Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1367 Scott Adams： Climate Racism, Tucker and Vaccinations, Facebook Trump Ban Fake News, Weaponized Virus and More

00:00:00.580 Hey, everybody. Oh, you are lucky today. You are so lucky today.

00:00:07.080 Because today will be the finest coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:12.700 All day long, really. It'll be the best one.

00:00:15.340 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask or a vessel of any kind.

00:00:21.340 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:24.540 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:30.000 The thing that makes everything better.

00:00:32.220 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:34.040 And if you have not participated, oh, again, I feel sorry for you.

00:00:38.080 But it's happening now. Go.

00:00:44.140 Ah, yeah, that's good.

00:00:48.140 So, let's talk about the news.

00:00:52.300 How many of you believe this is true news?

00:00:56.740 This will be a test of your BS detectors.

00:01:00.000 Is it true or false that a Facebook oversight board upheld Facebook's suspension of Trump's account?

00:01:09.660 Go.

00:01:10.200 In the comments, is that a real story or is it fake that the oversight board of Facebook agreed with Facebook to keep Trump suspended?

00:01:20.080 Go.

00:01:20.300 So, I'm looking at your comments.

00:01:23.660 I see true, not real, false, true, true, false.

00:01:28.280 Fake, fake.

00:01:30.180 Yes, fake.

00:01:31.440 True.

00:01:32.500 Interesting.

00:01:32.880 Now, all of you who are saying it's true, what do you think of the people that you can see in the comments saying it's not true?

00:01:40.860 Does that give you any feeling that maybe your confidence should be shaken?

00:01:48.480 Yeah.

00:01:49.200 And somebody said, if you're asking, it must be fake.

00:01:51.700 Well, you are correct.

00:01:53.540 Turns out it's fake news.

00:01:55.380 Here's what the news really is.

00:01:57.860 The opposite.

00:01:59.840 The opposite.

00:02:00.500 It's not even like close.

00:02:06.380 It's literally the freaking opposite.

00:02:09.480 Now, I didn't know this because I was reading CNN and Fox News, but then I went to Axios and I got a whole different story.

00:02:20.040 Here's the real story.

00:02:22.100 Can you believe this?

00:02:23.120 This will blow your mind if you think that that was true.

00:02:25.520 Here's the real story.

00:02:28.020 That the Oversight Board basically said, let's see, here's one of them summarizing it, just one member of the Oversight Board.

00:02:36.760 We felt it a bit lazy of Facebook to be sending over to us a penalty suggestion that didn't exist in their own rulebook, so to speak, in their own community standards.

00:02:47.780 And this was the Danish, former Danish Prime Minister who was on the board who said that.

00:02:52.100 He said, we are not here to lift responsibility off of Facebook.

00:02:57.400 We're here to be independent.

00:03:00.380 And so basically what they did is they sent it back to Facebook and said, why isn't this either a permanent ban, which we could evaluate, because permanent bans are part of what Facebook says they can do,

00:03:16.520 or a temporary, say, six months or whatever the time limit is, ban.

00:03:23.780 That's different.

00:03:25.700 That's really different.

00:03:26.800 Because according to the Oversight Committee, the Oversight Committee apparently would have been fine letting Facebook put Trump back on, as long as he had been treated the same way as everybody else.

00:03:39.520 So what the Oversight Board said was, you didn't follow your own rules, and therefore, we don't support the ban.

00:03:47.680 Now, they didn't say he should be banned or he should not be banned.

00:03:53.440 I have to be really careful here.

00:03:55.340 They basically said, you didn't even follow your own rules, so don't ask us to rule on your own rules when this isn't even close to them.

00:04:04.740 Go back and figure out if he's permanently banned, and then we'll rule on that.

00:04:08.640 Or go back and say he's banned for a certain amount of time, which is also part of your standard, and we'll rule on that.

00:04:17.040 But don't tell us there's some ambiguous ban that doesn't have a time and it's not permanent, because it's not in the rules.

00:04:25.940 So now think about how that was reported to you.

00:04:30.300 Does that make you angry?

00:04:31.880 You should be a little bit angry that this was reported as these people upheld the ban.

00:04:39.060 What they did was just say it's not even appropriate to ask us the question.

00:04:43.620 It's so inappropriate the way you've handled it that we can't even rule on it.

00:04:50.300 That's pretty much the opposite of upholding the ban.

00:04:53.800 They basically said the ban is illegitimate as is.

00:04:57.680 Go back and do something that's legitimate.

00:05:00.020 Yeah, Dorothy says I'm speechless.

00:05:04.420 Just think about how abused you were by that news.

00:05:07.900 Now, I've decided to start reading Axios, because my understanding is that they're attempting to be some kind of non-left, non-right, more medium of the road, less biased.

00:05:21.000 I don't know if they can pull that off.

00:05:23.780 That's a pretty hard standard to pull off.

00:05:26.520 But I'm going to start watching them, because they did report this accurately, and everything else I saw reported it inaccurately, as far as I know.

00:05:36.600 Maybe Axios is wrong.

00:05:37.800 Who knows?

00:05:39.400 Maybe.

00:05:40.740 So here's another more on that topic.

00:05:42.860 Larry Elder tweeted out that Facebook banned Trump for saying, since November 2020, that the election was, quote, stolen by Hillary Clinton since November 2016, has said the same thing.

00:05:56.780 And he showed a bunch of quotes of Hillary Clinton.

00:05:59.480 So he's saying, why was Trump banned for saying the election was illegitimate when Hillary was not?

00:06:07.160 Well, I saw some pushback to this, saying those are different situations, and Hillary was not saying that her election was rigged. 0.94

00:06:15.260 But I think she was, just a different way.

00:06:18.860 I think the idea that Hillary was promoting was that Russia had corrupted the election somehow. 1.00

00:06:28.260 That's the same.

00:06:30.200 It's a different situation.

00:06:32.600 But in terms of questioning the integrity of our election, without actually having any evidence whatsoever, looks the same to me.

00:06:42.160 To me, it looks the same.

00:06:43.300 So in terms of whether both of them or neither of them should have been kicked off of Facebook.

00:06:49.780 Now, it's kind of amazing that as long as you've got the majority with you, let's say, you know, 60% of the country or whatever it is.

00:06:57.900 I'll just make up a number for conversation.

00:07:01.020 As long as most of the country is willing to accept a lie, you don't have to tell the truth.

00:07:07.020 If 60% of the country is willing to just act like it's true, even if they know it's not, you know, in this case, the situation is treating Trump differently than Hillary Clinton.

00:07:20.520 Now, as long as the public is willing to treat them as different, I guess you could get away with it.

00:07:26.920 It doesn't matter if it's true.

00:07:27.980 Here's something that makes me wonder if we've solved a little mystery or not about the virus.

00:07:39.080 You know, we've been wondering why it is that the Asian countries have been doing so well in avoiding the virus, the worst parts of the virus.

00:07:49.280 And non-Asian countries, especially mostly white ethnic countries, are doing poorly often, not every time.

00:07:59.660 So there's a little bit of new information here.

00:08:02.300 Now, we don't know if this will be, you know, who knows if future studies will uphold this.

00:08:07.380 But this is what we think we know right now, that bald men are up to 2.5 times more likely to suffer severe COVID stuff than people with a full head of hair.

00:08:17.300 Now, your first take on that is, oh, Scott, you're in trouble.

00:08:23.400 And you might be right about that.

00:08:25.700 But here's maybe the answer to why it's affecting different ethnic groups differently.

00:08:33.580 Now, male pattern baldness, and by the way, let me be clear here.

00:08:37.760 I'm now going to veer from stuff that may or may not be true, because it's reported in the news.

00:08:43.820 And now I'm going to go into complete speculative territory.

00:08:47.480 Okay?

00:08:48.380 So everything you hear from now on about this topic, just speculation.

00:08:52.760 So it's not a false claim.

00:08:54.160 It's just speculation.

00:08:56.700 But is it propaganda?

00:08:58.320 Well, you decide.

00:09:00.340 It probably is.

00:09:03.520 If it's true that male pattern baldness is a big indicator of how bad it's going to be,

00:09:11.060 who has the most male pattern baldness?

00:09:13.880 Well, it turns out white people do by a big percentage, right? 0.89

00:09:19.360 So Asian men have much less hair loss than American men.

00:09:26.640 Now, interestingly, the thing that causes this hair loss is a sensitivity to male hormones.

00:09:33.780 So bald people don't necessarily have more testosterone and male hormones.

00:09:42.660 They're simply more sensitive to it.

00:09:44.700 So my male pattern baldness, in all likelihood, don't know if it's for every person specifically,

00:09:53.160 but in all likelihood, what it's telling you, if you see somebody with male pattern baldness,

00:09:57.760 is that their body, for whatever genetic reason, is more susceptible to male hormones.

00:10:04.320 In other words, you're more likely to be alpha.

00:10:06.800 So here's the fun part.

00:10:10.660 I'll just wait for everybody to get mad.

00:10:13.900 Bald people, bald men, are more likely to have, let's say, toxic male chemistry. 1.00

00:10:24.560 Do I have toxic male chemistry?

00:10:28.220 Probably, if you've watched me at all, if there's anything that I would criticize myself for,

00:10:36.640 this sounds pretty fair, I'm pretty sure I have a high dose of male chemistry.

00:10:43.500 Now, whether you equate that to being alpha or beta or anything else,

00:10:48.760 well, that's, again, more speculative, and I don't have data to prove that,

00:10:53.920 but I have heard that, at least, that it is possible to detect who has more testosterone.

00:11:01.900 Have you ever heard that?

00:11:03.080 Have you heard that people can detect who has more testosterone,

00:11:07.780 or at least who is more influenced by it, I guess would be the other way to say it.

00:11:12.620 Yeah, I think you can.

00:11:14.820 So would it be, now I'm going to speculatively create, connect a whole bunch of dots.

00:11:20.560 Yes, what I say next is not confirmed or there's no evidence for it, right?

00:11:26.480 There's no evidence for this.

00:11:28.580 I'm just speculating.

00:11:30.580 Suppose you were a Chinese company and you were trying to create a virus 1.00

00:11:34.660 that, if it got out of the lab, would be really bad for your competitors,

00:11:39.720 but not nearly as bad for your own team.

00:11:42.960 What would it look like?

00:11:44.620 And what would be a clever way to do it?

00:11:46.520 Well, you would certainly want a virus that didn't affect ethnic Chinese people 1.00

00:11:53.720 or even people in your area, you know, Asian people in general.

00:11:57.960 You'd want it to affect mostly white people.

00:12:01.740 Now, again, I'm not saying that any of this happened.

00:12:05.900 I'm saying if you were to create a virus for the purpose of destroying your competition,

00:12:11.480 and if you were China, you would create one that would target people who were not you

00:12:17.540 and also were the people that you worried about the most

00:12:22.040 in terms of, you know, long-term competition as a country.

00:12:27.160 So here we have this virus that some people think was a weaponized modified virus

00:12:33.880 that does seem to target white alpha males

00:12:38.840 who tend to be the war-like people in the United States.

00:12:49.620 So does that mean that, therefore, it's a weaponized virus?

00:12:54.340 No. No.

00:12:56.320 It doesn't mean that at all.

00:12:57.840 But if you were going to make one,

00:13:00.840 this would be a pretty good way to do it.

00:13:03.140 But here are the differences.

00:13:05.120 A 2010 study from six Chinese studies found that fewer than 3% of men,

00:13:10.840 younger men, and just over 13% of those over 30,

00:13:15.060 experienced male pattern baldness,

00:13:17.380 which is way, way less than Americans,

00:13:20.620 where Caucasian men, pretty much all of them have some baldness, 0.54

00:13:25.500 but around half can expect to lose their hair by middle age.

00:13:29.320 So you've got 14% versus half.

00:13:36.460 Now, you could ask yourself,

00:13:38.300 is it a coincidence, just a coincidence,

00:13:41.920 that a natural virus happens to look a lot like the way

00:13:46.680 a weaponized virus would look if you made it?

00:13:50.460 Yes, that could be a coincidence.

00:13:52.700 It easily could be a coincidence,

00:13:54.080 because coincidences happen.

00:13:58.660 So I'm not going to say that this teaches you anything except it's a red flag.

00:14:05.060 I mean, I would certainly be looking really hard at anything

00:14:09.300 that took out all the alpha white males

00:14:12.180 and didn't affect so much Chinese nationals.

00:14:17.520 It's a red flag.

00:14:20.000 Speaking of red flags,

00:14:22.340 there are more ex-girlfriends of rocker Marilyn Manson

00:14:27.380 accusing him of abusive behavior.

00:14:31.700 Now, as I tweeted just before I got on,

00:14:34.380 I don't care about anybody who resists arrest

00:14:38.720 or dates Marilyn Manson.

00:14:42.260 Because if you didn't see that coming,

00:14:45.440 I can't help you.

00:14:47.360 Right?

00:14:47.840 You have to do a little bit for yourself.

00:14:50.940 Right?

00:14:51.660 I'm happy to help people who get themselves in trouble.

00:14:55.120 I'm happy to help people who are just unlucky.

00:14:58.500 But you have to do a little bit.

00:15:01.040 Like, just work with me.

00:15:03.300 Just a little bit on your own.

00:15:05.680 Like, don't date Marilyn Manson.

00:15:10.500 What do you got?

00:15:11.280 3.5 billion other possibilities?

00:15:14.160 I'm only going to rule out the one.

00:15:17.020 Maybe, you know,

00:15:18.420 maybe Jeffrey Epstein, if he were still alive.

00:15:21.820 I might rule him out.

00:15:23.300 But basically,

00:15:25.000 just don't date Marilyn Manson.

00:15:27.220 And don't get aggressive with police

00:15:32.940 who are stopping you.

00:15:34.080 If you just do those two little things,

00:15:37.140 then I'm on your side.

00:15:39.380 I could help you.

00:15:41.480 You know, bad luck?

00:15:42.480 I'm there for you.

00:15:43.880 Need a little helping hand?

00:15:45.740 I feel like I could do that.

00:15:47.660 You want a little advice?

00:15:48.780 I got it.

00:15:50.280 Maybe some people need some money?

00:15:52.000 Okay.

00:15:52.740 Depends, you know,

00:15:53.440 if you can make good use of it.

00:15:55.020 If it'll help,

00:15:56.880 well, you gotta do a little.

00:15:58.580 Just a little.

00:15:59.400 On your own.

00:16:01.720 I asked this question,

00:16:03.160 and you'll know why immediately.

00:16:05.500 I did a little informal poll,

00:16:07.500 and I said,

00:16:07.860 who would you trust on a health question

00:16:09.700 in the news?

00:16:11.880 Tucker Carlson or me?

00:16:14.040 Let's see how you answer here

00:16:15.920 on this live stream.

00:16:19.520 Who would you trust?

00:16:21.600 Let's say there was a health question

00:16:23.120 in the news.

00:16:23.840 You know that Tucker Carlson

00:16:26.000 is not a doctor.

00:16:27.140 You know that I'm not a doctor.

00:16:29.180 So neither of us have any medical

00:16:30.960 or scientific credentials.

00:16:34.260 So if we disagreed,

00:16:37.480 who would you trust?

00:16:40.940 Looking at your comments,

00:16:43.120 can't tell, can't tell.

00:16:46.620 Somebody says Fox is owned by Big Pharma.

00:16:49.580 Somebody says you, Tucker,

00:16:51.160 you, Tucker, you, you,

00:16:53.800 neither, neither,

00:16:55.500 both, neither.

00:16:57.340 Well, you can't be both

00:16:58.280 because the setup is that we disagree.

00:17:01.220 All right.

00:17:02.280 Here's how I would make that decision

00:17:04.160 if I were you.

00:17:06.020 I would look at

00:17:07.440 who has the broader talent stack

00:17:09.640 that is appropriate to the question.

00:17:11.900 Who would you prefer?

00:17:14.540 Let's say, I won't use myself,

00:17:16.860 Nate Silver,

00:17:18.520 who is an expert on statistics

00:17:20.080 and also not a doctor.

00:17:22.600 So if you had to trust Nate Silver,

00:17:25.520 who is an expert on analytical data,

00:17:28.600 statistical things,

00:17:30.100 versus Tucker Carlson,

00:17:32.400 and let's say they had a disagreement

00:17:33.980 about a health issue

00:17:35.760 that's in the news.

00:17:37.180 So they have the same information,

00:17:38.440 but they have a different group.

00:17:40.280 Who would you trust?

00:17:43.260 In that case,

00:17:44.640 well, if you trusted Tucker Carlson,

00:17:47.140 you would be trusting the person

00:17:48.620 with a smaller talent stack

00:17:50.320 because Nate would be more qualified

00:17:53.000 just on the analytical level.

00:17:55.100 Doesn't mean he'd be right, right?

00:17:57.160 But he'd be more qualified.

00:17:59.220 Even though neither of them are medical,

00:18:01.740 one of them can look at the data better.

00:18:04.940 Is that fair?

00:18:05.740 Now, suppose it was Tucker Carlson

00:18:09.300 and then me,

00:18:10.940 and we disagreed on a health issue.

00:18:12.980 Neither of us are experts.

00:18:14.860 Which of us has the talent stack

00:18:17.720 that is appropriate

00:18:18.820 to sorting out that kind of question?

00:18:21.880 I would argue that you should go

00:18:23.320 with somebody who has analytical background,

00:18:26.660 you know, economics, business, statistics,

00:18:29.580 and that that person would probably

00:18:31.280 have a little bit of an advantage

00:18:32.740 over somebody who might have

00:18:34.440 been more of a journalism path.

00:18:37.340 Now, I don't know if that's true.

00:18:38.620 I don't know what

00:18:39.260 Tucker Carlson's full background is,

00:18:41.800 so maybe there's more there

00:18:42.760 that I'm aware of,

00:18:44.340 but that's what you would take into account.

00:18:46.660 Then I would ask,

00:18:47.580 who has fallen for more hoaxes?

00:18:51.020 And I'd like to see this in the comments.

00:18:53.360 In the comments,

00:18:55.100 and let's only count hoaxes

00:18:56.660 that we know are hoaxes.

00:18:57.980 Because there are things

00:18:59.640 that you still suspect are hoaxes,

00:19:02.680 but we don't have an answer to them.

00:19:05.620 But who has fallen for more hoaxes?

00:19:10.800 In the comments.

00:19:13.440 Who has fallen for more hoaxes?

00:19:15.720 I'm looking at your comments,

00:19:20.500 and I'm seeing it looks like mixed.

00:19:23.240 So some say me,

00:19:24.320 some say Tucker takes more risks.

00:19:27.740 That's probably true.

00:19:29.000 Some say me,

00:19:30.200 me,

00:19:31.020 you.

00:19:31.640 All right,

00:19:31.840 what would be the examples

00:19:33.660 of the hoaxes I've fallen for?

00:19:36.620 Now watch this.

00:19:38.400 So a lot of people say

00:19:39.700 that I've fallen for more hoaxes.

00:19:42.240 Now list them.

00:19:43.040 Please list the hoaxes

00:19:46.240 that I've fallen for.

00:19:48.820 So the Covington kids,

00:19:50.720 I fell for that hoax for one day.

00:19:54.040 From a Rupard video.

00:19:56.520 So that one's on my,

00:19:57.660 so that one's on my bad list, right?

00:20:02.480 Is that it?

00:20:05.140 The fine people hoax I debunked.

00:20:09.060 Climate change,

00:20:10.220 we don't know,

00:20:10.920 we don't know what that is, right?

00:20:13.040 That's still an open question.

00:20:16.000 Bill Gates, UFOs.

00:20:17.940 Well, I'm right about all that.

00:20:19.880 The Bird UFO.

00:20:21.380 I'm right about that.

00:20:25.380 If you think I'm wrong about the UFOs,

00:20:28.360 well,

00:20:29.240 good luck with you there.

00:20:31.780 COVID fear.

00:20:33.200 No, you're just misstating my opinion.

00:20:36.460 Global warming.

00:20:40.200 Global warming.

00:20:41.360 Now, most of you who think

00:20:42.980 that I've fallen for hoaxes

00:20:44.340 on climate change, etc.,

00:20:45.800 would not be able to describe my opinion.

00:20:49.420 So here's the challenge.

00:20:51.180 Anybody who thinks

00:20:51.920 that I've fallen for a hoax,

00:20:54.160 see if you could describe

00:20:55.620 my opinion in your words.

00:20:58.140 Bet you can't.

00:20:59.800 I'll bet you can't.

00:21:01.000 All right, so that was interesting.

00:21:02.400 Now, I don't know

00:21:02.940 that there's any right answer to this,

00:21:04.400 but then I would also say

00:21:05.980 who predicted better?

00:21:08.300 If you've watched Tucker and me,

00:21:11.140 which one of us has predicted better?

00:21:16.920 I don't know.

00:21:18.760 But I think it's probably me,

00:21:21.280 but I don't know.

00:21:24.560 Somebody says masks.

00:21:26.180 Now, there are a bunch of topics

00:21:27.340 in which you cannot yet determine

00:21:29.080 who is right or wrong,

00:21:30.240 but you can determine

00:21:31.080 that I'm on the side of science.

00:21:32.620 So there may be some things

00:21:34.820 where we disagree,

00:21:36.120 but my opinion agrees with science.

00:21:38.960 I might be wrong.

00:21:41.220 All right, let's go on.

00:21:42.880 The new study that says salt

00:21:44.400 is bad for your immune system.

00:21:46.240 If you get too much salt,

00:21:47.580 your immune system isn't going to

00:21:49.380 fight off the COVID as well

00:21:50.700 or anything else.

00:21:52.840 And here's my question.

00:21:54.660 Why is the universe designed

00:21:56.700 in a way that

00:21:58.160 if there's anything we shouldn't do,

00:22:00.360 it's something we wanted to do?

00:22:03.420 You know, there's...

00:22:04.560 Well, I suppose that makes sense

00:22:05.960 because we wouldn't be doing it

00:22:06.980 if we didn't want to do it.

00:22:08.420 But the level of coincidence

00:22:11.400 that whenever there's

00:22:13.200 a new scientific breakthrough,

00:22:15.440 it's always going to be

00:22:16.440 don't do something you want to do.

00:22:18.640 Right?

00:22:19.840 It's like the things I want to do

00:22:21.300 are eat bad food,

00:22:22.520 look at my phone,

00:22:23.900 have reckless sex, whatever,

00:22:25.820 but can't do any of that stuff.

00:22:28.080 And I guess there's a reason for that

00:22:29.360 because nature used to take care of that,

00:22:31.860 but nature doesn't do that anymore.

00:22:34.500 Now you have to figure out

00:22:35.500 how much salt to eat.

00:22:38.700 This is funny in a bad way.

00:22:41.360 So apparently even at least one Democrat

00:22:44.260 is criticizing Biden

00:22:47.420 and the administration.

00:22:49.660 So Representative Quaylar

00:22:51.900 is pointing out

00:22:53.140 that they're showing photographs

00:22:54.640 of now their uncrowded

00:22:56.760 and almost empty facilities

00:22:59.540 for holding the children

00:23:00.600 at the border,

00:23:01.540 the immigrants coming in.

00:23:03.280 And apparently it's just a shell game.

00:23:05.160 All they did was

00:23:05.740 they took the crowded kids

00:23:07.420 out of this place

00:23:08.340 and they moved them next door

00:23:09.900 to the Health and Human Services tents.

00:23:12.320 So they moved them

00:23:13.320 from indoors to outdoors in tents.

00:23:18.040 And...

00:23:18.360 But here's what's funny about this.

00:23:19.860 As long as the Biden administration

00:23:23.280 can give you a photograph

00:23:25.140 of the old places

00:23:26.800 that now don't have much crowding

00:23:28.440 and they don't show you a photograph

00:23:30.680 of the new place they moved them to,

00:23:32.840 they win.

00:23:34.640 They win.

00:23:36.100 Because the photo is all the matters.

00:23:39.040 That's it.

00:23:40.240 The Biden administration

00:23:41.260 is getting the persuasion

00:23:44.140 on this completely right.

00:23:46.180 They knew

00:23:46.940 all they had to do

00:23:48.640 is one fake photo

00:23:49.940 of a seemingly empty facility,

00:23:53.380 even though they just moved them

00:23:54.780 to probably another crowded

00:23:56.120 tent facility next door.

00:23:57.700 That's all they needed.

00:23:59.120 And it worked.

00:24:00.380 So the fact that the, you know,

00:24:02.160 the critics of the administration

00:24:03.920 are calling it out,

00:24:05.700 well, of course they knew

00:24:07.660 they would be caught.

00:24:09.160 Do you think that they did this trick

00:24:10.920 thinking they wouldn't get caught?

00:24:13.700 No.

00:24:14.220 They knew they'd get caught.

00:24:15.160 They also knew

00:24:16.840 it wouldn't matter.

00:24:19.080 Because the truth

00:24:20.520 will be the photograph

00:24:21.540 in people's minds.

00:24:23.600 That's the truth.

00:24:25.020 And the fact that people

00:24:25.980 that the left doesn't follow

00:24:28.460 say it's fake news,

00:24:31.040 they won't see it.

00:24:32.720 Totally successful persuasion.

00:24:34.980 Totally unethical,

00:24:36.440 but totally successful.

00:24:39.740 There's new reporting says,

00:24:42.780 this is also Axios,

00:24:43.920 that the distribution

00:24:46.660 of global greenhouse gas emissions

00:24:48.980 has reached a point

00:24:51.120 where China is emitting

00:24:53.020 more than all the developed nations combined.

00:24:58.260 Wow.

00:24:59.540 So climate change

00:25:01.140 is basically a China problem.

00:25:03.960 Meaning that if China 0.67

00:25:05.640 were not doing what it's doing,

00:25:07.920 it would be

00:25:08.920 half of the size of the problem

00:25:10.780 and probably pretty solvable.

00:25:13.760 Right?

00:25:14.760 Now,

00:25:15.340 I knew that China 0.78

00:25:16.440 was a big part of the problem.

00:25:18.420 I didn't know it was half.

00:25:20.400 Did you know that?

00:25:21.900 I mean,

00:25:22.200 if you had asked me

00:25:23.300 in a survey,

00:25:24.560 how much is China's,

00:25:26.020 as part of the problem,

00:25:26.860 I would have said 25%.

00:25:28.060 I might have thought

00:25:30.320 India,

00:25:30.980 25%.

00:25:32.040 That's what I would have guessed.

00:25:34.040 But China,

00:25:34.760 50%

00:25:35.380 and growing.

00:25:36.820 It's not going down,

00:25:37.760 it's going up fast.

00:25:39.640 So,

00:25:40.260 somehow,

00:25:42.300 the left has managed

00:25:43.180 to make climate change

00:25:44.220 a race problem.

00:25:45.940 So they've combined

00:25:46.740 their favorite topics

00:25:47.720 and said,

00:25:48.260 climate change is racist.

00:25:50.200 But it sort of should be,

00:25:53.220 climate change

00:25:54.020 is a China problem.

00:25:56.600 And that would be

00:25:57.480 an important reframing,

00:25:58.720 but I don't think

00:25:59.300 it's going to happen.

00:26:00.380 Speaking of climate,

00:26:01.920 Biden administration

00:26:03.160 is,

00:26:03.640 at least privately,

00:26:04.820 saying that it wants

00:26:05.560 to prop up

00:26:06.460 the nuclear energy

00:26:07.720 business in the United States

00:26:09.660 with subsidies.

00:26:11.420 Taxpayer subsidies.

00:26:13.120 So,

00:26:13.480 apparently,

00:26:13.860 there are three sources

00:26:14.620 that say this is true.

00:26:16.740 I'm going to have to

00:26:17.840 give credit

00:26:18.500 to the Biden administration.

00:26:20.760 Now,

00:26:20.960 I think this is a continuation

00:26:22.180 from the Trump policy

00:26:23.980 that nuclear energy

00:26:26.260 needed to be important.

00:26:27.600 But,

00:26:28.040 let me say this

00:26:28.680 about both Trump

00:26:29.640 and Biden,

00:26:30.760 about nuclear power.

00:26:33.040 I believe they were

00:26:33.980 both complete failures.

00:26:36.500 Total failures.

00:26:38.040 Trump,

00:26:38.540 Biden,

00:26:39.000 complete failures.

00:26:40.140 Because they're trying

00:26:41.160 to have it both ways.

00:26:42.620 They're trying to

00:26:43.240 quietly support

00:26:44.880 nuclear,

00:26:45.960 which both Trump

00:26:46.800 and Biden

00:26:47.260 apparently are doing,

00:26:48.500 in substantial ways.

00:26:50.680 So,

00:26:51.180 the amount that

00:26:51.680 they're supporting it

00:26:52.520 quietly

00:26:53.340 looks pretty good,

00:26:55.480 actually.

00:26:55.980 I don't have a complaint

00:26:57.180 about that.

00:26:58.100 There do seem to be

00:26:58.840 lots of resources.

00:27:00.300 They built test beds.

00:27:01.640 Trump started that.

00:27:03.180 Biden looks like

00:27:03.920 he wants to

00:27:04.640 give them subsidies

00:27:05.720 to keep them going.

00:27:07.020 So,

00:27:07.360 they're definitely

00:27:07.840 doing the right stuff

00:27:09.220 on the details.

00:27:12.080 What they're not doing

00:27:13.160 is saying it out loud.

00:27:14.180 I don't know

00:27:16.400 why Trump didn't.

00:27:17.740 Maybe he was just

00:27:18.760 uncomfortable

00:27:19.180 with the topic

00:27:19.920 because it's,

00:27:21.140 you know,

00:27:21.780 it veers into

00:27:22.580 the scientific

00:27:23.240 pretty quickly.

00:27:26.280 So,

00:27:26.860 I don't know

00:27:27.140 what's going on,

00:27:28.220 but I would say

00:27:28.760 they're both

00:27:29.140 complete failures

00:27:30.240 in informing

00:27:31.560 the public

00:27:32.100 that nuclear

00:27:33.000 has to be a big

00:27:33.780 part of our solution.

00:27:35.240 Complete failures.

00:27:36.240 I mean,

00:27:36.560 100%

00:27:37.500 complete failure

00:27:39.160 Biden and Trump

00:27:40.460 on this issue.

00:27:41.240 while at the same time

00:27:42.860 their administration

00:27:44.260 is doing all

00:27:45.040 the right stuff.

00:27:46.380 Which is weird.

00:27:48.820 That they could

00:27:49.600 both be

00:27:50.160 completely successful

00:27:51.320 and 100%

00:27:53.180 failures

00:27:53.680 at the same time,

00:27:54.580 but it's happening.

00:27:57.800 Here's a

00:27:58.560 provocative

00:27:59.200 little story

00:28:00.260 that I'm going

00:28:00.940 to say

00:28:01.340 is more likely

00:28:02.620 fake news

00:28:03.300 than real.

00:28:05.020 The 2020 census,

00:28:06.920 apparently,

00:28:08.620 shows that

00:28:09.760 the number

00:28:10.340 of voters

00:28:11.160 is 5 million

00:28:13.440 less than

00:28:14.220 the number

00:28:14.720 of votes

00:28:16.460 for the last election.

00:28:19.680 So,

00:28:19.860 in other words,

00:28:20.620 the number

00:28:21.240 of people

00:28:21.620 who reported

00:28:22.580 that they voted

00:28:23.440 according to the census

00:28:24.580 is 5 million

00:28:27.180 fewer

00:28:27.740 than the number

00:28:29.160 of votes

00:28:29.540 we got.

00:28:30.400 Now,

00:28:30.840 when you hear that,

00:28:31.460 you say to yourself,

00:28:32.400 we got it.

00:28:33.800 We got this

00:28:34.440 smoking gun.

00:28:36.060 So,

00:28:36.300 now we know

00:28:37.020 that there are

00:28:38.820 a whole bunch

00:28:39.180 of fake votes,

00:28:40.200 right?

00:28:41.620 Don't fall

00:28:42.400 for this.

00:28:44.080 Do not fall

00:28:45.120 for this.

00:28:47.180 If you've fallen

00:28:48.140 for this,

00:28:48.700 you're falling

00:28:49.060 for anything.

00:28:50.800 You should not

00:28:51.760 trust this.

00:28:53.720 All right,

00:28:54.080 here's some background.

00:28:55.480 Have they ever

00:28:56.120 been wrong before?

00:28:58.420 Yeah.

00:28:59.520 Yeah.

00:29:00.340 They've been wrong

00:29:00.960 before

00:29:01.340 by big numbers,

00:29:02.600 like 9 million,

00:29:03.600 one previous

00:29:04.220 census.

00:29:05.260 but

00:29:08.020 they were

00:29:09.220 apparently

00:29:09.600 they were

00:29:10.020 usually wrong

00:29:10.940 or almost always

00:29:11.840 in the other

00:29:12.480 direction.

00:29:13.480 So,

00:29:13.960 this is the first

00:29:14.560 time they've

00:29:14.960 been wrong

00:29:15.340 in this direction.

00:29:17.240 Does that mean

00:29:18.000 anything?

00:29:20.760 If they've been

00:29:21.540 wrong before,

00:29:23.160 also by large

00:29:24.200 amounts,

00:29:25.920 but lots of times

00:29:26.940 they've been right,

00:29:28.260 but the only times

00:29:29.560 they've been wrong

00:29:30.240 was in the other

00:29:30.920 direction.

00:29:31.420 So,

00:29:33.380 does that tell you

00:29:33.880 that you know

00:29:34.360 something?

00:29:35.040 Is that a smoke

00:29:36.640 and gun

00:29:37.000 for some kind

00:29:38.500 of election

00:29:38.940 problems?

00:29:40.220 No.

00:29:41.360 No,

00:29:41.840 it isn't.

00:29:42.700 It doesn't tell

00:29:43.620 you anything.

00:29:44.700 It just tells you

00:29:45.620 that the number

00:29:48.800 of people who

00:29:49.360 voted and the

00:29:50.060 census don't

00:29:50.840 always match.

00:29:52.760 That's all I hear.

00:29:54.180 If you take it

00:29:55.080 to the next level

00:29:55.840 and say,

00:29:56.320 well,

00:29:56.600 there it is,

00:29:57.100 smoke and gun.

00:29:58.160 We found all

00:29:58.780 these fake votes.

00:30:00.240 That's a little

00:30:00.720 too far.

00:30:02.020 Now,

00:30:02.280 we can't rule

00:30:02.820 it out.

00:30:04.300 Does it make

00:30:05.020 me curious?

00:30:06.240 Oh,

00:30:06.480 yeah,

00:30:06.740 it does.

00:30:07.820 Is it a red

00:30:08.720 flag?

00:30:09.800 Yeah,

00:30:10.100 it is.

00:30:10.980 Yeah,

00:30:11.260 well,

00:30:11.680 or maybe

00:30:12.320 whatever's

00:30:12.760 less than red.

00:30:14.140 But you should

00:30:14.880 definitely look

00:30:15.540 into it.

00:30:16.640 So,

00:30:16.940 I'm not saying

00:30:17.360 it's unimportant.

00:30:19.220 I would definitely

00:30:20.100 want to get a little

00:30:21.280 bit more information

00:30:22.120 about this,

00:30:23.220 but I don't think

00:30:24.500 that it necessarily

00:30:25.220 is any kind

00:30:25.780 of proof

00:30:26.300 that there was

00:30:26.860 some bad stuff

00:30:27.760 going on

00:30:28.280 because it could

00:30:29.140 be inaccurate

00:30:29.640 for a variety

00:30:30.620 of reasons.

00:30:31.420 And as others

00:30:32.220 have pointed

00:30:32.620 out,

00:30:33.700 I think this

00:30:34.600 was,

00:30:35.160 if it's 2020,

00:30:36.620 the census

00:30:37.120 was taken

00:30:37.780 during the

00:30:39.320 pandemic.

00:30:41.000 So,

00:30:41.980 I don't know.

00:30:43.020 And how many

00:30:43.540 people decided

00:30:44.520 to vote,

00:30:45.700 let's say,

00:30:46.420 in the last

00:30:47.020 month or two

00:30:47.840 of the election?

00:30:48.380 I have a feeling

00:30:49.840 I have a feeling

00:30:49.860 a lot of people

00:30:50.400 didn't even

00:30:50.840 make up their

00:30:51.400 mind to vote

00:30:52.600 until the last

00:30:53.300 few months.

00:30:54.800 So,

00:30:55.000 if they did

00:30:55.300 the census,

00:30:56.020 let's say,

00:30:56.580 started in the

00:30:57.280 beginning of 2020,

00:30:58.480 how many people

00:30:59.560 said they were

00:31:00.020 going to vote?

00:31:01.100 I could easily

00:31:01.780 imagine that

00:31:03.720 five million

00:31:04.300 said they

00:31:05.360 weren't going

00:31:05.840 to and then

00:31:07.120 did.

00:31:08.560 So,

00:31:08.980 I've got

00:31:09.620 questions about

00:31:10.200 this.

00:31:10.920 There's some

00:31:11.480 news,

00:31:14.300 if I can call

00:31:14.920 it that,

00:31:15.380 coming out

00:31:15.780 of the

00:31:16.080 Arizona recount,

00:31:20.520 don't believe

00:31:21.860 any of it.

00:31:23.460 So,

00:31:23.800 here's my

00:31:24.160 advice to you.

00:31:25.160 Everything that

00:31:25.880 you hear coming

00:31:26.660 out of the

00:31:27.620 Arizona recount,

00:31:29.480 because I read

00:31:30.220 some stories

00:31:30.760 today that I

00:31:31.660 just shook my

00:31:32.260 head,

00:31:33.000 and I said,

00:31:33.480 these are

00:31:33.880 obviously fake

00:31:34.800 news.

00:31:35.880 Now,

00:31:36.300 could be wrong,

00:31:37.460 but wait until

00:31:38.240 you've got a few

00:31:39.360 respectable

00:31:40.200 outlets,

00:31:42.140 or there's

00:31:42.760 somebody who

00:31:43.160 goes on camera

00:31:43.960 that you know

00:31:44.620 is associated

00:31:45.280 with them,

00:31:46.160 and that

00:31:46.500 person says,

00:31:47.340 on camera,

00:31:48.440 yes,

00:31:49.000 we found

00:31:49.520 this or

00:31:49.940 that.

00:31:50.940 But don't

00:31:51.700 look at an

00:31:52.400 obscure

00:31:52.980 publication on

00:31:54.780 the internet

00:31:55.220 that tells

00:31:57.500 you that

00:31:57.980 they found

00:31:58.800 something already.

00:32:00.180 They might

00:32:00.600 have.

00:32:01.340 I'm not

00:32:01.680 ruling it

00:32:02.140 out.

00:32:03.240 I'm just

00:32:03.880 saying I

00:32:04.240 don't think

00:32:04.600 we have

00:32:04.940 any visibility

00:32:05.540 yet.

00:32:06.620 So,

00:32:06.940 don't believe

00:32:07.200 any of the

00:32:08.340 early reports.

00:32:11.480 Did you

00:32:12.000 know that

00:32:12.360 Coca-Cola

00:32:12.880 has paused

00:32:13.800 its

00:32:14.060 controversial

00:32:14.780 diversity

00:32:15.480 plan,

00:32:17.020 which included

00:32:17.940 penalties on

00:32:18.820 outside law

00:32:19.700 firms if

00:32:20.820 they failed

00:32:21.340 to meet

00:32:21.720 racial diversity

00:32:22.680 quotas,

00:32:23.500 so they

00:32:25.140 wouldn't even

00:32:25.560 deal with

00:32:26.180 law firms

00:32:27.360 that did

00:32:28.920 not have

00:32:29.940 enough diversity

00:32:30.740 in the law

00:32:31.520 firm.

00:32:32.720 Well,

00:32:33.240 apparently the

00:32:34.140 guy behind

00:32:34.840 all that,

00:32:35.320 their former

00:32:35.720 general counsel,

00:32:36.560 Bradley

00:32:36.840 Gaeton,

00:32:38.120 has abruptly

00:32:39.000 resigned.

00:32:39.640 last month

00:32:41.520 after less

00:32:42.400 of a year

00:32:42.720 on the job

00:32:43.280 and lots

00:32:43.840 of criticisms

00:32:44.640 of the

00:32:45.220 quotas.

00:32:47.120 And here's

00:32:48.320 what I'd

00:32:48.700 like to

00:32:49.040 know.

00:32:49.780 First of

00:32:50.240 all,

00:32:51.020 did he

00:32:52.020 leave his

00:32:52.760 job because

00:32:53.440 people were

00:32:54.400 unhappy with

00:32:54.960 him?

00:32:55.300 We assume

00:32:56.060 so,

00:32:56.520 but we

00:32:56.840 don't know

00:32:57.120 for sure.

00:32:58.340 And I

00:32:58.660 wonder how

00:32:59.440 many other

00:33:00.100 stories there

00:33:00.860 are of

00:33:01.300 people losing

00:33:02.060 jobs for

00:33:03.180 being too

00:33:04.080 woke.

00:33:04.540 because the

00:33:06.060 more of

00:33:06.420 those stories

00:33:06.980 you hear,

00:33:08.580 the less

00:33:09.480 of the

00:33:09.840 wokeness

00:33:10.440 problems

00:33:10.820 you'll get

00:33:11.320 because people

00:33:12.320 deal with

00:33:12.820 anecdotes,

00:33:13.520 not data,

00:33:14.000 right?

00:33:14.460 So if you

00:33:15.080 hear a story

00:33:15.680 about somebody

00:33:17.060 who went

00:33:17.440 too far

00:33:17.960 and got

00:33:18.860 fired,

00:33:19.680 that puts

00:33:21.280 a little

00:33:21.560 damper on

00:33:22.260 people going

00:33:22.880 too far.

00:33:25.560 Likewise,

00:33:26.260 the story

00:33:26.540 about Basecamp,

00:33:27.580 the company

00:33:28.380 that said

00:33:28.740 you can't

00:33:29.120 talk about

00:33:29.520 politics

00:33:29.960 anymore,

00:33:31.100 which basically

00:33:32.120 was a war

00:33:32.860 on wokeness.

00:33:33.660 you know,

00:33:34.600 it was in

00:33:34.880 disguise,

00:33:35.820 but it

00:33:36.080 said you

00:33:36.300 can't

00:33:36.520 talk about

00:33:37.080 politics

00:33:37.780 anymore,

00:33:38.940 and 20%

00:33:40.160 of the

00:33:40.380 workplace

00:33:40.700 left.

00:33:44.040 In essence,

00:33:45.320 they lost

00:33:45.720 their jobs

00:33:46.360 for being

00:33:47.040 too woke.

00:33:48.360 It was

00:33:48.760 voluntary,

00:33:49.400 but they

00:33:49.620 lost their

00:33:50.020 jobs.

00:33:51.220 So as

00:33:52.620 we find

00:33:53.020 more of

00:33:53.380 these,

00:33:53.740 that will

00:33:54.160 be the

00:33:54.600 thing that

00:33:54.960 pushes

00:33:55.220 back against

00:33:56.040 the slippery

00:33:57.620 slope.

00:33:59.840 Here's how

00:34:00.600 I would

00:34:01.080 like to

00:34:01.700 we should

00:34:02.980 talk about

00:34:03.560 racists.

00:34:04.780 I think

00:34:05.300 we should

00:34:05.600 talk about

00:34:06.020 racism as

00:34:06.820 being

00:34:07.160 something that

00:34:08.640 happens on

00:34:09.140 the extreme

00:34:09.620 left and

00:34:10.180 the extreme

00:34:10.680 right,

00:34:11.560 but does

00:34:12.140 not affect

00:34:12.800 ordinary

00:34:13.480 Republicans

00:34:14.060 or ordinary

00:34:15.460 Democrats.

00:34:18.340 And if

00:34:19.900 anybody's on

00:34:21.480 this live

00:34:22.740 stream who

00:34:23.360 leans

00:34:24.160 Democrat,

00:34:25.280 I just

00:34:25.820 have to

00:34:26.100 tell you

00:34:26.380 this personal

00:34:27.320 experience.

00:34:29.000 So for as

00:34:29.500 long as I've

00:34:29.980 been talking

00:34:30.380 about Trump

00:34:31.120 stuff and

00:34:31.660 dealing with

00:34:32.140 Republicans and

00:34:33.040 conservatives,

00:34:33.560 mostly my

00:34:34.760 audiences,

00:34:35.640 leans right,

00:34:36.940 I have not

00:34:38.320 encountered one

00:34:39.380 example ever

00:34:41.440 once of a

00:34:43.340 Republican who

00:34:45.060 criticized a

00:34:46.400 black

00:34:47.020 conservative.

00:34:50.300 I've never

00:34:51.220 heard it.

00:34:52.600 Because if you

00:34:53.380 believe that

00:34:53.920 Republicans are a

00:34:54.740 bunch of

00:34:55.000 racists, you

00:34:55.620 think to

00:34:55.960 yourself,

00:34:56.940 yeah, but

00:34:57.340 behind closed

00:34:58.160 doors, what

00:34:59.960 do the white 0.75

00:35:00.400 people say

00:35:00.900 about Tim

00:35:02.080 Scott?

00:35:03.460 What do

00:35:03.820 they say

00:35:04.100 behind closed

00:35:04.780 doors?

00:35:05.560 I've been

00:35:06.200 behind a lot

00:35:06.820 of closed

00:35:07.180 doors in

00:35:07.820 the sense of

00:35:08.340 private

00:35:08.680 conversations with

00:35:10.040 people who

00:35:10.660 would assume I

00:35:11.400 agreed with

00:35:12.440 them on

00:35:12.980 enough things

00:35:13.500 that they

00:35:13.760 could speak

00:35:14.160 freely.

00:35:15.020 I've never

00:35:15.680 heard it.

00:35:16.900 I've never

00:35:17.460 heard it.

00:35:17.900 How many

00:35:19.540 conservatives have

00:35:21.360 you heard who

00:35:22.620 have criticized

00:35:23.660 Candace Owens?

00:35:27.500 I've never

00:35:28.300 heard it.

00:35:29.180 I've heard

00:35:29.900 positive things

00:35:30.680 about her all

00:35:31.460 the time.

00:35:32.540 I've heard lots

00:35:33.340 of negative from

00:35:34.060 the left.

00:35:35.500 But I don't

00:35:36.040 think I've heard

00:35:36.780 one Republican

00:35:38.680 say anything bad

00:35:40.860 about Candace

00:35:41.460 Owens. 0.95

00:35:42.860 Behind closed

00:35:43.840 doors,

00:35:44.980 privately.

00:35:45.440 It just

00:35:46.620 doesn't happen.

00:35:48.000 And I think

00:35:48.620 there's this

00:35:49.020 whole illusion

00:35:49.660 out there that

00:35:50.940 Republicans have

00:35:51.800 maybe a public

00:35:53.020 look, but

00:35:54.460 behind closed

00:35:55.180 doors is a

00:35:55.820 little bit

00:35:56.120 different.

00:35:57.020 Don't you

00:35:57.300 think that?

00:35:59.100 Don't you

00:35:59.740 think that

00:36:00.100 behind closed

00:36:01.100 doors, don't

00:36:02.200 you think the

00:36:02.580 Democrats think

00:36:03.220 it's different

00:36:03.700 when we're

00:36:04.080 talking privately?

00:36:06.480 It's not my

00:36:07.380 experience.

00:36:08.180 I'm looking at

00:36:08.700 the comments to

00:36:09.380 see if anybody's

00:36:10.120 disagreeing.

00:36:10.820 I don't see it.

00:36:12.180 So I think

00:36:13.460 it's clear

00:36:14.040 that conservatives

00:36:16.440 judge people by

00:36:17.700 their philosophy

00:36:18.700 and their

00:36:19.100 approach to

00:36:19.640 life.

00:36:20.180 If you've got

00:36:20.920 the right

00:36:21.380 philosophy and

00:36:22.580 approach to

00:36:23.100 life, you're

00:36:24.320 willing to take

00:36:24.960 responsibility for

00:36:26.120 your own stuff,

00:36:27.140 and you don't

00:36:28.040 want to bug

00:36:28.460 other people too

00:36:29.160 much, Republicans

00:36:31.720 love you.

00:36:33.020 There's just no

00:36:33.940 exception.

00:36:35.200 There's just no

00:36:35.940 exception.

00:36:37.160 And if you think

00:36:38.100 there is, you're

00:36:39.380 living in a

00:36:40.140 horrible illusion,

00:36:41.940 because I would

00:36:42.380 imagine it would

00:36:43.140 be tough to

00:36:43.940 deal with

00:36:45.540 the Republicans

00:36:46.040 if you thought

00:36:46.640 they were saying

00:36:47.080 different things

00:36:47.720 behind closed

00:36:48.320 doors.

00:36:49.080 So I think a

00:36:49.640 more productive

00:36:50.200 way to look at

00:36:50.980 this, which

00:36:51.460 counters the

00:36:53.400 propaganda from

00:36:54.300 the news, is

00:36:55.860 that the racists

00:36:56.920 are on the

00:36:57.360 extreme left and

00:36:58.320 the extreme right.

00:36:59.640 But it has

00:37:00.260 nothing to do

00:37:00.900 with Republicans,

00:37:02.720 and it has

00:37:03.080 nothing to do

00:37:03.680 with Democrats.

00:37:05.220 It's just the

00:37:05.760 extremists on both

00:37:06.580 sides.

00:37:07.360 The overwoke people 0.97

00:37:08.540 are just racist

00:37:09.360 against different

00:37:10.100 groups, you

00:37:11.180 know, the white

00:37:12.080 supremacist, racist

00:37:13.720 against whatever.

00:37:16.260 It looks the

00:37:17.040 same to me, so I

00:37:18.080 don't see any

00:37:18.500 difference between

00:37:19.320 extreme left and

00:37:20.220 extreme right.

00:37:21.260 They're both just

00:37:22.340 horrible racists.

00:37:25.280 There's a report

00:37:26.580 from the Royal

00:37:27.120 College of

00:37:27.720 Psychiatrists.

00:37:28.600 I'm guessing this

00:37:29.340 is a British

00:37:29.880 group because of

00:37:30.660 that royal part.

00:37:32.240 And apparently

00:37:33.420 the climate

00:37:34.600 mental health

00:37:35.580 crisis is pretty,

00:37:36.980 pretty bad.

00:37:37.580 We've talked

00:37:37.980 about this

00:37:38.360 before, but

00:37:39.640 60% of the

00:37:40.620 people in their

00:37:41.040 polls said that

00:37:41.740 climate affects

00:37:42.560 their mental

00:37:43.100 health.

00:37:45.440 Does climate

00:37:46.360 affect your

00:37:46.940 mental health?

00:37:48.460 Because if it

00:37:49.320 does, you're

00:37:50.440 definitely doing

00:37:50.980 it wrong.

00:37:54.100 Here's my

00:37:54.820 advice, and I've

00:37:56.560 been reading some

00:37:57.120 tweets from Ed

00:37:57.980 Latimer today that 0.96

00:37:59.400 feels like the

00:38:01.720 same vibe, but

00:38:03.860 different approach.

00:38:05.220 it goes like

00:38:08.200 this.

00:38:09.880 There are

00:38:10.480 things you can

00:38:11.120 control that you

00:38:13.340 should worry

00:38:13.800 about.

00:38:15.140 There are

00:38:15.740 things you can't

00:38:16.520 control directly

00:38:17.840 that maybe you

00:38:19.660 should worry less

00:38:20.320 about.

00:38:21.500 The reason that

00:38:22.380 I don't worry

00:38:24.640 about climate

00:38:25.280 change is not

00:38:26.800 because it's not

00:38:27.500 a problem.

00:38:28.680 The reason I

00:38:29.520 don't worry about

00:38:30.160 it is that other

00:38:30.880 people are worried

00:38:31.560 about it.

00:38:32.960 That's good enough

00:38:33.800 for me.

00:38:34.120 As long as

00:38:35.360 other people are

00:38:36.160 panicked, that

00:38:37.720 means that the

00:38:38.320 resources are

00:38:39.060 going there, the

00:38:39.820 smart people are

00:38:40.520 working on the

00:38:41.060 problem, there's

00:38:42.480 enough intention

00:38:43.420 and energy

00:38:44.800 happening, we'll

00:38:45.980 be fine.

00:38:47.080 Whenever humans

00:38:48.380 focus on and

00:38:49.860 throw their energy

00:38:50.520 at solving a

00:38:51.100 problem, we

00:38:51.600 kind of do.

00:38:52.820 We kind of do.

00:38:53.940 So I think this

00:38:54.540 will be no

00:38:54.900 different.

00:38:55.940 So I'm not

00:38:56.620 worried about it,

00:38:58.000 which is

00:38:58.500 completely different

00:38:59.640 from saying it

00:39:01.800 is or is not a

00:39:02.580 problem.

00:39:03.900 I do think

00:39:04.780 that no matter

00:39:05.940 what humans are

00:39:06.880 doing to the

00:39:07.400 climate, we

00:39:08.880 humans should 0.81

00:39:09.440 reach a point

00:39:09.960 where we can

00:39:10.480 manipulate it.

00:39:11.820 I think it

00:39:12.380 would be good

00:39:13.020 no matter what

00:39:14.300 the situation

00:39:14.880 is if we

00:39:15.440 could learn

00:39:15.840 to turn the

00:39:17.520 temperature up

00:39:18.220 and down as

00:39:19.220 needed.

00:39:20.500 Yeah, I know

00:39:20.860 that sounds

00:39:21.260 dangerous, but I

00:39:21.940 think it's a good

00:39:22.600 trade-off.

00:39:24.500 And then people

00:39:25.180 said, will climate

00:39:26.040 emergencies be a

00:39:27.040 concern in 10

00:39:27.780 years?

00:39:28.360 84% said yes,

00:39:29.560 but that just

00:39:30.060 comes from the

00:39:30.620 news.

00:39:32.000 And then there's

00:39:32.840 the propaganda

00:39:33.380 question.

00:39:35.540 So think about

00:39:36.540 these three

00:39:37.060 questions on a

00:39:37.940 survey.

00:39:38.840 Two of them

00:39:39.520 are sort of

00:39:40.240 legitimate, and

00:39:41.600 the third one

00:39:42.260 is a question

00:39:43.600 that is really

00:39:44.360 persuasion, and

00:39:45.780 it's really

00:39:46.500 sneaky.

00:39:47.680 It's totally

00:39:48.840 unethical in my

00:39:49.780 opinion.

00:39:51.260 But it comes

00:39:52.020 from the Royal

00:39:52.540 College of

00:39:53.100 Psychiatrists, and

00:39:53.940 I guess they

00:39:54.420 thought it was

00:39:54.900 ethical, so we

00:39:56.680 have a disagreement

00:39:57.280 there.

00:39:58.120 But here's the

00:39:58.720 third question.

00:39:59.800 All right, look

00:40:00.360 at, first of

00:40:00.860 all, the first

00:40:01.320 two are

00:40:01.820 innocuous.

00:40:04.560 Does climate

00:40:05.340 affect your

00:40:05.800 mental health?

00:40:06.580 Fair question.

00:40:07.800 Will you still

00:40:08.480 be worried about

00:40:09.160 it in 10

00:40:09.540 years?

00:40:10.500 Fair question.

00:40:12.240 Now this

00:40:12.660 third one, see

00:40:13.720 if you think

00:40:14.080 this is fair.

00:40:16.060 Did you

00:40:16.440 realize climate

00:40:17.580 emergencies

00:40:18.400 contributed to

00:40:19.960 the outbreak

00:40:20.480 of COVID-19?

00:40:23.140 22% said

00:40:24.200 yes.

00:40:24.480 that's a

00:40:28.660 statement.

00:40:30.040 That's not a

00:40:30.940 survey question.

00:40:32.740 That is trying

00:40:34.400 to push a

00:40:35.720 fact into a

00:40:36.560 question so

00:40:37.840 that you read

00:40:38.360 this, and if

00:40:39.200 you were not

00:40:39.960 aware of any

00:40:40.760 other facts on

00:40:41.780 this topic, you

00:40:43.460 would come away

00:40:44.060 from this thinking,

00:40:44.920 oh, I didn't

00:40:45.300 realize that.

00:40:46.120 But the question

00:40:46.760 tells me it's

00:40:47.420 true that climate

00:40:49.260 emergencies, and

00:40:50.600 they use the word

00:40:51.260 emergencies, contributed

00:40:53.920 to the outbreak

00:40:54.680 of COVID-19.

00:40:56.820 Guess what

00:40:57.520 else?

00:40:58.400 Let me think, can

00:40:59.520 you think of

00:41:00.020 another example

00:41:01.720 of something that

00:41:04.020 was affected by

00:41:05.180 climate change?

00:41:06.360 Because their

00:41:07.580 claim is that the

00:41:09.000 COVID-19 thing was

00:41:10.100 affected by climate

00:41:11.000 change.

00:41:11.300 What other

00:41:12.760 things were

00:41:14.500 affected by it?

00:41:16.220 Was it

00:41:17.040 everything?

00:41:18.400 Yes, it was

00:41:21.980 everything.

00:41:23.120 There wasn't

00:41:23.820 anything that

00:41:24.460 wasn't made

00:41:24.980 worse, except

00:41:26.140 maybe telecommuting,

00:41:27.740 traffic, I guess,

00:41:28.760 by climate change

00:41:30.220 and COVID and

00:41:31.700 all that other

00:41:32.340 stuff.

00:41:32.940 Anything big is

00:41:33.800 affecting everything.

00:41:34.880 So climate change

00:41:35.600 should affect

00:41:36.040 everything.

00:41:38.420 Do you think

00:41:38.860 that they, when

00:41:40.900 they said that

00:41:42.300 climate emergencies,

00:41:43.780 their word,

00:41:44.780 contributed to the

00:41:45.580 outbreak of COVID-19,

00:41:47.180 do you think that

00:41:47.820 they did any

00:41:48.620 cost-benefit?

00:41:51.380 Do you think

00:41:52.020 they did that?

00:41:53.240 Do you think

00:41:53.720 they did a cost-benefit

00:41:54.680 and they said,

00:41:55.220 well, yes, there

00:41:56.240 were some bad

00:41:56.840 parts of the

00:41:57.620 climate to COVID-19,

00:41:59.240 but it was also

00:42:00.440 a little warmer

00:42:01.240 than it would

00:42:01.740 have been, so

00:42:02.680 people got

00:42:03.200 outside and

00:42:04.040 they got more

00:42:04.460 vitamin D.

00:42:05.400 No, they 1.00

00:42:05.980 didn't do that.

00:42:07.540 There's no way

00:42:08.420 that they looked

00:42:09.000 at both the

00:42:09.600 costs and the

00:42:10.680 benefits of any

00:42:12.360 climate change.

00:42:13.780 They just looked

00:42:14.700 at the costs.

00:42:15.380 You know that

00:42:16.760 without even

00:42:17.240 looking into it,

00:42:17.980 right?

00:42:18.240 You know that

00:42:18.940 because they

00:42:20.060 don't in

00:42:20.640 situations like

00:42:21.400 this.

00:42:21.960 So this is

00:42:22.440 propaganda disguised

00:42:24.560 as a pole.

00:42:25.620 You should learn

00:42:26.120 to recognize that.

00:42:27.580 But think about

00:42:28.340 the destruction

00:42:29.980 of the climate

00:42:31.060 compared to the

00:42:32.760 destruction of

00:42:33.840 60% of the

00:42:35.560 public's mental

00:42:36.940 health.

00:42:38.120 Which one's

00:42:38.920 worse?

00:42:39.180 I feel like

00:42:42.000 the destruction

00:42:43.660 of 60% of

00:42:45.800 the public's

00:42:46.440 mental health

00:42:47.380 is worse

00:42:49.060 than a little

00:42:50.680 bit of a rise

00:42:51.460 in the sea

00:42:51.880 level.

00:42:53.520 Let me give

00:42:54.320 you a choice.

00:42:55.540 I'll give you

00:42:56.000 these two choices.

00:42:57.040 You can have

00:42:57.540 a mental health

00:42:58.400 problem forever

00:42:59.200 or sea level

00:43:02.180 will rise an

00:43:03.060 inch.

00:43:04.280 Those are your

00:43:04.800 two choices.

00:43:06.180 Which one do

00:43:06.700 you pick?

00:43:07.020 Which one do

00:43:09.020 right?

00:43:10.360 You're going to

00:43:10.980 pick the sea

00:43:11.480 level every

00:43:13.020 time because

00:43:14.560 you're not too

00:43:15.500 worried about

00:43:15.900 the sea level

00:43:16.520 really.

00:43:18.140 But if you

00:43:19.520 have a mental

00:43:19.940 health problem

00:43:20.560 that's all

00:43:21.480 day every day.

00:43:22.760 It's not even

00:43:23.580 close.

00:43:24.840 So if you said

00:43:25.560 to me what is

00:43:26.140 a bigger

00:43:26.520 emergency?

00:43:28.420 Climate

00:43:28.820 change which

00:43:30.100 I believe all

00:43:31.640 the right people

00:43:32.180 are working on

00:43:32.900 to make that

00:43:33.860 okay in the

00:43:34.360 future or

00:43:35.640 that the way

00:43:36.780 the news reports

00:43:37.820 this is making

00:43:38.700 60% of the

00:43:39.860 country sick.

00:43:42.280 Sick.

00:43:43.400 Because mental

00:43:43.940 health problems

00:43:44.580 is you know

00:43:45.640 it's a health

00:43:46.220 problem.

00:43:46.780 You're sick.

00:43:48.360 These are not

00:43:49.140 even close.

00:43:51.340 But like I

00:43:52.300 say the only

00:43:53.040 reason that

00:43:53.620 there's so many

00:43:54.280 resources working

00:43:55.240 on climate is

00:43:56.220 because 60% of

00:43:57.600 the people are

00:43:58.540 so worried about

00:43:59.220 it they have

00:43:59.540 mental problems.

00:44:00.780 I feel as if

00:44:01.860 there would be

00:44:02.260 some way to get

00:44:03.120 people to work

00:44:03.760 on it without

00:44:05.200 down with the

00:44:05.500 mental problems.

00:44:08.420 Yeah so the

00:44:09.020 fake news does

00:44:09.960 not blame

00:44:10.860 itself.

00:44:12.120 You know

00:44:12.220 you've heard

00:44:13.800 of the

00:44:14.180 military industrial

00:44:15.680 complex.

00:44:16.740 The idea that

00:44:17.540 the people who

00:44:19.640 sell weapons

00:44:20.580 will work on

00:44:22.140 the government

00:44:22.620 to get them

00:44:23.360 to be starting

00:44:24.460 wars because

00:44:25.320 it's good for

00:44:25.900 business.

00:44:26.900 So the military

00:44:27.560 likes the people

00:44:28.840 who sell them

00:44:29.360 weapons etc.

00:44:30.360 So it's one

00:44:31.600 big military

00:44:32.720 operation.

00:44:35.820 And here we

00:44:37.620 have another

00:44:38.020 one which is

00:44:38.840 the fake news

00:44:40.500 industry and the

00:44:41.460 mental health

00:44:42.080 industry.

00:44:43.460 Have you noticed

00:44:44.340 that they kind

00:44:45.620 of work together

00:44:46.240 now?

00:44:47.420 You know just

00:44:47.840 in the way that

00:44:48.540 the weapons

00:44:49.820 making industry

00:44:50.940 is sort of good

00:44:52.340 friends with the

00:44:53.000 military but a

00:44:54.360 little too good.

00:44:55.680 You don't want

00:44:56.600 them to be too

00:44:57.260 friendly right?

00:44:58.560 They have to be

00:44:59.180 able to work

00:45:00.060 with each other

00:45:00.560 of course but

00:45:01.900 you don't want

00:45:02.440 them to be

00:45:03.000 you know like

00:45:03.640 that.

00:45:04.200 That's going to

00:45:04.680 be a problem.

00:45:06.800 But now we

00:45:07.560 have the fake

00:45:08.140 news industry

00:45:08.880 and the mental

00:45:10.320 health industry

00:45:11.080 working in this

00:45:12.540 circular fashion.

00:45:13.660 So the fake

00:45:14.120 news makes

00:45:15.640 people sick

00:45:16.440 by the way

00:45:17.540 they report it

00:45:18.280 and then the

00:45:19.640 mental health

00:45:20.180 people say

00:45:21.200 hey it's true

00:45:22.000 a lot of people

00:45:22.620 are getting sick

00:45:23.320 and then that

00:45:24.340 becomes news

00:45:25.280 for the fake

00:45:26.260 news business

00:45:27.000 and then they

00:45:27.980 use that to

00:45:29.240 beat up

00:45:29.620 Republicans

00:45:30.180 who didn't

00:45:31.380 cause the

00:45:31.780 problem.

00:45:33.500 The Republicans

00:45:34.320 are the ones

00:45:34.980 who say don't

00:45:36.080 worry about it

00:45:36.860 and whether you

00:45:38.420 should or should

00:45:38.880 not worry about

00:45:39.480 it it's not

00:45:40.000 causing anybody

00:45:40.540 mental illness.

00:45:42.860 So that's a

00:45:44.440 pretty ugly

00:45:45.140 situation there.

00:45:48.000 So climate

00:45:48.880 and racism

00:45:49.500 the two things

00:45:50.640 that we know

00:45:51.700 from Project

00:45:52.320 Veritas

00:45:52.780 that CNN

00:45:53.960 wants to push

00:45:55.380 as part

00:45:56.500 as a theme.

00:45:58.360 So it's

00:45:58.900 climate or

00:45:59.520 racism

00:45:59.880 and what

00:46:00.260 do those

00:46:00.580 two things

00:46:01.120 have in

00:46:01.500 common?

00:46:03.020 They're hard

00:46:03.960 to measure.

00:46:06.700 You know

00:46:06.940 you can

00:46:07.220 measure the

00:46:07.980 temperature

00:46:08.360 but you

00:46:09.280 can't measure

00:46:10.060 what will be

00:46:10.860 the problem

00:46:11.620 in 80 years.

00:46:12.880 It's just

00:46:13.400 you can do it

00:46:14.720 but nobody's

00:46:15.400 going to believe

00:46:15.980 that you got it

00:46:16.780 accurately.

00:46:18.640 Racism

00:46:19.200 same thing.

00:46:19.840 it's so

00:46:20.620 subjective

00:46:21.200 in terms of

00:46:22.600 how you

00:46:22.900 measure it

00:46:23.600 and do you

00:46:24.400 count racism

00:46:25.140 against white

00:46:25.860 people or

00:46:26.500 that doesn't

00:46:27.240 count.

00:46:28.360 So these

00:46:29.520 things are

00:46:30.080 resistant to

00:46:31.300 data.

00:46:32.860 So if you're

00:46:33.400 looking for

00:46:33.860 what the

00:46:34.380 fake news

00:46:35.040 loves,

00:46:36.260 look for

00:46:36.880 what a

00:46:37.340 manager of

00:46:38.160 a corporation

00:46:38.880 loves.

00:46:40.260 Do you know

00:46:40.540 what a

00:46:40.760 manager of

00:46:41.280 a corporation

00:46:41.880 loves?

00:46:43.360 A situation

00:46:43.980 where the

00:46:44.560 quality of

00:46:45.120 their work

00:46:45.520 can't be

00:46:46.280 measured because

00:46:47.480 then they

00:46:47.740 can make

00:46:48.040 any claim.

00:46:49.120 Well we

00:46:49.460 can't measure

00:46:49.980 it but I'm

00:46:50.600 pretty sure

00:46:51.180 all those

00:46:51.580 policies I

00:46:52.220 put in

00:46:52.480 place made

00:46:52.880 everything

00:46:53.180 better.

00:46:54.180 Just no

00:46:54.600 way to

00:46:54.820 measure it.

00:46:55.860 Same with

00:46:56.460 climate and

00:46:57.140 racism.

00:46:57.700 You can beat

00:46:58.120 up Republicans

00:46:58.780 on it all

00:46:59.440 day long

00:47:00.020 because if

00:47:01.300 things were

00:47:01.740 getting better

00:47:02.360 how would

00:47:03.880 you know?

00:47:05.120 How would

00:47:05.440 you know?

00:47:06.700 So beware

00:47:08.440 of ambiguous

00:47:09.400 topics.

00:47:11.140 Funniest

00:47:11.560 story in the

00:47:12.160 news.

00:47:14.060 By the way

00:47:14.540 I think you

00:47:14.960 should say

00:47:15.300 we should be

00:47:15.840 saying that

00:47:16.440 fixing climate

00:47:18.280 change with

00:47:18.800 green technology

00:47:19.660 is racist

00:47:20.320 because it

00:47:21.940 is.

00:47:23.060 If you

00:47:23.580 use green

00:47:24.160 technology with

00:47:25.240 the exception

00:47:25.620 of nuclear

00:47:26.440 energy, if

00:47:27.500 you use green

00:47:28.060 technology you're

00:47:29.240 spending more to

00:47:30.260 create energy

00:47:30.920 and that locks in

00:47:33.280 the rich people

00:47:33.940 they get to

00:47:34.580 stay rich but

00:47:35.880 poor people don't 1.00

00:47:36.740 get to move up

00:47:37.460 because energy

00:47:38.220 costs are too

00:47:38.840 much.

00:47:39.800 So yeah the

00:47:41.700 green technologies

00:47:42.640 with the exception

00:47:43.300 of nuclear are

00:47:44.880 entirely racist.

00:47:49.640 Mike Cernovich

00:47:50.620 had a tweet

00:47:53.080 where I saw

00:47:53.640 the president

00:47:54.440 of Azerbaijan

00:47:55.480 was talking to

00:47:58.040 a BBC

00:47:58.520 correspondent

00:47:59.240 and you just

00:48:00.640 have to see

00:48:01.200 this thing

00:48:01.640 it's a thing

00:48:03.380 of beauty.

00:48:04.380 If you ever

00:48:05.120 want to see

00:48:05.580 a politician

00:48:06.260 just crush

00:48:08.260 a journalist

00:48:09.000 I mean just

00:48:10.480 crush her 0.99

00:48:11.220 you have to

00:48:12.700 watch this

00:48:13.200 and the idea

00:48:13.980 was that

00:48:15.460 he was being

00:48:16.200 asked about

00:48:16.680 freedom of

00:48:17.220 press in his

00:48:17.860 own country

00:48:18.400 he responded

00:48:19.860 quite capably

00:48:21.000 now I'm not

00:48:22.040 going to support

00:48:22.720 him or whatever

00:48:23.840 he is or is

00:48:24.520 not doing

00:48:24.940 but he answered

00:48:25.900 the question

00:48:26.340 very capably

00:48:27.120 by saying that

00:48:28.400 they have full

00:48:29.180 social media

00:48:29.900 in their country

00:48:30.560 and they don't

00:48:32.860 ban it.

00:48:34.060 So apparently

00:48:34.480 you can go on

00:48:35.500 Facebook

00:48:35.860 say whatever

00:48:37.180 you want

00:48:37.620 in Azerbaijan.

00:48:39.100 Do you know

00:48:39.620 where you can't

00:48:40.200 do that?

00:48:41.880 The United States.

00:48:44.180 You can't go

00:48:45.420 on Facebook

00:48:45.820 and say

00:48:46.220 whatever you

00:48:46.660 want if you're

00:48:47.220 in the United

00:48:47.660 States

00:48:48.060 because then

00:48:49.040 you can get

00:48:49.440 banned for life.

00:48:50.820 But he's

00:48:51.140 saying in my

00:48:51.960 country

00:48:52.260 say whatever

00:48:53.100 you want

00:48:53.400 on Facebook.

00:48:54.400 Now of course

00:48:54.840 Facebook has

00:48:55.440 their own

00:48:55.720 policies

00:48:56.140 but I don't

00:48:56.980 think the

00:48:57.320 government

00:48:57.620 would be

00:48:58.160 pushing them

00:48:58.800 one way

00:48:59.100 or another.

00:48:59.900 Maybe they

00:49:00.280 are.

00:49:00.980 Hard to know.

00:49:02.120 But then

00:49:02.420 he brings up

00:49:03.400 Assange

00:49:03.880 and he says

00:49:04.620 who put

00:49:06.100 Assange in

00:49:06.700 jail and

00:49:07.180 why?

00:49:08.120 So basically

00:49:08.780 the president

00:49:09.740 of Azerbaijan

00:49:10.280 is saying

00:49:11.880 you can't

00:49:12.400 talk to me

00:49:12.820 about freedom

00:49:13.380 of press

00:49:13.920 when Assange

00:49:14.660 is in jail

00:49:15.340 for being

00:49:16.700 a reporter

00:49:17.540 and that's

00:49:19.120 it

00:49:19.420 according to

00:49:21.480 him.

00:49:22.380 And I would

00:49:23.300 say that's a

00:49:24.020 pretty good

00:49:24.780 argument.

00:49:25.540 So you have

00:49:25.900 to see how

00:49:26.480 he just

00:49:27.200 dissected this

00:49:28.120 BBC journalist.

00:49:29.600 on Bannon's

00:49:33.100 war room

00:49:33.520 podcast

00:49:34.240 which

00:49:35.260 you should

00:49:36.760 probably

00:49:37.020 watch

00:49:37.340 I guess

00:49:38.860 there was

00:49:39.200 an author

00:49:39.800 Joe Allen

00:49:40.560 talking about

00:49:41.060 transhumanism

00:49:42.020 which is

00:49:42.580 the idea

00:49:43.040 that your

00:49:44.100 digital identity

00:49:45.240 can go on

00:49:46.420 beyond your

00:49:47.260 mortal life.

00:49:48.960 So I've

00:49:49.380 told you

00:49:49.660 before

00:49:50.000 that I

00:49:51.820 have

00:49:52.120 authorized

00:49:53.360 myself

00:49:54.720 to become

00:49:56.140 a digital

00:49:57.060 AI in the

00:49:57.820 future

00:49:58.120 if anybody

00:49:58.960 wants to

00:49:59.420 do that.

00:50:00.560 However I

00:50:01.120 realized

00:50:01.680 that now

00:50:02.860 with blockchain

00:50:03.520 and with

00:50:04.980 the NFT

00:50:05.600 technology

00:50:06.340 where

00:50:06.860 any

00:50:07.700 digital

00:50:08.460 work

00:50:09.040 can be

00:50:10.320 let's say

00:50:10.920 registered

00:50:11.420 on the

00:50:11.960 blockchain

00:50:12.340 so you

00:50:13.180 know what

00:50:13.560 is the

00:50:13.860 original

00:50:14.260 and you

00:50:14.960 can

00:50:15.120 distinguish

00:50:15.540 it

00:50:15.840 from any

00:50:16.220 copies.

00:50:17.320 Well

00:50:17.740 someday

00:50:18.080 in the

00:50:18.360 future

00:50:18.620 there may

00:50:19.400 be many

00:50:19.860 copies

00:50:20.280 of me

00:50:20.740 because

00:50:21.840 if you

00:50:22.180 were

00:50:22.300 developing

00:50:22.720 AI

00:50:23.160 and you

00:50:24.060 were trying

00:50:24.340 to make

00:50:24.700 it

00:50:24.900 human

00:50:25.760 like

00:50:26.300 you

00:50:27.240 would

00:50:27.420 look

00:50:27.580 for

00:50:27.740 somebody

00:50:28.060 who

00:50:28.200 has

00:50:28.360 the

00:50:28.520 most

00:50:28.940 written

00:50:30.060 and

00:50:30.380 spoken

00:50:30.720 words

00:50:31.300 in the

00:50:31.760 world.

00:50:33.020 That would

00:50:33.720 be me.

00:50:34.700 Not more

00:50:35.280 than everybody

00:50:35.900 in the world

00:50:36.360 but I have

00:50:37.420 so much

00:50:38.640 public

00:50:40.080 writing

00:50:41.240 and speaking

00:50:41.940 that you

00:50:43.020 could scoop

00:50:44.160 it all up

00:50:44.660 with AI

00:50:45.080 and then

00:50:45.740 rebuild

00:50:46.280 me in

00:50:46.780 digital

00:50:47.100 form.

00:50:48.120 But

00:50:48.380 like an

00:50:50.000 NFT

00:50:50.360 I might

00:50:51.260 authorize

00:50:51.920 or sell

00:50:52.440 one version

00:50:53.420 that will

00:50:55.100 be my

00:50:55.640 soul

00:50:56.100 forever.

00:50:57.700 And whoever

00:50:58.160 is the

00:50:59.560 owner of

00:51:00.200 that one

00:51:00.740 version

00:51:01.200 will have

00:51:03.020 it registered

00:51:03.580 on the

00:51:03.940 blockchain

00:51:04.280 and they

00:51:05.660 will know

00:51:06.160 forever

00:51:06.920 that I'm

00:51:07.960 the one

00:51:08.320 that's

00:51:08.580 authorized

00:51:08.940 to be

00:51:09.940 my

00:51:11.080 eternal

00:51:12.160 digital

00:51:12.780 soul.

00:51:14.320 And any

00:51:14.660 other copies

00:51:15.260 you see

00:51:15.700 which are

00:51:16.080 authorized

00:51:16.520 would not

00:51:19.060 be the

00:51:19.360 original.

00:51:21.180 By the way

00:51:21.940 I've already

00:51:22.400 told Christina

00:51:23.240 that I

00:51:23.660 will be

00:51:23.960 haunting

00:51:24.340 the hell

00:51:24.860 end of

00:51:25.120 her

00:51:25.280 starting

00:51:26.140 day one

00:51:26.780 of my

00:51:27.660 death.

00:51:29.680 But it

00:51:30.340 will mostly

00:51:30.780 be in

00:51:31.220 digital form.

00:51:32.480 I'm going

00:51:33.080 to haunt.

00:51:33.980 I'm going

00:51:34.720 to haunt

00:51:35.080 her so

00:51:35.420 bad.

00:51:37.700 Satan

00:51:38.240 will buy

00:51:38.700 it.

00:51:39.960 Satan

00:51:40.480 will buy

00:51:40.880 by NFT.

00:51:43.240 Okay,

00:51:43.840 that is

00:51:44.260 funny.

00:51:45.340 So whoever

00:51:45.740 said

00:51:46.440 Okay,

00:51:49.620 that's really

00:51:50.040 funny.

00:51:50.340 Okay,

00:51:50.420 that's really

00:51:51.960 funny.

00:51:52.460 All right,

00:51:58.580 I'm going

00:51:58.780 to be laughing

00:51:59.620 about that

00:52:00.060 all day.

00:52:01.140 That Satan

00:52:01.680 could buy

00:52:02.160 my NFT

00:52:02.800 of myself.

00:52:05.380 That's

00:52:05.920 pretty funny.

00:52:07.720 All right,

00:52:08.400 I got one

00:52:08.800 more question

00:52:09.280 for you.

00:52:10.100 There's

00:52:10.300 some reporting

00:52:12.200 that

00:52:13.360 that is

00:52:16.060 funny.

00:52:16.320 there's

00:52:17.320 some

00:52:17.480 reporting

00:52:17.920 that

00:52:18.360 Bill

00:52:19.180 Gates,

00:52:19.880 as you

00:52:20.260 know,

00:52:20.540 he's

00:52:21.200 separating

00:52:21.740 from his

00:52:22.580 wife of

00:52:24.060 27 years.

00:52:25.300 But there's

00:52:25.820 some reporting

00:52:26.380 in the

00:52:26.720 Daily Mail

00:52:27.220 today

00:52:27.620 that he

00:52:30.780 had an

00:52:31.140 agreement

00:52:31.520 before he

00:52:32.500 got married,

00:52:33.280 he had an

00:52:33.720 agreement with

00:52:34.300 his wife

00:52:34.820 that he

00:52:35.900 could spend

00:52:36.380 the weekend

00:52:37.020 one year

00:52:40.460 a month

00:52:40.900 or one

00:52:42.080 time a year

00:52:42.920 he could spend

00:52:43.540 the weekend

00:52:43.900 with his

00:52:44.300 ex-girlfriend.

00:52:47.560 Now,

00:52:48.500 what do you

00:52:50.940 think of

00:52:51.240 that?

00:52:52.360 Now,

00:52:52.660 apparently,

00:52:53.220 he even

00:52:53.540 asked his

00:52:55.080 ex-girlfriend

00:52:55.880 for permission,

00:52:56.980 and he

00:52:57.520 even used

00:52:58.060 that word,

00:52:59.140 permission to

00:52:59.860 get married

00:53:00.280 to Melinda.

00:53:02.060 And then

00:53:02.620 Melinda

00:53:03.040 agreed that

00:53:04.940 he could

00:53:05.300 spend,

00:53:06.380 I think,

00:53:06.900 a weekend

00:53:07.300 or a week

00:53:08.480 a year

00:53:08.820 or something

00:53:09.200 with his

00:53:10.100 ex-wife,

00:53:10.860 with his

00:53:11.380 ex-girlfriend.

00:53:12.000 What do

00:53:13.860 you think

00:53:14.080 of that?

00:53:17.180 Well,

00:53:18.200 here's my

00:53:19.600 question number

00:53:20.220 one.

00:53:21.400 Let's assume

00:53:22.280 that it was

00:53:23.660 non-sexual.

00:53:25.280 Okay?

00:53:26.340 So,

00:53:27.000 I feel like

00:53:27.480 we can give

00:53:28.040 him the

00:53:28.660 benefit of

00:53:29.280 a doubt

00:53:29.600 that at

00:53:30.840 least everybody

00:53:31.440 assumed it

00:53:32.820 was going to

00:53:33.140 be a

00:53:33.520 non-sexual

00:53:34.280 thing.

00:53:35.020 Because I

00:53:35.360 didn't hear

00:53:35.880 about her

00:53:36.440 husband,

00:53:37.380 the ex-girlfriend's

00:53:38.580 husband,

00:53:39.380 but I think

00:53:39.720 she had one.

00:53:40.520 So I think

00:53:40.860 maybe he was

00:53:41.620 in on it

00:53:42.000 too.

00:53:42.880 So they

00:53:43.880 seem more

00:53:44.360 like,

00:53:44.740 you know,

00:53:45.680 life friends,

00:53:47.680 et cetera.

00:53:48.820 But what

00:53:51.340 do you think

00:53:51.660 of that?

00:53:52.560 Here's my

00:53:53.200 question

00:53:53.560 specifically.

00:53:55.160 Would you

00:53:55.660 consider both

00:53:56.600 his marriage

00:53:57.400 and his

00:53:58.780 ex-girlfriend

00:53:59.600 relationship,

00:54:01.160 would you

00:54:01.860 say that

00:54:02.180 his ex-girlfriend's

00:54:03.140 relationship

00:54:03.620 was,

00:54:04.240 quote,

00:54:05.500 intimate?

00:54:07.740 Not

00:54:08.380 sexually, 0.76

00:54:09.700 but just

00:54:10.700 intimate.

00:54:11.840 Would you

00:54:12.080 say it

00:54:12.280 was

00:54:12.400 intimate?

00:54:13.680 And if

00:54:14.360 he had

00:54:14.700 two

00:54:15.060 intimate

00:54:15.620 relationships,

00:54:17.560 does it,

00:54:19.340 is that

00:54:21.040 marriage?

00:54:22.700 Are you

00:54:23.320 actually

00:54:23.620 married if

00:54:25.100 you have

00:54:25.540 two intimate

00:54:26.520 relationships,

00:54:27.500 but only one

00:54:28.380 of them is

00:54:28.780 physical?

00:54:32.460 I'm just

00:54:33.120 looking at your

00:54:33.600 comments now,

00:54:34.260 because it's

00:54:34.540 kind of

00:54:34.840 fascinating.

00:54:36.120 Well,

00:54:36.320 she's 70

00:54:36.820 years old

00:54:37.380 now,

00:54:37.940 yes,

00:54:38.220 but apparently

00:54:38.780 for 27

00:54:39.840 years they've

00:54:40.500 been getting

00:54:40.880 together once

00:54:41.480 a year.

00:54:43.660 So I'm

00:54:44.300 seeing some

00:54:44.840 yeses,

00:54:45.600 nope,

00:54:46.060 just an

00:54:46.580 affair.

00:54:48.000 Emotional

00:54:48.500 cheating is

00:54:49.140 way worse.

00:54:50.280 We don't

00:54:50.680 know that it

00:54:51.160 was emotional

00:54:51.760 cheating.

00:54:53.120 It wasn't,

00:54:53.660 well,

00:54:53.880 actually it's

00:54:54.320 not cheating

00:54:54.800 because it

00:54:55.600 was above

00:54:56.180 board,

00:54:56.840 right?

00:54:57.600 So here's

00:54:58.320 what we

00:54:58.620 can't call

00:54:59.220 it.

00:54:59.820 I don't

00:55:00.100 think you

00:55:00.400 can call

00:55:00.700 it cheating,

00:55:01.680 because the

00:55:02.480 reporting is

00:55:03.100 that everybody

00:55:03.560 knew everything.

00:55:04.220 there was

00:55:04.940 no deceit

00:55:07.280 going on

00:55:07.860 that we're

00:55:08.300 aware of,

00:55:09.020 right?

00:55:09.620 So it

00:55:10.300 wasn't

00:55:10.660 cheating,

00:55:11.640 but was

00:55:12.780 it two

00:55:13.360 intimate

00:55:13.800 relationships?

00:55:16.360 I would

00:55:16.980 call it

00:55:17.340 intimate.

00:55:17.900 That would

00:55:18.140 be my

00:55:19.080 opinion.

00:55:22.060 And can

00:55:23.860 a marriage

00:55:24.340 survive when

00:55:26.480 there is

00:55:26.900 more than

00:55:27.280 one intimate

00:55:28.000 relationship?

00:55:31.260 I suppose

00:55:32.060 everybody's

00:55:32.560 different.

00:55:34.220 Yeah,

00:55:36.440 I'm looking

00:55:36.720 at your

00:55:37.340 answers are

00:55:37.860 all over

00:55:38.160 the board.

00:55:38.540 It's kind

00:55:38.840 of a,

00:55:39.900 it's quite a

00:55:40.920 mind bender,

00:55:41.800 isn't it?

00:55:42.260 When you

00:55:42.540 figure out how

00:55:43.600 other people

00:55:44.160 live.

00:55:47.780 Somebody says

00:55:48.640 there are

00:55:48.980 open marriages.

00:55:49.880 Yeah,

00:55:50.040 there are

00:55:50.260 open marriages,

00:55:51.340 but again,

00:55:52.140 nobody's lying

00:55:53.060 to anybody,

00:55:53.720 so it's not

00:55:54.200 cheating.

00:55:55.340 But is an

00:55:55.940 open marriage,

00:55:57.460 if it's just

00:55:58.440 sexual,

00:55:59.220 is that

00:55:59.580 intimate?

00:56:01.040 There's a

00:56:01.540 good question.

00:56:02.380 If two

00:56:02.780 people have

00:56:03.460 just a

00:56:04.380 physical

00:56:04.780 encounter,

00:56:06.020 and it

00:56:06.640 doesn't go

00:56:07.060 anywhere else,

00:56:07.720 they're not

00:56:08.020 in love or

00:56:08.480 anything,

00:56:08.860 is it

00:56:09.200 intimate?

00:56:10.620 I guess it

00:56:11.380 is,

00:56:11.640 just because

00:56:12.000 it's

00:56:12.160 physical.

00:56:19.060 Somebody

00:56:19.460 says,

00:56:20.060 this is

00:56:20.420 petty,

00:56:20.840 who cares?

00:56:23.280 Well,

00:56:23.760 I was just

00:56:24.280 interested how

00:56:25.900 close to the

00:56:26.840 public opinion

00:56:27.600 he was.

00:56:28.200 and I

00:56:30.360 got to say,

00:56:30.940 I can't

00:56:32.560 imagine that

00:56:33.120 they stayed

00:56:33.620 married for

00:56:34.620 27 years,

00:56:36.060 because here's

00:56:36.800 what I'm

00:56:37.260 guessing Melinda

00:56:38.900 Gates thought

00:56:39.820 when she

00:56:40.240 agreed to

00:56:40.680 this.

00:56:42.060 Pure

00:56:42.620 speculation,

00:56:43.940 can't read

00:56:44.500 any minds.

00:56:45.680 If you were

00:56:46.380 the wife in

00:56:47.280 this situation,

00:56:48.300 let's say the

00:56:48.980 fiance,

00:56:49.840 and your

00:56:51.640 potential husband

00:56:52.600 said to you,

00:56:53.300 I just want to

00:56:54.140 ask one thing,

00:56:55.420 that once a year

00:56:56.180 I can go off

00:56:56.820 with my

00:56:57.140 ex-girlfriend,

00:56:58.080 we're just

00:56:58.420 friends now,

00:56:59.440 but we're

00:56:59.760 going to

00:56:59.900 spend a

00:57:00.720 week or

00:57:01.040 whatever

00:57:01.300 together.

00:57:03.040 Wouldn't

00:57:03.440 you think,

00:57:04.480 if you were

00:57:04.920 the wife,

00:57:05.580 and let's

00:57:05.920 say you

00:57:06.180 agreed to

00:57:06.720 this deal,

00:57:08.040 would you

00:57:08.480 expect that

00:57:09.080 he'd really

00:57:09.540 do it every

00:57:10.040 year?

00:57:10.980 Or would

00:57:11.580 you expect

00:57:12.120 that he'd

00:57:12.540 do it once,

00:57:14.380 you'd give

00:57:14.860 him tons of

00:57:15.480 attitude when

00:57:16.160 he returned,

00:57:17.540 and then he'd

00:57:18.080 find a reason

00:57:18.600 not to do it

00:57:19.200 again?

00:57:20.620 Because I

00:57:21.200 don't think

00:57:21.660 any wife who 0.99

00:57:22.360 agrees to that

00:57:23.200 think it's

00:57:24.300 really going to

00:57:24.800 last 27 years.

00:57:27.060 I feel like

00:57:28.060 anybody who

00:57:28.560 agreed to

00:57:28.980 that would

00:57:29.400 think,

00:57:30.200 eh, he

00:57:30.700 might do

00:57:31.040 this once or

00:57:31.600 twice, but

00:57:32.360 I'll talk him

00:57:33.340 out of it.

00:57:34.580 And then he

00:57:34.980 did it for

00:57:35.380 27 years.

00:57:36.840 So I don't

00:57:37.460 see how that

00:57:38.040 marriage could

00:57:38.660 have lasted

00:57:39.240 with that

00:57:40.480 situation.

00:57:42.080 Now there's

00:57:42.540 no evidence

00:57:43.020 that that had

00:57:43.560 anything to

00:57:44.060 do with

00:57:44.400 their

00:57:44.600 dissolution,

00:57:45.660 I wouldn't

00:57:46.120 suggest that,

00:57:47.380 but it's a

00:57:48.660 mystery to me

00:57:49.260 how it lasted

00:57:49.760 27 years.

00:57:51.080 That seems

00:57:51.640 like something

00:57:52.080 that should

00:57:52.540 have lasted

00:57:52.920 about seven

00:57:53.580 years, and

00:57:54.820 at that point

00:57:55.640 she would

00:57:56.000 have said,

00:57:56.760 you know,

00:57:57.160 I really

00:57:57.520 thought you

00:57:57.940 were going

00:57:58.200 to stop

00:57:58.980 doing this

00:57:59.540 after a

00:57:59.940 while, but

00:58:01.720 27 years?

00:58:03.460 Every year?

00:58:04.360 I don't think

00:58:04.920 he missed a

00:58:05.340 year.

00:58:06.760 I don't know.

00:58:07.420 I don't know how

00:58:07.840 you stay married

00:58:08.420 in that situation.

00:58:09.620 All right, that's

00:58:10.000 all I got for

00:58:10.400 now, and I'll

00:58:11.000 talk to you

00:58:11.520 tomorrow.

00:58:12.260 Tomorrow.

00:58:12.280 Tomorrow.

00:58:12.320 Tomorrow.

00:58:12.360 Tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 06, 2021

Episode 1367 Scott Adams： Climate Racism, Tucker and Vaccinations, Facebook Trump Ban Fake News, Weaponized Virus and More

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript