Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 11, 2021


Episode 1281 Scott Adams: Forced Patriotism, Fake Coups and Analogies That Can Get You Fired From Your Mandalorian Gig


Episode Stats

Length

50 minutes

Words per Minute

147.69699

Word Count

7,481

Sentence Count

6

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

16


Summary

In this episode, Scott Adams talks about the new CDC finding that two masks are better than one when it comes to fighting infectious disease. But what does that actually mean and how can we know if this is true? And what is science really trying to tell us?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 hey oh whoa everybody's here good to see you well this is going to be oh you know it it's
00:00:12.400 you already know it's going to be the best coffee with scott adams why do i even have to tell you
00:00:16.940 you know the routine yeah if it could be any better than this i don't think it's possible
00:00:24.780 there really isn't but we're going to try let's try to take it to the next level with the
00:00:30.880 simultaneous sip and all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or gels or stein a canteen
00:00:34.980 jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee and join me now for
00:00:41.820 the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day the thing that makes everything better
00:00:45.880 except the mandalorian it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now go
00:00:51.860 i feel the normality returning to the country wait no no it's gone again it's gone again
00:01:04.820 we were almost normal there for a moment but no not at all let's talk about the news you all saw
00:01:15.020 the big news that two masks are better than one according to the cdc they did a little test and
00:01:21.100 they found out that two masks will reduce the the infectious particles by 92.5 percent 92.5 percent
00:01:32.800 now what they were talking about specifically is the people who wear a regular cloth covering like a
00:01:39.220 bandana kind of thing if you put a real mask beneath the bandana the two of those things would give you
00:01:48.080 92.5 percent uh protection uh protection now how do you interpret that how do you interpret this
00:01:58.380 information i saw on twitter that somebody interpreted the fact that two masks block 92 percent let's round
00:02:06.920 it up to 93 percent if two masks block 93 percent of the infectious particles that means that one mask
00:02:14.620 doesn't work that one mask doesn't work is that how you read it would your conclusion from this fact
00:02:22.700 be that math that one mask doesn't work if two masks block 93 percent of the infectious particles
00:02:30.160 don't you think one mask blocks a little bit and given that the second mask in this example
00:02:38.740 was the least useful kind of covering which would be just a cloth covering like a bandana given that we know that's the
00:02:48.760 least protective wouldn't we be able to say without actually doing a randomized controlled trial would it be
00:02:58.060 reasonable to say that the real mask might be doing some work maybe not 92.5 percent work
00:03:06.940 but isn't it doing something now many of you know that the the amount of the viral load makes a big
00:03:16.500 difference in outcomes so if you could reduce it by let's say 50 percent let's be conservative and say
00:03:23.760 that the first mask only reduced it by 50 percent two masks gets you to something bigger would that be worth
00:03:33.060 would the would the scientists be right if they had been telling us to wear one mask and one mask would
00:03:41.480 only reduce let's say we don't know this is true but i'm just working through a a citizen trying to
00:03:49.660 figure out what science is trying to tell us because there's science and then there's citizens and then
00:03:56.900 there's this giant uh confusing area between what science is really saying and what we're understanding
00:04:04.120 right so that whole communicating science part is the real problem area science is great except that
00:04:12.200 it's described to us by people so if you hear your science described to you by a person are you hearing
00:04:22.300 science no you're hearing just a person if you don't if you didn't directly do the science yourself
00:04:30.640 if you're not the one who performed the experiments you're not really hearing science you're hearing
00:04:37.940 somebody else describing science so you're really hearing a person so when you say do you trust science
00:04:45.800 i translate that in my mind into would i trust a stranger whose incentives i do not understand
00:04:54.260 never never if you're ever in a situation where you're asked to trust a stranger when you don't know
00:05:05.400 the stranger's motivations or intentions don't do that don't do that so when we hear about science we are being
00:05:15.320 told that we're hearing real science but we're not we're just hearing somebody's interpretation
00:05:19.600 so the best we can do as citizens since we don't have access to science we have access only to people
00:05:27.080 talking about it is to use whatever a little bit of sense and judgment we can to do the best we can
00:05:33.660 because science is just not available to us in an everyday decision-making way you just have to do
00:05:41.000 without it if we had it it'd be great i don't i only have people talking about it so my common sense
00:05:52.960 judgment is that if the cdc studied this carefully and found out that two masks block 93 percent of your
00:06:00.520 infectious particles and we know that the amount of viral load does matter it does seem to me that they
00:06:07.280 have come close to proving not technically in a real scientific randomized controlled trial way but
00:06:15.480 pretty close to a common sense clearly obvious benefit of masks now if the cdc's uh the way they studied it
00:06:27.820 was all done wrong then of course none of the supplies and we don't know if they did it right
00:06:33.940 do we were you there were you in the laboratory did you did you watch them set up the test and are you
00:06:41.960 an infectious uh disease specialist and a mass specialist and a scientist well if you were all
00:06:49.460 of those things and you were there you maybe have a pretty good idea of what was happening but we weren't
00:06:56.980 there and of course we know the news is mostly fake so we don't know anything but i would say this is
00:07:03.280 an indication that one mask probably does something useful uh it is not proof it is not proof but it's
00:07:11.740 another good indication uh there's some chatter on the internet because fox news apparently cut off
00:07:18.400 the impeachment manager in mid-sentence so he was talking about you know he was showing how bad the
00:07:26.320 attack on the capital was and fox news decided to go to the five and and and just you know have
00:07:34.580 entertainment instead now what do you think of that did fox news cut off news was that news
00:07:45.700 were we watching news when the impeachment managers were making a show uh you know specific video of the
00:07:56.020 the capital assault so that we could really feel the pain and the fear of the members of congress
00:08:05.260 um was that news was it news about how the members of congress felt about the assault well i already knew
00:08:16.260 it didn't you was there anybody here who was unaware that the politicians and really everybody who was at the
00:08:24.440 capital when the assault happened is there anybody who didn't know given the people who were literally
00:08:29.760 being killed is there anybody who didn't know that everybody there was afraid for their lives
00:08:36.400 i feel like i knew that did any of you not know that did you not know that they were afraid for their lives
00:08:44.400 and there was an attack and there was real violence to anybody is there anybody in the country
00:08:50.100 who did not already know that so is it news the fact that somebody is making you feel an attenuated
00:08:58.960 feeling about it is that news well i guess it's news in the sense that it's part of the story and
00:09:07.080 whatever any of the players of the stories do i guess that's news but once you'd seen a little bit of it
00:09:13.560 and you say to yourself scott now your name might be different let's say your name isn't scott you
00:09:20.140 would you would think it differently you would fill in your name here but scott um watching more of
00:09:28.480 this footage is not making me smarter is not making me know more facts it is not giving me reason or
00:09:37.400 detail well it's giving me detail but that i don't need but what is it what is it conveying to me
00:09:45.040 what is the purpose of the communication that the impeachment managers are making by showing more
00:09:52.180 details of the uh of the assault well could it have any reason other than to make you emotionally
00:10:02.100 weakened is there any other reason now i always i counsel you that if you can't think of another
00:10:10.660 reason for why something's happening that doesn't mean there isn't another reason it just means you
00:10:15.320 can't think of one so is this one of those cases where i just can't think of a reason that they need
00:10:21.260 to show us this extra video because remember the the trump's own lawyers have stipulated that what
00:10:30.500 happened at the the capital was a horrible event so you've got one side arguing hey this was horrible
00:10:38.920 you've got the other side saying yeah it was totally agree we will stipulate stipulate being the legal term
00:10:46.780 that says we agree with what you're saying yes it was a horrible event people were scared there was real
00:10:53.240 real danger real violence so if both sides agree that those are the facts both sides agree that anybody
00:11:04.240 involved in anything that was illegal needs to be punished what exactly are we looking at and why are we
00:11:11.640 looking at it the reason is obvious it's propaganda it's pure propaganda it's supposed to make you feel
00:11:19.260 a bad feeling about a certain set of people in america do you need that is that news is it news when your
00:11:30.000 politicians are making it number one all about themselves that's right your congress decided that the biggest
00:11:40.280 story in the whole fucking country is how they feel how they feel not it wasn't really a
00:11:49.140 question about the government being overthrown anybody who thinks it was a real coup or an
00:11:54.800 insurrection in any serious way that they would have controlled the government and change the nature of
00:12:00.140 the country or anything like that that's just stupid because nothing like that even remotely like that
00:12:04.880 happened they were the most armed country in the world and nobody used a gun except the only person who
00:12:13.520 used a gun was the police officer who shot the protester coming through the window which i've called a good
00:12:20.780 not good in the sense that we don't wish it happened but correct law enforcement action in my opinion
00:12:28.040 based on what we saw he probably stopped some amount of more violence as tragic as it was
00:12:35.100 so given that there's no information being conveyed which was is what i would call news
00:12:42.100 is fox news really to blame for cutting away i don't think so i think that cutting away was the right
00:12:50.380 news decision because otherwise they're just exposing us to propaganda to make us feel a certain way
00:12:58.220 and i don't really need the news to make me feel i like them to tell me the information i'll figure out
00:13:04.560 how to feel about it but i don't need you to tell me how to feel that's not news so i'm gonna back
00:13:13.600 fox news on pulling away from that um there's another story that doesn't make any sense to me
00:13:22.020 except that we're in this weird world where you could just say anything and and the two sides would
00:13:29.140 interpret it to agree with themselves i mean i could go in public and just say
00:13:33.280 and everybody who heard me the democrats would say there he goes again saying racist stuff
00:13:44.800 and the republicans would say well i think he made perfect sense i think he made sense i don't know
00:13:51.620 what you're talking about so we're in a world in which you can say anything just just any fucking
00:13:58.440 thing and people will argue that you were right and others will argue that you're wrong even if it
00:14:05.860 doesn't make any sense here's an example there's a headline that says donald trump knew that mike pence
00:14:13.080 had been evacuated from the maga mob before he tweeted that the vp quote didn't have courage to overturn the
00:14:20.580 election meaning what meaning what if you're a democrat you take that statement to say that
00:14:31.060 trump didn't care that mike pence was in danger and endangered him further and endangered him further
00:14:38.800 that's one interpretation here's the other interpretation
00:14:44.100 that once trump heard that mike pence had been evacuated which means to safety right when you
00:14:52.700 evacuate somebody do you evacuate them toward the danger or do you evacuate them away from the danger
00:15:01.100 because the president heard that his vice president was not in danger he had been evacuated and then
00:15:08.600 after that he said something about his courage now should he have said that i don't think so that's my
00:15:16.080 opinion i think the president was not handling it right i think i think he needs to you know answer to
00:15:23.240 that but you know the question of whether he was encouraging an insurrection or a coup is just sort of stupid
00:15:29.800 but the separate question of whether he acted uh in a way that reduced reduced the risk of violence
00:15:37.480 that's that's a separate question and i don't think he acted in a way that reduced the chance of violence
00:15:43.260 um so you know what do you make of that story it's a headline story and you could you could interpret
00:15:51.760 it both ways we're just at a point in the world in which it doesn't matter what the facts are
00:15:57.740 we're just going to interpret it the way we want um the panda tribune who you should be following
00:16:05.200 if you're not following the panda tribune on twitter you should be because it's funny and a good
00:16:11.960 account notice this the nbc news uh said the following now just listen to what nbc news said
00:16:21.200 and see if you can pick up anything that's wrong with us see if you can find out is there anything in
00:16:29.120 this list that i'm about to read you is there anything that doesn't fit with the rest of the
00:16:35.000 list see if you can detect it because the panda tribune did see if you can here's what nbc says
00:16:42.640 in his first weeks in office president biden has made a flurry of international phone calls
00:16:48.220 to american allies including the leaders of canada britain france japan and china
00:16:55.560 which of those doesn't belong in the list of american allies is it canada no we we have we have our
00:17:08.740 little dramas with canada but i feel like they're allies i feel like canada is a canada is a good
00:17:15.220 country we like canadians even when we disagree with them on issues how about uh let's see look for
00:17:23.060 britain france well we argue with britain and france now and then but they're allies wouldn't
00:17:30.440 you say pretty good pretty good countries you know we can have our differences but we're solid allies
00:17:37.500 with britain and france how about japan well world war ii was a little tough but since then
00:17:42.800 since world war ii i'd say quite good allies quite good allies what's the other one in this in this
00:17:49.760 sentence uh oh china china according to nbc china which is killing uh 50 to 100 000 u.s citizens a year
00:18:00.360 with fentanyl intentionally the country that probably lied to us about coronavirus and is stealing our
00:18:09.120 intellectual property is giving us bad trade deals and selling propaganda into our markets and is
00:18:16.160 closed closed closed closed to our investors in many ways they're our ally apparently they're our ally
00:18:23.680 according to nbc news now do you see how how this works nbc news is allegedly uh a vehicle of the cia
00:18:33.620 did you know that now i'm saying allegedly because people smarter than i am claim that this is uh obvious
00:18:42.500 unknown um so you should you should look to the other people to get a confirmation of that i'll
00:18:49.120 just say it's the allegation the allegation is that nbc news is the most the most captured of our media
00:18:57.080 captured i mean by uh intelligent services uh because ultimately any any kind of media that makes a
00:19:06.020 difference is going to get captured by intelligent services it's just a matter of time sooner or later
00:19:11.140 your intelligence services should if they're doing their job i guess you could say if they're doing
00:19:18.340 their job they should eventually capture all of the media services in their own country and capture as
00:19:24.660 many as they can in other countries too so um the only question about whether uh whether the
00:19:33.540 intelligence services manage our news the question is timing is it happening already or is it in our
00:19:41.060 future but it's guaranteed there there's no future in which it doesn't happen there's a matter it might be
00:19:47.620 a question of when but of course it has to happen the intelligence services will always control the
00:19:53.700 media uh and now you can see something that looks exactly like china controlling our controlling nbc news
00:20:03.460 because would an american loyal to the united states who was aware of the news ever put china in a list of
00:20:10.740 our allies and just try to just slip it in there at the end of the list and if you didn't notice china
00:20:17.140 it's sort of like our american allies including canada britain france japan and china china just kind of
00:20:26.740 slip it in there right when you see it happening right in front of your eyes you know the the propaganda
00:20:34.100 the you know maybe maybe foreign influence i mean it looks like it it looks like foreign influence
00:20:40.340 but you can't know for sure all right uh brett weinstein made the uh made a funny comment about
00:20:49.060 the double mask situation he says why not make masks doubled in the first place
00:20:56.980 to which i say oh pretty good question if if a double mask works why wouldn't you make the
00:21:04.580 single mask twice as thick i don't know the answer to that question i assume it has something to do
00:21:12.020 with you wouldn't be able to breathe i don't know is that the reason i really don't know um it's not
00:21:19.780 like air isn't going someplace so anyway it's a funny question i don't think he means it seriously but it's
00:21:27.140 a or maybe he does i don't know but it's a funny question but it removed it reminded me of an old joke
00:21:33.220 about you know how when an airplane crashes they'll they'll usually find the black box and it'll be
00:21:38.580 intact the whole airplane will be destroyed but the black box will just be intact and then they'll
00:21:44.420 figure out what happened to which i say to myself this is an old joke why don't they make the whole
00:21:50.660 airplane out of that block black box material all right now it's just a joke obviously you couldn't
00:21:57.860 do that but it reminded me of that uh matt walsh it has a very interesting string of tweets about
00:22:07.620 lebron james and the use of the word karen so i guess lebron tweeted that there was a karen as lebron
00:22:14.900 said in the audience and he mocked her and as matt walsh points out karen is a racial slur
00:22:24.500 and he as matt points out if i used a stereotypical name in a pejorative way to refer to a black woman
00:22:30.260 everyone would agree it's a slur i would agree i would agree with that if he used a stereotypical
00:22:37.300 pejorative you know word to describe a black woman i wouldn't be comfortable with that would you
00:22:44.580 i i would consider that very offensive to have some like special word that that's like a a bad word for
00:22:51.620 a black woman are you kidding me that would be completely unacceptable but apparently it's okay for
00:22:57.620 a white woman or at least some people think so and matt walsh is pushing pushing back
00:23:01.540 um and he says that uh using the karen word is no different than other racial slurs and that lebron
00:23:11.620 is therefore a bigot do you agree with that do you agree uh and by the way there's if you research karen
00:23:20.180 you'll see reference to it as specifically a white woman i know that other people have used it to mean
00:23:25.300 just a generic uh thing so i would like to suggest the following standard so that we just treat things
00:23:33.940 the same as i said as as i've often said that i am in complete agreement that any group can ban
00:23:42.740 certain words about their own group when i say ban i mean they get to say what is offensive to them
00:23:48.900 and if it's offensive to them that should mean something to us why do you want to offend anybody
00:23:56.980 what would be the purpose you know what what would you gain by just offending people nothing so why
00:24:04.020 you know why why wouldn't we as just a polite society that's trying to get along why wouldn't we
00:24:11.140 allow people to say hey this is a bad name for the people in my group use any other name but just don't
00:24:17.700 use this one right this is just the bad one it's why of course the n-word is universally banned does
00:24:24.580 anybody disagree with that i hope not i feel like that's a really ugly ugly super ugly word has no
00:24:32.820 place has no place in polite society but i would argue that the karen word although it does not have
00:24:40.180 that kind of historical weight or significance as the n-word nowhere near it i think that uh
00:24:47.460 if white women wanted it banned i would back them on that now if i were to use the that word karen
00:25:00.340 at least i would be a white person saying something that sounds like bad toward white people so i think
00:25:06.260 that would be allowed except except i'm male so if i said somebody's a karen i would be sexist
00:25:15.860 but not racist if you're lebron and you say somebody's a karen you're sexist and you're racist
00:25:25.780 so i'm only sexist because i'm white lebron is sexist and racist if he uses the karen word
00:25:34.340 so i guess we'll have to uh figure out how much we care about that
00:25:37.620 not very much as it turns out the k word yeah so one of the biggest stories on the internet is that
00:25:45.460 uh actress gina carano i hope i'm pronouncing it right who is a former mma fighter and uh until
00:25:53.860 recently she just got fired from her job but she was one of the stars of the disney plus um series the
00:26:01.140 the mandalorian which is based in a star wars universe and it's a the main character is this
00:26:06.900 masked helmeted you know fighter mandalorian he's called and uh gina was one of the other stars and
00:26:15.060 she played a badass you know uh just a badass mercenary i guess and she got fired for saying
00:26:23.860 some things that would be somewhat typical of a republican to say on twitter right so basically
00:26:31.220 you could pick any standard republican who uses twitter and say all right what did you say standard
00:26:37.620 republican and that's kind of what she has said in the past standard republican stuff and there was a
00:26:45.460 call for her to be fired for it and the biggest complaint they had is that she made a holocaust
00:26:55.060 or nazi reference to the fact that republicans are being uh you know identified and discriminated
00:27:01.940 against now what happened to her when she said that republicans are being treated like uh the holocaust
00:27:12.260 like the jews were in the holocaust uh at the moment the the public ganged up on her and got her fired
00:27:22.260 so did she prove her point yes she did yes her point was that having conservative oriented
00:27:31.780 views would put you in a discriminated situation and then she was proven right by being fired for
00:27:41.060 having those very same views which her point was if you have these views you could get fired or
00:27:46.980 discriminated against right so she proved her point the uh the funniest part of this story
00:27:53.460 is that the left is saying that she um basically minimized the holocaust because the holocaust was
00:28:02.420 about literally exterminating and killing six million jews how could you compare that to some people losing
00:28:10.020 their job in the united states right different you know one is gigantic the other one's pretty bad
00:28:16.900 bad but they're not you know these don't weigh the same right is that point good no that's not a good
00:28:26.020 point it's true it's true that they don't have the same weight that's true nobody's going to argue that
00:28:33.300 but the way nazi analogies are used in this country is as an analogy to uh you know make some hyperbole to
00:28:43.540 make your point when the republicans had been called nazis from 2015 to 2021 did anybody who was calling
00:28:55.300 trump a nazi think that he was really going to exterminate six million people no no it doesn't
00:29:02.740 work that way they used it with hyperbole they used it exactly the same way she did and she backed up
00:29:11.620 she backed it up right when she said that a certain class of people would be treated harshly that would
00:29:18.820 that being the whole point and then she was treated harshly for being one of those people
00:29:24.820 her point completely proven by by the fact that she got fired um that said of course we don't want
00:29:34.260 to minimize the holocaust and that's one of the complaints i've had from the beginning when trump's
00:29:39.060 supporters were being called nazis etc is that it minimized the real things um so either pick a
00:29:46.900 standard and i think it's hilarious that the left doesn't understand that they've been doing that to
00:29:51.540 the right for decades now so um and then somebody complained on twitter somebody on the left complained
00:30:00.100 that every time one of these uh right-leaning characters gets cancelled that they end up making more money
00:30:07.300 money to which i tweeted i hope so that that would be my goal my goal is that everybody who gets cancelled
00:30:15.940 for let's say ordinary speech it would be one thing to get cancelled for actually using the n-word and
00:30:23.620 you know actually saying racist stuff or actually inciting violence yeah i mean if you get cancelled for
00:30:30.100 that stuff that's your own damn fault but if you get cancelled for what is absolutely routine even if
00:30:36.500 you disagree with it it's routine language yeah i think i'd like to see those people get rich so i would
00:30:43.220 like to see um what's her name gina carano actress and ex-mma fighter do well so if anybody wants to make
00:30:53.620 her a job offer or something go ahead let's make her rich um in a new segment that i'm going to call
00:31:00.500 eating their own eating their own this is what the left is doing to themselves now that their common
00:31:08.500 enemy trump is is at least mostly off the stage so these are the examples in just today's news just
00:31:16.820 today so the ap has an article in which it looks like they've turned on the lincoln project remember
00:31:23.780 the lincoln project where the alleged republicans who had turned on trumpism and you basically joined
00:31:30.980 the left in attacking trump now the ap is basically accusing that of being sort of a grifter scam i'm
00:31:41.140 using my own words to characterize their story but the essence of it is they collected 90 million
00:31:48.100 and set up a structure where you couldn't exactly tell where it went meaning that out of that 90
00:31:54.580 million dollars some amount of that went to the people who organized the lincoln project for all of
00:32:01.860 their good work organizing the lincoln project how much of the 90 million do you suppose went to the
00:32:09.300 organizing members we don't know the only thing that the ap reports is that maybe a third of it was
00:32:17.780 used on ads a third and of 90 million only 30 million was used on the thing which the group was trying to
00:32:27.300 do the rest of it was consulting now i suppose they were trying to consult as well but how much of that
00:32:36.020 went to the consultants what was the word that rick wilson used the most when talking about trump
00:32:44.820 grifter a grifter somebody who's making making money off a situation somewhat disingenuously
00:32:55.060 i don't know uh but the ap which you would associate with the left or at least if you're
00:32:59.940 in the right you would say they are associated with the left uh have turned on the on the lincoln project
00:33:06.580 that's story number one number two instagram has banned robert f kennedy
00:33:15.700 instagram just banned robert f kennedy and why do they do it because he repeatedly they say shared
00:33:24.500 false claims about coven 19 and he apparently is an anti-vaxxer and he was banned for quote
00:33:31.540 repeatedly sharing debunked claims about the coronavirus vaccines so he's a member of the
00:33:38.740 left this happens to be one of the areas in which some members of the left and some members of the
00:33:45.140 right agree now i'm not on that team i i suspect the vaccinations are probably more good than bad
00:33:52.580 but it's interesting that a member of the left just got banned on instagram now remember there's no trump
00:34:00.660 so if they need to create i don't know action and controversy and all this they're going to end up
00:34:10.340 end up acting against themselves so that's example two number three jeep the the company that makes jeep
00:34:18.900 they pulled bruce springsteen's super bowl ad after it was revealed he was arrested for a dwi
00:34:25.860 and reckless driving in november on jersey shore so bruce springsteen associated with the left
00:34:32.260 uh has been pulled from his commercial now that they found out he had some dwi however the dwi appears
00:34:42.180 to be fake news which makes it even better so he got he got pulled off uh his commercial got pulled
00:34:52.100 probably for fake news now the part that's real is he was arrested for a dwi the part that might not be
00:35:00.740 real is that he was drunk because even the uh apparently the breathalyzer actually showed he
00:35:07.700 wasn't not even close he did have a shot so i guess a police officer he pulled over in his motorcycle to
00:35:15.300 take some pictures with some fans somebody offered him a shot he took it a police officer saw it they
00:35:20.420 pulled him over they tested him and his alcohol level was way below the the drunk level so he didn't do
00:35:27.460 anything illegal except i don't know took a shot in front of a cop i guess while he before he got on
00:35:35.060 his motorcycle so it's probably fake news and he's gonna get semi-canceled for that that's example number
00:35:43.140 three number four i told you the story about uh how uh mark cuban owner of the dallas mavericks had
00:35:52.420 cleverly decided just to not play the national anthem and just get rid of the whole problem just
00:35:58.340 don't play the national anthem well the nba having once it was discovered that they'd gone uh over a
00:36:04.500 dozen games without playing it somebody said hey where was that national anthem which is hilarious that
00:36:11.700 it took 12 games to figure it out i have a feeling mark cuban is laughing about that that it took 12 games
00:36:18.660 before anybody even noticed it's like this big issue it's such a big issue that they played 12 games
00:36:26.820 nobody even noticed and yet we act like it's a big issue didn't even notice when it wasn't happening
00:36:34.500 uh but here's the the fun part of this story the nba decided that they would force the mavericks to play
00:36:42.100 the national anthem and indeed they did i get i think it was last night against the hawks uh so mark cuban
00:36:49.300 relented and decided to go with the nba now here's my take on this i like patriotism i think it's a
00:37:00.020 necessary glue to hold society together i think it's more good than bad you know you could imagine it
00:37:06.980 turns into jingoism and you know whatever but i think patriotism is far more good than bad and i'm
00:37:13.860 in favor of brainwashing our children to make them patriots because it keeps the country together
00:37:20.500 but what about forced patriotism because it seems to me that mark cuban was sort of forced
00:37:29.780 to play the national anthem do you know what i feel like when you show me the flag and say would
00:37:38.100 you like to stand and show respect for the flag i feel proud i feel good about it like i i feel
00:37:46.420 everything about that just feels good to me i like our flag i really like our country you know even if i
00:37:54.740 complain about it i really like it so patriotism 100 i'm all on board with patriotism but what about
00:38:05.300 forced patriotism let me tell you what i think about forced patriotism fuck you the moment it's forced
00:38:16.340 fuck you you're not gonna force me to do it that's for sure if i want to do it i'd love to but if you're
00:38:27.700 gonna force me fuck you and we don't work that way the country it doesn't work that way now i know
00:38:35.620 what you're gonna say it's the nba is a private organization they can have their own rules just like
00:38:40.900 a platform could have terms of service and they're just enforcing their own internal rules why is that
00:38:47.380 my issue to which i say it's not really if internally they want to do this it's good for
00:38:53.060 their business that's fine but there's this other part of the story where apparently the texas governor
00:38:59.540 threatened uh the dallas mavericks that they would pull their tax benefits they got some kind of tax
00:39:05.860 benefits that they would pull their tax benefits if they didn't play the national anthem now i've got
00:39:13.540 a big problem it's one thing when your private organization says hey our organization would do
00:39:22.660 better if we play this national anthem fine that's fine private organization mark cuban can be in the
00:39:30.500 organization or he can sell his team you know it's that's okay but the governor of texas is the
00:39:37.220 government he's the government and the government just twisted the mavericks arm now we don't know if
00:39:45.300 mark cuban cared about what the governor was saying you know we don't have any information that says
00:39:50.980 that mark cuban made a decision based on what the government said but they did put pressure on
00:39:56.260 real pressure like real money pressure that is is unacceptable as anything could ever be so let me
00:40:06.180 say this to the governor of texas fuck you fuck you for trying to make the nba play the national anthem
00:40:16.660 if the nba wants to play the national anthem great great but if the government any form of government
00:40:26.100 is pressuring them to play the national anthem is pressuring them to play the national anthem
00:40:28.980 fuck you fuck you hard that's that's over the line that's way over the line that is way way way
00:40:37.540 over the line all right that doesn't work in this country now i'd like to think that mark cuban's
00:40:44.020 decision was based on the nba's preference not on the government's preference but if it was
00:40:49.780 if any part of this decision was because of the government's influence uh you should lose your
00:40:56.100 job for that the governor of texas should lose his job for this he should be impeached in fact i i think
00:41:03.860 that's an impeachable offense to try to force somebody to be patriotic and to show it in a specific way
00:41:10.420 i think that's impeachable or or should be i doubt it is but um that
00:41:21.380 is my show for today um yeah it's like forcing religion it's exactly like that
00:41:28.740 not exactly like that but you know you know the point all right is there anything i forgot today
00:41:34.980 uh somebody says no that's my governor and my tax dollars government tax dollars texans tax dollars
00:41:47.620 so you're saying that the governor was just representing the people of texas and so it was
00:41:53.700 the people of texas who would like the mavericks to play it well i see what you're saying i see what
00:42:01.140 you're saying that the governor was representing the will of the people that doesn't make any
00:42:06.500 difference you get that that doesn't make any difference right if the if the people were directly
00:42:12.900 in charge i might be persuaded but they elected the government and the government can't do that
00:42:19.860 at least i think it should be impeachable if they do it it doesn't matter if the people want it
00:42:25.300 that that is completely irrelevant suppose the people wanted the government to suppress your freedom
00:42:30.740 of speech is that okay a bunch of people want it yeah we really want our government to suppress
00:42:39.140 freedom of speech so that it's okay because the people want it no no it's not okay the government
00:42:45.540 can't do those things there are things that the people can do the things that individual uh private
00:42:51.220 companies can do but there are things that your government just can't do if if you're doing it right
00:43:00.740 uh why does capitalism need tax money it's a it's a fair question you know why do why does uh your
00:43:08.580 local communities support athletic teams and i would say that at least part of that is the national anthem
00:43:17.380 weirdly part of the reason that a government would put tax money toward a sport which you could say well
00:43:25.700 it's just entertainment why is my government spending my money on somebody else's entertainment
00:43:31.940 if you don't watch sports and i think the reason is that sports are a big unifying element of society
00:43:40.180 and because you do the pledge of allegiance it actually creates more patriots gives you something to
00:43:47.380 fight about that's symbolic instead of real fighting and i do think that having a sports identity
00:43:53.220 is a real part of a brand for a city i do think that the intangibles are pretty big now how do you
00:44:01.220 measure the intangible benefits compared to the tax dollars which you could measure more easily well
00:44:07.460 it's a judgment call it's a judgment call you can't know how much benefit you'll get because it's all
00:44:14.420 these weird patriotism is better community has a better brand the city has more of a reputation
00:44:20.820 none of that you can put a dollar amount on but it's not irrational for the city to want to get
00:44:27.140 those benefits somebody says because it generates a tax revenue yeah so some of it comes back that's
00:44:34.100 correct i don't believe that governments see that as a profit investment i think it's still a loss
00:44:40.500 but it's nonetheless true that some of the money comes back in different ways
00:44:43.860 uh sports are modern versions of romans bread and circuses i think that's true anything that gets
00:44:52.180 the public entertained and diverted is probably good for society because all that energy needs to go
00:44:59.060 somewhere it basically siphons off a lot of aggression in a way now i don't know if there's any science
00:45:06.100 to suggest that's a good thing but it looks like that's what's happening anyway um scott yearly
00:45:14.180 subscription options on locals anytime soon i haven't heard anything about that um maybe that will be
00:45:19.780 an option but we are looking into changing the uh the fee structure so you could follow more people at
00:45:26.180 a reasonable fee uh andrea mitchell has egg interface i don't know what that story is is that something
00:45:33.300 breaking breaking breaking news um all right so that's all i got for today and i will talk to
00:45:42.180 you oh yeah one one other piece of news uh so a press release from fox news saying that the greg
00:45:49.540 guffeld show which you're used to watching on saturday nights um is going to be uh every night
00:45:57.140 or five nights a week i think so greg guffeld great job not only and i assume he's still doing
00:46:05.940 going to do the five at the same time so he will have probably two of the biggest shows on on fox now
00:46:12.660 why does greg guffeld succeed where others in his business have not well one reason is he's not committed
00:46:21.060 to you know being crazy about one team he's willing to say this team did this good this team did this
00:46:28.020 well so he is more uh certainly uh as far away as you can get from the let's say the hannity side of
00:46:37.940 the world and a lot closer to the hey let's look at the facts and try to figure out what makes sense and
00:46:43.140 what doesn't make sense part of the world and that apparently is working so uh congratulations to him
00:46:50.180 on that all right um and that's all i got for now and i will talk to you tomorrow
00:47:02.500 all right periscope is down uh google felon fox why should i do that about transgender athletes and
00:47:11.220 women's sports now when i talk about the transgenders everybody hears it wrong so everybody who thinks
00:47:18.740 they disagree with me on transgender sports they probably don't because they don't quite understand
00:47:25.380 what i'm saying it's like you can say a and people hear b and then they just want to talk to
00:47:30.660 me about why i'm wrong about b i never said b i only said a what i mean by that is that
00:47:37.460 um if you reorganize sports so it doesn't just have a women's group and a men's group
00:47:44.100 then everybody can just play with the level of talent that that is appropriate and men and women
00:47:49.700 would be matched on teams normally it wouldn't just be transgender uh and then you'd have the same
00:47:56.180 amount of winners and losers but it would be distributed differently if your issue is a few college athletes
00:48:02.420 let's say women who would not get uh scholarships why do you care there are so few scholarships
00:48:10.980 and it only goes to people who were born genetically gifted and also were lucky enough
00:48:15.700 to have a parental situation that could support their sport why should they get any awards what why do they
00:48:23.220 get a scholarship why does that even make sense so if some women don't get scholarships
00:48:28.900 do you care why why do schools even do sports i'm not even sure it's useful so um the fact that
00:48:39.220 let me put it another way no matter how many women or men get trophies for sports i won't get any
00:48:48.820 how many did you get how many trophies did you get probably none i mean recently maybe you got some
00:48:55.940 in high school but how many trophies did you get this year did you get any i didn't get any this
00:49:03.060 whole trophy thing affects this tiny tiny tiny little group of people it's not you it's not me
00:49:12.180 and why are we even caring about it just reorganize the sports so everybody can play at the level that
00:49:18.020 they play at forget about these stupid scholarships if colleges want to give them well who cares
00:49:23.940 i mean they're private if they're private universities and they want to give a scholarship
00:49:28.500 they can do it for any any reason they want and i i don't see any reason why uh you need to have
00:49:36.340 sports winners who get the trophy and get the scholarship it just society doesn't need that has no value at all
00:49:44.100 so my point is not that if you kept sports exactly as they are transgender athletes wouldn't distort
00:49:54.340 things in a way that people don't like well that's clearly true it's clearly true that the transgender
00:50:00.340 athlete in some situations would dominate you know women's sports that's just true but how much you care
00:50:08.260 about it is the crazy part it can be true and not important but uh i don't i don't support keeping
00:50:16.900 sports exactly the way they are i think that they should change to simply let people play with the
00:50:22.980 level of talent that is equal to their skill that's it forget about the whole gender thing entirely all
00:50:30.420 right um and that's all i got for now i'll talk to you