Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1509 Scott Adams： Today's Coffee With Scott Adams Will Be Amazing

00:00:00.000 Well, there you are.

00:00:04.000 Good morning. Welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams,

00:00:08.920 which you can't hear because I forgot to turn on your sound.

00:00:13.040 I'll bet you're all yelling, where's my sound?

00:00:16.340 Where's my sound is what you're saying. How about now?

00:00:21.040 How about now? Well,

00:00:23.740 if you're on YouTube, you're saying to yourself,

00:00:27.100 I hope he has sound. And now you do.

00:00:31.620 You do. And if you'd like to enjoy today,

00:00:34.960 to the maximum potential, and I'm talking about the maximum,

00:00:38.880 don't settle for anything less than the maximum from the simultaneous sip.

00:00:44.100 Some of you say, you know, I'll just take the minimum.

00:00:47.760 No. No, don't be that person.

00:00:51.000 Take the maximum, and all you need for the maximum is a cup or mugger glass

00:00:54.720 or a tanker, chalice, or stein, a canteen, jugger, or flask,

00:00:58.940 a vessel of any kind.

00:01:00.920 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:03.120 I like coffee.

00:01:04.600 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:01:07.120 the dopamine hit of the day,

00:01:08.400 the thing that makes everything better except the Arizona audit.

00:01:11.880 It's called the simultaneous sip,

00:01:14.220 and watch it go to work right now.

00:01:15.620 Go.

00:01:20.560 Mmm.

00:01:21.880 I feel data improving everywhere.

00:01:24.720 Well, let's look at our stories, shall we?

00:01:32.000 Look at our stories today.

00:01:33.880 You know, some days you wake up,

00:01:35.580 if you do this, what I do with these live streams,

00:01:38.600 and you look at the news and you say to yourself,

00:01:41.080 oh, God, what am I going to do with this news?

00:01:44.100 This news is not naturally interesting.

00:01:47.080 But some days, the news is naturally interesting.

00:01:51.200 Today is one of those days.

00:01:52.500 But first, an update on my cat,

00:01:55.040 the most important story in the world.

00:01:56.920 Boo the cat had surgery yesterday

00:01:58.520 to remove a polyp from her ear area

00:02:02.760 that was causing her all kinds of problems.

00:02:06.700 And it looks like the surgery was a success.

00:02:09.120 She's recovering.

00:02:09.960 I hope to get her back today,

00:02:11.440 but I'll let you know.

00:02:13.860 So that's the most important story of the day.

00:02:18.800 The second most important thing that's happening

00:02:21.460 is that my notes didn't...

00:02:23.860 Oh, there we go.

00:02:26.300 So I just saw a tweet before I got on

00:02:28.460 about night condensation technology.

00:02:33.300 Apparently, there's some kind of giant sheet

00:02:36.580 you can put suspended over your crops.

00:02:41.140 And there's something about the technology

00:02:42.640 of this big surface that collects all the moisture

00:02:45.700 in a way that the ground itself doesn't collect it.

00:02:49.220 It's like 80% more or something.

00:02:51.360 And then a night after the moisture is collected,

00:02:54.040 they can just release it onto the crops.

00:02:56.040 So they can basically water the crops without rain.

00:03:00.380 Now, I don't know how stable

00:03:03.940 this big sheet-like looking thing is.

00:03:06.780 It looks like the wind would blow it all to hell.

00:03:09.020 But it does tell us that there's some kind of technology there

00:03:11.520 that might have some promise.

00:03:13.140 Maybe not that exact one.

00:03:15.740 But we might be able to water crops without water.

00:03:20.700 At least without rain and without groundwater.

00:03:23.580 That's pretty cool.

00:03:26.400 Rasmussen had a poll and asked

00:03:28.260 about the $4.6 billion proposed

00:03:31.420 to pay for the Afghan refugees

00:03:33.780 to resettle in the United States.

00:03:37.180 How many citizens of the United States

00:03:39.160 think it's a good idea to pay

00:03:40.460 for these Afghan refugees to settle?

00:03:42.700 Well, 56% said,

00:03:45.100 no, we do not want to spend $4.6 billion.

00:03:49.340 32% said, yes.

00:03:51.760 It's an interesting moral dilemma, isn't it?

00:03:54.120 Because if you asked,

00:03:56.200 should we get our allies out of Afghanistan,

00:03:59.700 people who helped us during the war efforts,

00:04:02.300 I think a vast majority of people will say,

00:04:05.220 yeah, of course, you've got to let your allies out.

00:04:08.320 But what good does that do?

00:04:10.660 Once they get out, they've got nothing.

00:04:14.120 I mean, where are they going?

00:04:16.140 Somebody's going to have to help them.

00:04:17.360 If we're going to take them out of their country,

00:04:20.140 you know, we broke it.

00:04:21.440 Did we buy it?

00:04:22.140 So that's the question.

00:04:24.100 We broke it.

00:04:25.960 And we broke the country.

00:04:27.520 And we broke their ability to live in it.

00:04:30.720 So we broke it.

00:04:31.860 Did we buy it?

00:04:33.480 I don't know.

00:04:35.160 It's an interesting question,

00:04:37.300 but I would think that we have some obligation.

00:04:40.320 You could argue about the price tag.

00:04:42.280 You could say, you know, it costs too much.

00:04:44.440 Everything costs too much.

00:04:46.080 But I feel like we do have some obligation

00:04:48.060 that some amount of that expense we need to eat

00:04:51.460 is just a question of how much.

00:04:55.680 Well, Chris Cuomo is in trouble.

00:04:57.740 His old boss tells a story from 20 years ago.

00:05:02.780 So when he worked for ABC,

00:05:05.140 allegedly at some party get-together of employees

00:05:07.940 and their spouses,

00:05:09.160 he came in and he had just changed jobs.

00:05:12.880 So his boss was now just recently his ex-boss, a woman.

00:05:16.340 And he allegedly gave her a big bear hug.

00:05:19.840 And then while he was hugging her,

00:05:21.720 he soundly grabbed her ass cheek and said,

00:05:26.120 I can do this now because you're not my boss.

00:05:31.620 Or we don't work together.

00:05:33.040 Something like that.

00:05:33.540 So I'm paraphrasing,

00:05:34.360 but basically he said,

00:05:35.760 I can do this now because, you know,

00:05:37.280 we don't work together.

00:05:39.380 Apparently his old boss corrected his data

00:05:42.720 and said, no, actually,

00:05:45.420 this may come as a surprise to you.

00:05:47.600 Here I'm paraphrasing again.

00:05:49.360 This is not her exact words,

00:05:51.180 but could have been.

00:05:53.460 No, no, Chris,

00:05:54.600 I would like to tell you that is fake news.

00:05:57.840 She didn't say any of this,

00:05:58.920 but I think she should have.

00:06:00.920 No, Chris, that's fake news.

00:06:02.540 The fact that you don't work for me or with me

00:06:05.080 does not make it okay to grab my ass in public.

00:06:10.960 Now, I know what you're thinking.

00:06:12.900 He grabbed her ass cheek

00:06:14.480 and you're all thinking the same thing.

00:06:18.480 Why doesn't she just turn the other cheek?

00:06:22.240 What, you weren't thinking that?

00:06:24.660 Some of you were.

00:06:27.040 Well, apparently that was not called for

00:06:29.640 in this particular situation.

00:06:30.940 But she did step aside

00:06:33.720 after this encounter

00:06:35.800 to show Chris Cuomo

00:06:37.500 that her husband was sitting right behind her.

00:06:41.080 That's right.

00:06:42.320 Chris Cuomo grabbed a married woman's ass

00:06:45.500 right in front of her husband.

00:06:48.000 Didn't know that the husband

00:06:49.000 was sitting right behind her.

00:06:51.760 Now, what is the most shocking part of this story?

00:06:55.040 That Chris Cuomo is still alive, right?

00:07:00.960 What kind of a husband sits there

00:07:02.680 and watches his wife's ass get grabbed

00:07:05.440 by Chris Cuomo

00:07:06.500 and that there's no part of the story

00:07:08.820 where a fight broke out?

00:07:12.100 Chris Cuomo's a pretty big guy.

00:07:15.180 Right?

00:07:15.800 I mean, if we're being honest,

00:07:17.360 I don't think you'd want to get in a fight

00:07:18.840 with Chris Cuomo, would you?

00:07:20.820 I mean, he's got some big guns there.

00:07:22.420 I don't know how tall he is,

00:07:23.480 but he looks pretty big.

00:07:25.060 I don't think you'd want to get in a fight

00:07:26.740 with Chris Cuomo.

00:07:29.000 But even I would have taken a run at him.

00:07:31.620 Right?

00:07:32.440 I'm like half his size,

00:07:34.040 but even I would have taken a run.

00:07:36.440 I mean, it might have gotten my ass kicked,

00:07:39.080 but it'd be worth it.

00:07:40.800 Wouldn't it?

00:07:41.840 Is there anybody here who's a husband

00:07:43.480 who wouldn't take a run at him?

00:07:44.800 I mean, the minimum I would have done

00:07:49.520 is kick him out.

00:07:51.580 I would have just pushed him toward the door.

00:07:53.980 You know, even at my size,

00:07:55.340 I could have got that done.

00:07:56.660 I would have just kept pushing him toward the door,

00:07:58.540 and if he punched me, he's got trouble.

00:08:00.440 But otherwise, I'm just going to push him out the door

00:08:02.240 and, you know, make sure he falls down

00:08:05.720 when I push him the last time.

00:08:07.560 But you have to get physical in that case,

00:08:11.180 don't you?

00:08:12.440 Don't you have to punch him?

00:08:13.480 Now, maybe you don't want to go to jail.

00:08:15.420 You don't want to cause a scene.

00:08:16.700 You don't want to ruin your wife's career.

00:08:20.560 But your wife just made you look like

00:08:22.440 the biggest pussy in the whole fucking world.

00:08:25.600 So I would like to nominate her

00:08:27.360 for worst wife in the world,

00:08:29.740 although there's some argument

00:08:31.500 that maybe the husband wasn't so cool either

00:08:33.540 if he didn't do anything in that situation.

00:08:38.420 But everything about this is wrong.

00:08:41.340 There's nobody in this story

00:08:42.620 who came out well, didn't they?

00:08:44.440 So Chris Cuomo looks bad in the story,

00:08:47.100 that being the point of the story.

00:08:48.960 The woman who talks about it

00:08:50.460 looks like a horrible bitch

00:08:52.540 because she just threw her husband under a bus

00:08:55.580 and that didn't need to happen.

00:08:57.560 But her husband's got some explaining too.

00:09:00.660 Like, why isn't there part of the story

00:09:02.380 where a fight broke out?

00:09:03.920 Like, where's that?

00:09:04.700 Now, maybe the husband played it right

00:09:07.760 because one can imagine

00:09:09.840 that the wife would prefer

00:09:10.980 there was not a fight.

00:09:13.300 Right?

00:09:13.680 It's the wife's career.

00:09:15.020 It's her life.

00:09:16.720 Maybe she prefers that you did not defend her

00:09:19.360 in that particular situation.

00:09:22.240 But, I don't know.

00:09:24.220 Nobody came out good in this story.

00:09:25.560 Now, will Chris Cuomo be forced to resign

00:09:29.780 or anything because of this?

00:09:32.640 This one's a tough one.

00:09:34.500 I normally employ what I call the 20-year rule.

00:09:37.780 You know, if you did something 20 years ago,

00:09:40.780 especially if it's verbal,

00:09:42.820 you know, just let it go.

00:09:44.180 But I've also said you can't do that

00:09:46.120 if it's, you know, murder.

00:09:47.880 You know, if it's a violent rape or something,

00:09:49.640 you're not going to forgive it

00:09:50.580 just because it was 20 years ago.

00:09:51.820 And this one's sort of in that gray area.

00:09:54.880 I don't know.

00:09:55.460 Do you forgive this one?

00:09:57.220 Do you say, well, that was 20 years ago?

00:10:01.300 That's a tough one.

00:10:02.640 I don't know.

00:10:03.600 I think you could go either way on this one.

00:10:05.800 But if you wanted to be supportive

00:10:08.220 of women in general,

00:10:09.380 you would go the way of

00:10:10.400 he needs to step down.

00:10:14.680 All right.

00:10:18.540 So, worst wife ever.

00:10:19.940 So, we're getting reports today.

00:10:23.180 I know you want to talk about this.

00:10:24.440 So, the report is there's a leaked draft,

00:10:28.920 not the final report,

00:10:30.360 just a leaked draft

00:10:31.900 of what later apparently will be released today

00:10:35.600 of the Arizona audit findings.

00:10:38.800 Allegedly, and this has been confirmed

00:10:40.740 by the county, all right,

00:10:42.560 so although it's a draft

00:10:44.080 and although it's a leak,

00:10:46.100 those two things normally mean

00:10:47.900 not very credible.

00:10:49.940 The county,

00:10:51.000 which does know what the real answer is,

00:10:54.040 the county says the draft is accurate.

00:10:56.980 All right.

00:10:57.400 So, at the moment,

00:10:58.840 we believe that the Arizona audit

00:11:01.480 found, not only found

00:11:03.040 no fraud that would reverse it,

00:11:06.560 but actually found that Biden won

00:11:07.860 by a few hundred votes

00:11:08.960 more than they thought.

00:11:11.080 Now,

00:11:12.140 what's the first thing you think

00:11:14.160 when you hear that?

00:11:14.880 All right.

00:11:18.180 First of all,

00:11:19.260 we don't know that this will stand.

00:11:22.420 Okay?

00:11:23.060 Can we all,

00:11:23.920 I know,

00:11:24.380 before you jump on me,

00:11:26.480 can we all agree

00:11:27.420 that we're in the fog of war

00:11:29.020 and that whatever is being reported now

00:11:32.180 is deeply unlikely

00:11:33.900 to be the same thing you think

00:11:35.400 by the end of today?

00:11:37.060 Everybody on the same page?

00:11:38.280 Does anybody think

00:11:39.780 that whatever it is

00:11:40.600 that we think we know today

00:11:41.940 will be the same thing

00:11:43.700 we think we know

00:11:44.340 at the end of today?

00:11:45.880 Probably not, right?

00:11:47.320 I don't think so.

00:11:48.860 Now,

00:11:49.660 I'm seeing in the comments,

00:11:51.340 let me address this.

00:11:52.400 I see somebody,

00:11:53.660 some people saying

00:11:54.380 that the releasing

00:11:55.680 the draft report

00:11:56.840 is spin

00:11:58.640 and getting ahead

00:11:59.940 of the story.

00:12:00.840 How many of you think that?

00:12:02.380 That what's happening here

00:12:03.340 is that somebody's trying

00:12:04.220 to get ahead of the story

00:12:05.520 because the real story

00:12:07.260 with the details

00:12:08.160 might be more damning.

00:12:10.540 And so somebody's trying

00:12:11.360 to get ahead of it

00:12:12.180 and like get that in your mind

00:12:14.580 so that it doesn't,

00:12:16.660 so you can't be moved from it

00:12:18.520 when the real facts come out.

00:12:20.160 Do you think so?

00:12:22.660 Here's why I think not.

00:12:25.100 You ready?

00:12:26.420 It's too close

00:12:27.400 to the actual release.

00:12:29.720 If your plan

00:12:30.760 is to inoculate people

00:12:32.580 with a fake story,

00:12:33.560 you want to have more time.

00:12:36.900 So if it had been

00:12:37.700 an intentional plan

00:12:38.760 to get a fake story

00:12:40.160 out there

00:12:40.560 to spin it a certain way

00:12:41.900 so the real story

00:12:42.800 couldn't affect it much,

00:12:44.240 you would do it much earlier.

00:12:46.320 You wouldn't do it

00:12:47.260 the same day, right?

00:12:49.480 Now, I suppose

00:12:50.200 if you were desperate

00:12:50.980 and you weren't good at this,

00:12:52.460 you might do it

00:12:53.060 the same day

00:12:53.680 because you got nothing else.

00:12:55.920 I don't know.

00:12:56.340 Maybe.

00:12:57.240 But this doesn't look like

00:12:58.760 any kind of a professional

00:13:00.040 spin job.

00:13:01.540 The professionals

00:13:02.220 would have done it

00:13:03.020 much sooner.

00:13:04.220 That's where all

00:13:04.760 the benefit is.

00:13:06.000 It's the soonness

00:13:06.980 that gives it the power

00:13:07.960 because it sinks in, right?

00:13:10.780 But if you just heard,

00:13:11.900 hey, there's something

00:13:12.380 about the Arizona audit

00:13:13.480 and then a few hours later

00:13:14.620 you got the correction,

00:13:16.480 I don't know

00:13:16.860 if it ever sunk in.

00:13:18.720 So it doesn't look like

00:13:20.480 a professional

00:13:21.360 propaganda job.

00:13:25.460 Could be an unprofessional one.

00:13:27.460 I mean, it could be

00:13:27.980 somebody who's taken

00:13:28.540 a whack at it

00:13:29.180 and they don't know

00:13:29.960 how to do it very well.

00:13:30.780 Maybe.

00:13:32.120 But I'm going to say

00:13:33.080 that's not what's happening.

00:13:35.240 Now, my prediction was

00:13:36.620 that the audit

00:13:37.360 would not turn up

00:13:38.780 irregularities

00:13:40.120 and it wasn't based

00:13:41.400 on me knowing

00:13:42.000 anything about the election.

00:13:43.640 It was based on the fact

00:13:44.600 that it would have leaked

00:13:45.740 much sooner.

00:13:48.080 If they had found

00:13:49.220 the goods,

00:13:49.920 it would have leaked

00:13:51.020 much sooner.

00:13:52.780 So,

00:13:53.940 I alone,

00:13:55.020 among my audience,

00:13:56.040 predicted,

00:13:56.640 maybe there's

00:13:57.600 somebody else here,

00:13:58.220 but I think

00:13:59.200 I alone predicted

00:14:00.120 that whether or not

00:14:01.900 there is fraud,

00:14:03.320 that's a separate question,

00:14:04.660 that the audit

00:14:05.500 wouldn't find it.

00:14:07.800 Two reasons

00:14:08.640 they won't find it.

00:14:10.560 They're not looking

00:14:11.480 in the right place.

00:14:14.880 And if they'd found

00:14:17.220 something,

00:14:17.660 we would have heard

00:14:18.260 through a leak.

00:14:19.200 You can't keep

00:14:20.020 that a secret.

00:14:21.240 Nobody could keep

00:14:22.120 that a secret.

00:14:22.660 There isn't a chance

00:14:24.260 in the world

00:14:24.820 that if they had

00:14:26.260 the goods,

00:14:27.360 we would not have

00:14:28.300 known about it

00:14:28.900 a month ago.

00:14:29.600 Just no chance.

00:14:32.960 Statistically,

00:14:33.520 there's some chance,

00:14:34.240 but very low.

00:14:35.400 All right.

00:14:36.920 So,

00:14:37.440 could I still be wrong?

00:14:40.920 Everybody listen

00:14:41.740 to this next part

00:14:42.540 because you're going

00:14:43.360 to swear I didn't

00:14:44.040 say this.

00:14:45.320 Okay?

00:14:46.300 Listen carefully

00:14:47.240 to this next part.

00:14:48.760 I could totally

00:14:49.580 be wrong.

00:14:50.100 If you can't say

00:14:52.660 that about everything

00:14:53.540 that you believe

00:14:54.240 statistically to be

00:14:55.480 likely,

00:14:57.000 you're not really

00:14:58.240 thinking.

00:14:59.900 You're just

00:15:00.620 punditing.

00:15:02.260 So,

00:15:02.720 if you're thinking,

00:15:04.000 then you say,

00:15:04.520 yeah,

00:15:04.640 I could be totally

00:15:05.180 wrong about this.

00:15:06.440 By the end of today,

00:15:07.500 everything I believe

00:15:08.240 to be true

00:15:08.720 could be reversed.

00:15:10.000 And I wouldn't be

00:15:10.640 that surprised,

00:15:12.080 but I'm giving you

00:15:13.240 my prediction based

00:15:14.020 on a specific

00:15:14.920 criteria,

00:15:16.120 which is it would

00:15:16.780 have leaked

00:15:17.140 if they had the goods.

00:15:18.160 Now,

00:15:18.740 here's the question.

00:15:20.100 There are two ways

00:15:21.180 to rig an election,

00:15:22.400 broadly speaking.

00:15:24.060 Right?

00:15:24.860 Two ways.

00:15:25.740 One would be

00:15:26.580 to put in fake votes,

00:15:28.440 which seems to me

00:15:30.900 hard and also

00:15:32.960 likely to be caught.

00:15:35.120 So,

00:15:35.680 one way to do it,

00:15:36.420 put in fake votes,

00:15:37.300 but it's kind of hard.

00:15:38.800 Well,

00:15:39.100 maybe it's not hard

00:15:39.720 to put them in,

00:15:40.880 but the odds

00:15:41.680 of getting away

00:15:42.360 with it,

00:15:43.020 not so good

00:15:44.520 because you can

00:15:45.060 find fake votes.

00:15:46.700 The second way

00:15:47.580 to do it is to

00:15:48.280 throw away votes

00:15:49.240 that are real votes,

00:15:50.580 but you throw away

00:15:51.300 just the ones

00:15:51.880 that will change

00:15:52.900 the election

00:15:53.320 the way you want.

00:15:54.460 How do you detect

00:15:55.540 thrown away votes?

00:15:58.500 Does an audit

00:15:59.280 find a vote

00:15:59.940 that they didn't get?

00:16:02.860 How do you count

00:16:03.780 the vote that isn't there?

00:16:07.160 Was there somebody

00:16:08.140 in charge of

00:16:09.160 missing votes?

00:16:10.800 Okay,

00:16:11.320 here's a missing vote,

00:16:12.400 that's one.

00:16:14.080 How do you count

00:16:14.760 missing votes?

00:16:15.380 You can't count

00:16:17.380 what isn't there.

00:16:19.220 Right?

00:16:20.280 And,

00:16:20.760 you know,

00:16:21.400 presumably they would

00:16:22.280 have been thrown away

00:16:23.160 long before they

00:16:24.040 reached the polling place.

00:16:25.880 They would have been

00:16:26.560 picked up and thrown away

00:16:27.720 by operatives,

00:16:29.040 the post office,

00:16:31.120 whatever.

00:16:32.160 Right?

00:16:32.360 It would have been done

00:16:33.100 by areas where you knew

00:16:34.980 there were a lot of

00:16:35.760 Trump voters,

00:16:36.660 for example.

00:16:37.660 Now,

00:16:38.720 did the Arizona audit

00:16:40.260 also do polling

00:16:42.740 to find out

00:16:44.860 if people who thought

00:16:46.080 they voted

00:16:46.640 really did?

00:16:48.320 I don't know.

00:16:49.280 I understand that

00:16:50.160 somebody was doing

00:16:50.900 that kind of work,

00:16:51.800 some kind of,

00:16:52.340 was doing that kind

00:16:52.980 of polling.

00:16:55.220 But I don't know

00:16:56.120 if that's the subject

00:16:57.220 of whatever this

00:16:58.100 draft report is.

00:17:00.000 So,

00:17:00.540 here's what I would

00:17:01.240 expect further

00:17:02.200 by the end of today.

00:17:03.380 I would expect

00:17:05.060 that the audit

00:17:05.880 didn't find anything,

00:17:08.160 but,

00:17:09.420 big but,

00:17:10.260 here's a big but,

00:17:12.200 and I'm not talking

00:17:12.920 about the one

00:17:13.460 that Chris Cuomo grabbed.

00:17:15.400 No,

00:17:15.700 it's a big but,

00:17:16.800 but not that one.

00:17:18.740 Actually,

00:17:19.100 I don't know

00:17:19.480 how big her but was,

00:17:20.440 but it sounds funny,

00:17:21.480 so I said it.

00:17:23.080 I don't regret it.

00:17:26.340 The big but is,

00:17:27.420 I believe that

00:17:27.960 by the end of today,

00:17:28.860 we will have an argument

00:17:29.800 that the Arizona audit

00:17:31.020 couldn't look at

00:17:32.000 the things it needed

00:17:32.840 to look at.

00:17:34.100 For example,

00:17:34.760 it couldn't get into

00:17:35.600 the software and hardware.

00:17:37.560 It couldn't determine

00:17:38.640 that there was

00:17:39.320 a chain of custody

00:17:40.460 in some cases,

00:17:41.700 and it couldn't determine

00:17:42.840 if any votes

00:17:43.560 had been discarded.

00:17:45.600 So,

00:17:46.080 I think that it's

00:17:46.740 going to be a report

00:17:47.460 that says the things

00:17:48.240 we can check

00:17:49.180 looked good.

00:17:50.560 The things that

00:17:51.280 we can't check,

00:17:52.260 we don't know.

00:17:52.740 So,

00:17:53.260 I think your two movies

00:17:55.360 will be intact

00:17:56.340 at the end of today.

00:17:58.040 Two movies.

00:17:59.260 One,

00:18:00.100 that says the Arizona audit

00:18:01.740 found no fraud

00:18:03.040 and it's done,

00:18:03.760 and the other,

00:18:04.640 they found lots of ways

00:18:05.720 there could have been fraud,

00:18:06.620 but they didn't know

00:18:07.960 how to check it.

00:18:09.380 Now,

00:18:09.900 here's my next question.

00:18:11.140 This one's fun.

00:18:12.980 This one's really fun to me.

00:18:15.260 See if you think

00:18:15.920 this is fun.

00:18:17.760 The auditors,

00:18:18.940 these ninja,

00:18:20.680 what are they called?

00:18:23.580 Cyber ninjas,

00:18:25.500 which is a terrible name

00:18:27.800 for an election fraud

00:18:30.620 auditing company.

00:18:34.280 Cyber ninjas.

00:18:35.780 Doesn't even really

00:18:36.720 sound that credible,

00:18:38.040 does it?

00:18:39.100 But,

00:18:39.740 did we not spend

00:18:41.040 months

00:18:41.840 listening to the left

00:18:43.620 tell us that

00:18:44.360 the cyber ninjas

00:18:45.380 could not do this work

00:18:46.840 and that they were

00:18:48.060 not credible?

00:18:49.380 Right?

00:18:50.480 And then the cyber ninjas

00:18:51.980 did the work

00:18:52.740 and came to

00:18:54.280 a conclusion

00:18:55.160 that Biden made

00:18:56.100 that had more votes

00:18:56.960 than anybody thought.

00:18:57.940 does somebody

00:19:01.360 owe cyber ninjas

00:19:02.580 a really big apology?

00:19:06.780 Because,

00:19:07.360 did anybody see

00:19:07.880 this coming?

00:19:09.020 I'm not sure

00:19:09.780 I saw this coming.

00:19:11.000 I mean,

00:19:11.200 I didn't make a prediction

00:19:12.160 one way or another.

00:19:13.300 But what I didn't see

00:19:14.460 is that cyber ninjas

00:19:15.980 would be so credible

00:19:17.140 that they found

00:19:17.900 more votes for Biden

00:19:18.920 and then just

00:19:19.540 reported it that way.

00:19:23.840 Yeah,

00:19:24.360 and everybody's

00:19:24.860 going to believe them

00:19:25.480 now that it agrees.

00:19:27.020 Now that the left

00:19:28.360 is getting an answer

00:19:29.160 that they like

00:19:29.820 or we think.

00:19:30.780 Right?

00:19:30.940 It's too early

00:19:31.360 to know that for sure.

00:19:33.120 But it looks like

00:19:33.880 they're going to get

00:19:34.360 an answer they like.

00:19:35.680 And they're going to say,

00:19:36.600 well,

00:19:37.080 that audit was pretty credible.

00:19:39.440 It's a good thing

00:19:40.020 those cyber ninjas

00:19:41.000 top shelf.

00:19:43.920 You know,

00:19:44.320 if you want to know

00:19:45.140 for sure

00:19:46.760 whether you had

00:19:48.220 any fraud,

00:19:49.300 call the cyber ninjas

00:19:50.880 because they'll get you

00:19:52.520 the right answer

00:19:53.080 every time.

00:19:53.520 So cyber ninjas

00:19:55.080 went from the least

00:19:56.040 credible audit

00:19:57.820 organization in the world

00:19:59.000 to the most.

00:20:00.380 Top of the heap.

00:20:02.080 Best auditors

00:20:03.180 of all time.

00:20:06.520 All right.

00:20:08.540 So that will be,

00:20:09.860 you know,

00:20:10.560 again,

00:20:11.080 just two movies

00:20:11.840 will emerge from that

00:20:12.740 as we know.

00:20:14.340 Well,

00:20:14.800 two of the biggest

00:20:15.380 problems in the world

00:20:16.080 got solved this week

00:20:17.040 and I think that's

00:20:17.900 pretty good news.

00:20:19.420 As you know,

00:20:20.740 climate change

00:20:21.580 is largely solved

00:20:22.700 or at least now

00:20:24.520 we have a plan

00:20:25.200 to solve it.

00:20:26.620 An actual useful

00:20:27.960 functional plan.

00:20:29.580 Because,

00:20:30.140 as you know,

00:20:30.900 Jennifer Granholm,

00:20:31.780 the Secretary of Energy,

00:20:34.320 said for the

00:20:35.160 Biden administration

00:20:36.140 they love nuclear energy

00:20:38.720 and it's a necessary

00:20:40.380 solution to the climate

00:20:41.720 and even if you don't

00:20:43.240 think there's a

00:20:43.740 climate problem,

00:20:44.520 I know we have

00:20:45.040 some doubters

00:20:45.600 watching today,

00:20:46.960 even if you didn't

00:20:47.660 believe that,

00:20:48.100 you still need

00:20:48.880 nuclear energy

00:20:49.620 because you need

00:20:50.200 a lot of energy

00:20:50.820 and it needs

00:20:51.360 to be cheap

00:20:51.920 and we need

00:20:53.100 it for space

00:20:53.720 and we need

00:20:54.180 it for all kinds

00:20:54.680 of stuff.

00:20:55.900 So,

00:20:56.660 the debate

00:20:57.240 against nuclear

00:20:58.680 power as a

00:20:59.920 future power

00:21:01.060 source for the

00:21:01.720 United States

00:21:02.280 is over.

00:21:03.760 It's over.

00:21:05.700 And I'm so

00:21:07.160 mind-boggled

00:21:08.000 by this whole thing.

00:21:09.960 I've never seen

00:21:10.840 an argument

00:21:11.320 that got settled.

00:21:12.820 Have you?

00:21:13.240 When was the

00:21:14.940 last time you

00:21:15.460 saw an argument

00:21:16.160 where somebody

00:21:17.920 won?

00:21:20.820 Think of

00:21:22.200 another example.

00:21:23.680 What is an

00:21:24.200 example in

00:21:24.860 which there

00:21:25.940 was vigorous

00:21:27.120 debate for

00:21:28.540 decades and

00:21:30.940 then one

00:21:31.560 side said,

00:21:32.800 no, yeah,

00:21:33.280 okay, I

00:21:33.660 guess you're

00:21:33.920 right.

00:21:34.740 I guess

00:21:35.080 nuclear is

00:21:35.540 good.

00:21:35.740 Let's do

00:21:36.040 that.

00:21:36.880 I've never

00:21:37.500 seen this.

00:21:39.460 What happened?

00:21:41.280 What the hell?

00:21:42.860 I mean,

00:21:43.160 obviously,

00:21:44.200 you know,

00:21:44.640 the advocates,

00:21:46.200 you know,

00:21:46.380 Mark Schneider,

00:21:47.360 Michael

00:21:47.620 Schellenberger,

00:21:48.980 you know,

00:21:49.180 Bjorn Lomborg

00:21:50.020 would probably

00:21:50.480 throw into

00:21:51.780 that mix.

00:21:53.420 I think they

00:21:53.940 did a great

00:21:54.420 job,

00:21:55.500 you know,

00:21:55.740 persuading.

00:21:56.540 I mean,

00:21:56.860 amazing job.

00:21:58.680 Schellenberger,

00:21:59.380 in particular,

00:22:00.640 testifying to

00:22:01.320 Congress,

00:22:01.840 probably changed

00:22:03.120 the fate of

00:22:03.580 the world.

00:22:05.020 Let me say

00:22:05.560 that again.

00:22:06.900 Don't know

00:22:07.340 for sure,

00:22:08.020 because,

00:22:08.340 you know,

00:22:08.440 many moving

00:22:09.080 parts and

00:22:09.700 lots of

00:22:10.480 things influencing

00:22:11.240 other things,

00:22:12.480 but from my

00:22:13.260 perspective,

00:22:13.980 it looks like

00:22:16.100 Michael

00:22:16.520 Schellenberger

00:22:17.220 changed the

00:22:18.620 fate of the

00:22:19.020 world.

00:22:20.020 by being

00:22:21.440 effective and

00:22:22.260 knowing his

00:22:22.960 stuff and

00:22:23.540 testifying to

00:22:24.740 Congress and

00:22:25.420 telling them,

00:22:26.280 you know,

00:22:26.480 we need

00:22:26.800 nuclear in the

00:22:27.460 mix.

00:22:28.060 I think he

00:22:28.840 sold them.

00:22:29.980 I mean,

00:22:30.160 I think that's

00:22:30.600 what happened.

00:22:31.420 Now,

00:22:31.620 of course,

00:22:31.900 there isn't

00:22:32.180 much of a

00:22:32.560 counter-argument.

00:22:34.060 The argument

00:22:34.740 is not so much

00:22:35.720 my point versus

00:22:37.520 your point.

00:22:38.760 The argument

00:22:39.640 with nuclear

00:22:40.420 evolved into

00:22:42.000 people who

00:22:43.400 were well-informed

00:22:45.440 and people

00:22:46.480 who weren't.

00:22:47.020 it sort of

00:22:48.600 evolved into

00:22:49.240 that.

00:22:50.280 And once

00:22:50.700 enough people

00:22:51.800 got informed,

00:22:53.200 thank you,

00:22:53.860 Mark Schneider,

00:22:54.640 thank you,

00:22:55.720 Michael

00:22:56.320 Schellenberger,

00:22:57.740 once people

00:22:58.480 were informed,

00:22:59.140 they were all

00:22:59.440 on the same

00:22:59.780 side,

00:23:00.920 turns out,

00:23:02.000 at least the

00:23:02.720 people in

00:23:03.100 charge.

00:23:03.340 So that's a

00:23:04.460 gigantic thing.

00:23:05.620 I mean,

00:23:05.800 I don't know

00:23:06.540 how,

00:23:07.560 I just don't

00:23:08.200 know how to

00:23:08.620 say enough

00:23:09.000 about that.

00:23:09.800 I mean,

00:23:10.040 that's really

00:23:10.580 the fate of

00:23:11.300 the planet

00:23:11.780 got decided

00:23:13.320 the right

00:23:14.580 way.

00:23:15.760 Now,

00:23:16.180 what have I

00:23:16.480 told you

00:23:16.840 about the,

00:23:17.420 there's a

00:23:18.000 thing called

00:23:18.380 the Adam's

00:23:19.020 Law of

00:23:19.500 Slow-Moving

00:23:20.160 Disasters.

00:23:21.240 Have you

00:23:21.500 heard of it?

00:23:22.460 I talk about

00:23:23.320 it all the

00:23:23.660 time.

00:23:24.160 If you can

00:23:24.760 see a disaster

00:23:25.580 coming decades

00:23:27.700 ahead,

00:23:28.440 such as

00:23:29.000 imagining we'll

00:23:29.680 run out of

00:23:30.160 oil,

00:23:30.660 or imagining

00:23:31.040 we'll run

00:23:31.520 out of food,

00:23:32.380 or imagining

00:23:33.460 whatever will

00:23:34.000 happen in,

00:23:34.900 you know,

00:23:35.200 50 years,

00:23:35.980 if you have

00:23:36.560 enough time,

00:23:38.360 humans are

00:23:38.940 always good at

00:23:39.540 adapting.

00:23:40.240 We're really

00:23:40.680 good at that

00:23:41.160 kind of problem.

00:23:41.740 Oh,

00:23:41.840 we've got lots

00:23:42.220 of time?

00:23:42.600 All right,

00:23:42.840 we'll fix that.

00:23:43.360 And it

00:23:45.120 looks like

00:23:45.540 we did.

00:23:46.940 I mean,

00:23:47.460 there's a ton

00:23:48.460 of work that

00:23:48.940 would have to

00:23:49.320 be done to

00:23:50.180 develop,

00:23:51.000 you know,

00:23:51.620 the new

00:23:52.300 models of

00:23:52.880 nuclear and

00:23:53.500 to build

00:23:53.820 the existing

00:23:54.540 ones,

00:23:54.940 et cetera.

00:23:55.600 But we

00:23:56.220 have a

00:23:56.500 plan,

00:23:57.380 and the

00:23:58.320 plan is

00:23:58.840 well within

00:23:59.340 the doable

00:24:00.340 channel of

00:24:02.600 humankind.

00:24:04.120 Can humankind

00:24:05.040 pull this

00:24:05.660 off?

00:24:06.580 Make enough

00:24:07.160 nuclear reactors

00:24:08.140 to really get

00:24:09.820 on top of

00:24:10.460 climate change

00:24:11.140 in the long

00:24:11.600 run?

00:24:12.140 I think so.

00:24:13.360 Yeah.

00:24:13.720 I mean,

00:24:14.000 that doesn't

00:24:14.460 mean we

00:24:14.760 will,

00:24:15.860 but do we

00:24:16.500 have that

00:24:16.840 capability?

00:24:17.620 Yeah.

00:24:18.360 Yeah,

00:24:18.620 it turns out

00:24:18.940 we do.

00:24:19.320 So we

00:24:19.560 actually have

00:24:20.140 a plan

00:24:21.700 that looks

00:24:23.140 like it

00:24:23.600 could solve

00:24:24.860 climate change.

00:24:27.000 And that's

00:24:27.660 like this

00:24:28.080 week.

00:24:29.120 As of this

00:24:30.000 week,

00:24:30.820 we solved

00:24:31.360 climate change

00:24:32.040 going forward.

00:24:32.660 The second

00:24:35.160 big thing

00:24:35.940 is the

00:24:36.440 pandemic

00:24:37.320 got solved.

00:24:38.300 I don't

00:24:38.460 know if

00:24:38.660 you saw

00:24:38.940 this story.

00:24:40.060 A lot

00:24:40.300 of you

00:24:40.540 think that

00:24:41.200 we don't

00:24:42.080 have a

00:24:42.380 solution to

00:24:42.960 the pandemic,

00:24:43.720 even with

00:24:44.280 vaccinations.

00:24:45.800 But no,

00:24:46.880 the pandemic

00:24:47.360 got solved

00:24:48.200 this week.

00:24:50.420 I solved

00:24:51.140 it because

00:24:51.640 I had some

00:24:52.040 spare time.

00:24:53.420 I know you

00:24:54.180 would have

00:24:54.440 done it,

00:24:55.580 but maybe

00:24:56.220 your schedule

00:24:56.740 was a little

00:24:57.140 busier than

00:24:57.680 mine.

00:24:58.000 And I

00:24:59.040 looked around

00:24:59.500 and I

00:24:59.740 said,

00:25:00.020 well,

00:25:00.140 I've got

00:25:00.440 some time.

00:25:01.240 What would

00:25:01.500 be the

00:25:01.840 thing to

00:25:02.220 do to

00:25:03.780 solve the

00:25:04.640 pandemic?

00:25:05.880 So I did

00:25:06.340 it.

00:25:07.120 I just

00:25:07.840 released a

00:25:08.400 video that

00:25:09.640 was on the

00:25:10.460 locals platform

00:25:11.500 only until a

00:25:12.740 few minutes

00:25:13.120 ago.

00:25:13.840 So I

00:25:14.060 released it

00:25:15.660 from its

00:25:16.220 captive

00:25:18.460 wrapper.

00:25:19.800 So you

00:25:20.360 can all see

00:25:20.780 it now.

00:25:21.160 It's on

00:25:21.360 Twitter.

00:25:22.440 And in

00:25:22.900 this video,

00:25:23.560 I explain

00:25:24.180 my plan for

00:25:26.260 solving the

00:25:26.760 pandemic.

00:25:28.000 Now,

00:25:28.300 you have to

00:25:28.620 see the

00:25:28.900 video to

00:25:29.360 see the

00:25:29.680 visual because

00:25:30.280 it's more

00:25:30.760 persuasive with

00:25:31.820 the visual.

00:25:32.660 But it goes

00:25:33.180 like this.

00:25:34.820 Say you're

00:25:35.500 in a room

00:25:36.040 with good

00:25:37.180 ventilation.

00:25:38.840 What are

00:25:39.160 the odds

00:25:39.580 of getting

00:25:39.960 COVID?

00:25:41.400 Masks or

00:25:42.020 no masks?

00:25:43.260 Well,

00:25:43.540 if the

00:25:43.760 ventilation is

00:25:44.380 good enough,

00:25:45.660 it would be

00:25:46.120 almost equivalent

00:25:46.820 to being

00:25:47.160 outdoors.

00:25:48.520 Right?

00:25:49.140 That's what

00:25:49.680 good ventilation

00:25:50.280 is.

00:25:50.980 It at least

00:25:51.620 gets you

00:25:51.980 closer to

00:25:52.540 what outdoors

00:25:53.080 would be

00:25:53.380 like.

00:25:54.220 But lots

00:25:55.880 of places

00:25:56.240 are not well

00:25:56.860 ventilated.

00:25:58.000 So let's

00:25:58.840 talk about

00:25:59.320 ventilation

00:25:59.880 separately.

00:26:02.340 Everything I

00:26:02.960 say after

00:26:03.480 this...

00:26:05.720 Everything I

00:26:09.260 say...

00:26:09.840 Sorry,

00:26:10.680 I just got

00:26:11.040 some news

00:26:11.800 that was

00:26:12.040 complicated.

00:26:12.480 Everything I

00:26:14.060 say after

00:26:14.780 this...

00:26:15.600 Well,

00:26:15.860 I don't know

00:26:16.180 what the

00:26:16.420 beginning of

00:26:16.740 that sentence

00:26:17.180 was anymore,

00:26:17.840 so let me

00:26:18.140 start a new

00:26:18.740 sentence.

00:26:20.040 One that I

00:26:20.660 can finish

00:26:21.320 with a point.

00:26:22.500 Okay?

00:26:26.240 So in a

00:26:26.980 room that

00:26:27.500 doesn't have

00:26:28.360 good ventilation,

00:26:29.740 there are

00:26:30.040 lots of

00:26:30.400 those,

00:26:30.640 right?

00:26:31.220 A normal

00:26:32.000 room,

00:26:32.880 all right?

00:26:33.280 A normal

00:26:33.780 room in a

00:26:34.180 house,

00:26:34.380 I would say

00:26:34.740 it doesn't

00:26:35.080 have great

00:26:35.540 ventilation,

00:26:36.160 it just

00:26:36.380 has good

00:26:36.800 enough.

00:26:37.320 But it

00:26:37.600 might not

00:26:37.860 be good

00:26:38.120 enough for

00:26:38.460 the coronavirus.

00:26:39.840 It might

00:26:40.380 be good

00:26:40.680 enough for

00:26:41.300 heating and

00:26:42.080 cooling and

00:26:42.680 keeping you

00:26:43.100 alive,

00:26:43.540 but maybe

00:26:43.860 not good

00:26:44.220 enough for

00:26:44.500 the coronavirus.

00:26:45.920 So what

00:26:46.320 I'm going

00:26:46.580 to talk

00:26:46.860 about next

00:26:47.560 has nothing

00:26:48.920 to do with

00:26:49.460 ventilation.

00:26:51.400 Ventilation,

00:26:52.040 the purpose

00:26:52.540 of it is to

00:26:53.200 move your

00:26:53.600 virus from

00:26:54.360 inside the

00:26:54.880 house to

00:26:55.220 outside the

00:26:55.720 house.

00:26:56.380 I am not

00:26:57.240 talking about

00:26:57.980 that.

00:26:59.040 Everything I

00:26:59.700 say next

00:27:00.320 has nothing

00:27:01.500 to do with

00:27:02.040 ventilation.

00:27:03.380 But your

00:27:03.820 brain is

00:27:05.500 going to

00:27:05.780 say,

00:27:06.120 he's talking

00:27:06.640 about

00:27:06.840 ventilation.

00:27:07.940 Let me

00:27:08.360 add a point

00:27:08.800 about

00:27:09.000 ventilation.

00:27:10.460 You know,

00:27:11.020 I see your

00:27:11.620 point,

00:27:11.940 Scott,

00:27:12.200 but have

00:27:12.480 you considered

00:27:13.140 ventilation?

00:27:16.340 Corey,

00:27:16.820 stop texting

00:27:18.760 me during

00:27:19.760 my live

00:27:20.140 stream.

00:27:23.220 So in

00:27:24.560 a moment,

00:27:25.020 I'm going

00:27:25.280 to flip

00:27:25.660 out because

00:27:26.980 in the

00:27:27.300 comments,

00:27:27.940 somebody's

00:27:28.560 going to

00:27:28.780 say,

00:27:29.680 and they

00:27:30.020 won't be

00:27:30.400 kidding,

00:27:31.760 but you

00:27:32.100 know what

00:27:32.400 would be

00:27:32.640 even better

00:27:33.040 than what

00:27:33.400 you're talking

00:27:33.800 about,

00:27:34.100 Scott?

00:27:34.380 Have you

00:27:34.680 considered

00:27:35.200 ventilation?

00:27:38.060 And then

00:27:38.540 I'm going

00:27:38.780 to read that

00:27:39.160 comment and

00:27:39.640 I'm going

00:27:39.860 to say,

00:27:41.560 well,

00:27:41.860 I don't

00:27:42.000 know what

00:27:42.200 I'll say.

00:27:42.500 I'll

00:27:42.600 probably flip

00:27:43.080 out.

00:27:45.240 No,

00:27:45.660 I will

00:27:45.900 flip out,

00:27:46.340 Zachary.

00:27:46.820 I'm going

00:27:47.580 to flip

00:27:47.840 out because

00:27:49.280 there's one

00:27:50.400 thing you

00:27:50.720 need to

00:27:50.960 hear clearly.

00:27:52.800 Nothing I

00:27:53.480 say next is

00:27:54.660 about fucking

00:27:55.920 ventilation.

00:27:57.940 Okay.

00:27:59.200 No

00:27:59.640 ventilation.

00:28:01.000 Here's the

00:28:01.400 idea.

00:28:01.860 Turn on

00:28:02.160 the fan.

00:28:03.260 Move the

00:28:03.620 air out.

00:28:04.960 You're

00:28:05.220 done.

00:28:06.280 That's it.

00:28:07.440 Just put

00:28:07.920 fans,

00:28:08.580 just regular

00:28:09.020 fans,

00:28:10.240 in any

00:28:10.800 room that

00:28:11.240 you've got

00:28:11.560 a problem

00:28:12.020 that you

00:28:12.680 think doesn't

00:28:13.240 have good

00:28:13.640 ventilation by

00:28:14.340 itself,

00:28:14.720 can't open

00:28:15.120 a window,

00:28:15.640 can't open

00:28:16.000 a door,

00:28:16.280 whatever.

00:28:17.140 Just put

00:28:17.540 fans in

00:28:18.000 there.

00:28:18.600 Here's the

00:28:19.060 idea.

00:28:19.380 Number one,

00:28:21.940 fans will

00:28:22.820 disperse your

00:28:23.800 plume faster.

00:28:25.840 Actually,

00:28:26.240 really fast.

00:28:27.440 So the

00:28:28.000 big problem

00:28:29.460 with infection

00:28:30.200 is if you

00:28:30.920 get a big

00:28:31.300 enough viral

00:28:31.840 load.

00:28:32.660 If you're in

00:28:33.320 a room with

00:28:33.840 somebody who

00:28:34.300 has COVID,

00:28:35.520 and they're

00:28:36.320 on one side

00:28:36.860 of the room,

00:28:37.880 and you're

00:28:38.320 huddled in

00:28:38.920 the corner

00:28:39.280 on the other

00:28:39.740 side,

00:28:40.900 like this,

00:28:42.460 what are the

00:28:43.060 chances that

00:28:43.600 you will get

00:28:44.100 COVID if the

00:28:45.520 person who

00:28:46.100 has the

00:28:46.540 COVID is

00:28:46.980 on the

00:28:47.220 other side

00:28:47.560 of the

00:28:47.740 room,

00:28:48.380 even poorly

00:28:49.020 ventilated?

00:28:50.200 Even poorly

00:28:50.960 ventilated.

00:28:51.580 What are the

00:28:51.880 odds?

00:28:52.660 Well, not

00:28:53.200 that high.

00:28:54.560 Because the

00:28:55.280 person standing

00:28:55.960 right in front

00:28:56.720 of the person

00:28:57.200 talking, well,

00:28:57.900 they've got a

00:28:58.280 problem because

00:28:58.800 of the plume,

00:29:00.040 the cloud of

00:29:01.700 virus and water

00:29:03.240 molecules coming

00:29:04.060 out of a

00:29:04.420 person's mouth.

00:29:05.100 If you could

00:29:06.680 get rid of

00:29:07.160 all the

00:29:07.620 plumes,

00:29:09.780 how often

00:29:11.000 would people

00:29:11.440 get infected

00:29:12.120 in a room

00:29:12.720 with people

00:29:13.220 who have

00:29:13.440 COVID?

00:29:14.460 No plumes.

00:29:16.580 Well, here's

00:29:18.100 my hypothesis.

00:29:19.860 That 80% of

00:29:20.840 the spread is

00:29:21.360 from plumes.

00:29:23.280 Because we

00:29:24.120 know we don't

00:29:24.620 get it from

00:29:25.000 surfaces.

00:29:26.200 Surfaces, you

00:29:27.200 know, basically

00:29:27.680 kill the virus

00:29:28.480 apparently, because

00:29:29.340 we're not that

00:29:30.440 worried about

00:29:30.920 surfaces anymore.

00:29:32.680 Right?

00:29:32.920 We were worried

00:29:34.020 about surfaces

00:29:34.640 before, but

00:29:35.260 surfaces seem

00:29:35.960 to be a

00:29:37.160 problem.

00:29:40.740 So, the

00:29:41.900 fan does

00:29:42.480 several things.

00:29:44.180 Number one, it

00:29:45.400 immediately

00:29:45.860 disperses the

00:29:46.800 plume.

00:29:48.060 So, does it

00:29:48.960 reduce 80% of

00:29:51.440 what would get

00:29:52.140 somebody infected?

00:29:53.060 Because they

00:29:53.380 need a certain

00:29:53.900 viral load for

00:29:54.980 the infection to

00:29:55.800 really take

00:29:58.200 root, but also

00:29:59.800 to get them

00:30:00.320 very sick.

00:30:01.560 So, if all

00:30:02.120 it did,

00:30:02.920 was remove

00:30:04.060 the option

00:30:04.620 that people

00:30:05.000 get very

00:30:05.500 sick, because

00:30:06.480 the viral load

00:30:07.140 they get is a

00:30:07.660 small one instead

00:30:08.400 of a big one,

00:30:09.600 that's gigantic.

00:30:11.480 But, I think it

00:30:12.380 would actually

00:30:12.720 prevent them

00:30:13.300 from getting

00:30:13.600 it.

00:30:14.000 Now, the

00:30:14.400 second thing

00:30:14.880 that the

00:30:15.340 airflow does,

00:30:17.120 if the air

00:30:17.780 is enough

00:30:18.080 that you

00:30:18.240 can feel

00:30:18.680 it, right,

00:30:19.740 is it, by

00:30:21.420 reducing the

00:30:22.200 plume, it

00:30:23.420 increases the

00:30:24.540 evaporation.

00:30:26.440 Now,

00:30:28.520 Anatoly, who

00:30:30.520 you should

00:30:30.880 follow on

00:30:31.600 Twitter, gave

00:30:33.180 us some

00:30:33.460 stats and

00:30:34.080 some science

00:30:34.660 that shows

00:30:35.060 that that's

00:30:35.580 the fact,

00:30:36.300 that moving

00:30:36.920 air will

00:30:37.620 reduce a

00:30:38.980 plume and

00:30:39.480 make it

00:30:39.780 evaporate

00:30:40.260 faster.

00:30:40.980 Now, if it

00:30:41.420 evaporates

00:30:42.000 faster, what

00:30:43.340 happens to the

00:30:43.900 virus that is

00:30:44.620 carried by the

00:30:45.360 water molecules?

00:30:46.120 The water

00:30:46.940 disappears, the

00:30:48.760 virus falls to

00:30:49.520 the ground.

00:30:50.340 So, it's the

00:30:51.040 water molecule

00:30:51.580 that protects

00:30:52.420 the virus to

00:30:53.300 get into you.

00:30:54.380 If you get rid

00:30:54.980 of the water

00:30:55.340 molecules that

00:30:56.140 protect it, the

00:30:58.340 virus is less

00:30:59.340 effective, drops

00:31:00.380 to the ground.

00:31:01.500 So, you've got

00:31:03.340 one thing that

00:31:04.100 gets rid of the

00:31:04.660 plume, so it

00:31:05.500 gets rid of the

00:31:06.000 viral load almost

00:31:06.980 immediately.

00:31:08.080 So, that's

00:31:08.720 probably 80% of

00:31:09.560 the problem.

00:31:10.700 Then, you have

00:31:11.600 the virus itself,

00:31:12.900 less of it,

00:31:13.920 because the air is

00:31:14.760 moving it around,

00:31:15.360 and now it's

00:31:15.760 evaporating faster.

00:31:17.580 And then, the

00:31:18.020 third thing, again,

00:31:18.960 this is hypothetical,

00:31:20.460 any of this would

00:31:21.340 have to be verified,

00:31:22.440 obviously, but if

00:31:23.540 you're moving the

00:31:24.200 air faster, is the

00:31:26.600 air bouncing against

00:31:27.640 surfaces more

00:31:30.360 often?

00:31:31.720 I think the

00:31:32.580 answer is yes.

00:31:34.240 Just give me a

00:31:35.380 common sense

00:31:36.180 opinion here in

00:31:39.440 the comments.

00:31:41.100 Does it make

00:31:41.600 sense to you that

00:31:43.200 if you add some

00:31:43.820 airflow, that

00:31:45.320 the air will be

00:31:46.000 bouncing off the

00:31:46.780 walls and the

00:31:47.440 furniture more

00:31:48.120 often, and we

00:31:49.480 know that surfaces

00:31:50.300 kill the virus

00:31:51.360 pretty effectively

00:31:52.140 compared to you

00:31:53.100 breathing it in?

00:31:55.040 Right?

00:31:55.780 Now, have I

00:31:57.780 given you three

00:31:59.140 practical explanations

00:32:02.520 that you say to

00:32:04.320 yourself, well, I'm

00:32:04.960 no scientist, but

00:32:05.900 those probably

00:32:06.700 almost certainly

00:32:07.500 make sense?

00:32:08.120 Ron says the air

00:32:11.580 needs to move at

00:32:12.220 least 56 miles

00:32:13.500 per hour.

00:32:14.020 I doubt it.

00:32:15.080 I doubt it.

00:32:16.140 Imagine if you had

00:32:18.020 a plume of a

00:32:19.140 cigarette smoke in

00:32:20.060 front of you, and

00:32:21.740 then imagine a fan on

00:32:23.080 the other side of the

00:32:23.720 room, enough that you

00:32:24.740 could feel it under

00:32:25.460 your skin.

00:32:26.740 That plume would

00:32:27.840 just move sideways

00:32:28.840 the moment they hit

00:32:30.900 the air.

00:32:31.500 I don't think you'd

00:32:32.280 need 56 miles an

00:32:33.420 hour.

00:32:34.240 Well, actually, let me

00:32:35.240 take that back.

00:32:36.640 Maybe it is 56

00:32:37.680 miles per hour at

00:32:38.580 the point of the

00:32:39.880 fan, but it

00:32:41.360 wouldn't be once it

00:32:42.500 reached the interior

00:32:43.420 of the room.

00:32:46.380 I hear you say

00:32:47.280 dehumidifiers, and I

00:32:49.340 think a fan is just

00:32:50.260 an easier, quicker

00:32:52.560 solution.

00:32:53.440 The dehumidifier

00:32:54.260 probably makes a

00:32:55.000 difference, too.

00:32:57.020 All right.

00:32:58.200 So there is my

00:32:59.920 hypothesis.

00:33:01.080 I believe that it's

00:33:02.180 testable.

00:33:03.640 You could find out,

00:33:04.540 for example,

00:33:05.240 you could put fans in

00:33:07.900 some classrooms and

00:33:09.120 not in others, check

00:33:11.060 again in a month, see

00:33:12.600 if anybody got it.

00:33:13.380 Well, you wouldn't

00:33:14.060 know if they got it in

00:33:14.760 the classroom.

00:33:15.620 There's probably some

00:33:16.220 way to test it.

00:33:19.160 But I would like to

00:33:20.400 submit that the

00:33:21.600 pandemic is over, and

00:33:23.660 if you've got a fan in

00:33:24.800 the room, you should be

00:33:25.540 able to take off your

00:33:26.280 mask.

00:33:27.920 Are you interested

00:33:28.900 now?

00:33:30.220 A little bit of

00:33:30.960 science.

00:33:31.900 If it could tell us

00:33:32.960 that the fans do make

00:33:34.700 a difference, could it

00:33:36.260 be the difference

00:33:36.900 between taking off your

00:33:38.000 mask in a public place

00:33:39.280 or not?

00:33:40.320 Let's say a classroom.

00:33:42.040 Could you take the

00:33:43.080 masks off if the fan

00:33:44.660 idea pans out?

00:33:46.440 Maybe.

00:33:47.340 It'd be a good

00:33:47.840 trade-off.

00:33:48.840 Because if I told you

00:33:51.120 about the fake

00:33:51.700 because, a fake

00:33:53.840 because is giving

00:33:55.400 somebody a reason when

00:33:56.640 they really want to do

00:33:57.760 the thing that you want

00:33:59.020 them to do.

00:33:59.420 They want to do it

00:34:00.740 too, but they need a

00:34:02.100 reason that sounds good

00:34:03.580 to other people.

00:34:05.280 So instead of saying,

00:34:06.380 hey, take the mask

00:34:07.940 off, do you think you

00:34:09.420 can sell that to people

00:34:10.440 who are pro-mask?

00:34:11.700 Do you think you will

00:34:12.680 ever sell to the pro-mask

00:34:15.540 crowd, hey, let's just

00:34:17.360 take them off?

00:34:19.260 No, no.

00:34:20.240 That's unsellable.

00:34:21.740 That is unpersuadable.

00:34:23.880 Here's what isn't.

00:34:25.560 Do you know, if you had

00:34:27.220 fans, they would be as

00:34:29.300 effective as masks, so

00:34:31.200 you can take the masks

00:34:32.240 off?

00:34:34.320 Eh?

00:34:35.880 How'd that feel?

00:34:37.700 It felt like a reason,

00:34:38.880 didn't it?

00:34:39.900 But it's a fake because.

00:34:41.900 Because even if the fans

00:34:43.140 do work, the masks would

00:34:45.620 still work a little bit

00:34:46.820 more, if they work at

00:34:48.200 all, right?

00:34:49.200 So if you were concerned,

00:34:50.780 you'd still say, well,

00:34:52.080 how about both?

00:34:54.040 But, in terms of

00:34:55.520 persuasion, and both would

00:34:56.980 make sense, maybe

00:34:57.760 logically, if you didn't

00:34:59.220 know the real risk and

00:35:00.160 you were concerned.

00:35:01.340 But, it gives you a fake

00:35:04.380 because.

00:35:06.160 Politicians need to say,

00:35:07.600 I'll get rid of the masks

00:35:08.840 because.

00:35:10.560 Either because of

00:35:11.640 vaccinations, because of

00:35:14.360 other mitigation, because of

00:35:15.980 this.

00:35:16.520 You've got to have a

00:35:17.120 because.

00:35:18.200 If they can't add the

00:35:19.260 because, they can't get

00:35:20.160 away with it.

00:35:21.260 And maybe the fans would

00:35:23.520 be the because.

00:35:24.760 Because, can you tell me

00:35:26.000 because, can anybody

00:35:28.200 here tell me that

00:35:29.180 wearing a mask would

00:35:30.620 be more or less

00:35:31.640 effective than just

00:35:33.320 increasing the airflow

00:35:34.220 in the room?

00:35:36.100 You can't, can you?

00:35:37.960 Because you don't

00:35:38.740 really know how

00:35:39.540 effective the masks

00:35:40.440 are, but they're not

00:35:41.220 like 100%.

00:35:42.200 Whatever effectiveness

00:35:44.180 masks have is probably

00:35:45.640 sub-20%.

00:35:46.940 Still worth doing, if

00:35:48.720 that's real.

00:35:50.020 I mean, if they really

00:35:50.840 reduced by 20%, you

00:35:52.640 would certainly use

00:35:53.200 them in some situations.

00:35:55.440 But, could you tell me

00:35:56.760 that a fan wouldn't

00:35:57.640 reduce it by 20% as

00:35:59.040 well?

00:36:01.360 No, you can't, because

00:36:02.560 we don't know.

00:36:03.420 But logically, I mean,

00:36:05.260 if you just looked at

00:36:05.960 the reasons they

00:36:06.800 should, I don't know,

00:36:09.560 kind of looks like

00:36:10.260 they'd be equivalent.

00:36:11.720 Somewhere in that

00:36:12.440 sub-20% range, maybe.

00:36:14.420 I would think fans

00:36:15.280 could have a higher

00:36:16.140 potential, though,

00:36:16.880 actually.

00:36:17.980 All right, so that's

00:36:18.640 the good news.

00:36:19.200 I talked about that

00:36:19.920 way too much.

00:36:20.480 I think you would

00:36:21.440 agree.

00:36:22.340 I should be talking

00:36:23.200 about my cat, Boo,

00:36:24.260 more.

00:36:25.760 Well, John Stossel,

00:36:27.360 you all know John

00:36:28.160 Stossel?

00:36:29.000 He's suing Facebook

00:36:29.960 over censoring him

00:36:31.220 for some stuff he,

00:36:33.260 some content he had

00:36:34.140 on climate change,

00:36:35.700 in which his content

00:36:37.120 was not unscientific,

00:36:40.540 meaning that he did

00:36:41.440 not say something

00:36:42.340 that scientists

00:36:43.740 would disagree with.

00:36:45.360 He did frame it

00:36:47.040 in ways that would

00:36:48.800 maybe make you a

00:36:49.940 little more skeptical

00:36:50.740 about some elements

00:36:51.980 of the claims

00:36:52.900 of climate change,

00:36:54.280 but he did not

00:36:55.420 report an inaccurate

00:36:57.860 fact, nor is he

00:36:59.420 accused.

00:37:00.500 He's not even

00:37:01.060 accused of having

00:37:01.980 an inaccurate fact.

00:37:03.460 The thing they

00:37:03.980 accused him of is

00:37:04.860 something that they

00:37:05.600 imagined he said

00:37:06.720 and then dinged him

00:37:07.820 for it.

00:37:08.820 So he got dinged

00:37:10.180 for something they

00:37:10.860 interpreted he said

00:37:11.920 that he didn't say.

00:37:13.580 So that's bad.

00:37:15.120 Bjorn Lomborg,

00:37:16.580 I mentioned him again,

00:37:17.680 by the way,

00:37:18.000 I'll be interviewing

00:37:19.200 Bjorn Lomborg

00:37:21.180 for his paperback

00:37:24.660 version of his book.

00:37:26.620 That's coming up

00:37:27.560 in some weeks.

00:37:29.680 And I'll let you know

00:37:31.960 when that comes up.

00:37:33.340 So Facebook has

00:37:35.960 some explaining to do.

00:37:37.640 Now you notice that

00:37:38.640 the censoring seems

00:37:40.580 to be unique to Facebook

00:37:42.840 in these stories.

00:37:43.980 Because I'm pretty sure

00:37:45.820 that Twitter did not

00:37:46.760 suppress either one

00:37:48.260 of them.

00:37:49.300 In fact, they're

00:37:50.420 talking about it

00:37:51.100 on Twitter.

00:37:52.280 So remember my rule

00:37:55.540 that if you can't say

00:37:57.460 something good about

00:37:58.880 something you criticize,

00:38:01.060 you're probably not

00:38:02.320 credible.

00:38:03.680 You've got to be able

00:38:04.220 to say something good

00:38:05.320 about the things

00:38:06.600 you criticize.

00:38:07.980 So let me do that

00:38:09.100 for Twitter.

00:38:10.060 Twitter has taken a lot

00:38:11.080 of heat for censorship

00:38:13.620 and shadow banning

00:38:15.460 allegedly, et cetera.

00:38:17.440 But in this case,

00:38:18.860 it looks like Facebook

00:38:19.880 got it totally wrong

00:38:21.040 and Twitter got it

00:38:21.780 totally right.

00:38:22.880 It's worth mentioning.

00:38:24.920 Twitter got it

00:38:25.640 totally right.

00:38:26.580 Because they didn't ban

00:38:27.440 any of this content.

00:38:29.600 So give them credit

00:38:30.780 for that.

00:38:31.420 All right.

00:38:32.220 There's a new story

00:38:32.920 that Biden's attacks cheat.

00:38:34.540 Of course.

00:38:35.620 Just when he's trying

00:38:41.180 to get his gigantic

00:38:43.360 tax increase

00:38:44.240 on the rich through,

00:38:45.320 there's this story.

00:38:46.240 So here's the details.

00:38:47.760 And I know this will

00:38:48.420 be complicated

00:38:49.180 for most of you.

00:38:51.880 All right.

00:38:52.760 So I'm going to do

00:38:53.700 my cartoonist best

00:38:55.420 to simplify this story.

00:38:58.000 If you are an individual

00:38:59.420 who is doing a job

00:39:01.180 such as giving speeches

00:39:02.360 for money,

00:39:02.960 which is what Biden

00:39:03.960 was doing between jobs,

00:39:06.700 he made $13 million

00:39:07.640 giving mostly speeches.

00:39:09.960 Now, one of the things

00:39:10.880 you can do,

00:39:11.560 and it's very common,

00:39:13.140 is that instead of

00:39:14.340 taking the money

00:39:14.920 as an individual

00:39:15.760 and then paying taxes

00:39:17.300 just like a human,

00:39:18.920 you can do some paperwork

00:39:20.620 with a lawyer

00:39:21.280 and declare that you

00:39:22.440 are a S corporation.

00:39:24.960 There are different

00:39:25.440 kinds of corporations.

00:39:26.820 The S corp is typically

00:39:28.220 for this purpose

00:39:29.100 where there's like

00:39:29.740 one principal person

00:39:31.100 who is the business.

00:39:32.460 Now, in that case,

00:39:35.300 you still have to determine,

00:39:36.920 at least on paper,

00:39:38.520 how much of the money

00:39:39.520 that Biden would get

00:39:40.840 in this case

00:39:41.580 would be in the form

00:39:42.960 of looking like

00:39:43.840 a regular salary

00:39:44.840 for being the CEO

00:39:46.020 of his own S corporation,

00:39:48.920 which is just him.

00:39:50.600 So not only do you

00:39:51.780 define yourself

00:39:52.540 as a corporation,

00:39:54.140 but then you give yourself

00:39:55.440 the job of being

00:39:56.600 the head of the corporation,

00:39:57.720 which is all just you.

00:39:59.100 So it's just Biden.

00:39:59.880 But he's a corporation,

00:40:01.720 but he's also a person

00:40:02.700 who's in charge

00:40:04.120 of the corporation.

00:40:05.300 All right?

00:40:05.720 Now, in that setup,

00:40:07.260 you have to give

00:40:08.100 your CEO self a salary,

00:40:10.120 just like you were

00:40:10.920 an employee,

00:40:11.820 while the rest of the money

00:40:13.240 that you don't call salary

00:40:15.300 becomes income

00:40:17.120 through the corporation.

00:40:18.460 Now, the reason you do this

00:40:19.700 is that individuals

00:40:21.180 pay more taxes

00:40:22.140 than corporations.

00:40:23.820 So if you can say,

00:40:25.040 oh, I'm really a corporation,

00:40:26.560 then you pay fewer taxes,

00:40:29.220 especially for the Medicare

00:40:30.440 portion, 3.8%.

00:40:32.160 So the higher the salary is,

00:40:37.120 the more you're going to pay

00:40:39.120 in Medicare taxes.

00:40:41.600 The higher the S corporation

00:40:43.620 profit part is,

00:40:44.880 that you arbitrarily define

00:40:46.860 which portion is which,

00:40:48.400 the higher that one is,

00:40:49.480 the more taxes you pay.

00:40:51.220 So the game with an S corp

00:40:53.240 is to try to get away with,

00:40:56.280 meaning that you're gaming

00:40:57.720 the audit in the future.

00:40:59.740 Like, if we got audited,

00:41:01.720 what is the least we can claim

00:41:03.880 is the salary for the CEO.

00:41:07.080 And so the question is,

00:41:08.380 over two years,

00:41:09.200 he made $13 million.

00:41:10.520 That's, let's say,

00:41:11.200 $6.5 million a year.

00:41:13.180 And he made $800,000

00:41:14.780 that he paid himself

00:41:15.960 as a CEO.

00:41:17.340 So it's two years,

00:41:18.680 so cut that in half.

00:41:19.640 $400,000 a year

00:41:21.840 to be the CEO

00:41:23.500 of a $6.5 million operation.

00:41:28.280 Does that sound right?

00:41:29.520 If you were the CEO

00:41:31.120 of a $6.5 million business,

00:41:34.820 meaning its profits were,

00:41:36.280 that's just the profits,

00:41:37.740 not the gross,

00:41:39.680 but the profit pre-tax

00:41:42.540 was $6.5 million.

00:41:45.320 Is that a fair salary,

00:41:46.840 $400,000,

00:41:47.600 to be the CEO

00:41:48.580 of that size of a business?

00:41:52.960 Yes, it is.

00:41:54.400 Yes, it is.

00:41:55.880 How's the audit going to do?

00:41:57.500 Fine.

00:41:58.780 Fine.

00:41:59.760 Is this story real?

00:42:01.740 Nope.

00:42:02.960 Nope.

00:42:03.820 It's fake news.

00:42:05.360 Because if you go into an audit

00:42:06.980 and say,

00:42:07.520 the complexity of this business

00:42:10.280 was that somebody else

00:42:12.120 would make travel arrangements,

00:42:14.520 you know,

00:42:14.680 maybe Jill or an assistant

00:42:16.280 or something,

00:42:17.120 and Biden would just show up

00:42:18.620 and talk and go home.

00:42:21.060 That's the whole business.

00:42:23.080 What decisions does the CEO

00:42:24.740 need to make in a business

00:42:25.820 like that?

00:42:27.840 Not much.

00:42:29.460 Like, the CEO job

00:42:30.520 is actually an empty shell.

00:42:32.640 It doesn't really do anything.

00:42:34.480 Because the employee

00:42:35.380 makes all the decisions.

00:42:36.920 The employee just happens

00:42:37.940 to also be the CEO.

00:42:38.900 So, is $400,000

00:42:41.840 too little

00:42:43.240 to pay for somebody

00:42:45.020 who literally does nothing?

00:42:47.680 Not really.

00:42:49.220 Not really.

00:42:50.200 If the CEO job

00:42:51.220 had actually been hard,

00:42:53.000 like where he had to manage

00:42:54.360 a lot of people

00:42:55.020 and he had to, you know,

00:42:56.820 make decisions

00:42:57.560 and strategic bets

00:42:59.060 and stuff like that,

00:43:00.760 eh,

00:43:01.200 maybe you could argue

00:43:02.080 that that CEO

00:43:02.800 needs to get paid

00:43:03.520 a lot of money.

00:43:04.560 But he's basically

00:43:05.380 just a, you know,

00:43:06.800 punch a ticket,

00:43:08.340 fill in a blank

00:43:09.120 on a forum CEO.

00:43:10.420 He doesn't do anything.

00:43:11.940 Literally just signs

00:43:12.880 a couple of forms a year

00:43:14.420 and that's it.

00:43:14.960 The whole job.

00:43:16.220 So, I would say

00:43:17.320 that he's going to fly

00:43:18.180 through this audit fine.

00:43:20.120 Now, if there's somebody here

00:43:21.220 who's a, you know,

00:43:23.860 tax specialist

00:43:24.640 or a tax attorney

00:43:25.660 or something,

00:43:26.260 just jump in

00:43:26.900 and tell me I'm wrong.

00:43:28.480 But on the common sense level,

00:43:31.180 $400,000 a year

00:43:32.580 to be a CEO of a business

00:43:34.240 that doesn't need

00:43:34.960 any work at all

00:43:35.800 from the CEO

00:43:36.560 feels about right.

00:43:40.460 I don't know.

00:43:40.980 I feel he'll get away with that.

00:43:44.240 Derek Chauvin

00:43:45.040 is appealing

00:43:47.980 on 14 grounds.

00:43:49.100 I guess he couldn't afford

00:43:50.240 a judge,

00:43:51.320 or I'm sorry,

00:43:51.980 he couldn't afford

00:43:52.340 his own lawyer

00:43:52.880 at this point.

00:43:54.120 So, I think he did it himself.

00:43:56.100 But among his claims,

00:43:57.580 he says that his judge

00:43:59.180 abused his discretion

00:44:00.500 when he denied

00:44:02.000 Chauvin's request

00:44:02.740 to move the trial

00:44:03.500 out of the county

00:44:04.320 due to pretrial publicity.

00:44:07.140 And I ask you this question.

00:44:09.680 I'm not a lawyer.

00:44:12.200 So, I'm just looking at this

00:44:13.500 as a human

00:44:14.660 who, you know,

00:44:15.880 has some sense

00:44:16.580 of what seems fair

00:44:17.640 and what doesn't seem fair,

00:44:19.160 even though fairness

00:44:19.920 is not real.

00:44:23.060 How does he lose this?

00:44:24.460 How could Derek Chauvin

00:44:27.300 possibly lose this appeal?

00:44:29.540 I've never seen

00:44:31.440 a clearer case

00:44:32.680 where something should

00:44:34.400 move to a different venue.

00:44:36.220 Have you?

00:44:38.100 As in the history

00:44:39.540 of trials,

00:44:41.980 has there ever been

00:44:42.700 a cleaner case

00:44:43.820 where you absolutely

00:44:44.760 needed to move this

00:44:45.780 out of town?

00:44:47.540 Because the people

00:44:48.440 in the jury

00:44:49.400 would justifiably

00:44:51.680 be afraid

00:44:52.240 for their lives.

00:44:54.680 Right?

00:44:54.840 Dr. Scott Adams.

00:44:59.600 One of my trolls

00:45:00.560 is Dr. Scott Adams.

00:45:03.960 They just refused.

00:45:06.720 I'm just looking

00:45:07.260 at your comments.

00:45:07.920 Does anybody

00:45:08.240 disagree with that?

00:45:14.200 Now, the argument

00:45:15.120 against it

00:45:15.940 would be that

00:45:16.760 no matter where he went,

00:45:17.960 he would get

00:45:18.320 the same level

00:45:20.280 of bias.

00:45:21.840 But I don't think

00:45:22.860 the bias

00:45:23.580 would form

00:45:25.260 a physical

00:45:26.040 threat

00:45:27.500 everywhere,

00:45:28.720 right?

00:45:29.440 If you're local

00:45:30.400 to where the crime

00:45:31.220 happened,

00:45:31.960 I think that

00:45:32.580 if you're on the jury,

00:45:33.500 you're physically

00:45:34.200 threatened.

00:45:35.740 But if you were

00:45:36.360 in some far-flung

00:45:37.420 place,

00:45:37.920 and let's say

00:45:38.260 it's two years

00:45:38.860 from now,

00:45:39.420 the appeals process

00:45:40.360 moves slowly,

00:45:41.500 two years from now

00:45:43.040 in a different county

00:45:43.900 where they've already

00:45:44.680 forgotten the story,

00:45:46.560 I don't know,

00:45:47.100 would those people

00:45:47.700 be just as afraid

00:45:48.860 as the people

00:45:50.960 in the local

00:45:51.600 community

00:45:52.420 at the moment

00:45:53.260 it's still really,

00:45:54.060 really hot

00:45:54.420 in people's minds?

00:45:55.600 I don't think so.

00:45:57.040 I think it would

00:45:57.620 be different.

00:45:58.720 I don't see how

00:45:59.340 he loses this.

00:46:00.880 So,

00:46:01.500 get your seatbelts on.

00:46:04.020 I mean,

00:46:04.420 I suppose a lawyer

00:46:05.280 would have a different

00:46:05.920 opinion on this,

00:46:06.700 but just as a human,

00:46:08.920 if you ask me,

00:46:09.760 did this look like

00:46:10.480 a fair trial

00:46:11.320 the way they did it?

00:46:12.160 No.

00:46:13.320 No.

00:46:14.060 I'm not saying

00:46:14.640 he's innocent.

00:46:16.180 Nothing like that.

00:46:17.140 I'm not telling you

00:46:18.360 he should go free.

00:46:19.640 Nothing like that.

00:46:20.800 I'm just saying

00:46:21.360 there's no way

00:46:21.880 that looks like

00:46:22.400 a fair trial

00:46:23.140 to a reasonable

00:46:23.780 person looking at it.

00:46:25.180 It doesn't.

00:46:26.380 And we live in a country

00:46:27.440 where it has to look

00:46:29.440 reasonable to us.

00:46:31.160 Let me say this again.

00:46:32.900 You know,

00:46:33.080 the law has its own

00:46:34.040 standards, right?

00:46:34.920 And you have to satisfy

00:46:35.720 the standards of the law.

00:46:37.600 But,

00:46:38.740 the law has to

00:46:40.380 look reasonable

00:46:42.080 to us.

00:46:44.040 It has to.

00:46:44.940 Because the whole

00:46:46.900 system depends on that.

00:46:48.820 Reasonable people

00:46:49.580 have to look at it

00:46:50.300 and say,

00:46:50.560 well,

00:46:51.040 I might not like it.

00:46:53.100 I certainly wouldn't

00:46:54.280 like it if this law

00:46:55.360 was aimed at me,

00:46:56.160 but I can see

00:46:57.580 why you did it.

00:46:58.720 It makes sense.

00:46:59.980 It's got to be

00:47:00.700 reasonable to a

00:47:01.460 reasonable person,

00:47:02.220 and this clearly isn't.

00:47:03.420 It's not even close

00:47:04.320 to being reasonable.

00:47:06.440 All right.

00:47:06.700 Apparently the

00:47:09.360 January 6th

00:47:10.340 Select Committee,

00:47:12.420 yes,

00:47:12.880 it's not a group

00:47:13.640 of losers

00:47:14.260 who are studying

00:47:15.240 something that

00:47:15.940 doesn't need to be

00:47:16.620 studied.

00:47:17.020 It's not that.

00:47:17.900 It's a select

00:47:18.900 committee.

00:47:20.400 Premium.

00:47:21.740 Platinum grade.

00:47:23.760 It's the

00:47:24.120 Platinum Select

00:47:25.360 Gold Star

00:47:28.020 Prime

00:47:29.260 Committee.

00:47:31.660 And let me tell you,

00:47:32.540 with a name like that,

00:47:33.640 you know that they've

00:47:35.220 got some good stuff

00:47:36.320 coming.

00:47:36.700 Anyway,

00:47:37.000 they've subpoenaed

00:47:38.340 their first witnesses

00:47:39.260 that includes

00:47:40.260 Trump loyalists,

00:47:43.220 as they're called,

00:47:44.140 Mark Meadows,

00:47:45.060 Dan Scavino,

00:47:46.480 Steve Bannon,

00:47:47.300 and Kash Patel.

00:47:50.660 I feel like this is

00:47:52.140 the balance

00:47:55.100 to the Arizona audit.

00:47:58.260 You know,

00:47:58.560 the Arizona audit,

00:48:00.260 the Republicans are

00:48:01.160 expecting some red meat

00:48:02.280 out of that.

00:48:02.680 I'm going to get

00:48:04.080 some red meat

00:48:04.680 and maybe they won't.

00:48:07.860 But I think,

00:48:08.680 likewise,

00:48:09.460 the people who think

00:48:10.580 this select committee

00:48:11.520 is going to find

00:48:12.240 the coup

00:48:14.480 fingerprints

00:48:15.760 all over this

00:48:16.480 and find out

00:48:17.320 it's much worse

00:48:18.040 than anybody thought,

00:48:19.520 no.

00:48:20.860 They're not going

00:48:21.500 to find anything.

00:48:22.540 I think it's just

00:48:23.200 going to be a bunch

00:48:23.900 of people

00:48:24.380 doing what they

00:48:26.000 thought made sense

00:48:26.660 at the time.

00:48:28.340 That's all it's

00:48:28.920 going to be.

00:48:29.980 So everybody's

00:48:31.220 going to be

00:48:31.480 disappointed.

00:48:32.680 I saw a very

00:48:35.360 informative thread

00:48:36.400 on mild COVID

00:48:40.180 by Michigan NOAH,

00:48:43.840 Twitter user

00:48:44.900 Michigan underscore

00:48:46.200 NOAH,

00:48:47.040 N-O-A-H.

00:48:48.880 And you can look

00:48:50.180 at my Twitter feed

00:48:50.820 to find it.

00:48:51.280 I retweeted it.

00:48:52.460 And he talks about

00:48:53.620 how we talk about

00:48:54.940 the definition

00:48:55.540 of mild cases

00:48:57.520 of coronavirus

00:48:58.760 virus or COVID.

00:49:00.820 A mild case

00:49:01.700 is defined

00:49:02.160 as something

00:49:02.580 that didn't

00:49:02.980 put you

00:49:03.300 in the hospital.

00:49:05.260 But turns out

00:49:06.440 there are a lot

00:49:07.040 of nasty cases

00:49:08.060 of COVID

00:49:08.900 that didn't result

00:49:10.780 in hospitalization,

00:49:11.920 but they're pretty

00:49:12.380 nasty and they

00:49:13.140 might have

00:49:13.460 some long-lasting

00:49:14.780 effect.

00:49:15.980 And so NOAH

00:49:17.220 makes the argument

00:49:17.920 that we imagine

00:49:19.360 that the virus

00:49:20.500 is not as bad

00:49:22.300 as it really is

00:49:23.200 because we're

00:49:24.440 misunderstanding mild

00:49:25.960 and we're

00:49:26.960 misunderstanding

00:49:27.600 what it means

00:49:28.480 to not be

00:49:29.180 hospitalized.

00:49:30.220 In our minds,

00:49:31.540 not hospitalized

00:49:32.460 means,

00:49:33.280 well,

00:49:33.500 it's like a

00:49:33.920 sniffle,

00:49:35.060 right?

00:49:35.840 Okay,

00:49:36.540 maybe it's like

00:49:37.720 a normal flu.

00:49:40.040 But that's all

00:49:40.760 it is,

00:49:42.040 right?

00:49:42.520 If you hear

00:49:43.120 mild,

00:49:44.300 a mild case

00:49:45.420 of COVID,

00:49:46.160 you think

00:49:46.560 sniffle,

00:49:47.620 don't you?

00:49:49.000 Or a little

00:49:49.820 more than sniffle,

00:49:50.620 but that's about

00:49:51.160 all you think.

00:49:51.640 It turns out

00:49:52.940 that that category

00:49:53.840 mild,

00:49:54.480 if you use it

00:49:55.060 in a medical

00:49:55.640 context,

00:49:56.600 it includes

00:49:57.220 moderate.

00:49:58.580 And when you

00:49:58.980 look at both

00:49:59.500 mild and

00:50:00.180 moderate symptoms,

00:50:01.120 some of them

00:50:01.540 are nasty.

00:50:02.780 It's shit you

00:50:03.220 don't want.

00:50:04.320 Here's some

00:50:04.720 examples.

00:50:05.580 Now,

00:50:05.760 I would say

00:50:06.060 none of this

00:50:07.160 data is what

00:50:07.980 I would call

00:50:08.360 confirmed,

00:50:09.220 but I'll just

00:50:10.160 give it to you.

00:50:12.060 In one study,

00:50:13.180 two out of three

00:50:13.720 people who had

00:50:14.760 COVID had at

00:50:16.840 least one

00:50:17.360 outpatient visit

00:50:18.380 to a doctor,

00:50:19.600 visit one to

00:50:20.580 six months

00:50:21.040 after diagnosis.

00:50:22.520 So two-thirds

00:50:23.440 of the people

00:50:23.980 who had COVID,

00:50:27.040 a month to

00:50:27.880 six months,

00:50:28.880 so this is long

00:50:29.760 after you should

00:50:30.400 have been better,

00:50:32.160 two-thirds of

00:50:33.120 them had to

00:50:33.540 visit a doctor

00:50:34.200 for one thing

00:50:34.880 or another.

00:50:36.020 Now,

00:50:36.320 the first question

00:50:36.920 you must ask

00:50:37.620 is,

00:50:38.440 how many people

00:50:39.700 visit a doctor

00:50:40.440 within six months

00:50:41.400 of adults?

00:50:43.080 Because remember,

00:50:43.640 most kids

00:50:44.120 didn't have it,

00:50:44.880 so you're not

00:50:45.280 talking about

00:50:45.680 the healthy people,

00:50:46.440 we're talking

00:50:46.700 about the older

00:50:47.180 people.

00:50:47.540 If you looked

00:50:48.560 in the,

00:50:48.960 let's say,

00:50:49.440 over 40 crowd

00:50:50.800 where most

00:50:51.600 of the COVID

00:50:51.980 was,

00:50:52.620 how many people

00:50:53.320 over 40

00:50:54.120 have at least

00:50:55.260 one outpatient

00:50:56.120 visit to a doctor

00:50:57.380 in six months?

00:51:00.420 It's got to be

00:51:01.240 at least

00:51:01.620 two out of three.

00:51:05.120 Isn't it exactly

00:51:06.080 the same number

00:51:06.860 as this?

00:51:08.600 I don't know.

00:51:10.040 But I guess

00:51:11.160 I'm not as

00:51:11.840 scared by this

00:51:13.520 because I don't

00:51:14.000 know what the

00:51:14.380 baseline is.

00:51:15.040 But I feel

00:51:16.040 like people

00:51:16.500 over 40

00:51:17.200 get to the

00:51:17.660 doctor once

00:51:18.320 every six

00:51:18.880 months.

00:51:19.500 It feels

00:51:19.860 like it.

00:51:20.840 So at least

00:51:21.220 two-thirds

00:51:21.660 of them.

00:51:22.720 All right.

00:51:23.460 But another

00:51:24.040 study said,

00:51:25.680 out of 233

00:51:26.860 survivors,

00:51:27.520 so remember,

00:51:27.960 it's the

00:51:28.160 smallest sample,

00:51:29.800 found 40%

00:51:30.860 were suffering

00:51:31.380 from mental

00:51:32.060 illness three

00:51:34.580 and a half

00:51:34.880 years after,

00:51:35.840 I think this

00:51:36.240 was after

00:51:36.560 normal flu.

00:51:40.660 And there's

00:51:43.020 chronic fatigue,

00:51:44.820 syndrome suggested,

00:51:46.580 et cetera.

00:51:47.440 So the

00:51:48.280 suggestion here

00:51:49.200 by Noah is

00:51:49.960 that the

00:51:50.440 long COVID

00:51:51.640 and the

00:51:52.300 possible side

00:51:53.160 effects might

00:51:53.740 be more than

00:51:54.200 we think,

00:51:54.980 and makes

00:51:55.480 the case that

00:51:56.060 even the

00:51:56.480 regular flu

00:51:57.240 has longer

00:51:58.740 term implications

00:51:59.680 than people

00:52:00.240 realize,

00:52:00.980 even just the

00:52:01.760 regular flu.

00:52:03.020 So if the

00:52:03.440 regular flu has

00:52:04.380 long term

00:52:04.860 implications,

00:52:05.680 and we seem

00:52:06.140 to know that,

00:52:07.680 for some

00:52:08.140 people anyway,

00:52:09.260 then COVID

00:52:10.140 presumably would

00:52:11.140 be worse because

00:52:11.780 it attacks you

00:52:12.380 worse.

00:52:12.620 Well, the

00:52:13.880 Pfizer booster

00:52:14.620 looks like the

00:52:15.500 CDC head has

00:52:16.600 approved that

00:52:17.180 for some

00:52:17.880 high-risk

00:52:18.580 people.

00:52:20.880 That got

00:52:23.560 really bad,

00:52:24.240 didn't it?

00:52:25.580 So the

00:52:26.000 Pfizer has,

00:52:28.680 so it's

00:52:29.220 approved for

00:52:29.700 a third one.

00:52:30.780 But because

00:52:32.260 there's enough

00:52:33.420 risk that

00:52:35.420 they don't

00:52:35.920 want to give

00:52:36.340 it to low-risk

00:52:37.140 people,

00:52:37.600 say kids,

00:52:38.300 they only want

00:52:39.060 to give it

00:52:39.360 to you if

00:52:39.680 you're over,

00:52:40.120 I don't know,

00:52:40.380 65.

00:52:40.760 I'm not

00:52:41.520 sure if

00:52:41.780 you need

00:52:42.020 a comorbidity

00:52:42.740 or not.

00:52:43.800 But that

00:52:45.740 tells you

00:52:46.180 it's sort

00:52:46.500 of on the

00:52:46.840 edge,

00:52:47.160 doesn't it?

00:52:49.540 You know,

00:52:50.140 I thought

00:52:50.980 we were

00:52:51.340 dealing with

00:52:51.980 cleaner odds

00:52:53.500 than this.

00:52:55.160 You know,

00:52:55.400 the odds

00:52:55.800 of getting

00:52:56.100 vaccinated

00:52:56.680 versus the

00:52:57.320 odds of

00:52:57.580 not getting

00:52:57.940 vaccinated,

00:52:59.000 depending on

00:52:59.580 what numbers

00:53:00.080 you believe

00:53:00.560 or who

00:53:01.380 you trust,

00:53:02.340 should be

00:53:02.720 a big

00:53:02.940 difference.

00:53:04.200 Right?

00:53:04.700 Now,

00:53:04.940 if the

00:53:05.200 numbers are

00:53:05.580 accurate.

00:53:05.960 If people

00:53:06.900 are making

00:53:07.220 up the

00:53:07.500 numbers,

00:53:07.860 all bets

00:53:08.160 are off.

00:53:09.220 But in

00:53:10.000 theory,

00:53:10.620 the

00:53:10.720 vaccination

00:53:11.080 is like

00:53:11.600 many times

00:53:12.640 safer than

00:53:13.860 not getting

00:53:14.300 vaccinated.

00:53:15.280 But when

00:53:15.720 you get

00:53:16.000 to the

00:53:16.980 booster,

00:53:18.780 it's like,

00:53:19.180 well,

00:53:19.360 if you're

00:53:19.660 over 65,

00:53:21.020 yeah.

00:53:22.140 But if

00:53:22.660 you're 64,

00:53:24.060 I don't

00:53:25.560 know,

00:53:26.100 if you're

00:53:26.440 64,

00:53:28.140 it might

00:53:28.420 not be

00:53:28.760 worth it.

00:53:29.940 But it's

00:53:30.580 worth it if

00:53:31.000 you're 65.

00:53:31.600 65.

00:53:33.380 Okay.

00:53:35.020 I'm 64.

00:53:37.380 Right?

00:53:38.220 So, I

00:53:40.340 don't know.

00:53:40.660 To me, it

00:53:41.080 feels like

00:53:41.600 this is kind

00:53:42.120 of marginal,

00:53:43.480 depending on

00:53:44.140 your age.

00:53:44.520 Maybe if

00:53:44.780 you're 80,

00:53:45.180 it's not

00:53:45.480 marginal.

00:53:45.920 But if

00:53:46.200 you're in

00:53:47.000 your 60s,

00:53:48.080 you're like,

00:53:48.500 I don't

00:53:49.660 know, kind

00:53:50.240 of marginal.

00:53:51.320 Here's my

00:53:51.880 next question.

00:53:54.060 Why would

00:53:54.660 you give a

00:53:56.260 third Pfizer

00:53:57.680 booster to

00:53:59.060 these people?

00:53:59.640 Why wouldn't

00:54:00.640 you give

00:54:01.020 them one

00:54:01.620 Moderna?

00:54:04.400 Would you

00:54:06.020 be better

00:54:06.440 off or

00:54:06.880 worse off

00:54:07.440 with two

00:54:09.340 Pfizer shots

00:54:10.180 and then the

00:54:10.660 booster being

00:54:11.200 a Moderna?

00:54:12.460 Or would

00:54:13.120 you be better

00:54:13.560 off with

00:54:13.960 three Pfizer's?

00:54:15.480 Because if

00:54:16.180 Pfizer has

00:54:16.840 the problem,

00:54:18.400 you get a

00:54:18.960 triple Pfizer,

00:54:20.380 triple the

00:54:20.920 potential problem.

00:54:22.660 But if

00:54:24.160 you gave

00:54:24.520 them two

00:54:25.160 Pfizer's and

00:54:25.820 they were

00:54:26.080 okay so

00:54:26.640 far,

00:54:27.780 then you

00:54:28.200 gave them

00:54:28.580 a Moderna,

00:54:29.640 do you

00:54:31.080 get to

00:54:31.320 the same

00:54:31.660 level of

00:54:32.480 protection,

00:54:34.980 but have

00:54:35.520 you diversified

00:54:37.960 your risk?

00:54:40.040 I would

00:54:40.360 love to

00:54:40.940 see a

00:54:41.420 doctor or

00:54:41.940 an expert

00:54:42.240 give me an

00:54:42.740 opinion on

00:54:43.180 that.

00:54:43.780 Because it

00:54:44.600 could be

00:54:44.900 that it's

00:54:45.200 just too

00:54:45.500 hard to

00:54:45.860 test it

00:54:46.520 because it's

00:54:46.940 two different

00:54:47.400 companies.

00:54:48.160 It just

00:54:49.100 may not be

00:54:49.620 possible to

00:54:50.320 test that.

00:54:51.440 But in

00:54:52.280 concept,

00:54:53.900 in concept,

00:54:55.860 given the

00:54:56.580 unknowns,

00:54:57.020 and there

00:54:59.040 are lots

00:54:59.320 of unknowns,

00:55:00.480 given the

00:55:01.040 unknowns,

00:55:01.800 wouldn't it

00:55:02.360 be safer to

00:55:03.200 give them

00:55:03.580 a Moderna

00:55:04.120 as the

00:55:04.580 booster?

00:55:06.460 Yes or

00:55:07.080 no?

00:55:08.860 It's just

00:55:09.400 sort of an

00:55:10.320 interesting

00:55:10.620 question.

00:55:11.180 I don't

00:55:11.300 know.

00:55:11.460 And that,

00:55:15.940 ladies and

00:55:16.540 gentlemen,

00:55:18.740 concludes

00:55:19.300 the best

00:55:20.800 coffee with

00:55:21.640 Scott Adams

00:55:22.240 all day.

00:55:24.940 I mean,

00:55:25.280 since midnight

00:55:26.440 last night,

00:55:28.540 I don't think

00:55:29.100 there's been a

00:55:29.540 better one.

00:55:30.680 This is it.

00:55:32.900 So,

00:55:33.800 yeah,

00:55:34.260 ever.

00:55:35.160 Ever.

00:55:35.420 Ever.

00:55:36.320 Ever,

00:55:37.020 spelled with an

00:55:37.560 A.

00:55:37.680 test for

00:55:43.200 antibodies first

00:55:44.140 sounds more

00:55:44.900 logical.

00:55:46.260 Anita says,

00:55:47.160 Anita Butts,

00:55:48.200 are you a

00:55:48.680 doctor?

00:55:49.440 No.

00:55:50.320 I'm the

00:55:50.720 person who's

00:55:51.440 got a better

00:55:52.720 track record

00:55:53.340 than the

00:55:53.780 doctors.

00:55:54.660 You know,

00:55:54.940 there's nothing

00:55:55.340 that amuses

00:55:55.860 me more than

00:55:56.700 when people

00:55:57.100 say,

00:55:57.600 Scott,

00:55:58.520 you idiot.

00:56:00.900 You're not

00:56:01.500 a doctor.

00:56:03.180 Why do we

00:56:03.960 listen to you

00:56:04.480 at all?

00:56:06.040 You're not

00:56:06.360 a doctor.

00:56:07.680 Well,

00:56:08.720 my track

00:56:09.680 record is

00:56:10.140 better than

00:56:10.520 the doctors

00:56:11.040 so far.

00:56:13.460 I'm sorry.

00:56:14.760 It's just

00:56:15.220 the truth.

00:56:16.340 I do have

00:56:16.980 a better

00:56:17.260 track record

00:56:17.940 than the

00:56:18.620 doctors.

00:56:19.460 Now,

00:56:19.840 why is that?

00:56:21.180 Because I

00:56:21.660 only pick

00:56:22.060 areas where

00:56:23.060 I'm confident.

00:56:24.480 So,

00:56:24.740 when they

00:56:25.020 said masks

00:56:25.700 don't work,

00:56:26.560 Fauci said

00:56:27.100 it originally,

00:56:28.100 I said,

00:56:28.860 I'm no

00:56:29.480 doctor,

00:56:30.000 but I can

00:56:31.020 spot bullshit.

00:56:32.680 So,

00:56:33.280 I spotted

00:56:33.660 bullshit before

00:56:34.380 the doctors

00:56:34.860 did.

00:56:35.060 Now,

00:56:37.800 do I

00:56:38.380 argue with

00:56:38.920 them about

00:56:39.440 a long

00:56:40.100 COVID or

00:56:40.660 something?

00:56:40.980 No,

00:56:41.500 because how

00:56:42.460 would I

00:56:42.760 know?

00:56:43.300 So,

00:56:43.520 I'll take

00:56:44.620 the doctors

00:56:45.140 over my

00:56:45.880 own opinion

00:56:46.340 on things

00:56:46.860 that I

00:56:47.500 have no

00:56:47.820 special

00:56:48.300 knowledge

00:56:49.040 about.

00:56:49.740 But if it

00:56:50.180 just comes

00:56:50.580 to are

00:56:50.960 you being

00:56:51.300 bullshitted,

00:56:52.600 I'm pretty

00:56:53.200 good at

00:56:53.580 that.

00:56:54.280 Pretty

00:56:54.580 good.

00:56:55.380 So,

00:56:55.580 yes,

00:56:55.820 my track

00:56:56.340 record of

00:56:56.920 just the

00:56:57.360 things I

00:56:57.740 cherry-picked

00:56:58.260 to talk

00:56:58.680 about is

00:56:59.400 better than

00:56:59.840 the doctors.

00:57:01.480 It's a

00:57:01.940 fact.

00:57:02.280 You can

00:57:02.500 look it up

00:57:02.800 yourself.

00:57:03.920 Update on

00:57:04.580 Boo,

00:57:04.900 I'll get

00:57:05.260 an update

00:57:05.720 this morning,

00:57:06.420 but she

00:57:06.920 survived the

00:57:07.760 surgery just

00:57:08.760 fine and was

00:57:09.520 recovering as

00:57:10.760 of last night

00:57:11.380 and moving

00:57:11.740 around,

00:57:13.240 but I'll get

00:57:14.100 more information

00:57:14.700 today.

00:57:15.700 Now,

00:57:16.440 that is all

00:57:17.100 we've got for

00:57:17.480 today,

00:57:17.860 and I've got to

00:57:18.320 run,

00:57:18.800 and it's been

00:57:19.420 a pleasure,

00:57:20.100 as always.

00:57:21.700 And when

00:57:22.020 will I see

00:57:22.500 you again?

00:57:23.500 That's right,

00:57:24.580 tomorrow.

00:57:25.000 Tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 24, 2021

Episode 1509 Scott Adams： Today's Coffee With Scott Adams Will Be Amazing

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript