Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1249 Scott Adams： Join Me in a Pledge of Allegiance to the Official Narrative, and I Teach Democrats How to Disavow Violence

00:00:00.000 Hey everybody. Come on in. Come on in. Do you know what it's time for? It's time for...

00:00:17.240 Wait a minute. I'm getting a message. Oh. Oh, really? Okay. All right. Well, there'll

00:00:25.100 be a little change. There's a little bit of a change today. I've been told that the

00:00:29.980 simultaneous sip is no longer allowed, and I'm not questioning it. It's been replaced

00:00:36.480 with a new pledge, a pledge of allegiance to the official narrative, and I'm hoping you

00:00:43.960 can join me in this pledge. I'd like all of you to join along. Let me read it to you first,

00:00:50.680 and then we'll do the actual pledge. You can find this in my Twitter feed today at 6.41am,

00:00:59.140 so it'll be several tweets down. And if you'd like to join in the pledge of allegiance to the

00:01:06.500 official narrative, it goes like this. I pledge allegiance to the official narrative, and I

00:01:12.200 affirm that our election systems are the only digital systems that are 100% immune from hacking.

00:01:18.520 I further affirm that there was no election fraud of any kind because we are not allowed to check

00:01:25.640 a man and a woman. So that's the pledge. Please join me now. This will be replacing the simultaneous

00:01:33.360 sip, at least for this morning, maybe forever, because this is more important than anything else

00:01:40.040 you're doing. Stand, please. Please stand. You don't want to sit for this. I need some respect.

00:01:49.540 Please stand for the pledge of allegiance to the official narrative. Put your hand over your heart.

00:01:55.400 It's optional, but I think it's respectful. And I'll lead you now in the pledge.

00:02:01.080 I pledge allegiance to the official narrative, and I affirm that our election systems are the only

00:02:08.440 digital systems that are 100% immune from hacking. I further affirm that there was no election fraud of

00:02:16.440 any kind because we are not allowed to check a man and a woman.

00:02:25.480 And now, and now you may take the sip, which is the, wait a minute, I'm getting another message.

00:02:37.340 I can't say that word.

00:02:38.940 But it's just called the official sip now. I used to call this something else, but we don't use that term

00:02:46.680 anymore. This is just the official narrative sip. I don't know if it's going to taste the same,

00:02:53.280 honestly, but you can try it. Let's do it together. See if it tastes as good as the simultaneous sip.

00:03:01.100 I'm a little worried.

00:03:09.840 Oh my God. Did you taste that at home? Oh God. I'm throwing this cup away. Shit. I don't know what got

00:03:23.380 into that, but it's bitter as hell. Well, let's talk about the news that we're allowed to talk about.

00:03:30.840 Well, there's a big up outbreak of coronavirus in China. I guess Beijing is locking down pretty hard.

00:03:41.300 And here is the question that I ask you about.

00:03:48.940 Are there still people saying they can't hear?

00:03:51.160 I think I'll just delete all the people who say they can't hear. Seriously? Are you actually saying

00:04:00.740 that you can't hear on YouTube? That's not real, is it?

00:04:04.080 All right. Your mic on YouTube is off. My microphone is on. My microphone is plugged in. Yes, it is.

00:04:20.500 Is there anybody who can hear?

00:04:30.120 Unbelievable. I'm actually, apparently I have technical problems on YouTube.

00:04:37.520 All right, YouTube, we're going to turn you off then. Goodbye.

00:04:41.340 All right, so YouTube's dead. We'll just Periscope this one.

00:04:50.500 Hello, Periscope. Too bad YouTube, for whatever reason, doesn't work today.

00:04:57.000 But I'm sure we can carry on.

00:05:01.080 All right, let's talk about China.

00:05:02.940 So they've got an outbreak.

00:05:06.360 And here's the thing I wonder.

00:05:09.280 Was there any chance that wasn't going to happen?

00:05:12.840 It doesn't feel like there was any chance that China wouldn't have a major outbreak,

00:05:17.580 no matter what they had done.

00:05:20.580 So this is the least surprising thing in the world.

00:05:23.100 But it also makes me wonder if our intelligence agencies ever thought to themselves,

00:05:30.060 I wonder if we should just spread a little coronavirus around Beijing.

00:05:34.920 Now, I don't think they did that.

00:05:37.240 But do you think they talked about it?

00:05:40.200 Because I got a feeling they talked about it.

00:05:43.000 That would just be part of the job, I would think.

00:05:46.580 Twitter stock is down about 10% or 9% when I just checked a minute ago.

00:05:51.200 Anyway, full disclosure, I do own Twitter stock.

00:05:57.640 Do you have a problem with that?

00:06:02.200 So let me tell you why I own Twitter stock.

00:06:06.660 I like to own stock in a company that's so powerful,

00:06:12.560 it can ban the President of the United States and, here's the good part,

00:06:18.180 and make its competitor go away.

00:06:21.200 Just go away.

00:06:22.940 Twitter just did that.

00:06:24.220 Just banned the President of the United States

00:06:26.000 and then made their competition in Parler just go away.

00:06:30.640 I mean, I don't think they did it directly, but, you know, Parler went away.

00:06:35.300 So I don't give investment advice.

00:06:39.020 And if you had bought Twitter on my advice, if I had given it, I didn't give this advice,

00:06:45.300 but if I told you last week to buy it, you'd be down 10%.

00:06:48.680 So don't take any investment advice on specific companies from me.

00:06:54.760 That would be a bad idea.

00:06:56.100 Okay?

00:06:56.260 That said, let me give you general investment advice,

00:07:01.440 and then you can apply it to whatever company you want, but it's general advice, not about Twitter.

00:07:06.480 If you find a company that's so powerful it can ban the President

00:07:11.080 and get rid of its competition in the same week,

00:07:15.460 that's probably a good investment.

00:07:17.860 Take any of the big tech companies that have a dominant foothold right now.

00:07:29.140 There's nothing, there's almost nothing that you can do.

00:07:33.320 Those companies are pretty well entrenched.

00:07:36.380 So investment-wise, any company that has that much power looks pretty good.

00:07:41.160 Okay, so I'm just going to tell you I won't be selling my Twitter stock

00:07:46.100 because nothing changed from the moment I bought it.

00:07:50.960 One of the things that I think it was Warren Buffett teaches

00:07:55.240 is if you buy a stock, don't sell it until the reason you bought it in the first place changes.

00:08:02.620 Now, of course, there will be exceptions to that.

00:08:04.980 But as a general rule, the reason I bought Twitter is that there's no competition.

00:08:11.160 That's why I bought it.

00:08:12.800 I bought it because there isn't really any competition.

00:08:16.500 And did that change?

00:08:18.820 Nope.

00:08:20.260 Nope. Still no competition. Not really.

00:08:23.600 So I'll hold on to that, even though you don't like that.

00:08:29.820 So let's talk about the conspiracy theory rumors that the President has

00:08:37.000 or will sign something called the Insurrection Act,

00:08:39.860 which I don't know the details, but I guess it would be like a little like martial law-y

00:08:45.760 that he could employ the military to stay in power or something like that.

00:08:50.780 Let me tell you this.

00:08:53.240 If there's anybody watching this who believes that the President has or would or will

00:08:59.280 sign something called an Insurrection Act,

00:09:02.540 remember what I'm telling you right now.

00:09:06.040 I'm telling you there's a 100% chance that's not true.

00:09:10.880 Not a 99% chance.

00:09:13.420 100% chance that's not true.

00:09:16.820 Now, wait a few weeks and then review.

00:09:21.000 Remember that I told you this.

00:09:22.680 If it turns out I'm right, I'm right.

00:09:27.800 Look at what you believed and then look what I told you

00:09:31.460 and then see which one of us got this right.

00:09:34.780 If you got it wrong and you were sure that you believe the Internet,

00:09:39.080 that there's some kind of Insurrection Act being signed,

00:09:43.260 just remember I told you it wasn't true.

00:09:46.620 So that the next time there's a question about,

00:09:50.300 hey, is this thing true or not,

00:09:52.120 you should at the very least check with me first

00:09:56.460 or other people that you trust.

00:09:59.500 I'm not the only person telling you that the Insurrection Act thing is not true.

00:10:04.680 Look at anybody else who's telling you that.

00:10:07.420 I mean, I haven't looked at, you know,

00:10:09.720 I've not checked, let's say, Mike Cernovich's Twitter feed.

00:10:13.180 I don't know what he said about it.

00:10:14.980 But I can guess, I can guess that he's saying it's not real.

00:10:23.260 You know, you can name five other people that you know on Twitter.

00:10:27.800 Check their Twitter feeds if they're talking about this.

00:10:30.840 They will tell you it's not real.

00:10:33.580 And these are people that you trust.

00:10:35.960 So just keep track.

00:10:38.160 And when you are wrong about this later,

00:10:40.500 look to the people who are right for your future opinions.

00:10:44.980 There is a bad case of what I will call QDS instead of TDS,

00:10:51.060 which is Trump derangement syndrome.

00:10:53.900 The Q phenomenon has created a cognitive dissonance trigger,

00:11:01.620 the likes of which we haven't seen since 2016.

00:11:05.300 I told you when Trump got elected that people's brains would just break

00:11:10.140 because they wouldn't be able to hold in their head everything they believed to be true

00:11:14.160 at the same time he gets elected

00:11:16.500 because that would be so completely different from everything they believed about reality.

00:11:21.900 Crack.

00:11:22.520 Their brains couldn't hold the two conflicting thoughts.

00:11:26.320 Wait a minute.

00:11:26.900 Everything I think about Trump, if that's true,

00:11:28.740 he couldn't possibly get, oh yeah, he did get elected.

00:11:32.580 So that's what triggers cognitive dissonance,

00:11:34.820 two thoughts that can't be held at the same time.

00:11:39.100 So you need some weird like hallucination to paper together the two thoughts.

00:11:44.040 Now their hallucination was Russia collusion.

00:11:47.360 So that was how they papered over the fact that Trump couldn't get elected, but he did.

00:11:53.420 Ah, there must have been some Russian collusion.

00:11:56.900 Now the Q people are in the same situation.

00:12:00.440 The Q people are finding out that everything that they'd ever been told about Q isn't happening.

00:12:07.160 So they are learning that deeply held beliefs, really strongly held beliefs,

00:12:12.660 clearly are not true because now we'll observe that there's no mass arrests of the deep state,

00:12:20.460 we'll observe that Trump didn't have some plan he's implementing,

00:12:24.200 we'll observe that there was no Insurrection Act.

00:12:27.100 So after you've observed all of the things that you believed for four years, I guess, in cases,

00:12:33.260 all of it not being true,

00:12:35.400 what would be the predictable outcome of their minds?

00:12:40.140 Well, this setup is unmistakable.

00:12:44.140 They have a belief it will be violated in the most aggressive way

00:12:48.740 because reality is not going to serve up anything close to what they imagined was going to happen.

00:12:53.900 And they will have to invent a hallucination like the Russia collusion hoax.

00:13:01.240 They will need to paper over this impossibility

00:13:04.500 that Q is right at the same time that none of it happens.

00:13:08.760 And what will that hallucination be?

00:13:12.860 The hallucination will be something you can't even imagine

00:13:16.500 because did you think the Russia collusion thing would...

00:13:20.000 I mean, that just came out of nowhere, right?

00:13:22.120 I mean, I'm sure it was part of a plan by some people to put forth that idea.

00:13:28.860 But you didn't see it coming.

00:13:30.100 And whatever happens to the people with the Q brains and their cognitive dissonance,

00:13:35.780 which is going to be extreme now, it's going to be really extreme,

00:13:39.000 you don't know what that's going to do.

00:13:41.680 But a whole lot of people are going to be flipping out.

00:13:45.700 So I don't...

00:13:49.100 If you're just joining, I don't know what was wrong with the YouTube feed,

00:13:52.820 but people said the sound didn't work, so I just turned it off.

00:13:59.640 And somebody says,

00:14:00.680 Why is Twitter suspending all accounts mentioning Q?

00:14:05.100 Because they can.

00:14:07.180 They can.

00:14:07.940 Did I tell you that the reason that I own Twitter stock is that they're so powerful

00:14:13.280 they can basically decide what free speech is now?

00:14:18.180 Remember, the exception to free speech used to be

00:14:21.600 you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.

00:14:25.240 Now, the reason for that is that that would be dangerous.

00:14:28.480 People would try to run out of the theater and they'd trample each other.

00:14:31.300 And if there's not a fire, it's a pretty bad example of using speech.

00:14:37.940 But now we've added to that example,

00:14:41.200 you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.

00:14:44.040 And this is not a joke.

00:14:45.200 There's no hyperbole here.

00:14:46.300 We've added to that example,

00:14:48.840 you can't question an election

00:14:51.260 after it's certified.

00:14:54.600 Now, I suppose you could question it before it's certified.

00:14:57.640 But after it's certified,

00:14:59.500 that's our new exception to freedom of speech

00:15:02.020 for all practical purposes.

00:15:05.900 Now, by the way,

00:15:07.300 somebody said Twitter's down 6.4% now.

00:15:10.740 So it started down 10%

00:15:12.040 and now it's down 6%.

00:15:13.880 Do you know what these smart investors

00:15:16.040 just said to themselves?

00:15:18.800 Are you serious?

00:15:19.940 Somebody's going to give this stock to be at a 10% discount?

00:15:23.540 I'll take it.

00:15:26.200 6% discount on Twitter stock today?

00:15:29.740 I hate to tell you, but it's a bargain.

00:15:32.060 No, I don't take that back

00:15:33.320 because that sounds like a stock recommendation.

00:15:35.960 Reverse that.

00:15:37.120 There were no stock recommendations in this live stream.

00:15:41.000 You should not listen to me for stock recommendations.

00:15:43.540 All right.

00:15:43.760 So, let's see.

00:15:51.380 The Proud Boy leader,

00:15:53.240 Nicholas Oaks.

00:15:55.780 So apparently he shared an image of himself on social media

00:15:58.900 smoking a cigarette in the Capitol last week.

00:16:02.400 And he was arrested in Hawaii.

00:16:04.720 But he's claiming that he took part in the raid

00:16:06.620 as a professional journalist.

00:16:08.020 I don't think that's going to go too far.

00:16:10.960 But it's good that he has some kind of a defense, I suppose.

00:16:15.640 Don't you wonder what he was thinking?

00:16:18.400 When the head of the Proud Boys

00:16:20.120 was standing in the Capitol building

00:16:22.040 smoking a cigarette and taking a selfie,

00:16:25.720 did he think...

00:16:27.020 Did he think that that was going to be fine?

00:16:32.560 What did he think?

00:16:36.160 Yeah, what did he think?

00:16:37.200 Somebody said Amazon is down today.

00:16:39.780 But I wouldn't worry about Amazon's future either.

00:16:43.120 They've got a pretty good situation going there.

00:16:46.240 So, I just have to wonder

00:16:47.600 what was in the heads of the people who did this.

00:16:50.220 Now, some of them were murderous killers.

00:16:54.200 We've learned.

00:16:55.400 Some of them were just patriots.

00:16:58.780 But I would love to know

00:17:00.680 what was going through the head of somebody

00:17:02.520 who thought they could smoke a cigarette in the Capitol

00:17:04.920 after, you know, getting in the way they got in,

00:17:09.080 taking a picture of themselves

00:17:10.400 and thinking that would be fine.

00:17:12.760 I guess they thought it would be fine.

00:17:14.980 What the hell is wrong with that?

00:17:18.300 We've all now seen,

00:17:19.560 I think you've all seen the video,

00:17:21.140 the horrendous video of the protesters

00:17:23.500 dragging a police officer out of a doorway

00:17:27.040 and beating him with American flag

00:17:29.760 and other blunt objects.

00:17:32.200 We see that police officer

00:17:34.160 laying motionlessly on the ground

00:17:36.880 after being beaten.

00:17:38.900 Some of you are disagreeing about the fact check

00:17:41.900 about whether he died

00:17:43.460 or that somebody else died

00:17:45.480 or was that actually showing him being killed

00:17:48.240 or just injured?

00:17:49.260 So, there's a little question there.

00:17:50.960 But here's what I said about it.

00:17:52.200 Once you've seen the video

00:17:54.140 of the crowd

00:17:55.940 either killing or attempting to kill,

00:17:59.660 it was at least attempted murder.

00:18:02.080 It was either murder or attempted murder.

00:18:04.760 One of those.

00:18:07.260 After seeing that,

00:18:09.020 I would say that the

00:18:10.180 law enforcement officer

00:18:11.960 who opened fire

00:18:12.940 and shot the woman

00:18:15.180 who was coming through the broken window

00:18:16.700 through the neck and killed her,

00:18:18.740 I would say

00:18:19.460 that was a clean shoot.

00:18:23.600 Now, I say that

00:18:24.960 because if somebody is dragging

00:18:26.900 police officers out

00:18:28.120 and beating them

00:18:28.960 in an organized, crowd way,

00:18:32.220 and you're a police officer

00:18:33.560 and that crowd is 10 feet away from you

00:18:35.960 and heading toward you,

00:18:37.960 and they've just beaten to death

00:18:39.860 or attempted to beat to death,

00:18:42.260 a police officer,

00:18:43.340 the same job you have,

00:18:45.240 and they're right there,

00:18:46.280 do you have the ability to shoot?

00:18:49.760 And the answer is yes.

00:18:52.920 Yeah, you do.

00:18:54.400 If somebody just murdered

00:18:56.720 one of your kind

00:18:58.440 and it's the same, you know,

00:19:00.900 crowd composition,

00:19:02.260 it's not the same exact people,

00:19:03.700 but the composition,

00:19:04.960 for the same reason

00:19:06.060 on the same day,

00:19:07.820 yeah, you can shoot

00:19:08.800 the first person

00:19:09.540 through the glass.

00:19:11.740 Now, on Twitter,

00:19:12.620 when I said this,

00:19:13.480 people said to me,

00:19:14.340 Scott, there's no evidence

00:19:16.300 that the cop

00:19:17.740 who did the shooting

00:19:18.720 was even aware

00:19:20.420 that this other cop

00:19:22.420 had been murdered

00:19:23.460 or almost murdered,

00:19:24.700 whichever it was,

00:19:26.380 you know,

00:19:26.680 in a different area

00:19:27.560 in the Capitol.

00:19:28.980 To which I say,

00:19:30.620 that makes no difference.

00:19:33.020 Why does that matter?

00:19:34.360 Why does it matter

00:19:35.340 if the cop who fired

00:19:36.740 was aware

00:19:38.100 that somebody in his job

00:19:40.760 had just been beaten

00:19:41.500 to death or near death?

00:19:43.200 Why does that matter?

00:19:44.700 Because he made

00:19:45.580 the right decision.

00:19:47.200 Now, whether he knew

00:19:48.500 about that

00:19:49.040 or didn't know about it,

00:19:50.900 doesn't matter

00:19:52.000 if he knew about it

00:19:52.820 or didn't know about it,

00:19:54.000 he made the right decision

00:19:55.440 because we know about it.

00:19:58.120 The fact that you

00:19:59.120 and I know about it now

00:20:00.520 means that he made

00:20:02.000 the right decision.

00:20:03.180 He was operating

00:20:04.240 in the fog of war.

00:20:06.200 He had a decision to make

00:20:07.820 that put himself

00:20:09.200 at great personal risk

00:20:10.720 because, you know,

00:20:12.060 if you take the shot,

00:20:13.040 you personally

00:20:13.740 are at great personal risk.

00:20:16.000 And he did it

00:20:17.940 in the fog of war,

00:20:19.040 not knowing if it was

00:20:20.040 the right thing

00:20:20.600 or the wrong thing,

00:20:21.760 but he took a personal risk

00:20:23.280 in his effort

00:20:24.900 to protect

00:20:25.860 the vice president,

00:20:27.100 et cetera.

00:20:28.060 And in retrospect,

00:20:29.940 he was right

00:20:30.920 because he perceived

00:20:33.780 the situation

00:20:34.460 as an immediate

00:20:36.300 deadly threat.

00:20:37.860 One assumes he did.

00:20:39.140 I mean,

00:20:39.880 I can't read his mind.

00:20:41.300 But one assumes he did

00:20:42.340 because he took the shot

00:20:43.520 and it looked like

00:20:44.400 a controlled,

00:20:46.260 intelligent,

00:20:47.900 thawed-down shot.

00:20:50.600 So it doesn't matter.

00:20:52.460 It doesn't matter

00:20:53.060 if he knew

00:20:53.520 about the other violence.

00:20:55.740 They were a violent crowd

00:20:57.080 exactly the way

00:20:58.360 his treatment of them

00:21:00.940 would suggest they were.

00:21:02.600 So I would say

00:21:03.660 that that police officer

00:21:04.900 who was, I think,

00:21:05.700 suspended,

00:21:06.180 when you get suspended,

00:21:08.580 there's a cloud over you

00:21:10.760 that there's an assumption,

00:21:12.680 a default assumption

00:21:13.800 that maybe

00:21:14.420 you did something wrong.

00:21:15.640 There's still a maybe,

00:21:17.040 but doesn't it feel

00:21:17.820 a little bit more like

00:21:18.860 we think you did

00:21:19.720 something wrong?

00:21:21.220 I feel as if

00:21:22.260 the suspension

00:21:23.100 or whatever they've done

00:21:24.060 to him

00:21:24.380 should be immediately reversed

00:21:26.300 because based on

00:21:28.240 what we've all seen,

00:21:30.380 the clear default assumption

00:21:32.020 is that it was

00:21:32.720 an appropriate shooting.

00:21:34.660 tragedy,

00:21:36.980 the woman who got shot,

00:21:38.300 I want to say this

00:21:38.840 as clearly as possible,

00:21:40.480 didn't deserve to get shot.

00:21:43.220 So the individual

00:21:44.500 who got shot,

00:21:45.500 we all agree,

00:21:46.780 should not have been shot.

00:21:48.800 But the larger decision

00:21:50.360 of how do you stop a crowd,

00:21:52.700 yeah,

00:21:53.060 that looked like

00:21:53.740 good police work to me.

00:21:56.240 Now,

00:21:56.960 could it be

00:21:57.620 that he did actually

00:21:58.640 do something

00:21:59.200 that's illegal

00:22:00.040 or inappropriate

00:22:00.860 and he should be punished?

00:22:02.280 Maybe,

00:22:02.600 but I haven't seen it.

00:22:05.120 I haven't seen

00:22:05.720 anything like that.

00:22:06.740 I feel as though

00:22:07.400 the appropriate treatment

00:22:08.800 for that law enforcement officer

00:22:10.360 is to give him

00:22:12.240 the benefit of a doubt

00:22:13.300 until there's some evidence,

00:22:15.300 which I haven't seen,

00:22:17.040 that he acted inappropriately.

00:22:19.260 Now,

00:22:19.540 somebody else on Twitter

00:22:20.360 said to me,

00:22:21.120 Scott,

00:22:22.080 there is never

00:22:23.220 a reason

00:22:24.260 to shoot into a crowd,

00:22:26.340 especially when the people

00:22:28.000 that you can see visibly

00:22:29.100 are not armed

00:22:30.120 with deadly weapons.

00:22:31.820 Do you believe that?

00:22:33.560 That there's never

00:22:34.580 a reason

00:22:35.080 to shoot into a crowd?

00:22:37.240 Well,

00:22:37.660 I said to the person

00:22:38.400 who tweeted,

00:22:39.700 I think you should

00:22:41.760 tell your wife

00:22:42.460 that if there's

00:22:44.260 an angry crowd

00:22:45.120 surrounding your home

00:22:46.200 that you will not

00:22:48.620 shoot into the crowd,

00:22:50.300 you would let them

00:22:51.400 come into the home

00:22:52.060 and kill your wife.

00:22:53.500 That would be your choice.

00:22:54.740 But I want to tell you

00:22:56.960 that your wife

00:22:58.100 might be interested

00:22:58.860 to know that

00:23:00.220 if I were protecting

00:23:01.100 my wife,

00:23:02.780 and let's say

00:23:03.460 an angry crowd

00:23:04.320 that I believed

00:23:05.260 had weapons

00:23:05.920 and meant me harm,

00:23:07.960 was surrounding the house,

00:23:09.720 I'm just going to put

00:23:10.760 my strategy on it.

00:23:13.520 If an angry crowd

00:23:14.880 of men,

00:23:15.760 women,

00:23:16.040 and children

00:23:16.480 surround my house

00:23:18.620 and I have a belief

00:23:20.000 that they are going

00:23:20.660 to do harm

00:23:21.180 to my wife,

00:23:22.300 I will slay

00:23:23.460 every one of them,

00:23:24.240 men,

00:23:24.900 women,

00:23:25.200 and children.

00:23:26.500 Now,

00:23:27.260 that's just me.

00:23:29.380 Now,

00:23:29.680 this assumes

00:23:30.620 that I know

00:23:32.160 the danger is real.

00:23:33.920 But,

00:23:34.640 apparently,

00:23:35.280 this person

00:23:35.740 wants to tell his wife

00:23:36.860 that he would let her die

00:23:38.140 at the hands of the crowd

00:23:40.080 because there is no reason

00:23:41.820 to shoot into a crowd.

00:23:44.900 I guess that's

00:23:46.020 one way to look at it.

00:23:47.900 But,

00:23:48.460 my wife's going to be alive

00:23:49.980 and yours won't.

00:23:53.000 So,

00:23:53.880 you might want to

00:23:54.500 explain that to her.

00:23:57.900 Of course,

00:23:58.500 I would go to jail

00:23:59.180 in either case,

00:23:59.980 but at least my wife

00:24:00.820 would be alive.

00:24:04.120 So,

00:24:04.720 here's

00:24:05.120 three layers down

00:24:07.640 of reality

00:24:08.540 on this story

00:24:09.640 about Linwood.

00:24:11.080 Apparently,

00:24:11.540 he's been banned

00:24:12.140 from Twitter,

00:24:13.160 as a lot of people

00:24:14.420 have been,

00:24:14.900 for

00:24:16.700 calling for

00:24:20.100 Mike Pence

00:24:20.640 to face

00:24:21.080 a firing squad.

00:24:23.080 He actually

00:24:23.840 said that.

00:24:25.580 Now,

00:24:26.280 there are some

00:24:27.320 bans

00:24:27.740 that look

00:24:28.920 unreasonable

00:24:29.800 to me,

00:24:31.280 but this isn't

00:24:32.180 one of them.

00:24:33.280 If you call

00:24:34.200 for the vice president

00:24:35.160 to be the subject

00:24:37.240 of a firing squad

00:24:38.560 when the vice president

00:24:39.480 has done literally

00:24:40.220 nothing wrong,

00:24:41.700 literally

00:24:42.180 nothing wrong,

00:24:42.940 yeah,

00:24:44.260 that might be

00:24:44.960 raising the ban

00:24:45.780 from something.

00:24:47.700 Yeah.

00:24:48.640 I suppose

00:24:49.400 the free speech

00:24:50.420 extremist

00:24:51.080 would still say

00:24:51.880 yeah,

00:24:52.300 but even so.

00:24:54.260 Well,

00:24:54.540 I don't know.

00:24:55.460 Yeah,

00:24:55.840 at least it wouldn't

00:24:56.680 bother me

00:24:57.200 if somebody

00:24:57.700 got banned

00:24:58.220 for something

00:24:58.640 like that.

00:24:59.200 but here's

00:25:02.420 the three layers

00:25:04.020 down analysis.

00:25:06.440 On the top

00:25:07.300 layer,

00:25:07.940 it just looks

00:25:08.580 like a lawyer

00:25:09.400 who's a little

00:25:10.360 bit crazy,

00:25:11.060 right?

00:25:11.920 And then you

00:25:12.560 look at

00:25:13.080 Sidney Powell

00:25:13.940 and you say,

00:25:14.620 oh,

00:25:15.380 looks like

00:25:15.880 Trump got

00:25:16.340 two lawyers

00:25:17.280 who are a little

00:25:18.220 bit crazy,

00:25:19.120 a little bit crazy.

00:25:20.280 That's what it

00:25:20.800 looks like.

00:25:23.880 But,

00:25:24.620 is there

00:25:25.820 more to the story?

00:25:27.160 I will tell you

00:25:28.080 that early on

00:25:28.920 in this saga,

00:25:29.760 when we first

00:25:30.540 heard the

00:25:31.180 wilder allegations

00:25:32.540 from Linwood

00:25:34.200 and from

00:25:34.700 Sidney Powell,

00:25:36.180 that the people

00:25:37.480 who I know

00:25:40.040 who know the

00:25:40.720 most about

00:25:41.260 how the world

00:25:41.860 works,

00:25:42.380 I'm being very

00:25:43.040 vague here,

00:25:44.520 the people who

00:25:45.100 know the most

00:25:45.720 about how the

00:25:46.280 world works,

00:25:47.180 interpret that

00:25:48.120 any way you want,

00:25:49.580 but you should

00:25:50.820 assume that these

00:25:51.600 are people who

00:25:52.160 have been part

00:25:53.580 of that world,

00:25:55.220 right?

00:25:55.440 Not people who

00:25:56.200 imagine what

00:25:57.380 it's like,

00:25:58.600 but people who

00:25:59.820 have been part

00:26:00.900 of things.

00:26:01.960 Let's just say

00:26:02.840 people who have

00:26:03.360 been involved

00:26:04.100 in real things

00:26:06.140 that maybe

00:26:06.660 you're not aware

00:26:07.340 of.

00:26:08.340 When this first

00:26:09.360 came up,

00:26:09.940 they said to me

00:26:10.660 that it's almost

00:26:12.340 certainly a

00:26:13.080 disinformation

00:26:13.700 campaign,

00:26:15.260 meaning that

00:26:16.160 these two

00:26:17.460 lawyers,

00:26:18.100 Linwood and

00:26:19.020 Sidney Powell,

00:26:20.580 may have been

00:26:21.400 identified as

00:26:23.280 people who

00:26:23.920 would believe

00:26:24.740 conspiracy theory.

00:26:26.180 because that

00:26:27.960 is something

00:26:28.440 that you

00:26:28.860 could figure

00:26:29.460 out.

00:26:30.000 You could

00:26:30.320 figure out

00:26:30.720 from past

00:26:31.340 record who

00:26:32.520 is likely

00:26:33.240 to believe

00:26:34.040 a wild

00:26:35.000 story.

00:26:36.320 My concern

00:26:37.420 is that they

00:26:38.020 were identified

00:26:38.620 as people

00:26:39.240 likely to

00:26:39.900 believe a

00:26:40.420 wild story

00:26:41.320 and that they

00:26:42.640 may have been

00:26:43.140 fed one for

00:26:44.780 the purpose of

00:26:45.580 discrediting them.

00:26:47.720 And that

00:26:48.920 looks exactly

00:26:49.820 like what

00:26:50.380 happened,

00:26:51.240 and I need

00:26:52.000 to tell you

00:26:52.680 that I was

00:26:53.980 told that

00:26:54.480 was happening

00:26:55.220 from the

00:26:55.740 start,

00:26:56.760 and that

00:26:57.100 this has

00:26:57.520 every tell

00:26:59.740 for being

00:27:01.100 some kind

00:27:01.940 of either

00:27:02.420 people who

00:27:02.980 are in

00:27:03.500 current

00:27:03.980 intelligence

00:27:04.580 agencies or

00:27:05.620 have been

00:27:06.680 involved or

00:27:07.460 have worked

00:27:07.980 with them or

00:27:08.620 have some

00:27:09.360 kind of deep

00:27:09.880 experience in

00:27:10.860 disinformation

00:27:11.780 as a profession.

00:27:13.420 they appear

00:27:14.940 to be behind

00:27:15.760 feeding these

00:27:17.080 conspiracy theories

00:27:19.100 to these

00:27:19.560 lawyers,

00:27:20.440 but I'm

00:27:22.420 not forgiving

00:27:23.780 the lawyers.

00:27:25.340 I believe

00:27:25.960 that they

00:27:26.520 might have

00:27:26.980 been targeted

00:27:27.620 because they

00:27:28.940 might have

00:27:29.400 been perceived

00:27:30.060 as people

00:27:31.600 who would

00:27:32.000 believe things.

00:27:33.560 So I'm

00:27:34.560 just speculating.

00:27:35.660 I don't have

00:27:36.300 any direct

00:27:36.820 evidence of

00:27:37.400 any of that.

00:27:38.340 I'm just

00:27:38.800 saying that

00:27:39.280 people told

00:27:39.960 me this was

00:27:40.600 what was

00:27:41.000 happening in

00:27:41.520 the beginning,

00:27:42.500 and there

00:27:43.180 are people

00:27:43.480 who would

00:27:43.800 know.

00:27:45.720 Well, they

00:27:46.440 would know

00:27:46.740 just by the

00:27:47.980 tells, not

00:27:48.680 because they

00:27:49.120 had personal

00:27:49.940 information.

00:27:51.320 And that's

00:27:53.320 what it looks

00:27:53.640 like to me.

00:27:54.960 To me, it

00:27:55.400 looks like a

00:27:56.100 disinformation

00:27:56.600 campaign that

00:27:57.780 was 100%

00:27:58.560 successful.

00:27:59.520 We'll never

00:28:00.060 know.

00:28:00.940 That's just

00:28:01.420 speculation.

00:28:07.100 So apparently

00:28:08.180 the company

00:28:09.300 Cumulus Media,

00:28:10.820 which I guess

00:28:11.640 is the employer

00:28:12.340 for Mark

00:28:14.060 Levin, Ben

00:28:14.840 Shapiro, Dan

00:28:15.700 Bongino,

00:28:16.960 etc., has

00:28:17.980 told its on

00:28:18.720 air personalities.

00:28:19.660 This is a

00:28:20.080 report.

00:28:20.560 I don't know

00:28:20.860 if it's true.

00:28:21.920 I don't think

00:28:22.400 you could assume

00:28:23.000 this is true

00:28:23.600 just because

00:28:24.120 it's in the

00:28:24.640 news.

00:28:25.760 But just

00:28:31.500 because it's

00:28:32.020 in the news.

00:28:33.600 So by the

00:28:34.760 way, I'll

00:28:35.220 play back the

00:28:36.720 YouTube and

00:28:37.860 see if the

00:28:38.840 audio was

00:28:39.420 okay.

00:28:40.300 If it is

00:28:41.020 okay, then

00:28:41.700 I'll just

00:28:42.160 never listen

00:28:43.220 to anybody

00:28:43.760 who says

00:28:44.520 there's an

00:28:44.880 audio problem.

00:28:45.600 I'll just

00:28:45.920 pour through

00:28:47.840 it.

00:28:48.340 But every

00:28:48.780 now and

00:28:49.040 then there

00:28:49.300 actually is

00:28:49.760 an audio

00:28:50.080 problem, so

00:28:50.740 it's confusing.

00:28:54.580 All right.

00:28:55.400 So what do

00:28:56.400 you think about

00:28:56.840 the fact that

00:28:57.640 Cumulus Media

00:28:59.360 is telling

00:29:00.120 their on-air

00:29:01.040 people,

00:29:01.640 allegedly,

00:29:02.240 that's the

00:29:02.700 story, I

00:29:03.240 don't know

00:29:03.480 how truthful

00:29:04.180 this is,

00:29:05.280 that they

00:29:06.000 can't talk

00:29:06.660 about certain

00:29:07.180 topics.

00:29:11.040 So over

00:29:12.040 here I'm

00:29:12.440 seeing people

00:29:12.880 say the

00:29:13.260 audio was

00:29:14.160 fine and

00:29:14.680 other people

00:29:15.100 saying it

00:29:15.780 was a

00:29:16.000 problem.

00:29:17.820 It sounded

00:29:18.320 like room

00:29:18.860 audio.

00:29:19.940 So it

00:29:20.220 probably

00:29:20.440 sounded like

00:29:21.100 my microphone

00:29:21.740 wasn't working.

00:29:23.300 I'll look

00:29:23.820 into that.

00:29:25.380 All right.

00:29:29.740 So here's

00:29:32.040 my take on

00:29:32.780 what Trump

00:29:33.700 did.

00:29:34.000 and I

00:29:34.520 feel as

00:29:35.220 though just

00:29:36.600 putting it

00:29:37.160 in the

00:29:37.600 cleanest

00:29:38.320 simple form

00:29:39.320 has some

00:29:39.800 value.

00:29:40.760 So you

00:29:41.700 already know

00:29:42.140 my opinion

00:29:42.620 but putting

00:29:43.140 it simply

00:29:43.660 helps.

00:29:44.240 It's like

00:29:44.680 this.

00:29:47.160 There's

00:29:47.680 nothing wrong

00:29:48.260 with inspiring

00:29:48.980 people to

00:29:49.680 protest against

00:29:51.020 an election

00:29:51.700 result which

00:29:53.660 you think

00:29:54.280 was non-transparent.

00:29:56.560 So if all

00:29:57.380 you're doing

00:29:57.740 is saying,

00:29:58.240 hey, I

00:29:58.840 think we

00:29:59.120 should look

00:29:59.480 into this

00:29:59.900 election result

00:30:00.980 and it

00:30:01.360 was a

00:30:01.640 peaceful,

00:30:02.340 if it

00:30:02.900 had been a

00:30:03.400 peaceful

00:30:03.700 protest,

00:30:04.360 nobody would

00:30:04.880 have a

00:30:05.120 problem

00:30:05.320 with that.

00:30:08.860 But we'd

00:30:13.020 also all

00:30:13.600 agree that

00:30:14.400 inciting an

00:30:15.140 insurrection

00:30:15.640 would be a

00:30:17.040 bad thing.

00:30:17.920 So I think

00:30:18.500 there are two

00:30:18.880 things we all

00:30:19.520 agree on.

00:30:21.100 Peaceful

00:30:21.620 protest over

00:30:22.880 an election

00:30:23.400 result and

00:30:24.340 transparency of

00:30:25.200 the election,

00:30:26.380 probably all

00:30:27.220 good as long

00:30:28.040 as it doesn't

00:30:28.500 turn violent.

00:30:29.100 And at

00:30:32.360 the same

00:30:32.640 time, we

00:30:33.280 would all

00:30:33.620 agree that

00:30:34.220 directly

00:30:34.960 inciting an

00:30:35.920 insurrection,

00:30:37.300 especially if

00:30:37.960 you're a

00:30:38.200 sitting president,

00:30:39.300 would be

00:30:40.000 really bad,

00:30:41.840 especially if

00:30:42.600 there was no

00:30:43.220 election

00:30:43.680 irregularity.

00:30:46.020 But here's

00:30:46.740 the thing,

00:30:47.800 that distinction

00:30:48.780 requires the

00:30:50.640 public to

00:30:51.220 know the

00:30:51.580 difference.

00:30:52.860 But what

00:30:53.260 if the

00:30:53.560 public, or

00:30:54.580 too many of

00:30:55.400 the public,

00:30:55.900 it doesn't

00:30:56.220 have to be

00:30:56.580 the whole

00:30:56.860 public,

00:30:57.280 but what

00:30:58.080 if too

00:30:58.420 many of

00:30:58.780 the public

00:30:59.060 can't tell

00:30:59.620 the difference

00:31:00.180 between being

00:31:01.940 asked to

00:31:02.460 do a safe

00:31:04.360 non-violent

00:31:05.900 protest and

00:31:07.640 an insurrection?

00:31:09.800 Because that's

00:31:10.560 what happened.

00:31:12.280 There were

00:31:12.600 apparently,

00:31:13.240 there were a

00:31:13.620 number of

00:31:13.980 people who

00:31:14.440 couldn't tell

00:31:15.060 the difference

00:31:15.740 between,

00:31:16.980 yeah, let's

00:31:17.700 go protest,

00:31:19.200 and our

00:31:19.700 voice will be

00:31:20.360 heard, and

00:31:21.100 let's have a

00:31:21.720 violent insurrection

00:31:22.800 against the

00:31:23.340 president, or

00:31:24.640 against the

00:31:25.140 vice president,

00:31:25.700 I guess.

00:31:26.000 Now, if

00:31:28.520 the public

00:31:29.120 could tell

00:31:29.700 the difference

00:31:30.240 between those

00:31:30.940 two things,

00:31:31.920 a peaceful

00:31:32.420 protest,

00:31:33.680 inspiration,

00:31:35.220 versus inspiring

00:31:36.780 a violent

00:31:38.320 takeover, if

00:31:39.600 all of the

00:31:40.400 public knew

00:31:41.620 that those

00:31:42.080 were different

00:31:42.640 things, then

00:31:44.180 everything the

00:31:44.940 president did

00:31:45.720 was fine.

00:31:47.300 He didn't

00:31:47.620 do a thing

00:31:48.040 wrong.

00:31:48.880 If the

00:31:49.760 public could

00:31:50.880 tell the

00:31:51.340 difference,

00:31:52.800 but they

00:31:53.580 can't.

00:31:54.160 they can't

00:31:55.860 tell the

00:31:56.140 difference.

00:31:57.400 Apparently,

00:31:58.120 there are

00:31:58.880 plenty of

00:31:59.420 people who

00:31:59.980 think go

00:32:01.080 protest means

00:32:02.600 a signal to

00:32:03.840 overthrow the

00:32:04.460 government.

00:32:05.420 Now, should

00:32:06.500 Trump have

00:32:07.140 known that?

00:32:08.660 Should Trump

00:32:09.640 have known

00:32:10.300 that saying

00:32:11.340 the right

00:32:11.880 thing, which

00:32:13.080 is go

00:32:13.480 protest, the

00:32:14.940 right thing

00:32:15.360 according to

00:32:15.880 his opinion,

00:32:17.440 should Trump

00:32:18.620 have known

00:32:19.180 that doing

00:32:20.160 the right

00:32:20.760 thing, let's

00:32:21.900 go protest,

00:32:22.600 you assume

00:32:23.440 it's peaceful,

00:32:24.460 would lead to

00:32:25.540 the wrong

00:32:26.040 thing, some

00:32:26.960 people thinking

00:32:27.580 that they

00:32:27.960 should go do

00:32:28.420 bad things.

00:32:29.440 The answer

00:32:29.820 is I think

00:32:30.280 so.

00:32:31.180 I think

00:32:31.720 Trump should

00:32:32.320 have known

00:32:32.760 that the

00:32:33.700 public would

00:32:34.320 not be smart

00:32:35.140 enough to

00:32:36.340 make that

00:32:36.760 distinction and

00:32:38.480 that it would

00:32:38.880 cause trouble.

00:32:40.020 But here's the

00:32:40.820 problem.

00:32:42.160 Can we ever

00:32:43.020 have street

00:32:44.420 protests again?

00:32:46.240 Because is

00:32:47.120 anybody telling

00:32:47.920 that the

00:32:48.640 leaders of

00:32:49.240 Black Lives

00:32:49.900 Matter that

00:32:50.460 they should

00:32:50.920 step down?

00:32:51.540 because their

00:32:53.100 protests led

00:32:53.980 to some

00:32:54.680 members of

00:32:56.120 the group

00:32:56.760 being bad

00:32:57.920 actors and

00:32:58.540 doing bad

00:32:59.040 things and

00:32:59.560 people got

00:33:00.120 hurt.

00:33:01.260 So are we

00:33:01.780 asking the

00:33:02.300 same thing

00:33:02.740 of Black

00:33:03.100 Lives Matter?

00:33:04.000 That their

00:33:04.520 leaders should

00:33:05.160 take responsibility

00:33:06.040 for all the

00:33:06.980 danger?

00:33:09.560 Because wouldn't

00:33:10.380 you say that

00:33:10.900 Black Lives

00:33:11.460 Matter could

00:33:12.120 know with

00:33:12.620 100% certainty,

00:33:14.540 certainly after

00:33:15.340 the first few

00:33:16.040 nights, they

00:33:16.800 could know

00:33:17.140 with complete

00:33:17.720 certainty that

00:33:18.980 continuing the

00:33:19.840 street protests

00:33:20.640 would lead to

00:33:21.480 more damage and

00:33:22.800 death and

00:33:23.780 injury?

00:33:24.460 Of course they

00:33:25.040 would.

00:33:25.960 So why are

00:33:26.580 they not just

00:33:28.540 as on the

00:33:29.160 spot as

00:33:29.700 Trump is?

00:33:30.400 In both

00:33:31.020 cases, they

00:33:32.540 would know if

00:33:33.600 Black Lives

00:33:34.120 Matter had

00:33:34.640 said, yeah,

00:33:36.080 we're going to

00:33:36.700 be peaceful,

00:33:38.360 but protests

00:33:40.420 that make you

00:33:41.220 uncomfortable are

00:33:42.720 the good ones,

00:33:44.240 and nothing

00:33:45.880 really good

00:33:46.900 ever happened

00:33:47.800 without a

00:33:48.560 little bit of

00:33:49.180 violence.

00:33:50.820 If Black

00:33:51.400 Lives Matter

00:33:51.920 leaders are

00:33:52.480 saying stuff

00:33:53.120 like that,

00:33:54.640 are they not

00:33:55.520 fully responsible

00:33:56.480 for every

00:33:57.220 violent thing

00:33:57.840 that came out

00:33:58.440 of what was

00:34:00.700 mostly peaceful?

00:34:02.640 Same standard.

00:34:04.120 I just think

00:34:04.640 you have to

00:34:04.980 apply the same

00:34:05.640 standard.

00:34:06.660 That said,

00:34:08.060 if the leaders

00:34:09.240 of Black Lives

00:34:10.080 Matter had been

00:34:11.040 president of the

00:34:11.940 United States,

00:34:14.020 and they had

00:34:14.760 encouraged what

00:34:16.100 would be,

00:34:16.580 let's say,

00:34:17.160 a justified

00:34:18.700 protest,

00:34:21.440 justified in

00:34:22.180 the sense that

00:34:22.800 there are real

00:34:23.340 concerns about

00:34:24.140 police action

00:34:24.900 against black

00:34:26.360 citizens.

00:34:27.540 So no matter

00:34:28.520 what you think

00:34:29.020 about the actual

00:34:29.620 data or what

00:34:30.340 you think about

00:34:30.920 that, it's a

00:34:31.400 real concern,

00:34:33.200 right?

00:34:33.580 And I don't

00:34:34.280 ignore something

00:34:35.760 that is that much

00:34:36.720 of a concern by

00:34:37.640 my fellow citizens,

00:34:38.600 even if I think

00:34:39.460 I would look at

00:34:41.760 it a little

00:34:42.020 differently.

00:34:42.740 The concern

00:34:43.300 itself is fully

00:34:45.100 worth the

00:34:46.000 consideration,

00:34:46.760 right?

00:34:47.260 Because that's

00:34:47.760 just respect.

00:34:49.120 It wouldn't

00:34:49.700 matter who it

00:34:50.440 was or what

00:34:51.040 their complaint

00:34:51.760 was.

00:34:52.380 If they're

00:34:53.020 really, really

00:34:53.820 bothered by it

00:34:54.580 to the point

00:34:54.940 where living

00:34:55.420 in this country

00:34:56.060 is a problem,

00:34:57.400 I think you

00:34:58.600 got to address

00:34:59.140 it.

00:34:59.600 So if Black

00:35:01.840 Lives Matter

00:35:02.360 leaders had

00:35:03.020 been president

00:35:03.640 and said,

00:35:04.360 hey, go do

00:35:04.900 some peaceful

00:35:05.520 protests, and

00:35:07.620 then people

00:35:08.740 got killed,

00:35:10.220 because they're

00:35:10.740 not all peaceful,

00:35:11.660 some bad

00:35:12.360 elements will

00:35:12.900 join, what

00:35:14.540 happens if

00:35:15.060 you keep

00:35:15.440 doing it?

00:35:16.460 And then

00:35:16.780 the next

00:35:17.180 night you

00:35:17.540 say, yeah,

00:35:18.000 go do it

00:35:18.420 again, and

00:35:18.940 somebody gets

00:35:19.580 hurt again.

00:35:20.480 And then

00:35:20.740 the third

00:35:21.100 night you

00:35:21.440 say, yeah,

00:35:22.160 go do it

00:35:22.540 again, somebody

00:35:23.820 gets hurt

00:35:24.160 again.

00:35:25.000 Well, I

00:35:25.440 think you

00:35:25.740 would ask

00:35:26.080 the, in

00:35:27.960 this hypothetical

00:35:28.700 imaginary

00:35:29.540 situation, you

00:35:30.340 would ask

00:35:30.720 the head

00:35:31.640 of Black

00:35:32.040 Lives Matter,

00:35:32.700 who in my

00:35:33.280 imaginary

00:35:33.720 situation is

00:35:34.540 also the

00:35:34.960 president, you

00:35:35.920 would ask

00:35:36.220 him to step

00:35:36.720 down, wouldn't

00:35:38.320 you?

00:35:38.980 But here's the

00:35:39.880 bigger question.

00:35:41.300 Now that we

00:35:41.920 know that every

00:35:42.900 kind of street

00:35:43.660 protest will

00:35:44.580 inevitably be,

00:35:46.660 let's say, will

00:35:49.040 be taken over

00:35:49.740 by the bad

00:35:50.340 elements.

00:35:51.360 If you had a

00:35:52.240 protest tomorrow

00:35:53.180 that was a

00:35:54.400 street protest

00:35:55.000 with lots of

00:35:55.720 energy, it

00:35:57.260 wouldn't matter

00:35:57.680 what the topic

00:35:58.280 was.

00:35:59.220 Bad people

00:35:59.960 would join it

00:36:00.620 and they'd

00:36:01.340 say, hey, we

00:36:01.960 can hide in

00:36:02.520 this crowd, we'll

00:36:03.920 break some

00:36:04.620 windows, we'll

00:36:05.260 hurt some

00:36:05.640 people that we

00:36:06.300 think should be

00:36:06.820 hurt.

00:36:07.100 so maybe we've

00:36:09.640 reached a point

00:36:10.200 where if you

00:36:10.920 have social

00:36:11.440 media that

00:36:12.020 works, we

00:36:13.720 don't really

00:36:14.440 have social

00:36:14.960 media that

00:36:15.400 works at this

00:36:16.000 point, I

00:36:16.340 would argue,

00:36:17.360 in terms of

00:36:18.280 free speech,

00:36:19.580 but maybe we

00:36:20.520 should just

00:36:21.060 take it as a

00:36:23.280 standard that if

00:36:25.040 you're an

00:36:25.440 organizer of a

00:36:26.400 protest and

00:36:27.160 somebody dies,

00:36:28.080 you're responsible

00:36:28.780 because that's

00:36:29.780 what we told

00:36:30.260 Trump and I

00:36:31.800 don't disagree.

00:36:32.420 I don't

00:36:33.780 disagree that

00:36:35.260 Trump has

00:36:35.780 responsibility for

00:36:38.160 the deaths in

00:36:38.800 the Capitol.

00:36:39.400 I think he has

00:36:39.820 responsibility.

00:36:41.060 But I would

00:36:41.820 like to take

00:36:42.320 that concept and

00:36:43.820 apply it to

00:36:44.340 everybody.

00:36:45.800 I think the

00:36:46.480 Black Lives Matter

00:36:47.280 leaders have

00:36:47.920 responsibility for

00:36:49.740 the deaths that

00:36:50.660 came out of

00:36:51.060 those protests.

00:36:52.520 Now, you

00:36:53.100 might say the

00:36:53.820 benefit of the

00:36:54.520 protests in the

00:36:55.740 long run is

00:36:56.440 greater than the

00:36:58.500 immediate deaths.

00:37:00.080 And I would

00:37:00.460 listen to that

00:37:01.020 argument, but you

00:37:02.100 still have to

00:37:02.400 take responsibility

00:37:03.280 for the deaths.

00:37:04.380 Because if you

00:37:05.100 do something you

00:37:05.900 know will result

00:37:07.140 in death, if

00:37:10.140 you know it, or

00:37:11.440 at least injury,

00:37:12.380 if you know it,

00:37:13.660 do you think if

00:37:14.300 Antifa brings,

00:37:15.540 I don't know,

00:37:16.340 let's say Antifa

00:37:17.180 brings a thousand

00:37:18.080 people to a city,

00:37:19.760 do you think they

00:37:20.360 don't know people

00:37:21.100 are going to get

00:37:21.580 hurt?

00:37:21.960 Of course they

00:37:22.460 do.

00:37:23.240 Of course they

00:37:23.840 do.

00:37:25.320 So I would just

00:37:26.840 want to be

00:37:27.280 consistent in the

00:37:28.260 standard.

00:37:28.960 Either the

00:37:30.020 leaders are always

00:37:31.120 blamed for the

00:37:32.280 deaths, or

00:37:33.760 never.

00:37:34.700 But you've

00:37:35.080 got to pick

00:37:35.420 one.

00:37:36.660 And I guess I'd

00:37:37.680 be okay picking

00:37:38.500 either one.

00:37:40.740 Right?

00:37:43.100 I've entered the

00:37:44.340 twilight zone.

00:37:47.220 Somebody says

00:37:48.200 Kamala Harris

00:37:48.900 encouraged writers

00:37:49.940 she should be

00:37:50.660 impeached next.

00:37:51.660 I think that's

00:37:52.360 completely fair.

00:37:54.360 So people are

00:37:55.260 saying that Kamala

00:37:56.000 Harris had

00:37:57.100 encouraged the

00:37:58.320 Black Lives Matter

00:37:59.020 protesters and

00:38:00.400 protesters and

00:38:00.420 even said

00:38:00.960 things that

00:38:01.500 sounded to me

00:38:02.260 like she

00:38:02.700 encouraged a

00:38:03.360 little bit of

00:38:03.880 violence.

00:38:04.980 That's the way

00:38:05.440 I heard it.

00:38:06.920 You know,

00:38:07.360 maybe the exact

00:38:08.420 words don't say

00:38:09.180 that.

00:38:09.780 But similar to

00:38:10.500 the Trump

00:38:10.920 situation, if I

00:38:11.960 hear it that

00:38:12.560 way, well,

00:38:14.200 that's sort of

00:38:14.880 the reality if

00:38:15.600 you hear it

00:38:16.020 that way.

00:38:16.560 That's your

00:38:16.980 reality.

00:38:17.860 So I think

00:38:18.560 that would

00:38:18.880 actually be

00:38:19.500 100%

00:38:20.600 appropriate,

00:38:22.360 that no

00:38:22.840 matter whether

00:38:23.520 President Trump

00:38:24.280 gets impeached

00:38:24.900 or not,

00:38:25.780 yeah, I do

00:38:26.180 think Kamala

00:38:26.820 Harris should be

00:38:27.360 impeached on

00:38:28.100 day one.

00:38:29.220 That's completely

00:38:29.880 appropriate because

00:38:31.220 the things she

00:38:31.840 said did

00:38:33.220 lead, you

00:38:34.180 know, encouraged

00:38:34.900 incited to

00:38:36.320 rioting and

00:38:37.380 death.

00:38:38.040 I think that's

00:38:38.740 perfectly appropriate.

00:38:40.580 In fact, I

00:38:41.520 don't know if

00:38:42.080 the Republicans

00:38:42.900 have any

00:38:43.440 ability to

00:38:44.260 push for

00:38:45.220 that, but

00:38:45.640 I'd put it

00:38:46.120 through today.

00:38:47.480 There's no

00:38:47.900 reason that you

00:38:48.480 can't, there

00:38:49.300 is no reason

00:38:50.080 you can't

00:38:50.540 impeach

00:38:51.100 Kamala

00:38:52.260 Harris for

00:38:53.820 something she

00:38:54.320 did before

00:38:54.780 she took

00:38:55.180 office, right?

00:38:56.260 Because it

00:38:56.840 was all sort

00:38:57.260 of connected

00:38:57.800 to taking

00:38:58.540 office, it

00:38:59.080 was when

00:38:59.460 she was

00:38:59.700 running.

00:39:00.860 So yeah, I

00:39:01.540 think Kamala

00:39:02.040 Harris should

00:39:02.480 be impeached

00:39:04.740 under the

00:39:05.880 same theory

00:39:07.020 that the

00:39:07.580 president will

00:39:09.120 probably get

00:39:09.880 impeached.

00:39:10.960 Now, by

00:39:11.500 the way, I

00:39:13.920 don't have

00:39:14.460 strong opinions

00:39:15.460 about impeachment

00:39:16.420 versus resigning

00:39:18.460 versus 25th

00:39:19.960 amendment versus

00:39:20.840 even just not

00:39:21.860 doing anything.

00:39:23.140 I feel as

00:39:23.920 if these

00:39:25.680 things all

00:39:26.140 became the

00:39:26.640 same thing

00:39:27.180 because there's

00:39:27.880 no time

00:39:28.340 left.

00:39:29.800 I mean, I

00:39:30.100 suppose the

00:39:30.860 impeachment

00:39:31.240 thing, I've

00:39:32.020 heard that if

00:39:32.600 he gets

00:39:32.900 impeached, can

00:39:33.940 somebody fact

00:39:34.760 check this

00:39:35.200 on me?

00:39:36.160 Is it true

00:39:36.640 that if the

00:39:37.060 president gets

00:39:37.620 impeached, he

00:39:38.300 loses his

00:39:39.260 pension and

00:39:41.040 security detail?

00:39:43.420 I don't know

00:39:44.380 that that's true.

00:39:45.200 That doesn't

00:39:45.600 sound true to

00:39:46.260 me.

00:39:47.040 It doesn't

00:39:47.600 sound true

00:39:48.600 that if you're

00:39:49.180 an ex-president,

00:39:49.960 you don't get

00:39:50.420 secret service

00:39:51.060 protection.

00:39:51.540 but fact

00:39:52.960 check that

00:39:53.360 for me.

00:39:54.020 If that

00:39:54.260 were true,

00:39:54.700 that would

00:39:54.920 be just

00:39:55.960 the worst

00:39:56.400 thing I'd

00:39:56.780 heard all

00:39:57.600 year.

00:39:59.280 I hope

00:39:59.660 it's not.

00:40:00.300 All right.

00:40:05.340 Remember

00:40:05.820 when everybody

00:40:07.580 said that

00:40:08.420 Trump supporters

00:40:09.420 would follow

00:40:10.540 him no matter

00:40:11.240 what, and

00:40:12.660 that if he

00:40:13.220 shot somebody

00:40:13.880 on Fifth

00:40:14.340 Avenue, his

00:40:15.080 supporters would

00:40:15.780 still support

00:40:16.420 him?

00:40:16.580 Well, here's

00:40:17.800 the weird and

00:40:19.700 convenient thing

00:40:20.580 that happened

00:40:21.060 this week.

00:40:23.620 Trump, he

00:40:24.700 wasn't trying

00:40:25.280 to do this,

00:40:25.940 of course, but

00:40:26.460 inadvertently,

00:40:27.320 Trump created

00:40:27.960 an off-ramp

00:40:28.860 for people like

00:40:30.460 me, which is

00:40:32.100 actually really

00:40:32.680 convenient.

00:40:35.080 So, without

00:40:36.200 this week, the

00:40:38.040 events of this

00:40:38.780 week and the

00:40:39.480 Capitol stuff,

00:40:41.120 Trump would

00:40:41.780 have left

00:40:42.120 office, and I

00:40:43.000 would just be a

00:40:43.700 person who

00:40:44.160 supported him

00:40:44.940 on, you

00:40:46.060 know,

00:40:46.160 90% of

00:40:47.460 everything he

00:40:47.960 did from

00:40:48.460 beginning to

00:40:49.000 end.

00:40:49.660 And then I

00:40:50.300 would have to

00:40:50.760 live with that

00:40:51.500 as the guy who

00:40:53.200 would support

00:40:53.800 Trump, who

00:40:54.980 other people

00:40:55.500 think is a

00:40:56.060 monster, no

00:40:57.220 matter what

00:40:57.840 he did.

00:40:59.240 No matter

00:40:59.820 what he did.

00:41:01.180 Now, if you

00:41:01.880 support somebody

00:41:02.740 who other

00:41:03.840 people think

00:41:04.940 is Hitler, and

00:41:06.600 you support him

00:41:07.320 no matter what

00:41:08.500 he does, well,

00:41:10.160 you just look

00:41:10.640 like Hitler.

00:41:12.300 So, that was

00:41:13.160 what I was

00:41:13.640 looking forward

00:41:14.280 to, is that

00:41:15.440 Trump would

00:41:15.860 just leave

00:41:16.320 office, and

00:41:17.540 then I would

00:41:18.040 be branded

00:41:18.680 Hitler's helper

00:41:19.660 forever, and

00:41:20.540 that would be

00:41:20.860 the rest of

00:41:21.300 my life.

00:41:22.780 But, because

00:41:24.500 of the events

00:41:25.260 of this past

00:41:25.860 week, it

00:41:27.220 makes it really

00:41:28.200 easy for people

00:41:29.500 like me to

00:41:30.120 say, oh, I'm

00:41:30.900 out.

00:41:32.080 Okay.

00:41:33.020 I like those

00:41:33.900 other things he

00:41:34.560 did.

00:41:35.000 I like the

00:41:35.420 Middle East, the

00:41:36.140 economy before the

00:41:37.300 coronavirus.

00:41:38.240 There was a

00:41:38.600 bunch of stuff

00:41:39.080 I liked, and I

00:41:40.720 can still like

00:41:41.400 them just as much

00:41:42.140 as I liked them

00:41:42.820 before, but

00:41:44.340 this is my

00:41:46.000 shooting somebody

00:41:46.940 on Fifth Avenue

00:41:48.000 moment, and

00:41:50.040 I don't

00:41:51.340 support it

00:41:51.940 when he

00:41:53.440 shoots somebody

00:41:53.960 on Fifth Avenue,

00:41:54.840 and now you

00:41:55.720 know for sure,

00:41:56.860 because in

00:41:58.300 this exact

00:41:59.000 case, I'm

00:41:59.740 not arguing

00:42:01.120 against impeachment.

00:42:02.400 I'm not even

00:42:02.960 arguing against

00:42:04.040 the 25th

00:42:05.900 Amendment.

00:42:06.700 I don't know,

00:42:07.660 you know, in

00:42:08.960 terms of precedent

00:42:09.740 or anything

00:42:10.240 like that, if

00:42:11.380 it's a good

00:42:11.740 idea, but I

00:42:12.760 don't have any

00:42:13.360 stake in it.

00:42:14.040 I have no

00:42:14.400 argument for

00:42:14.980 that, and I

00:42:16.920 don't think it

00:42:17.280 matters either,

00:42:17.900 because in a

00:42:18.400 few days he's

00:42:18.940 out of office

00:42:19.420 either way.

00:42:20.960 So, that's

00:42:25.060 where I stand

00:42:25.520 on that.

00:42:28.240 Apparently, the

00:42:28.940 PGA of

00:42:29.820 America, they're

00:42:30.540 even canceling

00:42:32.080 their golf

00:42:33.300 tournament that

00:42:34.000 was at one of

00:42:34.960 the Trump

00:42:35.300 properties.

00:42:36.680 I don't know

00:42:37.380 how the Trump

00:42:38.060 family,

00:42:39.740 is going to

00:42:41.080 avoid total

00:42:42.360 economic

00:42:43.180 destruction.

00:42:45.060 And I

00:42:45.800 don't think

00:42:46.280 that is

00:42:47.160 fair.

00:42:49.900 That is

00:42:50.700 deeply unfair,

00:42:51.660 because I

00:42:52.860 don't believe,

00:42:53.780 at least, you

00:42:54.620 know, the

00:42:55.300 Trump family,

00:42:56.460 I don't believe

00:42:57.080 that they had

00:42:57.620 anything in

00:42:58.200 mind except

00:42:58.700 helping the

00:42:59.220 country and,

00:43:00.160 you know,

00:43:00.700 getting a good

00:43:01.420 outcome.

00:43:02.160 And it looks

00:43:02.720 like they

00:43:03.920 will be

00:43:04.480 punished for

00:43:06.040 trying to

00:43:06.620 help the

00:43:07.020 country by

00:43:07.900 a complete

00:43:08.540 destruction of

00:43:09.300 their brand.

00:43:10.300 Now, you

00:43:10.600 could say

00:43:11.220 that President

00:43:12.640 Trump was

00:43:13.220 responsible for

00:43:14.000 that, and I

00:43:14.440 wouldn't argue

00:43:14.900 that.

00:43:18.780 All right.

00:43:21.160 That is

00:43:22.600 what I want

00:43:23.120 to say.

00:43:24.160 So, I'm

00:43:24.780 seeing in the

00:43:25.800 comments, people

00:43:27.820 are saying that

00:43:28.480 you've got to

00:43:29.120 cover your

00:43:29.500 ass.

00:43:30.500 Cover your

00:43:31.000 ass.

00:43:32.200 Now, what I'm

00:43:33.120 saying to you

00:43:34.080 is that Trump

00:43:36.380 inadvertently

00:43:37.100 created a

00:43:37.720 situation where

00:43:38.500 you can

00:43:38.900 cover your

00:43:39.500 ass, but

00:43:40.880 also be

00:43:41.380 completely

00:43:41.860 honest and

00:43:42.620 transparent.

00:43:44.400 I'm not

00:43:45.140 lying when I

00:43:46.140 say that

00:43:47.900 Trump did

00:43:48.460 something very

00:43:49.140 bad this

00:43:49.700 week, and

00:43:50.600 if people want

00:43:51.240 to impeach

00:43:51.660 him for it,

00:43:52.200 I'm not going

00:43:52.600 to argue with

00:43:53.060 it.

00:43:53.520 Does that

00:43:53.960 sound like

00:43:54.500 a lie?

00:43:56.360 Do I sound

00:43:57.060 dishonest when

00:43:57.800 I say that?

00:43:59.060 Because it's a

00:43:59.860 pretty popular

00:44:00.540 opinion.

00:44:02.660 I don't know

00:44:03.360 why you would

00:44:03.800 disbelieve that.

00:44:04.760 Now, it

00:44:05.680 just happens

00:44:06.200 to cover

00:44:06.800 my ass.

00:44:08.300 Now, am

00:44:08.800 I, do I

00:44:10.360 feel bad

00:44:11.160 that the

00:44:12.300 truth also

00:44:14.560 somehow helps

00:44:15.940 me?

00:44:16.320 No, I don't

00:44:16.900 feel bad about

00:44:17.420 it.

00:44:18.100 Why should I

00:44:18.600 feel bad

00:44:19.220 that the

00:44:20.400 truth went

00:44:20.980 my way?

00:44:22.900 In a small

00:44:24.160 way.

00:44:25.640 They are

00:44:26.320 making him

00:44:26.820 disappear,

00:44:28.280 and that is,

00:44:29.400 it is amazing

00:44:30.440 to watch it

00:44:30.980 happen.

00:44:31.240 You said

00:44:35.300 fair.

00:44:37.460 Oh, I

00:44:38.020 said fair

00:44:38.520 is BS.

00:44:39.640 Yeah, I

00:44:40.220 use the word

00:44:40.800 fair in

00:44:42.100 casual

00:44:42.580 conversation

00:44:43.340 while also

00:44:44.260 believing that

00:44:45.400 it's not a

00:44:45.860 real thing.

00:44:46.840 But you

00:44:47.240 know what

00:44:47.500 fair means.

00:44:48.440 In the

00:44:49.000 context I

00:44:49.640 use it, it

00:44:50.180 means that

00:44:50.780 reasonable

00:44:52.080 people would

00:44:52.840 look at it

00:44:53.380 and say,

00:44:53.800 okay, that's

00:44:56.820 all I mean.

00:44:57.480 There's no

00:44:57.800 such thing as

00:44:58.380 actual fairness,

00:44:59.300 but there

00:45:00.520 is a

00:45:00.880 situation

00:45:01.340 where human

00:45:01.980 beings will

00:45:02.560 look at a

00:45:02.980 situation and

00:45:03.740 say, that's

00:45:04.940 okay.

00:45:06.080 Somebody says,

00:45:06.880 you're a

00:45:07.120 coward, Scott.

00:45:08.280 You're a

00:45:08.940 fucking idiot.

00:45:10.740 I'll tell you,

00:45:11.620 if you've

00:45:12.100 watched me for

00:45:12.700 four years and

00:45:13.340 you think I'm

00:45:14.020 a coward,

00:45:15.040 you're a

00:45:15.500 fucking idiot.

00:45:17.300 So maybe

00:45:17.940 catch up a

00:45:18.920 little bit and

00:45:19.380 find out what

00:45:19.960 I've been up

00:45:20.360 to.

00:45:21.680 That's one of

00:45:22.320 the dumbest

00:45:22.940 opinions on

00:45:25.040 earth right

00:45:25.500 now.

00:45:25.720 You're

00:45:28.680 buying into

00:45:29.120 the scam.

00:45:30.640 Which one?

00:45:31.660 Did you

00:45:31.960 see the

00:45:32.280 BLML

00:45:32.720 rioter that

00:45:33.560 was in

00:45:34.020 the capital?

00:45:35.500 Yeah, I

00:45:35.920 don't disbelieve

00:45:37.080 that there

00:45:37.440 were some

00:45:37.960 bad elements

00:45:39.440 who were

00:45:39.880 not MAGA

00:45:40.440 people, but

00:45:41.400 obviously there

00:45:42.120 were plenty of

00:45:42.660 MAGA people

00:45:43.140 who made it

00:45:44.000 into the

00:45:44.360 capital.

00:45:46.620 It is

00:45:47.280 wrong,

00:45:47.920 somebody says

00:45:48.420 in capitals.

00:45:51.940 Wait until

00:45:52.580 these big tech

00:45:53.100 companies start

00:45:53.680 using our

00:45:54.240 private DMs

00:45:55.420 and emails

00:45:56.020 against us.

00:45:57.040 Well, I

00:45:57.320 assume that's

00:45:57.860 going to

00:45:58.080 happen.

00:45:58.660 That feels

00:45:59.360 inevitable.

00:46:00.500 If you've

00:46:01.000 said anything

00:46:01.560 by DM or

00:46:02.700 private message,

00:46:04.780 you have to

00:46:06.340 assume that

00:46:06.800 that's all

00:46:07.320 discoverable.

00:46:09.200 My sort

00:46:11.580 of ongoing

00:46:12.340 approach for

00:46:13.460 the last

00:46:13.820 several years

00:46:14.820 anyway, is

00:46:15.940 that I don't

00:46:16.360 say anything

00:46:17.080 privately that

00:46:19.400 would end

00:46:21.060 me if it

00:46:22.160 were public.

00:46:23.600 I say bad

00:46:25.000 things publicly

00:46:25.960 in terms of

00:46:26.680 there could

00:46:28.000 be some

00:46:28.420 things that

00:46:28.880 I wouldn't

00:46:29.140 say in

00:46:29.400 public, I'll

00:46:29.880 say privately,

00:46:30.960 but none

00:46:31.460 of them would

00:46:31.820 end my

00:46:32.180 career.

00:46:32.820 They're not

00:46:33.080 that bad.

00:46:38.400 What the

00:46:39.080 jackals are

00:46:39.680 doing to

00:46:40.080 Trump is

00:46:40.740 horrible.

00:46:41.380 It is.

00:46:43.500 Yeah, the

00:46:44.080 Wall Street

00:46:44.420 Journal says

00:46:45.020 Trump isn't

00:46:45.860 guilty of

00:46:46.540 incitement, and

00:46:47.600 I agree.

00:46:48.860 From a legal

00:46:49.860 perspective, I

00:46:51.200 don't think you

00:46:51.900 can say that

00:46:52.580 anything he

00:46:53.180 said was

00:46:54.300 incitement.

00:46:55.520 What I'm

00:46:56.240 saying is he

00:46:57.100 should have

00:46:57.580 known as a

00:46:58.560 leader that it

00:46:59.780 would have an

00:47:00.320 unintended effect,

00:47:01.740 that the way he

00:47:02.820 was talking would

00:47:03.680 have the

00:47:04.040 unintended effect.

00:47:05.380 So if you

00:47:06.280 looked at what

00:47:06.740 he intended, and

00:47:08.420 you look at what

00:47:08.920 he did, there's

00:47:09.900 no mistake.

00:47:11.640 If you ask

00:47:12.500 yourself, should a

00:47:13.380 leader have

00:47:13.800 known that

00:47:15.160 those things he

00:47:15.840 did which were

00:47:16.440 technically accurate

00:47:17.820 and legal and

00:47:18.560 okay, that even

00:47:20.000 though they were

00:47:20.460 technically okay,

00:47:21.480 should he have

00:47:21.960 known it was

00:47:23.700 going to lead to

00:47:24.480 what it led to?

00:47:25.140 And the answer

00:47:25.420 is yes.

00:47:26.580 As a leader, he

00:47:27.500 should have

00:47:27.960 known that even

00:47:29.440 though he didn't

00:47:29.880 break any laws,

00:47:31.400 it was going to

00:47:32.040 lead to something

00:47:32.560 like that.

00:47:35.480 Excellent

00:47:35.880 question here.

00:47:37.320 Have you noticed

00:47:38.080 that we've all

00:47:38.740 been trained to

00:47:39.640 think past the

00:47:40.580 sale?

00:47:41.540 The sale is

00:47:42.780 that the election

00:47:43.360 was fine.

00:47:44.900 If the election

00:47:45.760 was fine, this is

00:47:46.820 the official

00:47:47.320 narrative, and as

00:47:48.420 you know, I

00:47:48.840 pledged allegiance

00:47:49.540 to it earlier,

00:47:50.460 if the official

00:47:51.680 narrative is

00:47:52.460 also true, then

00:47:54.660 what Trump is

00:47:55.380 doing is quite

00:47:56.440 destructive, and

00:47:57.760 it would look

00:47:59.080 that way.

00:48:00.140 If it turned

00:48:00.980 out, and we

00:48:01.960 can't know this,

00:48:02.900 there's no way

00:48:03.420 to know, but

00:48:04.440 hypothetically, just

00:48:05.740 as a mental

00:48:06.540 experiment, let's

00:48:07.880 say that the

00:48:08.560 election, hypothetically,

00:48:11.560 no evidence of

00:48:12.460 this that I've

00:48:13.040 seen, or at

00:48:14.000 least no proof

00:48:14.520 of it, let's

00:48:16.320 say it was

00:48:17.040 illegitimate.

00:48:18.480 then, if you

00:48:20.260 were to look at

00:48:20.820 the president's

00:48:21.620 actions, they

00:48:22.560 look a lot

00:48:22.940 different, don't

00:48:23.520 they?

00:48:24.760 What if

00:48:25.420 President Trump

00:48:26.560 is the only

00:48:27.120 one who's

00:48:27.820 right?

00:48:30.080 What if he's

00:48:30.700 the only one

00:48:31.080 who's right?

00:48:32.940 Now, of course,

00:48:33.640 many of you

00:48:34.120 would be right

00:48:34.620 too if you

00:48:35.040 think there

00:48:35.500 was something

00:48:35.760 wrong with

00:48:36.080 the election

00:48:36.500 in that

00:48:38.040 scenario, but

00:48:38.640 in terms of

00:48:39.080 the official

00:48:39.560 narrative, what

00:48:40.860 if Trump's

00:48:41.320 the only one

00:48:41.820 who's right?

00:48:42.220 You can't

00:48:44.820 rule that

00:48:45.160 out, because

00:48:46.320 have there

00:48:47.020 been other

00:48:47.560 situations where

00:48:48.460 Trump was the

00:48:49.160 only one who

00:48:49.640 was right?

00:48:51.000 Yeah.

00:48:51.940 Yeah, there

00:48:52.560 have been.

00:48:53.500 Right.

00:48:54.040 If he did

00:48:54.780 not have a

00:48:55.760 history of

00:48:57.720 fairly frequently

00:48:59.020 being the only

00:48:59.840 one who was

00:49:00.280 right, I

00:49:02.900 would say you

00:49:03.680 wouldn't have

00:49:04.040 to worry about

00:49:04.640 that.

00:49:05.180 But he does

00:49:05.940 have that

00:49:06.360 history of

00:49:07.600 going against

00:49:08.280 the crowd and

00:49:09.140 being right.

00:49:10.360 being right.

00:49:14.240 I like this

00:49:16.120 comment, buzz

00:49:17.160 your girlfriend,

00:49:18.080 woof.

00:49:20.260 She's my

00:49:21.040 wife.

00:49:25.700 You have

00:49:26.540 disappointed us

00:49:27.440 all.

00:49:28.900 I'm sorry,

00:49:29.580 Jerry French,

00:49:30.580 that I've

00:49:31.000 disappointed you.

00:49:32.420 Can you tell

00:49:32.960 me what exactly

00:49:33.800 you're disappointed

00:49:34.760 in?

00:49:35.940 Could you be

00:49:36.840 more specific?

00:49:39.200 By the way,

00:49:39.960 my follower

00:49:41.100 count went

00:49:42.860 from 666,000

00:49:45.420 to 611,000.

00:49:48.700 So I'm

00:49:52.020 dropping like

00:49:52.660 a rock.

00:49:54.440 Somebody says,

00:49:55.220 Scott is

00:49:55.800 swinging both

00:49:56.520 ways.

00:49:57.220 Now, there's

00:49:57.780 an idiot

00:49:58.220 comment.

00:49:59.340 So from

00:50:00.620 Soshu,

00:50:02.680 whatever.

00:50:03.400 So somebody

00:50:03.900 says that I'm

00:50:04.740 swinging both

00:50:05.780 ways.

00:50:07.000 Now, that's

00:50:07.620 that's a

00:50:09.040 comment from

00:50:09.560 an idiot

00:50:09.980 because a

00:50:11.920 smart person,

00:50:12.620 and I would

00:50:13.260 hope that there

00:50:13.780 would be more

00:50:14.200 smart people

00:50:14.760 than dumb

00:50:15.200 people on

00:50:15.620 here.

00:50:16.200 A smart

00:50:16.660 person would

00:50:17.240 say, well,

00:50:19.080 Trump has a

00:50:20.160 whole bunch of

00:50:20.600 pluses, but

00:50:21.820 there are some

00:50:22.300 negatives.

00:50:24.100 That's what a

00:50:24.780 smart person

00:50:25.300 would say.

00:50:26.020 A dumb

00:50:26.380 person would

00:50:26.860 say, take

00:50:27.620 aside.

00:50:28.760 Take aside,

00:50:29.660 damn it.

00:50:29.960 that's what

00:50:31.500 dumb people

00:50:31.920 say.

00:50:33.280 Taking aside

00:50:34.000 regardless of

00:50:34.980 who's right

00:50:35.400 and wrong

00:50:35.800 is stupid.

00:50:37.360 That's just

00:50:37.780 stupid.

00:50:39.000 So stupid

00:50:39.860 people should

00:50:40.560 leave this

00:50:41.560 live stream

00:50:42.180 immediately.

00:50:42.820 If you think

00:50:43.380 I should just

00:50:43.860 take aside,

00:50:45.620 that's stupid.

00:50:47.940 What about

00:50:48.640 personal

00:50:49.040 responsibility

00:50:49.640 of the crowd?

00:50:51.420 You could

00:50:51.820 have more

00:50:52.220 than one

00:50:52.640 person

00:50:52.940 responsible.

00:50:53.920 The people

00:50:54.260 can be

00:50:54.680 personally

00:50:55.240 responsible

00:50:55.960 and legally

00:50:57.160 responsible

00:50:57.760 for whatever

00:50:58.800 they did.

00:50:59.620 At the

00:50:59.940 same time,

00:51:01.680 you could

00:51:02.080 have a

00:51:02.520 president

00:51:02.840 who's

00:51:03.220 inspiring

00:51:03.660 them.

00:51:07.220 Yeah, it

00:51:07.800 is funny

00:51:08.120 that my

00:51:08.680 follower

00:51:09.560 count stopped

00:51:11.440 at 666.

00:51:14.720 Do you

00:51:15.260 feel a

00:51:15.680 dealer should

00:51:16.320 be convicted

00:51:17.040 for an

00:51:17.740 overdose?

00:51:18.980 Well, I

00:51:19.580 don't think

00:51:20.060 that the

00:51:20.800 legal standard

00:51:21.820 should be

00:51:22.500 applied to

00:51:23.220 the presidency.

00:51:24.060 So that

00:51:24.380 would be

00:51:24.680 bad at

00:51:25.500 using analogies.

00:51:27.380 So every

00:51:27.960 time you

00:51:28.340 say,

00:51:28.800 but Scott,

00:51:29.820 what about

00:51:30.600 this

00:51:30.880 completely

00:51:31.340 different

00:51:31.760 situation?

00:51:33.200 My answer

00:51:33.780 is always

00:51:34.160 going to

00:51:34.380 be the

00:51:34.660 same.

00:51:35.360 That's

00:51:35.680 a

00:51:35.780 different

00:51:36.000 situation.

00:51:37.380 But Scott,

00:51:38.480 what about

00:51:38.960 this other

00:51:39.700 different

00:51:40.180 situation

00:51:40.860 to which

00:51:41.560 I,

00:51:42.660 I bet

00:51:42.960 you can

00:51:43.280 anticipate

00:51:43.720 it,

00:51:44.460 say,

00:51:44.900 well,

00:51:45.040 that's

00:51:45.240 just

00:51:45.420 another

00:51:45.720 different

00:51:46.080 situation.

00:51:47.240 But if

00:51:47.620 you want

00:51:47.840 to talk

00:51:48.100 about

00:51:48.300 this

00:51:48.620 situation,

00:51:49.380 I'd

00:51:49.640 be

00:51:49.760 happy

00:51:49.960 to.

00:51:50.540 If

00:51:50.920 you're

00:51:51.060 talking

00:51:51.240 about

00:51:51.460 personal

00:51:51.900 responsibility

00:51:52.540 of,

00:51:53.140 let's

00:51:53.460 say,

00:51:53.620 a drug

00:51:53.920 overdose,

00:51:54.300 the law

00:51:56.180 requires,

00:51:58.960 defines who

00:52:00.760 has responsibility

00:52:01.500 for what.

00:52:02.900 If the

00:52:03.660 dealer,

00:52:04.160 in your

00:52:04.580 example,

00:52:05.760 sold somebody

00:52:06.720 that they

00:52:07.140 thought was

00:52:07.740 Xanax,

00:52:08.460 but turned

00:52:08.980 out to be

00:52:09.520 fentanyl,

00:52:10.520 and the

00:52:11.100 person died

00:52:11.720 from it,

00:52:12.180 I do think

00:52:12.720 the dealer

00:52:14.100 should be

00:52:14.500 executed,

00:52:15.700 in my opinion.

00:52:17.460 So does that

00:52:18.060 answer your

00:52:18.420 question?

00:52:18.680 Now I

00:52:19.460 think the

00:52:19.780 person who

00:52:20.160 takes it

00:52:20.720 also has

00:52:21.940 complete

00:52:22.880 responsibility

00:52:23.540 for their

00:52:24.140 own

00:52:24.360 decisions,

00:52:25.400 but at

00:52:26.120 the same

00:52:26.440 time,

00:52:27.100 the person

00:52:27.480 who sold

00:52:28.560 them Xanax

00:52:29.240 that was

00:52:29.600 really deadly

00:52:30.200 fentanyl,

00:52:31.260 and ended

00:52:31.760 up killing

00:52:32.200 them,

00:52:32.960 I think

00:52:33.320 they should

00:52:33.600 be executed.

00:52:35.820 That's

00:52:36.340 just my

00:52:36.660 opinion.

00:52:41.800 People

00:52:42.320 with

00:52:42.560 cognitive

00:52:43.040 dissonance

00:52:43.680 either

00:52:44.320 change

00:52:44.760 their

00:52:45.000 minds

00:52:45.440 or change

00:52:46.260 the

00:52:46.460 interpretation,

00:52:47.340 right?

00:52:47.900 But it's

00:52:48.480 not cognitive

00:52:49.180 dissonance

00:52:49.780 if you

00:52:50.100 change

00:52:50.380 your

00:52:50.540 mind.

00:52:51.800 It's

00:52:52.040 only

00:52:52.240 cognitive

00:52:52.660 dissonance

00:52:53.140 if you

00:52:53.420 change

00:52:53.720 your

00:52:53.920 hallucination

00:52:54.960 that holds

00:52:55.320 it all

00:52:55.580 together.

00:52:57.340 Any

00:52:57.680 comments on

00:52:58.300 Twitter

00:52:58.540 versus

00:52:58.960 Gab?

00:52:59.460 No,

00:52:59.780 I think

00:53:00.140 Gab and

00:53:00.700 Parler

00:53:01.040 are all

00:53:01.940 doomed.

00:53:03.220 And by

00:53:03.480 the way,

00:53:03.940 I sometimes

00:53:07.360 tell you

00:53:07.900 that I

00:53:08.380 know the

00:53:09.260 news before

00:53:09.920 you do.

00:53:11.200 The news

00:53:12.080 about

00:53:12.420 Parler

00:53:12.960 and Gab

00:53:13.720 getting in

00:53:14.780 trouble,

00:53:15.460 I knew

00:53:16.020 months ago,

00:53:18.480 and I

00:53:20.880 knew it

00:53:21.200 from,

00:53:22.420 I won't

00:53:23.460 even tell

00:53:23.820 you who

00:53:24.080 told me

00:53:24.500 because that

00:53:25.240 would be

00:53:25.520 funny.

00:53:27.320 Let's

00:53:27.800 just say

00:53:28.160 that somebody

00:53:29.020 who would

00:53:31.040 know told

00:53:32.520 me months

00:53:33.100 ago that

00:53:34.520 Parler and

00:53:35.180 Gab would

00:53:35.700 either have

00:53:36.140 to turn

00:53:36.560 into Twitter,

00:53:37.420 in other

00:53:37.660 words,

00:53:37.880 act the

00:53:38.260 same way

00:53:38.620 they do,

00:53:39.400 or they

00:53:39.860 would go

00:53:40.380 on a

00:53:40.620 business

00:53:40.960 because if

00:53:42.420 you let

00:53:42.700 the Nazis

00:53:43.180 on,

00:53:43.620 et cetera,

00:53:44.320 they'll be

00:53:45.000 canceled.

00:53:45.940 So I

00:53:46.440 knew that

00:53:46.800 months ago.

00:53:47.340 There was

00:53:48.020 no other

00:53:48.440 way it

00:53:48.740 was going

00:53:49.040 to go,

00:53:49.880 that Parler

00:53:50.360 and Gab

00:53:50.840 were going

00:53:51.260 to either

00:53:51.660 become filled

00:53:53.060 with Nazis

00:53:53.720 and canceled,

00:53:55.200 or they

00:53:56.140 have to act

00:53:56.640 exactly like

00:53:57.460 Twitter,

00:53:58.680 and then

00:53:59.120 there's no

00:53:59.520 point in

00:53:59.880 them existing.

00:54:00.760 So there

00:54:01.220 was never

00:54:01.580 a path

00:54:02.120 for Parler

00:54:03.400 or Gab

00:54:04.060 to ever

00:54:04.460 succeed.

00:54:05.740 Now I

00:54:06.100 knew that

00:54:06.440 months ago

00:54:07.040 because somebody

00:54:08.380 who was

00:54:08.820 smarter

00:54:09.840 just told

00:54:11.680 me.

00:54:12.680 And the

00:54:13.240 first time I

00:54:13.740 heard it,

00:54:14.100 I was like,

00:54:14.440 oh,

00:54:16.460 yeah,

00:54:17.400 there's no

00:54:17.800 other way

00:54:18.160 that can

00:54:18.540 go.

00:54:19.700 They're

00:54:20.020 either going

00:54:20.520 to become

00:54:20.880 Twitter,

00:54:21.340 in which

00:54:21.620 case they

00:54:22.360 don't need

00:54:22.800 any reason

00:54:23.260 to exist,

00:54:24.240 or they're

00:54:25.160 going to

00:54:25.380 go the

00:54:26.040 other way

00:54:26.540 and they

00:54:26.940 have to

00:54:27.320 get canceled

00:54:27.760 because they

00:54:28.140 would be

00:54:28.300 full of

00:54:28.620 Nazis and

00:54:29.220 they would

00:54:29.960 lose their

00:54:30.360 banking.

00:54:30.840 It was

00:54:31.000 all obvious.

00:54:31.740 It was

00:54:31.960 obvious months

00:54:32.940 ago that we

00:54:34.140 would be

00:54:34.540 exactly where

00:54:35.320 we are

00:54:35.620 now.

00:54:35.920 have you

00:54:41.400 finalized

00:54:41.860 your

00:54:42.020 California

00:54:42.540 escape

00:54:43.020 yet?

00:54:44.200 Yeah,

00:54:44.560 I've got

00:54:44.960 too many

00:54:45.420 ties in

00:54:46.080 California.

00:54:46.720 That

00:54:46.820 wouldn't

00:54:47.060 be good.

00:54:48.980 I haven't

00:54:49.540 seen Arnold

00:54:50.100 Schwarzenegger's

00:54:50.960 thing yet,

00:54:51.720 but I

00:54:53.360 don't really

00:54:53.740 care what

00:54:54.180 his opinion

00:54:54.640 is on

00:54:55.160 this.

00:54:57.800 Too

00:54:58.280 little

00:54:58.580 faith,

00:54:59.520 Scott.

00:54:59.900 I don't

00:55:00.160 really operate

00:55:00.720 on faith.

00:55:02.160 I don't

00:55:02.360 know if

00:55:03.100 you've

00:55:03.300 noticed.

00:55:04.400 It's

00:55:04.580 not really

00:55:05.000 a good

00:55:05.280 way.

00:55:05.920 Gab has

00:55:08.820 survived

00:55:09.340 without an

00:55:10.040 app,

00:55:10.660 but it's

00:55:11.220 not very

00:55:11.800 vital at

00:55:13.340 the moment.

00:55:14.620 Whatever,

00:55:15.640 but my

00:55:16.580 point stands,

00:55:17.940 Gab doesn't

00:55:18.760 have a

00:55:19.100 purpose unless

00:55:20.700 it can be

00:55:21.240 free speech,

00:55:21.960 and it

00:55:22.200 can't.

00:55:23.100 We don't

00:55:23.560 live in a

00:55:23.940 world where

00:55:24.240 it can.

00:55:24.660 The banking

00:55:25.100 system would

00:55:26.640 just close

00:55:27.040 them down.

00:55:29.100 Parlors

00:55:29.540 getting their

00:55:30.000 own servers,

00:55:30.840 well, good

00:55:31.240 luck with

00:55:31.580 that.

00:55:34.160 Even if

00:55:34.860 they get

00:55:35.240 their own

00:55:35.560 servers,

00:55:36.260 it seems

00:55:36.580 like there

00:55:36.900 would be

00:55:37.100 enough

00:55:37.460 related

00:55:38.640 companies and

00:55:39.740 advertisers who

00:55:40.860 don't want to

00:55:41.220 advertise.

00:55:42.100 I just don't

00:55:42.800 see how the

00:55:43.200 business model

00:55:43.760 could work.

00:55:45.280 The other

00:55:45.800 possibility is

00:55:47.200 locals.

00:55:51.460 Locals is

00:55:52.080 where I

00:55:52.680 have my

00:55:53.980 content.

00:55:55.020 If I get

00:55:55.460 banned from

00:55:56.000 any of this

00:55:56.440 stuff, you

00:55:56.840 can find me

00:55:57.340 there.

00:55:57.600 It's a

00:55:57.840 subscription

00:55:58.300 service.

00:55:59.900 We're

00:56:00.200 looking at

00:56:00.820 doing groups

00:56:01.680 subscriptions.

00:56:03.940 Subscriptions,

00:56:04.560 yeah.

00:56:05.220 So right

00:56:05.620 now you

00:56:06.140 subscribe to

00:56:07.420 each creator

00:56:08.420 you want to

00:56:08.860 follow, but

00:56:09.940 we have to

00:56:10.380 figure out how

00:56:10.880 to package it

00:56:11.780 better so

00:56:12.280 that you can

00:56:12.960 get more

00:56:13.320 creators.

00:56:15.040 Scott, are

00:56:15.660 you Scottish?

00:56:17.380 I am.

00:56:19.200 Just a little

00:56:19.960 bit.

00:56:20.620 Just a little

00:56:21.180 bit of

00:56:21.560 Scottish.

00:56:22.080 When I

00:56:26.760 saw the

00:56:27.180 mass

00:56:27.520 mail-in

00:56:28.100 scam get

00:56:28.780 normalized, I

00:56:29.920 don't know

00:56:30.140 what that's

00:56:30.500 about.

00:56:35.300 Okay,

00:56:35.980 somebody says

00:56:36.500 gab works,

00:56:37.700 gab works,

00:56:38.480 gab works,

00:56:39.040 okay.

00:56:42.440 What about

00:56:43.160 Italy?

00:56:44.180 The Italy

00:56:45.060 story.

00:56:46.720 So I

00:56:47.100 tweeted,

00:56:48.400 or retweeted

00:56:49.260 a tweet by

00:56:50.040 the

00:56:53.100 Overstock

00:56:53.840 CEO

00:56:54.400 Byrne,

00:56:55.440 and he

00:56:56.420 seems to

00:56:56.820 be the

00:56:57.280 smartest

00:56:57.820 person who

00:56:59.380 is making

00:57:00.040 these claims.

00:57:01.280 So there's

00:57:02.080 claims about

00:57:02.880 something in

00:57:03.500 Italy that

00:57:04.440 somehow affected

00:57:05.500 our elections.

00:57:06.500 Now here's my

00:57:07.360 take on that.

00:57:08.460 If that

00:57:09.320 story is

00:57:10.000 true,

00:57:11.400 that Italy

00:57:12.060 was involved

00:57:12.820 in affecting

00:57:14.360 our elections,

00:57:15.360 if it's

00:57:16.180 true,

00:57:17.060 it will be

00:57:17.600 the first

00:57:18.180 time in my

00:57:18.940 memory

00:57:19.340 that a

00:57:20.460 story that

00:57:20.980 has that

00:57:21.520 vibe is

00:57:23.320 true.

00:57:24.640 Right?

00:57:25.120 So when I

00:57:25.800 say a

00:57:26.260 story that

00:57:26.700 has that

00:57:27.320 vibe,

00:57:28.960 let me

00:57:29.300 give you

00:57:29.520 an example.

00:57:30.920 If somebody

00:57:31.420 said tomorrow

00:57:32.060 that a

00:57:33.120 large ape-like

00:57:34.400 creature had

00:57:35.200 been discovered

00:57:35.760 in the wild,

00:57:37.180 living forever,

00:57:39.180 and I'd say,

00:57:39.920 you mean

00:57:40.140 Bigfoot?

00:57:41.400 And then the

00:57:41.860 person would

00:57:42.220 say, no,

00:57:42.560 no, not

00:57:42.940 Bigfoot.

00:57:43.760 It's a

00:57:44.240 different creature.

00:57:45.620 It's a

00:57:45.880 dinosaur.

00:57:46.780 Let's say a

00:57:47.200 dinosaur.

00:57:47.560 Somebody says,

00:57:48.960 we discovered

00:57:49.440 a full-sized

00:57:50.300 dinosaur,

00:57:51.280 and it's

00:57:51.920 been living

00:57:52.400 the whole

00:57:52.820 time in

00:57:53.600 Iceland.

00:57:54.720 We'll just

00:57:55.000 pick a

00:57:55.340 place.

00:57:56.500 Would you

00:57:57.020 believe that?

00:57:58.580 Probably not.

00:58:00.180 In other

00:58:00.560 words, it's a

00:58:01.180 story that

00:58:02.360 has a vibe

00:58:03.300 to it that

00:58:04.720 you would

00:58:05.140 just say,

00:58:05.880 I don't

00:58:06.700 know if I

00:58:07.160 even need

00:58:07.540 to research

00:58:08.080 this, because

00:58:09.160 I don't

00:58:09.460 think a

00:58:09.980 full-sized

00:58:10.520 dinosaur has

00:58:11.300 been found

00:58:11.880 in Iceland.

00:58:13.740 So there's

00:58:14.500 some things

00:58:14.960 that just

00:58:15.260 by their

00:58:15.660 vibe, you

00:58:16.900 say, I

00:58:17.920 don't feel

00:58:18.480 like I

00:58:18.880 have to

00:58:19.240 research this

00:58:20.000 one.

00:58:20.740 I feel

00:58:21.220 like I

00:58:21.660 can just

00:58:22.220 brush this

00:58:23.940 one aside.

00:58:25.000 So the

00:58:25.660 Italy story

00:58:26.280 has that

00:58:26.840 vibe to

00:58:27.880 me.

00:58:28.700 It sounds

00:58:29.240 exactly like

00:58:30.640 a story

00:58:31.020 that's not

00:58:31.520 true.

00:58:32.880 But it

00:58:33.880 is 2021,

00:58:35.460 and we've

00:58:36.200 been surprised

00:58:36.900 before.

00:58:37.360 Yeah, Patrick

00:58:37.860 Byrne, I

00:58:38.280 couldn't remember

00:58:38.740 his first

00:58:39.100 name.

00:58:39.740 So if you

00:58:40.280 look into

00:58:40.660 Patrick Byrne,

00:58:41.440 you'll find

00:58:43.080 out he

00:58:43.720 has some

00:58:44.360 serious

00:58:44.840 academic

00:58:45.440 credentials,

00:58:47.020 probably

00:58:47.700 literally a

00:58:48.860 genius IQ,

00:58:49.800 I think is

00:58:50.620 fair to

00:58:51.540 say, and

00:58:52.560 he's looked

00:58:52.920 into it.

00:58:54.820 So if

00:58:56.020 somebody with

00:58:56.740 those credentials

00:58:57.640 and that

00:58:58.140 level of

00:58:58.700 intelligence

00:58:59.360 looks into

00:59:00.440 something and

00:59:01.100 makes a

00:59:01.500 claim, should

00:59:02.160 you take it

00:59:02.580 seriously?

00:59:03.420 Well, you

00:59:03.940 should take

00:59:04.260 it seriously

00:59:04.720 enough to

00:59:05.240 look into

00:59:05.640 it, for

00:59:06.340 sure.

00:59:07.080 I mean, he

00:59:07.460 certainly has

00:59:08.840 earned that

00:59:09.740 level of

00:59:10.300 credibility.

00:59:11.440 that a

00:59:12.060 claim with

00:59:12.680 specifics, and

00:59:13.680 you know, he

00:59:14.500 claims some

00:59:15.040 background, we

00:59:15.620 should look

00:59:15.940 into it.

00:59:17.100 So I'm

00:59:17.800 fully in

00:59:18.560 favor of, well,

00:59:19.940 let's see

00:59:20.200 what's there.

00:59:21.240 But I

00:59:21.600 would say

00:59:21.860 that about

00:59:22.200 everything.

00:59:23.260 If he

00:59:23.860 asked me to

00:59:24.420 bet on

00:59:24.880 it, I

00:59:25.980 would put a

00:59:26.580 pretty big

00:59:27.360 bet on

00:59:27.820 that not

00:59:28.180 being true.

00:59:29.720 Pretty big

00:59:30.540 bet.

00:59:31.220 I'd probably

00:59:31.820 give you a

00:59:32.360 10 to 1

00:59:32.940 odds.

00:59:34.180 So I'd

00:59:34.440 probably bet

00:59:34.960 $100

00:59:35.400 against losing

00:59:37.900 $1,000

00:59:38.440 that it's

00:59:39.240 not true.

00:59:40.720 Could it

00:59:41.140 be true?

00:59:41.940 Well, it

00:59:42.300 falls into

00:59:42.700 the category

00:59:43.200 of, I

00:59:43.800 suppose,

00:59:44.120 anything's

00:59:44.540 possible.

00:59:45.300 But it

00:59:45.860 doesn't have

00:59:46.440 the feel of

00:59:47.440 something that's

00:59:48.020 true.

00:59:49.000 That's all I

00:59:49.640 know for

00:59:49.980 sure.

00:59:51.540 All right.

00:59:52.700 That's all I

00:59:53.300 got for now,

00:59:53.940 and I will

00:59:54.440 talk to you

00:59:55.000 tomorrow.

00:59:56.320 good to know.

00:59:57.000 Now, you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 11, 2021

Episode 1249 Scott Adams： Join Me in a Pledge of Allegiance to the Official Narrative, and I Teach Democrats How to Disavow Violence

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript