Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1253 Scott Adams： How Do You Know an Election Was Fair？ More Interesting Than You Think

00:00:00.360 It's good to see you. What a great day today is. Really, it's great.

00:00:09.080 You're going to have one of the most enlightening coffees with Scott Adams of all time, maybe since yesterday.

00:00:15.980 And all you need is a cup or a mug, a glass of tank, a chelsea, a canteen, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:22.420 Filled with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:24.880 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of that dope beat of the day thing makes everything better except election transparency.

00:00:33.860 Go.

00:00:38.440 A little bit cold, but still amazing.

00:00:44.520 Well, I'll warm that up later.

00:00:48.380 I misspelled the title.

00:00:51.040 Probably did.

00:00:51.840 I do my titles on these live streams by voice to text, and sometimes I don't check them that well.

00:00:59.220 It could say anything.

00:01:00.660 I have no idea what it says.

00:01:02.980 All right.

00:01:03.440 Here's some stuff in the news.

00:01:06.180 Apparently, an idea is going around that when Kamala Harris is sworn in as VP,

00:01:11.860 that there's a call for her supporters to, quote, wear pearls.

00:01:15.360 That's right.

00:01:17.500 So the idea is that the women who are supporting Kamala Harris will wear pearls that day in support.

00:01:24.000 And I think that's a great idea.

00:01:25.500 I would add to that Chanel handbags would be good.

00:01:28.420 A good way to commemorate Kamala Harris's inauguration would be expensive jewelry,

00:01:38.200 maybe a $25,000 Chanel handbag, possibly a designer gown.

00:01:45.840 I think that these are all totally appropriate.

00:01:47.740 And I think that all 81, well, probably 40 million women who voted for Harris Biden,

00:01:54.020 they should get out all their expensive jewelry, their Chanel handbags, their designer outfits,

00:01:59.760 and show some respect.

00:02:02.160 Wait, you don't all have pearls?

00:02:06.020 Ah, really?

00:02:08.640 There are people who don't have Chanel handbags and pearls and designer clothes?

00:02:12.880 Well, maybe this plan is stupid.

00:02:16.700 Okay, maybe.

00:02:18.340 Well, moving on.

00:02:21.180 So North Korea is being provocative, and they had a military parade

00:02:26.080 and unveiled what they think is the most powerful weapon in the whole world.

00:02:31.380 It would be a submarine-launched ballistic missile.

00:02:36.100 That's right.

00:02:36.640 North Korea has a submarine-launched ballistic missile.

00:02:44.240 That's pretty scary.

00:02:46.080 The only thing they don't have is the submarine part.

00:02:52.100 Apparently, there's no indication they have a submarine that could launch any kind of a missile,

00:02:57.160 but they totally plan to get one.

00:02:59.460 But they have the missile.

00:03:00.440 I believe the current plan is, if you get enough people lined up just right,

00:03:05.880 you can kind of throw it.

00:03:08.800 But until we have the actual submarine,

00:03:11.660 largely it'll be an Elbonian slingshot situation to launch it.

00:03:17.360 I don't know.

00:03:18.580 I'm sure they have another plan.

00:03:21.420 But it's interesting that Kim Jong-un is testing Biden,

00:03:25.080 because this is one of the traps that Biden has as president.

00:03:28.220 You know Biden can't agree with anything that Trump did.

00:03:32.220 It's just never going to happen, right?

00:03:33.960 So whatever Trump did in North Korea,

00:03:37.360 Biden has to do a different thing,

00:03:39.440 because otherwise he would be acknowledging Trump did something right.

00:03:43.240 What's the different thing?

00:03:45.120 Starting a fight with Kim Jong-un?

00:03:47.760 What the hell is he going to do?

00:03:50.120 So Biden will either have to fail,

00:03:53.320 because Kim Jong-un will probably keep testing him,

00:03:55.540 or turn into Trump,

00:03:59.360 or do something that didn't work for 60 years before Trump.

00:04:03.680 Doesn't have a lot of options.

00:04:07.700 Here's a...

00:04:09.680 This is...

00:04:10.320 I have to admit, this story got to me a little bit.

00:04:13.400 When you and I watched the Capital Assault,

00:04:19.260 and we saw the videos and everything,

00:04:21.240 I have to admit that you watch it a little bit like it's a TV show.

00:04:27.020 You know, even though you know it's real, it's important, it's a big deal.

00:04:30.380 But there's something about the medium of, you know,

00:04:33.140 television and broadcast that gives you some distance.

00:04:37.280 And so you kind of watch it like it's a bad movie.

00:04:39.640 You know, it doesn't...

00:04:41.260 You're not really in the scene so much.

00:04:43.520 And then I heard AOC talking about that,

00:04:47.340 and she was in there,

00:04:48.420 and she said she thought she was going to die in the Capital Assault.

00:04:53.680 Now, the first thing I thought was,

00:04:55.340 ah, it wasn't that dangerous, you know?

00:04:58.080 You're not going to die.

00:04:59.120 And then you think, oh, wait a minute.

00:05:03.020 If those protesters had seen or gotten a hold of AOC,

00:05:07.600 she would be like the main target, wouldn't she?

00:05:12.780 Like, if you were a deluded, crazed, violent right-winger,

00:05:19.160 is there anybody who would be more sort of in your mind

00:05:22.600 as a representative of the Democrats?

00:05:26.360 That is some scary shit.

00:05:29.120 So when you hear AOC talk about it,

00:05:31.380 she is unique because she is so visible,

00:05:34.280 so she would be more of a target than other people, presumably.

00:05:38.140 That's really chilling.

00:05:39.720 I have to admit, it gave me a different feel for the situation

00:05:43.560 because, you know, if you're ordinary politicians

00:05:46.800 that said we feared for our lives,

00:05:48.420 I think that would have been true.

00:05:50.480 But not the way she would fear for her life

00:05:52.940 because she would literally be a target

00:05:54.480 for crazed right-wing people.

00:05:56.700 So that was pretty chilling.

00:06:00.380 Just in my mind, anyway,

00:06:02.260 it took it to another level of how horrible it was.

00:06:05.700 And basically every day we hear more about it,

00:06:08.900 it goes to another level of horribleness.

00:06:11.420 It's pretty horrible.

00:06:12.140 But also about AOC,

00:06:17.860 she was also noodling on the idea of, quote,

00:06:22.300 reigning in the media

00:06:23.520 with some kind of unspoken, undesigned, as of yet,

00:06:29.220 government oversight involvement.

00:06:33.020 And the idea is not really formed,

00:06:36.240 nor would she claim that it is.

00:06:38.600 But she is simply making the observation

00:06:41.180 that the media has become dangerous.

00:06:44.120 Now, of course, when she talks about it,

00:06:45.740 she's thinking right-leaning media.

00:06:49.400 But here again is where my suggestion

00:06:52.400 of agreeing with the left is the best strategy.

00:06:55.860 And agreeing with them aggressively.

00:06:59.620 In other words, agreeing with them harder

00:07:01.200 than they agree with themselves.

00:07:03.500 And here's a perfect example.

00:07:05.380 If you say, no AOC, freedom of the press and free speech,

00:07:09.840 and we're just going to fight for that,

00:07:12.580 you know, probably nothing's going to happen.

00:07:14.880 Nothing good, nothing bad.

00:07:16.280 Probably just nothing happens.

00:07:17.400 But suppose you embraced it.

00:07:21.220 Suppose you went the opposite direction

00:07:23.260 that anybody would expect.

00:07:25.540 Let's say you're a solid Republican,

00:07:28.280 and AOC says,

00:07:29.380 we've got to do something about all this fake news, basically.

00:07:32.540 What if you said yes?

00:07:34.920 And said, can I join you?

00:07:36.960 And put together something that fights the fake news?

00:07:39.840 Because here's the thing I don't think anybody understands.

00:07:43.380 There's nobody on the right

00:07:45.100 who wants to be fooled by fake news from their own side.

00:07:50.640 Nobody does that by choice.

00:07:53.180 I do think that it's true

00:07:54.540 that people on the left are fooled by their media.

00:07:57.180 People on the right are sometimes fooled by their media, too.

00:08:00.640 And how much of it is happening on either side

00:08:03.740 probably depends on who's in office

00:08:05.800 more than anything about the sides.

00:08:10.260 So instead of fighting her on this,

00:08:12.920 what sounds like government censorship,

00:08:15.820 I would go at it aggressively

00:08:17.540 and agree with it and ask if he can help.

00:08:20.580 Because the first thing I would service

00:08:22.600 is the fine people hoax.

00:08:24.700 The president said you should drink bleach hoax.

00:08:28.600 And I would just go down the line of the hoaxes.

00:08:31.300 And then when AOC on her side says,

00:08:33.380 yes, but you've got a bunch of hoaxes, too,

00:08:36.840 I would say, yeah, let's look into that.

00:08:39.380 Let's look into that.

00:08:41.820 You make some good points.

00:08:43.840 Here are all the hoaxes on your side.

00:08:45.980 It would be kind of dumb to assume

00:08:47.660 there are no hoaxes on the other side, right?

00:08:50.980 What are the odds that all the hoaxes are on one side?

00:08:55.240 Nothing, basically.

00:08:56.720 They're on both sides.

00:08:58.680 And I think AOC is dead right on this.

00:09:03.040 I don't think that there's an obvious way to handle it,

00:09:06.340 but let me make some suggestions.

00:09:10.300 Suppose there was, I feel as if there's another,

00:09:15.560 there's an opening for a need.

00:09:19.900 And I'm going to model it today.

00:09:22.300 So I'm going to model in a little bit

00:09:24.480 the need that I think the country needs,

00:09:27.340 which is basically interpreting the news

00:09:29.520 for people who aren't as good at it.

00:09:31.760 Now, if you were young,

00:09:34.500 would you be good at spotting fake news?

00:09:38.220 Well, not as good as somebody who's been around a while

00:09:40.980 and seen what the pattern looks like.

00:09:43.460 All right?

00:09:43.880 So just right there, an obvious example,

00:09:46.220 young people need a little bit of help 1.00

00:09:48.180 knowing what's real and what's fake in the news.

00:09:51.500 Also, they need a little context.

00:09:53.280 They might need a little extra description.

00:09:55.440 So there's something that's needed on top of news

00:09:58.300 that's not just opinion.

00:10:00.820 We have too much of that.

00:10:02.200 We've got plenty of opinion.

00:10:04.080 And the news tends to just give you the headlines

00:10:06.580 and they put it within their frame

00:10:08.500 of whoever their audience is.

00:10:10.180 So none of that's useful.

00:10:12.300 All right?

00:10:13.120 The news is put in a biased frame,

00:10:15.660 so that's not useful.

00:10:17.380 And, you know, you don't have contacts.

00:10:19.660 So it's not very useful.

00:10:21.440 What you need is somebody

00:10:22.600 like what I'm going to do

00:10:24.040 when I talk about election security in a little bit.

00:10:26.540 You need somebody who can just explain the situation

00:10:29.940 and is not beholden to either the left

00:10:33.620 or the right news sources.

00:10:35.340 Let me give you some examples.

00:10:38.140 Now, these are not people I'd say

00:10:39.480 should do this function.

00:10:41.600 I'm just saying that such people exist.

00:10:44.160 There are people who exist

00:10:45.380 who are able to criticize the left and the right

00:10:48.480 just as easily.

00:10:50.080 All right?

00:10:50.900 Take a Glenn Greenwald.

00:10:54.040 Criticizes the left,

00:10:55.060 criticizes the right,

00:10:56.320 has great context.

00:10:57.840 He'd be a good one to be an explainer.

00:11:00.540 Matt Taibbi,

00:11:02.040 no friend to President Trump,

00:11:04.060 but also doesn't seem to fall for fake news too easily.

00:11:09.060 That's good.

00:11:10.360 What about me?

00:11:11.900 You know, you've seen me agree with the president,

00:11:14.400 disagree with the president.

00:11:15.860 I'm left a Bernie,

00:11:16.960 but I like Trump.

00:11:17.880 I'm exactly the kind of person,

00:11:22.400 I don't think I should be the person,

00:11:24.640 but I'm the kind of person

00:11:26.080 who could give you a little bit more

00:11:28.120 than the news can give you

00:11:29.340 and the politicians can give you.

00:11:31.900 Jonathan Turley,

00:11:32.860 there's a great example.

00:11:34.380 Jonathan Turley is an excellent source

00:11:36.740 of somebody who reliably will disagree

00:11:39.800 with the Republicans when he's got a reason.

00:11:42.980 He'll disagree with the Democrats

00:11:44.340 when he's got a reason,

00:11:45.260 and you can't tell which way he's going to go.

00:11:49.120 He just follows the facts.

00:11:50.880 Take Alan Dershowitz.

00:11:52.700 Alan Dershowitz, a famous Democrat,

00:11:55.140 will take a Republican,

00:11:56.860 you know,

00:11:57.480 leaning cause and heartbeat

00:11:59.220 if the law leans that way.

00:12:02.560 So you do have a number of people

00:12:05.020 who have a weird quality

00:12:06.680 that they're at least capable

00:12:08.460 of switching sides

00:12:09.900 depending on where the facts go.

00:12:12.000 Okay?

00:12:12.680 So, maybe AOC has something there.

00:12:15.020 There may be...

00:12:16.480 Let's say...

00:12:17.300 Let me suggest the mildest form

00:12:20.920 that you might call censorship,

00:12:23.800 but I don't think so.

00:12:25.580 All right?

00:12:26.260 Let's say there was a group of people

00:12:28.880 that have the qualities

00:12:30.320 that I just described.

00:12:32.640 Let's say that they form

00:12:34.620 a private, independent entity

00:12:37.520 who are independent thinkers

00:12:39.640 who just help you

00:12:40.820 sort through the fake news.

00:12:43.120 And let's say that they voluntarily

00:12:45.120 limit their own involvement

00:12:47.480 in this entity

00:12:48.720 to, I'll just pick a number,

00:12:50.720 a two-year term.

00:12:52.280 So you don't want the same people

00:12:53.620 just being in there

00:12:54.560 and taking root

00:12:55.920 and then they get too much power

00:12:57.540 and blah, blah, blah.

00:12:58.400 So you want it to be a rotating,

00:13:00.220 fairly quickly rotating group.

00:13:02.720 And let's say that the government

00:13:04.560 simply did this.

00:13:07.180 Let's say the government said,

00:13:08.400 look, I know you don't trust

00:13:10.120 the news on the left.

00:13:11.640 Some of you don't trust

00:13:12.620 the news on the right.

00:13:14.080 We recommend,

00:13:15.860 but do not require,

00:13:17.980 just recommend

00:13:18.980 that you check

00:13:20.320 with this independent group

00:13:21.640 of rotating independent voices

00:13:23.620 just to give some context.

00:13:26.500 All right?

00:13:26.700 We're not saying

00:13:27.300 they're always right.

00:13:28.120 We're not saying

00:13:28.640 they're always wrong.

00:13:29.540 But it's not going to be

00:13:30.580 like the news

00:13:31.360 because the news

00:13:32.760 isn't trying to be right,

00:13:34.140 if we're being honest.

00:13:35.600 The news isn't trying

00:13:38.200 to be right.

00:13:40.740 I see Mike Sertovich

00:13:42.320 is being recommended

00:13:43.820 for this list.

00:13:45.680 I would also put him

00:13:47.040 on that list,

00:13:48.260 but he has that

00:13:50.420 pizza game thing

00:13:52.520 over his head.

00:13:54.880 So I think even Mike,

00:13:56.000 if you talk to him privately,

00:13:57.200 I'm guessing.

00:13:57.820 I'm not a mind reader,

00:13:59.340 you know,

00:13:59.740 but just guessing.

00:14:02.100 If you said,

00:14:03.000 hey, do you think

00:14:03.520 you're the perfect fit

00:14:04.480 for this?

00:14:05.400 Probably even he would say,

00:14:06.980 no, I got that

00:14:07.860 pizza game thing over me.

00:14:09.880 Try somebody else,

00:14:10.800 they'd have more credibility.

00:14:12.020 I'm guessing

00:14:12.500 that's what he would say.

00:14:13.940 But in terms of

00:14:15.140 is he the type of person

00:14:16.540 who has the right kind of mind

00:14:19.020 and independent thought?

00:14:20.460 Yeah, absolutely.

00:14:21.760 So if it were up to me,

00:14:23.820 yes.

00:14:24.780 But he's got

00:14:25.540 a reputational issue

00:14:26.700 that he would admit,

00:14:29.100 I think.

00:14:29.800 I mean, he put it

00:14:30.380 in his own,

00:14:30.960 he put it in his movie Hoax,

00:14:33.160 so it's not like

00:14:34.160 he's running away from it.

00:14:36.440 Alex Jones,

00:14:37.340 same problem, right?

00:14:38.320 He's not going to be viewed

00:14:40.180 as an independent voice.

00:14:42.480 All right.

00:14:44.620 But that's the idea,

00:14:45.700 is that maybe

00:14:48.140 there is some way

00:14:48.940 to embrace that idea.

00:14:51.380 All right.

00:14:54.520 Here's another way

00:14:55.400 to know that you live

00:14:56.460 in a propaganda bubble.

00:14:58.780 If everybody keeps telling you

00:15:00.320 that an election recount

00:15:01.680 is the same as an audit.

00:15:05.980 Because a recount

00:15:07.200 feels like completely different

00:15:09.760 from an audit.

00:15:11.520 How do you check

00:15:13.180 the software

00:15:14.100 of your election devices,

00:15:18.700 your counting machines

00:15:19.840 and your voting machines?

00:15:21.060 How do you check that

00:15:21.960 with a recount?

00:15:24.180 We're going to talk

00:15:24.840 about that.

00:15:26.320 So,

00:15:26.860 do they just count up

00:15:27.940 the lines of code

00:15:28.800 and say,

00:15:29.340 well, we counted

00:15:29.840 the lines of code,

00:15:30.720 it looks good to us.

00:15:32.500 Right?

00:15:33.020 I mean,

00:15:33.300 how do you check it?

00:15:34.260 So here are some questions

00:15:35.260 that I've been asking.

00:15:37.540 And

00:15:37.900 I'll run them by you

00:15:40.820 and I would say

00:15:41.380 that I'm short

00:15:42.160 of having an answer yet.

00:15:43.760 Now, right now,

00:15:44.480 I'm going to be modeling

00:15:45.400 what I just talked about.

00:15:47.480 Somebody to describe

00:15:48.620 the context of the news

00:15:50.360 to give you

00:15:51.340 a little better feel

00:15:52.680 for what's true

00:15:53.400 and what isn't.

00:15:54.040 And here it goes.

00:15:55.580 How do you know,

00:15:57.240 how does anybody know,

00:15:58.840 an election is fair?

00:16:00.640 It has been suggested

00:16:02.000 that if you do

00:16:03.320 these two things,

00:16:04.880 you can pretty much

00:16:05.960 find any kind of fraud

00:16:07.280 that would be big enough

00:16:08.740 to change

00:16:09.240 a national election.

00:16:11.100 Right?

00:16:11.520 So this is

00:16:12.400 brand new information

00:16:14.100 from just interacting

00:16:15.220 with people

00:16:15.720 who are smarter than I am

00:16:16.820 for the last several minutes.

00:16:18.500 And this is what

00:16:19.060 I believe I've learned.

00:16:21.000 Number one,

00:16:21.920 if you do a recount,

00:16:24.000 you can test

00:16:24.880 that the machines

00:16:26.200 doing the counting

00:16:27.200 counted correctly

00:16:28.980 the ballots.

00:16:31.480 But,

00:16:32.780 as you're just about

00:16:34.060 to yell into the screen

00:16:35.440 at me,

00:16:36.480 but Scott,

00:16:37.520 all you're doing

00:16:38.460 is counting

00:16:38.960 the fake ballots

00:16:39.900 if they're fake.

00:16:41.160 Right?

00:16:41.660 If the ballots

00:16:42.580 were not real ballots,

00:16:44.560 counting them

00:16:45.080 a second time

00:16:45.920 would just be

00:16:47.120 recounting fake ballots.

00:16:48.780 That's what you're

00:16:49.360 going to say to me

00:16:49.860 right now,

00:16:50.300 right?

00:16:51.520 But,

00:16:52.080 here's the second part.

00:16:53.780 Suppose on top

00:16:54.740 of recounting,

00:16:55.760 just to make sure

00:16:56.400 the physical counting

00:16:58.040 part is done right,

00:17:00.160 suppose on top

00:17:01.100 of that,

00:17:01.600 in addition,

00:17:02.940 you spot-checked

00:17:04.320 not every vote,

00:17:06.140 but you spot-checked

00:17:07.180 enough

00:17:07.580 to know that

00:17:08.900 there were no,

00:17:10.240 let's say,

00:17:10.680 signature problems

00:17:11.740 or fake ballots

00:17:13.200 or some irregularities

00:17:15.780 with addresses

00:17:16.860 or eligibility

00:17:18.480 to vote.

00:17:19.760 So,

00:17:20.060 let's say you

00:17:20.960 didn't check

00:17:21.980 everyone,

00:17:23.180 but you checked

00:17:23.720 enough of them

00:17:24.400 that if there had

00:17:25.040 been a problem

00:17:25.560 you would have

00:17:26.420 picked it up.

00:17:27.840 So,

00:17:28.320 now you've

00:17:28.780 checked enough

00:17:29.940 of the ballots

00:17:30.600 individually

00:17:31.360 to know that

00:17:33.520 statistically

00:17:34.280 you would have

00:17:34.960 found some

00:17:35.460 problems

00:17:35.880 if they were

00:17:36.460 there,

00:17:36.820 but you didn't.

00:17:38.320 And then you've

00:17:38.820 also checked

00:17:39.400 the count.

00:17:40.020 is there

00:17:41.780 anything

00:17:42.300 that you

00:17:42.740 could do

00:17:43.320 as a

00:17:44.180 potential fraudster

00:17:45.820 that could 0.68

00:17:47.040 defeat those

00:17:48.040 two kinds

00:17:48.740 of checks?

00:17:50.920 The claim

00:17:53.160 is that

00:17:54.620 there's nothing

00:17:55.060 you could do

00:17:55.780 that wouldn't

00:17:57.760 be obviously

00:17:58.480 detectable.

00:17:59.780 So,

00:18:00.140 everybody who

00:18:00.740 says a

00:18:01.820 recount doesn't

00:18:02.760 work,

00:18:03.920 you're absolutely

00:18:04.740 right that

00:18:06.280 by itself

00:18:07.160 it doesn't

00:18:08.500 work.

00:18:08.840 everybody who

00:18:10.860 says that if

00:18:11.560 you just

00:18:11.920 check some

00:18:12.520 ballots to

00:18:13.080 make sure

00:18:13.420 that those

00:18:13.920 signatures

00:18:14.460 matched and

00:18:15.420 they're real

00:18:15.760 people and

00:18:16.380 it's not

00:18:16.740 dead people,

00:18:17.740 if you're

00:18:18.120 just doing

00:18:18.520 a random

00:18:19.020 but statistically

00:18:21.940 valid check,

00:18:23.460 that doesn't

00:18:25.140 tell you that

00:18:26.000 you counted

00:18:26.460 right.

00:18:27.980 But what if

00:18:28.600 you do both?

00:18:30.180 You've checked

00:18:30.780 enough of the

00:18:31.660 individual ballots

00:18:32.600 to know there's

00:18:33.180 not a problem

00:18:33.800 with them,

00:18:34.760 and you've

00:18:35.240 checked the

00:18:36.260 counting to

00:18:37.120 know the

00:18:37.480 counting was

00:18:38.160 right,

00:18:38.840 have you

00:18:39.760 now checked

00:18:41.400 everything you

00:18:42.400 need to

00:18:42.900 check to

00:18:44.100 find large

00:18:45.200 fraud?

00:18:46.340 Now,

00:18:46.700 this would

00:18:47.040 not uncover

00:18:48.200 somebody who

00:18:49.600 signed up

00:18:50.060 their neighbor

00:18:51.640 who didn't

00:18:52.400 know about

00:18:52.880 it,

00:18:53.060 right?

00:18:53.460 So,

00:18:53.920 the onesies

00:18:54.420 and twosies,

00:18:55.120 of course,

00:18:55.480 could slide

00:18:55.940 right through.

00:18:59.020 All right,

00:18:59.700 so somebody's

00:19:00.240 saying,

00:19:00.440 what about

00:19:00.700 the software

00:19:01.300 code?

00:19:01.820 what would

00:19:03.100 the software

00:19:03.700 code do

00:19:04.820 besides make

00:19:06.400 the count

00:19:07.040 incorrect?

00:19:08.580 And if

00:19:09.080 you've got

00:19:09.400 the final

00:19:09.900 tally,

00:19:11.120 and you've

00:19:11.780 got the

00:19:12.100 original ballots,

00:19:13.520 and you

00:19:13.860 recount the

00:19:14.520 original ballots,

00:19:15.880 and then you

00:19:16.480 look at the

00:19:17.020 count that

00:19:17.440 came out of

00:19:17.840 the machine,

00:19:18.880 and they

00:19:19.420 match,

00:19:20.000 you know,

00:19:20.320 within one

00:19:20.820 or two votes

00:19:21.420 or whatever,

00:19:22.060 but they

00:19:22.380 match,

00:19:23.560 does it

00:19:24.220 matter what

00:19:24.640 happened in

00:19:25.220 the internals

00:19:25.980 of the

00:19:26.440 software?

00:19:26.740 What could

00:19:29.680 you do

00:19:30.000 with the

00:19:30.320 software that

00:19:31.760 would do

00:19:32.040 anything wrong

00:19:32.840 or bad if

00:19:33.860 you know that

00:19:34.400 the ballots

00:19:34.960 that went

00:19:35.360 into it

00:19:35.780 and got

00:19:36.080 counted are

00:19:37.380 the same

00:19:37.860 as the

00:19:38.320 final tally?

00:19:40.020 Does that

00:19:40.700 not prove

00:19:42.520 to your

00:19:42.940 satisfaction that

00:19:43.880 even if there

00:19:44.600 was some

00:19:44.920 mischief in

00:19:45.440 there,

00:19:46.100 it didn't

00:19:46.460 do anything?

00:19:47.600 Because if

00:19:48.160 it did,

00:19:48.680 they wouldn't

00:19:49.240 match.

00:19:50.700 Am I

00:19:51.240 wrong?

00:19:51.940 What about

00:19:52.380 the dead

00:19:52.760 voters,

00:19:53.540 somebody says?

00:19:54.340 What about

00:19:54.640 these alleged

00:19:55.400 zillions of

00:19:56.720 dead voters?

00:19:57.720 In every

00:19:58.360 case,

00:19:59.600 it is my

00:20:00.120 understanding

00:20:00.620 that that

00:20:01.420 has been

00:20:01.780 looked into

00:20:02.420 and found

00:20:03.560 that those

00:20:04.180 were onesies

00:20:04.900 and twosies,

00:20:05.740 in other

00:20:05.960 words,

00:20:06.160 small numbers,

00:20:07.060 and that

00:20:07.700 there is no

00:20:08.320 indication that

00:20:10.440 there are a

00:20:10.900 large number

00:20:11.460 of dead

00:20:11.860 voters.

00:20:12.420 That has

00:20:12.620 not been

00:20:13.080 detected

00:20:13.520 anywhere.

00:20:15.160 There are

00:20:16.160 lists of

00:20:17.360 people who

00:20:17.860 look like

00:20:18.300 they might

00:20:18.720 have been

00:20:18.960 dead or

00:20:19.560 incorrect,

00:20:21.180 who have

00:20:21.460 maybe not

00:20:22.040 checked every

00:20:22.680 single one,

00:20:23.800 but since we

00:20:24.380 know that lots

00:20:24.940 of people have

00:20:25.440 the same name,

00:20:26.720 there is

00:20:28.320 another

00:20:28.580 explanation,

00:20:29.460 which is

00:20:29.780 lots of

00:20:30.140 people have

00:20:30.480 the same

00:20:30.740 name.

00:20:32.200 Now,

00:20:32.860 you go right

00:20:33.440 down the

00:20:33.780 list.

00:20:34.120 What about

00:20:34.500 the people

00:20:34.980 who don't

00:20:37.540 really,

00:20:38.180 they use the

00:20:39.400 same address,

00:20:40.320 or whatever,

00:20:40.760 blah, blah, blah.

00:20:43.700 Everything,

00:20:44.800 I believe most

00:20:45.960 of these things

00:20:46.600 have at least

00:20:47.160 been randomly

00:20:48.100 spot-checked

00:20:49.000 to know that

00:20:49.680 they're not

00:20:50.900 checking out.

00:20:51.540 So, let

00:20:54.420 me get to

00:20:54.980 point two.

00:20:56.580 So, here's

00:20:56.940 the first

00:20:57.380 thing that I

00:20:57.880 want to

00:20:58.140 know.

00:20:58.860 And by

00:20:59.120 the way,

00:20:59.700 an election

00:21:00.280 expert did

00:21:03.160 contact me

00:21:03.880 just this

00:21:05.000 morning and

00:21:06.500 offered to

00:21:07.100 answer some

00:21:07.640 questions about

00:21:08.400 election system

00:21:10.020 integrity.

00:21:10.740 Because the

00:21:11.100 question I

00:21:11.560 have is,

00:21:12.460 is there

00:21:12.820 any way to

00:21:13.440 cheat?

00:21:15.000 Suppose it

00:21:16.820 was true,

00:21:17.700 and I'm not

00:21:18.900 saying this is

00:21:19.540 true,

00:21:19.860 suppose it's

00:21:20.400 true, that

00:21:22.200 our system

00:21:22.960 doesn't have

00:21:23.840 any way you

00:21:24.380 can cheat so

00:21:26.060 long as you've

00:21:26.680 done those two

00:21:27.260 things.

00:21:27.720 You do a

00:21:28.200 recount in the

00:21:28.960 places that you

00:21:29.500 have questions,

00:21:30.620 and you do a

00:21:31.520 statistically valid

00:21:32.660 check of any

00:21:34.140 allegations about

00:21:35.080 dead people

00:21:35.640 voting or wrong

00:21:36.740 addresses or

00:21:37.740 signatures not

00:21:38.960 matching, and

00:21:39.580 you don't find

00:21:40.060 any.

00:21:41.600 Is that it?

00:21:42.660 Are you done?

00:21:43.360 100% okay?

00:21:45.400 I don't know.

00:21:47.420 I don't know.

00:21:48.420 But I do know

00:21:49.460 this.

00:21:50.400 If that were

00:21:51.560 true, if it

00:21:54.580 were true that

00:21:55.940 those two kinds 0.59

00:21:56.940 of checkings get

00:21:58.920 all the problems

00:21:59.760 that could be

00:22:00.380 found, why

00:22:02.020 hasn't anybody

00:22:02.600 told us that?

00:22:04.680 Does that seem

00:22:05.540 like there's

00:22:05.940 something missing?

00:22:07.400 Where is the

00:22:08.100 expert who says,

00:22:09.200 look, look,

00:22:09.660 look, the

00:22:10.620 biggest question

00:22:11.280 in the country is

00:22:12.740 election integrity.

00:22:14.200 Let me explain

00:22:15.140 to you why it

00:22:16.540 couldn't have been

00:22:17.200 a problem.

00:22:17.680 And then that

00:22:19.180 expert, hypothetically,

00:22:20.820 would say, as

00:22:21.960 long as you're

00:22:22.460 doing these two

00:22:23.140 things, recounting

00:22:25.540 and checking it to

00:22:26.280 the total, and

00:22:27.480 also randomly

00:22:28.260 checking enough

00:22:29.320 of them, the

00:22:30.580 claims of dead

00:22:31.400 people, the

00:22:32.000 claims of

00:22:32.560 signatures not

00:22:33.240 matching, if you

00:22:34.220 check enough of

00:22:34.980 them, you can

00:22:35.920 determine statistically

00:22:36.960 that there was no

00:22:37.700 problem.

00:22:38.020 where is my

00:22:40.400 expert, who

00:22:41.280 actually understands

00:22:42.180 the whole system

00:22:42.980 from beginning to

00:22:43.740 end, who sits in

00:22:45.720 front of the

00:22:46.100 camera on CNN

00:22:47.060 and says, look,

00:22:49.140 you got all these

00:22:49.840 claims, but I'm

00:22:51.360 telling you there's

00:22:51.980 no physical

00:22:52.840 possible way there

00:22:55.140 could be massive

00:22:55.780 fraud when you've

00:22:57.400 checked these two

00:22:58.200 things, and we

00:22:59.200 have.

00:23:00.700 Where's that

00:23:01.400 person?

00:23:02.860 Is the problem

00:23:04.100 that what I just

00:23:06.380 said is true, but

00:23:07.660 people are terrible

00:23:08.440 communicators, they

00:23:10.340 don't know that

00:23:11.000 that's the biggest

00:23:11.640 question, and that

00:23:12.580 it could be easily

00:23:13.420 described, because I

00:23:14.900 just easily

00:23:15.480 described it.

00:23:17.160 In fact, I only

00:23:18.240 got this description

00:23:19.400 from a tweet from

00:23:21.080 a stranger.

00:23:22.180 Somebody just

00:23:22.760 tweeted at me, oh,

00:23:23.980 if you do this and

00:23:24.840 this, you're fine.

00:23:26.580 I don't know.

00:23:27.580 I'm no expert.

00:23:28.600 Where's my expert?

00:23:30.920 I'll try to get you

00:23:31.860 an expert.

00:23:33.480 Now, I told you I

00:23:35.620 got the master list

00:23:36.840 of all the

00:23:37.560 election claims, or

00:23:38.920 something close to

00:23:40.020 all of them, and

00:23:41.500 the debunks of

00:23:43.220 them.

00:23:44.540 Now, it's a very

00:23:45.120 long document.

00:23:46.100 It's 42 pages of

00:23:47.480 background and

00:23:48.360 claims and what

00:23:49.420 happened about

00:23:49.940 them.

00:23:50.680 So I've looked

00:23:51.220 through them, and

00:23:52.800 I was offered this

00:23:55.320 document by, as I

00:23:56.640 told you, somebody

00:23:57.480 you would recognize

00:23:59.460 in the government,

00:24:00.480 and I'm going to

00:24:00.920 try to leave names

00:24:01.740 out of it just

00:24:02.340 because I don't

00:24:02.760 want to bias the

00:24:04.480 audience.

00:24:04.860 But just assume

00:24:08.220 that somebody you

00:24:09.780 know in the

00:24:10.400 government said,

00:24:11.800 hey, Scott, you're

00:24:12.580 talking about this.

00:24:13.800 You should see this

00:24:14.520 document that shows

00:24:15.480 all of the claims

00:24:16.280 and then shows how

00:24:18.020 they've been

00:24:18.400 debunked, either by

00:24:19.960 the courts, I think

00:24:21.280 mostly by the

00:24:21.900 courts, or at least

00:24:22.680 logically debunked.

00:24:24.260 So I looked

00:24:24.700 through it.

00:24:25.920 What do you think

00:24:26.700 I found?

00:24:28.160 Do you think that I

00:24:29.500 looked at a document

00:24:30.400 that claims to

00:24:31.340 debunk all the

00:24:32.400 claims, and that I

00:24:33.940 read it, and I

00:24:34.540 said to myself,

00:24:36.200 oh, pretty good.

00:24:38.020 These are pretty

00:24:38.540 good debunks.

00:24:40.940 No.

00:24:42.760 Of course not.

00:24:45.300 If you live in the

00:24:46.340 real world, you

00:24:47.940 should have known

00:24:48.520 before I even

00:24:49.320 touched the

00:24:49.900 document that what

00:24:51.360 it wasn't going to

00:24:52.360 do is answer all

00:24:53.240 my questions.

00:24:55.000 Right?

00:24:55.780 If you live in the

00:24:56.500 real world, there

00:24:57.600 wasn't any chance

00:24:58.560 that a 42-page

00:25:00.020 document was going

00:25:01.420 to answer all of my

00:25:02.200 questions.

00:25:02.620 questions, but it

00:25:04.220 is really useful.

00:25:05.180 Let me tell you some

00:25:05.920 of the things I

00:25:06.680 found.

00:25:08.160 So this is a

00:25:09.220 document that its

00:25:10.880 intention was to

00:25:11.900 make you stop

00:25:12.680 doubting the

00:25:14.100 election outcomes.

00:25:16.440 Let me say here,

00:25:17.400 for the benefit of

00:25:18.420 my censors who

00:25:20.740 are watching this,

00:25:22.620 I'm not personally

00:25:23.940 aware of any

00:25:24.960 proof of election

00:25:27.120 fraud.

00:25:28.820 Just me personally,

00:25:30.160 I haven't seen any.

00:25:31.260 And if somebody

00:25:32.600 told me they'd

00:25:33.400 seen it, why

00:25:34.100 would I believe

00:25:34.680 them?

00:25:36.420 We're not in a

00:25:37.400 world where you

00:25:38.040 could believe any

00:25:38.860 allegation.

00:25:39.920 I'm the guy who

00:25:40.540 told you that at

00:25:41.380 least 95% of all

00:25:43.060 the election fraud

00:25:44.480 allegations at the

00:25:45.380 very beginning, I

00:25:46.360 told you this, would

00:25:47.620 be BS.

00:25:48.800 Even if there's some

00:25:49.660 real stuff there, 95%

00:25:51.920 of it would be BS.

00:25:52.720 So, which is not

00:25:58.180 to say there's no

00:25:58.840 fraud, just that the

00:26:01.820 specific claims would

00:26:02.860 mostly be BS.

00:26:04.400 So here are some of

00:26:05.440 the things I found as

00:26:06.520 counters.

00:26:07.420 Of course, a lot of

00:26:08.700 the counters were that

00:26:09.860 the argument did not

00:26:11.720 have standing.

00:26:13.180 So a lot of things were

00:26:14.600 rejected because it was

00:26:16.540 too late to bring the

00:26:17.800 thing or the people

00:26:18.780 bringing it were not

00:26:19.700 the right people bringing

00:26:20.540 it.

00:26:20.700 So there were a

00:26:21.720 number of things were

00:26:22.320 rejected for technical

00:26:23.480 reasons.

00:26:24.440 But the other question

00:26:25.780 was, were there any

00:26:27.100 actual claims that

00:26:29.500 were evaluated by a

00:26:30.920 court?

00:26:31.500 And the answer is,

00:26:33.160 yes, ish.

00:26:36.580 By evaluated by the

00:26:38.240 court, I mean that the

00:26:39.420 document debunking it

00:26:40.680 has reasons like this.

00:26:43.400 The guy making the

00:26:44.440 claim is not credible.

00:26:47.440 To which I say,

00:26:48.740 that would be true of

00:26:51.980 every politician.

00:26:53.900 That would be true of a 0.92

00:26:55.040 lot of people who are

00:26:56.020 not credible.

00:26:57.020 But the claim is

00:26:58.040 something you could

00:26:58.680 check.

00:27:00.440 Suppose somebody who's

00:27:01.580 not credible,

00:27:03.060 somebody whose past

00:27:04.420 might have included

00:27:05.500 being a ghost hunter,

00:27:07.420 because that's one of

00:27:08.280 the examples.

00:27:09.160 So one of the experts

00:27:10.300 had some history of

00:27:11.900 being a ghost hunter.

00:27:12.860 And so that was

00:27:14.760 used to dismiss

00:27:15.620 his claim.

00:27:16.940 To which I say,

00:27:18.380 his claim had

00:27:20.220 evidence.

00:27:22.200 It wasn't like

00:27:23.260 something he claims

00:27:24.420 he saw,

00:27:25.640 it's something he

00:27:26.340 says he can show

00:27:27.140 you.

00:27:28.320 Like on a document,

00:27:30.200 on a, you know,

00:27:31.840 he can show it to

00:27:32.560 you.

00:27:33.020 So everything that

00:27:34.060 he saw, he can just

00:27:35.840 hand it to you,

00:27:36.660 and is willing to.

00:27:37.500 But it was dismissed

00:27:39.600 because he was once

00:27:40.640 a ghost hunter.

00:27:42.920 Do you feel okay

00:27:43.840 about that?

00:27:45.120 Do you feel okay

00:27:45.860 that his evidence,

00:27:47.900 and apparently he has

00:27:49.120 at least some expertise

00:27:50.180 that would allow him

00:27:51.300 to evaluate that

00:27:52.840 kind of evidence,

00:27:54.020 are you okay that

00:27:54.820 he was dismissed

00:27:55.820 for having once

00:27:57.060 been a ghost hunter?

00:27:58.720 Because if he's

00:28:00.060 willing to show

00:28:00.860 you the evidence,

00:28:02.600 wouldn't it feel

00:28:03.480 a little bit more

00:28:04.320 credible to say,

00:28:05.840 and we looked at

00:28:06.740 the evidence,

00:28:07.500 and here's why

00:28:08.780 the evidence is

00:28:09.480 not real?

00:28:11.280 I feel like that

00:28:13.100 was a little bit

00:28:13.660 brushed off.

00:28:14.880 Now, do I

00:28:15.440 personally think

00:28:16.360 that that's,

00:28:18.080 you know,

00:28:18.400 whichever one was

00:28:19.440 the ghost hunter

00:28:20.140 expert,

00:28:21.020 do I personally

00:28:21.820 think his evidence

00:28:22.700 was credible?

00:28:24.220 No.

00:28:25.360 No.

00:28:26.400 I don't.

00:28:27.240 But I'm just saying

00:28:27.960 if it was rejected

00:28:28.860 without being looked

00:28:29.760 at, let's not

00:28:31.460 claim it was

00:28:32.080 being looked at.

00:28:33.200 Because that just

00:28:34.160 didn't happen.

00:28:35.780 Or, at least

00:28:36.980 their response

00:28:37.780 in this document

00:28:38.700 doesn't mention

00:28:39.420 that they looked

00:28:40.020 at the details.

00:28:42.040 But again,

00:28:42.840 95% of the claims

00:28:43.920 are going to be

00:28:44.440 bogus,

00:28:45.280 and so I don't

00:28:46.280 believe that expert

00:28:47.220 because I don't

00:28:48.440 believe any of them.

00:28:49.700 Just automatically,

00:28:50.640 I don't believe it.

00:28:51.220 they've got a pretty

00:28:52.880 big high barrier,

00:28:55.960 or let's see,

00:28:56.520 a high bar for

00:28:57.600 proof,

00:28:58.560 in my mind,

00:28:59.440 and nobody's

00:28:59.960 met it yet.

00:29:01.360 So,

00:29:02.900 here's another

00:29:04.160 allegation.

00:29:05.520 There was an

00:29:05.880 allegation that the

00:29:06.660 vote count

00:29:07.560 stopped in some

00:29:09.760 places,

00:29:11.280 about this,

00:29:12.220 you know,

00:29:12.580 mysteriously stopped,

00:29:14.380 and then when it

00:29:15.420 restarted,

00:29:17.340 there were massive

00:29:18.280 votes for Biden.

00:29:19.380 That's one of the

00:29:20.620 major things that

00:29:21.920 many of the people

00:29:23.160 watching this would

00:29:24.800 say is really strong

00:29:25.980 evidence that there's

00:29:26.800 something up.

00:29:29.360 But,

00:29:29.740 you would be happy

00:29:30.440 to know that it

00:29:31.520 has been thoroughly

00:29:32.360 debunked by this

00:29:33.980 document I saw.

00:29:35.620 So,

00:29:36.120 what would be the

00:29:36.760 other reason that

00:29:37.700 the vote counting

00:29:38.360 would stop,

00:29:39.820 and then when it

00:29:40.520 restarts,

00:29:41.560 it's massively

00:29:42.300 Biden votes?

00:29:43.300 and the answer

00:29:44.340 is that those

00:29:45.480 are the mail-in

00:29:46.680 ballots.

00:29:47.720 So,

00:29:48.300 they saved the

00:29:48.940 mail-in ballots

00:29:50.020 to count them

00:29:50.680 at the end,

00:29:51.640 and everybody

00:29:52.320 knew that the

00:29:52.980 mail-in ballots

00:29:53.640 would favor the

00:29:54.960 Democrat,

00:29:55.580 because it always

00:29:56.000 does.

00:29:57.040 So,

00:29:57.600 the answer to

00:29:58.400 that is that

00:29:59.080 the reason that

00:29:59.780 the voting

00:30:00.180 stopped,

00:30:01.700 and then when

00:30:02.280 it restarted,

00:30:03.760 it was massively

00:30:04.560 Biden,

00:30:05.140 is perfectly

00:30:05.740 explainable by

00:30:07.300 the fact that

00:30:07.840 mail-in votes,

00:30:08.820 we knew,

00:30:09.340 would go to

00:30:09.780 Biden.

00:30:10.040 Are you good

00:30:10.700 with that?

00:30:11.020 You're way

00:30:14.260 ahead of me,

00:30:15.460 but why the

00:30:16.200 stop?

00:30:17.900 Why the

00:30:18.500 stop?

00:30:19.660 The debunk

00:30:20.820 for the claim

00:30:22.020 that it was

00:30:22.560 stopped,

00:30:23.560 and then when

00:30:24.140 it restarted,

00:30:25.060 it was massively

00:30:25.760 Biden,

00:30:26.680 was that mail-in

00:30:27.720 votes are at

00:30:29.260 the end,

00:30:29.780 and they're

00:30:30.120 massively going

00:30:31.320 to be Democrat.

00:30:32.080 We already

00:30:32.380 knew that.

00:30:33.640 But where did

00:30:34.160 they explain

00:30:34.660 the stopping

00:30:35.260 part?

00:30:36.660 The stopping

00:30:37.520 part was not

00:30:38.200 addressed.

00:30:39.660 So,

00:30:39.920 the document

00:30:40.420 that debunks

00:30:41.240 the claim

00:30:42.840 that there

00:30:43.460 was mysterious

00:30:44.960 stops in

00:30:46.640 the places

00:30:47.080 where there

00:30:47.540 are questions,

00:30:48.760 followed by

00:30:49.440 the Biden

00:30:49.960 ballots that

00:30:50.580 are mail-in,

00:30:51.380 mail-in.

00:30:51.980 The mail-in

00:30:52.760 ballot part,

00:30:53.640 that sounds

00:30:54.180 okay.

00:30:55.460 Do you have

00:30:55.920 any problem

00:30:56.480 with understanding

00:30:57.300 that mail-in

00:30:58.000 ballots would

00:30:59.160 favor Biden?

00:31:00.580 You probably

00:31:01.140 don't question

00:31:01.700 that, right?

00:31:02.260 Everybody knew

00:31:02.900 that.

00:31:04.000 But why the

00:31:04.560 stop?

00:31:05.380 It was the

00:31:06.100 stops that

00:31:07.080 were common

00:31:07.560 to the

00:31:07.980 problem areas

00:31:09.160 that are

00:31:10.580 the question.

00:31:11.540 And the

00:31:11.800 debunk

00:31:12.260 doesn't

00:31:13.080 mention them.

00:31:14.600 Now,

00:31:14.880 could there

00:31:15.220 be a

00:31:15.680 perfectly

00:31:16.020 good reason?

00:31:16.880 And the

00:31:17.120 answer is

00:31:17.400 yes.

00:31:18.320 The perfectly

00:31:18.920 good reason

00:31:19.620 could be,

00:31:20.140 and I'm

00:31:20.340 just speculating,

00:31:21.640 pure speculation,

00:31:23.200 it could be

00:31:23.780 that there's

00:31:24.220 some kind

00:31:24.640 of a

00:31:25.260 process

00:31:25.980 set up

00:31:27.160 that's a

00:31:27.860 little different

00:31:28.520 when you

00:31:29.360 go to

00:31:29.760 count the

00:31:30.580 mail-ins

00:31:32.140 that came

00:31:32.580 from some

00:31:33.120 source.

00:31:34.120 There might

00:31:34.600 be a

00:31:35.080 reason where

00:31:35.680 they physically

00:31:37.280 need to move

00:31:37.980 them into the

00:31:38.560 building,

00:31:40.040 say,

00:31:40.420 let's say,

00:31:40.860 for example,

00:31:42.100 and that it

00:31:42.760 takes a little

00:31:43.120 while to

00:31:43.520 physically move

00:31:44.240 them in so

00:31:44.840 they weren't

00:31:45.180 really stopping

00:31:46.340 counting,

00:31:47.180 maybe it was

00:31:48.380 just the

00:31:48.680 process.

00:31:49.860 But that

00:31:50.460 needs to be

00:31:50.920 explained,

00:31:51.440 doesn't it?

00:31:52.820 Doesn't that

00:31:53.260 need to be

00:31:53.640 explained?

00:31:55.040 Don't we need

00:31:56.000 to hear that?

00:31:56.800 Somebody say,

00:31:57.440 oh yeah,

00:31:58.480 it looks like

00:31:59.220 it's stopped,

00:32:00.120 but that's just

00:32:00.900 part of the

00:32:01.260 process.

00:32:02.320 You should

00:32:02.700 expect that.

00:32:03.800 And then also

00:32:04.480 explain to us

00:32:05.220 why other cities

00:32:06.180 didn't have the

00:32:06.780 stop,

00:32:07.500 if that's the

00:32:08.120 case.

00:32:08.860 It could be

00:32:09.520 that every city

00:32:10.240 had some kind

00:32:10.960 of a stop,

00:32:12.060 some were longer

00:32:12.780 than others,

00:32:13.640 maybe it doesn't

00:32:14.200 mean anything.

00:32:15.280 But wouldn't

00:32:15.740 you at least

00:32:16.140 like to know,

00:32:17.860 was it limited

00:32:18.860 to these

00:32:19.420 problem,

00:32:21.520 at least

00:32:22.060 alleged problem

00:32:23.020 cities?

00:32:24.020 They're the only

00:32:24.640 ones that have

00:32:25.100 a stop with

00:32:25.820 a restart?

00:32:27.160 So if you

00:32:28.300 think that the

00:32:28.920 courts have

00:32:29.700 judged this and

00:32:30.580 smart people have

00:32:31.360 looked at it and

00:32:32.460 they've addressed

00:32:33.040 all the claims,

00:32:34.980 I'm not seeing it.

00:32:36.160 All right,

00:32:37.260 here's another

00:32:37.680 one.

00:32:39.540 Suppose you

00:32:40.580 go to a court

00:32:41.420 and you say,

00:32:42.420 I've got all

00:32:43.480 this statistical

00:32:44.260 evidence that a

00:32:45.260 crime happened,

00:32:46.800 but there is

00:32:48.840 a 10% chance

00:32:50.060 that it was

00:32:51.060 perfectly legal

00:32:52.700 whatever happened.

00:32:54.100 So my

00:32:54.840 statistical evidence

00:32:56.180 is a 90%

00:32:57.900 chance that

00:32:58.620 there was a

00:32:59.040 crime.

00:32:59.460 can't tell

00:33:01.580 exactly,

00:33:02.440 90% chance,

00:33:03.960 but there is

00:33:04.860 a 10% chance

00:33:06.020 that something

00:33:06.500 normal happened

00:33:07.280 and it just

00:33:07.900 looks anomalous.

00:33:09.900 What does the

00:33:10.880 court do with

00:33:11.780 that?

00:33:13.520 Toss it out.

00:33:15.180 They toss it

00:33:15.700 out.

00:33:16.240 Because if there's

00:33:17.120 any explanation

00:33:18.180 for the thing

00:33:19.280 that isn't

00:33:20.640 crazy,

00:33:21.540 that's your

00:33:22.280 benefit of the

00:33:22.840 doubt.

00:33:23.920 Right?

00:33:24.540 So let me

00:33:25.480 give you an

00:33:26.200 example.

00:33:26.820 If you had

00:33:28.160 an anomalous

00:33:29.000 result in a,

00:33:30.840 let's say,

00:33:31.420 a precinct,

00:33:32.700 where let's

00:33:33.220 say it had

00:33:33.800 always gone to

00:33:34.440 Trump for,

00:33:35.820 or let's say

00:33:36.420 it had always

00:33:36.760 gone to

00:33:37.360 Republicans for

00:33:39.240 30 years in

00:33:40.080 a row,

00:33:40.800 it went strongly

00:33:41.700 to Trump last

00:33:42.640 year,

00:33:43.340 but this time

00:33:44.260 it went to

00:33:44.740 Biden strong.

00:33:46.300 Now, if you're

00:33:47.180 just a human,

00:33:48.360 you say,

00:33:48.860 whoa, whoa,

00:33:49.140 whoa, there's

00:33:49.840 something we need

00:33:50.700 to look into.

00:33:52.400 This 30-year

00:33:53.760 trend just went

00:33:55.620 to Trump on

00:33:56.800 by the way,

00:33:57.260 I'm making

00:33:57.600 this one up.

00:33:58.280 I don't think

00:33:58.640 this is an

00:33:59.140 actual allegation.

00:34:00.780 Just went to

00:34:01.320 Trump.

00:34:03.360 Statistically,

00:34:04.500 the odds of

00:34:05.020 that, 90%

00:34:06.500 chance there's

00:34:07.200 something fishy

00:34:07.860 going on.

00:34:09.520 But there's a

00:34:10.340 10% chance

00:34:11.380 that somebody

00:34:13.760 was just good

00:34:14.460 at getting out

00:34:14.980 the vote.

00:34:16.440 Right?

00:34:17.300 They could have

00:34:18.040 just been

00:34:18.560 really good

00:34:19.920 in that precinct

00:34:22.040 at getting out

00:34:22.700 the vote.

00:34:23.360 So the court

00:34:23.960 looks at it

00:34:24.520 and said,

00:34:25.360 it sounds like

00:34:26.020 you have two

00:34:26.460 explanations.

00:34:27.600 One, 90%

00:34:29.200 chance that

00:34:29.920 this is fishy.

00:34:31.320 And the other,

00:34:32.700 it was completely

00:34:33.420 normal and

00:34:34.160 somebody was

00:34:34.760 good at getting

00:34:35.300 out the vote.

00:34:36.440 What does the

00:34:37.280 court do with

00:34:37.900 that?

00:34:39.080 They don't take

00:34:40.060 the case.

00:34:41.640 Because if you

00:34:42.560 know from the

00:34:43.480 start there is

00:34:45.500 an explanation

00:34:46.300 that can just

00:34:47.340 explain it away,

00:34:48.840 you don't look

00:34:49.680 at it.

00:34:50.040 So there are

00:34:51.480 a whole bunch

00:34:51.940 of cases

00:34:52.440 in which there's

00:34:53.600 something like

00:34:54.840 an enormous

00:34:56.360 statistical question

00:34:58.280 that the court

00:34:59.900 just looks at

00:35:00.520 and says,

00:35:01.120 but is there

00:35:02.220 any other way

00:35:03.140 this could be

00:35:03.700 explained?

00:35:05.260 And if the

00:35:05.760 answer is yes,

00:35:06.760 the court

00:35:07.340 doesn't look at

00:35:07.980 it.

00:35:08.720 Because they're

00:35:09.420 dealing with

00:35:10.160 high likelihood

00:35:11.420 things.

00:35:12.420 Now suppose

00:35:13.180 you had

00:35:15.320 lots of

00:35:16.100 lots of

00:35:17.640 individual

00:35:18.100 cases that

00:35:19.000 if you looked

00:35:19.480 at any one

00:35:20.100 of them,

00:35:20.660 it would not

00:35:21.360 add up to

00:35:22.200 changing the

00:35:22.920 election.

00:35:23.900 But it's a

00:35:25.080 bunch of

00:35:25.380 different precincts

00:35:26.360 with, you

00:35:26.740 know, 2%

00:35:27.960 shaving here

00:35:28.860 or there.

00:35:30.020 Would that be

00:35:30.900 enough to

00:35:31.900 change the

00:35:32.340 election?

00:35:32.880 Well, in

00:35:33.180 theory it

00:35:33.600 could be

00:35:33.820 enough to

00:35:34.160 change the

00:35:34.580 election,

00:35:35.400 but if a

00:35:36.100 court is just

00:35:36.740 looking at

00:35:37.200 one part of

00:35:38.020 it, the

00:35:38.880 court is going

00:35:39.420 to say,

00:35:39.900 this wouldn't

00:35:40.260 change the

00:35:40.740 outcome, the

00:35:41.780 part I'm

00:35:42.120 looking at,

00:35:43.400 so therefore I

00:35:44.100 won't take

00:35:44.520 it.

00:35:45.360 So there are

00:35:46.080 all these

00:35:46.520 reasons why

00:35:47.200 the court

00:35:47.620 is the

00:35:48.080 wrong tool

00:35:48.900 to even

00:35:50.020 look into

00:35:50.480 stuff.

00:35:51.500 Because as

00:35:51.940 soon as you

00:35:52.360 say, well,

00:35:53.120 there might

00:35:53.400 be another

00:35:53.820 explanation,

00:35:55.140 the court

00:35:55.520 says, that's

00:35:56.080 all we need

00:35:56.460 to hear.

00:35:57.540 If you

00:35:57.900 don't have

00:35:59.300 a direct

00:35:59.860 witness to

00:36:01.680 the crime

00:36:02.260 and it's

00:36:03.940 just statistical

00:36:04.740 and there's

00:36:05.880 another reason

00:36:06.720 that it could

00:36:07.720 have happened,

00:36:08.180 that's it.

00:36:08.800 That's the

00:36:09.160 end of the

00:36:09.480 question.

00:36:11.380 What about

00:36:12.040 all those

00:36:12.500 eyewitnesses

00:36:13.700 that you

00:36:14.320 heard about?

00:36:14.880 you heard

00:36:15.740 about a

00:36:16.040 whole bunch

00:36:16.340 of eyewitnesses

00:36:17.400 that had

00:36:18.820 signed

00:36:19.280 affidavits

00:36:20.120 and stuff

00:36:20.620 saying they

00:36:21.100 had witnessed

00:36:21.560 crime?

00:36:23.320 Well, turns

00:36:24.140 out a lot

00:36:24.580 of that's

00:36:24.900 fake.

00:36:26.220 There are a

00:36:27.240 lot of people

00:36:27.700 who say they

00:36:28.480 witnessed

00:36:28.960 something,

00:36:30.040 but a number

00:36:31.440 of those

00:36:31.860 allegations

00:36:32.460 sound like

00:36:33.680 we don't

00:36:34.660 know what

00:36:35.060 happened behind

00:36:35.700 that door,

00:36:36.840 or I think

00:36:38.000 they were

00:36:38.320 changing things

00:36:39.140 but I can't

00:36:39.720 be sure,

00:36:40.300 or they

00:36:41.720 had a

00:36:42.040 pile of

00:36:42.700 ballots

00:36:43.520 that looked

00:36:44.060 suspicious

00:36:44.620 but I

00:36:45.180 don't know

00:36:45.520 for sure.

00:36:47.140 If you

00:36:47.520 add all

00:36:48.060 of that

00:36:48.360 up, it

00:36:48.660 doesn't

00:36:48.880 add to

00:36:49.360 anything,

00:36:50.600 nothing.

00:36:51.480 It's just

00:36:51.920 people who

00:36:52.420 saw something

00:36:53.040 that they

00:36:53.400 didn't know

00:36:53.680 what they

00:36:53.880 were seeing

00:36:54.320 and are

00:36:55.140 calling out

00:36:55.800 something

00:36:56.580 looks

00:36:56.900 suspicious.

00:36:58.040 But that's

00:36:58.460 not evidence.

00:37:00.060 The fact

00:37:00.540 that somebody

00:37:00.980 doesn't know

00:37:01.500 why something

00:37:02.040 happened

00:37:02.520 isn't going

00:37:04.140 to convict

00:37:04.620 anybody.

00:37:04.960 So the

00:37:08.880 other problem

00:37:09.440 is that,

00:37:10.500 and the

00:37:10.820 first time

00:37:11.460 I heard

00:37:11.740 this was

00:37:12.200 reading this

00:37:12.720 document,

00:37:13.280 and I'll

00:37:13.500 bet you

00:37:13.800 have never

00:37:14.220 heard this.

00:37:15.720 And ask

00:37:16.180 yourself how

00:37:17.060 well you're

00:37:17.520 being served

00:37:18.120 by the

00:37:18.560 news that

00:37:19.540 the next

00:37:19.920 thing I

00:37:20.260 tell you,

00:37:20.640 you've

00:37:20.820 probably

00:37:21.100 never heard

00:37:21.660 before.

00:37:22.680 A lot

00:37:23.260 of those

00:37:23.600 witnesses

00:37:24.060 signed

00:37:25.960 statements,

00:37:27.400 but not

00:37:28.340 under oath

00:37:29.100 and not

00:37:29.540 with any

00:37:30.940 kind of

00:37:31.380 legal binding

00:37:32.120 anything.

00:37:33.280 And so the

00:37:33.720 courts looked

00:37:34.280 at it and

00:37:34.600 said,

00:37:34.960 yeah it's

00:37:35.300 a signed

00:37:35.680 statement

00:37:36.140 not under

00:37:37.120 oath,

00:37:38.460 and they

00:37:39.280 tossed it

00:37:39.660 out.

00:37:40.620 So you

00:37:41.080 can go to

00:37:41.480 the court

00:37:41.800 and say

00:37:42.200 here are

00:37:43.100 100

00:37:44.000 signed

00:37:44.880 statements

00:37:45.340 from

00:37:45.820 witnesses

00:37:46.280 who say

00:37:47.540 that they

00:37:47.960 directly

00:37:48.520 saw some

00:37:49.320 fraud.

00:37:50.400 What does

00:37:50.840 the court

00:37:51.160 do with

00:37:51.660 100

00:37:52.260 signed

00:37:53.540 statements

00:37:54.200 from people

00:37:55.080 who say

00:37:55.420 they directly

00:37:56.200 looked at

00:37:57.320 fraud?

00:37:58.680 The court

00:37:59.400 says that's

00:37:59.900 not evidence

00:38:00.600 because they're

00:38:01.740 not signed,

00:38:03.000 or they're

00:38:03.260 not legally

00:38:04.460 binding.

00:38:04.960 There's

00:38:05.660 nobody who

00:38:06.260 signed under

00:38:07.200 threat or

00:38:08.600 penalty of

00:38:09.540 lying under

00:38:10.440 oath.

00:38:11.460 So the

00:38:12.040 court says

00:38:12.580 that's no

00:38:13.320 evidence.

00:38:14.320 Now I have

00:38:14.840 to ask

00:38:15.120 myself,

00:38:16.120 I have to

00:38:17.260 ask myself,

00:38:18.540 why did

00:38:19.820 these so

00:38:20.580 many people

00:38:21.220 not want to

00:38:22.780 sign something

00:38:23.360 that was

00:38:23.720 legally binding

00:38:24.600 on them?

00:38:25.800 Well,

00:38:26.520 I don't know,

00:38:27.460 but if I

00:38:28.300 were them,

00:38:29.300 I would not

00:38:30.020 sign something

00:38:30.780 that was

00:38:31.400 libelous and

00:38:33.280 legally binding

00:38:34.160 on me just

00:38:35.920 to solve

00:38:36.400 somebody else's

00:38:37.120 problem.

00:38:38.120 I think that

00:38:39.160 from a legal

00:38:39.760 perspective,

00:38:40.320 I would not

00:38:41.860 want to sign

00:38:42.520 something that

00:38:43.260 bound me to

00:38:45.280 what I said in

00:38:46.140 a way that I

00:38:46.640 could be sued

00:38:47.320 later.

00:38:48.720 Suppose I said

00:38:49.700 I'm a direct

00:38:50.360 witness to

00:38:51.140 some person

00:38:52.860 or company,

00:38:54.340 let's say

00:38:54.700 Dominion or

00:38:55.260 something,

00:38:55.820 doing something

00:38:56.420 wrong.

00:38:58.180 And that I've

00:38:58.660 signed that

00:38:59.140 under penalty

00:38:59.840 of, you

00:39:00.940 know, of

00:39:02.460 what is it,

00:39:03.580 penalty of

00:39:04.320 lying under

00:39:04.800 oath.

00:39:06.280 I don't think

00:39:07.180 I signed

00:39:07.660 that.

00:39:08.660 Because even

00:39:09.380 in my own

00:39:09.960 mind, I'm

00:39:10.460 going to

00:39:10.640 think, maybe

00:39:11.900 I'm not

00:39:12.320 100% sure.

00:39:14.040 People ask

00:39:14.640 me what I

00:39:15.100 saw, I saw

00:39:16.380 an irregularity,

00:39:17.480 I'm reporting

00:39:18.020 it, I'm just

00:39:18.520 doing what

00:39:18.940 people asked.

00:39:20.040 I witnessed,

00:39:21.280 I reported.

00:39:22.740 But if you're

00:39:23.340 asking me to

00:39:23.900 do it under

00:39:24.380 oath, then

00:39:25.920 you're also

00:39:26.380 putting me

00:39:26.960 at risk,

00:39:28.460 personal risk.

00:39:29.880 Maybe I don't

00:39:30.420 want that.

00:39:31.500 Maybe I'll

00:39:31.900 sign what I

00:39:32.600 saw, but I

00:39:33.140 won't sign it

00:39:33.700 under oath.

00:39:34.780 So what are

00:39:35.400 the courts

00:39:35.740 going to do?

00:39:36.940 Courts say

00:39:37.480 that's not

00:39:37.880 evidence, you

00:39:38.620 didn't sign

00:39:39.000 it under

00:39:39.320 oath.

00:39:40.960 Right?

00:39:41.560 Perjury is

00:39:42.080 the word I'm

00:39:42.420 looking for,

00:39:42.920 thank you.

00:39:45.280 So we've

00:39:45.840 got that.

00:39:46.900 Let's see.

00:39:47.760 And so there

00:39:48.160 are a number

00:39:48.400 of claims that

00:39:49.080 don't have any

00:39:49.580 direct evidence,

00:39:51.140 claims that are

00:39:51.860 not under

00:39:52.480 oath, you

00:39:53.560 know, under

00:39:53.920 penalty of

00:39:54.660 perjury.

00:39:55.920 No, no

00:39:57.780 addressing the

00:39:58.500 stopping of

00:39:59.080 counting, just

00:40:00.020 addressing that

00:40:01.340 there's a

00:40:01.780 reason that

00:40:02.200 Biden came

00:40:02.740 from behind.

00:40:06.140 Oh, and

00:40:06.800 then here's

00:40:07.780 the one that

00:40:08.120 just made me

00:40:08.580 laugh out

00:40:09.160 loud.

00:40:09.880 You've also

00:40:10.400 heard the

00:40:10.720 claims that

00:40:11.440 the number

00:40:12.560 of rejected

00:40:13.420 ballots went

00:40:15.280 from a

00:40:15.900 larger number

00:40:16.600 to an

00:40:17.420 infinitesimally

00:40:18.260 smaller number.

00:40:19.620 Now, when I

00:40:20.200 say a larger

00:40:20.720 number, I mean,

00:40:21.580 you know, we're

00:40:21.980 only talking

00:40:22.380 about one or

00:40:22.940 two percent or

00:40:23.700 some small

00:40:24.400 number, in

00:40:25.660 the past

00:40:26.320 historically had

00:40:27.440 been rejected

00:40:28.060 because the

00:40:29.520 person who

00:40:30.020 filled out the

00:40:30.560 ballot made

00:40:31.080 some kind of

00:40:31.760 error.

00:40:32.840 And it would

00:40:33.200 be some kind

00:40:33.720 of an error

00:40:34.140 that, you

00:40:35.540 know, might

00:40:35.800 be hard to

00:40:36.300 correct, etc.

00:40:38.120 Now, I think

00:40:38.780 the process

00:40:39.480 allows for

00:40:40.640 correction, if

00:40:41.780 you didn't

00:40:42.080 know that.

00:40:42.880 So even if a

00:40:43.760 ballot has

00:40:45.000 some problem

00:40:45.600 and they can't

00:40:46.240 count it the

00:40:46.680 way it is,

00:40:47.420 there is a

00:40:48.040 process where

00:40:48.680 the voter is

00:40:49.280 contacted and

00:40:50.580 they're given a

00:40:51.100 chance to fix

00:40:52.180 their ballot.

00:40:52.720 I don't know

00:40:53.680 how many people

00:40:54.200 actually do

00:40:54.740 that.

00:40:55.720 It seems to

00:40:56.280 be, yeah, they

00:40:57.080 have the option

00:40:58.220 to cure the

00:40:59.040 ballot, it's

00:40:59.540 called.

00:41:00.240 But I don't

00:41:02.360 know how many

00:41:03.160 people actually

00:41:03.920 take the

00:41:04.620 option and

00:41:05.940 how many they

00:41:06.500 can actually

00:41:06.980 contact.

00:41:07.860 It seems like

00:41:08.260 it would be a

00:41:08.560 lot of people.

00:41:09.940 But the

00:41:10.400 claim was that

00:41:11.520 because the

00:41:14.020 standard for

00:41:14.800 rejection went

00:41:15.760 from an

00:41:16.880 historical level

00:41:17.880 to way, way

00:41:18.900 lower and

00:41:19.920 almost nothing

00:41:20.620 was rejected,

00:41:21.320 and that

00:41:22.260 difference in

00:41:22.860 rejection rate

00:41:23.640 could have

00:41:24.000 actually tipped

00:41:24.620 the election

00:41:25.100 because things

00:41:27.680 were close.

00:41:29.980 Actually, I

00:41:30.560 don't know that

00:41:31.180 it could have

00:41:31.540 tipped the

00:41:31.880 election, but

00:41:32.460 it would be a

00:41:33.160 biggish kind

00:41:34.140 of an impact.

00:41:37.600 So here's the

00:41:38.360 thing.

00:41:39.680 The explanation

00:41:40.680 in the document

00:41:41.720 was that there's

00:41:42.920 another reason

00:41:43.840 why that

00:41:45.680 difference could

00:41:46.700 have happened.

00:41:47.180 And as long

00:41:48.380 as there's

00:41:48.760 another reasonable

00:41:49.880 reason, then

00:41:51.920 you're not

00:41:52.340 going to get

00:41:52.640 any kind of

00:41:53.240 court action

00:41:55.060 on it because

00:41:55.680 the court will

00:41:56.180 just say,

00:41:57.140 well, you

00:41:57.560 haven't disproven

00:41:58.680 the other

00:41:59.120 explanation.

00:41:59.960 There could

00:42:00.200 just be a

00:42:00.660 logical explanation

00:42:01.540 for it.

00:42:02.360 And here's the

00:42:02.980 logical other

00:42:04.040 explanation.

00:42:06.680 People were

00:42:07.680 more careful

00:42:08.320 this time.

00:42:12.680 That's it.

00:42:13.640 That's the

00:42:14.220 explanation about

00:42:15.220 why the number

00:42:15.860 that were

00:42:16.320 rejected for

00:42:17.260 being wrong

00:42:18.500 were so much

00:42:19.740 lower this time.

00:42:20.640 And it's a big

00:42:21.040 difference because

00:42:22.580 people were so

00:42:23.720 much better

00:42:24.320 trained at

00:42:26.140 filling them

00:42:26.560 out because

00:42:27.340 they had been

00:42:27.960 taught by the

00:42:29.620 news and by

00:42:30.340 everybody else

00:42:30.960 that you have

00:42:31.800 to fill it

00:42:32.260 out correctly

00:42:33.000 or else it

00:42:34.460 won't count.

00:42:35.880 So unlike

00:42:36.600 every year in

00:42:37.620 the past where

00:42:39.260 people tried

00:42:40.040 hard to do it

00:42:40.800 correctly but

00:42:41.460 they had a

00:42:41.980 certain error

00:42:42.500 right, this

00:42:43.820 time, because

00:42:44.540 they knew it

00:42:44.960 was more

00:42:45.320 important,

00:42:45.860 and they'd

00:42:46.440 been trained

00:42:47.160 a little

00:42:47.500 bit.

00:42:49.140 They'd been

00:42:49.700 trained a

00:42:50.120 little bit

00:42:50.420 better.

00:42:51.520 They really

00:42:52.280 got that

00:42:52.760 error right

00:42:53.200 down.

00:42:54.340 So that's

00:42:54.680 the other

00:42:55.000 possible

00:42:55.460 explanation.

00:42:56.640 So as long

00:42:57.000 as you have

00:42:57.260 another possible

00:42:57.980 explanation,

00:42:59.760 the court

00:43:01.060 says, well,

00:43:02.220 we're not

00:43:02.620 going to look

00:43:02.960 into it because

00:43:03.920 as soon as

00:43:05.200 the defense

00:43:05.780 says, well,

00:43:07.140 it could just

00:43:07.580 be natural,

00:43:08.280 that's the

00:43:08.600 end of the

00:43:08.880 case.

00:43:09.880 Because you

00:43:10.420 can't prove

00:43:11.100 why it

00:43:11.440 happened.

00:43:12.420 You just

00:43:12.820 have this

00:43:13.180 suspicion.

00:43:13.640 So that

00:43:17.460 explanation is

00:43:18.200 laughable.

00:43:18.860 Anybody who's

00:43:19.480 met human

00:43:20.160 beings knows

00:43:21.620 that they're

00:43:22.040 not going to

00:43:22.460 be suddenly

00:43:23.220 more accurate

00:43:24.080 because you

00:43:24.800 told them

00:43:25.180 to.

00:43:25.840 They're not

00:43:26.380 going to

00:43:26.620 suddenly be

00:43:27.220 more accurate

00:43:27.780 because orange

00:43:29.440 man is

00:43:29.980 extra bad.

00:43:31.460 People don't

00:43:32.160 act like that.

00:43:33.380 The error rate

00:43:34.200 that you've had

00:43:34.740 every year

00:43:35.340 before is

00:43:36.280 going to be

00:43:36.800 pretty similar

00:43:37.700 because people

00:43:39.120 just don't,

00:43:40.980 we don't

00:43:41.420 respond that

00:43:42.120 way.

00:43:42.460 Oh, it's

00:43:42.860 important?

00:43:43.680 Okay, I'll

00:43:44.240 drop my

00:43:44.680 error rate

00:43:45.080 to zero.

00:43:46.020 You should

00:43:46.320 have told

00:43:46.600 me that

00:43:46.920 the election

00:43:47.420 of the

00:43:47.720 United States

00:43:48.320 president

00:43:49.100 was important.

00:43:50.380 I didn't

00:43:50.740 know before,

00:43:51.420 so I guess

00:43:51.760 I'll pay

00:43:52.060 attention now.

00:43:53.360 I mean,

00:43:53.760 just ridiculous

00:43:55.600 explanations.

00:43:58.580 But maybe

00:43:59.460 good enough

00:43:59.880 for the

00:44:00.140 court.

00:44:00.800 So here's

00:44:01.180 my point

00:44:01.580 about this.

00:44:03.640 Anybody

00:44:04.120 who tells

00:44:04.640 you that

00:44:05.240 the election

00:44:06.800 fraud has

00:44:07.840 been looked

00:44:08.340 into and

00:44:09.120 debunked by

00:44:09.960 the right

00:44:10.400 entities,

00:44:11.260 speaking of

00:44:11.920 the courts,

00:44:13.280 they're using

00:44:14.740 the wrong

00:44:15.240 tool for

00:44:16.140 the job.

00:44:17.280 The court

00:44:17.800 has a certain

00:44:18.640 role, but

00:44:19.900 it is nothing

00:44:20.680 like whatever

00:44:22.240 it would take

00:44:22.920 to determine

00:44:23.660 whether fraud

00:44:24.440 existed or

00:44:25.220 did not in

00:44:25.880 an election.

00:44:26.720 Because the

00:44:27.220 things that

00:44:27.660 they can look

00:44:28.220 at are so

00:44:28.840 limited, and

00:44:30.380 the rules that

00:44:31.100 they operate

00:44:31.620 on are so

00:44:32.480 defined that

00:44:34.560 it just doesn't

00:44:35.100 fit.

00:44:35.520 So the

00:44:36.560 election claims

00:44:37.660 just didn't

00:44:39.040 fit in a

00:44:39.580 court.

00:44:40.960 And the

00:44:41.280 court basically

00:44:42.060 was saying,

00:44:42.720 stop trying to

00:44:43.800 bring them

00:44:44.140 here, we're

00:44:45.200 the wrong

00:44:45.720 tool for

00:44:46.420 that.

00:44:47.400 And they

00:44:47.720 are.

00:44:48.220 But there

00:44:48.600 is no

00:44:48.880 other tool.

00:44:50.160 The court's

00:44:50.680 the only

00:44:51.080 tool, but

00:44:52.240 it's a

00:44:52.520 completely

00:44:52.900 wrong tool.

00:44:54.380 So if you

00:44:54.780 were trying

00:44:55.080 to find out

00:44:55.700 if there

00:44:56.120 was radio

00:44:56.720 activity in

00:44:57.580 your house,

00:44:58.660 and you

00:44:59.000 decided to

00:44:59.600 use your

00:45:00.000 smartphone to

00:45:00.840 do it,

00:45:02.160 let me do

00:45:02.700 that now.

00:45:03.280 Let me

00:45:03.480 check for

00:45:03.880 radio activity

00:45:04.620 in my

00:45:04.960 house.

00:45:06.280 Checking,

00:45:06.840 checking.

00:45:07.260 Oh, it

00:45:07.600 turns out I

00:45:08.560 don't have an

00:45:09.120 app for

00:45:09.520 that.

00:45:10.460 It turns out

00:45:11.000 that my

00:45:11.320 phone is

00:45:12.540 the wrong

00:45:13.080 tool to

00:45:14.620 determine if

00:45:15.260 there's radio

00:45:15.860 activity in

00:45:16.460 my house.

00:45:17.680 But I'm

00:45:18.280 going to use

00:45:18.660 it anyway,

00:45:19.720 and when I

00:45:20.180 don't find

00:45:20.700 any radio

00:45:21.280 activity, I'll

00:45:21.880 say there

00:45:22.440 isn't any,

00:45:23.540 because my

00:45:24.020 tool didn't

00:45:24.480 find any.

00:45:25.380 That is

00:45:25.840 exactly what's

00:45:26.780 happening.

00:45:27.900 Not really,

00:45:28.600 not exactly,

00:45:29.460 but by

00:45:30.440 analogy,

00:45:31.860 using the

00:45:32.560 court to

00:45:34.120 figure out

00:45:34.640 whether the

00:45:35.140 election was

00:45:35.720 fraudulent,

00:45:36.280 it's just

00:45:36.620 the wrong

00:45:36.940 tool.

00:45:37.900 The court

00:45:38.220 can't do

00:45:38.740 that.

00:45:39.760 It could

00:45:40.140 do it in

00:45:40.760 some special

00:45:41.860 cases, but

00:45:43.880 it's really not

00:45:44.360 designed for

00:45:44.880 that.

00:45:45.620 And given

00:45:46.880 the speed of

00:45:47.700 things, the

00:45:48.460 allegations which

00:45:49.760 were made to

00:45:50.200 the court were

00:45:51.400 empty and

00:45:52.280 ridiculous and

00:45:53.740 crazy.

00:45:55.480 here's a

00:45:58.260 thing that

00:45:59.100 makes me

00:45:59.500 suspicious.

00:46:01.320 And let

00:46:02.040 me say

00:46:02.300 again, I'll

00:46:03.380 bookend this

00:46:03.940 by saying, I

00:46:04.580 don't have

00:46:04.920 any, I've

00:46:05.740 never seen

00:46:06.160 any proof

00:46:06.680 that the

00:46:07.040 election was

00:46:07.560 fraudulent.

00:46:09.280 Proof that I

00:46:10.240 personally could

00:46:11.060 look at and

00:46:11.820 see it with my

00:46:12.560 own eyes and

00:46:13.280 that sort of

00:46:13.640 thing.

00:46:14.300 Just lots of

00:46:15.080 allegations.

00:46:16.200 But here's

00:46:16.760 what bothers

00:46:19.000 me.

00:46:21.340 If any

00:46:22.340 kind of

00:46:22.760 major fraud

00:46:23.440 happened,

00:46:23.900 my personal

00:46:24.840 belief is

00:46:25.540 that it

00:46:25.840 would more

00:46:26.240 likely happen

00:46:27.020 with some

00:46:28.000 kind of a

00:46:28.500 software hack

00:46:29.460 if, and

00:46:30.880 this is a

00:46:31.300 big if, that

00:46:33.000 could happen

00:46:33.500 without being

00:46:34.080 detected in a

00:46:34.940 recount.

00:46:36.260 Because the

00:46:36.900 recounts would

00:46:37.440 have presumably

00:46:38.620 found it.

00:46:39.400 I guess I

00:46:39.800 need an

00:46:40.120 expert to

00:46:40.600 tell me if

00:46:40.980 that's true.

00:46:44.040 But let's

00:46:44.720 say to be

00:46:45.940 big enough to

00:46:47.380 change the

00:46:47.900 election, it

00:46:48.620 would have had

00:46:49.000 to be software.

00:46:50.500 Now I'm not

00:46:50.960 saying that

00:46:51.360 happened.

00:46:52.360 I'm just

00:46:52.720 saying it

00:46:53.020 would have to

00:46:53.340 be something

00:46:53.760 of scale

00:46:54.480 that could 0.68

00:46:55.500 affect a

00:46:56.040 lot of

00:46:56.360 different

00:46:56.580 places in

00:46:57.240 small ways

00:46:58.540 so you

00:46:58.800 could get

00:46:59.080 away with

00:46:59.400 it.

00:47:00.520 Now, if

00:47:01.980 there was

00:47:02.360 some entity,

00:47:03.740 let's say

00:47:04.320 Russia or 0.72

00:47:05.380 China or 0.92

00:47:06.020 the Democrats

00:47:06.660 or bad

00:47:07.440 actors or

00:47:07.980 whatever,

00:47:08.640 some entity

00:47:09.280 that had

00:47:09.780 that capability,

00:47:12.040 how would

00:47:12.760 they cover

00:47:13.200 their tracks

00:47:13.880 when the

00:47:14.820 election was

00:47:15.440 questioned?

00:47:16.840 What would

00:47:17.300 be the way

00:47:17.820 to do

00:47:18.200 that?

00:47:18.700 Well, if

00:47:19.560 they're the

00:47:19.920 highest level

00:47:20.820 operators,

00:47:21.520 they would

00:47:23.040 take the

00:47:24.360 place where

00:47:24.960 the real

00:47:25.480 election fraud

00:47:26.320 happened.

00:47:26.960 Again, no

00:47:28.220 evidence of

00:47:28.840 this.

00:47:29.560 I'm just

00:47:29.980 walking you

00:47:31.020 through a

00:47:31.400 speculative

00:47:31.860 scenario here.

00:47:33.240 So I'm not

00:47:33.680 making a claim

00:47:34.460 of election

00:47:35.480 fraud.

00:47:36.060 I have no

00:47:36.380 proof of that

00:47:37.500 personally.

00:47:39.620 But imagine

00:47:40.260 a scenario

00:47:41.060 in which you

00:47:42.220 knew that the

00:47:43.140 software hack

00:47:44.280 was the thing

00:47:45.020 that could be

00:47:45.600 detected,

00:47:46.740 whereas all

00:47:47.300 this other

00:47:47.760 ballot counting

00:47:48.860 and mail-in

00:47:49.400 stuff would

00:47:50.400 be a great

00:47:50.900 diversion.

00:47:52.160 The first

00:47:52.480 thing you do

00:47:53.060 is make sure

00:47:54.180 that people

00:47:54.580 got really

00:47:55.140 worked up

00:47:55.840 about the

00:47:57.100 physical

00:47:59.380 ballots and

00:48:00.860 the mail-in

00:48:01.440 stuff,

00:48:01.980 because you

00:48:02.480 want them to

00:48:02.980 be looking in

00:48:03.520 the wrong

00:48:03.860 place.

00:48:05.840 Just

00:48:06.360 hypothetically,

00:48:07.240 I'm not

00:48:07.520 making an

00:48:07.940 actual

00:48:08.260 accusation.

00:48:09.820 So you

00:48:10.500 would probably

00:48:11.080 stir up as

00:48:12.340 much fake

00:48:12.920 news as you

00:48:13.520 could on

00:48:14.040 social media,

00:48:15.300 show a

00:48:15.680 bunch of

00:48:16.000 fake claims

00:48:17.900 about physical

00:48:18.940 ballots and

00:48:19.580 stuff, to

00:48:20.220 make everybody

00:48:20.840 focus on

00:48:21.640 that stuff.

00:48:22.900 And even in

00:48:23.380 the comments,

00:48:23.920 you can see

00:48:24.320 people saying,

00:48:24.960 but what about

00:48:25.400 ballot harvesting

00:48:26.300 and dead

00:48:27.500 people, and

00:48:28.480 those are all

00:48:29.560 the things you

00:48:29.960 would want

00:48:30.420 them to be

00:48:30.880 looking at.

00:48:31.760 Because once

00:48:32.380 those are all

00:48:32.980 debunked,

00:48:34.360 because the

00:48:34.720 people who,

00:48:35.380 again, this is

00:48:35.960 just a

00:48:36.240 hypothetical,

00:48:37.240 if the

00:48:37.940 hypothetical group

00:48:38.820 who had

00:48:39.120 hacked the

00:48:39.800 election

00:48:40.180 wanted the

00:48:42.340 election

00:48:43.820 skeptics to

00:48:45.240 lose all

00:48:47.580 their

00:48:47.740 credibility,

00:48:48.960 they would

00:48:49.300 send them

00:48:49.720 to look at

00:48:50.160 things where

00:48:50.680 there's not

00:48:51.640 going to be

00:48:51.980 a problem,

00:48:52.920 and then when

00:48:53.340 no problem

00:48:54.120 is found,

00:48:55.460 the people

00:48:55.920 claiming

00:48:56.300 problems are

00:48:57.280 debunked,

00:48:58.160 basically.

00:48:58.720 They look

00:48:59.100 like crazy.

00:49:01.640 Now, so

00:49:02.440 that's what

00:49:02.780 you do.

00:49:03.080 First, you

00:49:03.400 get their

00:49:03.740 attention on

00:49:04.420 the physical

00:49:04.900 ballots.

00:49:05.820 The other

00:49:06.480 thing you

00:49:06.880 do, and

00:49:07.240 this is the

00:49:07.700 important part,

00:49:08.780 is you

00:49:09.420 would drop

00:49:09.900 a gigantic

00:49:10.640 piece of

00:49:11.300 disinformation

00:49:12.020 about the

00:49:13.400 software part.

00:49:15.360 And it

00:49:15.580 would be

00:49:15.940 something like,

00:49:16.900 oh, Hugo

00:49:18.640 Chavez and

00:49:20.040 Venezuela own 0.98

00:49:21.400 these machines,

00:49:22.640 and they're

00:49:22.880 really, something

00:49:24.340 like that.

00:49:25.240 Something so

00:49:26.000 crazy that when

00:49:27.860 you debunked the

00:49:28.880 big lie, that

00:49:30.280 Hugo Chavez,

00:49:31.700 blah, blah, blah,

00:49:32.260 that you would

00:49:33.300 never be able to

00:49:34.020 penetrate beyond

00:49:34.840 that into

00:49:36.120 forcing a

00:49:36.860 recount, because

00:49:38.100 you would have

00:49:38.780 discredited your

00:49:40.420 own legal team

00:49:41.380 so badly that

00:49:42.740 people wouldn't

00:49:43.220 take you seriously

00:49:44.000 after that.

00:49:44.660 And that's

00:49:46.420 exactly what

00:49:47.080 happened.

00:49:48.400 So, if you

00:49:49.840 look at

00:49:50.140 Linwood and

00:49:51.060 Sidney

00:49:52.660 Powell, if

00:49:54.540 people who

00:49:55.600 hypothetically,

00:49:57.940 not claiming it

00:49:58.960 happened, don't

00:49:59.540 have any evidence

00:50:00.260 for it, I'm just

00:50:00.900 walking through a

00:50:02.600 speculative

00:50:03.120 scenario, the

00:50:04.840 way to shut

00:50:05.860 those people

00:50:06.500 down would

00:50:07.380 have been to

00:50:08.160 feed them

00:50:08.920 ridiculous

00:50:10.240 conspiracy theories

00:50:11.500 about a

00:50:12.660 military,

00:50:13.120 PSYOP

00:50:13.880 operation in

00:50:14.800 Venezuela,

00:50:16.240 maybe send

00:50:17.420 some Italian

00:50:18.640 satellite conspiracy

00:50:20.520 stuff.

00:50:21.680 And when that

00:50:22.300 stuff is debunked,

00:50:23.300 it just removes

00:50:24.340 your ability to

00:50:25.140 go deeper,

00:50:26.180 because you've

00:50:26.560 been so thoroughly

00:50:27.280 debunked.

00:50:28.680 So, I'm not

00:50:30.420 saying that

00:50:31.000 happened.

00:50:31.720 No direct

00:50:32.620 evidence of that

00:50:33.400 whatsoever.

00:50:34.360 I'm just saying

00:50:35.240 it looks exactly

00:50:36.320 like what would

00:50:39.200 have happened if

00:50:40.380 this scenario

00:50:41.060 were to happen.

00:50:42.100 So, you can't

00:50:42.940 rule out either

00:50:43.540 scenario.

00:50:44.660 Usually, the

00:50:45.340 fantastical ones

00:50:46.460 are less likely,

00:50:48.380 but it just

00:50:50.020 makes me scratch

00:50:50.900 my head when I

00:50:51.860 see that it

00:50:52.440 looks exactly

00:50:54.220 like a

00:50:54.900 disinformation

00:50:55.480 campaign would

00:50:56.420 look.

00:50:57.400 Doesn't mean

00:50:58.080 there is one,

00:50:59.100 just means it

00:51:00.280 looks exactly

00:51:00.860 like one.

00:51:02.060 That's how it

00:51:02.620 would play out.

00:51:05.740 CNN is

00:51:06.580 reporting on

00:51:07.220 its own fake

00:51:07.820 news, which is

00:51:08.520 weird.

00:51:08.780 So, they

00:51:11.080 say the

00:51:11.440 evidence

00:51:11.880 uncovered so

00:51:12.760 far is that

00:51:14.360 there was

00:51:14.840 weapons and

00:51:15.980 tactics and

00:51:16.960 plans for the

00:51:18.160 assault on the

00:51:19.380 Capitol well

00:51:20.600 ahead of the

00:51:21.280 president's

00:51:22.140 closest comments

00:51:24.000 about it, and

00:51:25.760 so that maybe it

00:51:26.700 was just a

00:51:27.140 planned event as

00:51:28.200 opposed to

00:51:28.740 something that

00:51:29.240 spiraled out of

00:51:30.120 control because of

00:51:31.280 anything Trump

00:51:32.340 might have said.

00:51:33.000 So, CNN is

00:51:35.140 actually basically

00:51:36.420 debunking their

00:51:37.240 own news.

00:51:39.040 Interesting.

00:51:44.260 Apparently, the

00:51:45.000 FBI, according to

00:51:45.940 Fox News, visited

00:51:47.580 some of the

00:51:48.160 extremists prior

00:51:49.420 to the pro-Trump

00:51:51.480 rally to try to

00:51:52.860 talk them out

00:51:53.440 of going.

00:51:54.660 So, the

00:51:55.480 FBI was so

00:51:57.640 concerned about

00:51:59.580 violence in the

00:52:00.320 Capitol that it

00:52:01.520 was proactively

00:52:02.320 visiting people

00:52:03.560 to ask them

00:52:04.340 not to go.

00:52:06.460 So, given

00:52:07.540 these two

00:52:08.120 facts, CNN

00:52:09.800 saying it

00:52:10.440 looks like there

00:52:10.900 was advanced

00:52:11.440 planning, and

00:52:12.960 Fox News

00:52:13.580 reporting that

00:52:14.320 the FBI had

00:52:15.100 visited people

00:52:15.760 ahead of time

00:52:16.360 because they

00:52:16.960 knew there

00:52:17.240 was advanced

00:52:17.740 planning, and

00:52:19.360 still the

00:52:20.180 president is

00:52:20.920 being impeached

00:52:21.720 for being the

00:52:22.980 thing that

00:52:23.440 incited the

00:52:24.940 riot.

00:52:26.000 That's right.

00:52:26.860 He incited the

00:52:27.860 riot that was 0.73

00:52:28.940 planned weeks

00:52:30.380 before he

00:52:30.960 incited them.

00:52:32.320 And he

00:52:33.360 actually got

00:52:33.780 impeached for

00:52:34.220 that.

00:52:35.840 You live in

00:52:36.660 that country.

00:52:38.160 Do you feel

00:52:38.600 proud about

00:52:39.060 that?

00:52:39.980 Are you proud

00:52:40.520 to live in

00:52:40.920 the country

00:52:41.260 that impeached

00:52:41.900 him for

00:52:42.820 something that

00:52:43.420 was going to

00:52:43.940 happen no

00:52:44.620 matter what

00:52:45.020 he did?

00:52:46.940 Well, I

00:52:48.300 think he could

00:52:48.820 have stopped

00:52:49.340 it, and so

00:52:49.960 I'm still, I'm

00:52:51.500 not going to

00:52:51.840 give the

00:52:52.100 president a pass

00:52:52.820 on that,

00:52:53.600 because I

00:52:53.940 think one

00:52:54.400 tweet would

00:52:54.980 have stopped

00:52:55.540 the occupation

00:52:56.820 of the

00:52:57.180 Capitol.

00:52:57.480 the evidence

00:52:58.880 suggests that

00:53:00.640 if he had

00:53:01.100 simply said

00:53:01.820 you went

00:53:02.960 too far,

00:53:03.860 get the

00:53:04.160 hell out of

00:53:04.600 the Capitol

00:53:05.160 building,

00:53:06.260 they would

00:53:07.000 have left

00:53:07.380 immediately.

00:53:08.960 I think the

00:53:09.520 evidence suggests

00:53:10.560 that they were

00:53:11.400 sort of thinking

00:53:12.160 that he was

00:53:12.780 behind them,

00:53:13.960 waiting for a

00:53:14.580 sign, you

00:53:15.240 know, there's

00:53:15.500 actually reporting

00:53:16.700 that they were

00:53:17.800 actively, they

00:53:18.900 had cell phone

00:53:19.640 problems, so

00:53:21.040 they were trying

00:53:21.460 to get somebody

00:53:22.160 who had a

00:53:22.440 cell phone to

00:53:23.000 see what

00:53:23.340 Trump was

00:53:23.740 saying at

00:53:24.840 the moment

00:53:25.240 they were in

00:53:25.640 the Capitol.

00:53:26.700 One tweet,

00:53:28.100 get the hell

00:53:28.900 out of the

00:53:29.300 Capitol, this

00:53:30.520 is not part

00:53:31.100 of the deal.

00:53:32.080 One tweet,

00:53:33.340 they walk

00:53:33.800 out, I

00:53:34.440 think.

00:53:36.560 Somebody says

00:53:37.300 he did, but

00:53:38.080 I don't think

00:53:38.840 that he was

00:53:40.000 as timely as

00:53:40.740 I'm saying.

00:53:42.380 Now we know

00:53:43.160 that there

00:53:43.520 were some,

00:53:44.060 at least one

00:53:44.720 BML activist

00:53:45.740 and maybe one

00:53:47.060 Democrat,

00:53:47.920 registered

00:53:48.380 Democrat,

00:53:49.440 who were

00:53:50.180 active parts

00:53:51.040 of the

00:53:51.340 Capitol

00:53:51.640 assault.

00:53:53.360 So some

00:53:54.220 guy with a

00:53:55.180 video crew

00:53:56.500 who was,

00:53:58.120 his own

00:53:58.680 video shows

00:53:59.420 him actively

00:54:00.160 encouraging the

00:54:01.420 protesters and

00:54:02.720 actively being

00:54:03.480 part of it and

00:54:04.680 yelling stuff

00:54:05.320 like, it's our

00:54:06.160 house and we

00:54:07.440 got to get this

00:54:09.740 shit burned

00:54:10.640 down.

00:54:11.560 That's the guy

00:54:12.040 who claims he

00:54:12.640 was just taking

00:54:13.200 video of it and

00:54:13.980 he's not guilty.

00:54:15.440 So we do know

00:54:16.400 that at least on

00:54:17.400 some scale that

00:54:19.020 there were non-

00:54:20.220 Republicans there

00:54:21.160 for troublemaking

00:54:23.460 purposes.

00:54:23.940 So that's

00:54:24.500 confirmed now.

00:54:25.720 When I say

00:54:26.420 it's confirmed,

00:54:27.260 I mean that

00:54:27.820 CNN will never

00:54:28.660 say that this

00:54:29.280 has happened.

00:54:30.300 But I don't

00:54:30.740 know at what

00:54:31.220 scale.

00:54:32.160 There are some

00:54:32.740 people who are

00:54:33.320 confirmed to be

00:54:34.100 on the other

00:54:34.700 team.

00:54:35.660 So it's at

00:54:36.720 least a partial

00:54:37.660 false flag.

00:54:40.340 It's definitely

00:54:41.080 not a full

00:54:41.680 false flag because

00:54:42.560 lots of people

00:54:43.100 were just Trump

00:54:43.680 supporters.

00:54:44.460 But it's at

00:54:44.880 least a partial

00:54:45.620 fake flag,

00:54:47.860 false flag,

00:54:48.580 and I don't

00:54:48.940 know if that's

00:54:49.360 even a thing.

00:54:50.900 Because if it's

00:54:51.540 partial, it's not.

00:54:52.400 It doesn't make

00:54:52.860 much difference.

00:54:53.740 All right.

00:54:55.440 Have you seen

00:54:56.180 the video of

00:54:57.200 the leftists

00:54:59.660 destroying

00:55:00.260 Washington, D.C.

00:55:01.440 during Trump's

00:55:02.100 inauguration?

00:55:03.840 How quickly

00:55:04.800 we forget

00:55:05.880 that Trump's

00:55:07.380 inauguration

00:55:08.140 incited a

00:55:09.760 riot.

00:55:11.420 But not

00:55:12.100 because of

00:55:12.620 Trump necessarily,

00:55:13.740 but because of

00:55:14.280 the Democrats.

00:55:15.440 Don't you think

00:55:16.040 that that riot

00:55:16.740 was sort of

00:55:17.600 incited by the

00:55:19.920 Democrats, what

00:55:20.600 they've been saying

00:55:21.160 about Trump

00:55:21.620 during the entire

00:55:22.240 election?

00:55:22.860 I'd say so.

00:55:24.240 So we just act

00:55:25.140 like it didn't

00:55:25.580 happen.

00:55:26.920 But there's

00:55:27.480 video of a

00:55:28.780 riot and windows

00:55:29.700 being broken

00:55:30.360 during Trump's

00:55:31.420 inauguration.

00:55:33.660 There's still

00:55:34.180 stories about

00:55:34.780 San Francisco

00:55:35.560 shrinking.

00:55:37.000 Rents are

00:55:37.380 going down.

00:55:38.200 Home prices

00:55:38.660 are going down

00:55:39.240 in San Francisco.

00:55:40.620 The tech

00:55:41.600 company is moving

00:55:42.320 out.

00:55:43.400 Here's an

00:55:43.900 interesting factoid.

00:55:45.240 I live an

00:55:46.300 hour from San

00:55:47.200 Francisco, and

00:55:48.880 home prices here

00:55:49.820 went up.

00:55:50.440 because part

00:55:52.480 of moving

00:55:52.840 out of San

00:55:53.280 Francisco is

00:55:54.020 also moving

00:55:54.840 an hour away,

00:55:56.480 still being in

00:55:57.200 California, but

00:55:57.900 not being in

00:55:58.460 San Francisco.

00:55:59.620 So my

00:56:00.180 property values

00:56:00.880 actually went

00:56:01.480 up, weirdly,

00:56:03.200 because San

00:56:04.040 Francisco went

00:56:04.720 to hell. 0.85

00:56:06.980 So Biden's

00:56:07.800 recommending

00:56:08.720 $1.9 trillion

00:56:10.260 in COVID relief,

00:56:11.640 and blah, blah,

00:56:12.020 blah.

00:56:12.740 And an

00:56:13.480 incoming

00:56:13.900 administration

00:56:15.080 official said

00:56:15.880 that the

00:56:16.380 vaccine rollout

00:56:17.480 was, quote,

00:56:18.700 worse than

00:56:19.400 we could

00:56:19.760 have imagined.

00:56:21.900 And, you

00:56:23.660 know, I

00:56:23.900 don't have a

00:56:24.520 fact check on

00:56:25.320 whether the

00:56:25.920 vaccine rollout

00:56:27.020 is worse than

00:56:27.860 we imagined

00:56:28.440 or not.

00:56:29.240 The thing I

00:56:30.060 would have

00:56:30.360 assumed would

00:56:31.700 happen is if

00:56:33.260 you do

00:56:33.540 something on a

00:56:34.120 very large

00:56:34.780 scale for the

00:56:35.660 first time

00:56:36.200 ever, and I

00:56:37.740 would say that

00:56:38.240 describes the

00:56:38.900 situation, what

00:56:40.200 should you

00:56:40.560 expect?

00:56:41.700 Well, you

00:56:42.260 should expect

00:56:42.720 that the first

00:56:43.340 month is a

00:56:44.060 total failure,

00:56:45.840 followed by the

00:56:46.720 second month

00:56:47.300 improving, and

00:56:48.220 then maybe by

00:56:48.780 the third

00:56:49.200 month, you're

00:56:50.320 better than you

00:56:50.920 could have ever

00:56:51.460 imagined it could

00:56:52.320 have been, because

00:56:53.680 that's just the

00:56:54.280 learning curve.

00:56:55.480 So judging the

00:56:56.480 rollout of the

00:56:57.820 vaccine on the

00:56:58.680 first month is

00:57:00.280 fair, because we

00:57:02.280 did want to get

00:57:02.880 that right, but I

00:57:04.700 don't think it's

00:57:05.280 unexpected that it

00:57:06.560 was terrible for the

00:57:07.740 first month.

00:57:08.920 I feel like that

00:57:09.800 was sort of baked

00:57:10.520 into the process,

00:57:11.760 because the reason

00:57:12.540 you test things is

00:57:14.660 that you don't

00:57:15.140 roll out a

00:57:15.840 major thing, and

00:57:16.800 then the first

00:57:17.300 month is terrible.

00:57:18.780 Take Obamacare.

00:57:20.800 Obamacare rolled

00:57:21.600 out, all kinds of

00:57:22.620 problems with the

00:57:23.400 servers and the

00:57:24.260 website and

00:57:24.740 everything, but

00:57:25.320 eventually it got

00:57:27.660 to the point where

00:57:28.500 it's so sticky, it's

00:57:30.400 not going away

00:57:31.060 apparently.

00:57:33.200 So, perfectly

00:57:34.600 normal, but still

00:57:36.340 I think Trump

00:57:37.260 administration has

00:57:38.280 to take the blame

00:57:38.940 for that, and

00:57:40.160 certainly his

00:57:40.840 distraction about

00:57:41.720 the election and

00:57:42.800 impeachment and all

00:57:44.200 that stuff, that

00:57:45.580 stuff matters.

00:57:47.100 I think we're

00:57:47.620 paying for it.

00:57:49.940 Biden knows that

00:57:51.080 his inauguration

00:57:51.920 will attract

00:57:52.620 violence, wouldn't

00:57:55.280 you say?

00:57:56.160 Wouldn't you say

00:57:56.940 that Biden knows

00:57:57.780 for sure that the

00:57:59.340 odds of violence

00:58:00.280 at his inauguration

00:58:01.960 are close to 100%?

00:58:04.980 Why does he have

00:58:05.980 it?

00:58:06.460 Why is he going to

00:58:07.080 have the inauguration

00:58:08.000 if he knows there's

00:58:09.020 going to be violence?

00:58:10.360 Would he not have

00:58:11.280 blood on his hands?

00:58:12.260 Because the

00:58:13.480 inauguration doesn't

00:58:14.400 have a constitutional

00:58:15.940 purpose, apparently.

00:58:17.700 I mean, you could

00:58:18.180 do, I think you

00:58:19.580 don't need the

00:58:20.160 inauguration, but if

00:58:21.780 you do need it, it

00:58:22.600 doesn't have to be in

00:58:23.320 front of a crowd.

00:58:24.980 So it's a completely

00:58:26.140 unnecessary ceremony

00:58:27.660 guaranteed to hurt

00:58:29.900 or kill Americans, 0.85

00:58:31.480 and he's going to do

00:58:32.560 it.

00:58:35.000 Shouldn't he be

00:58:35.800 impeached during the

00:58:36.940 inauguration?

00:58:37.500 I would think that

00:58:39.280 Congress should

00:58:40.260 initiate impeachment

00:58:41.300 during the

00:58:42.000 inauguration, because

00:58:43.640 he's doing something

00:58:44.620 that absolutely isn't

00:58:45.980 going to invite or

00:58:47.880 incite.

00:58:48.940 It's going to invite

00:58:50.080 violence and doesn't

00:58:50.960 have a purpose.

00:58:52.020 There's no purpose.

00:58:54.960 So I would say he

00:58:56.940 should be impeached

00:58:57.620 during his

00:58:58.400 inauguration.

00:59:00.100 That's not going to

00:59:01.080 happen.

00:59:02.020 So Don Lemon

00:59:02.660 continues to be the

00:59:03.780 worst human being in

00:59:04.840 the history of human

00:59:05.600 beings, and he's gone

00:59:07.380 full Nazi accusation

00:59:10.060 to all Trump

00:59:10.800 supporters.

00:59:11.820 So his thinking, if

00:59:13.720 you can call it that,

00:59:14.760 is that because the

00:59:16.620 Klan supports Trump,

00:59:19.140 he says, therefore if

00:59:21.540 you also support Trump,

00:59:22.900 you're supporting the

00:59:23.760 Klan.

00:59:25.340 Good thinking, Don

00:59:26.480 Lemon.

00:59:27.520 There's an idea that

00:59:28.600 will destroy the whole

00:59:29.500 country.

00:59:31.400 Now, Don Lemon, of

00:59:33.220 course, is an accused

00:59:34.340 sex offender.

00:59:35.360 I don't know the

00:59:37.020 truth of it, but he's

00:59:37.820 accused of molesting

00:59:39.180 some young man.

00:59:41.900 And I would guess that

00:59:43.160 given that there are

00:59:45.620 plenty of pedophiles in

00:59:47.300 the world, wouldn't you

00:59:48.780 assume that a lot of

00:59:49.520 them watch Don Lemon's

00:59:51.980 show?

00:59:53.880 Would you say it's a

00:59:55.020 true statement that lots

00:59:56.380 of pedophiles watch the

00:59:58.840 news?

00:59:59.500 Probably.

01:00:00.200 I mean, they watch

01:00:00.860 everything else, so why

01:00:01.860 wouldn't they?

01:00:02.200 So, does that make Don

01:00:04.720 Lemon, by his own

01:00:05.840 preferred way of

01:00:08.400 looking at the world,

01:00:09.160 does that make him a

01:00:10.420 pedophile because he's

01:00:12.300 supported by them?

01:00:14.820 Now, he's not claiming

01:00:16.120 that every single racist

01:00:18.060 supports Trump.

01:00:21.160 He's saying that members

01:00:22.760 of the Klan do, lots of 0.74

01:00:24.880 racists support Trump.

01:00:26.120 I think that's true.

01:00:27.300 But he's not saying that

01:00:28.460 there aren't also racists

01:00:29.840 who support other people.

01:00:31.180 Likewise, I'm not making

01:00:33.080 any claim that pedophiles

01:00:34.480 only like Don Lemon.

01:00:36.760 That would be crazy.

01:00:38.580 But a lot of them do.

01:00:40.100 Wouldn't you say that

01:00:40.840 would be true?

01:00:42.400 So, I feel as though his

01:00:43.960 own logic puts him in

01:00:47.940 the pedophile camp.

01:00:49.440 And I'm not saying he is.

01:00:51.260 I have no, certainly I'm

01:00:52.560 not going to accuse him of

01:00:53.480 anything like that.

01:00:54.480 I'm just saying that by

01:00:55.420 his own preferred way of

01:00:56.920 looking at the world, he's

01:00:59.260 associated with pedophiles

01:01:00.720 and I guess he's happy

01:01:02.560 with that.

01:01:03.160 That's his, it's his own

01:01:04.120 philosophy.

01:01:06.020 So, um, here's something

01:01:09.960 scary.

01:01:10.740 The, the guy who brought

01:01:11.980 the zip ties or he's, he

01:01:13.700 claims he found them and

01:01:14.760 he was going to give them

01:01:15.520 to authorities.

01:01:16.640 The, the zip tie guy at

01:01:18.680 the Capitol assault, he

01:01:20.440 was photographed with some

01:01:21.500 zip ties.

01:01:22.060 The, the type you would

01:01:23.520 use to constrain somebody

01:01:25.140 like, uh, cheap handcuffs.

01:01:28.200 Uh, so he, they found

01:01:30.100 him and then, uh, they

01:01:32.560 removed his firearms.

01:01:34.700 And so I guess he's under

01:01:36.100 home confinement without

01:01:37.800 his firearms.

01:01:38.840 But here's the scary part.

01:01:40.700 Uh, and his internet access

01:01:42.860 will be limited.

01:01:45.520 What?

01:01:47.220 His internet access will be

01:01:49.540 limited?

01:01:49.900 limited to what?

01:01:52.780 And when did that become

01:01:54.300 a law?

01:01:55.820 Do you remember a law about

01:01:57.660 your internet access being

01:01:59.600 limited?

01:02:01.520 Because that's too far.

01:02:04.220 That's too far.

01:02:06.100 Let me say that again.

01:02:08.240 Um, you know, you, I know

01:02:09.980 some of you are going to

01:02:10.800 argue he shouldn't have his

01:02:11.720 firearms removed if you're

01:02:13.120 absolutist in that.

01:02:14.720 But at least there's an

01:02:15.600 argument for that.

01:02:17.220 You know, if somebody has

01:02:18.120 been accused of some

01:02:19.200 violent crime, might go to

01:02:20.680 jail for it, has, has

01:02:22.740 weapons, might have been

01:02:23.980 involved in an insurrection,

01:02:25.800 you don't know.

01:02:27.940 You could, you could see

01:02:29.060 the argument for taking

01:02:30.160 away their firearms

01:02:31.100 temporarily until the legal

01:02:33.360 system, you know, does its

01:02:34.620 thing.

01:02:35.260 And you could argue against

01:02:36.540 it.

01:02:36.860 I think you could make an

01:02:37.740 argument against it as well.

01:02:39.280 But what is the argument for

01:02:40.780 taking, for limiting his

01:02:42.300 internet access?

01:02:43.460 internet access?

01:02:45.620 Really?

01:02:48.000 That, limiting his internet

01:02:50.200 access feels completely wrong

01:02:53.180 to me.

01:02:54.440 Now, I suppose they're doing

01:02:55.780 it so he doesn't, I don't

01:02:57.100 know, talk to other bad people

01:02:59.620 and raise trouble.

01:03:02.140 But isn't that sort of a, just

01:03:04.160 a free speech sort of situation?

01:03:06.160 And he hasn't been, he hasn't

01:03:07.720 been convicted of anything?

01:03:08.780 To me, this is super alarming

01:03:11.740 that the government can use

01:03:13.380 your internet access as a

01:03:14.860 penalty without the benefit of

01:03:17.100 any law that suggests they

01:03:19.520 can.

01:03:21.180 Maybe there is a law, I just

01:03:22.360 don't know about it.

01:03:23.460 So I'm just going to put that

01:03:24.420 out there as a gigantic red flag

01:03:26.460 that's about the scariest thing

01:03:27.780 I've seen this week.

01:03:29.200 And that includes Kim Jong-un's,

01:03:31.300 you know, intercontinental

01:03:33.240 missile.

01:03:36.360 All right.

01:03:36.940 Um, that is probably all I

01:03:40.300 wanted to talk about, I think.

01:03:41.940 I think it is.

01:03:44.940 Somebody says, you told us we

01:03:46.320 no longer have free speech.

01:03:48.040 Well, we don't.

01:03:48.900 We don't have free speech in a

01:03:50.880 practical sense.

01:03:52.380 We have it in a, uh, legal

01:03:55.260 sense, most of the time.

01:03:57.860 Apparently this, this person can

01:04:01.000 say anything he wants, just not

01:04:02.440 on the internet.

01:04:03.880 All right.

01:04:04.480 So, having now modeled for you,

01:04:07.960 um, the example of somebody

01:04:10.480 who's not taking a left or a

01:04:12.640 right side, I hope, I hope that

01:04:14.160 you saw that when I talked about

01:04:15.980 the election, did it feel like I

01:04:17.520 was biased right or biased left?

01:04:22.620 Everybody's biased, so I'm not

01:04:24.240 going to claim that, you know, I'm

01:04:25.580 free from bias.

01:04:26.640 That's not a thing.

01:04:28.000 But I think I got close.

01:04:29.860 I think that when I talked about

01:04:31.380 the election claims as well as the

01:04:33.800 debunks, I feel like I treated that 1.00

01:04:36.160 fairly.

01:04:37.820 Now, wouldn't you like to see more

01:04:40.200 people do that kind of thing?

01:04:43.100 And I think AOC is on to something

01:04:45.200 without having designed the

01:04:47.360 particulars of it.

01:04:48.740 There is a need for this.

01:04:51.420 Would you not agree that there's

01:04:53.020 a need for this, whether you like

01:04:55.120 the way I did it or not, that's

01:04:56.760 separate.

01:04:57.460 But there's a need for this.

01:04:58.740 That's just an explainer.

01:05:01.260 Somebody to explain what is likely

01:05:04.120 and what is not, etc.

01:05:05.900 All right.

01:05:06.460 So I'll put that out there.

01:05:07.980 Oh, somebody wanted me to mention

01:05:09.360 the Jack Dorsey video.

01:05:13.140 So there's a, I guess, Project

01:05:16.040 Veritas has a video of Jack Dorsey

01:05:17.880 talking to 5,000 Twitter employees

01:05:21.540 in which he's saying that they're

01:05:23.840 focusing on Trump's Twitter account

01:05:26.400 and what to do with that, but also

01:05:28.460 they were getting rid of QAnon

01:05:29.880 and that there would be, you know,

01:05:31.760 lots more of this later and that

01:05:33.780 it's the beginning of a process,

01:05:35.460 not the end, etc.

01:05:36.700 Now, that was held up by people as

01:05:40.460 evidence that Jack Dorsey is saying

01:05:43.680 he's going after conservatives.

01:05:45.820 I guess that's the way it was

01:05:46.860 interpreted.

01:05:48.100 But Twitter's response to it was

01:05:50.400 kind of perfect.

01:05:51.500 Again, if you're just judging the

01:05:53.140 quality of the communication, I'm not

01:05:55.480 talking about the issue, just the

01:05:57.600 quality of the communication.

01:05:59.760 Twitter officially said, yeah, he

01:06:02.460 said on that hidden video exactly

01:06:04.860 what he said in a tweet thread

01:06:06.100 yesterday.

01:06:07.600 And he did.

01:06:09.340 Basically, basically what he said on

01:06:11.620 the undercover video is exactly what

01:06:13.680 he said in public.

01:06:15.040 I didn't see any difference.

01:06:16.760 Now, the thing we'd be looking for

01:06:18.420 that Jack has not mentioned and is

01:06:22.340 really glaring in not being mentioned

01:06:25.100 and it's a big problem.

01:06:28.100 In both the Veritas video and his

01:06:30.720 tweet, what he didn't mention is that

01:06:33.240 anybody on the left would ever be

01:06:35.040 censored, if you want to use that

01:06:38.300 word, in the same way.

01:06:40.620 Now, how would you feel if you heard

01:06:44.080 that in addition to QAnon, that

01:06:47.360 accounts associated with the left but

01:06:49.380 with different rumors or disinformation

01:06:51.740 or violent ideas, suppose they had

01:06:55.380 also been taken down.

01:06:57.300 How would you feel about that?

01:06:59.160 Well, you'd feel different.

01:07:00.780 You'd feel different.

01:07:02.300 But when Jack Dorsey is talking to

01:07:05.300 Twitter and the only words that at

01:07:08.940 least are on this video have to do with

01:07:11.260 the folks on the right, it is totally

01:07:14.400 legitimate that the folks on the right

01:07:16.380 say, I think I need a little more

01:07:18.920 context and if I don't have it, I'm

01:07:22.000 going to assume that this is all about

01:07:23.740 just going after the right.

01:07:25.280 Would that be a fair assumption

01:07:26.800 based on everything you've seen?

01:07:29.660 Would it be fair for you to assume

01:07:31.680 that Twitter and Jack are only going

01:07:34.720 after accounts on the right?

01:07:37.360 I would say yes.

01:07:38.980 I would say yes.

01:07:39.640 That would be a fair assumption

01:07:40.880 based on the evidence we have.

01:07:42.980 So if that's not true, I would ask

01:07:46.800 Jack and Twitter to clarify because

01:07:49.700 that would be an important

01:07:50.480 clarification.

01:07:51.820 So if there are examples of groups

01:07:54.560 on the left, maybe some Antifa

01:07:56.520 accounts, et cetera, that are being

01:07:59.060 blocked for the same standard that

01:08:01.460 they promote disinformation and or

01:08:03.840 violence, disinformation being of

01:08:07.480 election kind, I think, is the specific

01:08:09.940 kind that they care about.

01:08:10.960 So wouldn't you say it's a fair

01:08:15.260 request to at least get Twitter and

01:08:18.700 Jack Dorsey's opinion about whether

01:08:21.820 this is going to be really a right

01:08:24.720 leaning effort or a violence

01:08:27.480 leaning effort in terms of service

01:08:29.480 effort?

01:08:30.100 I'd like to hear that just as a

01:08:31.480 clarification.

01:08:32.940 But I don't think we heard new

01:08:35.560 information on the Veritas, Project

01:08:37.720 Veritas video.

01:08:39.240 Sounded just like the tweet.

01:08:40.960 But both of them have that missing

01:08:43.080 element that we'd like to see.

01:08:45.860 All right.

01:08:51.260 Somebody said Trump was an idiot for

01:08:55.520 not denouncing the Proud Boys at that

01:08:57.620 debate.

01:08:58.480 Well, Trump has a he has a pattern of

01:09:02.000 not denouncing anybody who's on his

01:09:04.220 side.

01:09:06.440 And you could argue that that helped him

01:09:11.020 get elected the first time.

01:09:13.920 So strategically, it's hard to know if

01:09:17.560 that's a plus or a minus.

01:09:19.780 All right.

01:09:21.280 I see some questions about Dr.

01:09:23.460 Shiva and his software discussion.

01:09:26.100 And I would get back to my original

01:09:27.740 question, which I'm still waiting for an

01:09:29.340 answer is, could you do anything to the

01:09:32.760 software that would cheat the election

01:09:35.680 and not be caught in a recount plus an

01:09:40.680 audit and audit of the signatures and

01:09:43.940 stuff like that?

01:09:44.880 So we don't know.

01:09:46.960 All right.

01:09:47.160 That's all we have for now.

01:09:48.200 And I'll talk to you tomorrow.

01:09:54.100 All right.

01:09:54.940 YouTubers. 0.92

01:09:55.140 Let's see.

01:10:00.620 There were bad people on both sides.

01:10:03.200 Yeah.

01:10:05.600 Just print more ballots.

01:10:07.840 Packetized crime.

01:10:09.280 Yeah.

01:10:09.480 The idea of packetized election fraud

01:10:12.480 would be that there's lots of it.

01:10:14.460 But if you find any bit of it, it's not

01:10:16.760 enough to change the election.

01:10:18.780 So the way you would do that most

01:10:21.720 reliably would be with software.

01:10:23.840 But if anything like that could be

01:10:26.140 detected with a recount, well, it

01:10:29.360 wasn't.

01:10:35.020 All right.

01:10:37.060 Barnes says Powell was set up.

01:10:39.720 Yeah.

01:10:39.880 That's the information that I'm getting

01:10:41.460 as well.

01:10:42.240 Early on, I heard that from people who

01:10:44.400 know this world.

01:10:45.860 Early on, people said, oh, that's

01:10:47.420 obvious disinformation campaign.

01:10:52.420 All right.

01:10:53.120 That's all I got for now.

01:10:54.940 I will talk to you tomorrow.

01:10:56.300 All right.

01:10:56.360 That's all I got for now.

01:10:56.400 I will talk to you tomorrow.

01:10:56.440 That's all I got for now.

01:10:56.460 I will talk to you tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 15, 2021

Episode 1253 Scott Adams： How Do You Know an Election Was Fair？ More Interesting Than You Think

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript