Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1340 Scott Adams： Court Packing, Floyd Trial, Vaccination Passports, North Korea and Fun

00:00:00.000 oh do I have a show for you today yeah today will be the best coffee with Scott

00:00:09.900 Adams of all time and I don't say that lightly well what are we going to do

00:00:18.360 first yes it's a simultaneous sip and all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of

00:00:21.780 tanker chalice of style canteen jug glass a vessel of any kind fill it with your

00:00:25.860 favorite liquid I like coffee wait hold breaking news I'm getting breaking news

00:00:33.600 there's a new study that shows that drinking coffee in moderation keyword

00:00:40.080 moderation substantially reduces cancer and all cardiovascular problems true

00:00:48.900 story by the way I just tweeted it thank you Ian for pointing that out so just

00:00:55.260 think about this for a moment just think about this moderate coffee drinking

00:01:00.640 reduces your cancer and your cardiovascular risk if that's what you can do with

00:01:08.620 moderate coffee drinking think what you can do when you just start swilling it by

00:01:13.320 the gallon yeah superpowers that's how science works join me now for the

00:01:20.140 simultaneous sip go hold on hold on hold on that's not enough we're trying to

00:01:29.020 protect our health now one more go ah I feel a little bit I think I had a little

00:01:38.320 cancer in my shoulder but it feels better now yeah cardiovascular 20% better oh I'll

00:01:50.200 tell you you don't expect it to work that quickly but here it is all right well I

00:01:57.340 like to think that everybody who watches my content gets healthier and smarter and I

00:02:08.720 actually think that's really happening you know based on my feedback from people you

00:02:14.820 don't get to see it so you don't you don't see the the view that I see but the

00:02:19.520 number of people who contact me literally every day you know multiple people every day they've

00:02:24.340 lost weight they you know they're healthier they're happier they're getting younger and

00:02:30.080 apparently they're drinking coffee and and reducing the risk of serious illness so it's

00:02:36.340 all working it's working my plan is working I love the fact that every Saturday Bill Maher is

00:02:46.460 trending for something he said and I say to myself okay I get that it's a political show and stuff

00:02:53.180 so you know those things make news but every week every week he's trending and I'm trying to figure

00:03:01.260 out what is it he does that makes him trend every week and I think the answer is he sometimes tells

00:03:08.660 the truth now I think actually most of the time he tells the truth uh like most people but they don't

00:03:16.460 do it on tv he actually tells the truth on tv and everybody goes whoa what the hell the next thing

00:03:25.380 you know it's like trending on twitter and and that literally is what's happening he literally is just

00:03:31.120 telling you the truth and it becomes like a national story it's so rare but uh he uh apparently he's

00:03:40.240 joining me uh somewhat in this opinion that movies uh are no longer worth your time and

00:03:49.060 this is what he said in a tweet today about about the current batch of movies I love this tweet so

00:04:00.180 Bill Maher says I don't have to leave the theater whistling but would it kill Hollywood to once in a

00:04:06.440 while make a movie that doesn't make me want to take a bath with a toaster he says we all had a rough

00:04:14.100 year a little escapism would have been appreciated now let me let me climb on that a little bit you

00:04:23.080 know I've been telling you for a long time that if you willingly consume uh sad fiction there's just a

00:04:30.280 bunch of people with problems because that's what a movie is you know the movie arc is I got a really

00:04:35.520 big problem and I'm going to make you look at my big problems for three hours and maybe at the end

00:04:40.540 we'll be happy or maybe at the end a lot of people will be dead one of those and yeah I hear Godzilla

00:04:48.100 versus Kong is actually pretty good I'm surprised I can't believe honestly I can't even imagine how that

00:04:55.180 movie could be good here's a spoiler for the uh King Kong and Godzilla movie so if if you're going to

00:05:05.140 watch the movie I haven't watched the movie I haven't watched it so I'm going to give you a spoiler

00:05:09.340 for the movie having never watched it and never heard anything about it all right this hand is Godzilla

00:05:15.960 this hand is King Kong I will now show you the entire movie Godzilla versus King Kong

00:05:25.140 the end that is the entire movie and I believe I've saved you a little bit money there and also a

00:05:49.560 little bit of risk of getting COVID so yeah there's no reason to watch uh bad entertainment that's why

00:05:56.140 um I'm not trying to do a commercial for YouTube but YouTube gets it totally right because YouTube

00:06:03.880 gets you you know short little bits that are often educational useful expand your awareness and don't hurt

00:06:11.640 you can watch YouTube for days and never see anything I mean if you want to yeah you'd have to look for it

00:06:20.400 you can find stuff that'll make you sad if you look for it but mostly YouTube's YouTube is about things that

00:06:26.540 make you smarter or make you happy why would anybody ever watch a movie again unless it's a comedy which

00:06:35.000 they don't make anymore yeah sure super a superhero one is really a comedy when I watch these superhero

00:06:42.400 movies which I do watch those I watch them for the dialogue in between the fight scenes because

00:06:49.000 sometimes it's really funny like when the Hulk was you know banging loci against the the ground that

00:06:55.600 was just funny so that's the closest Hollywood gets to humor now there's a story that 40 percent of

00:07:02.840 the Marines say they won't get vaccinated what do you think of that do you know it would have been a

00:07:09.000 good statistic to include with that story I'll bet it wasn't there I haven't read all of the reports of

00:07:15.680 it but I would like to know what exactly is the death rate for unusually healthy young people with perfect

00:07:23.460 diets and no zero obesity I'm thinking it's kind of low so isn't this exactly the group of people that

00:07:34.260 you wouldn't be surprised you know forget about what your opinion is whether they should or should not

00:07:39.540 do it but I wouldn't be surprised because here's what we did wrong with the Marines we meaning America

00:07:47.620 right collectively I've never gone through any basic training or Marine training or firearms training

00:07:57.380 in the military or anything like that but I have to make an assumption does it is it fair to assume

00:08:02.900 that teaching somebody to be a Marine includes a good dose of risk management training in other words

00:08:11.200 learning that this situation is more dangerous than this one if even if it's not obvious on the surface

00:08:17.180 right in order to win a war it's all risk management decisions plus violence that's sort of all it is

00:08:25.360 risk management resources I guess and violence so should we be surprised that the very people who have

00:08:34.900 the lowest risk and I think this is speculative but it seems reasonable trained in risk management

00:08:42.120 and they've also been trained to not be afraid of bullshit right now I don't think COVID is bullshit I'm

00:08:52.520 saying that if you looked at their specific risks the big one is bullets and you know fragmentation

00:09:01.300 from bombs right that's like the big risk of going to the war that's like a real risk we've actually

00:09:08.840 trained this specific group of people plus you know whatever whatever they brought to the show to not be

00:09:15.040 afraid even in the scariest situation should you be surprised that they're also not afraid in

00:09:22.520 the least the least scary situation for them now of course COVID is a very scary situation for the world

00:09:31.700 for for them specifically it's kind of the last thing they need to worry about

00:09:37.460 let's say you're a marine and you get you get infected what what is the downside

00:09:43.900 one week off with pay right right I mean maybe you're not where you want to be but

00:09:53.340 it's sort of not the worst thing in the world a week off with pay all right so I'm not saying that

00:10:00.340 the Marines should or should not get vaccinated I'll leave that to them and and the medical

00:10:06.040 professionals and the military professionals there's certainly some precedent that you could

00:10:10.660 don't be surprised if it becomes mandatory I wouldn't be surprised but we'll wait on that

00:10:16.440 if I told you we're going to develop a system a new system for the world in addition to existing

00:10:24.360 systems and then the new system would have this feature that you could be punished because a

00:10:31.900 stranger holds a different opinion opinion right we're not talking about anybody breaking a law or

00:10:38.220 anything like that would you agree to a system that allowed you to be punished because a stranger

00:10:46.420 somebody you don't even know holds a different opinion than you do would you ever agree to that

00:10:51.620 that's that's our current system that's that's the system we we sort of evolved into without

00:10:59.060 thinking about it too much because here here's the setup

00:11:03.220 um if you have the opinion which no court has uh has upheld uh actually I can't even say this

00:11:14.060 because uh I think I get banned from YouTube even mentioning the topic but there's a topic

00:11:19.340 that had something to do with let's say electing and somebody you can you can guess what that might

00:11:27.800 be and there are some people who have different opinions about let's say the the perfection of the

00:11:36.920 system there's some people who think it was closer to perfect and other people who might have a

00:11:43.540 different opinion now since we haven't done a fully transparent look at everything there is to look

00:11:50.800 at both of those are opinions meaning that nobody could know they're right you couldn't know which one

00:12:00.380 is right so it's just an opinion but our current system is that if the people who manage the various

00:12:07.060 platforms have a different opinion than you do they can punish you by taking you off the platform

00:12:15.340 because in the modern world that is punishment it could punish you economically it could punish you

00:12:20.780 socially it's punishment our current system allows a stranger to punish you for having a different

00:12:30.640 opinion now it would be one thing if their opinion was confirmed by science you know it was like two

00:12:38.220 plus two is four it's not really an opinion in that case you could imagine there's some situation where

00:12:44.480 you know the misinformation is bad for society and they have to they have to do something about it

00:12:49.780 but if it's a valid just difference of opinion they can punish you for your opinion current that's the

00:12:57.140 current system well if i get punished for my opinions uh you can find me on the locals platform

00:13:03.340 subscription platform uh that's growing like crazy by the way i've got thousands of subscribers now

00:13:10.360 and i'm giving them micro lessons on improving their life with the promise that they will get

00:13:15.720 thousands of dollars of life value per month so far people are saying that they're getting that

00:13:22.760 so we'll see if we can keep it up all right um biden is uh is putting together a commission of uh so-called

00:13:30.960 independent scholars and whatnot to talk about court packing and other court reforms now what do you

00:13:38.960 think of that does this mean that joe biden is in favor of court packing and he's just putting a

00:13:45.060 commission together to cover himself so that when he does it you can say hey all these independent

00:13:51.200 people democrats and republicans they said it'd be okay do you think that's what's going to happen

00:13:57.040 i'm going to make a prediction and it goes like this i of course and you may have noticed have

00:14:05.700 sometimes been critical of president biden i've been critical of his let's say mental capabilities etc

00:14:13.700 but if you wanted to kill something with bureaucracy and make it look like the the shot was fired by

00:14:23.300 someone else you couldn't do much better than joe biden because it looks to me like joe biden is

00:14:32.160 creating the commission specifically to not do court packing so that this is my prediction

00:14:38.160 i believe most people on the right are saying oh no this is the first step to court packing

00:14:43.300 so he plans to do it and he's just giving some cover for himself totally possible all right so let

00:14:50.680 me say as clearly as possible i'm not ruling that out if you're just looking at the surface

00:14:55.560 kind of looks that way it doesn't it it looks sort of like he does plan to do it so i will

00:15:01.560 acknowledge that it looks exactly like he plans to do it i'll acknowledge that that could be

00:15:07.860 actually literally the reality but i'm going to predict the opposite i predict that this is just

00:15:17.140 cover so that when the scholars most of them or all of them say this is a bad idea and why

00:15:24.500 that uh that biden will have cover for not doing it now i think he might do some other court reforms

00:15:31.120 i don't even know what they are but there might you know it's always good to look at reforms

00:15:35.180 here's why i think the commission will not recommend court packing

00:15:39.760 it's kind of obvious isn't it because the next president would just court pack again and then when

00:15:48.580 it changes parties again they court pack again why wouldn't they and then where does it stop

00:15:55.560 how big is the court but more importantly it doesn't even matter how big the court is what matters is

00:16:00.840 that would uh eliminate independence or even the semblance of independence of the judiciary it would

00:16:08.360 effectively destroy the republic as it was originally conceived now now you could argue i'd like to destroy

00:16:16.180 the republic but if you're not arguing that you would like to destroy the public the republic

00:16:22.840 uh that's a bad idea because it would the the independence of the three branches of government

00:16:30.120 is the most essential part of the government and this would eliminate it it would make them basically

00:16:34.840 it would make the court a captive of the executive of office so there's no point in having a court

00:16:42.040 if the executive office pretty much not a hundred percent but pretty much determines what they're going to

00:16:48.440 decide before they even get a case right so i can't believe that you would even get democrats who are

00:16:56.040 actual scholars right real scholars i'm not sure you could get a democrat scholar to buy into this

00:17:03.560 now i was thinking the other day and uh i'm going to modify a suggestion i had a long time ago i was

00:17:09.080 thinking once wouldn't we be better off if you always made the court balanced so they actually have the

00:17:17.240 same amount of conservative leaning and right leading people and that that was my first thought

00:17:23.080 it's like well that would be perfect because then they wouldn't make any decisions unless you could get

00:17:28.280 at least one person to to kind of go over to the other side otherwise it would just be tie tie tie tie

00:17:35.480 but if it was something important and the court you know really thought they need to move on it

00:17:41.560 somebody could go over to the other side that's what i was thinking i feel now that was a terrible

00:17:47.560 idea here's why if it's even your incentive to start trading gets really high as in well we can't get

00:17:58.520 anything done on anything but you'd like to get this thing done you conservatives and we liberals would

00:18:05.160 like to get this other thing passed why don't we make a deal we just need one of you to come over on

00:18:11.800 this issue and then we'll have one of us go over on that other issue now i don't believe that the

00:18:17.480 justices have ever had a conversation like that i mean i would like to believe that these are serious

00:18:23.560 people who would never come close to any kind of horse trading but right now they don't have to

00:18:28.520 what happens if they had to it would be just like congress it would just be horse trading and then

00:18:35.480 what happens if you get that situation are they more susceptible to bribery if you take nine justices

00:18:42.200 and expand it to any larger number have you increased or decreased or kept the same the risk of bribery or

00:18:50.440 blackmail it's more right it's more because there are more people to bribe so there are all kinds of

00:18:57.800 things wrong with court packing and i think and i predict that joe biden is using the bureaucracy

00:19:04.840 of the system uh basically to kill it but he might do some court reforms that you might like who knows

00:19:13.000 um south korea reportedly and i don't believe any news that comes out of i'm sorry north korea i don't

00:19:19.240 believe any news that comes out of north korea but the news is that there was some uh guy who was a

00:19:26.920 official in education who had been tasked with fixing education in some way in north korea but given no

00:19:35.640 resources to do it and i guess he made the mistake of complaining that he wasn't getting enough resources

00:19:41.400 to do his job and the way uh kim jong-un decided to fix this was by executing him which is not funny

00:19:54.680 just the fact that i laughed uh that's just because i'm a terrible person it's not because it's funny

00:20:00.680 let's just get that clear it's not funny i'm a terrible person

00:20:06.760 um

00:20:09.000 so

00:20:11.000 this is what the guy said uh before they killed him

00:20:15.160 allegedly the chairman reportedly said i don't understand why the authorities would choose to

00:20:20.440 implement the act create this commission and call busy professors away from their university jobs

00:20:26.200 if they were not going to give the commission any resources park said even if we make suggestions

00:20:32.600 they just tell us to keep our mouths shut so let's go through the motions of gathering and then go home

00:20:37.560 he reportedly told his commission members

00:20:41.480 now doesn't that sound like every employee of a big company

00:20:46.440 you gave me this assignment but you didn't give me enough resources

00:20:50.760 and then the pointy-haired boss just executes him so this is a case of the simulation and code reuse

00:20:58.680 kim jong-un has just become the pointy head boss pointy-haired boss

00:21:04.440 have you seen a picture of kim jong-un he is getting closer and closer to a little pointy hair thing

00:21:11.880 sort of like flatter in the middle a little bit a little bit pointy-haired

00:21:15.800 code reuse simulation all right let's uh talk about the big news of the day the uh floyd trial

00:21:24.920 and before i give you my uh my legal analysis here's the thing you need to know and hear this clearly

00:21:35.240 number one you should never get medical advice from a cartoonist number two don't take your

00:21:41.640 financial advice from cartoonists number three don't take legal advice from cartoonists all

00:21:50.200 right we're going to do this just for fun most of us are not lawyers although weirdly i have a very

00:21:55.480 large percentage of lawyers who watch this based on based on the messages i get um so you people who

00:22:02.760 are really lawyers can you um please keep me honest i'll be watching the comments as i make my

00:22:10.440 ignorant and ill-informed analysis all right are we all on the same page that what will follow

00:22:16.200 will be ignorant and uninformed but fun but fun right so i think one of the things i would like to

00:22:23.320 do is do my analysis um from a uh citizen perspective not a lawyer's perspective because

00:22:32.680 there really are two two things happening there's the the lawyers doing lawyer things and they understand

00:22:38.600 that world and they know what they're doing and that will create some kind of result but then

00:22:43.000 there's this other thing which is unfortunately bigger and more important which is how the public

00:22:47.800 is viewing it the public are for the most part not lawyers just like us most of us right so i'm

00:22:54.840 going to be talking in a way that i don't think is too far off from what this big batch of non-lawyers

00:23:01.240 will be thinking and feeling in other words very approximate and inaccurate and not really

00:23:08.040 understanding the law so i'm in that group so let's talk about that um in my opinion after watching both

00:23:18.840 the prosecution and the defense do their job yesterday uh i would say that they that the cause of

00:23:25.800 death is established that the cause of death is established now in my opinion so this is my

00:23:32.920 opinion as just a person watching it like a non-lawyer and in my opinion homicide has been established

00:23:41.000 by both the prosecution and the defense so right now the defense witness i believe has you know they

00:23:51.560 and i get the names confused of you know who's the which doctor is is saying what but um i believe

00:23:59.400 that even the defense has said that it was the police action that was the the cause and that means

00:24:08.200 homicide right so here's here's the first part i want to assert that homicide that question is now

00:24:18.680 answered and i believe that even the the jury will say to themselves okay homicide has now been proven

00:24:26.360 and what i mean by that is that the evidence for a drug overdose i think has been eliminated

00:24:33.800 because the there's nobody who testified he had pills in the stomach or that he had immediately

00:24:39.800 ingested it right before you know we had all heard that right uh hadn't we all heard that it looked

00:24:45.640 like he had taken some pills during the arrest or something but there weren't there there was no

00:24:51.320 indication that it was in his stomach so we don't have evidence that he did anything that is likely in any

00:24:59.320 realistic way to have coincidentally caused him to die from drugs at coincidentally the time the police

00:25:07.240 were holding him down right now i'm going to talk about drugs being part of the cause

00:25:12.120 you know they're part of the story for sure in my opinion um but here's what you need to know about

00:25:19.880 homicide it's not a crime did you know that how many in the comments tell me how many of you knew

00:25:31.400 that homicide is not a crime

00:25:34.440 but homicide has been demonstrated to be true it's just not a crime and he hasn't been charged with

00:25:44.760 homicide do you know why he hasn't been charged with homicide because it's not a crime right yeah

00:25:53.480 watch the comments some people are saying what the yeah that's what you should be saying i'm trying to

00:25:59.160 trigger you into saying what are you talking about how could homicide not be a crime it's not look it up

00:26:07.880 homicide simply means that a human killed somebody and killed is somewhat strictly defined you know or

00:26:17.240 let's say by precedent to mean that a human did the last thing that was like push them over the edge

00:26:25.560 so it could be that the human shot them or it could be that the human did some other kind of action that

00:26:31.240 was the the the final variable now this is really important if a human was the final variable

00:26:42.440 in the death that's homicide and i think that both the i think all of the medical people have said

00:26:49.480 that if you took away the police action um it's unlikely he would have died because what are the

00:26:56.520 odds that he somehow had an overdose without taking drugs recently like you don't really

00:27:04.360 my understanding is overdoses happen pretty quickly after you take the wrong amount of drugs

00:27:08.920 so it would be weird if he had taken the drugs hours before and then just by coincidence he happened

00:27:15.080 to have an overdose death right when the police were sitting on him i mean what are the odds so yes the

00:27:21.240 police the police action resulted in his death that's homicide all right so are we all on the same page

00:27:29.320 the homicide at least i think from the jury's perspective has been completely proven because there's

00:27:35.880 there is no medical person who says anything different there's no medical person who is saying

00:27:42.440 the cause was an overdose or the cause was his health nobody's saying that so it is homicide right again

00:27:51.480 i'm speaking as a non-lawyer just like a person just a person it's homicide but that is not illegal per

00:27:58.920 se because there were different reasons that you could be not guilty of any crime one would be self-defense

00:28:06.360 if you kill somebody in self-defense it's homicide it just doesn't happen to be illegal and i think that

00:28:14.760 shaven has one other opportunity to do homicide without being illegal and it goes like this

00:28:22.280 a reasonable person would not know that what he was doing was a a mortal danger

00:28:29.800 so if shaven chauvin whatever and his lawyers can demonstrate that a reasonable person wouldn't have

00:28:37.880 known this could kill somebody no crime is committed there has to be something in the officer's head

00:28:46.280 that gets to either intention and by the way he's not even being charged with intentionally killing

00:28:53.240 him did you know that the charge does not include any thought that he did it intentionally it's just

00:29:00.280 not even in the charges that would i think that'd be first degree right um the charge is that a reasonable

00:29:07.560 person should have known that his actions would put at least at least a risk of death so that's what

00:29:15.400 the prosecution has to show let me give you a little more detail on this here in psychology today i know

00:29:25.160 it's not a legal document but there was a writer uh barrett brogard who did a real good job of just sort

00:29:32.600 of laying out you know what the charges are so here are the charges uh he's charged with second degree

00:29:39.880 unintentional murder third degree murder and second degree manslaughter now here's a little bit more

00:29:49.960 on that now first of all is this confusing this is really confusing stuff how many people in the jury

00:29:59.000 are going to be capable of really sorting through this amount of nuance it's kind of hard you know we're

00:30:05.000 asking ordinary people to do a pretty tough task here but i think they'll take it very seriously and

00:30:11.240 and and i have at least some optimism that they'll they'll get it right um so here's what we need to

00:30:18.440 know there's nothing about intentional in the charges uh but proving second degree unintentional murder

00:30:27.240 this is what it would require showing that the defendant officer chauvin chauvin chauvin

00:30:34.040 caused the victim's death that part we know from the medical examiners or at least that's the testimony

00:30:40.040 and had specific intent to hold on inflict bodily harm short of death so was the officer trying to harm

00:30:50.280 floyd um but maybe he didn't think that would kill him but he was trying to cause him a lot of harm

00:30:56.920 and if that went too far he would be guilty of murder is that what happened well how do you treat

00:31:04.840 um a police officer who does intentional harm in the in the uh in the act of subduing somebody

00:31:14.440 don't you if you tase somebody and they die with a taser are you guilty of murder

00:31:20.200 because we know that a taser can kill people do you know what kind of people can be killed by a taser

00:31:30.040 people with weak hearts

00:31:31.720 such as i'll just pick one example of a person with a weak heart george floyd if george floyd had

00:31:40.600 been tased there was a pretty high likelihood he would have died from being tased is tasing an ordinary

00:31:50.360 thing that police do well i i hate to use the word ordinary but we see it a lot if you're a citizen

00:31:57.880 you've seen lots of footage of police tasing people and there is evidence that if you had a weak heart

00:32:04.760 and you got tased you could die there's there's some evidence a number of people have died that way

00:32:10.520 now i don't believe that this situation was taser worthy meaning that um i don't think he would

00:32:18.040 have appropriately used the taser in that case because that might have been a little bit more

00:32:22.280 i don't know that for sure but it seemed like it wasn't really called for the the police had enough

00:32:27.320 human power and floyd was sort of only half resisting it didn't look like a taser situation to me

00:32:34.440 but suppose you knew that within police procedure there's this thing called the taser

00:32:41.080 and it would have killed him or could have you know there's more risk with him

00:32:45.320 that sort of gives you a context in your head as just a citizen that police do things that can kill

00:32:53.560 people without intending to kill them that it's actually a normal fairly routine the police are

00:33:01.160 putting um let's say force on people in a variety of ways and each of those variety of ways could

00:33:08.360 actually kill somebody so i don't believe that in the context of police work holding somebody down with

00:33:15.000 the intent that it would hurt if they tried to get up it didn't look like trying to hurt him so much

00:33:21.240 as obviously trying to contain him or since we're talking about reasonable doubt a reasonable person

00:33:29.160 could say i don't know i can't read his mind i don't know if his intention to hurt him it looked like

00:33:35.400 it was in his intention just to keep him subdued so i think this part about specific intent to inflict

00:33:43.320 bodily harm short of death is not demonstrated by any evidence is it does anybody have any evidence

00:33:51.560 from anybody that would suggest we know the officer's internal mental thoughts i don't think so so it

00:33:57.640 looks like the prosecution hasn't made that case so that one is a second degree unintentional murder

00:34:04.360 so here's another one third degree murder it requires showing that the accused officer shaven

00:34:10.600 caused the victim's death and their acts were eminently dangerous and were performed with a depraved mind

00:34:20.760 now a depraved mind means that you have you're just sort of an evil person you're an evil person and you did

00:34:28.520 things that you knew put somebody in mortal danger but you did it anyway because you're just sort of a

00:34:34.920 bastard right what evidence has been presented that would show that uh chauvin has a depraved mind

00:34:46.200 none right i don't believe there's any evidence presented to that is there has anybody seen any evidence even

00:34:53.320 proposed that goes in that direction i haven't seen any um and that their acts were eminently

00:35:00.760 dangerous now this so it's even two parts because there's the word and here so i'd have to be a lawyer

00:35:07.160 to know that if you could really separate these ands but let's take it the way this writer wrote it and

00:35:13.240 say that it has to be both eminently dangerous and done with this depraved mind thing there's no evidence

00:35:20.520 of a depraved mind no motivation in in evidence etc um so eminently dangerous let's just look at that

00:35:31.000 and see what evidence we have for that now remember the standard is reasonable doubt

00:35:37.080 the standard is not we know what happened the standard is is there a reasonable doubt about the

00:35:43.560 prosecution story so let's see if there is what would uh oh this is interesting before i do that so

00:35:55.480 without anybody really making note of it the prosecution and the defense have agreed

00:36:03.800 that the video has been debunked

00:36:05.720 do you believe that is my statement true that as of yesterday both the prosecution

00:36:15.960 and the defense are on the same page on this following fact that the video has been debunked

00:36:24.760 here's what i mean up until really about yesterday a hundred percent of the world believed that his knee

00:36:32.040 was on uh george floyd's neck for nine minutes pretty much that's all anybody's talking about

00:36:40.200 his knee was on his neck for nine minutes and now both the prosecution and the defense based on witnesses

00:36:48.360 agree that wasn't the case it looked like it but it wasn't because the video shows that his his

00:36:56.440 knee was in different places and i'm saying that the prosecution agrees because they changed the way

00:37:00.840 they talked about it now they're talking about the knee and the neck area on the on the back and the neck

00:37:06.920 area they started moving it off the you know off of the artery stuff and now it's just sort of in that

00:37:12.520 area and we don't know how much pressure was on it etc so this is um although the um the fact that his knee was

00:37:24.600 not on a neck did not change the potential liability for the officer because we have medical testimony now

00:37:33.320 that wherever that knee was whether it was sort of backish or neckish both of them could have killed

00:37:40.360 him or would have been the cause of death so it's no defense apparently to say no it wasn't exactly on

00:37:47.400 the neck the whole time because the position of him with the handcuffs on on the ground with a guy on his

00:37:53.880 back uh and a bad heart and had some drugs in him he put all that together and he could have and one of

00:38:01.640 the medical people said he was killed cause of death by the knee on the neckish backish area but here's the

00:38:10.040 point it debunks the video it doesn't it doesn't defend shaven because the the new theory of death

00:38:18.680 death about the specifics of it still would make him guilty of something if he did it with this

00:38:24.200 depraved whatever and some kind of uh knowledge that it would be bad but it's important that the

00:38:32.680 defense change their entire theory in the middle of the the thing the entire world believed that the one

00:38:41.320 thing that we all believed to be true was that this damn knee was on george floyd's neck for nine

00:38:47.800 minutes and we just found out that wasn't true and even the defense is acknowledging it that's a big deal

00:38:56.760 here's why it showed that you can't tell what's happening on videos right that's the takeaway the

00:39:05.560 takeaway is we were all defense prosecution public a hundred percent of the people who saw the video

00:39:13.640 initially were all wrong about a really important point where exactly was that knee because if the

00:39:20.840 knee was on the neck the whole time suddenly that feels like you know a little bit about his intentions

00:39:26.840 right maybe you don't but it feels like you do doesn't it that feels like an intention

00:39:31.800 but if you see that he moved it around now you've got reasonable doubt but that reasonable doubt would

00:39:40.680 be removed perhaps if you thought that shaven knew that no matter where his knee was this positional

00:39:48.440 asphyxiation thing was potentially going to be fatal did he know that so um i think it's amazing that

00:39:58.680 the video has been debunked but it's still the evidence uh so here's how i would approach it if

00:40:04.760 i were the defense and again i'm not a lawyer so just assume that i don't even know what's going to

00:40:09.880 be allowable in court right it doesn't mean any of this could actually happen i'm just giving you my

00:40:15.560 human being defense not a lawyer defense i would start by saying that we live in a world in which

00:40:21.960 it is typical to see two movies on one screen and i would explain that that's a how many of you in the

00:40:31.320 jury are familiar with the laurel and yanny situation and you would see the people nervously giggle in the

00:40:39.080 jury because most of them are familiar with how easily they're fooled with the laurel and yanny and

00:40:45.080 then you say then i'd say and ladies and gentlemen of the jury you know that before you came in here

00:40:51.320 every one of us and i have to admit even the defense before we looked at the the video in detail we too

00:40:58.920 thought that knee was on his neck for nine minutes that was the movie we thought we were watching

00:41:05.560 but now that we've watched it from a number of angles and had experts testify we know that there was

00:41:10.920 another movie playing at the same time there was one that we all thought we saw and there's one that's

00:41:17.080 different so different in fact that the prosecution has changed the cause of death still they say it's my

00:41:23.320 client but a completely different mechanism of death that we're just learning now it was the video that

00:41:30.200 got us here and we've all just agreed that we didn't see it right video is bad evidence laurel and

00:41:38.360 yanny taught you that um you've probably seen a number of videos uh you know in your own experience

00:41:44.280 i don't have to mention which ones but in your own experience have you had let's say in the last year or

00:41:49.720 two have you seen anything that looked real on video and later you found out it wasn't besides this case

00:41:56.680 and most people would be yeah i can think of an example and by the way it's good hypnosis to let

00:42:02.840 them come up with their own example if you give them an example they'll fight with it and say

00:42:08.120 i'm not sure that's an example if you say have you ever seen an example where people were fooled

00:42:13.640 by video and maybe you were people will come up with their own example that they don't fight with

00:42:19.880 so that's why you you let them fill in the blank you don't you don't fill it in for them

00:42:27.000 so once i have established that the prosecution had changed their entire argument from the neck thing

00:42:33.880 to the positional thing i would say look how easily we can be fooled just to put some doubt in their

00:42:39.400 heads right and then i would say if we're trying to figure out whether derek shaven knew that he was

00:42:47.080 putting his client at risk here are the questions we must ask number one why did all the other police

00:42:54.440 officers who were in the scene not intervene well there's a number of possibilities and we don't

00:43:02.680 have it in evidence right one possibility is they were just um maybe they were timid they didn't want

00:43:10.040 to you know uh interfere with a veteran officer um one is there they were all racists every one of them

00:43:18.200 was a racist and they were just happy to see uh floyd killed i don't think that's the case but i'm just

00:43:25.320 saying all the things that are possible here's another thing that's possible did you notice that all the

00:43:31.080 police did nothing but yet all of the non-police the citizens were quite sure that he was being killed

00:43:40.120 but none of the police at least acted as if they thought that was a serious risk why would that be

00:43:49.880 well i'll give you a few possibilities one you're a bum bro um

00:43:59.720 i'll just get rid of you

00:44:00.680 if the best you could do is yell at me in all caps

00:44:08.520 um

00:44:10.760 and by the way you haven't heard my conclusion yet so i'm just i'm just saying what the defense could be

00:44:15.640 uh don't assume this is my opinion all right i'm just telling you what the defense could be all right

00:44:23.560 um so why did all the cops stand down and the non-cops thought it looked like murder here's one

00:44:29.880 possibility remember we're only going for reasonable doubt so you don't have to agree that this is the

00:44:36.120 reason you just have to agree it's one of the possible reasons and we don't know that's all i'm

00:44:42.120 going for one of the possible reasons is police are experienced and they're trained citizens are not

00:44:51.080 experienced in police stops and they're not trained the police probably are aware of the guy who

00:44:59.320 is the police trainer who testified and said that in his opinion chauvin used the least amount of

00:45:06.040 force that was the you know to get the job done and that it was not a deadly situation now is he right

00:45:16.040 or is he wrong the police trainer it doesn't matter here's why the police trainer is

00:45:25.080 a reasonable person nobody said he's crazy he's a reasonable person if you would put the police

00:45:33.720 trainer in chauvin's situation he was saying he would have acted about the same and he trains it

00:45:42.120 he not only trained chauvin but he probably directly or indirectly was involved with the training

00:45:47.320 for all of the other officers could it be that the reason people who are trained didn't get into it is

00:45:54.440 because the training told them this was safe but if you were a citizen you had not been trained by that

00:46:01.000 you've never heard this training remember they usually say they can't breathe they say they're in pain

00:46:08.120 the handcuffs are hurting their wrists they all say it it doesn't mean it's true but the public's

00:46:16.600 never had that training never had that experience so i would say that the the activity of the other

00:46:22.600 police officers the fact that not one of them would get involved suggests that police are watching a

00:46:30.280 different movie the movie they were seeing is just somebody taken down according to policy

00:46:37.880 the mood and it would be safe according to their movie the way they were trained the citizens were

00:46:43.320 seeing somebody with uh with a neck with a knee on their neck for nine minutes as the lights were going

00:46:49.320 out and in his life they were watching a different movie so to imagine that these people viewed the same

00:46:57.400 incident is just not true they weren't viewing the same incident it was the same facts but the way they

00:47:04.600 they filtered it had to be different one was filtered through training and experience one was filtered

00:47:09.960 through no training and experience

00:47:14.280 so there's some reasonable doubt right there now what about the way shaven himself acted do you think

00:47:22.360 that if he believed that he was putting floyd in mortal danger that he would have continued to do it in

00:47:28.680 front of lots of witnesses in front of other police cameras going could shaven have reasonably believed

00:47:38.360 that putting himself just the officer himself in a situation where witnesses would watch him end the life

00:47:46.200 of a black man who's on the ground do you think that shaven thought that there would be no consequences

00:47:54.440 if something bad happened to floyd in that situation not reasonably no reasonable person would think that he

00:48:02.040 would be you know just go about his day if floyd died is there any evidence that shaven is a sociopath

00:48:10.920 i don't believe so i don't believe there's any evidence that he's some kind of weird sociopath

00:48:17.640 how would you feel if you if you held somebody down and they died how would you feel it would ruin your

00:48:27.480 frickin life if you killed somebody accidentally you would never get over that even if you're a cop

00:48:35.080 right cops are a little tougher right they've seen more things they've got training but even a cop it's

00:48:40.760 going to ruin his frickin life if he accidentally kills a guy because he had his knee on him for nine

00:48:46.280 minutes right so is it reasonable to imagine that even shaven shaven knew that he was putting this guy in

00:48:54.680 that much danger when his trainer would have done the same thing the police around him apparently either

00:49:02.760 didn't intervene or would have done the same thing now you could ask yourself should he have known

00:49:11.640 and that would be an interesting question but i don't think it would be legally

00:49:17.560 useful because all you have to demonstrate is that a reasonable person in that same situation

00:49:23.960 would have acted the same way a reasonable person and we have that proof because the trainer acted the

00:49:31.000 same way and all of the other police officers acted the same way everybody who had similar training

00:49:38.200 everybody acted the same way and everybody who didn't have that training acted a different way

00:49:45.240 two movies on one screen with a perfect explanation of why people are seeing the movie differently

00:49:51.160 all right um there's also the issue that the crowd was threatening and apparently police procedure is that

00:50:01.080 you take care of the threat to the officers first and then you treat anybody who might be having medical

00:50:07.240 problems you could argue that it shouldn't be that way but it is that way and that's exculpatory too

00:50:14.840 but here's the interesting thing oh so here are two kinds of demonstrations that the um the the defense

00:50:23.160 could do now i don't know if these would be allowed right so there's a question of what the judge allows

00:50:28.680 but imagine the defense attorney takes in a bathroom scale puts it on the floor during closing arguments

00:50:35.640 gets down on two knees one knee on the bathroom scale and one knee on the floor what do you think the scale

00:50:42.280 would register as weight assuming that you're you're trying to not put your full weight on the the the

00:50:49.720 down knee what what would be the weight it would well have you tried it i tried it this morning

00:50:57.080 i i put down it looks like somebody tried it because they've already because they have a number there so

00:51:02.600 with me it was around 50 pounds all right so i my weight is uh probably 158 something like that

00:51:12.200 shaven was 140 so not too far out of the the range and my mine was about 50 pounds okay so one demonstration

00:51:22.280 is just having somebody get down and about the same size as shaven or have shaven himself i guess you

00:51:28.680 could have him do it himself just get down on the on the thing and show that it looks like about 50

00:51:33.640 pounds at minimum now does that mean that shaven was giving him only 50 pounds of pressure or could he

00:51:42.280 have been leaning right into it it'd be hard to tell in the video but it gives a reasonable doubt

00:51:49.080 because now you're not sure was he putting you know 140 pounds on it or is he putting 50 pounds on it

00:51:55.640 because george floyd was a big guy right let me ask you this well actually let's take the next example

00:52:03.880 first the other thing and i don't think this would necessarily be allowed by the judge but you can

00:52:09.000 imagine the defense attorney giving his closing arguments on handcuffed and on his uh stomach while

00:52:17.640 three people were sitting on him and he just you know talks through it you know so so he could

00:52:23.240 demonstrate it that way but let me tell you the most persuasive way to do a demonstration one of the

00:52:30.440 things that the that the video lies about is the sizes of the people involved remember you know a

00:52:38.600 picture doesn't lie yes it does pictures lie better than than anything there's nothing that lies better

00:52:44.760 than a picture pictures are the best way to lie um but one of the things that the video doesn't give you

00:52:51.720 when you're seeing george floyd's head basically and then you're seeing shaven you can't tell how big

00:52:58.120 either of them are floyd was like six uh six four and you know probably 200 something and he was big

00:53:06.760 strapping youngish guy shaven was 140 pounds and five eight i think five eight so if you did your

00:53:16.600 demonstration in the courtroom and you were trying to show the jury what they didn't necessarily see

00:53:22.520 on video somebody says six six and 240 pounds um i could say that it's somewhere in that range um

00:53:34.680 so here's how you do the demonstration in the court you would get a very large wait for it white man

00:53:43.000 to play george floyd got to be white but about the same size about the same age big healthy looking

00:53:53.000 muscular youngish big white guy then you get three black guys who are about 140 pounds

00:54:02.440 to play the role of the police officers and then you could see that there was a big difference between

00:54:08.680 the people on top and the person that they were subduing because imagine um imagine the

00:54:17.160 the jury is seeing the actual dimensions of the people which you can't tell on the video it doesn't

00:54:22.680 show you right somebody thinks i'm a right-wing shill

00:54:30.280 um if anybody's new to this i'm left of bernie and i don't identify with too many things that you

00:54:39.240 would call right wing uh so do your homework don't be a fucking bitch learn something about me before you

00:54:49.000 before you criticize okay just just don't be a bitch about it just try to up your game a little bit

00:54:55.320 criticism is fine you're welcome to criticize but just get a little bit of information before you do it

00:55:01.800 because if you're criticizing without even knowing who i am you're just being a bitch so don't be that okay

00:55:09.720 all right uh and it is fair and interesting to talk about the trial and how it will go this is not a political thing

00:55:17.320 it's legal thing and it's interesting it's also a prediction thing let you know where things are going all right

00:55:23.560 so if you did that demonstration i think people would see it and if you reversed the ethnicities

00:55:29.640 of the people involved it would really mess up the brains of the jury because then they would see with

00:55:35.960 their own eyes that race had influenced them you want the jury to know that the races of the people

00:55:44.120 involved biased them and the way to do it is give a demonstration where you reverse the races

00:55:49.720 and nobody would give a fuck if a if a four if a 140 pound black police officer put his knee for nine

00:56:00.520 minutes on a 240 pound strapping six foot six white guy on the ground nobody would give a fuck right

00:56:12.120 and and i'm not saying that has anything to do with racism it has to do with um there's a natural

00:56:20.120 there's a natural what would you call it revulsion toward the powerful beating up the less powerful

00:56:27.320 it's a natural revulsion and you you can even be a racist and you'd have the revulsion right because

00:56:34.920 when you see somebody in power doing something bad to somebody who you know you think is a group that has

00:56:41.240 no power that's way worse than if you reversed it and the person getting hurt is the powerful one in in

00:56:48.360 other situations right and reversing the ethnicities to do your demonstration you wouldn't have to say

00:56:54.840 any of that the people in the jury would get it they would say why did this seem so bad when the

00:57:01.640 races were the other way and the answer is it is worse when the races are the other way that's not

00:57:08.280 not it's not um it's not an illusion it is worse when when the powerful are squishing the less powerful

00:57:17.960 that's worse but that doesn't change the legal liability the fact that it feels worse and is

00:57:25.960 worse it is worse right i won't even say it feels worse it's just worse you know squashing the less

00:57:31.480 powerful is just the worst but it's not worse from a legal perspective it's no worse from the legal

00:57:40.840 perspective and this is the context so um

00:57:48.520 let's see

00:57:52.680 here's a question i have if you if it takes three things to kill somebody which one is the cause of

00:57:59.320 death so the defense's witness said that the death was caused by a a collection of three things

00:58:10.600 that he had a bad heart he was on drugs which can change your breathing and breathing was the issue

00:58:18.680 and the police officers put him in a position that restricted his breathing now legally that's homicide

00:58:27.720 as i said and legally it puts the last action as the cause the last action was the police

00:58:35.320 so technically legally the way definitions work the way the law works the cop killed him doesn't mean

00:58:42.680 it's illegal because he maybe didn't know it but the uh the important thing here is that your common

00:58:52.040 sense about this is a little different than how the law treats it and necessarily right that doesn't

00:58:57.400 mean anything's broken my common sense goes like this if it took all three of those things to kill him

00:59:06.200 they were all the cause i get that the last thing that happens always looks like the cause but that's an

00:59:14.040 illusion it required all three things or at least wait for it there's a reasonable doubt that he would have

00:59:23.320 died without the first two things is there anybody who testified that if he did anybody testify that it's

00:59:33.640 we could know he would have died short of having a heart problem and the drug problem you kind of don't know

00:59:41.400 if you took those other two things away the drugs that affects your breathing the heart that affects your

00:59:48.040 breathing and then he died because he couldn't breathe i don't know i feel like i get that one

00:59:56.360 has to be the cause it's just the last thing that happened but our common sense says three things killed

01:00:04.360 him because if you took away any of those one any one of the three he'd probably be alive right if the

01:00:10.760 police hadn't stopped him i think he'd be alive if he didn't have a heart problem don't know but there's a

01:00:16.920 good chance he'd be alive if he hadn't done drugs don't know if it made a difference for sure but

01:00:23.240 there's a good chance so we're only talking about reasonable doubt right that's pretty reasonable in

01:00:29.400 the doubt category i would say especially when we know that tasing can actually kill you if you have a

01:00:35.000 heart like george floyd's actually i shouldn't say that that would be a little bit too much medical

01:00:41.640 certainty but say somebody has a weak heart would be in trouble um

01:00:49.240 so let's see what else we got here all right that's enough for that so my my take on it is

01:00:55.400 that uh the news will be so far the news is reporting this the news is reporting that uh

01:01:03.560 homicide has largely been demonstrated what they don't tell you is what i just told you

01:01:08.920 that that doesn't mean it's a crime watch how illegitimate the press is when they uh

01:01:16.520 when they describe the homicide without telling you that's not illegal by itself they won't tell

01:01:23.080 you that you will be led to believe that proving it was homicide which i believe has been proven and

01:01:29.800 to my satisfaction anyway they're going to tell you that that's the same as murder by sort of just

01:01:36.600 talking about it the same way they won't say it directly they'll just conflate murder with homicide

01:01:43.320 until you can't tell the difference and you want to riot over it that's what that's where it's going

01:01:48.360 speaking of uh propaganda let me give you two sentences and you tell me which one of these is

01:01:54.680 propaganda and which one of these is just an accurate statement we'll take a hypothetical

01:02:01.880 hypothetically let's say there was a congress person who had been charged with something

01:02:08.360 and there were two ways to describe this thing they had been well not not charged with let's say

01:02:12.680 accused let's say there's a congressman who's merely been accused of something no trial he's been

01:02:18.520 accused of something and uh there are two ways to say it one way goes like this the congressman

01:02:27.160 congressman is accused of having sex with a minor here's the second way to say it and both of these

01:02:34.360 will be true the congressman has been accused of having sex with a 17 year old which one of those is

01:02:42.440 propaganda and which one of those is just the news which one did cnn say cnn always says sex with a minor

01:02:54.200 right and they're trying to trap you into saying wait a minute 17 is not so bad oh what did you say

01:03:07.080 pedophile it's a trap so uh somebody says the first one yeah so when you see propaganda like that

01:03:18.360 where the the first thing that you say is the thing people remember now i think i saw jake tapper

01:03:24.840 say he was accused of having sex with a minor and then clarified a 17 year old

01:03:32.760 wouldn't it be better to say he was accused of having sex with a 17 year old who's technically a minor

01:03:40.840 do those sound the same to you because one of them is trying to get a result and the other one is

01:03:48.040 describing what happened i would say and by the way if you have two ways to describe something and

01:03:55.160 it's only an allegation you do have a social responsibility to use the description that doesn't

01:04:02.200 make him look guilty because there's not even a there's not even a charge much less a court case we

01:04:09.640 don't even have a victim and they're already talking about him like he's guilty without a

01:04:14.760 victim meaning we don't we don't know there's a real person yet if there ever is all right

01:04:23.960 nate silver was hilarious and a tweet you should be following nate silver uh he does a better job of

01:04:31.000 sticking with the uh the data and out of the politics than most people yeah and here's what he

01:04:37.560 he tweeted and this i laughed for like a long time over this he goes uh 54 of people who have

01:04:44.200 already been vaccinated are still very or somewhat worried about catching covet and but only 29 of

01:04:52.920 people who refuse to get vaccinated are very or somewhat worried about catching covet and then here's

01:04:58.760 his punchline great job everyone that's like a perfect punchline great job everyone it's so droll

01:05:11.000 basically it doesn't matter what you do you're going to be unhappy i guess

01:05:17.400 uh one way or another you'll be unhappy all right uh there's a video that i think youtube

01:05:24.520 took down but i i saw it i don't know i'm not sure how it took down it is since i saw it but uh

01:05:32.440 there's this dr cole who's made a couple of claims and i want to run them by you because i don't know

01:05:37.560 that they're true and he said the following so fact checking you on this he said all super spreader

01:05:43.400 events have been indoors can somebody fact check that first of all i'm not sure we know where all the

01:05:50.360 uh super spreader events have been because i'm not sure you'd know there was a super spreader event

01:05:56.760 you just know a lot of people are infected um but is that true that uh all super spreader events have

01:06:04.920 been indoors because that would be a pretty big deal yeah all known so the problem is whether that's

01:06:11.960 just the ones that are known here's the other uh thing he said which i have much lower opinion of

01:06:19.160 its credibility he he said there's no such thing as flu and cold season there's only low vitamin d

01:06:25.320 season in other words he's saying that in some seasons your vitamin d is low and that's why you

01:06:31.880 catch things that you wouldn't normally catch otherwise do you buy that here's here's the problem

01:06:38.840 with the vitamin d thing and you might remember that you know a year ago i was making all kinds of

01:06:44.360 noise about the fact that it looked like vitamin d was the the big correlation here it just seemed to

01:06:50.120 be that where there was lots of vitamin d people had better results and i didn't know that that was

01:06:57.080 uh anything but a coincidence but it was worth looking at and i still think that you have to be careful

01:07:03.720 about that correlation because people who are old and sick have low vitamin d it could be just another

01:07:11.160 way to know you're old and sick it doesn't have to necessarily um yeah yeah it doesn't necessarily

01:07:20.680 have to be the the vitamin d works it could just be a correlation that sick people don't have much

01:07:25.960 vitamin d but that said i'm still going to keep my vitamin d up because it's good for you in general

01:07:32.920 here's my next speculative question we've all been told that herd immunity

01:07:38.120 is when you get to you know 70 80 percent or whatever i think this virus they're thinking

01:07:44.120 it's higher because it's so spready but does the herd immunity number in that 70 range does

01:07:54.120 that make sense when your virus attacks certain parts of the population and leaves others largely

01:08:00.920 unhurt and when only the only people who are super spreaders are the people who are pretty sick and

01:08:08.840 obese and they're the ones who are getting vaccinated first it seems to me that the idea of herd immunity

01:08:17.400 that made sense for all other things doesn't make sense in this case and what i'm saying is that and

01:08:24.280 this is just speculation right so don't take this as anything you should believe more of a question

01:08:30.520 i guess even question if you were to uh let's say hypothetically you vaccinated everybody over 70

01:08:39.800 and everybody over 50 who's obese and i think we could do that right that or at least you get almost

01:08:48.280 all of them everybody else could still get the virus and it could rage through the rest of the community

01:08:56.040 but there wouldn't be any super spreaders right how fast does this virus spread if you could snap

01:09:05.400 your fingers and the only kind of spread was the one-to-one type and that's it and the the person's

01:09:12.040 getting it never got sick because let's say they're they're young or whatever they are um

01:09:21.080 i don't know that 70 is necessary i think it's more like getting all the super spreaders and then

01:09:27.880 maybe it takes care of itself i don't know just a question i have a second question

01:09:32.680 is there anything like micro immunity so we've heard that the the amount of the viral load you get

01:09:43.240 has a lot to do with how sick you get you know that plus your natural health so what would happen to a

01:09:50.360 perfectly healthy person who is exposed to just a little bit of virus could they beat the virus without

01:09:59.880 getting symptoms and become sort of micro immune

01:10:07.160 and you get to herd immunity just because they were exposed but maybe they don't even test could

01:10:13.080 could you have uh could you test negative for covid but have antibodies is that a thing

01:10:21.400 i don't know and if you can't get covid outdoors and we don't think you get it on airplanes enough to

01:10:32.360 stop flights where the hell are you getting it you know i've i have this uh this theory that i've never

01:10:40.040 said before let's say hypothesis that it's a sexually transmitted problem i'm just going to put that out

01:10:47.560 there i just have a theory that it might be sexually transmitted

01:10:54.840 i'm only kidding about that but uh but when you see the kids are not having bad problems and

01:11:02.200 the seniors are uh there's actually a there is rampant sex in old folks homes and nursing homes a lot

01:11:09.160 a lot of people don't know that but there is pretty rampant unprotected sex among seniors

01:11:17.720 all right that's all i got to say for today and i'll talk to you tomorrow

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 10, 2021

Episode 1340 Scott Adams： Court Packing, Floyd Trial, Vaccination Passports, North Korea and Fun

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript