Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1295 Scott Adams： The Ongoing Disinformation Campaign Against the American Public, and Tiger Too

00:00:00.000 Boop, boom, bum, bum, bum.

00:00:03.380 Hey, everybody.

00:00:04.860 You're right on time.

00:00:07.220 Almost early.

00:00:09.120 Come on in.

00:00:09.940 Gather around.

00:00:10.800 Grab a chair.

00:00:11.660 It's time for the best part of the day.

00:00:14.120 Yeah.

00:00:15.180 Once again, isn't it great that there's coffee with Scott Adams every day?

00:00:21.040 That's right.

00:00:21.920 It's the best part.

00:00:23.120 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or a challenge.

00:00:25.820 It's time to canteen jug of flowers.

00:00:27.100 It's a little of any kind.

00:00:28.320 And fill it with your favorite liquid I like, coffee.

00:00:32.300 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day,

00:00:37.080 the thing that makes what?

00:00:39.740 That's right.

00:00:40.380 Everything better.

00:00:41.540 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

00:00:44.600 Go.

00:00:53.700 Stretch, everybody.

00:00:55.320 Ah, I feel so good.

00:00:58.780 What a day.

00:01:00.480 All right.

00:01:01.200 Well, let's start with all the good news.

00:01:03.500 Do you want the good news first?

00:01:04.940 Of course you do.

00:01:05.940 Of course you do.

00:01:07.460 In pandemic news, the new single shot of vaccination from J&J, it looks like it has 85% efficacy.

00:01:17.940 And if you don't like the word efficacy, well, you haven't said it out loud.

00:01:25.860 Try it.

00:01:26.440 Try it at home.

00:01:27.340 Say efficacy.

00:01:29.160 It's fun.

00:01:30.280 It is.

00:01:32.100 And it has 85% efficacy 28 days after you get it, and that's pretty good.

00:01:36.840 And it has almost an 88% efficacy.

00:01:43.300 Did I say efficacy?

00:01:46.200 Of blocking asymptomatic infections.

00:01:50.200 Bam.

00:01:51.240 Pretty good stuff.

00:01:54.100 Would you take the single shot that gave you 85% efficacy, or would you wait for the double shot that gives you a little bit more?

00:02:03.480 I don't know.

00:02:05.900 I told you that I'm going to wait until the last possible moment, because I'm not eligible yet.

00:02:11.540 But I think I'll be in the next wave.

00:02:15.240 So maybe in a few weeks.

00:02:16.740 I'm not sure.

00:02:18.300 Here's some more good news.

00:02:20.080 As you know, I think over 20 states have legislation to associate funding for school with the children instead of the school,

00:02:30.200 so that the child could go to a different competing school, a private school, for example,

00:02:35.640 and the funding would move with them, the government funding.

00:02:39.440 So that is a really big trend that's happening now.

00:02:42.460 Corey DeAngelis, you'll find him on Twitter, does the most tweeting about this productively.

00:02:49.220 He's most involved in this.

00:02:51.200 And he does more than tweeting, obviously.

00:02:53.380 He's active in this space.

00:02:54.920 But a new study says, according to Corey, that charter schools are 35% more cost-effective

00:03:03.280 and produce a 46% larger return on investment than district schools.

00:03:10.380 Do you trust that statistic?

00:03:13.520 I don't.

00:03:16.140 You know, this is the sort of statistic that you want to trust because it agrees with you already.

00:03:22.060 I want it to be true that having competition in anything makes things better, just as a general statement.

00:03:30.820 No matter the field, if you add competition to it, it should make things better.

00:03:35.000 So I want it to be true that these charter schools are more cost-effective.

00:03:41.140 But then you would also have to factor in what happens to the school they left behind.

00:03:47.280 Did it get worse?

00:03:49.160 What happened to the average?

00:03:50.160 So I don't think things like this can be studied, actually.

00:03:55.520 So I wouldn't totally trust this number.

00:03:58.400 But at the very least, it can help you size things.

00:04:04.920 So I think this at least is evidence that charter schools are not worse.

00:04:10.500 But I don't think you could say that numbers such as this, I wouldn't ever trust them to be accurate, per se.

00:04:17.540 But if there were some big problem where they spent more money and got less results, you'd probably see it.

00:04:24.460 They'd probably be big enough to see.

00:04:27.220 All right.

00:04:29.620 Digital Doug on Twitter was questioning the fact that the coronavirus numbers in the United States are over half a million deaths,

00:04:38.040 whereas regular seasonal flu would be, you know, maybe 10% of that, typically.

00:04:44.600 And Digital Doug says, if you pay hospitals five figures for treating the flu, meaning the regular seasonal flu,

00:04:53.740 and five figures more for putting patients on respirators, let's see what the regular flu numbers look like then.

00:05:00.180 So Digital Doug believes that if hospitals were incentivized to record the regular seasonal flu,

00:05:10.700 that there would be 10 times as much death attributed to the regular flu.

00:05:16.760 Does that make sense to you?

00:05:19.420 Now, let me tell you how to think of this argument.

00:05:21.740 If the argument is that financial incentives cause people to code more things as coronavirus,

00:05:31.020 that's a good argument, wouldn't you say?

00:05:33.660 Does anybody disagree with that?

00:05:35.600 That if you, and I say this a million times, if you put friction on something, you'll get less of it.

00:05:42.820 Almost always.

00:05:44.200 Doesn't even matter what you're talking about.

00:05:46.280 You add friction, and you get a little less of it.

00:05:49.060 If you add incentives, again, for almost anything, you're going to get more of it.

00:05:57.260 So the argument is that incentives have been added somewhat accidentally because, you know, people had good intentions.

00:06:04.700 But there's an incentive to say that something is a COVID infection or a COVID death when maybe it was a gray area, right?

00:06:14.580 Let me tell you how to judge that argument.

00:06:17.180 If there were just as many coronavirus deaths as the regular flu, early on, pretty good argument.

00:06:28.720 Pretty good argument.

00:06:30.140 It doesn't mean it's true, but you'd have to take it seriously.

00:06:35.200 Suppose the corona deaths were 20% more than the regular flu deaths in any year.

00:06:43.860 Ah, then you'd have to take that argument pretty seriously.

00:06:46.340 Because, like I said, you incentivize anything, and it wouldn't be surprising to get 20% more of something that had a financial incentive.

00:06:56.920 You'd all agree with that, right?

00:06:58.800 Getting 20% more, that wouldn't be surprising.

00:07:01.540 But that's not where we are.

00:07:03.820 We're at 10 times more deaths from coronavirus.

00:07:08.660 It's real.

00:07:09.500 So, this argument used to make sense.

00:07:15.160 I've said it myself.

00:07:16.600 If you incentivize something, you get more of it.

00:07:19.360 But you don't get 10 times more without somebody noticing that there's something up, right?

00:07:25.720 We are way beyond the point where questioning whether coronavirus deaths are real is a rational opinion.

00:07:34.240 It used to be.

00:07:35.920 It used to be a rational opinion, which I think time has shown us did not hold up.

00:07:42.680 But you are not being rational today if you think that the issue is miscounting.

00:07:51.600 We're not even close to that being a reasonable hypothesis.

00:07:55.260 But it was.

00:07:56.020 It was at one point.

00:07:56.980 So, I think you need to update your thinking on that.

00:08:00.800 Here's another one.

00:08:03.020 So, Ivor Cummins, who you probably see on the internet, tweets a lot about the coronavirus,

00:08:11.420 tweeted a graph today that shows that Sweden's excess deaths are among the lowest in Europe.

00:08:19.340 And the claim is that they did not do as aggressive a lockdown and social distancing,

00:08:25.660 and therefore proof positive that lockdowns and social distancing don't work,

00:08:31.800 according to Ivor or Ivor, I don't know how to pronounce his first name, Cummins.

00:08:37.760 So, I just tweeted this right before I came on live here,

00:08:41.260 and I asked the fact checkers to check that.

00:08:44.840 Let me ask you, do you think that that's true?

00:08:47.440 Do you think that when the other people comment on his tweet,

00:08:51.980 do you think they're going to say, oh yeah, we checked the numbers,

00:08:55.100 and these look like the accurate numbers?

00:08:59.080 I would bet against that.

00:09:02.380 Yeah, I'm seeing in the comments there's some disagreement about whether it's true or not.

00:09:07.000 This is the kind of statistic that is just a little suspiciously too on the nose, isn't it?

00:09:15.980 I just don't believe those numbers.

00:09:23.000 Now, by the end of this live stream, I could be changing my mind.

00:09:28.320 In other words, if the people I consider good at fact-checking look at this and they say,

00:09:33.700 wow, yeah, it does look like Sweden is a mystery.

00:09:37.520 They didn't lock down and they got the same result, or better.

00:09:45.640 All right, I just saw a comment that's making my brain explode, but I'm not going to go there.

00:09:53.220 All right, let's talk about something else.

00:09:58.260 So, fact-checkers, check me on that Sweden death thing.

00:10:01.420 Elon Musk continues to be the most interesting of the billionaires,

00:10:07.940 maybe just the most interesting person in the country right now while Trump is taking a little break.

00:10:15.440 And I guess he was asked to comment on a Washington Post story that was critical of Tesla.

00:10:23.080 And, as you know, the Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos,

00:10:28.640 who you could consider a competitor to Elon Musk,

00:10:33.120 because they're both trying to conquer space, if you will.

00:10:37.380 And they're trading places as the richest person in America.

00:10:43.220 It goes back and forth.

00:10:45.480 And here was Elon Musk's reply to the Washington Post hit piece on Tesla.

00:10:51.320 And when asked, he said, quote,

00:10:53.620 Give my regards to your puppet master.

00:10:57.280 Musk replied to the paper's request for his story.

00:11:05.020 Give my regards to the puppet masters.

00:11:11.760 Now, could there be a more perfect response?

00:11:17.040 If you put together, like, a team of experts in communication,

00:11:22.720 and said, all right, team of experts, we're going to have to respond to this,

00:11:26.960 what are you going to do?

00:11:28.760 And the team of experts would have said,

00:11:30.740 Well, we'll put out this statement, it'll be, you know, hundreds of words,

00:11:34.780 and it will say, Tesla denies the allegations,

00:11:39.180 and we make good cars, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, right?

00:11:42.500 Elon Musk, in one, how many words?

00:11:48.100 One, two, three, four, five, six, seven.

00:11:51.340 In seven words, just annihilated this thing.

00:11:56.920 Give my regards to your puppet master.

00:11:59.520 Now, what's beautiful about it is not just the comment

00:12:03.540 that there could be some bias in the story.

00:12:06.340 And by the way, I don't know that the story has any bias.

00:12:08.900 I mean, I'm not alleging that.

00:12:11.700 But as a comment about the story, it's golden.

00:12:15.040 It's just perfect.

00:12:16.400 It's the smallest comment you could make that packs the most powerful punch.

00:12:20.760 Because you can't really think of anything but what Elon said, right?

00:12:25.800 You've already forgotten what the story was.

00:12:28.900 I didn't even read the story, but, like, if I had,

00:12:31.700 I would have forgotten it already.

00:12:33.340 Because all I'd be thinking is that Elon Musk

00:12:35.820 says the Washington Post are puppets to Bezos.

00:12:39.100 It's just more interesting, right?

00:12:40.720 So what Elon Musk does is he simply does things more interestingly

00:12:46.500 than other people.

00:12:50.160 Fact check me on this.

00:12:51.360 Tesla doesn't do standard marketing, does it, in advertising?

00:12:56.020 Can somebody fact check me on that?

00:12:57.600 I thought that was true, that they don't do regular ads

00:13:00.180 because they don't need it.

00:13:02.220 All you have to do is put a bioweapon defense in your car

00:13:07.380 and you don't need advertisements.

00:13:09.060 You have something to talk about, right?

00:13:11.420 Yeah, I'm seeing people confirm it.

00:13:13.040 I think that's true.

00:13:14.380 So what Elon Musk does is brilliant.

00:13:16.880 He just acts more interesting than other people

00:13:19.240 and he doesn't need to advertise.

00:13:21.920 Now, you have to be able to pull that off, right?

00:13:24.520 Because this comment from Musk was probably just off the top of his head.

00:13:30.240 So you can't do that, right?

00:13:32.500 You could try.

00:13:34.440 But being this interesting spontaneously

00:13:37.000 so that the headlines just go with your interesting comment

00:13:41.280 instead of the thing you're commenting about,

00:13:43.440 that's skill.

00:13:45.420 And maybe you don't have it.

00:13:46.540 All right, Stephen Crowder, you know him from Louder on Crowder.

00:13:53.260 I have a question about this story.

00:13:55.420 He said he'd been...

00:13:56.160 The story this morning was that he had been suspended from Twitter

00:13:59.920 after saying that he can confirm that some people voted

00:14:03.720 at addresses that do not exist.

00:14:06.060 That's his claim.

00:14:07.600 Don't cancel me.

00:14:08.900 Please, please, please, please don't cancel me.

00:14:13.440 It's not even my opinion.

00:14:16.040 It's his opinion.

00:14:17.380 I'm just talking about it.

00:14:19.160 Please, please give me another minute of social media.

00:14:23.360 All right.

00:14:26.020 But when I was commenting about the story,

00:14:30.220 Stephen Crowder replied to me on Twitter.

00:14:33.800 So I don't know how banned he was

00:14:37.140 if he's already replying to me on Twitter

00:14:39.080 the same day that I heard the story.

00:14:41.860 So I don't know if he's back or I got the story wrong.

00:14:44.820 Did he get banned from a different platform?

00:14:47.480 Can somebody clear that up?

00:14:49.280 Did he get banned and he's back on already?

00:14:51.400 Or did he get banned from a different...

00:14:53.660 Oh, it was a 12-hour ban.

00:14:55.180 12-hour suspension.

00:14:56.720 That makes sense.

00:14:57.780 All right.

00:14:58.020 12-hour suspension.

00:14:59.500 Let's go with that because that sounds right anyway.

00:15:01.680 And as I have told you,

00:15:05.060 my new theme is that if somebody gets banned or censored,

00:15:12.360 let's say if they get censored,

00:15:14.720 I'm going to send them some money for being censored.

00:15:19.000 So I want to make it,

00:15:21.160 and I know a lot of people are on the same page,

00:15:24.280 that individually you might buy his shirt or his mug from his store.

00:15:29.980 I tweeted the address of his store.

00:15:35.060 And to you it's $10,

00:15:36.520 but basically you're just voting for freedom of speech.

00:15:39.040 It's a $10 vote to support freedom of speech

00:15:43.880 whenever you see one of these situations happen.

00:15:47.520 So buy Stephen Crowder's stuff.

00:15:49.500 I want to say, while I'm at it,

00:15:51.600 that I do not agree with all of the things Stephen Crowder says.

00:15:55.640 Doesn't matter.

00:15:56.880 That's not what we're here to talk about, right?

00:15:59.180 And I'll tell you, just so I'm on record with it,

00:16:01.600 I'm not a fan of his argument that there are two genders.

00:16:07.240 I know you hate it.

00:16:08.940 Here's my argument.

00:16:10.620 The two-gender thing is a social construct

00:16:13.620 based largely on biology.

00:16:15.980 I mean, it's not just invented out of nothing.

00:16:18.720 It's based on observation and biology and stuff like that.

00:16:22.740 But it's a convenience.

00:16:25.380 Society categorizes things for convenience.

00:16:29.120 And it is convenient and useful to have two genders

00:16:34.280 because then you just have two bathrooms

00:16:35.940 and you can keep rapists away from women.

00:16:38.940 And, you know, there are lots of good reasons

00:16:40.920 that we narrow it down to two.

00:16:43.540 But it's social reasons.

00:16:45.680 I think a more productive way to look at people

00:16:48.280 is that there are 7.5 billion people,

00:16:53.200 rounded off, whatever it is,

00:16:55.420 and they're all different.

00:16:56.260 Every one of them is just different.

00:17:00.240 They're different sexually.

00:17:01.980 They're different mentally,

00:17:03.480 different physically,

00:17:04.500 different health-wise.

00:17:05.800 We're just all different.

00:17:08.080 That's the healthiest way to look at the world.

00:17:11.720 It's not two genders

00:17:13.200 except for convenience.

00:17:16.480 Now, if you argued,

00:17:17.620 should we keep it two genders

00:17:20.660 because we can't afford to have, like,

00:17:22.660 a bathroom for every option,

00:17:24.700 I would say that's a conversation

00:17:27.860 that's reasonable.

00:17:29.620 You can reasonably say,

00:17:31.480 yeah, I get that everybody's different,

00:17:33.340 but we can't have, like,

00:17:34.840 a different bathroom for every person, etc.

00:17:36.960 I would like my own bathroom.

00:17:39.800 I'd like to be my own gender

00:17:41.240 so I could not have to share a bathroom

00:17:43.540 when I go to the mall.

00:17:45.740 It's just my own bathroom.

00:17:47.220 People like me, whatever I am.

00:17:48.720 So, the only thing I would put in your head

00:17:53.220 is that while it's perfectly reasonable,

00:17:55.960 perfectly reasonable,

00:17:57.360 to argue that you should limit things

00:17:59.140 to two genders for practical reasons,

00:18:01.900 that's very bad for a lot of people

00:18:04.000 because they don't feel they fit

00:18:06.040 into a category, right?

00:18:07.720 So, you have to make practical decisions

00:18:10.600 when it comes to how to organize society,

00:18:13.020 and not everybody is going to win.

00:18:14.720 But I think we should be more compassionate.

00:18:19.420 The people are just different.

00:18:21.140 And not worse, not better,

00:18:22.620 just different.

00:18:23.860 And just take that as our model.

00:18:26.680 I would like to give a shout-out

00:18:28.100 to Brit Hume.

00:18:30.560 He made another wonderful comment

00:18:33.020 today on Twitter,

00:18:34.180 and I've been watching him

00:18:35.640 for a long time.

00:18:37.260 You know, Fox News

00:18:38.300 association there.

00:18:40.820 And I don't think

00:18:43.180 I've ever seen Brit Hume

00:18:44.680 say something

00:18:45.300 that wasn't reasonable

00:18:46.620 and backed by evidence.

00:18:50.440 And I don't know

00:18:51.440 if you can say that

00:18:52.260 about everybody

00:18:53.060 that you see on TV.

00:18:55.120 And it takes a while

00:18:56.240 before you realize.

00:18:57.580 I was sort of realizing it today.

00:18:58.960 It's like,

00:18:59.700 I've never seen Brit Hume

00:19:01.200 say anything that was bullshit.

00:19:04.660 I've never seen him

00:19:05.700 even spin a story.

00:19:07.740 And you can tell

00:19:08.300 when somebody's spinning a story, right?

00:19:09.980 That's the most common thing.

00:19:12.080 So just a shout-out

00:19:13.040 for being one of the most useful people

00:19:15.500 in the news business.

00:19:17.380 When he talks,

00:19:18.660 I feel that

00:19:19.740 whether I agree with him or not,

00:19:21.920 it's just not bullshit.

00:19:23.480 It's just like an actual

00:19:24.600 honest opinion

00:19:25.460 based on data and stuff.

00:19:27.160 It's so rare

00:19:27.920 that I call him out.

00:19:29.040 It's like, all right.

00:19:30.060 Because I'm going to be talking

00:19:30.980 about people doing

00:19:31.720 the opposite in the pit.

00:19:34.160 And what he pointed out

00:19:35.460 was about Dr. Fauci,

00:19:37.220 and it explained to me

00:19:39.000 why I'm not as bothered

00:19:41.540 by Fauci

00:19:42.660 as almost everybody else

00:19:44.460 seems to be.

00:19:46.120 Fauci has sort of become,

00:19:47.260 you know,

00:19:47.940 our coronavirus grinch.

00:19:50.760 Right?

00:19:51.260 He's sort of the grinch

00:19:52.120 of the coronavirus.

00:19:53.520 And everybody wants to hate him.

00:19:55.280 But I haven't ever felt that.

00:19:58.200 And I was trying to figure out why.

00:19:59.820 Like, why is it

00:20:00.600 that, you know,

00:20:02.260 Fauci could be right or wrong,

00:20:03.740 but I don't have bad feelings

00:20:04.840 about him at all.

00:20:07.060 And Brit Hume explains it.

00:20:08.240 Indirectly,

00:20:10.140 he wasn't trying to.

00:20:11.480 But he says,

00:20:12.080 remember,

00:20:12.660 in this tweet he said,

00:20:14.140 about Fauci,

00:20:14.980 he said,

00:20:15.300 his job is to fight

00:20:16.260 the corona,

00:20:17.000 the COVID outbreak.

00:20:18.180 He has no responsibility

00:20:19.660 for children's mental health

00:20:21.240 or education.

00:20:22.320 The economy

00:20:23.200 is someone else's problem.

00:20:25.240 So are missed cancer,

00:20:26.440 screening,

00:20:26.900 suicides,

00:20:27.500 and other collateral damage

00:20:28.820 from lockdowns.

00:20:30.200 And that

00:20:31.020 explained it.

00:20:33.580 Explained my own opinion

00:20:34.700 to me.

00:20:35.160 And that is that

00:20:36.900 I only saw

00:20:38.440 Fauci as a bad cop.

00:20:41.520 And as a bad cop,

00:20:43.720 he's excellent.

00:20:45.380 It's not his job

00:20:46.780 to tell you what to do

00:20:47.960 about the economy.

00:20:48.900 It's not his job.

00:20:50.460 As,

00:20:51.060 as Brit Hume points out,

00:20:52.700 it's just not his job.

00:20:54.380 The other stuff.

00:20:55.860 So when you're evaluating

00:20:57.120 Fauci,

00:20:58.740 evaluate him

00:20:59.680 on his job.

00:21:01.280 But also,

00:21:02.060 you're an adult.

00:21:03.500 So you can say,

00:21:04.560 it's not the only word

00:21:05.860 on everything.

00:21:06.540 He's not in charge

00:21:07.200 of the economy.

00:21:08.040 He's not in charge

00:21:08.600 of children's suicides,

00:21:10.820 et cetera.

00:21:11.420 I mean,

00:21:11.660 he cares about those things,

00:21:12.780 obviously.

00:21:13.260 He's a human.

00:21:14.120 And he's American.

00:21:15.220 So of course,

00:21:15.700 he cares about those things,

00:21:17.080 you assume.

00:21:18.500 But,

00:21:18.940 that's why I'm not bothered

00:21:21.500 by him,

00:21:21.900 because I see him

00:21:22.640 in context.

00:21:23.740 If you see him

00:21:24.540 out of context,

00:21:25.660 and you imagine

00:21:26.300 that he is responsible

00:21:27.580 for the economy

00:21:29.140 and those other things,

00:21:30.940 then he would be doing

00:21:31.640 the worst job ever.

00:21:33.500 But he's not.

00:21:35.000 He's only responsible

00:21:36.320 for his little wing,

00:21:37.640 and he's acting

00:21:38.580 exactly like a guy

00:21:39.840 who's responsible

00:21:40.680 for that little wing.

00:21:41.920 So just keep that frame

00:21:43.080 in mind

00:21:43.580 when you're judging him.

00:21:45.000 I think he's

00:21:45.880 very valuable.

00:21:47.840 Very valuable.

00:21:49.680 I don't agree

00:21:50.560 with him on everything,

00:21:51.860 but I think

00:21:52.720 he's very valuable.

00:21:53.580 You've just got to

00:21:54.020 keep him in his box

00:21:54.980 as to what his job is.

00:21:56.760 That's a very good addition

00:21:58.440 from Brit Hume.

00:22:00.460 Of course,

00:22:01.000 the Tiger Woods accident

00:22:02.260 is all the headlines

00:22:03.600 because it's Tiger Woods.

00:22:07.220 But what are the odds

00:22:08.320 that the best golfer

00:22:09.380 of all time

00:22:10.280 can't drive straight

00:22:13.000 and ended up

00:22:14.240 in the rough?

00:22:16.160 I feel as though

00:22:17.280 this simulation

00:22:18.040 is just messing with us.

00:22:20.300 Because,

00:22:21.000 really?

00:22:22.180 Really?

00:22:22.800 The best golfer

00:22:23.820 in the world,

00:22:24.400 he can't drive straight

00:22:25.680 and he ends up

00:22:26.420 in the rough.

00:22:27.940 That doesn't even

00:22:29.600 feel like a coincidence.

00:22:31.600 It just feels like

00:22:32.680 the simulation

00:22:34.000 ran out of ideas

00:22:35.100 and it's just

00:22:35.660 recycling stuff.

00:22:38.520 But, of course,

00:22:40.240 we, you know,

00:22:41.460 everybody cares

00:22:42.620 about Tiger Woods.

00:22:43.900 One of the things

00:22:44.480 that Tiger Woods does,

00:22:46.200 and I don't think

00:22:46.880 he gets enough credit

00:22:47.740 for it,

00:22:48.120 he does get credit

00:22:48.800 for it,

00:22:49.120 but can you think

00:22:51.140 of anybody

00:22:52.000 in the world,

00:22:55.260 right?

00:22:55.660 But I'll say

00:22:56.340 the United States

00:22:57.500 just to keep it

00:22:58.320 local-ish,

00:22:59.780 but it would apply

00:23:00.620 to the world.

00:23:01.620 Is there even

00:23:02.320 one person

00:23:03.260 who doesn't like

00:23:05.180 Tiger Woods?

00:23:06.720 Besides maybe

00:23:07.560 his ex-wife,

00:23:08.320 I don't know.

00:23:09.700 He's like the most

00:23:10.620 popular person

00:23:11.540 ever.

00:23:11.960 And I think

00:23:14.200 that his

00:23:15.280 contribution

00:23:16.060 to, let's

00:23:18.340 say, social

00:23:19.860 cohesion

00:23:20.580 and, you

00:23:22.120 know, any

00:23:23.260 racial stuff,

00:23:25.440 he's one of the

00:23:26.140 most productive,

00:23:27.500 useful, best

00:23:30.060 things that's ever

00:23:30.960 happened to America

00:23:31.820 just by being

00:23:33.040 good at golf

00:23:33.680 and being, you

00:23:35.200 know, at least

00:23:35.640 partly black,

00:23:36.660 which people

00:23:37.240 see as black.

00:23:39.720 So, I don't

00:23:41.100 think we can

00:23:41.640 understate his

00:23:42.640 contribution to

00:23:43.720 the betterment

00:23:44.500 of our social

00:23:46.260 situation, just

00:23:47.740 by being black

00:23:48.940 somewhat and

00:23:51.560 excelling and,

00:23:54.300 you know, being

00:23:54.900 such a star

00:23:57.080 and being so

00:23:57.940 likable.

00:23:58.800 I mean, I think

00:23:59.240 he's just good

00:23:59.920 for the world.

00:24:02.380 There was a

00:24:03.220 sports guy who

00:24:04.220 got in trouble,

00:24:04.920 Andy Scholes,

00:24:06.240 because he sort

00:24:06.920 of speculated

00:24:07.680 that painkillers

00:24:08.680 were part of

00:24:09.140 the story,

00:24:10.220 whereas there

00:24:10.920 is no evidence

00:24:11.740 of inebriation,

00:24:12.900 but he hasn't

00:24:13.420 been blood

00:24:14.420 tested yet.

00:24:15.860 I would like

00:24:16.680 to say that

00:24:17.260 maybe Andy

00:24:18.120 Scholes did

00:24:18.860 get a little

00:24:20.280 ahead of himself

00:24:21.040 by speculating

00:24:22.000 that he wasn't

00:24:22.900 surprised about

00:24:24.380 Tiger Woods'

00:24:25.400 accident because

00:24:26.180 Tiger Woods has

00:24:26.900 a history of

00:24:27.480 painkiller use

00:24:29.380 and maybe

00:24:31.400 overuse.

00:24:32.120 I think he went

00:24:32.620 to some rehab

00:24:33.180 for it.

00:24:33.660 but it is

00:24:36.480 premature.

00:24:38.180 It would be

00:24:38.780 premature.

00:24:41.340 Somebody says

00:24:42.120 7.30 a.m.

00:24:43.220 and he crashed

00:24:43.840 that bad.

00:24:44.600 Well, that could

00:24:45.000 be, if he were

00:24:46.900 taking any kind

00:24:48.800 of painkillers

00:24:49.580 because he had

00:24:50.200 pain and he did

00:24:51.060 have back surgery

00:24:51.920 recently, you would

00:24:54.540 take them at any

00:24:55.180 time of day, right?

00:24:56.000 You'd take them

00:24:56.540 whenever they were

00:24:57.760 prescribed.

00:24:58.200 So, yeah, that

00:24:59.580 could certainly be

00:25:00.720 a factor, but I

00:25:02.160 don't feel like it

00:25:02.820 explains it, does

00:25:03.680 it?

00:25:05.400 How do you

00:25:06.180 explain the

00:25:07.340 extent of the

00:25:08.280 accident that he

00:25:09.020 went so far?

00:25:11.420 I don't know

00:25:12.360 that, I don't

00:25:13.560 even think drugs

00:25:14.300 can explain it,

00:25:15.480 right?

00:25:15.900 I feel like there's

00:25:16.820 at least one other

00:25:17.760 thing that we

00:25:18.880 don't know about

00:25:19.680 and even if he

00:25:21.560 has some painkillers

00:25:22.840 in his body, I

00:25:23.540 don't feel like

00:25:24.180 that's what

00:25:24.660 happened.

00:25:26.620 I, I,

00:25:27.060 somebody says he

00:25:29.100 was probably

00:25:29.620 texting.

00:25:31.600 I don't know.

00:25:34.400 He could have

00:25:35.180 been texting, but

00:25:36.160 if, it just looks

00:25:37.140 like something else

00:25:38.180 happened, unless

00:25:38.980 the speed was so

00:25:39.880 high that, that

00:25:40.800 we're fooled by it.

00:25:41.940 On the plus side,

00:25:43.400 the SUV that he

00:25:44.740 was in, the

00:25:46.300 Genesis GV80,

00:25:48.960 apparently performed

00:25:50.540 well because the

00:25:51.880 entire front part

00:25:52.800 of the cart was

00:25:53.440 crushed, but Tiger

00:25:55.160 survived in a

00:25:56.980 pretty bad

00:25:57.340 accident.

00:25:58.380 So, shout

00:25:59.640 out to the

00:26:00.960 makers of the

00:26:02.820 Genesis

00:26:03.220 vehicle.

00:26:05.400 Assuming the

00:26:06.140 vehicle was not

00:26:07.080 part of the

00:26:07.580 accident, it

00:26:08.860 looks like it

00:26:09.400 may have saved

00:26:09.940 his life.

00:26:10.960 So there's some

00:26:11.480 good engineering

00:26:12.120 there.

00:26:13.120 Romney is saying

00:26:13.960 that if Trump

00:26:14.680 ran in 2024, he

00:26:16.540 would easily win

00:26:17.560 the nomination.

00:26:20.080 What do you

00:26:20.680 think about that?

00:26:21.880 Do you think

00:26:22.320 Trump would easily

00:26:23.480 win the nomination?

00:26:24.280 I feel like he

00:26:25.860 would, right?

00:26:26.720 Because you'd

00:26:27.420 have a number of

00:26:28.060 people running,

00:26:29.340 and he would

00:26:30.360 certainly get at

00:26:31.540 least 25% of the

00:26:33.140 vote, just like

00:26:33.880 the last time, and

00:26:35.300 that would be more

00:26:36.020 than any of the

00:26:36.820 others individually

00:26:37.600 got.

00:26:38.260 So just the fact

00:26:39.240 that he's the

00:26:39.720 biggest fish who

00:26:41.340 would be in that

00:26:41.980 lake, the biggest

00:26:43.720 one gets nominated.

00:26:45.640 So it does look

00:26:46.960 like Trump, I

00:26:48.020 would agree with

00:26:48.560 Romney, that if he

00:26:49.600 ran again, he'd at

00:26:51.680 least get the

00:26:52.220 nomination, I

00:26:53.500 would be very

00:26:54.060 skeptical that he

00:26:54.960 could win the

00:26:55.540 election.

00:26:58.180 He may be too

00:26:59.700 crippled by the

00:27:01.160 assault on the

00:27:02.280 Capitol, but he

00:27:03.520 could win the

00:27:04.000 nomination.

00:27:05.160 Now that brings

00:27:05.740 up the second

00:27:07.640 question of who

00:27:09.180 are the leaders in

00:27:10.160 this country anymore?

00:27:12.380 I feel like we

00:27:13.340 have this gigantic

00:27:14.380 vacuum of

00:27:16.240 leadership, both

00:27:18.580 on the left and

00:27:19.320 the right.

00:27:20.080 Now there are

00:27:20.480 certainly people that

00:27:21.280 are being talked

00:27:21.820 about for running

00:27:23.600 for president, but

00:27:25.100 none of them have

00:27:25.880 really the kind of

00:27:27.600 star power that

00:27:29.360 we're used to, and

00:27:30.300 maybe it's just the

00:27:31.200 Trump effect.

00:27:32.000 We have an

00:27:32.980 expectation of a

00:27:34.040 certain amount of

00:27:34.640 star power, but

00:27:35.840 maybe that's

00:27:36.340 unrealistic.

00:27:39.000 So here's my

00:27:39.940 take, and I

00:27:41.660 want to tell you

00:27:42.260 that if you will

00:27:43.920 be bothered in the

00:27:44.880 future about me

00:27:46.780 saying that AOC,

00:27:48.560 like Trump, has

00:27:50.160 real skill, even

00:27:52.160 if you don't like

00:27:52.780 her policies, you

00:27:55.260 probably don't want

00:27:55.860 to follow me,

00:27:56.860 because I'm going

00:27:57.300 to be talking about

00:27:57.980 it a lot.

00:27:58.740 And the reason I'm

00:27:59.380 going to be talking

00:27:59.900 about it a lot is

00:28:00.660 that AOC is the

00:28:02.820 only leader in the

00:28:03.740 country right now.

00:28:05.300 Now, I don't like

00:28:06.680 the things she's

00:28:07.540 talking about in

00:28:09.760 every case.

00:28:11.520 Some of it I do

00:28:12.400 like, actually.

00:28:12.960 But, so I'm not

00:28:14.520 agreeing with her

00:28:15.240 policies, but I

00:28:18.800 would say she's the

00:28:19.720 only national leader

00:28:20.940 we have at the

00:28:21.660 moment.

00:28:23.160 I know that's a big

00:28:24.220 statement, but I

00:28:25.840 think it is.

00:28:26.960 And she is very

00:28:28.460 wisely, which, I

00:28:31.140 mean, I think she's

00:28:31.900 guaranteed to be

00:28:32.700 president eventually.

00:28:34.280 I just don't know

00:28:34.960 when.

00:28:36.140 So here's my

00:28:37.220 prediction.

00:28:39.340 AOC is guaranteed

00:28:40.380 to be president

00:28:41.340 eventually, guaranteed.

00:28:43.960 Unless there's some

00:28:44.900 like new scandal

00:28:45.900 that we don't know

00:28:46.660 about.

00:28:47.240 But if she just

00:28:47.920 keeps doing what

00:28:48.720 she's doing, she

00:28:50.500 will be president.

00:28:51.720 And here's the

00:28:52.400 thing.

00:28:53.280 You can back a

00:28:54.640 leader that you

00:28:55.360 don't agree with

00:28:56.760 if they're leading.

00:28:58.700 At least they're

00:28:59.740 leading, right?

00:29:01.380 I backed Trump,

00:29:04.140 as you know, even

00:29:05.460 though there were a

00:29:06.120 number of things

00:29:06.760 that he wanted to

00:29:07.740 do that I would

00:29:08.540 not agree with,

00:29:09.420 such as deporting

00:29:10.620 11 million people

00:29:12.120 when he took

00:29:12.780 office, right?

00:29:13.680 Now, I knew that

00:29:14.700 he wouldn't do

00:29:15.440 that, and he

00:29:16.300 didn't.

00:29:17.420 But I can back

00:29:19.900 a leader who

00:29:20.900 has things and

00:29:22.620 their policies I

00:29:23.460 don't like, as

00:29:24.820 long as they're a

00:29:25.480 leader.

00:29:26.220 Because you need

00:29:26.960 the leadership,

00:29:27.640 right?

00:29:28.900 You can't do

00:29:29.560 without it.

00:29:30.700 And I would say

00:29:31.360 AOC is now the

00:29:32.440 only national

00:29:33.320 leader, if you

00:29:34.440 don't count Trump

00:29:35.260 who's sort of on

00:29:35.900 hiatus at the

00:29:36.680 moment.

00:29:36.920 I'm watching

00:29:40.000 the comments

00:29:40.580 and watching

00:29:41.080 people throwing

00:29:41.900 up, people

00:29:43.220 are going into

00:29:44.280 spasms.

00:29:45.680 No, she's not

00:29:46.640 a leader, she's

00:29:47.440 a fake.

00:29:50.220 Calling her a

00:29:51.000 fake isn't

00:29:51.540 saying anything,

00:29:52.760 because all

00:29:53.540 leaders are

00:29:54.220 putting on a

00:29:54.860 show.

00:29:55.920 So she's

00:29:56.640 putting on a

00:29:57.200 show, and if

00:29:58.200 you say to

00:29:58.700 me, but wait,

00:29:59.820 she's fake,

00:30:00.420 because she's

00:30:00.760 just putting on

00:30:01.300 a show, I

00:30:02.860 say, what did

00:30:03.860 you think Trump

00:30:05.540 was?

00:30:06.780 He was a

00:30:07.240 guy who was

00:30:07.800 smart enough to

00:30:08.620 know how to

00:30:09.100 put on a

00:30:09.560 show, and it

00:30:10.220 worked.

00:30:12.520 Same skills.

00:30:13.380 All right, so

00:30:13.860 AOC is in the

00:30:14.560 news again, because

00:30:15.280 she took on the

00:30:16.080 Biden administration

00:30:17.720 for reopening the

00:30:19.020 Texas migrant

00:30:19.880 facilities, which

00:30:21.600 in the past have

00:30:22.560 been called kids

00:30:23.540 in cages, although

00:30:24.660 the actual cage

00:30:26.400 cage may be down

00:30:27.960 the road if the

00:30:28.800 numbers keep

00:30:29.560 coming in the

00:30:30.100 way they are.

00:30:31.300 But still, it's a

00:30:32.280 facility where you're

00:30:33.120 locking up kids, and

00:30:34.300 AOC came out

00:30:35.880 publicly, and

00:30:36.600 even though it's

00:30:37.140 her own party, she

00:30:38.840 said, this is not

00:30:39.880 okay.

00:30:41.940 And she said,

00:30:44.020 never has been

00:30:45.360 okay, never will

00:30:46.240 be okay, no

00:30:47.000 matter the

00:30:47.460 administration or

00:30:48.480 party, she

00:30:49.120 tweeted.

00:30:50.940 That's leadership.

00:30:53.380 That's leadership.

00:30:54.420 All right, I'm

00:30:54.800 going to delete

00:30:55.280 you.

00:30:56.760 All right, let me

00:30:57.840 give you a rule

00:30:58.600 here.

00:30:59.160 Everybody who

00:30:59.820 says that when I

00:31:00.720 talk about AOC's

00:31:02.000 skill, that I'm

00:31:03.620 really having a

00:31:04.380 crush on her, you're

00:31:06.200 just going to get

00:31:06.800 blocked.

00:31:07.920 Because I don't

00:31:08.860 want to deal with

00:31:09.540 that level of high

00:31:10.520 school mentality.

00:31:12.020 Okay?

00:31:12.840 People can be

00:31:13.740 female and also

00:31:14.800 good at leadership.

00:31:16.940 Can we not accept

00:31:19.780 that that's like a

00:31:21.240 thing?

00:31:22.760 So, goodbye to

00:31:25.420 Kent.

00:31:26.820 All right, if

00:31:32.600 anybody else wants

00:31:33.400 to suggest that

00:31:35.160 my real interest

00:31:36.220 in her is

00:31:37.220 because she's a

00:31:38.900 woman, I'd like to

00:31:40.020 block you right

00:31:40.660 away so I don't

00:31:41.340 have to deal with

00:31:41.860 that anymore.

00:31:42.760 Okay?

00:31:43.960 All right.

00:31:48.540 Who else would

00:31:49.920 you say?

00:31:50.420 I'd like to see in

00:31:51.100 your comments.

00:31:52.580 I've made a claim

00:31:53.540 that some of you

00:31:54.160 don't like, that

00:31:54.840 she's the only

00:31:55.720 national leader at

00:31:57.640 the moment.

00:31:58.880 Because she's going

00:31:59.900 against her own

00:32:00.560 party.

00:32:01.500 You're not a leader

00:32:02.560 if all you're doing

00:32:03.360 is agreeing with

00:32:04.080 your side.

00:32:05.580 Did Trump always

00:32:07.120 just agree with

00:32:08.040 his side?

00:32:09.140 He didn't.

00:32:10.580 That's partly why

00:32:12.100 there's so much

00:32:12.540 trouble, right?

00:32:13.360 He was always

00:32:14.100 fighting with his

00:32:14.880 own side.

00:32:15.920 If you're not

00:32:16.660 fighting with your

00:32:17.420 own side, in

00:32:19.580 addition to the

00:32:20.260 other side, you're

00:32:21.320 not a leader, you're

00:32:22.900 just a team

00:32:23.380 player.

00:32:23.700 So until you

00:32:25.840 see somebody

00:32:26.500 cross their own

00:32:28.540 party line, you're

00:32:30.120 not talking about

00:32:30.760 a leader.

00:32:31.400 You're just

00:32:31.780 talking about a

00:32:32.460 political hack,

00:32:34.100 basically.

00:32:35.460 So AOC has

00:32:36.600 done it twice in

00:32:37.620 the past week.

00:32:38.580 I forget what the

00:32:39.240 other one was.

00:32:40.420 But we have one

00:32:41.600 leader in the

00:32:42.160 country, like it

00:32:43.620 or not.

00:32:44.480 Give me another

00:32:45.120 name of somebody

00:32:46.040 who would fall

00:32:47.940 into that camp.

00:32:49.700 I'm seeing Rand

00:32:50.460 Paul Tulsi.

00:32:51.320 Tulsi is a good

00:32:53.460 name in that.

00:32:54.780 I would say

00:32:55.240 Tulsi compared

00:32:57.760 to AOC would

00:32:59.280 be, I hate

00:33:01.340 to say this

00:33:01.820 because I really

00:33:02.300 like Tulsi

00:33:04.060 Gabbard as a

00:33:05.080 political voice,

00:33:07.060 but I feel like

00:33:08.560 she's the Mike

00:33:09.400 Pence to AOC

00:33:11.960 being Trump.

00:33:14.080 I hate to say

00:33:15.060 that.

00:33:15.380 That's really not

00:33:15.980 a fair thing to

00:33:16.680 say.

00:33:17.820 But Tulsi

00:33:18.700 doesn't bring

00:33:19.520 the heat,

00:33:20.660 the energy,

00:33:23.180 and partly

00:33:23.700 because her

00:33:24.160 personality is

00:33:24.960 sort of low

00:33:25.700 key.

00:33:26.620 So she brings

00:33:27.220 capability and

00:33:28.340 good things that

00:33:28.940 you like and

00:33:29.940 would be a very

00:33:30.700 capable president,

00:33:31.960 in my opinion.

00:33:32.680 I could get

00:33:33.380 behind that.

00:33:34.920 But I don't

00:33:35.700 know she has

00:33:36.140 the star power,

00:33:37.400 quite.

00:33:39.340 It would be an

00:33:39.860 interesting contest.

00:33:42.020 How would you

00:33:42.600 like to see a

00:33:43.200 presidential contest

00:33:44.200 someday between

00:33:46.060 Tulsi Gabbard and

00:33:48.320 AOC?

00:33:49.740 Just woman

00:33:50.540 versus woman.

00:33:52.740 That would be

00:33:53.200 pretty interesting.

00:33:54.240 I could get

00:33:54.900 into that.

00:33:55.460 That would be

00:33:55.800 fun.

00:33:57.020 And maybe time.

00:33:58.120 Maybe it's time

00:33:58.720 for two women

00:33:59.340 to be running

00:33:59.900 for president.

00:34:01.440 That would be

00:34:02.180 the real shake

00:34:05.140 up, wouldn't

00:34:05.580 it?

00:34:10.200 Somebody says

00:34:10.980 she's charismatic

00:34:11.700 and dangerous

00:34:12.460 like many evil

00:34:13.380 leaders of the

00:34:13.940 past.

00:34:15.000 So she's

00:34:15.580 added some

00:34:17.660 nuance to

00:34:18.680 what AOC has,

00:34:20.100 to what she's

00:34:20.600 saying about

00:34:21.060 border and

00:34:21.900 getting rid of

00:34:22.520 ICE and

00:34:23.180 opening the

00:34:23.760 borders and

00:34:24.320 stuff.

00:34:24.580 And all of

00:34:24.920 it sounds

00:34:25.280 crazy, right?

00:34:26.800 When you

00:34:27.140 first hear it,

00:34:27.700 you're like,

00:34:28.120 what are you

00:34:28.720 talking about

00:34:29.200 opening the

00:34:29.840 borders?

00:34:30.580 That's the

00:34:30.960 worst idea I've

00:34:31.720 ever heard in

00:34:32.240 the entire

00:34:32.640 world.

00:34:33.560 But if you

00:34:34.060 actually hear her

00:34:34.720 talk about it

00:34:35.400 in more depth,

00:34:37.220 what she's

00:34:37.780 talking about is

00:34:38.780 figuring out how

00:34:40.080 to do it.

00:34:41.520 And the idea

00:34:42.500 is that there

00:34:43.060 might be a

00:34:43.560 big idea of

00:34:44.960 just rethinking

00:34:45.840 everything that

00:34:47.220 would make

00:34:47.780 aggressive border

00:34:49.600 control not

00:34:50.440 necessary.

00:34:51.660 That it doesn't

00:34:52.560 mean it would be

00:34:53.060 bad for the

00:34:53.640 United States,

00:34:54.860 but there's the

00:34:56.980 feeling that you

00:34:58.620 could get from

00:34:59.180 where we are to

00:35:00.080 some better

00:35:00.660 place, and we

00:35:01.940 don't know what

00:35:02.580 the path is.

00:35:04.200 Now, what do

00:35:04.720 you think of

00:35:05.120 that?

00:35:06.160 What do you

00:35:06.600 think of the

00:35:07.080 fact that AOC's

00:35:08.960 plan for

00:35:09.760 immigration is

00:35:10.920 will do

00:35:12.120 something that

00:35:12.740 nobody's thought

00:35:13.440 of yet, and I

00:35:14.240 haven't thought

00:35:14.740 of it either, but

00:35:15.880 it'll be really

00:35:16.500 good, and it'll

00:35:17.160 fix things.

00:35:18.440 What do you

00:35:18.840 think of a

00:35:19.240 plan like that?

00:35:21.180 Is your first

00:35:22.020 thought, oh my

00:35:22.720 God, she doesn't

00:35:23.320 have a plan.

00:35:24.680 There's no

00:35:25.280 plan.

00:35:27.340 Right?

00:35:27.900 That's your

00:35:28.280 first thought.

00:35:29.620 Here's my

00:35:30.220 first thought.

00:35:31.500 That's the

00:35:32.100 leader I want.

00:35:33.740 Now, I'm not

00:35:34.160 saying AOC.

00:35:35.220 I'm saying I

00:35:36.140 want a leader who

00:35:37.000 talks exactly like

00:35:38.380 that.

00:35:39.220 That's exactly

00:35:40.160 what I want to

00:35:41.020 hear.

00:35:41.580 I want to hear

00:35:42.380 that here's where

00:35:43.820 we want to get

00:35:44.480 to, here's where

00:35:45.880 we are, and we

00:35:47.080 have no idea how

00:35:48.040 to get there, but

00:35:48.740 damn it, we're

00:35:49.280 going to figure

00:35:49.680 it out.

00:35:50.900 We're going to

00:35:51.480 figure it out.

00:35:52.240 And if we can't

00:35:53.000 figure it out, well,

00:35:54.580 at least we

00:35:55.020 tried.

00:35:56.840 That's the leader

00:35:57.500 I want.

00:35:58.360 I don't want

00:35:59.040 somebody who

00:35:59.640 says, you know,

00:36:00.820 I'm not even

00:36:01.580 going to try to

00:36:02.240 get there unless

00:36:02.880 I know all the

00:36:03.500 steps.

00:36:04.620 When Kennedy

00:36:05.440 said we're

00:36:05.940 going to the

00:36:06.540 moon, did he

00:36:08.240 say we

00:36:08.700 already know

00:36:09.240 how to get

00:36:09.620 to the moon?

00:36:11.020 No.

00:36:12.060 The reason

00:36:12.660 Kennedy is

00:36:13.320 called such

00:36:13.860 a great leader

00:36:14.680 for saying

00:36:15.160 we're going

00:36:15.520 to the moon

00:36:16.000 is specifically

00:36:17.480 because, wait

00:36:19.700 for it, we

00:36:21.280 didn't know

00:36:21.620 how to do

00:36:22.040 it.

00:36:23.160 I mean, we

00:36:23.600 figured we

00:36:24.120 could figure

00:36:24.560 it out, but

00:36:26.180 we didn't know

00:36:26.640 how when he

00:36:27.700 talked about

00:36:28.140 it.

00:36:28.780 We don't

00:36:29.400 know how to

00:36:29.840 fix immigration

00:36:30.680 such that strong

00:36:32.120 enforcement would

00:36:33.000 not even be

00:36:33.600 necessary.

00:36:34.780 We don't know

00:36:35.220 how to do

00:36:35.560 that.

00:36:35.840 AOC says,

00:36:38.300 let's figure

00:36:39.320 it out.

00:36:40.740 I like

00:36:41.500 that.

00:36:42.740 I don't

00:36:43.100 know if we

00:36:43.520 can figure

00:36:44.080 it out, but

00:36:44.780 I also would

00:36:45.400 not have

00:36:45.780 known if we

00:36:46.400 could figure

00:36:46.860 out landing

00:36:47.440 on the moon.

00:36:48.440 I wouldn't

00:36:49.060 have known.

00:36:50.680 I was

00:36:51.280 somebody who

00:36:51.880 challenges us.

00:36:54.460 AOC challenged

00:36:55.640 the country to

00:36:57.180 figure out how

00:36:57.980 to do this

00:36:58.580 without being

00:36:59.240 cruel to people

00:37:00.180 coming across.

00:37:01.060 is it

00:37:02.020 impossible?

00:37:03.060 If you

00:37:03.680 say it's

00:37:04.160 impossible,

00:37:05.960 check your

00:37:08.500 thinking.

00:37:10.020 It might

00:37:10.600 be impossible.

00:37:11.840 I can't

00:37:12.320 see a way

00:37:12.660 to do it.

00:37:14.220 I don't

00:37:14.740 think you

00:37:15.060 can see a

00:37:15.480 way to do

00:37:15.840 it.

00:37:16.620 But I

00:37:17.260 don't want

00:37:17.840 to live in

00:37:18.180 a country

00:37:18.600 where my

00:37:19.760 leader agrees

00:37:20.700 with me.

00:37:21.700 Right?

00:37:22.340 I don't

00:37:22.860 want my

00:37:23.240 leader to

00:37:23.700 say, oh,

00:37:24.200 you can't

00:37:24.560 see how

00:37:24.820 to do

00:37:25.040 it?

00:37:25.280 I guess

00:37:25.780 we can't

00:37:26.140 do it.

00:37:27.580 I guess

00:37:28.000 we can't

00:37:28.340 go to the

00:37:28.680 moon.

00:37:29.040 Anybody?

00:37:29.680 Anybody?

00:37:29.940 Can somebody

00:37:31.200 build a

00:37:31.740 rocket?

00:37:32.220 Anybody in

00:37:32.660 the audience?

00:37:33.140 None of

00:37:33.420 you?

00:37:34.200 Nobody knows

00:37:34.840 how to

00:37:35.060 build a

00:37:35.340 rocket to

00:37:35.720 the moon.

00:37:36.640 Guess we

00:37:37.160 can't go.

00:37:39.020 You don't

00:37:39.560 need that

00:37:39.880 kind of

00:37:40.160 leadership.

00:37:41.100 You need

00:37:41.460 the people

00:37:42.220 who say,

00:37:42.720 we're going

00:37:42.920 to make

00:37:43.160 this work.

00:37:43.980 We don't

00:37:44.380 know how

00:37:44.720 yet.

00:37:45.280 But we're

00:37:45.620 going to

00:37:45.780 make it

00:37:46.060 work.

00:37:46.940 We don't

00:37:47.300 know how.

00:37:48.900 Now,

00:37:50.040 or she's

00:37:51.320 crazy.

00:37:54.040 In the

00:37:54.580 comments,

00:37:54.980 somebody says,

00:37:55.420 or she's

00:37:55.880 crazy.

00:37:56.860 Well,

00:37:57.360 let me put

00:37:57.780 it to you

00:37:58.140 this way.

00:37:58.540 If she

00:38:00.400 were crazy,

00:38:01.980 you'd see

00:38:02.520 it in

00:38:02.860 lots of

00:38:03.300 different ways,

00:38:04.000 I think.

00:38:05.100 It would be

00:38:05.780 sort of

00:38:06.060 obvious.

00:38:06.740 But if she's

00:38:07.540 smarter than

00:38:08.240 you think

00:38:08.820 she is,

00:38:10.060 she would

00:38:10.500 talk like

00:38:11.020 this.

00:38:12.440 She says

00:38:13.180 directly,

00:38:13.780 I don't know

00:38:14.220 how to do

00:38:14.640 it.

00:38:15.700 If she said,

00:38:16.640 I do know

00:38:17.140 how to do

00:38:17.560 it, but I'm

00:38:18.520 not telling

00:38:18.980 you, well,

00:38:20.240 then she's

00:38:20.760 crazy.

00:38:21.520 Or if she

00:38:22.020 said, I do

00:38:22.460 know how to

00:38:22.860 do it, and

00:38:23.300 what she

00:38:23.600 described clearly

00:38:25.140 wouldn't work,

00:38:26.060 such as

00:38:27.160 just throwing

00:38:27.780 the gates

00:38:28.220 open and

00:38:28.940 opening the

00:38:29.840 border, but

00:38:30.620 she's not

00:38:31.060 saying that.

00:38:32.500 She is

00:38:33.160 smart enough

00:38:33.740 to know

00:38:34.240 that that

00:38:35.480 wouldn't

00:38:35.780 work, and

00:38:37.140 she doesn't

00:38:37.620 know what

00:38:38.020 would work,

00:38:39.500 but she

00:38:39.960 has a

00:38:41.400 moonshot

00:38:42.140 idea about

00:38:43.200 how to get

00:38:43.680 there.

00:38:46.080 All right,

00:38:46.820 Chris

00:38:47.120 Silliza, let's

00:38:48.100 talk about

00:38:48.460 the fake

00:38:48.760 news.

00:38:49.260 So I

00:38:52.120 love how

00:38:52.620 CNN creates

00:38:54.880 news out

00:38:55.640 of nothing

00:38:56.140 using the

00:38:57.560 opinion people,

00:38:58.860 and they're

00:38:59.260 not alone.

00:38:59.980 I suppose

00:39:00.440 Fox News

00:39:01.160 does the

00:39:01.600 same, but

00:39:02.720 this example

00:39:03.620 shows you

00:39:04.460 how it's

00:39:04.800 done.

00:39:05.880 So Chris

00:39:06.300 Silliza, in

00:39:06.920 a larger

00:39:07.360 article talking

00:39:08.280 about a

00:39:08.760 number of

00:39:09.040 things,

00:39:09.820 talks about

00:39:10.300 Senator

00:39:10.780 Johnson

00:39:11.280 said last

00:39:12.760 week that

00:39:14.560 he didn't

00:39:15.100 believe what

00:39:15.780 happened at

00:39:16.340 the Capitol

00:39:16.840 was, quote,

00:39:17.680 an armed

00:39:18.380 insurrection.

00:39:20.120 So there's

00:39:21.060 a quote from

00:39:21.720 a senator

00:39:22.180 saying he

00:39:22.700 didn't think

00:39:23.060 it was an

00:39:23.440 armed

00:39:23.680 insurrection

00:39:24.240 at the

00:39:24.620 Capitol,

00:39:25.420 and then

00:39:26.120 Silliza

00:39:26.560 finishes that

00:39:27.740 sentence with

00:39:29.600 comma,

00:39:30.960 despite ample

00:39:31.920 evidence that

00:39:32.680 it was.

00:39:35.420 So it's

00:39:36.180 just put out

00:39:36.660 there like

00:39:37.140 common

00:39:37.680 knowledge,

00:39:39.240 despite ample

00:39:40.180 evidence that

00:39:40.880 it was an

00:39:41.700 armed

00:39:42.000 insurrection,

00:39:42.880 to which I

00:39:43.380 say, I

00:39:44.820 didn't see

00:39:45.200 any.

00:39:46.320 Did they

00:39:46.720 report some

00:39:47.380 ample evidence

00:39:48.060 that it was

00:39:48.640 an armed

00:39:49.180 insurrection?

00:39:51.520 I didn't see

00:39:52.400 any evidence.

00:39:53.640 In fact, I

00:39:54.160 saw lots of

00:39:55.780 evidence that

00:39:56.400 it wasn't.

00:39:57.760 I mean, lots

00:39:58.580 and lots of

00:39:59.180 evidence that

00:39:59.780 it wasn't.

00:40:01.140 It was just

00:40:01.680 individuals who

00:40:02.760 wanted a

00:40:03.460 different election

00:40:04.020 outcome, or

00:40:05.640 wanted

00:40:06.100 transparency.

00:40:08.280 But he just

00:40:09.240 puts it out

00:40:09.760 there in an

00:40:10.480 opinion article

00:40:11.460 as if that's

00:40:13.340 just an

00:40:13.800 established fact.

00:40:14.760 Now, if

00:40:15.500 you were a

00:40:15.920 CNN consumer,

00:40:17.520 and you

00:40:17.860 weren't, let's

00:40:18.560 say, following

00:40:19.120 news every

00:40:19.780 day, but you

00:40:20.320 read this

00:40:20.700 article, wouldn't

00:40:22.020 you accept that

00:40:22.780 this must be

00:40:23.360 just an

00:40:23.780 established fact?

00:40:26.180 Never

00:40:26.640 happened.

00:40:27.620 Nothing like

00:40:28.420 this established

00:40:29.240 that as a

00:40:29.880 fact.

00:40:30.540 In fact, it's

00:40:31.140 obviously not

00:40:31.940 true.

00:40:32.900 You don't even

00:40:33.400 have to be an

00:40:33.860 expert to know

00:40:34.420 that's not

00:40:34.920 true.

00:40:35.160 You just look at

00:40:36.920 the photos of

00:40:37.720 the actual

00:40:38.160 assault.

00:40:40.460 They're

00:40:40.980 obviously not

00:40:41.700 trying to

00:40:42.100 overthrow the

00:40:42.660 government.

00:40:43.540 They could

00:40:44.140 never have

00:40:44.640 had any

00:40:45.060 plan that

00:40:45.660 says, if

00:40:46.880 we put the

00:40:47.400 Viking hat

00:40:48.000 guy and the

00:40:49.180 zip tie guy

00:40:51.660 in this room

00:40:52.780 that's empty,

00:40:53.940 they will

00:40:54.640 control the

00:40:55.240 government of

00:40:55.660 the United

00:40:56.000 States.

00:40:56.380 I mean, it's

00:40:56.620 just ridiculous.

00:40:58.100 So this is

00:40:58.620 one example

00:40:59.220 of CNN,

00:41:01.520 their technique

00:41:02.680 for perpetuating

00:41:03.740 fake news.

00:41:06.120 Tucker Carlson

00:41:06.840 had a real

00:41:07.700 interesting piece

00:41:08.840 about the

00:41:10.320 disinformation

00:41:10.900 campaign in

00:41:11.940 this country.

00:41:12.660 so-called

00:41:14.640 disinformation

00:41:15.220 campaign.

00:41:16.960 And there's

00:41:18.920 a part I

00:41:19.440 don't quite

00:41:20.340 agree with

00:41:21.800 Tucker, but

00:41:23.320 sadly, I've

00:41:25.180 had enough

00:41:25.620 experience

00:41:26.220 disagreeing with

00:41:27.200 Tucker and

00:41:27.820 then later

00:41:28.280 agreeing with

00:41:28.920 him that

00:41:30.340 I'm not going

00:41:31.840 to say that

00:41:32.360 just because I

00:41:33.080 disagree with

00:41:33.840 him on a

00:41:34.640 minor point,

00:41:35.220 I'll tell you

00:41:35.580 about in a

00:41:35.960 minute, that

00:41:36.900 he's necessarily

00:41:37.760 wrong.

00:41:39.240 So don't

00:41:40.100 take that

00:41:40.500 from it.

00:41:41.580 I'm just

00:41:41.940 saying I'm

00:41:42.580 not on the

00:41:43.020 same page,

00:41:43.620 but he

00:41:43.880 could be

00:41:44.120 right.

00:41:44.700 We'll find

00:41:45.140 out.

00:41:46.120 And here's

00:41:46.620 his point,

00:41:48.180 that there

00:41:50.280 was a

00:41:50.580 researcher who

00:41:51.360 found out

00:41:51.920 that around

00:41:52.460 2011, when

00:41:54.320 the Occupy

00:41:55.400 Wall Street

00:41:55.920 stuff was

00:41:56.600 happening,

00:41:57.500 and remember

00:41:57.920 Occupy Wall

00:41:58.820 Street was

00:41:59.300 really about

00:41:59.980 going after

00:42:01.140 the rich,

00:42:02.460 the Wall

00:42:03.020 Street rich,

00:42:03.960 those rich

00:42:04.520 people.

00:42:04.760 So it

00:42:05.760 was an

00:42:06.140 anti-rich

00:42:07.080 movement,

00:42:08.220 anti-rich

00:42:08.800 people

00:42:09.100 movement.

00:42:10.800 Have you

00:42:11.380 heard about

00:42:11.720 that lately?

00:42:13.560 When was

00:42:14.040 the last

00:42:14.380 time you

00:42:14.700 heard about

00:42:15.080 Occupy

00:42:15.660 Wall Street

00:42:16.240 and all

00:42:18.400 those rich

00:42:18.880 people?

00:42:20.440 It just

00:42:21.080 sort of went

00:42:21.500 away,

00:42:21.860 didn't it?

00:42:23.260 What replaced

00:42:24.200 it?

00:42:25.280 Well, what

00:42:25.860 replaced it is

00:42:26.960 the narrative

00:42:27.540 that the

00:42:28.180 biggest problem

00:42:28.740 in the United

00:42:29.180 States is

00:42:30.140 race.

00:42:31.240 it was

00:42:32.900 just replaced.

00:42:34.680 So, instead

00:42:36.300 of going

00:42:36.680 after rich

00:42:37.240 people, it

00:42:38.160 turned into

00:42:38.840 the races

00:42:40.280 going after

00:42:40.900 each other.

00:42:42.240 And who,

00:42:43.520 how did

00:42:43.920 that happen?

00:42:45.460 How'd that

00:42:45.900 happen?

00:42:48.400 Did it just

00:42:49.260 sort of

00:42:49.940 naturally

00:42:50.420 happen?

00:42:51.440 Did it

00:42:51.940 evolve into

00:42:53.180 happening and

00:42:53.860 there was no

00:42:54.320 decision making?

00:42:55.600 Well, here's

00:42:56.080 where I might

00:42:56.820 be on a

00:42:57.220 different page

00:42:57.760 from Tucker

00:42:58.500 because the

00:42:59.480 suggestion, or

00:43:00.460 at least what

00:43:00.880 I took from

00:43:01.580 it, I

00:43:01.880 could be

00:43:02.280 misinterpreting

00:43:02.940 it, but I

00:43:03.780 took from

00:43:04.220 Tucker's piece

00:43:04.920 that there

00:43:05.460 was some

00:43:05.840 intention there

00:43:06.820 by important

00:43:09.000 figures who

00:43:09.860 are the

00:43:10.320 puppet masters

00:43:10.960 of our

00:43:11.460 society to

00:43:12.820 make people

00:43:13.640 stop focusing

00:43:14.540 on the

00:43:15.020 rich, because

00:43:16.460 the rich

00:43:16.820 people don't

00:43:17.280 want that,

00:43:18.440 and give

00:43:19.960 you a

00:43:20.240 diversion,

00:43:20.860 something

00:43:21.120 shiny.

00:43:23.440 Here's

00:43:23.780 something to

00:43:24.280 back Tucker's

00:43:25.340 point.

00:43:26.540 He says

00:43:26.900 that,

00:43:28.920 let's see,

00:43:29.700 when people

00:43:32.320 were asked

00:43:33.000 how many

00:43:34.040 unarmed,

00:43:35.540 the key

00:43:36.080 word is

00:43:36.420 unarmed,

00:43:37.620 people who

00:43:38.520 have been

00:43:38.720 killed by

00:43:39.180 police,

00:43:39.800 specifically how

00:43:40.640 many unarmed

00:43:41.660 African-Americans

00:43:42.640 were gunned

00:43:43.400 down by police

00:43:44.140 in 2019.

00:43:46.380 So they do a

00:43:46.880 survey and

00:43:47.260 they say,

00:43:47.900 take your

00:43:48.860 best guess

00:43:49.600 how many

00:43:51.000 unarmed,

00:43:52.340 keyword

00:43:52.760 unarmed,

00:43:54.120 black

00:43:55.000 citizens were

00:43:57.040 gunned down by

00:43:57.920 cops that

00:43:58.560 year,

00:43:59.460 presumably

00:44:00.080 meaning killed.

00:44:02.280 What do you

00:44:03.100 think people

00:44:03.540 guessed?

00:44:05.020 Democrats

00:44:05.740 guessed 44%

00:44:07.540 of Democrats,

00:44:09.500 no, actually

00:44:10.040 44% of

00:44:11.380 liberals,

00:44:12.500 said they

00:44:13.500 believe it

00:44:14.040 was about

00:44:14.380 1,000 or

00:44:15.260 more per

00:44:16.880 year.

00:44:18.520 That's because

00:44:19.540 they listened

00:44:20.160 to the news

00:44:20.940 and social

00:44:21.600 media.

00:44:22.800 And they

00:44:23.180 believed 44%

00:44:24.740 of liberals,

00:44:26.340 almost half,

00:44:27.920 believe that

00:44:28.960 the number

00:44:29.420 is close to

00:44:30.240 1,000 or

00:44:31.020 more.

00:44:32.280 Now, let

00:44:33.800 me ask you

00:44:34.260 something.

00:44:35.400 If police

00:44:36.320 were killing

00:44:36.900 1,000 unarmed

00:44:38.620 black men a

00:44:39.720 year in this

00:44:40.400 country, you

00:44:42.080 couldn't keep

00:44:42.860 me off the

00:44:44.420 street, right?

00:44:46.060 Like I would

00:44:46.700 be in Black

00:44:47.420 Lives Matter,

00:44:48.720 like I would

00:44:49.200 be a charter

00:44:49.800 member,

00:44:50.820 dues-paying

00:44:51.580 member.

00:44:52.500 If this number

00:44:53.220 were anywhere

00:44:53.800 near that,

00:44:55.460 you would

00:44:56.440 have to leave

00:44:57.140 your house,

00:44:58.160 you would

00:44:58.540 have to

00:44:58.940 protest,

00:44:59.980 you would

00:45:00.340 have to

00:45:00.700 defund

00:45:01.060 the police.

00:45:02.520 You would

00:45:02.820 have to,

00:45:03.620 if this were

00:45:04.340 even close

00:45:04.900 to true.

00:45:06.500 But of

00:45:07.100 course it's

00:45:07.440 not.

00:45:07.820 The real

00:45:08.060 number is

00:45:08.460 under 30.

00:45:10.320 So liberals

00:45:11.100 think it's

00:45:11.960 1,000 or

00:45:12.820 more a year.

00:45:14.160 You would

00:45:14.740 act very

00:45:15.520 differently if

00:45:16.480 it were 1,000

00:45:17.200 or more a

00:45:17.700 year.

00:45:18.320 You would

00:45:18.700 act very

00:45:19.200 differently.

00:45:20.420 So you

00:45:21.240 can almost

00:45:21.600 understand why

00:45:22.900 there's this

00:45:23.260 big difference.

00:45:23.780 there's a

00:45:24.340 news black

00:45:27.740 hole, no

00:45:28.860 pun intended,

00:45:29.980 in which

00:45:30.740 liberals just

00:45:31.880 don't know

00:45:32.500 what's

00:45:32.760 happening.

00:45:33.960 And

00:45:34.160 conservatives

00:45:34.620 do.

00:45:35.300 So actually

00:45:35.920 25% of

00:45:36.960 conservatives

00:45:37.560 even thought

00:45:39.020 that.

00:45:40.720 What?

00:45:41.780 What kind

00:45:42.420 of news are

00:45:42.940 the conservatives

00:45:43.480 watching?

00:45:44.620 Because I

00:45:45.260 don't know

00:45:45.560 any conservative

00:45:46.220 news sites

00:45:46.900 that have

00:45:47.280 reported this

00:45:47.960 incorrectly or

00:45:48.920 suggested that

00:45:49.720 it was anywhere

00:45:50.140 in that range.

00:45:50.920 But even

00:45:52.040 the conservative

00:45:52.760 news talks

00:45:54.780 about what

00:45:55.400 CNN talks

00:45:56.140 about.

00:45:56.860 In other

00:45:57.140 words, the

00:45:57.940 news covers

00:45:58.640 the news.

00:46:00.240 So maybe

00:46:01.040 wherever you

00:46:01.840 watch you

00:46:02.340 could be

00:46:02.660 misled.

00:46:03.480 But just

00:46:03.820 think how

00:46:04.400 big a deal

00:46:04.980 that is.

00:46:06.600 I mean,

00:46:07.720 and then

00:46:08.260 this question

00:46:09.460 was not

00:46:10.000 asked, but

00:46:11.320 how many

00:46:12.400 liberals

00:46:13.480 believe that

00:46:14.440 President Trump

00:46:15.240 once said

00:46:16.140 that neo-Nazis

00:46:18.080 were fine

00:46:19.200 people?

00:46:20.920 I'll bet

00:46:21.460 it's over

00:46:21.840 80%.

00:46:22.660 It could

00:46:23.880 be 90%.

00:46:24.800 I'll bet

00:46:25.500 90% of

00:46:26.320 liberals

00:46:26.620 believe that

00:46:27.240 that fake

00:46:27.800 news actually

00:46:28.760 happened.

00:46:29.800 Most

00:46:30.320 conservatives

00:46:30.920 know it's

00:46:31.340 a hoax.

00:46:32.200 If you

00:46:32.660 look at the

00:46:33.040 full transcript,

00:46:33.980 he said

00:46:34.340 the opposite.

00:46:38.140 But, man,

00:46:39.300 it is so

00:46:39.880 clear that

00:46:41.340 the real

00:46:41.860 problem in

00:46:42.420 this country

00:46:42.920 is a

00:46:43.500 disinformation

00:46:44.100 campaign from

00:46:45.060 the media.

00:46:45.500 and it's

00:46:48.300 hard to

00:46:49.080 discount it

00:46:50.220 as unintentional,

00:46:51.620 isn't it?

00:46:52.420 It's really

00:46:53.120 hard to look

00:46:53.700 at this set

00:46:54.260 of facts

00:46:54.780 and say,

00:46:55.860 well,

00:46:56.120 nobody's

00:46:56.600 doing that

00:46:57.080 intentionally.

00:46:59.300 Although,

00:47:00.180 I'm not

00:47:00.540 sold that

00:47:01.960 the case

00:47:02.800 has been

00:47:03.140 made,

00:47:03.640 that there

00:47:04.100 are shadowy

00:47:04.860 puppet masters.

00:47:06.380 Who are

00:47:06.840 they?

00:47:07.440 What are

00:47:08.000 their names?

00:47:08.540 When did

00:47:08.880 they have

00:47:09.180 a meeting?

00:47:10.120 Did they

00:47:10.600 have a

00:47:11.000 meeting,

00:47:11.300 or did

00:47:11.540 they just

00:47:11.880 know what

00:47:12.320 to do?

00:47:13.500 So that

00:47:13.980 part,

00:47:14.620 I'm not

00:47:15.440 quite buying

00:47:15.980 that it

00:47:16.680 was a

00:47:17.020 plot.

00:47:18.400 But you

00:47:18.980 can buy

00:47:19.380 that it

00:47:19.740 happened.

00:47:21.120 You can

00:47:21.640 simply

00:47:22.040 observe

00:47:22.500 that the

00:47:23.680 movement

00:47:23.980 against

00:47:24.420 Occupy

00:47:24.980 Wall

00:47:25.220 Street

00:47:25.480 disappeared

00:47:26.460 at about

00:47:27.400 the same

00:47:27.860 time that

00:47:28.300 the word

00:47:28.700 racism

00:47:29.200 took off

00:47:30.340 in mentions

00:47:31.020 in the

00:47:31.380 media.

00:47:32.420 Now,

00:47:32.600 there were

00:47:32.800 also events.

00:47:33.840 There was

00:47:34.240 a George

00:47:34.620 Floyd event,

00:47:35.540 other tragic

00:47:36.200 events,

00:47:36.900 so there

00:47:37.220 were reasons.

00:47:38.760 But were

00:47:39.680 all of those

00:47:40.460 reasons present

00:47:41.400 in 2011?

00:47:42.320 Did the

00:47:44.240 country become

00:47:45.000 more bad

00:47:47.320 racist since

00:47:49.140 2011?

00:47:50.360 I don't

00:47:50.920 think so.

00:47:51.820 I feel like

00:47:52.460 we probably

00:47:52.880 got less

00:47:53.940 racist,

00:47:54.820 just like

00:47:55.920 every single

00:47:56.960 year of the

00:47:57.680 United States.

00:47:59.140 Probably

00:47:59.720 every year

00:48:00.460 of the

00:48:00.740 Republic,

00:48:01.800 people on

00:48:02.960 average have

00:48:03.560 gotten a

00:48:04.060 little less

00:48:04.620 racist.

00:48:05.520 It feels

00:48:05.840 like it to

00:48:06.220 me.

00:48:07.220 Maybe any

00:48:07.980 given year

00:48:08.660 might be

00:48:09.180 different,

00:48:09.540 but over

00:48:09.840 time.

00:48:11.120 So wouldn't

00:48:11.560 you say

00:48:11.960 that racism

00:48:12.540 is probably

00:48:13.680 somewhat

00:48:15.900 less than

00:48:17.580 it was in

00:48:17.980 2011 when

00:48:18.940 apparently that

00:48:19.920 wasn't even a

00:48:20.480 big issue

00:48:20.920 relative to

00:48:22.540 the Occupy

00:48:23.380 Wall Street

00:48:23.780 issue being

00:48:24.320 bigger.

00:48:24.620 in other

00:48:27.840 news,

00:48:28.540 there's a

00:48:30.180 flight,

00:48:30.780 American

00:48:31.140 Airlines

00:48:31.540 flight,

00:48:32.000 that reported

00:48:32.660 a UFO

00:48:33.680 sighting,

00:48:34.400 doesn't mean

00:48:35.400 it's an

00:48:35.860 alien ship,

00:48:37.000 just unidentified,

00:48:38.260 that looked like

00:48:39.080 a cruise missile

00:48:39.960 that just went

00:48:41.740 over their

00:48:42.060 plane.

00:48:43.840 Now,

00:48:44.400 do you believe

00:48:45.440 that there was

00:48:46.060 an unidentified

00:48:47.000 long tubular

00:48:49.120 object that went

00:48:50.040 right over an

00:48:50.680 airplane that

00:48:51.920 was not

00:48:52.640 known to

00:48:53.360 flight control?

00:48:56.000 And the way

00:48:56.500 they asked the

00:48:57.020 question was,

00:48:57.780 they said,

00:48:59.120 the pilot said,

00:49:01.280 do you have

00:49:03.860 any targets

00:49:04.620 up here?

00:49:05.700 Because he

00:49:06.120 thought a

00:49:06.540 missile just

00:49:07.080 went past

00:49:07.620 them at a

00:49:08.080 target.

00:49:08.600 And he was

00:49:08.880 wondering,

00:49:09.480 is there

00:49:10.740 anything in

00:49:11.340 the air

00:49:11.740 near me

00:49:12.340 that I need

00:49:13.520 to worry

00:49:13.900 about because

00:49:14.460 somebody shot

00:49:15.080 a missile

00:49:15.560 at it?

00:49:16.660 I'd be worried

00:49:17.540 about that.

00:49:19.160 Now,

00:49:19.400 of course,

00:49:19.700 we don't

00:49:19.960 know the

00:49:20.380 answer to

00:49:20.880 this.

00:49:21.900 We don't

00:49:22.360 know that

00:49:22.700 anything got

00:49:23.200 shot into

00:49:23.700 the air or

00:49:25.180 that any big

00:49:25.940 missiles landed

00:49:26.740 anywhere that

00:49:27.260 we don't know

00:49:27.700 about.

00:49:28.520 So it's just a

00:49:29.640 mystery.

00:49:30.240 That's all it

00:49:30.740 is.

00:49:31.300 If I had to

00:49:31.960 guess, I would

00:49:32.780 say they

00:49:33.620 didn't see

00:49:34.080 anything.

00:49:35.100 Maybe they

00:49:35.560 saw a shadow

00:49:36.180 of some kind.

00:49:36.940 I don't know.

00:49:37.740 So my guess is

00:49:38.580 they didn't see

00:49:39.060 anything, but

00:49:39.920 we'll find out.

00:49:41.440 There's a story

00:49:42.000 about a woman

00:49:42.680 who's a trophy

00:49:43.420 hunter getting

00:49:44.400 a lot of heat

00:49:45.060 for killing a

00:49:46.680 giraffe,

00:49:47.320 cutting on

00:49:48.740 its heart,

00:49:49.820 which is pretty

00:49:50.520 big, and

00:49:51.500 holding it up

00:49:52.160 for social

00:49:52.760 media.

00:49:54.080 Now, if that

00:49:54.520 wasn't bad

00:49:55.060 enough, apparently

00:49:56.840 this one woman

00:49:57.720 has killed over

00:49:58.680 500 big

00:49:59.980 animals, lions,

00:50:01.220 leopards,

00:50:01.840 elephants, etc.

00:50:03.400 500.

00:50:04.900 And she was

00:50:05.440 really, really

00:50:06.060 excited and

00:50:06.980 couldn't handle

00:50:08.360 herself when she

00:50:09.700 learned that she

00:50:10.340 could kill an

00:50:11.540 adult giraffe.

00:50:12.400 giraffe.

00:50:13.780 Now, I'm not

00:50:15.840 anti-hunting

00:50:16.780 per se.

00:50:18.940 You know, there

00:50:19.360 are some times

00:50:20.120 when it makes

00:50:20.520 sense.

00:50:21.260 And if she

00:50:23.040 had gone big

00:50:23.840 game hunting

00:50:24.500 once or twice,

00:50:25.940 I wouldn't

00:50:27.060 like it, but

00:50:29.580 I'd have a

00:50:30.700 different opinion

00:50:31.320 than if she

00:50:32.020 did it 500

00:50:32.780 times.

00:50:33.680 If you kill

00:50:34.700 500 big

00:50:35.840 animals, you're

00:50:37.240 just a serial

00:50:38.040 killer who

00:50:39.260 doesn't want to

00:50:39.860 get in trouble

00:50:40.320 with the law.

00:50:41.860 It feels like

00:50:42.840 that's just a

00:50:43.480 serial killer

00:50:44.180 vibe, doesn't

00:50:44.960 it?

00:50:47.140 I don't know.

00:50:49.940 But she's

00:50:50.900 pretty happy

00:50:51.340 with herself.

00:50:52.340 All right.

00:50:55.340 I also

00:50:56.060 wonder if she

00:50:56.580 owns a pet.

00:50:58.480 Imagine if you

00:50:59.300 had killed

00:50:59.740 500 mammals

00:51:01.060 for fun.

00:51:03.520 Does she

00:51:04.080 have a dog?

00:51:07.380 Does she?

00:51:08.340 Does she

00:51:08.640 have a dog?

00:51:09.220 Because that

00:51:09.980 dog would be

00:51:10.660 really nervous.

00:51:13.340 I mean, would

00:51:14.000 she ever look at

00:51:14.600 her dog and

00:51:15.200 think to

00:51:15.480 herself, I

00:51:16.900 love my dog,

00:51:17.820 but oh, man,

00:51:18.820 it would be

00:51:19.140 fun to kill

00:51:19.860 it.

00:51:20.740 I'd love to

00:51:21.280 just shoot my

00:51:22.200 dog.

00:51:23.360 If you've

00:51:24.040 killed 500

00:51:24.800 mammals, you

00:51:26.340 don't think she

00:51:27.020 fantasizes about

00:51:28.000 shooting her

00:51:28.640 own dog?

00:51:30.180 If she has

00:51:30.920 one.

00:51:31.520 Anyway, Biden

00:51:33.680 is allegedly, I

00:51:35.940 think we need

00:51:36.440 some confirmation

00:51:37.040 on this story

00:51:37.820 because I

00:51:38.500 saw it in

00:51:38.940 an Asian

00:51:39.860 publication,

00:51:40.700 but apparently

00:51:41.660 Biden is

00:51:43.420 considering an

00:51:44.160 executive order

00:51:45.080 to push

00:51:47.520 alternate supply

00:51:48.580 chains to

00:51:49.160 go around

00:51:49.740 China,

00:51:50.760 specifically for

00:51:51.800 tech stuff like

00:51:52.600 chips and

00:51:53.080 batteries and

00:51:53.660 rare earth

00:51:54.140 stuff.

00:51:55.960 Now, if

00:51:56.540 that's true,

00:51:57.780 that Biden

00:51:58.340 has an EO

00:51:59.220 coming in

00:52:00.480 which we're

00:52:01.020 going to build

00:52:01.840 out a

00:52:02.520 separate supply

00:52:04.820 chain that

00:52:05.580 doesn't involve

00:52:06.180 China, I

00:52:07.220 would be

00:52:07.580 giving Biden

00:52:08.260 a lot of

00:52:08.900 credit for

00:52:09.460 that.

00:52:10.200 Now, I

00:52:10.520 would think

00:52:10.840 that he

00:52:11.160 wouldn't do

00:52:11.720 it if

00:52:12.500 Trump had

00:52:13.240 not gotten

00:52:14.320 the ball

00:52:14.760 rolling in

00:52:15.640 turning the

00:52:16.440 opinion of

00:52:17.140 the United

00:52:17.500 States

00:52:17.820 citizens

00:52:18.360 against China.

00:52:20.580 If Trump

00:52:21.380 had not made

00:52:22.000 it possible

00:52:22.640 for Biden

00:52:23.240 to do

00:52:23.540 this, I

00:52:23.820 don't think

00:52:24.080 he could

00:52:24.420 have.

00:52:25.780 So if

00:52:26.420 this happens,

00:52:27.700 I will give

00:52:28.300 Biden credit

00:52:29.040 because that's

00:52:31.480 the rule,

00:52:32.000 right?

00:52:32.220 If something

00:52:32.680 good happens

00:52:33.340 under his

00:52:33.860 administration,

00:52:35.420 I'm going

00:52:35.760 to give

00:52:36.020 him credit,

00:52:36.720 but we

00:52:37.000 can put

00:52:37.360 an asterisk

00:52:37.940 next to

00:52:38.360 it and

00:52:38.520 say it

00:52:39.700 wouldn't

00:52:39.980 have happened

00:52:40.380 without

00:52:40.680 Trump,

00:52:41.600 but still

00:52:41.980 Biden has

00:52:42.480 to do

00:52:42.880 it, so

00:52:43.800 he gets

00:52:44.160 credit if

00:52:44.720 he does

00:52:45.020 it.

00:52:46.160 And this

00:52:46.760 would be

00:52:47.020 very important,

00:52:47.720 but I

00:52:47.900 don't know

00:52:48.140 if it's

00:52:48.380 true yet.

00:52:51.000 Apparently

00:52:51.440 Biden has

00:52:52.120 not declared

00:52:52.920 yet that

00:52:53.620 the Uyghur

00:52:55.220 situation in

00:52:56.040 China is a

00:52:56.760 genocide.

00:52:57.980 I guess

00:52:58.320 Trump made

00:52:59.040 that declaration

00:52:59.780 just before

00:53:00.480 he left to

00:53:01.680 sort of leave

00:53:02.400 it with Biden

00:53:03.000 as a problem.

00:53:03.860 And Biden,

00:53:05.320 he has not

00:53:08.100 decided to

00:53:08.780 do that.

00:53:10.000 Canada,

00:53:10.540 however,

00:53:11.220 the parliament

00:53:11.640 voted Monday

00:53:12.920 to pass a

00:53:13.480 non-binding

00:53:14.440 motion

00:53:15.020 classifying

00:53:16.920 China as

00:53:17.840 being involved

00:53:18.780 in a genocide.

00:53:20.220 So Canada,

00:53:21.500 good work.

00:53:23.600 United States,

00:53:25.400 look at

00:53:25.860 Canada.

00:53:27.120 Come on.

00:53:28.400 Biden,

00:53:29.140 Canada did

00:53:29.760 it.

00:53:30.240 You can do

00:53:30.800 it.

00:53:31.640 Do it.

00:53:32.540 Do it,

00:53:33.000 Joe.

00:53:33.520 Do it.

00:53:35.000 All right.

00:53:35.640 And I

00:53:35.900 remind you

00:53:36.440 that we

00:53:36.780 are in

00:53:37.040 a war

00:53:37.360 with China

00:53:37.960 and they're

00:53:39.220 killing 70,000

00:53:40.400 people a

00:53:40.920 year with

00:53:41.900 fentanyl,

00:53:42.620 which they

00:53:43.040 easily could

00:53:43.740 stop because

00:53:44.880 there's one

00:53:45.360 guy in

00:53:45.800 charge of

00:53:46.160 it.

00:53:47.080 We've

00:53:47.520 already told

00:53:48.040 them who

00:53:48.320 his name

00:53:48.700 is.

00:53:49.140 They know

00:53:49.440 where he

00:53:49.700 is.

00:53:50.860 He's still

00:53:51.320 doing it.

00:53:52.440 So China

00:53:52.920 has decided

00:53:53.880 explicitly to

00:53:55.440 send us

00:53:55.920 fentanyl and

00:53:56.820 kill us and

00:53:57.700 to not stop

00:53:58.500 it.

00:53:58.680 If we

00:54:00.980 sent them

00:54:01.460 some

00:54:01.740 fentanyl

00:54:02.220 their way,

00:54:02.820 it would

00:54:03.320 not be

00:54:04.100 inappropriate.

00:54:05.460 Probably not

00:54:06.060 a good idea,

00:54:07.020 but it would

00:54:07.660 not be

00:54:08.060 morally wrong

00:54:09.020 to fight

00:54:09.660 fire with

00:54:10.300 fire.

00:54:14.740 That's just

00:54:15.480 my opinion.

00:54:17.280 That's just

00:54:17.980 my opinion.

00:54:18.820 Somebody says,

00:54:19.440 where is

00:54:19.780 Jack Ma?

00:54:21.540 I don't

00:54:22.180 know.

00:54:22.780 He's got a

00:54:23.300 problem.

00:54:24.500 My next

00:54:25.260 segment is

00:54:26.100 called

00:54:26.300 Experts

00:54:26.860 Are Dumb.

00:54:29.760 I've been

00:54:30.640 having an

00:54:31.220 online

00:54:31.540 conversation

00:54:32.100 with a

00:54:32.460 number of

00:54:32.900 doctors and

00:54:33.780 ER doctors

00:54:34.560 and pediatricians

00:54:35.900 who are very

00:54:36.980 mad at me

00:54:37.540 for having

00:54:37.980 opinions.

00:54:39.260 Oh,

00:54:39.520 they're very

00:54:39.920 mad at me.

00:54:40.640 Because if

00:54:41.060 you've noticed,

00:54:41.900 I am not a

00:54:42.600 doctor.

00:54:43.680 Apparently,

00:54:44.380 you can't

00:54:44.700 have doctor

00:54:45.460 related opinions

00:54:46.540 if you're not

00:54:47.080 one because

00:54:47.600 they'll be

00:54:47.960 pretty mad

00:54:48.660 at you.

00:54:49.420 Pretty mad.

00:54:50.840 But here's

00:54:51.220 what I've

00:54:51.480 learned.

00:54:51.720 The whole

00:54:53.360 question about

00:54:54.560 the seasonal

00:54:55.340 flu, the

00:54:56.060 regular flu,

00:54:57.380 killing 50,000

00:54:58.520 people a year,

00:54:59.380 which I am

00:55:00.240 skeptical of,

00:55:02.320 I've been

00:55:03.720 learning more

00:55:04.180 about that.

00:55:05.020 And when I

00:55:06.680 hear that

00:55:07.260 children were

00:55:08.820 dying from

00:55:09.420 it, I had

00:55:10.980 some questions.

00:55:12.380 And here's

00:55:12.800 what I've

00:55:13.100 learned.

00:55:14.240 That even

00:55:15.860 if you don't

00:55:16.620 have an

00:55:18.620 underlying

00:55:19.300 problem that

00:55:20.140 has a name

00:55:20.780 to it,

00:55:21.720 the regular

00:55:23.080 flu can

00:55:23.640 kill you

00:55:24.040 if you're

00:55:24.460 a child

00:55:24.860 under

00:55:25.340 specific

00:55:27.360 conditions.

00:55:28.520 And I

00:55:28.700 guess the

00:55:29.060 specific

00:55:29.480 condition is

00:55:30.280 a high

00:55:31.200 viral load

00:55:32.200 with some

00:55:33.420 kind of

00:55:33.800 difference in

00:55:34.380 the architecture

00:55:35.120 of your

00:55:35.640 lungs that

00:55:36.380 would make

00:55:36.780 you somewhat

00:55:37.280 unique,

00:55:38.640 and maybe

00:55:39.300 something about

00:55:40.060 the immune

00:55:40.620 system not

00:55:41.240 being developed,

00:55:42.100 I don't know

00:55:42.540 about that.

00:55:43.640 But that

00:55:44.540 there's

00:55:44.800 something

00:55:45.140 different about

00:55:46.060 the children

00:55:46.700 who die

00:55:47.260 from the

00:55:47.640 flu,

00:55:48.520 both in

00:55:49.440 exposure level

00:55:50.400 and architecture

00:55:51.820 of the

00:55:52.360 lungs.

00:55:53.580 Now,

00:55:54.780 that sort

00:55:55.280 of opens

00:55:55.860 up the

00:55:56.440 question of

00:55:57.000 what it

00:55:57.260 means to

00:55:57.700 be healthy.

00:55:59.140 What's the

00:55:59.580 definition?

00:56:00.900 Would that

00:56:01.360 be a

00:56:01.620 definition of

00:56:02.260 a healthy

00:56:02.800 child dying

00:56:04.460 from the

00:56:05.620 virus when

00:56:07.160 99.9% of

00:56:08.720 children don't

00:56:09.520 and don't

00:56:10.120 even get

00:56:10.520 close to

00:56:10.960 death?

00:56:12.120 So would

00:56:13.100 you say that

00:56:13.620 that's a

00:56:14.020 healthy child

00:56:14.700 when they

00:56:16.040 can't survive

00:56:16.840 the environment

00:56:17.900 that they

00:56:18.660 are meant

00:56:19.000 to be

00:56:19.300 in?

00:56:20.400 So if

00:56:21.480 you say

00:56:21.900 yes,

00:56:22.540 that kid

00:56:22.900 is completely

00:56:23.460 healthy,

00:56:24.020 because if

00:56:24.360 they didn't

00:56:24.740 have access

00:56:25.260 to this

00:56:25.720 virus,

00:56:27.000 they'd be

00:56:27.380 fine.

00:56:28.820 But what

00:56:29.400 would you

00:56:29.680 say about

00:56:30.020 a bubble

00:56:30.400 boy?

00:56:31.380 Somebody who,

00:56:32.240 if they

00:56:32.460 left their

00:56:32.900 bubble,

00:56:33.700 almost any

00:56:34.380 kind of

00:56:34.700 infection

00:56:35.080 would kill

00:56:35.500 them.

00:56:36.180 When they're

00:56:36.740 inside the

00:56:37.320 bubble,

00:56:37.680 do you call

00:56:38.040 them healthy?

00:56:39.940 Because they

00:56:40.560 are.

00:56:41.040 They could

00:56:41.420 live out

00:56:41.760 their whole

00:56:42.100 life without

00:56:43.760 a physical

00:56:45.560 problem if

00:56:46.460 they don't

00:56:46.800 get infected.

00:56:47.900 So is that

00:56:48.780 person healthy?

00:56:50.200 See, you can

00:56:50.800 see how the

00:56:51.480 definition of

00:56:52.420 what healthy

00:56:52.960 means is

00:56:54.560 driving the

00:56:55.340 discussion.

00:56:55.940 It's not about

00:56:56.540 what's happening,

00:56:58.000 it's about what

00:56:58.740 you insist is the

00:56:59.780 word you're going

00:57:00.380 to use.

00:57:01.100 That's word

00:57:01.660 thinking, I

00:57:02.300 call it.

00:57:03.320 It's people who

00:57:04.180 think they're

00:57:04.700 arguing, but

00:57:05.600 they're really

00:57:05.960 trying to hold

00:57:06.900 on to a

00:57:07.340 definition, or

00:57:08.780 win by defining

00:57:09.840 the word the

00:57:10.780 way that works

00:57:11.340 for them.

00:57:12.180 Here's my

00:57:12.740 definition of

00:57:13.400 healthy.

00:57:14.560 It's different

00:57:15.400 from the

00:57:15.900 medical definition.

00:57:16.840 It's more of a

00:57:17.540 common sense

00:57:18.140 definition.

00:57:18.860 It goes like

00:57:19.380 this.

00:57:20.280 If you are not

00:57:21.160 capable of

00:57:22.000 surviving the

00:57:24.120 environment for

00:57:25.060 which you are

00:57:25.720 naturally, you

00:57:27.240 know, you're

00:57:27.860 born into, such

00:57:29.700 as just living in

00:57:30.980 the atmosphere, I

00:57:33.440 don't know that I

00:57:34.000 would call that

00:57:34.460 healthy.

00:57:35.480 I would call that

00:57:36.200 somebody who has a

00:57:37.300 major health

00:57:37.980 problem, because

00:57:39.320 the normal

00:57:40.160 environment, operating

00:57:41.980 just the way you

00:57:42.760 think it will, will

00:57:44.300 kill them, but it

00:57:46.020 wouldn't kill 99.9%

00:57:47.700 of people who had

00:57:48.320 exactly the same

00:57:49.120 exposure.

00:57:50.340 I would call that

00:57:51.340 unhealthy, by

00:57:53.040 definition.

00:57:54.200 But, in a

00:57:55.220 medical sense, if

00:57:56.420 they have not been

00:57:57.000 exposed to the

00:57:57.840 thing that's going

00:57:58.380 to hurt them,

00:57:59.460 doctors are going

00:58:00.260 to say, no, that's

00:58:00.880 perfectly healthy, it's

00:58:01.780 the virus that killed

00:58:03.020 them.

00:58:04.840 That's kind of a

00:58:05.720 definitional problem,

00:58:06.920 isn't it?

00:58:07.660 Aren't we both

00:58:08.380 talking about the

00:58:09.180 same thing?

00:58:10.340 That you need the

00:58:11.060 virus, but you also

00:58:12.520 need the person to

00:58:13.480 have a specific

00:58:14.300 situation going

00:58:15.460 on.

00:58:17.100 And if you call

00:58:18.020 that specific

00:58:18.860 situation perfectly

00:58:20.160 healthy, it just

00:58:21.280 happens to cause you

00:58:22.340 to die if it comes

00:58:23.240 in contact with

00:58:24.480 something that is

00:58:25.160 commonly in your

00:58:26.100 environment, I'm

00:58:28.660 not sure I would

00:58:29.320 call that healthy.

00:58:31.520 So, I don't know

00:58:33.100 that there's a

00:58:33.660 disagreement about

00:58:34.620 that, other than

00:58:35.620 what word you want

00:58:36.620 to use for it.

00:58:37.760 But, on top of

00:58:38.680 that is the

00:58:39.280 question of why

00:58:40.220 we don't hear about

00:58:42.200 people dying of

00:58:43.700 the regular flu when

00:58:45.560 they're allegedly

00:58:46.400 dying in the same

00:58:47.420 numbers as people

00:58:48.960 who die from car

00:58:50.780 accidents and

00:58:51.540 overdoses, and we

00:58:52.400 hear about them all

00:58:53.020 the time.

00:58:53.840 We personally know

00:58:54.840 people who have

00:58:55.300 died from those

00:58:55.920 other things.

00:58:56.960 Almost every adult

00:58:57.760 does.

00:58:58.900 But I don't know

00:58:59.580 anybody who died

00:59:00.220 in regular flu.

00:59:02.380 So, then somebody

00:59:05.780 on social media

00:59:06.740 said, Scott, you're

00:59:08.420 finally on our side

00:59:09.360 now.

00:59:10.060 We've been saying

00:59:10.800 the same thing

00:59:11.580 about coronavirus,

00:59:13.420 that the way it's

00:59:14.580 counted is probably

00:59:15.400 wrong.

00:59:16.320 To which I say,

00:59:17.500 boop, boop, wait

00:59:18.660 a minute.

00:59:19.840 No, I'm making

00:59:20.880 the opposite

00:59:21.660 point.

00:59:23.380 Completely opposite

00:59:24.360 point.

00:59:25.400 If you think that

00:59:26.500 me questioning the

00:59:27.740 statistics of

00:59:28.740 regular seasonal

00:59:30.020 flu is sort of

00:59:31.880 the same argument

00:59:32.720 as the people who

00:59:34.120 are questioning the

00:59:34.840 number of people

00:59:35.400 dying from

00:59:36.080 coronavirus, you

00:59:37.260 have 100%

00:59:38.020 backwards.

00:59:39.540 They're opposites.

00:59:41.680 The question is,

00:59:43.120 why does my

00:59:43.700 observation as

00:59:44.960 just living in the

00:59:45.780 world not agree

00:59:47.400 with the science?

00:59:49.000 In the case of

00:59:49.900 the normal flu,

00:59:51.200 there's a

00:59:51.820 disagreement.

00:59:52.580 My observation is

00:59:53.760 I haven't seen

00:59:54.360 anybody die of

00:59:55.080 regular flu.

00:59:56.600 Now, I'm not

00:59:57.340 saying that children

00:59:57.960 haven't died.

00:59:58.800 There are enough

00:59:59.180 reports that that's

00:59:59.980 obviously true.

01:00:01.340 But, how come I

01:00:04.360 have so many

01:00:05.080 examples of COVID?

01:00:07.700 I observe people

01:00:08.760 I know who know

01:00:09.600 other people, etc.

01:00:10.380 who have really

01:00:11.380 died of COVID,

01:00:12.440 and there are

01:00:12.940 half a million

01:00:13.480 of them.

01:00:14.420 In the case of

01:00:15.240 COVID, the science

01:00:16.200 says a whole bunch

01:00:17.160 of people are

01:00:17.620 dying.

01:00:18.820 My observation is

01:00:20.520 that a whole bunch

01:00:21.480 of people are

01:00:21.940 dying.

01:00:22.760 Completely

01:00:23.200 compatible.

01:00:24.840 Observation and

01:00:26.320 scientific opinion

01:00:27.440 totally match.

01:00:29.580 Now, that doesn't

01:00:30.220 mean they're both

01:00:30.740 right, but at least

01:00:32.320 they match.

01:00:33.520 In the regular

01:00:34.480 flu deaths, my

01:00:35.840 observation is

01:00:36.780 nowhere near the

01:00:38.380 scientific opinion.

01:00:40.340 That's the problem.

01:00:42.040 I'm not making a

01:00:42.880 statement about

01:00:44.080 what the answer is

01:00:45.400 to unravel that.

01:00:46.760 It's a question.

01:00:47.660 It's a legitimate

01:00:48.540 question, meaning I

01:00:50.120 don't have the answer

01:00:51.040 and I'm not telling

01:00:52.460 you that the question

01:00:53.580 tells you what to

01:00:55.120 think about the

01:00:56.060 answer.

01:00:57.040 If you jump to a

01:00:58.620 conclusion because I

01:00:59.720 ask a question,

01:01:01.000 that's sort of on you

01:01:02.080 because I'm not

01:01:03.420 jumping to any

01:01:04.000 conclusions.

01:01:04.420 I actually don't

01:01:05.560 know why this

01:01:07.320 mystery endures,

01:01:08.580 that the observation

01:01:09.880 and the science

01:01:10.640 don't match.

01:01:13.720 All right, so

01:01:14.620 let's see, what

01:01:19.020 else have we got

01:01:19.520 here?

01:01:20.380 Let me ask you this

01:01:21.220 question just to make

01:01:22.120 it more provocative.

01:01:25.180 If somebody has an

01:01:26.560 allergy to peanuts,

01:01:28.700 allergy to peanuts,

01:01:31.080 and they go forth in

01:01:32.740 the world and they

01:01:33.500 encounter some

01:01:34.260 peanuts and they

01:01:35.540 die, what does the

01:01:37.960 death certificate say

01:01:39.500 if you are allergic

01:01:41.900 to peanuts, you're

01:01:42.820 exposed to them and

01:01:43.560 then you die?

01:01:45.960 Would the death

01:01:47.540 certificate say killed

01:01:49.420 by peanuts?

01:01:51.240 What do you think?

01:01:52.580 Would the death

01:01:53.140 certificate say that?

01:01:54.380 Killed by peanuts.

01:01:55.900 Cause of death?

01:01:57.420 Peanuts.

01:01:59.480 No.

01:02:00.040 No.

01:02:01.380 No.

01:02:02.360 But if you got exposed

01:02:04.000 to the virus, let's

01:02:05.560 say the regular

01:02:06.160 seasonal virus, the

01:02:07.700 cause of death would

01:02:08.520 be the virus.

01:02:10.680 But why isn't the

01:02:11.800 cause of death with

01:02:12.720 the peanut the

01:02:14.300 peanut?

01:02:18.100 And the answer to

01:02:20.480 what the death

01:02:21.980 certificate says is

01:02:23.120 anaphylexic, if I'm

01:02:25.180 saying it right,

01:02:25.840 anaphylactic shock,

01:02:27.360 right?

01:02:27.580 That's what the death

01:02:28.280 death certificate would

01:02:28.960 say.

01:02:29.800 Now, you need both

01:02:31.880 the person to have a

01:02:33.580 biological genetic

01:02:36.200 propensity and that

01:02:38.580 you also need the

01:02:39.520 peanut.

01:02:40.400 If you only have one

01:02:41.860 or the other, the

01:02:42.720 person is alive.

01:02:44.520 Both situations.

01:02:46.080 Gotta have a peanut.

01:02:47.660 Gotta have a natural

01:02:49.100 reaction to it.

01:02:52.640 How's that different

01:02:53.580 from the virus?

01:02:54.360 If you only have the

01:02:56.680 virus and 99.9% of

01:03:00.460 the people, let's say

01:03:01.280 the seasonal virus, not

01:03:02.760 the coronavirus.

01:03:03.880 If you only have the

01:03:04.800 seasonal virus and your

01:03:06.900 body is like 99.9% of

01:03:09.240 all other bodies, no

01:03:11.340 problem.

01:03:12.700 It's only when you have

01:03:13.600 both situations, a

01:03:15.040 virus plus a body that

01:03:17.820 by its design or nature

01:03:20.780 can't handle it.

01:03:22.140 So, in one case, you

01:03:24.320 say the cause of death

01:03:25.320 is the virus.

01:03:26.400 In the other case, you

01:03:27.460 say it's the reaction to

01:03:29.300 the virus based on peanut

01:03:31.400 plus whatever you

01:03:32.760 naturally have going on.

01:03:34.520 You see that they're

01:03:35.380 handled differently,

01:03:36.300 right?

01:03:37.180 Now, my only point is

01:03:39.420 we're talking about

01:03:40.440 definitions of words.

01:03:42.780 It's not, maybe, not a

01:03:45.720 real argument.

01:03:46.340 All right.

01:03:50.280 Analogy.

01:03:51.540 Now, an analogy, an

01:03:54.680 analogy can help you

01:03:56.020 understand a concept, which

01:03:58.660 is what I just did.

01:04:00.060 It doesn't help you win

01:04:01.600 an argument.

01:04:02.960 So, it would not be

01:04:04.240 true that, therefore,

01:04:05.960 peanuts are handled this

01:04:06.940 way.

01:04:07.240 Therefore, I'm right about

01:04:08.320 viruses.

01:04:09.140 That would be irrational

01:04:10.220 because it's just two

01:04:11.520 different situations.

01:04:12.380 But, if the peanut thing

01:04:14.840 makes you ask the

01:04:15.760 question, hey, if you

01:04:18.040 need two things, the

01:04:20.280 peanut and the person

01:04:21.820 being in a special

01:04:22.680 situation, it helps you

01:04:25.620 think differently about

01:04:26.700 the other one.

01:04:27.540 So, helping you think

01:04:28.420 differently is what it

01:04:29.280 does.

01:04:29.700 It doesn't, it's not

01:04:30.580 like a reason.

01:04:32.500 So, that's the

01:04:34.520 difference.

01:04:35.760 Why doesn't pointing

01:04:36.880 out hypocrisy work?

01:04:38.620 I don't know the answer

01:04:39.620 to that, except I'll

01:04:41.420 speculate.

01:04:42.380 And, I've said

01:04:43.300 forever that pointing

01:04:44.460 out somebody's

01:04:45.200 hypocrisy never makes

01:04:46.600 them change their

01:04:47.240 mind.

01:04:48.180 And, the reason is

01:04:49.300 they know they're

01:04:49.880 doing it.

01:04:51.020 So, the people who

01:04:52.100 are being hypocritical,

01:04:53.940 they know they're

01:04:54.600 being hypocritical.

01:04:55.900 They're doing it

01:04:56.660 because they're taking

01:04:57.560 a side.

01:04:58.420 They're on a team.

01:04:59.660 So, if you point

01:05:00.620 out to somebody, hey,

01:05:02.280 you're being

01:05:03.020 hypocritical, you're

01:05:04.820 not telling them

01:05:05.460 something they don't

01:05:06.200 know.

01:05:07.340 You have not

01:05:08.360 introduced new

01:05:09.480 information.

01:05:11.020 They're never

01:05:11.820 meant to be

01:05:12.540 serious.

01:05:13.600 They're just

01:05:14.400 making an argument

01:05:16.100 because they think

01:05:16.880 it might work.

01:05:18.440 That's all.

01:05:19.540 That's all.

01:05:21.020 So, yeah, hypocrisy,

01:05:22.860 pointing it out, will

01:05:23.620 never change anybody's

01:05:24.580 opinion.

01:05:25.040 I've never seen it.

01:05:25.920 Have you?

01:05:26.800 Have you ever seen

01:05:27.480 anybody change their

01:05:28.280 opinion because somebody

01:05:29.260 said, hey, you're a

01:05:30.000 hypocrite?

01:05:30.640 And then the person

01:05:31.460 says, oh, yeah.

01:05:32.860 Yeah, yeah, I hadn't

01:05:35.140 really looked at it

01:05:35.840 that way, but now

01:05:37.320 that you mentioned

01:05:37.880 it, I'm a hypocrite.

01:05:39.860 I changed my mind.

01:05:41.740 I think I'll not be

01:05:42.620 a hypocrite.

01:05:43.220 No.

01:05:44.180 They will immediately

01:05:44.960 tell you the situations

01:05:46.160 are different.

01:05:47.400 That's it.

01:05:48.580 They'll just say, ah,

01:05:49.220 it's a different

01:05:49.600 situation.

01:05:50.260 I'm not a hypocrite.

01:05:52.700 Did the butter kill

01:05:53.500 the man with the

01:05:54.640 heart attack?

01:05:57.180 Butter's good for you.

01:05:58.180 You have to use a

01:05:58.780 better example.

01:05:59.340 We used to think

01:06:02.280 butter was bad, but

01:06:03.440 we learned it is not.

01:06:05.000 I believe that's the

01:06:05.880 current, the current

01:06:06.980 science is that butter

01:06:08.540 is not bad for you.

01:06:14.220 All right.

01:06:16.780 Like eating meat, but

01:06:18.080 being against killing

01:06:19.020 giraffes is hypocrisy.

01:06:21.420 Yeah, so I don't eat

01:06:22.600 meat, so I can say

01:06:23.980 anything I want about

01:06:24.800 giraffes.

01:06:25.220 But I don't think that

01:06:26.600 the game hunting and

01:06:29.160 big game hunting and

01:06:30.640 killing animals for

01:06:32.240 food, that is not

01:06:34.560 the same thing.

01:06:37.260 Yeah.

01:06:37.900 I could certainly

01:06:38.720 understand that you

01:06:39.720 have to kill something

01:06:41.600 to eat.

01:06:42.900 That's different.

01:06:48.320 No meat for you?

01:06:49.680 Why?

01:06:50.240 The only reason I

01:06:50.900 don't eat meat is

01:06:52.320 because I don't digest

01:06:53.480 it well.

01:06:54.780 I do eat some fish,

01:06:56.180 but I don't love it.

01:06:57.080 I just do it for the

01:06:57.880 health benefits.

01:07:00.020 All right.

01:07:01.720 Somebody says,

01:07:02.720 big game hunting

01:07:03.540 supports big game.

01:07:04.820 Well, the experts,

01:07:05.900 based on reading about

01:07:07.720 it this morning,

01:07:09.200 a lot of experts are

01:07:10.380 saying that that is a

01:07:11.560 ridiculous argument

01:07:12.980 and that big game

01:07:14.160 hunting does not

01:07:15.160 support big game.

01:07:17.200 There's an argument

01:07:18.100 that it does,

01:07:19.240 but smart people say

01:07:20.560 that's a ridiculous

01:07:21.200 argument.

01:07:22.900 I don't know who's

01:07:23.840 right, but it doesn't

01:07:25.000 sound like a good

01:07:25.820 argument to me.

01:07:26.580 somebody says,

01:07:30.480 let's see,

01:07:31.640 Robo Steve says,

01:07:32.880 Scott,

01:07:33.360 tying himself in

01:07:34.200 knots,

01:07:34.680 trying to defend

01:07:35.460 his nonsense.

01:07:36.720 Is that a reason?

01:07:38.500 Is that a good

01:07:39.540 comment right there?

01:07:41.920 Tying myself in

01:07:42.960 knots,

01:07:43.700 trying to defend

01:07:44.380 my reasons.

01:07:45.560 Let me tell you,

01:07:46.560 if you think,

01:07:48.920 let me ask the rest

01:07:50.280 of you here.

01:07:51.420 Many of you disagree

01:07:52.400 with me on lots

01:07:53.940 of different things,

01:07:55.080 which is part of the

01:07:56.140 fun of coming here,

01:07:57.260 right?

01:07:57.500 If you agreed with me

01:07:58.720 all the time,

01:07:59.220 I don't know,

01:07:59.580 it would be as much

01:08:00.200 fun.

01:08:01.200 But would you say,

01:08:03.420 for the benefit of

01:08:04.540 Steve here,

01:08:05.760 that even when you

01:08:07.040 disagree with me,

01:08:08.580 am I irrational

01:08:09.680 often?

01:08:11.040 Are my arguments

01:08:12.180 unreasonable?

01:08:14.680 Even when you

01:08:15.440 disagree with me,

01:08:16.900 don't you think that

01:08:17.880 at least the arguments

01:08:19.080 got some merit?

01:08:19.940 I mean,

01:08:20.340 you might think

01:08:20.760 I have a fact

01:08:21.460 wrong,

01:08:22.080 or maybe you

01:08:22.980 think I haven't

01:08:24.020 considered everything.

01:08:26.120 But do you think

01:08:26.740 my arguments

01:08:27.680 are twisted

01:08:28.780 in pretzels?

01:08:33.540 It's hard to know

01:08:34.520 based on the comments

01:08:35.400 whether people

01:08:35.980 just agree with me

01:08:37.080 and so therefore

01:08:38.060 I look brilliant.

01:08:39.360 If you agree

01:08:40.340 with somebody,

01:08:40.980 they look brilliant

01:08:41.720 in general.

01:08:43.420 Yeah,

01:08:43.740 I would like to

01:08:44.440 suggest that

01:08:45.440 whoever says

01:08:46.060 I'm tying myself

01:08:47.100 in pretzels

01:08:48.500 with my argument

01:08:49.440 I'm not saying

01:08:51.380 I'm right all

01:08:52.060 the time

01:08:52.480 or anything

01:08:53.400 like that.

01:08:54.580 But I don't

01:08:55.280 think you'll find

01:08:55.920 the arguments

01:08:56.480 are too irrational.

01:08:57.900 And when they

01:08:58.320 are,

01:08:58.640 people point it

01:08:59.240 out and

01:08:59.700 sometimes I

01:09:00.400 adjust.

01:09:02.060 All right.

01:09:06.580 Somebody says,

01:09:07.500 sometimes you can

01:09:08.200 say,

01:09:08.560 maybe I got that

01:09:09.320 wrong though.

01:09:10.000 That flu thing

01:09:10.860 was like a pretzel.

01:09:12.460 Well,

01:09:12.700 give me an example.

01:09:13.380 See,

01:09:14.700 here's my contention

01:09:15.980 that those of you

01:09:17.240 who are having

01:09:17.880 the,

01:09:18.920 and whoever says

01:09:19.800 sophistry as well,

01:09:21.260 those of you who

01:09:21.980 say that's sophistry

01:09:22.940 or you're twisted

01:09:24.860 in pretzels,

01:09:26.160 my observation

01:09:27.340 of living life

01:09:28.740 and being a

01:09:29.800 trained hypnotist

01:09:30.700 is that those

01:09:31.640 people are experiencing

01:09:32.860 cognitive dissonance.

01:09:35.060 And that's what it,

01:09:35.900 exactly what it

01:09:36.700 feels like.

01:09:37.740 So if your,

01:09:38.640 if your take

01:09:41.340 on my argument

01:09:42.160 was,

01:09:43.040 well,

01:09:43.280 I understand

01:09:43.820 your argument,

01:09:44.660 Scott,

01:09:45.280 but I disagree

01:09:46.340 with it because

01:09:47.320 of this reason

01:09:48.400 or this fact

01:09:49.340 or this priority,

01:09:51.900 you probably

01:09:52.620 are not experiencing

01:09:53.680 cognitive dissonance.

01:09:55.220 You're a person

01:09:55.780 with a different

01:09:56.300 opinion.

01:09:57.680 If you listen

01:09:58.880 to my opinion

01:09:59.600 on the regular

01:10:00.500 flu stuff

01:10:01.180 and you concluded

01:10:02.360 that it didn't

01:10:02.920 make sense,

01:10:04.600 that it was all

01:10:05.120 like pretzely

01:10:05.920 and sophistry,

01:10:07.340 you are almost

01:10:09.540 certainly experiencing

01:10:10.580 cognitive dissonance.

01:10:12.260 And the reason

01:10:12.640 I point that out

01:10:13.500 is look at

01:10:14.540 the other people's

01:10:15.460 comments.

01:10:16.620 When you see,

01:10:17.560 let's say,

01:10:18.400 I'll just pick a number

01:10:19.360 for arguments,

01:10:20.180 75% of the people

01:10:21.580 say,

01:10:22.420 I completely

01:10:23.000 understand your

01:10:23.820 argument,

01:10:25.020 even if I don't

01:10:25.780 agree with it.

01:10:26.760 And then 25%

01:10:28.060 say,

01:10:29.080 I think your

01:10:29.760 argument is

01:10:30.400 pretzel logic

01:10:31.460 and sophistry.

01:10:33.620 Almost always

01:10:34.580 you can depend

01:10:35.280 on those people

01:10:36.240 being the

01:10:36.660 cognitive dissonance

01:10:37.340 dissonance ones

01:10:38.340 and the people

01:10:39.360 who say,

01:10:39.900 I see the

01:10:40.340 argument but

01:10:41.060 sometimes I

01:10:41.760 disagree with it,

01:10:42.500 this reason or

01:10:43.340 that.

01:10:44.220 Probably just

01:10:44.860 different opinions.

01:10:46.740 Alright.

01:10:47.540 So,

01:10:48.160 that's all I

01:10:48.720 got for you.

01:10:50.260 And now,

01:10:51.720 I take my

01:10:52.860 leave and I

01:10:53.500 will talk to you

01:10:53.920 tomorrow.

01:10:54.820 Bye for now.

01:10:56.820 Alright,

01:10:57.460 YouTubers,

01:10:58.140 I've got an

01:10:58.400 extra minute.

01:10:59.180 By the way,

01:10:59.620 on YouTube,

01:11:00.380 I'll just

01:11:01.880 tell you guys,

01:11:03.000 I created

01:11:03.540 yesterday on

01:11:04.380 the Locals

01:11:05.340 platform,

01:11:06.520 subscription

01:11:07.040 service,

01:11:08.200 a lesson on

01:11:09.300 how to become

01:11:09.780 a cartoonist.

01:11:11.000 Now,

01:11:11.280 separately,

01:11:11.820 I'll do a

01:11:12.160 lesson on

01:11:12.560 how to draw

01:11:13.200 a cartoon,

01:11:14.180 but the

01:11:14.660 business side

01:11:15.760 and what tools

01:11:16.460 to use and

01:11:17.080 how to think

01:11:17.560 about it and

01:11:18.100 how to break

01:11:18.540 into the

01:11:18.880 business and

01:11:19.560 sort of the

01:11:20.580 general setup

01:11:21.680 of how someone

01:11:23.120 would become a

01:11:23.820 cartoonist is

01:11:24.940 now on the

01:11:25.580 Locals platform,

01:11:27.260 Locals.com,

01:11:28.160 just search for

01:11:28.720 my name.

01:11:29.840 And the

01:11:31.440 reason I did

01:11:32.020 it is not

01:11:32.500 because I think

01:11:33.100 a lot of

01:11:33.500 people want

01:11:33.920 to become

01:11:34.280 cartoonists.

01:11:35.920 What you'll

01:11:36.540 find is a

01:11:37.060 whole lot of

01:11:37.560 non-obvious

01:11:38.720 suggestions,

01:11:40.760 which I think

01:11:41.300 you'll find

01:11:41.760 interesting,

01:11:43.300 just the

01:11:43.680 non-obvious

01:11:44.240 ones.

01:11:45.000 And it'll

01:11:45.720 also give

01:11:46.140 you an idea

01:11:46.620 about breaking

01:11:47.460 into any

01:11:48.200 kind of field

01:11:48.860 that is

01:11:49.800 unfamiliar.

01:11:51.600 So if you

01:11:52.200 look at the

01:11:52.640 concepts that

01:11:54.220 I talk about

01:11:54.880 with cartooning,

01:11:55.860 really?

01:11:56.040 Richard McCarthy,

01:11:59.660 did you really

01:12:00.160 just send me

01:12:00.600 $100?

01:12:02.040 You're a

01:12:02.840 saint.

01:12:05.020 You know,

01:12:05.700 I have to

01:12:06.240 say that it's

01:12:08.120 weird.

01:12:08.640 No, it would

01:12:09.640 not be telling

01:12:10.220 you something

01:12:10.600 you don't know

01:12:11.280 that I'm rich.

01:12:13.920 The Dilbert

01:12:14.600 cartoon did a

01:12:16.140 good job for

01:12:16.700 me.

01:12:17.640 And I don't

01:12:18.480 do this because

01:12:20.060 of the money,

01:12:21.400 right?

01:12:21.740 But I do

01:12:22.140 monetize.

01:12:23.060 I do monetize.

01:12:24.040 And that does

01:12:25.120 make me work

01:12:25.760 harder.

01:12:26.380 I'm pretty

01:12:26.700 sure that I

01:12:27.180 do more

01:12:27.560 work because

01:12:29.080 it's monetized.

01:12:30.040 Actually, I'm

01:12:30.700 positive.

01:12:31.340 There's no

01:12:31.700 doubt about

01:12:32.140 it.

01:12:32.700 I do way

01:12:33.480 more effort

01:12:34.240 and put

01:12:35.040 more into

01:12:35.600 it because

01:12:36.680 it's monetized

01:12:37.600 even if I

01:12:38.180 don't need

01:12:38.520 the money.

01:12:39.620 So when

01:12:41.920 I just saw

01:12:43.700 that notice

01:12:44.600 come in

01:12:45.040 that somebody

01:12:45.540 just gave

01:12:46.320 me $100.

01:12:47.480 I don't

01:12:48.080 know why

01:12:48.580 exactly,

01:12:49.240 but I did

01:12:49.740 something that

01:12:50.640 somebody said

01:12:51.440 that's worth

01:12:52.620 $100.

01:12:53.820 And I got

01:12:54.560 to say that

01:12:55.540 while I

01:12:55.900 don't need

01:12:56.360 $100

01:12:56.740 that you

01:12:58.300 made my

01:12:58.920 day because

01:13:00.460 I just

01:13:01.200 feel like a

01:13:01.880 compliment.

01:13:03.260 But a

01:13:04.520 compliment with

01:13:05.260 money, that's

01:13:07.100 a real

01:13:07.360 compliment.

01:13:08.480 You don't

01:13:09.040 have to

01:13:09.380 wonder if

01:13:09.800 it's

01:13:09.980 insincere.

01:13:10.960 It's $100.

01:13:12.100 That's

01:13:12.480 sincere.

01:13:13.400 So thank

01:13:14.020 you for

01:13:14.280 that.

01:13:14.500 That actually

01:13:15.060 moved me

01:13:16.480 because it's

01:13:18.440 just a vote

01:13:19.300 of confidence

01:13:19.800 and I

01:13:20.180 appreciate it.

01:13:20.740 I appreciate

01:13:21.760 it very

01:13:22.220 much.

01:13:22.880 And I'm

01:13:23.060 going to

01:13:23.220 end on

01:13:23.540 that happy

01:13:24.500 note.

01:13:24.860 So thank

01:13:25.200 you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 24, 2021

Episode 1295 Scott Adams： The Ongoing Disinformation Campaign Against the American Public, and Tiger Too

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript