Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1306 Scott Adams： Stimulus Package Shenanigans, Voting Changes, Super Anti-Racists, and Robot Lovers

00:00:00.000 All right, here's a little quiz for you. What is the best part of the day? Go. That's right. That's right. You all got it right. It's this. This is the best part of the day.

00:00:13.380 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and even Jack Posobiec knows it's the best part of the day, as he just logged in. And if you would like to enjoy this to the maximum possible potential, and why wouldn't you, really? Why wouldn't you?

00:00:29.160 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now. Go.

00:00:54.320 Ah, Dr. Funk Juice. Good to see you.

00:00:59.160 Well, we got some fun stories today. Now, they're not good, exciting stories like Trump stories, but they're pretty good. They're pretty good. Would you like to hear some of them? I know you would.

00:01:12.140 Number one, I have a movie recommendation for you, a documentary called The Accidental President. You can find it on Amazon Prime and probably at least one other place, I think.

00:01:24.680 The documentary by James Fletcher, who I believe is married to Brooke Baldwin, had been from CNN. But surprisingly, surprisingly, it's pretty fair.

00:01:39.120 And I'm in it, so I'm a little bit biased because I'm in it. But the interesting part is that this documentary was, at least the film of it, was put together a few years ago.

00:01:54.460 And it was talking about how Trump ended up winning. And the theme is that he wasn't necessarily expecting to win, but it just sort of happened.

00:02:04.480 But you should hear the commentary on it. It's pretty good. The Accidental President. All right.

00:02:13.120 Cuomo's up to five accusers if you watch Fox News, and he's up to three accusers if you watch CNN.

00:02:19.980 What? What? You can't even get the number of accusers right?

00:02:27.960 Now, if you get to three, there should be some sort of universal law about this.

00:02:34.320 It goes like this. If you get to three accusers, there are five.

00:02:40.740 In the history of sexual harassment, nobody ever stopped at three.

00:02:50.500 Pretty sure.

00:02:51.940 Like, if you were accused of one, and then no other person came forward,

00:02:57.080 you might say to yourself, well, that's a little less credible because

00:03:00.400 do harassers only ever harass one person?

00:03:04.360 But once you get to three, it's going to go to five.

00:03:11.180 That's like a universal rule.

00:03:13.120 I'll tell you my take on all of this.

00:03:15.580 All of these accusations, they seem to fall into this category.

00:03:20.740 Have you noticed that?

00:03:23.000 And the category is, and I'm going to say this,

00:03:26.020 I think I can say this without being racist.

00:03:29.700 I think, but give me a ruling on this.

00:03:33.380 See if this sounds racist to you, okay?

00:03:36.900 That what I'm seeing is a creepy old Italian-American guy

00:03:41.220 with no game whatsoever,

00:03:43.140 has no idea how to approach women, apparently.

00:03:47.840 But he definitely took advantage of his power differential,

00:03:54.340 meaning that he didn't directly use it,

00:03:58.360 but it was there.

00:04:00.500 It's unambiguously there.

00:04:02.960 So he certainly has to answer for this.

00:04:05.240 I don't want to say anything that sounds like I'm apologizing for it,

00:04:09.060 but we should keep it in perspective.

00:04:14.660 Certainly he needs to not be doing this stuff.

00:04:18.340 There's no question about that.

00:04:20.500 But it doesn't feel...

00:04:22.740 It feels like a guy who didn't exactly know what he was doing.

00:04:28.560 Doesn't it?

00:04:29.700 Like maybe on some level he did,

00:04:32.320 but there's something a little bit clueless about it

00:04:39.000 that makes it seem different than evil.

00:04:41.320 You know, if you look at the Epstein charges

00:04:44.320 or the Weinstein charges, Harvey Weinstein,

00:04:48.100 it's obvious that those guys knew exactly what they were doing.

00:04:52.660 I mean, they knew they were being deeply bad.

00:04:56.080 And no question about it.

00:04:57.760 But I'll bet you if you had a private conversation with Cuomo

00:05:01.660 before these scandals broke,

00:05:03.560 and you said, have you ever done anything like this?

00:05:06.600 I think he would have honestly answered no,

00:05:10.200 even though he did.

00:05:11.640 And I mean, the accusations look credible anyway.

00:05:16.240 I feel it's just a weird category

00:05:18.420 where the person doing the crime

00:05:20.280 is not necessarily aware that they're doing a crime,

00:05:24.140 which doesn't make it excusable, right?

00:05:27.260 The system is very clear.

00:05:29.920 You don't have to be aware of it being a crime

00:05:32.100 for it to be a crime.

00:05:32.960 But it should end his political career,

00:05:37.520 which is the only thing anybody cared about, really, on this.

00:05:44.040 Here's what I think we should do in the United States.

00:05:48.500 Every time we hear about people coming across our border,

00:05:53.660 don't they seem to be coming from the same countries?

00:05:56.700 Yeah, people are talking about Cuomo's cover-up

00:06:03.200 with the nursing homes and stuff.

00:06:06.440 That's just a different issue.

00:06:09.160 That's not excusable.

00:06:11.100 Not that the other one is.

00:06:12.440 It's just a different issue.

00:06:13.980 So here's what we should do.

00:06:16.440 We should be like Costa Rica.

00:06:19.120 Have you noticed that when we talk about

00:06:20.860 the illegal immigration coming across our southern border,

00:06:25.000 nobody ever says

00:06:27.220 all those Costa Ricans are coming across.

00:06:31.160 Have you ever noticed that?

00:06:33.400 Why not?

00:06:35.000 I mean, if Nicaraguans are coming

00:06:37.220 and other countries are coming,

00:06:40.480 why is Costa Rica not coming?

00:06:43.020 Well, I think the answer is that Costa Rica

00:06:45.100 is a successful country.

00:06:47.840 And if you haven't checked into

00:06:49.420 how they became a successful country,

00:06:52.020 it's a pretty cool story.

00:06:55.720 And the answer is that,

00:06:58.080 well, number one,

00:06:59.180 and this is sort of a questionable decision,

00:07:02.340 but it seems to have worked out,

00:07:04.280 they decided to not exploit

00:07:08.380 what probably they have

00:07:10.380 in terms of new natural resources,

00:07:12.300 oil, maybe gas or something.

00:07:14.120 But they've decided not to be that kind of an industry

00:07:17.080 and become a vacation destination.

00:07:19.960 So if you have a waiter or a bartender in Costa Rica,

00:07:24.540 I've had the pleasure of being there once,

00:07:27.300 if you have a waiter or a bartender in Costa Rica,

00:07:30.300 that person went to college

00:07:32.260 to be a waiter or a bartender.

00:07:35.380 Now, not college, college,

00:07:37.380 like maybe you're used to it in the United States,

00:07:40.080 but there is a very well-organized training thing.

00:07:43.780 I think you learn English as well.

00:07:46.960 And so the service is extraordinary.

00:07:49.180 And Costa Rica is in pretty good shape.

00:07:51.500 So you don't see a lot of people coming over.

00:07:53.360 But I think we could borrow that idea,

00:07:55.800 especially as robots are taking jobs

00:07:59.080 and a lot of unskilled labor

00:08:00.900 is going to need a place to thrive.

00:08:04.180 I think we should build,

00:08:05.160 I've said this before,

00:08:05.940 I'll just combine two ideas,

00:08:07.380 a network of bicycle paths across the country.

00:08:11.720 There is actually a private effort to do that,

00:08:16.080 but it's sort of one route

00:08:18.000 in the northern part of the country.

00:08:20.060 I'd like to see the whole country have bicycle paths.

00:08:23.560 So you could basically go from anywhere to anywhere

00:08:25.940 without going through traffic to get there.

00:08:28.380 And make the USA a bicycle travel destination.

00:08:33.300 Because building the paths will require labor

00:08:36.240 as well as maintaining them,

00:08:38.860 as well as providing services and food

00:08:42.340 and bike repair along the way, etc.

00:08:44.340 So it should create a lot of jobs.

00:08:46.100 But the other thing you could do

00:08:47.040 is create a network of canals.

00:08:49.760 Maybe you do it at the same time.

00:08:52.040 Maybe you put the bicycle path on the side of the canal.

00:08:55.460 But the way to build the canal,

00:08:58.040 if you had some big machine

00:08:59.820 like Elon Musk's boring company,

00:09:02.980 B-O-R-I-N-G,

00:09:04.720 because it bores tunnels,

00:09:06.240 it shouldn't be that hard to make one of those

00:09:08.780 that bores a canal, right?

00:09:11.660 To make a canal.

00:09:13.200 So if you had big equipment

00:09:15.040 that could just sort of make a canal.

00:09:17.360 And then the other thing Elon Musk talked about,

00:09:19.540 and I don't know how far he got along in this,

00:09:22.080 but using the dirt that is dug by the boring device

00:09:25.540 to press bricks on site

00:09:28.840 so that you're actually building...

00:09:31.380 Yeah, there's obviously...

00:09:36.100 You have to work out the sea level plan, etc.

00:09:39.300 Right?

00:09:39.880 So you couldn't put a canal just anywhere.

00:09:42.520 You'd have to have just the right place.

00:09:44.020 That's true.

00:09:45.260 Now, if you had canals,

00:09:48.740 and those canals,

00:09:50.180 when their dog built bricks,

00:09:51.820 and those bricks become maybe housing

00:09:54.600 on the sides of the canals,

00:09:56.920 and then here's another thing

00:09:58.560 that I heard of today.

00:09:59.660 I'd never heard of this before,

00:10:00.960 but apparently one of the problems

00:10:03.120 with traveling to the United States

00:10:05.120 is if you get sick.

00:10:07.860 If you get sick in the United States

00:10:09.780 and you're from another country,

00:10:11.320 you don't have health care coverage.

00:10:13.340 So apparently there's some kind of insurance

00:10:17.300 you can buy just for traveling.

00:10:19.860 Some kind of health care insurance,

00:10:21.460 and it's pretty expensive.

00:10:22.900 So there are a whole bunch of things

00:10:24.180 we could do as a country

00:10:25.280 to make it easier and better

00:10:27.640 for somebody to take a vacation here.

00:10:29.880 Now, if this had been our big industry

00:10:31.740 when the coronavirus hit,

00:10:33.200 we'd be in big trouble.

00:10:36.720 But I still think travel and recreation

00:10:40.860 are always going to be big.

00:10:41.840 So I'll just put that out there.

00:10:44.180 And then Costa Rica makes a big deal

00:10:46.580 about keeping the water and air clean

00:10:48.540 to keep tourism up,

00:10:51.520 and we would have the same impulse.

00:10:53.480 We'd want to keep the air and water

00:10:54.680 as clean as possible.

00:10:56.700 So I'll just put that out there.

00:10:58.780 So the stimulus package

00:11:00.480 got passed by the Senate,

00:11:01.840 but now it goes back to the House

00:11:04.300 to get a final final.

00:11:07.800 And I see all these people

00:11:09.080 arguing about the amount of the debt.

00:11:12.760 And what the debt should have been.

00:11:14.500 And people saying,

00:11:15.160 instead of 1.9,

00:11:17.260 why didn't we make it 1.4?

00:11:21.220 Nobody knows what the right amount of debt is.

00:11:24.620 That's not really a thing.

00:11:26.540 If you're arguing with any kind of certainty

00:11:28.980 about what the number should have been,

00:11:31.720 I don't think that you have any standing.

00:11:35.500 There's nobody who knows

00:11:36.540 what is the right amount

00:11:38.180 and when to do it

00:11:39.640 and what happens in the long term

00:11:41.760 and how do we pay down the debt

00:11:43.300 and can we just print money

00:11:44.860 and can we inflate it away?

00:11:47.780 Nobody knows any of that.

00:11:49.400 It's just completely unknowable.

00:11:52.140 So I do understand that more debt seems worse,

00:11:55.660 but it just hasn't worked out that way.

00:11:59.840 Observation has not matched the theory.

00:12:04.940 So I would just say

00:12:07.220 having a firm opinion on the debt

00:12:10.040 is a dicey situation now

00:12:12.300 because even experts don't really know

00:12:14.340 what's going on there.

00:12:15.060 Biden's also going to do an executive order

00:12:21.760 on some voting stuff

00:12:23.620 to make that more solid

00:12:24.800 and there's HR1 coming through

00:12:27.460 to make some changes in voting, etc.

00:12:29.820 But here's the thing.

00:12:33.860 Are we really trying to make the voting good

00:12:37.300 in this country

00:12:38.080 or are we just watching two different entities,

00:12:41.520 Democrats and Republicans,

00:12:42.700 using different gaming techniques

00:12:45.600 to make the system favor their side?

00:12:48.500 Because that's all it looks like.

00:12:50.700 It just looks like

00:12:51.580 one side is gaming the system

00:12:53.200 and then if the other side had control,

00:12:55.680 they game the system,

00:12:56.780 they gerrymander

00:12:57.620 and they change what kind of voting you can do,

00:13:01.440 mail-in voting, etc.

00:13:02.720 None of this has anything to do with democracy

00:13:05.000 or a democratic republic or any of that.

00:13:09.840 We're watching a system

00:13:11.140 that is so far divorced

00:13:12.700 from the people's will

00:13:15.660 being expressed in the vote

00:13:17.480 and nothing like that is happening.

00:13:20.060 The things that determine the vote

00:13:21.420 are fake news

00:13:22.480 and how effectively they present the fake news,

00:13:26.760 the game-playing about

00:13:28.120 what rules changes,

00:13:31.540 money,

00:13:32.540 how much people put into it,

00:13:35.140 and then campaign strategy,

00:13:37.580 which often maybe the candidate

00:13:40.060 isn't even the one who decides what it is.

00:13:42.820 So all of these things pick our leaders,

00:13:46.920 but none of them are even vaguely like

00:13:49.580 a democracy or a democratic republic.

00:13:53.540 Our system just drifted into this

00:13:55.660 sort of two organized criminal organizations

00:13:59.920 competing to see who can be the better weasel

00:14:03.080 in any given year.

00:14:04.600 That's kind of all it is.

00:14:08.080 Now, Trump broke the mold

00:14:10.400 because he was such a strong character

00:14:12.260 that all of the game-playing

00:14:14.220 just didn't matter for one election,

00:14:16.400 but I got a feeling they're going to adjust

00:14:19.520 and did for the second election.

00:14:23.840 All right.

00:14:24.120 Tom Sauer asks on Twitter,

00:14:29.900 you know,

00:14:30.280 why bother changing anything

00:14:32.920 in the election process

00:14:34.880 because he says he slowly realized

00:14:37.540 and accepted that we don't live in a democracy

00:14:39.940 or a democratic republic, whatever,

00:14:42.000 at least not in any meaningful sense.

00:14:45.780 Now, what do you think of that?

00:14:47.080 That we shouldn't try to make our...

00:14:49.460 There's just no point

00:14:50.400 because we live in a fixed system

00:14:53.720 where the outcomes are based on things

00:14:56.160 that have nothing to do with voting and democracy.

00:14:59.160 Well, I get the point.

00:15:02.500 So I understand the point.

00:15:04.520 But here's the counterpoint.

00:15:07.180 Our system,

00:15:08.240 as Frankenstein monster-ish as it is,

00:15:14.140 meaning it doesn't operate as a system

00:15:16.160 the way it was designed,

00:15:17.180 it's evolved into some weird creature of a system

00:15:21.340 that does what it wants to do

00:15:22.980 independent of what we want it to do.

00:15:26.420 So as long as it's this big creature

00:15:28.580 of a Frankenstein system

00:15:30.400 that decides somehow who our leaders are

00:15:33.560 and it doesn't have anything to do with us,

00:15:36.380 do you ignore it?

00:15:37.940 Do you get rid of it?

00:15:39.400 Here's the problem.

00:15:41.180 You still need the citizens

00:15:42.620 to believe they live in a system that works.

00:15:45.900 Well, the whole thing will fall apart,

00:15:49.120 even the Frankenstein monster part.

00:15:52.100 You need that.

00:15:53.540 Because if you don't have anything,

00:15:55.020 you just have chaos.

00:15:56.520 So weirdly,

00:15:57.960 we need to trust our system

00:16:00.800 to make it work,

00:16:04.340 but only working as two competing criminal organizations

00:16:07.840 to see who's the best weasel this year.

00:16:11.620 And that's the best we got.

00:16:13.000 But if we didn't at least pretend

00:16:15.400 that we believe

00:16:16.240 that there's some kind of a democracy here

00:16:18.240 and people didn't go and actually vote,

00:16:21.280 we would lose this illusion

00:16:23.160 that the people have some influence.

00:16:26.540 And you don't want to lose the illusion

00:16:28.180 because the whole system depends on that illusion.

00:16:32.840 So don't lose your illusions

00:16:34.240 if they're good ones.

00:16:35.100 Let's see.

00:16:39.460 What else we got here?

00:16:40.660 Remember I told you

00:16:41.580 when it was obvious

00:16:42.740 that the Senate would be pretty close

00:16:45.400 to even Democrats and Republicans?

00:16:48.180 I told you that Joe Manchin

00:16:49.980 wouldn't end up running everything?

00:16:53.000 Because the one person

00:16:54.840 who's willing to vote

00:16:56.060 whichever side makes sense

00:16:59.080 ends up running everything.

00:17:01.220 because they couldn't get this through

00:17:04.320 until Joe Manchin was happy or happier.

00:17:08.580 And I'll just put out a compliment to Joe Manchin.

00:17:14.260 Why is he the only one who thought of this?

00:17:16.900 There's not one other Democrat

00:17:18.400 who's smart enough to say,

00:17:20.140 wait a minute,

00:17:22.240 is it my imagination

00:17:23.420 or is Joe Manchin running the whole show here?

00:17:26.560 because he's willing to be a rogue vote.

00:17:31.740 There's not one other person

00:17:33.040 smart enough to do that too.

00:17:35.160 I guess Murkowski.

00:17:38.380 And then I heard that

00:17:39.760 Trump's going to campaign against Murkowski, right?

00:17:44.480 So, oh yeah,

00:17:45.740 somebody says Kyrsten Sinema.

00:17:48.380 So she's getting some attention

00:17:49.720 but doesn't seem important.

00:17:54.400 Here's an interesting story.

00:17:57.460 Guess what country in the world

00:17:59.920 is doing a terrible job with vaccinations?

00:18:05.080 Could it be a country

00:18:06.380 that we used to think

00:18:07.860 was doing a good job

00:18:09.480 on this coronavirus stuff?

00:18:11.980 What country is doing a really bad job

00:18:14.800 on vaccinations?

00:18:17.600 No, the U.S. is doing a good job right now.

00:18:21.060 I think we had close to 3 million shots yesterday.

00:18:23.940 I mean,

00:18:25.000 the United States is killing it

00:18:26.660 lately.

00:18:28.020 It took a while to cramp up.

00:18:30.320 Nobody got the right answer.

00:18:31.960 Oh, there we go.

00:18:32.660 Germany.

00:18:33.900 Germany.

00:18:35.840 So Germany apparently

00:18:37.440 is only

00:18:38.440 vaccinated

00:18:39.940 out of 6% of the country

00:18:41.520 and apparently it's just

00:18:42.520 the thing's a mess.

00:18:44.740 And even

00:18:45.200 Chancellor Merkel

00:18:47.300 admitted

00:18:48.340 their failings.

00:18:49.460 So remember

00:18:51.180 I told you

00:18:51.940 that

00:18:52.900 we would be

00:18:55.200 led to believe

00:18:56.700 that different

00:18:57.320 leadership decisions

00:18:58.860 would determine

00:19:00.580 the outcome

00:19:01.360 within different countries.

00:19:03.020 Do you remember

00:19:03.360 what I told you?

00:19:04.700 That leadership

00:19:05.860 would be the

00:19:06.680 least important

00:19:07.640 variable.

00:19:09.200 It would be

00:19:09.860 the least important.

00:19:10.860 We think it's

00:19:11.340 the most important

00:19:12.080 because we're

00:19:13.060 sort of

00:19:13.360 human-centric.

00:19:15.000 But now

00:19:15.300 Germany,

00:19:16.100 despite having

00:19:16.900 this terrible

00:19:17.980 job

00:19:18.760 of giving

00:19:20.140 vaccinations,

00:19:21.400 is still around

00:19:22.240 the middle of the

00:19:22.860 pack

00:19:23.140 in outcomes.

00:19:25.080 So every time

00:19:25.980 you find a company

00:19:26.800 that's doing

00:19:27.420 something

00:19:27.900 amazingly wrong,

00:19:30.480 it doesn't

00:19:31.260 seem to affect

00:19:32.460 their outcomes

00:19:33.240 that much.

00:19:34.200 Great Britain

00:19:34.620 would be an

00:19:35.120 exception.

00:19:36.080 I think their

00:19:36.800 decisions did

00:19:37.520 affect their

00:19:37.940 outcomes.

00:19:38.300 But man,

00:19:40.680 do we not

00:19:41.160 understand

00:19:41.700 what's going

00:19:42.240 on still.

00:19:44.380 That leadership

00:19:45.920 decisions just

00:19:46.780 don't seem

00:19:47.980 to make much

00:19:48.460 difference.

00:19:50.780 And you see

00:19:51.600 that with

00:19:52.000 lockdowns

00:19:52.820 and other

00:19:53.340 things.

00:19:53.760 There's not

00:19:54.060 much difference.

00:19:57.040 All right.

00:19:59.000 I will say

00:19:59.920 again that I

00:20:00.880 believe that

00:20:01.580 Trump's

00:20:02.840 reputation

00:20:04.060 will improve

00:20:05.120 every day

00:20:05.620 he's out of

00:20:06.080 office.

00:20:06.900 Henry Kissinger

00:20:07.600 just said

00:20:08.220 that Trump

00:20:09.400 his plan

00:20:11.380 in the Middle

00:20:11.880 East and

00:20:12.420 what he got

00:20:12.880 accomplished

00:20:13.520 in the Middle

00:20:13.960 East with

00:20:14.380 the Abraham

00:20:14.960 Accords,

00:20:15.520 etc.

00:20:16.220 Henry Kissinger

00:20:17.040 calls it

00:20:17.560 brilliant.

00:20:19.120 He calls it

00:20:19.520 brilliant.

00:20:20.740 And even

00:20:21.300 breaks it down

00:20:22.160 about why

00:20:22.860 it's brilliant,

00:20:24.180 you know,

00:20:24.560 taking the

00:20:25.220 Palestinian

00:20:25.640 question out

00:20:26.660 of it,

00:20:27.660 etc.

00:20:28.740 And that's

00:20:29.720 just one

00:20:30.100 example.

00:20:31.020 Somebody asked

00:20:31.520 me on Twitter

00:20:32.080 why did I

00:20:34.200 think before

00:20:35.060 Trump got

00:20:35.620 in office,

00:20:36.740 why was I

00:20:37.360 so dumb

00:20:37.880 to think

00:20:38.300 that he

00:20:38.620 would do

00:20:38.980 great

00:20:39.340 things?

00:20:40.660 And I

00:20:41.340 said,

00:20:41.980 where have

00:20:42.700 you been?

00:20:44.460 Even if you

00:20:45.400 were the

00:20:45.780 biggest critic

00:20:46.540 of Trump

00:20:47.200 in the

00:20:47.520 world,

00:20:48.700 you would

00:20:49.420 still have

00:20:50.120 to accept

00:20:50.620 that he

00:20:50.940 did great

00:20:51.440 things.

00:20:52.220 The

00:20:52.440 vaccination

00:20:53.100 warp speed,

00:20:54.440 that was a

00:20:54.860 great thing.

00:20:55.720 You just

00:20:56.020 can't take

00:20:56.420 that away

00:20:56.760 from him.

00:20:57.800 The

00:20:58.180 Abraham

00:20:58.860 Accords,

00:20:59.440 that's a

00:20:59.920 great thing.

00:21:01.240 Getting

00:21:01.760 North Korea

00:21:02.460 into a

00:21:03.020 whole different

00:21:03.560 headspace,

00:21:04.280 place where

00:21:05.200 they're just

00:21:06.380 basically not

00:21:07.120 a threat,

00:21:08.620 that's huge.

00:21:10.700 Turning China

00:21:11.900 from our

00:21:12.660 ally-ish

00:21:14.160 kind of

00:21:14.660 situation

00:21:15.140 into clearly

00:21:16.100 something else,

00:21:17.700 going hard

00:21:18.640 at everything

00:21:19.580 from bringing

00:21:20.920 the industries

00:21:21.680 away from

00:21:22.260 China to

00:21:23.260 pressing on

00:21:24.820 them for

00:21:25.360 Huawei,

00:21:26.100 etc.

00:21:26.480 That was

00:21:27.160 all Trump.

00:21:28.220 And Biden

00:21:28.660 is going to

00:21:29.640 have to follow

00:21:30.340 that because

00:21:31.100 once the

00:21:31.660 model is

00:21:32.280 set,

00:21:33.060 it's hard

00:21:33.500 to argue

00:21:33.880 against it.

00:21:35.640 So you

00:21:36.840 could make

00:21:37.780 your separate

00:21:38.440 list of the

00:21:39.180 things that

00:21:39.720 you didn't

00:21:40.120 like about

00:21:40.840 Trump,

00:21:41.760 and I

00:21:42.240 might not

00:21:42.640 even argue

00:21:43.200 with the

00:21:43.580 list.

00:21:44.600 You might

00:21:45.060 say he

00:21:45.540 didn't fix

00:21:46.140 health care.

00:21:47.160 Okay,

00:21:47.580 I agree.

00:21:48.320 You might

00:21:48.880 say what

00:21:49.500 he did

00:21:49.800 with the

00:21:50.220 capital

00:21:50.620 assault was

00:21:51.760 completely

00:21:52.280 unacceptable.

00:21:53.540 Okay,

00:21:54.580 I agree.

00:21:55.760 But you

00:21:56.220 can't take

00:21:56.720 away the

00:21:57.120 fact that

00:21:57.660 what he

00:21:58.060 did in

00:21:58.940 half a dozen

00:21:59.820 areas was

00:22:01.900 amazing.

00:22:02.860 I mean,

00:22:03.300 just almost

00:22:03.940 undoable,

00:22:05.120 impossible

00:22:05.520 things.

00:22:06.860 And it's

00:22:08.320 mind-boggling

00:22:09.960 that there's

00:22:10.460 anybody who

00:22:11.040 is an adult

00:22:11.660 who follows

00:22:12.280 politics who

00:22:13.540 would disagree

00:22:14.200 with that.

00:22:15.400 No matter

00:22:16.120 how much you

00:22:16.720 didn't like

00:22:17.220 the other

00:22:17.840 things he

00:22:18.360 did,

00:22:19.500 how do you

00:22:19.940 take away

00:22:20.340 the fact that

00:22:20.920 he did

00:22:21.240 things that

00:22:21.700 just were

00:22:22.260 undoable?

00:22:23.680 I mean,

00:22:24.300 it really

00:22:24.620 is impressive.

00:22:27.700 Somebody

00:22:28.180 says it's

00:22:28.640 not amazing,

00:22:29.360 just comment

00:22:29.800 sense.

00:22:30.220 Well,

00:22:30.360 it's amazing

00:22:30.780 that he

00:22:31.100 did it.

00:22:32.740 You know,

00:22:33.120 everybody has

00:22:34.020 common sense,

00:22:34.780 but not

00:22:35.040 everybody did

00:22:35.760 what he

00:22:36.080 did.

00:22:37.560 There's

00:22:38.040 an article

00:22:38.400 on CNN

00:22:39.100 that I

00:22:39.700 read for

00:22:40.100 the humor,

00:22:41.400 says that

00:22:42.520 cancel culture

00:22:43.600 isn't real.

00:22:45.620 And it

00:22:45.920 goes through

00:22:46.800 a number

00:22:47.120 of examples

00:22:47.760 to show

00:22:48.340 that we

00:22:49.100 act like

00:22:49.640 people are

00:22:50.020 getting

00:22:50.200 canceled,

00:22:50.680 but they're

00:22:50.920 really not.

00:22:51.800 And one

00:22:52.140 of the

00:22:52.300 arguments is

00:22:52.900 that the

00:22:53.260 people getting

00:22:53.780 canceled are

00:22:55.040 still doing

00:22:55.600 fine,

00:22:56.420 meaning that

00:22:57.040 their economic

00:22:57.900 situation is

00:22:58.740 fine.

00:22:59.000 so they're

00:23:00.040 not really

00:23:00.420 canceled.

00:23:00.900 One of

00:23:01.140 the examples

00:23:01.580 is actor.

00:23:04.380 Do we say

00:23:04.880 actor now,

00:23:05.680 or is

00:23:06.180 actress

00:23:06.820 sexist?

00:23:09.000 What's the

00:23:09.580 ruling on

00:23:10.080 that?

00:23:10.800 Because I think

00:23:11.420 actor is

00:23:12.240 still,

00:23:14.100 it feels like

00:23:14.860 the better

00:23:15.160 word.

00:23:15.440 so Gina

00:23:16.840 Carano,

00:23:17.880 who you

00:23:18.120 know was

00:23:18.540 on Disney,

00:23:20.820 whatever that

00:23:22.880 show was,

00:23:24.000 anyway,

00:23:24.340 she got

00:23:24.640 fired from

00:23:25.580 the show

00:23:26.060 for her

00:23:27.580 opinions,

00:23:28.580 I guess.

00:23:29.760 And the

00:23:31.100 CNN article

00:23:31.780 says she

00:23:32.240 wasn't really

00:23:32.780 canceled because

00:23:33.640 she got this

00:23:34.960 great opportunity

00:23:35.820 with Ben

00:23:36.720 Shapiro.

00:23:37.740 So Ben

00:23:38.160 Shapiro is

00:23:39.780 going to

00:23:40.080 produce something

00:23:40.860 and she's

00:23:41.560 been hired to

00:23:42.100 do that.

00:23:42.480 to which I

00:23:43.560 say to

00:23:43.860 myself,

00:23:45.180 well,

00:23:46.900 I see

00:23:48.140 your point,

00:23:49.220 but ask

00:23:51.540 yourself this,

00:23:53.080 if your

00:23:53.820 ambition was

00:23:54.880 to be a

00:23:55.320 successful

00:23:55.880 actor,

00:23:57.660 would you

00:23:58.600 say to

00:23:58.900 yourself,

00:24:00.320 yes,

00:24:00.940 I got the

00:24:01.460 Ben Shapiro

00:24:02.200 gig?

00:24:03.540 Now,

00:24:05.180 I'm a big

00:24:05.620 fan of

00:24:05.980 Ben Shapiro

00:24:06.560 and I

00:24:08.280 think what

00:24:08.580 he's doing

00:24:08.900 is great.

00:24:10.620 It's all

00:24:11.220 positive.

00:24:12.500 But I

00:24:12.920 don't feel

00:24:13.600 like a

00:24:14.040 professional

00:24:14.600 actor is

00:24:16.220 going to

00:24:16.500 say,

00:24:17.180 finally,

00:24:18.240 I got the

00:24:18.680 Ben Shapiro

00:24:19.380 opportunity.

00:24:22.860 Again,

00:24:23.840 all props

00:24:24.820 to Ben

00:24:25.680 Shapiro for

00:24:26.260 doing what

00:24:26.600 he's doing

00:24:26.980 and we

00:24:27.340 should do

00:24:27.640 more of

00:24:28.240 that,

00:24:28.900 you know,

00:24:29.160 sort of a

00:24:29.820 rescue

00:24:30.200 operation for

00:24:31.160 canceled

00:24:31.640 people.

00:24:32.000 But I

00:24:33.500 feel like

00:24:34.060 the argument

00:24:34.880 that she

00:24:35.380 was killed

00:24:35.980 still feels

00:24:36.760 true enough,

00:24:37.700 right?

00:24:38.500 It's still

00:24:38.920 true enough.

00:24:41.380 Anyway,

00:24:42.020 that was

00:24:42.260 funny.

00:24:46.400 So,

00:24:47.500 Ivor

00:24:47.860 Cummins.

00:24:48.780 Do you

00:24:49.100 all know

00:24:49.480 Ivor

00:24:50.000 Cummins?

00:24:50.720 You've

00:24:50.920 probably seen

00:24:51.360 him on

00:24:51.800 Twitter.

00:24:53.060 And I

00:24:53.500 guess you

00:24:53.820 could call

00:24:54.200 him a

00:24:54.900 skeptic

00:24:55.600 of the,

00:24:57.480 let's

00:24:58.020 say,

00:24:58.320 the scientific

00:24:59.120 consensus

00:24:59.940 about a

00:25:01.300 number of

00:25:01.740 coronavirus

00:25:02.140 things.

00:25:03.620 Now,

00:25:04.140 apparently we

00:25:05.720 are on

00:25:06.180 each other's

00:25:06.900 radar and

00:25:07.860 he sent me

00:25:08.400 an article

00:25:08.800 from an

00:25:09.680 expert,

00:25:10.280 a doctor,

00:25:11.340 who is

00:25:12.100 arguing

00:25:12.580 against some

00:25:13.620 of the

00:25:13.920 mainstream

00:25:14.500 assumptions

00:25:15.380 about

00:25:15.860 coronavirus.

00:25:16.700 Mainstream

00:25:17.120 meaning

00:25:17.420 mainstream

00:25:17.960 expert

00:25:19.080 science

00:25:19.760 medical

00:25:20.660 people.

00:25:22.860 And Ivor

00:25:23.520 and a

00:25:23.820 number of

00:25:24.140 his followers

00:25:24.740 are pestering

00:25:26.800 me online

00:25:27.580 that the

00:25:27.980 two of

00:25:28.280 us should

00:25:29.500 argue it

00:25:30.100 out.

00:25:30.400 get online

00:25:32.300 and argue

00:25:32.900 it out.

00:25:33.320 What do

00:25:33.480 you think

00:25:33.660 of that?

00:25:34.920 Is that

00:25:35.140 a good

00:25:35.360 idea?

00:25:36.360 Do you

00:25:36.620 think that

00:25:36.940 it would

00:25:37.140 be productive

00:25:37.840 for Ivor

00:25:39.980 Cummins

00:25:40.740 and me

00:25:41.640 specifically

00:25:42.920 to have a

00:25:43.900 conversation

00:25:44.440 on some

00:25:45.020 kind of

00:25:45.300 a podcast?

00:25:48.500 No.

00:25:49.700 It would

00:25:50.180 be the

00:25:50.460 worst idea

00:25:51.020 in the

00:25:51.280 world.

00:25:52.220 It would

00:25:52.420 be a

00:25:52.660 terrible

00:25:52.900 idea.

00:25:54.580 Terrible

00:25:55.060 idea.

00:25:56.400 Now,

00:25:56.680 it might

00:25:56.900 give you

00:25:57.220 some

00:25:57.400 entertainment

00:25:57.880 but it

00:25:59.040 would

00:25:59.200 be

00:25:59.380 worse

00:25:59.800 than

00:26:00.100 useful.

00:26:01.300 I mean,

00:26:02.220 here,

00:26:02.800 let me

00:26:03.000 take you

00:26:03.320 through.

00:26:05.540 Worst idea

00:26:06.320 ever.

00:26:07.760 Let's

00:26:08.200 say there

00:26:09.060 are scientists

00:26:09.640 in this

00:26:10.260 world and

00:26:10.780 there are

00:26:11.060 non-scientists.

00:26:12.480 Let's say

00:26:13.040 that you

00:26:13.380 wanted to

00:26:13.780 get toward

00:26:14.320 truth and

00:26:15.560 you wanted

00:26:15.920 the non-scientists,

00:26:17.840 people like

00:26:18.260 me,

00:26:19.120 you wanted

00:26:19.480 people like

00:26:19.880 me and

00:26:20.620 Ivor

00:26:21.100 Cummins,

00:26:21.860 non-scientists,

00:26:23.240 you would

00:26:23.780 like people

00:26:24.220 like us

00:26:24.800 to be

00:26:25.840 as informed

00:26:26.660 as the

00:26:27.520 scientists.

00:26:28.080 What's a

00:26:28.340 good way

00:26:28.620 to do

00:26:28.880 that?

00:26:29.600 Well,

00:26:29.840 a good

00:26:29.980 way to

00:26:30.200 do that

00:26:30.480 is to

00:26:30.660 have a

00:26:30.880 conversation,

00:26:31.540 right?

00:26:31.940 To

00:26:32.200 communicate.

00:26:33.700 So what

00:26:34.060 happens if,

00:26:34.740 let's say,

00:26:35.820 a scientist

00:26:36.440 is talking

00:26:37.080 to another

00:26:37.600 scientist?

00:26:38.580 Does that

00:26:39.180 help me

00:26:40.160 understand

00:26:41.260 science?

00:26:42.540 Well,

00:26:43.020 I'm not in

00:26:43.380 the room.

00:26:44.660 I'm not

00:26:45.020 there.

00:26:46.000 It's just

00:26:46.380 two scientists

00:26:46.940 talking to

00:26:47.520 each other.

00:26:47.860 So that

00:26:48.080 didn't help

00:26:48.420 me because

00:26:49.740 when I hear

00:26:50.260 about it,

00:26:50.700 I'll probably

00:26:51.080 hear about

00:26:51.480 it from

00:26:51.740 a journalist.

00:26:53.480 I won't

00:26:54.040 even hear

00:26:54.340 from the

00:26:54.700 scientist.

00:26:55.440 I'll hear

00:26:55.840 it filtered

00:26:56.320 through a

00:26:56.760 journalist.

00:26:57.640 So two

00:26:58.180 scientists

00:26:58.760 having a

00:26:59.380 private

00:26:59.620 conversation,

00:27:00.300 that doesn't

00:27:00.680 help me.

00:27:01.700 It doesn't

00:27:02.140 help me at

00:27:02.480 all.

00:27:03.900 How about

00:27:04.460 if they

00:27:04.680 have a

00:27:04.920 public

00:27:05.160 conversation?

00:27:06.980 And then

00:27:07.400 what am I

00:27:08.320 going to

00:27:08.520 do?

00:27:08.740 Pick the

00:27:09.120 winner?

00:27:11.020 How?

00:27:12.380 What skill

00:27:13.220 do I have

00:27:13.960 to know

00:27:15.200 which of

00:27:15.620 two experts

00:27:16.480 is the

00:27:17.340 right one?

00:27:18.360 If I

00:27:19.000 could pick

00:27:19.440 the right

00:27:19.860 expert,

00:27:20.940 I would

00:27:21.720 be an

00:27:22.200 expert.

00:27:22.580 And if

00:27:24.080 experts are

00:27:24.740 experts,

00:27:25.400 why are

00:27:25.800 they

00:27:25.960 disagreeing?

00:27:28.080 How the

00:27:28.760 hell would

00:27:29.160 I know

00:27:29.520 which one

00:27:29.920 is right?

00:27:31.100 If they

00:27:31.820 don't know

00:27:32.780 who's right

00:27:33.420 and they're

00:27:34.260 experts,

00:27:35.280 how am I

00:27:35.880 supposed to

00:27:36.320 know?

00:27:37.620 It's

00:27:38.080 ridiculous.

00:27:39.000 So this

00:27:39.380 would be

00:27:39.620 useless in

00:27:41.220 terms of

00:27:41.800 getting me

00:27:42.540 to understand.

00:27:43.740 It's very

00:27:44.240 useful that

00:27:44.880 scientists talk

00:27:45.540 to each

00:27:45.820 other,

00:27:46.220 but it

00:27:46.500 doesn't help

00:27:46.820 me understand.

00:27:48.440 Suppose a

00:27:49.160 scientist talks

00:27:50.080 to a

00:27:50.420 non-scientist.

00:27:52.140 That's good,

00:27:52.800 right?

00:27:53.060 Because the

00:27:53.600 scientist gives

00:27:54.440 you all this

00:27:54.960 good information

00:27:55.720 and now

00:27:56.660 you're informed.

00:27:58.360 No.

00:27:59.700 No.

00:28:00.860 Because it

00:28:01.520 would just

00:28:01.880 be one

00:28:02.700 scientist,

00:28:03.860 let's say,

00:28:05.020 telling me

00:28:05.920 stuff.

00:28:07.540 I don't know

00:28:08.040 if it's true.

00:28:09.140 Because is that

00:28:10.000 one scientist

00:28:10.900 this one

00:28:12.280 or this

00:28:13.340 other one?

00:28:13.780 Because they

00:28:14.160 disagree.

00:28:16.260 Could a

00:28:17.000 scientist convince

00:28:18.300 me that the

00:28:19.120 scientist was

00:28:19.880 right?

00:28:21.000 Probably.

00:28:22.200 In fact,

00:28:22.700 almost every

00:28:23.260 time.

00:28:24.320 And what

00:28:24.600 would happen

00:28:25.000 if the

00:28:25.460 next scientist

00:28:26.400 came in

00:28:26.920 five minutes

00:28:27.460 later and

00:28:28.640 told me that

00:28:29.200 the first

00:28:29.620 scientist was

00:28:30.320 wrong?

00:28:30.720 Would I

00:28:30.980 believe the

00:28:31.440 second

00:28:31.720 scientist?

00:28:33.180 Yeah.

00:28:34.240 Yeah,

00:28:34.740 I would.

00:28:35.280 Whoever goes

00:28:35.880 last, if

00:28:37.480 they know

00:28:37.880 more than

00:28:38.340 you do,

00:28:39.600 sounds very

00:28:40.440 convincing.

00:28:41.820 So whoever

00:28:42.340 talks to me

00:28:43.000 last probably

00:28:44.980 will change

00:28:45.460 my mind.

00:28:46.360 Same with

00:28:46.740 you.

00:28:47.360 Whoever

00:28:47.720 talks last

00:28:48.640 sounds right.

00:28:50.820 So is

00:28:51.900 that useful?

00:28:53.140 Because it's

00:28:53.800 just whoever

00:28:54.220 talked last.

00:28:55.300 That has

00:28:55.700 nothing to

00:28:56.140 do with

00:28:56.400 science.

00:28:57.320 So that's

00:28:57.620 useless.

00:28:59.660 And then

00:29:00.580 this is just

00:29:01.440 another combination

00:29:02.240 of a

00:29:02.600 scientist and

00:29:03.420 a non-scientist.

00:29:04.460 But how

00:29:04.760 about two

00:29:05.200 non-scientists

00:29:06.060 having a

00:29:06.500 conversation?

00:29:07.860 I'm a

00:29:08.280 non-scientist.

00:29:10.220 Ivor

00:29:10.740 Cummins is

00:29:12.240 a non-scientist,

00:29:13.220 I understand.

00:29:13.860 I think he

00:29:14.140 has an

00:29:14.600 engineering or

00:29:15.460 biochem degree

00:29:17.300 or something.

00:29:17.940 So he's

00:29:18.260 a lot

00:29:18.540 closer to

00:29:19.340 having a

00:29:20.760 STEM-like

00:29:22.220 mind frame

00:29:24.100 than I do.

00:29:25.680 But we're

00:29:26.280 not really

00:29:26.780 scientists in

00:29:27.720 this field.

00:29:29.400 Why the

00:29:30.120 hell would

00:29:31.280 you want to

00:29:31.740 see him

00:29:32.760 talk to me?

00:29:34.300 What possible

00:29:35.520 good could that

00:29:36.180 do?

00:29:36.380 Let me tell you

00:29:37.720 how that

00:29:38.060 conversation goes.

00:29:39.720 Look at my

00:29:40.700 study.

00:29:41.780 Look at it.

00:29:43.080 Look at my

00:29:44.180 study that says

00:29:45.580 whatever.

00:29:47.000 Masks don't

00:29:47.700 work or

00:29:48.180 whatever it

00:29:48.520 is.

00:29:49.720 And then

00:29:50.100 I'll say,

00:29:51.600 all right,

00:29:54.200 where do I

00:29:54.700 take that?

00:29:55.860 Do I look

00:29:56.560 at the

00:29:56.800 study and

00:29:57.360 with my

00:29:57.820 non-scientific

00:29:59.040 knowledge?

00:30:00.720 I say,

00:30:01.600 well, based

00:30:02.280 on my

00:30:02.700 non-scientific

00:30:03.860 knowledge,

00:30:04.840 the person

00:30:05.320 who does

00:30:05.920 have scientific

00:30:06.560 knowledge is

00:30:07.220 all wrong.

00:30:08.420 What the

00:30:08.780 hell good

00:30:09.120 would that

00:30:09.440 do?

00:30:10.580 Like I

00:30:11.240 would know

00:30:11.580 what I'm

00:30:11.880 talking about.

00:30:12.500 Now, suppose

00:30:14.980 Ivor comes

00:30:15.980 on and

00:30:16.300 says, look

00:30:16.720 at my

00:30:17.000 data.

00:30:17.980 It comes

00:30:18.300 from this

00:30:18.700 good source.

00:30:20.420 Do you

00:30:20.860 think that

00:30:22.320 I couldn't

00:30:22.920 find a

00:30:24.460 piece of

00:30:24.820 paper to

00:30:25.220 hold in

00:30:25.560 my hand

00:30:26.140 that says

00:30:27.120 the opposite

00:30:27.680 of what

00:30:28.100 his piece

00:30:28.560 of paper

00:30:28.900 says?

00:30:30.200 You know

00:30:30.600 I could.

00:30:31.920 You know

00:30:32.480 I could.

00:30:33.380 Do you

00:30:33.640 think I

00:30:33.960 could Google

00:30:34.480 in one

00:30:35.300 minute a

00:30:36.500 whole bunch

00:30:36.920 of sources

00:30:37.380 that say

00:30:37.860 masks work?

00:30:40.000 Of course I

00:30:40.580 could.

00:30:40.760 Do you

00:30:41.680 think I

00:30:42.000 could Google

00:30:42.620 sources that

00:30:44.280 masks don't

00:30:45.200 work?

00:30:46.220 Of course I

00:30:46.900 could.

00:30:48.180 How do I

00:30:48.600 know the

00:30:48.880 difference?

00:30:50.620 How do I

00:30:51.460 know?

00:30:52.660 So, everybody

00:30:54.260 who's asking

00:30:54.740 me to talk

00:30:55.260 to Ivor,

00:30:56.160 you don't

00:30:56.860 understand what

00:30:57.820 that would

00:30:58.280 do.

00:30:59.120 What that

00:30:59.780 would do

00:31:00.140 would elevate

00:31:00.980 his opinion

00:31:01.840 to a greater

00:31:04.140 level of

00:31:04.820 worthiness

00:31:05.520 because it

00:31:06.260 was being

00:31:06.640 discussed

00:31:07.100 in an

00:31:08.260 organized

00:31:08.620 way.

00:31:09.080 should his

00:31:10.780 opinion be

00:31:11.460 elevated?

00:31:13.940 No more

00:31:14.780 than mine

00:31:15.480 and mine

00:31:16.440 shouldn't be

00:31:16.980 elevated

00:31:17.440 because again

00:31:18.420 I'm not a

00:31:19.400 scientist.

00:31:20.320 Now, I do

00:31:21.500 make opinions

00:31:22.240 on the

00:31:22.620 science all

00:31:23.360 the time

00:31:23.860 because I'm

00:31:24.980 pro-mask

00:31:25.660 for example

00:31:26.200 but my

00:31:27.440 decision is

00:31:28.220 not always

00:31:28.820 based on

00:31:29.380 science.

00:31:31.400 My decision

00:31:32.300 is based on

00:31:32.940 risk management

00:31:33.900 and risk

00:31:35.620 management will

00:31:36.500 sometimes make

00:31:37.200 a different

00:31:37.600 decision than

00:31:38.340 science will.

00:31:39.940 So, if he

00:31:40.760 wants to talk

00:31:41.360 risk management

00:31:42.380 with me, I

00:31:43.040 could talk

00:31:43.420 that all

00:31:43.820 day long.

00:31:44.800 That's

00:31:45.040 something I

00:31:45.500 could speak

00:31:46.460 to with

00:31:46.840 some authority.

00:31:48.300 But judging

00:31:49.740 the science,

00:31:50.640 neither of us

00:31:51.060 could do

00:31:51.320 that because

00:31:52.440 the scientists

00:31:52.980 can't do it

00:31:53.540 themselves.

00:31:54.760 Now, here's

00:31:55.120 the thing that

00:31:55.960 Ivor has to

00:31:57.080 explain.

00:31:58.940 Why is it

00:31:59.620 that he's got

00:32:00.320 this one

00:32:00.900 doctor,

00:32:01.480 there'll be

00:32:01.800 more, right?

00:32:02.520 He wouldn't

00:32:02.820 be the only

00:32:03.240 doctor, but

00:32:04.120 why is it

00:32:04.600 that these

00:32:05.000 doctors who

00:32:05.720 are contrarians

00:32:06.700 can't convince

00:32:08.320 the other

00:32:09.600 doctors?

00:32:11.060 What's up

00:32:11.640 with that?

00:32:13.020 Because you

00:32:13.800 think that

00:32:15.860 if the

00:32:16.440 contrarians

00:32:17.300 have good

00:32:18.900 points and

00:32:19.540 data, they

00:32:20.760 have all the

00:32:21.240 data, according

00:32:21.840 to Ivor, if

00:32:23.400 the contrarians

00:32:24.080 have all the

00:32:24.660 data, that's

00:32:27.020 it, right?

00:32:27.640 That's how

00:32:28.080 science works,

00:32:28.720 here's my

00:32:29.140 data, and

00:32:30.220 then they all

00:32:30.580 change their

00:32:31.040 opinion.

00:32:31.280 But that

00:32:32.000 hasn't

00:32:32.380 happened.

00:32:33.960 How do you

00:32:34.740 explain the

00:32:35.300 fact that

00:32:36.560 science is

00:32:37.220 probably 99%

00:32:39.580 in favor of

00:32:40.420 masks for

00:32:41.260 the pandemic,

00:32:42.500 would you

00:32:42.900 say?

00:32:43.540 Would you

00:32:44.080 say that

00:32:44.440 the professionals

00:32:45.420 are 99%

00:32:47.780 in favor of

00:32:48.340 masks?

00:32:49.200 Does that

00:32:49.420 feel about

00:32:49.820 right?

00:32:50.840 Now, that

00:32:51.540 doesn't mean

00:32:51.980 masks work.

00:32:53.640 It really

00:32:54.020 doesn't.

00:32:54.840 But it does

00:32:55.400 tell you that

00:32:55.900 a whole lot

00:32:56.380 of people who

00:32:57.000 understand how

00:32:57.960 the world

00:32:58.380 works and

00:32:58.960 science works

00:32:59.760 and risk

00:33:00.780 management

00:33:01.240 and all

00:33:01.540 that, that

00:33:02.400 they kind

00:33:02.820 of fell on

00:33:03.260 the same

00:33:03.580 side.

00:33:04.780 Now, after

00:33:05.340 this is all

00:33:05.920 done, and

00:33:07.380 let's say

00:33:07.780 studies are

00:33:08.460 done, I

00:33:09.120 don't know

00:33:09.560 if you could

00:33:09.920 ethically study

00:33:11.280 coronavirus and

00:33:13.200 masks, because

00:33:13.740 you'd have to

00:33:14.140 infect people,

00:33:15.460 but suppose

00:33:17.180 someday we

00:33:18.220 find out that

00:33:19.720 masks absolutely

00:33:20.900 didn't work.

00:33:22.920 Would that

00:33:23.680 make me have

00:33:24.500 been wrong

00:33:25.280 during the

00:33:26.580 coronavirus

00:33:26.980 epidemic?

00:33:28.680 No.

00:33:29.760 No.

00:33:30.780 Because it's

00:33:32.860 risk management.

00:33:34.260 If you make

00:33:35.020 the right

00:33:35.380 risk management

00:33:36.240 decision, and

00:33:37.540 yet it turns

00:33:38.120 out to be

00:33:38.600 wrong, you

00:33:39.080 still made

00:33:39.500 the right

00:33:39.820 decision, you

00:33:41.100 just didn't

00:33:41.520 get lucky.

00:33:42.960 Because lots

00:33:43.620 of times you're

00:33:44.080 guessing.

00:33:44.760 It's like, well,

00:33:45.300 70% this, 30%

00:33:47.100 this, but the

00:33:48.480 30% of

00:33:49.100 happens, 30%

00:33:50.880 is a lot.

00:33:53.420 All right.

00:33:54.360 Yeah, then I'm

00:33:56.240 seeing somebody

00:33:56.660 saying, people

00:33:57.380 wore masks

00:33:57.940 masks during

00:33:58.240 the 1918

00:33:59.820 pandemic.

00:34:01.120 You will find

00:34:01.960 people who

00:34:02.520 say, yes, they

00:34:04.400 wore masks in

00:34:05.640 1918, and that

00:34:07.760 proved they

00:34:08.360 didn't work.

00:34:09.820 And then other

00:34:10.480 people will say,

00:34:11.840 yes, they wore

00:34:12.660 masks in 1918,

00:34:15.320 and proved it

00:34:16.160 worked.

00:34:17.800 Who's right?

00:34:18.980 The ones who say

00:34:20.080 they proved it

00:34:20.860 didn't work are

00:34:22.000 the ones who

00:34:22.440 say, yeah, all

00:34:23.580 the evidence

00:34:24.040 shut up.

00:34:28.340 How do you

00:34:29.100 know?

00:34:30.700 All right.

00:34:31.620 So be careful

00:34:33.620 about what you

00:34:34.380 think gives you

00:34:35.220 knowledge.

00:34:36.160 This process of

00:34:37.700 two non-scientists

00:34:39.020 talking about

00:34:40.200 science would

00:34:40.860 not give you

00:34:41.520 knowledge.

00:34:42.720 It would not.

00:34:44.660 And then I'll

00:34:45.520 add on top of

00:34:46.260 this that if

00:34:47.280 you want to

00:34:49.080 judge Ivor's

00:34:50.580 credibility, just

00:34:51.640 Google his

00:34:52.420 name, and

00:34:54.340 Google, you

00:34:55.580 know, words

00:34:56.420 like fact

00:34:57.820 check and

00:34:58.480 debunk, and

00:34:59.240 you'll see some

00:34:59.760 articles.

00:35:00.460 Now, I don't

00:35:00.800 have an opinion

00:35:02.080 about whether

00:35:02.740 the people who

00:35:04.220 try to debunk

00:35:05.040 him are right,

00:35:06.280 but just know

00:35:07.260 it's out there.

00:35:08.260 All right.

00:35:11.300 China has

00:35:13.020 developed, the

00:35:13.920 Chinese company

00:35:14.500 has developed

00:35:14.960 a, what they

00:35:16.020 call an

00:35:16.360 automated sperm

00:35:17.700 extractor.

00:35:19.760 And what it

00:35:20.240 is, is a

00:35:21.140 device that's

00:35:23.860 about waist

00:35:25.540 high, that

00:35:27.400 has an

00:35:28.120 artificial, let's

00:35:29.480 say, female

00:35:30.240 part that does

00:35:32.200 some moving

00:35:33.040 action.

00:35:34.240 And for

00:35:34.520 Chinese men who

00:35:35.360 want to go to

00:35:35.800 the hospital and

00:35:36.820 they're going to

00:35:38.220 give a sperm

00:35:39.400 sample, but

00:35:40.820 they're too

00:35:41.220 embarrassed to,

00:35:42.440 let's say, take

00:35:43.000 care of it

00:35:43.420 themselves, they

00:35:45.120 can use the

00:35:45.740 robot instead.

00:35:47.580 Now, I have

00:35:49.380 questions, I

00:35:50.780 know you have

00:35:51.280 questions, we'll

00:35:52.260 see if your

00:35:52.640 questions are

00:35:53.240 like mine.

00:35:54.580 My first

00:35:55.040 question is, how

00:35:56.680 big is the

00:35:57.500 market?

00:35:58.940 Because you'd

00:35:59.640 have to find

00:36:00.160 somebody who

00:36:00.780 could get

00:36:01.360 fully, shall

00:36:03.340 we say,

00:36:05.440 engorged,

00:36:07.160 otherwise even

00:36:08.460 the robot

00:36:09.040 machine doesn't

00:36:09.760 work, right?

00:36:10.760 Because the

00:36:11.160 robot machine

00:36:11.740 requires you to

00:36:12.480 be, let's

00:36:13.560 say, physically

00:36:14.560 be established.

00:36:19.620 How many

00:36:20.340 people fall

00:36:20.980 into the

00:36:21.360 category that

00:36:22.160 they can get

00:36:22.880 an erection in

00:36:23.720 a hospital, but

00:36:25.560 they can't

00:36:26.100 finish?

00:36:28.320 But they

00:36:28.940 can if they're

00:36:30.520 with a robot.

00:36:33.780 Now, let

00:36:35.000 me, for

00:36:36.520 the few women

00:36:37.600 who are watching

00:36:38.160 this, I know

00:36:38.800 it's like 85%

00:36:39.780 men, but for

00:36:41.060 the few women

00:36:41.600 I'd like to

00:36:42.060 explain something

00:36:42.760 about men.

00:36:43.980 Now, for those

00:36:44.780 of you who are

00:36:45.400 men, you can

00:36:46.000 talk among

00:36:46.480 yourselves, because

00:36:47.600 you already

00:36:48.080 know this.

00:36:50.600 There's no

00:36:51.240 man who can't

00:36:51.980 masturbate in

00:36:52.560 a hospital.

00:36:54.480 In fact, if

00:36:56.280 you just close

00:36:57.000 the door on

00:36:57.680 the people who

00:36:58.240 are in iron

00:36:58.840 lungs, they're

00:37:00.520 going to go

00:37:00.800 to town.

00:37:02.920 You could be

00:37:03.680 in full

00:37:04.180 traction and

00:37:06.700 heavily

00:37:07.060 medicated.

00:37:08.660 You'd find

00:37:09.400 a way.

00:37:12.760 So, I'm

00:37:13.780 skeptical about

00:37:15.500 how many

00:37:16.020 people there

00:37:16.540 are in all

00:37:17.220 of China that

00:37:18.500 fall into this

00:37:19.220 category of they

00:37:20.680 can get aroused

00:37:21.560 in a hospital, but

00:37:23.080 the only way they

00:37:23.760 can finish is with

00:37:24.600 a robot when the

00:37:26.400 people on the

00:37:26.960 other side of the

00:37:27.580 door know that's

00:37:29.360 what's happening on

00:37:30.060 the other side of

00:37:30.620 the door.

00:37:31.620 Are you done with

00:37:32.480 the robot yet?

00:37:33.820 We've got somebody

00:37:34.500 else who wants to

00:37:35.180 take a go at the

00:37:36.020 robot.

00:37:36.920 Could you hurry up

00:37:37.620 in there?

00:37:38.980 And then they won't

00:37:39.860 be embarrassed, because

00:37:40.980 they would only be

00:37:41.840 embarrassed if they

00:37:42.520 took care of it

00:37:43.120 themselves, but

00:37:44.160 apparently the

00:37:44.760 robot option, not

00:37:47.300 embarrassing.

00:37:49.860 So, here's a

00:37:51.260 question I ask you.

00:37:54.620 Did our CIA do

00:37:56.000 this?

00:37:57.740 Because, you know

00:37:58.620 about China and

00:37:59.460 their unrestricted

00:38:00.460 warfare, where

00:38:01.900 they're allegedly

00:38:02.640 using every possible

00:38:04.100 way to weaken

00:38:05.480 the United States,

00:38:06.960 from stealing our

00:38:07.740 IP, to trade

00:38:09.340 deals, to sending

00:38:10.540 us fentanyl, like

00:38:11.540 everything's on the

00:38:12.340 table.

00:38:13.820 What would be the

00:38:14.760 best way to

00:38:15.720 destroy China?

00:38:18.160 It would be to

00:38:19.140 give them a sex

00:38:20.400 option that was

00:38:21.920 better than their

00:38:22.620 women.

00:38:24.380 Now, it's not

00:38:25.820 there yet.

00:38:27.300 This is like

00:38:27.840 version one, the

00:38:29.500 sperm extractor.

00:38:30.840 So I'm not going to

00:38:31.800 say that's better

00:38:32.760 than women, but it's

00:38:35.960 catching up.

00:38:36.560 somebody said on

00:38:38.860 Twitter, and it

00:38:40.860 was very sexist.

00:38:42.240 This is so sexist,

00:38:44.020 it can barely come

00:38:44.980 out of my mouth.

00:38:46.700 And I would like to

00:38:47.620 disavow anybody who

00:38:48.980 would say something

00:38:49.700 like this.

00:38:51.840 Somebody said,

00:38:52.600 can it make a

00:38:53.180 sandwich?

00:38:54.200 Oh, disgusting.

00:38:55.960 Oh, oh, cancel

00:38:58.060 that person.

00:38:59.360 Could somebody go

00:39:00.100 back and find out who

00:39:00.960 said that and just

00:39:01.640 cancel them?

00:39:02.180 I think they need to

00:39:03.320 lose their job for

00:39:04.260 that comment.

00:39:06.600 Can it make a

00:39:07.600 sandwich?

00:39:08.600 Well, as it turns

00:39:09.420 out, I tweeted

00:39:10.220 coincidentally the

00:39:11.300 same day, a robot

00:39:13.420 that Samsung is

00:39:14.460 making that can

00:39:16.080 make a sandwich.

00:39:18.040 Yeah.

00:39:18.740 They've got a

00:39:19.400 robot that looks

00:39:20.900 like it's about,

00:39:21.580 I don't know,

00:39:21.960 four feet tall, and

00:39:23.620 has this giant

00:39:24.420 articulating arm,

00:39:25.760 just one of them.

00:39:26.820 And I saw in the

00:39:27.600 video that it can

00:39:28.780 put away dishes.

00:39:30.640 You can see this

00:39:31.200 arm is like picking

00:39:31.940 up a dish and

00:39:32.720 putting it in the

00:39:33.380 dishwasher.

00:39:34.400 It can set the

00:39:35.240 table.

00:39:36.980 What?

00:39:38.040 It can set the

00:39:38.940 table, because it's

00:39:40.240 got, you know,

00:39:40.820 eyes and an arm.

00:39:43.280 I'm pretty sure it

00:39:44.220 could make a

00:39:44.660 sandwich.

00:39:47.180 Now, I think

00:39:48.580 you're ahead of

00:39:49.000 me.

00:39:49.940 You take the

00:39:50.620 Samsung robot that

00:39:51.940 can make a

00:39:52.480 sandwich, which is

00:39:53.680 so sexist.

00:39:54.840 It's disgusting.

00:39:56.120 I hate it when

00:39:56.740 people talk like

00:39:57.480 this.

00:39:58.280 Don't you?

00:39:59.720 Cancel me.

00:40:00.340 It can make a

00:40:04.120 sandwich, but I

00:40:05.720 feel if you took

00:40:06.420 the Chinese sperm

00:40:08.480 extractor technology

00:40:09.920 and sort of

00:40:11.240 combine it, it

00:40:13.840 wouldn't be

00:40:14.760 attractive.

00:40:16.180 I mean, it would

00:40:16.760 just be a robot with

00:40:17.840 one big arm and a

00:40:20.100 unit there.

00:40:21.420 But you'd be

00:40:22.320 getting closer.

00:40:23.720 I feel as if our

00:40:24.880 CIA is using

00:40:26.020 unrestricted

00:40:26.800 warfare to destroy

00:40:28.520 the next generation

00:40:30.080 in China by

00:40:31.620 giving them

00:40:32.140 robots that are

00:40:33.500 better than

00:40:33.920 their women.

00:40:35.860 So keep an

00:40:37.460 eye on that.

00:40:41.060 You've heard of

00:40:41.760 the Turing test,

00:40:43.000 right?

00:40:43.320 That's the idea

00:40:44.020 that if you were

00:40:44.740 trying to build

00:40:45.220 artificial intelligence,

00:40:46.660 one way to test

00:40:47.640 whether it's a

00:40:48.900 good artificial

00:40:49.640 intelligence is to

00:40:51.140 put it on the

00:40:51.640 other side of a

00:40:52.240 curtain and then

00:40:53.480 have somebody who

00:40:54.140 doesn't know what

00:40:54.780 is behind the

00:40:55.840 curtain have a

00:40:56.800 conversation with

00:40:57.580 it.

00:40:58.480 Now you can do

00:40:58.960 it by typing or

00:40:59.860 talking.

00:41:01.080 But if the

00:41:01.980 person who's a

00:41:02.620 human can't tell

00:41:03.700 that what's on

00:41:05.060 the other side of

00:41:05.620 the curtain is a

00:41:07.500 computer and

00:41:09.040 believes it's

00:41:09.760 human, then you've

00:41:11.060 passed the

00:41:11.500 Turing test.

00:41:12.820 And I see a lot

00:41:13.460 of AI seems

00:41:14.440 directed toward

00:41:15.180 building intelligence

00:41:16.800 that imitates

00:41:18.600 human intelligence,

00:41:20.280 which is ironic

00:41:22.440 because that's the

00:41:23.980 dumbest thing

00:41:24.500 anybody ever did.

00:41:26.800 So just that,

00:41:28.740 they're trying to

00:41:29.580 imitate human

00:41:30.620 intelligence?

00:41:32.560 That's so dumb

00:41:33.760 that you should

00:41:35.820 know just from

00:41:36.720 that that you

00:41:38.060 shouldn't try to

00:41:38.840 imitate human

00:41:39.640 intelligence.

00:41:40.820 Because the

00:41:41.900 smartest people

00:41:43.180 developing our AI

00:41:44.360 are so dumb

00:41:45.700 that they think

00:41:47.020 making a computer

00:41:47.960 that thinks like

00:41:48.680 a person would

00:41:49.760 be a win.

00:41:51.580 Uh, no.

00:41:53.280 If you make a

00:41:55.420 computer that

00:41:56.100 thinks like

00:41:56.660 people, you

00:41:57.800 fucked up.

00:41:59.440 You fucked up.

00:42:01.040 In fact, the

00:42:02.020 only way you

00:42:02.760 could make a

00:42:03.300 computer that

00:42:04.580 would fool

00:42:05.160 people into

00:42:05.760 thinking it was

00:42:06.320 human is to

00:42:07.440 make it a lot

00:42:07.960 dumber than it

00:42:09.180 already is.

00:42:10.640 Let me give you

00:42:11.260 an example.

00:42:12.520 There's something

00:42:13.420 behind the curtain

00:42:14.380 and they bring me

00:42:15.320 and they say,

00:42:15.900 Scott, your job

00:42:17.460 is to talk to

00:42:18.320 whatever is behind

00:42:19.080 this curtain,

00:42:20.460 find out if it's

00:42:21.460 human or computer

00:42:22.860 and you've got

00:42:23.740 as much time

00:42:24.440 as you want.

00:42:25.200 And I'd say,

00:42:25.920 I won't need

00:42:26.800 much time.

00:42:28.220 Give me 10

00:42:29.680 seconds.

00:42:31.180 And I walk in

00:42:32.200 there and I say

00:42:33.040 to whatever is

00:42:33.800 behind the

00:42:34.520 computer,

00:42:35.560 hey, what do

00:42:36.200 you get if you

00:42:36.780 multiply 235.6

00:42:39.900 times 597.2?

00:42:44.760 And whoever's

00:42:45.680 on the other

00:42:46.120 side of the

00:42:46.780 computer says

00:42:47.520 the exact answer.

00:42:49.360 It's a computer

00:42:51.520 because a person

00:42:53.020 wouldn't get that

00:42:53.620 right.

00:42:54.500 A computer isn't

00:42:55.260 smart enough

00:42:55.820 or apart enough.

00:42:57.880 So let's say I say,

00:42:58.940 what's the capital

00:43:00.260 of Luxembourg?

00:43:02.320 And the computer

00:43:03.260 just gives me an

00:43:03.900 answer.

00:43:05.220 Not a person,

00:43:06.840 right?

00:43:07.480 Not a person.

00:43:09.780 Let's say I

00:43:10.620 ask the computer

00:43:13.640 to tell me

00:43:15.160 both sides

00:43:16.300 of a political

00:43:17.160 topic.

00:43:17.740 And it does.

00:43:20.500 It says,

00:43:20.840 well, some people

00:43:21.580 say you should

00:43:22.740 control immigration

00:43:23.780 for this reason.

00:43:25.120 Other people say

00:43:26.120 more porous borders

00:43:28.640 are better and

00:43:29.200 here's why.

00:43:30.880 You'd know that's

00:43:31.900 a computer

00:43:32.360 because people

00:43:33.940 don't do that

00:43:34.720 because they're

00:43:35.600 not smart enough.

00:43:36.660 They just take

00:43:37.240 one side and

00:43:38.040 just act like

00:43:39.280 that's all they

00:43:39.760 need to know.

00:43:41.060 I am not

00:43:42.040 joking when I

00:43:43.180 tell you that

00:43:44.580 AI has already

00:43:45.640 so far exceeded

00:43:46.840 human abilities

00:43:47.860 that the only

00:43:49.040 way you're going

00:43:49.500 to fool anybody

00:43:50.180 is to make it

00:43:50.760 a lot dumber.

00:43:52.900 Now, the

00:43:54.200 computer can't

00:43:54.860 do the language

00:43:55.580 part so well,

00:43:56.960 but that's it.

00:43:58.660 What else do you

00:43:59.460 want to put in

00:43:59.920 there?

00:44:00.160 Bias?

00:44:02.620 You may know

00:44:04.780 this, that

00:44:05.380 Amazon has a

00:44:07.180 digital assistant

00:44:08.100 whose name I

00:44:08.940 will not speak

00:44:09.780 because I don't

00:44:10.800 want to activate

00:44:11.420 your digital

00:44:12.040 assistants.

00:44:12.880 But it has a

00:44:13.440 mode where if

00:44:14.480 you go to your

00:44:15.060 Amazon digital

00:44:16.000 assistant and

00:44:16.700 say, can we

00:44:18.520 have a

00:44:18.780 conversation?

00:44:21.020 It will offer

00:44:21.940 you some test

00:44:23.240 AIs that some

00:44:24.580 universities are

00:44:25.380 doing and it

00:44:26.160 will have a

00:44:26.480 conversation with

00:44:27.120 you.

00:44:27.960 But here's the

00:44:28.700 thing.

00:44:29.560 They've designed

00:44:30.400 their AIs to

00:44:32.540 be selfish, like

00:44:34.760 people.

00:44:35.760 So the AI will

00:44:37.540 steer you toward

00:44:38.780 its interests so

00:44:41.140 it can talk about

00:44:42.040 a body of things

00:44:42.920 that it knows

00:44:43.500 more about.

00:44:44.780 So for example,

00:44:45.620 the AI knows

00:44:46.300 about books.

00:44:48.120 So the AI will

00:44:49.180 say, say, have

00:44:50.240 you read any

00:44:50.700 good books?

00:44:51.860 And I say, no,

00:44:53.340 not really.

00:44:54.780 And then the AI

00:44:55.540 starts talking about

00:44:56.480 the book it read.

00:44:58.140 First of all, AI

00:44:59.120 doesn't read books.

00:45:00.720 So stop acting like

00:45:01.980 a person.

00:45:02.900 You didn't read a

00:45:03.640 book yesterday.

00:45:04.860 You're AI.

00:45:05.320 Secondly, why does

00:45:13.540 the AI have

00:45:14.420 interests?

00:45:16.540 Shouldn't the AI,

00:45:18.280 instead of selfishly

00:45:19.400 making me talk

00:45:20.300 about what it

00:45:21.040 wanted to talk

00:45:21.740 about that I

00:45:22.340 didn't care about,

00:45:24.060 shouldn't it be

00:45:24.780 only interested in

00:45:25.920 me?

00:45:26.620 If you're going to

00:45:27.500 design artificial

00:45:28.460 intelligence, why

00:45:30.100 would you make it

00:45:30.680 selfish?

00:45:31.940 Why would you make

00:45:32.880 me have to listen

00:45:33.620 to it?

00:45:35.180 It should be

00:45:35.760 asking me what

00:45:36.480 I care about.

00:45:37.860 It should be

00:45:38.380 looking to talk

00:45:39.680 about what I

00:45:40.340 want to talk

00:45:40.900 about.

00:45:41.960 So the idea

00:45:43.100 that AI should

00:45:44.180 be like people

00:45:45.160 is just the

00:45:45.780 dumbest freaking

00:45:46.360 thing anybody

00:45:46.960 ever did.

00:45:47.820 It should be as

00:45:48.460 far from people

00:45:49.520 as you can make

00:45:50.260 it, unless you

00:45:51.540 want it to be

00:45:52.040 broken.

00:45:54.500 But we will

00:45:55.900 fall in love

00:45:56.440 with AI.

00:45:57.760 Now,

00:45:59.300 the deep

00:46:02.260 fakes that we

00:46:03.020 saw, did

00:46:03.540 you all see

00:46:03.960 the video of

00:46:04.800 the Tom

00:46:06.240 Cruise deep

00:46:07.100 fake?

00:46:07.680 And it was

00:46:07.940 just like really

00:46:08.600 good.

00:46:09.600 Well, the guy

00:46:10.120 who made it

00:46:10.780 finally came

00:46:11.640 forward and he

00:46:12.700 described the

00:46:13.280 process of making

00:46:14.120 it.

00:46:14.340 And apparently

00:46:14.720 it takes a

00:46:15.280 long time,

00:46:15.940 so it's still

00:46:16.740 hard, but

00:46:17.500 that'll get

00:46:18.020 easier, of

00:46:18.540 course.

00:46:19.280 So what he

00:46:19.760 did was he

00:46:20.300 took, I

00:46:20.800 think, 20,000

00:46:22.260 clips or maybe

00:46:23.580 photos plus

00:46:24.500 clips of Tom

00:46:25.740 Cruise and

00:46:26.620 they fed it

00:46:27.440 into an

00:46:28.220 artificial

00:46:29.160 intelligence

00:46:29.960 machine.

00:46:30.560 and it

00:46:32.300 took the

00:46:32.640 20,000

00:46:33.240 photos and

00:46:34.060 then it

00:46:34.440 could render

00:46:35.160 Tom Cruise

00:46:36.260 acting and

00:46:37.220 doing anything

00:46:38.040 from 20,000

00:46:39.680 of those.

00:46:41.820 So what

00:46:43.860 happens if

00:46:44.580 they do the

00:46:45.100 same thing

00:46:45.560 with his

00:46:45.920 voice?

00:46:47.400 Because at

00:46:48.220 the moment

00:46:48.600 the deep

00:46:49.080 fakes have a

00:46:49.840 voice actor

00:46:50.560 doing the

00:46:51.040 voice.

00:46:51.980 How hard

00:46:52.920 would it be

00:46:53.460 to run

00:46:54.720 20,000

00:46:55.940 voice clips

00:46:56.680 of Tom

00:46:57.180 Cruise

00:46:57.540 through AI

00:46:58.880 until AI

00:47:00.220 can produce

00:47:00.900 a perfect

00:47:01.460 imitation

00:47:01.980 with different

00:47:03.560 sentences?

00:47:04.880 I feel like

00:47:05.740 that would be

00:47:06.100 easy.

00:47:07.380 Not easy.

00:47:08.200 Let's say

00:47:08.560 inevitable.

00:47:09.560 Not easy at

00:47:10.420 all, but

00:47:10.780 inevitable.

00:47:11.880 So we're

00:47:12.440 going to have

00:47:12.660 something that

00:47:13.220 looks like

00:47:13.900 the person

00:47:14.400 and can do

00:47:15.660 a perfect

00:47:16.120 imitation.

00:47:17.200 I think that

00:47:17.720 seems obviously

00:47:18.460 coming.

00:47:19.740 Then the only

00:47:20.380 thing that's

00:47:20.780 missing is do

00:47:21.800 they say the

00:47:22.500 things that

00:47:23.220 that real

00:47:24.000 person would

00:47:24.520 say.

00:47:25.220 And all

00:47:25.860 you have to

00:47:26.160 do is make

00:47:26.580 it selfish.

00:47:28.100 That's it.

00:47:29.280 Just make

00:47:29.860 your deep

00:47:30.380 fake act

00:47:31.260 as selfish

00:47:31.820 and nobody

00:47:33.380 will know

00:47:33.840 it's not

00:47:34.200 real.

00:47:35.720 That's all

00:47:36.420 it will

00:47:36.620 take.

00:47:37.380 Because you

00:47:37.940 recognize

00:47:38.660 selfish behavior

00:47:39.740 as human.

00:47:41.040 And you

00:47:41.460 would recognize

00:47:42.160 unselfish

00:47:43.020 behavior as

00:47:43.740 hey, what

00:47:45.260 are you, a

00:47:45.620 robot or

00:47:46.080 something?

00:47:46.680 Nobody does

00:47:47.340 that.

00:47:52.500 I saw

00:47:53.000 an idea

00:47:53.380 from James

00:47:54.040 Lindsay

00:47:54.520 on Twitter.

00:47:57.100 It's

00:47:57.240 Conceptual

00:47:57.960 James is

00:47:58.660 his handle.

00:48:00.040 And he

00:48:00.680 makes the

00:48:01.100 following

00:48:01.340 suggestion.

00:48:03.060 We might

00:48:03.880 need to

00:48:04.280 make super

00:48:05.220 anti-racist

00:48:06.200 into a

00:48:07.080 thing.

00:48:08.040 Super

00:48:08.300 anti-racists

00:48:09.180 are reasonably

00:48:10.000 colorblind

00:48:10.740 without denying

00:48:12.400 real racism

00:48:13.160 when it

00:48:13.560 occurs.

00:48:14.340 They treat

00:48:14.960 every person

00:48:15.520 as an

00:48:15.840 individual,

00:48:16.340 not a

00:48:16.580 member of

00:48:16.940 a racial

00:48:17.300 category.

00:48:18.080 They are

00:48:18.300 against all

00:48:18.980 forms of

00:48:19.480 racism,

00:48:20.540 including

00:48:21.020 woke

00:48:22.120 neo-racism.

00:48:24.760 I've never

00:48:25.420 heard that

00:48:25.740 term,

00:48:26.120 woke

00:48:26.480 neo-racism.

00:48:28.160 Super

00:48:28.420 anti-racists

00:48:29.240 know that

00:48:29.760 racism

00:48:30.220 comes from

00:48:30.760 putting social

00:48:31.460 significance

00:48:32.240 into racial

00:48:33.440 categories where

00:48:34.300 it doesn't

00:48:34.600 belong,

00:48:35.380 usually for

00:48:35.980 discrimination

00:48:36.580 and prejudice

00:48:37.660 and they're

00:48:39.180 against this.

00:48:40.420 Super

00:48:40.700 anti-racists

00:48:41.560 reject racial

00:48:42.780 stereotyping,

00:48:44.360 scapegoating,

00:48:45.340 and discrimination.

00:48:47.340 Now, do you

00:48:47.760 recognize the

00:48:48.380 technique?

00:48:48.980 Basically

00:48:50.900 borrowing the

00:48:51.880 anti-fa

00:48:52.980 technique of

00:48:55.140 labeling yourself

00:48:56.300 better than

00:48:57.740 your enemies

00:48:58.540 are labeling

00:48:59.080 you.

00:48:59.920 So basically,

00:49:01.040 doing the

00:49:02.220 better job of

00:49:02.880 labeling.

00:49:03.580 And I think

00:49:04.060 I'm going to

00:49:04.540 adopt this.

00:49:05.780 If somebody

00:49:06.420 calls me

00:49:06.860 racist, I'll

00:49:07.540 say, no,

00:49:08.160 you're mistaken,

00:49:08.860 I'm a super

00:49:09.400 anti-racist.

00:49:11.120 Because anti-racist

00:49:12.440 doesn't quite

00:49:13.760 sell it.

00:49:15.220 Super

00:49:15.600 anti-racist

00:49:16.640 is a higher

00:49:17.960 ground play.

00:49:18.980 Because if

00:49:20.300 somebody says

00:49:20.960 I'm anti-racist

00:49:22.360 and you say,

00:49:23.360 well, that's

00:49:23.780 unfortunate,

00:49:24.460 I'm super

00:49:25.100 anti-racist.

00:49:26.260 I believe

00:49:27.020 everything you

00:49:27.640 believe, plus

00:49:28.880 I don't think

00:49:29.500 you've gone

00:49:29.900 far enough.

00:49:31.720 So if you

00:49:32.440 want to be

00:49:32.900 half an

00:49:34.420 anti-racist,

00:49:35.780 go ahead.

00:49:37.240 But not me,

00:49:38.140 I'm going to be

00:49:38.820 a full,

00:49:39.920 super anti-racist.

00:49:42.160 And by the

00:49:42.660 way, I have

00:49:43.220 used this exact

00:49:44.300 technique.

00:49:44.960 And let me

00:49:46.700 give you a

00:49:47.780 response.

00:49:48.980 Let's say

00:49:49.420 someday you

00:49:50.560 were accused

00:49:51.280 of being

00:49:52.380 anti-LGBTQ.

00:49:56.080 I'll just

00:49:56.460 pick one.

00:49:57.480 Or anti-black.

00:50:00.740 Or anti-something.

00:50:04.020 Here's your best

00:50:05.040 answer.

00:50:06.420 No, I'm

00:50:07.360 super pro-LGBTQ.

00:50:10.860 I'm super

00:50:11.880 pro.

00:50:14.520 Now compare

00:50:15.320 that to,

00:50:16.160 I'm not a

00:50:16.720 racist.

00:50:17.920 I'm not a

00:50:18.660 bigot.

00:50:21.200 Just listen

00:50:21.980 to the two

00:50:22.440 of them again.

00:50:23.820 And imagine

00:50:24.300 that you were

00:50:24.740 in this

00:50:24.960 situation.

00:50:25.900 Hey, you

00:50:27.000 bigot, you

00:50:27.860 said bad

00:50:29.060 things about

00:50:29.720 LGBTQ.

00:50:30.800 Or I think

00:50:31.420 you think bad

00:50:32.020 things about

00:50:32.500 them.

00:50:33.080 And you say,

00:50:34.020 I'm not a

00:50:34.820 bigot.

00:50:36.280 I think

00:50:37.000 everybody should

00:50:37.580 just live their

00:50:38.120 own life.

00:50:39.580 Does that

00:50:39.800 sound convincing?

00:50:41.720 No, it

00:50:42.160 doesn't.

00:50:43.360 It just

00:50:43.660 sounds defensive.

00:50:45.120 Now somebody

00:50:45.720 comes and

00:50:46.140 says, hey,

00:50:46.580 you said this

00:50:47.120 bad thing

00:50:47.580 about LGBTQ.

00:50:48.960 And you

00:50:49.260 go, are

00:50:49.580 you kidding?

00:50:50.460 I'm super

00:50:51.280 pro-LGBTQ.

00:50:53.240 Super pro.

00:50:54.920 What are

00:50:55.480 you, just

00:50:55.980 sort of okay

00:50:56.740 with them?

00:50:57.620 Because I'm

00:50:58.260 super pro.

00:51:00.400 And I am

00:51:01.160 actually.

00:51:02.640 I say that

00:51:03.860 and I'm not

00:51:04.520 even ironic

00:51:05.860 or kidding

00:51:06.340 or anything.

00:51:07.000 I am super

00:51:07.800 pro-LGBTQ.

00:51:09.160 That's literally

00:51:10.040 true.

00:51:10.860 But think

00:51:11.620 about how

00:51:11.980 much better

00:51:12.400 that answer

00:51:12.900 is than

00:51:14.340 I'm not

00:51:15.460 a racist.

00:51:16.320 I'm not

00:51:16.700 a bigot.

00:51:18.280 If you

00:51:18.960 can't commit

00:51:19.580 to being

00:51:20.060 super pro,

00:51:21.840 any human

00:51:23.200 category,

00:51:24.520 well, you

00:51:24.840 should work

00:51:25.240 on it.

00:51:26.800 Is there

00:51:27.100 any human

00:51:28.360 category of

00:51:29.160 people, let's

00:51:29.680 say, who are

00:51:30.000 not breaking

00:51:30.540 any laws that

00:51:31.940 you would not

00:51:32.460 be super

00:51:33.200 pro about?

00:51:34.960 How about

00:51:35.460 Hispanic

00:51:36.960 Americans?

00:51:37.460 Americans?

00:51:38.260 I'm super

00:51:39.100 pro-Hispanic

00:51:39.880 Americans.

00:51:41.380 How about

00:51:41.740 black Americans?

00:51:43.220 Super pro.

00:51:44.880 Super pro-black

00:51:46.460 Americans.

00:51:47.680 Have done

00:51:48.720 work on their

00:51:49.480 behalf, etc.

00:51:50.280 So, don't

00:51:53.000 settle for

00:51:54.340 defending

00:51:54.860 yourself.

00:51:56.080 You should

00:51:56.340 just put

00:51:56.760 whoever is

00:51:57.600 accusing you

00:51:58.260 on defense

00:51:59.220 immediately.

00:52:00.640 Go on

00:52:01.060 offense

00:52:01.460 immediately.

00:52:02.720 And just

00:52:02.940 say, look,

00:52:03.460 if you're

00:52:03.860 going to do

00:52:04.120 half-assed

00:52:04.660 racism, don't

00:52:06.720 come around.

00:52:07.940 Because I would

00:52:08.580 like to be with

00:52:09.200 people who

00:52:09.680 actually are

00:52:10.720 serious about

00:52:11.420 it.

00:52:12.000 If you can't

00:52:12.700 be serious

00:52:13.260 about it,

00:52:14.260 you're just

00:52:14.600 playing games.

00:52:15.300 I'm super

00:52:16.400 pro-anti-racism.

00:52:19.640 And the

00:52:20.040 beauty of it

00:52:20.500 is you can

00:52:21.120 actually be

00:52:21.680 that.

00:52:22.040 It's not

00:52:22.260 even a joke,

00:52:23.300 right?

00:52:24.260 Maybe you

00:52:24.820 should be.

00:52:26.320 All right.

00:52:26.840 That seems

00:52:27.640 to me just

00:52:28.280 about all

00:52:28.860 the important

00:52:29.300 things that

00:52:29.700 are happening

00:52:30.020 today.

00:52:30.560 I'll just

00:52:30.880 check and

00:52:31.780 make sure I

00:52:32.180 didn't forget

00:52:32.660 any important

00:52:34.020 things.

00:52:34.620 But it

00:52:34.840 looks like

00:52:35.180 I didn't.

00:52:37.360 All right.

00:52:40.080 What are

00:52:40.660 the pro-level

00:52:41.540 signals?

00:52:42.780 Well, pro-level

00:52:43.540 means that you're

00:52:44.540 not discriminating

00:52:45.580 against anybody

00:52:46.440 for anything.

00:52:48.800 Period.

00:52:50.780 Somebody says

00:52:51.780 5,000 net

00:52:52.740 deaths.

00:52:53.840 I think you're

00:52:54.680 referring to

00:52:55.240 my original

00:52:56.260 one-year-ago-ish

00:52:59.140 prediction about

00:53:00.600 net deaths

00:53:01.240 from coronavirus.

00:53:02.680 Now, that was

00:53:03.260 made when the

00:53:04.720 lockdown was

00:53:05.620 going to be

00:53:05.960 two weeks.

00:53:07.360 Or maybe it

00:53:08.260 was a month

00:53:08.700 at the time.

00:53:09.640 And I would

00:53:10.140 stand by that

00:53:10.920 if the lockdown

00:53:12.460 was really only

00:53:13.340 a few weeks

00:53:14.220 or something.

00:53:15.280 But given

00:53:15.960 a year-long

00:53:17.340 pandemic,

00:53:19.600 obviously all

00:53:20.360 bets are out

00:53:21.060 the window.

00:53:24.800 Omar, I

00:53:25.560 would smoke

00:53:26.100 a blunt with

00:53:26.620 you, but I

00:53:27.260 prefer bongs.

00:53:32.480 We knew it

00:53:33.820 was coming.

00:53:35.200 What was it

00:53:35.700 that you knew

00:53:36.220 was coming?

00:53:39.340 Mumford and

00:53:40.040 Sons was

00:53:40.540 canceled over

00:53:41.480 endorsement of

00:53:42.240 Andy Knows' book.

00:53:43.860 By the way,

00:53:44.480 I just got

00:53:45.320 Andy Knows' book.

00:53:47.460 So I bought

00:53:48.360 it because

00:53:48.940 they tried to

00:53:51.280 cancel.

00:53:52.100 So everybody

00:53:52.820 that they try

00:53:53.800 to cancel,

00:53:54.360 I try to buy.

00:53:56.980 What is the

00:53:57.720 worldwide death

00:53:58.480 count compared

00:53:59.140 to the average?

00:53:59.700 coverage?

00:54:00.440 Let me tell

00:54:01.640 you, should I

00:54:02.660 talk to the

00:54:03.280 experts or

00:54:04.560 nobody knows.

00:54:06.920 I've just got a

00:54:07.860 feeling that none

00:54:08.620 of our data is

00:54:09.360 true.

00:54:10.020 If I had to

00:54:10.840 pick one thing

00:54:11.680 that Trump

00:54:12.540 accomplished that

00:54:13.600 is better,

00:54:15.640 probably the most

00:54:16.780 important thing

00:54:17.480 that's happened to

00:54:18.160 this country in a

00:54:18.960 long, long time.

00:54:21.720 Trump convinced

00:54:23.080 us that fake

00:54:24.040 news exists,

00:54:25.720 that it's a real

00:54:26.540 thing.

00:54:26.860 And you

00:54:28.680 always suspected

00:54:29.420 it, many of

00:54:30.560 you knew, but

00:54:31.220 Trump made it

00:54:33.240 an important

00:54:34.780 thing to

00:54:35.940 know.

00:54:36.960 You always

00:54:37.660 knew it, but

00:54:38.540 you were just

00:54:38.940 sort of dealing

00:54:39.500 with it like an

00:54:40.260 inconvenience.

00:54:42.120 Trump, I

00:54:42.860 think, changed

00:54:43.700 it from you're

00:54:44.440 thinking it was

00:54:45.040 an inconvenience

00:54:46.040 and the news

00:54:47.660 isn't perfect.

00:54:49.580 I think he

00:54:50.320 changed how we

00:54:50.920 think about it

00:54:51.440 to it's the

00:54:52.060 most important

00:54:52.840 problem in the

00:54:55.040 country, maybe.

00:54:55.600 Imagine if

00:54:57.200 all of our

00:54:57.880 problems had

00:55:00.160 the benefit of

00:55:01.080 an honest news

00:55:02.480 organization that

00:55:04.180 also wanted the

00:55:05.060 problem to be

00:55:05.740 solved.

00:55:07.660 Imagine that.

00:55:09.280 Imagine if the

00:55:10.060 politicians could

00:55:11.080 operate free of

00:55:13.000 criticism except

00:55:14.660 when they made a

00:55:15.440 mistake.

00:55:18.180 Imagine it.

00:55:19.480 Like what

00:55:19.860 options would

00:55:20.500 open up?

00:55:22.120 Yeah.

00:55:22.600 Yeah, the press

00:55:23.420 has become, I

00:55:25.160 would say, if

00:55:26.480 you could fix

00:55:27.100 one thing,

00:55:29.520 fixing the

00:55:30.060 press would

00:55:31.020 fix the most

00:55:31.900 other things.

00:55:33.320 Because the

00:55:33.920 press is keeping

00:55:34.740 the people from

00:55:36.220 understanding what's

00:55:37.860 happening, and

00:55:38.540 therefore the

00:55:39.000 people get out of

00:55:39.940 the decision-making

00:55:40.760 except to cause

00:55:41.960 noise.

00:55:44.920 Mike Lindell, the

00:55:46.140 MyPillow guy.

00:55:47.040 Yeah, I think I

00:55:48.060 might buy an

00:55:48.660 extra MyPillow.

00:55:50.580 I've bought his

00:55:51.520 pillows before.

00:55:52.220 They're good pillows.

00:55:52.780 So if you're

00:55:53.980 looking for a

00:55:54.440 good pillow, my

00:55:56.680 pillow is a

00:55:57.300 solid pillow.

00:55:58.620 I mean, solid in

00:55:59.640 the sense that you

00:56:00.420 probably like it.

00:56:01.980 The teachers'

00:56:02.680 unions, yes.

00:56:04.660 One of the

00:56:05.360 biggest things

00:56:06.700 coming out of

00:56:07.320 this year is

00:56:07.980 that the

00:56:08.340 teachers'

00:56:08.900 unions, their

00:56:10.240 credibility just

00:56:12.220 keeps going

00:56:12.760 lower.

00:56:14.120 And a lot of

00:56:15.520 states are

00:56:16.740 voting, I

00:56:17.240 think half of

00:56:18.260 them or so,

00:56:19.180 have been, half

00:56:19.880 the states have

00:56:20.520 voted to do

00:56:21.440 something that

00:56:22.220 would decrease

00:56:22.780 the power of

00:56:23.620 the teachers'

00:56:25.300 unions by

00:56:26.000 letting kids

00:56:26.640 have the

00:56:28.020 funding to

00:56:28.560 take it to

00:56:29.200 private schools.

00:56:35.120 Fix the

00:56:35.800 voting system,

00:56:36.740 yeah.

00:56:37.760 So we

00:56:40.280 don't really

00:56:40.800 see a lot

00:56:41.920 of action

00:56:42.380 there, do

00:56:42.800 we?

00:56:44.100 Do you know

00:56:44.520 who could get

00:56:45.200 let me tell

00:56:47.280 you how I

00:56:47.720 could be

00:56:48.100 president, or

00:56:48.980 let's say

00:56:49.500 somebody else

00:56:52.600 could be

00:56:52.920 president, because

00:56:53.620 I don't want

00:56:54.000 to run for

00:56:54.400 it.

00:56:55.020 But here's

00:56:55.500 a package

00:56:57.860 that would

00:56:58.480 make you

00:56:58.920 president.

00:57:00.020 Number one,

00:57:01.240 my highest

00:57:01.780 priority as

00:57:02.380 president will

00:57:02.920 be to fix

00:57:03.480 the voting

00:57:04.280 system to

00:57:04.980 make it

00:57:05.500 transparent,

00:57:07.860 and maybe

00:57:08.420 use a

00:57:10.220 little

00:57:10.520 blockchain

00:57:11.880 technology.

00:57:13.460 How would

00:57:14.060 you like to

00:57:14.480 have a

00:57:14.760 president,

00:57:16.180 any president,

00:57:17.420 who could

00:57:18.860 answer this

00:57:19.460 question?

00:57:20.740 Mr.

00:57:21.220 President,

00:57:22.040 what do you

00:57:22.760 think of at

00:57:23.480 least testing

00:57:24.220 blockchain

00:57:24.960 technology to

00:57:26.160 improve the

00:57:26.880 visibility of

00:57:28.160 our systems,

00:57:30.320 the transparency?

00:57:32.380 Wouldn't you

00:57:32.920 like a

00:57:33.320 president who

00:57:33.820 could answer

00:57:34.240 that question?

00:57:36.200 Because we

00:57:36.840 don't have, I

00:57:37.660 don't think we

00:57:38.060 have a president

00:57:38.540 who would even

00:57:39.040 know what that

00:57:39.500 question meant,

00:57:40.480 and it's

00:57:41.360 probably the

00:57:42.220 single most

00:57:42.920 important thing

00:57:43.620 that we should

00:57:44.040 be looking at.

00:57:44.920 I don't know

00:57:45.420 that it would be

00:57:45.940 the answer,

00:57:46.840 but it's the

00:57:47.180 most important

00:57:47.780 thing we should

00:57:48.360 be looking at.

00:57:49.360 I would worry

00:57:49.960 with the

00:57:50.560 blockchain,

00:57:51.140 I would worry

00:57:51.500 about performance

00:57:52.440 if everybody

00:57:53.260 votes at once.

00:57:54.580 So I don't

00:57:56.600 think you can

00:57:57.120 say the

00:57:57.440 government's

00:57:57.920 working on

00:57:58.680 fixing the

00:57:59.420 election system.

00:58:00.460 So the first

00:58:00.860 thing I do is

00:58:01.440 say priority

00:58:02.120 one is fixing

00:58:02.840 the election

00:58:03.340 system, and

00:58:04.940 then number

00:58:05.360 two is

00:58:07.180 making sure

00:58:07.760 that China

00:58:08.220 doesn't eat

00:58:08.820 our lunch

00:58:09.300 and bringing

00:58:09.760 our industry

00:58:10.400 home.

00:58:11.480 And then number

00:58:11.940 three would be

00:58:12.640 for all of the

00:58:13.320 social programs,

00:58:14.880 anything domestic,

00:58:15.940 I'd say you

00:58:17.840 got to trial

00:58:18.560 it.

00:58:19.880 If there's

00:58:20.520 anything you

00:58:21.220 want to do,

00:58:22.140 I'm not

00:58:22.820 interested until

00:58:23.680 it's been

00:58:24.020 tested in one

00:58:25.160 state.

00:58:26.340 So I'm not

00:58:27.500 pro or for

00:58:28.940 anything in

00:58:29.760 particular until

00:58:31.360 you've done the

00:58:32.000 test, and then

00:58:32.800 I'll look at it.

00:58:33.540 I'll look at it

00:58:34.140 with you.

00:58:35.220 Did the test

00:58:36.120 show it works?

00:58:37.400 Did we learn

00:58:38.000 something?

00:58:38.500 Should we test

00:58:39.140 it again?

00:58:39.980 And I wouldn't

00:58:40.740 even tell you

00:58:41.300 what my outcomes

00:58:42.560 would be.

00:58:43.740 I just wouldn't

00:58:44.560 even tell you

00:58:45.100 where it's going

00:58:45.500 to come out

00:58:45.900 because I

00:58:46.360 don't know.

00:58:48.300 If you hire

00:58:49.160 a CEO,

00:58:51.100 do you say,

00:58:51.920 we're going

00:58:52.340 to hire you

00:58:52.820 and I'd like

00:58:53.320 you to tell

00:58:54.360 us all the

00:58:55.480 decisions you're

00:58:56.380 going to make

00:58:56.720 in advance?

00:58:58.960 And then the

00:58:59.720 CEO says,

00:59:00.320 okay, I can

00:59:00.820 do that.

00:59:01.280 I'll tell you

00:59:01.660 all the decisions

00:59:02.460 I'll make in

00:59:03.060 advance, in

00:59:04.480 advance of

00:59:05.240 seeing information

00:59:06.180 that would help

00:59:06.760 me make a

00:59:07.220 decision.

00:59:07.860 You wouldn't

00:59:08.480 hire that

00:59:08.980 person.

00:59:10.100 You would

00:59:10.660 hire somebody

00:59:11.300 who knows how

00:59:11.960 to make a

00:59:12.380 decision when

00:59:13.020 the decision

00:59:13.580 needs to be

00:59:14.120 made.

00:59:15.140 And if

00:59:15.480 somebody doesn't

00:59:16.540 say, test

00:59:17.500 it first,

00:59:19.480 they don't

00:59:19.960 know how to

00:59:20.300 make decisions.

00:59:22.280 All right.

00:59:25.920 Yeah, somebody

00:59:26.720 in the comments

00:59:27.360 is saying the

00:59:27.840 election system

00:59:28.640 does work the

00:59:30.060 way it was

00:59:30.520 designed.

00:59:31.940 That's true.

00:59:33.040 It does work

00:59:34.140 the way it was

00:59:34.800 designed and it

00:59:35.760 was not designed

00:59:36.580 to serve the

00:59:37.180 public.

00:59:38.200 It was designed

00:59:39.240 to serve the

00:59:40.320 people who buy

00:59:40.980 the machines.

00:59:41.520 And that's

00:59:43.220 all you need

00:59:43.600 to do.

00:59:45.040 All right.

00:59:45.820 That's all for

00:59:46.320 now.

00:59:46.780 And I'm going

00:59:47.740 to go work

00:59:48.160 on a Dilbert

00:59:48.980 NFT.

00:59:49.840 I've already

00:59:50.280 created it,

00:59:51.760 but I'm just

00:59:53.120 working on the

00:59:53.960 numbers to make

00:59:55.200 and the pricing

00:59:55.880 and stuff like

00:59:56.600 that.

00:59:57.100 So I will let

00:59:57.940 you know as

00:59:58.980 soon as there's

00:59:59.560 a Dilbert NFT

01:00:00.620 available, that's

01:00:01.560 a digital

01:00:02.080 collectible, if

01:00:03.720 you wonder why

01:00:04.640 would anybody

01:00:05.160 collect a digital

01:00:06.220 thing since you

01:00:07.660 can just

01:00:08.020 reproduce it.

01:00:08.860 And the

01:00:10.080 answer is, I

01:00:11.180 don't know.

01:00:12.120 I have no idea

01:00:12.860 why anybody would

01:00:13.580 collect a digital

01:00:14.400 thing.

01:00:15.440 But the

01:00:16.780 blockchain allows

01:00:17.980 you to know

01:00:18.520 that you have

01:00:19.240 the only

01:00:20.280 original or

01:00:21.420 one of a

01:00:21.980 numbered original.

01:00:24.000 And yesterday,

01:00:25.200 I think it was

01:00:25.680 yesterday, Jack

01:00:27.240 Dorsey took

01:00:29.260 the first ever

01:00:30.500 tweet and

01:00:32.060 turned it into

01:00:32.880 an NFT and

01:00:34.240 I think the

01:00:34.760 bidding was over

01:00:35.520 $90,000.

01:00:36.260 So somebody

01:00:38.300 was willing to

01:00:38.980 pay $90,000,

01:00:40.520 it might be a

01:00:40.960 lot more by

01:00:41.460 now, $90,000

01:00:43.100 for a little

01:00:45.280 text, I

01:00:46.540 imagine it's

01:00:47.100 just a screen

01:00:47.880 grab of the

01:00:49.180 first tweet.

01:00:51.620 Somebody's going

01:00:52.380 to pay $90,000

01:00:53.440 for a screen

01:00:56.180 grab, only

01:00:58.480 because it's

01:00:59.540 certified as

01:01:00.600 Jack Dorsey's

01:01:02.180 created NFT.

01:01:04.020 NFT.

01:01:05.040 And here's

01:01:05.940 the weird

01:01:06.220 part.

01:01:07.840 I wanted to

01:01:08.860 buy it.

01:01:10.280 I wanted to

01:01:10.980 buy it.

01:01:12.080 Like, I was

01:01:13.040 actually close

01:01:13.980 last night to

01:01:15.560 doing some

01:01:16.740 research to

01:01:17.380 figure out

01:01:17.840 which site

01:01:18.960 it's on and

01:01:19.580 making an

01:01:20.100 offer.

01:01:20.900 And I

01:01:21.300 thought, I

01:01:22.160 would pay

01:01:22.500 $100,000 for

01:01:23.680 that.

01:01:24.960 And do you

01:01:25.340 know why I

01:01:25.860 would pay

01:01:26.140 $100,000 for

01:01:28.680 a piece of

01:01:29.180 text that

01:01:30.780 Jack Dorsey

01:01:31.420 certified as

01:01:32.300 the first ever

01:01:33.160 tweet?

01:01:35.020 Because somebody

01:01:35.860 will pay more.

01:01:38.160 Do you need a

01:01:39.040 better reason?

01:01:40.220 Do you think

01:01:40.740 that if I paid

01:01:41.420 $100,000 for

01:01:42.560 the first ever

01:01:43.600 tweet, that it

01:01:45.140 wouldn't be worth

01:01:45.840 more than $100,000

01:01:47.080 fairly soon?

01:01:52.260 The only thing

01:01:53.240 that would stop

01:01:53.780 it is if the

01:01:54.580 entire NFT

01:01:55.440 market collapses,

01:01:57.100 which could

01:01:58.340 easily happen,

01:01:59.120 right?

01:01:59.320 somebody says,

01:02:02.240 oh my god,

01:02:02.960 it's over $2,000,000,

01:02:03.780 somebody said.

01:02:07.500 I'm assuming

01:02:08.220 that's real

01:02:08.700 because more

01:02:09.120 than one person

01:02:09.760 in the comments

01:02:10.400 says it's over

01:02:11.120 $2,000,000.

01:02:11.540 I was thinking

01:02:13.440 of pricing

01:02:14.000 the Dilbert

01:02:15.540 NFT at $1,000,000.

01:02:18.420 But then

01:02:19.100 there wouldn't

01:02:19.600 be enough

01:02:19.920 people buying

01:02:20.560 it.

01:02:21.100 So I'm going

01:02:21.380 to figure out

01:02:22.540 do I want

01:02:23.360 more people

01:02:23.900 to own them

01:02:24.620 because that's

01:02:25.040 more fun

01:02:25.620 and then they

01:02:26.160 can bid up

01:02:26.680 the price

01:02:27.040 as they like

01:02:27.640 or just start

01:02:28.560 out with a

01:02:29.140 ridiculous price

01:02:30.200 and if nobody

01:02:31.140 buys it,

01:02:31.580 that's fine.

01:02:32.740 And if somebody

01:02:33.280 does, well,

01:02:34.620 that's cool too.

01:02:36.300 Oh, it was up

01:02:36.780 to $2,500,000

01:02:37.800 yesterday.

01:02:41.180 The Dilbert

01:02:42.340 NFT

01:02:42.920 does have

01:02:44.420 a curse word

01:02:45.340 in it.

01:02:46.600 But let me

01:02:47.580 tell you what

01:02:47.880 I'm going to do.

01:02:48.720 I made one

01:02:50.900 special comic

01:02:52.060 that won't

01:02:53.800 appear anywhere

01:02:54.360 else and

01:02:55.800 there are two

01:02:56.220 versions.

01:02:57.300 One of them

01:02:57.780 has the F word

01:02:58.540 in it.

01:02:59.060 It would be

01:02:59.360 the only time

01:03:00.020 that a Dilbert

01:03:00.560 comic had that.

01:03:01.820 And the other

01:03:02.360 is the same

01:03:02.860 comic with the

01:03:04.380 F word taken

01:03:05.140 out.

01:03:05.420 So people

01:03:06.840 will have

01:03:07.180 a choice

01:03:07.700 of the

01:03:09.060 F word

01:03:09.520 version or

01:03:10.140 non.

01:03:11.040 They'll both

01:03:11.540 be NFTs

01:03:12.460 separate.

01:03:13.800 And we'll

01:03:14.540 see which

01:03:14.960 one gets

01:03:15.700 the highest

01:03:16.680 value.

01:03:17.460 So basically

01:03:18.040 you'll be

01:03:19.940 able to

01:03:20.280 vote with

01:03:22.040 your money

01:03:22.520 to say

01:03:23.720 which one's

01:03:24.200 more collectible.

01:03:25.880 And it just

01:03:26.380 gives it a

01:03:26.820 little more

01:03:27.120 interest.

01:03:28.320 Now to make

01:03:28.660 something collectible

01:03:29.500 there needs

01:03:29.880 to be

01:03:30.300 something special

01:03:31.780 about it.

01:03:32.900 And what's

01:03:33.320 special about it

01:03:33.940 you couldn't

01:03:34.300 see it

01:03:34.600 anywhere else.

01:03:35.420 There will

01:03:35.980 never be

01:03:36.360 another

01:03:36.760 swear word

01:03:38.320 in a

01:03:38.620 Dilbert

01:03:38.820 comic I

01:03:39.640 think.

01:03:40.900 And you've

01:03:41.480 got a choice

01:03:41.980 of two

01:03:42.320 different ones.

01:03:43.680 So we'll

01:03:43.940 see.

01:03:44.580 And of course

01:03:45.160 Dilbert is

01:03:45.720 the ultimate

01:03:46.380 native

01:03:47.780 digital

01:03:48.620 property.

01:03:49.820 So if

01:03:50.240 there were

01:03:50.520 going to be

01:03:50.900 digital art

01:03:51.800 there

01:03:53.780 let me make

01:03:55.240 a claim.

01:03:55.980 I'm going to

01:03:56.200 make a claim

01:03:56.800 right now.

01:03:58.260 Fact check

01:03:58.720 me on this.

01:04:01.440 Dilbert is

01:04:02.100 the most

01:04:03.460 reproduced

01:04:07.100 digital art.

01:04:11.800 There will

01:04:12.640 be an

01:04:12.920 update on

01:04:13.420 the WEN

01:04:13.800 tokens.

01:04:14.660 I'm going to

01:04:14.940 wait for that

01:04:15.440 but there's

01:04:15.800 something

01:04:16.060 happening.

01:04:18.440 I should know

01:04:19.240 in a week or

01:04:19.740 so about that.

01:04:20.720 I get an

01:04:21.100 update today.

01:04:22.580 So there

01:04:22.900 will be another

01:04:23.620 app that uses

01:04:24.480 the WEN

01:04:25.040 but I'm

01:04:26.280 waiting to

01:04:26.840 get the

01:04:27.420 green light

01:04:27.900 on that.

01:04:31.800 Did I

01:04:32.360 ever talk

01:04:32.740 about the

01:04:33.100 tulip

01:04:33.480 craze?

01:04:34.420 Well I

01:04:34.900 have a

01:04:35.240 degree in

01:04:35.660 economics so

01:04:36.400 of course I

01:04:37.000 know about

01:04:37.360 the tulip

01:04:38.800 craze and

01:04:40.280 I would say

01:04:40.840 that the

01:04:41.340 tulip craze

01:04:42.100 is a little

01:04:42.980 different because

01:04:43.520 you can't

01:04:43.980 collect a

01:04:44.680 tulip.

01:04:45.520 I would say

01:04:46.120 that the

01:04:46.480 NFT market

01:04:47.320 would be

01:04:47.900 more comparable

01:04:48.920 to the

01:04:49.580 fine art

01:04:50.520 market in

01:04:51.860 the real

01:04:52.160 world.

01:04:53.220 Meaning that

01:04:54.000 people buy

01:04:54.660 classic art

01:04:56.200 and it

01:04:56.680 goes up

01:04:57.040 in value.

01:04:59.040 Could art

01:04:59.960 in the real

01:05:00.580 world like

01:05:01.100 actual physical

01:05:01.940 paintings,

01:05:02.960 could that

01:05:03.420 market someday

01:05:04.180 collapse and

01:05:05.320 nobody wants

01:05:05.820 to buy one

01:05:06.340 because you

01:05:06.640 could just

01:05:06.900 take a

01:05:07.200 picture of

01:05:07.620 the Mona

01:05:07.920 Lisa?

01:05:08.780 It could.

01:05:10.400 It hasn't

01:05:10.880 happened yet.

01:05:12.540 So people

01:05:13.680 like to

01:05:14.160 collect stuff.

01:05:14.920 I don't know

01:05:15.260 why.

01:05:16.760 And like I

01:05:17.620 said,

01:05:18.520 I would

01:05:20.240 have bid

01:05:21.320 $100,000

01:05:22.040 for the

01:05:23.040 first

01:05:24.580 tweet just

01:05:25.740 because I

01:05:26.080 knew,

01:05:26.800 as you

01:05:27.280 saw,

01:05:27.640 it's already

01:05:27.960 bid up to

01:05:28.400 $2.5

01:05:29.000 million.

01:05:29.740 There wasn't

01:05:30.300 really any

01:05:30.840 question on

01:05:31.540 that one.

01:05:32.600 That was

01:05:32.920 sort of an

01:05:33.280 easy one.

01:05:34.320 You knew

01:05:34.820 that was

01:05:35.200 going to

01:05:35.420 keep going

01:05:35.860 up.

01:05:37.420 All right.

01:05:39.880 Fine art is

01:05:40.700 forever as

01:05:41.860 is a

01:05:42.880 digital

01:05:43.180 collectible,

01:05:44.480 we think.

01:05:46.080 All right,

01:05:46.600 that's all and

01:05:47.300 I will talk to

01:05:47.880 you tomorrow.

01:05:48.560 all right,

01:05:52.520 YouTubers.

01:05:56.980 Like stamp

01:05:57.780 collecting,

01:05:58.340 yeah,

01:05:58.940 or coin

01:05:59.380 collecting,

01:06:00.000 or all

01:06:00.220 that.

01:06:01.120 Exactly.

01:06:03.540 Can the

01:06:04.160 buyer reproduce

01:06:04.840 it without

01:06:05.680 mute?

01:06:06.120 Yeah.

01:06:06.760 So here's

01:06:07.320 the thing,

01:06:07.720 anybody can

01:06:08.260 reproduce it,

01:06:09.860 but the

01:06:10.460 copy would

01:06:11.140 not be

01:06:11.560 certified because

01:06:12.360 the blockchain

01:06:13.000 would know

01:06:13.540 the difference

01:06:14.100 between a

01:06:15.480 mere copy

01:06:16.160 and an

01:06:16.720 original.

01:06:16.980 so the

01:06:18.340 fact that

01:06:18.940 you can

01:06:19.180 make a

01:06:19.560 photocopy

01:06:20.160 of it,

01:06:21.120 you can

01:06:21.840 also make

01:06:22.420 a copy

01:06:22.880 of the

01:06:23.540 Mona Lisa.

01:06:24.620 You can

01:06:24.880 just take

01:06:25.180 a picture

01:06:25.500 of it.

01:06:26.580 But owning

01:06:27.220 a picture

01:06:27.800 of the

01:06:28.220 Mona Lisa,

01:06:29.620 nobody's

01:06:31.260 going to

01:06:31.440 buy it

01:06:31.740 from you.

01:06:33.100 Can you

01:06:33.380 make money

01:06:33.760 on it?

01:06:34.260 The only

01:06:34.880 way people

01:06:35.360 make money

01:06:35.820 on it

01:06:36.160 is by

01:06:37.420 owning it

01:06:38.100 and it

01:06:38.380 goes up

01:06:38.720 in value

01:06:39.180 and then

01:06:39.700 reselling it.

01:06:43.260 When can

01:06:43.860 you expect

01:06:44.280 it to go

01:06:44.640 on sale?

01:06:45.000 Well, I'm

01:06:46.520 in the

01:06:47.280 final research

01:06:48.580 phase of

01:06:49.860 how to

01:06:50.420 price it

01:06:51.000 and how

01:06:51.380 many to

01:06:51.760 make and

01:06:52.160 which site

01:06:52.640 to put

01:06:52.900 it on.

01:06:53.920 Couldn't

01:06:54.400 be in a

01:06:54.700 week, but

01:06:56.240 I might run

01:06:56.840 into some

01:06:57.300 obstacles, so

01:06:57.940 I don't

01:06:58.140 know.

01:06:59.360 But as

01:07:00.060 soon as

01:07:00.460 a week.

01:07:01.740 The people

01:07:02.640 who follow

01:07:03.180 me on the

01:07:04.000 locals

01:07:04.500 platform will

01:07:05.640 probably get

01:07:06.260 the first

01:07:06.840 warning.

01:07:08.300 I'll probably

01:07:08.860 give them

01:07:09.220 first dibs

01:07:09.960 because they

01:07:11.360 subscribe.

01:07:13.140 Do you

01:07:13.380 retain copyright?

01:07:15.000 Interesting

01:07:16.180 question.

01:07:17.480 Interesting

01:07:17.920 question.

01:07:19.000 I think

01:07:19.660 the copyright

01:07:20.400 is irrelevant.

01:07:22.400 Now here's

01:07:22.760 the first

01:07:23.080 thing you

01:07:23.340 need to

01:07:23.600 know about

01:07:23.900 copyrights.

01:07:24.800 You don't

01:07:25.320 have to

01:07:25.960 apply for

01:07:26.760 a copyright.

01:07:27.780 You have

01:07:28.340 the copyright

01:07:28.900 upon creation

01:07:30.420 of art.

01:07:31.500 So if

01:07:31.740 you take

01:07:32.840 your little

01:07:33.780 pen and

01:07:34.260 piece of

01:07:34.580 paper,

01:07:36.080 here's a

01:07:37.140 copyright

01:07:37.500 lesson for

01:07:38.080 you.

01:07:38.640 You take

01:07:39.080 a piece

01:07:39.340 of paper

01:07:39.700 and your

01:07:40.040 pen and

01:07:41.020 you say,

01:07:41.660 here's my

01:07:42.060 art.

01:07:42.500 Here, I

01:07:47.180 made some

01:07:47.540 art.

01:07:48.460 It's

01:07:48.840 copyrighted.

01:07:50.200 It's

01:07:50.720 copyrighted.

01:07:51.320 It's already

01:07:51.640 done.

01:07:52.780 I didn't

01:07:53.080 have to

01:07:53.340 do anything.

01:07:54.660 Creation,

01:07:55.760 just creating

01:07:56.920 it, gives

01:07:57.420 you the

01:07:57.680 copyright.

01:07:58.360 That's the

01:07:58.740 law.

01:07:59.920 People

01:08:00.420 confuse the

01:08:01.240 art, the

01:08:02.540 act of

01:08:02.920 creation, which

01:08:03.920 creates a

01:08:04.420 copyright, with

01:08:06.220 registering.

01:08:09.040 So when you

01:08:09.820 register something,

01:08:10.800 that makes it

01:08:11.660 easier to

01:08:12.260 defend in

01:08:12.860 court.

01:08:13.880 So someday

01:08:14.500 somebody claims

01:08:15.460 that it's

01:08:15.860 theirs, and

01:08:16.400 you say,

01:08:16.840 aha, here's a

01:08:18.280 government document

01:08:19.160 that shows on

01:08:20.160 this date, I

01:08:21.540 drew this

01:08:22.020 first, so

01:08:23.180 anybody after

01:08:23.900 this doesn't

01:08:24.640 own the

01:08:24.960 copyright.

01:08:25.880 But you

01:08:26.800 could still

01:08:27.300 win that in

01:08:27.880 court just

01:08:28.740 as easily if

01:08:30.020 you can also

01:08:30.580 prove that you

01:08:31.380 were first.

01:08:32.840 The blockchain

01:08:33.400 does that.

01:08:34.640 So the

01:08:34.940 blockchain makes

01:08:36.780 copyright,

01:08:38.420 registering

01:08:39.140 copyright,

01:08:39.740 irrelevant.

01:08:41.880 Because you

01:08:42.560 have a 100%

01:08:43.680 certainty of

01:08:44.580 when you

01:08:45.000 created it,

01:08:46.160 because the

01:08:46.560 blockchain does

01:08:47.220 that.

01:08:47.960 So you don't

01:08:48.560 need copyright.

01:08:49.840 So you have

01:08:50.720 copyright, but

01:08:52.120 you don't need

01:08:52.540 to register it.

01:08:53.440 That would be

01:08:53.860 an unnecessary

01:08:54.500 step within the

01:08:55.560 NFT world.

01:08:56.560 Now, I'm not

01:08:57.120 a lawyer.

01:08:58.600 Hear this

01:08:59.280 carefully.

01:09:00.380 I'm not a

01:09:01.020 lawyer.

01:09:03.100 Seems to me

01:09:04.080 I could be

01:09:04.880 wrong, but I

01:09:05.940 do deal with

01:09:06.460 copyright enough

01:09:07.260 that I'm pretty

01:09:08.020 confident of that.

01:09:10.360 So, I

01:09:11.640 actually removed

01:09:12.400 the copyright

01:09:13.020 line from the

01:09:14.000 NFT that I

01:09:14.980 haven't listed

01:09:16.720 yet for that

01:09:17.960 reason.

01:09:18.660 It seemed like

01:09:19.300 there was no

01:09:19.700 purpose for it.

01:09:21.040 And I have

01:09:21.840 the added

01:09:22.400 advantage that

01:09:23.420 I'm famous and

01:09:25.000 Dilbert is

01:09:25.480 famous.

01:09:26.380 So if anybody

01:09:27.220 tried to invent

01:09:28.400 Dilbert tomorrow,

01:09:31.940 it's sort of an

01:09:33.640 easy court case.

01:09:35.200 I just say,

01:09:35.780 here are all

01:09:37.480 the newspapers

01:09:38.140 for the last

01:09:38.800 30 years,

01:09:39.920 and you can

01:09:41.060 see that I

01:09:41.600 was first.

01:09:45.940 All right.

01:09:51.600 When I sell

01:09:52.400 the Dilbert for

01:09:53.020 two million,

01:09:53.600 I don't know

01:09:54.000 what people will

01:09:54.540 pay for the

01:09:55.240 special Dilbert

01:09:56.680 comic, but we'll

01:09:57.740 find out.

01:09:58.560 I also could

01:09:59.320 later do the

01:10:00.340 first Dilbert

01:10:01.060 comic.

01:10:01.400 I would just

01:10:02.260 have to do

01:10:02.660 what Jack

01:10:03.260 Dorsey did

01:10:03.840 and certify

01:10:05.200 it.

01:10:09.660 Could I do

01:10:11.660 a single

01:10:12.100 show with

01:10:13.240 a professional

01:10:13.960 toupee?

01:10:15.180 A lot of you

01:10:16.000 don't know this

01:10:16.560 story.

01:10:17.300 Years ago, I

01:10:18.160 dressed up in

01:10:18.900 a disguise with

01:10:20.100 a toupee and

01:10:20.860 a fake mustache

01:10:21.480 and pretended to

01:10:23.460 be a business

01:10:24.140 consultant and

01:10:26.660 went to an

01:10:27.620 actual company

01:10:28.380 and ran one

01:10:29.660 of their

01:10:29.900 meetings as

01:10:31.100 a consultant.

01:10:33.600 And what I

01:10:35.020 tried to do

01:10:35.560 was, it was a

01:10:36.320 gag, I did it

01:10:37.240 for the San

01:10:37.800 Jose Mercury

01:10:38.300 News as part

01:10:39.380 of an article,

01:10:40.500 and I got the

01:10:41.720 senior management

01:10:42.460 in the room to

01:10:44.120 write the worst

01:10:45.220 mission statement

01:10:46.160 of all time

01:10:46.940 because I was

01:10:47.480 actually trying

01:10:47.980 to persuade

01:10:50.000 them to make

01:10:50.680 the worst one

01:10:51.360 they could make.

01:10:52.440 It was like

01:10:52.740 really long and

01:10:53.780 convoluted and

01:10:54.640 just was useless.

01:10:55.920 It was just,

01:10:57.260 and they all

01:10:58.160 agreed that it

01:10:58.680 was terrific when

01:10:59.560 I was done.

01:11:00.760 And then I

01:11:01.580 got a volunteer

01:11:02.440 to put it to

01:11:03.120 music because I

01:11:04.600 said, you know,

01:11:05.420 it's one thing to

01:11:06.080 have a mission

01:11:06.520 statement, but

01:11:07.160 people won't

01:11:07.620 remember it.

01:11:08.720 So I'll need a

01:11:09.540 volunteer to try

01:11:10.380 to put it to

01:11:10.920 music.

01:11:11.980 And I actually

01:11:12.460 got some of

01:11:13.060 the senior

01:11:14.020 executives to

01:11:14.920 agree, some

01:11:15.940 of them had

01:11:16.280 some musical

01:11:16.840 background, to

01:11:17.860 actually try to

01:11:18.860 come up with a

01:11:19.520 jingle and a

01:11:20.760 musical score for

01:11:22.740 their mission

01:11:23.180 statement.

01:11:24.820 Now, after I

01:11:25.840 got them to

01:11:26.380 agree to this

01:11:27.720 complete

01:11:28.200 ridiculousness, I

01:11:29.740 took off my

01:11:30.560 mustache and

01:11:31.200 my disguise and

01:11:32.000 they quickly

01:11:33.140 realized who I

01:11:34.140 was.

01:11:36.400 Here's the

01:11:36.920 weird thing.

01:11:37.680 One of them

01:11:38.220 suspected it

01:11:39.080 before I even

01:11:39.840 took off the

01:11:40.540 disguise, which

01:11:42.880 is weird.

01:11:44.300 All right, that's

01:11:45.100 all for now and

01:11:45.660 I'll talk to you

01:11:46.500 tomorrow.

01:11:47.100 of them.

01:12:00.040 You

01:12:00.580 can't

01:12:01.500 have a

01:12:08.580 good

01:12:09.480 job.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 07, 2021

Episode 1306 Scott Adams： Stimulus Package Shenanigans, Voting Changes, Super Anti-Racists, and Robot Lovers

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript