Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 15, 2021


Episode 1345 Scott Adams： I Am Back, This Time With Audio


Episode Stats

Length

49 minutes

Words per Minute

143.05896

Word Count

7,021

Sentence Count

372

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

On today's show, we talk about the latest in the latest Project Veritas investigation into CNN's use of a fake news story to try to delegitimize the Trump administration, and why we should be worried about it. Plus, a lot of other stuff.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 You'll be experiencing a thing I like to call audio.
00:00:04.440 Yes, the iPad has a little flaw built into it where you can't charge it and plug in your microphone at the same time.
00:00:11.020 Same port. That's not right.
00:00:14.060 But shall we redo the simultaneous sip because you may have missed it on the first try.
00:00:19.640 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice of style, a canteen jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind,
00:00:24.880 fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:27.640 I like coffee.
00:00:30.000 Come on in and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dope bean hit of the day thing that makes everything better.
00:00:37.380 It's called the simultaneous sip. Go.
00:00:42.540 Yes, the silent sip, not nearly as good.
00:00:47.360 Now, of course, the context of this is that trolls like to come in here and say the sound doesn't work.
00:00:54.800 This time I knew it was true because I didn't have my microphone in.
00:00:57.980 But I was surprised that the sound doesn't work without a microphone.
00:01:04.080 You'd think that would be kind of basic.
00:01:07.900 You were worried I'd been canceled.
00:01:09.580 Oh, that's going to happen.
00:01:10.800 So let's talk about that.
00:01:11.700 So YouTube took down one of my videos from weeks ago and said that I had violated something.
00:01:20.220 And so I tweeted about it saying I didn't know why I was taken down.
00:01:23.800 And YouTube responded, some official Twitter response, and it said that I had violated one of their rules about talking about the election.
00:01:36.760 To which I said, what did I say that was inappropriate about the election?
00:01:45.160 Because I'm not aware of anything I said that would cross any line that YouTube or anybody else has.
00:01:53.340 Now, apparently they said it wasn't about China.
00:01:56.780 So they did tell me it was about the election.
00:01:58.520 But I didn't say anything that was inappropriate about the election, nothing that wasn't obviously true, and some opinions that are just opinions.
00:02:10.040 So here's the thing.
00:02:12.200 Do you see the setup?
00:02:14.280 So I've got this one warning, if you will, which could turn into a strike, I assume, if I do it again.
00:02:19.960 But how do I avoid doing it again?
00:02:25.380 I don't know what I did the first time.
00:02:27.600 And they won't tell me.
00:02:29.440 So the odds of doing something you didn't know you did the first time are pretty high.
00:02:36.620 Because I didn't know I did it the first time.
00:02:39.680 It would be one thing if I knew I was saying something over the line.
00:02:44.240 But I'm not aware of anything that was over the line.
00:02:47.700 Which is not to say there wasn't.
00:02:49.960 I'm just not aware of it.
00:02:51.640 It wasn't intentional.
00:02:53.820 So have I not been now set up that they can give me a couple of warnings, not tell me what they're about, and then just boot me off the platform?
00:03:06.700 Do you think that's real?
00:03:08.980 Well, I wouldn't have thought it was real until the Project Veritas videos about CNN.
00:03:14.780 When you see it on CNN, you think to yourself, well, that's probably not the only place it's happening.
00:03:21.060 We'll talk about that in a minute.
00:03:23.040 All right.
00:03:23.340 So stocks are up 9.8%.
00:03:25.560 Those stimulus checks must be working.
00:03:29.840 And anecdotally, there's a lot of people in stores lately.
00:03:33.120 I've been noticing that.
00:03:34.020 But I love the fact that Biden is getting credit for basically doing things that Trump would have done.
00:03:43.580 So Trump would have brought us out of Afghanistan.
00:03:46.280 But a few months later, Biden's doing it.
00:03:50.940 Trump would have done some kind of infrastructure plan, or at least backed one or signed one.
00:03:57.060 But a few months later, Biden will probably get to do that.
00:04:00.880 But Trump would have eventually given checks, stimulus checks.
00:04:06.840 A few months later, Biden does that.
00:04:09.920 So even CNN's opinion propagandists were saying that Biden is accomplishing Trump's objectives.
00:04:18.040 But they try to make it look like Trump couldn't get it done, which is not implied.
00:04:23.400 It's just there's a time for everything.
00:04:25.580 And Biden was in office when it happened.
00:04:27.480 All right, here's the pun of the day, best pun of the day.
00:04:35.920 You've heard that Vox, I guess you'd call him journalist, Aaron Rupar, his name got in, is sort of in the, what would you call it?
00:04:48.480 Let's say it's entering the common language as the word for misleading video.
00:04:54.080 So when you take a video out of context and it changes its meaning, that's being called a Rupar, R-U-P-A-R.
00:05:02.460 Because, allegedly, Aaron Rupar does that so often that they just named it after him.
00:05:09.860 So it's in the lexicon, thank you.
00:05:12.580 It's in the lexicon.
00:05:14.140 But there's a new one, a new Rupar about Tom Cotton.
00:05:17.860 So he was doing some stuff in Congress.
00:05:22.140 And if you see just the clip, he looks pretty unreasonable.
00:05:26.420 But if you see the whole context, it looks a lot better.
00:05:30.420 So he got Rupar'd.
00:05:32.440 Joel Pollack tweeted about that and suggested that anybody, he said,
00:05:38.080 victims of misleading video edits should get, wait for it, Ruparations.
00:05:44.600 Ruparations.
00:05:48.420 Yes, Ruparations.
00:05:52.920 I asked this question on Twitter in a little poll.
00:05:55.880 I said, have you cut back on your consumption of Coca-Cola products for political reasons?
00:06:02.720 Over half of the respondents said yes.
00:06:06.780 Now, of course, this is the most unscientific poll they could ever be.
00:06:10.280 But, and, you know, my Twitter followers lean conservative, even though I'm not conservative.
00:06:19.540 But they do.
00:06:20.420 They're conservative.
00:06:22.100 And half of them said that they're cutting back on Coca-Cola.
00:06:27.740 In completely unrelated news, Coca-Cola has announced that maybe they should be more open-minded.
00:06:35.300 And, you know, listen to the people on all sides of the aisle.
00:06:41.220 So do you think that Coca-Cola is feeling it in the pocketbook?
00:06:45.740 I don't know.
00:06:47.540 But if half of the people who were just following me said they cut back,
00:06:52.740 I have to think probably anybody who was watching Fox News, which is a lot of people,
00:06:58.460 probably a lot of them are cutting back.
00:07:00.320 So, here's an interesting thing.
00:07:07.060 Should a actual professional polling company ask this question?
00:07:12.940 Have you cut back on your Coca-Cola consumption for political reasons?
00:07:17.680 If the answer is yes, in any substantial way, it changes the world.
00:07:23.780 It will change the world.
00:07:26.720 Because it would be the most noticeable example of a corporation that sort of left its lane to get into politics
00:07:33.820 and just got spanked.
00:07:36.300 Now, the other possibility is there's no difference in Coca-Cola sales.
00:07:41.120 Don't know.
00:07:42.460 But if enough people in a survey say they're cutting back for political reasons,
00:07:48.480 that's going to get their attention.
00:07:50.180 That's the sort of thing that gets the CEO fired.
00:07:53.800 So we don't know if he'll get fired for that.
00:07:56.280 But I think he should be, in my opinion.
00:08:00.920 Getting involved in politics and having that take a bite out of your bottom line,
00:08:07.200 I think that's a firing offense.
00:08:10.760 That's just bad management.
00:08:11.860 Speaking of polling, Rasmussen asked how many people expected conviction in the George Floyd trial.
00:08:23.180 So how many people thought Chauvin would be convicted?
00:08:26.680 Interestingly, this is one of those unifying questions.
00:08:31.780 79% of conservatives expect Chauvin to get convicted of one of the charges, at least.
00:08:38.160 But 76% of liberals, too.
00:08:40.100 So basically the same.
00:08:42.200 Just as many conservatives as liberals expect a conviction.
00:08:46.220 And I've said before that this should have been the most unifying thing that's ever happened in this country.
00:08:52.400 From the day the George Floyd thing happened, right up to today,
00:08:57.720 I've never heard anybody who wasn't horrified by it.
00:09:01.280 It's not like there's some conservatives who are saying,
00:09:04.180 yeah, that's just the way it should have gone.
00:09:05.740 I mean, there are people questioning whether the officer caused the death.
00:09:10.640 That's a fair question.
00:09:12.180 But there wasn't anybody who wasn't horrified by it.
00:09:15.660 It's really unifying.
00:09:18.380 But we found a way to not be unified over it, even though it should have been.
00:09:21.720 The one thing we all would have agreed on, that we don't want that, what was on the video.
00:09:26.680 But the next question Rasmussen asked was how likely, and by the way, for the numbers I gave you,
00:09:33.860 I added together the two likelies, you know, very likely and somewhat likelies.
00:09:38.420 And I'll do that again with this one.
00:09:41.740 How likely it will cause riots.
00:09:44.920 86% of conservatives think that whatever the outcome is, it'll cause riots.
00:09:50.340 But 68% of liberals also expect riots.
00:09:55.460 Again, regardless of the outcome.
00:09:58.400 But remember I keep telling you that in these national polls, no matter what the question is,
00:10:07.820 about 25% of the people who answer would just be whack.
00:10:12.380 They either misinterpreted the question, or they're insane, or they're pranking.
00:10:18.080 They're just something.
00:10:18.780 But that solid 25% is just crazy people.
00:10:23.640 And it turns out that 20% of liberals say that rioting is not likely after the verdict.
00:10:34.680 What?
00:10:35.960 There are 20% of liberals who think it's not likely that there's going to be riots?
00:10:42.680 Who are these people?
00:10:44.920 These are the most wrong people in the universe.
00:10:47.940 Do they even understand the question?
00:10:49.860 I mean, honestly, I can't figure out how anybody would have that opinion.
00:10:53.640 Like, even one person in the whole country.
00:10:56.840 How do you get even to that opinion?
00:10:59.880 If somebody says artists, maybe.
00:11:02.800 Yeah, 25%-ish will answer anything in any poll.
00:11:08.800 Don't know what's up with that.
00:11:13.280 Stock market's up.
00:11:15.460 That's good.
00:11:16.600 All-time high, I think.
00:11:17.680 So the police officer who accidentally discharged a gun instead of her taser, and actually killed
00:11:26.560 the guy she was stopping, is charged.
00:11:30.900 And she's in her orange jumpsuit.
00:11:33.760 And I don't really understand it.
00:11:36.400 Do you?
00:11:36.780 Because the body cam footage made it completely clear that it was an accident.
00:11:44.800 Do you get...
00:11:46.340 Is that a jailable offense?
00:11:48.340 If it's obviously and totally an accident?
00:11:52.220 Now, you could say, we wish the accident hadn't happened.
00:11:55.720 You could say, if she were better trained or a better officer, it wouldn't happen.
00:12:00.340 But accidents happen.
00:12:03.300 And it couldn't be more clear that there was no intention, and that she couldn't have known,
00:12:10.440 because if she knew, she wouldn't have pulled the trigger.
00:12:12.660 So obviously she didn't know, and obviously there was no intention, and obviously she was
00:12:19.080 horrified as soon as it happened.
00:12:21.460 Do you go to jail for that?
00:12:23.720 A mistake?
00:12:25.620 I get that the standard has to be higher for the police.
00:12:30.000 But what about the human being standard?
00:12:33.340 You know, there's nothing she can do to bring back the deceased.
00:12:38.640 You know, if there were some way to make that better, then I'd say do it.
00:12:42.660 But there is no way to make that better.
00:12:45.080 All you can do is destroy a second life more than it already is, and it's got to be pretty
00:12:50.180 bad, because she killed a guy without meaning to.
00:12:53.540 I mean, she has to live with that.
00:12:55.480 So there's something deeply unjust about this police officer being taken a mugshot in an orange
00:13:05.560 jumpsuit and then being put with presumably other prisoners.
00:13:09.580 I don't know in what sense.
00:13:11.200 But wow, that just seems so wrong.
00:13:15.540 It's like a double wrong.
00:13:18.320 So it's like two wrongs killed Mr. Right.
00:13:22.220 That was his actual name, Right.
00:13:23.900 So two wrongs.
00:13:27.040 I mean, what he did certainly made it more risky.
00:13:30.140 What she did was obviously the thing that killed him.
00:13:32.620 So they both had to do something wrong.
00:13:35.180 It was two wrongs that killed Right.
00:13:37.700 That actually happened.
00:13:39.540 All right.
00:13:40.120 Not making light of anybody's death, of course.
00:13:42.640 But the simulation is just offering up all these coincidences.
00:13:47.100 They're just weird.
00:13:48.160 Jack Posobiec warns that you might want to think about getting out of Minnesota around the time of the verdict.
00:14:00.920 But I was warning people that getting out of Minnesota or staying out might be a good idea.
00:14:07.460 But if you come to California, there's probably just a very short window before the forest fires start.
00:14:15.320 Because apparently our forests are like super, super dry, like drier than they have ever been with more kindling than there's ever been.
00:14:23.960 So in about a month, the skies here will darken, and I will not have summer like last year.
00:14:33.560 Last year, there was no summer in California.
00:14:36.620 So in the middle of the pandemic, you still couldn't go outdoors.
00:14:41.740 Like it was the only thing you could do, and you couldn't even do that because it was just air quality was too low.
00:14:50.380 So that's coming.
00:14:51.700 And I'm not too optimistic about the electricity staying on either.
00:14:57.620 Oh, there's an outcome in the Ashley Babbitt situation.
00:15:03.800 She's the woman who was shot during the Capitol assault.
00:15:08.680 If you're checking your predictions, what was your prediction?
00:15:13.040 My prediction was that the person who did the shooting should not be charged, just based on what I saw.
00:15:19.800 You don't really know all the facts in a thing just by watching it on video.
00:15:25.200 But in my opinion, and I know this was deeply offensive to maybe most of you,
00:15:31.160 but in my opinion, I saw somebody who should not be charged with a crime.
00:15:36.760 Because I did think that lethal violence was called for under that very specific situation.
00:15:45.500 Now, I hear people saying, should have done a warning shot or should have done something.
00:15:51.600 Maybe.
00:15:52.640 Maybe.
00:15:53.040 But I just don't think that shooting somebody who's breaching a door in the Capitol surrounded by rioters
00:16:07.720 who you don't know what kind of weapons they have or what their intentions are.
00:16:12.140 I'm going to say I agree with it.
00:16:14.020 I'm going to say I agree with no charge.
00:16:15.900 And I agree with us not knowing who did the shot.
00:16:19.420 I do agree with that.
00:16:21.300 And I, but I understand, completely understand if just emotionally everything about this feels wrong.
00:16:29.360 Because she was just, she got shot trying to make the world better.
00:16:34.820 Right?
00:16:36.480 That's a fact.
00:16:37.280 In fact, she was in the process of legitimately and patriotically trying to make the world a better place.
00:16:44.920 Because she thought there was some injustice, and she thought she was marching against it.
00:16:49.740 Somebody who was in the military, trained to defend the country, probably thought she was.
00:16:54.560 So it's tragic.
00:16:56.680 And I certainly don't think anybody deserves to get shot.
00:16:59.560 But that's a separate question from whether the person who did the shooting did a really hard choice.
00:17:08.320 And you don't want to be in that situation.
00:17:12.260 But, yeah, I think no charge was the right decision.
00:17:16.320 But I also respect anybody who disagrees with that, because I think that's a close call.
00:17:22.020 We've got some court packing going on.
00:17:24.160 And I guess there's a bill now, and even though Biden set up this advisory committee,
00:17:30.480 which we think is just a smokescreen for figuring out a way to not do it.
00:17:35.120 But still, Congress, finding a way to embarrass itself, has introduced a bill.
00:17:41.780 And it's led by Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler.
00:17:45.560 Now, the fact that Jerry Nadler is assigned to this makes me wonder if every time they talk about
00:17:54.880 who's going to do something, if it's something you know is doomed, you look around and say,
00:18:01.160 well, this project's kind of doomed.
00:18:04.200 Who would like to be the lead on it?
00:18:07.340 Russia collusion?
00:18:08.580 Anybody?
00:18:09.240 Jerry?
00:18:09.980 Jerry!
00:18:11.200 Jerry would like to take the lead on Russia collusion.
00:18:14.360 Good work, Jerry.
00:18:15.560 Get out there on camera.
00:18:17.840 Make sure you've really, you know, put your reputation on the line for Russian collusion.
00:18:25.120 It's going to be good for you, Jerry.
00:18:26.760 I think this could make your career.
00:18:29.440 Because, you know, your career in Congress, I don't want to say it's not stellar,
00:18:35.560 but it's a little not stellar, if you know what I mean.
00:18:38.860 This could be your chance, Jerry.
00:18:41.020 Jerry, you could be our star.
00:18:43.380 But don't worry.
00:18:45.480 We're not going to send you out alone on this Russia collusion thing.
00:18:49.760 No, no, no, no.
00:18:51.160 We're going to give you a strong partner that people will respect.
00:18:54.920 His name is Adam Schiff.
00:18:56.740 And when the two of you go out there, it looks like Abbott and Costello.
00:19:01.060 But no, it's a very serious duo.
00:19:03.720 And you're going to have a great result.
00:19:05.580 You said yes?
00:19:08.200 He said yes.
00:19:09.440 He's going to do it.
00:19:13.680 Well, months go by.
00:19:16.540 Somebody gets the idea of doing a court-packing bill,
00:19:20.560 which the public hates, the Supreme Court hates,
00:19:26.680 Joe Biden doesn't like it too much,
00:19:30.300 and even Ruth Bader Ginsburg was against it.
00:19:35.260 So they said,
00:19:36.420 we need to volunteer to lead this court-packing idea.
00:19:42.060 Anybody?
00:19:42.760 Anybody?
00:19:43.800 Jerry?
00:19:46.820 Would you like to step up?
00:19:48.820 Good work, Jerry.
00:19:50.520 Glad you're stepping up to this.
00:19:53.260 Take the ball and run.
00:19:54.700 And if you'd like,
00:19:57.700 we could pair you with somebody who is equally worth...
00:20:00.260 I mean, somebody who could help you out.
00:20:03.100 Somebody whose reputation couldn't get any worse.
00:20:06.280 Have you met Eric Swalwell?
00:20:10.040 He's on the team.
00:20:11.580 Actually, I don't know if he's on the team,
00:20:12.980 but it would be funny if he were.
00:20:15.400 And if you never thought of Nadler and Adam Schiff
00:20:19.000 being Abbott and Costello,
00:20:20.880 well, you're welcome.
00:20:22.400 You're welcome,
00:20:23.020 because that's in your head now.
00:20:24.700 Well,
00:20:27.480 if it turns out,
00:20:30.160 let's do another topic.
00:20:34.140 So CNN
00:20:34.700 has a little bit of a
00:20:38.840 reputation problem
00:20:41.800 courtesy of Project Veritas.
00:20:45.980 And it's getting to the point where it's just funny.
00:20:49.340 I mean, CNN is so busted now,
00:20:51.720 it's funny.
00:20:52.520 And there are lots of levels to why this is funny.
00:20:56.260 So just so you know the story,
00:20:58.480 this is the funniest part.
00:21:01.480 There's a CNN technical director who got caught on video
00:21:04.320 trashing CNN,
00:21:06.080 his employer,
00:21:07.280 for being just a naked propaganda site,
00:21:10.660 and that they all know they're working on propaganda,
00:21:12.980 and he describes how they do it
00:21:14.760 with, you know,
00:21:15.680 no regard to truth.
00:21:16.980 And he just says it out loud,
00:21:19.540 and it's on video.
00:21:21.200 And the funniest thing about it is that he got busted by this,
00:21:24.300 this Tinder date,
00:21:27.480 a woman who went on a date with him,
00:21:29.400 and allegedly she went on five dates with him,
00:21:32.100 you know,
00:21:32.440 because it took him a while to give up the goods on video.
00:21:36.180 She went on five dates with him,
00:21:38.340 and I don't think he got a kiss.
00:21:43.400 So,
00:21:44.400 this is the quality of person that they hire at CNN.
00:21:48.180 Somebody who goes on five Tinder dates
00:21:51.860 and don't think he got a kiss.
00:21:55.740 So,
00:21:56.740 those who can't date,
00:21:59.500 work,
00:22:00.720 work as CNN.
00:22:04.940 So,
00:22:05.600 but it gets better.
00:22:06.600 So the latest drop,
00:22:08.080 so there's,
00:22:08.660 I guess there's going to be multiples,
00:22:10.160 but the second one from Project Veritas
00:22:12.740 and James O'Keefe
00:22:14.080 hitting home runs this week.
00:22:16.600 Congratulations,
00:22:17.120 by the way,
00:22:17.940 James.
00:22:19.400 Congratulations on,
00:22:20.480 probably your biggest,
00:22:22.100 I would say this is O'Keefe's biggest
00:22:24.080 score so far,
00:22:26.940 I think.
00:22:27.720 I don't know anything that's bigger than this.
00:22:30.200 And,
00:22:31.300 they actually got on video,
00:22:34.280 this is amazing,
00:22:35.820 they got on video
00:22:36.940 the CNN technical director
00:22:39.380 saying directly
00:22:40.900 that they target Matt Gaetz.
00:22:44.840 And here's what he,
00:22:46.100 here's what he says.
00:22:47.700 Quote,
00:22:48.400 if the agenda,
00:22:49.660 say,
00:22:50.060 is to get Matt Gaetz right now,
00:22:52.280 he's like this Republican.
00:22:54.320 He's a problem for the Democratic Party.
00:22:56.900 So,
00:22:57.420 we're,
00:22:57.880 meaning CNN,
00:22:58.920 we're going to keep running these stories
00:23:00.680 to keep hurting him.
00:23:03.720 He said it directly.
00:23:06.280 Directly.
00:23:07.660 That it's a propaganda network.
00:23:09.600 They singled somebody out for destruction
00:23:11.660 because he's good.
00:23:14.440 Now,
00:23:14.940 here's the funniest part.
00:23:16.880 Now,
00:23:17.440 I'm not going to predict this is going to happen.
00:23:19.300 All right?
00:23:20.420 It's just funny because it could.
00:23:23.660 So,
00:23:23.980 this is more in the speculative fun category,
00:23:26.840 not a prediction.
00:23:29.320 Somebody very smart,
00:23:31.620 who shall remain nameless for now,
00:23:34.020 but very smart,
00:23:36.080 said when this first broke
00:23:38.140 about Matt Gaetz,
00:23:41.620 this very smart person said,
00:23:43.800 there's one of two things
00:23:45.220 that's going to happen from this.
00:23:47.460 He'll be destroyed,
00:23:48.620 or it will make him president.
00:23:54.180 And when I heard that,
00:23:55.880 I just laughed because it was,
00:23:58.000 you know,
00:23:58.220 it just didn't ring,
00:23:59.320 like,
00:24:00.120 clever to me.
00:24:01.120 I was like,
00:24:01.800 no,
00:24:02.280 he's just going to be destroyed.
00:24:04.120 Just going to be destroyed.
00:24:06.800 But,
00:24:08.060 it's getting interesting now,
00:24:09.460 isn't it?
00:24:10.520 Yet another day has gone by
00:24:12.220 without something that looks like
00:24:14.520 definitive legal risk
00:24:17.120 for Mr. Gaetz.
00:24:19.280 You were kind of expecting it,
00:24:20.680 weren't you?
00:24:21.640 All this smoke,
00:24:23.400 got to be a little fire.
00:24:25.860 But every time we clear the smoke,
00:24:28.420 and we look down,
00:24:29.280 and we're waiting for that fire,
00:24:31.000 it's sort of in the future.
00:24:33.600 Well,
00:24:34.500 oh,
00:24:35.400 well,
00:24:35.700 I guess I don't see any burning embers
00:24:37.380 at the moment,
00:24:38.220 but they're coming.
00:24:39.540 How do we know they're coming?
00:24:40.960 Well,
00:24:41.760 let me read for you
00:24:42.780 a headline from CNN
00:24:45.420 about the Gaetz situation.
00:24:47.620 This is the headline.
00:24:49.360 Women detail drug use,
00:24:51.520 sex,
00:24:51.960 and payments
00:24:52.520 after late night parties
00:24:54.040 with Gaetz and others.
00:24:56.140 Now,
00:24:56.460 if you heard this headline,
00:24:58.020 what would you expect
00:24:59.180 the story to say?
00:25:00.400 would you expect
00:25:02.560 that this women detail
00:25:04.060 drug use,
00:25:04.820 sex,
00:25:05.160 and payments
00:25:05.640 after late night
00:25:06.560 with parties
00:25:07.660 with Gaetz?
00:25:08.840 Wouldn't you expect
00:25:09.840 that some part
00:25:10.760 of the story
00:25:11.560 would say
00:25:12.700 that somebody,
00:25:14.120 anybody,
00:25:15.280 had seen Matt Gaetz
00:25:16.840 do any of those things?
00:25:19.260 but the story says
00:25:21.800 nobody saw him
00:25:23.620 do any of those things
00:25:24.660 and there's no evidence.
00:25:27.640 That's the actual story.
00:25:28.980 There's no evidence
00:25:29.620 of any of that.
00:25:30.960 There's no evidence
00:25:31.920 that he took
00:25:32.480 a recreational drug.
00:25:34.620 None.
00:25:36.080 Somebody saw him
00:25:36.840 take a pill.
00:25:38.400 I kind of take a pill
00:25:39.620 just about every day.
00:25:41.440 You know,
00:25:41.840 vitamin D,
00:25:42.600 whatever.
00:25:42.960 Who knows?
00:25:44.360 But no evidence
00:25:45.280 it was illegal.
00:25:47.820 Then there's,
00:25:48.580 you know,
00:25:48.880 the talks about the sex.
00:25:51.400 Nobody saw sex.
00:25:53.060 Nobody saw underage,
00:25:54.380 any women there.
00:25:55.840 And the payments,
00:25:56.980 there's no direct link
00:25:58.480 to Gaetz on payments.
00:26:00.720 There are, you know,
00:26:01.320 indications
00:26:01.860 and allegations
00:26:02.680 and suggestions
00:26:03.600 and who knows?
00:26:05.300 Who knows
00:26:05.780 what we're going to find?
00:26:06.600 I remind you,
00:26:08.620 it's not my job
00:26:09.900 to defend anybody's
00:26:11.740 sex life
00:26:12.640 or drug use
00:26:13.480 or alleged drug use
00:26:14.860 or anything else.
00:26:16.400 So,
00:26:16.780 Gaetz is on his own
00:26:18.400 for that, right?
00:26:19.680 He's on his own.
00:26:21.520 And generally speaking,
00:26:23.160 I'm not going to defend
00:26:24.100 anybody's sex life.
00:26:26.080 That's just not my job.
00:26:28.100 But,
00:26:28.700 we can talk about
00:26:29.500 the propaganda
00:26:30.040 aspect of it
00:26:31.300 while we're waiting
00:26:32.200 to find out
00:26:32.720 if there's anything
00:26:33.440 to it.
00:26:36.160 And then,
00:26:36.940 so,
00:26:38.100 my point being
00:26:38.940 that
00:26:39.440 if they don't
00:26:41.260 finish Matt Gaetz
00:26:42.420 off,
00:26:43.360 and they're trying
00:26:43.920 pretty hard,
00:26:44.860 if they don't
00:26:45.740 finish him off,
00:26:47.940 he might get stronger.
00:26:49.660 And the reason
00:26:50.400 they're targeting him
00:26:51.340 is they've admitted
00:26:52.660 he's effective.
00:26:55.380 How many people
00:26:56.460 would they say
00:26:56.940 that about?
00:26:59.000 Right?
00:27:00.020 How many people
00:27:00.860 would CNN say
00:27:01.860 on the Republican side,
00:27:04.660 how many people
00:27:05.240 would they call out
00:27:06.200 as effective?
00:27:06.840 Because that means
00:27:08.140 they're worried.
00:27:09.460 If he were bad
00:27:10.580 at his job,
00:27:11.480 which is talking
00:27:12.140 in public
00:27:12.660 about policies
00:27:13.560 and stuff,
00:27:14.340 if he were bad
00:27:15.160 at that,
00:27:16.220 they would just
00:27:16.820 let him on
00:27:17.660 and let him
00:27:18.140 do his thing.
00:27:19.260 But they said
00:27:19.960 he's good.
00:27:21.900 The Democrats
00:27:22.880 were afraid of him.
00:27:25.560 It sounds a little
00:27:26.560 smarter now,
00:27:27.220 doesn't it?
00:27:28.020 When you think
00:27:28.640 if they don't
00:27:29.620 finish him off,
00:27:31.580 he could be
00:27:32.200 president.
00:27:33.300 Let me give you
00:27:33.960 another element
00:27:35.860 to that.
00:27:36.240 The things
00:27:37.100 he's accused of,
00:27:38.100 let's say there's
00:27:39.180 no evidence
00:27:40.200 of whatever
00:27:41.700 the worst parts
00:27:42.540 are.
00:27:43.240 So this will
00:27:44.280 just be speculative.
00:27:45.900 If it turns out
00:27:47.280 that there's
00:27:48.720 no there there
00:27:49.640 and no real
00:27:50.660 evidence ever
00:27:51.300 emerges,
00:27:52.520 what we're going
00:27:53.480 to know about
00:27:53.960 Matt Gaetz
00:27:54.500 is that he was
00:27:55.120 targeted by CNN
00:27:56.280 for being
00:27:57.020 too effective.
00:28:00.200 Right?
00:28:01.640 That's what
00:28:02.360 you'll know
00:28:02.700 about him.
00:28:03.400 Here's the second
00:28:04.080 thing you'll know
00:28:04.640 about him.
00:28:05.020 when he was
00:28:06.480 single,
00:28:07.680 he had a
00:28:09.500 very active
00:28:10.200 sex life,
00:28:11.080 we're told,
00:28:12.000 reliably.
00:28:13.700 Do you think
00:28:14.460 that would hurt
00:28:14.980 him?
00:28:17.120 Put on your
00:28:17.960 persuasion hat.
00:28:19.880 There's a
00:28:20.440 young man
00:28:22.660 in Congress
00:28:23.380 and he had
00:28:24.620 a very
00:28:25.640 successful,
00:28:26.540 apparently,
00:28:27.740 sexual life.
00:28:30.280 Hurts him
00:28:30.840 helps him.
00:28:33.620 Yeah.
00:28:34.780 Think about it.
00:28:36.760 Because he was
00:28:37.620 single,
00:28:38.700 as long as
00:28:39.480 nothing worse
00:28:40.380 comes out
00:28:40.960 than we've
00:28:41.500 seen,
00:28:42.220 it's going to
00:28:42.980 help him.
00:28:44.220 I hate to say
00:28:45.140 it,
00:28:46.400 but human
00:28:47.660 beings
00:28:48.260 like people
00:28:50.060 who are,
00:28:51.280 let's say,
00:28:54.020 sexually successful,
00:28:55.740 if I can put it
00:28:56.700 that way.
00:28:57.620 Yeah,
00:28:57.900 JFK,
00:28:58.560 right?
00:28:59.320 It's,
00:29:00.120 your brain
00:29:01.240 will say,
00:29:02.000 oh,
00:29:02.320 he's a
00:29:02.840 horrible man
00:29:03.520 slut.
00:29:04.500 And if you're
00:29:04.920 talking in public,
00:29:06.480 you'll say,
00:29:07.100 well,
00:29:07.420 I hate all of
00:29:08.340 that.
00:29:08.780 He's sure a
00:29:10.120 bad person.
00:29:11.220 I wish he hadn't
00:29:11.880 shown those
00:29:12.380 pictures to his
00:29:13.840 weasel,
00:29:14.900 his weasel
00:29:15.980 coworkers,
00:29:17.040 who apparently
00:29:17.540 threw him
00:29:18.000 under a bus.
00:29:18.620 But a part
00:29:22.740 of you,
00:29:23.280 like your
00:29:23.620 rational brain
00:29:24.300 will say,
00:29:24.760 this is all
00:29:25.160 bad,
00:29:25.580 I disavow
00:29:26.560 it.
00:29:27.360 But your
00:29:27.840 biological part
00:29:29.180 is going to
00:29:30.340 be a little
00:29:30.700 triggered by it.
00:29:33.340 So keep an
00:29:34.220 eye on this.
00:29:34.740 It'll be
00:29:35.000 interesting.
00:29:36.020 All right,
00:29:36.480 here's the
00:29:37.280 biggest news
00:29:37.820 of the day.
00:29:38.300 You ready?
00:29:39.520 A Dilbert,
00:29:40.400 well,
00:29:40.540 actually two,
00:29:41.700 two Dilbert
00:29:42.560 NFTs just
00:29:43.740 launched.
00:29:45.220 And you
00:29:45.760 can look at
00:29:46.620 my pinned
00:29:47.280 tweet,
00:29:47.900 to find
00:29:48.800 the link
00:29:49.140 to them.
00:29:50.060 There are
00:29:50.380 two versions
00:29:51.040 of Dilbert
00:29:52.460 comic strips
00:29:53.100 that were
00:29:53.380 made just
00:29:53.920 for this.
00:29:54.660 They don't
00:29:54.980 run in any
00:29:55.540 newspapers,
00:29:56.240 these particular
00:29:56.760 ones.
00:29:57.560 But one of
00:29:58.100 them is a
00:29:59.900 naughty version.
00:30:01.440 The other
00:30:01.940 one is the
00:30:02.420 clean version
00:30:03.000 with no
00:30:03.620 naughty words.
00:30:04.740 One uses
00:30:05.300 the F word
00:30:05.940 and it will
00:30:06.360 be probably
00:30:07.600 the only time
00:30:08.300 it ever
00:30:08.660 happens in
00:30:09.180 a Dilbert
00:30:09.540 comic.
00:30:10.320 Obviously
00:30:10.740 that can't
00:30:11.280 run in a
00:30:11.700 newspaper.
00:30:12.520 So it's
00:30:12.880 the only one
00:30:13.480 that has an
00:30:14.280 obscenity in
00:30:14.860 it.
00:30:15.180 It's used
00:30:15.920 in an artistic
00:30:16.940 way.
00:30:17.300 I don't
00:30:17.640 just throw
00:30:18.140 it in
00:30:18.380 there.
00:30:19.280 And you
00:30:20.380 can now
00:30:20.780 vote by
00:30:22.960 being in
00:30:24.840 part of
00:30:25.180 the auction.
00:30:27.020 And I'll
00:30:27.560 tell you what
00:30:28.180 an NFT is
00:30:28.960 in a minute.
00:30:29.940 And you
00:30:31.260 can see if
00:30:31.840 you like the
00:30:32.420 naughty one
00:30:32.820 or the
00:30:33.200 other one.
00:30:34.260 So here's
00:30:34.760 what an
00:30:35.020 NFT is.
00:30:35.660 An NFT,
00:30:36.160 if you don't
00:30:36.480 know,
00:30:36.820 is a digital
00:30:37.820 collectible
00:30:39.260 piece of
00:30:39.860 art.
00:30:40.560 What?
00:30:41.240 You say.
00:30:42.140 How can you
00:30:42.800 collect a
00:30:43.800 digital thing
00:30:44.560 when anybody
00:30:45.480 can just
00:30:45.940 make a
00:30:46.280 perfect
00:30:46.580 reproduction
00:30:47.080 of it?
00:30:48.360 They're
00:30:48.780 literally
00:30:49.380 worthless if
00:30:50.620 it's a
00:30:50.920 digital image
00:30:51.580 or a
00:30:53.140 digital video
00:30:54.260 or anything.
00:30:54.980 And all
00:30:55.520 of these
00:30:55.780 things can
00:30:56.200 be NFTs.
00:30:57.060 It stands
00:30:57.400 for non-fungible
00:30:58.980 token or
00:30:59.640 something.
00:31:00.420 But that
00:31:00.900 doesn't matter.
00:31:02.640 You don't
00:31:03.100 need to know
00:31:03.520 what it
00:31:03.720 stands for.
00:31:04.560 So what it
00:31:04.960 is is a
00:31:05.480 marketplace for
00:31:06.640 digital art
00:31:07.460 that people
00:31:08.880 will pay up
00:31:09.760 to millions
00:31:10.260 for.
00:31:10.600 And what
00:31:11.360 makes it
00:31:11.820 unique and
00:31:12.540 collectible
00:31:13.100 is that
00:31:13.820 the artist,
00:31:14.560 in this
00:31:14.840 case I'm
00:31:15.760 the artist,
00:31:16.920 the artist
00:31:17.840 essentially
00:31:19.100 registers it,
00:31:20.480 I'm speaking
00:31:21.320 in a
00:31:21.800 non-technical
00:31:23.500 way,
00:31:24.020 essentially
00:31:24.400 puts it
00:31:24.840 on the
00:31:25.100 blockchain
00:31:25.440 so that
00:31:26.160 it's
00:31:26.540 public
00:31:27.260 and
00:31:27.800 uncorruptible
00:31:28.720 forever,
00:31:29.480 that one
00:31:30.360 copy is
00:31:31.000 the original.
00:31:32.460 Every other
00:31:33.340 copy will
00:31:34.040 not have
00:31:34.520 the benefit
00:31:35.020 of that
00:31:35.640 connection
00:31:36.140 to the
00:31:36.480 blockchain,
00:31:37.340 which is
00:31:37.860 the way
00:31:38.160 you know
00:31:38.600 it's the
00:31:39.100 original.
00:31:39.440 Now,
00:31:41.340 should you
00:31:42.400 invest in
00:31:43.700 digital art
00:31:44.600 called
00:31:45.320 NFTs?
00:31:46.880 I don't
00:31:47.640 know why
00:31:47.940 anybody would
00:31:48.520 because I
00:31:49.520 don't collect
00:31:49.960 things.
00:31:50.740 I don't
00:31:51.100 collect stamps,
00:31:52.760 I don't
00:31:53.080 collect cars,
00:31:54.640 I don't
00:31:55.200 collect anything.
00:31:56.260 I had sort
00:31:56.800 of a
00:31:57.240 flashlight
00:31:57.820 fetish for
00:31:59.240 a while but
00:31:59.780 I even
00:32:00.200 broke that.
00:32:02.620 So,
00:32:03.480 if you
00:32:04.020 are not
00:32:04.380 already
00:32:04.760 deeply
00:32:05.120 into
00:32:05.500 crypto,
00:32:06.440 don't
00:32:06.820 get into
00:32:07.280 it for
00:32:07.540 this.
00:32:08.620 You
00:32:09.060 want
00:32:09.540 people
00:32:11.160 who
00:32:11.360 are
00:32:11.420 into
00:32:11.640 it
00:32:11.800 to
00:32:11.900 do
00:32:12.040 it.
00:32:12.860 But
00:32:12.980 now let
00:32:14.200 me
00:32:14.280 connect
00:32:14.580 this
00:32:14.800 to
00:32:14.940 an
00:32:15.060 actual
00:32:15.300 topic
00:32:15.620 you
00:32:15.780 care
00:32:16.000 about.
00:32:17.840 If you're
00:32:18.960 not in
00:32:19.280 the NFT
00:32:19.780 market,
00:32:21.080 this has
00:32:21.540 no meaning
00:32:21.980 to you.
00:32:23.100 But it
00:32:23.960 does connect
00:32:24.580 to the
00:32:24.900 real world
00:32:25.460 in a way
00:32:26.020 that I
00:32:26.780 don't know
00:32:27.100 if I've
00:32:27.420 heard anybody
00:32:27.940 say yet.
00:32:29.280 And I
00:32:29.580 might have
00:32:30.140 a little
00:32:30.580 behind-the-curtain
00:32:32.880 insight about
00:32:33.700 this.
00:32:34.600 And this
00:32:34.980 might blow
00:32:35.580 your mind
00:32:36.040 a little
00:32:36.340 bit.
00:32:38.060 You
00:32:38.620 know also,
00:32:39.440 and I'll
00:32:39.920 tie this
00:32:40.540 into the
00:32:40.960 NFTs,
00:32:41.860 you've
00:32:42.120 heard of
00:32:42.500 BitClout,
00:32:43.800 a new
00:32:44.280 startup,
00:32:45.200 B-I-T-C-L-O-U-T,
00:32:47.640 BitClout,
00:32:48.800 in which
00:32:49.520 people,
00:32:50.840 human beings,
00:32:51.680 real people,
00:32:52.300 such as
00:32:52.760 myself,
00:32:53.780 are turned
00:32:54.320 into
00:32:54.780 essentially
00:32:56.040 an NFT-like
00:32:58.780 asset,
00:32:59.940 I'll say
00:33:00.280 it's like
00:33:00.720 it,
00:33:00.880 it's not
00:33:01.180 the same
00:33:01.500 thing,
00:33:02.340 in which
00:33:02.880 you can
00:33:03.360 buy
00:33:04.020 coins
00:33:05.180 or tokens
00:33:05.820 in people.
00:33:07.920 So right
00:33:08.340 now,
00:33:08.660 Elon Musk
00:33:09.320 is the
00:33:09.780 most expensive
00:33:10.520 one,
00:33:11.180 and I
00:33:11.500 think I'm
00:33:13.740 somewhere
00:33:13.980 down the
00:33:14.440 list,
00:33:15.100 but I'm
00:33:15.900 in the
00:33:16.140 top 20,
00:33:16.940 I think,
00:33:17.560 of human
00:33:18.880 beings in
00:33:19.440 the world
00:33:19.880 that are
00:33:20.220 in this
00:33:20.620 market.
00:33:22.100 Now here's
00:33:22.740 the part
00:33:23.160 that you
00:33:24.100 don't see
00:33:24.620 coming.
00:33:26.400 There's a
00:33:27.020 much,
00:33:27.600 much more
00:33:28.820 important
00:33:29.460 social element
00:33:30.640 to this
00:33:31.080 that's
00:33:31.700 completely
00:33:32.220 invisible.
00:33:32.880 the
00:33:35.480 crypto
00:33:35.980 market
00:33:36.380 is
00:33:36.860 creating
00:33:37.320 a
00:33:37.560 market
00:33:37.880 in
00:33:39.440 influence.
00:33:42.340 And the
00:33:43.080 higher you
00:33:43.620 are bid
00:33:43.960 up in
00:33:44.300 this
00:33:44.480 market
00:33:44.780 of
00:33:44.960 influence,
00:33:45.880 the
00:33:46.480 more
00:33:46.720 you
00:33:46.900 will
00:33:47.060 actually
00:33:47.360 have
00:33:47.620 in
00:33:47.760 the
00:33:47.900 real
00:33:48.100 world.
00:33:49.060 Not
00:33:49.320 only
00:33:49.620 because
00:33:49.940 you
00:33:50.280 might
00:33:50.460 share
00:33:50.820 in
00:33:51.000 this
00:33:51.200 upside
00:33:51.720 so
00:33:52.020 you
00:33:52.160 could
00:33:52.300 get
00:33:52.460 some
00:33:52.760 of
00:33:52.860 the
00:33:53.040 financial
00:33:54.120 benefit
00:33:54.760 of
00:33:55.080 other
00:33:55.400 people
00:33:55.740 bidding
00:33:56.060 you
00:33:56.340 up,
00:33:57.060 because
00:33:57.480 that's
00:33:57.700 how
00:33:57.840 BitCloud
00:33:58.180 works.
00:33:58.860 The
00:33:58.980 creator
00:33:59.360 gets
00:33:59.620 some
00:33:59.820 coins
00:34:00.080 if
00:34:00.280 they
00:34:00.420 want
00:34:00.620 them.
00:34:00.760 And
00:34:01.800 what
00:34:03.420 that
00:34:03.620 does
00:34:04.100 is
00:34:04.500 create
00:34:04.800 almost
00:34:05.380 if
00:34:05.740 it's
00:34:05.920 successful,
00:34:06.620 it's
00:34:06.900 nowhere
00:34:07.180 near
00:34:07.660 this
00:34:08.180 point
00:34:08.400 yet,
00:34:08.860 but
00:34:09.280 where
00:34:09.540 it
00:34:09.740 could
00:34:09.960 go
00:34:10.400 is
00:34:11.660 creating
00:34:12.060 a
00:34:12.260 shadow
00:34:12.540 government.
00:34:14.700 Didn't
00:34:15.200 see that
00:34:15.560 coming,
00:34:15.940 did you?
00:34:16.140 Now
00:34:17.760 I've
00:34:17.940 told
00:34:18.120 you
00:34:18.300 that
00:34:18.620 the
00:34:19.300 form
00:34:19.880 of
00:34:20.060 government
00:34:20.380 is
00:34:20.660 already
00:34:21.040 evolving
00:34:21.640 so
00:34:22.420 that
00:34:22.600 people
00:34:22.920 who
00:34:23.220 are
00:34:23.540 I'm
00:34:26.380 going
00:34:26.480 to
00:34:26.600 lose
00:34:26.900 power
00:34:27.200 here
00:34:27.460 fairly
00:34:27.880 soon
00:34:28.200 so
00:34:28.500 if
00:34:28.800 it
00:34:29.120 goes
00:34:29.380 blank
00:34:30.040 we'll
00:34:30.240 be
00:34:30.360 done
00:34:30.500 for
00:34:30.640 today
00:34:30.940 if
00:34:31.520 the
00:34:31.660 power
00:34:31.840 goes
00:34:32.060 out
00:34:32.220 my
00:34:33.540 battery
00:34:33.820 is
00:34:33.940 low.
00:34:34.600 So
00:34:34.720 the
00:34:34.900 point
00:34:35.100 is
00:34:35.380 these
00:34:36.780 markets
00:34:37.640 of
00:34:38.060 NFTs
00:34:38.600 and
00:34:39.080 the
00:34:39.380 bit
00:34:39.580 clout
00:34:39.960 which
00:34:40.260 are
00:34:40.440 separate
00:34:40.960 but
00:34:41.660 they're
00:34:42.160 moving
00:34:42.480 toward
00:34:42.740 the
00:34:42.920 same
00:34:43.120 direction
00:34:43.560 that
00:34:44.500 people
00:34:45.100 can
00:34:46.020 be
00:34:46.240 bid
00:34:46.480 up
00:34:46.700 and
00:34:46.840 influence
00:34:47.340 so
00:34:48.580 my
00:34:48.880 influence
00:34:49.340 for
00:34:49.540 example
00:34:49.920 is
00:34:50.280 way
00:34:50.580 above
00:34:51.100 my
00:34:52.200 fame
00:34:52.720 or
00:34:52.940 my
00:34:53.180 elected
00:34:53.540 office
00:34:54.100 or
00:34:54.960 my
00:34:55.200 wealth
00:34:55.640 or
00:34:55.900 anything
00:34:56.180 would
00:34:56.680 put
00:34:57.720 me
00:34:57.920 but
00:34:58.880 people
00:35:00.320 on
00:35:00.600 bit
00:35:00.840 clout
00:35:01.200 and
00:35:02.220 of
00:35:02.380 course
00:35:02.560 it's
00:35:02.780 not
00:35:02.980 a
00:35:03.200 representative
00:35:04.360 of
00:35:04.620 the
00:35:04.700 whole
00:35:04.840 country
00:35:05.180 but
00:35:05.940 people
00:35:06.180 on
00:35:06.400 bit
00:35:06.560 clout
00:35:06.920 apparently
00:35:08.960 have
00:35:09.240 decided
00:35:09.680 to
00:35:10.380 increase
00:35:11.540 my
00:35:11.880 voice
00:35:12.320 now
00:35:13.620 that's
00:35:13.880 not
00:35:14.000 what
00:35:14.140 they
00:35:14.280 think
00:35:14.540 they're
00:35:14.720 doing
00:35:14.980 they
00:35:15.540 probably
00:35:15.760 think
00:35:16.020 they're
00:35:16.200 just
00:35:16.400 investing
00:35:17.020 because
00:35:17.300 they
00:35:17.440 think
00:35:17.680 maybe
00:35:18.060 maybe
00:35:18.860 I'll
00:35:19.040 get
00:35:19.200 more
00:35:19.400 attention
00:35:19.820 my
00:35:20.260 reputation
00:35:21.100 will
00:35:21.420 improve
00:35:21.700 or
00:35:21.840 something
00:35:22.100 but
00:35:23.100 the
00:35:23.560 effect
00:35:24.080 of
00:35:24.300 it
00:35:24.500 is
00:35:25.460 boosting
00:35:26.060 eventually
00:35:27.240 not
00:35:27.780 quite
00:35:28.060 there
00:35:28.320 yet
00:35:28.700 but
00:35:29.560 eventually
00:35:30.020 boosting
00:35:31.400 people
00:35:31.820 who
00:35:31.980 are
00:35:32.040 not
00:35:32.280 elected
00:35:32.620 so
00:35:33.580 it's
00:35:33.720 almost
00:35:34.060 a
00:35:34.300 form
00:35:34.660 of
00:35:34.960 election
00:35:35.620 in
00:35:36.540 which
00:35:36.780 a
00:35:37.080 shadow
00:35:37.680 influencer
00:35:39.520 society
00:35:40.340 will
00:35:40.740 be
00:35:40.980 created
00:35:41.400 and
00:35:41.860 you
00:35:42.040 can
00:35:42.220 find
00:35:42.500 out
00:35:42.720 who
00:35:42.940 other
00:35:43.240 people
00:35:43.580 who
00:35:43.780 are
00:35:43.900 smart
00:35:44.300 think
00:35:45.220 you
00:35:45.420 should
00:35:45.640 listen
00:35:46.120 to
00:35:46.360 remember
00:35:47.280 I
00:35:47.440 told
00:35:47.640 you
00:35:47.760 that
00:35:47.900 we
00:35:48.000 should
00:35:48.160 have
00:35:48.320 a
00:35:48.520 propaganda
00:35:49.140 checking
00:35:49.880 service
00:35:50.620 well
00:35:52.320 we don't
00:35:53.120 have
00:35:53.360 that
00:35:53.700 but
00:35:54.320 suppose
00:35:54.680 you
00:35:54.860 knew
00:35:55.020 who
00:35:55.180 to
00:35:55.320 listen
00:35:55.580 to
00:35:55.820 who
00:35:56.000 wasn't
00:35:56.280 going
00:35:56.420 to
00:35:56.500 lie
00:35:56.680 to
00:35:56.800 you
00:35:57.000 pretty
00:35:58.700 rare
00:35:59.020 if
00:35:59.840 you
00:35:59.980 look
00:36:00.180 at
00:36:00.360 the
00:36:00.560 list
00:36:01.360 of
00:36:01.540 the
00:36:01.680 top
00:36:01.940 people
00:36:02.260 on
00:36:02.520 BitClout
00:36:03.200 here's
00:36:04.480 your
00:36:04.640 challenge
00:36:05.100 find
00:36:06.800 me
00:36:06.980 a
00:36:07.160 liar
00:36:07.520 right
00:36:09.560 now
00:36:09.920 some
00:36:10.120 of
00:36:10.240 them
00:36:11.860 sure
00:36:12.100 how
00:36:12.240 to
00:36:12.320 count
00:36:12.540 that
00:36:12.840 but
00:36:13.560 look
00:36:13.820 at
00:36:13.920 the
00:36:14.060 list
00:36:14.460 and
00:36:15.600 find
00:36:15.980 a
00:36:16.240 liar
00:36:16.660 on
00:36:17.040 the
00:36:17.200 list
00:36:17.620 not
00:36:19.660 many
00:36:20.000 and
00:36:21.300 almost
00:36:21.580 everybody
00:36:22.060 who
00:36:22.400 is
00:36:22.560 famous
00:36:23.020 you
00:36:24.120 would
00:36:24.300 kind
00:36:24.580 of
00:36:24.700 consider
00:36:25.040 a
00:36:25.260 liar
00:36:25.560 wouldn't
00:36:26.560 you
00:36:26.720 like
00:36:27.000 anybody
00:36:27.320 who's
00:36:27.540 in
00:36:27.640 the
00:36:27.760 media
00:36:28.100 you'd
00:36:28.820 say
00:36:28.960 well
00:36:29.400 you know
00:36:30.000 I've
00:36:30.280 seen
00:36:30.480 you
00:36:30.640 lie
00:36:30.980 but
00:36:31.960 number
00:36:32.220 one
00:36:32.500 on
00:36:32.680 their
00:36:32.820 list
00:36:33.160 is
00:36:33.440 Elon
00:36:33.800 Musk
00:36:34.220 has
00:36:35.300 he
00:36:35.380 ever
00:36:35.560 lied
00:36:35.860 to
00:36:36.000 you
00:36:36.140 I
00:36:37.280 don't
00:36:37.400 think
00:36:37.620 so
00:36:37.920 how
00:36:38.640 about
00:36:38.840 Naval
00:36:39.400 Ravikant
00:36:41.860 to
00:36:42.080 you
00:36:42.260 don't
00:36:43.180 think
00:36:43.380 so
00:36:43.660 how
00:36:44.220 about
00:36:44.360 Balaji
00:36:44.860 ever
00:36:47.200 lied
00:36:47.480 to
00:36:47.620 you
00:36:47.840 nope
00:36:48.940 how
00:36:50.060 about
00:36:50.240 me
00:36:50.600 have
00:36:51.600 they
00:36:51.720 ever
00:36:51.900 lied
00:36:52.180 to
00:36:52.340 you
00:36:52.560 I
00:36:52.900 can't
00:36:53.120 think
00:36:53.300 of a
00:36:53.480 time
00:36:53.660 I
00:36:53.800 have
00:36:54.020 because
00:36:54.240 I
00:36:54.360 don't
00:36:54.460 have
00:36:54.620 any
00:36:54.760 reason
00:36:54.980 to
00:36:55.200 but
00:36:56.360 that
00:36:57.540 doesn't
00:36:57.800 mean
00:36:58.040 you know
00:36:58.400 obviously
00:36:58.740 that
00:36:59.000 doesn't
00:36:59.280 mean
00:36:59.580 oh
00:37:00.980 somebody
00:37:01.260 says
00:37:01.500 Jake
00:37:01.820 Paul's
00:37:02.180 up
00:37:02.320 there
00:37:02.460 too
00:37:02.660 yeah
00:37:03.080 there
00:37:03.260 will
00:37:03.440 be
00:37:03.620 people
00:37:03.920 who
00:37:04.080 are
00:37:04.160 just
00:37:04.340 celebrities
00:37:04.860 you know
00:37:05.340 Taylor
00:37:05.660 Swift
00:37:06.020 etc
00:37:06.380 but
00:37:07.140 I
00:37:07.260 think
00:37:07.460 that
00:37:07.660 they
00:37:07.940 I
00:37:09.340 think
00:37:09.560 the
00:37:09.780 celebrities
00:37:10.220 will
00:37:10.580 be
00:37:10.780 somewhat
00:37:11.380 discounted
00:37:12.300 in the
00:37:12.680 clout
00:37:13.120 category
00:37:13.860 they'll
00:37:14.200 just
00:37:14.380 be
00:37:14.560 famous
00:37:14.980 somebody
00:37:16.360 says
00:37:16.660 you
00:37:16.820 lie
00:37:17.120 by
00:37:17.380 omission
00:37:17.820 not
00:37:19.020 intentionally
00:37:19.540 I
00:37:20.540 can't
00:37:20.820 think
00:37:21.000 of a
00:37:21.240 time
00:37:21.420 I've
00:37:21.620 done
00:37:21.780 that
00:37:22.060 but
00:37:22.900 I'm
00:37:23.840 also
00:37:24.100 welcome
00:37:24.520 to
00:37:24.960 you know
00:37:25.800 in the
00:37:26.160 comments
00:37:26.560 anybody
00:37:27.480 who adds
00:37:28.120 context
00:37:28.780 in fact
00:37:29.400 the very
00:37:29.800 thing
00:37:30.080 that I
00:37:30.360 try to
00:37:30.740 do
00:37:30.880 most
00:37:31.340 is
00:37:32.120 add
00:37:32.480 context
00:37:33.040 so
00:37:33.880 if
00:37:34.040 you
00:37:34.140 ever
00:37:34.340 see
00:37:34.560 me
00:37:34.880 doing
00:37:36.040 what
00:37:36.280 you
00:37:36.520 think
00:37:36.940 is
00:37:37.720 lying
00:37:38.060 by
00:37:38.320 omission
00:37:38.700 just
00:37:39.700 put
00:37:39.880 it
00:37:39.960 in
00:37:40.020 the
00:37:40.100 comments
00:37:40.460 if
00:37:41.880 I
00:37:42.000 see
00:37:42.220 it
00:37:42.420 I
00:37:42.740 will
00:37:42.900 mention
00:37:43.180 it
00:37:44.480 oh
00:37:46.100 I
00:37:46.240 withhold
00:37:46.600 news
00:37:46.980 that
00:37:47.340 will
00:37:47.740 scare
00:37:47.960 you
00:37:48.120 yes
00:37:48.340 there
00:37:48.540 are
00:37:48.620 things
00:37:48.820 I
00:37:48.960 don't
00:37:49.180 tell
00:37:49.440 you
00:37:49.720 but
00:37:50.920 it's
00:37:51.120 different
00:37:51.420 if
00:37:51.900 the
00:37:52.080 topic
00:37:52.400 is
00:37:52.600 already
00:37:52.860 out
00:37:53.080 there
00:37:53.300 and
00:37:53.460 there
00:37:53.580 is
00:37:53.640 some
00:37:53.800 context
00:37:54.300 I
00:37:55.200 don't
00:37:55.580 try
00:37:55.760 to
00:37:55.900 withhold
00:37:56.200 context
00:37:56.780 if
00:37:57.600 the
00:37:57.760 topic
00:37:58.020 is
00:37:58.140 out
00:37:58.300 there
00:37:58.500 it's
00:37:58.820 only
00:37:58.980 a
00:37:59.120 topic
00:37:59.360 you
00:37:59.700 don't
00:37:59.840 know
00:38:00.000 about
00:38:00.200 all
00:38:01.460 right
00:38:01.600 so
00:38:02.640 look
00:38:02.880 for
00:38:03.020 this
00:38:03.240 what
00:38:03.500 you
00:38:03.660 think
00:38:03.940 is
00:38:04.180 a
00:38:04.400 silly
00:38:04.880 crypto
00:38:05.940 thing
00:38:06.460 that
00:38:06.740 makes
00:38:07.000 no
00:38:07.240 sense
00:38:07.580 it
00:38:07.720 has
00:38:07.880 no
00:38:08.120 impact
00:38:08.560 on
00:38:08.740 the
00:38:08.880 real
00:38:09.040 world
00:38:09.400 nothing
00:38:10.160 more
00:38:10.460 important
00:38:10.860 than
00:38:11.120 people
00:38:11.440 collecting
00:38:12.500 decorative
00:38:13.020 plates
00:38:13.520 you're
00:38:14.480 missing
00:38:14.900 the
00:38:15.180 long
00:38:15.460 term
00:38:15.720 play
00:38:16.120 it
00:38:16.860 could
00:38:17.100 replace
00:38:17.620 the
00:38:17.860 freaking
00:38:18.160 government
00:38:18.800 keep
00:38:21.260 an eye
00:38:21.500 on it
00:38:22.080 I
00:38:22.580 guess
00:38:22.740 Biden
00:38:23.100 is
00:38:23.340 going
00:38:23.480 to
00:38:23.600 sanction
00:38:23.940 Russia
00:38:24.400 what's
00:38:25.040 that
00:38:25.200 look
00:38:25.400 like
00:38:25.740 what
00:38:26.940 the
00:38:27.140 hell
00:38:27.340 are we
00:38:28.820 I guess
00:38:29.680 we
00:38:29.860 sanctioned
00:38:30.460 some
00:38:30.620 companies
00:38:31.120 and some
00:38:31.680 people
00:38:32.040 is that
00:38:32.740 going to
00:38:32.880 make
00:38:33.080 any
00:38:33.300 difference
00:38:33.680 I
00:38:34.680 don't
00:38:34.800 think
00:38:34.960 we
00:38:35.100 have
00:38:35.320 any
00:38:35.540 leverage
00:38:35.960 do we
00:38:36.320 because
00:38:36.880 we've
00:38:37.120 already
00:38:37.320 sort of
00:38:37.820 sanctioned
00:38:38.840 all the
00:38:39.100 obvious
00:38:39.440 stuff
00:38:39.780 there's
00:38:40.580 nothing
00:38:40.800 to do
00:38:41.120 today
00:38:41.400 but
00:38:43.840 Biden
00:38:44.880 will have
00:38:45.140 to do
00:38:45.380 something
00:38:45.680 my
00:38:47.480 guess
00:38:47.820 is that
00:38:48.200 Putin
00:38:48.480 is
00:38:48.720 completely
00:38:49.140 aware
00:38:49.540 that
00:38:49.900 he
00:38:50.480 can
00:38:50.700 take
00:38:51.000 what
00:38:51.160 he
00:38:51.260 wants
00:38:51.600 and
00:38:52.520 that
00:38:52.720 Biden
00:38:53.040 won't
00:38:53.580 start
00:38:53.980 a
00:38:54.120 war
00:38:54.300 over
00:38:54.520 it
00:38:54.700 the
00:38:55.640 only
00:38:56.120 thing
00:38:56.360 Putin
00:38:56.600 has
00:38:56.800 to worry
00:38:57.080 about
00:38:57.320 is that
00:38:57.740 Biden
00:38:58.020 is run
00:38:58.480 by the
00:38:59.140 military
00:39:00.160 industrial
00:39:00.680 complex
00:39:01.380 which
00:39:02.560 you have
00:39:02.820 to worry
00:39:03.160 about
00:39:03.400 right
00:39:03.640 because
00:39:04.280 if the
00:39:04.600 military
00:39:04.940 industrial
00:39:05.460 complex
00:39:06.180 sees a
00:39:07.320 opportunity
00:39:07.920 for a
00:39:08.420 fight
00:39:08.620 and war
00:39:08.940 that
00:39:10.100 we think
00:39:10.880 will be
00:39:11.260 short
00:39:11.620 of a
00:39:11.920 nuclear
00:39:12.300 encounter
00:39:13.620 they're
00:39:14.620 kind of
00:39:15.000 going to
00:39:15.200 want to
00:39:15.520 see it
00:39:15.960 because
00:39:16.440 it's
00:39:16.580 good
00:39:16.740 for
00:39:16.900 business
00:39:17.280 so
00:39:18.360 Biden's
00:39:18.980 a little
00:39:19.200 scary
00:39:19.660 that way
00:39:20.180 whereas
00:39:20.620 Trump
00:39:21.080 we had
00:39:21.500 more
00:39:21.760 confidence
00:39:22.260 that he
00:39:22.840 was going
00:39:23.100 to make
00:39:23.360 a decision
00:39:23.880 that was
00:39:24.840 good
00:39:25.040 for the
00:39:25.360 country
00:39:25.700 you don't
00:39:27.160 feel the
00:39:27.620 same
00:39:27.840 about
00:39:28.140 Biden
00:39:28.520 in this
00:39:29.160 case
00:39:29.600 in this
00:39:30.720 case
00:39:31.060 you wonder
00:39:31.820 who
00:39:33.320 exactly
00:39:33.840 is the
00:39:34.880 power
00:39:35.200 behind
00:39:35.720 Biden
00:39:36.140 and do
00:39:36.740 they want
00:39:37.300 no war
00:39:37.900 they might
00:39:38.880 want a
00:39:39.220 little
00:39:39.340 war
00:39:39.700 they might
00:39:40.500 want a
00:39:40.820 little
00:39:40.940 bit
00:39:41.240 they don't
00:39:42.560 want
00:39:42.760 nuclear
00:39:43.120 war
00:39:43.360 of course
00:39:43.780 oh the
00:39:46.980 other thing
00:39:47.360 that the
00:39:48.020 CNN
00:39:48.300 undercover
00:39:48.880 tapes
00:39:49.240 by
00:39:49.700 Project
00:39:50.740 Veritas
00:39:51.160 said
00:39:51.760 is that
00:39:52.560 they plan
00:39:53.000 to make
00:39:53.600 CNN
00:39:54.880 plans to
00:39:55.440 make
00:39:55.640 climate
00:39:56.120 change
00:39:56.580 the next
00:39:57.620 scariest
00:39:58.300 thing
00:39:58.660 so that's
00:39:59.700 why you
00:40:00.000 see it
00:40:00.240 turn into
00:40:00.600 climate
00:40:01.000 emergency
00:40:01.660 and
00:40:02.640 they're
00:40:03.280 already
00:40:03.560 running
00:40:03.940 climate
00:40:04.500 scare
00:40:04.880 stories
00:40:05.400 so that's
00:40:06.540 coming
00:40:06.760 the latest
00:40:08.380 from the
00:40:09.280 CDC
00:40:10.360 and the
00:40:11.020 experts
00:40:11.500 about
00:40:11.820 viruses
00:40:12.260 is
00:40:12.920 that you
00:40:13.880 probably
00:40:14.400 can't get
00:40:15.240 it from
00:40:15.600 a surface
00:40:16.340 very easily
00:40:17.300 that it's
00:40:18.820 pretty much
00:40:19.560 all in
00:40:19.960 the air
00:40:20.400 and it's
00:40:20.920 pretty much
00:40:21.360 all indoors
00:40:21.940 so the
00:40:23.120 two things
00:40:23.760 that we
00:40:24.260 got
00:40:24.640 let's say
00:40:25.260 more
00:40:25.520 confirmation
00:40:26.060 of
00:40:26.480 just in
00:40:26.860 the last
00:40:27.080 day or
00:40:27.380 two
00:40:27.540 is that
00:40:28.680 breathing
00:40:30.180 indoors
00:40:30.960 with people
00:40:31.660 who have
00:40:32.080 it
00:40:32.260 is the
00:40:33.380 dangerous
00:40:33.740 thing
00:40:34.060 being
00:40:35.340 outdoors
00:40:35.940 in any
00:40:36.920 context
00:40:37.440 appears to
00:40:38.120 be quite
00:40:38.460 safe
00:40:38.900 in any
00:40:40.320 context
00:40:40.860 because
00:40:41.540 outdoors
00:40:42.000 just sort
00:40:42.740 of blows
00:40:43.100 the virus
00:40:43.860 away
00:40:44.180 apparently
00:40:44.560 but then
00:40:46.220 the other
00:40:46.480 thing is
00:40:46.840 we're
00:40:47.020 probably
00:40:47.360 you know
00:40:48.200 overdoing
00:40:49.280 the
00:40:49.580 sanitizing
00:40:50.740 the surfaces
00:40:51.380 because you
00:40:51.880 almost can't
00:40:52.420 get it
00:40:52.660 that way
00:40:53.020 you can
00:40:53.900 you can
00:40:55.160 it's not
00:40:55.800 perfectly
00:40:56.260 safe
00:40:56.700 but
00:40:58.120 it's not
00:40:58.920 likely
00:40:59.220 now
00:41:00.100 in the
00:41:00.860 comments
00:41:01.300 I would
00:41:01.940 like to
00:41:02.320 ask you
00:41:02.680 this
00:41:03.020 I made
00:41:03.860 a decision
00:41:04.420 on day
00:41:05.200 one of
00:41:05.680 the
00:41:05.820 coronavirus
00:41:06.260 that I
00:41:07.840 wasn't
00:41:08.120 going to
00:41:08.380 sanitize
00:41:08.920 stuff
00:41:09.220 my
00:41:12.620 gut feeling
00:41:13.900 is that
00:41:15.300 if you
00:41:15.780 could get
00:41:16.160 it from
00:41:16.480 surfaces
00:41:17.040 we're all
00:41:18.740 going to
00:41:18.960 have it
00:41:19.260 in a
00:41:19.460 month
00:41:19.720 and
00:41:21.860 therefore
00:41:22.280 after a
00:41:23.460 few weeks
00:41:24.020 when it
00:41:24.440 was clear
00:41:24.820 we didn't
00:41:25.240 already have
00:41:25.820 it in a
00:41:26.160 month
00:41:26.400 I said
00:41:27.820 to myself
00:41:28.360 I'm not
00:41:29.040 sanitizing
00:41:29.660 anything
00:41:30.020 now if I
00:41:30.920 go into
00:41:31.260 a building
00:41:31.720 and they've
00:41:32.240 got a
00:41:32.440 requirement
00:41:32.920 or even
00:41:33.420 a suggestion
00:41:34.000 I will
00:41:35.100 do the
00:41:35.420 hand
00:41:35.640 sanitizer
00:41:36.120 but I
00:41:37.400 have never
00:41:37.960 sanitized
00:41:38.880 anything I
00:41:39.480 bought from
00:41:39.880 a store
00:41:40.240 I have
00:41:41.860 never
00:41:42.160 gone to
00:41:42.880 go
00:41:43.220 sanitize
00:41:44.520 my hand
00:41:45.100 after taking
00:41:46.340 some cash
00:41:46.960 from a
00:41:47.280 cashier
00:41:47.620 I've
00:41:49.400 completely
00:41:50.480 ignored
00:41:50.940 that
00:41:51.200 guidance
00:41:51.700 and
00:41:53.080 was
00:41:54.200 right
00:41:54.520 and
00:41:56.020 was
00:41:56.240 white
00:41:56.500 now
00:41:58.060 somebody
00:41:58.480 says
00:41:58.860 but you
00:42:00.120 do
00:42:00.320 wear a
00:42:00.680 mask
00:42:01.020 what do
00:42:02.120 you think
00:42:02.500 the
00:42:02.980 best
00:42:03.900 medical
00:42:06.040 scientific
00:42:06.860 evidence
00:42:07.400 is for
00:42:08.160 masks
00:42:08.740 in the
00:42:10.280 comments
00:42:10.720 tell me
00:42:11.320 what you
00:42:11.680 think
00:42:12.020 is the
00:42:12.940 best
00:42:13.240 evidence
00:42:13.840 for
00:42:14.280 or against
00:42:14.760 masks
00:42:15.300 not a
00:42:16.000 specific
00:42:16.380 thing
00:42:16.700 but do
00:42:17.520 you
00:42:17.680 believe
00:42:18.100 tell me
00:42:18.640 how many
00:42:18.920 people
00:42:19.220 believe
00:42:19.660 that science
00:42:20.780 has shown
00:42:21.400 conclusively
00:42:22.260 or at least
00:42:22.880 really really
00:42:23.420 strongly
00:42:23.840 that masks
00:42:25.220 work
00:42:25.800 or how many
00:42:27.140 of you
00:42:27.380 think that
00:42:27.840 the science
00:42:28.380 shows
00:42:28.780 they definitely
00:42:29.860 don't work
00:42:30.460 in the
00:42:30.860 comments
00:42:31.220 go
00:42:31.540 now
00:42:33.300 I'll make
00:42:33.940 some comments
00:42:34.480 while I'm
00:42:34.840 watching your
00:42:35.480 your
00:42:36.440 comments
00:42:37.680 now
00:42:38.360 most of
00:42:39.560 you are
00:42:39.960 probably
00:42:40.260 leaning
00:42:41.060 right
00:42:41.560 probably
00:42:42.600 more
00:42:42.880 conservatives
00:42:43.340 here
00:42:43.700 than
00:42:43.960 others
00:42:44.420 and
00:42:45.880 you
00:42:46.940 are
00:42:47.120 accused
00:42:47.680 not
00:42:48.820 you
00:42:49.100 specifically
00:42:49.660 but
00:42:50.040 the
00:42:50.620 group
00:42:50.940 of
00:42:51.140 conservatives
00:42:51.640 are
00:42:52.360 accused
00:42:52.940 of
00:42:53.240 ignoring
00:42:53.700 science
00:42:54.320 sometimes
00:42:56.940 way too
00:42:58.160 often
00:42:58.560 ignoring
00:42:59.660 science
00:43:00.140 turns out
00:43:00.600 to be
00:43:00.860 right
00:43:01.160 which is
00:43:02.760 exactly
00:43:03.160 why you
00:43:03.600 do it
00:43:03.980 right
00:43:04.260 all of
00:43:05.640 you
00:43:05.780 conservatives
00:43:06.300 who are
00:43:07.040 criticized
00:43:07.760 to death
00:43:08.480 about
00:43:09.320 ignoring
00:43:09.780 science
00:43:10.320 it's not
00:43:11.540 because you
00:43:12.080 haven't
00:43:12.420 noticed
00:43:12.900 the science
00:43:13.540 is bullshit
00:43:14.040 you have
00:43:15.440 and the
00:43:16.560 science
00:43:16.980 is filtered
00:43:17.540 through
00:43:17.900 political
00:43:18.340 people
00:43:18.820 and it's
00:43:19.220 filtered
00:43:19.460 through
00:43:19.780 advocates
00:43:20.260 so you
00:43:21.020 never
00:43:21.220 really
00:43:21.500 see the
00:43:21.880 science
00:43:22.320 you just
00:43:23.180 see people
00:43:23.600 talking about
00:43:24.160 it that
00:43:24.400 you don't
00:43:24.640 trust
00:43:25.000 and they're
00:43:26.000 often wrong
00:43:26.620 so let
00:43:28.920 me say
00:43:29.220 to you
00:43:29.540 that those
00:43:30.280 of you
00:43:30.720 who have
00:43:31.020 the opinion
00:43:31.440 that masks
00:43:32.200 don't work
00:43:33.020 two things
00:43:34.620 I disagree
00:43:36.160 but not
00:43:38.460 with a
00:43:38.860 binary way
00:43:39.640 like I'm
00:43:40.140 100%
00:43:40.700 sure
00:43:41.040 if I
00:43:42.200 had to
00:43:42.420 put a
00:43:42.740 number
00:43:43.020 on it
00:43:43.540 80%
00:43:44.600 sure
00:43:44.960 so number
00:43:47.460 one
00:43:47.780 I think
00:43:48.500 masks
00:43:48.900 work
00:43:49.320 80%
00:43:50.460 certainly
00:43:50.880 I'm not
00:43:52.560 an expert
00:43:52.960 so how
00:43:54.100 likely
00:43:54.440 could I
00:43:54.820 be wrong
00:43:55.320 really
00:43:56.500 likely
00:43:57.000 right
00:43:57.540 second
00:43:58.620 thing
00:43:58.880 is
00:43:59.160 if you
00:43:59.580 have
00:43:59.800 an
00:44:00.100 opposing
00:44:00.520 opinion
00:44:00.940 and you
00:44:02.080 say
00:44:02.380 masks
00:44:02.840 don't
00:44:03.140 work
00:44:03.420 I
00:44:04.040 think
00:44:04.320 you're
00:44:04.540 wrong
00:44:04.820 but I
00:44:06.160 respect
00:44:06.500 that
00:44:06.760 opinion
00:44:07.060 because
00:44:08.180 it's
00:44:08.400 not
00:44:08.620 unfounded
00:44:09.260 it's
00:44:09.500 not
00:44:09.640 like
00:44:09.820 crazy
00:44:10.240 right
00:44:10.880 but I'm
00:44:11.720 pretty sure
00:44:12.180 it's
00:44:12.340 wrong
00:44:12.560 I give
00:44:13.000 it an
00:44:13.220 80%
00:44:13.620 chance
00:44:14.000 it's
00:44:14.160 wrong
00:44:14.380 now look
00:44:15.360 at my
00:44:15.600 track record
00:44:16.200 for all
00:44:17.620 of the
00:44:18.160 you know
00:44:18.760 the predictions
00:44:19.420 I've made
00:44:19.900 about the
00:44:20.460 the virus
00:44:21.500 and anything
00:44:22.000 else
00:44:22.380 and say
00:44:23.140 to yourself
00:44:23.640 have I
00:44:24.960 been right
00:44:25.420 more than
00:44:25.780 I'm wrong
00:44:26.180 and should
00:44:28.280 you take
00:44:28.680 seriously
00:44:29.180 that somebody
00:44:30.340 who's been
00:44:30.760 right a lot
00:44:31.700 thinks there's
00:44:33.220 an 80%
00:44:33.780 chance the
00:44:34.340 masks are
00:44:35.020 working
00:44:35.700 now here's
00:44:37.100 my thinking
00:44:37.860 the medical
00:44:39.420 community
00:44:40.020 and the
00:44:40.940 scientific
00:44:41.380 community
00:44:42.000 are very
00:44:43.880 unified
00:44:44.340 on this
00:44:44.920 now that
00:44:46.500 doesn't
00:44:46.780 make them
00:44:47.060 right
00:44:47.420 can we
00:44:48.760 all agree
00:44:49.200 just because
00:44:49.900 everybody's
00:44:50.400 unified
00:44:50.920 that doesn't
00:44:51.460 make it
00:44:51.760 right
00:44:52.160 but it's
00:44:52.940 a fact
00:44:53.440 there the
00:44:54.760 doctors are
00:44:55.440 overwhelmingly in
00:44:56.420 favor of
00:44:56.840 masks
00:44:57.200 indoors
00:44:57.680 and the
00:44:58.880 science is
00:44:59.720 overwhelmingly in
00:45:00.680 favor of
00:45:01.200 masks
00:45:01.660 indoors
00:45:02.640 outdoors
00:45:03.800 is different
00:45:04.700 situation
00:45:05.180 now if
00:45:07.080 you believed
00:45:07.800 because you've
00:45:08.620 been following
00:45:09.060 certain skeptics
00:45:10.140 that if you
00:45:11.060 were to look
00:45:11.520 at the
00:45:11.820 science
00:45:12.320 the science
00:45:13.400 would show
00:45:13.780 they don't
00:45:14.320 work
00:45:14.660 you have
00:45:16.100 been bamboozled
00:45:17.140 all right
00:45:18.280 because there
00:45:19.560 are a lot
00:45:19.880 of skeptics
00:45:20.560 printing a lot
00:45:21.900 of stuff
00:45:22.300 that is not
00:45:23.000 credible
00:45:23.380 and you've
00:45:24.480 probably seen
00:45:25.020 a lot of
00:45:25.560 it
00:45:25.800 none of
00:45:27.160 it's
00:45:27.360 credible
00:45:27.720 and I
00:45:29.560 gotta be
00:45:29.780 really careful
00:45:30.360 when I
00:45:30.820 say none
00:45:31.580 of the
00:45:31.880 anti-mask
00:45:32.540 stuff is
00:45:33.000 credible
00:45:33.420 doesn't mean
00:45:34.620 it's wrong
00:45:35.060 it doesn't
00:45:36.580 mean it's
00:45:36.860 wrong
00:45:37.140 it could be
00:45:38.180 completely
00:45:38.540 right
00:45:39.000 and at the
00:45:40.180 same time
00:45:40.820 have no
00:45:41.300 credibility
00:45:41.880 because of
00:45:42.820 the way
00:45:43.000 it's presented
00:45:43.620 right
00:45:43.880 you can't
00:45:44.360 believe it
00:45:44.920 but it
00:45:45.680 could still
00:45:45.960 be right
00:45:46.440 right
00:45:47.540 now
00:45:48.360 as long
00:45:50.940 as the
00:45:51.260 people who
00:45:51.640 know the
00:45:52.120 most are
00:45:52.900 really solidly
00:45:54.300 in favor
00:45:54.740 of it
00:45:55.100 my risk
00:45:56.220 management
00:45:56.700 decision
00:45:57.200 is it's
00:45:57.700 worth the
00:45:58.060 risk
00:45:58.380 even though
00:45:59.400 I freaking
00:46:00.100 hate the
00:46:00.580 masks
00:46:01.000 I hate
00:46:02.640 masks
00:46:03.060 as much
00:46:03.460 as you
00:46:03.740 do
00:46:03.920 right
00:46:04.180 and plus
00:46:05.260 I have
00:46:05.640 a little
00:46:05.940 asthma
00:46:06.320 so when I
00:46:07.360 put it
00:46:07.640 in a
00:46:07.820 mask
00:46:08.120 I'm
00:46:08.420 basically
00:46:08.840 gasping
00:46:09.500 for air
00:46:10.000 I think
00:46:10.380 a lot
00:46:10.580 of it's
00:46:10.820 psychological
00:46:11.260 but I
00:46:12.560 hate
00:46:13.020 masks
00:46:13.600 and I
00:46:14.940 still think
00:46:15.380 it's a good
00:46:15.720 risk
00:46:15.960 management
00:46:16.360 because I
00:46:17.000 think it's
00:46:17.320 temporary
00:46:17.660 whatever
00:46:18.740 temporary
00:46:19.160 is
00:46:19.460 so that's
00:46:20.260 where I'm
00:46:20.580 at
00:46:20.780 on
00:46:21.420 masks
00:46:22.280 thanks
00:46:22.780 for asking
00:46:23.140 someday
00:46:26.020 I wonder
00:46:26.400 if we'll
00:46:26.700 know
00:46:26.960 the
00:46:27.900 evidence
00:46:30.140 that most
00:46:30.720 people use
00:46:31.420 about
00:46:31.800 social
00:46:33.040 distancing
00:46:33.580 and masks
00:46:34.240 is unfortunately
00:46:35.380 irrational
00:46:36.080 and see if
00:46:36.980 you do
00:46:37.260 this
00:46:37.540 you'll see
00:46:38.360 a graph
00:46:38.880 on Twitter
00:46:39.440 and it'll
00:46:40.340 say here
00:46:40.940 are two
00:46:41.240 places
00:46:41.740 one has
00:46:43.020 tight mask
00:46:43.760 control
00:46:44.340 and social
00:46:45.680 distancing
00:46:46.100 and the
00:46:46.620 other is
00:46:47.540 completely
00:46:47.940 opposite
00:46:48.380 no masks
00:46:49.140 and no
00:46:49.460 social distancing
00:46:50.120 but look at
00:46:50.960 the curves
00:46:51.560 they're the
00:46:52.020 same
00:46:52.400 so if
00:46:53.560 there are
00:46:53.720 two places
00:46:54.320 one uses
00:46:55.960 masks and
00:46:56.980 distancing
00:46:57.380 the other
00:46:57.840 does not
00:46:58.480 but their
00:46:59.460 curves are
00:47:00.020 the same
00:47:00.760 what's that
00:47:01.900 tell you
00:47:02.300 about masks
00:47:03.140 go
00:47:03.540 the answer
00:47:06.280 is nothing
00:47:06.720 right
00:47:08.100 so if you
00:47:08.920 believed that
00:47:09.600 what I just
00:47:10.160 described
00:47:10.640 even if it's
00:47:11.220 accurate
00:47:11.560 and most
00:47:12.500 of our data
00:47:13.260 is not
00:47:13.600 accurate
00:47:13.940 but even if
00:47:14.760 the curves
00:47:15.180 were exactly
00:47:15.820 the same
00:47:16.360 it wouldn't
00:47:17.760 tell you
00:47:18.040 anything
00:47:18.420 about masks
00:47:19.260 right
00:47:20.440 and you have
00:47:21.020 to understand
00:47:21.500 that
00:47:21.820 and the
00:47:22.440 reason is
00:47:22.860 because there
00:47:23.200 are too
00:47:23.400 many variables
00:47:24.040 and one
00:47:25.240 of the
00:47:25.480 reasons
00:47:25.740 that you
00:47:26.200 don't
00:47:26.520 require
00:47:26.900 masks
00:47:27.460 is that
00:47:28.280 everything
00:47:28.580 else
00:47:28.900 is looking
00:47:29.280 good
00:47:29.620 right
00:47:30.820 so you
00:47:31.200 end up
00:47:31.540 your cause
00:47:32.040 and effect
00:47:32.360 get backwards
00:47:32.880 so if
00:47:34.220 you believe
00:47:34.940 that looking
00:47:35.700 at any
00:47:36.140 two areas
00:47:36.880 and comparing
00:47:37.600 them
00:47:37.960 tells you
00:47:39.020 something
00:47:39.380 you need
00:47:39.840 to release
00:47:40.360 on that
00:47:40.860 because it
00:47:41.800 doesn't
00:47:42.560 all right
00:47:44.140 I'm about
00:47:44.620 out of
00:47:45.140 battery
00:47:45.480 so I'm
00:47:45.860 going to
00:47:46.040 make
00:47:46.300 I'm about
00:47:48.580 out of
00:47:48.900 battery
00:47:49.140 so I'll
00:47:49.540 make my
00:47:50.200 closing
00:47:51.740 arguments
00:47:52.300 which are
00:47:52.860 I think
00:47:53.200 I'm
00:47:53.460 I think
00:47:55.000 I'm
00:47:55.320 closed
00:47:55.880 if you
00:47:56.800 saw a
00:47:57.100 little
00:47:57.260 hiccup
00:47:57.760 there
00:47:58.020 it's
00:47:58.220 because
00:47:58.360 I got
00:47:58.700 a
00:47:58.920 low
00:47:59.300 battery
00:47:59.660 notice
00:48:00.040 and I
00:48:00.320 had to
00:48:00.580 clear it
00:48:01.040 but I
00:48:01.820 have
00:48:02.020 almost
00:48:02.540 no
00:48:02.740 battery
00:48:02.980 left
00:48:03.260 so I'm
00:48:03.640 going to
00:48:04.000 end it
00:48:04.420 up
00:48:04.580 now
00:48:05.140 somebody
00:48:09.860 says
00:48:10.360 that the
00:48:10.940 graphs
00:48:11.340 if they're
00:48:11.780 the same
00:48:12.200 it tells
00:48:12.600 you that
00:48:13.100 if masks
00:48:13.820 help
00:48:14.240 they don't
00:48:15.080 help
00:48:15.360 much
00:48:15.800 no
00:48:16.440 no
00:48:17.240 that is
00:48:17.640 100%
00:48:18.260 wrong
00:48:18.600 you can't
00:48:19.860 tell that
00:48:20.320 you really
00:48:21.360 can't
00:48:21.900 and that
00:48:22.440 that's the
00:48:23.000 illusion
00:48:23.400 that's
00:48:23.800 that's
00:48:24.060 like an
00:48:24.360 optical
00:48:24.720 illusion
00:48:25.200 except
00:48:25.600 optical
00:48:26.280 it's
00:48:27.160 an illusion
00:48:27.740 that if
00:48:29.660 they made
00:48:30.020 a big
00:48:30.260 difference
00:48:30.620 you'd be
00:48:31.060 able to
00:48:31.360 tell
00:48:31.600 because the
00:48:32.700 other variables
00:48:33.400 are really
00:48:34.000 big and
00:48:34.940 they're all
00:48:35.320 over the
00:48:35.660 place
00:48:35.980 you really
00:48:36.980 can't tell
00:48:37.600 from comparing
00:48:38.540 two places
00:48:39.120 that there's
00:48:39.920 probably nothing
00:48:40.660 more important
00:48:41.460 to understand
00:48:43.200 if you're not
00:48:43.760 a statistics
00:48:44.460 person
00:48:44.960 just understand
00:48:46.600 you just
00:48:46.940 can't compare
00:48:47.440 two places
00:48:48.000 with that many
00:48:48.620 variables that are
00:48:49.400 all over the
00:48:49.820 place
00:48:50.040 it just
00:48:50.320 can't be
00:48:50.660 done
00:48:50.860 and that
00:48:53.280 is your
00:48:55.140 live stream
00:48:55.680 for today
00:48:56.180 and I'll
00:48:56.720 talk to you
00:48:57.320 tomorrow
00:48:57.900 now
00:48:58.520 and I'll
00:49:03.560 jump in