Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1520 Scott Adams： We Are Going to Have Some Fun Today. Get In Here.

00:00:00.000 Well, good morning, everybody.

00:00:06.020 It's time for the best part of the day.

00:00:09.260 The part that makes everybody happier, everybody richer,

00:00:13.540 everybody a little better looking.

00:00:15.880 Yeah, have you noticed that people who watch

00:00:17.840 Coffee with Scott Adams,

00:00:20.360 they're a little bit sexier than other people, aren't they?

00:00:23.920 Yeah, they are. You know they are. You know it.

00:00:27.060 You can see them on the streets.

00:00:28.320 You'd be walking down the street.

00:00:30.860 There'd be a whole crowd of people.

00:00:32.720 You look at the crowd of people, and you say,

00:00:34.460 ordinary, ordinary, ordinary.

00:00:37.700 And then you'll see somebody who watches the simultaneous sip.

00:00:41.260 You won't even know it.

00:00:42.920 They'll be complete strangers, but they're almost glowing.

00:00:48.000 Almost like you could see their aura.

00:00:51.120 Yeah, no, it's true.

00:00:54.020 You just look for it. You'll start to see it.

00:00:56.020 Yeah, those who come here early and enjoy the simultaneous sip,

00:01:00.100 you have a big advantage in life over those who don't.

00:01:03.340 And if you'd like to take it up to another level,

00:01:05.820 almost to the level of unfair,

00:01:08.980 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass,

00:01:11.280 a tank or chelsea,

00:01:12.140 a canteen jug or flask.

00:01:15.000 A vessel of what kind?

00:01:16.960 Any kind.

00:01:18.380 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:21.180 I like coffee.

00:01:24.320 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:01:27.320 The dopamine.

00:01:28.980 Hit it today.

00:01:30.660 The thing that makes everything better.

00:01:32.800 Yeah.

00:01:33.420 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:01:35.220 And watch it do its thing.

00:01:36.640 Go.

00:01:36.880 Go.

00:01:41.380 Now, some of you can drink tea and pretend it's coffee.

00:01:48.760 That's fine, too.

00:01:49.500 Yeah, let's go, Brandon.

00:01:51.840 Let's go, Brandon.

00:01:54.400 Well, Rasmussen did a poll,

00:01:57.380 asked people if people are more divided after Biden

00:02:00.320 or less divided.

00:02:02.140 Now, thank goodness.

00:02:04.040 Thank goodness we got President Biden

00:02:07.640 to bring the country together.

00:02:10.860 Dare I say, unite us.

00:02:13.460 Yes.

00:02:14.200 And how's he doing?

00:02:16.080 First year on the job,

00:02:17.340 Joe Biden has...

00:02:19.500 Well, according to the Rasmussen poll,

00:02:22.020 64% of people polled said we're more divided.

00:02:28.840 Hmm.

00:02:29.920 Well, that's not good.

00:02:31.940 But 11% said we're more united.

00:02:35.680 So 11%.

00:02:36.980 Working out great.

00:02:39.220 43% said Trump would make it even worse.

00:02:46.460 So according to this poll,

00:02:50.040 I may be reading too much into it,

00:02:52.520 but I believe that we've shown that every president,

00:02:56.080 no matter who they are, makes everything worse.

00:02:58.080 Sort of a Zeno's paradox kind of a situation.

00:03:04.940 Every president, no matter who it is,

00:03:07.800 just makes things 50% worse.

00:03:11.860 Forever.

00:03:13.340 Wherever you are,

00:03:14.780 and whoever the next president is,

00:03:16.920 I'm sorry, it's going to be 50% worse than it was.

00:03:19.740 So I'm not sure that this is the kind of poll

00:03:23.440 that's telling us much more than how people want you

00:03:29.220 to know the answer to the question, basically.

00:03:33.080 Because I don't know that you can measure how divided we are.

00:03:37.760 Is that even a thing?

00:03:39.900 Can you even measure that?

00:03:41.580 How divided we are?

00:03:42.660 Kind of subjective.

00:03:45.740 Well, you all know Facebook had a major outage yesterday

00:03:49.820 that reportedly cost Mark Zuckerberg $7 billion.

00:03:55.900 $7 billion.

00:03:59.440 5% of his wealth.

00:04:02.980 And do you think he noticed?

00:04:05.820 He probably had to borrow money for lunch.

00:04:08.240 But did he really lose $7 billion?

00:04:10.220 No, no.

00:04:12.660 On paper, something went down.

00:04:16.180 It'll go back up next week.

00:04:17.480 So he didn't lose anything.

00:04:22.240 There's something in this story that is hilarious.

00:04:26.560 How many of you know the hilarious part

00:04:29.000 of the Facebook outage story?

00:04:31.260 So they were out for hours, and it cost them.

00:04:33.700 They lost $160 million of revenue,

00:04:36.540 and it was a pretty big deal.

00:04:38.240 But how many of you know the funny part of it?

00:04:42.660 Well, okay, you're close.

00:04:44.480 Somebody say it's an upgrade.

00:04:46.120 No, there's something funnier.

00:04:48.120 There's something funnier about this story,

00:04:50.160 and we don't know the details yet.

00:04:52.720 But there's something very funny about it.

00:04:55.000 You ready?

00:04:57.060 Let me just read this sentence.

00:05:00.280 I think this came from CNN.

00:05:01.660 The exact cause of the outage has not been confirmed by Facebook.

00:05:08.240 But one expert said the problem may have been caused by an internal error made by staff

00:05:13.900 that effectively erased the site from the Internet.

00:05:17.280 How do you erase the site from the Internet?

00:05:23.600 You do it this way.

00:05:25.760 Sean Graham Cunningham, the CTO of web security firm Cloudflare,

00:05:31.440 said Facebook made a series of updates to its border gateway protocol,

00:05:35.820 which caused it to, quote, disappear from the Internet.

00:05:38.400 Okay, now maybe it's because I'm the Dilbert cartoonist,

00:05:44.980 and I can see a whole month of material coming.

00:05:48.520 But here's the funny part.

00:05:52.020 In all likelihood, there's one employee somewhere

00:05:56.400 who knows they did this.

00:05:59.000 Somewhere, somewhere in the 700-some billion people,

00:06:11.540 there's one poor bastard who knows he pushed the wrong button

00:06:15.040 and made Facebook disappear from the Internet.

00:06:23.160 I'm trying to think of this poor guy's performance review in a few months.

00:06:36.200 He's going to be sitting down with his boss.

00:06:48.780 Sitting down with his boss.

00:06:53.160 How'd your quarter go?

00:06:59.740 So, what did you accomplish this quarter?

00:07:05.920 Well, we've been seeing a lot of bad publicity.

00:07:14.900 We've been seeing a lot of bad publicity about how Facebook is destroying youth.

00:07:23.160 Hurting people and hurting people's self-esteem.

00:07:30.000 It's causing a lot of damage.

00:07:33.980 But I stopped that shit.

00:07:40.320 So, here's the irony.

00:07:43.100 Whoever it is who pushed the wrong button

00:07:46.840 and erased Facebook from the Internet.

00:07:48.700 Whoever did that

00:07:52.500 did more good for the world

00:07:56.460 than any politician

00:07:59.080 except maybe Rand Paul

00:08:00.440 for the last year.

00:08:04.660 It's the only good thing

00:08:05.920 that anybody's ever done at Facebook.

00:08:09.740 And he's going to get fired for it.

00:08:11.580 Well, if you couldn't tell,

00:08:19.820 I finally got enough good sleep last night.

00:08:25.840 I just love this story.

00:08:28.500 All right.

00:08:29.920 Let's move on.

00:08:30.720 So, the $3.5 trillion infrastructure bill,

00:08:37.240 how do you think that's doing?

00:08:40.140 How's that doing?

00:08:42.680 Everybody think that's going to slide right through?

00:08:46.080 You know, it's free.

00:08:47.960 It's $3.5 trillion,

00:08:49.980 but that sounds like a lot.

00:08:52.140 But you've got to spread it over 10 years.

00:08:55.000 And then you have to appreciate

00:08:58.900 that not only is it spread over 10 years,

00:09:01.440 so not nearly as bad,

00:09:04.600 but it's free.

00:09:09.900 According to Biden,

00:09:10.860 it pays for itself.

00:09:12.080 So, if it's free,

00:09:14.400 why can't you get that approved?

00:09:16.520 But Manchin and Sinema,

00:09:18.560 the two senators,

00:09:19.300 are holding tight.

00:09:20.340 And who besides me

00:09:24.460 predicted that this would never get assigned?

00:09:28.380 Do you remember?

00:09:30.000 Give me a fact check

00:09:31.380 in case anybody wonders

00:09:32.740 if I'm just making this up.

00:09:35.040 So, in the comments,

00:09:36.000 can you verify

00:09:36.680 that I've been saying for a long time

00:09:39.520 that this thing isn't going to get assigned?

00:09:42.500 You can verify that.

00:09:44.000 Has anybody else said that?

00:09:45.980 Has anybody else who's,

00:09:47.300 let's say, a prominent pundit

00:09:48.740 just said,

00:09:49.380 this isn't going to get assigned?

00:09:50.820 This is never going to happen.

00:09:53.700 Now, I don't know

00:09:54.440 if it'll get negotiated

00:09:55.680 down to a trillion or something.

00:09:59.400 So, Democrats,

00:10:01.480 would you like some advice?

00:10:04.260 This is free advice

00:10:05.460 for Democrats.

00:10:07.740 You ready?

00:10:08.880 Here's how to get

00:10:09.540 their infrastructure bill passed.

00:10:12.360 Not the full $3.5 trillion.

00:10:14.880 All right,

00:10:15.100 they're not going to get that passed.

00:10:16.120 But,

00:10:17.340 how to get something,

00:10:19.280 something passed.

00:10:20.280 Let me ask you this question,

00:10:22.060 and maybe you know the answer.

00:10:24.080 Of the $3.5 trillion

00:10:26.180 in infrastructure,

00:10:28.080 how much of the $3.5 trillion

00:10:29.980 goes toward fixing

00:10:32.400 our election systems

00:10:33.720 such that they could be

00:10:36.080 audited instantly

00:10:38.160 and we wouldn't have

00:10:39.140 any questions about

00:10:40.080 whether it was a fair election?

00:10:41.300 How much of the $3.5 trillion

00:10:45.620 goes to our most important infrastructure?

00:10:49.880 Oh, yeah, I said it.

00:10:51.160 Our most important infrastructure.

00:10:53.860 What's more important?

00:10:55.880 Your potholes

00:10:56.800 or your republic?

00:11:01.220 Which is the higher priority infrastructure?

00:11:04.320 It's not even close, right?

00:11:07.220 It's not even close.

00:11:09.140 So, here's what

00:11:10.160 the Democrats could do

00:11:11.960 to make their infrastructure bill

00:11:13.820 a little more palatable.

00:11:16.020 A little more palatable.

00:11:18.460 Put in a big part

00:11:20.120 that fixes

00:11:21.120 the most important infrastructure.

00:11:24.040 How about that?

00:11:25.780 Let's put some money in there

00:11:27.540 to fix the most important infrastructure,

00:11:30.140 the elections.

00:11:31.060 Because everything else

00:11:31.940 is subsidiary to that.

00:11:34.620 Now, that's not going to get you

00:11:36.220 all $3.5 trillion.

00:11:38.120 The Republicans aren't going to go for that.

00:11:40.060 But, do you think

00:11:41.360 you could get some Republicans on board

00:11:43.300 for a trillion

00:11:45.140 plus election reform?

00:11:48.440 One trillion plus election reform.

00:11:52.060 Who's against election improvements?

00:11:55.580 Does any...

00:11:56.260 Well, I mean, in public,

00:11:57.480 you can't say you're against it,

00:11:58.660 even if you are.

00:12:01.240 All right, that's my suggestion.

00:12:03.040 Fix that thing 0.80

00:12:03.940 by putting the election stuff in there

00:12:05.440 and hold tight.

00:12:06.720 I wouldn't say anything...

00:12:08.380 Let me say this again.

00:12:09.380 To Republicans,

00:12:11.380 don't say anything

00:12:12.260 that doesn't have election

00:12:13.360 reform in it

00:12:15.100 as part of the infrastructure.

00:12:17.760 Don't say anything.

00:12:18.620 Don't fix a road.

00:12:20.300 Don't give anybody Wi-Fi.

00:12:21.540 Don't do anything.

00:12:22.880 Election reform.

00:12:24.160 Number one priority.

00:12:25.680 Get that in there

00:12:26.560 and then you can negotiate.

00:12:27.720 But if that's not in there,

00:12:29.440 don't even negotiate.

00:12:30.820 There's nothing to talk about.

00:12:32.400 You can't have an infrastructure bill

00:12:33.820 that ignores the most important infrastructure.

00:12:36.780 Right?

00:12:37.000 I mean, that's just stupid.

00:12:38.880 There's some things you could say,

00:12:41.020 are, well,

00:12:41.700 I'm philosophically opposed

00:12:43.340 or I don't like this much socialism.

00:12:45.980 And those are sort of,

00:12:47.620 you know,

00:12:48.160 fair,

00:12:48.940 fair kinds of arguments.

00:12:51.460 But it's not a philosophical debate

00:12:54.020 to say that we have

00:12:55.260 skepticism in this country

00:12:57.180 about the election integrity.

00:12:59.500 I mean,

00:12:59.680 nobody would argue

00:13:00.360 that there is skepticism.

00:13:02.180 And that that needs to get fixed

00:13:03.700 to have a healthy republic.

00:13:05.840 Those are not really arguable points.

00:13:08.680 So I would say

00:13:09.860 that an infrastructure bill

00:13:11.240 that doesn't have fixing

00:13:13.060 the most important infrastructure in it

00:13:15.420 is just stupid. 0.59

00:13:17.860 So stop calling it,

00:13:19.300 you know,

00:13:20.060 whatever it is,

00:13:20.780 different priorities.

00:13:21.820 It's just stupid.

00:13:23.720 Put the infrastructure

00:13:24.820 in the infrastructure bill

00:13:25.960 and maybe you got a chance.

00:13:28.680 All right.

00:13:32.280 There was a black ex-Tesla worker

00:13:34.800 who won a court case.

00:13:36.860 He claimed he was racially abused

00:13:38.900 every day at a California plant,

00:13:41.100 including being called the N-word

00:13:43.120 and he was awarded $137 million.

00:13:47.280 Now,

00:13:47.780 when you read that headline,

00:13:48.780 if you did,

00:13:49.560 or maybe you're hearing it

00:13:50.520 for the first time,

00:13:52.060 did you not say to yourself,

00:13:53.740 this looks a little exaggerated,

00:13:57.160 meaning that the size of the award

00:13:58.640 seems crazy,

00:14:00.300 you know,

00:14:00.820 and of size with the crime.

00:14:03.400 But also,

00:14:04.180 I mean,

00:14:04.500 really,

00:14:05.300 really,

00:14:05.700 this guy was abused every day.

00:14:07.980 Every day.

00:14:09.180 Really,

00:14:09.580 every day he got racially abused.

00:14:13.540 And then,

00:14:14.180 so,

00:14:14.500 you know,

00:14:14.760 I'm totally skeptical.

00:14:16.200 Read the headline.

00:14:17.060 I go,

00:14:17.260 oh,

00:14:17.580 God,

00:14:17.900 it's one of these stories of,

00:14:19.660 you know,

00:14:20.020 somebody couldn't take a joke

00:14:21.980 or something like that.

00:14:22.960 And then I read the actual claims.

00:14:25.300 Are you ready for this?

00:14:26.780 These are the things that,

00:14:27.900 apparently,

00:14:28.200 the court found credible.

00:14:30.620 Right?

00:14:30.920 So,

00:14:31.200 the court found these claims credible.

00:14:34.200 Here's what he claimed.

00:14:35.320 I think this was from,

00:14:39.280 was it from Fox News?

00:14:41.260 I forget.

00:14:42.380 The 52-year-old,

00:14:44.160 he was a contracted elevator operator.

00:14:47.160 He claimed that fellow employees

00:14:48.600 drew swastikas 0.95

00:14:50.280 and left racist graffiti around the plant

00:14:53.460 while he said

00:14:54.900 one of his supervisors

00:14:56.080 drew a person with a black face 1.00

00:14:58.560 and a bone in his hair

00:15:00.420 and wrote boo,

00:15:02.740 short for jigaboo.

00:15:04.060 The supervisor then allegedly told him

00:15:07.720 he,

00:15:08.520 quote,

00:15:08.880 couldn't take a joke.

00:15:13.860 When Diaz confronted him,

00:15:17.040 Diaz contended that none of his supervisors

00:15:18.960 stepped in to stop the abuse.

00:15:20.580 Is any of that true?

00:15:22.380 I mean,

00:15:22.820 it sounds like it passed the test

00:15:24.520 for the jury.

00:15:29.540 But,

00:15:30.580 have any of you ever been

00:15:32.620 in any kind of environment like this?

00:15:35.280 Because I,

00:15:35.840 I've never been anywhere near

00:15:37.140 anything like this.

00:15:39.660 You know,

00:15:39.900 I live in California.

00:15:41.340 This,

00:15:41.580 this factory is,

00:15:43.300 you know,

00:15:43.760 just down the road.

00:15:46.860 And,

00:15:47.460 why could I live here

00:15:48.900 all my adult life?

00:15:50.660 I've never been anywhere near,

00:15:52.820 never where,

00:15:53.600 never anywhere near

00:15:54.800 any kind of behavior like this.

00:15:56.840 Have you?

00:15:57.400 I'm just looking at your comments

00:16:01.200 to see if any of you

00:16:02.840 have ever been near

00:16:03.860 this kind of behavior.

00:16:06.260 I'm not seeing any yeses.

00:16:09.340 Oh,

00:16:09.800 I saw yes.

00:16:11.180 Saw some more yeses.

00:16:13.340 Saw another yes.

00:16:15.060 I'm seeing some yeses.

00:16:17.140 Somebody said no

00:16:17.780 and I've worked in lots of blue collar.

00:16:19.400 That's sort of what I was looking for.

00:16:23.220 Somebody says no

00:16:24.160 and they've been to the deep south.

00:16:25.580 I don't know.

00:16:28.220 This is shocking.

00:16:30.580 And I'm seeing yeses.

00:16:32.340 So that,

00:16:32.740 all of you who said no,

00:16:35.460 you know,

00:16:35.640 you had the same experience

00:16:36.580 I have apparently,

00:16:38.180 just be aware.

00:16:39.860 There are people

00:16:40.640 who are probably credible

00:16:41.840 who are saying yes.

00:16:44.860 That this is real.

00:16:46.520 It's a little wake up call,

00:16:47.560 isn't it?

00:16:48.480 That,

00:16:48.880 you know,

00:16:49.060 you think things are good

00:16:49.960 but you're thinking

00:16:50.480 in terms of the average.

00:16:52.240 Right?

00:16:52.840 On average,

00:16:53.680 things are pretty good

00:16:54.480 relative to where

00:16:56.000 they used to be,

00:16:56.680 right?

00:16:57.000 Lots of improvement needed.

00:16:59.060 But man,

00:16:59.800 you see something like this

00:17:00.840 and you say,

00:17:01.380 if any of this

00:17:01.960 is even close to true,

00:17:04.420 it does kind of shock me.

00:17:06.880 I am a little bit shocked.

00:17:09.180 So in that case,

00:17:10.300 the $137 million is fine.

00:17:13.380 You know,

00:17:13.660 but if the claims are true,

00:17:16.340 suddenly the amount of money

00:17:17.720 doesn't look so high anymore,

00:17:18.960 does it?

00:17:19.300 Because,

00:17:20.220 you know,

00:17:20.460 the reason is punitive.

00:17:21.540 It's not about

00:17:22.140 rewarding this guy.

00:17:24.000 It's just punitive.

00:17:26.320 All right.

00:17:27.280 CNN has turned on Facebook,

00:17:29.260 which is interesting

00:17:30.020 in itself

00:17:30.720 because,

00:17:31.580 you know,

00:17:31.780 you would imagine them both

00:17:32.920 being left-leaning

00:17:34.760 organizations.

00:17:36.720 But in a

00:17:37.520 opinion piece

00:17:38.640 by Cara

00:17:39.280 Alemo,

00:17:41.080 Alemo,

00:17:42.200 I wish people had

00:17:44.220 some way for me

00:17:46.120 to pronounce their names

00:17:46.820 correctly.

00:17:49.560 So here's what she said

00:17:50.880 in an opinion piece

00:17:51.840 on CNN.

00:17:52.520 And the fact that it's on CNN

00:17:53.700 seems important,

00:17:55.520 right?

00:17:56.760 She said,

00:17:57.680 thus the debate

00:17:58.420 we should be having

00:17:59.260 isn't about whether

00:18:00.500 Facebook knows

00:18:01.480 its product is harmful.

00:18:03.400 These facts

00:18:04.080 were established

00:18:04.860 by independent researchers

00:18:06.280 long ago.

00:18:08.020 So a CNN opinion piece

00:18:09.540 is offering

00:18:10.520 as an established fact

00:18:12.420 that even Facebook

00:18:13.640 would agree to

00:18:14.420 that independent researchers

00:18:16.420 say that Facebook

00:18:17.220 is harmful.

00:18:19.780 Just a statement.

00:18:20.760 It's just harmful.

00:18:24.440 And so she says,

00:18:25.820 rather,

00:18:26.120 the question we should

00:18:26.780 be asking ourselves

00:18:27.500 is why Americans 0.97

00:18:28.660 are still spending

00:18:30.000 so much time

00:18:30.760 of their lives

00:18:32.020 on it

00:18:32.520 when it's making them

00:18:33.780 unhappy

00:18:34.280 and divided.

00:18:35.120 So we know

00:18:37.720 that Facebook

00:18:38.320 is harmful.

00:18:40.060 Why are people

00:18:40.880 spending so much time

00:18:41.780 on it?

00:18:43.060 Now again,

00:18:43.800 the big story here

00:18:44.640 is just that Facebook

00:18:45.540 is reporting it

00:18:46.540 or not reporting it

00:18:47.680 but putting this

00:18:48.820 opinion piece

00:18:49.660 on their site.

00:18:51.380 So, you know,

00:18:52.940 the left is fractured.

00:18:54.120 Not only the progressives

00:18:55.240 versus the Pelosi types

00:18:57.360 but even the Facebooks

00:19:00.080 versus the CNNs now.

00:19:01.580 Not really on the same

00:19:02.480 side anymore.

00:19:03.500 So when Rasmussen

00:19:04.520 did that poll,

00:19:05.320 are we more

00:19:05.940 or less divided?

00:19:07.820 Interestingly,

00:19:08.600 we're more fractured.

00:19:09.580 I don't know

00:19:11.200 that we're more divided

00:19:12.260 but we're more fractured.

00:19:13.980 Does that make sense?

00:19:15.100 Instead of two teams,

00:19:17.160 it's more like,

00:19:18.040 you know,

00:19:18.420 four or six teams

00:19:19.620 or something different.

00:19:21.540 So I don't know

00:19:22.300 if that's more divided

00:19:23.140 or more fractured

00:19:24.160 or is that the same thing?

00:19:28.540 But, of course,

00:19:29.380 the real reason

00:19:29.880 that we use Facebook

00:19:31.160 so much

00:19:31.660 is that many of us

00:19:32.900 can't avoid it.

00:19:34.420 You know,

00:19:34.660 you need it for business.

00:19:36.320 And it's addictive.

00:19:37.860 It's designed to be addictive.

00:19:39.700 So, of course,

00:19:40.460 it's harmful.

00:19:41.180 And, of course,

00:19:41.620 we do it.

00:19:42.860 Same as cigarettes.

00:19:44.540 Same as any other addiction.

00:19:46.480 Why do we treat

00:19:47.220 internet addiction

00:19:48.100 different than,

00:19:49.160 say,

00:19:50.700 heroin addiction?

00:19:52.000 Why do we treat

00:19:52.820 them differently?

00:19:55.500 You know,

00:19:55.840 they're not the same,

00:19:56.740 of course,

00:19:57.360 but it feels like

00:19:59.120 the concept is similar.

00:20:01.220 You know,

00:20:01.700 I'm not entirely sure

00:20:02.940 that Instagram

00:20:03.580 in particular

00:20:04.380 will survive

00:20:05.380 at least in its

00:20:07.040 current form.

00:20:08.300 I think Instagram

00:20:08.980 in particular

00:20:09.700 seems like

00:20:10.280 the more dangerous

00:20:11.580 one, frankly.

00:20:13.580 So, we'll see.

00:20:16.500 New York teachers

00:20:17.620 protested,

00:20:19.080 many of them,

00:20:19.960 and they were

00:20:20.480 shouting,

00:20:21.580 F Joe Biden

00:20:22.460 and F Bill de Blasio.

00:20:25.580 So, thousands

00:20:26.300 of teachers

00:20:26.960 lost their job

00:20:27.980 because of the

00:20:28.560 vaccine mandate.

00:20:30.500 But, let's put

00:20:31.880 some context

00:20:32.520 on this.

00:20:33.760 Does everybody

00:20:34.200 like context?

00:20:34.880 I had some

00:20:37.500 people arguing

00:20:38.180 against context

00:20:40.060 today.

00:20:43.140 Her argument

00:20:44.060 was that

00:20:44.720 if I asked

00:20:45.440 for context,

00:20:47.320 I was trying

00:20:49.400 to brainwash

00:20:50.400 them

00:20:50.640 or try to

00:20:52.500 convince them

00:20:52.960 of something

00:20:53.360 bad,

00:20:54.300 to which I say,

00:20:56.280 hmm,

00:20:57.060 I don't know

00:20:58.060 a situation

00:20:58.640 in which context

00:20:59.620 makes things

00:21:00.240 worse.

00:21:03.160 Is there one?

00:21:03.920 If you're

00:21:05.820 trying to

00:21:06.280 accurately

00:21:06.920 understand the

00:21:07.680 situation,

00:21:08.780 is there a

00:21:09.280 situation where

00:21:09.920 context makes

00:21:10.920 it worse?

00:21:12.300 There were

00:21:12.760 actually people

00:21:13.360 pushing back

00:21:14.980 because I asked

00:21:16.420 for context.

00:21:17.740 I'll tell you

00:21:18.160 why in a second.

00:21:19.480 So, the context

00:21:20.480 I asked for

00:21:21.060 is, are there

00:21:22.680 any other

00:21:23.220 mandatory

00:21:23.740 vaccinations

00:21:24.520 that teachers

00:21:25.300 also need

00:21:26.120 to have?

00:21:27.720 Was that

00:21:28.140 a fair

00:21:28.400 question?

00:21:28.780 Is it a

00:21:30.380 fair question

00:21:31.740 for context

00:21:32.700 to know if

00:21:34.140 there are

00:21:34.440 other vaccinations

00:21:35.340 that are required

00:21:36.260 of the teachers?

00:21:38.920 Now, the

00:21:39.740 critics said,

00:21:41.200 Scott,

00:21:41.700 Scott, Scott,

00:21:42.500 this is so

00:21:43.540 unfair,

00:21:43.940 you're just

00:21:44.460 trying to

00:21:44.840 get people

00:21:45.260 vaccinated.

00:21:46.300 That's your

00:21:46.700 real agenda,

00:21:48.340 is to embarrass

00:21:49.500 these people

00:21:50.080 and get people

00:21:50.880 vaccinated.

00:21:52.360 No, no.

00:21:54.340 You can't

00:21:54.960 read my mind

00:21:55.640 and that's

00:21:55.960 not my secret

00:21:56.660 agenda.

00:21:57.660 I really

00:21:58.000 don't care

00:21:58.440 if people

00:21:58.780 get vaccinated,

00:21:59.840 as long as

00:22:00.260 I am, right?

00:22:01.500 I care about

00:22:02.000 myself.

00:22:05.860 But here's

00:22:07.380 what the

00:22:07.660 context told

00:22:08.420 me.

00:22:09.060 First of all,

00:22:09.580 do you know

00:22:09.880 the answer

00:22:10.220 to the question?

00:22:11.280 In the

00:22:11.520 comments,

00:22:12.280 give me your

00:22:13.080 answer because

00:22:13.760 I don't

00:22:14.380 think anybody

00:22:15.080 has really

00:22:16.680 looked into

00:22:17.100 it too

00:22:17.640 deeply.

00:22:18.540 But are

00:22:18.940 there other

00:22:19.400 vaccinations

00:22:19.920 that teachers

00:22:21.040 in the United

00:22:21.520 States,

00:22:22.020 that might

00:22:22.280 differ by

00:22:22.740 state,

00:22:23.640 that are

00:22:24.320 required to

00:22:25.160 have?

00:22:26.920 I'm seeing

00:22:27.320 some people

00:22:27.760 say plenty,

00:22:29.280 saying yeses.

00:22:30.580 The answer

00:22:31.300 is sort of

00:22:31.980 no.

00:22:33.380 The answer

00:22:34.060 is sort of

00:22:34.720 no, meaning

00:22:35.340 there's nothing

00:22:36.000 that's enforced.

00:22:38.000 Right?

00:22:38.440 So based on

00:22:39.140 the answers

00:22:39.640 that I got,

00:22:40.940 my current

00:22:41.540 understanding,

00:22:42.120 which I

00:22:42.560 might revise

00:22:43.140 if I get

00:22:43.780 some new

00:22:44.100 information.

00:22:44.980 But it

00:22:45.220 looks like

00:22:45.700 there's some

00:22:46.880 mild preferences

00:22:48.820 in some

00:22:49.440 places, but

00:22:50.160 nobody's really

00:22:50.760 checking.

00:22:51.340 I don't think

00:22:51.740 any teacher

00:22:52.280 ever lost

00:22:52.940 a job

00:22:53.480 before now

00:22:54.860 for a

00:22:56.080 lack of

00:22:56.480 vaccination.

00:22:57.700 Is that

00:22:57.920 true?

00:22:59.180 Is there

00:22:59.820 any teacher

00:23:00.780 who ever

00:23:01.260 couldn't get

00:23:01.820 hired or

00:23:02.240 lost a job

00:23:02.980 for a

00:23:04.020 different kind

00:23:04.620 of vaccination

00:23:05.280 recently?

00:23:07.340 I don't think

00:23:08.100 that's the

00:23:08.480 thing.

00:23:09.340 So here's

00:23:10.040 your context.

00:23:12.600 Required

00:23:13.120 forced

00:23:13.820 vaccinations

00:23:14.460 of teachers

00:23:15.140 is not

00:23:17.260 a thing.

00:23:18.880 So if

00:23:19.300 it's a

00:23:19.560 thing now,

00:23:20.060 it's a

00:23:20.320 thing for

00:23:20.620 the first

00:23:20.940 time.

00:23:22.960 So I

00:23:23.720 think there's

00:23:25.060 still a

00:23:25.420 little bit

00:23:25.720 of disagreement

00:23:26.160 on fact.

00:23:27.220 So I

00:23:27.460 think you'll

00:23:27.860 find that

00:23:28.380 in some

00:23:28.720 places it

00:23:29.360 looks like

00:23:29.840 it's a

00:23:30.140 requirement,

00:23:30.820 but it's

00:23:31.040 not enforced.

00:23:31.960 So in

00:23:32.380 effect,

00:23:32.780 it's not.

00:23:34.060 This is

00:23:34.500 enforced.

00:23:36.240 Yeah.

00:23:37.080 So when

00:23:37.860 I ask for

00:23:38.360 context,

00:23:38.940 this is

00:23:39.680 what people

00:23:40.120 said,

00:23:40.840 Scott,

00:23:41.480 you bastard. 0.95

00:23:42.840 You're

00:23:43.240 trying to

00:23:43.640 make this

00:23:44.560 vaccination

00:23:45.200 like the

00:23:46.340 others.

00:23:46.980 And you

00:23:47.400 know they're

00:23:47.820 not the

00:23:48.200 same.

00:23:49.240 Damn it.

00:23:49.700 You know

00:23:50.060 they're not

00:23:50.380 the same.

00:23:51.180 Because this

00:23:51.720 one was

00:23:52.660 a faster

00:23:53.900 pace and

00:23:54.600 it didn't

00:23:54.840 have as

00:23:55.140 much time

00:23:55.720 so we

00:23:56.040 don't know

00:23:56.320 the safety.

00:23:57.180 It's a

00:23:57.420 different

00:23:57.620 technology.

00:23:58.760 Scott,

00:23:59.260 you bastard. 0.95

00:24:00.740 Stop

00:24:01.220 saying that

00:24:01.840 this

00:24:02.100 vaccination

00:24:02.700 is in

00:24:03.280 any way,

00:24:04.320 in any

00:24:04.900 way,

00:24:06.100 equivalent,

00:24:07.540 similar to

00:24:08.260 or we

00:24:09.220 should make

00:24:09.560 any

00:24:09.760 decisions

00:24:10.140 based on

00:24:10.880 what the

00:24:12.580 other

00:24:12.760 vaccinations

00:24:13.320 did.

00:24:13.660 They're

00:24:13.760 just

00:24:13.960 different.

00:24:15.500 True.

00:24:17.540 Can I

00:24:18.160 agree with

00:24:18.540 you?

00:24:19.660 Am I

00:24:20.180 allowed to

00:24:20.640 agree with

00:24:21.040 my critics?

00:24:21.680 Of course

00:24:22.160 they're

00:24:22.320 different.

00:24:23.340 This is

00:24:23.740 why I

00:24:24.120 say don't

00:24:24.480 use

00:24:24.700 analogies

00:24:25.340 to make

00:24:25.700 decisions.

00:24:26.960 Because it's

00:24:27.620 just a

00:24:27.940 different

00:24:28.160 thing.

00:24:29.760 But can

00:24:31.060 context ever

00:24:31.900 be useful?

00:24:33.920 What did

00:24:34.540 the context

00:24:35.160 tell me

00:24:35.720 once people

00:24:36.760 said no?

00:24:37.340 There's

00:24:37.580 no other

00:24:38.080 example where

00:24:40.020 it's been

00:24:40.420 old fool?

00:24:42.160 You old

00:24:42.460 fool?

00:24:43.280 There's no

00:24:43.820 other example

00:24:44.620 where we've

00:24:45.860 required

00:24:46.260 vaccinations.

00:24:47.780 So did

00:24:49.180 my context

00:24:50.100 support the

00:24:52.160 idea you

00:24:52.700 should get

00:24:53.040 vaccinated or

00:24:53.880 the teacher

00:24:54.260 should?

00:24:54.880 Or did

00:24:55.300 the context

00:24:56.080 support the

00:24:57.320 idea that

00:24:57.800 they shouldn't?

00:24:59.600 It supports

00:25:00.340 the idea that

00:25:00.920 they shouldn't.

00:25:01.820 Because it's

00:25:02.400 a new

00:25:02.640 precedent.

00:25:03.760 So if you

00:25:04.160 look at the

00:25:04.540 old precedent,

00:25:05.200 it's like we

00:25:06.160 were pretty

00:25:06.600 laissez-faire,

00:25:08.140 sort of let

00:25:09.060 it go.

00:25:10.360 So this is

00:25:11.160 different.

00:25:12.200 And I think

00:25:12.960 that's worth

00:25:13.540 noting.

00:25:14.400 Because if

00:25:15.060 this was in

00:25:15.700 any way

00:25:16.260 similar to

00:25:17.740 the past,

00:25:18.520 you'd feel

00:25:18.980 different about

00:25:19.540 it.

00:25:21.160 Than if you

00:25:21.860 knew, well,

00:25:22.260 this is

00:25:22.500 brand new.

00:25:23.280 Whoa, whoa,

00:25:23.760 this is

00:25:24.160 brand new.

00:25:25.140 So when I

00:25:25.880 asked for the

00:25:26.360 context, I

00:25:27.440 didn't ask for

00:25:28.100 the context

00:25:28.700 because it

00:25:29.280 would help

00:25:29.600 my argument,

00:25:30.640 which I don't

00:25:31.180 have, because

00:25:32.440 I don't have

00:25:32.820 an argument.

00:25:33.820 You're

00:25:34.040 imagining that

00:25:34.720 I'm trying

00:25:35.060 to persuade

00:25:35.520 you, and

00:25:35.860 I'm not.

00:25:36.200 I'm just

00:25:36.380 trying to

00:25:36.660 understand it.

00:25:38.240 So the

00:25:38.800 context went

00:25:39.620 exactly the

00:25:40.340 opposite of

00:25:40.860 the way that

00:25:41.180 my critics

00:25:41.760 thought it

00:25:42.480 would.

00:25:43.420 You thought

00:25:43.900 that when I

00:25:44.320 asked for

00:25:44.620 the context,

00:25:45.400 it was going

00:25:45.760 to support

00:25:46.140 the idea

00:25:46.540 that they

00:25:46.780 should get

00:25:47.040 vaccinated.

00:25:48.020 It didn't.

00:25:49.180 It was the

00:25:49.560 opposite.

00:25:50.560 That's why

00:25:50.960 you asked

00:25:51.260 for context.

00:25:52.400 You asked

00:25:53.000 for context

00:25:53.600 because you

00:25:54.240 don't know

00:25:55.100 which way

00:25:55.720 it's going

00:25:56.020 to point.

00:25:57.200 And by

00:25:57.500 the way,

00:25:57.820 context doesn't

00:25:59.140 answer the

00:25:59.800 story, because

00:26:00.600 again, they're

00:26:01.100 different vaccinations.

00:26:02.640 So you can't

00:26:04.000 take the

00:26:04.340 context and

00:26:04.940 just say,

00:26:05.420 okay, now we

00:26:06.720 know the

00:26:06.980 context.

00:26:08.100 We're all

00:26:08.640 done.

00:26:09.020 It doesn't

00:26:09.320 work like

00:26:09.680 that.

00:26:10.240 But it's part

00:26:10.900 of the larger

00:26:11.400 story, right?

00:26:12.660 It's part of

00:26:13.320 how we feel

00:26:13.980 about it.

00:26:14.480 It's part of

00:26:15.000 what we've

00:26:17.100 accepted in the

00:26:17.880 past.

00:26:18.260 It's part of

00:26:18.720 the story.

00:26:19.120 So let's know

00:26:21.080 about it.

00:26:21.500 So I would

00:26:22.560 say that the

00:26:23.000 context does

00:26:24.040 support the

00:26:25.640 teachers not

00:26:26.380 getting vaccinated.

00:26:27.840 Doesn't mean

00:26:28.300 that's the

00:26:28.660 right answer.

00:26:29.980 Doesn't mean

00:26:30.520 it's the right

00:26:30.980 answer, but

00:26:31.580 the context

00:26:32.120 would support

00:26:32.660 that.

00:26:35.260 All right.

00:26:39.580 Let's see,

00:26:40.200 what else

00:26:40.420 do we

00:26:40.600 have to

00:26:40.740 go on?

00:26:41.680 Playboy made

00:26:42.380 some news by

00:26:43.160 putting a man 0.62

00:26:44.020 on the cover.

00:26:45.740 A male cover

00:26:47.160 star dressed

00:26:48.760 as a bunny.

00:26:50.180 I'm not sure

00:26:50.860 what the guy's

00:26:51.740 deal was if

00:26:52.540 he was, I

00:26:53.800 don't know

00:26:54.040 what his

00:26:54.300 sexual identification

00:26:55.440 was, but it

00:26:56.480 was a male

00:26:57.340 dressed in a

00:26:58.580 bunny outfit.

00:27:02.400 Now, what

00:27:03.000 do you think

00:27:03.320 of that as

00:27:04.180 a strategy?

00:27:06.000 Is that a

00:27:06.620 good strategy

00:27:07.160 for Playboy?

00:27:09.080 Most of you

00:27:09.800 say it's

00:27:10.180 stupid, right?

00:27:11.180 I think almost

00:27:11.800 every person

00:27:12.400 here is going

00:27:12.800 to say that's

00:27:13.240 dumb, they've

00:27:13.960 destroyed their

00:27:14.520 brand.

00:27:15.660 Let me give

00:27:16.320 you the

00:27:16.600 counter-argument.

00:27:18.560 Okay?

00:27:19.140 Because you

00:27:19.520 think there's

00:27:19.960 no counter-argument

00:27:20.840 you probably

00:27:22.400 think there's

00:27:23.020 no way

00:27:24.600 this is

00:27:25.360 smart for

00:27:26.300 Playboy,

00:27:26.880 right?

00:27:28.100 All right,

00:27:28.380 here's the

00:27:28.700 counter-argument.

00:27:29.560 It's pretty

00:27:29.920 good.

00:27:30.680 I think you'll

00:27:31.160 be surprised

00:27:31.660 how good the

00:27:32.120 counter-argument

00:27:32.640 is.

00:27:33.720 Number one,

00:27:35.160 could Playboy

00:27:35.860 stay in

00:27:36.360 business by

00:27:37.300 continuing to

00:27:38.260 print nude

00:27:40.020 pictures of

00:27:42.160 women? 1.00

00:27:43.920 No.

00:27:45.440 So can we

00:27:46.620 all agree with

00:27:47.160 this?

00:27:47.420 that the

00:27:48.300 internet

00:27:48.880 makes it

00:27:50.580 ridiculous to

00:27:51.680 imagine that

00:27:52.240 Playboy could

00:27:52.880 exist as a

00:27:54.300 magazine that's

00:27:55.540 primary purpose

00:27:56.440 is to show

00:27:57.060 naked women. 1.00

00:27:58.180 We all agree

00:27:58.840 that Playboy

00:27:59.560 could not

00:28:00.200 exist the

00:28:02.060 way it was,

00:28:02.760 right?

00:28:03.380 So that's the

00:28:03.900 starting point.

00:28:04.700 They had to

00:28:05.260 change.

00:28:06.740 Now, how could

00:28:07.420 they change?

00:28:08.500 One way they

00:28:09.240 could change

00:28:09.660 is by trying

00:28:10.320 to be more

00:28:11.720 provocative than

00:28:12.640 the internet.

00:28:13.100 Is that

00:28:14.180 possible?

00:28:15.560 Could Playboy

00:28:16.300 be more

00:28:17.220 sexy than

00:28:18.600 the internet?

00:28:19.680 Can they

00:28:20.260 get some

00:28:20.600 attention by

00:28:21.180 being as

00:28:21.980 sexy as

00:28:22.560 the internet,

00:28:23.380 meaning as

00:28:24.080 much X-rated

00:28:24.800 stuff, etc.?

00:28:25.780 No.

00:28:26.620 No.

00:28:26.840 There's no

00:28:27.980 niche there.

00:28:29.220 There's no

00:28:29.580 place to go.

00:28:31.180 So agree with

00:28:32.160 me first that

00:28:34.080 Playboy as a

00:28:35.340 vehicle for

00:28:36.200 showing pictures

00:28:37.240 of naked

00:28:37.720 women was 1.00

00:28:38.380 dead.

00:28:39.880 It might have

00:28:40.760 had a few

00:28:41.120 months left,

00:28:41.700 but it was

00:28:42.000 dead.

00:28:42.420 So take

00:28:44.420 for the

00:28:45.720 assumption that

00:28:46.420 they were

00:28:47.400 dead.

00:28:48.180 So they had

00:28:48.580 to do

00:28:48.800 something.

00:28:49.640 Here's my

00:28:50.140 argument.

00:28:51.320 Playboy has

00:28:52.060 always been

00:28:52.580 at least three

00:28:53.340 magazines in

00:28:54.200 one.

00:28:55.700 People don't

00:28:56.220 realize it

00:28:56.800 because you

00:28:57.080 think about

00:28:57.960 the nudity.

00:28:59.320 But the

00:28:59.640 other parts of

00:29:00.240 Playboy was

00:29:00.800 it was a

00:29:01.160 lifestyle magazine

00:29:02.400 and it was a

00:29:03.800 lifestyle of

00:29:04.620 people very

00:29:05.260 open-minded.

00:29:06.500 The people

00:29:07.000 who had

00:29:08.660 just extreme

00:29:10.540 open-mindedness

00:29:11.460 about

00:29:11.760 progressive

00:29:12.940 anything.

00:29:14.260 So Playboy

00:29:14.740 was always

00:29:15.240 the ultimate

00:29:15.820 left-leaning

00:29:16.980 socially

00:29:17.860 progressive

00:29:18.500 vehicle in

00:29:20.080 addition to

00:29:21.980 having naked

00:29:22.560 pictures.

00:29:23.360 The third

00:29:24.020 thing they

00:29:24.420 were was

00:29:24.920 fairly serious.

00:29:26.540 The Playboy

00:29:27.180 interview was

00:29:28.780 usually a big

00:29:29.460 thing.

00:29:29.880 Jimmy Carter

00:29:30.520 was in the

00:29:31.020 Playboy

00:29:31.300 interview.

00:29:32.880 A lot

00:29:33.180 of news

00:29:35.600 was broken

00:29:36.260 with the

00:29:36.720 Playboy

00:29:37.040 interviews.

00:29:37.900 So the

00:29:38.120 Playboy

00:29:38.420 interview was

00:29:38.900 almost its own

00:29:39.520 magazine.

00:29:39.920 It was

00:29:40.660 within this

00:29:41.280 Naked People

00:29:42.300 magazine but

00:29:43.000 it was like

00:29:43.800 its own

00:29:44.120 entity.

00:29:45.760 By the way

00:29:46.220 I was once

00:29:47.260 the subject

00:29:47.880 of the

00:29:48.280 Playboy

00:29:48.660 interview years

00:29:51.340 ago when

00:29:51.760 Dilbert was a

00:29:52.480 bigger deal.

00:29:53.800 And I have to

00:29:54.780 tell you that

00:29:55.260 the Playboy

00:29:56.360 journalist and

00:29:58.040 the way they

00:29:58.460 handled it and

00:29:59.180 the fact-checking

00:29:59.980 was one of the

00:30:01.360 finest

00:30:01.900 journalistic

00:30:03.980 experiences I've

00:30:05.120 had, like

00:30:06.880 legitimately

00:30:07.540 journalistically

00:30:09.380 high quality

00:30:10.860 was Playboy.

00:30:13.520 Now most

00:30:13.940 people, you

00:30:14.560 don't think of

00:30:15.080 that.

00:30:15.400 You don't

00:30:15.620 think of

00:30:16.000 Playboy as

00:30:16.580 being a high

00:30:17.660 level journalistic

00:30:18.820 entity but it

00:30:20.260 is.

00:30:20.560 It always has

00:30:21.020 been.

00:30:21.740 Well I'm not

00:30:22.140 sure about

00:30:22.540 currently but it

00:30:23.580 always has

00:30:23.960 been.

00:30:25.100 So they had

00:30:26.060 to change and

00:30:26.820 they couldn't

00:30:27.200 give more

00:30:27.640 nudity but it

00:30:28.780 was always a

00:30:29.300 magazine about

00:30:30.500 progressive stuff

00:30:31.480 and about pushing

00:30:32.660 the boundaries and

00:30:33.540 about political

00:30:34.380 stuff.

00:30:35.360 I think this

00:30:36.340 was a Hail Mary

00:30:37.180 pass.

00:30:38.580 Meaning that

00:30:39.360 Playboy has to

00:30:40.300 turn into

00:30:40.740 something else to

00:30:42.080 survive.

00:30:42.960 There's no

00:30:43.280 question about

00:30:43.800 that.

00:30:44.480 And the only

00:30:45.080 thing they could

00:30:45.600 turn into was

00:30:47.100 something closer to

00:30:48.180 the other two

00:30:48.840 things that they

00:30:49.520 did besides

00:30:50.340 nudity.

00:30:51.340 And the other

00:30:51.840 two things they

00:30:52.520 did was get

00:30:53.140 your attention

00:30:53.700 and be relevant

00:30:55.720 about socially

00:30:57.100 provocative things

00:30:59.180 that are on the

00:31:00.460 edge.

00:31:01.900 Will it work?

00:31:03.540 I wouldn't bet

00:31:04.560 on it.

00:31:05.980 But did they

00:31:06.900 have a better

00:31:07.520 play?

00:31:09.400 Right?

00:31:10.220 Did Playboy have

00:31:12.080 a better play?

00:31:14.380 I don't think

00:31:15.300 so.

00:31:16.260 I think this was

00:31:17.040 the best of

00:31:17.920 their bad

00:31:18.380 options and

00:31:19.780 they executed

00:31:21.160 it really well.

00:31:23.140 They executed

00:31:24.400 this really well.

00:31:26.220 Why?

00:31:26.900 Because we're

00:31:27.260 talking about it.

00:31:28.720 We're talking

00:31:29.240 about it.

00:31:29.880 Suddenly Playboy

00:31:31.380 became relevant

00:31:33.220 the moment it

00:31:34.920 pissed you off. 0.92

00:31:36.360 As soon as you

00:31:37.120 were mad about

00:31:37.940 that cover,

00:31:38.760 what's happening

00:31:40.500 with all of my

00:31:41.440 traditions and

00:31:43.000 all that?

00:31:43.940 As soon as you

00:31:44.620 got mad about it

00:31:45.440 and thought they

00:31:45.940 were killing

00:31:46.300 themselves and

00:31:47.120 you get all

00:31:48.240 whatever you

00:31:49.140 thought about it,

00:31:49.940 it worked.

00:31:51.600 So Playboy

00:31:52.280 succeeded.

00:31:54.920 They succeeded

00:31:55.840 in pushing

00:31:56.500 themselves right

00:31:57.200 into the front

00:31:57.940 of a very,

00:32:00.140 let's say,

00:32:01.600 energy-filled

00:32:02.620 discussion about

00:32:04.140 gender and

00:32:05.400 sexuality and

00:32:06.220 stuff.

00:32:06.800 And they became

00:32:07.540 relevant by

00:32:09.460 making you a

00:32:10.200 little bit angry

00:32:10.840 or disturbed or

00:32:12.640 whatever it did

00:32:13.200 to you.

00:32:14.200 So that's my

00:32:15.020 argument.

00:32:15.840 My argument is

00:32:16.520 not that it will

00:32:17.140 work, but it

00:32:19.080 was their best

00:32:19.660 play and they

00:32:20.880 executed it well.

00:32:23.240 Disagreements?

00:32:24.120 In the comments.

00:32:25.640 Disagree?

00:32:28.240 I think I sold

00:32:29.120 you on that.

00:32:30.580 It looks like I

00:32:31.180 sold you on that.

00:32:32.100 Okay.

00:32:33.420 Let's talk about

00:32:34.420 China.

00:32:37.020 You remember

00:32:37.840 I gave Trump

00:32:39.440 credit, as many

00:32:40.760 did, for

00:32:41.840 negotiating a

00:32:42.520 trade deal with

00:32:43.640 China and

00:32:44.260 pushing hard and

00:32:45.360 there was all

00:32:46.200 that trade war 0.81

00:32:47.640 and stuff, but

00:32:48.240 at least he got

00:32:48.760 a good deal out

00:32:49.440 of it and

00:32:49.800 China was going 0.97

00:32:50.400 to buy a

00:32:50.840 bunch of our

00:32:51.580 farm goods,

00:32:52.400 et cetera.

00:32:53.720 And then they

00:32:54.460 just didn't.

00:32:57.320 That's what

00:32:57.820 happens when you

00:32:58.380 make a deal

00:32:58.920 with China.

00:33:00.140 You make a deal

00:33:01.060 and then they

00:33:01.580 just don't do

00:33:02.780 their part.

00:33:04.460 Why?

00:33:05.320 I don't know.

00:33:06.160 It doesn't

00:33:06.480 matter.

00:33:07.720 I'm sure they

00:33:08.340 would have found

00:33:08.720 some reason to

00:33:09.440 not do it.

00:33:10.700 They just

00:33:11.020 didn't do it.

00:33:12.560 So now Biden's

00:33:13.280 going to push

00:33:13.980 back.

00:33:15.260 So do we

00:33:16.120 give Trump a

00:33:17.420 win for

00:33:18.420 negotiating a

00:33:19.340 trade deal?

00:33:20.320 Well, maybe

00:33:22.100 only in the sense

00:33:23.240 that it exposed

00:33:24.260 China for what

00:33:25.200 it is.

00:33:26.760 So you had

00:33:27.560 to at least

00:33:28.400 make them

00:33:28.820 agree to a

00:33:29.460 deal and

00:33:31.180 then whether

00:33:31.680 they lived up

00:33:33.600 to the deal

00:33:34.000 is a second

00:33:34.560 question.

00:33:35.700 But I think

00:33:36.140 Trump's instinct

00:33:37.260 to get them

00:33:37.880 to agree to a

00:33:38.800 deal was right 0.86

00:33:39.460 and now we

00:33:40.820 can observe

00:33:41.260 that we can't

00:33:41.860 deal with them

00:33:42.320 because they

00:33:43.040 just didn't

00:33:43.380 keep their

00:33:43.720 deal.

00:33:44.600 Now I'm

00:33:44.900 sure if we

00:33:45.340 talked to

00:33:45.680 China they'd 0.99

00:33:46.120 have a

00:33:46.360 different opinion

00:33:46.880 of what's

00:33:47.440 going on here.

00:33:48.560 Probably would

00:33:49.200 say we didn't

00:33:49.740 do our part

00:33:50.280 of the deal

00:33:50.660 so maybe part

00:33:51.440 of this story

00:33:51.900 is missing

00:33:52.340 if we're

00:33:52.680 being fair.

00:33:53.620 There's

00:33:53.780 probably

00:33:53.980 something

00:33:54.280 missing in

00:33:54.780 the story.

00:33:56.140 But we

00:33:58.180 certainly didn't

00:33:59.560 get a good

00:33:59.940 outcome.

00:34:01.380 Now this

00:34:02.820 again plays

00:34:04.960 into the

00:34:05.900 notion here

00:34:07.700 that China 0.93

00:34:08.740 is very

00:34:09.220 unsafe for

00:34:09.880 business.

00:34:10.520 Not just

00:34:11.200 commercial

00:34:12.060 business but

00:34:12.840 also political

00:34:15.040 deals.

00:34:16.400 They won't

00:34:17.780 keep a deal.

00:34:18.260 If China 0.97

00:34:19.640 won't keep

00:34:20.480 a deal

00:34:20.900 you just

00:34:22.320 can't deal

00:34:22.740 with them.

00:34:23.560 You can't

00:34:23.960 deal with

00:34:24.220 them politically.

00:34:24.900 You can't

00:34:25.160 deal with

00:34:25.460 them commercially.

00:34:26.800 They are

00:34:27.380 unsafe for

00:34:28.740 business.

00:34:29.860 We also

00:34:30.540 have some

00:34:30.860 reports also

00:34:32.200 on CNN

00:34:33.420 about some

00:34:36.120 whistleblowers 1.00

00:34:36.820 or I guess

00:34:37.520 some people

00:34:38.540 who came

00:34:39.040 out of the

00:34:40.340 China system.

00:34:41.820 One Uyghur 1.00

00:34:42.520 and one

00:34:43.040 police officer

00:34:44.100 who apparently

00:34:45.440 was ordered

00:34:45.980 to torture

00:34:46.540 them.

00:34:47.820 And I

00:34:48.020 guess the

00:34:48.380 way that

00:34:48.720 the Uyghurs 1.00

00:34:49.180 are picked

00:34:49.580 up is that

00:34:50.140 they literally

00:34:50.600 put a black 1.00

00:34:51.300 hood over

00:34:51.740 their heads

00:34:52.300 and they

00:34:53.980 take them

00:34:54.560 away and

00:34:55.800 they beat

00:34:56.360 them until

00:34:57.060 they confess

00:34:59.860 to things

00:35:00.540 that they're

00:35:00.920 not guilty

00:35:01.400 of.

00:35:02.540 And this

00:35:03.120 is men

00:35:03.520 and women

00:35:04.000 and all

00:35:05.760 of the

00:35:06.100 suspects

00:35:06.660 apparently

00:35:07.240 get raped. 0.81

00:35:09.780 Men and

00:35:10.480 women. 0.81

00:35:12.140 Let me

00:35:12.720 say that

00:35:13.020 again.

00:35:14.520 There's

00:35:14.840 some

00:35:15.020 suggestion.

00:35:15.640 Now of

00:35:15.860 course we

00:35:16.240 don't know

00:35:16.560 if the

00:35:16.760 reporting

00:35:17.120 is correct.

00:35:18.600 I mean

00:35:18.940 this is the

00:35:19.800 sort of

00:35:20.040 thing you

00:35:20.360 would expect

00:35:21.000 people to

00:35:21.620 lie about.

00:35:23.560 So let

00:35:24.140 me say

00:35:24.360 this.

00:35:25.080 The reason

00:35:25.680 that we

00:35:25.980 attacked Iraq 0.95

00:35:26.820 and the

00:35:27.100 weapons of

00:35:27.540 mass destruction

00:35:28.200 we thought

00:35:28.680 were there

00:35:29.000 is that

00:35:29.380 somebody had

00:35:30.520 a reason

00:35:30.880 to lie

00:35:31.480 to get

00:35:32.340 us to

00:35:32.600 attack

00:35:32.880 Iraq.

00:35:34.280 So when

00:35:35.020 you see

00:35:35.280 a story

00:35:35.660 like this

00:35:36.260 you've

00:35:36.760 got to

00:35:37.140 say

00:35:37.500 historically

00:35:38.300 these

00:35:38.780 whistleblowers 1.00

00:35:39.580 of this

00:35:41.480 type

00:35:41.840 are lying.

00:35:43.020 historically

00:35:45.340 this kind

00:35:47.320 of story

00:35:47.660 would not

00:35:48.000 be true.

00:35:50.020 Anybody

00:35:50.460 disagree

00:35:50.800 with that?

00:35:52.480 Would you

00:35:53.040 say that

00:35:53.460 historically

00:35:54.080 the

00:35:55.100 whistleblower

00:35:55.800 who says

00:35:56.220 we get

00:35:56.700 tortured

00:35:57.040 every day

00:35:57.620 is usually

00:35:58.800 not true?

00:36:00.340 Now that

00:36:00.640 doesn't mean

00:36:00.980 there's no

00:36:01.340 torture.

00:36:02.060 I'm sure

00:36:02.300 there is.

00:36:03.460 But don't

00:36:04.040 you think

00:36:04.340 it's a

00:36:04.680 little bit

00:36:05.020 of hyperbole?

00:36:06.340 A little

00:36:06.880 bit?

00:36:07.700 Because this

00:36:08.460 person has

00:36:09.020 a great

00:36:09.500 incentive to

00:36:10.260 make it

00:36:10.680 sound worse

00:36:11.140 than it

00:36:11.420 is.

00:36:12.260 Now however

00:36:12.720 bad it

00:36:13.120 is,

00:36:13.500 it's a

00:36:15.000 10 and

00:36:15.340 a 10.

00:36:16.480 But the

00:36:17.680 whistleblower

00:36:18.140 is going

00:36:18.360 to make

00:36:18.580 it sound

00:36:18.860 like a

00:36:19.180 15.

00:36:20.540 So let

00:36:21.240 me not

00:36:21.520 minimize it.

00:36:22.540 On a

00:36:22.820 scale of

00:36:23.180 1 to

00:36:23.480 10,

00:36:23.920 it's a

00:36:24.180 10.

00:36:25.800 It's a

00:36:26.380 10.

00:36:27.860 But the

00:36:28.460 whistleblower

00:36:28.860 is going

00:36:29.080 to make

00:36:29.300 it look

00:36:29.560 like a

00:36:29.880 15.

00:36:30.720 That

00:36:30.940 would be

00:36:31.200 normal

00:36:31.600 to what

00:36:32.060 you

00:36:32.180 expect.

00:36:32.960 So just

00:36:33.340 keep that

00:36:33.720 in mind

00:36:34.100 that there's

00:36:35.120 an incentive

00:36:35.700 to at

00:36:38.240 least shade

00:36:38.800 things a

00:36:39.180 little bit.

00:36:40.320 But

00:36:40.680 the story

00:36:41.540 so far

00:36:42.020 is that

00:36:42.360 the police

00:36:43.080 use electric

00:36:43.820 batons on

00:36:44.660 the Uyghurs. 0.98

00:36:45.620 They put a

00:36:46.220 black hood

00:36:46.700 on them

00:36:47.060 when they

00:36:47.380 pick them

00:36:47.760 up in

00:36:48.020 the street.

00:36:48.780 They take

00:36:49.380 them back.

00:36:49.920 They beat

00:36:50.380 them badly

00:36:51.140 and often

00:36:52.020 and often.

00:36:55.520 And then

00:36:56.300 one of the

00:36:56.900 men reported

00:36:58.620 that the

00:37:00.060 guards forced

00:37:01.160 the other

00:37:01.880 prisoners to

00:37:03.120 rape him. 0.88

00:37:05.140 Gang rape 0.99

00:37:05.700 him,

00:37:05.940 apparently.

00:37:07.120 And that

00:37:07.500 that was

00:37:07.780 normal.

00:37:10.680 Now,

00:37:11.520 I don't

00:37:12.220 know about

00:37:12.520 that last

00:37:12.940 part.

00:37:13.880 I'm going

00:37:14.140 to say

00:37:14.360 that the

00:37:14.700 last part,

00:37:16.040 the guy

00:37:16.640 saying it

00:37:17.080 sounded

00:37:17.320 credible,

00:37:18.040 and if

00:37:18.340 it did

00:37:18.680 happen,

00:37:19.100 it's

00:37:19.240 horrible,

00:37:20.560 et cetera.

00:37:21.940 I don't

00:37:22.480 know if I

00:37:22.860 could go

00:37:23.120 that far.

00:37:23.700 But

00:37:23.840 whatever it

00:37:24.260 is,

00:37:24.460 it's a

00:37:24.740 10 out

00:37:25.040 of 10.

00:37:25.880 So bad

00:37:26.640 stuff's

00:37:27.000 happening

00:37:27.260 there.

00:37:32.140 And

00:37:32.580 again,

00:37:34.140 China is 0.85

00:37:36.700 unsafe for

00:37:37.220 business.

00:37:37.520 Now,

00:37:38.100 I did

00:37:38.280 get a

00:37:38.680 lengthy

00:37:39.120 message

00:37:39.560 from one

00:37:40.480 of my

00:37:40.700 contacts

00:37:41.120 on

00:37:41.480 LinkedIn,

00:37:43.600 and if

00:37:44.160 you're

00:37:44.320 watching

00:37:44.580 right now,

00:37:45.020 I won't

00:37:45.220 mention

00:37:45.460 your name,

00:37:46.440 but that

00:37:48.100 my context

00:37:48.960 is lacking

00:37:50.160 on China.

00:37:51.680 For

00:37:52.240 example,

00:37:53.520 here's the

00:37:53.980 counterargument,

00:37:55.400 that China's 0.96

00:37:56.120 aggressiveness

00:37:57.040 in the

00:37:57.760 South China

00:37:58.800 Sea is

00:37:59.900 actually

00:38:00.280 mostly

00:38:00.760 defensive,

00:38:01.880 because they're

00:38:03.200 putting up a

00:38:03.800 defense against

00:38:04.500 the, you know,

00:38:05.300 I don't know,

00:38:06.100 U.S.

00:38:06.620 Fifth Fleet

00:38:07.220 or something,

00:38:08.080 because they

00:38:08.900 don't want to

00:38:09.260 be, they 0.83

00:38:11.300 don't ever

00:38:11.660 want to be

00:38:12.060 locked into

00:38:12.860 their own

00:38:13.260 territory where

00:38:14.000 they can't

00:38:14.440 do trade.

00:38:15.520 And indeed,

00:38:16.240 having the

00:38:16.720 Belt and

00:38:17.080 Road Initiative

00:38:17.700 would give

00:38:18.220 them, you 0.56

00:38:19.120 know, some

00:38:19.380 diversification

00:38:20.260 of commercial

00:38:22.380 outlets, so

00:38:23.840 they wouldn't

00:38:24.220 need exclusively

00:38:25.700 the ocean,

00:38:26.660 and they'd have

00:38:27.040 an option,

00:38:27.580 et cetera.

00:38:28.360 Do you believe

00:38:28.880 any of that?

00:38:30.820 To me, I'm

00:38:31.820 not sure there's

00:38:32.480 such a difference

00:38:33.220 between a

00:38:33.840 defensive act

00:38:34.760 and an

00:38:35.160 offensive act.

00:38:36.620 I feel like

00:38:37.400 that distinction

00:38:38.100 is a little

00:38:38.900 bit artificial.

00:38:40.500 Don't you?

00:38:41.500 There we go.

00:38:42.420 Aggressive

00:38:42.840 defense.

00:38:44.220 Yeah.

00:38:44.680 Being aggressively

00:38:45.720 defensive looks a

00:38:46.860 lot like

00:38:47.260 offensiveness.

00:38:48.680 And we

00:38:49.320 certainly know

00:38:49.920 that the

00:38:50.520 Chinese government

00:38:52.520 has some

00:38:53.660 ambitions about

00:38:54.440 controlling as

00:38:55.300 much of the

00:38:55.760 world as they 0.87

00:38:56.340 can.

00:38:57.100 Same as we

00:38:57.640 do, right?

00:38:59.080 Every superpower

00:39:00.000 wants to control

00:39:00.840 as much as they

00:39:01.520 can.

00:39:02.580 Why wouldn't

00:39:03.040 you?

00:39:03.720 I mean, so do

00:39:04.400 you.

00:39:04.580 Don't you

00:39:05.180 want to

00:39:05.520 control as

00:39:06.060 much of

00:39:06.380 your life

00:39:06.760 as you

00:39:07.020 can?

00:39:07.880 So it's

00:39:08.620 pretty natural

00:39:09.480 that China 0.93

00:39:09.900 would be

00:39:10.200 trying to

00:39:10.560 control as

00:39:11.060 much as

00:39:11.400 they can.

00:39:12.420 But do

00:39:12.780 they have a

00:39:13.340 defensive

00:39:13.880 incentive

00:39:14.600 too?

00:39:15.420 Sure.

00:39:16.600 Now, apparently

00:39:17.220 also the

00:39:18.020 flyovers over

00:39:19.580 Taiwan were,

00:39:21.300 I think,

00:39:21.980 key to some

00:39:22.760 holiday or

00:39:23.360 something.

00:39:24.260 But that

00:39:24.640 doesn't really

00:39:25.520 make it

00:39:26.940 better.

00:39:27.200 So just

00:39:30.060 be aware

00:39:30.580 that there

00:39:31.160 is one

00:39:33.560 point in

00:39:34.020 view that

00:39:34.780 China's 0.76

00:39:35.240 actions are

00:39:35.800 a little

00:39:36.060 bit more

00:39:36.440 defensive than

00:39:37.260 they look.

00:39:38.500 But I'm

00:39:38.900 not buying

00:39:39.360 it.

00:39:40.680 I definitely

00:39:41.500 think that

00:39:41.920 they have a

00:39:42.260 defensive

00:39:42.640 motivation,

00:39:44.980 as everyone

00:39:45.540 does.

00:39:46.800 But I feel

00:39:47.580 like all of

00:39:48.260 their defense

00:39:48.760 has an

00:39:49.380 offensive

00:39:49.980 secondary

00:39:51.320 purpose.

00:39:52.760 So that's

00:39:53.280 what it looks

00:39:53.640 like.

00:39:54.120 And it

00:39:54.460 should.

00:39:55.200 I mean,

00:39:55.480 that would be

00:39:56.120 the rational

00:39:56.580 thing to do.

00:39:57.200 Why would

00:39:58.460 you have

00:39:58.680 something that's

00:39:59.180 purely defensive

00:39:59.960 when it

00:40:00.560 could be

00:40:01.000 both?

00:40:06.120 Here's a

00:40:07.120 question for

00:40:08.080 you that's

00:40:08.500 kind of

00:40:08.880 weird.

00:40:10.120 So on

00:40:10.980 Twitter,

00:40:11.480 Twitter user

00:40:12.180 Christopher Hill

00:40:13.140 noticed this,

00:40:14.400 and I guess

00:40:15.700 others noticed

00:40:16.620 it too.

00:40:17.300 But did you

00:40:17.780 know that

00:40:18.200 Biden's

00:40:18.980 Build Back

00:40:20.020 Better

00:40:20.360 slogan is

00:40:21.880 being used

00:40:22.540 in Canada

00:40:23.220 and Great

00:40:23.900 Britain? 0.71

00:40:24.120 Did you

00:40:25.880 know that?

00:40:27.200 I guess

00:40:29.120 Boris Johnson

00:40:29.860 uses it

00:40:30.620 and Trudeau

00:40:33.240 uses it

00:40:33.860 in Canada?

00:40:35.360 They all

00:40:36.160 use Build

00:40:36.640 Back

00:40:36.860 Better?

00:40:42.640 What's that

00:40:43.340 telling you?

00:40:46.220 I've never

00:40:46.960 seen that

00:40:47.380 happen before.

00:40:48.580 Have you?

00:40:49.320 Because it

00:40:49.760 feels like it

00:40:50.300 would be so

00:40:50.780 obvious that

00:40:51.640 you're cribbing

00:40:52.860 somebody's

00:40:53.320 slogan that

00:40:53.860 you wouldn't

00:40:54.180 do it.

00:40:59.360 Pelosi

00:40:59.840 called it

00:41:00.320 Obama's

00:41:01.020 Build Back

00:41:01.480 Better.

00:41:04.220 It's a

00:41:04.880 New World

00:41:05.300 Order

00:41:05.600 slogan.

00:41:09.040 I'm not

00:41:10.020 so much

00:41:10.820 into the

00:41:11.180 New World

00:41:11.560 Order

00:41:11.960 conspiracy

00:41:13.140 stuff,

00:41:14.300 but it

00:41:15.280 is a weird

00:41:15.680 coincidence

00:41:16.180 that it

00:41:17.320 doesn't have

00:41:17.720 an explanation

00:41:18.400 that I can

00:41:19.140 think of,

00:41:19.760 because it

00:41:20.180 isn't so

00:41:20.760 clever,

00:41:21.160 is it?

00:41:22.960 Now,

00:41:23.420 I will

00:41:23.640 give it

00:41:23.980 one benefit.

00:41:26.960 And I

00:41:27.140 don't think

00:41:27.420 it's like,

00:41:28.080 does it feel

00:41:28.940 like the

00:41:29.820 public is

00:41:30.480 saying Build

00:41:31.020 Back

00:41:31.260 Better the

00:41:31.740 same way

00:41:32.120 they were

00:41:32.400 saying MAGA

00:41:33.120 and Make

00:41:33.760 America

00:41:34.080 Great Again?

00:41:35.040 The genius

00:41:35.800 of Trump's

00:41:37.640 slogan making

00:41:38.880 is that people

00:41:39.820 would repeat

00:41:40.420 it,

00:41:40.760 because they

00:41:41.600 liked it.

00:41:42.800 Have you

00:41:43.100 ever heard

00:41:43.580 a Democrat

00:41:44.340 who proudly

00:41:45.160 says,

00:41:45.820 Build Back

00:41:46.240 Better?

00:41:47.120 I mean,

00:41:47.440 except for

00:41:47.860 the professional

00:41:48.440 politicians.

00:41:50.000 Do you see

00:41:50.400 it on Twitter?

00:41:52.100 Do you see

00:41:52.780 a lot of

00:41:53.260 just Biden

00:41:53.920 supporters

00:41:54.420 saying,

00:41:55.720 Build Back

00:41:56.060 Better?

00:41:57.620 Not really,

00:41:58.540 right?

00:42:00.680 It's,

00:42:01.860 I don't

00:42:02.500 know how

00:42:02.740 that slogan

00:42:03.220 became so

00:42:03.820 popular when

00:42:04.480 the public

00:42:04.860 doesn't care

00:42:05.360 about it

00:42:05.740 at all.

00:42:06.580 It's only

00:42:06.980 the politicians.

00:42:08.440 So there's

00:42:08.760 something weird

00:42:09.340 going on there,

00:42:09.940 we just

00:42:10.200 don't know

00:42:10.480 what it is.

00:42:13.820 Adam

00:42:14.300 Dopamine,

00:42:15.840 it's not

00:42:16.560 his real

00:42:16.900 name,

00:42:17.580 on Twitter,

00:42:19.000 asks,

00:42:19.940 why are

00:42:20.400 passenger

00:42:22.240 planes not

00:42:23.100 spreading

00:42:23.460 COVID?

00:42:24.400 So you

00:42:24.920 pack all

00:42:25.360 these people

00:42:25.780 in the

00:42:26.180 passenger

00:42:26.660 plane,

00:42:27.840 and we

00:42:28.160 know,

00:42:28.500 of course,

00:42:28.780 now that

00:42:29.200 just being

00:42:29.700 vaccinated

00:42:30.260 isn't enough

00:42:31.260 to prevent

00:42:32.500 COVID spread.

00:42:35.400 Why are

00:42:36.220 airplanes not

00:42:37.540 being grounded?

00:42:38.300 Why are we

00:42:40.280 not hearing

00:42:40.780 stories about,

00:42:41.820 well,

00:42:42.380 yeah,

00:42:42.600 we've got to

00:42:43.060 fly,

00:42:43.580 but yeah,

00:42:44.060 I have to

00:42:44.400 admit,

00:42:45.340 getting a lot

00:42:45.800 of infections.

00:42:46.440 We don't

00:42:47.520 want to

00:42:47.760 close the

00:42:48.180 airlines,

00:42:48.980 even though

00:42:49.760 we're getting

00:42:50.060 a lot of

00:42:50.440 infections.

00:42:51.840 I think it's

00:42:52.500 not happening,

00:42:53.160 right?

00:42:54.760 It's just

00:42:55.380 not happening.

00:42:57.500 So the

00:42:58.300 first question

00:42:58.860 is,

00:42:59.160 is it because

00:42:59.700 of the

00:43:00.100 filters,

00:43:00.900 the airflow?

00:43:01.600 Airplanes are

00:43:02.540 sensationally

00:43:03.540 well designed

00:43:04.380 in terms of

00:43:05.460 airflow.

00:43:05.860 They have to

00:43:06.240 be.

00:43:07.420 But here's

00:43:07.960 my counterpoint.

00:43:08.860 I tweeted

00:43:09.200 it and then I

00:43:09.780 untweeted it

00:43:10.400 after I thought

00:43:11.000 for a second.

00:43:11.860 Here's why I

00:43:12.460 untweeted it.

00:43:13.240 How many

00:43:15.560 infections are

00:43:16.120 we getting

00:43:16.340 from buses?

00:43:18.520 Right?

00:43:19.480 How many

00:43:19.960 infections do

00:43:20.660 we get from

00:43:21.280 subways?

00:43:23.940 How about

00:43:24.500 cars?

00:43:27.060 I feel like

00:43:27.940 it's sort

00:43:29.060 of none,

00:43:29.580 right?

00:43:30.840 Ubers?

00:43:31.660 Yeah,

00:43:31.880 Ubers.

00:43:33.000 How many

00:43:33.500 Ubers are 0.70

00:43:34.080 giving people

00:43:34.680 COVID?

00:43:37.000 What is

00:43:38.000 going on

00:43:38.620 in elevators?

00:43:39.980 Now,

00:43:40.260 elevators,

00:43:40.780 you're not in

00:43:41.140 there for very

00:43:41.680 long,

00:43:42.000 so maybe that

00:43:42.740 makes more

00:43:43.160 sense.

00:43:44.040 But I

00:43:44.920 feel as

00:43:45.440 if we

00:43:47.540 really don't

00:43:48.140 know how

00:43:48.520 this stuff

00:43:49.000 spreads still.

00:43:51.020 Am I

00:43:51.600 wrong?

00:43:53.100 Because we

00:43:54.340 should know

00:43:54.920 exactly where

00:43:56.480 people are

00:43:56.940 getting it by

00:43:57.480 now.

00:43:57.980 Because people

00:43:58.380 can kind

00:43:58.800 of, you

00:43:59.580 know,

00:43:59.880 they can

00:44:00.600 put together

00:44:01.640 where they

00:44:02.460 were and

00:44:03.000 who got

00:44:03.380 it in

00:44:03.920 enough

00:44:04.440 cases,

00:44:05.280 not every

00:44:05.800 case,

00:44:06.460 but in

00:44:06.800 enough

00:44:07.000 cases you

00:44:07.540 know where

00:44:07.840 you got

00:44:08.200 it.

00:44:09.300 That we

00:44:09.660 should know

00:44:10.120 by now

00:44:10.540 where people

00:44:11.200 are getting

00:44:11.600 it.

00:44:12.240 Why do

00:44:12.540 you think

00:44:12.760 you don't

00:44:13.080 know that?

00:44:14.300 Why do

00:44:14.660 you think

00:44:14.940 you as

00:44:15.360 a member

00:44:15.660 of the

00:44:15.860 public,

00:44:16.260 who is

00:44:16.420 really paying

00:44:16.880 attention,

00:44:17.700 because it

00:44:18.200 matters to

00:44:18.800 your daily

00:44:19.160 life,

00:44:19.760 you're really

00:44:20.220 paying attention.

00:44:21.440 You don't

00:44:21.960 know,

00:44:23.140 as of right

00:44:24.080 now,

00:44:24.560 given the

00:44:25.220 vaccination

00:44:25.580 status of

00:44:26.460 the country,

00:44:27.280 you don't

00:44:27.740 know where

00:44:28.120 people are

00:44:28.520 getting it,

00:44:28.940 do you?

00:44:30.220 Why not?

00:44:31.880 It's got to

00:44:32.700 be available,

00:44:33.540 right?

00:44:34.440 Somehow,

00:44:36.000 somebody's

00:44:36.440 studying this.

00:44:37.760 Somebody is

00:44:38.760 studying people

00:44:39.400 with COVID

00:44:39.880 and saying,

00:44:40.460 okay,

00:44:40.760 if you

00:44:41.180 know where

00:44:42.420 you were

00:44:42.700 infected,

00:44:43.220 what's your

00:44:43.500 best guess?

00:44:45.060 We kind

00:44:45.540 of know

00:44:45.840 that by

00:44:46.240 now,

00:44:46.500 don't we?

00:44:47.400 And

00:44:47.600 whatever it

00:44:48.100 was before

00:44:48.900 vaccinations,

00:44:50.060 it might be

00:44:50.580 different now.

00:44:51.600 It could

00:44:51.980 be that the

00:44:52.780 place we

00:44:53.240 get it now

00:44:53.680 is a

00:44:53.960 different way

00:44:54.440 and a

00:44:54.680 different

00:44:54.820 place.

00:44:56.200 Let me

00:44:56.760 give you

00:44:57.160 a provocative

00:44:58.140 thought.

00:45:02.200 Is it a

00:45:02.920 sexually 0.61

00:45:03.300 transmitted

00:45:03.960 disease now?

00:45:07.040 Think about

00:45:07.860 it.

00:45:08.740 If you're

00:45:09.740 not getting

00:45:10.160 it on the

00:45:10.580 plane and

00:45:11.680 you're not

00:45:12.020 getting it

00:45:12.380 in the

00:45:12.580 classroom,

00:45:13.760 you're not

00:45:14.220 getting it

00:45:14.580 at work,

00:45:15.300 and I

00:45:15.580 don't know

00:45:15.820 if that's

00:45:16.160 true because

00:45:16.880 we have a

00:45:17.320 lack of

00:45:17.780 data,

00:45:18.600 right?

00:45:19.480 Where are

00:45:19.960 people getting

00:45:20.460 it?

00:45:23.280 Sex?

00:45:24.620 Because I

00:45:25.080 feel like

00:45:25.580 if you're

00:45:26.800 vaccinated,

00:45:28.220 you've got to

00:45:28.840 slobber all

00:45:29.540 over somebody

00:45:30.180 to give it

00:45:30.640 to them,

00:45:30.900 don't you?

00:45:32.240 I'm just

00:45:32.880 speculating.

00:45:34.180 Nothing I

00:45:34.760 say now should

00:45:35.340 be taken as

00:45:35.940 any kind of

00:45:36.440 a fact,

00:45:37.540 right?

00:45:38.420 But I

00:45:38.900 wonder if

00:45:39.340 we get to

00:45:39.780 the point,

00:45:40.760 let's say

00:45:41.280 just about

00:45:41.840 everybody gets

00:45:42.340 vaccinated.

00:45:43.380 Let's say

00:45:43.740 we get to

00:45:44.040 90%.

00:45:44.680 And let's

00:45:46.820 say that

00:45:47.220 the vaccination

00:45:47.720 reduces the

00:45:48.660 amount of

00:45:49.020 viral load

00:45:49.680 so that

00:45:50.740 you don't

00:45:51.640 give it to

00:45:52.060 people so

00:45:52.500 much just

00:45:52.920 by talking

00:45:53.460 or just

00:45:54.440 by being

00:45:54.800 in the

00:45:55.080 room.

00:45:55.820 How would

00:45:56.320 you give

00:45:56.620 it to

00:45:56.820 people if

00:45:57.800 it's a

00:45:58.140 lower

00:45:58.380 viral load

00:45:59.600 and they're

00:46:00.940 vaccinated

00:46:01.340 too?

00:46:02.680 You pretty

00:46:03.400 much have to

00:46:04.440 stick your

00:46:04.920 tongue down

00:46:05.460 the throat.

00:46:06.440 Am I

00:46:07.000 wrong?

00:46:08.180 Now, I'm

00:46:08.800 exaggerating,

00:46:09.640 right?

00:46:10.100 I'm exaggerating

00:46:10.980 for effect.

00:46:13.520 But are we

00:46:14.240 reaching a

00:46:14.720 point where

00:46:15.240 the only way

00:46:15.880 this thing is

00:46:16.480 going to

00:46:16.760 spread in

00:46:17.380 any meaningful

00:46:18.020 way is

00:46:19.340 you've got to

00:46:19.780 climb on top

00:46:20.520 of another

00:46:20.920 human and

00:46:21.640 breathe in

00:46:22.100 their mouth? 0.75

00:46:24.140 Again,

00:46:24.740 exaggerating a

00:46:25.340 little bit.

00:46:25.900 But I feel

00:46:26.340 like it's

00:46:26.700 becoming a

00:46:27.200 sexually 0.61

00:46:27.540 transmitted

00:46:28.160 disease and

00:46:29.260 it might be

00:46:29.780 mostly transmitted

00:46:30.620 by people

00:46:31.120 having affairs.

00:46:31.820 Yeah, see

00:46:35.420 where I went

00:46:35.860 there?

00:46:36.640 It might be

00:46:37.160 mostly trans

00:46:37.940 at some point

00:46:39.100 and maybe

00:46:39.500 we're approaching

00:46:40.080 it.

00:46:41.020 At some point

00:46:41.720 if you get

00:46:42.140 enough people

00:46:42.800 vaccinated,

00:46:43.820 it's mostly

00:46:45.460 going to come

00:46:46.340 from sex

00:46:47.040 because that's

00:46:48.140 the only time

00:46:48.540 you're getting

00:46:48.840 that close

00:46:49.400 for that long.

00:46:51.280 Right?

00:46:52.300 Am I wrong?

00:46:53.420 Am I wrong

00:46:53.920 that this could

00:46:54.540 morph into a

00:46:55.540 sexually transmitted

00:46:56.480 disease because

00:46:57.520 it's just the

00:46:58.020 only way you

00:46:58.580 can get enough

00:46:59.160 virus into

00:47:00.560 another vaccinated

00:47:01.380 person?

00:47:04.240 I'll just put

00:47:05.040 that out there.

00:47:06.260 All right,

00:47:06.560 I saw Rasmussen

00:47:07.320 tweeting something

00:47:08.300 from the

00:47:08.820 Gateway Pundit

00:47:09.680 and there's a

00:47:10.920 claim here

00:47:11.540 that I will

00:47:12.380 give low

00:47:13.140 credibility

00:47:13.620 so I don't

00:47:14.900 get banned

00:47:15.520 from social

00:47:16.500 media.

00:47:17.600 And that's

00:47:18.320 my actual

00:47:18.760 opinion.

00:47:19.140 I think

00:47:19.360 there's low

00:47:20.000 credibility

00:47:20.420 to this

00:47:21.020 claim that

00:47:22.160 there are

00:47:22.460 393

00:47:23.500 illegal

00:47:25.340 registered

00:47:26.180 voters in

00:47:27.000 Arizona,

00:47:28.580 meaning that

00:47:29.260 there's two

00:47:29.840 databases that

00:47:30.560 didn't match.

00:47:31.380 There's a

00:47:31.700 social security

00:47:32.820 numbers that

00:47:34.120 didn't match

00:47:34.520 the voting

00:47:35.000 polls or

00:47:35.600 something like

00:47:35.960 that.

00:47:36.780 And there's

00:47:37.260 some discrepancy

00:47:38.040 of 393

00:47:39.240 people who

00:47:40.060 maybe shouldn't

00:47:41.020 have voted

00:47:41.420 that maybe

00:47:42.280 did.

00:47:44.160 Is that

00:47:44.740 real?

00:47:46.160 Is that

00:47:46.620 being reported

00:47:47.240 on CNN?

00:47:49.120 I don't

00:47:49.840 think so.

00:47:50.600 Is it

00:47:50.880 being reported

00:47:51.420 on Fox

00:47:52.460 News?

00:47:54.180 Is Fox

00:47:55.180 News reporting

00:47:55.940 this as

00:47:56.400 true?

00:47:57.660 Here's the

00:47:58.280 way I

00:47:58.860 approach this.

00:47:59.740 The gateway

00:48:02.000 pundit doesn't

00:48:02.740 have a

00:48:03.300 100%

00:48:04.860 accurate record.

00:48:06.480 I don't

00:48:06.800 know what

00:48:06.980 the record

00:48:07.320 is.

00:48:08.000 But like

00:48:09.020 most entities,

00:48:09.960 it's not

00:48:10.340 100%.

00:48:10.940 That's all I

00:48:12.260 can say for

00:48:12.700 sure.

00:48:13.020 I don't

00:48:13.160 know how it

00:48:14.060 compares to

00:48:14.540 the New York

00:48:14.900 Times, for

00:48:16.060 example.

00:48:18.960 But here's a

00:48:20.300 good standard.

00:48:21.040 If it's not

00:48:21.500 being reported

00:48:22.140 by both

00:48:22.960 entities, it's

00:48:23.700 probably not

00:48:24.160 true.

00:48:24.380 If you

00:48:25.580 don't see

00:48:25.920 CNN saying

00:48:26.700 it, and

00:48:27.180 also Fox

00:48:27.880 News saying

00:48:28.320 yeah, we

00:48:28.900 do have

00:48:29.220 this

00:48:29.420 discrepancy,

00:48:30.800 maybe one

00:48:31.280 would say

00:48:31.600 why and

00:48:32.080 the other

00:48:32.380 wouldn't,

00:48:32.860 but probably

00:48:34.280 not something

00:48:34.820 to worry

00:48:35.240 about.

00:48:36.960 Probably

00:48:37.440 just a

00:48:37.940 database

00:48:38.200 problem.

00:48:40.240 So I'll

00:48:41.460 say that's

00:48:42.460 not confirmed.

00:48:43.980 I mean, it's

00:48:44.340 certainly a

00:48:44.720 red flag and

00:48:45.500 certainly we

00:48:46.000 should know

00:48:46.380 why there's

00:48:46.920 a difference,

00:48:47.700 but probably

00:48:48.480 just a

00:48:48.880 database

00:48:49.140 difference.

00:48:50.220 Probably

00:48:50.500 not any

00:48:51.640 bad thing

00:48:54.040 found.

00:48:55.680 A

00:48:56.240 vaccinated

00:48:56.580 person who

00:48:57.240 develops

00:48:57.740 symptoms is

00:48:58.400 just as

00:48:58.960 contagious as

00:48:59.760 a non-vax.

00:49:01.160 True?

00:49:02.000 For a

00:49:02.680 shorter amount

00:49:03.180 of time.

00:49:04.440 So once you

00:49:05.060 add on top

00:49:05.720 of that,

00:49:06.080 that true

00:49:06.540 statement that

00:49:08.020 a vaccinated

00:49:08.780 person who

00:49:09.380 just got the

00:49:10.040 vaccination can

00:49:11.120 give off a

00:49:11.740 lot of virus,

00:49:12.660 but not for

00:49:13.300 long.

00:49:14.940 So they're

00:49:15.480 contagious.

00:49:17.000 They're that

00:49:17.500 contagious for a

00:49:18.520 short time,

00:49:19.160 I think.

00:49:20.140 Check on

00:49:20.660 that.

00:49:21.000 Do a fact

00:49:21.360 check on

00:49:21.720 that,

00:49:21.980 okay?

00:49:23.120 Not

00:49:23.400 positive.

00:49:26.640 I was

00:49:27.240 asked if

00:49:27.640 I'm getting

00:49:27.980 the booster.

00:49:28.840 My answer

00:49:29.320 to that is

00:49:29.760 the same as

00:49:30.400 my answer to

00:49:31.060 the original

00:49:31.840 vaccination

00:49:32.800 question.

00:49:34.140 Since I

00:49:34.560 got the

00:49:35.200 regular

00:49:35.500 vaccination as

00:49:36.360 late as

00:49:36.860 possible,

00:49:37.960 so that I

00:49:38.440 could have

00:49:38.680 the benefit

00:49:39.120 of as

00:49:39.520 many months

00:49:40.140 of other

00:49:40.680 people getting

00:49:41.320 it as

00:49:41.640 possible,

00:49:42.200 I'm also

00:49:44.120 going to

00:49:44.420 wait as

00:49:45.080 long as

00:49:45.540 possible for

00:49:46.220 the booster

00:49:46.660 so that I

00:49:47.820 have as

00:49:48.100 much information

00:49:48.900 about other

00:49:49.440 people's

00:49:49.840 experiences as

00:49:50.680 possible.

00:49:51.360 So the

00:49:51.740 answer is

00:49:52.100 I haven't

00:49:52.420 decided and

00:49:54.420 I shouldn't

00:49:55.160 until the

00:49:56.660 last minute.

00:49:57.440 The only

00:49:57.840 time to

00:49:58.220 decide this

00:49:58.700 is the

00:49:59.020 last minute.

00:50:00.260 Deciding

00:50:00.640 ahead of

00:50:01.060 time is

00:50:02.180 dumb.

00:50:03.580 It's

00:50:03.800 dumb.

00:50:04.800 Now,

00:50:05.240 I suppose if

00:50:06.580 you had some

00:50:07.440 profession that

00:50:08.100 required it,

00:50:08.660 you might decide

00:50:09.200 ahead of time.

00:50:09.640 But if you

00:50:11.220 have the luxury

00:50:14.020 of being able

00:50:15.340 to self-quarantine

00:50:17.620 and still

00:50:18.540 work, as I

00:50:19.760 do, I'll

00:50:21.420 wait until the

00:50:21.760 last minute.

00:50:24.200 All right.

00:50:27.440 The French

00:50:29.800 Catholic Church

00:50:30.720 discovered that

00:50:32.120 there were at

00:50:32.480 least 3,000

00:50:33.540 pedophiles who

00:50:34.460 have been

00:50:34.680 working within

00:50:35.300 the ranks of

00:50:35.940 the French

00:50:36.320 Catholic Church

00:50:37.060 since the

00:50:38.160 50s.

00:50:39.360 They estimate

00:50:40.020 that as many

00:50:40.740 as 330,000

00:50:42.880 children were

00:50:44.260 victims since

00:50:45.060 the 50s.

00:50:46.400 But on the

00:50:47.380 optimistic view,

00:50:48.440 some say only

00:50:49.300 200,000.

00:50:52.400 That's the

00:50:53.020 optimistic view.

00:50:54.720 Now, how many

00:50:56.380 is that?

00:50:56.960 That is 3,000 and

00:50:58.340 have around

00:50:58.800 115,000

00:51:00.200 priests.

00:51:00.620 That's a lot

00:51:00.920 of priests.

00:51:02.080 So 3,000 is

00:51:03.060 not a lot out

00:51:04.040 of 115,000.

00:51:05.880 I don't even

00:51:06.280 know if that's

00:51:06.760 higher than

00:51:07.200 the average

00:51:08.720 in the public.

00:51:10.240 It feels like

00:51:10.800 it is, but I

00:51:11.800 don't know

00:51:12.100 that it is.

00:51:15.880 I feel like

00:51:16.880 somehow this

00:51:20.580 needs to get

00:51:21.080 fixed.

00:51:22.500 Let me give

00:51:23.180 you the

00:51:24.500 hypnotist's view

00:51:25.640 of this

00:51:26.260 situation.

00:51:26.780 The hypnotist

00:51:28.860 says that

00:51:30.200 over time,

00:51:32.380 every shoe

00:51:33.300 salesman should

00:51:34.500 be a man

00:51:35.220 with a shoe

00:51:35.820 fetish or

00:51:37.100 a foot

00:51:37.380 fetish.

00:51:38.360 Let me say

00:51:39.060 that again.

00:51:40.200 Over time,

00:51:41.220 not on day

00:51:41.900 one, but

00:51:42.860 over time,

00:51:44.740 every shoe

00:51:45.500 salesman should

00:51:47.340 be a man

00:51:48.220 with a foot

00:51:48.760 fetish.

00:51:49.760 Why?

00:51:50.560 Because they'd

00:51:51.100 work for

00:51:51.480 cheaper.

00:51:53.020 A man with 0.98

00:51:53.580 a foot fetish

00:51:54.160 will take a

00:51:54.640 job as a

00:51:55.140 shoe salesman

00:51:55.720 for less

00:51:56.440 money.

00:51:57.560 He's like,

00:51:58.520 that's a

00:51:58.920 pretty good

00:51:59.160 job.

00:51:59.840 I love my

00:52:00.440 job.

00:52:00.860 I can't

00:52:01.120 wait to

00:52:01.360 go to

00:52:01.580 work.

00:52:03.700 Likewise,

00:52:05.260 over time,

00:52:06.300 you would

00:52:06.540 expect that

00:52:07.160 every coach

00:52:09.540 of an

00:52:10.140 all-female,

00:52:11.280 young-female 0.80

00:52:11.920 team would

00:52:13.800 be sexual

00:52:14.540 harassers.

00:52:16.120 Not on

00:52:16.800 day one,

00:52:18.360 but over

00:52:18.840 time, you'd

00:52:19.820 expect all

00:52:20.360 the harassers

00:52:21.260 to be attracted

00:52:21.940 to the place

00:52:22.440 where they

00:52:22.740 can do the

00:52:23.120 most harassing.

00:52:24.460 So over

00:52:24.960 time, you'd

00:52:25.480 expect every

00:52:26.080 organization that

00:52:27.140 has young

00:52:27.820 people as

00:52:28.460 their charge

00:52:30.040 and adults

00:52:31.840 in charge,

00:52:32.420 you'd expect

00:52:32.900 over time

00:52:33.600 that they

00:52:33.940 would all

00:52:34.200 become

00:52:34.440 pedophiles.

00:52:36.180 Sorry.

00:52:37.460 Human

00:52:38.000 motivation.

00:52:39.240 You can't

00:52:39.760 turn off

00:52:40.140 human motivation.

00:52:41.000 So if you

00:52:42.820 have an

00:52:43.140 organization that

00:52:44.140 absolutely is

00:52:45.120 going to

00:52:45.340 attract pedophiles, 0.58

00:52:47.260 you need to

00:52:47.860 do something

00:52:48.480 about that.

00:52:50.560 I don't know

00:52:51.160 what the

00:52:51.520 answer is,

00:52:52.060 but if you

00:52:52.580 know that

00:52:53.640 you're attracting

00:52:54.200 the wrong

00:52:54.980 people,

00:52:57.280 the Boy

00:52:57.780 Scouts,

00:52:58.240 perfect example,

00:52:59.340 exactly.

00:53:00.260 You would

00:53:00.560 expect over

00:53:01.180 time that

00:53:02.140 you would

00:53:02.380 have more

00:53:02.800 and more

00:53:03.120 of the

00:53:03.560 people you

00:53:04.120 don't want

00:53:04.500 in those

00:53:04.760 ranks because

00:53:05.780 they would be

00:53:06.140 attracted and

00:53:06.780 why not?

00:53:07.980 I mean,

00:53:08.300 from their

00:53:08.600 perspective,

00:53:09.180 why not?

00:53:10.680 All right.

00:53:12.660 Here's what

00:53:13.260 we think we

00:53:14.040 know about

00:53:14.420 shots.

00:53:14.840 I'll tell you

00:53:15.240 what I

00:53:15.860 think I

00:53:16.240 know so

00:53:17.720 far.

00:53:19.120 That two

00:53:19.860 shots is

00:53:20.340 better than

00:53:20.700 one.

00:53:21.420 All right.

00:53:21.700 Give me a

00:53:22.040 fact check as

00:53:22.680 I go.

00:53:23.700 I'm going to

00:53:24.040 state things

00:53:24.740 we think we

00:53:25.560 know are

00:53:26.260 true.

00:53:27.460 Two shots

00:53:28.160 is better

00:53:28.480 than one.

00:53:29.840 I hear that

00:53:30.440 we're assuming

00:53:31.120 that one

00:53:31.560 shot is not

00:53:33.040 going to kill

00:53:33.440 you.

00:53:35.700 And again,

00:53:36.420 this is not

00:53:36.860 necessarily your

00:53:37.680 opinion.

00:53:38.160 This would be

00:53:38.500 the consensus

00:53:40.040 scientific opinion.

00:53:42.160 We now

00:53:42.940 believe that

00:53:43.520 three shots

00:53:44.240 is better

00:53:44.600 than two.

00:53:46.260 Again,

00:53:46.800 I'm not

00:53:47.260 saying you

00:53:47.700 agree with

00:53:48.260 it.

00:53:48.740 I'm saying

00:53:49.140 this is the

00:53:49.640 consensus.

00:53:51.940 We believe

00:53:52.820 that natural

00:53:53.480 immunity is

00:53:54.340 better than

00:53:55.160 two shots.

00:53:57.120 Not quite

00:53:57.940 sure about

00:53:58.420 that.

00:53:59.400 But we do

00:54:00.180 know that

00:54:00.560 natural

00:54:00.940 immunity gives

00:54:01.980 you immunity

00:54:02.520 to sort of

00:54:03.340 every part

00:54:04.400 inside and

00:54:05.160 out of the

00:54:06.040 virus.

00:54:06.960 Whereas the

00:54:07.720 shots give

00:54:08.980 you a very

00:54:09.380 specific

00:54:09.940 immunity.

00:54:11.100 I'm probably

00:54:11.540 doing a bad

00:54:12.180 job of

00:54:12.520 explaining this.

00:54:13.500 But it's that

00:54:14.920 spike protein

00:54:15.740 that they're

00:54:16.160 targeting.

00:54:16.940 So they're

00:54:17.160 looking at

00:54:17.540 one element

00:54:18.380 and creating

00:54:19.780 a vaccine

00:54:21.200 around that

00:54:21.680 one element.

00:54:22.460 Whereas natural

00:54:23.200 immunity gives

00:54:24.140 you immunity to

00:54:24.880 basically all

00:54:25.600 of the parts.

00:54:26.200 Is that better?

00:54:28.100 Well, at least

00:54:28.680 one expert said

00:54:29.440 so on a video

00:54:31.000 I saw today.

00:54:31.600 But maybe

00:54:34.160 that's a

00:54:35.160 question.

00:54:37.340 So natural

00:54:37.880 immunity seems

00:54:38.580 better than

00:54:39.060 two shots.

00:54:40.740 Is natural

00:54:41.720 immunity better

00:54:42.440 than three

00:54:44.060 shots?

00:54:46.020 Probably.

00:54:47.220 Again, I'm not

00:54:47.980 sure we know

00:54:48.440 that.

00:54:49.320 But probably

00:54:49.820 because of the

00:54:50.820 completeness of

00:54:52.100 the immunity

00:54:52.540 for the

00:54:53.500 natural one.

00:54:54.600 If that

00:54:55.520 matters over

00:54:56.040 time, I don't

00:54:56.480 know.

00:54:56.660 The consensus

00:54:58.360 also is that

00:54:59.080 natural immunity

00:54:59.900 plus shots is

00:55:01.700 better than

00:55:02.160 either one

00:55:02.620 alone.

00:55:04.140 Yeah, how

00:55:04.820 about that?

00:55:06.220 Do you agree

00:55:06.700 with that?

00:55:07.060 That would be

00:55:07.400 the consensus.

00:55:08.780 That having

00:55:09.220 the shots is

00:55:10.080 good and

00:55:10.540 having natural

00:55:11.060 immunity is

00:55:11.620 good.

00:55:13.080 And regardless

00:55:14.020 of which one

00:55:14.560 is better,

00:55:16.000 it's better to

00:55:16.520 have both.

00:55:17.760 Especially if

00:55:18.440 you have the

00:55:18.760 shot first and

00:55:19.720 then you get

00:55:20.160 the natural

00:55:20.880 immunity on

00:55:21.440 top of it.

00:55:22.360 Because then

00:55:22.760 you'll be

00:55:23.100 protected from

00:55:23.920 hospitalization,

00:55:25.240 mostly.

00:55:25.500 And then

00:55:26.760 you'll get

00:55:27.060 the full

00:55:27.460 natural

00:55:27.880 immunity.

00:55:29.060 And then

00:55:29.520 I think we

00:55:31.900 know that both

00:55:32.440 the shot and

00:55:33.500 natural immunity

00:55:34.140 wane over

00:55:34.820 time.

00:55:35.880 But it

00:55:37.240 could be that

00:55:37.800 the natural

00:55:38.320 immunity doesn't

00:55:39.140 wane the

00:55:39.720 same way.

00:55:41.940 We don't

00:55:42.580 know that yet,

00:55:43.300 so that's still

00:55:43.720 a little bit

00:55:44.100 open.

00:55:44.920 But it

00:55:46.100 could be that

00:55:46.600 natural

00:55:46.960 immunity morphs

00:55:48.680 into something

00:55:49.300 that can more

00:55:50.760 quickly reconstitute

00:55:52.580 itself.

00:55:53.700 Whereas we

00:55:54.620 don't know if

00:55:55.080 that's true

00:55:55.420 of the shots.

00:55:56.160 If the shots

00:55:56.620 wear off,

00:55:57.920 is there any

00:55:58.600 traces of

00:55:59.900 them left that

00:56:00.360 can quickly

00:56:00.880 reconstitute what

00:56:01.920 was there?

00:56:02.920 Don't know.

00:56:04.160 But that's

00:56:04.800 where we're

00:56:05.120 at.

00:56:06.320 Andres

00:56:06.700 Bekaus notes

00:56:07.700 that the

00:56:08.300 immunity from

00:56:09.960 infections versus

00:56:11.680 the two shots

00:56:12.460 is still

00:56:12.860 uncertain.

00:56:14.020 So we don't

00:56:14.740 have data for

00:56:15.320 that.

00:56:15.600 All right.

00:56:19.320 And that

00:56:20.180 is what I

00:56:21.900 wanted to say

00:56:22.480 today.

00:56:23.140 That is

00:56:24.880 everything I

00:56:25.400 wanted to

00:56:25.700 say today.

00:56:31.000 Oh,

00:56:31.520 here's a

00:56:31.860 counterpoint.

00:56:32.880 I do not

00:56:33.400 agree that

00:56:34.540 both are

00:56:35.420 better.

00:56:36.180 You'll have

00:56:36.520 whatever the

00:56:37.100 VAX got to

00:56:37.860 give you,

00:56:38.620 plus, yeah.

00:56:40.320 So you get

00:56:42.140 the benefits of

00:56:43.140 both the

00:56:43.520 natural immunity

00:56:44.220 plus the

00:56:45.040 shots, but 0.98

00:56:46.340 you also get

00:56:47.060 whatever risks

00:56:48.200 come with

00:56:49.760 both getting

00:56:50.540 the virus

00:56:52.360 and also the

00:56:54.160 risk of

00:56:54.560 getting the

00:56:54.940 vaccine itself.

00:56:55.820 So that's

00:56:56.120 true.

00:56:56.820 But I don't

00:56:57.140 know that

00:56:57.440 that changes

00:56:57.920 your...

00:56:59.460 Mark says,

00:57:01.180 from one

00:57:01.700 cartoonist to

00:57:02.320 another, what

00:57:03.760 do you make

00:57:04.080 of Ben

00:57:04.420 Garrison's work

00:57:05.240 as a fellow

00:57:05.840 cartoonist?

00:57:07.500 Brilliant.

00:57:08.860 Ben

00:57:09.100 Garrison's work

00:57:10.020 as a

00:57:10.800 cartoonist, I

00:57:11.520 say, is

00:57:11.860 brilliant.

00:57:12.940 Why?

00:57:13.840 Because he

00:57:14.360 found a

00:57:14.860 market and

00:57:16.100 then he

00:57:16.420 addressed his

00:57:17.040 market.

00:57:18.020 Now, you

00:57:18.720 know, it

00:57:19.080 might not

00:57:19.400 be your

00:57:19.660 thing, if

00:57:20.200 you're left

00:57:20.580 leaning or

00:57:21.120 whatever, but

00:57:22.100 in terms of

00:57:22.980 a, let's

00:57:25.240 see, the

00:57:25.660 commercial

00:57:26.180 decisions,

00:57:28.540 they're right

00:57:29.300 on.

00:57:30.000 So you

00:57:30.260 found a

00:57:30.620 market, you

00:57:31.080 served his

00:57:31.500 market, and

00:57:31.900 he does it

00:57:32.300 very well,

00:57:33.140 very well.

00:57:33.920 So you

00:57:35.520 can disagree

00:57:36.040 with his

00:57:36.480 point of

00:57:36.880 view, that's

00:57:37.480 a separate

00:57:37.860 question, but

00:57:39.040 as a

00:57:39.420 cartoonist,

00:57:40.060 yeah, very

00:57:40.500 good, very

00:57:41.280 good.

00:57:45.660 All right,

00:57:46.340 that's about

00:57:46.700 all I

00:57:46.940 have.

00:57:47.140 I've got

00:57:47.320 to run

00:57:47.640 and do

00:57:47.980 something

00:57:48.200 else, and

00:57:49.420 thanks for

00:57:51.260 joining in.

00:57:52.560 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 05, 2021

Episode 1520 Scott Adams： We Are Going to Have Some Fun Today. Get In Here.

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript