ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
Real Coffee with Scott Adams
- July 19, 2021
Episode 1441 Scott Adams: Persuasion Tips Based on the Headlines, and Lots More
Episode Stats
Length
42 minutes
Words per Minute
141.47368
Word Count
6,048
Sentence Count
416
Misogynist Sentences
9
Hate Speech Sentences
13
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Good morning, everybody.
00:00:05.060
All of you YouTubers, I've already been talking to the people on Locals, and man, are you
00:00:12.320
in for a good coffee with Scott Adams today.
00:00:16.360
One of the very best, I dare say, and I haven't even done it yet, that's how confident I am
00:00:21.480
that this will be terrific.
00:00:23.600
And the only thing that could make it better, really the only thing I can think of, nothing
00:00:29.500
else could make this better, except a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chelsea, a
00:00:34.120
canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, which you would probably fill with your favorite
00:00:39.980
liquid, if you're thinking ahead.
00:00:43.220
I like coffee.
00:00:44.940
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that
00:00:49.940
makes everything better.
00:00:50.640
It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now.
00:00:54.280
Go.
00:00:54.500
Oh, so good.
00:01:06.820
Now, let's talk about some of the news.
00:01:11.360
Rasmussen did a poll and asked likely voters, asked the likely voters, who deserves more credit
00:01:22.160
for the COVID-19 vaccinations?
00:01:25.540
Surprisingly, it did not go the way that you would think it would go.
00:01:31.400
Because wouldn't you expect that that question would go purely along political lines?
00:01:36.760
Who did better on the COVID vaccination, Trump or Biden?
00:01:40.960
You'd expect that to be on straight party lines, wouldn't you?
00:01:44.140
You know, any Biden versus Trump question.
00:01:46.080
But no, Trump got 51%, as should get more credit, and Biden only 41%, which is pretty substantial.
00:01:56.640
Pretty substantial.
00:01:58.500
But here's the interesting part about this.
00:02:01.680
In the age group of 40 to 64, and what makes the age group of 40 to 64 interesting?
00:02:09.140
What's interesting about them is that they're the experienced workers.
00:02:16.560
People who have experience in life are between 40 and 64, and they've just got a little bit
00:02:22.020
more vision about what, you know, how things work.
00:02:26.220
And I think that that group had 58% said Trump.
00:02:29.820
So the people who have the most experience in life, you know, before they become senior citizens,
00:02:37.320
58% of them gave more credit to Trump.
00:02:41.020
Now, here's why.
00:02:43.200
Compare these two tasks.
00:02:46.220
Rolling out vaccinations so that everybody gets it and everybody is informed, and it's paid for.
00:02:52.740
So that's a big logistics issue, right?
00:02:56.100
How do you get all these vaccinations to different places, et cetera?
00:03:00.460
So that's what Biden is mostly doing.
00:03:03.320
Then compare that to getting government institutions to operate four years faster than normal.
00:03:12.460
Right?
00:03:13.660
These are not equal tasks.
00:03:16.200
The task of actually getting the vaccinations out to everybody probably was just a budget question,
00:03:22.380
because I don't think the president was personally coordinating the trucks.
00:03:26.800
You've got to get storage.
00:03:28.420
Do you have enough storage for these trucks?
00:03:30.960
No.
00:03:31.800
No.
00:03:32.140
All that stuff, the states were coordinating it.
00:03:34.860
You know, it was driven down to the lowest, presumably driven down to the lowest operators.
00:03:40.620
You know, the people who knew where the trucks were.
00:03:42.840
Where is my refrigeration?
00:03:45.040
You know, how do I get it there?
00:03:45.880
So I think the Biden stuff would have looked the same under every president.
00:03:50.720
Would you agree with that?
00:03:53.420
That the Biden's contribution to the vaccination rollout, which is impressive.
00:03:59.980
You know, I give him an A, rolling it out.
00:04:05.120
But I think any president would have gotten an A, because the president doesn't even do the work.
00:04:10.160
They just say, roll it out, and then stuff happens.
00:04:13.160
But how hard was it for Trump to get all of these institutions to operate faster?
00:04:18.860
That was bordering on magic.
00:04:22.740
And I'm surprised that there are so many people in the public who notice it.
00:04:27.080
But the real tell is that the working age people, the people with the most experience,
00:04:33.860
they recognize that what Trump did is far more of an accomplishment than what Biden did.
00:04:38.780
Even though what Biden will do is more energy, because, you know, the rollout is a bigger deal
00:04:43.320
than anything, but, yeah, I think Trump properly gets more credit for that.
00:04:52.000
I saw a tweet, which I agree with, from Ian Martisis, who says, and I quote,
00:05:00.140
due to the relatively rapid emergence of COVID variants, I'm just summarizing here.
00:05:09.580
So because there's so many variants popping up, all people will eventually be infected by the virus.
00:05:15.040
Do you agree with that?
00:05:16.620
Now that we know that being vaccinated won't stop you from getting the virus,
00:05:22.420
it just reduces the symptoms,
00:05:24.260
would you say it's true, given that we're now in our second season and this virus is not burning out?
00:05:32.240
It's actually getting stronger.
00:05:35.280
I hate to say it, but it's getting stronger.
00:05:39.320
Remember even the Spanish flu burned out in a year?
00:05:42.620
Or did it take two?
00:05:43.900
I can't remember the Spanish flu.
00:05:45.880
But I don't feel like this thing's burning out.
00:05:48.700
Now, it feels permanent, which also suggests it's engineered, of course.
00:05:54.640
But it feels like it's here to stay.
00:05:57.720
So when you make your decisions about how to handle your life from here on in,
00:06:04.340
do you assume you'll get it or assume that you won't?
00:06:08.820
Because I agree with this.
00:06:10.280
I think basically almost everybody's going to get it.
00:06:13.140
Maybe 85%, something like that.
00:06:15.140
So let's say you're going to make your decisions.
00:06:21.860
Here is your persuasion tip if you're the government.
00:06:27.980
You ready for this?
00:06:29.740
You're going to like this one.
00:06:32.720
There's somebody who says that they turn off the live stream
00:06:35.540
when I tease you about how good something's going to be before I say it.
00:06:41.360
But I do it anyway.
00:06:45.140
If I were going to advise the government how to get people vaccinated,
00:06:50.320
I would say this.
00:06:52.520
Probably if you have comorbidities, you've already gotten vaccinated.
00:06:58.020
Probably, right?
00:06:59.280
The people with comorbidities are far more vaccinated
00:07:01.820
because it just makes sense.
00:07:03.800
Their risk is different than everybody else's.
00:07:05.900
But how do you get somebody vaccinated who's under 40 and healthy?
00:07:12.980
That's the problem, right?
00:07:16.060
Because if you say to somebody who's under 40 and healthy,
00:07:20.120
hey, you get vaccinated, they'll usually say,
00:07:22.780
well, tell me what's the risk of the vaccination itself,
00:07:25.900
which is non-zero.
00:07:27.260
There's a risk.
00:07:28.680
And what's the risk of dying from COVID?
00:07:32.660
And they're going to say, I don't know,
00:07:35.020
but the risk of COVID is vanishingly small,
00:07:37.680
but I don't know enough about this vaccination.
00:07:39.700
So, you know, everybody's guessing
00:07:43.420
because you don't really know the odds of anything.
00:07:46.960
But a reasonable person could say, I'll wait it out.
00:07:52.200
Would you agree?
00:07:54.000
Would all of you agree that a reasonable, healthy young person
00:07:58.280
could make a reasonable decision
00:08:01.480
if the only thing they're looking at is the risk of death,
00:08:05.920
it would be reasonable not to take the vaccination?
00:08:08.200
Do I get banned for saying that?
00:08:11.160
But hold on, don't ban me yet.
00:08:13.160
There's a punchline coming.
00:08:14.820
Don't ban me.
00:08:16.140
Don't ban me.
00:08:17.000
I'm going to say something state approved in a moment here
00:08:19.560
and redeem myself.
00:08:21.820
It goes like this.
00:08:23.400
Suppose they change the branding for what the vaccine is.
00:08:27.900
Because right now, you think of it as a thing
00:08:29.900
that keeps you alive, right?
00:08:32.120
Right?
00:08:32.540
If the only thing the virus did was make you pretty sick,
00:08:37.640
we wouldn't be that worried about it.
00:08:39.920
You'd get plenty sick.
00:08:41.240
You'd get over it.
00:08:42.060
It would be just like when I was a kid.
00:08:43.740
We would just get chicken pox and just get over it.
00:08:47.720
But suppose you change the branding for people under 40
00:08:52.020
and you called the vaccination, wait for it, wait for it,
00:08:57.220
the treatment for, or the prevention for long-haul COVID.
00:09:03.380
And you don't even talk about the risk of death.
00:09:06.640
You know why?
00:09:07.940
Because if you're under 40, you think your risk of death
00:09:10.320
is so small that you don't even put it in your decision.
00:09:14.180
But if you're trying to persuade people to get vaccinated,
00:09:17.540
if they're healthy and, say, under 40, just to pick a number,
00:09:20.340
I would say, hey, would you like the vaccination
00:09:25.080
to prevent long-haul COVID?
00:09:28.120
Now, they might say, come on, how likely is it
00:09:32.260
that I'll get long-haul COVID?
00:09:34.720
Well, what are the chances?
00:09:36.560
So I looked that up before I got on here.
00:09:38.700
There's at least one study that says you have a 25% chance
00:09:42.160
of long-haul COVID.
00:09:44.980
Now, go back to the prior tweet.
00:09:47.780
Remember Ian Martisis?
00:09:50.340
He's telling us, in his view, this is just an opinion,
00:09:54.440
kind of speculative, that we'll all get infected.
00:09:58.900
Suppose that's true.
00:10:01.140
I think it's reasonable.
00:10:02.880
I don't know what the odds are that everybody will get infected,
00:10:05.340
but it looks like it.
00:10:07.100
I mean, if I had to guess,
00:10:08.200
I'd say 85% will be infected eventually.
00:10:11.320
But I don't know that for sure.
00:10:13.280
However, it's reasonable.
00:10:14.180
Now, suppose you had nearly 100% chance,
00:10:17.840
or 85% chance, let's say,
00:10:19.540
of getting infected
00:10:21.080
and a 25% chance of long-haul problems.
00:10:27.680
Would you take a vaccine
00:10:29.300
that was only to prevent the long-haul problems?
00:10:33.460
And that's all they sold it to you for.
00:10:35.480
It's like, hey, if you're over 40,
00:10:36.880
we've got a vaccination that will keep you from dying.
00:10:39.180
Because that's what you care about.
00:10:42.220
If you're under 40 and you're healthy,
00:10:44.080
no comorbidities,
00:10:45.920
we've got this vaccine
00:10:47.460
that will prevent you from getting long-haul COVID.
00:10:51.280
It's different, right?
00:10:53.220
Because every time I argue,
00:10:55.240
if not argue,
00:10:56.120
but any time I talk with somebody who's anti-vaccine,
00:10:59.400
they only talk about the risk of death.
00:11:01.380
So don't talk about that.
00:11:05.360
Talk about long-haul.
00:11:07.140
Do you want the long-haul vaccine or not?
00:11:10.420
That's what it is.
00:11:11.860
Because honestly,
00:11:12.720
the risk of death
00:11:13.440
from either the vaccination itself
00:11:15.300
or from COVID
00:11:16.980
is so low,
00:11:19.700
stop talking about it.
00:11:21.420
It just doesn't matter anymore
00:11:23.120
to decision-making.
00:11:24.880
It definitely matters if you die.
00:11:27.300
You know,
00:11:27.520
if your family member happens to be
00:11:29.020
one of the few people who die,
00:11:30.540
yeah, that matters, of course.
00:11:32.220
That's tragic.
00:11:33.360
But it doesn't matter to you and I
00:11:34.940
for our decision-making.
00:11:36.160
The risk is too small.
00:11:37.620
You don't make a decision
00:11:38.560
when you go to get bread
00:11:39.700
that you're going to die.
00:11:42.000
But you might, right?
00:11:44.220
You go to buy a loaf of bread,
00:11:46.000
you might die.
00:11:47.420
But you don't put it in your decision-making
00:11:49.720
because it's too small.
00:11:52.200
Now, here's another percentage
00:11:53.700
that I don't know the answer to.
00:11:56.060
Let's say it's true
00:11:57.040
that 25% of people
00:11:58.880
who get COVID
00:12:00.260
get some long-haul symptoms.
00:12:03.080
They seem to be
00:12:04.320
along the lines of inflammation,
00:12:06.560
don't they?
00:12:08.280
Is everything that
00:12:09.680
COVID long-haul does to you,
00:12:12.140
is it all under the umbrella
00:12:13.600
of inflammation?
00:12:15.200
Like inflamed organs
00:12:16.540
and inflamed brain?
00:12:19.400
And here's my question.
00:12:21.280
What do we know about the permanent,
00:12:23.820
the risk of permanent danger?
00:12:25.260
could we say that maybe
00:12:28.100
4%?
00:12:30.460
I'm just making this number up, right?
00:12:32.780
Could you say that 4%
00:12:34.280
of all the people
00:12:35.140
who get long-haul,
00:12:36.940
or maybe just 4%
00:12:39.020
of the people
00:12:39.600
who get COVID,
00:12:41.640
could get some kind of
00:12:42.600
permanent
00:12:43.140
restructuring of their organs
00:12:46.420
that might not be optimal?
00:12:49.720
I don't know.
00:12:51.300
I don't know.
00:12:52.160
But I'll tell you,
00:12:53.060
if it is that high,
00:12:54.900
I don't want to know about it.
00:12:56.240
All right,
00:12:56.540
changing the topic.
00:12:59.160
The founder of the 1619
00:13:00.800
project,
00:13:01.880
you probably all know her,
00:13:03.780
Nicole Hannah-Jones.
00:13:05.560
So she's getting criticized
00:13:06.840
because at some point
00:13:08.000
she had been asked
00:13:09.220
in an interview
00:13:09.800
what was the most,
00:13:11.580
I guess,
00:13:12.740
equal country.
00:13:14.260
A country where
00:13:14.980
there was the least racism,
00:13:16.420
I believe,
00:13:16.800
was the context.
00:13:18.620
And she answered
00:13:20.120
that it might be Cuba.
00:13:22.580
And noted that Cuba
00:13:23.680
does very well
00:13:24.840
in having a variety
00:13:26.340
of black and brown
00:13:27.660
and white people
00:13:28.380
and seems to handle
00:13:30.340
that diversity
00:13:31.680
better than other countries.
00:13:33.760
Now,
00:13:34.340
as you might expect,
00:13:36.540
people said,
00:13:37.320
you know,
00:13:37.700
that comes with
00:13:38.320
a big dose of socialism,
00:13:40.020
that comes with
00:13:40.880
a big dose
00:13:41.480
of you don't have
00:13:42.100
any food.
00:13:44.500
So there's a downside.
00:13:47.180
But are they related?
00:13:49.920
Are they related?
00:13:51.660
Is it the socialism
00:13:52.840
that's somehow
00:13:55.840
causing them
00:13:57.600
to have a good result?
00:14:00.420
Why would socialism
00:14:01.620
cause you to have
00:14:02.560
a better result
00:14:03.340
integrating people?
00:14:05.260
Is it because
00:14:06.200
there would be
00:14:06.580
no rich people?
00:14:08.580
Yeah,
00:14:08.860
everybody's equal
00:14:09.560
because we're in poverty,
00:14:10.640
right?
00:14:11.780
I feel like
00:14:12.540
that's what's going on.
00:14:15.100
That the way
00:14:15.900
you get equality
00:14:17.080
is by destroying
00:14:18.640
the economy
00:14:19.320
so that you don't
00:14:20.140
have rich people.
00:14:22.660
Yeah,
00:14:23.120
so she's getting
00:14:24.140
criticized for that,
00:14:26.600
maybe quite reasonably.
00:14:29.320
But here's my question.
00:14:31.280
Hold in your mind
00:14:32.460
an image
00:14:33.320
of Nicole Hannah-Jones,
00:14:36.100
the founder
00:14:36.660
of the 1619 Project.
00:14:38.320
And if there's
00:14:39.880
somebody on Locals
00:14:40.700
who wants to
00:14:41.260
paste in a photo
00:14:42.560
for the rest of you,
00:14:43.540
that would help.
00:14:44.740
Now,
00:14:45.020
I'm not going to
00:14:45.500
show it to you here
00:14:46.300
because then it gets
00:14:48.040
taken out of context
00:14:49.060
and blah, blah, blah.
00:14:51.040
And I don't believe
00:14:52.940
in making fun
00:14:54.620
of people's appearances
00:14:55.760
as a general rule.
00:14:57.680
But if somebody
00:15:00.340
makes a fashion choice,
00:15:03.060
I think you can
00:15:03.920
comment on that,
00:15:05.460
right?
00:15:06.340
So if somebody
00:15:06.980
just is not attractive,
00:15:08.460
I don't think that's,
00:15:09.740
you know,
00:15:10.240
that's not reasonable
00:15:11.680
to bring up in public.
00:15:13.240
No reason for it.
00:15:14.960
But suppose
00:15:15.480
somebody consciously
00:15:16.900
chooses a look
00:15:18.040
to present
00:15:19.520
something.
00:15:21.280
Let's say
00:15:21.920
Hillary Clinton
00:15:23.820
would wear her
00:15:24.740
pantsuits,
00:15:25.400
which I think
00:15:27.240
was actually
00:15:27.660
a pretty good choice
00:15:28.500
to make her look
00:15:29.420
professional, etc.
00:15:31.080
Could I comment
00:15:32.160
on Hillary Clinton's
00:15:34.900
pantsuit?
00:15:35.820
I think yes.
00:15:37.200
I think yes.
00:15:38.540
Could I comment
00:15:39.360
on Donald Trump's
00:15:40.880
haircut?
00:15:42.420
I say yes
00:15:43.220
because that's a choice.
00:15:45.000
He wasn't born
00:15:45.980
with a haircut.
00:15:47.480
It's a choice.
00:15:48.160
Likewise,
00:15:50.920
Project 1619 founder
00:15:53.040
Nicole Hannah-Jones
00:15:54.120
has made a fashion
00:15:55.960
choice to have,
00:15:57.540
okay,
00:15:58.160
on Locals
00:15:58.760
we're seeing
00:15:59.120
a picture of her,
00:16:00.800
to have red hair,
00:16:02.800
dyed red hair,
00:16:04.000
that sort of
00:16:05.740
tufts out
00:16:06.340
in two directions.
00:16:07.900
So rather than
00:16:08.620
being,
00:16:09.140
let's say,
00:16:09.600
fully rounded
00:16:10.320
like, say,
00:16:11.160
the head of a mushroom,
00:16:12.660
it's more
00:16:13.740
distributed
00:16:15.000
toward two directions.
00:16:16.780
Is it just me
00:16:19.200
or do you see
00:16:21.220
Bozo the Clown?
00:16:23.360
Now,
00:16:23.920
find a picture
00:16:24.600
of Bozo the Clown
00:16:25.580
and again,
00:16:27.680
I'm not trying
00:16:28.580
to be unkind.
00:16:29.880
We're talking
00:16:30.240
about persuasion.
00:16:31.860
I'm talking about
00:16:32.480
somebody who's
00:16:33.280
a public figure
00:16:34.080
who makes
00:16:35.220
conscious decisions
00:16:36.380
about her appearance
00:16:37.500
who has decided
00:16:39.260
to go with
00:16:40.880
a look
00:16:41.300
which,
00:16:42.720
to my mind,
00:16:44.600
suggests
00:16:45.240
Bozo the Clown.
00:16:47.360
Like,
00:16:47.620
that's the first
00:16:48.160
thing I think
00:16:48.660
of.
00:16:49.440
And I'm not
00:16:49.960
trying to be
00:16:50.960
unkind.
00:16:51.840
We're talking
00:16:52.340
about the
00:16:53.180
topic of
00:16:54.180
persuasion.
00:16:55.540
Right?
00:16:55.940
If you're trying
00:16:56.760
to persuade
00:16:57.500
somebody on a
00:16:58.620
deadly serious
00:17:00.000
topic,
00:17:01.500
racism,
00:17:02.900
right,
00:17:03.200
slavery,
00:17:04.480
like deadly,
00:17:05.400
literally deadly
00:17:06.220
serious topics,
00:17:07.920
do you want
00:17:08.960
to pick a look
00:17:09.720
that reminds
00:17:11.120
people of
00:17:11.820
Bozo the Clown?
00:17:13.680
No.
00:17:14.860
No,
00:17:15.360
don't do
00:17:15.740
that.
00:17:16.940
So that
00:17:17.480
would be
00:17:17.800
a persuasion
00:17:18.620
fail.
00:17:19.700
If anybody
00:17:20.800
looks at
00:17:21.240
your look
00:17:21.660
and says
00:17:22.140
to themselves,
00:17:23.440
I think
00:17:24.040
I'm being
00:17:24.400
reminded of
00:17:25.120
something,
00:17:25.620
it's either
00:17:26.160
Bozo the Clown
00:17:28.200
or a rat.
00:17:37.840
I hear a
00:17:38.620
piano being
00:17:39.160
played at
00:17:43.020
7.17 in the
00:17:44.180
morning.
00:17:44.540
That's weird.
00:17:45.720
Okay,
00:17:46.120
I don't know
00:17:46.460
what that's
00:17:46.780
all about.
00:17:49.360
One of the
00:17:49.960
things about
00:17:50.360
being me is
00:17:50.900
I never know
00:17:51.360
who's living
00:17:51.820
in my house
00:17:52.400
at any
00:17:52.740
moment,
00:17:53.380
but apparently
00:17:53.900
there's more
00:17:54.400
than one
00:17:54.700
piano player.
00:17:58.900
So here's
00:17:59.740
my other
00:18:00.120
comment about
00:18:01.040
Hannah
00:18:01.980
Nicole
00:18:02.440
Jones.
00:18:04.460
No,
00:18:04.680
Nicole
00:18:04.980
Hannah
00:18:05.280
Jones.
00:18:06.280
She's got
00:18:06.880
one of those
00:18:07.200
names that
00:18:07.580
you can put
00:18:07.920
in any
00:18:08.260
order.
00:18:09.260
Let's call
00:18:09.640
her
00:18:09.880
Nicole
00:18:10.320
Hannah
00:18:10.560
Jones.
00:18:11.820
And
00:18:12.080
if you
00:18:14.840
have a look
00:18:15.360
that looks
00:18:15.800
like Bozo
00:18:16.320
the Clown,
00:18:17.420
it makes
00:18:17.920
it seem
00:18:18.440
as though
00:18:18.920
you don't
00:18:20.600
have any
00:18:21.020
friends who
00:18:21.620
can be
00:18:21.940
honest with
00:18:22.540
you.
00:18:22.720
doesn't
00:18:24.680
it feel
00:18:25.020
like that's
00:18:25.480
true?
00:18:27.220
Somebody
00:18:27.620
in the
00:18:28.500
comments says
00:18:29.060
you're like
00:18:29.520
Larry David.
00:18:30.900
True.
00:18:32.080
So for
00:18:32.560
quite a number
00:18:33.280
of years
00:18:33.680
people have
00:18:34.200
said to me
00:18:34.640
you remind
00:18:35.560
me of
00:18:35.920
somebody.
00:18:37.280
It's often
00:18:37.940
Larry David.
00:18:39.240
So I
00:18:39.700
accept that.
00:18:40.980
I accept
00:18:41.440
that.
00:18:42.100
Now there's
00:18:42.300
not much
00:18:42.600
I can do
00:18:43.000
about it.
00:18:43.720
I don't
00:18:44.300
have much
00:18:44.660
to work
00:18:45.020
with here.
00:18:46.180
But it
00:18:46.880
certainly
00:18:47.160
would be
00:18:47.540
worth noting
00:18:48.240
if it
00:18:48.940
was some
00:18:49.260
choice I
00:18:49.740
made.
00:18:50.520
All
00:18:50.600
right.
00:18:50.720
here's
00:18:52.760
something I
00:18:53.200
learned about
00:18:54.120
Epstein's
00:18:55.380
death in
00:18:56.400
jail.
00:18:57.700
I guess
00:18:58.240
there's a
00:18:58.560
new book
00:18:58.900
coming out
00:18:59.500
by
00:19:00.340
investigative
00:19:01.860
reporter
00:19:02.500
Julie
00:19:02.860
Brown
00:19:03.280
called
00:19:03.640
The
00:19:03.820
Jeffrey
00:19:04.080
Epstein
00:19:04.400
Story.
00:19:05.740
Perversion
00:19:06.260
of
00:19:06.460
Justice
00:19:06.860
the
00:19:07.220
Jeffrey
00:19:07.700
Epstein
00:19:08.000
story
00:19:08.380
is
00:19:08.540
called.
00:19:09.660
And
00:19:09.880
here's
00:19:10.160
what she
00:19:10.500
says
00:19:10.880
that I
00:19:11.360
did
00:19:11.540
not
00:19:11.740
know.
00:19:12.960
Here's
00:19:13.220
a little
00:19:13.460
bit
00:19:13.620
more
00:19:13.880
about
00:19:14.340
Epstein's
00:19:15.200
cellmate.
00:19:16.840
Do you
00:19:17.440
know
00:19:17.580
anything
00:19:17.820
about
00:19:18.080
Epstein's
00:19:18.700
cellmate?
00:19:20.720
Well,
00:19:21.920
his name
00:19:22.380
was
00:19:22.620
Nicholas
00:19:23.160
Tartaglione.
00:19:26.320
Tartaglione.
00:19:28.040
Okay.
00:19:28.980
He's
00:19:29.480
described as
00:19:30.380
a hulking
00:19:30.940
ex-cop
00:19:31.880
facing the
00:19:33.380
death penalty
00:19:34.200
on federal
00:19:36.680
murder and
00:19:37.300
drug charges.
00:19:38.000
I think he
00:19:38.360
killed four
00:19:38.940
people.
00:19:40.600
And he
00:19:40.960
was Epstein's
00:19:41.660
cellmate.
00:19:43.480
Now,
00:19:43.840
Epstein
00:19:44.200
was not
00:19:45.720
dangerous in
00:19:46.700
that normal
00:19:47.260
way,
00:19:47.760
you know,
00:19:47.980
the violence
00:19:48.700
way.
00:19:49.260
He was
00:19:49.560
obviously
00:19:50.160
plenty
00:19:50.620
physically
00:19:51.600
dangerous
00:19:52.160
in his
00:19:52.640
way.
00:19:53.880
But
00:19:54.240
is that
00:19:54.820
normal?
00:19:55.140
You put
00:19:56.600
somebody on
00:19:57.120
death row
00:19:57.680
in with
00:19:58.160
an Epstein?
00:19:59.360
Is that
00:20:00.080
normal
00:20:00.420
procedure?
00:20:02.040
Don't
00:20:02.300
know.
00:20:03.580
But
00:20:03.840
apparently
00:20:05.280
here's the
00:20:05.860
part that
00:20:06.260
blew me
00:20:06.660
away.
00:20:07.780
Tartaglione
00:20:08.260
had an
00:20:08.980
illegal
00:20:09.420
cell phone.
00:20:12.920
Epstein's
00:20:13.520
cellmate
00:20:14.460
had a
00:20:15.800
cell phone.
00:20:18.200
He had
00:20:19.060
it.
00:20:19.560
He had
00:20:20.080
a cell
00:20:20.480
phone.
00:20:24.020
Here's
00:20:24.460
my
00:20:24.660
question.
00:20:25.880
How many
00:20:26.440
prisoners
00:20:26.940
have an
00:20:27.560
illegal
00:20:27.900
cell phone?
00:20:28.740
Like,
00:20:28.940
as a
00:20:29.160
percentage?
00:20:30.580
Is it
00:20:30.880
a lot?
00:20:31.960
I mean,
00:20:32.180
maybe it's
00:20:32.580
a lot.
00:20:33.340
How the
00:20:33.680
hell do
00:20:33.940
you smuggle
00:20:34.360
in a
00:20:34.660
cell phone?
00:20:35.100
It has
00:20:35.300
to be
00:20:35.520
through the
00:20:35.960
staff,
00:20:36.400
right?
00:20:37.280
Can
00:20:37.600
you get
00:20:38.000
a cell
00:20:38.480
phone to
00:20:38.940
a prisoner
00:20:39.380
in any
00:20:40.820
way except
00:20:41.640
through the
00:20:42.140
staff,
00:20:43.560
the guards,
00:20:45.400
right?
00:20:46.680
You'd
00:20:47.120
have to
00:20:47.540
have an
00:20:47.840
insider
00:20:48.360
being in
00:20:49.620
on that,
00:20:50.020
wouldn't
00:20:50.260
you?
00:20:51.640
I mean,
00:20:52.020
especially
00:20:52.780
because I
00:20:55.060
believe
00:20:55.500
Epstein's
00:20:56.700
cell had a
00:20:57.440
camera in
00:20:57.920
it.
00:20:58.880
So the
00:20:59.620
cellmate
00:21:00.400
apparently had
00:21:02.060
an illegal
00:21:02.580
phone in
00:21:03.940
a cell that
00:21:04.540
was being
00:21:04.940
monitored by
00:21:05.620
cameras.
00:21:06.100
how do
00:21:08.780
you get
00:21:08.960
away with
00:21:09.300
that?
00:21:11.360
How does
00:21:12.020
the jail
00:21:12.560
not have
00:21:13.600
some way
00:21:14.000
to detect
00:21:14.700
a cell
00:21:15.300
phone by
00:21:15.720
now?
00:21:16.720
Can't you
00:21:17.120
detect a
00:21:17.760
cell phone?
00:21:18.480
Is there
00:21:18.960
no device
00:21:19.720
that will
00:21:20.520
tell you
00:21:20.860
that a
00:21:21.240
cell phone
00:21:21.660
signal is
00:21:22.200
being given
00:21:22.680
off nearby?
00:21:25.400
How do
00:21:26.040
you have a
00:21:26.460
cell phone
00:21:26.880
in jail
00:21:27.360
in 2021
00:21:28.220
unless
00:21:28.760
they're not
00:21:29.180
trying very
00:21:29.700
hard to
00:21:30.060
prevent it?
00:21:31.620
So I
00:21:32.020
would say
00:21:32.320
that's
00:21:32.620
pretty damning.
00:21:33.400
And then
00:21:36.240
cell officials
00:21:36.880
say that
00:21:37.420
the contents
00:21:38.020
of this
00:21:38.560
illegal phone
00:21:39.280
was quote
00:21:39.860
inadvertently
00:21:41.400
destroyed.
00:21:42.760
The contents
00:21:43.760
of his
00:21:44.140
phone was
00:21:45.700
inadvertently
00:21:46.420
destroyed
00:21:47.040
because that
00:21:49.160
happens.
00:21:50.280
Right.
00:21:50.780
Most important
00:21:51.620
investigation of
00:21:53.620
the last
00:21:54.580
10 years
00:21:55.060
probably and
00:21:56.500
some evidence
00:21:57.180
just inadvertently
00:21:58.320
because nobody
00:21:59.440
thought to save
00:22:00.180
any evidence.
00:22:01.140
It was like
00:22:01.300
well most
00:22:01.820
important
00:22:02.340
alleged
00:22:03.840
suicide
00:22:04.280
ever but
00:22:05.180
you know
00:22:05.800
better not
00:22:06.880
save any
00:22:07.480
evidence.
00:22:09.080
So that's
00:22:09.940
all looking
00:22:10.380
pretty
00:22:11.060
unusual.
00:22:17.060
God I
00:22:17.760
wish I
00:22:18.060
could tell
00:22:18.400
you some
00:22:18.740
of the
00:22:18.900
things I
00:22:19.240
know.
00:22:20.140
One of
00:22:20.700
the hard
00:22:21.600
things about
00:22:22.140
being me
00:22:22.660
is that
00:22:24.180
I do
00:22:24.600
hear news
00:22:25.840
like long
00:22:26.700
before you
00:22:27.260
do.
00:22:28.240
Sometimes
00:22:28.620
months
00:22:29.360
if not
00:22:30.520
years
00:22:31.000
before you
00:22:32.260
hear it
00:22:32.740
and there's
00:22:33.720
stuff I
00:22:34.160
hear that
00:22:34.560
I just
00:22:34.820
can't tell
00:22:35.280
you and
00:22:36.380
it's
00:22:36.820
well I
00:22:39.480
know it's
00:22:40.400
annoying when
00:22:40.880
I say
00:22:41.140
that.
00:22:41.840
So let's
00:22:42.120
talk about
00:22:42.500
the Tokyo
00:22:43.220
Olympics.
00:22:45.140
Reportedly
00:22:45.620
and I don't
00:22:46.180
really believe
00:22:46.720
this story
00:22:47.260
but we're
00:22:49.000
going to go
00:22:49.400
with this
00:22:49.860
because I
00:22:50.400
think this
00:22:50.760
is fake
00:22:51.160
news but
00:22:51.740
it's fun.
00:22:52.980
It's fun
00:22:53.480
fake news.
00:22:55.760
Allegedly the
00:22:56.920
beds for the
00:22:58.000
athletes are
00:22:59.200
made out of
00:22:59.820
cardboard and
00:23:00.840
they're designed
00:23:01.520
so that they
00:23:02.760
will collapse
00:23:03.760
under the
00:23:04.360
weight of
00:23:04.820
fornication.
00:23:07.560
That's right.
00:23:09.100
You can
00:23:09.500
sleep on
00:23:09.980
them fine
00:23:10.520
but if you
00:23:12.680
get all
00:23:13.060
busy on
00:23:13.620
them and
00:23:14.540
you become
00:23:15.080
an Olympic
00:23:16.640
fornicator
00:23:17.400
these beds
00:23:19.360
are designed
00:23:19.920
to collapse.
00:23:20.900
Now let me
00:23:21.560
stop and say
00:23:22.180
I don't believe
00:23:22.800
anything about
00:23:23.400
this story.
00:23:24.500
I do not
00:23:25.040
believe that
00:23:26.020
beds were
00:23:26.480
designed
00:23:27.060
intentionally
00:23:28.100
to prevent
00:23:29.540
fornication
00:23:30.420
at the
00:23:31.040
Olympics.
00:23:31.960
But it
00:23:32.360
is a story.
00:23:33.940
Right?
00:23:34.440
So I'm
00:23:34.780
going to
00:23:35.040
talk about
00:23:35.560
it because
00:23:36.480
it's a
00:23:36.820
story but
00:23:37.340
I don't
00:23:37.600
believe it's
00:23:37.980
true.
00:23:38.580
However it
00:23:39.260
raises some
00:23:39.920
interesting
00:23:40.420
questions.
00:23:41.880
If you're
00:23:42.580
a young
00:23:43.100
single person
00:23:43.800
at the
00:23:44.160
Olympics and
00:23:44.700
you're
00:23:44.900
competing
00:23:45.300
which of
00:23:46.920
the other
00:23:47.320
athletes
00:23:47.940
looks the
00:23:49.180
sexiest
00:23:49.680
to you?
00:23:51.420
I'm
00:23:51.700
wondering do
00:23:52.400
they have
00:23:52.760
a lot of
00:23:53.340
private
00:23:53.620
conversations
00:23:54.240
over lunch
00:23:54.960
like
00:23:55.360
I've
00:23:56.980
got to
00:23:57.160
get me
00:23:57.420
a gymnast.
00:23:58.700
Why?
00:23:59.080
Because you
00:23:59.440
think they're
00:23:59.840
sexy?
00:24:00.860
No because
00:24:01.620
I have a
00:24:02.120
cardboard bed
00:24:03.080
and I need
00:24:03.640
the smallest
00:24:04.260
amount of
00:24:04.840
weight and
00:24:07.040
I'm thinking
00:24:07.480
gymnast.
00:24:09.140
98 pounds.
00:24:10.700
You know?
00:24:11.440
I could
00:24:11.740
probably make
00:24:12.280
that work.
00:24:13.680
Or is it
00:24:14.580
the javelin
00:24:15.240
throwers?
00:24:16.700
Is it just
00:24:17.560
something about
00:24:18.460
the javelin?
00:24:19.300
You know
00:24:19.540
what I mean?
00:24:20.080
You know
00:24:20.280
what I mean?
00:24:20.840
Wink wink
00:24:21.280
wink.
00:24:21.780
Javelin
00:24:22.220
thrower?
00:24:23.200
Yeah?
00:24:24.020
Do the
00:24:24.500
ladies like
00:24:24.980
the javelin
00:24:25.520
thrower?
00:24:25.880
You know
00:24:26.040
what I
00:24:26.220
mean?
00:24:26.500
You know
00:24:26.700
what I
00:24:26.900
mean?
00:24:27.700
Okay.
00:24:28.940
Or is it
00:24:29.480
the weight
00:24:29.740
lifters?
00:24:30.700
Is it
00:24:30.980
the big
00:24:31.240
bulky
00:24:31.560
guys?
00:24:32.140
Is it
00:24:32.400
or do
00:24:33.680
they like
00:24:34.060
the freaks?
00:24:35.560
They like
00:24:36.220
the ones
00:24:37.080
who can
00:24:37.440
ski and
00:24:38.400
shoot?
00:24:39.680
Yeah.
00:24:40.780
You get
00:24:41.460
a lover
00:24:42.940
who can
00:24:43.460
ski and
00:24:44.220
shoot and
00:24:44.940
you've got
00:24:45.140
to ask
00:24:45.460
yourself
00:24:45.840
what else
00:24:47.180
can they
00:24:47.540
do?
00:24:48.620
Yeah.
00:24:49.360
Can they
00:24:49.740
tickle your
00:24:50.220
balls?
00:24:50.760
Well never
00:24:51.300
mind.
00:24:52.120
Never
00:24:52.380
mind.
00:24:52.640
I'm just
00:24:53.240
saying that
00:24:53.640
some athletes
00:24:54.260
can multitask.
00:24:56.060
They're better
00:24:56.440
at two
00:24:58.180
things.
00:24:58.960
Some people
00:24:59.340
can only do
00:24:59.800
one thing.
00:25:00.840
Some people
00:25:01.240
can only
00:25:01.600
shoot.
00:25:02.560
Some people
00:25:03.060
can only
00:25:03.520
ski.
00:25:04.640
But some
00:25:05.100
people can
00:25:06.340
shoot and
00:25:06.860
ski.
00:25:08.360
And I'm
00:25:09.100
saying that
00:25:09.680
could be a
00:25:10.320
tell for a
00:25:10.820
good lover.
00:25:11.980
Not every
00:25:12.520
time but I
00:25:13.240
feel like the
00:25:13.940
odds are in
00:25:14.420
your favor.
00:25:14.800
Yeah.
00:25:17.580
Anyway these
00:25:18.320
are the
00:25:18.540
questions I
00:25:19.040
think of.
00:25:19.580
Which Olympic
00:25:20.260
athletes would
00:25:20.940
be the best
00:25:21.380
lovers?
00:25:21.660
I said
00:25:24.080
the other
00:25:24.340
day there
00:25:24.680
should be
00:25:24.960
a fleet
00:25:25.660
of drones.
00:25:28.020
How is
00:25:29.120
the word
00:25:29.420
drone exactly
00:25:30.440
appearing on
00:25:32.140
my screen
00:25:32.720
in the
00:25:33.020
comments?
00:25:34.460
Exactly as
00:25:35.440
I said
00:25:35.940
the story
00:25:37.120
about drones.
00:25:37.820
That's weird.
00:25:39.400
Anyway I
00:25:40.940
asked I said
00:25:41.780
there should
00:25:42.060
be drones
00:25:42.560
for forest
00:25:43.180
fires.
00:25:44.620
In other
00:25:45.060
words drones
00:25:45.820
that are
00:25:46.100
looking for
00:25:46.640
forest fires
00:25:47.400
and spotting
00:25:48.100
them but
00:25:49.100
also an
00:25:50.000
army of
00:25:50.600
drones to
00:25:51.260
bring water
00:25:51.880
and try
00:25:52.620
to get to
00:25:53.900
the fire
00:25:54.200
as quickly
00:25:54.620
as possible.
00:25:55.960
Now the
00:25:56.440
drones that
00:25:57.260
could bring
00:25:57.620
water are
00:25:58.320
probably a
00:25:58.780
pretty big
00:25:59.180
problem because
00:25:59.840
how do you
00:26:00.180
load them up
00:26:00.700
with water
00:26:01.260
without a
00:26:02.360
pilot?
00:26:03.020
I suppose
00:26:03.300
that's pretty
00:26:03.720
hard.
00:26:04.900
But could be
00:26:05.460
done.
00:26:06.340
It's certainly
00:26:06.900
well within the
00:26:07.760
ability of
00:26:08.640
technology someday
00:26:09.780
if we spend
00:26:10.540
enough money
00:26:11.040
to have drones
00:26:12.340
that would fly
00:26:13.160
down and grab
00:26:13.860
water.
00:26:17.140
Hey Carpe,
00:26:18.200
good to see you
00:26:19.280
and all the
00:26:19.780
Olympic
00:26:20.080
fornicators.
00:26:22.400
But it
00:26:22.920
turns out that
00:26:23.580
California does
00:26:24.400
have a fleet
00:26:25.640
of drones.
00:26:26.880
Did not know
00:26:27.480
that.
00:26:28.220
So we do
00:26:28.600
have a fleet
00:26:29.060
of drones
00:26:29.560
that I think
00:26:30.420
are just
00:26:30.740
looking for
00:26:31.360
fires.
00:26:31.880
They're not
00:26:32.180
treating them.
00:26:34.760
And maybe
00:26:35.280
small volume
00:26:36.860
of chemical
00:26:37.440
foam.
00:26:38.200
Exactly.
00:26:39.080
So if you
00:26:39.780
cut the fire
00:26:40.420
fast enough
00:26:41.460
maybe 100
00:26:44.740
drones with
00:26:45.740
chemical
00:26:46.440
retardant
00:26:47.120
because it's
00:26:47.640
not as heavy
00:26:48.200
I'm guessing
00:26:48.800
as water.
00:26:50.780
Maybe.
00:26:52.000
Maybe that
00:26:52.680
gets it done.
00:26:54.560
But if I
00:26:55.440
were the
00:26:56.220
California
00:26:56.680
governor here
00:26:57.420
is my
00:26:57.880
persuasion
00:26:58.700
tip.
00:27:00.360
Persuasion
00:27:00.880
tip.
00:27:02.060
I would be
00:27:02.960
talking more
00:27:03.600
about this
00:27:04.120
stuff.
00:27:05.140
Because the
00:27:05.880
news is all
00:27:06.460
about stuff
00:27:06.960
burning up.
00:27:08.060
It's just
00:27:08.380
non-stop bad
00:27:09.300
news and what
00:27:09.940
are you doing
00:27:10.300
about it.
00:27:11.060
And if you're
00:27:11.520
a citizen it
00:27:12.120
looks like the
00:27:12.580
governor is
00:27:13.020
doing basically
00:27:13.900
nothing.
00:27:15.200
Now what are
00:27:16.400
the odds that
00:27:17.380
the governor
00:27:17.920
and the
00:27:18.580
state of
00:27:18.920
California are
00:27:19.760
actually doing
00:27:21.120
nothing.
00:27:22.540
Nothing more
00:27:24.080
than they did
00:27:24.600
last year.
00:27:25.800
Is that
00:27:26.140
possible?
00:27:27.320
Are they
00:27:27.680
really just
00:27:28.220
doing nothing
00:27:29.080
more than they
00:27:29.720
did last year
00:27:30.360
when the whole
00:27:30.740
damn state
00:27:31.300
seemed like it
00:27:31.840
was on fire?
00:27:32.420
No.
00:27:33.480
They're probably
00:27:33.900
doing stuff.
00:27:35.320
And it probably
00:27:35.860
matters.
00:27:36.580
And it's probably
00:27:37.060
pretty good stuff.
00:27:38.480
So why aren't
00:27:39.180
we hearing about it?
00:27:40.140
So here's my
00:27:40.740
persuasion tip for
00:27:41.860
the governor.
00:27:42.900
If you're doing
00:27:43.480
something about
00:27:44.140
these forest fires
00:27:45.040
then maybe
00:27:50.060
goodbye user.
00:27:55.760
If you're
00:27:56.320
anyway.
00:28:00.220
Skipping
00:28:00.660
topics.
00:28:02.340
Have you seen
00:28:03.080
the photo?
00:28:03.960
I'll bet all of
00:28:04.560
you have by now.
00:28:05.280
If you follow the
00:28:05.880
news you've seen
00:28:06.480
the photo of the
00:28:08.060
Texas state
00:28:09.340
Democrats who
00:28:11.120
got on a plane
00:28:12.040
or a bus or
00:28:12.920
something and they
00:28:13.480
ran away and
00:28:18.680
they took a
00:28:21.800
selfie of how
00:28:22.780
happy they were
00:28:23.600
and pleased with
00:28:24.360
themselves and
00:28:25.240
smug on that
00:28:26.560
bus.
00:28:27.560
Here's my
00:28:28.300
persuasion tip.
00:28:32.480
Don't release a
00:28:33.660
photo that your
00:28:35.920
enemies are going
00:28:36.880
to be really
00:28:37.420
happy to publish
00:28:38.400
over and over
00:28:39.520
and over again.
00:28:40.300
Now look at
00:28:42.740
the face of the
00:28:43.640
woman who's
00:28:44.160
closest to the
00:28:45.420
camera.
00:28:46.000
She was probably
00:28:46.460
the one who was
00:28:46.980
holding the
00:28:47.440
camera.
00:28:48.040
Yeah I'm seeing
00:28:48.640
on locals
00:28:49.560
somebody's posting
00:28:50.500
it.
00:28:51.280
There's a woman
00:28:51.860
there with a
00:28:52.740
creepy big smile.
00:28:55.140
I'm going to
00:28:55.360
try to do it.
00:28:58.140
Like this.
00:28:59.000
I think I nailed
00:28:59.620
it actually.
00:29:00.240
This is her look.
00:29:02.760
And the problem
00:29:03.680
is that she's
00:29:05.180
too pleased with
00:29:06.280
herself.
00:29:07.820
Am I right?
00:29:08.640
She doesn't look
00:29:10.320
like somebody who's
00:29:11.540
doing something for
00:29:12.440
the good of the
00:29:13.080
country or you
00:29:14.760
know she's found
00:29:15.540
the only thing you
00:29:16.320
could do to try to
00:29:17.460
solve a problem.
00:29:18.820
She doesn't have
00:29:19.600
that problem solver
00:29:21.440
look if you know
00:29:23.240
what I mean.
00:29:24.400
She has the
00:29:25.200
crazed Karen look.
00:29:28.120
Right?
00:29:28.540
Karen.
00:29:31.640
And she took the
00:29:33.380
picture and she was
00:29:34.280
probably dumb enough
00:29:35.000
to be the one who
00:29:35.740
published it.
00:29:36.540
but really anybody
00:29:39.500
else would have
00:29:41.920
known.
00:29:43.400
Like the people who
00:29:44.520
did not take the
00:29:45.420
picture probably
00:29:46.000
looked at it and
00:29:46.620
said well there's
00:29:48.260
my brand.
00:29:53.320
Come on you love
00:29:54.300
it when I make that
00:29:55.020
face.
00:29:55.700
If you're listening
00:29:56.300
to this on the
00:29:56.960
podcast and you
00:29:58.320
can't see the
00:29:58.880
visual of the best
00:30:00.380
physical impression
00:30:01.840
anybody's ever done
00:30:03.140
of the Karen on the
00:30:04.860
bus well you've
00:30:06.400
missed something
00:30:06.900
good.
00:30:07.280
I'm going to do
00:30:07.700
it again.
00:30:08.180
You're going to
00:30:08.480
miss it again.
00:30:11.060
Pretty good wasn't
00:30:11.720
it?
00:30:12.660
I think that was my
00:30:13.400
best work.
00:30:16.340
Well here's some
00:30:17.160
fake news that you
00:30:18.220
didn't think was
00:30:18.800
fake news.
00:30:20.000
Have you been
00:30:20.460
hearing that the
00:30:21.420
Arizona audit the
00:30:23.040
election audit found
00:30:24.820
74,000 ish ballots
00:30:27.980
that don't have a
00:30:31.040
record of being
00:30:32.160
mailed in.
00:30:34.020
What?
00:30:35.820
Have you heard
00:30:36.520
that?
00:30:37.240
It's all over the
00:30:38.020
news all over social
00:30:39.160
media that they
00:30:40.240
found 74,000 ballots
00:30:42.140
that don't seem to
00:30:42.900
have a record of
00:30:44.740
having been valid
00:30:46.820
mail-in ballots.
00:30:48.900
So have you heard
00:30:49.420
that story?
00:30:50.940
Do you know it's
00:30:51.800
fake news?
00:30:53.800
How many of you
00:30:54.640
know it's fake news?
00:30:55.560
Here's the real
00:30:57.740
story.
00:30:59.400
That 74,000 includes
00:31:01.560
early voting.
00:31:03.780
People who did not
00:31:05.200
mail in a ballot
00:31:06.220
they just voted
00:31:07.300
early.
00:31:08.960
And it includes
00:31:09.900
things that came in
00:31:10.960
after some date
00:31:11.740
where they came up
00:31:12.520
with their numbers.
00:31:14.140
So between the two
00:31:15.000
things the fact
00:31:16.900
that it also
00:31:17.440
includes a whole
00:31:18.120
different category
00:31:18.840
of voters which
00:31:20.820
should not be linked
00:31:21.860
to online voting
00:31:22.820
so of course they're
00:31:23.600
not in the records
00:31:24.240
as online voters
00:31:25.360
because they
00:31:26.340
weren't.
00:31:27.420
They were never
00:31:27.880
online voters.
00:31:28.700
They just showed
00:31:29.160
up early and
00:31:29.640
voted in person.
00:31:31.260
So the whole
00:31:32.560
74,000 thing
00:31:33.880
looks like fake
00:31:35.180
news based on
00:31:36.140
the auditors not
00:31:37.380
knowing how the
00:31:38.000
system works.
00:31:39.920
That's awkward.
00:31:41.700
Now I could be
00:31:43.200
wrong because I'm
00:31:44.660
using a CNN
00:31:46.600
fact check on
00:31:47.660
this.
00:31:48.260
So it could be
00:31:49.000
bullshit.
00:31:50.240
But I feel as if
00:31:52.160
the bias here is in
00:31:53.400
favor of the fact
00:31:54.280
checkers.
00:31:55.360
I feel as if the
00:31:56.560
fact checkers
00:31:57.200
probably got this
00:31:58.800
one right.
00:32:00.380
Probably.
00:32:01.500
So ask yourself.
00:32:03.380
If you watched a
00:32:05.180
news source or
00:32:06.420
somebody tweeted
00:32:07.180
that number around
00:32:08.060
like it was a
00:32:09.460
fact and you
00:32:10.940
accepted it as a
00:32:12.100
fact, check where
00:32:14.680
you got it from.
00:32:16.160
Just take a look
00:32:17.160
at where you got
00:32:17.680
it from and see
00:32:19.340
if you want to
00:32:19.860
trust that source
00:32:20.620
going forward.
00:32:21.260
Now remember what
00:32:22.720
I told you early
00:32:23.500
on when the
00:32:24.660
election was being
00:32:25.560
questioned and
00:32:26.440
audits were
00:32:27.020
happening and all
00:32:27.980
that?
00:32:28.700
I told you from
00:32:29.580
the very start
00:32:30.460
that no matter
00:32:31.860
whether there was
00:32:32.780
any impropriety or
00:32:33.920
not, irregardless of
00:32:36.080
how much there was
00:32:36.940
or regardless of
00:32:38.460
how much there was,
00:32:39.800
that 95% of the
00:32:42.900
claims would be
00:32:44.060
bullshit.
00:32:44.420
Even if someday we
00:32:47.080
find that 5% are
00:32:48.320
true, which we
00:32:49.760
haven't found,
00:32:50.640
nobody's done that,
00:32:52.160
but even if we did,
00:32:53.800
still 95% of the
00:32:55.220
claims would be
00:32:55.820
utter bullshit and
00:32:56.740
apparently this is
00:32:57.440
one of them.
00:32:58.860
All right, the
00:32:59.220
Guardian is doing
00:33:01.880
an investigative piece
00:33:03.260
that looks like it
00:33:04.160
could be important on
00:33:05.680
some kind of spyware
00:33:06.920
program called
00:33:07.740
Pegasus.
00:33:09.320
So there's a
00:33:10.120
company, the NSO
00:33:11.600
group, who sells
00:33:12.500
this surveillance
00:33:13.420
software that
00:33:15.220
allows you to
00:33:15.860
surveil people on
00:33:17.740
their cell phone.
00:33:19.240
But they say
00:33:20.300
they're selling it
00:33:21.020
to only intelligence
00:33:23.520
agencies and, you
00:33:24.660
know, the good
00:33:25.380
guys.
00:33:26.380
Do you believe
00:33:27.160
that?
00:33:28.780
Well, you're safe
00:33:29.920
because this
00:33:31.260
technology to look
00:33:32.560
into anybody's
00:33:33.460
phone is only
00:33:35.640
being given to
00:33:36.340
the good guys.
00:33:38.020
So it's
00:33:39.640
Project Pegasus,
00:33:40.740
yes, thank
00:33:41.220
you.
00:33:43.420
So,
00:33:45.220
so, yeah,
00:33:49.500
your phone can
00:33:50.400
be spied on by
00:33:51.940
anybody who has
00:33:52.620
this software and
00:33:54.520
that means any
00:33:55.320
intelligence agency
00:33:56.360
basically can get
00:33:57.320
into your phone.
00:33:58.420
Now, the scary
00:33:59.280
part is that there
00:34:00.180
was some kind of
00:34:00.840
hack where the
00:34:01.700
Guardian got a
00:34:02.560
hold of a list of
00:34:04.460
people that are
00:34:05.340
being spied on by
00:34:06.560
this software,
00:34:08.180
journalists.
00:34:08.660
journalists, right?
00:34:12.880
Now, I'm going to
00:34:14.960
have to check that
00:34:15.820
list to see if I'm
00:34:17.180
fucking on it, right?
00:34:19.780
Now, I don't know if
00:34:20.760
I would be called a
00:34:21.520
journalist, but I'm, I
00:34:23.480
work in that domain,
00:34:24.540
right?
00:34:24.920
I'm, I'm an opinion
00:34:25.940
maker in the political
00:34:27.300
sense, so I would
00:34:29.540
think I would be
00:34:30.440
exactly in the
00:34:31.480
crosshairs of what
00:34:34.760
somebody would want
00:34:35.540
to spy on because I
00:34:37.900
have an influence and
00:34:39.160
I talk about the
00:34:39.880
topic that people
00:34:40.660
spy on.
00:34:42.220
So, when the list
00:34:43.460
comes out, I have to
00:34:46.220
check the fucking
00:34:46.880
list to see if I'm
00:34:49.000
on it.
00:34:49.880
Like, really, I have
00:34:50.960
to check the list.
00:34:52.240
Now, I bet I'm not.
00:34:53.840
You know, if I had to
00:34:54.460
take a guess, the odds
00:34:55.420
are low.
00:34:56.120
But I have to
00:34:57.480
check.
00:34:59.280
Now, I suppose
00:34:59.840
somebody might have
00:35:00.420
told me by now.
00:35:01.720
I probably would have
00:35:02.800
been informed by now
00:35:03.740
if I were on it.
00:35:05.620
Anyway.
00:35:08.000
We also have news
00:35:09.720
that China has
00:35:10.900
apparently been doing
00:35:11.840
the Russia trick of
00:35:13.640
hiring criminal
00:35:14.760
contract hackers.
00:35:16.840
So, things can't be
00:35:17.860
tied as easily back to
00:35:19.020
the government.
00:35:19.980
They just hire
00:35:20.740
criminals to do the
00:35:21.800
hacking and apparently
00:35:22.820
they've been hacking
00:35:23.560
and blackmailing
00:35:24.520
American companies.
00:35:26.120
And I don't know
00:35:30.800
what to say about
00:35:31.560
China anymore.
00:35:33.400
China's brand is
00:35:35.660
fentanyl mass
00:35:36.600
murder, cyber
00:35:37.380
crimes, ethnic
00:35:38.260
genocide, IP
00:35:39.320
theft, climate
00:35:40.300
destruction, illegal
00:35:41.480
trade practices,
00:35:43.220
selling the organs
00:35:44.320
of living dissidents,
00:35:46.720
and unleashing the
00:35:48.320
coronavirus on the
00:35:49.300
world.
00:35:50.860
That's their brand.
00:35:53.020
Like, when you
00:35:53.560
think about them,
00:35:54.920
you think of
00:35:55.620
just all that
00:35:56.800
shit?
00:35:58.760
And apparently
00:36:00.340
they can just
00:36:00.940
hack on us too
00:36:01.800
because there's
00:36:03.000
no penalty.
00:36:06.240
I think we have
00:36:07.260
to expel all of
00:36:08.280
their diplomats,
00:36:09.660
don't you?
00:36:10.800
I feel as if the
00:36:12.280
fentanyl issue
00:36:13.280
alone should cause
00:36:15.120
us to just expel
00:36:16.180
all of their
00:36:16.720
diplomats and
00:36:18.180
treat them as if
00:36:19.060
they're a pariah
00:36:19.740
country until they
00:36:20.680
at least fix that.
00:36:22.580
I mean, with the
00:36:23.100
cyber stuff, I could
00:36:24.120
sort of imagine
00:36:24.900
that maybe we're
00:36:25.620
doing it back to
00:36:26.360
them.
00:36:27.440
So maybe we're a
00:36:28.280
bunch of hypocrites
00:36:29.120
and I would
00:36:30.780
imagine the United
00:36:31.580
States is hacking
00:36:32.340
China.
00:36:33.320
I doubt we're
00:36:34.000
blackmailing them
00:36:34.840
and doing ransomware.
00:36:36.640
I doubt we're
00:36:37.060
doing that.
00:36:38.180
Maybe.
00:36:39.020
Who knows?
00:36:40.580
But fentanyl, I
00:36:42.560
don't think we're
00:36:43.020
sending them
00:36:43.500
fentanyl.
00:36:44.440
So we should just
00:36:45.100
say, look, we're
00:36:47.160
closing business with
00:36:48.180
you guys.
00:36:49.240
Trade with anybody
00:36:49.960
you want, but not
00:36:50.880
us, because you've
00:36:52.180
got to stop the
00:36:52.720
fentanyl.
00:36:53.220
That's the ticket to
00:36:54.860
get into the
00:36:55.360
conversation.
00:36:57.100
You don't negotiate
00:36:58.260
fentanyl.
00:37:01.020
That's what Trump
00:37:01.900
did wrong.
00:37:03.160
Trump negotiated
00:37:04.580
fentanyl.
00:37:06.620
You don't negotiate
00:37:07.880
with a mass
00:37:08.600
murderer who's
00:37:09.340
literally murdering
00:37:10.500
you, because
00:37:11.620
whatever reason
00:37:12.320
they're doing it,
00:37:12.920
they wanted to
00:37:13.440
keep doing it.
00:37:14.100
You don't
00:37:14.360
negotiate that.
00:37:16.020
You just tell
00:37:16.600
them what the
00:37:17.040
penalty is, and
00:37:18.080
then you apply
00:37:18.660
it.
00:37:19.740
That's it.
00:37:20.420
You don't
00:37:20.640
negotiate fucking
00:37:21.880
fentanyl.
00:37:23.560
So, yeah, Trump
00:37:24.360
got that completely
00:37:25.260
wrong.
00:37:26.360
At least he tried.
00:37:29.720
Here's some more
00:37:30.480
semi-fake news.
00:37:33.780
So there's, I
00:37:34.800
saw an article, and
00:37:36.140
I made the mistake
00:37:36.780
of tweeting it
00:37:37.460
myself, so I
00:37:38.480
added to the
00:37:39.180
fake newsness,
00:37:40.380
which is that
00:37:41.360
there is a
00:37:41.920
Northern California
00:37:42.720
county, I think
00:37:45.240
it might be my
00:37:45.880
county or the
00:37:46.640
one next to me,
00:37:47.280
I'm not sure
00:37:47.680
which one,
00:37:48.660
but that
00:37:50.780
changed the
00:37:52.420
way it counts
00:37:53.000
coronavirus deaths
00:37:54.360
and decreased
00:37:55.120
their number of
00:37:56.040
fatalities by
00:37:56.840
25%.
00:37:57.780
What?
00:37:59.660
They decreased
00:38:00.820
the number of
00:38:02.060
past fatalities
00:38:03.260
by 25%, and
00:38:05.280
here's what they
00:38:05.840
did.
00:38:06.780
They stopped
00:38:07.420
counting people
00:38:08.320
who died in,
00:38:09.340
for example,
00:38:10.480
car crashes
00:38:11.280
who might have
00:38:12.700
also had
00:38:13.260
COVID.
00:38:14.940
Wait, what?
00:38:15.760
they were
00:38:17.220
counting people
00:38:17.980
who died in
00:38:18.860
violent car
00:38:19.640
crashes as
00:38:21.040
COVID deaths
00:38:21.820
if they had
00:38:23.920
COVID too.
00:38:25.600
First question,
00:38:26.800
why did they
00:38:27.300
even test them?
00:38:28.140
Is it a standard
00:38:28.880
now?
00:38:29.320
If anybody is in
00:38:30.300
the hospital,
00:38:30.760
do they all get
00:38:31.220
tested?
00:38:32.040
Which would make
00:38:32.720
sense, I suppose.
00:38:34.260
But,
00:38:34.880
really?
00:38:35.960
Now, do you
00:38:39.940
believe this
00:38:40.380
news?
00:38:41.840
Okay, how many
00:38:42.660
believe the
00:38:43.140
news?
00:38:44.080
This is reported
00:38:45.180
by a local
00:38:46.280
news entity.
00:38:48.160
I tweeted it
00:38:49.240
around.
00:38:50.240
It says,
00:38:50.920
my county has
00:38:51.980
changed their
00:38:52.580
methodology and
00:38:53.460
increased the
00:38:54.100
deaths by 25%.
00:38:55.220
real news or
00:38:56.620
fake news?
00:38:58.320
Real news or
00:38:59.280
fake news?
00:39:00.840
The answer is
00:39:02.000
semi-fake.
00:39:04.380
Because the
00:39:05.140
state didn't
00:39:06.920
count it this
00:39:07.560
way.
00:39:08.500
So when you
00:39:08.900
were looking at
00:39:09.440
the state's
00:39:10.160
results, they
00:39:11.160
were always
00:39:11.520
accurate.
00:39:12.480
So the state
00:39:13.260
was not
00:39:13.880
including somebody
00:39:15.180
who died in a
00:39:15.920
car accident who
00:39:17.180
also had COVID.
00:39:18.660
The county
00:39:19.320
was, but when
00:39:20.840
they reported
00:39:21.300
it to the
00:39:21.660
state, the
00:39:22.140
state would
00:39:22.500
subtract those
00:39:23.140
out, I
00:39:23.480
guess.
00:39:23.720
So, apparently
00:39:26.200
the state
00:39:26.820
number was not
00:39:27.940
distorted in
00:39:28.880
this way, but
00:39:30.500
the county was.
00:39:31.520
Does that matter?
00:39:32.820
Because that means
00:39:33.560
that our overall
00:39:34.940
numbers are still
00:39:35.720
correct.
00:39:36.780
So I'm going to
00:39:37.240
call this semi-fake
00:39:39.060
news, but very
00:39:40.560
persuasive.
00:39:41.680
And here's the
00:39:42.360
persuasion tip.
00:39:43.740
The thing that
00:39:44.300
made this fake
00:39:45.020
news sell is
00:39:46.440
that the part
00:39:47.020
about the state
00:39:48.600
correcting for
00:39:49.500
this was way
00:39:52.820
toward the end
00:39:53.380
of the article.
00:39:54.660
And if I've
00:39:55.160
taught you
00:39:55.500
anything, we
00:39:56.920
pay attention
00:39:57.560
to things that
00:39:58.300
happen first.
00:39:59.860
That's it.
00:40:01.180
That's a really
00:40:01.960
important rule.
00:40:03.200
Whatever gets
00:40:04.060
our attention
00:40:04.560
first sticks
00:40:05.680
in our minds
00:40:06.340
and everything
00:40:06.740
after that is
00:40:07.380
lessened.
00:40:08.100
That's why
00:40:08.360
first impressions
00:40:09.140
are so important.
00:40:10.440
So if you
00:40:10.920
write an article
00:40:11.560
that says,
00:40:12.640
hey, past
00:40:14.440
deaths are
00:40:14.920
reduced 25%
00:40:16.020
because we
00:40:16.600
changed how
00:40:17.060
we do it in
00:40:17.520
the county,
00:40:18.760
most people,
00:40:20.540
including me
00:40:21.360
the first time
00:40:21.980
I read it
00:40:22.520
quickly,
00:40:23.700
completely
00:40:24.120
missed the
00:40:24.620
fact that
00:40:25.440
the state
00:40:25.860
doesn't make
00:40:26.380
that mistake.
00:40:28.460
So there
00:40:29.220
you go.
00:40:30.640
Semi-fake
00:40:31.720
news.
00:40:35.300
That is
00:40:36.900
your live
00:40:37.320
stream for
00:40:37.800
today.
00:40:38.480
Was it one
00:40:39.020
of the best
00:40:39.420
you've ever
00:40:39.800
seen?
00:40:40.320
Well, I
00:40:40.820
don't know.
00:40:41.480
I don't
00:40:41.720
know.
00:40:42.560
But it's
00:40:43.100
up there.
00:40:44.740
And I
00:40:46.920
have a
00:40:47.360
question and
00:40:48.220
a request.
00:40:48.720
The YouTube
00:40:50.520
traffic for
00:40:51.700
this live
00:40:52.120
stream is
00:40:52.540
down about
00:40:53.180
one-third
00:40:53.920
since I
00:40:55.660
started live
00:40:56.440
streaming on
00:40:57.220
locals.
00:40:58.160
Is that
00:40:58.740
because a
00:40:59.240
third of
00:40:59.580
you went
00:40:59.900
to locals?
00:41:01.400
Because you
00:41:02.160
preferred something
00:41:03.920
about it?
00:41:04.380
Maybe there's
00:41:04.740
no commercials.
00:41:05.580
That's why
00:41:05.860
you like it.
00:41:06.840
But anyway,
00:41:07.620
if you're
00:41:08.420
going to stay
00:41:08.760
on YouTube,
00:41:09.900
could you do
00:41:10.440
me a big
00:41:10.860
favor and hit
00:41:11.900
the subscribe
00:41:12.500
button that
00:41:13.420
is, let's
00:41:14.020
see, to my
00:41:15.680
side?
00:41:16.140
It would
00:41:16.420
be here.
00:41:19.240
Is it down
00:41:19.920
here or is
00:41:20.640
it down over
00:41:21.060
there?
00:41:22.080
It's on one
00:41:22.420
of those
00:41:22.660
sides.
00:41:23.440
But anyway,
00:41:24.020
if you subscribe
00:41:25.540
to things
00:41:26.120
anyway, hitting
00:41:27.380
that button
00:41:27.880
will give you
00:41:28.620
a notice that
00:41:29.300
I'm going
00:41:29.820
live.
00:41:31.340
So do that
00:41:32.280
if you feel
00:41:33.620
inclined.
00:41:34.380
Otherwise, go
00:41:35.180
to locals.
00:41:35.760
It's a
00:41:36.120
subscription
00:41:36.620
service and
00:41:38.060
you won't
00:41:38.480
get commercials
00:41:39.120
there.
00:41:43.460
It says,
00:41:44.260
you lied.
00:41:44.840
still have
00:41:46.300
ads when
00:41:46.960
subscribed.
00:41:48.540
No, the
00:41:49.400
subscription is
00:41:50.200
not what, let
00:41:52.680
me clarify,
00:41:53.380
that wasn't a
00:41:53.820
lie, but it
00:41:54.560
was a good
00:41:54.860
question.
00:41:55.680
Somebody's
00:41:56.140
saying that if
00:41:56.680
you subscribe to
00:41:57.480
the YouTube
00:41:57.860
channel that I
00:41:58.820
said you won't
00:41:59.400
see commercials.
00:42:01.260
If I said that,
00:42:02.060
then I misspoke.
00:42:03.280
What I meant
00:42:03.780
was, if you
00:42:05.120
subscribe to
00:42:06.100
YouTube, which
00:42:07.980
is paying a
00:42:08.880
fee, to
00:42:10.160
YouTube in
00:42:10.800
general, then
00:42:12.360
you don't get
00:42:12.880
ads for any
00:42:14.140
content you
00:42:14.800
watch.
00:42:15.720
So I
00:42:16.340
probably messed
00:42:17.260
up the
00:42:17.600
description of
00:42:18.200
that.
00:42:18.380
That might
00:42:18.660
be on me.
00:42:19.740
But what I
00:42:20.220
meant to
00:42:20.520
say is the
00:42:21.240
subscription does
00:42:22.340
nothing but give
00:42:23.000
you a notice,
00:42:24.000
I think, it
00:42:24.860
does nothing but
00:42:25.460
give you a
00:42:25.880
notice that the
00:42:28.940
content is
00:42:29.520
there.
00:42:30.160
But to not
00:42:31.060
see the
00:42:31.460
commercials, you
00:42:33.280
would have to
00:42:33.740
subscribe not by
00:42:35.020
pushing the
00:42:35.480
button but by
00:42:36.140
paying a fee
00:42:36.740
every month to
00:42:37.480
YouTube.
00:42:38.240
So if I said
00:42:38.860
that wrong, I
00:42:39.520
apologize.
00:42:40.560
I think I said
00:42:41.240
it right now.
00:42:42.320
All right, that's
00:42:42.860
all for today.
00:42:43.380
And I'll talk
00:42:43.900
to you on
00:42:44.280
YouTube tomorrow.
Link copied!