Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1253 Scott Adams： How Do You Know an Election Was Fair？ More Interesting Than You Think

00:00:00.360 It's good to see you. What a great day today is. Really, it's great.

00:00:09.080 You're going to have one of the most enlightening coffees with Scott Adams of all time, maybe since yesterday.

00:00:15.980 And all you need is a cup or a mug, a glass of tank, a chelsea, a canteen, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:22.420 Filled with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:24.880 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of that dope beat of the day thing makes everything better except election transparency.

00:00:33.860 Go.

00:00:38.440 A little bit cold, but still amazing.

00:00:44.520 Well, I'll warm that up later.

00:00:48.380 I misspelled the title.

00:00:51.040 Probably did.

00:00:51.840 I do my titles on these live streams by voice to text, and sometimes I don't check them that well.

00:00:59.220 It could say anything.

00:01:00.660 I have no idea what it says.

00:01:02.980 All right.

00:01:03.440 Here's some stuff in the news.

00:01:06.180 Apparently, an idea is going around that when Kamala Harris is sworn in as VP,

00:01:11.860 that there's a call for her supporters to, quote, wear pearls.

00:01:15.360 That's right.

00:01:17.500 So the idea is that the women who are supporting Kamala Harris will wear pearls that day in support.

00:01:24.000 And I think that's a great idea.

00:01:25.500 I would add to that Chanel handbags would be good.

00:01:28.420 A good way to commemorate Kamala Harris's inauguration would be expensive jewelry,

00:01:38.200 maybe a $25,000 Chanel handbag, possibly a designer gown.

00:01:45.840 I think that these are all totally appropriate.

00:01:47.740 And I think that all 81, well, probably 40 million women who voted for Harris Biden,

00:01:54.020 they should get out all their expensive jewelry, their Chanel handbags, their designer outfits,

00:01:59.760 and show some respect.

00:02:02.160 Wait, you don't all have pearls?

00:02:06.020 Ah, really?

00:02:08.640 There are people who don't have Chanel handbags and pearls and designer clothes?

00:02:12.880 Well, maybe this plan is stupid.

00:02:16.700 Okay, maybe.

00:02:18.340 Well, moving on.

00:02:21.180 So North Korea is being provocative, and they had a military parade

00:02:26.080 and unveiled what they think is the most powerful weapon in the whole world.

00:02:31.380 It would be a submarine-launched ballistic missile.

00:02:36.100 That's right.

00:02:36.640 North Korea has a submarine-launched ballistic missile.

00:02:44.240 That's pretty scary.

00:02:46.080 The only thing they don't have is the submarine part.

00:02:52.100 Apparently, there's no indication they have a submarine that could launch any kind of a missile,

00:02:57.160 but they totally plan to get one.

00:02:59.460 But they have the missile.

00:03:00.440 I believe the current plan is, if you get enough people lined up just right,

00:03:05.880 you can kind of throw it.

00:03:08.800 But until we have the actual submarine,

00:03:11.660 largely it'll be an Elbonian slingshot situation to launch it.

00:03:17.360 I don't know.

00:03:18.580 I'm sure they have another plan.

00:03:21.420 But it's interesting that Kim Jong-un is testing Biden,

00:03:25.080 because this is one of the traps that Biden has as president.

00:03:28.220 You know Biden can't agree with anything that Trump did.

00:03:32.220 It's just never going to happen, right?

00:03:33.960 So whatever Trump did in North Korea,

00:03:37.360 Biden has to do a different thing,

00:03:39.440 because otherwise he would be acknowledging Trump did something right.

00:03:43.240 What's the different thing?

00:03:45.120 Starting a fight with Kim Jong-un?

00:03:47.760 What the hell is he going to do?

00:03:50.120 So Biden will either have to fail,

00:03:53.320 because Kim Jong-un will probably keep testing him,

00:03:55.540 or turn into Trump,

00:03:59.360 or do something that didn't work for 60 years before Trump.

00:04:03.680 Doesn't have a lot of options.

00:04:07.700 Here's a...

00:04:09.680 This is...

00:04:10.320 I have to admit, this story got to me a little bit.

00:04:13.400 When you and I watched the Capital Assault,

00:04:19.260 and we saw the videos and everything,

00:04:21.240 I have to admit that you watch it a little bit like it's a TV show.

00:04:27.020 You know, even though you know it's real, it's important, it's a big deal.

00:04:30.380 But there's something about the medium of, you know,

00:04:33.140 television and broadcast that gives you some distance.

00:04:37.280 And so you kind of watch it like it's a bad movie.

00:04:39.640 You know, it doesn't...

00:04:41.260 You're not really in the scene so much.

00:04:43.520 And then I heard AOC talking about that,

00:04:47.340 and she was in there,

00:04:48.420 and she said she thought she was going to die in the Capital Assault.

00:04:53.680 Now, the first thing I thought was,

00:04:55.340 ah, it wasn't that dangerous, you know?

00:04:58.080 You're not going to die.

00:04:59.120 And then you think, oh, wait a minute.

00:05:03.020 If those protesters had seen or gotten a hold of AOC,

00:05:07.600 she would be like the main target, wouldn't she?

00:05:12.780 Like, if you were a deluded, crazed, violent right-winger,

00:05:19.160 is there anybody who would be more sort of in your mind

00:05:22.600 as a representative of the Democrats?

00:05:26.360 That is some scary shit.

00:05:29.120 So when you hear AOC talk about it,

00:05:31.380 she is unique because she is so visible,

00:05:34.280 so she would be more of a target than other people, presumably.

00:05:38.140 That's really chilling.

00:05:39.720 I have to admit, it gave me a different feel for the situation

00:05:43.560 because, you know, if you're ordinary politicians

00:05:46.800 that said we feared for our lives,

00:05:48.420 I think that would have been true.

00:05:50.480 But not the way she would fear for her life

00:05:52.940 because she would literally be a target

00:05:54.480 for crazed right-wing people.

00:05:56.700 So that was pretty chilling.

00:06:00.380 Just in my mind, anyway,

00:06:02.260 it took it to another level of how horrible it was.

00:06:05.700 And basically every day we hear more about it,

00:06:08.900 it goes to another level of horribleness.

00:06:11.420 It's pretty horrible.

00:06:12.140 But also about AOC,

00:06:17.860 she was also noodling on the idea of, quote,

00:06:22.300 reigning in the media

00:06:23.520 with some kind of unspoken, undesigned, as of yet,

00:06:29.220 government oversight involvement.

00:06:33.020 And the idea is not really formed,

00:06:36.240 nor would she claim that it is.

00:06:38.600 But she is simply making the observation

00:06:41.180 that the media has become dangerous.

00:06:44.120 Now, of course, when she talks about it,

00:06:45.740 she's thinking right-leaning media.

00:06:49.400 But here again is where my suggestion

00:06:52.400 of agreeing with the left is the best strategy.

00:06:55.860 And agreeing with them aggressively.

00:06:59.620 In other words, agreeing with them harder

00:07:01.200 than they agree with themselves.

00:07:03.500 And here's a perfect example.

00:07:05.380 If you say, no AOC, freedom of the press and free speech,

00:07:09.840 and we're just going to fight for that,

00:07:12.580 you know, probably nothing's going to happen.

00:07:14.880 Nothing good, nothing bad.

00:07:16.280 Probably just nothing happens.

00:07:17.400 But suppose you embraced it.

00:07:21.220 Suppose you went the opposite direction

00:07:23.260 that anybody would expect.

00:07:25.540 Let's say you're a solid Republican,

00:07:28.280 and AOC says,

00:07:29.380 we've got to do something about all this fake news, basically.

00:07:32.540 What if you said yes?

00:07:34.920 And said, can I join you?

00:07:36.960 And put together something that fights the fake news?

00:07:39.840 Because here's the thing I don't think anybody understands.

00:07:43.380 There's nobody on the right

00:07:45.100 who wants to be fooled by fake news from their own side.

00:07:50.640 Nobody does that by choice.

00:07:53.180 I do think that it's true

00:07:54.540 that people on the left are fooled by their media.

00:07:57.180 People on the right are sometimes fooled by their media, too.

00:08:00.640 And how much of it is happening on either side

00:08:03.740 probably depends on who's in office

00:08:05.800 more than anything about the sides.

00:08:10.260 So instead of fighting her on this,

00:08:12.920 what sounds like government censorship,

00:08:15.820 I would go at it aggressively

00:08:17.540 and agree with it and ask if he can help.

00:08:20.580 Because the first thing I would service

00:08:22.600 is the fine people hoax.

00:08:24.700 The president said you should drink bleach hoax.

00:08:28.600 And I would just go down the line of the hoaxes.

00:08:31.300 And then when AOC on her side says,

00:08:33.380 yes, but you've got a bunch of hoaxes, too,

00:08:36.840 I would say, yeah, let's look into that.

00:08:39.380 Let's look into that.

00:08:41.820 You make some good points.

00:08:43.840 Here are all the hoaxes on your side.

00:08:45.980 It would be kind of dumb to assume

00:08:47.660 there are no hoaxes on the other side, right?

00:08:50.980 What are the odds that all the hoaxes are on one side?

00:08:55.240 Nothing, basically.

00:08:56.720 They're on both sides.

00:08:58.680 And I think AOC is dead right on this.

00:09:03.040 I don't think that there's an obvious way to handle it,

00:09:06.340 but let me make some suggestions.

00:09:10.300 Suppose there was, I feel as if there's another,

00:09:15.560 there's an opening for a need.

00:09:19.900 And I'm going to model it today.

00:09:22.300 So I'm going to model in a little bit

00:09:24.480 the need that I think the country needs,

00:09:27.340 which is basically interpreting the news

00:09:29.520 for people who aren't as good at it.

00:09:31.760 Now, if you were young,

00:09:34.500 would you be good at spotting fake news?

00:09:38.220 Well, not as good as somebody who's been around a while

00:09:40.980 and seen what the pattern looks like.

00:09:43.460 All right?

00:09:43.880 So just right there, an obvious example,

00:09:46.220 young people need a little bit of help

00:09:48.180 knowing what's real and what's fake in the news.

00:09:51.500 Also, they need a little context.

00:09:53.280 They might need a little extra description.

00:09:55.440 So there's something that's needed on top of news

00:09:58.300 that's not just opinion.

00:10:00.820 We have too much of that.

00:10:02.200 We've got plenty of opinion.

00:10:04.080 And the news tends to just give you the headlines

00:10:06.580 and they put it within their frame

00:10:08.500 of whoever their audience is.

00:10:10.180 So none of that's useful.

00:10:12.300 All right?

00:10:13.120 The news is put in a biased frame,

00:10:15.660 so that's not useful.

00:10:17.380 And, you know, you don't have contacts.

00:10:19.660 So it's not very useful.

00:10:21.440 What you need is somebody

00:10:22.600 like what I'm going to do

00:10:24.040 when I talk about election security in a little bit.

00:10:26.540 You need somebody who can just explain the situation

00:10:29.940 and is not beholden to either the left

00:10:33.620 or the right news sources.

00:10:35.340 Let me give you some examples.

00:10:38.140 Now, these are not people I'd say

00:10:39.480 should do this function.

00:10:41.600 I'm just saying that such people exist.

00:10:44.160 There are people who exist

00:10:45.380 who are able to criticize the left and the right

00:10:48.480 just as easily.

00:10:50.080 All right?

00:10:50.900 Take a Glenn Greenwald.

00:10:54.040 Criticizes the left,

00:10:55.060 criticizes the right,

00:10:56.320 has great context.

00:10:57.840 He'd be a good one to be an explainer.

00:11:00.540 Matt Taibbi,

00:11:02.040 no friend to President Trump,

00:11:04.060 but also doesn't seem to fall for fake news too easily.

00:11:09.060 That's good.

00:11:10.360 What about me?

00:11:11.900 You know, you've seen me agree with the president,

00:11:14.400 disagree with the president.

00:11:15.860 I'm left a Bernie,

00:11:16.960 but I like Trump.

00:11:17.880 I'm exactly the kind of person,

00:11:22.400 I don't think I should be the person,

00:11:24.640 but I'm the kind of person

00:11:26.080 who could give you a little bit more

00:11:28.120 than the news can give you

00:11:29.340 and the politicians can give you.

00:11:31.900 Jonathan Turley,

00:11:32.860 there's a great example.

00:11:34.380 Jonathan Turley is an excellent source

00:11:36.740 of somebody who reliably will disagree

00:11:39.800 with the Republicans when he's got a reason.

00:11:42.980 He'll disagree with the Democrats

00:11:44.340 when he's got a reason,

00:11:45.260 and you can't tell which way he's going to go.

00:11:49.120 He just follows the facts.

00:11:50.880 Take Alan Dershowitz.

00:11:52.700 Alan Dershowitz, a famous Democrat,

00:11:55.140 will take a Republican,

00:11:56.860 you know,

00:11:57.480 leaning cause and heartbeat

00:11:59.220 if the law leans that way.

00:12:02.560 So you do have a number of people

00:12:05.020 who have a weird quality

00:12:06.680 that they're at least capable

00:12:08.460 of switching sides

00:12:09.900 depending on where the facts go.

00:12:12.000 Okay?

00:12:12.680 So, maybe AOC has something there.

00:12:15.020 There may be...

00:12:16.480 Let's say...

00:12:17.300 Let me suggest the mildest form

00:12:20.920 that you might call censorship,

00:12:23.800 but I don't think so.

00:12:25.580 All right?

00:12:26.260 Let's say there was a group of people

00:12:28.880 that have the qualities

00:12:30.320 that I just described.

00:12:32.640 Let's say that they form

00:12:34.620 a private, independent entity

00:12:37.520 who are independent thinkers

00:12:39.640 who just help you

00:12:40.820 sort through the fake news.

00:12:43.120 And let's say that they voluntarily

00:12:45.120 limit their own involvement

00:12:47.480 in this entity

00:12:48.720 to, I'll just pick a number,

00:12:50.720 a two-year term.

00:12:52.280 So you don't want the same people

00:12:53.620 just being in there

00:12:54.560 and taking root

00:12:55.920 and then they get too much power

00:12:57.540 and blah, blah, blah.

00:12:58.400 So you want it to be a rotating,

00:13:00.220 fairly quickly rotating group.

00:13:02.720 And let's say that the government

00:13:04.560 simply did this.

00:13:07.180 Let's say the government said,

00:13:08.400 look, I know you don't trust

00:13:10.120 the news on the left.

00:13:11.640 Some of you don't trust

00:13:12.620 the news on the right.

00:13:14.080 We recommend,

00:13:15.860 but do not require,

00:13:17.980 just recommend

00:13:18.980 that you check

00:13:20.320 with this independent group

00:13:21.640 of rotating independent voices

00:13:23.620 just to give some context.

00:13:26.500 All right?

00:13:26.700 We're not saying

00:13:27.300 they're always right.

00:13:28.120 We're not saying

00:13:28.640 they're always wrong.

00:13:29.540 But it's not going to be

00:13:30.580 like the news

00:13:31.360 because the news

00:13:32.760 isn't trying to be right,

00:13:34.140 if we're being honest.

00:13:35.600 The news isn't trying

00:13:38.200 to be right.

00:13:40.740 I see Mike Sertovich

00:13:42.320 is being recommended

00:13:43.820 for this list.

00:13:45.680 I would also put him

00:13:47.040 on that list,

00:13:48.260 but he has that

00:13:50.420 pizza game thing

00:13:52.520 over his head.

00:13:54.880 So I think even Mike,

00:13:56.000 if you talk to him privately,

00:13:57.200 I'm guessing.

00:13:57.820 I'm not a mind reader,

00:13:59.340 you know,

00:13:59.740 but just guessing.

00:14:02.100 If you said,

00:14:03.000 hey, do you think

00:14:03.520 you're the perfect fit

00:14:04.480 for this?

00:14:05.400 Probably even he would say,

00:14:06.980 no, I got that

00:14:07.860 pizza game thing over me.

00:14:09.880 Try somebody else,

00:14:10.800 they'd have more credibility.

00:14:12.020 I'm guessing

00:14:12.500 that's what he would say.

00:14:13.940 But in terms of

00:14:15.140 is he the type of person

00:14:16.540 who has the right kind of mind

00:14:19.020 and independent thought?

00:14:20.460 Yeah, absolutely.

00:14:21.760 So if it were up to me,

00:14:23.820 yes.

00:14:24.780 But he's got

00:14:25.540 a reputational issue

00:14:26.700 that he would admit,

00:14:29.100 I think.

00:14:29.800 I mean, he put it

00:14:30.380 in his own,

00:14:30.960 he put it in his movie Hoax,

00:14:33.160 so it's not like

00:14:34.160 he's running away from it.

00:14:36.440 Alex Jones,

00:14:37.340 same problem, right?

00:14:38.320 He's not going to be viewed

00:14:40.180 as an independent voice.

00:14:42.480 All right.

00:14:44.620 But that's the idea,

00:14:45.700 is that maybe

00:14:48.140 there is some way

00:14:48.940 to embrace that idea.

00:14:51.380 All right.

00:14:54.520 Here's another way

00:14:55.400 to know that you live

00:14:56.460 in a propaganda bubble.

00:14:58.780 If everybody keeps telling you

00:15:00.320 that an election recount

00:15:01.680 is the same as an audit.

00:15:05.980 Because a recount

00:15:07.200 feels like completely different

00:15:09.760 from an audit.

00:15:11.520 How do you check

00:15:13.180 the software

00:15:14.100 of your election devices,

00:15:18.700 your counting machines

00:15:19.840 and your voting machines?

00:15:21.060 How do you check that

00:15:21.960 with a recount?

00:15:24.180 We're going to talk

00:15:24.840 about that.

00:15:26.320 So,

00:15:26.860 do they just count up

00:15:27.940 the lines of code

00:15:28.800 and say,

00:15:29.340 well, we counted

00:15:29.840 the lines of code,

00:15:30.720 it looks good to us.

00:15:32.500 Right?

00:15:33.020 I mean,

00:15:33.300 how do you check it?

00:15:34.260 So here are some questions

00:15:35.260 that I've been asking.

00:15:37.540 And

00:15:37.900 I'll run them by you

00:15:40.820 and I would say

00:15:41.380 that I'm short

00:15:42.160 of having an answer yet.

00:15:43.760 Now, right now,

00:15:44.480 I'm going to be modeling

00:15:45.400 what I just talked about.

00:15:47.480 Somebody to describe

00:15:48.620 the context of the news

00:15:50.360 to give you

00:15:51.340 a little better feel

00:15:52.680 for what's true

00:15:53.400 and what isn't.

00:15:54.040 And here it goes.

00:15:55.580 How do you know,

00:15:57.240 how does anybody know,

00:15:58.840 an election is fair?

00:16:00.640 It has been suggested

00:16:02.000 that if you do

00:16:03.320 these two things,

00:16:04.880 you can pretty much

00:16:05.960 find any kind of fraud

00:16:07.280 that would be big enough

00:16:08.740 to change

00:16:09.240 a national election.

00:16:11.100 Right?

00:16:11.520 So this is

00:16:12.400 brand new information

00:16:14.100 from just interacting

00:16:15.220 with people

00:16:15.720 who are smarter than I am

00:16:16.820 for the last several minutes.

00:16:18.500 And this is what

00:16:19.060 I believe I've learned.

00:16:21.000 Number one,

00:16:21.920 if you do a recount,

00:16:24.000 you can test

00:16:24.880 that the machines

00:16:26.200 doing the counting

00:16:27.200 counted correctly

00:16:28.980 the ballots.

00:16:31.480 But,

00:16:32.780 as you're just about

00:16:34.060 to yell into the screen

00:16:35.440 at me,

00:16:36.480 but Scott,

00:16:37.520 all you're doing

00:16:38.460 is counting

00:16:38.960 the fake ballots

00:16:39.900 if they're fake.

00:16:41.160 Right?

00:16:41.660 If the ballots

00:16:42.580 were not real ballots,

00:16:44.560 counting them

00:16:45.080 a second time

00:16:45.920 would just be

00:16:47.120 recounting fake ballots.

00:16:48.780 That's what you're

00:16:49.360 going to say to me

00:16:49.860 right now,

00:16:50.300 right?

00:16:51.520 But,

00:16:52.080 here's the second part.

00:16:53.780 Suppose on top

00:16:54.740 of recounting,

00:16:55.760 just to make sure

00:16:56.400 the physical counting

00:16:58.040 part is done right,

00:17:00.160 suppose on top

00:17:01.100 of that,

00:17:01.600 in addition,

00:17:02.940 you spot-checked

00:17:04.320 not every vote,

00:17:06.140 but you spot-checked

00:17:07.180 enough

00:17:07.580 to know that

00:17:08.900 there were no,

00:17:10.240 let's say,

00:17:10.680 signature problems

00:17:11.740 or fake ballots

00:17:13.200 or some irregularities

00:17:15.780 with addresses

00:17:16.860 or eligibility

00:17:18.480 to vote.

00:17:19.760 So,

00:17:20.060 let's say you

00:17:20.960 didn't check

00:17:21.980 everyone,

00:17:23.180 but you checked

00:17:23.720 enough of them

00:17:24.400 that if there had

00:17:25.040 been a problem

00:17:25.560 you would have

00:17:26.420 picked it up.

00:17:27.840 So,

00:17:28.320 now you've

00:17:28.780 checked enough

00:17:29.940 of the ballots

00:17:30.600 individually

00:17:31.360 to know that

00:17:33.520 statistically

00:17:34.280 you would have

00:17:34.960 found some

00:17:35.460 problems

00:17:35.880 if they were

00:17:36.460 there,

00:17:36.820 but you didn't.

00:17:38.320 And then you've

00:17:38.820 also checked

00:17:39.400 the count.

00:17:40.020 is there

00:17:41.780 anything

00:17:42.300 that you

00:17:42.740 could do

00:17:43.320 as a

00:17:44.180 potential fraudster

00:17:45.820 that could

00:17:47.040 defeat those

00:17:48.040 two kinds

00:17:48.740 of checks?

00:17:50.920 The claim

00:17:53.160 is that

00:17:54.620 there's nothing

00:17:55.060 you could do

00:17:55.780 that wouldn't

00:17:57.760 be obviously

00:17:58.480 detectable.

00:17:59.780 So,

00:18:00.140 everybody who

00:18:00.740 says a

00:18:01.820 recount doesn't

00:18:02.760 work,

00:18:03.920 you're absolutely

00:18:04.740 right that

00:18:06.280 by itself

00:18:07.160 it doesn't

00:18:08.500 work.

00:18:08.840 everybody who

00:18:10.860 says that if

00:18:11.560 you just

00:18:11.920 check some

00:18:12.520 ballots to

00:18:13.080 make sure

00:18:13.420 that those

00:18:13.920 signatures

00:18:14.460 matched and

00:18:15.420 they're real

00:18:15.760 people and

00:18:16.380 it's not

00:18:16.740 dead people,

00:18:17.740 if you're

00:18:18.120 just doing

00:18:18.520 a random

00:18:19.020 but statistically

00:18:21.940 valid check,

00:18:23.460 that doesn't

00:18:25.140 tell you that

00:18:26.000 you counted

00:18:26.460 right.

00:18:27.980 But what if

00:18:28.600 you do both?

00:18:30.180 You've checked

00:18:30.780 enough of the

00:18:31.660 individual ballots

00:18:32.600 to know there's

00:18:33.180 not a problem

00:18:33.800 with them,

00:18:34.760 and you've

00:18:35.240 checked the

00:18:36.260 counting to

00:18:37.120 know the

00:18:37.480 counting was

00:18:38.160 right,

00:18:38.840 have you

00:18:39.760 now checked

00:18:41.400 everything you

00:18:42.400 need to

00:18:42.900 check to

00:18:44.100 find large

00:18:45.200 fraud?

00:18:46.340 Now,

00:18:46.700 this would

00:18:47.040 not uncover

00:18:48.200 somebody who

00:18:49.600 signed up

00:18:50.060 their neighbor

00:18:51.640 who didn't

00:18:52.400 know about

00:18:52.880 it,

00:18:53.060 right?

00:18:53.460 So,

00:18:53.920 the onesies

00:18:54.420 and twosies,

00:18:55.120 of course,

00:18:55.480 could slide

00:18:55.940 right through.

00:18:59.020 All right,

00:18:59.700 so somebody's

00:19:00.240 saying,

00:19:00.440 what about

00:19:00.700 the software

00:19:01.300 code?

00:19:01.820 what would

00:19:03.100 the software

00:19:03.700 code do

00:19:04.820 besides make

00:19:06.400 the count

00:19:07.040 incorrect?

00:19:08.580 And if

00:19:09.080 you've got

00:19:09.400 the final

00:19:09.900 tally,

00:19:11.120 and you've

00:19:11.780 got the

00:19:12.100 original ballots,

00:19:13.520 and you

00:19:13.860 recount the

00:19:14.520 original ballots,

00:19:15.880 and then you

00:19:16.480 look at the

00:19:17.020 count that

00:19:17.440 came out of

00:19:17.840 the machine,

00:19:18.880 and they

00:19:19.420 match,

00:19:20.000 you know,

00:19:20.320 within one

00:19:20.820 or two votes

00:19:21.420 or whatever,

00:19:22.060 but they

00:19:22.380 match,

00:19:23.560 does it

00:19:24.220 matter what

00:19:24.640 happened in

00:19:25.220 the internals

00:19:25.980 of the

00:19:26.440 software?

00:19:26.740 What could

00:19:29.680 you do

00:19:30.000 with the

00:19:30.320 software that

00:19:31.760 would do

00:19:32.040 anything wrong

00:19:32.840 or bad if

00:19:33.860 you know that

00:19:34.400 the ballots

00:19:34.960 that went

00:19:35.360 into it

00:19:35.780 and got

00:19:36.080 counted are

00:19:37.380 the same

00:19:37.860 as the

00:19:38.320 final tally?

00:19:40.020 Does that

00:19:40.700 not prove

00:19:42.520 to your

00:19:42.940 satisfaction that

00:19:43.880 even if there

00:19:44.600 was some

00:19:44.920 mischief in

00:19:45.440 there,

00:19:46.100 it didn't

00:19:46.460 do anything?

00:19:47.600 Because if

00:19:48.160 it did,

00:19:48.680 they wouldn't

00:19:49.240 match.

00:19:50.700 Am I

00:19:51.240 wrong?

00:19:51.940 What about

00:19:52.380 the dead

00:19:52.760 voters,

00:19:53.540 somebody says?

00:19:54.340 What about

00:19:54.640 these alleged

00:19:55.400 zillions of

00:19:56.720 dead voters?

00:19:57.720 In every

00:19:58.360 case,

00:19:59.600 it is my

00:20:00.120 understanding

00:20:00.620 that that

00:20:01.420 has been

00:20:01.780 looked into

00:20:02.420 and found

00:20:03.560 that those

00:20:04.180 were onesies

00:20:04.900 and twosies,

00:20:05.740 in other

00:20:05.960 words,

00:20:06.160 small numbers,

00:20:07.060 and that

00:20:07.700 there is no

00:20:08.320 indication that

00:20:10.440 there are a

00:20:10.900 large number

00:20:11.460 of dead

00:20:11.860 voters.

00:20:12.420 That has

00:20:12.620 not been

00:20:13.080 detected

00:20:13.520 anywhere.

00:20:15.160 There are

00:20:16.160 lists of

00:20:17.360 people who

00:20:17.860 look like

00:20:18.300 they might

00:20:18.720 have been

00:20:18.960 dead or

00:20:19.560 incorrect,

00:20:21.180 who have

00:20:21.460 maybe not

00:20:22.040 checked every

00:20:22.680 single one,

00:20:23.800 but since we

00:20:24.380 know that lots

00:20:24.940 of people have

00:20:25.440 the same name,

00:20:26.720 there is

00:20:28.320 another

00:20:28.580 explanation,

00:20:29.460 which is

00:20:29.780 lots of

00:20:30.140 people have

00:20:30.480 the same

00:20:30.740 name.

00:20:32.200 Now,

00:20:32.860 you go right

00:20:33.440 down the

00:20:33.780 list.

00:20:34.120 What about

00:20:34.500 the people

00:20:34.980 who don't

00:20:37.540 really,

00:20:38.180 they use the

00:20:39.400 same address,

00:20:40.320 or whatever,

00:20:40.760 blah, blah, blah.

00:20:43.700 Everything,

00:20:44.800 I believe most

00:20:45.960 of these things

00:20:46.600 have at least

00:20:47.160 been randomly

00:20:48.100 spot-checked

00:20:49.000 to know that

00:20:49.680 they're not

00:20:50.900 checking out.

00:20:51.540 So, let

00:20:54.420 me get to

00:20:54.980 point two.

00:20:56.580 So, here's

00:20:56.940 the first

00:20:57.380 thing that I

00:20:57.880 want to

00:20:58.140 know.

00:20:58.860 And by

00:20:59.120 the way,

00:20:59.700 an election

00:21:00.280 expert did

00:21:03.160 contact me

00:21:03.880 just this

00:21:05.000 morning and

00:21:06.500 offered to

00:21:07.100 answer some

00:21:07.640 questions about

00:21:08.400 election system

00:21:10.020 integrity.

00:21:10.740 Because the

00:21:11.100 question I

00:21:11.560 have is,

00:21:12.460 is there

00:21:12.820 any way to

00:21:13.440 cheat?

00:21:15.000 Suppose it

00:21:16.820 was true,

00:21:17.700 and I'm not

00:21:18.900 saying this is

00:21:19.540 true,

00:21:19.860 suppose it's

00:21:20.400 true, that

00:21:22.200 our system

00:21:22.960 doesn't have

00:21:23.840 any way you

00:21:24.380 can cheat so

00:21:26.060 long as you've

00:21:26.680 done those two

00:21:27.260 things.

00:21:27.720 You do a

00:21:28.200 recount in the

00:21:28.960 places that you

00:21:29.500 have questions,

00:21:30.620 and you do a

00:21:31.520 statistically valid

00:21:32.660 check of any

00:21:34.140 allegations about

00:21:35.080 dead people

00:21:35.640 voting or wrong

00:21:36.740 addresses or

00:21:37.740 signatures not

00:21:38.960 matching, and

00:21:39.580 you don't find

00:21:40.060 any.

00:21:41.600 Is that it?

00:21:42.660 Are you done?

00:21:43.360 100% okay?

00:21:45.400 I don't know.

00:21:47.420 I don't know.

00:21:48.420 But I do know

00:21:49.460 this.

00:21:50.400 If that were

00:21:51.560 true, if it

00:21:54.580 were true that

00:21:55.940 those two kinds

00:21:56.940 of checkings get

00:21:58.920 all the problems

00:21:59.760 that could be

00:22:00.380 found, why

00:22:02.020 hasn't anybody

00:22:02.600 told us that?

00:22:04.680 Does that seem

00:22:05.540 like there's

00:22:05.940 something missing?

00:22:07.400 Where is the

00:22:08.100 expert who says,

00:22:09.200 look, look,

00:22:09.660 look, the

00:22:10.620 biggest question

00:22:11.280 in the country is

00:22:12.740 election integrity.

00:22:14.200 Let me explain

00:22:15.140 to you why it

00:22:16.540 couldn't have been

00:22:17.200 a problem.

00:22:17.680 And then that

00:22:19.180 expert, hypothetically,

00:22:20.820 would say, as

00:22:21.960 long as you're

00:22:22.460 doing these two

00:22:23.140 things, recounting

00:22:25.540 and checking it to

00:22:26.280 the total, and

00:22:27.480 also randomly

00:22:28.260 checking enough

00:22:29.320 of them, the

00:22:30.580 claims of dead

00:22:31.400 people, the

00:22:32.000 claims of

00:22:32.560 signatures not

00:22:33.240 matching, if you

00:22:34.220 check enough of

00:22:34.980 them, you can

00:22:35.920 determine statistically

00:22:36.960 that there was no

00:22:37.700 problem.

00:22:38.020 where is my

00:22:40.400 expert, who

00:22:41.280 actually understands

00:22:42.180 the whole system

00:22:42.980 from beginning to

00:22:43.740 end, who sits in

00:22:45.720 front of the

00:22:46.100 camera on CNN

00:22:47.060 and says, look,

00:22:49.140 you got all these

00:22:49.840 claims, but I'm

00:22:51.360 telling you there's

00:22:51.980 no physical

00:22:52.840 possible way there

00:22:55.140 could be massive

00:22:55.780 fraud when you've

00:22:57.400 checked these two

00:22:58.200 things, and we

00:22:59.200 have.

00:23:00.700 Where's that

00:23:01.400 person?

00:23:02.860 Is the problem

00:23:04.100 that what I just

00:23:06.380 said is true, but

00:23:07.660 people are terrible

00:23:08.440 communicators, they

00:23:10.340 don't know that

00:23:11.000 that's the biggest

00:23:11.640 question, and that

00:23:12.580 it could be easily

00:23:13.420 described, because I

00:23:14.900 just easily

00:23:15.480 described it.

00:23:17.160 In fact, I only

00:23:18.240 got this description

00:23:19.400 from a tweet from

00:23:21.080 a stranger.

00:23:22.180 Somebody just

00:23:22.760 tweeted at me, oh,

00:23:23.980 if you do this and

00:23:24.840 this, you're fine.

00:23:26.580 I don't know.

00:23:27.580 I'm no expert.

00:23:28.600 Where's my expert?

00:23:30.920 I'll try to get you

00:23:31.860 an expert.

00:23:33.480 Now, I told you I

00:23:35.620 got the master list

00:23:36.840 of all the

00:23:37.560 election claims, or

00:23:38.920 something close to

00:23:40.020 all of them, and

00:23:41.500 the debunks of

00:23:43.220 them.

00:23:44.540 Now, it's a very

00:23:45.120 long document.

00:23:46.100 It's 42 pages of

00:23:47.480 background and

00:23:48.360 claims and what

00:23:49.420 happened about

00:23:49.940 them.

00:23:50.680 So I've looked

00:23:51.220 through them, and

00:23:52.800 I was offered this

00:23:55.320 document by, as I

00:23:56.640 told you, somebody

00:23:57.480 you would recognize

00:23:59.460 in the government,

00:24:00.480 and I'm going to

00:24:00.920 try to leave names

00:24:01.740 out of it just

00:24:02.340 because I don't

00:24:02.760 want to bias the

00:24:04.480 audience.

00:24:04.860 But just assume

00:24:08.220 that somebody you

00:24:09.780 know in the

00:24:10.400 government said,

00:24:11.800 hey, Scott, you're

00:24:12.580 talking about this.

00:24:13.800 You should see this

00:24:14.520 document that shows

00:24:15.480 all of the claims

00:24:16.280 and then shows how

00:24:18.020 they've been

00:24:18.400 debunked, either by

00:24:19.960 the courts, I think

00:24:21.280 mostly by the

00:24:21.900 courts, or at least

00:24:22.680 logically debunked.

00:24:24.260 So I looked

00:24:24.700 through it.

00:24:25.920 What do you think

00:24:26.700 I found?

00:24:28.160 Do you think that I

00:24:29.500 looked at a document

00:24:30.400 that claims to

00:24:31.340 debunk all the

00:24:32.400 claims, and that I

00:24:33.940 read it, and I

00:24:34.540 said to myself,

00:24:36.200 oh, pretty good.

00:24:38.020 These are pretty

00:24:38.540 good debunks.

00:24:40.940 No.

00:24:42.760 Of course not.

00:24:45.300 If you live in the

00:24:46.340 real world, you

00:24:47.940 should have known

00:24:48.520 before I even

00:24:49.320 touched the

00:24:49.900 document that what

00:24:51.360 it wasn't going to

00:24:52.360 do is answer all

00:24:53.240 my questions.

00:24:55.000 Right?

00:24:55.780 If you live in the

00:24:56.500 real world, there

00:24:57.600 wasn't any chance

00:24:58.560 that a 42-page

00:25:00.020 document was going

00:25:01.420 to answer all of my

00:25:02.200 questions.

00:25:02.620 questions, but it

00:25:04.220 is really useful.

00:25:05.180 Let me tell you some

00:25:05.920 of the things I

00:25:06.680 found.

00:25:08.160 So this is a

00:25:09.220 document that its

00:25:10.880 intention was to

00:25:11.900 make you stop

00:25:12.680 doubting the

00:25:14.100 election outcomes.

00:25:16.440 Let me say here,

00:25:17.400 for the benefit of

00:25:18.420 my censors who

00:25:20.740 are watching this,

00:25:22.620 I'm not personally

00:25:23.940 aware of any

00:25:24.960 proof of election

00:25:27.120 fraud.

00:25:28.820 Just me personally,

00:25:30.160 I haven't seen any.

00:25:31.260 And if somebody

00:25:32.600 told me they'd

00:25:33.400 seen it, why

00:25:34.100 would I believe

00:25:34.680 them?

00:25:36.420 We're not in a

00:25:37.400 world where you

00:25:38.040 could believe any

00:25:38.860 allegation.

00:25:39.920 I'm the guy who

00:25:40.540 told you that at

00:25:41.380 least 95% of all

00:25:43.060 the election fraud

00:25:44.480 allegations at the

00:25:45.380 very beginning, I

00:25:46.360 told you this, would

00:25:47.620 be BS.

00:25:48.800 Even if there's some

00:25:49.660 real stuff there, 95%

00:25:51.920 of it would be BS.

00:25:52.720 So, which is not

00:25:58.180 to say there's no

00:25:58.840 fraud, just that the

00:26:01.820 specific claims would

00:26:02.860 mostly be BS.

00:26:04.400 So here are some of

00:26:05.440 the things I found as

00:26:06.520 counters.

00:26:07.420 Of course, a lot of

00:26:08.700 the counters were that

00:26:09.860 the argument did not

00:26:11.720 have standing.

00:26:13.180 So a lot of things were

00:26:14.600 rejected because it was

00:26:16.540 too late to bring the

00:26:17.800 thing or the people

00:26:18.780 bringing it were not

00:26:19.700 the right people bringing

00:26:20.540 it.

00:26:20.700 So there were a

00:26:21.720 number of things were

00:26:22.320 rejected for technical

00:26:23.480 reasons.

00:26:24.440 But the other question

00:26:25.780 was, were there any

00:26:27.100 actual claims that

00:26:29.500 were evaluated by a

00:26:30.920 court?

00:26:31.500 And the answer is,

00:26:33.160 yes, ish.

00:26:36.580 By evaluated by the

00:26:38.240 court, I mean that the

00:26:39.420 document debunking it

00:26:40.680 has reasons like this.

00:26:43.400 The guy making the

00:26:44.440 claim is not credible.

00:26:47.440 To which I say,

00:26:48.740 that would be true of

00:26:51.980 every politician.

00:26:53.900 That would be true of a

00:26:55.040 lot of people who are

00:26:56.020 not credible.

00:26:57.020 But the claim is

00:26:58.040 something you could

00:26:58.680 check.

00:27:00.440 Suppose somebody who's

00:27:01.580 not credible,

00:27:03.060 somebody whose past

00:27:04.420 might have included

00:27:05.500 being a ghost hunter,

00:27:07.420 because that's one of

00:27:08.280 the examples.

00:27:09.160 So one of the experts

00:27:10.300 had some history of

00:27:11.900 being a ghost hunter.

00:27:12.860 And so that was

00:27:14.760 used to dismiss

00:27:15.620 his claim.

00:27:16.940 To which I say,

00:27:18.380 his claim had

00:27:20.220 evidence.

00:27:22.200 It wasn't like

00:27:23.260 something he claims

00:27:24.420 he saw,

00:27:25.640 it's something he

00:27:26.340 says he can show

00:27:27.140 you.

00:27:28.320 Like on a document,

00:27:30.200 on a, you know,

00:27:31.840 he can show it to

00:27:32.560 you.

00:27:33.020 So everything that

00:27:34.060 he saw, he can just

00:27:35.840 hand it to you,

00:27:36.660 and is willing to.

00:27:37.500 But it was dismissed

00:27:39.600 because he was once

00:27:40.640 a ghost hunter.

00:27:42.920 Do you feel okay

00:27:43.840 about that?

00:27:45.120 Do you feel okay

00:27:45.860 that his evidence,

00:27:47.900 and apparently he has

00:27:49.120 at least some expertise

00:27:50.180 that would allow him

00:27:51.300 to evaluate that

00:27:52.840 kind of evidence,

00:27:54.020 are you okay that

00:27:54.820 he was dismissed

00:27:55.820 for having once

00:27:57.060 been a ghost hunter?

00:27:58.720 Because if he's

00:28:00.060 willing to show

00:28:00.860 you the evidence,

00:28:02.600 wouldn't it feel

00:28:03.480 a little bit more

00:28:04.320 credible to say,

00:28:05.840 and we looked at

00:28:06.740 the evidence,

00:28:07.500 and here's why

00:28:08.780 the evidence is

00:28:09.480 not real?

00:28:11.280 I feel like that

00:28:13.100 was a little bit

00:28:13.660 brushed off.

00:28:14.880 Now, do I

00:28:15.440 personally think

00:28:16.360 that that's,

00:28:18.080 you know,

00:28:18.400 whichever one was

00:28:19.440 the ghost hunter

00:28:20.140 expert,

00:28:21.020 do I personally

00:28:21.820 think his evidence

00:28:22.700 was credible?

00:28:24.220 No.

00:28:25.360 No.

00:28:26.400 I don't.

00:28:27.240 But I'm just saying

00:28:27.960 if it was rejected

00:28:28.860 without being looked

00:28:29.760 at, let's not

00:28:31.460 claim it was

00:28:32.080 being looked at.

00:28:33.200 Because that just

00:28:34.160 didn't happen.

00:28:35.780 Or, at least

00:28:36.980 their response

00:28:37.780 in this document

00:28:38.700 doesn't mention

00:28:39.420 that they looked

00:28:40.020 at the details.

00:28:42.040 But again,

00:28:42.840 95% of the claims

00:28:43.920 are going to be

00:28:44.440 bogus,

00:28:45.280 and so I don't

00:28:46.280 believe that expert

00:28:47.220 because I don't

00:28:48.440 believe any of them.

00:28:49.700 Just automatically,

00:28:50.640 I don't believe it.

00:28:51.220 they've got a pretty

00:28:52.880 big high barrier,

00:28:55.960 or let's see,

00:28:56.520 a high bar for

00:28:57.600 proof,

00:28:58.560 in my mind,

00:28:59.440 and nobody's

00:28:59.960 met it yet.

00:29:01.360 So,

00:29:02.900 here's another

00:29:04.160 allegation.

00:29:05.520 There was an

00:29:05.880 allegation that the

00:29:06.660 vote count

00:29:07.560 stopped in some

00:29:09.760 places,

00:29:11.280 about this,

00:29:12.220 you know,

00:29:12.580 mysteriously stopped,

00:29:14.380 and then when it

00:29:15.420 restarted,

00:29:17.340 there were massive

00:29:18.280 votes for Biden.

00:29:19.380 That's one of the

00:29:20.620 major things that

00:29:21.920 many of the people

00:29:23.160 watching this would

00:29:24.800 say is really strong

00:29:25.980 evidence that there's

00:29:26.800 something up.

00:29:29.360 But,

00:29:29.740 you would be happy

00:29:30.440 to know that it

00:29:31.520 has been thoroughly

00:29:32.360 debunked by this

00:29:33.980 document I saw.

00:29:35.620 So,

00:29:36.120 what would be the

00:29:36.760 other reason that

00:29:37.700 the vote counting

00:29:38.360 would stop,

00:29:39.820 and then when it

00:29:40.520 restarts,

00:29:41.560 it's massively

00:29:42.300 Biden votes?

00:29:43.300 and the answer

00:29:44.340 is that those

00:29:45.480 are the mail-in

00:29:46.680 ballots.

00:29:47.720 So,

00:29:48.300 they saved the

00:29:48.940 mail-in ballots

00:29:50.020 to count them

00:29:50.680 at the end,

00:29:51.640 and everybody

00:29:52.320 knew that the

00:29:52.980 mail-in ballots

00:29:53.640 would favor the

00:29:54.960 Democrat,

00:29:55.580 because it always

00:29:56.000 does.

00:29:57.040 So,

00:29:57.600 the answer to

00:29:58.400 that is that

00:29:59.080 the reason that

00:29:59.780 the voting

00:30:00.180 stopped,

00:30:01.700 and then when

00:30:02.280 it restarted,

00:30:03.760 it was massively

00:30:04.560 Biden,

00:30:05.140 is perfectly

00:30:05.740 explainable by

00:30:07.300 the fact that

00:30:07.840 mail-in votes,

00:30:08.820 we knew,

00:30:09.340 would go to

00:30:09.780 Biden.

00:30:10.040 Are you good

00:30:10.700 with that?

00:30:11.020 You're way

00:30:14.260 ahead of me,

00:30:15.460 but why the

00:30:16.200 stop?

00:30:17.900 Why the

00:30:18.500 stop?

00:30:19.660 The debunk

00:30:20.820 for the claim

00:30:22.020 that it was

00:30:22.560 stopped,

00:30:23.560 and then when

00:30:24.140 it restarted,

00:30:25.060 it was massively

00:30:25.760 Biden,

00:30:26.680 was that mail-in

00:30:27.720 votes are at

00:30:29.260 the end,

00:30:29.780 and they're

00:30:30.120 massively going

00:30:31.320 to be Democrat.

00:30:32.080 We already

00:30:32.380 knew that.

00:30:33.640 But where did

00:30:34.160 they explain

00:30:34.660 the stopping

00:30:35.260 part?

00:30:36.660 The stopping

00:30:37.520 part was not

00:30:38.200 addressed.

00:30:39.660 So,

00:30:39.920 the document

00:30:40.420 that debunks

00:30:41.240 the claim

00:30:42.840 that there

00:30:43.460 was mysterious

00:30:44.960 stops in

00:30:46.640 the places

00:30:47.080 where there

00:30:47.540 are questions,

00:30:48.760 followed by

00:30:49.440 the Biden

00:30:49.960 ballots that

00:30:50.580 are mail-in,

00:30:51.380 mail-in.

00:30:51.980 The mail-in

00:30:52.760 ballot part,

00:30:53.640 that sounds

00:30:54.180 okay.

00:30:55.460 Do you have

00:30:55.920 any problem

00:30:56.480 with understanding

00:30:57.300 that mail-in

00:30:58.000 ballots would

00:30:59.160 favor Biden?

00:31:00.580 You probably

00:31:01.140 don't question

00:31:01.700 that, right?

00:31:02.260 Everybody knew

00:31:02.900 that.

00:31:04.000 But why the

00:31:04.560 stop?

00:31:05.380 It was the

00:31:06.100 stops that

00:31:07.080 were common

00:31:07.560 to the

00:31:07.980 problem areas

00:31:09.160 that are

00:31:10.580 the question.

00:31:11.540 And the

00:31:11.800 debunk

00:31:12.260 doesn't

00:31:13.080 mention them.

00:31:14.600 Now,

00:31:14.880 could there

00:31:15.220 be a

00:31:15.680 perfectly

00:31:16.020 good reason?

00:31:16.880 And the

00:31:17.120 answer is

00:31:17.400 yes.

00:31:18.320 The perfectly

00:31:18.920 good reason

00:31:19.620 could be,

00:31:20.140 and I'm

00:31:20.340 just speculating,

00:31:21.640 pure speculation,

00:31:23.200 it could be

00:31:23.780 that there's

00:31:24.220 some kind

00:31:24.640 of a

00:31:25.260 process

00:31:25.980 set up

00:31:27.160 that's a

00:31:27.860 little different

00:31:28.520 when you

00:31:29.360 go to

00:31:29.760 count the

00:31:30.580 mail-ins

00:31:32.140 that came

00:31:32.580 from some

00:31:33.120 source.

00:31:34.120 There might

00:31:34.600 be a

00:31:35.080 reason where

00:31:35.680 they physically

00:31:37.280 need to move

00:31:37.980 them into the

00:31:38.560 building,

00:31:40.040 say,

00:31:40.420 let's say,

00:31:40.860 for example,

00:31:42.100 and that it

00:31:42.760 takes a little

00:31:43.120 while to

00:31:43.520 physically move

00:31:44.240 them in so

00:31:44.840 they weren't

00:31:45.180 really stopping

00:31:46.340 counting,

00:31:47.180 maybe it was

00:31:48.380 just the

00:31:48.680 process.

00:31:49.860 But that

00:31:50.460 needs to be

00:31:50.920 explained,

00:31:51.440 doesn't it?

00:31:52.820 Doesn't that

00:31:53.260 need to be

00:31:53.640 explained?

00:31:55.040 Don't we need

00:31:56.000 to hear that?

00:31:56.800 Somebody say,

00:31:57.440 oh yeah,

00:31:58.480 it looks like

00:31:59.220 it's stopped,

00:32:00.120 but that's just

00:32:00.900 part of the

00:32:01.260 process.

00:32:02.320 You should

00:32:02.700 expect that.

00:32:03.800 And then also

00:32:04.480 explain to us

00:32:05.220 why other cities

00:32:06.180 didn't have the

00:32:06.780 stop,

00:32:07.500 if that's the

00:32:08.120 case.

00:32:08.860 It could be

00:32:09.520 that every city

00:32:10.240 had some kind

00:32:10.960 of a stop,

00:32:12.060 some were longer

00:32:12.780 than others,

00:32:13.640 maybe it doesn't

00:32:14.200 mean anything.

00:32:15.280 But wouldn't

00:32:15.740 you at least

00:32:16.140 like to know,

00:32:17.860 was it limited

00:32:18.860 to these

00:32:19.420 problem,

00:32:21.520 at least

00:32:22.060 alleged problem

00:32:23.020 cities?

00:32:24.020 They're the only

00:32:24.640 ones that have

00:32:25.100 a stop with

00:32:25.820 a restart?

00:32:27.160 So if you

00:32:28.300 think that the

00:32:28.920 courts have

00:32:29.700 judged this and

00:32:30.580 smart people have

00:32:31.360 looked at it and

00:32:32.460 they've addressed

00:32:33.040 all the claims,

00:32:34.980 I'm not seeing it.

00:32:36.160 All right,

00:32:37.260 here's another

00:32:37.680 one.

00:32:39.540 Suppose you

00:32:40.580 go to a court

00:32:41.420 and you say,

00:32:42.420 I've got all

00:32:43.480 this statistical

00:32:44.260 evidence that a

00:32:45.260 crime happened,

00:32:46.800 but there is

00:32:48.840 a 10% chance

00:32:50.060 that it was

00:32:51.060 perfectly legal

00:32:52.700 whatever happened.

00:32:54.100 So my

00:32:54.840 statistical evidence

00:32:56.180 is a 90%

00:32:57.900 chance that

00:32:58.620 there was a

00:32:59.040 crime.

00:32:59.460 can't tell

00:33:01.580 exactly,

00:33:02.440 90% chance,

00:33:03.960 but there is

00:33:04.860 a 10% chance

00:33:06.020 that something

00:33:06.500 normal happened

00:33:07.280 and it just

00:33:07.900 looks anomalous.

00:33:09.900 What does the

00:33:10.880 court do with

00:33:11.780 that?

00:33:13.520 Toss it out.

00:33:15.180 They toss it

00:33:15.700 out.

00:33:16.240 Because if there's

00:33:17.120 any explanation

00:33:18.180 for the thing

00:33:19.280 that isn't

00:33:20.640 crazy,

00:33:21.540 that's your

00:33:22.280 benefit of the

00:33:22.840 doubt.

00:33:23.920 Right?

00:33:24.540 So let me

00:33:25.480 give you an

00:33:26.200 example.

00:33:26.820 If you had

00:33:28.160 an anomalous

00:33:29.000 result in a,

00:33:30.840 let's say,

00:33:31.420 a precinct,

00:33:32.700 where let's

00:33:33.220 say it had

00:33:33.800 always gone to

00:33:34.440 Trump for,

00:33:35.820 or let's say

00:33:36.420 it had always

00:33:36.760 gone to

00:33:37.360 Republicans for

00:33:39.240 30 years in

00:33:40.080 a row,

00:33:40.800 it went strongly

00:33:41.700 to Trump last

00:33:42.640 year,

00:33:43.340 but this time

00:33:44.260 it went to

00:33:44.740 Biden strong.

00:33:46.300 Now, if you're

00:33:47.180 just a human,

00:33:48.360 you say,

00:33:48.860 whoa, whoa,

00:33:49.140 whoa, there's

00:33:49.840 something we need

00:33:50.700 to look into.

00:33:52.400 This 30-year

00:33:53.760 trend just went

00:33:55.620 to Trump on

00:33:56.800 by the way,

00:33:57.260 I'm making

00:33:57.600 this one up.

00:33:58.280 I don't think

00:33:58.640 this is an

00:33:59.140 actual allegation.

00:34:00.780 Just went to

00:34:01.320 Trump.

00:34:03.360 Statistically,

00:34:04.500 the odds of

00:34:05.020 that, 90%

00:34:06.500 chance there's

00:34:07.200 something fishy

00:34:07.860 going on.

00:34:09.520 But there's a

00:34:10.340 10% chance

00:34:11.380 that somebody

00:34:13.760 was just good

00:34:14.460 at getting out

00:34:14.980 the vote.

00:34:16.440 Right?

00:34:17.300 They could have

00:34:18.040 just been

00:34:18.560 really good

00:34:19.920 in that precinct

00:34:22.040 at getting out

00:34:22.700 the vote.

00:34:23.360 So the court

00:34:23.960 looks at it

00:34:24.520 and said,

00:34:25.360 it sounds like

00:34:26.020 you have two

00:34:26.460 explanations.

00:34:27.600 One, 90%

00:34:29.200 chance that

00:34:29.920 this is fishy.

00:34:31.320 And the other,

00:34:32.700 it was completely

00:34:33.420 normal and

00:34:34.160 somebody was

00:34:34.760 good at getting

00:34:35.300 out the vote.

00:34:36.440 What does the

00:34:37.280 court do with

00:34:37.900 that?

00:34:39.080 They don't take

00:34:40.060 the case.

00:34:41.640 Because if you

00:34:42.560 know from the

00:34:43.480 start there is

00:34:45.500 an explanation

00:34:46.300 that can just

00:34:47.340 explain it away,

00:34:48.840 you don't look

00:34:49.680 at it.

00:34:50.040 So there are

00:34:51.480 a whole bunch

00:34:51.940 of cases

00:34:52.440 in which there's

00:34:53.600 something like

00:34:54.840 an enormous

00:34:56.360 statistical question

00:34:58.280 that the court

00:34:59.900 just looks at

00:35:00.520 and says,

00:35:01.120 but is there

00:35:02.220 any other way

00:35:03.140 this could be

00:35:03.700 explained?

00:35:05.260 And if the

00:35:05.760 answer is yes,

00:35:06.760 the court

00:35:07.340 doesn't look at

00:35:07.980 it.

00:35:08.720 Because they're

00:35:09.420 dealing with

00:35:10.160 high likelihood

00:35:11.420 things.

00:35:12.420 Now suppose

00:35:13.180 you had

00:35:15.320 lots of

00:35:16.100 lots of

00:35:17.640 individual

00:35:18.100 cases that

00:35:19.000 if you looked

00:35:19.480 at any one

00:35:20.100 of them,

00:35:20.660 it would not

00:35:21.360 add up to

00:35:22.200 changing the

00:35:22.920 election.

00:35:23.900 But it's a

00:35:25.080 bunch of

00:35:25.380 different precincts

00:35:26.360 with, you

00:35:26.740 know, 2%

00:35:27.960 shaving here

00:35:28.860 or there.

00:35:30.020 Would that be

00:35:30.900 enough to

00:35:31.900 change the

00:35:32.340 election?

00:35:32.880 Well, in

00:35:33.180 theory it

00:35:33.600 could be

00:35:33.820 enough to

00:35:34.160 change the

00:35:34.580 election,

00:35:35.400 but if a

00:35:36.100 court is just

00:35:36.740 looking at

00:35:37.200 one part of

00:35:38.020 it, the

00:35:38.880 court is going

00:35:39.420 to say,

00:35:39.900 this wouldn't

00:35:40.260 change the

00:35:40.740 outcome, the

00:35:41.780 part I'm

00:35:42.120 looking at,

00:35:43.400 so therefore I

00:35:44.100 won't take

00:35:44.520 it.

00:35:45.360 So there are

00:35:46.080 all these

00:35:46.520 reasons why

00:35:47.200 the court

00:35:47.620 is the

00:35:48.080 wrong tool

00:35:48.900 to even

00:35:50.020 look into

00:35:50.480 stuff.

00:35:51.500 Because as

00:35:51.940 soon as you

00:35:52.360 say, well,

00:35:53.120 there might

00:35:53.400 be another

00:35:53.820 explanation,

00:35:55.140 the court

00:35:55.520 says, that's

00:35:56.080 all we need

00:35:56.460 to hear.

00:35:57.540 If you

00:35:57.900 don't have

00:35:59.300 a direct

00:35:59.860 witness to

00:36:01.680 the crime

00:36:02.260 and it's

00:36:03.940 just statistical

00:36:04.740 and there's

00:36:05.880 another reason

00:36:06.720 that it could

00:36:07.720 have happened,

00:36:08.180 that's it.

00:36:08.800 That's the

00:36:09.160 end of the

00:36:09.480 question.

00:36:11.380 What about

00:36:12.040 all those

00:36:12.500 eyewitnesses

00:36:13.700 that you

00:36:14.320 heard about?

00:36:14.880 you heard

00:36:15.740 about a

00:36:16.040 whole bunch

00:36:16.340 of eyewitnesses

00:36:17.400 that had

00:36:18.820 signed

00:36:19.280 affidavits

00:36:20.120 and stuff

00:36:20.620 saying they

00:36:21.100 had witnessed

00:36:21.560 crime?

00:36:23.320 Well, turns

00:36:24.140 out a lot

00:36:24.580 of that's

00:36:24.900 fake.

00:36:26.220 There are a

00:36:27.240 lot of people

00:36:27.700 who say they

00:36:28.480 witnessed

00:36:28.960 something,

00:36:30.040 but a number

00:36:31.440 of those

00:36:31.860 allegations

00:36:32.460 sound like

00:36:33.680 we don't

00:36:34.660 know what

00:36:35.060 happened behind

00:36:35.700 that door,

00:36:36.840 or I think

00:36:38.000 they were

00:36:38.320 changing things

00:36:39.140 but I can't

00:36:39.720 be sure,

00:36:40.300 or they

00:36:41.720 had a

00:36:42.040 pile of

00:36:42.700 ballots

00:36:43.520 that looked

00:36:44.060 suspicious

00:36:44.620 but I

00:36:45.180 don't know

00:36:45.520 for sure.

00:36:47.140 If you

00:36:47.520 add all

00:36:48.060 of that

00:36:48.360 up, it

00:36:48.660 doesn't

00:36:48.880 add to

00:36:49.360 anything,

00:36:50.600 nothing.

00:36:51.480 It's just

00:36:51.920 people who

00:36:52.420 saw something

00:36:53.040 that they

00:36:53.400 didn't know

00:36:53.680 what they

00:36:53.880 were seeing

00:36:54.320 and are

00:36:55.140 calling out

00:36:55.800 something

00:36:56.580 looks

00:36:56.900 suspicious.

00:36:58.040 But that's

00:36:58.460 not evidence.

00:37:00.060 The fact

00:37:00.540 that somebody

00:37:00.980 doesn't know

00:37:01.500 why something

00:37:02.040 happened

00:37:02.520 isn't going

00:37:04.140 to convict

00:37:04.620 anybody.

00:37:04.960 So the

00:37:08.880 other problem

00:37:09.440 is that,

00:37:10.500 and the

00:37:10.820 first time

00:37:11.460 I heard

00:37:11.740 this was

00:37:12.200 reading this

00:37:12.720 document,

00:37:13.280 and I'll

00:37:13.500 bet you

00:37:13.800 have never

00:37:14.220 heard this.

00:37:15.720 And ask

00:37:16.180 yourself how

00:37:17.060 well you're

00:37:17.520 being served

00:37:18.120 by the

00:37:18.560 news that

00:37:19.540 the next

00:37:19.920 thing I

00:37:20.260 tell you,

00:37:20.640 you've

00:37:20.820 probably

00:37:21.100 never heard

00:37:21.660 before.

00:37:22.680 A lot

00:37:23.260 of those

00:37:23.600 witnesses

00:37:24.060 signed

00:37:25.960 statements,

00:37:27.400 but not

00:37:28.340 under oath

00:37:29.100 and not

00:37:29.540 with any

00:37:30.940 kind of

00:37:31.380 legal binding

00:37:32.120 anything.

00:37:33.280 And so the

00:37:33.720 courts looked

00:37:34.280 at it and

00:37:34.600 said,

00:37:34.960 yeah it's

00:37:35.300 a signed

00:37:35.680 statement

00:37:36.140 not under

00:37:37.120 oath,

00:37:38.460 and they

00:37:39.280 tossed it

00:37:39.660 out.

00:37:40.620 So you

00:37:41.080 can go to

00:37:41.480 the court

00:37:41.800 and say

00:37:42.200 here are

00:37:43.100 100

00:37:44.000 signed

00:37:44.880 statements

00:37:45.340 from

00:37:45.820 witnesses

00:37:46.280 who say

00:37:47.540 that they

00:37:47.960 directly

00:37:48.520 saw some

00:37:49.320 fraud.

00:37:50.400 What does

00:37:50.840 the court

00:37:51.160 do with

00:37:51.660 100

00:37:52.260 signed

00:37:53.540 statements

00:37:54.200 from people

00:37:55.080 who say

00:37:55.420 they directly

00:37:56.200 looked at

00:37:57.320 fraud?

00:37:58.680 The court

00:37:59.400 says that's

00:37:59.900 not evidence

00:38:00.600 because they're

00:38:01.740 not signed,

00:38:03.000 or they're

00:38:03.260 not legally

00:38:04.460 binding.

00:38:04.960 There's

00:38:05.660 nobody who

00:38:06.260 signed under

00:38:07.200 threat or

00:38:08.600 penalty of

00:38:09.540 lying under

00:38:10.440 oath.

00:38:11.460 So the

00:38:12.040 court says

00:38:12.580 that's no

00:38:13.320 evidence.

00:38:14.320 Now I have

00:38:14.840 to ask

00:38:15.120 myself,

00:38:16.120 I have to

00:38:17.260 ask myself,

00:38:18.540 why did

00:38:19.820 these so

00:38:20.580 many people

00:38:21.220 not want to

00:38:22.780 sign something

00:38:23.360 that was

00:38:23.720 legally binding

00:38:24.600 on them?

00:38:25.800 Well,

00:38:26.520 I don't know,

00:38:27.460 but if I

00:38:28.300 were them,

00:38:29.300 I would not

00:38:30.020 sign something

00:38:30.780 that was

00:38:31.400 libelous and

00:38:33.280 legally binding

00:38:34.160 on me just

00:38:35.920 to solve

00:38:36.400 somebody else's

00:38:37.120 problem.

00:38:38.120 I think that

00:38:39.160 from a legal

00:38:39.760 perspective,

00:38:40.320 I would not

00:38:41.860 want to sign

00:38:42.520 something that

00:38:43.260 bound me to

00:38:45.280 what I said in

00:38:46.140 a way that I

00:38:46.640 could be sued

00:38:47.320 later.

00:38:48.720 Suppose I said

00:38:49.700 I'm a direct

00:38:50.360 witness to

00:38:51.140 some person

00:38:52.860 or company,

00:38:54.340 let's say

00:38:54.700 Dominion or

00:38:55.260 something,

00:38:55.820 doing something

00:38:56.420 wrong.

00:38:58.180 And that I've

00:38:58.660 signed that

00:38:59.140 under penalty

00:38:59.840 of, you

00:39:00.940 know, of

00:39:02.460 what is it,

00:39:03.580 penalty of

00:39:04.320 lying under

00:39:04.800 oath.

00:39:06.280 I don't think

00:39:07.180 I signed

00:39:07.660 that.

00:39:08.660 Because even

00:39:09.380 in my own

00:39:09.960 mind, I'm

00:39:10.460 going to

00:39:10.640 think, maybe

00:39:11.900 I'm not

00:39:12.320 100% sure.

00:39:14.040 People ask

00:39:14.640 me what I

00:39:15.100 saw, I saw

00:39:16.380 an irregularity,

00:39:17.480 I'm reporting

00:39:18.020 it, I'm just

00:39:18.520 doing what

00:39:18.940 people asked.

00:39:20.040 I witnessed,

00:39:21.280 I reported.

00:39:22.740 But if you're

00:39:23.340 asking me to

00:39:23.900 do it under

00:39:24.380 oath, then

00:39:25.920 you're also

00:39:26.380 putting me

00:39:26.960 at risk,

00:39:28.460 personal risk.

00:39:29.880 Maybe I don't

00:39:30.420 want that.

00:39:31.500 Maybe I'll

00:39:31.900 sign what I

00:39:32.600 saw, but I

00:39:33.140 won't sign it

00:39:33.700 under oath.

00:39:34.780 So what are

00:39:35.400 the courts

00:39:35.740 going to do?

00:39:36.940 Courts say

00:39:37.480 that's not

00:39:37.880 evidence, you

00:39:38.620 didn't sign

00:39:39.000 it under

00:39:39.320 oath.

00:39:40.960 Right?

00:39:41.560 Perjury is

00:39:42.080 the word I'm

00:39:42.420 looking for,

00:39:42.920 thank you.

00:39:45.280 So we've

00:39:45.840 got that.

00:39:46.900 Let's see.

00:39:47.760 And so there

00:39:48.160 are a number

00:39:48.400 of claims that

00:39:49.080 don't have any

00:39:49.580 direct evidence,

00:39:51.140 claims that are

00:39:51.860 not under

00:39:52.480 oath, you

00:39:53.560 know, under

00:39:53.920 penalty of

00:39:54.660 perjury.

00:39:55.920 No, no

00:39:57.780 addressing the

00:39:58.500 stopping of

00:39:59.080 counting, just

00:40:00.020 addressing that

00:40:01.340 there's a

00:40:01.780 reason that

00:40:02.200 Biden came

00:40:02.740 from behind.

00:40:06.140 Oh, and

00:40:06.800 then here's

00:40:07.780 the one that

00:40:08.120 just made me

00:40:08.580 laugh out

00:40:09.160 loud.

00:40:09.880 You've also

00:40:10.400 heard the

00:40:10.720 claims that

00:40:11.440 the number

00:40:12.560 of rejected

00:40:13.420 ballots went

00:40:15.280 from a

00:40:15.900 larger number

00:40:16.600 to an

00:40:17.420 infinitesimally

00:40:18.260 smaller number.

00:40:19.620 Now, when I

00:40:20.200 say a larger

00:40:20.720 number, I mean,

00:40:21.580 you know, we're

00:40:21.980 only talking

00:40:22.380 about one or

00:40:22.940 two percent or

00:40:23.700 some small

00:40:24.400 number, in

00:40:25.660 the past

00:40:26.320 historically had

00:40:27.440 been rejected

00:40:28.060 because the

00:40:29.520 person who

00:40:30.020 filled out the

00:40:30.560 ballot made

00:40:31.080 some kind of

00:40:31.760 error.

00:40:32.840 And it would

00:40:33.200 be some kind

00:40:33.720 of an error

00:40:34.140 that, you

00:40:35.540 know, might

00:40:35.800 be hard to

00:40:36.300 correct, etc.

00:40:38.120 Now, I think

00:40:38.780 the process

00:40:39.480 allows for

00:40:40.640 correction, if

00:40:41.780 you didn't

00:40:42.080 know that.

00:40:42.880 So even if a

00:40:43.760 ballot has

00:40:45.000 some problem

00:40:45.600 and they can't

00:40:46.240 count it the

00:40:46.680 way it is,

00:40:47.420 there is a

00:40:48.040 process where

00:40:48.680 the voter is

00:40:49.280 contacted and

00:40:50.580 they're given a

00:40:51.100 chance to fix

00:40:52.180 their ballot.

00:40:52.720 I don't know

00:40:53.680 how many people

00:40:54.200 actually do

00:40:54.740 that.

00:40:55.720 It seems to

00:40:56.280 be, yeah, they

00:40:57.080 have the option

00:40:58.220 to cure the

00:40:59.040 ballot, it's

00:40:59.540 called.

00:41:00.240 But I don't

00:41:02.360 know how many

00:41:03.160 people actually

00:41:03.920 take the

00:41:04.620 option and

00:41:05.940 how many they

00:41:06.500 can actually

00:41:06.980 contact.

00:41:07.860 It seems like

00:41:08.260 it would be a

00:41:08.560 lot of people.

00:41:09.940 But the

00:41:10.400 claim was that

00:41:11.520 because the

00:41:14.020 standard for

00:41:14.800 rejection went

00:41:15.760 from an

00:41:16.880 historical level

00:41:17.880 to way, way

00:41:18.900 lower and

00:41:19.920 almost nothing

00:41:20.620 was rejected,

00:41:21.320 and that

00:41:22.260 difference in

00:41:22.860 rejection rate

00:41:23.640 could have

00:41:24.000 actually tipped

00:41:24.620 the election

00:41:25.100 because things

00:41:27.680 were close.

00:41:29.980 Actually, I

00:41:30.560 don't know that

00:41:31.180 it could have

00:41:31.540 tipped the

00:41:31.880 election, but

00:41:32.460 it would be a

00:41:33.160 biggish kind

00:41:34.140 of an impact.

00:41:37.600 So here's the

00:41:38.360 thing.

00:41:39.680 The explanation

00:41:40.680 in the document

00:41:41.720 was that there's

00:41:42.920 another reason

00:41:43.840 why that

00:41:45.680 difference could

00:41:46.700 have happened.

00:41:47.180 And as long

00:41:48.380 as there's

00:41:48.760 another reasonable

00:41:49.880 reason, then

00:41:51.920 you're not

00:41:52.340 going to get

00:41:52.640 any kind of

00:41:53.240 court action

00:41:55.060 on it because

00:41:55.680 the court will

00:41:56.180 just say,

00:41:57.140 well, you

00:41:57.560 haven't disproven

00:41:58.680 the other

00:41:59.120 explanation.

00:41:59.960 There could

00:42:00.200 just be a

00:42:00.660 logical explanation

00:42:01.540 for it.

00:42:02.360 And here's the

00:42:02.980 logical other

00:42:04.040 explanation.

00:42:06.680 People were

00:42:07.680 more careful

00:42:08.320 this time.

00:42:12.680 That's it.

00:42:13.640 That's the

00:42:14.220 explanation about

00:42:15.220 why the number

00:42:15.860 that were

00:42:16.320 rejected for

00:42:17.260 being wrong

00:42:18.500 were so much

00:42:19.740 lower this time.

00:42:20.640 And it's a big

00:42:21.040 difference because

00:42:22.580 people were so

00:42:23.720 much better

00:42:24.320 trained at

00:42:26.140 filling them

00:42:26.560 out because

00:42:27.340 they had been

00:42:27.960 taught by the

00:42:29.620 news and by

00:42:30.340 everybody else

00:42:30.960 that you have

00:42:31.800 to fill it

00:42:32.260 out correctly

00:42:33.000 or else it

00:42:34.460 won't count.

00:42:35.880 So unlike

00:42:36.600 every year in

00:42:37.620 the past where

00:42:39.260 people tried

00:42:40.040 hard to do it

00:42:40.800 correctly but

00:42:41.460 they had a

00:42:41.980 certain error

00:42:42.500 right, this

00:42:43.820 time, because

00:42:44.540 they knew it

00:42:44.960 was more

00:42:45.320 important,

00:42:45.860 and they'd

00:42:46.440 been trained

00:42:47.160 a little

00:42:47.500 bit.

00:42:49.140 They'd been

00:42:49.700 trained a

00:42:50.120 little bit

00:42:50.420 better.

00:42:51.520 They really

00:42:52.280 got that

00:42:52.760 error right

00:42:53.200 down.

00:42:54.340 So that's

00:42:54.680 the other

00:42:55.000 possible

00:42:55.460 explanation.

00:42:56.640 So as long

00:42:57.000 as you have

00:42:57.260 another possible

00:42:57.980 explanation,

00:42:59.760 the court

00:43:01.060 says, well,

00:43:02.220 we're not

00:43:02.620 going to look

00:43:02.960 into it because

00:43:03.920 as soon as

00:43:05.200 the defense

00:43:05.780 says, well,

00:43:07.140 it could just

00:43:07.580 be natural,

00:43:08.280 that's the

00:43:08.600 end of the

00:43:08.880 case.

00:43:09.880 Because you

00:43:10.420 can't prove

00:43:11.100 why it

00:43:11.440 happened.

00:43:12.420 You just

00:43:12.820 have this

00:43:13.180 suspicion.

00:43:13.640 So that

00:43:17.460 explanation is

00:43:18.200 laughable.

00:43:18.860 Anybody who's

00:43:19.480 met human

00:43:20.160 beings knows

00:43:21.620 that they're

00:43:22.040 not going to

00:43:22.460 be suddenly

00:43:23.220 more accurate

00:43:24.080 because you

00:43:24.800 told them

00:43:25.180 to.

00:43:25.840 They're not

00:43:26.380 going to

00:43:26.620 suddenly be

00:43:27.220 more accurate

00:43:27.780 because orange

00:43:29.440 man is

00:43:29.980 extra bad.

00:43:31.460 People don't

00:43:32.160 act like that.

00:43:33.380 The error rate

00:43:34.200 that you've had

00:43:34.740 every year

00:43:35.340 before is

00:43:36.280 going to be

00:43:36.800 pretty similar

00:43:37.700 because people

00:43:39.120 just don't,

00:43:40.980 we don't

00:43:41.420 respond that

00:43:42.120 way.

00:43:42.460 Oh, it's

00:43:42.860 important?

00:43:43.680 Okay, I'll

00:43:44.240 drop my

00:43:44.680 error rate

00:43:45.080 to zero.

00:43:46.020 You should

00:43:46.320 have told

00:43:46.600 me that

00:43:46.920 the election

00:43:47.420 of the

00:43:47.720 United States

00:43:48.320 president

00:43:49.100 was important.

00:43:50.380 I didn't

00:43:50.740 know before,

00:43:51.420 so I guess

00:43:51.760 I'll pay

00:43:52.060 attention now.

00:43:53.360 I mean,

00:43:53.760 just ridiculous

00:43:55.600 explanations.

00:43:58.580 But maybe

00:43:59.460 good enough

00:43:59.880 for the

00:44:00.140 court.

00:44:00.800 So here's

00:44:01.180 my point

00:44:01.580 about this.

00:44:03.640 Anybody

00:44:04.120 who tells

00:44:04.640 you that

00:44:05.240 the election

00:44:06.800 fraud has

00:44:07.840 been looked

00:44:08.340 into and

00:44:09.120 debunked by

00:44:09.960 the right

00:44:10.400 entities,

00:44:11.260 speaking of

00:44:11.920 the courts,

00:44:13.280 they're using

00:44:14.740 the wrong

00:44:15.240 tool for

00:44:16.140 the job.

00:44:17.280 The court

00:44:17.800 has a certain

00:44:18.640 role, but

00:44:19.900 it is nothing

00:44:20.680 like whatever

00:44:22.240 it would take

00:44:22.920 to determine

00:44:23.660 whether fraud

00:44:24.440 existed or

00:44:25.220 did not in

00:44:25.880 an election.

00:44:26.720 Because the

00:44:27.220 things that

00:44:27.660 they can look

00:44:28.220 at are so

00:44:28.840 limited, and

00:44:30.380 the rules that

00:44:31.100 they operate

00:44:31.620 on are so

00:44:32.480 defined that

00:44:34.560 it just doesn't

00:44:35.100 fit.

00:44:35.520 So the

00:44:36.560 election claims

00:44:37.660 just didn't

00:44:39.040 fit in a

00:44:39.580 court.

00:44:40.960 And the

00:44:41.280 court basically

00:44:42.060 was saying,

00:44:42.720 stop trying to

00:44:43.800 bring them

00:44:44.140 here, we're

00:44:45.200 the wrong

00:44:45.720 tool for

00:44:46.420 that.

00:44:47.400 And they

00:44:47.720 are.

00:44:48.220 But there

00:44:48.600 is no

00:44:48.880 other tool.

00:44:50.160 The court's

00:44:50.680 the only

00:44:51.080 tool, but

00:44:52.240 it's a

00:44:52.520 completely

00:44:52.900 wrong tool.

00:44:54.380 So if you

00:44:54.780 were trying

00:44:55.080 to find out

00:44:55.700 if there

00:44:56.120 was radio

00:44:56.720 activity in

00:44:57.580 your house,

00:44:58.660 and you

00:44:59.000 decided to

00:44:59.600 use your

00:45:00.000 smartphone to

00:45:00.840 do it,

00:45:02.160 let me do

00:45:02.700 that now.

00:45:03.280 Let me

00:45:03.480 check for

00:45:03.880 radio activity

00:45:04.620 in my

00:45:04.960 house.

00:45:06.280 Checking,

00:45:06.840 checking.

00:45:07.260 Oh, it

00:45:07.600 turns out I

00:45:08.560 don't have an

00:45:09.120 app for

00:45:09.520 that.

00:45:10.460 It turns out

00:45:11.000 that my

00:45:11.320 phone is

00:45:12.540 the wrong

00:45:13.080 tool to

00:45:14.620 determine if

00:45:15.260 there's radio

00:45:15.860 activity in

00:45:16.460 my house.

00:45:17.680 But I'm

00:45:18.280 going to use

00:45:18.660 it anyway,

00:45:19.720 and when I

00:45:20.180 don't find

00:45:20.700 any radio

00:45:21.280 activity, I'll

00:45:21.880 say there

00:45:22.440 isn't any,

00:45:23.540 because my

00:45:24.020 tool didn't

00:45:24.480 find any.

00:45:25.380 That is

00:45:25.840 exactly what's

00:45:26.780 happening.

00:45:27.900 Not really,

00:45:28.600 not exactly,

00:45:29.460 but by

00:45:30.440 analogy,

00:45:31.860 using the

00:45:32.560 court to

00:45:34.120 figure out

00:45:34.640 whether the

00:45:35.140 election was

00:45:35.720 fraudulent,

00:45:36.280 it's just

00:45:36.620 the wrong

00:45:36.940 tool.

00:45:37.900 The court

00:45:38.220 can't do

00:45:38.740 that.

00:45:39.760 It could

00:45:40.140 do it in

00:45:40.760 some special

00:45:41.860 cases, but

00:45:43.880 it's really not

00:45:44.360 designed for

00:45:44.880 that.

00:45:45.620 And given

00:45:46.880 the speed of

00:45:47.700 things, the

00:45:48.460 allegations which

00:45:49.760 were made to

00:45:50.200 the court were

00:45:51.400 empty and

00:45:52.280 ridiculous and

00:45:53.740 crazy.

00:45:55.480 here's a

00:45:58.260 thing that

00:45:59.100 makes me

00:45:59.500 suspicious.

00:46:01.320 And let

00:46:02.040 me say

00:46:02.300 again, I'll

00:46:03.380 bookend this

00:46:03.940 by saying, I

00:46:04.580 don't have

00:46:04.920 any, I've

00:46:05.740 never seen

00:46:06.160 any proof

00:46:06.680 that the

00:46:07.040 election was

00:46:07.560 fraudulent.

00:46:09.280 Proof that I

00:46:10.240 personally could

00:46:11.060 look at and

00:46:11.820 see it with my

00:46:12.560 own eyes and

00:46:13.280 that sort of

00:46:13.640 thing.

00:46:14.300 Just lots of

00:46:15.080 allegations.

00:46:16.200 But here's

00:46:16.760 what bothers

00:46:19.000 me.

00:46:21.340 If any

00:46:22.340 kind of

00:46:22.760 major fraud

00:46:23.440 happened,

00:46:23.900 my personal

00:46:24.840 belief is

00:46:25.540 that it

00:46:25.840 would more

00:46:26.240 likely happen

00:46:27.020 with some

00:46:28.000 kind of a

00:46:28.500 software hack

00:46:29.460 if, and

00:46:30.880 this is a

00:46:31.300 big if, that

00:46:33.000 could happen

00:46:33.500 without being

00:46:34.080 detected in a

00:46:34.940 recount.

00:46:36.260 Because the

00:46:36.900 recounts would

00:46:37.440 have presumably

00:46:38.620 found it.

00:46:39.400 I guess I

00:46:39.800 need an

00:46:40.120 expert to

00:46:40.600 tell me if

00:46:40.980 that's true.

00:46:44.040 But let's

00:46:44.720 say to be

00:46:45.940 big enough to

00:46:47.380 change the

00:46:47.900 election, it

00:46:48.620 would have had

00:46:49.000 to be software.

00:46:50.500 Now I'm not

00:46:50.960 saying that

00:46:51.360 happened.

00:46:52.360 I'm just

00:46:52.720 saying it

00:46:53.020 would have to

00:46:53.340 be something

00:46:53.760 of scale

00:46:54.480 that could

00:46:55.500 affect a

00:46:56.040 lot of

00:46:56.360 different

00:46:56.580 places in

00:46:57.240 small ways

00:46:58.540 so you

00:46:58.800 could get

00:46:59.080 away with

00:46:59.400 it.

00:47:00.520 Now, if

00:47:01.980 there was

00:47:02.360 some entity,

00:47:03.740 let's say

00:47:04.320 Russia or

00:47:05.380 China or

00:47:06.020 the Democrats

00:47:06.660 or bad

00:47:07.440 actors or

00:47:07.980 whatever,

00:47:08.640 some entity

00:47:09.280 that had

00:47:09.780 that capability,

00:47:12.040 how would

00:47:12.760 they cover

00:47:13.200 their tracks

00:47:13.880 when the

00:47:14.820 election was

00:47:15.440 questioned?

00:47:16.840 What would

00:47:17.300 be the way

00:47:17.820 to do

00:47:18.200 that?

00:47:18.700 Well, if

00:47:19.560 they're the

00:47:19.920 highest level

00:47:20.820 operators,

00:47:21.520 they would

00:47:23.040 take the

00:47:24.360 place where

00:47:24.960 the real

00:47:25.480 election fraud

00:47:26.320 happened.

00:47:26.960 Again, no

00:47:28.220 evidence of

00:47:28.840 this.

00:47:29.560 I'm just

00:47:29.980 walking you

00:47:31.020 through a

00:47:31.400 speculative

00:47:31.860 scenario here.

00:47:33.240 So I'm not

00:47:33.680 making a claim

00:47:34.460 of election

00:47:35.480 fraud.

00:47:36.060 I have no

00:47:36.380 proof of that

00:47:37.500 personally.

00:47:39.620 But imagine

00:47:40.260 a scenario

00:47:41.060 in which you

00:47:42.220 knew that the

00:47:43.140 software hack

00:47:44.280 was the thing

00:47:45.020 that could be

00:47:45.600 detected,

00:47:46.740 whereas all

00:47:47.300 this other

00:47:47.760 ballot counting

00:47:48.860 and mail-in

00:47:49.400 stuff would

00:47:50.400 be a great

00:47:50.900 diversion.

00:47:52.160 The first

00:47:52.480 thing you do

00:47:53.060 is make sure

00:47:54.180 that people

00:47:54.580 got really

00:47:55.140 worked up

00:47:55.840 about the

00:47:57.100 physical

00:47:59.380 ballots and

00:48:00.860 the mail-in

00:48:01.440 stuff,

00:48:01.980 because you

00:48:02.480 want them to

00:48:02.980 be looking in

00:48:03.520 the wrong

00:48:03.860 place.

00:48:05.840 Just

00:48:06.360 hypothetically,

00:48:07.240 I'm not

00:48:07.520 making an

00:48:07.940 actual

00:48:08.260 accusation.

00:48:09.820 So you

00:48:10.500 would probably

00:48:11.080 stir up as

00:48:12.340 much fake

00:48:12.920 news as you

00:48:13.520 could on

00:48:14.040 social media,

00:48:15.300 show a

00:48:15.680 bunch of

00:48:16.000 fake claims

00:48:17.900 about physical

00:48:18.940 ballots and

00:48:19.580 stuff, to

00:48:20.220 make everybody

00:48:20.840 focus on

00:48:21.640 that stuff.

00:48:22.900 And even in

00:48:23.380 the comments,

00:48:23.920 you can see

00:48:24.320 people saying,

00:48:24.960 but what about

00:48:25.400 ballot harvesting

00:48:26.300 and dead

00:48:27.500 people, and

00:48:28.480 those are all

00:48:29.560 the things you

00:48:29.960 would want

00:48:30.420 them to be

00:48:30.880 looking at.

00:48:31.760 Because once

00:48:32.380 those are all

00:48:32.980 debunked,

00:48:34.360 because the

00:48:34.720 people who,

00:48:35.380 again, this is

00:48:35.960 just a

00:48:36.240 hypothetical,

00:48:37.240 if the

00:48:37.940 hypothetical group

00:48:38.820 who had

00:48:39.120 hacked the

00:48:39.800 election

00:48:40.180 wanted the

00:48:42.340 election

00:48:43.820 skeptics to

00:48:45.240 lose all

00:48:47.580 their

00:48:47.740 credibility,

00:48:48.960 they would

00:48:49.300 send them

00:48:49.720 to look at

00:48:50.160 things where

00:48:50.680 there's not

00:48:51.640 going to be

00:48:51.980 a problem,

00:48:52.920 and then when

00:48:53.340 no problem

00:48:54.120 is found,

00:48:55.460 the people

00:48:55.920 claiming

00:48:56.300 problems are

00:48:57.280 debunked,

00:48:58.160 basically.

00:48:58.720 They look

00:48:59.100 like crazy.

00:49:01.640 Now, so

00:49:02.440 that's what

00:49:02.780 you do.

00:49:03.080 First, you

00:49:03.400 get their

00:49:03.740 attention on

00:49:04.420 the physical

00:49:04.900 ballots.

00:49:05.820 The other

00:49:06.480 thing you

00:49:06.880 do, and

00:49:07.240 this is the

00:49:07.700 important part,

00:49:08.780 is you

00:49:09.420 would drop

00:49:09.900 a gigantic

00:49:10.640 piece of

00:49:11.300 disinformation

00:49:12.020 about the

00:49:13.400 software part.

00:49:15.360 And it

00:49:15.580 would be

00:49:15.940 something like,

00:49:16.900 oh, Hugo

00:49:18.640 Chavez and

00:49:20.040 Venezuela own

00:49:21.400 these machines,

00:49:22.640 and they're

00:49:22.880 really, something

00:49:24.340 like that.

00:49:25.240 Something so

00:49:26.000 crazy that when

00:49:27.860 you debunked the

00:49:28.880 big lie, that

00:49:30.280 Hugo Chavez,

00:49:31.700 blah, blah, blah,

00:49:32.260 that you would

00:49:33.300 never be able to

00:49:34.020 penetrate beyond

00:49:34.840 that into

00:49:36.120 forcing a

00:49:36.860 recount, because

00:49:38.100 you would have

00:49:38.780 discredited your

00:49:40.420 own legal team

00:49:41.380 so badly that

00:49:42.740 people wouldn't

00:49:43.220 take you seriously

00:49:44.000 after that.

00:49:44.660 And that's

00:49:46.420 exactly what

00:49:47.080 happened.

00:49:48.400 So, if you

00:49:49.840 look at

00:49:50.140 Linwood and

00:49:51.060 Sidney

00:49:52.660 Powell, if

00:49:54.540 people who

00:49:55.600 hypothetically,

00:49:57.940 not claiming it

00:49:58.960 happened, don't

00:49:59.540 have any evidence

00:50:00.260 for it, I'm just

00:50:00.900 walking through a

00:50:02.600 speculative

00:50:03.120 scenario, the

00:50:04.840 way to shut

00:50:05.860 those people

00:50:06.500 down would

00:50:07.380 have been to

00:50:08.160 feed them

00:50:08.920 ridiculous

00:50:10.240 conspiracy theories

00:50:11.500 about a

00:50:12.660 military,

00:50:13.120 PSYOP

00:50:13.880 operation in

00:50:14.800 Venezuela,

00:50:16.240 maybe send

00:50:17.420 some Italian

00:50:18.640 satellite conspiracy

00:50:20.520 stuff.

00:50:21.680 And when that

00:50:22.300 stuff is debunked,

00:50:23.300 it just removes

00:50:24.340 your ability to

00:50:25.140 go deeper,

00:50:26.180 because you've

00:50:26.560 been so thoroughly

00:50:27.280 debunked.

00:50:28.680 So, I'm not

00:50:30.420 saying that

00:50:31.000 happened.

00:50:31.720 No direct

00:50:32.620 evidence of that

00:50:33.400 whatsoever.

00:50:34.360 I'm just saying

00:50:35.240 it looks exactly

00:50:36.320 like what would

00:50:39.200 have happened if

00:50:40.380 this scenario

00:50:41.060 were to happen.

00:50:42.100 So, you can't

00:50:42.940 rule out either

00:50:43.540 scenario.

00:50:44.660 Usually, the

00:50:45.340 fantastical ones

00:50:46.460 are less likely,

00:50:48.380 but it just

00:50:50.020 makes me scratch

00:50:50.900 my head when I

00:50:51.860 see that it

00:50:52.440 looks exactly

00:50:54.220 like a

00:50:54.900 disinformation

00:50:55.480 campaign would

00:50:56.420 look.

00:50:57.400 Doesn't mean

00:50:58.080 there is one,

00:50:59.100 just means it

00:51:00.280 looks exactly

00:51:00.860 like one.

00:51:02.060 That's how it

00:51:02.620 would play out.

00:51:05.740 CNN is

00:51:06.580 reporting on

00:51:07.220 its own fake

00:51:07.820 news, which is

00:51:08.520 weird.

00:51:08.780 So, they

00:51:11.080 say the

00:51:11.440 evidence

00:51:11.880 uncovered so

00:51:12.760 far is that

00:51:14.360 there was

00:51:14.840 weapons and

00:51:15.980 tactics and

00:51:16.960 plans for the

00:51:18.160 assault on the

00:51:19.380 Capitol well

00:51:20.600 ahead of the

00:51:21.280 president's

00:51:22.140 closest comments

00:51:24.000 about it, and

00:51:25.760 so that maybe it

00:51:26.700 was just a

00:51:27.140 planned event as

00:51:28.200 opposed to

00:51:28.740 something that

00:51:29.240 spiraled out of

00:51:30.120 control because of

00:51:31.280 anything Trump

00:51:32.340 might have said.

00:51:33.000 So, CNN is

00:51:35.140 actually basically

00:51:36.420 debunking their

00:51:37.240 own news.

00:51:39.040 Interesting.

00:51:44.260 Apparently, the

00:51:45.000 FBI, according to

00:51:45.940 Fox News, visited

00:51:47.580 some of the

00:51:48.160 extremists prior

00:51:49.420 to the pro-Trump

00:51:51.480 rally to try to

00:51:52.860 talk them out

00:51:53.440 of going.

00:51:54.660 So, the

00:51:55.480 FBI was so

00:51:57.640 concerned about

00:51:59.580 violence in the

00:52:00.320 Capitol that it

00:52:01.520 was proactively

00:52:02.320 visiting people

00:52:03.560 to ask them

00:52:04.340 not to go.

00:52:06.460 So, given

00:52:07.540 these two

00:52:08.120 facts, CNN

00:52:09.800 saying it

00:52:10.440 looks like there

00:52:10.900 was advanced

00:52:11.440 planning, and

00:52:12.960 Fox News

00:52:13.580 reporting that

00:52:14.320 the FBI had

00:52:15.100 visited people

00:52:15.760 ahead of time

00:52:16.360 because they

00:52:16.960 knew there

00:52:17.240 was advanced

00:52:17.740 planning, and

00:52:19.360 still the

00:52:20.180 president is

00:52:20.920 being impeached

00:52:21.720 for being the

00:52:22.980 thing that

00:52:23.440 incited the

00:52:24.940 riot.

00:52:26.000 That's right.

00:52:26.860 He incited the

00:52:27.860 riot that was

00:52:28.940 planned weeks

00:52:30.380 before he

00:52:30.960 incited them.

00:52:32.320 And he

00:52:33.360 actually got

00:52:33.780 impeached for

00:52:34.220 that.

00:52:35.840 You live in

00:52:36.660 that country.

00:52:38.160 Do you feel

00:52:38.600 proud about

00:52:39.060 that?

00:52:39.980 Are you proud

00:52:40.520 to live in

00:52:40.920 the country

00:52:41.260 that impeached

00:52:41.900 him for

00:52:42.820 something that

00:52:43.420 was going to

00:52:43.940 happen no

00:52:44.620 matter what

00:52:45.020 he did?

00:52:46.940 Well, I

00:52:48.300 think he could

00:52:48.820 have stopped

00:52:49.340 it, and so

00:52:49.960 I'm still, I'm

00:52:51.500 not going to

00:52:51.840 give the

00:52:52.100 president a pass

00:52:52.820 on that,

00:52:53.600 because I

00:52:53.940 think one

00:52:54.400 tweet would

00:52:54.980 have stopped

00:52:55.540 the occupation

00:52:56.820 of the

00:52:57.180 Capitol.

00:52:57.480 the evidence

00:52:58.880 suggests that

00:53:00.640 if he had

00:53:01.100 simply said

00:53:01.820 you went

00:53:02.960 too far,

00:53:03.860 get the

00:53:04.160 hell out of

00:53:04.600 the Capitol

00:53:05.160 building,

00:53:06.260 they would

00:53:07.000 have left

00:53:07.380 immediately.

00:53:08.960 I think the

00:53:09.520 evidence suggests

00:53:10.560 that they were

00:53:11.400 sort of thinking

00:53:12.160 that he was

00:53:12.780 behind them,

00:53:13.960 waiting for a

00:53:14.580 sign, you

00:53:15.240 know, there's

00:53:15.500 actually reporting

00:53:16.700 that they were

00:53:17.800 actively, they

00:53:18.900 had cell phone

00:53:19.640 problems, so

00:53:21.040 they were trying

00:53:21.460 to get somebody

00:53:22.160 who had a

00:53:22.440 cell phone to

00:53:23.000 see what

00:53:23.340 Trump was

00:53:23.740 saying at

00:53:24.840 the moment

00:53:25.240 they were in

00:53:25.640 the Capitol.

00:53:26.700 One tweet,

00:53:28.100 get the hell

00:53:28.900 out of the

00:53:29.300 Capitol, this

00:53:30.520 is not part

00:53:31.100 of the deal.

00:53:32.080 One tweet,

00:53:33.340 they walk

00:53:33.800 out, I

00:53:34.440 think.

00:53:36.560 Somebody says

00:53:37.300 he did, but

00:53:38.080 I don't think

00:53:38.840 that he was

00:53:40.000 as timely as

00:53:40.740 I'm saying.

00:53:42.380 Now we know

00:53:43.160 that there

00:53:43.520 were some,

00:53:44.060 at least one

00:53:44.720 BML activist

00:53:45.740 and maybe one

00:53:47.060 Democrat,

00:53:47.920 registered

00:53:48.380 Democrat,

00:53:49.440 who were

00:53:50.180 active parts

00:53:51.040 of the

00:53:51.340 Capitol

00:53:51.640 assault.

00:53:53.360 So some

00:53:54.220 guy with a

00:53:55.180 video crew

00:53:56.500 who was,

00:53:58.120 his own

00:53:58.680 video shows

00:53:59.420 him actively

00:54:00.160 encouraging the

00:54:01.420 protesters and

00:54:02.720 actively being

00:54:03.480 part of it and

00:54:04.680 yelling stuff

00:54:05.320 like, it's our

00:54:06.160 house and we

00:54:07.440 got to get this

00:54:09.740 shit burned

00:54:10.640 down.

00:54:11.560 That's the guy

00:54:12.040 who claims he

00:54:12.640 was just taking

00:54:13.200 video of it and

00:54:13.980 he's not guilty.

00:54:15.440 So we do know

00:54:16.400 that at least on

00:54:17.400 some scale that

00:54:19.020 there were non-

00:54:20.220 Republicans there

00:54:21.160 for troublemaking

00:54:23.460 purposes.

00:54:23.940 So that's

00:54:24.500 confirmed now.

00:54:25.720 When I say

00:54:26.420 it's confirmed,

00:54:27.260 I mean that

00:54:27.820 CNN will never

00:54:28.660 say that this

00:54:29.280 has happened.

00:54:30.300 But I don't

00:54:30.740 know at what

00:54:31.220 scale.

00:54:32.160 There are some

00:54:32.740 people who are

00:54:33.320 confirmed to be

00:54:34.100 on the other

00:54:34.700 team.

00:54:35.660 So it's at

00:54:36.720 least a partial

00:54:37.660 false flag.

00:54:40.340 It's definitely

00:54:41.080 not a full

00:54:41.680 false flag because

00:54:42.560 lots of people

00:54:43.100 were just Trump

00:54:43.680 supporters.

00:54:44.460 But it's at

00:54:44.880 least a partial

00:54:45.620 fake flag,

00:54:47.860 false flag,

00:54:48.580 and I don't

00:54:48.940 know if that's

00:54:49.360 even a thing.

00:54:50.900 Because if it's

00:54:51.540 partial, it's not.

00:54:52.400 It doesn't make

00:54:52.860 much difference.

00:54:53.740 All right.

00:54:55.440 Have you seen

00:54:56.180 the video of

00:54:57.200 the leftists

00:54:59.660 destroying

00:55:00.260 Washington, D.C.

00:55:01.440 during Trump's

00:55:02.100 inauguration?

00:55:03.840 How quickly

00:55:04.800 we forget

00:55:05.880 that Trump's

00:55:07.380 inauguration

00:55:08.140 incited a

00:55:09.760 riot.

00:55:11.420 But not

00:55:12.100 because of

00:55:12.620 Trump necessarily,

00:55:13.740 but because of

00:55:14.280 the Democrats.

00:55:15.440 Don't you think

00:55:16.040 that that riot

00:55:16.740 was sort of

00:55:17.600 incited by the

00:55:19.920 Democrats, what

00:55:20.600 they've been saying

00:55:21.160 about Trump

00:55:21.620 during the entire

00:55:22.240 election?

00:55:22.860 I'd say so.

00:55:24.240 So we just act

00:55:25.140 like it didn't

00:55:25.580 happen.

00:55:26.920 But there's

00:55:27.480 video of a

00:55:28.780 riot and windows

00:55:29.700 being broken

00:55:30.360 during Trump's

00:55:31.420 inauguration.

00:55:33.660 There's still

00:55:34.180 stories about

00:55:34.780 San Francisco

00:55:35.560 shrinking.

00:55:37.000 Rents are

00:55:37.380 going down.

00:55:38.200 Home prices

00:55:38.660 are going down

00:55:39.240 in San Francisco.

00:55:40.620 The tech

00:55:41.600 company is moving

00:55:42.320 out.

00:55:43.400 Here's an

00:55:43.900 interesting factoid.

00:55:45.240 I live an

00:55:46.300 hour from San

00:55:47.200 Francisco, and

00:55:48.880 home prices here

00:55:49.820 went up.

00:55:50.440 because part

00:55:52.480 of moving

00:55:52.840 out of San

00:55:53.280 Francisco is

00:55:54.020 also moving

00:55:54.840 an hour away,

00:55:56.480 still being in

00:55:57.200 California, but

00:55:57.900 not being in

00:55:58.460 San Francisco.

00:55:59.620 So my

00:56:00.180 property values

00:56:00.880 actually went

00:56:01.480 up, weirdly,

00:56:03.200 because San

00:56:04.040 Francisco went

00:56:04.720 to hell.

00:56:06.980 So Biden's

00:56:07.800 recommending

00:56:08.720 $1.9 trillion

00:56:10.260 in COVID relief,

00:56:11.640 and blah, blah,

00:56:12.020 blah.

00:56:12.740 And an

00:56:13.480 incoming

00:56:13.900 administration

00:56:15.080 official said

00:56:15.880 that the

00:56:16.380 vaccine rollout

00:56:17.480 was, quote,

00:56:18.700 worse than

00:56:19.400 we could

00:56:19.760 have imagined.

00:56:21.900 And, you

00:56:23.660 know, I

00:56:23.900 don't have a

00:56:24.520 fact check on

00:56:25.320 whether the

00:56:25.920 vaccine rollout

00:56:27.020 is worse than

00:56:27.860 we imagined

00:56:28.440 or not.

00:56:29.240 The thing I

00:56:30.060 would have

00:56:30.360 assumed would

00:56:31.700 happen is if

00:56:33.260 you do

00:56:33.540 something on a

00:56:34.120 very large

00:56:34.780 scale for the

00:56:35.660 first time

00:56:36.200 ever, and I

00:56:37.740 would say that

00:56:38.240 describes the

00:56:38.900 situation, what

00:56:40.200 should you

00:56:40.560 expect?

00:56:41.700 Well, you

00:56:42.260 should expect

00:56:42.720 that the first

00:56:43.340 month is a

00:56:44.060 total failure,

00:56:45.840 followed by the

00:56:46.720 second month

00:56:47.300 improving, and

00:56:48.220 then maybe by

00:56:48.780 the third

00:56:49.200 month, you're

00:56:50.320 better than you

00:56:50.920 could have ever

00:56:51.460 imagined it could

00:56:52.320 have been, because

00:56:53.680 that's just the

00:56:54.280 learning curve.

00:56:55.480 So judging the

00:56:56.480 rollout of the

00:56:57.820 vaccine on the

00:56:58.680 first month is

00:57:00.280 fair, because we

00:57:02.280 did want to get

00:57:02.880 that right, but I

00:57:04.700 don't think it's

00:57:05.280 unexpected that it

00:57:06.560 was terrible for the

00:57:07.740 first month.

00:57:08.920 I feel like that

00:57:09.800 was sort of baked

00:57:10.520 into the process,

00:57:11.760 because the reason

00:57:12.540 you test things is

00:57:14.660 that you don't

00:57:15.140 roll out a

00:57:15.840 major thing, and

00:57:16.800 then the first

00:57:17.300 month is terrible.

00:57:18.780 Take Obamacare.

00:57:20.800 Obamacare rolled

00:57:21.600 out, all kinds of

00:57:22.620 problems with the

00:57:23.400 servers and the

00:57:24.260 website and

00:57:24.740 everything, but

00:57:25.320 eventually it got

00:57:27.660 to the point where

00:57:28.500 it's so sticky, it's

00:57:30.400 not going away

00:57:31.060 apparently.

00:57:33.200 So, perfectly

00:57:34.600 normal, but still

00:57:36.340 I think Trump

00:57:37.260 administration has

00:57:38.280 to take the blame

00:57:38.940 for that, and

00:57:40.160 certainly his

00:57:40.840 distraction about

00:57:41.720 the election and

00:57:42.800 impeachment and all

00:57:44.200 that stuff, that

00:57:45.580 stuff matters.

00:57:47.100 I think we're

00:57:47.620 paying for it.

00:57:49.940 Biden knows that

00:57:51.080 his inauguration

00:57:51.920 will attract

00:57:52.620 violence, wouldn't

00:57:55.280 you say?

00:57:56.160 Wouldn't you say

00:57:56.940 that Biden knows

00:57:57.780 for sure that the

00:57:59.340 odds of violence

00:58:00.280 at his inauguration

00:58:01.960 are close to 100%?

00:58:04.980 Why does he have

00:58:05.980 it?

00:58:06.460 Why is he going to

00:58:07.080 have the inauguration

00:58:08.000 if he knows there's

00:58:09.020 going to be violence?

00:58:10.360 Would he not have

00:58:11.280 blood on his hands?

00:58:12.260 Because the

00:58:13.480 inauguration doesn't

00:58:14.400 have a constitutional

00:58:15.940 purpose, apparently.

00:58:17.700 I mean, you could

00:58:18.180 do, I think you

00:58:19.580 don't need the

00:58:20.160 inauguration, but if

00:58:21.780 you do need it, it

00:58:22.600 doesn't have to be in

00:58:23.320 front of a crowd.

00:58:24.980 So it's a completely

00:58:26.140 unnecessary ceremony

00:58:27.660 guaranteed to hurt

00:58:29.900 or kill Americans,

00:58:31.480 and he's going to do

00:58:32.560 it.

00:58:35.000 Shouldn't he be

00:58:35.800 impeached during the

00:58:36.940 inauguration?

00:58:37.500 I would think that

00:58:39.280 Congress should

00:58:40.260 initiate impeachment

00:58:41.300 during the

00:58:42.000 inauguration, because

00:58:43.640 he's doing something

00:58:44.620 that absolutely isn't

00:58:45.980 going to invite or

00:58:47.880 incite.

00:58:48.940 It's going to invite

00:58:50.080 violence and doesn't

00:58:50.960 have a purpose.

00:58:52.020 There's no purpose.

00:58:54.960 So I would say he

00:58:56.940 should be impeached

00:58:57.620 during his

00:58:58.400 inauguration.

00:59:00.100 That's not going to

00:59:01.080 happen.

00:59:02.020 So Don Lemon

00:59:02.660 continues to be the

00:59:03.780 worst human being in

00:59:04.840 the history of human

00:59:05.600 beings, and he's gone

00:59:07.380 full Nazi accusation

00:59:10.060 to all Trump

00:59:10.800 supporters.

00:59:11.820 So his thinking, if

00:59:13.720 you can call it that,

00:59:14.760 is that because the

00:59:16.620 Klan supports Trump,

00:59:19.140 he says, therefore if

00:59:21.540 you also support Trump,

00:59:22.900 you're supporting the

00:59:23.760 Klan.

00:59:25.340 Good thinking, Don

00:59:26.480 Lemon.

00:59:27.520 There's an idea that

00:59:28.600 will destroy the whole

00:59:29.500 country.

00:59:31.400 Now, Don Lemon, of

00:59:33.220 course, is an accused

00:59:34.340 sex offender.

00:59:35.360 I don't know the

00:59:37.020 truth of it, but he's

00:59:37.820 accused of molesting

00:59:39.180 some young man.

00:59:41.900 And I would guess that

00:59:43.160 given that there are

00:59:45.620 plenty of pedophiles in

00:59:47.300 the world, wouldn't you

00:59:48.780 assume that a lot of

00:59:49.520 them watch Don Lemon's

00:59:51.980 show?

00:59:53.880 Would you say it's a

00:59:55.020 true statement that lots

00:59:56.380 of pedophiles watch the

00:59:58.840 news?

00:59:59.500 Probably.

01:00:00.200 I mean, they watch

01:00:00.860 everything else, so why

01:00:01.860 wouldn't they?

01:00:02.200 So, does that make Don

01:00:04.720 Lemon, by his own

01:00:05.840 preferred way of

01:00:08.400 looking at the world,

01:00:09.160 does that make him a

01:00:10.420 pedophile because he's

01:00:12.300 supported by them?

01:00:14.820 Now, he's not claiming

01:00:16.120 that every single racist

01:00:18.060 supports Trump.

01:00:21.160 He's saying that members

01:00:22.760 of the Klan do, lots of

01:00:24.880 racists support Trump.

01:00:26.120 I think that's true.

01:00:27.300 But he's not saying that

01:00:28.460 there aren't also racists

01:00:29.840 who support other people.

01:00:31.180 Likewise, I'm not making

01:00:33.080 any claim that pedophiles

01:00:34.480 only like Don Lemon.

01:00:36.760 That would be crazy.

01:00:38.580 But a lot of them do.

01:00:40.100 Wouldn't you say that

01:00:40.840 would be true?

01:00:42.400 So, I feel as though his

01:00:43.960 own logic puts him in

01:00:47.940 the pedophile camp.

01:00:49.440 And I'm not saying he is.

01:00:51.260 I have no, certainly I'm

01:00:52.560 not going to accuse him of

01:00:53.480 anything like that.

01:00:54.480 I'm just saying that by

01:00:55.420 his own preferred way of

01:00:56.920 looking at the world, he's

01:00:59.260 associated with pedophiles

01:01:00.720 and I guess he's happy

01:01:02.560 with that.

01:01:03.160 That's his, it's his own

01:01:04.120 philosophy.

01:01:06.020 So, um, here's something

01:01:09.960 scary.

01:01:10.740 The, the guy who brought

01:01:11.980 the zip ties or he's, he

01:01:13.700 claims he found them and

01:01:14.760 he was going to give them

01:01:15.520 to authorities.

01:01:16.640 The, the zip tie guy at

01:01:18.680 the Capitol assault, he

01:01:20.440 was photographed with some

01:01:21.500 zip ties.

01:01:22.060 The, the type you would

01:01:23.520 use to constrain somebody

01:01:25.140 like, uh, cheap handcuffs.

01:01:28.200 Uh, so he, they found

01:01:30.100 him and then, uh, they

01:01:32.560 removed his firearms.

01:01:34.700 And so I guess he's under

01:01:36.100 home confinement without

01:01:37.800 his firearms.

01:01:38.840 But here's the scary part.

01:01:40.700 Uh, and his internet access

01:01:42.860 will be limited.

01:01:45.520 What?

01:01:47.220 His internet access will be

01:01:49.540 limited?

01:01:49.900 limited to what?

01:01:52.780 And when did that become

01:01:54.300 a law?

01:01:55.820 Do you remember a law about

01:01:57.660 your internet access being

01:01:59.600 limited?

01:02:01.520 Because that's too far.

01:02:04.220 That's too far.

01:02:06.100 Let me say that again.

01:02:08.240 Um, you know, you, I know

01:02:09.980 some of you are going to

01:02:10.800 argue he shouldn't have his

01:02:11.720 firearms removed if you're

01:02:13.120 absolutist in that.

01:02:14.720 But at least there's an

01:02:15.600 argument for that.

01:02:17.220 You know, if somebody has

01:02:18.120 been accused of some

01:02:19.200 violent crime, might go to

01:02:20.680 jail for it, has, has

01:02:22.740 weapons, might have been

01:02:23.980 involved in an insurrection,

01:02:25.800 you don't know.

01:02:27.940 You could, you could see

01:02:29.060 the argument for taking

01:02:30.160 away their firearms

01:02:31.100 temporarily until the legal

01:02:33.360 system, you know, does its

01:02:34.620 thing.

01:02:35.260 And you could argue against

01:02:36.540 it.

01:02:36.860 I think you could make an

01:02:37.740 argument against it as well.

01:02:39.280 But what is the argument for

01:02:40.780 taking, for limiting his

01:02:42.300 internet access?

01:02:43.460 internet access?

01:02:45.620 Really?

01:02:48.000 That, limiting his internet

01:02:50.200 access feels completely wrong

01:02:53.180 to me.

01:02:54.440 Now, I suppose they're doing

01:02:55.780 it so he doesn't, I don't

01:02:57.100 know, talk to other bad people

01:02:59.620 and raise trouble.

01:03:02.140 But isn't that sort of a, just

01:03:04.160 a free speech sort of situation?

01:03:06.160 And he hasn't been, he hasn't

01:03:07.720 been convicted of anything?

01:03:08.780 To me, this is super alarming

01:03:11.740 that the government can use

01:03:13.380 your internet access as a

01:03:14.860 penalty without the benefit of

01:03:17.100 any law that suggests they

01:03:19.520 can.

01:03:21.180 Maybe there is a law, I just

01:03:22.360 don't know about it.

01:03:23.460 So I'm just going to put that

01:03:24.420 out there as a gigantic red flag

01:03:26.460 that's about the scariest thing

01:03:27.780 I've seen this week.

01:03:29.200 And that includes Kim Jong-un's,

01:03:31.300 you know, intercontinental

01:03:33.240 missile.

01:03:36.360 All right.

01:03:36.940 Um, that is probably all I

01:03:40.300 wanted to talk about, I think.

01:03:41.940 I think it is.

01:03:44.940 Somebody says, you told us we

01:03:46.320 no longer have free speech.

01:03:48.040 Well, we don't.

01:03:48.900 We don't have free speech in a

01:03:50.880 practical sense.

01:03:52.380 We have it in a, uh, legal

01:03:55.260 sense, most of the time.

01:03:57.860 Apparently this, this person can

01:04:01.000 say anything he wants, just not

01:04:02.440 on the internet.

01:04:03.880 All right.

01:04:04.480 So, having now modeled for you,

01:04:07.960 um, the example of somebody

01:04:10.480 who's not taking a left or a

01:04:12.640 right side, I hope, I hope that

01:04:14.160 you saw that when I talked about

01:04:15.980 the election, did it feel like I

01:04:17.520 was biased right or biased left?

01:04:22.620 Everybody's biased, so I'm not

01:04:24.240 going to claim that, you know, I'm

01:04:25.580 free from bias.

01:04:26.640 That's not a thing.

01:04:28.000 But I think I got close.

01:04:29.860 I think that when I talked about

01:04:31.380 the election claims as well as the

01:04:33.800 debunks, I feel like I treated that

01:04:36.160 fairly.

01:04:37.820 Now, wouldn't you like to see more

01:04:40.200 people do that kind of thing?

01:04:43.100 And I think AOC is on to something

01:04:45.200 without having designed the

01:04:47.360 particulars of it.

01:04:48.740 There is a need for this.

01:04:51.420 Would you not agree that there's

01:04:53.020 a need for this, whether you like

01:04:55.120 the way I did it or not, that's

01:04:56.760 separate.

01:04:57.460 But there's a need for this.

01:04:58.740 That's just an explainer.

01:05:01.260 Somebody to explain what is likely

01:05:04.120 and what is not, etc.

01:05:05.900 All right.

01:05:06.460 So I'll put that out there.

01:05:07.980 Oh, somebody wanted me to mention

01:05:09.360 the Jack Dorsey video.

01:05:13.140 So there's a, I guess, Project

01:05:16.040 Veritas has a video of Jack Dorsey

01:05:17.880 talking to 5,000 Twitter employees

01:05:21.540 in which he's saying that they're

01:05:23.840 focusing on Trump's Twitter account

01:05:26.400 and what to do with that, but also

01:05:28.460 they were getting rid of QAnon

01:05:29.880 and that there would be, you know,

01:05:31.760 lots more of this later and that

01:05:33.780 it's the beginning of a process,

01:05:35.460 not the end, etc.

01:05:36.700 Now, that was held up by people as

01:05:40.460 evidence that Jack Dorsey is saying

01:05:43.680 he's going after conservatives.

01:05:45.820 I guess that's the way it was

01:05:46.860 interpreted.

01:05:48.100 But Twitter's response to it was

01:05:50.400 kind of perfect.

01:05:51.500 Again, if you're just judging the

01:05:53.140 quality of the communication, I'm not

01:05:55.480 talking about the issue, just the

01:05:57.600 quality of the communication.

01:05:59.760 Twitter officially said, yeah, he

01:06:02.460 said on that hidden video exactly

01:06:04.860 what he said in a tweet thread

01:06:06.100 yesterday.

01:06:07.600 And he did.

01:06:09.340 Basically, basically what he said on

01:06:11.620 the undercover video is exactly what

01:06:13.680 he said in public.

01:06:15.040 I didn't see any difference.

01:06:16.760 Now, the thing we'd be looking for

01:06:18.420 that Jack has not mentioned and is

01:06:22.340 really glaring in not being mentioned

01:06:25.100 and it's a big problem.

01:06:28.100 In both the Veritas video and his

01:06:30.720 tweet, what he didn't mention is that

01:06:33.240 anybody on the left would ever be

01:06:35.040 censored, if you want to use that

01:06:38.300 word, in the same way.

01:06:40.620 Now, how would you feel if you heard

01:06:44.080 that in addition to QAnon, that

01:06:47.360 accounts associated with the left but

01:06:49.380 with different rumors or disinformation

01:06:51.740 or violent ideas, suppose they had

01:06:55.380 also been taken down.

01:06:57.300 How would you feel about that?

01:06:59.160 Well, you'd feel different.

01:07:00.780 You'd feel different.

01:07:02.300 But when Jack Dorsey is talking to

01:07:05.300 Twitter and the only words that at

01:07:08.940 least are on this video have to do with

01:07:11.260 the folks on the right, it is totally

01:07:14.400 legitimate that the folks on the right

01:07:16.380 say, I think I need a little more

01:07:18.920 context and if I don't have it, I'm

01:07:22.000 going to assume that this is all about

01:07:23.740 just going after the right.

01:07:25.280 Would that be a fair assumption

01:07:26.800 based on everything you've seen?

01:07:29.660 Would it be fair for you to assume

01:07:31.680 that Twitter and Jack are only going

01:07:34.720 after accounts on the right?

01:07:37.360 I would say yes.

01:07:38.980 I would say yes.

01:07:39.640 That would be a fair assumption

01:07:40.880 based on the evidence we have.

01:07:42.980 So if that's not true, I would ask

01:07:46.800 Jack and Twitter to clarify because

01:07:49.700 that would be an important

01:07:50.480 clarification.

01:07:51.820 So if there are examples of groups

01:07:54.560 on the left, maybe some Antifa

01:07:56.520 accounts, et cetera, that are being

01:07:59.060 blocked for the same standard that

01:08:01.460 they promote disinformation and or

01:08:03.840 violence, disinformation being of

01:08:07.480 election kind, I think, is the specific

01:08:09.940 kind that they care about.

01:08:10.960 So wouldn't you say it's a fair

01:08:15.260 request to at least get Twitter and

01:08:18.700 Jack Dorsey's opinion about whether

01:08:21.820 this is going to be really a right

01:08:24.720 leaning effort or a violence

01:08:27.480 leaning effort in terms of service

01:08:29.480 effort?

01:08:30.100 I'd like to hear that just as a

01:08:31.480 clarification.

01:08:32.940 But I don't think we heard new

01:08:35.560 information on the Veritas, Project

01:08:37.720 Veritas video.

01:08:39.240 Sounded just like the tweet.

01:08:40.960 But both of them have that missing

01:08:43.080 element that we'd like to see.

01:08:45.860 All right.

01:08:51.260 Somebody said Trump was an idiot for

01:08:55.520 not denouncing the Proud Boys at that

01:08:57.620 debate.

01:08:58.480 Well, Trump has a he has a pattern of

01:09:02.000 not denouncing anybody who's on his

01:09:04.220 side.

01:09:06.440 And you could argue that that helped him

01:09:11.020 get elected the first time.

01:09:13.920 So strategically, it's hard to know if

01:09:17.560 that's a plus or a minus.

01:09:19.780 All right.

01:09:21.280 I see some questions about Dr.

01:09:23.460 Shiva and his software discussion.

01:09:26.100 And I would get back to my original

01:09:27.740 question, which I'm still waiting for an

01:09:29.340 answer is, could you do anything to the

01:09:32.760 software that would cheat the election

01:09:35.680 and not be caught in a recount plus an

01:09:40.680 audit and audit of the signatures and

01:09:43.940 stuff like that?

01:09:44.880 So we don't know.

01:09:46.960 All right.

01:09:47.160 That's all we have for now.

01:09:48.200 And I'll talk to you tomorrow.

01:09:54.100 All right.

01:09:54.940 YouTubers.

01:09:55.140 Let's see.

01:10:00.620 There were bad people on both sides.

01:10:03.200 Yeah.

01:10:05.600 Just print more ballots.

01:10:07.840 Packetized crime.

01:10:09.280 Yeah.

01:10:09.480 The idea of packetized election fraud

01:10:12.480 would be that there's lots of it.

01:10:14.460 But if you find any bit of it, it's not

01:10:16.760 enough to change the election.

01:10:18.780 So the way you would do that most

01:10:21.720 reliably would be with software.

01:10:23.840 But if anything like that could be

01:10:26.140 detected with a recount, well, it

01:10:29.360 wasn't.

01:10:35.020 All right.

01:10:37.060 Barnes says Powell was set up.

01:10:39.720 Yeah.

01:10:39.880 That's the information that I'm getting

01:10:41.460 as well.

01:10:42.240 Early on, I heard that from people who

01:10:44.400 know this world.

01:10:45.860 Early on, people said, oh, that's

01:10:47.420 obvious disinformation campaign.

01:10:52.420 All right.

01:10:53.120 That's all I got for now.

01:10:54.940 I will talk to you tomorrow.

01:10:56.300 All right.

01:10:56.360 That's all I got for now.

01:10:56.400 I will talk to you tomorrow.

01:10:56.440 That's all I got for now.

01:10:56.460 I will talk to you tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 15, 2021

Episode 1253 Scott Adams： How Do You Know an Election Was Fair？ More Interesting Than You Think

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript