Episode 1251 Scott Adams： Wuhan Lab Allegations, the Coup Persuasion Success, and my Little White Pineal Gland
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 11 minutes
Words per Minute
150.36832
Summary
In this episode of the podcast, I talk about the coronavirus pandemic and how it has changed the way we look at the world, and what it will do in the future, and why we should be worried about it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
hey everybody come on in come on in it's all gonna be fun and good news today no bad news today
00:00:11.380
it's all good it's all about the brainwashing and the mental games the psychology oh it's gonna be
00:00:18.680
good but first we'll need the simultaneous sip to get ready for this awesomeness best part of
00:00:26.280
the day and all you need is a cup or a mug a glass of tanker gels or stein a canteen jug or a plastic
00:00:30.280
vessel of any kind filled with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for the
00:00:37.860
unparalleled pleasure the dopamine here of the day the thing that makes everything better yeah it does
00:00:43.240
it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now go
00:00:55.180
so one of the uh unintended consequences of the coronavirus and the school shutdowns and all of
00:01:05.280
that is that uh states are breaking out all over the place trying to assert their assert their ability
00:01:13.660
to allow students to choose where they go to school what the biggest two stories in the country
00:01:22.440
in terms of how important they will be to the future largely ignored are you watching all the
00:01:30.400
headlines about the uh all the movement toward uh breaking the let's say the monopoly that the
00:01:37.700
teachers unions have on schools there's a lot happening a lot a lot of states moving forward with
00:01:44.440
saying hey let's let's propose at least funding the students so lots of action lots of proposals
00:01:50.800
imagine if school choice could become real realer so that you have real school school choice for
00:01:59.480
everybody that would solve most of our problems it would take a big bite out of uh systemic racism
00:02:07.180
let's say every kid gets a good education or can that takes a lot of problems away right and it's the
00:02:14.400
teachers unions that prevent that good thing from happening but they're having a lot of problems now
00:02:19.780
because they're keeping the schools closed and i would guess this will lead to less support for
00:02:25.580
teachers unions and more support for choice so that's a gigantic story if it goes the right way
00:02:32.460
gigantic transforms the country protects us forever i mean it's really big the other one is that the
00:02:40.740
uh the government and i don't know what the trump administration can make permanent but at least in
00:02:46.160
terms of current priorities uh the government has decided to go big on small uh nuclear reactors to be used
00:02:56.000
for space now you don't realize yet how big a deal that is but if the government is decided that nuclear
00:03:04.900
power is necessary for space space force space exploration space defense and it is that means that our
00:03:14.240
domestic industry will get a big boost because they'll do a lot of things in maybe the government
00:03:20.540
sector for military and that will almost certainly create smaller cheaper better new technology
00:03:28.320
reactors that might even be safe from meltdown so that is something that would affect uh climate change
00:03:37.720
no matter what you thought about the actual risk of that it will change our whole energy structure it
00:03:42.800
changes our defense posture in the future gigantic you take those two stories just the nuclear energy for
00:03:52.020
space and how that will ripple through everything and then just the school choice stuff that's
00:03:59.580
springing up everywhere and like lots of little flowers those are transformative golden age
00:04:07.620
almost almost almost have i told you before that uh you should expect a demolition phase
00:04:17.280
before rebuilding because there was already stuff here the united states already exists you don't you
00:04:24.340
don't have a green field where you say well imagine we build something from nothing you don't have
00:04:29.180
that option you gotta you have to do demolition and i feel as if 2020 was a year of demolition
00:04:35.780
now some of it wasn't our choice right coronavirus just made us rethink every assumption which was
00:04:43.520
a really bad pandemic but what is the unintended consequence if you will of rethinking every assumption
00:04:54.020
it's really good it's really really good like really really so good you can't even wrap your head
00:05:03.080
around it the pandemic is nothing but bad in terms of what it's doing to us at the moment but making us
00:05:10.600
rethink from scratch every assumption about commuting what is the nature of school how do we interact do we
00:05:20.200
shake hands i mean just everything medicine how we deliver medicine how we make vaccines i mean a lot
00:05:29.000
changed but we're still in the middle of the fight so when you're middle in the middle of the fight against
00:05:34.460
the pandemic that's where your concentration is but if you just took a moment just take a moment
00:05:40.580
to just rise above it a little bit look at it from 35 000 feet just get a little distance from it
00:05:47.540
there is something amazing that is forming now are there also bad things that we have to watch out for
00:05:57.560
that are forming oh yeah there are oh yeah but we'll talk about that too it's all optimism today
00:06:05.880
i'm feeling good about america uh part of it is that the things that are going wrong are just sort of
00:06:11.840
funny they're they're sort of laughably funny problems i'll get i'll tell you a few of those in a bit
00:06:18.400
uh apparently mike pompeo allegedly he's going to report today that we have dramatic new evidence about
00:06:27.220
the virus allegedly leaking from a wuhan lab but the biggest part of it the bombshell part
00:06:33.660
is that the allegation includes the fact that they quote cultured the virus now i don't know what they
00:06:41.540
mean by cultured the virus i assume that means it's at least modified or created by humans right
00:06:51.800
so it's at the very least modified now that would be new information right it's something that we
00:06:58.140
suspected it's not something that's ever been confirmed but just to make it interesting great
00:07:04.420
britain is saying it's not true so britain says it is not a credible source of intel and that they
00:07:11.960
don't believe that it has shown that it is a cultured virus or that it even came from the wuhan lab lab
00:07:18.640
so you've got allegedly we haven't seen it yet but this is the reporting that mike pompeo will say
00:07:25.160
we have new evidence that wuhan was the source of the leak and that they had cultured the virus
00:07:30.720
so it was at least partially man man human modified let's say less sexist and
00:07:37.380
great britain says their intel people say that's not true so who are you going to believe
00:07:45.140
so you've got our intel agencies as stark contrast to the british intel agencies so who do you trust
00:07:54.440
which one of them is the credible one neither neither our our intelligence agencies aren't credible for
00:08:04.820
this kind of story there might be some kind of things for which our intelligence agencies are credible
00:08:11.780
by its nature i suppose but this isn't one of them if your own intelligence agency tells you something like this
00:08:20.580
and there's no source and there's no document they can show you
00:08:24.000
i wouldn't trust it this is weapons of mass destruction all over again there is zero credibility
00:08:32.380
to the mike pompeo story unless you see it with your own eyes if mike pompeo goes on tv or whatever
00:08:41.380
and says we have secret intelligence information that i can't share with you
00:08:46.320
it means nothing you should put zero credibility on that now what about great britain if i'm saying
00:08:56.340
there's zero credibility am i agreeing with great britain and therefore great britain is the credible
00:09:03.720
one no no great britain's intelligence agencies are not credible not even a little bit in fact
00:09:13.380
their job is to fool people if you're taking as your model of credibility somebody whose entire job
00:09:21.920
is to fool people well you're not really smart so you have two intelligence agencies on opposite sides
00:09:28.480
of the story and neither of them have any credibility so what do you do with that i'm planning to ignore it
00:09:36.800
and you can make your own decision but i would say this is a story about no information hello the
00:09:44.700
breaking headline is today we have no credible information on anything whatsoever that's the news
00:09:52.280
if you're interpreting it as hey i think i just found out something about wuhan uh no we don't live in a
00:10:02.780
world where you can trust our intelligence agencies on this kind of question at all like zero is exactly
00:10:11.400
the right amount of trust which doesn't mean it's not true by the way if you think i'm saying it's not
00:10:17.520
true that it escaped from the lab or it's not true that it was cultured i don't know i don't have an
00:10:25.840
opinion on that but i know i can't trust anybody else's opinion that i know all right um so it looks like
00:10:34.860
new york city is canceling their contracts with the trump organization for their their iconic central park
00:10:41.080
skating rink and something else in retaliation over the mega mob capital riot what is the unintended
00:10:50.580
consequence of people punishing the trump business for something they didn't like about trump's uh role
00:11:00.200
as president doesn't that pretty much guarantee that you don't get business people running for president
00:11:06.060
anymore let me ask you if i ran for president should i expect that my income would go up or down
00:11:14.720
you already know the answer to that it would go down anybody who already has some established kind
00:11:22.580
of a business would be crazy to go into politics watching what happened to trump now if trump had gone
00:11:29.560
through his term and simply been loved or hated in whatever degree you know he was and then they
00:11:37.320
just said okay but now you go back to your private industry and that's you know that's just separate
00:11:41.500
just do what you want to do that would be fair but the moment you make it acceptable i mean new york
00:11:48.580
city's uh government is doing this in public and bragging about it they're they're not it's not like it's
00:11:55.480
undercover i think they're actually publicly punishing him for his political actions in his business
00:12:04.560
is that the standard you want why would anybody successful run for president if they could if their
00:12:12.500
business will be punished because of their decisions remember half of the country is going to hate
00:12:17.320
whatever you do why would you go into a situation where half the country is going to put you out of
00:12:23.380
business even if they half loves you i wouldn't do it uh a number of people have been asking me to run
00:12:30.460
for president uh partly because the republicans have no more leadership i'm not even a republican
00:12:38.380
that would be sort of the first requirement i would think to run for president as a republican
00:12:44.100
um i would be an excellent choice but i'm not crazy enough to take that job i can't think of anything
00:12:51.800
that would make me want to do that job i mean i love my country but i'm not going to walk into a suicide
00:12:58.880
don't love it that much let me say let me say that clearly in case you didn't hear it i love my country
00:13:06.780
but i'm not going to intentionally run into a buzzsaw that i don't have to run into so i'm not going to run
00:13:13.780
for office that would be stupid for me now if you don't have money and so you don't have a business
00:13:20.420
to lose and your life is politics well that seems safer here's the funniest story you probably saw this
00:13:29.840
if you watched tucker carlson or saw some of the video clips so joe biden so far has the worst start
00:13:38.080
to a presidency i've ever seen now i've only seen presidents during my lifetime but i've never seen
00:13:45.240
a worse start and here's another example of it uh not so not only you know did he start by calling
00:13:52.040
half of the country a bunch of racists which if he did nothing else that would be the worst start of
00:13:57.080
any presidency but it gets better he just appointed to the head of department of justice civil rights
00:14:04.000
prosecution so the person responsible for prosecuting civil rights uh violations in this country at
00:14:11.980
the federal level i guess um had once written a uh an article while she was at harvard so the good news
00:14:22.360
is she went to harvard so when you hear that biden is uh is putting people in place who uh went to harvard
00:14:32.080
that sounds okay at least there that's proof that they have high intelligence and are capable of
00:14:38.900
succeeding so so far so good but let's see did she say anything that uh would be say controversial
00:14:46.240
or does she have any history or background saying something that would not make her let's say
00:14:53.360
the perfect choice for the head of the department of justice civil rights prosecution what could that be
00:15:01.540
something maybe in that domain that she may have said at some point in the past that would have some
00:15:07.800
relevance to the current job situation because you know one of the big complaints about trump
00:15:14.680
is they didn't make good hiring decisions now i've semi defended that by saying he didn't have many choices
00:15:21.360
because people didn't want to work for him because of the reputation so therefore he had a small pool of
00:15:27.040
people who were even willing to take the job so that was part of trump's problem and i've also said
00:15:32.760
that he fires better and firing is the real skill when you hire people you're kind of guessing
00:15:39.040
like ah they've never done this exact job but i feel like they could that's sort of guessing
00:15:44.720
but when they don't do the job well the firing is the skill part it's like okay pull the trigger
00:15:51.660
and he was good at that trump's a good firer but how's biden doing so he picked somebody for the
00:15:59.220
head of the doj civil rights prosecution who had once written a paper saying that black citizens she
00:16:07.100
happens to be african-american that's important to the story she says that blacks black people are
00:16:13.440
superior to white people mentally physically and spiritually and that there's a good reason for that
00:16:20.080
it's because their pineal gland doesn't have enough uh melanin or something um now i don't need to tell
00:16:30.720
you the science does not back her opinion i also don't know if she still holds the opinion because
00:16:38.060
this was a while ago right so if you're in college you can say some you can say some dumb stuff in
00:16:43.420
college i don't mind that and i've suggested the 20 year rule the 20 year rule is you just ignore
00:16:50.020
anything that happened 20 years ago but that would kind of depend on her disavowing it today
00:16:57.860
yeah has she ever retracted that is exactly the story had she retracted and said you know that was
00:17:05.960
just a dumb thing it was just a college thing i was just being you know i was being academic i was
00:17:12.560
trying to be provocative i don't hold those views now if she had said that i would at least
00:17:19.840
attempt to be consistent with my view that the 20 year rule should apply to whatever dumb ass
00:17:26.320
racist thing usually it's racist but whatever racist or homophobic thing you said 20 years ago
00:17:32.020
you're probably a different person by now and if you're a different person by now maybe you should
00:17:37.860
be judged by who you are instead of something else
00:17:41.840
but what could be funnier than joe biden who is one of his big claims to fame is that he does good
00:17:53.900
hiring compared to trump and he hires somebody who literally says that black people are superior
00:17:59.760
mentally physically and spiritually because of some science that isn't real science
00:18:05.140
you need to retract that really hard i don't know how much of a retraction you'd need to hear to feel
00:18:13.760
that it was real but i think you need a pretty serious retraction on that one if she if she wholeheartedly
00:18:21.660
disavowed her old views i would still hate it but i would want to be consistent with my views on
00:18:30.800
republicans and everybody else which is if it was 20 years ago and you don't hold that view now
00:18:37.220
i'm gonna let it go but she hasn't repudiated repudiated it so at the moment it's just it's
00:18:45.800
hilarious how how incompetent this is i mean how incompetent would you have to be to pick this person
00:18:52.840
for that job that's like the ultimate presidential incompetence and let me tell you i love being just a
00:19:00.160
critic it was so much harder when i was trying to put a you know the persuasion spin on trump and say
00:19:07.340
well yeah he said this but you have to understand how this is going to work out that was hard work
00:19:13.380
criticizing biden for being a dummy is really fun and easy so my workload went down about 50 percent
00:19:25.300
this is so dumb that when i read it you're not even going to believe this is true but i swear to god
00:19:31.980
this is true uh you know there's facial recognition apps now and law enforcement is using them to figure
00:19:38.560
out you know who was in the capital and also other stuff and apparently the lapd has announced that they
00:19:46.700
will allow a technology that uses a database of existing mugshots um so that they're okay with using a
00:19:55.240
database of existing mugshots and facial recognition against their small existing database
00:20:01.380
because that's they only have mugshots they don't have everybody else in the world who is not
00:20:05.940
in a mugshot but they're not going to use clear view or or tools like it clear view sort of the leader
00:20:14.480
in terms of accuracy there but um clear view has trained its technology and they use this is the
00:20:24.240
right phrase trained its technology on three billion photos now people think that clear view stores the
00:20:31.040
photos like they've scraped them and they've got a database of all the photos that didn't happen
00:20:36.120
clear view doesn't store any photos they have looked at all the photos and turned them into
00:20:43.420
a formula or an algorithm or a mathematical construct so what they store is math they don't have a photo
00:20:52.800
of you in their database they've got math that was a result of your facial features so that's all they
00:20:59.800
have is math and then that math becomes a pointer to where on the internet the actual public information
00:21:06.620
is you on on facebook etc so lapd has decided that they will use facial recognition but only on a tool
00:21:16.200
that hardly ever works so they've decided that they won't use a reliable tool that could find pretty
00:21:24.080
much everybody i mean close to 100 so they that's evil so they're not going to use the evil tool that is
00:21:32.420
100 effective or near it but they will use the evil tool because it's the same thing it's still
00:21:38.380
facial recognition right they will use the one that doesn't work now that sounds like i made that up
00:21:45.060
doesn't it but we're actually in a world where an entity will announce proudly they proudly announced
00:21:54.900
that they will use the tool that is if i had to put a a number on it maybe five percent as good as clearview
00:22:04.860
but the same technology in this not the same technology but in the sense that they're both facial recognition
00:22:11.720
this is happening this is actually happening like out loud right in front of us we choose to use the one
00:22:20.760
that's five percent effective it's equally evil you know if you think facial recognition is evil
00:22:26.220
that's what it is and they're not hiding it it is facial recognition but they only want to use the
00:22:32.880
one that doesn't work and they said that in public
00:22:35.520
what somebody says clearview is intrusive well it's facial recognition that works
00:22:45.240
it's only more intrusive than other things because it works better that's the only thing that makes
00:22:51.920
it different anyway i thought that was funny um scientists have done an experiment with snails
00:23:00.340
and they found that they can make the snail remember something that never happened
00:23:04.960
do you know what else never happened scientists making snails remember something that never happened
00:23:11.980
i don't think i have to actually read the story to know that whatever a snail remembers i don't know
00:23:18.560
if you can test that but let's say they taught the snails to do something if they saw some if they saw
00:23:26.360
something they'd seen before so maybe there's a way you can test false memories that way uh but i thought
00:23:33.640
that's not really the story that you can make a snail believe something that didn't happen you know what the
00:23:40.420
story is the fake news does that literally every day are you surprised that scientists working
00:23:47.580
really hard can fool a snail i'm not really surprised because 75 percent of the people i interacted with on
00:23:56.320
twitter today also are operating under false memories they were implanted by the fake news and it's why
00:24:03.220
it's quite obvious you just read their opinion you go oh you got that one from the fake news that's not
00:24:08.120
real it's exactly like the snail how much did we what kind of a grant did we do to find out this
00:24:15.500
the scientists can uh can give snails fake news and they'll believe it because if you can do it to a
00:24:23.840
living human being easily and effectively and consistently are you really surprised you can do
00:24:30.080
it to a snail i'm just saying there are some sciences more useful than others
00:24:34.700
here's a question i have in my my ever uh my my attempt to get as close to cancellation as i can
00:24:44.620
without actually getting cancelled i don't want to get cancelled by the way and i will
00:24:49.800
intentionally do things to make sure i don't go far enough that that's likely but i'm not sure it's up to
00:24:57.320
me because all it would take is one what would it take to get me cancelled if i don't do anything wrong
00:25:02.740
what would it take to get me cancelled snail false memory right all it takes is the fake news to
00:25:10.460
tell the the snails that they have a false memory of me doing something is that hard nope it's real
00:25:19.240
easy i'll give you some examples in a bit where the fake news is actively telling people to remember
00:25:25.480
something that didn't happen it's happening right now it's actually the headline the main news right now
00:25:30.820
is the snails it's just that you're the snails and the the news is telling you something that didn't happen
00:25:38.020
and it has become a memory i'm going to tell you in a moment a memory that at least half the country has
00:25:46.180
maybe three quarters an actual memory that didn't happen we'll get to that in a minute so if you think you're
00:25:53.380
different than the snail hold on for that so here's a question that i asked provocatively
00:25:59.840
if the mega protesters if they were all mega who knows uh that assaulted the capital
00:26:07.900
if they were planning a violent assault meaning that they planned a violent overthrow you know with
00:26:16.120
uh you know universal violence as opposed to there were members of the group who definitely were violent
00:26:22.040
and literally killed people or at least one so there definitely were violent people there who went
00:26:27.760
there to be violent but here's the question i have the mega people were armed to the teeth some of them
00:26:36.580
were right and if you looked at the number of guns owned by the people who attended probably most did not
00:26:45.140
take their weapons but the amount of them that attended who owned um weapons and i'm not talking about clubs
00:26:53.820
i'm talking about actual guns are you a little bit surprised that there was an insurrection of the most gun
00:27:02.460
owning people on the earth i think that's true wouldn't republicans be maybe among or the most gun owning people
00:27:10.900
on earth and none of them shot anybody am i right have you heard any story of a mega person even aiming
00:27:21.560
a weapon at another human now i don't know that it didn't happen but i haven't heard the story about
00:27:26.820
it there's no reporting on it all of those weapons all of those weapons thousands of them that they had
00:27:35.080
access to some of them actually brought weapons not one person brandished a weapon as in aiming it at
00:27:43.260
somebody now what kind of an insurrection is that when the people with massive weaponry don't bring it
00:27:53.700
and the ones that brought it didn't even attempt to use it what do you call that well we'll get into that
00:28:02.560
um here's what i'd call it the fake news has sold you on the idea that there was a coup attempt
00:28:13.980
and or an insurrection so those words used not exactly the same as each other but you know i think
00:28:22.900
the coup attempt is a little more let's say organized because it assumes that there's somebody you're
00:28:28.340
putting in charge whereas an insurrection maybe it's less organized i don't know or maybe they're
00:28:33.300
the same doesn't matter for my purposes but here's what got lost in the story and this is how all of
00:28:40.400
the snails will be reprogrammed what ted cruz and the other republic republicans were asking for
00:28:47.980
was not to quote overthrowing the election but how is it being reported it's being reported that those
00:28:56.700
senators were quote trying to overturn an election did ted cruz ever say i would like to overturn this
00:29:06.480
election nope how about josh hawley did he say i would like to overturn the election nope nope there
00:29:17.260
wasn't a single person who said let's overturn the election at least not in congress not a single
00:29:22.480
person did um did trump say let's overturn the election nope nope don't know anybody who knows
00:29:33.020
that all i know is ted cruz saying let's have let's use 10 days for an audit we have 10 days it won't
00:29:40.560
slow anything down it won't change the outcome unless we found out something we don't know and wouldn't it
00:29:46.020
make the whole country feel more confident in the process so congress was trying to take a an election
00:29:54.400
that did not have credibility with enough of the public to be you know really called a high class
00:30:01.680
quality credible election now it might have been fair and free how would i know i don't have any direct
00:30:08.960
direct evidence that i have access to i only have news reports so it might have been fair enough and free
00:30:15.560
enough but it is still a fact that half the country ish doesn't believe it was as fair as it should
00:30:23.500
have been so when you've got senators like ted cruz who i believe is a genuine patriot and josh hawley
00:30:31.280
genuine patriot and the others matt gates etc when they're asking for 10 days to improve the
00:30:39.120
reliability and credibility of an election that's not just for republicans that's for everybody
00:30:47.800
is there one of you who would not be better off with a more transparent election well i mean you
00:30:53.760
can make an argument if it changed the result of who got in office and you liked biden more than you
00:30:58.800
like trump then yeah maybe but wouldn't you be better off with a system that works wouldn't you
00:31:04.980
better be better off knowing that the election worked the fake news has brainwashed the public
00:31:11.740
into thinking this was an actual coup to which i ask you this provocative question if this were a coup
00:31:19.300
attempt as opposed to trying to force congress to have a 10-day audit and have some transparency which
00:31:28.120
the public required if it were a real coup how exactly was that coup going to work did they think these
00:31:37.820
clever coup plotters that once they had occupied two empty rooms that they were then the leaders of the
00:31:46.200
country what was that their thinking once we get in these empty rooms with all this furniture we run the
00:31:55.280
country now is that what they thought because i don't think so i don't think they thought that
00:32:01.860
did they think that by stealing the magic let lectern which did happen nancy's lectern was stolen
00:32:10.720
were they thinking if we can get a hold of the magic golden lectern we will have power over the whole world
00:32:19.200
i don't think they thought that it looked more like they were getting souvenirs
00:32:26.340
so let me ask you this if i said to you there are some senators who want more transparency in the
00:32:35.280
election so that we can be sure we had a solid election and that's better than the situation we
00:32:40.900
have with great uncertainty does that sound like a coup is a coup where you take the existing system
00:32:48.620
and try to improve it as it stands that is the opposite of a coup
00:32:55.760
if you're trying to make the current system work better transparently which is all they asked for just
00:33:05.100
an audit you're doing the opposite of a coup a coup is changing that system and changing the outcome
00:33:13.420
now could an outcome change yes but only if the system worked it only the only way the outcome
00:33:20.180
could change is if the system were repaired through transparency we can see what happened with an audit
00:33:27.840
and if and we don't know that would be the case and if that repairing of the transparency
00:33:33.140
caused a revote or some reevaluation that could happen but it's the opposite of a coup when you're
00:33:41.680
trying to make sure the public feels confident with the existing system changing the existing system
00:33:48.440
is the coup so when these people came in there and they were obviously trying to intimidate congress
00:33:57.200
so some people said to me scott scott scott what you don't understand is no it's not about stealing the
00:34:04.540
golden lectern so you have power it's not about them thinking that a coup could be accomplished by
00:34:11.200
fully occupying two empty rooms they didn't think that they were trying to bully and intimidate and scare
00:34:20.960
congress into doing something and that's bad that is bad except what exactly was it they were trying to
00:34:31.580
bully and scare and threaten congress into doing was it were they trying to bully and scare and threaten
00:34:40.160
congress into doing something illegal no no they weren't trying to get them to do anything illegal
00:34:46.580
were they trying to threaten and congress into doing something that their own rules of congress wouldn't allow
00:34:54.160
them to do no no congress could have done what they what the protesters wanted they could do an audit in fact
00:35:01.240
ted cruz had suggested it so wouldn't you say that the congress was being threatened and bullied
00:35:11.340
into doing the job because i would say that if half of the country feels there's no credibility in the election
00:35:21.700
and they have 10 days to do something that might make a difference
00:35:26.360
and you want them to do that thing which can be done it's practical it wouldn't change anything in
00:35:35.120
terms of the timing and it's their job you actually had an insurrection to try to force congress
00:35:44.120
just to do its job that actually happened and that's being presented as a coup attempt and an insurrection
00:35:53.780
it's literally the opposite it was an insurrection mostly right there were some bad elements in there
00:36:02.060
who had their own they must have had their own motives so i'm not trying to minimize the fact that
00:36:08.200
there were some bad people in that group and what those bad people did they have to be held fully
00:36:13.220
accountable for you know it's illegal you could execute them for all i care especially the one
00:36:18.640
who beat the cop anybody who beat that cop you could execute them i'm fine with that this would be
00:36:24.140
it's legal but i'm just saying that the mass the mass the far majority of these people that are being
00:36:32.820
called the insurrection and the coup were literally trying to intimidate congress into doing its job for
00:36:39.820
the first fucking time and that's being called a coup right encouraging congress to just simply do its job
00:36:50.180
that's it they didn't ask them to do something that's not their job they didn't ask them to quit
00:36:56.500
none of that they just asked them to do their job that's it now you could argue that maybe they shouldn't
00:37:06.620
have done their job that way etc but you can't argue what the intent was because if the intent was a coup
00:37:13.060
i think they would use some weapons if the intent was an insurrection like an actual change of government
00:37:20.320
based on their threats or their actual violence would they do it that way what kind of a weak ass coup
00:37:28.760
takes over two empty rooms steals a lectern and says i think we got this i think we're in charge of the
00:37:35.780
united states now that's not a thing that's what the fake news sold to the snails the snails believe
00:37:44.340
there was a coup and they will never believe anything else because the snails have been programmed by the
00:37:51.140
fake news to think that instead of a bunch of people taking a body of uh of you know the government
00:37:59.220
the congress which had what a 13 approval rating let me tell you if patriots surround a part of the
00:38:08.660
government that has a 13 rating of approval and they're refusing to do the most basic part of their
00:38:16.420
job which is hey could you maybe give us some insurance that the election was fair pretty basic
00:38:23.060
to the job i would say um if they're not willing to do their job shouldn't and have 13 approval
00:38:31.020
whose fault is it that uh patriots surrounded their building the bad ones went inside we don't condone
00:38:40.720
that whatsoever totally disavow the ones who went inside but you should expect that they're going to
00:38:45.680
surround the building you should you you should expect a free speech kind of demonstration i mean if
00:38:52.740
you didn't expect that so uh trump uh will either be impeached or almost impeached based on the fact
00:39:01.820
that although his words did not encourage violence and specifically said the opposite he said be peaceful
00:39:09.100
specifically be peaceful but i do think it's a fair it is a fair criticism that he should have known
00:39:18.420
what would happen even though his words you know were not um telling them to do that it wouldn't have
00:39:26.260
been too hard to know that you're creating a dangerous situation so i think he has to take
00:39:31.020
responsibility for that the same way he can take credit for some of the great things he did
00:39:34.800
um but if it's true that trump could be impeached or almost impeached because he should have known
00:39:45.300
it's not what he did intentionally it's why he should have known would have been the result
00:39:50.680
even though his specific actions didn't have that tell for for a problem he should have known
00:39:56.700
that his actions would have caused that i agree with that but should congress have known that
00:40:04.380
denying an audit under this condition would create violence
00:40:08.980
yeah you just got quiet didn't you should congress have known
00:40:16.680
that not backing the audit which there was no problems with it didn't have a budget problem
00:40:25.100
didn't have a timing problem there was no objection to it it could have been done should congress have known
00:40:33.420
that this would cause violence abso-fucking-lutely they should have known and all i ask is for some
00:40:43.920
consistency i will not push back on attempts to impeach trump over this
00:40:51.140
because i do think he's got something to answer for all leaders have to answer for the result of their
00:41:00.000
actions right the fact that he wasn't intending this to happen matters but it doesn't excuse it
00:41:07.180
right because you can be impeached for a mistake i would say it was a mistake it was a big one
00:41:13.420
it was a big mistake but it wasn't intentional i do you think do you think that trump wanted violence
00:41:21.000
i think that's the last thing he wanted i think that's the very last thing he wanted
00:41:26.500
it's obvious that he wanted pressure on congress but pressure to do an audit not pressure to overturn
00:41:33.280
the election not pressure to enter the building but there's no way trump wanted that but buck stops at
00:41:41.720
the top you know if i'm if i'm going to be even a little bit consistent the person in charge gets the
00:41:49.520
blame and the person in charge gets the credit if things go right even if they weren't directly
00:41:54.800
involved those are the rules and i don't think we should change them i'm not going to change it for
00:41:59.060
trump but i want to be consistent kamala harris was promoting violence by the bl black lives matter
00:42:07.540
protesters i think that should be treated the same so i can support impeaching trump over this even
00:42:16.460
understanding in my opinion that he didn't intend any of it to happen but the same way uh kamala harris
00:42:23.800
actually actively supported i'll say unrest i will say violence she didn't use that word but she was
00:42:30.920
certainly in favor of unrest which guaranteed death and destruction guaranteed it and of course you would
00:42:37.480
know that so how does kamala harris not get impeached it's the same standard and secondly how do
00:42:44.740
uh all of the members of congress who voted against the 10-day audit how in fuck did they not know that
00:42:54.020
they were going to get attacked for that how the fuck did they not know that was going to cause that
00:43:04.260
all right all right let me read this comment um the the coup insurrection false narrative is beyond
00:43:13.080
annoying yeah how the dems used it against uh yeah right that comment disappeared for reasons that
00:43:20.680
are not clear as i was reading it but thank you for the comment um so how do you feel living among
00:43:29.480
the snails who have been convinced that an attempt to solidify and protect the republic as it stands
00:43:37.180
has been turned by the fake news into a coup attempt and an insurrection where plainly it wasn't
00:43:45.720
plainly you don't need to be an expert on insurrections you just have to look at it and say
00:43:50.600
uh they took over a room you can't control a country by taking over a room an empty room now some of you
00:44:02.000
are saying uh but but they meant to take uh members of congress hostage let's say that's true there was a
00:44:09.420
guy there with twist ties right that that showed some intent but let's say worst case scenario that some
00:44:16.140
of the people who were in the building uh intended to harm or take uh control of let's say members of
00:44:24.540
congress do you know what's wrong with this how could you control the united states by taking hostage
00:44:32.380
any number of people who have a 13 approval rating and are not doing the will of the people
00:44:38.760
i do not condone any kind of hostage taking that i hope that's obvious i don't condone any violence and
00:44:48.700
i absolutely disavow anybody who entered the building they should have stayed out of the building period
00:44:54.220
but if you're gonna say this was a coup attempt you have to you have to complete the story i'm just
00:45:03.280
asking anybody who thinks it was a coup to complete the story and the story is if they took hostages
00:45:09.260
in congress would they control the country no no not even a little bit who name a member of congress
00:45:21.120
that we wouldn't sacrifice as opposed to overthrowing the government of the united states
00:45:27.660
i'm a big fan of mike pence even though he's very unpopular with a lot of people this week
00:45:33.840
i've been saying since the beginning that if you judge him for his job as a vice president
00:45:39.460
spectacular i i really think he's one of the strongest vice presidents we've ever had
00:45:45.200
even though i disagree with him on lgbtq stuff and other stuff so i don't think he should be president
00:45:50.320
but as a vice president damn good now as much as i like mike pence imagine if you will if the
00:45:59.360
uh the alleged coup attempt people had taken him hostage and were planning to kill him
00:46:05.800
if they didn't get their way then do the coup attempt people uh have they taken over the country
00:46:12.500
would that work hey we got your vice president we're going to do bad things to him unless you
00:46:19.940
let us run the country or put trump in charge and let trump have a second term would that work
00:46:26.860
no no we might love mike pence but we're not going to trade his life for the country that's not how it
00:46:37.540
works we would say well if that's the way it's got to be you know we're going to miss mike pence
00:46:45.320
there isn't a single person in the world who would trade the country for mike pence and mike pence is
00:46:51.780
awesome great guy you know overall i know some of you think he's a traitor for not for not wanting to
00:46:59.700
vote the way he did etc i think you i think he's a good person who's just trying to figure out
00:47:04.820
the best option and of bad options i just see him as a good person you don't have to agree with him
00:47:11.440
i don't either i don't agree with all of his decisions but i feel like he's a good person
00:47:16.980
still still if one person in our government is taken hostage we're not going to overthrow the
00:47:25.300
government turn it to the president whoever the president is you could pick trump or biden or anybody
00:47:30.760
else bad people take the president hostage sometime in the future do they own the country
00:47:37.360
no no not even a little bit not even slightly you could take every member of congress hostage
00:47:46.900
and it wouldn't have any effect on controlling the country because the rest of the country would say
00:47:53.140
oh well i guess we need some new politicians and we would just go on like it didn't even happen
00:47:58.040
you know we would of course kill all the coup people first but it wouldn't stop us there's no way
00:48:05.320
that any of those actions conceivably in the most wild imagination could have turned into anything like a coup
00:48:14.920
there was just no no connecting tissue that could have made that even slightly possible
00:48:20.780
not one percent nothing and yet the snails have been convinced it happened all right
00:48:28.180
um glenn beck's getting in trouble for referring to the uh the private company social media censorship of
00:48:38.340
some voices as a digital holocaust and then the people who um you know like the auschwitz museum people
00:48:45.980
etc say stop using our holocaust analogies because you're trivializing the holocaust i have two things to
00:48:54.080
say about that number one never don't don't compare things to the holocaust the whole point of the
00:49:02.040
holocaust is that it can't be compared to other things unless it's an actual another holocaust like
00:49:09.200
if somebody actually kills six million people of some identified group well yeah that's holocaust
00:49:15.660
but i don't call censorship and stuff like that a holocaust right it does it does cheapen the holocaust
00:49:23.080
so i agree that it's a word that there's some words you want to preserve right right you just want to
00:49:30.840
preserve some words and not not water down their meaning because they're important but here's the
00:49:37.300
fun part and the second part having suffered from four years of hitler analogies about trump
00:49:43.140
i really did kind of enjoy that glenn beck is making a legitimate it's legitimate i mean it's as
00:49:52.120
legitimate as the uh as the charges against trump for being hitler meaning neither of them are
00:49:59.000
legitimate because nothing really compares to hitler nothing compares to the holocaust
00:50:03.080
uh where it's just hyperbole but it's completely fair that after four years of listening to it
00:50:09.540
you want to send a little back i kind of enjoyed that and uh i have to tell you when it was obvious
00:50:18.680
that trump wasn't going to get a second term i i suffered a little bit of not depression nothing
00:50:25.960
like that but maybe a little bit of pre-sadness that i wouldn't be entertained
00:50:30.760
in the future wouldn't be fun things to talk about but uh that doesn't seem to be the case
00:50:38.200
so making fun of uh biden will be way more entertaining than defending trump because it'll be so easy
00:50:45.080
um john dvorak wrote a really provocative article talking about how the poor countries seem i was
00:50:53.160
talking about this yesterday how the countries with low income seem to be doing better on the
00:50:57.400
coronavirus than the countries with uh good health care systems and i was speculating there we don't
00:51:04.920
know why that is maybe it's sunshine or bad reporting or you know any one of ten things or ivermectin or
00:51:13.720
hydroxychloroquine everybody's got their own private theory but uh john dvorak's theory is the most
00:51:21.800
provocative of them all and i'm not telling you i agree with this i'm just going to tell you his
00:51:28.280
opinion because it's so fun and his opinion is it's mass hysteria that the countries that have a uh let's
00:51:37.480
say a well-developed news social media industry um they've generated a mass hysteria so that our
00:51:47.560
impression of what's happening is way out of line with what's happening and that the poor countries
00:51:54.840
don't have the same you know robust social media fake news kind of influence and so they don't know
00:52:02.440
that they're in a pandemic and the hypothesis and again this is not my opinion i'm going to tell you
00:52:10.200
my opinion in a moment but the hypothesis is that mass hysteria is so strong that if you get enough of
00:52:17.800
it going it looks like you have a pandemic when maybe you don't now part of his argument is we don't
00:52:27.080
see bodies piled up in these third world countries and i that's a mystery right if these other countries
00:52:33.480
are doing everything wrong at least according to the developed countries they are because they're not
00:52:39.080
they don't have the you know all the uh high quality health care if they're doing everything wrong where
00:52:45.800
are the bodies wouldn't we notice i mean even though we don't have great information about what's
00:52:52.760
happening in you know congo or uh some african country we don't have great information but
00:52:58.920
wouldn't we notice by now there'd be a lot of dead people maybe there are we just haven't noticed that
00:53:07.240
would be weird somebody says they bury them yeah but you still notice i mean they'd be talking about it
00:53:14.680
so i don't think i quite buy into uh john's theory only because we do have bodies piled up
00:53:23.000
if you count the number of people who seem to have died if you look at the impact on icus where there's
00:53:28.920
a hot space it looks like real real disease to me it looks real to me so there may be there may be some
00:53:38.360
some way that uh john dvorak's opinion about the mass hysteria or at least a hypothesis let let's say
00:53:44.840
it's a hypothesis as opposed to a an opinion i don't want to i don't want to oversell uh his opinion
00:53:52.360
he needs to do that himself but let's call the hypothesis it's really interesting
00:53:58.600
yeah and the part of the hypothesis i like and the thing that makes it provocative is that it's
00:54:04.040
entirely possible for a mass hysteria to cause people to think they're having health problems
00:54:09.800
they're not but i don't think that's happening in this case because i think there are too many
00:54:14.440
doctors looking at too many real things and too many real patients but you never know it's just
00:54:20.600
a fun thought um let's see i'd like to give a random compliment today i told you i'd be giving
00:54:29.320
out random compliments uh especially to people who you don't expect me to be complimenting today's
00:54:36.040
compliment is to geraldo rivera yeah i know i know what you're gonna say hold on just hold on
00:54:44.440
it's not as bad as you think you can handle this i know you can uh so geraldo of course has uh been
00:54:52.280
quite brutal on the president trump um who have been friends for a long time so geraldo has been a
00:54:59.000
booster overall but he's you know disagreed on immigration and some other some other things so
00:55:05.080
here's what he said in a tweet he said regardless of how senate ultimately votes i think he's talking
00:55:12.120
about impeachment he says it's entirely appropriate that uh trump be impeached by the house he knew what
00:55:18.360
mob what the mob intended from the jump and uh basically that's his point he knew what they were
00:55:24.680
going to do so it's it's on him and he uh he goes after trump pretty hard now here's my compliment
00:55:32.760
to geraldo yes he took a selfie with his shirt off over the age of 70 yes uh capone's vault
00:55:44.600
did not go the way maybe he hoped uh yes he does do a lot of self-promotion that's his job
00:55:54.040
so do i if you do this for a living you do a lot of self-promotion it's sort of what you do
00:55:59.240
uh that is part of the job but here's what i love about uh geraldo and the following compliment
00:56:07.240
geraldo doesn't give a shit what you think about his opinion
00:56:12.120
and i could not love that more he geraldo has said more opinions that more people disagree with
00:56:20.520
and said it you know with complete bravery i guess would be the right thing he is one brave mofo
00:56:29.560
he will say absolutely anything he thinks is true no matter what you think of it and he'll say it in
00:56:35.800
public and there are not many people like that now i don't agree with geraldo on a number of things
00:56:42.280
you know i've been watching him for a long time and sometimes i like him his opinion sometimes i disagree
00:56:48.360
but in every case don't you feel he's telling you his honest opinion
00:56:53.560
that's the special part it looks like i mean you can't read minds but my opinion of his opinion is
00:57:03.240
that every time he gives it i'm seeing an actual opinion when you watch almost anybody else who's in
00:57:09.560
this business and i think i could put myself in that category unfortunately you can smell the bias right
00:57:15.720
like it just reeks some people just reek of bias even when they're saying things that are true
00:57:24.120
they still reek of bias geraldo does not he does not reek of bias he can take a position on the left
00:57:32.680
when it looks like it makes sense to him even if i disagree and he can take a position on the right
00:57:38.280
if he thinks it makes sense that is special right you need more of geraldo even if you disagree with
00:57:47.640
him you don't need less of that you need a lot more of it in my opinion um stephen beschloss a historian
00:57:56.520
i believe he tweeted that after the grim week i was talking about some uh some of members of congress
00:58:02.760
tried to come to work with uh concealed carry i guess and they felt that they needed it for their
00:58:08.920
safety and they the they set off the uh i guess the uh security alarms and they refused to be patted
00:58:19.480
down now i didn't hear the rest of the story whether they were let in or not but they were apparently
00:58:26.040
they were strapped and they were they had weapons now beschloss um says that uh maybe i shouldn't be
00:58:35.240
surprised by the disgraceful level of arrogance of congress people who refuse to go through a metal
00:58:41.560
detector arrogance and selfishness qualities that helped us get into this mess to which i say
00:58:48.280
uh steven did you notice that congress was just invaded by armed people with twist ties
00:59:00.120
uh i feel as though congress has a right to defend themselves it's called the constitution and i don't
00:59:07.720
think we should ask them to go to work in that environment without feeling safe and if what it takes for
00:59:13.640
them to feel safe is their second amendment rights who has more second amendment rights than a congress
00:59:20.120
person you know ideally we all have the same rights but you know be serious they've got some they've got
00:59:26.360
extra rights because they're in congress they shouldn't have but they do and i completely back 100
00:59:34.920
the congress people who wanted to be armed if you put me in a situation where my personal security
00:59:42.280
security was as as as loose and tentative as apparently the security is for the capitol building
00:59:50.520
i would want to i would have a one concealed carry because who was going to stop the you know if they
00:59:56.440
got in who was going to stop them it looks like the police were standing aside i'd want to be armed
01:00:03.480
so i'm uh i'll back the people who tried to be armed for that um i made a prediction here that
01:00:10.280
the odds of democrats permanently shutting republicans out of power um and that's the worry the worry is
01:00:18.840
that they have so much power now they'll they'll be uh um changing the voting districts and they'll
01:00:24.680
be adding the district of columbia and they'll they'll add get rid of the filibuster and they'll pack
01:00:29.720
the courts and everything so the worry is that the democrats will just have this firm permanent control
01:00:35.160
on power maybe maybe that's definitely one of the things that could happen but if you're looking at
01:00:42.520
the odds i would say the odds of democrats self-destructing is way higher you know if
01:00:48.040
you're going to look at the next election i don't feel like it looks good for democrats already because
01:00:54.360
the democrats will have to um either not do the things they promised such as opening the border
01:01:02.040
or they have to do the things they promised and watch a disaster unfold because if you open the
01:01:09.480
border i don't feel like there are two ways that could go i feel like that's one of those few
01:01:15.800
situations where you don't have to guess which way it's going to go it would be a humanitarian disaster
01:01:23.000
i would imagine i don't i don't see how it could go any other way but uh this is all by way of saying
01:01:30.520
if you're worried that the democrats have a stranglehold on power uh i think they're self-destructing
01:01:38.120
because when they were out of power at least the presidency they had the luxury of saying crazy stuff
01:01:44.360
and not having to do any of it now if they say crazy stuff they're either going to disappoint because
01:01:50.040
they don't do it or they're going to do it and show that none of their plans work that's all that's
01:01:55.800
left they don't have a path to success because if you think it well they'll get in there and they'll
01:02:02.600
they'll shut down the republicans and and they'll do good work because if they do those two things
01:02:08.920
they'd have power forever do a good job shut down the republicans permanent situation but i don't think
01:02:17.960
so i mean anything's possible but it looks like democrats are going to self-destruct just by i mean
01:02:24.840
look at that appointment of kristen clark the the woman who had the 20 year old or whatever claim
01:02:31.240
about the pineal gland making black people superior he appointed that woman that that's the kind of uh
01:02:41.400
that's the kind of action we're going to see out of a biden administration it's literally laughably
01:02:47.320
stupid it's just laughably stupid now i'm sure all democrats thought that of everything that trump did
01:02:54.920
but that's my point my point is that being in power is hard being a critic which i am right now
01:03:02.120
where i just get to criticize people for whatever the hell they're doing real easy
01:03:08.680
i just moved from the hardest job in the world to the easiest not really feeling any pain at the moment
01:03:15.000
all right yeah there is stupidity on all sides of the aisles um i believe that is what i wanted to
01:03:24.840
talk about today should the trump wing of republicans form a new party now now if if the republicans want
01:03:33.320
any hope of ever getting power back that they need to be one party the reason it worked with trump is that
01:03:39.640
he managed to do the near impossible which is he unified the republican party uh
01:03:47.400
so now i don't think you want to start another party
01:03:51.640
what are the chances of 2024 having auditable elections i would say zero zero as far as i can
01:03:59.560
tell there is no interest in the government not real interest there are people talking but there doesn't
01:04:05.560
seem to be any real interest in fixing the election system have you seen it i don't see uh
01:04:14.280
i don't i don't see biden saying i'm going to make this my highest priority to make this auditable
01:04:20.520
i don't see any chance this can happen so i'm seeing a question about uh the patrick burn story i think
01:04:28.040
that's the story about italy being somehow involved in fixing the election so my my take on that just
01:04:34.440
quickly i've already i talked about that before my take is that patrick burn is like a really smart
01:04:39.720
guy if you look into his background and credentials he's super smart and successful too so you've got
01:04:47.000
that on one hand super smart and successful person making a claim but the claim is of a nature that i don't
01:04:55.640
believe ever right so the claim is sufficiently fantastical that i dismiss it as sort of a big
01:05:06.040
foot kind of a claim which doesn't mean it's not true i'm just saying that if you were going to look
01:05:11.560
at claims that sort of have that vibe you know it's complicated and you know you can't see nobody's
01:05:18.760
showing you the direct evidence it's people who talk to people about a complicated scheme and another
01:05:25.080
country anytime a story has all of those qualities to it you should bet against it so if i had to bet
01:05:34.680
10 to 1 odds is bullshit if i had to bet but that's 10 to 1 is there a 10 chance it's real yeah
01:05:43.720
maybe maybe maybe 10 chance um remember i've told you that any individual claim is almost certainly
01:05:51.800
false but that doesn't change the fact that you have a big system that involves software and the
01:05:57.320
odds of a big important system that involves software not being hacked is zero now i don't know if it was
01:06:05.560
hacked this year i don't know if the hacks if they happen changed any results i don't know if there
01:06:12.200
were just as many hacks for trump as against them i don't know if there were any hacks i just know
01:06:17.160
that this system has to be hacked eventually it's either happened is happening or will happen that's
01:06:25.160
the guarantee because all systems get hacked all you need is an insider to be willing to take a bribe
01:06:31.480
that's all it takes um somebody says it looks more real than other claims i don't think so
01:06:38.440
i don't think it's more real than the ones who have been debunked on the surface i don't know what
01:06:44.520
the reality is just on the surface doesn't look real uh there are no techies explaining the vote
01:06:51.720
switching yeah the whole the whole vote switching thing uh i just saw a reference to none of that being
01:06:58.440
real because uh i guess the tv reporting and i can't claim this to be true it's just something i saw on the
01:07:06.600
internet that the way the tv reports the the votes as they come in is estimates and so as new
01:07:14.920
information comes in to change their estimate it is actually completely normal and built into the
01:07:20.840
system that since their estimates sometimes they go up a little and sometimes they go down a little
01:07:26.360
but on average they mostly go up so it would have happened to both candidates and there's no story here
01:07:34.360
except the estimates were showing on the screen which you interpreted to be actual votes now i don't
01:07:42.360
know if that's true but if you if you told me which is more true that version that those numbers were
01:07:50.520
not dependable and they were just estimates or that right in front of us votes were being taken from
01:07:57.400
one candidate and given to another on national tv while you could watch it
01:08:06.360
maybe that happened but i would bet against that
01:08:10.520
right i would bet against that you could watch it happen in real time and it was just on television
01:08:17.400
uh it feels a lot more likely that they were working with estimates that were being updated and
01:08:23.640
sometimes they went backwards but not usually um somebody says we saw it happen
01:08:31.560
what i'm telling you is you didn't you didn't see it happen what i'm telling you is
01:08:36.920
that if the alternate explanation is correct i don't know if it is but if the alternate explanation is
01:08:42.120
that you saw estimates then no you did not see the vote count decreasing you saw estimates which of
01:08:49.960
course will move back and forth as new information comes in uh dr sheev has one part of election
01:08:58.200
fraud in massachusetts court i don't know that story but i'll be interested in it
01:09:09.800
yeah benford's law somebody saying that's been debunked so one of the problems is that a lot of
01:09:15.400
things that you heard as claims you did not hear the debunk and i i felt that problem too and i complained
01:09:22.760
about it that there should have always been some master list of all the allegations along with what was
01:09:30.200
at least presented as a debunk whether it was real or not so if you've never heard that the benford's
01:09:38.120
law thing was debunked ask yourself if you're getting good information because it was debunked
01:09:47.080
all right um that's all i got for now and um somebody says benford's law is not debunked it's just not
01:09:58.920
definitive that's uh i think that's an accurate statement but doesn't really disagree with debunked
01:10:06.120
meaning that there's a claim that uh rather than saying yeah this is really strong evidence of
01:10:13.720
something it just means you can't tell so i would call that debunked but i accept your
01:10:20.600
clarification that's all i got for you and i'll talk to you tomorrow all right youtubers i don't have
01:10:27.960
much else to say uh yeah benford's is a invitation to investigate right it would be good to have an audit
01:10:36.360
so all of these things are aired out uh matiah says this was a horrible periscope i give a zero out of one
01:10:53.240
we'll hide you on this jail um i need a micro lesson on finishing projects i might do that one
01:11:02.040
actually i've gotten a few uh requests for something in that category all right that's all for now