Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1509 Scott Adams： Today's Coffee With Scott Adams Will Be Amazing

00:00:00.000 Well, there you are.

00:00:04.000 Good morning. Welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams,

00:00:08.920 which you can't hear because I forgot to turn on your sound.

00:00:13.040 I'll bet you're all yelling, where's my sound?

00:00:16.340 Where's my sound is what you're saying. How about now?

00:00:21.040 How about now? Well,

00:00:23.740 if you're on YouTube, you're saying to yourself,

00:00:27.100 I hope he has sound. And now you do.

00:00:31.620 You do. And if you'd like to enjoy today,

00:00:34.960 to the maximum potential, and I'm talking about the maximum,

00:00:38.880 don't settle for anything less than the maximum from the simultaneous sip.

00:00:44.100 Some of you say, you know, I'll just take the minimum.

00:00:47.760 No. No, don't be that person.

00:00:51.000 Take the maximum, and all you need for the maximum is a cup or mugger glass

00:00:54.720 or a tanker, chalice, or stein, a canteen, jugger, or flask,

00:00:58.940 a vessel of any kind.

00:01:00.920 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:03.120 I like coffee.

00:01:04.600 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:01:07.120 the dopamine hit of the day,

00:01:08.400 the thing that makes everything better except the Arizona audit.

00:01:11.880 It's called the simultaneous sip,

00:01:14.220 and watch it go to work right now.

00:01:15.620 Go.

00:01:20.560 Mmm.

00:01:21.880 I feel data improving everywhere.

00:01:24.720 Well, let's look at our stories, shall we?

00:01:32.000 Look at our stories today.

00:01:33.880 You know, some days you wake up,

00:01:35.580 if you do this, what I do with these live streams,

00:01:38.600 and you look at the news and you say to yourself,

00:01:41.080 oh, God, what am I going to do with this news?

00:01:44.100 This news is not naturally interesting.

00:01:47.080 But some days, the news is naturally interesting.

00:01:51.200 Today is one of those days.

00:01:52.500 But first, an update on my cat,

00:01:55.040 the most important story in the world.

00:01:56.920 Boo the cat had surgery yesterday

00:01:58.520 to remove a polyp from her ear area 1.00

00:02:02.760 that was causing her all kinds of problems.

00:02:06.700 And it looks like the surgery was a success.

00:02:09.120 She's recovering.

00:02:09.960 I hope to get her back today,

00:02:11.440 but I'll let you know.

00:02:13.860 So that's the most important story of the day.

00:02:18.800 The second most important thing that's happening

00:02:21.460 is that my notes didn't...

00:02:23.860 Oh, there we go.

00:02:26.300 So I just saw a tweet before I got on

00:02:28.460 about night condensation technology.

00:02:33.300 Apparently, there's some kind of giant sheet

00:02:36.580 you can put suspended over your crops.

00:02:41.140 And there's something about the technology

00:02:42.640 of this big surface that collects all the moisture

00:02:45.700 in a way that the ground itself doesn't collect it.

00:02:49.220 It's like 80% more or something.

00:02:51.360 And then a night after the moisture is collected,

00:02:54.040 they can just release it onto the crops.

00:02:56.040 So they can basically water the crops without rain.

00:03:00.380 Now, I don't know how stable

00:03:03.940 this big sheet-like looking thing is.

00:03:06.780 It looks like the wind would blow it all to hell.

00:03:09.020 But it does tell us that there's some kind of technology there

00:03:11.520 that might have some promise.

00:03:13.140 Maybe not that exact one.

00:03:15.740 But we might be able to water crops without water.

00:03:20.700 At least without rain and without groundwater.

00:03:23.580 That's pretty cool.

00:03:26.400 Rasmussen had a poll and asked

00:03:28.260 about the $4.6 billion proposed

00:03:31.420 to pay for the Afghan refugees 1.00

00:03:33.780 to resettle in the United States.

00:03:37.180 How many citizens of the United States

00:03:39.160 think it's a good idea to pay

00:03:40.460 for these Afghan refugees to settle?

00:03:42.700 Well, 56% said,

00:03:45.100 no, we do not want to spend $4.6 billion.

00:03:49.340 32% said, yes.

00:03:51.760 It's an interesting moral dilemma, isn't it?

00:03:54.120 Because if you asked,

00:03:56.200 should we get our allies out of Afghanistan, 0.81

00:03:59.700 people who helped us during the war efforts,

00:04:02.300 I think a vast majority of people will say,

00:04:05.220 yeah, of course, you've got to let your allies out.

00:04:08.320 But what good does that do?

00:04:10.660 Once they get out, they've got nothing.

00:04:14.120 I mean, where are they going?

00:04:16.140 Somebody's going to have to help them.

00:04:17.360 If we're going to take them out of their country,

00:04:20.140 you know, we broke it.

00:04:21.440 Did we buy it?

00:04:22.140 So that's the question.

00:04:24.100 We broke it.

00:04:25.960 And we broke the country.

00:04:27.520 And we broke their ability to live in it.

00:04:30.720 So we broke it.

00:04:31.860 Did we buy it?

00:04:33.480 I don't know.

00:04:35.160 It's an interesting question,

00:04:37.300 but I would think that we have some obligation.

00:04:40.320 You could argue about the price tag.

00:04:42.280 You could say, you know, it costs too much.

00:04:44.440 Everything costs too much.

00:04:46.080 But I feel like we do have some obligation

00:04:48.060 that some amount of that expense we need to eat

00:04:51.460 is just a question of how much.

00:04:55.680 Well, Chris Cuomo is in trouble.

00:04:57.740 His old boss tells a story from 20 years ago.

00:05:02.780 So when he worked for ABC,

00:05:05.140 allegedly at some party get-together of employees

00:05:07.940 and their spouses,

00:05:09.160 he came in and he had just changed jobs.

00:05:12.880 So his boss was now just recently his ex-boss, a woman.

00:05:16.340 And he allegedly gave her a big bear hug.

00:05:19.840 And then while he was hugging her,

00:05:21.720 he soundly grabbed her ass cheek and said, 1.00

00:05:26.120 I can do this now because you're not my boss.

00:05:31.620 Or we don't work together.

00:05:33.040 Something like that.

00:05:33.540 So I'm paraphrasing,

00:05:34.360 but basically he said,

00:05:35.760 I can do this now because, you know,

00:05:37.280 we don't work together.

00:05:39.380 Apparently his old boss corrected his data

00:05:42.720 and said, no, actually,

00:05:45.420 this may come as a surprise to you.

00:05:47.600 Here I'm paraphrasing again.

00:05:49.360 This is not her exact words,

00:05:51.180 but could have been.

00:05:53.460 No, no, Chris,

00:05:54.600 I would like to tell you that is fake news.

00:05:57.840 She didn't say any of this,

00:05:58.920 but I think she should have.

00:06:00.920 No, Chris, that's fake news.

00:06:02.540 The fact that you don't work for me or with me

00:06:05.080 does not make it okay to grab my ass in public. 0.93

00:06:10.960 Now, I know what you're thinking.

00:06:12.900 He grabbed her ass cheek 1.00

00:06:14.480 and you're all thinking the same thing.

00:06:18.480 Why doesn't she just turn the other cheek? 1.00

00:06:22.240 What, you weren't thinking that?

00:06:24.660 Some of you were.

00:06:27.040 Well, apparently that was not called for

00:06:29.640 in this particular situation.

00:06:30.940 But she did step aside

00:06:33.720 after this encounter

00:06:35.800 to show Chris Cuomo

00:06:37.500 that her husband was sitting right behind her.

00:06:41.080 That's right.

00:06:42.320 Chris Cuomo grabbed a married woman's ass 0.99

00:06:45.500 right in front of her husband.

00:06:48.000 Didn't know that the husband 0.53

00:06:49.000 was sitting right behind her.

00:06:51.760 Now, what is the most shocking part of this story?

00:06:55.040 That Chris Cuomo is still alive, right?

00:07:00.960 What kind of a husband sits there 0.97

00:07:02.680 and watches his wife's ass get grabbed 1.00

00:07:05.440 by Chris Cuomo

00:07:06.500 and that there's no part of the story

00:07:08.820 where a fight broke out?

00:07:12.100 Chris Cuomo's a pretty big guy.

00:07:15.180 Right?

00:07:15.800 I mean, if we're being honest,

00:07:17.360 I don't think you'd want to get in a fight

00:07:18.840 with Chris Cuomo, would you?

00:07:20.820 I mean, he's got some big guns there.

00:07:22.420 I don't know how tall he is,

00:07:23.480 but he looks pretty big.

00:07:25.060 I don't think you'd want to get in a fight

00:07:26.740 with Chris Cuomo.

00:07:29.000 But even I would have taken a run at him.

00:07:31.620 Right?

00:07:32.440 I'm like half his size,

00:07:34.040 but even I would have taken a run.

00:07:36.440 I mean, it might have gotten my ass kicked,

00:07:39.080 but it'd be worth it.

00:07:40.800 Wouldn't it?

00:07:41.840 Is there anybody here who's a husband

00:07:43.480 who wouldn't take a run at him?

00:07:44.800 I mean, the minimum I would have done

00:07:49.520 is kick him out. 0.87

00:07:51.580 I would have just pushed him toward the door.

00:07:53.980 You know, even at my size,

00:07:55.340 I could have got that done.

00:07:56.660 I would have just kept pushing him toward the door,

00:07:58.540 and if he punched me, he's got trouble.

00:08:00.440 But otherwise, I'm just going to push him out the door

00:08:02.240 and, you know, make sure he falls down

00:08:05.720 when I push him the last time.

00:08:07.560 But you have to get physical in that case,

00:08:11.180 don't you?

00:08:12.440 Don't you have to punch him?

00:08:13.480 Now, maybe you don't want to go to jail.

00:08:15.420 You don't want to cause a scene.

00:08:16.700 You don't want to ruin your wife's career.

00:08:20.560 But your wife just made you look like 1.00

00:08:22.440 the biggest pussy in the whole fucking world. 1.00

00:08:25.600 So I would like to nominate her

00:08:27.360 for worst wife in the world, 1.00

00:08:29.740 although there's some argument

00:08:31.500 that maybe the husband wasn't so cool either

00:08:33.540 if he didn't do anything in that situation.

00:08:38.420 But everything about this is wrong.

00:08:41.340 There's nobody in this story

00:08:42.620 who came out well, didn't they?

00:08:44.440 So Chris Cuomo looks bad in the story,

00:08:47.100 that being the point of the story.

00:08:48.960 The woman who talks about it

00:08:50.460 looks like a horrible bitch 1.00

00:08:52.540 because she just threw her husband under a bus

00:08:55.580 and that didn't need to happen.

00:08:57.560 But her husband's got some explaining too.

00:09:00.660 Like, why isn't there part of the story

00:09:02.380 where a fight broke out?

00:09:03.920 Like, where's that?

00:09:04.700 Now, maybe the husband played it right

00:09:07.760 because one can imagine

00:09:09.840 that the wife would prefer 0.94

00:09:10.980 there was not a fight.

00:09:13.300 Right?

00:09:13.680 It's the wife's career. 1.00

00:09:15.020 It's her life.

00:09:16.720 Maybe she prefers that you did not defend her

00:09:19.360 in that particular situation.

00:09:22.240 But, I don't know.

00:09:24.220 Nobody came out good in this story.

00:09:25.560 Now, will Chris Cuomo be forced to resign

00:09:29.780 or anything because of this?

00:09:32.640 This one's a tough one.

00:09:34.500 I normally employ what I call the 20-year rule.

00:09:37.780 You know, if you did something 20 years ago,

00:09:40.780 especially if it's verbal,

00:09:42.820 you know, just let it go.

00:09:44.180 But I've also said you can't do that

00:09:46.120 if it's, you know, murder.

00:09:47.880 You know, if it's a violent rape or something,

00:09:49.640 you're not going to forgive it

00:09:50.580 just because it was 20 years ago.

00:09:51.820 And this one's sort of in that gray area.

00:09:54.880 I don't know.

00:09:55.460 Do you forgive this one?

00:09:57.220 Do you say, well, that was 20 years ago?

00:10:01.300 That's a tough one.

00:10:02.640 I don't know.

00:10:03.600 I think you could go either way on this one.

00:10:05.800 But if you wanted to be supportive

00:10:08.220 of women in general,

00:10:09.380 you would go the way of

00:10:10.400 he needs to step down.

00:10:14.680 All right.

00:10:18.540 So, worst wife ever. 1.00

00:10:19.940 So, we're getting reports today.

00:10:23.180 I know you want to talk about this.

00:10:24.440 So, the report is there's a leaked draft,

00:10:28.920 not the final report,

00:10:30.360 just a leaked draft

00:10:31.900 of what later apparently will be released today

00:10:35.600 of the Arizona audit findings.

00:10:38.800 Allegedly, and this has been confirmed

00:10:40.740 by the county, all right,

00:10:42.560 so although it's a draft

00:10:44.080 and although it's a leak,

00:10:46.100 those two things normally mean

00:10:47.900 not very credible.

00:10:49.940 The county,

00:10:51.000 which does know what the real answer is,

00:10:54.040 the county says the draft is accurate.

00:10:56.980 All right.

00:10:57.400 So, at the moment,

00:10:58.840 we believe that the Arizona audit

00:11:01.480 found, not only found

00:11:03.040 no fraud that would reverse it,

00:11:06.560 but actually found that Biden won

00:11:07.860 by a few hundred votes

00:11:08.960 more than they thought.

00:11:11.080 Now,

00:11:12.140 what's the first thing you think

00:11:14.160 when you hear that?

00:11:14.880 All right.

00:11:18.180 First of all,

00:11:19.260 we don't know that this will stand.

00:11:22.420 Okay?

00:11:23.060 Can we all,

00:11:23.920 I know,

00:11:24.380 before you jump on me,

00:11:26.480 can we all agree

00:11:27.420 that we're in the fog of war

00:11:29.020 and that whatever is being reported now

00:11:32.180 is deeply unlikely

00:11:33.900 to be the same thing you think

00:11:35.400 by the end of today?

00:11:37.060 Everybody on the same page?

00:11:38.280 Does anybody think

00:11:39.780 that whatever it is

00:11:40.600 that we think we know today

00:11:41.940 will be the same thing

00:11:43.700 we think we know

00:11:44.340 at the end of today?

00:11:45.880 Probably not, right?

00:11:47.320 I don't think so.

00:11:48.860 Now,

00:11:49.660 I'm seeing in the comments,

00:11:51.340 let me address this.

00:11:52.400 I see somebody,

00:11:53.660 some people saying

00:11:54.380 that the releasing

00:11:55.680 the draft report

00:11:56.840 is spin

00:11:58.640 and getting ahead

00:11:59.940 of the story.

00:12:00.840 How many of you think that?

00:12:02.380 That what's happening here

00:12:03.340 is that somebody's trying

00:12:04.220 to get ahead of the story

00:12:05.520 because the real story

00:12:07.260 with the details

00:12:08.160 might be more damning.

00:12:10.540 And so somebody's trying

00:12:11.360 to get ahead of it

00:12:12.180 and like get that in your mind

00:12:14.580 so that it doesn't,

00:12:16.660 so you can't be moved from it

00:12:18.520 when the real facts come out.

00:12:20.160 Do you think so?

00:12:22.660 Here's why I think not.

00:12:25.100 You ready?

00:12:26.420 It's too close

00:12:27.400 to the actual release.

00:12:29.720 If your plan

00:12:30.760 is to inoculate people

00:12:32.580 with a fake story,

00:12:33.560 you want to have more time.

00:12:36.900 So if it had been

00:12:37.700 an intentional plan

00:12:38.760 to get a fake story

00:12:40.160 out there

00:12:40.560 to spin it a certain way

00:12:41.900 so the real story

00:12:42.800 couldn't affect it much,

00:12:44.240 you would do it much earlier.

00:12:46.320 You wouldn't do it

00:12:47.260 the same day, right?

00:12:49.480 Now, I suppose

00:12:50.200 if you were desperate

00:12:50.980 and you weren't good at this,

00:12:52.460 you might do it

00:12:53.060 the same day

00:12:53.680 because you got nothing else.

00:12:55.920 I don't know.

00:12:56.340 Maybe.

00:12:57.240 But this doesn't look like

00:12:58.760 any kind of a professional

00:13:00.040 spin job.

00:13:01.540 The professionals

00:13:02.220 would have done it

00:13:03.020 much sooner.

00:13:04.220 That's where all

00:13:04.760 the benefit is.

00:13:06.000 It's the soonness

00:13:06.980 that gives it the power

00:13:07.960 because it sinks in, right?

00:13:10.780 But if you just heard,

00:13:11.900 hey, there's something

00:13:12.380 about the Arizona audit

00:13:13.480 and then a few hours later

00:13:14.620 you got the correction,

00:13:16.480 I don't know

00:13:16.860 if it ever sunk in.

00:13:18.720 So it doesn't look like

00:13:20.480 a professional

00:13:21.360 propaganda job.

00:13:25.460 Could be an unprofessional one.

00:13:27.460 I mean, it could be

00:13:27.980 somebody who's taken

00:13:28.540 a whack at it

00:13:29.180 and they don't know

00:13:29.960 how to do it very well.

00:13:30.780 Maybe.

00:13:32.120 But I'm going to say

00:13:33.080 that's not what's happening.

00:13:35.240 Now, my prediction was

00:13:36.620 that the audit

00:13:37.360 would not turn up

00:13:38.780 irregularities

00:13:40.120 and it wasn't based

00:13:41.400 on me knowing

00:13:42.000 anything about the election.

00:13:43.640 It was based on the fact

00:13:44.600 that it would have leaked

00:13:45.740 much sooner.

00:13:48.080 If they had found

00:13:49.220 the goods,

00:13:49.920 it would have leaked

00:13:51.020 much sooner.

00:13:52.780 So,

00:13:53.940 I alone,

00:13:55.020 among my audience,

00:13:56.040 predicted,

00:13:56.640 maybe there's

00:13:57.600 somebody else here,

00:13:58.220 but I think

00:13:59.200 I alone predicted

00:14:00.120 that whether or not

00:14:01.900 there is fraud,

00:14:03.320 that's a separate question,

00:14:04.660 that the audit

00:14:05.500 wouldn't find it.

00:14:07.800 Two reasons

00:14:08.640 they won't find it.

00:14:10.560 They're not looking

00:14:11.480 in the right place.

00:14:14.880 And if they'd found

00:14:17.220 something,

00:14:17.660 we would have heard

00:14:18.260 through a leak.

00:14:19.200 You can't keep

00:14:20.020 that a secret.

00:14:21.240 Nobody could keep

00:14:22.120 that a secret.

00:14:22.660 There isn't a chance

00:14:24.260 in the world

00:14:24.820 that if they had

00:14:26.260 the goods,

00:14:27.360 we would not have

00:14:28.300 known about it

00:14:28.900 a month ago.

00:14:29.600 Just no chance.

00:14:32.960 Statistically,

00:14:33.520 there's some chance,

00:14:34.240 but very low.

00:14:35.400 All right.

00:14:36.920 So,

00:14:37.440 could I still be wrong?

00:14:40.920 Everybody listen

00:14:41.740 to this next part

00:14:42.540 because you're going

00:14:43.360 to swear I didn't

00:14:44.040 say this.

00:14:45.320 Okay?

00:14:46.300 Listen carefully

00:14:47.240 to this next part.

00:14:48.760 I could totally

00:14:49.580 be wrong.

00:14:50.100 If you can't say

00:14:52.660 that about everything

00:14:53.540 that you believe

00:14:54.240 statistically to be

00:14:55.480 likely,

00:14:57.000 you're not really

00:14:58.240 thinking.

00:14:59.900 You're just

00:15:00.620 punditing.

00:15:02.260 So,

00:15:02.720 if you're thinking,

00:15:04.000 then you say,

00:15:04.520 yeah,

00:15:04.640 I could be totally

00:15:05.180 wrong about this.

00:15:06.440 By the end of today,

00:15:07.500 everything I believe

00:15:08.240 to be true

00:15:08.720 could be reversed.

00:15:10.000 And I wouldn't be

00:15:10.640 that surprised,

00:15:12.080 but I'm giving you

00:15:13.240 my prediction based

00:15:14.020 on a specific

00:15:14.920 criteria,

00:15:16.120 which is it would

00:15:16.780 have leaked

00:15:17.140 if they had the goods.

00:15:18.160 Now,

00:15:18.740 here's the question.

00:15:20.100 There are two ways

00:15:21.180 to rig an election,

00:15:22.400 broadly speaking.

00:15:24.060 Right?

00:15:24.860 Two ways.

00:15:25.740 One would be

00:15:26.580 to put in fake votes,

00:15:28.440 which seems to me

00:15:30.900 hard and also

00:15:32.960 likely to be caught.

00:15:35.120 So,

00:15:35.680 one way to do it,

00:15:36.420 put in fake votes,

00:15:37.300 but it's kind of hard.

00:15:38.800 Well,

00:15:39.100 maybe it's not hard

00:15:39.720 to put them in,

00:15:40.880 but the odds

00:15:41.680 of getting away

00:15:42.360 with it,

00:15:43.020 not so good

00:15:44.520 because you can

00:15:45.060 find fake votes.

00:15:46.700 The second way

00:15:47.580 to do it is to

00:15:48.280 throw away votes

00:15:49.240 that are real votes,

00:15:50.580 but you throw away

00:15:51.300 just the ones

00:15:51.880 that will change

00:15:52.900 the election

00:15:53.320 the way you want.

00:15:54.460 How do you detect

00:15:55.540 thrown away votes?

00:15:58.500 Does an audit

00:15:59.280 find a vote

00:15:59.940 that they didn't get?

00:16:02.860 How do you count

00:16:03.780 the vote that isn't there?

00:16:07.160 Was there somebody

00:16:08.140 in charge of

00:16:09.160 missing votes?

00:16:10.800 Okay,

00:16:11.320 here's a missing vote,

00:16:12.400 that's one.

00:16:14.080 How do you count

00:16:14.760 missing votes?

00:16:15.380 You can't count

00:16:17.380 what isn't there.

00:16:19.220 Right?

00:16:20.280 And,

00:16:20.760 you know,

00:16:21.400 presumably they would

00:16:22.280 have been thrown away

00:16:23.160 long before they

00:16:24.040 reached the polling place.

00:16:25.880 They would have been

00:16:26.560 picked up and thrown away

00:16:27.720 by operatives,

00:16:29.040 the post office,

00:16:31.120 whatever.

00:16:32.160 Right?

00:16:32.360 It would have been done

00:16:33.100 by areas where you knew

00:16:34.980 there were a lot of

00:16:35.760 Trump voters,

00:16:36.660 for example.

00:16:37.660 Now,

00:16:38.720 did the Arizona audit

00:16:40.260 also do polling

00:16:42.740 to find out

00:16:44.860 if people who thought

00:16:46.080 they voted

00:16:46.640 really did?

00:16:48.320 I don't know.

00:16:49.280 I understand that

00:16:50.160 somebody was doing

00:16:50.900 that kind of work,

00:16:51.800 some kind of,

00:16:52.340 was doing that kind

00:16:52.980 of polling.

00:16:55.220 But I don't know

00:16:56.120 if that's the subject

00:16:57.220 of whatever this

00:16:58.100 draft report is.

00:17:00.000 So,

00:17:00.540 here's what I would

00:17:01.240 expect further

00:17:02.200 by the end of today.

00:17:03.380 I would expect

00:17:05.060 that the audit

00:17:05.880 didn't find anything,

00:17:08.160 but,

00:17:09.420 big but,

00:17:10.260 here's a big but,

00:17:12.200 and I'm not talking

00:17:12.920 about the one

00:17:13.460 that Chris Cuomo grabbed.

00:17:15.400 No,

00:17:15.700 it's a big but,

00:17:16.800 but not that one.

00:17:18.740 Actually,

00:17:19.100 I don't know

00:17:19.480 how big her but was,

00:17:20.440 but it sounds funny,

00:17:21.480 so I said it.

00:17:23.080 I don't regret it.

00:17:26.340 The big but is,

00:17:27.420 I believe that

00:17:27.960 by the end of today,

00:17:28.860 we will have an argument

00:17:29.800 that the Arizona audit

00:17:31.020 couldn't look at

00:17:32.000 the things it needed

00:17:32.840 to look at.

00:17:34.100 For example,

00:17:34.760 it couldn't get into

00:17:35.600 the software and hardware.

00:17:37.560 It couldn't determine

00:17:38.640 that there was

00:17:39.320 a chain of custody

00:17:40.460 in some cases,

00:17:41.700 and it couldn't determine

00:17:42.840 if any votes

00:17:43.560 had been discarded.

00:17:45.600 So,

00:17:46.080 I think that it's

00:17:46.740 going to be a report

00:17:47.460 that says the things

00:17:48.240 we can check

00:17:49.180 looked good.

00:17:50.560 The things that

00:17:51.280 we can't check,

00:17:52.260 we don't know.

00:17:52.740 So,

00:17:53.260 I think your two movies

00:17:55.360 will be intact

00:17:56.340 at the end of today.

00:17:58.040 Two movies.

00:17:59.260 One,

00:18:00.100 that says the Arizona audit

00:18:01.740 found no fraud

00:18:03.040 and it's done,

00:18:03.760 and the other,

00:18:04.640 they found lots of ways

00:18:05.720 there could have been fraud,

00:18:06.620 but they didn't know

00:18:07.960 how to check it.

00:18:09.380 Now,

00:18:09.900 here's my next question.

00:18:11.140 This one's fun.

00:18:12.980 This one's really fun to me.

00:18:15.260 See if you think

00:18:15.920 this is fun.

00:18:17.760 The auditors,

00:18:18.940 these ninja,

00:18:20.680 what are they called?

00:18:23.580 Cyber ninjas,

00:18:25.500 which is a terrible name

00:18:27.800 for an election fraud

00:18:30.620 auditing company.

00:18:34.280 Cyber ninjas.

00:18:35.780 Doesn't even really

00:18:36.720 sound that credible,

00:18:38.040 does it?

00:18:39.100 But,

00:18:39.740 did we not spend

00:18:41.040 months

00:18:41.840 listening to the left

00:18:43.620 tell us that

00:18:44.360 the cyber ninjas

00:18:45.380 could not do this work

00:18:46.840 and that they were

00:18:48.060 not credible?

00:18:49.380 Right?

00:18:50.480 And then the cyber ninjas

00:18:51.980 did the work

00:18:52.740 and came to

00:18:54.280 a conclusion

00:18:55.160 that Biden made

00:18:56.100 that had more votes 0.92

00:18:56.960 than anybody thought.

00:18:57.940 does somebody

00:19:01.360 owe cyber ninjas

00:19:02.580 a really big apology?

00:19:06.780 Because,

00:19:07.360 did anybody see

00:19:07.880 this coming?

00:19:09.020 I'm not sure

00:19:09.780 I saw this coming.

00:19:11.000 I mean,

00:19:11.200 I didn't make a prediction

00:19:12.160 one way or another.

00:19:13.300 But what I didn't see

00:19:14.460 is that cyber ninjas

00:19:15.980 would be so credible

00:19:17.140 that they found

00:19:17.900 more votes for Biden

00:19:18.920 and then just

00:19:19.540 reported it that way.

00:19:23.840 Yeah,

00:19:24.360 and everybody's

00:19:24.860 going to believe them

00:19:25.480 now that it agrees.

00:19:27.020 Now that the left

00:19:28.360 is getting an answer

00:19:29.160 that they like

00:19:29.820 or we think.

00:19:30.780 Right?

00:19:30.940 It's too early

00:19:31.360 to know that for sure.

00:19:33.120 But it looks like

00:19:33.880 they're going to get

00:19:34.360 an answer they like.

00:19:35.680 And they're going to say,

00:19:36.600 well,

00:19:37.080 that audit was pretty credible.

00:19:39.440 It's a good thing

00:19:40.020 those cyber ninjas

00:19:41.000 top shelf.

00:19:43.920 You know,

00:19:44.320 if you want to know

00:19:45.140 for sure

00:19:46.760 whether you had

00:19:48.220 any fraud,

00:19:49.300 call the cyber ninjas

00:19:50.880 because they'll get you

00:19:52.520 the right answer

00:19:53.080 every time.

00:19:53.520 So cyber ninjas

00:19:55.080 went from the least

00:19:56.040 credible audit

00:19:57.820 organization in the world

00:19:59.000 to the most.

00:20:00.380 Top of the heap.

00:20:02.080 Best auditors

00:20:03.180 of all time.

00:20:06.520 All right.

00:20:08.540 So that will be,

00:20:09.860 you know,

00:20:10.560 again,

00:20:11.080 just two movies

00:20:11.840 will emerge from that

00:20:12.740 as we know.

00:20:14.340 Well,

00:20:14.800 two of the biggest

00:20:15.380 problems in the world

00:20:16.080 got solved this week

00:20:17.040 and I think that's

00:20:17.900 pretty good news.

00:20:19.420 As you know,

00:20:20.740 climate change

00:20:21.580 is largely solved

00:20:22.700 or at least now

00:20:24.520 we have a plan

00:20:25.200 to solve it.

00:20:26.620 An actual useful

00:20:27.960 functional plan.

00:20:29.580 Because,

00:20:30.140 as you know,

00:20:30.900 Jennifer Granholm,

00:20:31.780 the Secretary of Energy,

00:20:34.320 said for the

00:20:35.160 Biden administration

00:20:36.140 they love nuclear energy

00:20:38.720 and it's a necessary

00:20:40.380 solution to the climate

00:20:41.720 and even if you don't

00:20:43.240 think there's a

00:20:43.740 climate problem,

00:20:44.520 I know we have

00:20:45.040 some doubters

00:20:45.600 watching today,

00:20:46.960 even if you didn't

00:20:47.660 believe that,

00:20:48.100 you still need

00:20:48.880 nuclear energy

00:20:49.620 because you need

00:20:50.200 a lot of energy

00:20:50.820 and it needs

00:20:51.360 to be cheap

00:20:51.920 and we need

00:20:53.100 it for space

00:20:53.720 and we need

00:20:54.180 it for all kinds

00:20:54.680 of stuff.

00:20:55.900 So,

00:20:56.660 the debate

00:20:57.240 against nuclear

00:20:58.680 power as a

00:20:59.920 future power

00:21:01.060 source for the

00:21:01.720 United States

00:21:02.280 is over.

00:21:03.760 It's over.

00:21:05.700 And I'm so

00:21:07.160 mind-boggled

00:21:08.000 by this whole thing.

00:21:09.960 I've never seen

00:21:10.840 an argument

00:21:11.320 that got settled.

00:21:12.820 Have you?

00:21:13.240 When was the

00:21:14.940 last time you

00:21:15.460 saw an argument

00:21:16.160 where somebody

00:21:17.920 won?

00:21:20.820 Think of

00:21:22.200 another example.

00:21:23.680 What is an

00:21:24.200 example in

00:21:24.860 which there

00:21:25.940 was vigorous

00:21:27.120 debate for

00:21:28.540 decades and

00:21:30.940 then one

00:21:31.560 side said,

00:21:32.800 no, yeah,

00:21:33.280 okay, I

00:21:33.660 guess you're

00:21:33.920 right.

00:21:34.740 I guess

00:21:35.080 nuclear is

00:21:35.540 good.

00:21:35.740 Let's do

00:21:36.040 that.

00:21:36.880 I've never

00:21:37.500 seen this.

00:21:39.460 What happened?

00:21:41.280 What the hell?

00:21:42.860 I mean,

00:21:43.160 obviously,

00:21:44.200 you know,

00:21:44.640 the advocates,

00:21:46.200 you know,

00:21:46.380 Mark Schneider,

00:21:47.360 Michael

00:21:47.620 Schellenberger,

00:21:48.980 you know,

00:21:49.180 Bjorn Lomborg

00:21:50.020 would probably

00:21:50.480 throw into

00:21:51.780 that mix.

00:21:53.420 I think they

00:21:53.940 did a great

00:21:54.420 job,

00:21:55.500 you know,

00:21:55.740 persuading.

00:21:56.540 I mean,

00:21:56.860 amazing job.

00:21:58.680 Schellenberger,

00:21:59.380 in particular,

00:22:00.640 testifying to

00:22:01.320 Congress,

00:22:01.840 probably changed

00:22:03.120 the fate of

00:22:03.580 the world.

00:22:05.020 Let me say

00:22:05.560 that again.

00:22:06.900 Don't know

00:22:07.340 for sure,

00:22:08.020 because,

00:22:08.340 you know,

00:22:08.440 many moving

00:22:09.080 parts and

00:22:09.700 lots of

00:22:10.480 things influencing

00:22:11.240 other things,

00:22:12.480 but from my

00:22:13.260 perspective,

00:22:13.980 it looks like

00:22:16.100 Michael

00:22:16.520 Schellenberger

00:22:17.220 changed the

00:22:18.620 fate of the

00:22:19.020 world.

00:22:20.020 by being

00:22:21.440 effective and

00:22:22.260 knowing his

00:22:22.960 stuff and

00:22:23.540 testifying to

00:22:24.740 Congress and

00:22:25.420 telling them,

00:22:26.280 you know,

00:22:26.480 we need

00:22:26.800 nuclear in the

00:22:27.460 mix.

00:22:28.060 I think he

00:22:28.840 sold them.

00:22:29.980 I mean,

00:22:30.160 I think that's

00:22:30.600 what happened.

00:22:31.420 Now,

00:22:31.620 of course,

00:22:31.900 there isn't

00:22:32.180 much of a

00:22:32.560 counter-argument.

00:22:34.060 The argument

00:22:34.740 is not so much

00:22:35.720 my point versus

00:22:37.520 your point.

00:22:38.760 The argument

00:22:39.640 with nuclear

00:22:40.420 evolved into

00:22:42.000 people who

00:22:43.400 were well-informed

00:22:45.440 and people

00:22:46.480 who weren't.

00:22:47.020 it sort of

00:22:48.600 evolved into

00:22:49.240 that.

00:22:50.280 And once

00:22:50.700 enough people

00:22:51.800 got informed,

00:22:53.200 thank you,

00:22:53.860 Mark Schneider,

00:22:54.640 thank you,

00:22:55.720 Michael

00:22:56.320 Schellenberger,

00:22:57.740 once people

00:22:58.480 were informed,

00:22:59.140 they were all

00:22:59.440 on the same

00:22:59.780 side,

00:23:00.920 turns out,

00:23:02.000 at least the

00:23:02.720 people in

00:23:03.100 charge.

00:23:03.340 So that's a

00:23:04.460 gigantic thing.

00:23:05.620 I mean,

00:23:05.800 I don't know

00:23:06.540 how,

00:23:07.560 I just don't

00:23:08.200 know how to

00:23:08.620 say enough

00:23:09.000 about that.

00:23:09.800 I mean,

00:23:10.040 that's really

00:23:10.580 the fate of

00:23:11.300 the planet

00:23:11.780 got decided

00:23:13.320 the right

00:23:14.580 way.

00:23:15.760 Now,

00:23:16.180 what have I

00:23:16.480 told you

00:23:16.840 about the,

00:23:17.420 there's a

00:23:18.000 thing called

00:23:18.380 the Adam's

00:23:19.020 Law of

00:23:19.500 Slow-Moving

00:23:20.160 Disasters.

00:23:21.240 Have you

00:23:21.500 heard of it?

00:23:22.460 I talk about

00:23:23.320 it all the

00:23:23.660 time.

00:23:24.160 If you can

00:23:24.760 see a disaster

00:23:25.580 coming decades

00:23:27.700 ahead,

00:23:28.440 such as

00:23:29.000 imagining we'll

00:23:29.680 run out of

00:23:30.160 oil,

00:23:30.660 or imagining

00:23:31.040 we'll run

00:23:31.520 out of food,

00:23:32.380 or imagining

00:23:33.460 whatever will

00:23:34.000 happen in,

00:23:34.900 you know,

00:23:35.200 50 years,

00:23:35.980 if you have

00:23:36.560 enough time,

00:23:38.360 humans are

00:23:38.940 always good at

00:23:39.540 adapting.

00:23:40.240 We're really

00:23:40.680 good at that

00:23:41.160 kind of problem.

00:23:41.740 Oh,

00:23:41.840 we've got lots

00:23:42.220 of time?

00:23:42.600 All right,

00:23:42.840 we'll fix that.

00:23:43.360 And it

00:23:45.120 looks like

00:23:45.540 we did.

00:23:46.940 I mean,

00:23:47.460 there's a ton

00:23:48.460 of work that

00:23:48.940 would have to

00:23:49.320 be done to

00:23:50.180 develop,

00:23:51.000 you know,

00:23:51.620 the new

00:23:52.300 models of

00:23:52.880 nuclear and

00:23:53.500 to build

00:23:53.820 the existing

00:23:54.540 ones,

00:23:54.940 et cetera.

00:23:55.600 But we

00:23:56.220 have a

00:23:56.500 plan,

00:23:57.380 and the

00:23:58.320 plan is

00:23:58.840 well within

00:23:59.340 the doable

00:24:00.340 channel of

00:24:02.600 humankind.

00:24:04.120 Can humankind

00:24:05.040 pull this

00:24:05.660 off?

00:24:06.580 Make enough

00:24:07.160 nuclear reactors

00:24:08.140 to really get

00:24:09.820 on top of

00:24:10.460 climate change

00:24:11.140 in the long

00:24:11.600 run?

00:24:12.140 I think so.

00:24:13.360 Yeah.

00:24:13.720 I mean,

00:24:14.000 that doesn't

00:24:14.460 mean we

00:24:14.760 will,

00:24:15.860 but do we

00:24:16.500 have that

00:24:16.840 capability?

00:24:17.620 Yeah.

00:24:18.360 Yeah,

00:24:18.620 it turns out

00:24:18.940 we do.

00:24:19.320 So we

00:24:19.560 actually have

00:24:20.140 a plan

00:24:21.700 that looks

00:24:23.140 like it

00:24:23.600 could solve

00:24:24.860 climate change.

00:24:27.000 And that's

00:24:27.660 like this

00:24:28.080 week.

00:24:29.120 As of this

00:24:30.000 week,

00:24:30.820 we solved

00:24:31.360 climate change

00:24:32.040 going forward.

00:24:32.660 The second

00:24:35.160 big thing

00:24:35.940 is the

00:24:36.440 pandemic

00:24:37.320 got solved.

00:24:38.300 I don't

00:24:38.460 know if

00:24:38.660 you saw

00:24:38.940 this story.

00:24:40.060 A lot

00:24:40.300 of you

00:24:40.540 think that

00:24:41.200 we don't

00:24:42.080 have a

00:24:42.380 solution to

00:24:42.960 the pandemic,

00:24:43.720 even with

00:24:44.280 vaccinations.

00:24:45.800 But no,

00:24:46.880 the pandemic

00:24:47.360 got solved

00:24:48.200 this week.

00:24:50.420 I solved

00:24:51.140 it because

00:24:51.640 I had some

00:24:52.040 spare time.

00:24:53.420 I know you

00:24:54.180 would have

00:24:54.440 done it,

00:24:55.580 but maybe

00:24:56.220 your schedule

00:24:56.740 was a little

00:24:57.140 busier than

00:24:57.680 mine.

00:24:58.000 And I

00:24:59.040 looked around

00:24:59.500 and I

00:24:59.740 said,

00:25:00.020 well,

00:25:00.140 I've got

00:25:00.440 some time.

00:25:01.240 What would

00:25:01.500 be the

00:25:01.840 thing to

00:25:02.220 do to

00:25:03.780 solve the

00:25:04.640 pandemic?

00:25:05.880 So I did

00:25:06.340 it.

00:25:07.120 I just

00:25:07.840 released a

00:25:08.400 video that

00:25:09.640 was on the

00:25:10.460 locals platform

00:25:11.500 only until a

00:25:12.740 few minutes

00:25:13.120 ago.

00:25:13.840 So I

00:25:14.060 released it

00:25:15.660 from its

00:25:16.220 captive

00:25:18.460 wrapper.

00:25:19.800 So you

00:25:20.360 can all see

00:25:20.780 it now.

00:25:21.160 It's on

00:25:21.360 Twitter.

00:25:22.440 And in

00:25:22.900 this video,

00:25:23.560 I explain

00:25:24.180 my plan for

00:25:26.260 solving the

00:25:26.760 pandemic.

00:25:28.000 Now,

00:25:28.300 you have to

00:25:28.620 see the

00:25:28.900 video to

00:25:29.360 see the

00:25:29.680 visual because

00:25:30.280 it's more

00:25:30.760 persuasive with

00:25:31.820 the visual.

00:25:32.660 But it goes

00:25:33.180 like this.

00:25:34.820 Say you're

00:25:35.500 in a room

00:25:36.040 with good

00:25:37.180 ventilation.

00:25:38.840 What are

00:25:39.160 the odds

00:25:39.580 of getting

00:25:39.960 COVID?

00:25:41.400 Masks or

00:25:42.020 no masks?

00:25:43.260 Well,

00:25:43.540 if the

00:25:43.760 ventilation is

00:25:44.380 good enough,

00:25:45.660 it would be

00:25:46.120 almost equivalent

00:25:46.820 to being

00:25:47.160 outdoors.

00:25:48.520 Right?

00:25:49.140 That's what

00:25:49.680 good ventilation

00:25:50.280 is.

00:25:50.980 It at least

00:25:51.620 gets you

00:25:51.980 closer to

00:25:52.540 what outdoors

00:25:53.080 would be

00:25:53.380 like.

00:25:54.220 But lots

00:25:55.880 of places

00:25:56.240 are not well

00:25:56.860 ventilated.

00:25:58.000 So let's

00:25:58.840 talk about

00:25:59.320 ventilation

00:25:59.880 separately.

00:26:02.340 Everything I

00:26:02.960 say after

00:26:03.480 this...

00:26:05.720 Everything I

00:26:09.260 say...

00:26:09.840 Sorry,

00:26:10.680 I just got

00:26:11.040 some news

00:26:11.800 that was

00:26:12.040 complicated.

00:26:12.480 Everything I

00:26:14.060 say after

00:26:14.780 this...

00:26:15.600 Well,

00:26:15.860 I don't know

00:26:16.180 what the

00:26:16.420 beginning of

00:26:16.740 that sentence

00:26:17.180 was anymore,

00:26:17.840 so let me

00:26:18.140 start a new

00:26:18.740 sentence.

00:26:20.040 One that I

00:26:20.660 can finish

00:26:21.320 with a point.

00:26:22.500 Okay?

00:26:26.240 So in a

00:26:26.980 room that

00:26:27.500 doesn't have

00:26:28.360 good ventilation,

00:26:29.740 there are

00:26:30.040 lots of

00:26:30.400 those,

00:26:30.640 right?

00:26:31.220 A normal

00:26:32.000 room,

00:26:32.880 all right?

00:26:33.280 A normal

00:26:33.780 room in a

00:26:34.180 house,

00:26:34.380 I would say

00:26:34.740 it doesn't

00:26:35.080 have great

00:26:35.540 ventilation,

00:26:36.160 it just

00:26:36.380 has good

00:26:36.800 enough.

00:26:37.320 But it

00:26:37.600 might not

00:26:37.860 be good

00:26:38.120 enough for

00:26:38.460 the coronavirus.

00:26:39.840 It might

00:26:40.380 be good

00:26:40.680 enough for

00:26:41.300 heating and

00:26:42.080 cooling and

00:26:42.680 keeping you

00:26:43.100 alive,

00:26:43.540 but maybe

00:26:43.860 not good

00:26:44.220 enough for

00:26:44.500 the coronavirus.

00:26:45.920 So what

00:26:46.320 I'm going

00:26:46.580 to talk

00:26:46.860 about next

00:26:47.560 has nothing

00:26:48.920 to do with

00:26:49.460 ventilation.

00:26:51.400 Ventilation,

00:26:52.040 the purpose

00:26:52.540 of it is to

00:26:53.200 move your

00:26:53.600 virus from

00:26:54.360 inside the

00:26:54.880 house to

00:26:55.220 outside the

00:26:55.720 house.

00:26:56.380 I am not

00:26:57.240 talking about

00:26:57.980 that.

00:26:59.040 Everything I

00:26:59.700 say next

00:27:00.320 has nothing

00:27:01.500 to do with

00:27:02.040 ventilation.

00:27:03.380 But your

00:27:03.820 brain is

00:27:05.500 going to

00:27:05.780 say,

00:27:06.120 he's talking

00:27:06.640 about

00:27:06.840 ventilation.

00:27:07.940 Let me

00:27:08.360 add a point

00:27:08.800 about

00:27:09.000 ventilation.

00:27:10.460 You know,

00:27:11.020 I see your

00:27:11.620 point,

00:27:11.940 Scott,

00:27:12.200 but have

00:27:12.480 you considered

00:27:13.140 ventilation?

00:27:16.340 Corey,

00:27:16.820 stop texting

00:27:18.760 me during

00:27:19.760 my live

00:27:20.140 stream.

00:27:23.220 So in

00:27:24.560 a moment,

00:27:25.020 I'm going

00:27:25.280 to flip

00:27:25.660 out because

00:27:26.980 in the

00:27:27.300 comments,

00:27:27.940 somebody's

00:27:28.560 going to

00:27:28.780 say,

00:27:29.680 and they

00:27:30.020 won't be

00:27:30.400 kidding,

00:27:31.760 but you

00:27:32.100 know what

00:27:32.400 would be

00:27:32.640 even better

00:27:33.040 than what

00:27:33.400 you're talking

00:27:33.800 about,

00:27:34.100 Scott?

00:27:34.380 Have you

00:27:34.680 considered

00:27:35.200 ventilation?

00:27:38.060 And then

00:27:38.540 I'm going

00:27:38.780 to read that

00:27:39.160 comment and

00:27:39.640 I'm going

00:27:39.860 to say,

00:27:41.560 well,

00:27:41.860 I don't

00:27:42.000 know what

00:27:42.200 I'll say.

00:27:42.500 I'll

00:27:42.600 probably flip

00:27:43.080 out.

00:27:45.240 No,

00:27:45.660 I will

00:27:45.900 flip out,

00:27:46.340 Zachary.

00:27:46.820 I'm going

00:27:47.580 to flip

00:27:47.840 out because

00:27:49.280 there's one

00:27:50.400 thing you

00:27:50.720 need to

00:27:50.960 hear clearly.

00:27:52.800 Nothing I

00:27:53.480 say next is

00:27:54.660 about fucking

00:27:55.920 ventilation.

00:27:57.940 Okay.

00:27:59.200 No

00:27:59.640 ventilation.

00:28:01.000 Here's the

00:28:01.400 idea.

00:28:01.860 Turn on

00:28:02.160 the fan.

00:28:03.260 Move the

00:28:03.620 air out.

00:28:04.960 You're

00:28:05.220 done.

00:28:06.280 That's it.

00:28:07.440 Just put

00:28:07.920 fans,

00:28:08.580 just regular

00:28:09.020 fans,

00:28:10.240 in any

00:28:10.800 room that

00:28:11.240 you've got

00:28:11.560 a problem

00:28:12.020 that you

00:28:12.680 think doesn't

00:28:13.240 have good

00:28:13.640 ventilation by

00:28:14.340 itself,

00:28:14.720 can't open

00:28:15.120 a window,

00:28:15.640 can't open

00:28:16.000 a door,

00:28:16.280 whatever.

00:28:17.140 Just put

00:28:17.540 fans in

00:28:18.000 there.

00:28:18.600 Here's the

00:28:19.060 idea.

00:28:19.380 Number one,

00:28:21.940 fans will

00:28:22.820 disperse your

00:28:23.800 plume faster.

00:28:25.840 Actually,

00:28:26.240 really fast.

00:28:27.440 So the

00:28:28.000 big problem

00:28:29.460 with infection

00:28:30.200 is if you

00:28:30.920 get a big

00:28:31.300 enough viral

00:28:31.840 load.

00:28:32.660 If you're in

00:28:33.320 a room with

00:28:33.840 somebody who

00:28:34.300 has COVID,

00:28:35.520 and they're

00:28:36.320 on one side

00:28:36.860 of the room,

00:28:37.880 and you're

00:28:38.320 huddled in

00:28:38.920 the corner

00:28:39.280 on the other

00:28:39.740 side,

00:28:40.900 like this,

00:28:42.460 what are the

00:28:43.060 chances that

00:28:43.600 you will get

00:28:44.100 COVID if the

00:28:45.520 person who

00:28:46.100 has the

00:28:46.540 COVID is

00:28:46.980 on the

00:28:47.220 other side

00:28:47.560 of the

00:28:47.740 room,

00:28:48.380 even poorly

00:28:49.020 ventilated?

00:28:50.200 Even poorly

00:28:50.960 ventilated.

00:28:51.580 What are the

00:28:51.880 odds?

00:28:52.660 Well, not

00:28:53.200 that high.

00:28:54.560 Because the

00:28:55.280 person standing

00:28:55.960 right in front

00:28:56.720 of the person

00:28:57.200 talking, well,

00:28:57.900 they've got a

00:28:58.280 problem because

00:28:58.800 of the plume,

00:29:00.040 the cloud of

00:29:01.700 virus and water

00:29:03.240 molecules coming

00:29:04.060 out of a

00:29:04.420 person's mouth.

00:29:05.100 If you could

00:29:06.680 get rid of

00:29:07.160 all the

00:29:07.620 plumes,

00:29:09.780 how often

00:29:11.000 would people

00:29:11.440 get infected

00:29:12.120 in a room

00:29:12.720 with people

00:29:13.220 who have

00:29:13.440 COVID?

00:29:14.460 No plumes.

00:29:16.580 Well, here's

00:29:18.100 my hypothesis.

00:29:19.860 That 80% of

00:29:20.840 the spread is

00:29:21.360 from plumes.

00:29:23.280 Because we

00:29:24.120 know we don't

00:29:24.620 get it from

00:29:25.000 surfaces.

00:29:26.200 Surfaces, you

00:29:27.200 know, basically

00:29:27.680 kill the virus

00:29:28.480 apparently, because

00:29:29.340 we're not that

00:29:30.440 worried about

00:29:30.920 surfaces anymore.

00:29:32.680 Right?

00:29:32.920 We were worried

00:29:34.020 about surfaces

00:29:34.640 before, but

00:29:35.260 surfaces seem

00:29:35.960 to be a

00:29:37.160 problem.

00:29:40.740 So, the

00:29:41.900 fan does

00:29:42.480 several things.

00:29:44.180 Number one, it

00:29:45.400 immediately

00:29:45.860 disperses the

00:29:46.800 plume.

00:29:48.060 So, does it

00:29:48.960 reduce 80% of

00:29:51.440 what would get

00:29:52.140 somebody infected?

00:29:53.060 Because they

00:29:53.380 need a certain

00:29:53.900 viral load for

00:29:54.980 the infection to

00:29:55.800 really take

00:29:58.200 root, but also

00:29:59.800 to get them

00:30:00.320 very sick.

00:30:01.560 So, if all

00:30:02.120 it did,

00:30:02.920 was remove

00:30:04.060 the option

00:30:04.620 that people

00:30:05.000 get very

00:30:05.500 sick, because

00:30:06.480 the viral load

00:30:07.140 they get is a

00:30:07.660 small one instead

00:30:08.400 of a big one,

00:30:09.600 that's gigantic.

00:30:11.480 But, I think it

00:30:12.380 would actually

00:30:12.720 prevent them

00:30:13.300 from getting

00:30:13.600 it.

00:30:14.000 Now, the

00:30:14.400 second thing

00:30:14.880 that the

00:30:15.340 airflow does,

00:30:17.120 if the air

00:30:17.780 is enough

00:30:18.080 that you

00:30:18.240 can feel

00:30:18.680 it, right,

00:30:19.740 is it, by

00:30:21.420 reducing the

00:30:22.200 plume, it

00:30:23.420 increases the

00:30:24.540 evaporation.

00:30:26.440 Now,

00:30:28.520 Anatoly, who

00:30:30.520 you should

00:30:30.880 follow on

00:30:31.600 Twitter, gave

00:30:33.180 us some

00:30:33.460 stats and

00:30:34.080 some science

00:30:34.660 that shows

00:30:35.060 that that's

00:30:35.580 the fact,

00:30:36.300 that moving

00:30:36.920 air will

00:30:37.620 reduce a

00:30:38.980 plume and

00:30:39.480 make it

00:30:39.780 evaporate

00:30:40.260 faster.

00:30:40.980 Now, if it

00:30:41.420 evaporates

00:30:42.000 faster, what

00:30:43.340 happens to the

00:30:43.900 virus that is

00:30:44.620 carried by the

00:30:45.360 water molecules?

00:30:46.120 The water

00:30:46.940 disappears, the

00:30:48.760 virus falls to

00:30:49.520 the ground.

00:30:50.340 So, it's the

00:30:51.040 water molecule

00:30:51.580 that protects

00:30:52.420 the virus to

00:30:53.300 get into you.

00:30:54.380 If you get rid

00:30:54.980 of the water

00:30:55.340 molecules that

00:30:56.140 protect it, the

00:30:58.340 virus is less

00:30:59.340 effective, drops

00:31:00.380 to the ground.

00:31:01.500 So, you've got

00:31:03.340 one thing that

00:31:04.100 gets rid of the

00:31:04.660 plume, so it

00:31:05.500 gets rid of the

00:31:06.000 viral load almost

00:31:06.980 immediately.

00:31:08.080 So, that's

00:31:08.720 probably 80% of

00:31:09.560 the problem.

00:31:10.700 Then, you have

00:31:11.600 the virus itself,

00:31:12.900 less of it,

00:31:13.920 because the air is

00:31:14.760 moving it around,

00:31:15.360 and now it's

00:31:15.760 evaporating faster.

00:31:17.580 And then, the

00:31:18.020 third thing, again,

00:31:18.960 this is hypothetical,

00:31:20.460 any of this would

00:31:21.340 have to be verified,

00:31:22.440 obviously, but if

00:31:23.540 you're moving the

00:31:24.200 air faster, is the

00:31:26.600 air bouncing against

00:31:27.640 surfaces more

00:31:30.360 often?

00:31:31.720 I think the

00:31:32.580 answer is yes.

00:31:34.240 Just give me a

00:31:35.380 common sense

00:31:36.180 opinion here in

00:31:39.440 the comments.

00:31:41.100 Does it make

00:31:41.600 sense to you that

00:31:43.200 if you add some

00:31:43.820 airflow, that

00:31:45.320 the air will be

00:31:46.000 bouncing off the

00:31:46.780 walls and the

00:31:47.440 furniture more

00:31:48.120 often, and we

00:31:49.480 know that surfaces

00:31:50.300 kill the virus

00:31:51.360 pretty effectively

00:31:52.140 compared to you

00:31:53.100 breathing it in?

00:31:55.040 Right?

00:31:55.780 Now, have I

00:31:57.780 given you three

00:31:59.140 practical explanations

00:32:02.520 that you say to

00:32:04.320 yourself, well, I'm

00:32:04.960 no scientist, but

00:32:05.900 those probably

00:32:06.700 almost certainly

00:32:07.500 make sense?

00:32:08.120 Ron says the air

00:32:11.580 needs to move at

00:32:12.220 least 56 miles

00:32:13.500 per hour.

00:32:14.020 I doubt it.

00:32:15.080 I doubt it.

00:32:16.140 Imagine if you had

00:32:18.020 a plume of a

00:32:19.140 cigarette smoke in

00:32:20.060 front of you, and

00:32:21.740 then imagine a fan on

00:32:23.080 the other side of the

00:32:23.720 room, enough that you

00:32:24.740 could feel it under

00:32:25.460 your skin.

00:32:26.740 That plume would 0.87

00:32:27.840 just move sideways

00:32:28.840 the moment they hit

00:32:30.900 the air.

00:32:31.500 I don't think you'd

00:32:32.280 need 56 miles an

00:32:33.420 hour.

00:32:34.240 Well, actually, let me

00:32:35.240 take that back.

00:32:36.640 Maybe it is 56

00:32:37.680 miles per hour at

00:32:38.580 the point of the

00:32:39.880 fan, but it

00:32:41.360 wouldn't be once it

00:32:42.500 reached the interior

00:32:43.420 of the room.

00:32:46.380 I hear you say

00:32:47.280 dehumidifiers, and I

00:32:49.340 think a fan is just

00:32:50.260 an easier, quicker

00:32:52.560 solution.

00:32:53.440 The dehumidifier

00:32:54.260 probably makes a

00:32:55.000 difference, too.

00:32:57.020 All right.

00:32:58.200 So there is my

00:32:59.920 hypothesis.

00:33:01.080 I believe that it's

00:33:02.180 testable.

00:33:03.640 You could find out,

00:33:04.540 for example,

00:33:05.240 you could put fans in

00:33:07.900 some classrooms and

00:33:09.120 not in others, check

00:33:11.060 again in a month, see

00:33:12.600 if anybody got it.

00:33:13.380 Well, you wouldn't

00:33:14.060 know if they got it in

00:33:14.760 the classroom.

00:33:15.620 There's probably some

00:33:16.220 way to test it.

00:33:19.160 But I would like to

00:33:20.400 submit that the

00:33:21.600 pandemic is over, and

00:33:23.660 if you've got a fan in

00:33:24.800 the room, you should be

00:33:25.540 able to take off your

00:33:26.280 mask.

00:33:27.920 Are you interested

00:33:28.900 now?

00:33:30.220 A little bit of

00:33:30.960 science.

00:33:31.900 If it could tell us

00:33:32.960 that the fans do make

00:33:34.700 a difference, could it

00:33:36.260 be the difference

00:33:36.900 between taking off your

00:33:38.000 mask in a public place

00:33:39.280 or not?

00:33:40.320 Let's say a classroom.

00:33:42.040 Could you take the

00:33:43.080 masks off if the fan

00:33:44.660 idea pans out?

00:33:46.440 Maybe.

00:33:47.340 It'd be a good

00:33:47.840 trade-off.

00:33:48.840 Because if I told you

00:33:51.120 about the fake

00:33:51.700 because, a fake

00:33:53.840 because is giving

00:33:55.400 somebody a reason when

00:33:56.640 they really want to do

00:33:57.760 the thing that you want

00:33:59.020 them to do.

00:33:59.420 They want to do it

00:34:00.740 too, but they need a 0.94

00:34:02.100 reason that sounds good

00:34:03.580 to other people.

00:34:05.280 So instead of saying,

00:34:06.380 hey, take the mask

00:34:07.940 off, do you think you

00:34:09.420 can sell that to people

00:34:10.440 who are pro-mask?

00:34:11.700 Do you think you will

00:34:12.680 ever sell to the pro-mask

00:34:15.540 crowd, hey, let's just

00:34:17.360 take them off?

00:34:19.260 No, no.

00:34:20.240 That's unsellable.

00:34:21.740 That is unpersuadable.

00:34:23.880 Here's what isn't.

00:34:25.560 Do you know, if you had

00:34:27.220 fans, they would be as

00:34:29.300 effective as masks, so

00:34:31.200 you can take the masks

00:34:32.240 off?

00:34:34.320 Eh?

00:34:35.880 How'd that feel?

00:34:37.700 It felt like a reason,

00:34:38.880 didn't it?

00:34:39.900 But it's a fake because.

00:34:41.900 Because even if the fans

00:34:43.140 do work, the masks would

00:34:45.620 still work a little bit

00:34:46.820 more, if they work at

00:34:48.200 all, right?

00:34:49.200 So if you were concerned,

00:34:50.780 you'd still say, well,

00:34:52.080 how about both?

00:34:54.040 But, in terms of

00:34:55.520 persuasion, and both would

00:34:56.980 make sense, maybe

00:34:57.760 logically, if you didn't

00:34:59.220 know the real risk and

00:35:00.160 you were concerned.

00:35:01.340 But, it gives you a fake

00:35:04.380 because.

00:35:06.160 Politicians need to say, 0.98

00:35:07.600 I'll get rid of the masks

00:35:08.840 because.

00:35:10.560 Either because of

00:35:11.640 vaccinations, because of

00:35:14.360 other mitigation, because of

00:35:15.980 this.

00:35:16.520 You've got to have a

00:35:17.120 because.

00:35:18.200 If they can't add the

00:35:19.260 because, they can't get

00:35:20.160 away with it.

00:35:21.260 And maybe the fans would

00:35:23.520 be the because.

00:35:24.760 Because, can you tell me

00:35:26.000 because, can anybody

00:35:28.200 here tell me that

00:35:29.180 wearing a mask would

00:35:30.620 be more or less

00:35:31.640 effective than just

00:35:33.320 increasing the airflow

00:35:34.220 in the room?

00:35:36.100 You can't, can you?

00:35:37.960 Because you don't

00:35:38.740 really know how

00:35:39.540 effective the masks

00:35:40.440 are, but they're not

00:35:41.220 like 100%.

00:35:42.200 Whatever effectiveness

00:35:44.180 masks have is probably

00:35:45.640 sub-20%.

00:35:46.940 Still worth doing, if

00:35:48.720 that's real.

00:35:50.020 I mean, if they really

00:35:50.840 reduced by 20%, you

00:35:52.640 would certainly use

00:35:53.200 them in some situations.

00:35:55.440 But, could you tell me

00:35:56.760 that a fan wouldn't

00:35:57.640 reduce it by 20% as

00:35:59.040 well?

00:36:01.360 No, you can't, because

00:36:02.560 we don't know.

00:36:03.420 But logically, I mean,

00:36:05.260 if you just looked at

00:36:05.960 the reasons they

00:36:06.800 should, I don't know,

00:36:09.560 kind of looks like

00:36:10.260 they'd be equivalent.

00:36:11.720 Somewhere in that

00:36:12.440 sub-20% range, maybe.

00:36:14.420 I would think fans

00:36:15.280 could have a higher

00:36:16.140 potential, though,

00:36:16.880 actually.

00:36:17.980 All right, so that's

00:36:18.640 the good news.

00:36:19.200 I talked about that

00:36:19.920 way too much.

00:36:20.480 I think you would

00:36:21.440 agree.

00:36:22.340 I should be talking

00:36:23.200 about my cat, Boo,

00:36:24.260 more.

00:36:25.760 Well, John Stossel,

00:36:27.360 you all know John

00:36:28.160 Stossel?

00:36:29.000 He's suing Facebook

00:36:29.960 over censoring him

00:36:31.220 for some stuff he,

00:36:33.260 some content he had

00:36:34.140 on climate change,

00:36:35.700 in which his content

00:36:37.120 was not unscientific,

00:36:40.540 meaning that he did

00:36:41.440 not say something

00:36:42.340 that scientists

00:36:43.740 would disagree with.

00:36:45.360 He did frame it

00:36:47.040 in ways that would

00:36:48.800 maybe make you a

00:36:49.940 little more skeptical

00:36:50.740 about some elements

00:36:51.980 of the claims

00:36:52.900 of climate change,

00:36:54.280 but he did not

00:36:55.420 report an inaccurate

00:36:57.860 fact, nor is he

00:36:59.420 accused.

00:37:00.500 He's not even

00:37:01.060 accused of having

00:37:01.980 an inaccurate fact.

00:37:03.460 The thing they

00:37:03.980 accused him of is

00:37:04.860 something that they

00:37:05.600 imagined he said

00:37:06.720 and then dinged him

00:37:07.820 for it.

00:37:08.820 So he got dinged

00:37:10.180 for something they

00:37:10.860 interpreted he said

00:37:11.920 that he didn't say.

00:37:13.580 So that's bad.

00:37:15.120 Bjorn Lomborg,

00:37:16.580 I mentioned him again,

00:37:17.680 by the way,

00:37:18.000 I'll be interviewing

00:37:19.200 Bjorn Lomborg

00:37:21.180 for his paperback

00:37:24.660 version of his book.

00:37:26.620 That's coming up

00:37:27.560 in some weeks.

00:37:29.680 And I'll let you know

00:37:31.960 when that comes up.

00:37:33.340 So Facebook has

00:37:35.960 some explaining to do.

00:37:37.640 Now you notice that

00:37:38.640 the censoring seems

00:37:40.580 to be unique to Facebook

00:37:42.840 in these stories.

00:37:43.980 Because I'm pretty sure

00:37:45.820 that Twitter did not

00:37:46.760 suppress either one

00:37:48.260 of them.

00:37:49.300 In fact, they're

00:37:50.420 talking about it

00:37:51.100 on Twitter.

00:37:52.280 So remember my rule

00:37:55.540 that if you can't say

00:37:57.460 something good about

00:37:58.880 something you criticize,

00:38:01.060 you're probably not

00:38:02.320 credible.

00:38:03.680 You've got to be able

00:38:04.220 to say something good

00:38:05.320 about the things

00:38:06.600 you criticize.

00:38:07.980 So let me do that

00:38:09.100 for Twitter.

00:38:10.060 Twitter has taken a lot

00:38:11.080 of heat for censorship

00:38:13.620 and shadow banning

00:38:15.460 allegedly, et cetera.

00:38:17.440 But in this case,

00:38:18.860 it looks like Facebook

00:38:19.880 got it totally wrong

00:38:21.040 and Twitter got it

00:38:21.780 totally right.

00:38:22.880 It's worth mentioning.

00:38:24.920 Twitter got it

00:38:25.640 totally right.

00:38:26.580 Because they didn't ban

00:38:27.440 any of this content.

00:38:29.600 So give them credit

00:38:30.780 for that.

00:38:31.420 All right.

00:38:32.220 There's a new story

00:38:32.920 that Biden's attacks cheat.

00:38:34.540 Of course.

00:38:35.620 Just when he's trying

00:38:41.180 to get his gigantic

00:38:43.360 tax increase

00:38:44.240 on the rich through,

00:38:45.320 there's this story.

00:38:46.240 So here's the details.

00:38:47.760 And I know this will

00:38:48.420 be complicated

00:38:49.180 for most of you.

00:38:51.880 All right.

00:38:52.760 So I'm going to do

00:38:53.700 my cartoonist best

00:38:55.420 to simplify this story.

00:38:58.000 If you are an individual

00:38:59.420 who is doing a job

00:39:01.180 such as giving speeches

00:39:02.360 for money,

00:39:02.960 which is what Biden

00:39:03.960 was doing between jobs,

00:39:06.700 he made $13 million

00:39:07.640 giving mostly speeches.

00:39:09.960 Now, one of the things

00:39:10.880 you can do,

00:39:11.560 and it's very common,

00:39:13.140 is that instead of

00:39:14.340 taking the money

00:39:14.920 as an individual

00:39:15.760 and then paying taxes

00:39:17.300 just like a human,

00:39:18.920 you can do some paperwork

00:39:20.620 with a lawyer

00:39:21.280 and declare that you

00:39:22.440 are a S corporation.

00:39:24.960 There are different

00:39:25.440 kinds of corporations.

00:39:26.820 The S corp is typically

00:39:28.220 for this purpose

00:39:29.100 where there's like

00:39:29.740 one principal person

00:39:31.100 who is the business.

00:39:32.460 Now, in that case,

00:39:35.300 you still have to determine,

00:39:36.920 at least on paper,

00:39:38.520 how much of the money

00:39:39.520 that Biden would get

00:39:40.840 in this case

00:39:41.580 would be in the form

00:39:42.960 of looking like

00:39:43.840 a regular salary

00:39:44.840 for being the CEO

00:39:46.020 of his own S corporation,

00:39:48.920 which is just him.

00:39:50.600 So not only do you

00:39:51.780 define yourself

00:39:52.540 as a corporation,

00:39:54.140 but then you give yourself

00:39:55.440 the job of being

00:39:56.600 the head of the corporation,

00:39:57.720 which is all just you.

00:39:59.100 So it's just Biden.

00:39:59.880 But he's a corporation,

00:40:01.720 but he's also a person

00:40:02.700 who's in charge

00:40:04.120 of the corporation.

00:40:05.300 All right?

00:40:05.720 Now, in that setup,

00:40:07.260 you have to give

00:40:08.100 your CEO self a salary,

00:40:10.120 just like you were

00:40:10.920 an employee,

00:40:11.820 while the rest of the money

00:40:13.240 that you don't call salary

00:40:15.300 becomes income

00:40:17.120 through the corporation.

00:40:18.460 Now, the reason you do this

00:40:19.700 is that individuals

00:40:21.180 pay more taxes

00:40:22.140 than corporations.

00:40:23.820 So if you can say,

00:40:25.040 oh, I'm really a corporation,

00:40:26.560 then you pay fewer taxes,

00:40:29.220 especially for the Medicare

00:40:30.440 portion, 3.8%.

00:40:32.160 So the higher the salary is,

00:40:37.120 the more you're going to pay

00:40:39.120 in Medicare taxes.

00:40:41.600 The higher the S corporation

00:40:43.620 profit part is,

00:40:44.880 that you arbitrarily define

00:40:46.860 which portion is which,

00:40:48.400 the higher that one is,

00:40:49.480 the more taxes you pay.

00:40:51.220 So the game with an S corp

00:40:53.240 is to try to get away with,

00:40:56.280 meaning that you're gaming

00:40:57.720 the audit in the future.

00:40:59.740 Like, if we got audited,

00:41:01.720 what is the least we can claim

00:41:03.880 is the salary for the CEO.

00:41:07.080 And so the question is,

00:41:08.380 over two years,

00:41:09.200 he made $13 million.

00:41:10.520 That's, let's say,

00:41:11.200 $6.5 million a year.

00:41:13.180 And he made $800,000

00:41:14.780 that he paid himself

00:41:15.960 as a CEO.

00:41:17.340 So it's two years,

00:41:18.680 so cut that in half.

00:41:19.640 $400,000 a year

00:41:21.840 to be the CEO

00:41:23.500 of a $6.5 million operation.

00:41:28.280 Does that sound right?

00:41:29.520 If you were the CEO

00:41:31.120 of a $6.5 million business,

00:41:34.820 meaning its profits were,

00:41:36.280 that's just the profits,

00:41:37.740 not the gross,

00:41:39.680 but the profit pre-tax

00:41:42.540 was $6.5 million.

00:41:45.320 Is that a fair salary,

00:41:46.840 $400,000,

00:41:47.600 to be the CEO

00:41:48.580 of that size of a business?

00:41:52.960 Yes, it is.

00:41:54.400 Yes, it is.

00:41:55.880 How's the audit going to do?

00:41:57.500 Fine.

00:41:58.780 Fine.

00:41:59.760 Is this story real?

00:42:01.740 Nope.

00:42:02.960 Nope.

00:42:03.820 It's fake news.

00:42:05.360 Because if you go into an audit

00:42:06.980 and say,

00:42:07.520 the complexity of this business

00:42:10.280 was that somebody else

00:42:12.120 would make travel arrangements,

00:42:14.520 you know,

00:42:14.680 maybe Jill or an assistant 1.00

00:42:16.280 or something,

00:42:17.120 and Biden would just show up

00:42:18.620 and talk and go home.

00:42:21.060 That's the whole business.

00:42:23.080 What decisions does the CEO

00:42:24.740 need to make in a business

00:42:25.820 like that?

00:42:27.840 Not much.

00:42:29.460 Like, the CEO job

00:42:30.520 is actually an empty shell.

00:42:32.640 It doesn't really do anything.

00:42:34.480 Because the employee

00:42:35.380 makes all the decisions.

00:42:36.920 The employee just happens

00:42:37.940 to also be the CEO.

00:42:38.900 So, is $400,000

00:42:41.840 too little

00:42:43.240 to pay for somebody

00:42:45.020 who literally does nothing?

00:42:47.680 Not really.

00:42:49.220 Not really.

00:42:50.200 If the CEO job

00:42:51.220 had actually been hard,

00:42:53.000 like where he had to manage

00:42:54.360 a lot of people

00:42:55.020 and he had to, you know,

00:42:56.820 make decisions

00:42:57.560 and strategic bets

00:42:59.060 and stuff like that,

00:43:00.760 eh,

00:43:01.200 maybe you could argue

00:43:02.080 that that CEO

00:43:02.800 needs to get paid

00:43:03.520 a lot of money.

00:43:04.560 But he's basically

00:43:05.380 just a, you know,

00:43:06.800 punch a ticket,

00:43:08.340 fill in a blank

00:43:09.120 on a forum CEO.

00:43:10.420 He doesn't do anything.

00:43:11.940 Literally just signs

00:43:12.880 a couple of forms a year

00:43:14.420 and that's it.

00:43:14.960 The whole job.

00:43:16.220 So, I would say

00:43:17.320 that he's going to fly

00:43:18.180 through this audit fine.

00:43:20.120 Now, if there's somebody here

00:43:21.220 who's a, you know,

00:43:23.860 tax specialist

00:43:24.640 or a tax attorney

00:43:25.660 or something,

00:43:26.260 just jump in

00:43:26.900 and tell me I'm wrong.

00:43:28.480 But on the common sense level,

00:43:31.180 $400,000 a year

00:43:32.580 to be a CEO of a business

00:43:34.240 that doesn't need

00:43:34.960 any work at all

00:43:35.800 from the CEO

00:43:36.560 feels about right.

00:43:40.460 I don't know.

00:43:40.980 I feel he'll get away with that.

00:43:44.240 Derek Chauvin

00:43:45.040 is appealing

00:43:47.980 on 14 grounds.

00:43:49.100 I guess he couldn't afford

00:43:50.240 a judge,

00:43:51.320 or I'm sorry,

00:43:51.980 he couldn't afford

00:43:52.340 his own lawyer

00:43:52.880 at this point.

00:43:54.120 So, I think he did it himself.

00:43:56.100 But among his claims,

00:43:57.580 he says that his judge

00:43:59.180 abused his discretion

00:44:00.500 when he denied

00:44:02.000 Chauvin's request

00:44:02.740 to move the trial

00:44:03.500 out of the county

00:44:04.320 due to pretrial publicity.

00:44:07.140 And I ask you this question.

00:44:09.680 I'm not a lawyer.

00:44:12.200 So, I'm just looking at this

00:44:13.500 as a human

00:44:14.660 who, you know,

00:44:15.880 has some sense

00:44:16.580 of what seems fair

00:44:17.640 and what doesn't seem fair,

00:44:19.160 even though fairness

00:44:19.920 is not real.

00:44:23.060 How does he lose this?

00:44:24.460 How could Derek Chauvin

00:44:27.300 possibly lose this appeal?

00:44:29.540 I've never seen

00:44:31.440 a clearer case

00:44:32.680 where something should

00:44:34.400 move to a different venue.

00:44:36.220 Have you?

00:44:38.100 As in the history

00:44:39.540 of trials,

00:44:41.980 has there ever been

00:44:42.700 a cleaner case

00:44:43.820 where you absolutely

00:44:44.760 needed to move this

00:44:45.780 out of town?

00:44:47.540 Because the people

00:44:48.440 in the jury

00:44:49.400 would justifiably

00:44:51.680 be afraid

00:44:52.240 for their lives.

00:44:54.680 Right?

00:44:54.840 Dr. Scott Adams.

00:44:59.600 One of my trolls

00:45:00.560 is Dr. Scott Adams.

00:45:03.960 They just refused.

00:45:06.720 I'm just looking

00:45:07.260 at your comments.

00:45:07.920 Does anybody

00:45:08.240 disagree with that?

00:45:14.200 Now, the argument

00:45:15.120 against it

00:45:15.940 would be that

00:45:16.760 no matter where he went,

00:45:17.960 he would get

00:45:18.320 the same level

00:45:20.280 of bias.

00:45:21.840 But I don't think

00:45:22.860 the bias

00:45:23.580 would form

00:45:25.260 a physical

00:45:26.040 threat

00:45:27.500 everywhere,

00:45:28.720 right?

00:45:29.440 If you're local

00:45:30.400 to where the crime

00:45:31.220 happened,

00:45:31.960 I think that

00:45:32.580 if you're on the jury,

00:45:33.500 you're physically

00:45:34.200 threatened.

00:45:35.740 But if you were

00:45:36.360 in some far-flung

00:45:37.420 place,

00:45:37.920 and let's say

00:45:38.260 it's two years

00:45:38.860 from now,

00:45:39.420 the appeals process

00:45:40.360 moves slowly,

00:45:41.500 two years from now

00:45:43.040 in a different county

00:45:43.900 where they've already

00:45:44.680 forgotten the story,

00:45:46.560 I don't know,

00:45:47.100 would those people

00:45:47.700 be just as afraid

00:45:48.860 as the people

00:45:50.960 in the local

00:45:51.600 community

00:45:52.420 at the moment

00:45:53.260 it's still really,

00:45:54.060 really hot

00:45:54.420 in people's minds?

00:45:55.600 I don't think so.

00:45:57.040 I think it would

00:45:57.620 be different.

00:45:58.720 I don't see how

00:45:59.340 he loses this.

00:46:00.880 So,

00:46:01.500 get your seatbelts on.

00:46:04.020 I mean,

00:46:04.420 I suppose a lawyer

00:46:05.280 would have a different

00:46:05.920 opinion on this,

00:46:06.700 but just as a human,

00:46:08.920 if you ask me,

00:46:09.760 did this look like

00:46:10.480 a fair trial

00:46:11.320 the way they did it?

00:46:12.160 No.

00:46:13.320 No.

00:46:14.060 I'm not saying

00:46:14.640 he's innocent.

00:46:16.180 Nothing like that.

00:46:17.140 I'm not telling you

00:46:18.360 he should go free.

00:46:19.640 Nothing like that.

00:46:20.800 I'm just saying

00:46:21.360 there's no way

00:46:21.880 that looks like

00:46:22.400 a fair trial

00:46:23.140 to a reasonable

00:46:23.780 person looking at it.

00:46:25.180 It doesn't.

00:46:26.380 And we live in a country

00:46:27.440 where it has to look

00:46:29.440 reasonable to us.

00:46:31.160 Let me say this again.

00:46:32.900 You know,

00:46:33.080 the law has its own

00:46:34.040 standards, right?

00:46:34.920 And you have to satisfy

00:46:35.720 the standards of the law.

00:46:37.600 But,

00:46:38.740 the law has to

00:46:40.380 look reasonable

00:46:42.080 to us.

00:46:44.040 It has to.

00:46:44.940 Because the whole

00:46:46.900 system depends on that.

00:46:48.820 Reasonable people

00:46:49.580 have to look at it

00:46:50.300 and say,

00:46:50.560 well,

00:46:51.040 I might not like it.

00:46:53.100 I certainly wouldn't

00:46:54.280 like it if this law

00:46:55.360 was aimed at me,

00:46:56.160 but I can see

00:46:57.580 why you did it.

00:46:58.720 It makes sense.

00:46:59.980 It's got to be

00:47:00.700 reasonable to a

00:47:01.460 reasonable person,

00:47:02.220 and this clearly isn't.

00:47:03.420 It's not even close

00:47:04.320 to being reasonable.

00:47:06.440 All right.

00:47:06.700 Apparently the

00:47:09.360 January 6th

00:47:10.340 Select Committee,

00:47:12.420 yes,

00:47:12.880 it's not a group

00:47:13.640 of losers

00:47:14.260 who are studying

00:47:15.240 something that

00:47:15.940 doesn't need to be

00:47:16.620 studied.

00:47:17.020 It's not that.

00:47:17.900 It's a select

00:47:18.900 committee.

00:47:20.400 Premium.

00:47:21.740 Platinum grade.

00:47:23.760 It's the

00:47:24.120 Platinum Select

00:47:25.360 Gold Star

00:47:28.020 Prime

00:47:29.260 Committee.

00:47:31.660 And let me tell you,

00:47:32.540 with a name like that,

00:47:33.640 you know that they've

00:47:35.220 got some good stuff

00:47:36.320 coming.

00:47:36.700 Anyway,

00:47:37.000 they've subpoenaed

00:47:38.340 their first witnesses

00:47:39.260 that includes

00:47:40.260 Trump loyalists,

00:47:43.220 as they're called,

00:47:44.140 Mark Meadows,

00:47:45.060 Dan Scavino,

00:47:46.480 Steve Bannon,

00:47:47.300 and Kash Patel.

00:47:50.660 I feel like this is

00:47:52.140 the balance

00:47:55.100 to the Arizona audit.

00:47:58.260 You know,

00:47:58.560 the Arizona audit,

00:48:00.260 the Republicans are

00:48:01.160 expecting some red meat

00:48:02.280 out of that.

00:48:02.680 I'm going to get

00:48:04.080 some red meat

00:48:04.680 and maybe they won't.

00:48:07.860 But I think,

00:48:08.680 likewise,

00:48:09.460 the people who think

00:48:10.580 this select committee

00:48:11.520 is going to find

00:48:12.240 the coup

00:48:14.480 fingerprints

00:48:15.760 all over this

00:48:16.480 and find out

00:48:17.320 it's much worse

00:48:18.040 than anybody thought,

00:48:19.520 no.

00:48:20.860 They're not going

00:48:21.500 to find anything.

00:48:22.540 I think it's just

00:48:23.200 going to be a bunch

00:48:23.900 of people

00:48:24.380 doing what they

00:48:26.000 thought made sense

00:48:26.660 at the time.

00:48:28.340 That's all it's

00:48:28.920 going to be.

00:48:29.980 So everybody's

00:48:31.220 going to be

00:48:31.480 disappointed.

00:48:32.680 I saw a very

00:48:35.360 informative thread

00:48:36.400 on mild COVID

00:48:40.180 by Michigan NOAH,

00:48:43.840 Twitter user

00:48:44.900 Michigan underscore

00:48:46.200 NOAH,

00:48:47.040 N-O-A-H. 1.00

00:48:48.880 And you can look

00:48:50.180 at my Twitter feed

00:48:50.820 to find it.

00:48:51.280 I retweeted it.

00:48:52.460 And he talks about

00:48:53.620 how we talk about

00:48:54.940 the definition

00:48:55.540 of mild cases

00:48:57.520 of coronavirus

00:48:58.760 virus or COVID.

00:49:00.820 A mild case

00:49:01.700 is defined

00:49:02.160 as something

00:49:02.580 that didn't

00:49:02.980 put you

00:49:03.300 in the hospital.

00:49:05.260 But turns out

00:49:06.440 there are a lot

00:49:07.040 of nasty cases

00:49:08.060 of COVID

00:49:08.900 that didn't result

00:49:10.780 in hospitalization,

00:49:11.920 but they're pretty

00:49:12.380 nasty and they

00:49:13.140 might have

00:49:13.460 some long-lasting

00:49:14.780 effect.

00:49:15.980 And so NOAH

00:49:17.220 makes the argument

00:49:17.920 that we imagine

00:49:19.360 that the virus

00:49:20.500 is not as bad

00:49:22.300 as it really is

00:49:23.200 because we're

00:49:24.440 misunderstanding mild

00:49:25.960 and we're

00:49:26.960 misunderstanding

00:49:27.600 what it means

00:49:28.480 to not be

00:49:29.180 hospitalized.

00:49:30.220 In our minds,

00:49:31.540 not hospitalized

00:49:32.460 means,

00:49:33.280 well,

00:49:33.500 it's like a

00:49:33.920 sniffle,

00:49:35.060 right?

00:49:35.840 Okay,

00:49:36.540 maybe it's like

00:49:37.720 a normal flu.

00:49:40.040 But that's all

00:49:40.760 it is,

00:49:42.040 right?

00:49:42.520 If you hear

00:49:43.120 mild,

00:49:44.300 a mild case

00:49:45.420 of COVID,

00:49:46.160 you think

00:49:46.560 sniffle,

00:49:47.620 don't you?

00:49:49.000 Or a little

00:49:49.820 more than sniffle,

00:49:50.620 but that's about

00:49:51.160 all you think.

00:49:51.640 It turns out

00:49:52.940 that that category

00:49:53.840 mild,

00:49:54.480 if you use it

00:49:55.060 in a medical

00:49:55.640 context,

00:49:56.600 it includes

00:49:57.220 moderate.

00:49:58.580 And when you

00:49:58.980 look at both

00:49:59.500 mild and

00:50:00.180 moderate symptoms,

00:50:01.120 some of them

00:50:01.540 are nasty.

00:50:02.780 It's shit you

00:50:03.220 don't want.

00:50:04.320 Here's some

00:50:04.720 examples.

00:50:05.580 Now,

00:50:05.760 I would say

00:50:06.060 none of this

00:50:07.160 data is what

00:50:07.980 I would call

00:50:08.360 confirmed,

00:50:09.220 but I'll just

00:50:10.160 give it to you.

00:50:12.060 In one study,

00:50:13.180 two out of three

00:50:13.720 people who had

00:50:14.760 COVID had at

00:50:16.840 least one

00:50:17.360 outpatient visit

00:50:18.380 to a doctor,

00:50:19.600 visit one to

00:50:20.580 six months

00:50:21.040 after diagnosis.

00:50:22.520 So two-thirds

00:50:23.440 of the people

00:50:23.980 who had COVID,

00:50:27.040 a month to

00:50:27.880 six months,

00:50:28.880 so this is long

00:50:29.760 after you should

00:50:30.400 have been better,

00:50:32.160 two-thirds of

00:50:33.120 them had to

00:50:33.540 visit a doctor

00:50:34.200 for one thing

00:50:34.880 or another.

00:50:36.020 Now,

00:50:36.320 the first question

00:50:36.920 you must ask

00:50:37.620 is,

00:50:38.440 how many people

00:50:39.700 visit a doctor

00:50:40.440 within six months

00:50:41.400 of adults?

00:50:43.080 Because remember,

00:50:43.640 most kids

00:50:44.120 didn't have it,

00:50:44.880 so you're not

00:50:45.280 talking about

00:50:45.680 the healthy people,

00:50:46.440 we're talking

00:50:46.700 about the older

00:50:47.180 people.

00:50:47.540 If you looked

00:50:48.560 in the,

00:50:48.960 let's say,

00:50:49.440 over 40 crowd

00:50:50.800 where most

00:50:51.600 of the COVID

00:50:51.980 was,

00:50:52.620 how many people

00:50:53.320 over 40

00:50:54.120 have at least

00:50:55.260 one outpatient

00:50:56.120 visit to a doctor

00:50:57.380 in six months?

00:51:00.420 It's got to be

00:51:01.240 at least

00:51:01.620 two out of three.

00:51:05.120 Isn't it exactly

00:51:06.080 the same number

00:51:06.860 as this?

00:51:08.600 I don't know.

00:51:10.040 But I guess

00:51:11.160 I'm not as

00:51:11.840 scared by this

00:51:13.520 because I don't

00:51:14.000 know what the

00:51:14.380 baseline is.

00:51:15.040 But I feel

00:51:16.040 like people

00:51:16.500 over 40

00:51:17.200 get to the

00:51:17.660 doctor once

00:51:18.320 every six

00:51:18.880 months.

00:51:19.500 It feels

00:51:19.860 like it.

00:51:20.840 So at least

00:51:21.220 two-thirds

00:51:21.660 of them.

00:51:22.720 All right.

00:51:23.460 But another

00:51:24.040 study said,

00:51:25.680 out of 233

00:51:26.860 survivors,

00:51:27.520 so remember,

00:51:27.960 it's the

00:51:28.160 smallest sample,

00:51:29.800 found 40%

00:51:30.860 were suffering

00:51:31.380 from mental

00:51:32.060 illness three

00:51:34.580 and a half

00:51:34.880 years after,

00:51:35.840 I think this

00:51:36.240 was after

00:51:36.560 normal flu.

00:51:40.660 And there's

00:51:43.020 chronic fatigue,

00:51:44.820 syndrome suggested,

00:51:46.580 et cetera.

00:51:47.440 So the

00:51:48.280 suggestion here

00:51:49.200 by Noah is

00:51:49.960 that the

00:51:50.440 long COVID

00:51:51.640 and the

00:51:52.300 possible side

00:51:53.160 effects might

00:51:53.740 be more than

00:51:54.200 we think,

00:51:54.980 and makes

00:51:55.480 the case that

00:51:56.060 even the

00:51:56.480 regular flu

00:51:57.240 has longer

00:51:58.740 term implications

00:51:59.680 than people

00:52:00.240 realize,

00:52:00.980 even just the

00:52:01.760 regular flu.

00:52:03.020 So if the

00:52:03.440 regular flu has

00:52:04.380 long term

00:52:04.860 implications,

00:52:05.680 and we seem

00:52:06.140 to know that,

00:52:07.680 for some

00:52:08.140 people anyway,

00:52:09.260 then COVID

00:52:10.140 presumably would

00:52:11.140 be worse because

00:52:11.780 it attacks you

00:52:12.380 worse.

00:52:12.620 Well, the

00:52:13.880 Pfizer booster

00:52:14.620 looks like the

00:52:15.500 CDC head has

00:52:16.600 approved that

00:52:17.180 for some

00:52:17.880 high-risk

00:52:18.580 people.

00:52:20.880 That got

00:52:23.560 really bad,

00:52:24.240 didn't it?

00:52:25.580 So the

00:52:26.000 Pfizer has,

00:52:28.680 so it's

00:52:29.220 approved for

00:52:29.700 a third one.

00:52:30.780 But because

00:52:32.260 there's enough

00:52:33.420 risk that

00:52:35.420 they don't

00:52:35.920 want to give

00:52:36.340 it to low-risk

00:52:37.140 people,

00:52:37.600 say kids,

00:52:38.300 they only want

00:52:39.060 to give it

00:52:39.360 to you if

00:52:39.680 you're over,

00:52:40.120 I don't know,

00:52:40.380 65.

00:52:40.760 I'm not

00:52:41.520 sure if

00:52:41.780 you need

00:52:42.020 a comorbidity

00:52:42.740 or not.

00:52:43.800 But that

00:52:45.740 tells you

00:52:46.180 it's sort

00:52:46.500 of on the

00:52:46.840 edge,

00:52:47.160 doesn't it?

00:52:49.540 You know,

00:52:50.140 I thought

00:52:50.980 we were

00:52:51.340 dealing with

00:52:51.980 cleaner odds

00:52:53.500 than this.

00:52:55.160 You know,

00:52:55.400 the odds

00:52:55.800 of getting

00:52:56.100 vaccinated

00:52:56.680 versus the 0.55

00:52:57.320 odds of

00:52:57.580 not getting

00:52:57.940 vaccinated,

00:52:59.000 depending on

00:52:59.580 what numbers

00:53:00.080 you believe

00:53:00.560 or who

00:53:01.380 you trust,

00:53:02.340 should be

00:53:02.720 a big

00:53:02.940 difference.

00:53:04.200 Right?

00:53:04.700 Now,

00:53:04.940 if the

00:53:05.200 numbers are

00:53:05.580 accurate.

00:53:05.960 If people

00:53:06.900 are making

00:53:07.220 up the

00:53:07.500 numbers,

00:53:07.860 all bets

00:53:08.160 are off.

00:53:09.220 But in

00:53:10.000 theory,

00:53:10.620 the

00:53:10.720 vaccination

00:53:11.080 is like

00:53:11.600 many times

00:53:12.640 safer than

00:53:13.860 not getting

00:53:14.300 vaccinated.

00:53:15.280 But when

00:53:15.720 you get

00:53:16.000 to the

00:53:16.980 booster,

00:53:18.780 it's like,

00:53:19.180 well,

00:53:19.360 if you're

00:53:19.660 over 65,

00:53:21.020 yeah.

00:53:22.140 But if

00:53:22.660 you're 64,

00:53:24.060 I don't

00:53:25.560 know,

00:53:26.100 if you're

00:53:26.440 64,

00:53:28.140 it might

00:53:28.420 not be

00:53:28.760 worth it.

00:53:29.940 But it's

00:53:30.580 worth it if

00:53:31.000 you're 65.

00:53:31.600 65.

00:53:33.380 Okay.

00:53:35.020 I'm 64.

00:53:37.380 Right?

00:53:38.220 So, I

00:53:40.340 don't know.

00:53:40.660 To me, it

00:53:41.080 feels like

00:53:41.600 this is kind

00:53:42.120 of marginal,

00:53:43.480 depending on

00:53:44.140 your age.

00:53:44.520 Maybe if

00:53:44.780 you're 80,

00:53:45.180 it's not

00:53:45.480 marginal.

00:53:45.920 But if

00:53:46.200 you're in

00:53:47.000 your 60s,

00:53:48.080 you're like,

00:53:48.500 I don't

00:53:49.660 know, kind

00:53:50.240 of marginal.

00:53:51.320 Here's my

00:53:51.880 next question.

00:53:54.060 Why would

00:53:54.660 you give a

00:53:56.260 third Pfizer

00:53:57.680 booster to

00:53:59.060 these people?

00:53:59.640 Why wouldn't

00:54:00.640 you give

00:54:01.020 them one

00:54:01.620 Moderna?

00:54:04.400 Would you

00:54:06.020 be better

00:54:06.440 off or

00:54:06.880 worse off

00:54:07.440 with two

00:54:09.340 Pfizer shots

00:54:10.180 and then the

00:54:10.660 booster being

00:54:11.200 a Moderna?

00:54:12.460 Or would

00:54:13.120 you be better

00:54:13.560 off with

00:54:13.960 three Pfizer's?

00:54:15.480 Because if

00:54:16.180 Pfizer has

00:54:16.840 the problem,

00:54:18.400 you get a

00:54:18.960 triple Pfizer,

00:54:20.380 triple the

00:54:20.920 potential problem.

00:54:22.660 But if

00:54:24.160 you gave

00:54:24.520 them two

00:54:25.160 Pfizer's and

00:54:25.820 they were

00:54:26.080 okay so

00:54:26.640 far,

00:54:27.780 then you

00:54:28.200 gave them

00:54:28.580 a Moderna,

00:54:29.640 do you

00:54:31.080 get to

00:54:31.320 the same

00:54:31.660 level of

00:54:32.480 protection,

00:54:34.980 but have

00:54:35.520 you diversified

00:54:37.960 your risk?

00:54:40.040 I would

00:54:40.360 love to

00:54:40.940 see a

00:54:41.420 doctor or

00:54:41.940 an expert

00:54:42.240 give me an

00:54:42.740 opinion on

00:54:43.180 that.

00:54:43.780 Because it

00:54:44.600 could be

00:54:44.900 that it's

00:54:45.200 just too

00:54:45.500 hard to

00:54:45.860 test it

00:54:46.520 because it's

00:54:46.940 two different

00:54:47.400 companies.

00:54:48.160 It just

00:54:49.100 may not be

00:54:49.620 possible to

00:54:50.320 test that.

00:54:51.440 But in

00:54:52.280 concept,

00:54:53.900 in concept,

00:54:55.860 given the

00:54:56.580 unknowns,

00:54:57.020 and there

00:54:59.040 are lots

00:54:59.320 of unknowns,

00:55:00.480 given the

00:55:01.040 unknowns,

00:55:01.800 wouldn't it

00:55:02.360 be safer to

00:55:03.200 give them

00:55:03.580 a Moderna

00:55:04.120 as the

00:55:04.580 booster?

00:55:06.460 Yes or

00:55:07.080 no?

00:55:08.860 It's just

00:55:09.400 sort of an

00:55:10.320 interesting

00:55:10.620 question.

00:55:11.180 I don't

00:55:11.300 know.

00:55:11.460 And that,

00:55:15.940 ladies and 0.98

00:55:16.540 gentlemen,

00:55:18.740 concludes

00:55:19.300 the best

00:55:20.800 coffee with

00:55:21.640 Scott Adams

00:55:22.240 all day.

00:55:24.940 I mean,

00:55:25.280 since midnight

00:55:26.440 last night,

00:55:28.540 I don't think

00:55:29.100 there's been a

00:55:29.540 better one.

00:55:30.680 This is it.

00:55:32.900 So,

00:55:33.800 yeah,

00:55:34.260 ever.

00:55:35.160 Ever.

00:55:35.420 Ever.

00:55:36.320 Ever,

00:55:37.020 spelled with an

00:55:37.560 A.

00:55:37.680 test for

00:55:43.200 antibodies first 0.98

00:55:44.140 sounds more

00:55:44.900 logical.

00:55:46.260 Anita says,

00:55:47.160 Anita Butts,

00:55:48.200 are you a

00:55:48.680 doctor?

00:55:49.440 No.

00:55:50.320 I'm the

00:55:50.720 person who's

00:55:51.440 got a better

00:55:52.720 track record

00:55:53.340 than the

00:55:53.780 doctors.

00:55:54.660 You know,

00:55:54.940 there's nothing

00:55:55.340 that amuses

00:55:55.860 me more than

00:55:56.700 when people

00:55:57.100 say,

00:55:57.600 Scott,

00:55:58.520 you idiot. 0.95

00:56:00.900 You're not

00:56:01.500 a doctor.

00:56:03.180 Why do we

00:56:03.960 listen to you

00:56:04.480 at all?

00:56:06.040 You're not

00:56:06.360 a doctor.

00:56:07.680 Well,

00:56:08.720 my track

00:56:09.680 record is

00:56:10.140 better than

00:56:10.520 the doctors

00:56:11.040 so far.

00:56:13.460 I'm sorry.

00:56:14.760 It's just

00:56:15.220 the truth.

00:56:16.340 I do have

00:56:16.980 a better

00:56:17.260 track record

00:56:17.940 than the

00:56:18.620 doctors.

00:56:19.460 Now,

00:56:19.840 why is that?

00:56:21.180 Because I

00:56:21.660 only pick

00:56:22.060 areas where

00:56:23.060 I'm confident.

00:56:24.480 So,

00:56:24.740 when they

00:56:25.020 said masks

00:56:25.700 don't work,

00:56:26.560 Fauci said

00:56:27.100 it originally,

00:56:28.100 I said,

00:56:28.860 I'm no

00:56:29.480 doctor,

00:56:30.000 but I can

00:56:31.020 spot bullshit. 0.52

00:56:32.680 So,

00:56:33.280 I spotted

00:56:33.660 bullshit before

00:56:34.380 the doctors

00:56:34.860 did.

00:56:35.060 Now,

00:56:37.800 do I

00:56:38.380 argue with

00:56:38.920 them about

00:56:39.440 a long

00:56:40.100 COVID or

00:56:40.660 something?

00:56:40.980 No,

00:56:41.500 because how

00:56:42.460 would I

00:56:42.760 know?

00:56:43.300 So,

00:56:43.520 I'll take

00:56:44.620 the doctors

00:56:45.140 over my

00:56:45.880 own opinion

00:56:46.340 on things

00:56:46.860 that I

00:56:47.500 have no

00:56:47.820 special

00:56:48.300 knowledge

00:56:49.040 about.

00:56:49.740 But if it

00:56:50.180 just comes

00:56:50.580 to are

00:56:50.960 you being

00:56:51.300 bullshitted, 0.96

00:56:52.600 I'm pretty

00:56:53.200 good at

00:56:53.580 that.

00:56:54.280 Pretty

00:56:54.580 good.

00:56:55.380 So,

00:56:55.580 yes,

00:56:55.820 my track

00:56:56.340 record of

00:56:56.920 just the

00:56:57.360 things I

00:56:57.740 cherry-picked

00:56:58.260 to talk

00:56:58.680 about is

00:56:59.400 better than

00:56:59.840 the doctors.

00:57:01.480 It's a

00:57:01.940 fact.

00:57:02.280 You can

00:57:02.500 look it up

00:57:02.800 yourself.

00:57:03.920 Update on

00:57:04.580 Boo, 0.75

00:57:04.900 I'll get

00:57:05.260 an update

00:57:05.720 this morning,

00:57:06.420 but she

00:57:06.920 survived the

00:57:07.760 surgery just

00:57:08.760 fine and was

00:57:09.520 recovering as

00:57:10.760 of last night

00:57:11.380 and moving

00:57:11.740 around,

00:57:13.240 but I'll get

00:57:14.100 more information

00:57:14.700 today.

00:57:15.700 Now,

00:57:16.440 that is all

00:57:17.100 we've got for

00:57:17.480 today,

00:57:17.860 and I've got to

00:57:18.320 run,

00:57:18.800 and it's been

00:57:19.420 a pleasure,

00:57:20.100 as always.

00:57:21.700 And when

00:57:22.020 will I see

00:57:22.500 you again?

00:57:23.500 That's right,

00:57:24.580 tomorrow.

00:57:25.000 Tomorrow.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 24, 2021

Episode 1509 Scott Adams： Today's Coffee With Scott Adams Will Be Amazing

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript