Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 11, 2021


Episode 1372 Scott Adams： Pipeline Hackers, Tiger Loose in Houston, China Persuasion Game, More Fun


Episode Stats

Length

45 minutes

Words per Minute

147.53204

Word Count

6,761

Sentence Count

440

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

31


Summary

Comedian Michael Che is being accused of cultural misappropriation, and Great Britain wants to pass a law that could ban wokeness from universities. Also, Mark Wilkinson's birthday is coming up, and Scott Adams talks about the dopamine hit of the day: the simultaneous sip.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Well, let me just say this.
00:00:01.760 If you're wondering, Scott, do you only own maybe two T-shirts?
00:00:07.740 And do you wear them every day?
00:00:09.600 No, I bought a pile of T-shirts, many of them the same colors.
00:00:14.120 So if you see me looking exactly the same, well, that's because I'm lazy.
00:00:19.180 And I just buy piles of the same thing and then just wear them.
00:00:23.380 But that's not why you're here.
00:00:25.400 No, that's not why you're here.
00:00:26.680 However, you're here because you would like to enjoy the simultaneous sip with people all over the world.
00:00:34.560 And all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of Tinker Chels, a steiner, a canteen, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:39.700 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:42.440 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:45.900 Unparalleled, I say.
00:00:47.320 The dopamine hit of the day.
00:00:49.300 Of the day, I say.
00:00:50.980 It's called the simultaneous sip.
00:00:52.940 And I know that people all over the world are scurrying.
00:00:55.780 Scurrying like happy little chipmunks to grab their vessels to join me now in the simultaneous sip.
00:01:03.500 Go.
00:01:08.220 Oh, you did that really well.
00:01:10.440 I think you nailed it.
00:01:12.100 Good job, everybody.
00:01:13.260 Good job.
00:01:13.900 Happy birthday, Mark Wilkinson.
00:01:19.280 And the rest of you, happy birthday to you.
00:01:22.740 I don't know if it's your birthday, but I'm sure you have one this year.
00:01:27.780 Let's talk about all the stuff.
00:01:29.600 In my favorite category of the left eats itself,
00:01:32.620 Michael Che, who is getting some trouble for cultural misappropriation or cultural appropriation.
00:01:43.620 So, I guess Michael Che, who happens to be black, which is important to this story,
00:01:50.720 is being accused of writing a skit in which somebody uses, there's a word for it,
00:01:57.520 black cultural lingo or whatever it is.
00:02:01.440 Now, of course, it was Elon Musk who was speaking the words,
00:02:06.380 but it was actually written by a black guy who's getting in trouble for writing things
00:02:11.840 like a black guy would write something.
00:02:15.620 So, when I say like a black guy, I mean he was writing it from knowledge.
00:02:22.820 So, this reminds me of one of my favorite scenes on YouTube with Norm Macdonald.
00:02:31.180 I've told you before, I got obsessed watching Norm Macdonald clips on YouTube.
00:02:37.440 You can just line them up and watch one after another.
00:02:40.540 And there's something much funnier if you watch all of his clips,
00:02:44.240 because the thing that Norm Macdonald does, you know, he tells individual jokes,
00:02:50.060 but there's always a larger joke that's just above the jokes.
00:02:54.320 And if you don't see a lot of them, you don't get the larger context that the individual,
00:02:59.720 a lot of them are just dad jokes and stuff.
00:03:02.040 But if you don't see that the real joke is the layer above the joke,
00:03:06.520 you're missing the whole show.
00:03:08.640 And one of the clips that makes me laugh every time I see it
00:03:12.940 is he was doing a weekend update when he was doing that for Saturday Night Live,
00:03:17.800 however many years ago that was.
00:03:19.680 And he does one of his jokes, and it's like super sexist.
00:03:26.800 And the audience is like, whoa, I can't believe you said that.
00:03:29.920 It doesn't matter what the joke is.
00:03:31.120 And then Norm says, well, that joke was written by a woman.
00:03:37.420 He goes, now you don't know what the hell to do, do you?
00:03:40.660 It's one of the greatest lines ever.
00:03:42.980 Now you don't know what the hell to do, do you?
00:03:45.120 Because as soon as you realize that it wasn't him who wrote the joke,
00:03:48.360 it was a woman who wrote the joke,
00:03:49.960 your head goes, ah, okay, now I don't know what to think.
00:03:53.920 It was a great moment in comedy.
00:03:55.380 Great Britain is looking to pass some kind of law to cancel cancel culture.
00:04:06.080 So it's actually a war on wokeness over there in Great Britain.
00:04:09.660 So the idea is that people denied a platform by universities
00:04:15.080 will be able to sue them, I guess, in court.
00:04:20.300 So if a university says you're the wrong kind of person
00:04:23.420 because of your politics or whatever,
00:04:25.080 and you're denied from a university,
00:04:27.300 should this become law,
00:04:29.440 I guess you could do something about it.
00:04:31.480 Now, I always tell you that the slippery slope
00:04:35.460 doesn't slip forever.
00:04:38.320 There's usually a counterforce that pops up,
00:04:40.900 and this would be an example.
00:04:43.300 So the example of Michael Che being almost cancelled
00:04:48.280 for just being himself, basically.
00:04:51.520 And then, you know, that shows you
00:04:55.080 how ridiculous the wokeness thing has gotten.
00:04:58.140 Then you see the Great Britain
00:05:00.420 literally passing a law against it like it's a crime.
00:05:04.440 Like wokeness has achieved the level of criminal behavior.
00:05:10.260 Just think about that.
00:05:12.580 Wokeness, the discrimination against people
00:05:15.560 for what they say or think,
00:05:17.400 will have reached criminal proportions
00:05:21.580 if Great Britain passes this law.
00:05:25.260 Think about that.
00:05:27.440 Criminal proportions.
00:05:30.900 Somebody says it is criminal.
00:05:32.400 I suppose in some ways it is.
00:05:34.800 Here's a vaccination update.
00:05:36.300 46% of the U.S. population
00:05:39.280 has received at least one dose.
00:05:41.200 Now, that's way better than it sounds
00:05:45.060 because the 46% who got the one dose
00:05:48.280 does not include children, right?
00:05:51.440 So this is a completely misleading statistic.
00:05:55.720 What this should say
00:05:56.760 is that what percentage of people over, let's say, 70
00:06:00.920 got the vaccination
00:06:02.840 because it's way up there, right?
00:06:04.480 The number of people over 70
00:06:05.940 because that's basically the whole story, right?
00:06:10.600 If you get all the over 70s vaccinated,
00:06:13.340 your rate of death goes down 95%.
00:06:17.520 Can somebody help me on that number?
00:06:20.160 It'd be in that range, right?
00:06:21.720 90% at least.
00:06:24.580 So I think seeing 46% of the total population
00:06:28.720 is a completely misleading number.
00:06:32.020 And 32% have been fully vaccinated.
00:06:34.580 But again, that's going to be the older people.
00:06:37.920 I asked this question on Twitter
00:06:40.240 in a highly unscientific poll.
00:06:42.060 I said, how do you feel after the first vaccination?
00:06:46.600 Now, in some cases, you only need one.
00:06:48.900 But I wondered how people felt,
00:06:51.500 just psychologically, not physically.
00:06:54.120 But psychologically, do you feel better
00:06:56.080 after getting the first shot?
00:06:58.760 Or do you feel scared?
00:07:00.720 Well, I did get my first shot last week.
00:07:06.480 And the reason I asked is because I feel better.
00:07:10.820 Meaning that my mental feeling
00:07:15.540 when I'm just around people has improved.
00:07:19.460 And I would say substantially, actually.
00:07:21.740 So if you're trying to decide
00:07:26.000 whether getting the vaccination
00:07:27.700 will make you feel better or feel worse,
00:07:31.500 like more scared or less scared,
00:07:33.840 the people who took it said
00:07:36.560 that about a quarter of them,
00:07:38.000 I'm going to round off here quite a bit,
00:07:39.600 but about a quarter of them said
00:07:41.220 they're more afraid
00:07:42.620 after getting the vaccination.
00:07:46.240 I don't know.
00:07:46.920 Do you think you'd be one of those people?
00:07:48.640 More afraid after you got a vaccination.
00:07:51.580 About a quarter of the people are more relieved.
00:07:54.100 I'm closer to 30%.
00:07:56.020 I'm in that category.
00:07:57.720 I'm relieved.
00:08:00.020 And about half the people say no different,
00:08:02.260 which you'd expect.
00:08:04.000 So if you're wondering,
00:08:05.400 should I get the vaccination?
00:08:07.440 I would look at this.
00:08:09.080 Quarter of the people feel better.
00:08:11.200 I think you know which category you'd be in.
00:08:13.380 Now, this brings us to
00:08:16.280 an important risk management question.
00:08:20.320 Now, let's see if you can get this one right.
00:08:23.940 How do you incorporate the risk
00:08:27.680 of something completely unknown,
00:08:30.520 such as long-term vaccination side effects?
00:08:35.040 If you don't want to get the vaccination,
00:08:37.820 it's because you're afraid of the long-term effects.
00:08:41.220 I don't think that anybody looks at the short-term risk
00:08:46.020 and thinks that that's greater
00:08:48.020 than the risk of the virus itself.
00:08:50.420 Because you all know that, right?
00:08:52.320 If you're not dying in the first 10 minutes
00:08:54.480 or first two weeks,
00:08:55.960 if it doesn't get you in the first two weeks,
00:08:59.800 and even that's a safer risk
00:09:01.700 than not getting the vaccination,
00:09:03.180 according to what we know.
00:09:04.500 If it doesn't get you right away,
00:09:06.560 what are the odds it's going to get you
00:09:07.860 in the long-term?
00:09:08.580 And how do you calculate the risk-reward?
00:09:12.200 Well, I just interacted with somebody on Twitter
00:09:15.180 who felt that the unknown
00:09:17.680 was big enough to not get the vaccination.
00:09:22.180 How do you know how big the unknown is?
00:09:26.800 And I'm going to be looking at your answers
00:09:28.420 as they go by.
00:09:29.640 Because this is a tough one.
00:09:31.580 If you talk to the best risk management person
00:09:34.520 in the world,
00:09:35.860 or several of them,
00:09:37.240 would they even approach this the same way?
00:09:40.180 And I actually don't know the answer to that.
00:09:42.200 But I'll tell you how I approach it.
00:09:44.440 Okay?
00:09:45.260 Now, again,
00:09:46.580 I think people can approach this differently.
00:09:48.760 I'll just give you my risk management approach.
00:09:52.260 And remember,
00:09:53.700 none of this
00:09:54.620 is to suggest that you should do
00:09:56.720 or not do anything.
00:09:58.400 Right?
00:09:58.760 So this is not about you.
00:09:59.960 This is about you learning
00:10:02.100 some risk management technique.
00:10:05.640 What you do with it is all you.
00:10:07.480 Okay?
00:10:08.000 There's no persuasion
00:10:09.260 about vaccinations happening here.
00:10:11.480 If it feels like it,
00:10:12.980 turn that off.
00:10:14.380 You get to make your own decision.
00:10:16.400 No exceptions.
00:10:18.240 All right?
00:10:19.920 Here's how I do it.
00:10:20.980 There is a category of unknowns
00:10:23.860 that are completely unknown.
00:10:27.600 And then there's a category of unknowns
00:10:29.260 that fit into,
00:10:30.700 let's say,
00:10:31.640 a category,
00:10:34.540 another category,
00:10:35.760 which you can say something about the category,
00:10:38.360 but you can't know anything about
00:10:40.000 the things in it specifically.
00:10:41.880 Let me be more clear than that
00:10:43.840 because that wasn't very good.
00:10:44.860 We do know from experts
00:10:48.920 about the general risk of vaccinations,
00:10:52.440 generally speaking,
00:10:54.100 in the long run
00:10:55.040 because there have been
00:10:56.580 lots of different vaccinations
00:10:57.760 and lots of experts.
00:10:59.700 What the experts say
00:11:00.940 is that the long-term risk
00:11:03.640 is trivial.
00:11:06.960 Now, could they be wrong?
00:11:08.440 And if they were wrong,
00:11:10.280 could you die?
00:11:12.240 Yeah.
00:11:13.260 Yeah.
00:11:13.600 They could be wrong
00:11:14.920 and you could die
00:11:16.580 or get a terrible health problem.
00:11:19.320 But what are the odds of that?
00:11:21.140 Let me tell you
00:11:21.940 what else could happen.
00:11:24.420 In Houston,
00:11:25.580 there's a tiger
00:11:26.420 that's running free.
00:11:28.500 Literally,
00:11:29.180 a guy who had his own pet tiger
00:11:30.920 got arrested
00:11:31.560 and the tiger is out
00:11:33.380 wandering the streets.
00:11:35.460 Now,
00:11:35.920 that tiger
00:11:36.620 could come upon somebody
00:11:39.360 who's on their way
00:11:40.160 to get a vaccination
00:11:41.020 and the tiger
00:11:42.940 could kill somebody
00:11:44.040 who was going
00:11:45.400 to get a vaccination
00:11:46.560 because they left
00:11:47.600 the house to do it,
00:11:49.040 whereas if they had
00:11:49.900 never left the house,
00:11:51.800 the tiger could never
00:11:52.780 even find them
00:11:53.660 and kill them.
00:11:55.360 So,
00:11:56.040 if you were in Houston
00:11:57.600 and you were trying
00:11:58.300 to decide
00:11:58.840 whether to get
00:11:59.460 a vaccination today,
00:12:01.440 should you include
00:12:02.560 in your risk management
00:12:04.180 the odds of the tiger
00:12:06.080 getting you
00:12:07.160 because you left the house?
00:12:08.280 in the comments,
00:12:09.080 tell me,
00:12:09.740 should you consider it?
00:12:11.760 Because if the tiger
00:12:12.820 kills you,
00:12:14.000 you're dead.
00:12:15.660 I mean,
00:12:15.960 you're just dead.
00:12:17.460 That's the ultimate risk.
00:12:20.040 So,
00:12:20.580 should you include
00:12:21.600 the tiger risk
00:12:22.500 when you decide
00:12:23.720 to get your vaccinations?
00:12:25.240 Why not?
00:12:26.080 I'm seeing people say,
00:12:27.060 no.
00:12:27.980 It's a real risk.
00:12:30.020 If you're in Houston,
00:12:31.220 you don't know
00:12:31.940 where the tiger is.
00:12:33.060 It's unknown.
00:12:34.380 It's an unknown risk
00:12:35.820 that could kill you.
00:12:38.220 And it's real.
00:12:39.720 It's not imaginary.
00:12:41.540 It's a real tiger.
00:12:43.020 I didn't make that up,
00:12:43.840 by the way.
00:12:44.220 It's a real tiger.
00:12:45.540 Today,
00:12:45.920 there's an actual tiger
00:12:46.980 loose in Houston.
00:12:48.980 It's real.
00:12:51.800 So,
00:12:52.420 I'm looking at
00:12:53.000 your answers.
00:12:53.760 It's a tough one,
00:12:55.600 isn't it?
00:12:56.760 Because the risk
00:12:57.840 of getting killed
00:12:58.740 by that tiger,
00:13:00.220 if you go outdoors
00:13:01.260 in Houston today,
00:13:03.100 is probably higher
00:13:04.760 than the risk
00:13:05.360 of having a side effect
00:13:06.480 from the vaccination.
00:13:08.800 But we don't know.
00:13:10.920 Don't know.
00:13:12.360 Right?
00:13:13.100 So,
00:13:13.680 here's my general advice
00:13:15.300 on risk management.
00:13:18.040 If a risk
00:13:19.140 is so unknown,
00:13:22.220 but also experts say
00:13:23.780 it's not the kind
00:13:24.620 that you necessarily
00:13:25.360 need to worry about,
00:13:27.160 don't include it
00:13:28.320 in your calculation.
00:13:29.940 So,
00:13:30.220 I would say
00:13:30.580 don't include the tiger.
00:13:32.700 Don't include
00:13:33.520 the risk of driving.
00:13:35.360 Because you can die
00:13:36.100 in your car,
00:13:36.700 right?
00:13:37.260 So,
00:13:37.600 that's a risk
00:13:38.140 if you've got
00:13:38.560 to get the vaccination.
00:13:40.020 Don't include the risk
00:13:41.080 of,
00:13:41.440 let's say,
00:13:42.040 if you went to
00:13:42.900 a medical facility,
00:13:44.660 often you can get
00:13:45.920 an infection
00:13:46.440 just by being
00:13:47.140 in a hospital.
00:13:48.460 I wouldn't count it
00:13:49.240 because it's so small.
00:13:50.840 What are the odds
00:13:51.440 that you would be hit
00:13:52.100 by the rocket debris
00:13:53.940 from a Chinese rocket
00:13:56.520 that's coming back
00:13:57.420 into Earth's atmosphere?
00:13:59.400 I wouldn't count it.
00:14:02.320 It's a real risk.
00:14:03.660 There is actual debris.
00:14:05.740 There are actual meteors
00:14:07.080 that fall to Earth
00:14:08.160 and could kill you.
00:14:10.160 But I wouldn't count it
00:14:11.520 because all of that,
00:14:13.340 all the stuff
00:14:14.000 that's so remote,
00:14:15.880 I just round it to zero.
00:14:18.340 So,
00:14:18.840 here's my advice.
00:14:20.080 If the experts tell you
00:14:21.680 that a type of risk
00:14:22.900 is in the category
00:14:24.360 of things
00:14:25.020 that the experts say
00:14:26.180 is so small
00:14:27.300 you could ignore it
00:14:28.320 for this particular decision,
00:14:30.560 probably ignore it,
00:14:32.340 just like you would
00:14:33.320 ignore the tiger,
00:14:34.400 just like you ignore
00:14:35.260 the car ride risks,
00:14:37.340 just like you ignore
00:14:38.620 space debris
00:14:39.900 falling on your head.
00:14:41.700 Anything could happen,
00:14:43.480 but they're so small
00:14:45.160 that you should ignore them.
00:14:47.440 Somebody says
00:14:48.260 you're underestimating
00:14:49.300 the probability.
00:14:50.840 Keep in mind
00:14:51.620 that the probability
00:14:52.920 cannot be estimated.
00:14:54.440 What are your personal odds
00:14:57.840 of being killed
00:14:58.360 by the tiger in Houston?
00:15:00.620 Not the same
00:15:01.500 as anybody else's.
00:15:03.140 Even if you could estimate
00:15:04.360 the odds of everybody,
00:15:06.540 you know,
00:15:06.760 all people being killed
00:15:07.860 by the tiger,
00:15:09.080 you can't estimate
00:15:10.180 your odds
00:15:10.900 because that tiger
00:15:12.340 could be sitting
00:15:13.020 on your doorstep.
00:15:14.700 You might be the only one
00:15:16.080 who's close to the tiger
00:15:17.260 while it's hungry,
00:15:19.020 right?
00:15:19.780 So,
00:15:20.560 any general risk
00:15:22.240 doesn't apply to you.
00:15:23.280 your risk is you.
00:15:25.200 So,
00:15:25.720 it's a complete unknown,
00:15:27.500 but I would say
00:15:28.580 if the experts
00:15:29.520 were warning you
00:15:30.380 that it was a problem,
00:15:31.700 then I would take it seriously.
00:15:33.320 If the experts say
00:15:34.460 it's in the class
00:15:35.400 of things you don't
00:15:36.160 need to worry about
00:15:37.040 after the first two weeks,
00:15:39.320 because that's when
00:15:39.920 side effects tend
00:15:41.000 to represent themselves,
00:15:43.340 I would say
00:15:45.700 all of those risks
00:15:46.500 I would discount to zero.
00:15:47.540 but if you can find
00:15:49.380 a risk management expert
00:15:50.800 who disagrees with me,
00:15:53.340 or you can find
00:15:54.000 a better way
00:15:54.460 to calculate the risks,
00:15:56.380 then I would say
00:15:57.360 do it.
00:15:58.860 But that's where I am
00:15:59.780 on those things
00:16:00.920 that can't be calculated.
00:16:02.300 Did I see a headline
00:16:03.460 that said that
00:16:04.060 the California budget
00:16:05.200 had a surplus
00:16:07.060 of 75 billion?
00:16:08.520 I feel like
00:16:10.460 I hallucinated that
00:16:11.580 because I saw
00:16:12.880 that headline
00:16:13.380 and then I didn't see
00:16:14.280 any news reports on it.
00:16:15.580 Is that real?
00:16:16.800 California budget
00:16:17.780 had a 75 billion dollars
00:16:19.580 extra?
00:16:22.120 Did that really happen?
00:16:25.560 Now,
00:16:26.180 is that just
00:16:27.100 because they got
00:16:27.620 federal money?
00:16:29.720 Because the other thing
00:16:30.840 that's true
00:16:31.340 is apparently
00:16:32.040 we're going to run
00:16:33.320 out of electricity
00:16:34.120 like we always do,
00:16:35.220 and also
00:16:36.800 the forests
00:16:38.260 are going to catch
00:16:38.820 on fire again
00:16:39.580 because we haven't
00:16:41.000 cleaned out
00:16:41.480 the underbrush
00:16:42.280 and apparently
00:16:43.140 it's the driest
00:16:43.960 and worst
00:16:44.400 it's ever been.
00:16:46.160 So any moment now
00:16:47.340 the whole state's
00:16:48.020 going to go up
00:16:48.520 in smoke
00:16:49.040 just like last year.
00:16:50.440 Last year
00:16:50.840 you couldn't even
00:16:51.340 go outdoors
00:16:51.860 for months.
00:16:53.220 Couldn't go outdoors?
00:16:55.020 You couldn't go outdoors
00:16:56.600 for months
00:16:58.600 in California
00:17:00.100 last year
00:17:00.740 and this year
00:17:01.260 is supposed to be worse.
00:17:02.700 And he's thinking
00:17:03.360 about using this
00:17:04.320 for,
00:17:04.820 I don't know,
00:17:05.220 extra stimulus checks
00:17:06.960 or something
00:17:07.420 and I'm thinking
00:17:08.380 to myself
00:17:08.920 I feel like
00:17:10.400 we should throw
00:17:11.120 a few billion
00:17:11.980 at hiring
00:17:13.480 all the unemployed
00:17:14.380 people to go
00:17:15.320 clear the underbrush
00:17:16.420 because are you
00:17:17.700 telling me
00:17:18.280 are you telling me
00:17:20.840 that we don't
00:17:21.680 need to do it
00:17:22.420 or that we can't
00:17:23.260 find bodies?
00:17:24.540 We have the money.
00:17:26.320 You have hordes
00:17:27.260 of unemployed
00:17:27.820 people allegedly
00:17:28.960 and you have
00:17:30.640 all this money
00:17:31.260 and you have
00:17:32.120 exactly the task
00:17:33.300 that is most
00:17:34.080 important for them
00:17:34.840 to do
00:17:35.300 clearing the
00:17:36.620 underbrush.
00:17:38.260 I feel like
00:17:38.940 this is
00:17:39.540 quite an
00:17:40.740 opportunity here
00:17:41.540 but I guess
00:17:42.340 he's just going
00:17:42.820 to issue
00:17:43.100 checks
00:17:43.520 because that
00:17:43.920 would be
00:17:44.220 politically
00:17:44.740 expedient.
00:17:50.480 Let's see,
00:17:51.180 the AP is
00:17:51.800 reporting that
00:17:52.420 China has
00:17:53.020 opened up
00:17:53.400 a new front
00:17:54.120 for persuasion.
00:17:56.040 I guess they
00:17:56.420 got lots of
00:17:57.100 Twitter fake
00:17:57.860 accounts.
00:17:59.140 Twitter is
00:17:59.600 fighting hard
00:18:00.220 to identify
00:18:01.060 and get rid
00:18:02.020 of them
00:18:02.300 but they
00:18:03.200 just sign
00:18:03.940 up more.
00:18:05.020 So there
00:18:05.300 are tens
00:18:05.580 of thousands
00:18:06.060 of these
00:18:06.540 fake accounts
00:18:07.420 and hundreds
00:18:08.540 of thousands
00:18:09.080 of tweets
00:18:09.660 and retweets
00:18:10.360 and stuff
00:18:10.800 and I guess
00:18:15.440 it was
00:18:15.820 inevitable.
00:18:16.980 I mean,
00:18:17.240 why would
00:18:17.760 China not
00:18:18.480 do this?
00:18:19.740 There's no
00:18:20.400 reason in the
00:18:20.940 world for them
00:18:21.500 to not do
00:18:22.160 this.
00:18:22.660 They should
00:18:22.980 do this.
00:18:23.640 It's just
00:18:24.040 an obvious
00:18:24.460 thing to do.
00:18:25.000 So we
00:18:27.000 should expect
00:18:27.480 more of
00:18:27.860 that.
00:18:29.060 So in
00:18:29.420 my favorite
00:18:30.320 category of
00:18:32.600 news,
00:18:33.520 there's a
00:18:33.880 whole bunch
00:18:34.180 of stuff
00:18:34.560 happening in
00:18:35.200 the how
00:18:36.200 to build
00:18:36.620 a cheap
00:18:37.160 house
00:18:37.760 category.
00:18:39.080 Now when
00:18:39.480 I say
00:18:39.780 cheap,
00:18:40.220 I don't
00:18:40.520 mean crappy.
00:18:42.300 I mean
00:18:42.660 cheap as
00:18:43.180 in it did
00:18:43.580 not cost
00:18:44.080 you many
00:18:44.480 dollars,
00:18:45.200 but you
00:18:45.600 got an
00:18:45.900 awesome
00:18:46.120 house.
00:18:47.620 If you've
00:18:48.280 ever looked
00:18:48.660 at how
00:18:48.980 homes are
00:18:49.720 built,
00:18:50.900 you would
00:18:51.280 know that
00:18:51.700 the inefficiency
00:18:52.480 in the system
00:18:53.500 from beginning
00:18:54.120 to end
00:18:54.560 is
00:18:55.220 extraordinary.
00:18:57.140 Like the
00:18:57.720 entire
00:18:58.220 approval,
00:19:00.440 housing codes
00:19:02.100 all the way
00:19:02.620 through the
00:19:03.220 final
00:19:03.840 construction,
00:19:06.140 everything about
00:19:06.980 that industry
00:19:07.700 is completely
00:19:09.140 inefficient and
00:19:10.160 wrong.
00:19:11.120 I mean
00:19:11.340 you're using
00:19:11.840 materials that
00:19:12.700 have been
00:19:12.840 shipped from
00:19:13.320 the other
00:19:13.620 side of
00:19:13.940 the earth,
00:19:14.940 everything's
00:19:15.460 cut to
00:19:17.040 specific
00:19:18.120 models,
00:19:19.420 there's no
00:19:20.020 such thing
00:19:20.560 as engineering
00:19:21.360 a well
00:19:22.420 designed home
00:19:23.120 that everybody
00:19:23.580 can live in.
00:19:24.160 I mean
00:19:24.520 the whole
00:19:24.700 thing's
00:19:24.940 a complete
00:19:25.580 mess because
00:19:26.980 of the
00:19:27.260 dynamics of
00:19:27.980 the marketplace
00:19:28.480 and what
00:19:29.120 people can
00:19:29.600 sell and
00:19:30.200 what the
00:19:30.920 buyers know,
00:19:32.500 etc.
00:19:33.160 A simple
00:19:34.420 example is
00:19:35.920 that it
00:19:37.100 would be
00:19:37.460 easy for
00:19:38.220 a builder
00:19:38.680 to build
00:19:40.000 a closet
00:19:40.640 exactly where
00:19:41.940 you need
00:19:42.340 it,
00:19:42.980 but the
00:19:44.100 buyer of
00:19:44.560 the house
00:19:44.900 doesn't know
00:19:45.460 that the
00:19:45.800 closet isn't
00:19:46.500 there because
00:19:47.480 they don't
00:19:47.680 really notice.
00:19:48.820 They look at
00:19:49.260 the house and
00:19:49.900 it's beautiful
00:19:50.400 and they say,
00:19:50.900 oh, it's in
00:19:51.260 the right
00:19:51.480 location,
00:19:52.540 schools are
00:19:53.100 good,
00:19:53.300 they buy
00:19:53.700 it.
00:19:54.780 So houses
00:19:55.500 are not
00:19:55.920 designed for
00:19:56.520 the way you
00:19:56.940 live,
00:19:57.940 they're designed
00:19:58.760 that when you
00:19:59.180 stand in it
00:19:59.800 and look around
00:20:00.360 you go,
00:20:00.860 whoa, this
00:20:01.280 looks cool,
00:20:02.280 I want to
00:20:02.740 live here.
00:20:03.840 That's it.
00:20:05.180 So there's
00:20:06.000 not even any
00:20:06.880 attempt to
00:20:09.260 make a
00:20:09.680 well designed
00:20:10.320 home.
00:20:12.200 Think about
00:20:12.840 that.
00:20:14.260 That's a big
00:20:15.040 statement, isn't
00:20:15.620 it?
00:20:15.840 Every one of
00:20:16.380 us lives in,
00:20:17.260 you know,
00:20:17.580 not every one
00:20:18.260 of us,
00:20:18.600 unfortunately,
00:20:19.400 most of us
00:20:20.000 live in some
00:20:20.500 kind of a
00:20:20.880 home,
00:20:21.380 be it an
00:20:21.880 apartment or
00:20:22.560 a house.
00:20:24.280 Nobody,
00:20:25.720 as far as
00:20:26.580 I know,
00:20:28.040 nobody in
00:20:28.940 that part of
00:20:29.740 the industry
00:20:30.200 is putting
00:20:31.180 any attention
00:20:32.000 into designing
00:20:33.560 a home the
00:20:34.460 way you'd want
00:20:34.980 to live in
00:20:35.320 it.
00:20:36.280 Do you
00:20:36.840 believe that?
00:20:38.060 If you don't
00:20:38.760 believe it,
00:20:39.500 just tour any
00:20:40.300 home and
00:20:41.940 stand there
00:20:42.420 and say,
00:20:42.940 does this work
00:20:43.960 for the way
00:20:44.420 anybody lives?
00:20:46.200 Not even
00:20:46.580 close.
00:20:47.940 Right?
00:20:48.200 Just ask
00:20:48.660 yourself what
00:20:49.120 you do all
00:20:49.700 day and
00:20:50.960 then look at
00:20:51.420 the home and
00:20:52.600 say if it
00:20:53.000 matches.
00:20:53.840 It won't
00:20:54.260 even be
00:20:54.620 close.
00:20:56.740 Here's a
00:20:57.280 small example.
00:20:58.580 How many
00:20:59.020 of you own
00:20:59.600 pets?
00:21:02.480 Most of
00:21:03.100 you,
00:21:03.300 right?
00:21:03.760 Probably at
00:21:04.240 least two
00:21:04.620 thirds of
00:21:05.080 you own
00:21:05.420 a pet.
00:21:06.760 Was your
00:21:07.260 home designed
00:21:08.280 with a pet
00:21:09.680 door?
00:21:11.100 No.
00:21:12.100 Was your
00:21:12.660 home designed
00:21:13.300 with a place
00:21:14.020 that's obvious
00:21:14.640 where the
00:21:15.160 dog's food
00:21:16.740 would be
00:21:17.240 or the
00:21:17.740 cat's cat
00:21:18.340 box?
00:21:19.520 No.
00:21:21.040 Two thirds
00:21:21.920 of people
00:21:22.280 have pets.
00:21:23.920 Zero
00:21:24.420 homes are
00:21:25.220 designed
00:21:25.860 with a
00:21:26.700 pet in
00:21:27.040 mind.
00:21:28.260 Right?
00:21:30.900 Now,
00:21:31.620 I've seen
00:21:32.140 a few.
00:21:32.900 I've seen
00:21:33.360 a model
00:21:34.280 home with
00:21:34.880 a dog
00:21:36.000 shower in
00:21:37.520 it.
00:21:38.320 But they're
00:21:38.680 not even
00:21:40.000 trying to
00:21:40.900 design these
00:21:41.560 things the
00:21:42.740 way a
00:21:43.080 modern person
00:21:43.720 lives.
00:21:44.640 In my
00:21:45.880 house,
00:21:46.640 I designed
00:21:47.140 this house
00:21:47.620 12 years
00:21:48.380 ago,
00:21:48.960 and it's
00:21:50.000 got a
00:21:50.320 TV in
00:21:50.920 almost every
00:21:51.520 room.
00:21:53.060 TV in
00:21:53.940 almost every
00:21:54.520 room.
00:21:54.820 I think I
00:21:55.200 have 14
00:21:57.640 televisions.
00:21:59.520 How many
00:22:00.380 televisions do
00:22:01.760 all of us
00:22:02.660 who live
00:22:03.020 here watch
00:22:03.920 in any
00:22:04.480 given day?
00:22:06.700 None.
00:22:07.860 None.
00:22:08.820 People don't
00:22:09.420 watch television
00:22:10.140 anymore.
00:22:10.960 We watch it
00:22:11.660 on our
00:22:11.960 devices.
00:22:12.340 So if
00:22:13.740 I'm going
00:22:14.020 to watch
00:22:14.360 something in
00:22:14.780 the house,
00:22:15.300 I've got
00:22:15.600 headphones in
00:22:16.380 and I'm
00:22:17.240 watching it
00:22:17.640 on my
00:22:17.940 phone or
00:22:18.400 my iPad.
00:22:20.360 It used
00:22:20.960 to be that
00:22:21.380 I wanted
00:22:21.720 the big
00:22:22.080 screen because
00:22:23.220 CGI and
00:22:24.420 action movies.
00:22:25.620 But since
00:22:26.060 action movies
00:22:26.680 all look
00:22:27.080 alike, I
00:22:28.620 usually fast
00:22:29.320 forward during
00:22:29.900 the action
00:22:30.300 scenes.
00:22:31.460 Am I the
00:22:31.880 only one who
00:22:32.280 does that?
00:22:33.180 When I watch
00:22:33.780 an action
00:22:34.320 movie, like
00:22:35.100 a superhero
00:22:35.720 movie, and
00:22:37.260 it gets to
00:22:37.660 the fight
00:22:38.060 scene, I
00:22:39.160 just fast
00:22:39.660 forward through
00:22:40.140 the fight
00:22:40.520 scene, because
00:22:42.060 it's just
00:22:42.440 this.
00:22:44.080 I don't
00:22:44.700 need to
00:22:44.940 watch that.
00:22:46.420 Things are
00:22:46.940 moving, and
00:22:48.180 hero gets
00:22:49.160 hit and
00:22:49.620 then hits
00:22:49.980 back.
00:22:50.780 There's
00:22:51.180 nothing there.
00:22:52.500 The other
00:22:53.140 thing that I
00:22:53.680 fast forward
00:22:54.220 through is
00:22:55.280 any kind
00:22:55.740 of a love
00:22:56.520 scene.
00:22:57.600 In the
00:22:57.740 beginning of
00:22:58.340 a movie,
00:23:00.660 where they're
00:23:01.040 trying to
00:23:01.420 show that
00:23:01.800 these two
00:23:02.240 actors are
00:23:03.060 really two
00:23:03.520 people very
00:23:04.180 much in
00:23:04.620 love, and
00:23:05.720 they do
00:23:06.020 the sickeningly
00:23:07.120 sweet thing
00:23:07.940 so that you
00:23:08.920 can understand
00:23:09.560 they're really
00:23:10.040 in love,
00:23:10.540 because one
00:23:10.860 of them is
00:23:11.180 going to
00:23:11.400 die pretty
00:23:11.820 soon.
00:23:13.520 Fast forward.
00:23:15.000 Okay, we've
00:23:15.680 got ten minutes
00:23:16.520 of them
00:23:17.180 acting sickeningly
00:23:18.900 sweet to each
00:23:19.640 other that I
00:23:20.240 don't want to
00:23:20.680 see, all for
00:23:22.000 the purpose of
00:23:22.660 telling me that
00:23:23.680 these two people
00:23:24.380 really like each
00:23:25.200 other, and the
00:23:26.100 reason for that
00:23:26.840 is so that when
00:23:27.500 one of them
00:23:28.020 dies, I, as
00:23:29.440 the viewer,
00:23:30.260 will feel bad.
00:23:32.660 Why am I
00:23:33.380 going to watch
00:23:33.840 that?
00:23:34.980 Fast forward,
00:23:35.980 I got it.
00:23:37.100 Next scene,
00:23:37.760 somebody who's
00:23:39.660 tied to a
00:23:40.180 chair, and
00:23:40.780 they're going
00:23:41.060 to be
00:23:41.280 tortured.
00:23:42.120 I got it.
00:23:42.780 They're tough.
00:23:43.420 They can get
00:23:43.900 through it.
00:23:44.960 Fast forward,
00:23:45.720 torture is
00:23:46.220 over.
00:23:47.200 Car chase
00:23:47.880 scene.
00:23:49.580 There's going
00:23:50.160 to be a
00:23:50.440 car that's
00:23:51.040 going really
00:23:51.500 fast and
00:23:52.060 almost have
00:23:52.700 an accident.
00:23:53.800 Fast forward,
00:23:54.560 car chase
00:23:54.980 scene.
00:23:56.340 Why would
00:23:57.020 you need a
00:23:57.460 big screen to
00:23:58.300 watch anything?
00:24:00.180 There's no
00:24:00.800 reason for a
00:24:01.400 big screen.
00:24:02.400 The Hollywood
00:24:03.280 industry, I
00:24:10.300 don't know how
00:24:10.660 to deal with
00:24:11.000 that comment
00:24:11.480 about tobacco
00:24:12.160 yet, but I
00:24:12.840 saw it.
00:24:14.940 So anyway,
00:24:15.900 homes are not
00:24:16.500 designed for the
00:24:17.260 way we live, and
00:24:18.220 if they were, we
00:24:19.000 could do them
00:24:19.500 cheaply.
00:24:20.340 There are three
00:24:20.900 examples that
00:24:21.820 are new.
00:24:23.160 One of them
00:24:23.640 is a 3D
00:24:25.000 printed dirt
00:24:26.180 home in
00:24:26.820 Italy.
00:24:27.680 So in 200
00:24:28.420 hours, they can
00:24:29.620 dig up the
00:24:30.220 dirt, and
00:24:30.740 here's the
00:24:31.080 important part.
00:24:32.040 They use the
00:24:32.920 dirt that's
00:24:33.460 already there.
00:24:34.660 So they dig
00:24:35.520 it up, they
00:24:35.980 sift it, they
00:24:36.680 mix it with
00:24:37.260 corn husks, turn
00:24:38.800 it into a 3D
00:24:39.640 printer, and
00:24:40.520 200 hours later,
00:24:42.240 they build
00:24:42.760 really cool
00:24:43.440 looking houses.
00:24:44.880 They look like
00:24:45.520 pods and
00:24:46.260 stuff.
00:24:46.580 They're really
00:24:46.880 cool looking.
00:24:48.160 But while
00:24:50.940 they do
00:24:51.340 solve the
00:24:52.380 problem of
00:24:54.800 material shipping,
00:24:55.980 because they're
00:24:56.260 using materials
00:24:57.180 from the dirt
00:24:57.880 that's there,
00:24:59.420 what it
00:25:00.760 doesn't do
00:25:01.340 is give
00:25:01.740 you a way
00:25:02.120 to modify
00:25:02.960 it later.
00:25:04.460 Have you
00:25:04.820 ever lived
00:25:05.400 in a house
00:25:05.980 that you
00:25:06.400 didn't need
00:25:06.840 to modify
00:25:07.440 a lot?
00:25:08.960 In the
00:25:09.620 comments, how
00:25:10.960 many of you
00:25:11.620 live in a
00:25:12.300 house where
00:25:13.120 you're not
00:25:13.600 continuously
00:25:14.340 running another
00:25:15.980 cable, adding
00:25:17.640 an outlet,
00:25:19.380 changing a
00:25:21.240 wall?
00:25:23.020 So I don't
00:25:23.760 think these
00:25:24.180 3D homes are
00:25:25.020 the future, or
00:25:26.500 at least not
00:25:27.220 the whole
00:25:27.680 future, because
00:25:28.620 I think you
00:25:29.060 need homes
00:25:29.580 that can be
00:25:30.240 customized as
00:25:31.280 you go.
00:25:32.700 If you
00:25:33.120 can't change
00:25:33.680 the wiring
00:25:34.280 and stuff,
00:25:35.220 where do you
00:25:35.620 put the
00:25:35.920 wiring in a
00:25:36.820 3D printed
00:25:37.500 home?
00:25:38.500 How would
00:25:39.020 you open
00:25:39.420 up a
00:25:39.740 wall?
00:25:41.480 Could you
00:25:41.860 do it?
00:25:42.520 I don't
00:25:42.760 know.
00:25:43.800 So here's
00:25:44.360 another model.
00:25:45.800 There's a
00:25:46.440 tiny home
00:25:47.020 built with
00:25:47.700 some kind
00:25:50.500 of a
00:25:50.900 cheap panel.
00:25:53.200 Darn it.
00:25:54.020 I wish I'd
00:25:54.480 written that
00:25:54.840 down.
00:25:55.120 And the
00:25:56.860 third kind
00:25:57.480 is a
00:25:58.680 company in
00:25:59.560 Denmark or
00:26:02.300 someplace called
00:26:03.400 Gablock,
00:26:04.660 G-A-B-L-O-K,
00:26:07.060 and they
00:26:07.440 literally make
00:26:08.300 Lego-like
00:26:09.920 blocks.
00:26:10.800 So insulated
00:26:11.620 wooden blocks
00:26:12.900 that you can
00:26:13.880 pick up and
00:26:14.640 just put on a
00:26:15.460 wall by
00:26:15.840 yourself.
00:26:17.400 Almost there.
00:26:19.400 You think
00:26:19.880 that you need
00:26:20.800 to get to the
00:26:21.260 point where
00:26:21.620 people can
00:26:22.200 build their
00:26:22.640 own home
00:26:23.200 literally just
00:26:24.520 by putting
00:26:25.000 blocks together
00:26:25.940 to form the
00:26:27.120 home.
00:26:27.840 Because then
00:26:28.520 you can take
00:26:29.020 it apart and
00:26:30.960 reconfigure
00:26:31.800 things, rebuild
00:26:32.640 a home,
00:26:33.160 etc.
00:26:34.040 But there's
00:26:35.200 one more
00:26:35.580 thing that
00:26:35.940 needs to be
00:26:36.320 done to
00:26:36.600 make this
00:26:36.940 work.
00:26:38.000 We need
00:26:38.340 to have a
00:26:38.800 set of
00:26:39.320 common
00:26:39.780 designs for
00:26:41.180 best rooms.
00:26:42.900 Best room
00:26:43.560 design.
00:26:44.560 There definitely
00:26:45.300 is three
00:26:47.300 best bedroom
00:26:48.120 designs.
00:26:49.900 Don't you
00:26:50.340 think?
00:26:51.360 I mean,
00:26:51.720 there's not
00:26:52.280 that much
00:26:52.660 variation in
00:26:53.760 what a
00:26:54.060 bedroom needs
00:26:54.760 to be.
00:26:55.920 Bedstand,
00:26:56.780 bed,
00:26:57.640 someplace to
00:26:58.220 put your
00:26:58.460 clothes,
00:26:59.060 a window to
00:26:59.580 look out.
00:27:00.960 So you
00:27:01.640 can design
00:27:02.280 perfectly
00:27:03.360 designed areas
00:27:06.400 so that
00:27:06.920 nothing needs
00:27:07.400 to be cut.
00:27:08.660 So you
00:27:09.160 want your
00:27:09.540 floor plan
00:27:10.320 and your
00:27:11.000 walls to
00:27:12.280 be exactly
00:27:12.880 one foot
00:27:13.980 units.
00:27:16.160 So you
00:27:16.720 don't have
00:27:17.060 to cut
00:27:17.540 something in
00:27:18.020 half to
00:27:18.540 make it.
00:27:19.340 Nothing
00:27:19.560 needs to
00:27:19.880 be cut.
00:27:20.720 So we're
00:27:21.460 getting there.
00:27:23.280 Cheap
00:27:23.880 housing is
00:27:24.440 the future.
00:27:26.620 Israel and
00:27:27.700 Gaza are
00:27:28.400 at it.
00:27:28.920 I guess the
00:27:29.320 Gaza militants
00:27:30.140 are launching
00:27:30.860 rockets into
00:27:32.660 Israel and
00:27:34.820 the Iron
00:27:35.400 Dome is
00:27:36.080 doing a
00:27:36.560 good job,
00:27:37.100 they say.
00:27:38.100 Do you
00:27:38.360 believe that?
00:27:39.320 Do you
00:27:39.680 believe the
00:27:40.040 Iron Dome
00:27:40.600 is working?
00:27:42.620 Now the
00:27:43.300 Iron Dome
00:27:43.740 is Israel's
00:27:44.500 rocket
00:27:45.020 defense
00:27:45.540 system that
00:27:46.900 shoots rockets
00:27:47.640 up to shoot
00:27:48.360 down the
00:27:48.740 incoming rockets
00:27:49.500 and there's
00:27:50.300 some video
00:27:50.720 of it
00:27:51.000 working.
00:27:52.080 I do
00:27:52.400 remember
00:27:52.960 that however
00:27:54.560 many years
00:27:55.200 ago it was
00:27:55.820 there was
00:27:56.700 some video
00:27:57.180 of the
00:27:57.800 same thing
00:27:58.580 where it
00:27:59.040 was showing
00:28:00.120 the Israel
00:28:00.920 was just
00:28:01.340 knocking down
00:28:01.980 all these
00:28:02.360 rockets but
00:28:03.480 later we
00:28:03.960 found out
00:28:04.440 it was all
00:28:04.980 BS,
00:28:06.100 fake news,
00:28:07.360 and that
00:28:07.860 the number
00:28:08.380 of rockets
00:28:08.960 that it
00:28:09.320 actually hit
00:28:10.060 wasn't all
00:28:11.660 of them,
00:28:12.180 right?
00:28:12.360 So it
00:28:12.600 wasn't as
00:28:13.120 good.
00:28:13.780 Maybe it's
00:28:14.260 better now.
00:28:14.760 Maybe they
00:28:15.480 have more
00:28:16.020 defense.
00:28:18.080 But we're
00:28:18.500 seeing again
00:28:19.280 the Iron
00:28:20.860 Dome at
00:28:21.400 work and
00:28:22.880 I don't
00:28:23.600 know that
00:28:24.380 it's as
00:28:24.840 effective as
00:28:25.900 they would
00:28:26.480 like us to
00:28:27.080 believe but
00:28:27.940 it's definitely
00:28:28.340 better than
00:28:28.780 not having
00:28:29.240 one.
00:28:31.700 And the
00:28:32.460 question has
00:28:33.000 to be asked
00:28:33.560 would any
00:28:34.240 of this be
00:28:34.680 happening if
00:28:35.320 Trump were
00:28:36.100 still in
00:28:36.580 office?
00:28:38.160 Do we
00:28:38.680 believe that
00:28:40.020 the current
00:28:40.600 increase in
00:28:42.360 tensions over
00:28:43.060 there are
00:28:44.660 because it
00:28:46.300 was just
00:28:46.640 going to
00:28:46.820 happen anyway?
00:28:48.080 You know,
00:28:48.280 is it just
00:28:48.740 events on
00:28:49.320 the ground?
00:28:49.980 Or is it
00:28:51.480 opportunistic
00:28:52.660 stuff because
00:28:53.940 Biden isn't
00:28:55.020 president?
00:28:56.200 Is it
00:28:56.500 opportunistic?
00:28:57.380 What do you
00:28:57.640 think?
00:28:59.560 Yeah, I
00:29:00.100 feel as if
00:29:00.960 Trump would
00:29:03.020 have been
00:29:03.340 somewhat of
00:29:04.280 a control
00:29:04.960 on this but
00:29:05.780 it's hard to
00:29:06.220 know.
00:29:08.200 Let's talk
00:29:08.940 about that
00:29:09.400 Matt Gaetz
00:29:10.320 story that
00:29:10.920 continues to
00:29:11.740 be nothing.
00:29:13.460 Now, I'm
00:29:14.060 not going to
00:29:14.440 say that it
00:29:15.180 could never
00:29:15.600 turn into
00:29:16.200 nothing or
00:29:17.620 that it
00:29:18.100 could never
00:29:18.460 turn into
00:29:18.900 something.
00:29:19.960 But every
00:29:20.600 day that
00:29:21.000 goes by,
00:29:22.400 it's more
00:29:23.340 interesting that
00:29:24.120 we don't have
00:29:24.660 an accuser or
00:29:26.620 at least one
00:29:27.060 that has a
00:29:27.480 name.
00:29:28.960 All right?
00:29:29.380 So this
00:29:29.960 entire thing
00:29:30.760 about Matt
00:29:31.320 Gaetz, CNN
00:29:33.420 keeps trying to
00:29:34.160 make a story
00:29:34.780 about it, but
00:29:36.160 they don't have
00:29:36.940 anything that's
00:29:37.700 like evidence or
00:29:38.720 a witness or
00:29:39.600 a victim.
00:29:40.820 So it's a
00:29:41.660 crime story with
00:29:43.500 no evidence,
00:29:45.160 no victim
00:29:46.540 that's been
00:29:47.840 named, but a
00:29:50.120 lot of looking
00:29:50.740 for it.
00:29:51.440 And so the
00:29:51.840 latest is that
00:29:52.820 there are two
00:29:54.060 people who
00:29:54.620 might turn,
00:29:56.140 what's it
00:29:56.740 called,
00:29:57.100 state's evidence
00:29:57.780 or whatever,
00:29:59.040 would become
00:29:59.620 informants.
00:30:01.380 One of them is
00:30:02.140 the one we
00:30:02.540 already knew,
00:30:03.200 this Joel
00:30:03.660 Greenberg guy.
00:30:04.860 So that part
00:30:05.540 is not news
00:30:06.540 because we've
00:30:07.880 known that for a
00:30:08.460 while.
00:30:09.080 But CNN needs
00:30:10.040 to make this
00:30:10.660 news so they're
00:30:11.500 going to throw
00:30:11.840 in that fact that
00:30:12.580 we already knew.
00:30:13.620 And then they're
00:30:14.240 throwing in the
00:30:14.740 new fact, which
00:30:16.180 might not be a
00:30:16.840 fact, which is
00:30:18.360 that allegedly,
00:30:19.180 maybe, sort of,
00:30:20.700 there's some
00:30:21.180 ex-girlfriend of
00:30:22.240 Matt Gaetz who
00:30:23.440 might want to
00:30:24.100 talk to
00:30:24.540 authorities.
00:30:26.000 The ex-girlfriend
00:30:27.220 is not making
00:30:28.240 any accusations.
00:30:29.880 She's not the
00:30:30.480 victim.
00:30:31.320 She's not the
00:30:32.000 subject of the
00:30:33.080 potentially 17-year-old
00:30:35.320 girl.
00:30:37.480 She's just the
00:30:38.320 girlfriend who
00:30:38.860 might know
00:30:39.260 something.
00:30:39.620 So keep in
00:30:41.260 mind, Matt
00:30:44.080 Gaetz, a
00:30:45.540 sitting congress
00:30:46.420 person, has
00:30:47.620 been accused
00:30:48.280 of really
00:30:49.480 serious crimes
00:30:50.700 and now weeks
00:30:52.180 later, the best
00:30:53.480 story they can
00:30:54.280 come up with is
00:30:55.580 they might want
00:30:56.300 to talk to some
00:30:57.020 people who might
00:30:57.700 know some things
00:30:58.520 that they don't
00:30:59.600 know.
00:31:01.360 Are you
00:31:02.200 kidding me?
00:31:03.920 And we're
00:31:04.660 okay with this?
00:31:06.280 Like we're watching
00:31:07.040 this happen right
00:31:07.780 in front of us?
00:31:08.400 If you can't
00:31:10.100 come up with a
00:31:10.740 better story of
00:31:11.720 something he did
00:31:12.660 such as an
00:31:14.020 actual crime, an
00:31:16.140 actual allegation
00:31:17.620 with specifics, a
00:31:19.820 person involved, a
00:31:21.280 victim, if you
00:31:22.820 don't have any of
00:31:23.740 that, I don't
00:31:26.140 know that it's a
00:31:26.840 story yet.
00:31:28.660 Again, it's not
00:31:29.960 my job to
00:31:30.720 apologize for
00:31:31.640 anybody or
00:31:32.400 defend anybody
00:31:33.980 because I think
00:31:35.940 you and I can
00:31:37.200 say with
00:31:37.600 certainty that we
00:31:38.740 don't know what
00:31:40.280 Matt Gaetz did or
00:31:41.180 did not do,
00:31:41.820 right?
00:31:42.260 So we don't
00:31:42.740 know.
00:31:45.740 But I'm just
00:31:46.960 going to go out
00:31:47.480 and say it, that
00:31:48.280 if Matt Gaetz is
00:31:49.880 guilty of everything
00:31:51.060 he's accused of,
00:31:52.160 none of it looks
00:31:52.800 important to me.
00:31:56.260 Is anybody on the
00:31:57.360 same page with
00:31:57.920 that?
00:31:58.580 If he's guilty of
00:31:59.720 everything accused
00:32:00.600 of, and again,
00:32:01.520 there's no evidence
00:32:02.300 that the public is
00:32:03.900 aware of, just no
00:32:05.020 evidence that we're
00:32:06.380 aware of, if he's
00:32:09.360 guilty of every bit
00:32:10.240 of that, none of
00:32:11.100 it's important.
00:32:13.140 I mean, none of
00:32:13.680 it even rises to the
00:32:15.060 level of who cares.
00:32:17.720 And I know that I'm
00:32:18.780 not supposed to say
00:32:19.560 that, right?
00:32:21.120 Shouldn't I get
00:32:21.800 canceled for saying
00:32:22.640 that?
00:32:23.980 I'm supposed to,
00:32:25.400 you know, be
00:32:26.280 fretting about the
00:32:27.480 poor victim and
00:32:28.640 everything?
00:32:29.620 But there weren't
00:32:30.420 any.
00:32:31.460 This story doesn't
00:32:32.880 even have a victim.
00:32:34.320 Even if everything
00:32:35.500 that's alleged
00:32:36.280 happened, no
00:32:39.000 victim.
00:32:40.260 Except Matt
00:32:41.100 Gaetz.
00:32:42.300 Matt Gaetz looks
00:32:43.040 like a victim here,
00:32:44.400 but no other
00:32:45.340 one.
00:32:46.920 Otherwise, it's
00:32:47.760 people doing what
00:32:48.620 they wanted to do
00:32:50.080 and maybe one
00:32:51.280 person lied about
00:32:52.160 their age and
00:32:53.720 wasn't a victim.
00:32:56.980 If it's true that
00:32:58.100 a 17-year-old lied
00:32:59.240 about her age, and
00:33:00.220 that's maybe the
00:33:01.400 worst thing that
00:33:01.920 happened, who's the
00:33:03.420 victim?
00:33:04.380 The 17-year-old?
00:33:05.800 Apparently not.
00:33:07.940 Matt Gaetz?
00:33:08.780 Looks like it.
00:33:09.620 Looks like he's the
00:33:10.360 victim.
00:33:11.120 If somebody lies
00:33:11.920 about their age,
00:33:13.140 it's the guy who's
00:33:14.840 the victim, because
00:33:16.620 he wasn't doing the
00:33:17.420 lying, right?
00:33:19.520 So the more this
00:33:21.420 story emerges, the
00:33:22.400 more it looks like
00:33:23.000 Matt Gaetz is the
00:33:24.140 victim of the story
00:33:25.040 in a practical
00:33:26.120 sense.
00:33:26.900 In a legal sense,
00:33:28.040 of course, there are
00:33:29.160 laws about the
00:33:30.200 these things, which
00:33:31.040 you could argue
00:33:32.080 maybe there
00:33:32.560 shouldn't be, but
00:33:33.560 they do exist.
00:33:35.220 So let's talk
00:33:36.100 about that pipeline
00:33:37.180 hack.
00:33:39.680 Are you as
00:33:40.520 confused as I
00:33:41.480 am about why
00:33:43.080 they can't just
00:33:43.820 erase all their
00:33:44.520 software and use
00:33:46.640 the backup software
00:33:47.600 and go back in
00:33:48.460 action?
00:33:49.560 What kind of a
00:33:50.440 company that
00:33:51.300 runs a major
00:33:52.940 infrastructure asset
00:33:55.060 can't backup their
00:33:57.220 software?
00:33:57.600 software?
00:33:58.880 There's something
00:33:59.660 about this story I
00:34:00.860 don't understand,
00:34:02.380 right?
00:34:03.560 Now, somebody
00:34:04.900 said, Scott,
00:34:05.780 Scott, Scott,
00:34:06.400 you've been out of
00:34:07.000 the business world
00:34:07.600 too long.
00:34:08.820 Big companies don't
00:34:09.760 backup all their
00:34:10.540 software.
00:34:11.680 To which I say,
00:34:13.400 oh, I get that.
00:34:14.540 You know, I wouldn't
00:34:15.220 be surprised if big
00:34:16.560 companies didn't
00:34:17.340 backup all of their
00:34:18.300 software.
00:34:19.280 But if you're a
00:34:20.280 pipeline, if you're a
00:34:22.860 pipeline, I do sort
00:34:24.600 of expect you to
00:34:25.380 have all your
00:34:25.860 software backed
00:34:26.620 up.
00:34:27.360 If you're a
00:34:28.320 nuclear energy
00:34:29.540 plant, I kind
00:34:31.760 of expect, maybe
00:34:33.560 that's just me, but
00:34:35.420 I would kind of
00:34:36.100 expect you to have
00:34:36.820 a little bit of a
00:34:37.780 backup plan for
00:34:39.180 your data.
00:34:40.140 So there's
00:34:40.880 something about
00:34:41.460 the story that
00:34:42.100 doesn't make sense.
00:34:43.620 Either there's
00:34:44.380 massive incompetence
00:34:45.700 at the company for
00:34:47.220 having something
00:34:47.940 without a backup,
00:34:49.240 or maybe there's
00:34:52.040 some reason it's
00:34:52.720 not backed up that
00:34:53.780 I'm not aware
00:34:54.380 of.
00:34:55.380 So that's a big
00:34:56.640 question mark.
00:34:57.920 But here are my
00:34:58.640 other comments on
00:35:01.780 this.
00:35:03.500 Have I ever told
00:35:04.840 you, I tell you
00:35:06.240 this every day,
00:35:07.440 literally every day,
00:35:08.420 I tell you that the
00:35:09.160 difference between
00:35:09.860 Democrats and
00:35:10.580 Republicans is that
00:35:12.440 Democrats do not
00:35:13.520 factor in human
00:35:14.700 motivation when they
00:35:16.880 make decisions.
00:35:18.320 I know it's weird,
00:35:19.860 whereas the
00:35:20.340 Republicans start
00:35:21.620 with human
00:35:22.200 motivation, and
00:35:23.720 then build the
00:35:24.300 system around it,
00:35:25.300 and then it
00:35:25.780 always works.
00:35:27.020 But if you act
00:35:27.940 like human
00:35:28.420 motivation isn't
00:35:29.420 even a variable,
00:35:31.160 nothing's going to
00:35:32.020 work.
00:35:32.720 This is another
00:35:33.560 perfect example.
00:35:35.760 Imagine a
00:35:36.640 President Trump
00:35:37.600 being president
00:35:39.240 right now when
00:35:40.120 the pipeline got
00:35:41.000 hacked.
00:35:42.200 Here's what a
00:35:43.180 good negotiator
00:35:44.180 would say.
00:35:46.120 Release the
00:35:47.980 encrypted stuff
00:35:49.400 right now.
00:35:51.620 We're already
00:35:52.480 tracking you down
00:35:53.360 and we will
00:35:54.000 kill you.
00:35:55.160 We will kill
00:35:56.160 you where you
00:35:56.780 stand really
00:35:58.660 soon, and you
00:36:00.420 don't know whether
00:36:01.000 we know where you
00:36:01.680 are or not, so
00:36:02.860 you're going to
00:36:03.240 have to guess.
00:36:04.500 But if you
00:36:05.340 haven't released
00:36:05.900 this in 24 hours,
00:36:07.280 you might be
00:36:07.920 dead.
00:36:09.860 Now, what would
00:36:10.920 be the human
00:36:11.540 motivation of
00:36:12.380 hackers who could
00:36:14.040 not be entirely
00:36:14.860 sure if the
00:36:15.880 military of the
00:36:16.600 United States
00:36:17.380 already has a
00:36:19.080 laser sight on
00:36:20.580 their roof?
00:36:22.720 Because they
00:36:23.280 don't know.
00:36:24.720 Right?
00:36:25.280 The hackers think
00:36:26.480 they have a way
00:36:27.600 to be completely
00:36:28.420 safe or they
00:36:29.180 wouldn't do it.
00:36:30.280 But they don't
00:36:31.080 know.
00:36:32.520 And if Trump
00:36:33.520 were president,
00:36:34.340 do you think he
00:36:35.020 would let them
00:36:35.640 know that we
00:36:36.180 don't know where
00:36:36.780 they are?
00:36:38.140 Because we're
00:36:38.780 kind of doing
00:36:39.360 that.
00:36:40.440 By the fact that
00:36:41.480 we're dealing
00:36:41.880 with it the way
00:36:42.480 we're doing it,
00:36:43.600 I don't feel like
00:36:44.720 the hackers feel
00:36:45.620 like they're
00:36:46.460 in immediate
00:36:47.160 danger.
00:36:48.960 I think Trump
00:36:50.060 would tell them
00:36:50.760 they might be
00:36:51.680 dead in 24
00:36:52.560 hours.
00:36:55.020 That's what I
00:36:55.740 would do.
00:36:56.420 Because human
00:36:57.180 motivation is
00:36:58.140 they're not going
00:36:58.760 to do anything
00:36:59.280 differently unless
00:37:00.060 they're afraid.
00:37:01.360 So why the
00:37:02.360 hell would you
00:37:03.180 negotiate with
00:37:04.280 these hackers
00:37:04.920 without putting
00:37:06.120 them at the
00:37:06.840 threat of
00:37:07.660 immediate death?
00:37:09.560 That's how you
00:37:10.440 negotiate.
00:37:11.980 Right?
00:37:12.380 You don't
00:37:12.920 negotiate on a
00:37:13.880 weakness.
00:37:14.900 You tell them,
00:37:16.100 look, here's the
00:37:16.940 deal, hackers.
00:37:17.740 Because apparently
00:37:18.320 we're in
00:37:18.780 communication with
00:37:19.660 them, or
00:37:20.020 somebody is.
00:37:20.940 There must be
00:37:21.420 some kind of
00:37:21.840 communication,
00:37:22.540 right?
00:37:23.260 You tell them,
00:37:24.180 here's the deal.
00:37:25.560 How about you
00:37:26.620 just release the
00:37:27.480 data, we give
00:37:28.260 you nothing, and
00:37:29.920 you don't have to
00:37:30.700 guess whether
00:37:31.160 you'll be dead
00:37:31.760 by the end of
00:37:32.360 today.
00:37:35.040 I don't know,
00:37:35.660 that might make
00:37:36.800 them a little
00:37:37.160 more flexible, or
00:37:38.680 at least lower
00:37:39.180 the price.
00:37:41.720 But if we're not
00:37:42.720 negotiating from a
00:37:43.700 point of them
00:37:44.420 fearing their
00:37:45.160 death that day,
00:37:46.880 like literally
00:37:47.440 that day, you
00:37:48.820 might be dead by
00:37:49.600 the end of
00:37:50.000 today, we're
00:37:50.940 not doing it
00:37:51.420 right.
00:37:52.200 And I know
00:37:52.660 that Trump
00:37:53.100 would have
00:37:53.380 gotten that
00:37:53.780 right.
00:37:55.940 Because he
00:37:56.960 goes for the
00:37:57.940 threat first.
00:38:00.060 All right.
00:38:03.040 Somebody asked
00:38:03.820 on Twitter,
00:38:05.120 how is it
00:38:06.620 possible that a
00:38:07.620 pipeline can get
00:38:08.860 hacked?
00:38:09.340 You would think
00:38:09.880 it would have the
00:38:10.540 highest level of
00:38:11.320 cybersecurity.
00:38:11.800 security, and
00:38:12.820 it still got
00:38:13.200 hacked.
00:38:16.020 But why is it
00:38:17.140 that that could
00:38:17.720 get hacked, but
00:38:19.040 our election
00:38:19.640 system is
00:38:22.420 totally safe?
00:38:26.120 Do you have a,
00:38:27.560 does that feel
00:38:28.220 right?
00:38:29.260 That even
00:38:30.080 something as
00:38:30.720 important as a
00:38:31.760 pipeline can get
00:38:32.740 hacked, but the
00:38:34.400 election can't?
00:38:35.200 Now, that
00:38:38.060 comment sounds
00:38:38.920 clever, until I
00:38:40.620 point out that
00:38:42.200 the hackers who
00:38:42.980 hacked the
00:38:43.380 pipeline got
00:38:43.980 caught, meaning
00:38:45.500 that they weren't
00:38:46.160 trying to do
00:38:46.680 anything secret.
00:38:48.280 You can't really
00:38:49.280 blackmail unless
00:38:50.020 you tell people
00:38:50.600 you did it.
00:38:51.620 So if the
00:38:52.900 election system
00:38:53.800 had been hacked,
00:38:55.840 the proper
00:38:56.400 comparison would
00:38:57.320 be, would we
00:38:58.640 notice?
00:38:59.100 So the
00:39:00.880 pipeline was
00:39:02.280 not hacked
00:39:02.860 without notice,
00:39:04.100 it was hacked
00:39:04.680 with notice.
00:39:06.400 So you can't
00:39:07.420 really compare
00:39:07.880 that to
00:39:08.420 something that
00:39:09.140 presumably would
00:39:09.960 have been
00:39:10.180 hacked in a
00:39:11.940 secret way if
00:39:12.820 anybody could
00:39:13.400 have figured out
00:39:13.900 a way to do
00:39:14.360 it.
00:39:15.200 But I think
00:39:15.780 the general
00:39:17.220 concept is
00:39:18.100 correct, which
00:39:19.280 is that anything
00:39:19.900 could get
00:39:20.360 hacked.
00:39:21.600 So let me
00:39:22.520 say this as
00:39:23.040 clearly as I
00:39:23.660 can.
00:39:23.880 If you
00:39:25.600 say you
00:39:26.460 know that
00:39:27.080 the election
00:39:28.220 software was
00:39:28.940 hacked, you
00:39:30.700 don't know
00:39:31.100 that.
00:39:32.580 You don't
00:39:33.300 know that.
00:39:34.100 There's no
00:39:34.640 evidence of
00:39:35.520 that.
00:39:36.940 All right.
00:39:37.280 Actually, there
00:39:38.060 is a story in
00:39:39.620 some non-major
00:39:42.580 media, there is
00:39:43.580 some story about
00:39:44.300 the Arizona
00:39:44.840 audit that I'm
00:39:45.760 not going to
00:39:46.140 repeat because
00:39:46.840 it is not yet
00:39:47.600 from what I
00:39:48.960 would call a
00:39:49.440 credible source.
00:39:51.220 But anyway,
00:39:53.880 the point is
00:39:54.620 anything could
00:39:55.160 get hacked.
00:39:55.820 If you think
00:39:56.440 that the
00:39:56.720 election system
00:39:57.480 was hacked,
00:39:59.500 there's no
00:40:00.660 evidence of
00:40:01.120 that.
00:40:01.780 But if you
00:40:02.280 think it
00:40:02.660 definitely wasn't
00:40:03.660 hacked, you're
00:40:05.480 fucking stupid.
00:40:10.360 Sorry, I had
00:40:11.180 to drop the
00:40:12.040 F-bomb on you
00:40:12.800 there.
00:40:13.640 Because sometimes
00:40:14.220 stupid doesn't
00:40:15.100 tell the story.
00:40:17.300 Right?
00:40:17.620 Sometimes you're
00:40:18.480 effing stupid.
00:40:22.180 If you know
00:40:23.260 the system
00:40:23.800 was hacked,
00:40:25.420 show us the
00:40:26.020 information.
00:40:26.560 I haven't seen
00:40:27.000 any.
00:40:28.120 But if you
00:40:28.640 know it
00:40:29.200 wasn't, you're
00:40:29.840 just a fucking
00:40:30.400 idiot.
00:40:31.400 Right?
00:40:31.780 There's nothing
00:40:32.380 else you can say
00:40:33.100 about that.
00:40:34.240 If you're
00:40:35.360 positive it
00:40:36.260 wasn't hacked,
00:40:37.760 that's just
00:40:38.600 fucking idiot.
00:40:40.160 Because you
00:40:40.720 can't be
00:40:41.080 positive of
00:40:41.620 that.
00:40:42.240 You could be
00:40:42.700 right, by the
00:40:43.920 way.
00:40:44.540 If you say it
00:40:45.400 wasn't hacked,
00:40:46.140 you could be
00:40:46.540 right.
00:40:47.580 Because how
00:40:48.140 would I know?
00:40:49.460 The accusation
00:40:50.920 would be it was
00:40:51.620 hacked without the
00:40:52.960 public knowing.
00:40:54.020 That's the
00:40:54.480 very thing.
00:40:55.880 But if you're
00:40:57.220 positive because
00:40:58.580 CNN told you
00:40:59.620 that it wasn't,
00:41:01.080 and then you're
00:41:01.700 like, oh, CNN
00:41:02.420 says it wasn't
00:41:03.120 hacked, so I
00:41:03.740 guess it's all
00:41:04.180 good.
00:41:04.920 If you're
00:41:05.340 positive it
00:41:06.000 wasn't hacked,
00:41:06.520 you're fucking
00:41:06.920 stupid.
00:41:08.180 You can't know
00:41:09.000 that.
00:41:09.260 It's unknowable.
00:41:12.440 All right.
00:41:13.060 I just have to
00:41:15.460 dump on Melinda
00:41:16.260 Gates a little
00:41:16.880 bit more.
00:41:17.520 There's a quote
00:41:18.120 that's just
00:41:18.640 bugging the
00:41:19.260 hell out of
00:41:19.900 me.
00:41:21.100 When she took
00:41:22.260 her job at
00:41:22.980 the Gates
00:41:24.220 Foundation, she
00:41:25.100 had this quote.
00:41:26.500 She said,
00:41:27.020 Bill and I are
00:41:27.700 equal partners,
00:41:28.900 Melinda told the
00:41:29.820 Associated Press.
00:41:31.140 Men and women
00:41:31.880 should be equal
00:41:32.620 at work.
00:41:34.160 God, I hate
00:41:35.060 her.
00:41:36.920 I just hate
00:41:37.920 Melinda Gates,
00:41:38.740 I have to say.
00:41:40.520 This quote just
00:41:41.480 makes me hate
00:41:42.100 her guts.
00:41:43.700 I really do.
00:41:44.600 I just a
00:41:45.080 freaking hater.
00:41:46.420 Because while I
00:41:49.600 agree with the
00:41:50.120 sentiment, of
00:41:50.700 course, men and
00:41:51.300 women should be
00:41:51.860 equal at work in
00:41:53.200 the sense of
00:41:53.820 equal opportunity.
00:41:55.860 Men and women
00:41:56.480 should be equal
00:41:57.200 at work in the
00:41:58.480 sense of, you
00:42:00.880 know, equal
00:42:01.500 safety, equal
00:42:04.220 pay.
00:42:05.620 We all agree
00:42:06.540 with that,
00:42:07.100 right?
00:42:09.080 But Melinda is
00:42:11.620 not Bill Gates.
00:42:13.840 Bill Gates
00:42:14.700 built Microsoft
00:42:15.780 and became the
00:42:17.940 richest guy in
00:42:18.580 the world, at
00:42:19.160 least for a
00:42:19.560 while.
00:42:20.680 Melinda had
00:42:22.140 sex with Bill
00:42:22.980 Gates.
00:42:24.120 Now, I'm not
00:42:24.980 going to say
00:42:25.340 that's easy
00:42:25.980 either.
00:42:27.300 But it's not
00:42:28.700 the same.
00:42:30.220 You're not
00:42:30.700 equal.
00:42:31.820 Let me say
00:42:32.340 this as clear
00:42:32.940 as I can.
00:42:34.200 Bill Gates,
00:42:34.880 one of the
00:42:35.360 smartest people
00:42:36.100 on earth who
00:42:36.780 did one of the
00:42:37.320 most amazing
00:42:38.120 commercial successes
00:42:39.740 of all time.
00:42:41.340 That's who
00:42:41.820 Bill Gates is.
00:42:43.420 Melinda, you
00:42:44.220 are somebody
00:42:44.780 who sucked
00:42:45.380 his dick.
00:42:48.660 You're not
00:42:49.420 equal.
00:42:50.840 You're not
00:42:51.340 equal.
00:42:53.100 It has nothing
00:42:54.100 to do with
00:42:54.600 gender.
00:42:55.920 If Bill Gates
00:42:57.140 had been gay
00:42:58.560 and married a
00:43:00.200 man, he would
00:43:01.860 still be marrying
00:43:02.680 a man who only
00:43:04.260 sucked his dick.
00:43:05.160 That man did
00:43:07.900 not start
00:43:08.520 Microsoft.
00:43:09.960 That man did
00:43:11.520 not start the
00:43:12.200 Gates Foundation.
00:43:14.200 That man,
00:43:15.520 hypothetically,
00:43:16.860 didn't do
00:43:17.620 anything except
00:43:18.620 suck his dick.
00:43:20.460 You're not
00:43:21.020 equal.
00:43:22.540 You're not
00:43:22.980 equal.
00:43:24.240 Stop saying
00:43:25.040 it.
00:43:25.620 It's an insult
00:43:26.720 to men.
00:43:28.940 This is just
00:43:29.880 an insult.
00:43:30.420 So, Melinda,
00:43:34.240 I'm glad
00:43:35.020 Bill Gates
00:43:35.700 is divorcing
00:43:36.580 your ass.
00:43:37.720 Although,
00:43:38.240 maybe Melinda
00:43:38.860 is the one
00:43:39.340 who started
00:43:40.480 it.
00:43:40.780 I don't
00:43:40.940 know.
00:43:42.520 All right.
00:43:43.280 That
00:43:43.740 was Scott
00:43:47.860 ever on
00:43:48.320 Epstein's
00:43:48.920 island.
00:43:49.860 No, I
00:43:50.380 wasn't.
00:43:52.220 But if
00:43:52.900 you'd like to
00:43:53.360 start any
00:43:53.800 good rumors,
00:43:54.520 I'm always
00:43:54.960 up for a
00:43:55.440 good rumor.
00:43:56.800 Now, if I
00:43:57.600 haven't told
00:43:58.000 you this
00:43:58.300 before,
00:43:58.700 if you
00:44:00.340 ever hear
00:44:00.700 any great
00:44:01.640 sex rumors
00:44:02.920 about me,
00:44:04.880 I doubt
00:44:05.280 you will.
00:44:06.860 But if
00:44:07.220 you ever
00:44:07.440 did,
00:44:08.300 I would
00:44:08.800 encourage you
00:44:09.360 to believe
00:44:09.820 all of them
00:44:10.460 except anything
00:44:11.120 that's illegal.
00:44:12.840 Right?
00:44:13.160 So if you
00:44:13.540 hear any
00:44:13.840 rumors about
00:44:14.400 me that
00:44:14.720 anything
00:44:15.340 illegal,
00:44:16.680 it didn't
00:44:16.960 happen.
00:44:17.920 But if
00:44:18.460 you hear
00:44:18.680 any rumor
00:44:19.320 that's
00:44:19.980 interesting,
00:44:21.800 that's like
00:44:22.200 really interesting,
00:44:23.340 and it's like
00:44:24.020 sex is involved,
00:44:25.300 I would
00:44:25.940 encourage you
00:44:26.500 to believe
00:44:26.940 it.
00:44:27.620 It won't
00:44:28.020 be true.
00:44:28.700 It's very
00:44:30.800 unlikely it'll
00:44:31.500 be true.
00:44:32.620 But I would
00:44:33.060 encourage you
00:44:33.540 to believe
00:44:33.900 it, because
00:44:35.080 it makes
00:44:35.460 me more
00:44:35.820 interesting.
00:44:37.320 Yeah,
00:44:37.740 gerbil, if
00:44:38.500 you hear
00:44:38.640 anything about
00:44:39.160 a gerbil,
00:44:39.760 totally.
00:44:41.700 I totally
00:44:43.500 stuck that
00:44:45.020 gerbil in
00:44:45.480 there.
00:44:48.820 All right.
00:44:50.100 So that
00:44:51.120 is all I
00:44:51.580 have for you
00:44:52.020 today.
00:44:53.000 I think
00:44:53.740 that you
00:44:54.120 are noticing
00:44:54.700 that I
00:44:55.820 don't know
00:44:56.160 if it's
00:44:56.520 just because
00:44:57.920 we don't
00:44:58.460 have a
00:44:58.820 President
00:44:59.160 Trump,
00:45:00.040 but the
00:45:01.060 news has
00:45:02.060 really started
00:45:02.940 to become
00:45:03.540 sort of a
00:45:04.200 golden age
00:45:05.100 kind of a
00:45:05.980 news situation,
00:45:06.800 which is that
00:45:08.720 there doesn't
00:45:09.760 seem to be a
00:45:10.560 lot of terrible
00:45:11.220 stuff happening,
00:45:11.980 and the things
00:45:13.360 that were already
00:45:14.080 terrible seem
00:45:15.420 to be getting
00:45:15.940 better at a
00:45:16.560 pretty good
00:45:16.980 rate.
00:45:18.860 This is a
00:45:19.680 weird time.
00:45:21.520 You know,
00:45:21.780 anything could
00:45:22.280 happen in the
00:45:22.860 next few weeks,
00:45:23.600 days, but
00:45:23.980 we're definitely
00:45:24.980 entering the
00:45:26.140 best time in
00:45:27.140 human history,
00:45:27.800 and if you're
00:45:29.400 not seeing it,
00:45:30.120 you're missing
00:45:30.480 a great show,
00:45:31.760 because I don't
00:45:32.600 think any humans
00:45:33.620 have ever been
00:45:34.180 in a better
00:45:34.580 situation than
00:45:35.900 we're about to
00:45:36.940 be in.
00:45:37.360 We're not quite
00:45:37.820 there, all right?
00:45:38.840 We've got a lot
00:45:39.620 of work to do,
00:45:40.420 but we're right
00:45:41.540 on the cusp of a
00:45:43.480 golden age that
00:45:44.580 will be phenomenal.
00:45:46.560 All right,
00:45:46.900 that's all for now,
00:45:47.500 and I'll talk to
00:45:48.120 you tomorrow.
00:45:49.420 before.