38:51.420 Not so much.
00:38:53.080 I mean,
00:38:53.400 it's still not good.
00:38:55.760 But if you can't read
00:38:57.340 the room well enough
00:38:58.260 that you do this
00:38:59.360 on Christmas,
00:39:00.440 this is the most
00:39:01.260 stunningly incompetent thing
00:39:02.920 I've ever seen in my life.
00:39:04.340 The Republicans should have
00:39:05.420 just grinned
00:39:08.160 and signed that thing
00:39:09.880 and then complained
00:39:10.720 about it after the fact.
00:39:12.180 It's all you can do.
00:39:13.100 All right.
00:39:18.360 How much difference
00:39:19.540 does $600 make
00:39:21.320 after 10 months?
00:39:22.800 You know,
00:39:23.240 there's a big mystery
00:39:24.560 in all of this
00:39:26.460 that I have not
00:39:27.560 heard an answer for.
00:39:30.380 And I don't know
00:39:30.920 if any economists
00:39:31.820 are figuring this out.
00:39:32.960 And it goes like this.
00:39:35.020 All of these people
00:39:36.220 who lost their jobs
00:39:37.400 for the coronavirus,
00:39:39.360 how are they staying alive?
00:39:41.260 I honestly don't know.
00:39:45.080 Because if you told me,
00:39:46.280 oh,
00:39:46.540 they're,
00:39:48.200 are they just not paying rent
00:39:50.000 and they're getting food
00:39:52.240 from food banks?
00:39:54.320 Is that the whole story?
00:39:56.240 Because it feels like
00:39:57.500 we couldn't possibly be as well,
00:40:00.500 doing as well as we are
00:40:01.940 under the circumstances.
00:40:03.300 There's a disconnect
00:40:04.520 between the news I'm hearing
00:40:06.120 and the economic outcomes,
00:40:08.820 you know,
00:40:08.960 the stock market doing well,
00:40:10.200 et cetera.
00:40:10.420 It's disconnected.
00:40:11.840 There's something missing
00:40:12.960 in the story.
00:40:15.260 And I wonder if,
00:40:16.460 if what's missing is this,
00:40:18.740 that the people
00:40:20.220 who had those jobs
00:40:21.180 as, say,
00:40:22.080 bussers and servers
00:40:23.820 and whatever,
00:40:25.060 it could be that
00:40:25.900 they earned
00:40:26.620 so little money
00:40:28.120 that it didn't make
00:40:30.540 that much difference
00:40:31.240 to the economy
00:40:32.100 that all of them
00:40:33.760 lost their jobs.
00:40:35.480 For example,
00:40:37.380 how many of them
00:40:38.320 were also,
00:40:39.220 had another supporter?
00:40:40.960 You know,
00:40:41.240 they're living at home
00:40:42.440 or they have a spouse
00:40:43.860 who has a job
00:40:44.700 so they can still eat,
00:40:45.760 they just can't go on vacation.
00:40:47.440 It could be that
00:40:48.340 because of the nature
00:40:49.920 of which kind of workers
00:40:51.640 were most affected,
00:40:53.280 they were the lowest income
00:40:54.700 types of workers,
00:40:56.640 that surprisingly,
00:40:58.420 they added so little
00:40:59.600 to the economy
00:41:00.300 that you could wipe out
00:41:01.380 their entire contribution
00:41:02.960 to the economy
00:41:03.660 and it didn't make
00:41:04.400 that much difference.
00:41:08.000 All right.
00:41:08.820 Somebody says,
00:41:09.600 essential workers
00:41:10.360 are still getting paid.
00:41:12.560 That's true.
00:41:13.840 But only if they're working.
00:41:15.340 I'm talking about
00:41:15.900 unemployed people.
00:41:19.820 There are two economies.
00:41:21.200 There's the poor,
00:41:22.160 yeah,
00:41:23.020 the poor invisible.
00:41:24.040 The poor are kind of invisible
00:41:25.100 and that's,
00:41:25.920 I think in a sense,
00:41:27.080 that's what I'm saying.
00:41:28.280 And I don't know
00:41:29.000 how much of this
00:41:29.580 is my isolation, right?
00:41:30.840 If you have a certain lifestyle,
00:41:32.300 you end up not talking
00:41:33.620 to people who are
00:41:34.500 living a different
00:41:35.600 kind of lifestyle.
00:41:36.760 So let me ask
00:41:37.880 in the comments,
00:41:39.460 do you know anybody
00:41:41.440 who lost their job
00:41:42.560 during coronavirus?
00:41:43.900 And let's say
00:41:44.360 it was a low-end job.
00:41:46.580 Low-end meaning
00:41:47.440 a server
00:41:48.280 or something
00:41:49.540 in that economic group.
00:41:51.980 How many of you
00:41:52.880 know somebody like that
00:41:54.040 who can't figure out
00:41:56.200 how to eat?
00:41:58.440 I feel like we did
00:41:59.740 a really good job
00:42:00.880 of taking care of people.
00:42:02.300 One way or the other.
00:42:04.740 You know,
00:42:04.940 there's also a,
00:42:05.980 there's a hidden,
00:42:08.340 and here's part
00:42:09.480 of what I suspect.
00:42:10.840 There is a hidden thing
00:42:12.400 going on
00:42:13.040 and I'm going to make a,
00:42:14.140 I'm just going to speculate
00:42:15.120 that this is what's going on.
00:42:17.620 When the country
00:42:18.560 looked like it was
00:42:19.360 falling apart
00:42:20.100 and our government
00:42:20.940 couldn't necessarily
00:42:22.200 help us
00:42:23.800 during the beginning
00:42:24.920 of the pandemic,
00:42:26.240 even if the government
00:42:27.240 did everything
00:42:27.840 the government can do,
00:42:29.280 it did feel as if
00:42:30.580 maybe it wouldn't be
00:42:31.660 enough in time,
00:42:32.740 right?
00:42:33.220 And there could be
00:42:34.020 some dire consequences.
00:42:35.600 Here's what I believe
00:42:36.880 may be happening
00:42:38.160 and did happen.
00:42:39.440 Just speculation,
00:42:40.860 right?
00:42:41.500 And I'm not even sure
00:42:42.660 what percentage of,
00:42:43.680 you know,
00:42:44.400 credibility I would put
00:42:45.600 on my own speculation,
00:42:46.860 but I'll put it out there.
00:42:47.740 And it goes like this.
00:42:49.700 The first thing
00:42:50.860 that people
00:42:51.540 who had money,
00:42:53.820 and I'll put myself
00:42:54.620 in that category,
00:42:55.440 did,
00:42:55.580 the first thing
00:42:56.800 I did was
00:42:57.660 I surveyed,
00:42:58.960 you know,
00:42:59.840 my circle of people
00:43:01.320 that I know
00:43:02.120 and have a relationship with.
00:43:05.940 Surveyed meaning
00:43:06.540 I made sure I knew
00:43:07.440 how everybody was doing.
00:43:08.940 And then I made sure
00:43:09.920 that if there was anybody
00:43:10.980 who wouldn't be able
00:43:11.760 to eat,
00:43:13.660 that I would handle it.
00:43:15.480 In other words,
00:43:16.820 and it turns out
00:43:17.820 I didn't have to do
00:43:18.760 very much.
00:43:19.860 You know,
00:43:19.980 I was helpful in,
00:43:21.760 I'm going to say,
00:43:22.600 non-specific ways,
00:43:23.780 which is the point
00:43:25.720 of my story
00:43:26.420 is that people like me
00:43:28.580 who independently
00:43:29.720 and privately
00:43:30.580 helped other people
00:43:32.500 don't want to talk about it.
00:43:35.640 Do you know why
00:43:36.100 we don't want to talk about it?
00:43:37.900 Because you'll ask me
00:43:38.820 for money.
00:43:40.020 I can help the people
00:43:41.160 that, you know,
00:43:41.840 I'm close to,
00:43:42.620 I know,
00:43:43.140 they're part of my circle,
00:43:44.240 I've worked with them,
00:43:45.580 I've got some ongoing
00:43:46.620 relationship,
00:43:47.400 whatever,
00:43:48.380 and I've got a feeling
00:43:49.660 that that may have happened
00:43:51.060 massively all over the country.
00:43:52.660 I have a feeling
00:43:54.220 that private individuals
00:43:55.740 just massively stepped up
00:43:58.200 completely confidentially
00:44:01.100 because you have to do it
00:44:02.780 confidentially.
00:44:04.420 When you're rich,
00:44:05.260 the first thing you figure out
00:44:06.280 is that if you do
00:44:06.940 any kind of charity,
00:44:08.280 then you get eaten alive.
00:44:10.320 Doing public charity
00:44:11.520 is just one of the worst
00:44:12.520 things you can do
00:44:13.420 if you want to control
00:44:14.820 the rest of your life
00:44:15.780 because you just get
00:44:17.240 bombarded with new requests.
00:44:19.600 So unless you're doing it
00:44:20.660 like a Bill Pulte
00:44:21.560 who is making it,
00:44:23.040 he's actually making
00:44:23.820 that sort of a mission
00:44:24.760 and a project
00:44:25.800 so that's worth doing
00:44:27.420 because he wants people
00:44:28.360 to interact.
00:44:30.280 But everybody else
00:44:31.160 needs to do it
00:44:31.840 way under the,
00:44:32.760 way under the,
00:44:34.140 you know,
00:44:34.880 the notice of everybody else.
00:44:36.720 So I'm just going
00:44:37.640 to put this out there.
00:44:39.060 There is some possibility,
00:44:40.940 and I don't know how likely,
00:44:42.700 that the,
00:44:43.540 one of the biggest
00:44:44.700 unreported forces
00:44:46.300 is the private charity
00:44:49.300 of regular Americans.
00:44:51.640 And I'm not talking
00:44:52.400 about the rich either.
00:44:53.520 I'm talking about
00:44:54.320 the parents who said,
00:44:56.260 you know,
00:44:57.540 hey,
00:44:58.360 my son is okay,
00:45:00.540 but my son's best friend
00:45:01.820 from childhood
00:45:02.500 is not okay.
00:45:03.820 You can stay here
00:45:04.500 for a while.
00:45:05.860 Right?
00:45:06.280 I'll bet you there's
00:45:07.140 all kinds of that
00:45:08.260 happening all over the country,
00:45:09.700 and just people
00:45:10.180 don't talk about it
00:45:11.200 because it wouldn't be wise
00:45:12.720 to talk about it.
00:45:13.560 Just guessing.
00:45:14.020 So that's your Christmas
00:45:15.520 good thought for the day.
00:45:17.580 I would like to believe,
00:45:18.820 at least today,
00:45:20.040 that I live in a country
00:45:21.040 in which those
00:45:22.080 who can give
00:45:23.160 do give.
00:45:25.380 And I think we are
00:45:26.400 in that country.
00:45:27.600 I think that
00:45:28.280 anything that I say
00:45:29.420 about our
00:45:30.020 political system
00:45:32.060 and our
00:45:32.820 economy
00:45:34.300 and all that,
00:45:35.520 it looks like
00:45:36.320 it's a mess
00:45:36.940 on paper.
00:45:38.240 Doesn't it?
00:45:39.060 If you were just
00:45:39.920 to draw it on paper,
00:45:40.880 it just looks like
00:45:41.500 a hot mess.
00:45:42.700 But there is something
00:45:43.960 about the goodness
00:45:44.800 of people.
00:45:46.360 Of course,
00:45:46.740 they have their bad side,
00:45:47.800 their selfish side.
00:45:48.620 We talk about that
00:45:49.340 more than the good side.
00:45:50.720 But since it's Christmas,
00:45:52.400 let's talk about
00:45:53.060 the good side.
00:45:54.440 There is
00:45:55.080 some kind of force,
00:45:57.560 and I talked about
00:45:58.240 this yesterday more,
00:45:59.580 there is some kind
00:46:00.600 of force
00:46:01.120 that holds us together
00:46:02.340 that we don't
00:46:04.380 quite understand.
00:46:06.340 And we think
00:46:07.360 it's all these things
00:46:08.160 like the Constitution
00:46:09.160 and our laws
00:46:10.220 and blah, blah, blah.
00:46:11.300 I don't think it's that.
00:46:12.360 I think it is
00:46:13.720 whatever caused,
00:46:15.200 and I think
00:46:15.680 this is true,
00:46:17.020 lots of individuals
00:46:18.680 to help other individuals,
00:46:20.660 I feel like
00:46:21.480 whatever that is,
00:46:23.420 is the larger force
00:46:25.880 that keeps us together.
00:46:27.340 Sure,
00:46:27.820 we fight little battles.
00:46:29.800 You know,
00:46:30.000 we like to fight
00:46:30.620 the little battles
00:46:31.420 because we're a competitive
00:46:33.260 kind of species.
00:46:34.660 But the big battle
00:46:35.900 about being a country,
00:46:38.020 I feel like
00:46:38.900 we're just all
00:46:40.500 on the same side
00:46:41.220 on that
00:46:41.680 for the most part.
00:46:43.720 All right.
00:46:45.160 So here's someone
00:46:46.040 in the comments
00:46:46.660 saying,
00:46:47.240 I paid my cleaning lady
00:46:48.700 even though she was
00:46:49.560 not cleaning my house.
00:46:53.380 You are not
00:46:54.140 the first person
00:46:55.060 who has said that.
00:46:57.440 All right?
00:46:58.160 Do you know
00:46:58.680 how many rich people
00:46:59.640 continued to pay
00:47:00.700 their people
00:47:02.500 that they couldn't
00:47:03.280 do any work?
00:47:04.900 I would guess most.
00:47:07.080 I'll bet you
00:47:07.660 most rich people
00:47:08.820 continue paying
00:47:10.580 everybody
00:47:11.100 that they had
00:47:11.820 paid before
00:47:12.400 and just didn't
00:47:13.740 talk about it.
00:47:14.700 Just didn't mention it.
00:47:17.020 Right?
00:47:17.760 So,
00:47:18.660 that's what I think
00:47:19.860 happened
00:47:20.180 and that will be
00:47:21.140 your positive thought
00:47:21.980 for the day.
00:47:22.800 I hope you're all
00:47:23.380 going to have
00:47:23.660 a terrific Christmas.
00:47:25.300 I'm planning to have
00:47:26.020 a terrific Christmas
00:47:26.820 myself.
00:47:28.420 And,
00:47:30.860 oh,
00:47:31.160 well,
00:47:31.520 I hope,
00:47:32.060 I'm seeing somebody
00:47:32.860 saying that
00:47:33.640 they were reminded
00:47:34.480 to do that
00:47:35.160 and I hope you do.
00:47:36.320 so be good
00:47:37.500 to each other
00:47:38.000 and I will talk
00:47:38.860 to you tomorrow.