Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1345 Scott Adams： I Am Back, This Time With Audio

00:00:00.000 You'll be experiencing a thing I like to call audio.

00:00:04.440 Yes, the iPad has a little flaw built into it where you can't charge it and plug in your microphone at the same time.

00:00:11.020 Same port. That's not right.

00:00:14.060 But shall we redo the simultaneous sip because you may have missed it on the first try.

00:00:19.640 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice of style, a canteen jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind,

00:00:24.880 fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:27.640 I like coffee.

00:00:30.000 Come on in and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dope bean hit of the day thing that makes everything better.

00:00:37.380 It's called the simultaneous sip. Go.

00:00:42.540 Yes, the silent sip, not nearly as good.

00:00:47.360 Now, of course, the context of this is that trolls like to come in here and say the sound doesn't work.

00:00:54.800 This time I knew it was true because I didn't have my microphone in.

00:00:57.980 But I was surprised that the sound doesn't work without a microphone.

00:01:04.080 You'd think that would be kind of basic.

00:01:07.900 You were worried I'd been canceled.

00:01:09.580 Oh, that's going to happen.

00:01:10.800 So let's talk about that.

00:01:11.700 So YouTube took down one of my videos from weeks ago and said that I had violated something.

00:01:20.220 And so I tweeted about it saying I didn't know why I was taken down.

00:01:23.800 And YouTube responded, some official Twitter response, and it said that I had violated one of their rules about talking about the election.

00:01:36.760 To which I said, what did I say that was inappropriate about the election?

00:01:45.160 Because I'm not aware of anything I said that would cross any line that YouTube or anybody else has.

00:01:53.340 Now, apparently they said it wasn't about China.

00:01:56.780 So they did tell me it was about the election.

00:01:58.520 But I didn't say anything that was inappropriate about the election, nothing that wasn't obviously true, and some opinions that are just opinions.

00:02:10.040 So here's the thing.

00:02:12.200 Do you see the setup?

00:02:14.280 So I've got this one warning, if you will, which could turn into a strike, I assume, if I do it again.

00:02:19.960 But how do I avoid doing it again?

00:02:25.380 I don't know what I did the first time.

00:02:27.600 And they won't tell me.

00:02:29.440 So the odds of doing something you didn't know you did the first time are pretty high.

00:02:36.620 Because I didn't know I did it the first time.

00:02:39.680 It would be one thing if I knew I was saying something over the line.

00:02:44.240 But I'm not aware of anything that was over the line.

00:02:47.700 Which is not to say there wasn't.

00:02:49.960 I'm just not aware of it.

00:02:51.640 It wasn't intentional.

00:02:53.820 So have I not been now set up that they can give me a couple of warnings, not tell me what they're about, and then just boot me off the platform?

00:03:06.700 Do you think that's real?

00:03:08.980 Well, I wouldn't have thought it was real until the Project Veritas videos about CNN.

00:03:14.780 When you see it on CNN, you think to yourself, well, that's probably not the only place it's happening.

00:03:21.060 We'll talk about that in a minute.

00:03:23.040 All right.

00:03:23.340 So stocks are up 9.8%.

00:03:25.560 Those stimulus checks must be working.

00:03:29.840 And anecdotally, there's a lot of people in stores lately.

00:03:33.120 I've been noticing that.

00:03:34.020 But I love the fact that Biden is getting credit for basically doing things that Trump would have done.

00:03:43.580 So Trump would have brought us out of Afghanistan.

00:03:46.280 But a few months later, Biden's doing it.

00:03:50.940 Trump would have done some kind of infrastructure plan, or at least backed one or signed one.

00:03:57.060 But a few months later, Biden will probably get to do that.

00:04:00.880 But Trump would have eventually given checks, stimulus checks.

00:04:06.840 A few months later, Biden does that.

00:04:09.920 So even CNN's opinion propagandists were saying that Biden is accomplishing Trump's objectives.

00:04:18.040 But they try to make it look like Trump couldn't get it done, which is not implied.

00:04:23.400 It's just there's a time for everything.

00:04:25.580 And Biden was in office when it happened.

00:04:27.480 All right, here's the pun of the day, best pun of the day.

00:04:35.920 You've heard that Vox, I guess you'd call him journalist, Aaron Rupar, his name got in, is sort of in the, what would you call it?

00:04:48.480 Let's say it's entering the common language as the word for misleading video.

00:04:54.080 So when you take a video out of context and it changes its meaning, that's being called a Rupar, R-U-P-A-R.

00:05:02.460 Because, allegedly, Aaron Rupar does that so often that they just named it after him.

00:05:09.860 So it's in the lexicon, thank you.

00:05:12.580 It's in the lexicon.

00:05:14.140 But there's a new one, a new Rupar about Tom Cotton.

00:05:17.860 So he was doing some stuff in Congress.

00:05:22.140 And if you see just the clip, he looks pretty unreasonable.

00:05:26.420 But if you see the whole context, it looks a lot better.

00:05:30.420 So he got Rupar'd. 0.98

00:05:32.440 Joel Pollack tweeted about that and suggested that anybody, he said,

00:05:38.080 victims of misleading video edits should get, wait for it, Ruparations.

00:05:44.600 Ruparations.

00:05:48.420 Yes, Ruparations. 0.85

00:05:52.920 I asked this question on Twitter in a little poll.

00:05:55.880 I said, have you cut back on your consumption of Coca-Cola products for political reasons?

00:06:02.720 Over half of the respondents said yes.

00:06:06.780 Now, of course, this is the most unscientific poll they could ever be.

00:06:10.280 But, and, you know, my Twitter followers lean conservative, even though I'm not conservative.

00:06:19.540 But they do.

00:06:20.420 They're conservative.

00:06:22.100 And half of them said that they're cutting back on Coca-Cola.

00:06:27.740 In completely unrelated news, Coca-Cola has announced that maybe they should be more open-minded.

00:06:35.300 And, you know, listen to the people on all sides of the aisle.

00:06:41.220 So do you think that Coca-Cola is feeling it in the pocketbook?

00:06:45.740 I don't know.

00:06:47.540 But if half of the people who were just following me said they cut back,

00:06:52.740 I have to think probably anybody who was watching Fox News, which is a lot of people,

00:06:58.460 probably a lot of them are cutting back.

00:07:00.320 So, here's an interesting thing.

00:07:07.060 Should a actual professional polling company ask this question?

00:07:12.940 Have you cut back on your Coca-Cola consumption for political reasons?

00:07:17.680 If the answer is yes, in any substantial way, it changes the world.

00:07:23.780 It will change the world.

00:07:26.720 Because it would be the most noticeable example of a corporation that sort of left its lane to get into politics

00:07:33.820 and just got spanked. 0.99

00:07:36.300 Now, the other possibility is there's no difference in Coca-Cola sales.

00:07:41.120 Don't know.

00:07:42.460 But if enough people in a survey say they're cutting back for political reasons,

00:07:48.480 that's going to get their attention.

00:07:50.180 That's the sort of thing that gets the CEO fired.

00:07:53.800 So we don't know if he'll get fired for that.

00:07:56.280 But I think he should be, in my opinion.

00:08:00.920 Getting involved in politics and having that take a bite out of your bottom line,

00:08:07.200 I think that's a firing offense.

00:08:10.760 That's just bad management.

00:08:11.860 Speaking of polling, Rasmussen asked how many people expected conviction in the George Floyd trial.

00:08:23.180 So how many people thought Chauvin would be convicted?

00:08:26.680 Interestingly, this is one of those unifying questions.

00:08:31.780 79% of conservatives expect Chauvin to get convicted of one of the charges, at least.

00:08:38.160 But 76% of liberals, too.

00:08:40.100 So basically the same.

00:08:42.200 Just as many conservatives as liberals expect a conviction.

00:08:46.220 And I've said before that this should have been the most unifying thing that's ever happened in this country.

00:08:52.400 From the day the George Floyd thing happened, right up to today,

00:08:57.720 I've never heard anybody who wasn't horrified by it.

00:09:01.280 It's not like there's some conservatives who are saying,

00:09:04.180 yeah, that's just the way it should have gone.

00:09:05.740 I mean, there are people questioning whether the officer caused the death.

00:09:10.640 That's a fair question.

00:09:12.180 But there wasn't anybody who wasn't horrified by it.

00:09:15.660 It's really unifying.

00:09:18.380 But we found a way to not be unified over it, even though it should have been.

00:09:21.720 The one thing we all would have agreed on, that we don't want that, what was on the video.

00:09:26.680 But the next question Rasmussen asked was how likely, and by the way, for the numbers I gave you,

00:09:33.860 I added together the two likelies, you know, very likely and somewhat likelies. 0.99

00:09:38.420 And I'll do that again with this one.

00:09:41.740 How likely it will cause riots.

00:09:44.920 86% of conservatives think that whatever the outcome is, it'll cause riots.

00:09:50.340 But 68% of liberals also expect riots.

00:09:55.460 Again, regardless of the outcome.

00:09:58.400 But remember I keep telling you that in these national polls, no matter what the question is,

00:10:07.820 about 25% of the people who answer would just be whack.

00:10:12.380 They either misinterpreted the question, or they're insane, or they're pranking.

00:10:18.080 They're just something.

00:10:18.780 But that solid 25% is just crazy people.

00:10:23.640 And it turns out that 20% of liberals say that rioting is not likely after the verdict.

00:10:34.680 What?

00:10:35.960 There are 20% of liberals who think it's not likely that there's going to be riots?

00:10:42.680 Who are these people?

00:10:44.920 These are the most wrong people in the universe.

00:10:47.940 Do they even understand the question?

00:10:49.860 I mean, honestly, I can't figure out how anybody would have that opinion.

00:10:53.640 Like, even one person in the whole country.

00:10:56.840 How do you get even to that opinion?

00:10:59.880 If somebody says artists, maybe.

00:11:02.800 Yeah, 25%-ish will answer anything in any poll.

00:11:08.800 Don't know what's up with that.

00:11:13.280 Stock market's up.

00:11:15.460 That's good.

00:11:16.600 All-time high, I think.

00:11:17.680 So the police officer who accidentally discharged a gun instead of her taser, and actually killed

00:11:26.560 the guy she was stopping, is charged.

00:11:30.900 And she's in her orange jumpsuit.

00:11:33.760 And I don't really understand it.

00:11:36.400 Do you?

00:11:36.780 Because the body cam footage made it completely clear that it was an accident.

00:11:44.800 Do you get...

00:11:46.340 Is that a jailable offense?

00:11:48.340 If it's obviously and totally an accident?

00:11:52.220 Now, you could say, we wish the accident hadn't happened.

00:11:55.720 You could say, if she were better trained or a better officer, it wouldn't happen.

00:12:00.340 But accidents happen.

00:12:03.300 And it couldn't be more clear that there was no intention, and that she couldn't have known,

00:12:10.440 because if she knew, she wouldn't have pulled the trigger.

00:12:12.660 So obviously she didn't know, and obviously there was no intention, and obviously she was

00:12:19.080 horrified as soon as it happened.

00:12:21.460 Do you go to jail for that?

00:12:23.720 A mistake?

00:12:25.620 I get that the standard has to be higher for the police.

00:12:30.000 But what about the human being standard?

00:12:33.340 You know, there's nothing she can do to bring back the deceased.

00:12:38.640 You know, if there were some way to make that better, then I'd say do it.

00:12:42.660 But there is no way to make that better.

00:12:45.080 All you can do is destroy a second life more than it already is, and it's got to be pretty

00:12:50.180 bad, because she killed a guy without meaning to.

00:12:53.540 I mean, she has to live with that. 0.92

00:12:55.480 So there's something deeply unjust about this police officer being taken a mugshot in an orange

00:13:05.560 jumpsuit and then being put with presumably other prisoners.

00:13:09.580 I don't know in what sense.

00:13:11.200 But wow, that just seems so wrong.

00:13:15.540 It's like a double wrong.

00:13:18.320 So it's like two wrongs killed Mr. Right.

00:13:22.220 That was his actual name, Right.

00:13:23.900 So two wrongs.

00:13:27.040 I mean, what he did certainly made it more risky.

00:13:30.140 What she did was obviously the thing that killed him.

00:13:32.620 So they both had to do something wrong.

00:13:35.180 It was two wrongs that killed Right.

00:13:37.700 That actually happened.

00:13:39.540 All right.

00:13:40.120 Not making light of anybody's death, of course.

00:13:42.640 But the simulation is just offering up all these coincidences.

00:13:47.100 They're just weird.

00:13:48.160 Jack Posobiec warns that you might want to think about getting out of Minnesota around the time of the verdict.

00:14:00.920 But I was warning people that getting out of Minnesota or staying out might be a good idea.

00:14:07.460 But if you come to California, there's probably just a very short window before the forest fires start.

00:14:15.320 Because apparently our forests are like super, super dry, like drier than they have ever been with more kindling than there's ever been.

00:14:23.960 So in about a month, the skies here will darken, and I will not have summer like last year.

00:14:33.560 Last year, there was no summer in California.

00:14:36.620 So in the middle of the pandemic, you still couldn't go outdoors.

00:14:41.740 Like it was the only thing you could do, and you couldn't even do that because it was just air quality was too low.

00:14:50.380 So that's coming.

00:14:51.700 And I'm not too optimistic about the electricity staying on either.

00:14:57.620 Oh, there's an outcome in the Ashley Babbitt situation.

00:15:03.800 She's the woman who was shot during the Capitol assault. 0.51

00:15:08.680 If you're checking your predictions, what was your prediction?

00:15:13.040 My prediction was that the person who did the shooting should not be charged, just based on what I saw.

00:15:19.800 You don't really know all the facts in a thing just by watching it on video.

00:15:25.200 But in my opinion, and I know this was deeply offensive to maybe most of you,

00:15:31.160 but in my opinion, I saw somebody who should not be charged with a crime.

00:15:36.760 Because I did think that lethal violence was called for under that very specific situation.

00:15:45.500 Now, I hear people saying, should have done a warning shot or should have done something.

00:15:51.600 Maybe.

00:15:52.640 Maybe.

00:15:53.040 But I just don't think that shooting somebody who's breaching a door in the Capitol surrounded by rioters

00:16:07.720 who you don't know what kind of weapons they have or what their intentions are.

00:16:12.140 I'm going to say I agree with it.

00:16:14.020 I'm going to say I agree with no charge.

00:16:15.900 And I agree with us not knowing who did the shot.

00:16:19.420 I do agree with that.

00:16:21.300 And I, but I understand, completely understand if just emotionally everything about this feels wrong.

00:16:29.360 Because she was just, she got shot trying to make the world better.

00:16:34.820 Right?

00:16:36.480 That's a fact.

00:16:37.280 In fact, she was in the process of legitimately and patriotically trying to make the world a better place.

00:16:44.920 Because she thought there was some injustice, and she thought she was marching against it.

00:16:49.740 Somebody who was in the military, trained to defend the country, probably thought she was.

00:16:54.560 So it's tragic.

00:16:56.680 And I certainly don't think anybody deserves to get shot.

00:16:59.560 But that's a separate question from whether the person who did the shooting did a really hard choice.

00:17:08.320 And you don't want to be in that situation.

00:17:12.260 But, yeah, I think no charge was the right decision.

00:17:16.320 But I also respect anybody who disagrees with that, because I think that's a close call.

00:17:22.020 We've got some court packing going on.

00:17:24.160 And I guess there's a bill now, and even though Biden set up this advisory committee,

00:17:30.480 which we think is just a smokescreen for figuring out a way to not do it.

00:17:35.120 But still, Congress, finding a way to embarrass itself, has introduced a bill.

00:17:41.780 And it's led by Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler.

00:17:45.560 Now, the fact that Jerry Nadler is assigned to this makes me wonder if every time they talk about

00:17:54.880 who's going to do something, if it's something you know is doomed, you look around and say,

00:18:01.160 well, this project's kind of doomed.

00:18:04.200 Who would like to be the lead on it?

00:18:07.340 Russia collusion?

00:18:08.580 Anybody?

00:18:09.240 Jerry?

00:18:09.980 Jerry!

00:18:11.200 Jerry would like to take the lead on Russia collusion.

00:18:14.360 Good work, Jerry.

00:18:15.560 Get out there on camera.

00:18:17.840 Make sure you've really, you know, put your reputation on the line for Russian collusion.

00:18:25.120 It's going to be good for you, Jerry.

00:18:26.760 I think this could make your career.

00:18:29.440 Because, you know, your career in Congress, I don't want to say it's not stellar,

00:18:35.560 but it's a little not stellar, if you know what I mean.

00:18:38.860 This could be your chance, Jerry.

00:18:41.020 Jerry, you could be our star.

00:18:43.380 But don't worry.

00:18:45.480 We're not going to send you out alone on this Russia collusion thing.

00:18:49.760 No, no, no, no.

00:18:51.160 We're going to give you a strong partner that people will respect.

00:18:54.920 His name is Adam Schiff.

00:18:56.740 And when the two of you go out there, it looks like Abbott and Costello.

00:19:01.060 But no, it's a very serious duo.

00:19:03.720 And you're going to have a great result.

00:19:05.580 You said yes?

00:19:08.200 He said yes.

00:19:09.440 He's going to do it.

00:19:13.680 Well, months go by.

00:19:16.540 Somebody gets the idea of doing a court-packing bill,

00:19:20.560 which the public hates, the Supreme Court hates,

00:19:26.680 Joe Biden doesn't like it too much,

00:19:30.300 and even Ruth Bader Ginsburg was against it. 0.97

00:19:35.260 So they said,

00:19:36.420 we need to volunteer to lead this court-packing idea.

00:19:42.060 Anybody?

00:19:42.760 Anybody?

00:19:43.800 Jerry?

00:19:46.820 Would you like to step up?

00:19:48.820 Good work, Jerry.

00:19:50.520 Glad you're stepping up to this.

00:19:53.260 Take the ball and run.

00:19:54.700 And if you'd like,

00:19:57.700 we could pair you with somebody who is equally worth...

00:20:00.260 I mean, somebody who could help you out.

00:20:03.100 Somebody whose reputation couldn't get any worse.

00:20:06.280 Have you met Eric Swalwell?

00:20:10.040 He's on the team.

00:20:11.580 Actually, I don't know if he's on the team,

00:20:12.980 but it would be funny if he were.

00:20:15.400 And if you never thought of Nadler and Adam Schiff

00:20:19.000 being Abbott and Costello,

00:20:20.880 well, you're welcome.

00:20:22.400 You're welcome,

00:20:23.020 because that's in your head now.

00:20:24.700 Well,

00:20:27.480 if it turns out,

00:20:30.160 let's do another topic.

00:20:34.140 So CNN

00:20:34.700 has a little bit of a

00:20:38.840 reputation problem

00:20:41.800 courtesy of Project Veritas.

00:20:45.980 And it's getting to the point where it's just funny.

00:20:49.340 I mean, CNN is so busted now,

00:20:51.720 it's funny.

00:20:52.520 And there are lots of levels to why this is funny.

00:20:56.260 So just so you know the story,

00:20:58.480 this is the funniest part.

00:21:01.480 There's a CNN technical director who got caught on video

00:21:04.320 trashing CNN,

00:21:06.080 his employer,

00:21:07.280 for being just a naked propaganda site,

00:21:10.660 and that they all know they're working on propaganda,

00:21:12.980 and he describes how they do it

00:21:14.760 with, you know,

00:21:15.680 no regard to truth.

00:21:16.980 And he just says it out loud,

00:21:19.540 and it's on video.

00:21:21.200 And the funniest thing about it is that he got busted by this,

00:21:24.300 this Tinder date,

00:21:27.480 a woman who went on a date with him,

00:21:29.400 and allegedly she went on five dates with him,

00:21:32.100 you know,

00:21:32.440 because it took him a while to give up the goods on video.

00:21:36.180 She went on five dates with him,

00:21:38.340 and I don't think he got a kiss.

00:21:43.400 So,

00:21:44.400 this is the quality of person that they hire at CNN.

00:21:48.180 Somebody who goes on five Tinder dates

00:21:51.860 and don't think he got a kiss.

00:21:55.740 So,

00:21:56.740 those who can't date,

00:21:59.500 work,

00:22:00.720 work as CNN.

00:22:04.940 So,

00:22:05.600 but it gets better.

00:22:06.600 So the latest drop,

00:22:08.080 so there's,

00:22:08.660 I guess there's going to be multiples,

00:22:10.160 but the second one from Project Veritas

00:22:12.740 and James O'Keefe

00:22:14.080 hitting home runs this week.

00:22:16.600 Congratulations,

00:22:17.120 by the way,

00:22:17.940 James.

00:22:19.400 Congratulations on,

00:22:20.480 probably your biggest,

00:22:22.100 I would say this is O'Keefe's biggest

00:22:24.080 score so far,

00:22:26.940 I think.

00:22:27.720 I don't know anything that's bigger than this.

00:22:30.200 And,

00:22:31.300 they actually got on video,

00:22:34.280 this is amazing,

00:22:35.820 they got on video

00:22:36.940 the CNN technical director

00:22:39.380 saying directly

00:22:40.900 that they target Matt Gaetz.

00:22:44.840 And here's what he,

00:22:46.100 here's what he says.

00:22:47.700 Quote,

00:22:48.400 if the agenda,

00:22:49.660 say,

00:22:50.060 is to get Matt Gaetz right now,

00:22:52.280 he's like this Republican.

00:22:54.320 He's a problem for the Democratic Party.

00:22:56.900 So,

00:22:57.420 we're,

00:22:57.880 meaning CNN,

00:22:58.920 we're going to keep running these stories

00:23:00.680 to keep hurting him.

00:23:03.720 He said it directly.

00:23:06.280 Directly.

00:23:07.660 That it's a propaganda network.

00:23:09.600 They singled somebody out for destruction

00:23:11.660 because he's good.

00:23:14.440 Now,

00:23:14.940 here's the funniest part.

00:23:16.880 Now,

00:23:17.440 I'm not going to predict this is going to happen.

00:23:19.300 All right?

00:23:20.420 It's just funny because it could.

00:23:23.660 So,

00:23:23.980 this is more in the speculative fun category,

00:23:26.840 not a prediction.

00:23:29.320 Somebody very smart,

00:23:31.620 who shall remain nameless for now,

00:23:34.020 but very smart,

00:23:36.080 said when this first broke

00:23:38.140 about Matt Gaetz,

00:23:41.620 this very smart person said,

00:23:43.800 there's one of two things

00:23:45.220 that's going to happen from this.

00:23:47.460 He'll be destroyed,

00:23:48.620 or it will make him president.

00:23:54.180 And when I heard that,

00:23:55.880 I just laughed because it was,

00:23:58.000 you know,

00:23:58.220 it just didn't ring,

00:23:59.320 like,

00:24:00.120 clever to me.

00:24:01.120 I was like,

00:24:01.800 no,

00:24:02.280 he's just going to be destroyed.

00:24:04.120 Just going to be destroyed.

00:24:06.800 But,

00:24:08.060 it's getting interesting now,

00:24:09.460 isn't it?

00:24:10.520 Yet another day has gone by

00:24:12.220 without something that looks like

00:24:14.520 definitive legal risk

00:24:17.120 for Mr. Gaetz.

00:24:19.280 You were kind of expecting it,

00:24:20.680 weren't you?

00:24:21.640 All this smoke,

00:24:23.400 got to be a little fire.

00:24:25.860 But every time we clear the smoke,

00:24:28.420 and we look down,

00:24:29.280 and we're waiting for that fire,

00:24:31.000 it's sort of in the future.

00:24:33.600 Well,

00:24:34.500 oh,

00:24:35.400 well,

00:24:35.700 I guess I don't see any burning embers

00:24:37.380 at the moment,

00:24:38.220 but they're coming.

00:24:39.540 How do we know they're coming?

00:24:40.960 Well,

00:24:41.760 let me read for you

00:24:42.780 a headline from CNN

00:24:45.420 about the Gaetz situation.

00:24:47.620 This is the headline.

00:24:49.360 Women detail drug use, 0.88

00:24:51.520 sex, 0.67

00:24:51.960 and payments

00:24:52.520 after late night parties

00:24:54.040 with Gaetz and others.

00:24:56.140 Now,

00:24:56.460 if you heard this headline,

00:24:58.020 what would you expect

00:24:59.180 the story to say?

00:25:00.400 would you expect

00:25:02.560 that this women detail

00:25:04.060 drug use,

00:25:04.820 sex, 0.67

00:25:05.160 and payments

00:25:05.640 after late night

00:25:06.560 with parties

00:25:07.660 with Gaetz?

00:25:08.840 Wouldn't you expect

00:25:09.840 that some part

00:25:10.760 of the story

00:25:11.560 would say

00:25:12.700 that somebody,

00:25:14.120 anybody,

00:25:15.280 had seen Matt Gaetz

00:25:16.840 do any of those things?

00:25:19.260 but the story says

00:25:21.800 nobody saw him

00:25:23.620 do any of those things

00:25:24.660 and there's no evidence.

00:25:27.640 That's the actual story.

00:25:28.980 There's no evidence

00:25:29.620 of any of that.

00:25:30.960 There's no evidence

00:25:31.920 that he took

00:25:32.480 a recreational drug.

00:25:34.620 None.

00:25:36.080 Somebody saw him

00:25:36.840 take a pill.

00:25:38.400 I kind of take a pill

00:25:39.620 just about every day.

00:25:41.440 You know,

00:25:41.840 vitamin D,

00:25:42.600 whatever.

00:25:42.960 Who knows?

00:25:44.360 But no evidence

00:25:45.280 it was illegal.

00:25:47.820 Then there's,

00:25:48.580 you know,

00:25:48.880 the talks about the sex.

00:25:51.400 Nobody saw sex.

00:25:53.060 Nobody saw underage,

00:25:54.380 any women there. 0.99

00:25:55.840 And the payments,

00:25:56.980 there's no direct link

00:25:58.480 to Gaetz on payments.

00:26:00.720 There are, you know,

00:26:01.320 indications

00:26:01.860 and allegations

00:26:02.680 and suggestions

00:26:03.600 and who knows?

00:26:05.300 Who knows

00:26:05.780 what we're going to find?

00:26:06.600 I remind you,

00:26:08.620 it's not my job

00:26:09.900 to defend anybody's

00:26:11.740 sex life

00:26:12.640 or drug use

00:26:13.480 or alleged drug use

00:26:14.860 or anything else.

00:26:16.400 So,

00:26:16.780 Gaetz is on his own

00:26:18.400 for that, right?

00:26:19.680 He's on his own.

00:26:21.520 And generally speaking,

00:26:23.160 I'm not going to defend

00:26:24.100 anybody's sex life.

00:26:26.080 That's just not my job.

00:26:28.100 But,

00:26:28.700 we can talk about

00:26:29.500 the propaganda

00:26:30.040 aspect of it

00:26:31.300 while we're waiting

00:26:32.200 to find out

00:26:32.720 if there's anything

00:26:33.440 to it.

00:26:36.160 And then,

00:26:36.940 so,

00:26:38.100 my point being

00:26:38.940 that

00:26:39.440 if they don't

00:26:41.260 finish Matt Gaetz

00:26:42.420 off,

00:26:43.360 and they're trying

00:26:43.920 pretty hard,

00:26:44.860 if they don't

00:26:45.740 finish him off, 0.98

00:26:47.940 he might get stronger.

00:26:49.660 And the reason

00:26:50.400 they're targeting him

00:26:51.340 is they've admitted

00:26:52.660 he's effective.

00:26:55.380 How many people

00:26:56.460 would they say

00:26:56.940 that about?

00:26:59.000 Right?

00:27:00.020 How many people

00:27:00.860 would CNN say

00:27:01.860 on the Republican side,

00:27:04.660 how many people

00:27:05.240 would they call out

00:27:06.200 as effective?

00:27:06.840 Because that means

00:27:08.140 they're worried.

00:27:09.460 If he were bad

00:27:10.580 at his job,

00:27:11.480 which is talking

00:27:12.140 in public

00:27:12.660 about policies

00:27:13.560 and stuff,

00:27:14.340 if he were bad

00:27:15.160 at that,

00:27:16.220 they would just

00:27:16.820 let him on

00:27:17.660 and let him

00:27:18.140 do his thing.

00:27:19.260 But they said

00:27:19.960 he's good.

00:27:21.900 The Democrats

00:27:22.880 were afraid of him.

00:27:25.560 It sounds a little

00:27:26.560 smarter now,

00:27:27.220 doesn't it?

00:27:28.020 When you think

00:27:28.640 if they don't

00:27:29.620 finish him off, 0.98

00:27:31.580 he could be

00:27:32.200 president.

00:27:33.300 Let me give you

00:27:33.960 another element

00:27:35.860 to that.

00:27:36.240 The things

00:27:37.100 he's accused of,

00:27:38.100 let's say there's

00:27:39.180 no evidence

00:27:40.200 of whatever

00:27:41.700 the worst parts

00:27:42.540 are.

00:27:43.240 So this will

00:27:44.280 just be speculative.

00:27:45.900 If it turns out

00:27:47.280 that there's

00:27:48.720 no there there

00:27:49.640 and no real

00:27:50.660 evidence ever

00:27:51.300 emerges,

00:27:52.520 what we're going

00:27:53.480 to know about

00:27:53.960 Matt Gaetz

00:27:54.500 is that he was

00:27:55.120 targeted by CNN

00:27:56.280 for being

00:27:57.020 too effective.

00:28:00.200 Right?

00:28:01.640 That's what

00:28:02.360 you'll know

00:28:02.700 about him.

00:28:03.400 Here's the second

00:28:04.080 thing you'll know

00:28:04.640 about him.

00:28:05.020 when he was

00:28:06.480 single,

00:28:07.680 he had a

00:28:09.500 very active

00:28:10.200 sex life,

00:28:11.080 we're told,

00:28:12.000 reliably.

00:28:13.700 Do you think

00:28:14.460 that would hurt

00:28:14.980 him?

00:28:17.120 Put on your

00:28:17.960 persuasion hat.

00:28:19.880 There's a

00:28:20.440 young man

00:28:22.660 in Congress

00:28:23.380 and he had

00:28:24.620 a very

00:28:25.640 successful,

00:28:26.540 apparently,

00:28:27.740 sexual life.

00:28:30.280 Hurts him

00:28:30.840 helps him.

00:28:33.620 Yeah.

00:28:34.780 Think about it.

00:28:36.760 Because he was

00:28:37.620 single,

00:28:38.700 as long as

00:28:39.480 nothing worse

00:28:40.380 comes out

00:28:40.960 than we've

00:28:41.500 seen,

00:28:42.220 it's going to

00:28:42.980 help him.

00:28:44.220 I hate to say

00:28:45.140 it,

00:28:46.400 but human

00:28:47.660 beings

00:28:48.260 like people

00:28:50.060 who are,

00:28:51.280 let's say,

00:28:54.020 sexually successful,

00:28:55.740 if I can put it

00:28:56.700 that way.

00:28:57.620 Yeah,

00:28:57.900 JFK,

00:28:58.560 right?

00:28:59.320 It's,

00:29:00.120 your brain

00:29:01.240 will say,

00:29:02.000 oh,

00:29:02.320 he's a

00:29:02.840 horrible man

00:29:03.520 slut. 1.00

00:29:04.500 And if you're

00:29:04.920 talking in public,

00:29:06.480 you'll say,

00:29:07.100 well,

00:29:07.420 I hate all of

00:29:08.340 that.

00:29:08.780 He's sure a

00:29:10.120 bad person.

00:29:11.220 I wish he hadn't

00:29:11.880 shown those

00:29:12.380 pictures to his

00:29:13.840 weasel,

00:29:14.900 his weasel

00:29:15.980 coworkers,

00:29:17.040 who apparently

00:29:17.540 threw him

00:29:18.000 under a bus.

00:29:18.620 But a part

00:29:22.740 of you,

00:29:23.280 like your

00:29:23.620 rational brain

00:29:24.300 will say,

00:29:24.760 this is all

00:29:25.160 bad,

00:29:25.580 I disavow

00:29:26.560 it.

00:29:27.360 But your

00:29:27.840 biological part

00:29:29.180 is going to

00:29:30.340 be a little

00:29:30.700 triggered by it.

00:29:33.340 So keep an

00:29:34.220 eye on this.

00:29:34.740 It'll be

00:29:35.000 interesting.

00:29:36.020 All right,

00:29:36.480 here's the

00:29:37.280 biggest news

00:29:37.820 of the day.

00:29:38.300 You ready?

00:29:39.520 A Dilbert,

00:29:40.400 well,

00:29:40.540 actually two,

00:29:41.700 two Dilbert

00:29:42.560 NFTs just

00:29:43.740 launched.

00:29:45.220 And you

00:29:45.760 can look at

00:29:46.620 my pinned

00:29:47.280 tweet,

00:29:47.900 to find

00:29:48.800 the link

00:29:49.140 to them.

00:29:50.060 There are

00:29:50.380 two versions

00:29:51.040 of Dilbert

00:29:52.460 comic strips

00:29:53.100 that were

00:29:53.380 made just

00:29:53.920 for this.

00:29:54.660 They don't

00:29:54.980 run in any

00:29:55.540 newspapers,

00:29:56.240 these particular

00:29:56.760 ones.

00:29:57.560 But one of

00:29:58.100 them is a

00:29:59.900 naughty version.

00:30:01.440 The other

00:30:01.940 one is the

00:30:02.420 clean version

00:30:03.000 with no

00:30:03.620 naughty words.

00:30:04.740 One uses

00:30:05.300 the F word

00:30:05.940 and it will

00:30:06.360 be probably

00:30:07.600 the only time

00:30:08.300 it ever

00:30:08.660 happens in

00:30:09.180 a Dilbert

00:30:09.540 comic.

00:30:10.320 Obviously

00:30:10.740 that can't

00:30:11.280 run in a

00:30:11.700 newspaper.

00:30:12.520 So it's

00:30:12.880 the only one

00:30:13.480 that has an

00:30:14.280 obscenity in

00:30:14.860 it.

00:30:15.180 It's used

00:30:15.920 in an artistic

00:30:16.940 way.

00:30:17.300 I don't

00:30:17.640 just throw

00:30:18.140 it in

00:30:18.380 there.

00:30:19.280 And you

00:30:20.380 can now

00:30:20.780 vote by

00:30:22.960 being in

00:30:24.840 part of

00:30:25.180 the auction.

00:30:27.020 And I'll

00:30:27.560 tell you what

00:30:28.180 an NFT is

00:30:28.960 in a minute.

00:30:29.940 And you

00:30:31.260 can see if

00:30:31.840 you like the

00:30:32.420 naughty one

00:30:32.820 or the

00:30:33.200 other one.

00:30:34.260 So here's

00:30:34.760 what an

00:30:35.020 NFT is.

00:30:35.660 An NFT,

00:30:36.160 if you don't

00:30:36.480 know,

00:30:36.820 is a digital

00:30:37.820 collectible

00:30:39.260 piece of

00:30:39.860 art.

00:30:40.560 What?

00:30:41.240 You say.

00:30:42.140 How can you

00:30:42.800 collect a

00:30:43.800 digital thing

00:30:44.560 when anybody

00:30:45.480 can just

00:30:45.940 make a

00:30:46.280 perfect

00:30:46.580 reproduction

00:30:47.080 of it?

00:30:48.360 They're

00:30:48.780 literally

00:30:49.380 worthless if

00:30:50.620 it's a

00:30:50.920 digital image

00:30:51.580 or a

00:30:53.140 digital video

00:30:54.260 or anything.

00:30:54.980 And all

00:30:55.520 of these

00:30:55.780 things can

00:30:56.200 be NFTs.

00:30:57.060 It stands

00:30:57.400 for non-fungible

00:30:58.980 token or

00:30:59.640 something.

00:31:00.420 But that

00:31:00.900 doesn't matter.

00:31:02.640 You don't

00:31:03.100 need to know

00:31:03.520 what it

00:31:03.720 stands for.

00:31:04.560 So what it

00:31:04.960 is is a

00:31:05.480 marketplace for

00:31:06.640 digital art

00:31:07.460 that people

00:31:08.880 will pay up

00:31:09.760 to millions

00:31:10.260 for.

00:31:10.600 And what

00:31:11.360 makes it

00:31:11.820 unique and

00:31:12.540 collectible

00:31:13.100 is that

00:31:13.820 the artist,

00:31:14.560 in this

00:31:14.840 case I'm

00:31:15.760 the artist,

00:31:16.920 the artist

00:31:17.840 essentially

00:31:19.100 registers it,

00:31:20.480 I'm speaking

00:31:21.320 in a

00:31:21.800 non-technical

00:31:23.500 way,

00:31:24.020 essentially

00:31:24.400 puts it

00:31:24.840 on the

00:31:25.100 blockchain

00:31:25.440 so that

00:31:26.160 it's

00:31:26.540 public

00:31:27.260 and

00:31:27.800 uncorruptible

00:31:28.720 forever,

00:31:29.480 that one

00:31:30.360 copy is

00:31:31.000 the original.

00:31:32.460 Every other

00:31:33.340 copy will

00:31:34.040 not have

00:31:34.520 the benefit

00:31:35.020 of that

00:31:35.640 connection

00:31:36.140 to the

00:31:36.480 blockchain,

00:31:37.340 which is

00:31:37.860 the way

00:31:38.160 you know

00:31:38.600 it's the

00:31:39.100 original.

00:31:39.440 Now,

00:31:41.340 should you

00:31:42.400 invest in

00:31:43.700 digital art

00:31:44.600 called

00:31:45.320 NFTs?

00:31:46.880 I don't

00:31:47.640 know why

00:31:47.940 anybody would

00:31:48.520 because I

00:31:49.520 don't collect

00:31:49.960 things.

00:31:50.740 I don't

00:31:51.100 collect stamps,

00:31:52.760 I don't

00:31:53.080 collect cars,

00:31:54.640 I don't

00:31:55.200 collect anything.

00:31:56.260 I had sort

00:31:56.800 of a

00:31:57.240 flashlight

00:31:57.820 fetish for

00:31:59.240 a while but

00:31:59.780 I even

00:32:00.200 broke that.

00:32:02.620 So,

00:32:03.480 if you

00:32:04.020 are not

00:32:04.380 already

00:32:04.760 deeply

00:32:05.120 into

00:32:05.500 crypto,

00:32:06.440 don't

00:32:06.820 get into

00:32:07.280 it for

00:32:07.540 this.

00:32:08.620 You

00:32:09.060 want

00:32:09.540 people

00:32:11.160 who

00:32:11.360 are

00:32:11.420 into

00:32:11.640 it

00:32:11.800 to

00:32:11.900 do

00:32:12.040 it.

00:32:12.860 But

00:32:12.980 now let

00:32:14.200 me

00:32:14.280 connect

00:32:14.580 this

00:32:14.800 to

00:32:14.940 an

00:32:15.060 actual

00:32:15.300 topic

00:32:15.620 you

00:32:15.780 care

00:32:16.000 about.

00:32:17.840 If you're

00:32:18.960 not in

00:32:19.280 the NFT

00:32:19.780 market,

00:32:21.080 this has

00:32:21.540 no meaning

00:32:21.980 to you.

00:32:23.100 But it

00:32:23.960 does connect

00:32:24.580 to the

00:32:24.900 real world

00:32:25.460 in a way

00:32:26.020 that I

00:32:26.780 don't know

00:32:27.100 if I've

00:32:27.420 heard anybody

00:32:27.940 say yet.

00:32:29.280 And I

00:32:29.580 might have

00:32:30.140 a little

00:32:30.580 behind-the-curtain

00:32:32.880 insight about

00:32:33.700 this.

00:32:34.600 And this

00:32:34.980 might blow

00:32:35.580 your mind

00:32:36.040 a little

00:32:36.340 bit.

00:32:38.060 You

00:32:38.620 know also,

00:32:39.440 and I'll

00:32:39.920 tie this

00:32:40.540 into the

00:32:40.960 NFTs,

00:32:41.860 you've

00:32:42.120 heard of

00:32:42.500 BitClout,

00:32:43.800 a new

00:32:44.280 startup,

00:32:45.200 B-I-T-C-L-O-U-T, 1.00

00:32:47.640 BitClout,

00:32:48.800 in which

00:32:49.520 people,

00:32:50.840 human beings,

00:32:51.680 real people,

00:32:52.300 such as

00:32:52.760 myself,

00:32:53.780 are turned

00:32:54.320 into

00:32:54.780 essentially

00:32:56.040 an NFT-like

00:32:58.780 asset,

00:32:59.940 I'll say

00:33:00.280 it's like

00:33:00.720 it,

00:33:00.880 it's not

00:33:01.180 the same

00:33:01.500 thing,

00:33:02.340 in which

00:33:02.880 you can

00:33:03.360 buy

00:33:04.020 coins

00:33:05.180 or tokens

00:33:05.820 in people.

00:33:07.920 So right

00:33:08.340 now,

00:33:08.660 Elon Musk

00:33:09.320 is the

00:33:09.780 most expensive

00:33:10.520 one,

00:33:11.180 and I

00:33:11.500 think I'm

00:33:13.740 somewhere

00:33:13.980 down the

00:33:14.440 list,

00:33:15.100 but I'm

00:33:15.900 in the

00:33:16.140 top 20,

00:33:16.940 I think,

00:33:17.560 of human

00:33:18.880 beings in

00:33:19.440 the world

00:33:19.880 that are

00:33:20.220 in this

00:33:20.620 market.

00:33:22.100 Now here's

00:33:22.740 the part

00:33:23.160 that you

00:33:24.100 don't see

00:33:24.620 coming.

00:33:26.400 There's a

00:33:27.020 much,

00:33:27.600 much more

00:33:28.820 important

00:33:29.460 social element

00:33:30.640 to this

00:33:31.080 that's

00:33:31.700 completely

00:33:32.220 invisible.

00:33:32.880 the

00:33:35.480 crypto

00:33:35.980 market

00:33:36.380 is

00:33:36.860 creating

00:33:37.320 a

00:33:37.560 market

00:33:37.880 in

00:33:39.440 influence.

00:33:42.340 And the

00:33:43.080 higher you

00:33:43.620 are bid

00:33:43.960 up in

00:33:44.300 this

00:33:44.480 market

00:33:44.780 of

00:33:44.960 influence,

00:33:45.880 the

00:33:46.480 more

00:33:46.720 you

00:33:46.900 will

00:33:47.060 actually

00:33:47.360 have

00:33:47.620 in

00:33:47.760 the

00:33:47.900 real

00:33:48.100 world.

00:33:49.060 Not

00:33:49.320 only

00:33:49.620 because

00:33:49.940 you

00:33:50.280 might

00:33:50.460 share

00:33:50.820 in

00:33:51.000 this

00:33:51.200 upside

00:33:51.720 so

00:33:52.020 you

00:33:52.160 could

00:33:52.300 get

00:33:52.460 some

00:33:52.760 of

00:33:52.860 the

00:33:53.040 financial

00:33:54.120 benefit

00:33:54.760 of

00:33:55.080 other

00:33:55.400 people

00:33:55.740 bidding

00:33:56.060 you

00:33:56.340 up,

00:33:57.060 because

00:33:57.480 that's

00:33:57.700 how

00:33:57.840 BitCloud

00:33:58.180 works.

00:33:58.860 The

00:33:58.980 creator

00:33:59.360 gets

00:33:59.620 some

00:33:59.820 coins

00:34:00.080 if

00:34:00.280 they

00:34:00.420 want

00:34:00.620 them.

00:34:00.760 And

00:34:01.800 what

00:34:03.420 that

00:34:03.620 does

00:34:04.100 is

00:34:04.500 create

00:34:04.800 almost

00:34:05.380 if

00:34:05.740 it's

00:34:05.920 successful,

00:34:06.620 it's

00:34:06.900 nowhere

00:34:07.180 near

00:34:07.660 this

00:34:08.180 point

00:34:08.400 yet,

00:34:08.860 but

00:34:09.280 where

00:34:09.540 it

00:34:09.740 could

00:34:09.960 go

00:34:10.400 is

00:34:11.660 creating

00:34:12.060 a

00:34:12.260 shadow

00:34:12.540 government.

00:34:14.700 Didn't

00:34:15.200 see that

00:34:15.560 coming,

00:34:15.940 did you?

00:34:16.140 Now

00:34:17.760 I've

00:34:17.940 told

00:34:18.120 you

00:34:18.300 that

00:34:18.620 the

00:34:19.300 form

00:34:19.880 of

00:34:20.060 government

00:34:20.380 is

00:34:20.660 already

00:34:21.040 evolving

00:34:21.640 so

00:34:22.420 that

00:34:22.600 people

00:34:22.920 who

00:34:23.220 are

00:34:23.540 I'm

00:34:26.380 going

00:34:26.480 to

00:34:26.600 lose

00:34:26.900 power

00:34:27.200 here

00:34:27.460 fairly

00:34:27.880 soon

00:34:28.200 so

00:34:28.500 if

00:34:28.800 it

00:34:29.120 goes

00:34:29.380 blank

00:34:30.040 we'll

00:34:30.240 be

00:34:30.360 done

00:34:30.500 for

00:34:30.640 today

00:34:30.940 if

00:34:31.520 the

00:34:31.660 power

00:34:31.840 goes

00:34:32.060 out

00:34:32.220 my

00:34:33.540 battery

00:34:33.820 is

00:34:33.940 low.

00:34:34.600 So

00:34:34.720 the

00:34:34.900 point

00:34:35.100 is

00:34:35.380 these

00:34:36.780 markets

00:34:37.640 of

00:34:38.060 NFTs

00:34:38.600 and

00:34:39.080 the

00:34:39.380 bit

00:34:39.580 clout

00:34:39.960 which

00:34:40.260 are

00:34:40.440 separate

00:34:40.960 but

00:34:41.660 they're

00:34:42.160 moving

00:34:42.480 toward

00:34:42.740 the

00:34:42.920 same

00:34:43.120 direction

00:34:43.560 that

00:34:44.500 people

00:34:45.100 can

00:34:46.020 be

00:34:46.240 bid

00:34:46.480 up

00:34:46.700 and

00:34:46.840 influence

00:34:47.340 so

00:34:48.580 my

00:34:48.880 influence

00:34:49.340 for

00:34:49.540 example

00:34:49.920 is

00:34:50.280 way

00:34:50.580 above

00:34:51.100 my

00:34:52.200 fame

00:34:52.720 or

00:34:52.940 my

00:34:53.180 elected

00:34:53.540 office

00:34:54.100 or

00:34:54.960 my

00:34:55.200 wealth

00:34:55.640 or

00:34:55.900 anything

00:34:56.180 would

00:34:56.680 put

00:34:57.720 me

00:34:57.920 but

00:34:58.880 people

00:35:00.320 on

00:35:00.600 bit

00:35:00.840 clout

00:35:01.200 and

00:35:02.220 of

00:35:02.380 course

00:35:02.560 it's

00:35:02.780 not

00:35:02.980 a

00:35:03.200 representative

00:35:04.360 of

00:35:04.620 the

00:35:04.700 whole

00:35:04.840 country

00:35:05.180 but

00:35:05.940 people

00:35:06.180 on

00:35:06.400 bit

00:35:06.560 clout

00:35:06.920 apparently

00:35:08.960 have

00:35:09.240 decided

00:35:09.680 to

00:35:10.380 increase

00:35:11.540 my

00:35:11.880 voice

00:35:12.320 now

00:35:13.620 that's

00:35:13.880 not

00:35:14.000 what

00:35:14.140 they

00:35:14.280 think

00:35:14.540 they're

00:35:14.720 doing

00:35:14.980 they

00:35:15.540 probably

00:35:15.760 think

00:35:16.020 they're

00:35:16.200 just

00:35:16.400 investing

00:35:17.020 because

00:35:17.300 they

00:35:17.440 think

00:35:17.680 maybe

00:35:18.060 maybe

00:35:18.860 I'll

00:35:19.040 get

00:35:19.200 more

00:35:19.400 attention

00:35:19.820 my

00:35:20.260 reputation

00:35:21.100 will

00:35:21.420 improve

00:35:21.700 or

00:35:21.840 something

00:35:22.100 but

00:35:23.100 the

00:35:23.560 effect

00:35:24.080 of

00:35:24.300 it

00:35:24.500 is

00:35:25.460 boosting

00:35:26.060 eventually

00:35:27.240 not

00:35:27.780 quite

00:35:28.060 there

00:35:28.320 yet

00:35:28.700 but

00:35:29.560 eventually

00:35:30.020 boosting

00:35:31.400 people

00:35:31.820 who

00:35:31.980 are

00:35:32.040 not

00:35:32.280 elected

00:35:32.620 so

00:35:33.580 it's

00:35:33.720 almost

00:35:34.060 a

00:35:34.300 form

00:35:34.660 of

00:35:34.960 election

00:35:35.620 in

00:35:36.540 which

00:35:36.780 a

00:35:37.080 shadow

00:35:37.680 influencer

00:35:39.520 society

00:35:40.340 will

00:35:40.740 be

00:35:40.980 created

00:35:41.400 and

00:35:41.860 you

00:35:42.040 can

00:35:42.220 find

00:35:42.500 out

00:35:42.720 who

00:35:42.940 other

00:35:43.240 people

00:35:43.580 who

00:35:43.780 are

00:35:43.900 smart

00:35:44.300 think

00:35:45.220 you

00:35:45.420 should

00:35:45.640 listen

00:35:46.120 to

00:35:46.360 remember

00:35:47.280 I

00:35:47.440 told

00:35:47.640 you

00:35:47.760 that

00:35:47.900 we

00:35:48.000 should

00:35:48.160 have

00:35:48.320 a

00:35:48.520 propaganda

00:35:49.140 checking

00:35:49.880 service

00:35:50.620 well

00:35:52.320 we don't

00:35:53.120 have

00:35:53.360 that

00:35:53.700 but

00:35:54.320 suppose

00:35:54.680 you

00:35:54.860 knew

00:35:55.020 who

00:35:55.180 to

00:35:55.320 listen

00:35:55.580 to

00:35:55.820 who

00:35:56.000 wasn't

00:35:56.280 going

00:35:56.420 to

00:35:56.500 lie

00:35:56.680 to

00:35:56.800 you

00:35:57.000 pretty

00:35:58.700 rare

00:35:59.020 if

00:35:59.840 you

00:35:59.980 look

00:36:00.180 at

00:36:00.360 the

00:36:00.560 list

00:36:01.360 of

00:36:01.540 the

00:36:01.680 top

00:36:01.940 people

00:36:02.260 on

00:36:02.520 BitClout

00:36:03.200 here's

00:36:04.480 your

00:36:04.640 challenge

00:36:05.100 find

00:36:06.800 me

00:36:06.980 a

00:36:07.160 liar

00:36:07.520 right

00:36:09.560 now

00:36:09.920 some

00:36:10.120 of

00:36:10.240 them

00:36:11.860 sure

00:36:12.100 how

00:36:12.240 to

00:36:12.320 count

00:36:12.540 that

00:36:12.840 but

00:36:13.560 look

00:36:13.820 at

00:36:13.920 the

00:36:14.060 list

00:36:14.460 and

00:36:15.600 find

00:36:15.980 a

00:36:16.240 liar

00:36:16.660 on

00:36:17.040 the

00:36:17.200 list

00:36:17.620 not

00:36:19.660 many

00:36:20.000 and

00:36:21.300 almost

00:36:21.580 everybody

00:36:22.060 who

00:36:22.400 is

00:36:22.560 famous

00:36:23.020 you

00:36:24.120 would

00:36:24.300 kind

00:36:24.580 of

00:36:24.700 consider

00:36:25.040 a

00:36:25.260 liar

00:36:25.560 wouldn't

00:36:26.560 you

00:36:26.720 like

00:36:27.000 anybody

00:36:27.320 who's

00:36:27.540 in

00:36:27.640 the

00:36:27.760 media

00:36:28.100 you'd

00:36:28.820 say

00:36:28.960 well

00:36:29.400 you know

00:36:30.000 I've

00:36:30.280 seen

00:36:30.480 you

00:36:30.640 lie

00:36:30.980 but

00:36:31.960 number

00:36:32.220 one

00:36:32.500 on

00:36:32.680 their

00:36:32.820 list

00:36:33.160 is

00:36:33.440 Elon

00:36:33.800 Musk 0.77

00:36:34.220 has

00:36:35.300 he

00:36:35.380 ever

00:36:35.560 lied

00:36:35.860 to

00:36:36.000 you

00:36:36.140 I

00:36:37.280 don't

00:36:37.400 think

00:36:37.620 so

00:36:37.920 how

00:36:38.640 about

00:36:38.840 Naval

00:36:39.400 Ravikant

00:36:41.860 to

00:36:42.080 you

00:36:42.260 don't

00:36:43.180 think

00:36:43.380 so

00:36:43.660 how

00:36:44.220 about

00:36:44.360 Balaji

00:36:44.860 ever

00:36:47.200 lied

00:36:47.480 to

00:36:47.620 you

00:36:47.840 nope

00:36:48.940 how

00:36:50.060 about

00:36:50.240 me

00:36:50.600 have

00:36:51.600 they

00:36:51.720 ever

00:36:51.900 lied

00:36:52.180 to

00:36:52.340 you

00:36:52.560 I

00:36:52.900 can't

00:36:53.120 think

00:36:53.300 of a

00:36:53.480 time

00:36:53.660 I

00:36:53.800 have

00:36:54.020 because

00:36:54.240 I

00:36:54.360 don't

00:36:54.460 have

00:36:54.620 any

00:36:54.760 reason

00:36:54.980 to

00:36:55.200 but

00:36:56.360 that

00:36:57.540 doesn't

00:36:57.800 mean

00:36:58.040 you know

00:36:58.400 obviously

00:36:58.740 that

00:36:59.000 doesn't

00:36:59.280 mean

00:36:59.580 oh

00:37:00.980 somebody

00:37:01.260 says

00:37:01.500 Jake

00:37:01.820 Paul's

00:37:02.180 up

00:37:02.320 there

00:37:02.460 too

00:37:02.660 yeah

00:37:03.080 there

00:37:03.260 will

00:37:03.440 be

00:37:03.620 people

00:37:03.920 who

00:37:04.080 are

00:37:04.160 just

00:37:04.340 celebrities

00:37:04.860 you know

00:37:05.340 Taylor

00:37:05.660 Swift

00:37:06.020 etc

00:37:06.380 but

00:37:07.140 I

00:37:07.260 think

00:37:07.460 that

00:37:07.660 they

00:37:07.940 I

00:37:09.340 think

00:37:09.560 the

00:37:09.780 celebrities

00:37:10.220 will

00:37:10.580 be

00:37:10.780 somewhat

00:37:11.380 discounted

00:37:12.300 in the

00:37:12.680 clout

00:37:13.120 category

00:37:13.860 they'll

00:37:14.200 just

00:37:14.380 be

00:37:14.560 famous

00:37:14.980 somebody

00:37:16.360 says

00:37:16.660 you

00:37:16.820 lie

00:37:17.120 by

00:37:17.380 omission

00:37:17.820 not

00:37:19.020 intentionally

00:37:19.540 I

00:37:20.540 can't

00:37:20.820 think

00:37:21.000 of a

00:37:21.240 time

00:37:21.420 I've

00:37:21.620 done

00:37:21.780 that

00:37:22.060 but

00:37:22.900 I'm

00:37:23.840 also

00:37:24.100 welcome

00:37:24.520 to

00:37:24.960 you know

00:37:25.800 in the

00:37:26.160 comments

00:37:26.560 anybody

00:37:27.480 who adds

00:37:28.120 context

00:37:28.780 in fact

00:37:29.400 the very

00:37:29.800 thing

00:37:30.080 that I

00:37:30.360 try to

00:37:30.740 do

00:37:30.880 most

00:37:31.340 is

00:37:32.120 add

00:37:32.480 context

00:37:33.040 so

00:37:33.880 if

00:37:34.040 you

00:37:34.140 ever

00:37:34.340 see

00:37:34.560 me

00:37:34.880 doing

00:37:36.040 what

00:37:36.280 you

00:37:36.520 think

00:37:36.940 is

00:37:37.720 lying

00:37:38.060 by

00:37:38.320 omission

00:37:38.700 just

00:37:39.700 put

00:37:39.880 it

00:37:39.960 in

00:37:40.020 the

00:37:40.100 comments

00:37:40.460 if

00:37:41.880 I

00:37:42.000 see

00:37:42.220 it

00:37:42.420 I

00:37:42.740 will

00:37:42.900 mention

00:37:43.180 it

00:37:44.480 oh

00:37:46.100 I

00:37:46.240 withhold

00:37:46.600 news

00:37:46.980 that

00:37:47.340 will

00:37:47.740 scare

00:37:47.960 you

00:37:48.120 yes

00:37:48.340 there

00:37:48.540 are

00:37:48.620 things

00:37:48.820 I

00:37:48.960 don't

00:37:49.180 tell

00:37:49.440 you

00:37:49.720 but

00:37:50.920 it's

00:37:51.120 different

00:37:51.420 if

00:37:51.900 the

00:37:52.080 topic

00:37:52.400 is

00:37:52.600 already

00:37:52.860 out

00:37:53.080 there

00:37:53.300 and

00:37:53.460 there

00:37:53.580 is

00:37:53.640 some

00:37:53.800 context

00:37:54.300 I

00:37:55.200 don't

00:37:55.580 try

00:37:55.760 to

00:37:55.900 withhold

00:37:56.200 context

00:37:56.780 if

00:37:57.600 the

00:37:57.760 topic

00:37:58.020 is

00:37:58.140 out

00:37:58.300 there

00:37:58.500 it's

00:37:58.820 only

00:37:58.980 a

00:37:59.120 topic

00:37:59.360 you

00:37:59.700 don't

00:37:59.840 know

00:38:00.000 about

00:38:00.200 all

00:38:01.460 right

00:38:01.600 so

00:38:02.640 look

00:38:02.880 for

00:38:03.020 this

00:38:03.240 what

00:38:03.500 you

00:38:03.660 think

00:38:03.940 is

00:38:04.180 a

00:38:04.400 silly

00:38:04.880 crypto

00:38:05.940 thing

00:38:06.460 that

00:38:06.740 makes

00:38:07.000 no

00:38:07.240 sense

00:38:07.580 it

00:38:07.720 has

00:38:07.880 no

00:38:08.120 impact

00:38:08.560 on

00:38:08.740 the

00:38:08.880 real

00:38:09.040 world

00:38:09.400 nothing

00:38:10.160 more

00:38:10.460 important

00:38:10.860 than

00:38:11.120 people

00:38:11.440 collecting

00:38:12.500 decorative

00:38:13.020 plates

00:38:13.520 you're

00:38:14.480 missing

00:38:14.900 the

00:38:15.180 long

00:38:15.460 term

00:38:15.720 play

00:38:16.120 it

00:38:16.860 could

00:38:17.100 replace

00:38:17.620 the

00:38:17.860 freaking

00:38:18.160 government

00:38:18.800 keep

00:38:21.260 an eye

00:38:21.500 on it

00:38:22.080 I

00:38:22.580 guess

00:38:22.740 Biden

00:38:23.100 is

00:38:23.340 going

00:38:23.480 to

00:38:23.600 sanction

00:38:23.940 Russia

00:38:24.400 what's

00:38:25.040 that

00:38:25.200 look

00:38:25.400 like

00:38:25.740 what

00:38:26.940 the

00:38:27.140 hell

00:38:27.340 are we

00:38:28.820 I guess

00:38:29.680 we

00:38:29.860 sanctioned

00:38:30.460 some

00:38:30.620 companies

00:38:31.120 and some

00:38:31.680 people

00:38:32.040 is that

00:38:32.740 going to

00:38:32.880 make

00:38:33.080 any

00:38:33.300 difference

00:38:33.680 I

00:38:34.680 don't

00:38:34.800 think

00:38:34.960 we

00:38:35.100 have

00:38:35.320 any

00:38:35.540 leverage

00:38:35.960 do we

00:38:36.320 because

00:38:36.880 we've

00:38:37.120 already

00:38:37.320 sort of

00:38:37.820 sanctioned

00:38:38.840 all the

00:38:39.100 obvious

00:38:39.440 stuff

00:38:39.780 there's

00:38:40.580 nothing

00:38:40.800 to do

00:38:41.120 today

00:38:41.400 but

00:38:43.840 Biden

00:38:44.880 will have

00:38:45.140 to do

00:38:45.380 something

00:38:45.680 my

00:38:47.480 guess

00:38:47.820 is that

00:38:48.200 Putin

00:38:48.480 is

00:38:48.720 completely

00:38:49.140 aware

00:38:49.540 that

00:38:49.900 he

00:38:50.480 can

00:38:50.700 take

00:38:51.000 what

00:38:51.160 he

00:38:51.260 wants

00:38:51.600 and

00:38:52.520 that

00:38:52.720 Biden

00:38:53.040 won't

00:38:53.580 start

00:38:53.980 a

00:38:54.120 war

00:38:54.300 over

00:38:54.520 it

00:38:54.700 the

00:38:55.640 only

00:38:56.120 thing

00:38:56.360 Putin

00:38:56.600 has

00:38:56.800 to worry

00:38:57.080 about

00:38:57.320 is that

00:38:57.740 Biden

00:38:58.020 is run

00:38:58.480 by the

00:38:59.140 military

00:39:00.160 industrial

00:39:00.680 complex

00:39:01.380 which

00:39:02.560 you have

00:39:02.820 to worry

00:39:03.160 about

00:39:03.400 right

00:39:03.640 because

00:39:04.280 if the

00:39:04.600 military

00:39:04.940 industrial

00:39:05.460 complex

00:39:06.180 sees a

00:39:07.320 opportunity

00:39:07.920 for a

00:39:08.420 fight

00:39:08.620 and war

00:39:08.940 that

00:39:10.100 we think

00:39:10.880 will be

00:39:11.260 short

00:39:11.620 of a

00:39:11.920 nuclear

00:39:12.300 encounter

00:39:13.620 they're

00:39:14.620 kind of

00:39:15.000 going to

00:39:15.200 want to

00:39:15.520 see it

00:39:15.960 because

00:39:16.440 it's

00:39:16.580 good

00:39:16.740 for

00:39:16.900 business

00:39:17.280 so

00:39:18.360 Biden's

00:39:18.980 a little

00:39:19.200 scary

00:39:19.660 that way

00:39:20.180 whereas

00:39:20.620 Trump

00:39:21.080 we had

00:39:21.500 more

00:39:21.760 confidence

00:39:22.260 that he

00:39:22.840 was going

00:39:23.100 to make

00:39:23.360 a decision

00:39:23.880 that was

00:39:24.840 good

00:39:25.040 for the

00:39:25.360 country

00:39:25.700 you don't

00:39:27.160 feel the

00:39:27.620 same

00:39:27.840 about

00:39:28.140 Biden

00:39:28.520 in this

00:39:29.160 case

00:39:29.600 in this

00:39:30.720 case

00:39:31.060 you wonder

00:39:31.820 who

00:39:33.320 exactly

00:39:33.840 is the

00:39:34.880 power

00:39:35.200 behind

00:39:35.720 Biden

00:39:36.140 and do

00:39:36.740 they want

00:39:37.300 no war 0.63

00:39:37.900 they might

00:39:38.880 want a

00:39:39.220 little

00:39:39.340 war

00:39:39.700 they might

00:39:40.500 want a

00:39:40.820 little

00:39:40.940 bit

00:39:41.240 they don't

00:39:42.560 want

00:39:42.760 nuclear

00:39:43.120 war

00:39:43.360 of course

00:39:43.780 oh the

00:39:46.980 other thing

00:39:47.360 that the

00:39:48.020 CNN

00:39:48.300 undercover

00:39:48.880 tapes

00:39:49.240 by

00:39:49.700 Project

00:39:50.740 Veritas

00:39:51.160 said

00:39:51.760 is that

00:39:52.560 they plan

00:39:53.000 to make

00:39:53.600 CNN

00:39:54.880 plans to

00:39:55.440 make

00:39:55.640 climate

00:39:56.120 change

00:39:56.580 the next

00:39:57.620 scariest

00:39:58.300 thing

00:39:58.660 so that's

00:39:59.700 why you

00:40:00.000 see it

00:40:00.240 turn into

00:40:00.600 climate

00:40:01.000 emergency

00:40:01.660 and

00:40:02.640 they're

00:40:03.280 already

00:40:03.560 running

00:40:03.940 climate

00:40:04.500 scare

00:40:04.880 stories

00:40:05.400 so that's

00:40:06.540 coming

00:40:06.760 the latest

00:40:08.380 from the

00:40:09.280 CDC

00:40:10.360 and the

00:40:11.020 experts

00:40:11.500 about

00:40:11.820 viruses

00:40:12.260 is

00:40:12.920 that you

00:40:13.880 probably

00:40:14.400 can't get

00:40:15.240 it from

00:40:15.600 a surface

00:40:16.340 very easily

00:40:17.300 that it's

00:40:18.820 pretty much

00:40:19.560 all in

00:40:19.960 the air

00:40:20.400 and it's

00:40:20.920 pretty much

00:40:21.360 all indoors

00:40:21.940 so the

00:40:23.120 two things

00:40:23.760 that we

00:40:24.260 got

00:40:24.640 let's say

00:40:25.260 more

00:40:25.520 confirmation

00:40:26.060 of

00:40:26.480 just in

00:40:26.860 the last

00:40:27.080 day or

00:40:27.380 two

00:40:27.540 is that

00:40:28.680 breathing

00:40:30.180 indoors

00:40:30.960 with people

00:40:31.660 who have

00:40:32.080 it

00:40:32.260 is the

00:40:33.380 dangerous

00:40:33.740 thing

00:40:34.060 being

00:40:35.340 outdoors

00:40:35.940 in any

00:40:36.920 context

00:40:37.440 appears to

00:40:38.120 be quite

00:40:38.460 safe

00:40:38.900 in any

00:40:40.320 context

00:40:40.860 because

00:40:41.540 outdoors

00:40:42.000 just sort

00:40:42.740 of blows

00:40:43.100 the virus

00:40:43.860 away

00:40:44.180 apparently

00:40:44.560 but then

00:40:46.220 the other

00:40:46.480 thing is

00:40:46.840 we're

00:40:47.020 probably

00:40:47.360 you know

00:40:48.200 overdoing

00:40:49.280 the

00:40:49.580 sanitizing

00:40:50.740 the surfaces

00:40:51.380 because you

00:40:51.880 almost can't

00:40:52.420 get it

00:40:52.660 that way

00:40:53.020 you can

00:40:53.900 you can

00:40:55.160 it's not

00:40:55.800 perfectly

00:40:56.260 safe

00:40:56.700 but

00:40:58.120 it's not

00:40:58.920 likely

00:40:59.220 now

00:41:00.100 in the

00:41:00.860 comments

00:41:01.300 I would

00:41:01.940 like to

00:41:02.320 ask you

00:41:02.680 this

00:41:03.020 I made

00:41:03.860 a decision

00:41:04.420 on day

00:41:05.200 one of

00:41:05.680 the

00:41:05.820 coronavirus

00:41:06.260 that I

00:41:07.840 wasn't

00:41:08.120 going to

00:41:08.380 sanitize

00:41:08.920 stuff

00:41:09.220 my

00:41:12.620 gut feeling

00:41:13.900 is that

00:41:15.300 if you

00:41:15.780 could get

00:41:16.160 it from

00:41:16.480 surfaces

00:41:17.040 we're all

00:41:18.740 going to

00:41:18.960 have it

00:41:19.260 in a

00:41:19.460 month

00:41:19.720 and

00:41:21.860 therefore

00:41:22.280 after a

00:41:23.460 few weeks

00:41:24.020 when it

00:41:24.440 was clear

00:41:24.820 we didn't

00:41:25.240 already have

00:41:25.820 it in a

00:41:26.160 month

00:41:26.400 I said

00:41:27.820 to myself

00:41:28.360 I'm not

00:41:29.040 sanitizing

00:41:29.660 anything

00:41:30.020 now if I

00:41:30.920 go into

00:41:31.260 a building

00:41:31.720 and they've

00:41:32.240 got a

00:41:32.440 requirement

00:41:32.920 or even

00:41:33.420 a suggestion

00:41:34.000 I will

00:41:35.100 do the

00:41:35.420 hand

00:41:35.640 sanitizer

00:41:36.120 but I

00:41:37.400 have never

00:41:37.960 sanitized

00:41:38.880 anything I

00:41:39.480 bought from

00:41:39.880 a store

00:41:40.240 I have

00:41:41.860 never

00:41:42.160 gone to

00:41:42.880 go

00:41:43.220 sanitize

00:41:44.520 my hand

00:41:45.100 after taking

00:41:46.340 some cash

00:41:46.960 from a

00:41:47.280 cashier

00:41:47.620 I've

00:41:49.400 completely

00:41:50.480 ignored

00:41:50.940 that

00:41:51.200 guidance

00:41:51.700 and

00:41:53.080 was

00:41:54.200 right

00:41:54.520 and

00:41:56.020 was

00:41:56.240 white

00:41:56.500 now

00:41:58.060 somebody

00:41:58.480 says

00:41:58.860 but you

00:42:00.120 do

00:42:00.320 wear a

00:42:00.680 mask

00:42:01.020 what do

00:42:02.120 you think

00:42:02.500 the

00:42:02.980 best

00:42:03.900 medical

00:42:06.040 scientific

00:42:06.860 evidence

00:42:07.400 is for

00:42:08.160 masks

00:42:08.740 in the

00:42:10.280 comments

00:42:10.720 tell me

00:42:11.320 what you

00:42:11.680 think

00:42:12.020 is the

00:42:12.940 best

00:42:13.240 evidence

00:42:13.840 for

00:42:14.280 or against

00:42:14.760 masks

00:42:15.300 not a

00:42:16.000 specific

00:42:16.380 thing

00:42:16.700 but do

00:42:17.520 you

00:42:17.680 believe

00:42:18.100 tell me

00:42:18.640 how many

00:42:18.920 people

00:42:19.220 believe

00:42:19.660 that science

00:42:20.780 has shown

00:42:21.400 conclusively

00:42:22.260 or at least

00:42:22.880 really really

00:42:23.420 strongly

00:42:23.840 that masks

00:42:25.220 work

00:42:25.800 or how many

00:42:27.140 of you

00:42:27.380 think that

00:42:27.840 the science

00:42:28.380 shows

00:42:28.780 they definitely

00:42:29.860 don't work

00:42:30.460 in the

00:42:30.860 comments

00:42:31.220 go

00:42:31.540 now

00:42:33.300 I'll make

00:42:33.940 some comments

00:42:34.480 while I'm

00:42:34.840 watching your

00:42:35.480 your

00:42:36.440 comments

00:42:37.680 now

00:42:38.360 most of

00:42:39.560 you are

00:42:39.960 probably

00:42:40.260 leaning

00:42:41.060 right

00:42:41.560 probably

00:42:42.600 more

00:42:42.880 conservatives

00:42:43.340 here

00:42:43.700 than

00:42:43.960 others

00:42:44.420 and

00:42:45.880 you

00:42:46.940 are

00:42:47.120 accused

00:42:47.680 not

00:42:48.820 you

00:42:49.100 specifically

00:42:49.660 but

00:42:50.040 the

00:42:50.620 group

00:42:50.940 of

00:42:51.140 conservatives

00:42:51.640 are

00:42:52.360 accused

00:42:52.940 of

00:42:53.240 ignoring

00:42:53.700 science

00:42:54.320 sometimes

00:42:56.940 way too

00:42:58.160 often

00:42:58.560 ignoring

00:42:59.660 science

00:43:00.140 turns out

00:43:00.600 to be

00:43:00.860 right

00:43:01.160 which is

00:43:02.760 exactly

00:43:03.160 why you

00:43:03.600 do it

00:43:03.980 right

00:43:04.260 all of

00:43:05.640 you

00:43:05.780 conservatives

00:43:06.300 who are

00:43:07.040 criticized

00:43:07.760 to death

00:43:08.480 about

00:43:09.320 ignoring

00:43:09.780 science

00:43:10.320 it's not

00:43:11.540 because you

00:43:12.080 haven't

00:43:12.420 noticed

00:43:12.900 the science

00:43:13.540 is bullshit

00:43:14.040 you have

00:43:15.440 and the

00:43:16.560 science

00:43:16.980 is filtered

00:43:17.540 through

00:43:17.900 political

00:43:18.340 people

00:43:18.820 and it's

00:43:19.220 filtered

00:43:19.460 through

00:43:19.780 advocates

00:43:20.260 so you

00:43:21.020 never

00:43:21.220 really

00:43:21.500 see the

00:43:21.880 science

00:43:22.320 you just

00:43:23.180 see people

00:43:23.600 talking about

00:43:24.160 it that

00:43:24.400 you don't

00:43:24.640 trust

00:43:25.000 and they're

00:43:26.000 often wrong

00:43:26.620 so let

00:43:28.920 me say

00:43:29.220 to you

00:43:29.540 that those

00:43:30.280 of you

00:43:30.720 who have

00:43:31.020 the opinion

00:43:31.440 that masks

00:43:32.200 don't work

00:43:33.020 two things

00:43:34.620 I disagree

00:43:36.160 but not

00:43:38.460 with a

00:43:38.860 binary way

00:43:39.640 like I'm

00:43:40.140 100%

00:43:40.700 sure

00:43:41.040 if I

00:43:42.200 had to

00:43:42.420 put a

00:43:42.740 number

00:43:43.020 on it

00:43:43.540 80%

00:43:44.600 sure

00:43:44.960 so number

00:43:47.460 one

00:43:47.780 I think

00:43:48.500 masks

00:43:48.900 work

00:43:49.320 80%

00:43:50.460 certainly

00:43:50.880 I'm not

00:43:52.560 an expert

00:43:52.960 so how

00:43:54.100 likely

00:43:54.440 could I

00:43:54.820 be wrong

00:43:55.320 really

00:43:56.500 likely

00:43:57.000 right

00:43:57.540 second

00:43:58.620 thing

00:43:58.880 is

00:43:59.160 if you

00:43:59.580 have

00:43:59.800 an

00:44:00.100 opposing

00:44:00.520 opinion

00:44:00.940 and you

00:44:02.080 say

00:44:02.380 masks

00:44:02.840 don't

00:44:03.140 work

00:44:03.420 I

00:44:04.040 think

00:44:04.320 you're

00:44:04.540 wrong

00:44:04.820 but I

00:44:06.160 respect

00:44:06.500 that

00:44:06.760 opinion

00:44:07.060 because

00:44:08.180 it's

00:44:08.400 not

00:44:08.620 unfounded

00:44:09.260 it's

00:44:09.500 not

00:44:09.640 like

00:44:09.820 crazy

00:44:10.240 right

00:44:10.880 but I'm

00:44:11.720 pretty sure

00:44:12.180 it's

00:44:12.340 wrong

00:44:12.560 I give

00:44:13.000 it an

00:44:13.220 80%

00:44:13.620 chance

00:44:14.000 it's

00:44:14.160 wrong

00:44:14.380 now look

00:44:15.360 at my

00:44:15.600 track record

00:44:16.200 for all

00:44:17.620 of the

00:44:18.160 you know

00:44:18.760 the predictions

00:44:19.420 I've made

00:44:19.900 about the

00:44:20.460 the virus

00:44:21.500 and anything

00:44:22.000 else

00:44:22.380 and say

00:44:23.140 to yourself

00:44:23.640 have I

00:44:24.960 been right

00:44:25.420 more than

00:44:25.780 I'm wrong

00:44:26.180 and should

00:44:28.280 you take

00:44:28.680 seriously

00:44:29.180 that somebody

00:44:30.340 who's been

00:44:30.760 right a lot

00:44:31.700 thinks there's

00:44:33.220 an 80%

00:44:33.780 chance the

00:44:34.340 masks are

00:44:35.020 working

00:44:35.700 now here's

00:44:37.100 my thinking

00:44:37.860 the medical

00:44:39.420 community

00:44:40.020 and the

00:44:40.940 scientific

00:44:41.380 community

00:44:42.000 are very

00:44:43.880 unified

00:44:44.340 on this

00:44:44.920 now that

00:44:46.500 doesn't

00:44:46.780 make them

00:44:47.060 right

00:44:47.420 can we

00:44:48.760 all agree

00:44:49.200 just because

00:44:49.900 everybody's

00:44:50.400 unified

00:44:50.920 that doesn't

00:44:51.460 make it

00:44:51.760 right

00:44:52.160 but it's

00:44:52.940 a fact

00:44:53.440 there the

00:44:54.760 doctors are

00:44:55.440 overwhelmingly in

00:44:56.420 favor of

00:44:56.840 masks

00:44:57.200 indoors

00:44:57.680 and the

00:44:58.880 science is

00:44:59.720 overwhelmingly in

00:45:00.680 favor of

00:45:01.200 masks

00:45:01.660 indoors

00:45:02.640 outdoors

00:45:03.800 is different

00:45:04.700 situation

00:45:05.180 now if

00:45:07.080 you believed

00:45:07.800 because you've

00:45:08.620 been following

00:45:09.060 certain skeptics

00:45:10.140 that if you

00:45:11.060 were to look

00:45:11.520 at the

00:45:11.820 science

00:45:12.320 the science

00:45:13.400 would show

00:45:13.780 they don't

00:45:14.320 work

00:45:14.660 you have

00:45:16.100 been bamboozled

00:45:17.140 all right

00:45:18.280 because there

00:45:19.560 are a lot

00:45:19.880 of skeptics

00:45:20.560 printing a lot

00:45:21.900 of stuff

00:45:22.300 that is not

00:45:23.000 credible

00:45:23.380 and you've

00:45:24.480 probably seen

00:45:25.020 a lot of

00:45:25.560 it

00:45:25.800 none of

00:45:27.160 it's

00:45:27.360 credible

00:45:27.720 and I

00:45:29.560 gotta be

00:45:29.780 really careful

00:45:30.360 when I

00:45:30.820 say none

00:45:31.580 of the

00:45:31.880 anti-mask

00:45:32.540 stuff is

00:45:33.000 credible

00:45:33.420 doesn't mean

00:45:34.620 it's wrong

00:45:35.060 it doesn't

00:45:36.580 mean it's

00:45:36.860 wrong

00:45:37.140 it could be

00:45:38.180 completely

00:45:38.540 right

00:45:39.000 and at the

00:45:40.180 same time

00:45:40.820 have no

00:45:41.300 credibility

00:45:41.880 because of

00:45:42.820 the way

00:45:43.000 it's presented

00:45:43.620 right

00:45:43.880 you can't

00:45:44.360 believe it

00:45:44.920 but it

00:45:45.680 could still

00:45:45.960 be right

00:45:46.440 right

00:45:47.540 now

00:45:48.360 as long

00:45:50.940 as the

00:45:51.260 people who

00:45:51.640 know the

00:45:52.120 most are

00:45:52.900 really solidly

00:45:54.300 in favor

00:45:54.740 of it

00:45:55.100 my risk

00:45:56.220 management

00:45:56.700 decision

00:45:57.200 is it's

00:45:57.700 worth the

00:45:58.060 risk

00:45:58.380 even though

00:45:59.400 I freaking

00:46:00.100 hate the

00:46:00.580 masks

00:46:01.000 I hate

00:46:02.640 masks

00:46:03.060 as much

00:46:03.460 as you

00:46:03.740 do

00:46:03.920 right

00:46:04.180 and plus

00:46:05.260 I have

00:46:05.640 a little

00:46:05.940 asthma

00:46:06.320 so when I

00:46:07.360 put it

00:46:07.640 in a

00:46:07.820 mask

00:46:08.120 I'm

00:46:08.420 basically

00:46:08.840 gasping

00:46:09.500 for air

00:46:10.000 I think

00:46:10.380 a lot

00:46:10.580 of it's

00:46:10.820 psychological

00:46:11.260 but I

00:46:12.560 hate

00:46:13.020 masks

00:46:13.600 and I

00:46:14.940 still think

00:46:15.380 it's a good

00:46:15.720 risk

00:46:15.960 management

00:46:16.360 because I

00:46:17.000 think it's

00:46:17.320 temporary

00:46:17.660 whatever

00:46:18.740 temporary

00:46:19.160 is

00:46:19.460 so that's

00:46:20.260 where I'm

00:46:20.580 at

00:46:20.780 on

00:46:21.420 masks

00:46:22.280 thanks

00:46:22.780 for asking

00:46:23.140 someday

00:46:26.020 I wonder

00:46:26.400 if we'll

00:46:26.700 know

00:46:26.960 the

00:46:27.900 evidence

00:46:30.140 that most

00:46:30.720 people use

00:46:31.420 about

00:46:31.800 social

00:46:33.040 distancing

00:46:33.580 and masks

00:46:34.240 is unfortunately

00:46:35.380 irrational

00:46:36.080 and see if

00:46:36.980 you do

00:46:37.260 this

00:46:37.540 you'll see

00:46:38.360 a graph

00:46:38.880 on Twitter

00:46:39.440 and it'll

00:46:40.340 say here

00:46:40.940 are two

00:46:41.240 places

00:46:41.740 one has

00:46:43.020 tight mask

00:46:43.760 control

00:46:44.340 and social

00:46:45.680 distancing

00:46:46.100 and the

00:46:46.620 other is

00:46:47.540 completely

00:46:47.940 opposite

00:46:48.380 no masks

00:46:49.140 and no

00:46:49.460 social distancing

00:46:50.120 but look at

00:46:50.960 the curves

00:46:51.560 they're the

00:46:52.020 same

00:46:52.400 so if

00:46:53.560 there are

00:46:53.720 two places

00:46:54.320 one uses

00:46:55.960 masks and

00:46:56.980 distancing

00:46:57.380 the other

00:46:57.840 does not

00:46:58.480 but their

00:46:59.460 curves are

00:47:00.020 the same

00:47:00.760 what's that

00:47:01.900 tell you

00:47:02.300 about masks

00:47:03.140 go

00:47:03.540 the answer

00:47:06.280 is nothing

00:47:06.720 right

00:47:08.100 so if you

00:47:08.920 believed that

00:47:09.600 what I just

00:47:10.160 described

00:47:10.640 even if it's

00:47:11.220 accurate

00:47:11.560 and most

00:47:12.500 of our data

00:47:13.260 is not

00:47:13.600 accurate

00:47:13.940 but even if

00:47:14.760 the curves

00:47:15.180 were exactly

00:47:15.820 the same

00:47:16.360 it wouldn't

00:47:17.760 tell you

00:47:18.040 anything

00:47:18.420 about masks

00:47:19.260 right

00:47:20.440 and you have

00:47:21.020 to understand

00:47:21.500 that

00:47:21.820 and the

00:47:22.440 reason is

00:47:22.860 because there

00:47:23.200 are too

00:47:23.400 many variables

00:47:24.040 and one

00:47:25.240 of the

00:47:25.480 reasons

00:47:25.740 that you

00:47:26.200 don't

00:47:26.520 require

00:47:26.900 masks

00:47:27.460 is that

00:47:28.280 everything

00:47:28.580 else

00:47:28.900 is looking

00:47:29.280 good

00:47:29.620 right

00:47:30.820 so you

00:47:31.200 end up

00:47:31.540 your cause

00:47:32.040 and effect

00:47:32.360 get backwards

00:47:32.880 so if

00:47:34.220 you believe

00:47:34.940 that looking

00:47:35.700 at any

00:47:36.140 two areas

00:47:36.880 and comparing

00:47:37.600 them

00:47:37.960 tells you

00:47:39.020 something

00:47:39.380 you need

00:47:39.840 to release

00:47:40.360 on that

00:47:40.860 because it

00:47:41.800 doesn't

00:47:42.560 all right

00:47:44.140 I'm about

00:47:44.620 out of

00:47:45.140 battery

00:47:45.480 so I'm

00:47:45.860 going to

00:47:46.040 make

00:47:46.300 I'm about

00:47:48.580 out of

00:47:48.900 battery

00:47:49.140 so I'll

00:47:49.540 make my

00:47:50.200 closing

00:47:51.740 arguments

00:47:52.300 which are

00:47:52.860 I think

00:47:53.200 I'm

00:47:53.460 I think

00:47:55.000 I'm

00:47:55.320 closed

00:47:55.880 if you

00:47:56.800 saw a

00:47:57.100 little

00:47:57.260 hiccup

00:47:57.760 there

00:47:58.020 it's

00:47:58.220 because

00:47:58.360 I got

00:47:58.700 a

00:47:58.920 low

00:47:59.300 battery

00:47:59.660 notice

00:48:00.040 and I

00:48:00.320 had to

00:48:00.580 clear it

00:48:01.040 but I

00:48:01.820 have

00:48:02.020 almost

00:48:02.540 no

00:48:02.740 battery

00:48:02.980 left

00:48:03.260 so I'm

00:48:03.640 going to

00:48:04.000 end it

00:48:04.420 up

00:48:04.580 now

00:48:05.140 somebody

00:48:09.860 says

00:48:10.360 that the

00:48:10.940 graphs

00:48:11.340 if they're

00:48:11.780 the same

00:48:12.200 it tells

00:48:12.600 you that

00:48:13.100 if masks

00:48:13.820 help

00:48:14.240 they don't

00:48:15.080 help

00:48:15.360 much

00:48:15.800 no

00:48:16.440 no

00:48:17.240 that is

00:48:17.640 100%

00:48:18.260 wrong

00:48:18.600 you can't

00:48:19.860 tell that

00:48:20.320 you really

00:48:21.360 can't

00:48:21.900 and that

00:48:22.440 that's the

00:48:23.000 illusion

00:48:23.400 that's

00:48:23.800 that's

00:48:24.060 like an

00:48:24.360 optical

00:48:24.720 illusion

00:48:25.200 except

00:48:25.600 optical

00:48:26.280 it's

00:48:27.160 an illusion

00:48:27.740 that if

00:48:29.660 they made

00:48:30.020 a big

00:48:30.260 difference

00:48:30.620 you'd be

00:48:31.060 able to

00:48:31.360 tell

00:48:31.600 because the

00:48:32.700 other variables

00:48:33.400 are really

00:48:34.000 big and

00:48:34.940 they're all

00:48:35.320 over the

00:48:35.660 place

00:48:35.980 you really

00:48:36.980 can't tell

00:48:37.600 from comparing

00:48:38.540 two places

00:48:39.120 that there's

00:48:39.920 probably nothing

00:48:40.660 more important

00:48:41.460 to understand

00:48:43.200 if you're not

00:48:43.760 a statistics

00:48:44.460 person

00:48:44.960 just understand

00:48:46.600 you just

00:48:46.940 can't compare

00:48:47.440 two places

00:48:48.000 with that many

00:48:48.620 variables that are

00:48:49.400 all over the

00:48:49.820 place

00:48:50.040 it just

00:48:50.320 can't be

00:48:50.660 done

00:48:50.860 and that

00:48:53.280 is your

00:48:55.140 live stream

00:48:55.680 for today

00:48:56.180 and I'll

00:48:56.720 talk to you

00:48:57.320 tomorrow

00:48:57.900 now

00:48:58.520 and I'll

00:49:03.560 jump in

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 15, 2021

Episode 1345 Scott Adams： I Am Back, This Time With Audio

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript