Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 15, 2021


Episode 1437 Scott Adams： The Big Lie, Bigger Lies, and Lying Liars


Episode Stats


Length

35 minutes

Words per minute

134.20164

Word count

4,774

Sentence count

290

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

9

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Elon Musk has a new way to get internet connectivity everywhere, and it s going to revolutionize the way we all communicate. President Trump is trying to get China to stop sending us Fentanyl, but it s still killing tens of thousands every day.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 All right, before we start, YouTubers, can you tell me if you can hear me?
00:00:08.540 I'm trying something new with my audio, which is a splitter that's charging my iPad at the same time it's producing audio.
00:00:19.700 So I think it's working. I don't see any complaints.
00:00:22.300 Now, if you would like to enjoy this, and I know you would, and I'm talking about really enjoy it,
00:00:31.020 not just the usual delight that you always get, but I'm talking about taking it up a level.
00:00:38.060 Well, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind,
00:00:43.240 fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:45.580 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine here today, the thing that makes, what, everything better?
00:00:51.740 Yeah, everything. And it's called the simultaneous hip, and it's going to happen right now.
00:00:56.960 Go.
00:01:01.120 Ah, that's good stuff. Good stuff.
00:01:06.740 Oh, I can feel every particle in my body, every molecule, every corpuscle.
00:01:13.820 It's feeling a little bit better.
00:01:16.300 Well, do we have stories today?
00:01:18.960 Oh, man. Oh, man. Things are getting good.
00:01:23.560 You can feel the 2022 election getting closer.
00:01:27.620 It's almost like a tangible thing now.
00:01:30.820 But let's talk about the good news first.
00:01:33.300 Elon Musk's Starlink, which is the network of low-Earth satellites,
00:01:39.500 launched by Musk's company, SpaceX, I think.
00:01:42.820 People are using it already.
00:01:46.320 I'm not sure if it's still in beta or if it's in production mode.
00:01:50.200 But rural people are signing on and getting tremendous internet speeds.
00:01:55.240 So you're going to have an entirely new way to get internet, I think, everywhere.
00:02:01.480 Everywhere in the world.
00:02:02.480 And what does it mean to the world if everybody can get internet connectivity from Elon Musk?
00:02:14.680 Does it mean, for example, that China won't be able to block the internet?
00:02:20.300 How would China block Elon Musk's satellites?
00:02:30.480 How would you do that?
00:02:31.880 Could he even do it?
00:02:34.340 And so this is my big question.
00:02:36.180 Or Cuba or anyplace else.
00:02:39.020 Here's my big question.
00:02:40.360 Did Elon Musk just fix everything?
00:02:47.280 Did he?
00:02:48.040 Because can't you easily imagine that the solution to everything is better communication?
00:02:56.180 If people actually knew what was happening and were not censored,
00:03:00.920 doesn't everything work better?
00:03:03.180 You get more democracy, dictators fall, markets are more efficient.
00:03:09.220 Am I wrong?
00:03:10.260 It looks like Elon Musk is this close to fixing everything.
00:03:18.040 Just everything.
00:03:21.260 Because that's all it would take, if you think about it.
00:03:24.840 If everybody could talk to everybody without the government or anybody interfering or getting canceled or being kicked off the platform or whatever else,
00:03:36.120 doesn't it fix everything?
00:03:37.400 You know, not right away, but in the long run, you know, the good forces, it seems like, would rise.
00:03:45.120 And the bad forces would have trouble if they couldn't control communication.
00:03:48.700 So it's one of these things that just feels like a little business story over on the side.
00:03:55.020 It's like, oh, we've got another.
00:03:56.620 Looks like we have another way to get internet for many other ways.
00:04:00.540 Here's another one.
00:04:02.240 I'm not sure that's the case.
00:04:04.800 This might be everything.
00:04:06.180 Dr. Nicole Sapphire points out in a tweet that the U.S. now has more people dying from drug overdoses every day than from COVID-19.
00:04:24.680 So it's about time to rethink our priorities.
00:04:30.380 When you're in the middle of a pandemic, it's all about the pandemic, and it should be.
00:04:36.020 But it's time to start thinking about our other priorities, and it's time to get serious about China as the source of much but not all of these deaths.
00:04:47.160 And I'll say again, we should stop, we just close our embassies with China.
00:04:55.140 We should just withdraw our diplomats and close diplomatic relations with China until they stop sending fentanyl.
00:05:03.380 That should be the opening bid for relations.
00:05:06.680 Just no relations.
00:05:08.320 If you can't stop sending us fucking poison, that's it.
00:05:13.140 We'll just be done with you. 0.58
00:05:14.060 Now, I would think that if China looked at its total strategic situation, it might say, well, we did like killing you by the tens of thousands every year.
00:05:25.220 But all things considered, maybe we'll stop doing that because we also need relations with the biggest country in the world.
00:05:32.380 I think Trump could have pulled this off.
00:05:34.500 He didn't.
00:05:35.540 And I criticize him greatly for failing on the fentanyl front.
00:05:39.880 But at least he took a run at it.
00:05:41.780 At least he tried.
00:05:42.700 But, I mean, he failed completely.
00:05:44.960 Nothing stopped.
00:05:47.220 I'd like to see him take another run at it, frankly.
00:05:51.240 So is anybody watching the story with Tucker Carlson?
00:05:56.300 Anybody?
00:05:58.540 So here's what's happening.
00:06:00.980 There's sort of a big picture and a little picture.
00:06:02.940 The little picture, which could later be a big picture, is that Tucker is talking about the election irregularities.
00:06:12.720 Now, that's the small picture.
00:06:14.640 Here's the bigger picture.
00:06:15.540 In the last several years, the left has been, one by one, picking off voices on the right.
00:06:24.400 Now, many of those voices have self-cancelled, done things which got their asses cancelled.
00:06:29.800 But, you've got Rush Limbaugh passed away.
00:06:37.420 You've got, for whatever reason, we don't talk about Hannity as much.
00:06:42.180 I'm not sure what changed there.
00:06:43.860 But it seems to be, yeah, Bill O'Reilly is off of Fox News, et cetera, all for different reasons.
00:06:51.120 But, correct me if I'm wrong, Tucker Carlson is now the most important voice on the right.
00:06:57.600 Who would disagree with that?
00:07:00.520 Any disagreement?
00:07:02.560 It looks to me that Tucker Carlson is the only one who takes on the hard stories, while also being, you know, in prime time and having a huge audience and being respected, et cetera.
00:07:17.240 Yeah, you know, Greg Gottfeld's more of a special case because, you know, he's half entertainment, half news, so he's sort of a hybrid.
00:07:26.220 You wouldn't compare him to the Hannity's or the Tucker Carlson's.
00:07:32.260 Sort of a different game.
00:07:34.380 But, in terms of who moves the needle, it's Tucker, right?
00:07:40.780 Sorry, I think everybody, I've seen the comments, everybody agreeing with that statement.
00:07:43.860 So, whether you like Tucker or not, I think you'd agree that he's the most important voice on the right.
00:07:49.020 Now, some of that is from his own good work.
00:07:52.180 Maybe most of it is from his own good work.
00:07:54.600 But, it's also true that the other voices have been trimmed away, wouldn't you say?
00:08:01.760 And so, his voice rose by simply surviving and also being excellent at what he does.
00:08:09.320 So, here's the thing.
00:08:17.160 Tucker Carlson is talking about Fulton County in Georgia.
00:08:21.420 And, apparently, there's some information that he's reporting.
00:08:25.260 You know, I don't have any independent information about that.
00:08:32.780 Let me pause again to talk to YouTube.
00:08:38.040 Those of you on Locals, if you don't mind, I've got a little message for the people on YouTube.
00:08:46.220 Stop complaining about the volume.
00:08:51.700 The problem's on your end.
00:08:53.920 YouTube has low volume for some people on some videos and has nothing to do with the setup.
00:09:00.120 As you can see in the comments, the sound is fine.
00:09:04.400 Many, many people are telling you the sound is fine.
00:09:07.340 So, if you want to talk about the sound, just go somewhere else.
00:09:14.500 Okay?
00:09:15.280 Just go somewhere else.
00:09:16.800 Anyway, Tucker's talking about some new information that says the votes in Fulton County in Georgia in 2020.
00:09:23.880 So, here are some of the things that come out of that reporting.
00:09:26.160 So, there are a number of votes that were counted more than once, and the evidence for that seems solid.
00:09:35.320 Right?
00:09:35.640 So, these are things we seem to know with pretty high certainty that some number of votes, a significant number, not necessarily enough to change the result, but a significant number, were counted more than once.
00:09:51.940 And if you've seen the, you know, the evidence of it, they can show them, they can show they were counted more than once, you can see the picture of it, you can tell very easily it's the same ballot, and you can see that it was counted more than once.
00:10:03.480 Very clear.
00:10:05.600 But we don't know the total number of them yet.
00:10:10.100 More than 100,000 ballot tally sheets were missing for months after the election, and then when they showed up, a number of them were fraudulent.
00:10:19.080 Meaning that the tally on the outside didn't match, or even close, to the actual count of the bag, or whatever that was in.
00:10:29.160 So, we know that that happened, and it happened several times, that can be confirmed.
00:10:34.940 So, now we know that tallies, the vote tallies were fraudulently changed, and we know that some significant number of votes were counted twice.
00:10:45.420 On top of that, Tucker was reporting that there were piles of ballots with no folds in them.
00:10:55.320 I'm not sure how accurate this part is, but since everything would have to be folded to be mailed, anything that didn't have a fold on it,
00:11:04.400 and apparently it looked like it was machine-reproduced, as opposed to filled out by people, that would suggest fraud, if any of that is true.
00:11:14.880 Of course, we would need confirmation for that.
00:11:16.980 Now, we're also hearing, you know, some rumors that the Maricopa stuff has also uncovered some amount of confirmed irregularity,
00:11:30.580 but we don't know if it's trivial or a lot, so we're still waiting to hear about that.
00:11:34.680 So, what would be the tip-off, let's say hypothetically, let's say hypothetically there were big problems with the election,
00:11:47.380 and I don't have evidence that any court has produced that such a thing is happening, right?
00:11:53.120 So, just so I don't get canceled, no court has shown evidence of widespread fraud.
00:11:59.060 Are we all on the same page?
00:12:00.200 No court, no court has found widespread fraud, but we also know courts are not the place to look for it, right?
00:12:10.120 It's also true that your lawnmower has never launched a rocket into space.
00:12:18.340 It's also true that no bologna sandwich has ever filed a patent,
00:12:26.780 but it's true that the courts did not find any widespread fraud.
00:12:34.840 And also, no bologna sandwich has ever filed a patent.
00:12:38.640 Those two things are true, and so I think that means something, right?
00:12:44.740 So, here's what's interesting.
00:12:47.160 If Tucker Carlson is going after the big lie, well, let me back up a little bit.
00:12:56.240 I heard Robert Barnes on the Viva Barnes podcast, which is excellent.
00:13:02.480 I keep recommending it.
00:13:04.480 He said there was a tell for a lie if somebody said something is 1,000% not true.
00:13:11.220 That if somebody goes up to 1,000%, it's sort of a tell for a lie.
00:13:18.360 And I thought about that, and I thought, I'm not sure, you know, these tells are not 100% kinds of things, right?
00:13:24.620 They don't always mean what they look like they're indicating.
00:13:28.480 But I thought to myself, that does sound true-ish.
00:13:32.640 You know, it kind of rings true.
00:13:34.220 But let me give you another example that's sort of along those lines.
00:13:39.940 The big lie.
00:13:42.040 The phrase, the big lie.
00:13:45.200 Do you think that the news needed to brand the big lie if the only story was that it wasn't true?
00:13:55.400 Why is it that this story got a brand, the big lie?
00:14:01.220 Whereas other stories, I don't know if they get branded, do they?
00:14:04.880 We just call them fake news or not fake news.
00:14:08.060 We just say it's true or it's not true.
00:14:10.980 But this got branded.
00:14:14.300 And all the big media entities used the brand.
00:14:19.000 Does that sound like something that a news person came up with on their own?
00:14:22.700 Do you think somebody in the news business said, hey, let's call it the big lie?
00:14:30.360 Do you think so?
00:14:31.640 Yeah, and of course the purpose of it is that it's a Hitler analogy. 0.65
00:14:35.220 So it makes anybody in the Trump organization look like a Hitler-like entity because the big lie comes directly from Nazi propaganda.
00:14:44.980 But do you think the, you've been watching the news people forever, do you think that the news people are clever enough to pull off that kind of a persuasion move, to call it the big lie?
00:15:00.260 And make it stick because it's sticking really well.
00:15:03.080 Do you think so?
00:15:03.740 Because I don't see evidence of that skill set in the media itself.
00:15:10.460 Where would that skill set be?
00:15:13.160 If it's not the news people who are trained to come up with propaganda of that quality, because that's really high quality propaganda.
00:15:23.760 Who's got those kinds of skills?
00:15:27.300 Well, I do.
00:15:28.640 I have those kinds of skills, but it wasn't me.
00:15:31.820 Who else?
00:15:33.740 Yeah, it's the CIA.
00:15:35.840 Right.
00:15:37.080 It's somebody associated with or trained by an intelligence agency.
00:15:43.780 When you see the big lie, that's like a thousand percent.
00:15:49.580 It's this glaring signal that they're covering up fraud.
00:15:53.500 That doesn't mean they are.
00:15:56.620 One possibility is that there's somebody in the news organization who is really good at branding.
00:16:02.960 And maybe you just wanted to brand this thing.
00:16:05.540 Maybe it was CNN.
00:16:06.800 Maybe it was Jeff Zucker.
00:16:08.540 It's possible.
00:16:10.180 You know, you could get lucky, right?
00:16:12.140 It's possible that somebody could hit on, you know, just the right thing that's stuck in people's minds and people liked it.
00:16:18.180 They just copied it.
00:16:19.020 Because things go viral all the time and not necessarily from experts who created a viral thing.
00:16:25.800 But if you wanted to look at what it obviously looks like, which is not what it necessarily is, right?
00:16:33.760 So let's say that sometimes things look obviously like something, but that doesn't mean it is that, right?
00:16:39.920 We could be fooled.
00:16:41.880 Well, let me tell you what it looks obviously like.
00:16:44.420 Now that we know that there is significant fraud in the election, we don't know if it's enough to change the election, but it's significant enough that you would at least change your rules and procedures to deal with it.
00:17:00.640 Would we agree with that standard?
00:17:02.040 Could we say at this point, with what's already been reported, does it feel safe to say that we're not yet at a point where you'd say the election should be changed because of anything that's been reported?
00:17:14.980 But you would definitely say that you should change your procedures for voting because it uncovered a number of problems that, if they had been larger, could have changed the outcome.
00:17:27.480 So I would say that the definition of significant voter fraud would be something that causes you to change the process.
00:17:37.340 Have we reached that level?
00:17:39.920 Don't you think we've reached the level where you'd, if anything that, if anything that Tucker reported is true, any of it, you'd have to change the process to make sure it doesn't happen again, right?
00:17:53.440 I call that significant.
00:17:54.620 So in the context of reasonably high confidence that there's significant fraud, far short, perhaps, of changing an outcome, but still significant, and you have a propaganda, let's say, event, maybe that's just speculation,
00:18:18.640 but you've got this big lie thing that looks like it comes from professionals, because honestly, I've never seen anybody in the news business who had that kind of skill.
00:18:29.000 But everybody, not everybody, but the CIA would have that skill.
00:18:32.360 So it looks like, and I'm not claiming this is true, because I get cancelled for claiming anything like that.
00:18:42.260 But if you were just going to say, well, what's it look like?
00:18:45.460 It looks like a stolen election, supported by the intelligence agencies of the United States, and then sold to the American people through the media to suppress any questions by calling it the big lie,
00:19:03.740 and making sure that if you questioned it, you would be labeled a Nazi, right?
00:19:08.640 Now, if you were thinking, Scott, Scott, Scott, Scott, I don't think this is some big conspiracy,
00:19:15.680 because if there were some big conspiracy, you'd see all kinds of signs of it.
00:19:21.660 For example, on the very day that Tucker Carlson reported on these irregularities, alleged, alleged irregularities,
00:19:32.100 if it were really an organized effort by powerful people behind the scenes,
00:19:39.840 you would think that just about the same day that Tucker did that, there would be a major movement to cancel Tucker.
00:19:46.480 Oh, oh wait, there is. Today. Today.
00:19:53.800 The hashtag, Tucker is killing us, is matched with a video compilation in which there are claims that Tucker's made about, I don't know, the vaccine dangers or something.
00:20:05.640 And so they put together a clip that shows that his advice would get you killed.
00:20:11.620 You know, if you followed his, I guess you could call it, you know, medical reporting or something, you could get yourself killed.
00:20:20.320 So do you think it's a coincidence that there's a full-on attack on Tucker Carlson
00:20:26.720 at the same time that he's breaking the story, at the same time that he's the most important voice on the right?
00:20:33.660 Does that sound like a coincidence?
00:20:37.600 How about the fact that if any of this reporting about the election is true,
00:20:43.580 even if it doesn't rise to the level of it would have changed the election,
00:20:48.800 but if it's true, and if it's true to the level of being significant,
00:20:55.580 meaning that rules would have to change to make it stop next time,
00:21:00.260 Trump's your next president.
00:21:03.660 Right?
00:21:05.760 Try to think of a situation in which we could know for sure
00:21:09.040 that the election had been fraudulent in a bunch of ways,
00:21:13.340 even maybe way less than enough to change the outcome,
00:21:17.160 but say we confirmed it was fraudulent in a number of ways.
00:21:22.080 Trump's your next president.
00:21:26.660 What the hell are you going to do about it?
00:21:28.160 I'm not saying it's good or bad.
00:21:31.700 I'm saying if Tucker's reporting holds up,
00:21:37.140 Trump's your next president.
00:21:39.880 Because it will be too delicious to keep him out of office.
00:21:45.720 Because Trump term one is a dangerous motherfucker.
00:21:55.500 Trump term two is a dangerous motherfucker on steroids. 0.99
00:22:03.000 And when I say dangerous, I mean to the system, not to the country.
00:22:06.820 What would he do if he didn't need to get re-elected?
00:22:13.340 Now, I'm not worried about the propaganda that he wants to take over the country, etc.
00:22:20.180 I'm not worried about that at all.
00:22:22.400 But I don't think Republicans would be able to resist
00:22:25.740 letting a rabid dog into the house with their enemies.
00:22:30.940 I feel like if the pit bull wants to kill somebody,
00:22:36.400 and you need somebody killed, figuratively speaking,
00:22:39.260 not actually killing people,
00:22:42.100 I feel like it's going to be too hard to resist.
00:22:45.980 Because, you know, people don't really make decisions on policies and stuff like that.
00:22:50.740 They make decisions based on how they feel.
00:22:53.860 How would you feel if you believed that the election was fraudulent,
00:22:59.100 and even if it didn't change the final outcome,
00:23:02.560 they tried really hard?
00:23:05.060 How do you feel?
00:23:07.080 That'll get you to the election, won't it?
00:23:09.380 And what if they fix these holes for next time?
00:23:15.140 Yeah.
00:23:16.560 Yeah, the figuratively speaking part might not make it into the quote.
00:23:22.180 I see somebody saying that Trump wasn't really vaccinated.
00:23:26.200 I'm positive he was really vaccinated.
00:23:29.100 I don't think that story, I don't think we'd miss that story.
00:23:33.580 But I'm positive he's really vaccinated.
00:23:36.300 All right, so we've got some interesting stuff going here.
00:23:39.280 I would say if Tucker does not get canceled,
00:23:43.400 Republicans will sweep 2022,
00:23:47.560 and then 2024 is going to be pretty much whatever they want.
00:23:51.420 I'm getting a lot of calls early in the morning.
00:23:56.860 It's weird.
00:24:00.780 All right.
00:24:04.340 In related news, and it's probably not a coincidence,
00:24:08.640 there's some reporting from The Guardian.
00:24:12.440 Now, The Guardian is a British publication.
00:24:14.580 Are the Brits on the same side as the United States?
00:24:20.500 They're our allies, right?
00:24:22.720 But have you ever noticed
00:24:24.540 that Britain seems to be prominently involved
00:24:30.740 involved in some stories that we don't like,
00:24:33.340 such as the Steele dossier, right?
00:24:38.120 So I'm not entirely sure
00:24:40.420 that Great Britain is always our friend
00:24:43.400 because, you know,
00:24:44.780 your friends sometimes want to influence you
00:24:47.700 for their own self-interest.
00:24:49.400 So it could be that Great Britain 0.84
00:24:52.840 is not exactly as much a friend
00:24:55.320 to the United States as they could be.
00:24:57.320 I'll just put that out there.
00:24:59.520 But now we have The Guardian,
00:25:00.820 a British publication,
00:25:02.220 saying that somehow they have these...
00:25:05.360 They got a hold of secret Kremlin papers
00:25:11.360 that seem to show a plot
00:25:15.140 by Putin himself, directly involved,
00:25:18.000 to make sure that a mentally unstable candidate, 0.81
00:25:23.560 who they thought was Trump, allegedly,
00:25:26.400 would get elected
00:25:27.600 and that they were going to put
00:25:29.160 all of their efforts in Russia,
00:25:32.900 all of their assets were going to be
00:25:34.340 put into getting Trump elected.
00:25:38.420 Now, have you ever heard more bullshit in your life?
00:25:42.580 Oh, and there's also a suggestion
00:25:45.580 that there's really compromising material
00:25:49.320 that Russia really does have
00:25:50.700 that they just didn't use the first term, I guess,
00:25:53.980 but secret stuff they have.
00:25:55.680 But it's in the appendix,
00:25:56.860 which is not included.
00:25:59.940 That's convenient, right?
00:26:01.620 The accusations of the compromising information,
00:26:05.140 it's referred to in the appendix,
00:26:06.860 but they don't have that.
00:26:08.140 They got the document,
00:26:09.300 but not the appendix.
00:26:11.280 Totally believable.
00:26:12.160 All right.
00:26:14.920 This is just a repeat of 2016, right?
00:26:17.920 All they're doing is just running the same games again
00:26:20.440 because they worked last time.
00:26:25.280 Do you think that Putin
00:26:27.600 would want a, quote,
00:26:30.100 mentally unstable president of the United States
00:26:32.860 to be his opponent?
00:26:34.300 Do you believe that
00:26:37.500 because Putin thought that
00:26:39.940 that Trump would cause more civil strife
00:26:43.660 that he wanted Trump to be his opponent?
00:26:47.780 A mentally unstable guy 0.86
00:26:49.900 with the nuclear codes pointed at Russia.
00:26:53.840 That's what he wanted?
00:26:55.400 You think Putin is that fucking stupid?
00:26:59.080 There's no indication that Putin is that dumb.
00:27:03.440 None.
00:27:04.300 In fact,
00:27:05.880 in fact,
00:27:08.480 if anything,
00:27:10.220 Putin is so rational,
00:27:12.520 it just drives you crazy.
00:27:15.620 He's very rational.
00:27:17.380 He does,
00:27:17.820 you know,
00:27:18.080 even if he's evil,
00:27:19.300 which apparently he is,
00:27:21.340 he's very rational.
00:27:23.420 So I can't imagine
00:27:24.700 that he'd want a mentally unstable person 0.91
00:27:27.120 to be his opponent.
00:27:28.140 That doesn't seem like a good play.
00:27:29.780 So I'm going to say that
00:27:32.160 this looks like a British intelligence operation.
00:27:36.320 It's just a speculation, right?
00:27:38.420 I don't have proof of any of that.
00:27:41.140 But to me,
00:27:41.680 it looks like a British intelligence operation
00:27:43.920 to keep Trump out of the White House.
00:27:45.880 That's what it looks like to me.
00:27:49.520 Likewise,
00:27:50.460 the,
00:27:51.600 well,
00:27:52.900 that's what it looks like.
00:27:54.440 Then we've got this story
00:27:55.980 that
00:27:58.840 apparently
00:28:00.140 the chief of staff
00:28:03.740 of the military,
00:28:05.100 General Milley,
00:28:06.280 was so afraid
00:28:07.680 that Trump
00:28:08.660 would try to do
00:28:09.560 a coup,
00:28:12.140 but he said,
00:28:14.000 damn it,
00:28:14.700 that coup
00:28:15.140 will never happen
00:28:16.080 because
00:28:17.080 the military
00:28:18.200 has all the guns
00:28:19.220 and the coup
00:28:20.880 plotters
00:28:21.340 don't have enough guns
00:28:22.220 to take over the country.
00:28:24.220 To which I say,
00:28:26.620 how did we get
00:28:27.600 as the chief of staff
00:28:29.500 of the military
00:28:30.280 of the strongest
00:28:31.160 military power
00:28:32.780 in the history
00:28:33.520 of civilization,
00:28:35.160 how did we end up
00:28:36.320 with
00:28:36.660 the dumbest fucking
00:28:38.120 general in the world?
00:28:40.460 Because
00:28:40.940 I've seen him talk now
00:28:42.100 and the whole time
00:28:42.820 he's talking
00:28:43.260 I think,
00:28:44.260 is it my imagination
00:28:45.320 or is he really
00:28:46.560 a dumb fuck? 0.88
00:28:47.320 And he's really dumb.
00:28:50.320 Like actually
00:28:51.040 just literally dumb.
00:28:53.560 And I don't say that
00:28:54.920 about most people
00:28:55.800 that I criticize.
00:28:57.900 Have you ever heard me
00:28:58.840 call like,
00:28:59.780 you know,
00:29:00.020 major political people
00:29:01.240 that I disagree with
00:29:02.360 dumb?
00:29:04.960 I don't really use
00:29:06.200 that word a lot
00:29:07.020 because I usually think
00:29:08.480 that by the time
00:29:09.260 you reach that level
00:29:10.260 you're pretty damn smart
00:29:12.200 even if you're evil
00:29:13.280 and even if I don't
00:29:14.700 agree with what
00:29:15.440 you're doing.
00:29:16.460 I still say 0.62
00:29:17.180 you're pretty damn smart
00:29:18.140 but he looks
00:29:20.280 actually dumb
00:29:21.260 and when I saw him
00:29:23.500 testifying
00:29:24.280 he didn't sound
00:29:26.680 smart at all
00:29:27.620 and I do believe
00:29:29.260 that you can tell.
00:29:31.240 I do believe
00:29:32.500 that you can tell
00:29:33.620 the difference
00:29:34.260 between somebody
00:29:37.860 who's dumb
00:29:38.580 and smart 0.77
00:29:39.100 if you just
00:29:39.640 listen to him talk
00:29:40.540 and he feels dumb
00:29:42.620 and I don't feel safe
00:29:43.880 with that guy
00:29:44.380 in that uniform
00:29:45.120 at all.
00:29:45.780 so that's a problem.
00:29:49.760 So
00:29:50.000 do you think
00:29:52.540 that there was ever
00:29:53.340 a real risk
00:29:54.240 of a coup
00:29:55.300 just because
00:29:56.760 the dumbest guy
00:29:57.740 in uniform
00:29:58.460 was afraid of one?
00:30:00.920 Even at the same time
00:30:02.280 he realized
00:30:02.920 that a guy
00:30:03.620 in a Viking hat
00:30:04.580 could not conquer
00:30:05.920 the military
00:30:06.740 of the United States
00:30:07.900 he still thought
00:30:09.400 there was a risk.
00:30:11.420 Really?
00:30:11.920 Now
00:30:13.420 certainly
00:30:14.320 there was a risk
00:30:15.040 of violence
00:30:15.660 and violence
00:30:16.360 happened
00:30:16.720 but that's not
00:30:18.240 a risk
00:30:18.580 of a coup.
00:30:19.680 How do a bunch
00:30:20.200 of unarmed
00:30:20.980 protesters
00:30:21.840 you know
00:30:22.720 with what
00:30:23.180 some blunt objects
00:30:25.180 and some bear spray
00:30:26.880 or something
00:30:27.300 how did the
00:30:29.520 chief of our military
00:30:31.060 think that that was
00:30:31.960 going to be somehow
00:30:32.760 you know
00:30:33.600 there were zip ties
00:30:34.360 how did the head
00:30:36.040 of our military
00:30:36.600 think that that
00:30:37.220 was going to be a coup?
00:30:38.960 He acted as if
00:30:40.180 he was the one
00:30:41.340 who knew
00:30:41.720 it wouldn't work.
00:30:43.680 Do you know
00:30:44.680 who else
00:30:45.320 knew that
00:30:46.240 that wouldn't work?
00:30:48.320 Everybody.
00:30:50.060 Everybody
00:30:50.540 including the people
00:30:51.560 involved.
00:30:52.660 There was nobody
00:30:53.420 who thought
00:30:53.800 that that was a coup.
00:30:55.360 It's just purely
00:30:56.420 the intelligence agencies
00:30:57.720 manipulating the media
00:30:59.120 to tell you
00:31:00.060 it was a coup.
00:31:01.520 It's crazy.
00:31:05.200 Trump teed up
00:31:06.260 the problem
00:31:06.740 by calling
00:31:07.240 for supporters.
00:31:08.440 Yeah.
00:31:09.220 Yeah.
00:31:09.560 I'm not the one
00:31:10.400 to say Trump
00:31:11.220 is blame free.
00:31:14.380 In case you're wondering
00:31:15.520 did Trump do
00:31:17.240 everything he could
00:31:18.080 have done
00:31:18.460 to stop
00:31:19.500 Scott's lying?
00:31:23.060 Hey Dick
00:31:23.940 what are the odds
00:31:25.660 that my critics
00:31:26.340 are always named
00:31:27.120 Richard?
00:31:28.280 They're literally
00:31:28.880 dicks. 0.84
00:31:30.540 So Richard
00:31:31.400 may I call you
00:31:32.780 Dick?
00:31:34.840 You are
00:31:35.860 queuing me up
00:31:37.380 perfectly for my
00:31:38.220 next topic.
00:31:38.960 Thank you.
00:31:40.360 Have you noticed
00:31:41.180 a trend
00:31:41.900 which is that
00:31:43.080 my critics
00:31:43.820 have completely
00:31:45.140 stopped criticizing
00:31:46.360 my content?
00:31:48.060 They only go
00:31:48.900 after me personally
00:31:49.700 now?
00:31:50.700 And they say
00:31:51.540 things like
00:31:52.080 your take on
00:31:54.120 vaccinations
00:31:54.660 was a hot mess.
00:31:57.320 What part?
00:31:58.880 What would be
00:32:00.760 a thing
00:32:01.160 I said
00:32:01.760 that you
00:32:02.740 disagree with?
00:32:04.340 Just name
00:32:05.100 one thing.
00:32:06.780 Now I'm lying
00:32:08.080 but we're not
00:32:09.480 going to specify
00:32:10.040 what you're lying
00:32:10.760 about.
00:32:12.300 That's not important.
00:32:13.840 No you're just
00:32:14.400 lying.
00:32:15.900 About what?
00:32:17.280 Oh you're just
00:32:17.760 lying.
00:32:18.020 what I'm saying
00:32:26.760 because if
00:32:27.920 there were
00:32:28.600 specific things
00:32:29.420 people disagreed
00:32:30.260 with they
00:32:30.600 would just
00:32:30.920 say it.
00:32:32.000 They would
00:32:32.320 say you
00:32:33.280 said x
00:32:34.040 here's my
00:32:35.180 data to show
00:32:35.860 you're wrong
00:32:36.300 or you
00:32:37.960 said x
00:32:38.460 was true
00:32:39.000 and my
00:32:40.060 opinion is
00:32:40.660 wrong and
00:32:41.180 here's why.
00:32:42.640 How hard
00:32:43.060 would that be?
00:32:43.860 Even in a tweet
00:32:44.660 you could fit
00:32:45.180 all that in
00:32:45.700 but no.
00:32:48.400 Nope.
00:32:54.300 I'm going to
00:32:54.900 move my
00:32:55.300 microphone down
00:32:56.080 a little bit
00:32:56.580 because somebody
00:32:57.640 I'm getting a
00:32:58.580 lot of
00:32:58.940 people talking
00:33:01.540 on YouTube
00:33:03.080 to turn up
00:33:04.900 my sound
00:33:05.460 and one
00:33:07.080 has asked me
00:33:07.560 to move my
00:33:08.100 microphone up
00:33:08.760 so I'm going to
00:33:09.060 move it down
00:33:09.560 a little bit.
00:33:10.220 Fuck you.
00:33:10.960 I'm going to
00:33:12.840 move it down
00:33:13.320 a little bit.
00:33:14.340 Every time you
00:33:15.140 tell me to
00:33:15.480 move the
00:33:16.340 volume up
00:33:16.880 I'm going to
00:33:17.140 move it
00:33:17.400 down a little
00:33:17.840 bit.
00:33:19.320 Just go to
00:33:20.040 locals if you
00:33:20.740 want to hear
00:33:21.080 the volume.
00:33:22.980 You'll have to
00:33:23.340 subscribe.
00:33:28.760 All right.
00:33:30.700 Somebody says
00:33:31.400 China's doing it. 0.93
00:33:33.540 All right.
00:33:33.820 Let's talk
00:33:34.160 about the
00:33:38.520 teachers unions.
00:33:39.200 There's a
00:33:40.960 good tweet
00:33:42.820 here by
00:33:43.320 Adam Dopamine
00:33:44.160 who said
00:33:45.580 that Juneteenth
00:33:46.340 first celebrated
00:33:47.240 in 1865
00:33:48.420 but the
00:33:48.980 public was
00:33:49.580 ignorant to
00:33:50.380 its existence
00:33:51.040 until last
00:33:51.820 year.
00:33:52.600 Well I think
00:33:52.960 the white
00:33:53.400 public was
00:33:54.100 ignorant to
00:33:54.720 its existence.
00:33:55.920 I think the
00:33:56.320 black public
00:33:56.980 kind of knew
00:33:57.620 what it was.
00:33:58.480 But the
00:33:58.700 point still
00:33:59.120 stands.
00:34:00.000 That the
00:34:00.420 teachers unions
00:34:01.280 failed to
00:34:01.800 educate us
00:34:02.420 about racially
00:34:03.060 important events.
00:34:04.840 Clearly they
00:34:05.540 can't be trusted
00:34:06.140 to teach
00:34:06.820 critical race
00:34:07.580 theory.
00:34:08.640 And I
00:34:08.840 thought
00:34:09.080 it's a
00:34:10.040 pretty good
00:34:10.340 point.
00:34:11.820 The teachers
00:34:12.520 who never
00:34:13.680 told us
00:34:14.260 or at least
00:34:14.820 most of us
00:34:15.720 about something
00:34:17.040 called Juneteenth
00:34:18.060 how are they
00:34:19.100 going to teach
00:34:19.500 you critical
00:34:19.960 race theory?
00:34:21.440 You went all
00:34:21.960 your life
00:34:22.340 without hearing
00:34:22.800 about that
00:34:23.380 or at least
00:34:23.760 many of you
00:34:24.180 did.
00:34:25.420 All right.
00:34:31.080 Cerno
00:34:31.820 was right
00:34:33.440 about the
00:34:33.920 FBI lying.
00:34:34.900 Don't know
00:34:35.280 about that
00:34:35.660 story exactly.
00:34:36.600 just looking
00:34:37.860 at your
00:34:38.380 comments now.
00:34:42.000 All right.
00:34:45.600 That's all
00:34:46.320 I've got
00:34:46.680 for now.
00:34:48.180 And I'm
00:34:48.620 going to go
00:34:48.880 do some
00:34:49.200 other things.
00:34:51.980 But
00:34:52.240 keep watching
00:34:54.220 for indications
00:34:55.700 that the
00:34:56.360 intelligence
00:34:56.920 agencies are
00:34:58.080 running
00:34:58.460 everything.
00:34:59.620 Because at
00:35:00.040 this point
00:35:00.540 the signals
00:35:01.340 seem to
00:35:01.860 indicate that
00:35:02.400 pretty clearly.
00:35:06.120 And I
00:35:06.960 wouldn't say
00:35:07.520 there's
00:35:07.880 proof.
00:35:09.460 But certainly
00:35:10.280 all the
00:35:10.900 evidence is
00:35:11.860 just sort
00:35:13.180 of now
00:35:13.660 really clear.
00:35:16.260 It might be
00:35:16.920 false.
00:35:18.040 But it sure
00:35:18.480 looks that
00:35:18.880 way.
00:35:20.520 All right.
00:35:20.940 I'm
00:35:29.800 just
00:35:29.960 looking at
00:35:30.220 your
00:35:30.320 comments.
00:35:31.120 I'm
00:35:31.420 going to
00:35:31.560 turn off
00:35:31.840 YouTube and
00:35:32.420 I will
00:35:32.660 talk to
00:35:33.020 you
00:35:33.160 YouTubers 0.97
00:35:33.560 tomorrow.