Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1520 Scott Adams： We Are Going to Have Some Fun Today. Get In Here.

00:00:00.000 Well, good morning, everybody.

00:00:06.020 It's time for the best part of the day.

00:00:09.260 The part that makes everybody happier, everybody richer,

00:00:13.540 everybody a little better looking.

00:00:15.880 Yeah, have you noticed that people who watch

00:00:17.840 Coffee with Scott Adams,

00:00:20.360 they're a little bit sexier than other people, aren't they?

00:00:23.920 Yeah, they are. You know they are. You know it.

00:00:27.060 You can see them on the streets.

00:00:28.320 You'd be walking down the street.

00:00:30.860 There'd be a whole crowd of people.

00:00:32.720 You look at the crowd of people, and you say,

00:00:34.460 ordinary, ordinary, ordinary.

00:00:37.700 And then you'll see somebody who watches the simultaneous sip.

00:00:41.260 You won't even know it.

00:00:42.920 They'll be complete strangers, but they're almost glowing.

00:00:48.000 Almost like you could see their aura.

00:00:51.120 Yeah, no, it's true.

00:00:54.020 You just look for it. You'll start to see it.

00:00:56.020 Yeah, those who come here early and enjoy the simultaneous sip,

00:01:00.100 you have a big advantage in life over those who don't.

00:01:03.340 And if you'd like to take it up to another level,

00:01:05.820 almost to the level of unfair,

00:01:08.980 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass,

00:01:11.280 a tank or chelsea,

00:01:12.140 a canteen jug or flask.

00:01:15.000 A vessel of what kind?

00:01:16.960 Any kind.

00:01:18.380 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:01:21.180 I like coffee.

00:01:24.320 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:01:27.320 The dopamine.

00:01:28.980 Hit it today.

00:01:30.660 The thing that makes everything better.

00:01:32.800 Yeah.

00:01:33.420 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:01:35.220 And watch it do its thing.

00:01:36.640 Go.

00:01:36.880 Go.

00:01:41.380 Now, some of you can drink tea and pretend it's coffee.

00:01:48.760 That's fine, too.

00:01:49.500 Yeah, let's go, Brandon.

00:01:51.840 Let's go, Brandon.

00:01:54.400 Well, Rasmussen did a poll,

00:01:57.380 asked people if people are more divided after Biden

00:02:00.320 or less divided.

00:02:02.140 Now, thank goodness.

00:02:04.040 Thank goodness we got President Biden

00:02:07.640 to bring the country together.

00:02:10.860 Dare I say, unite us.

00:02:13.460 Yes.

00:02:14.200 And how's he doing?

00:02:16.080 First year on the job,

00:02:17.340 Joe Biden has...

00:02:19.500 Well, according to the Rasmussen poll,

00:02:22.020 64% of people polled said we're more divided.

00:02:28.840 Hmm.

00:02:29.920 Well, that's not good.

00:02:31.940 But 11% said we're more united.

00:02:35.680 So 11%.

00:02:36.980 Working out great.

00:02:39.220 43% said Trump would make it even worse.

00:02:46.460 So according to this poll,

00:02:50.040 I may be reading too much into it,

00:02:52.520 but I believe that we've shown that every president,

00:02:56.080 no matter who they are, makes everything worse.

00:02:58.080 Sort of a Zeno's paradox kind of a situation.

00:03:04.940 Every president, no matter who it is,

00:03:07.800 just makes things 50% worse.

00:03:11.860 Forever.

00:03:13.340 Wherever you are,

00:03:14.780 and whoever the next president is,

00:03:16.920 I'm sorry, it's going to be 50% worse than it was.

00:03:19.740 So I'm not sure that this is the kind of poll

00:03:23.440 that's telling us much more than how people want you

00:03:29.220 to know the answer to the question, basically.

00:03:33.080 Because I don't know that you can measure how divided we are.

00:03:37.760 Is that even a thing?

00:03:39.900 Can you even measure that?

00:03:41.580 How divided we are?

00:03:42.660 Kind of subjective.

00:03:45.740 Well, you all know Facebook had a major outage yesterday

00:03:49.820 that reportedly cost Mark Zuckerberg $7 billion.

00:03:55.900 $7 billion.

00:03:59.440 5% of his wealth.

00:04:02.980 And do you think he noticed?

00:04:05.820 He probably had to borrow money for lunch.

00:04:08.240 But did he really lose $7 billion?

00:04:10.220 No, no.

00:04:12.660 On paper, something went down.

00:04:16.180 It'll go back up next week.

00:04:17.480 So he didn't lose anything.

00:04:22.240 There's something in this story that is hilarious.

00:04:26.560 How many of you know the hilarious part

00:04:29.000 of the Facebook outage story?

00:04:31.260 So they were out for hours, and it cost them.

00:04:33.700 They lost $160 million of revenue,

00:04:36.540 and it was a pretty big deal.

00:04:38.240 But how many of you know the funny part of it?

00:04:42.660 Well, okay, you're close.

00:04:44.480 Somebody say it's an upgrade.

00:04:46.120 No, there's something funnier.

00:04:48.120 There's something funnier about this story,

00:04:50.160 and we don't know the details yet.

00:04:52.720 But there's something very funny about it.

00:04:55.000 You ready?

00:04:57.060 Let me just read this sentence.

00:05:00.280 I think this came from CNN.

00:05:01.660 The exact cause of the outage has not been confirmed by Facebook.

00:05:08.240 But one expert said the problem may have been caused by an internal error made by staff

00:05:13.900 that effectively erased the site from the Internet.

00:05:17.280 How do you erase the site from the Internet?

00:05:23.600 You do it this way.

00:05:25.760 Sean Graham Cunningham, the CTO of web security firm Cloudflare,

00:05:31.440 said Facebook made a series of updates to its border gateway protocol,

00:05:35.820 which caused it to, quote, disappear from the Internet.

00:05:38.400 Okay, now maybe it's because I'm the Dilbert cartoonist,

00:05:44.980 and I can see a whole month of material coming.

00:05:48.520 But here's the funny part.

00:05:52.020 In all likelihood, there's one employee somewhere

00:05:56.400 who knows they did this.

00:05:59.000 Somewhere, somewhere in the 700-some billion people,

00:06:11.540 there's one poor bastard who knows he pushed the wrong button

00:06:15.040 and made Facebook disappear from the Internet.

00:06:23.160 I'm trying to think of this poor guy's performance review in a few months.

00:06:36.200 He's going to be sitting down with his boss.

00:06:48.780 Sitting down with his boss.

00:06:53.160 How'd your quarter go?

00:06:59.740 So, what did you accomplish this quarter?

00:07:05.920 Well, we've been seeing a lot of bad publicity.

00:07:14.900 We've been seeing a lot of bad publicity about how Facebook is destroying youth.

00:07:23.160 Hurting people and hurting people's self-esteem.

00:07:30.000 It's causing a lot of damage.

00:07:33.980 But I stopped that shit.

00:07:40.320 So, here's the irony.

00:07:43.100 Whoever it is who pushed the wrong button

00:07:46.840 and erased Facebook from the Internet.

00:07:48.700 Whoever did that

00:07:52.500 did more good for the world

00:07:56.460 than any politician

00:07:59.080 except maybe Rand Paul

00:08:00.440 for the last year.

00:08:04.660 It's the only good thing

00:08:05.920 that anybody's ever done at Facebook.

00:08:09.740 And he's going to get fired for it.

00:08:11.580 Well, if you couldn't tell,

00:08:19.820 I finally got enough good sleep last night.

00:08:25.840 I just love this story.

00:08:28.500 All right.

00:08:29.920 Let's move on.

00:08:30.720 So, the $3.5 trillion infrastructure bill,

00:08:37.240 how do you think that's doing?

00:08:40.140 How's that doing?

00:08:42.680 Everybody think that's going to slide right through?

00:08:46.080 You know, it's free.

00:08:47.960 It's $3.5 trillion,

00:08:49.980 but that sounds like a lot.

00:08:52.140 But you've got to spread it over 10 years.

00:08:55.000 And then you have to appreciate

00:08:58.900 that not only is it spread over 10 years,

00:09:01.440 so not nearly as bad,

00:09:04.600 but it's free.

00:09:09.900 According to Biden,

00:09:10.860 it pays for itself.

00:09:12.080 So, if it's free,

00:09:14.400 why can't you get that approved?

00:09:16.520 But Manchin and Sinema,

00:09:18.560 the two senators,

00:09:19.300 are holding tight.

00:09:20.340 And who besides me

00:09:24.460 predicted that this would never get assigned?

00:09:28.380 Do you remember?

00:09:30.000 Give me a fact check

00:09:31.380 in case anybody wonders

00:09:32.740 if I'm just making this up.

00:09:35.040 So, in the comments,

00:09:36.000 can you verify

00:09:36.680 that I've been saying for a long time

00:09:39.520 that this thing isn't going to get assigned?

00:09:42.500 You can verify that.

00:09:44.000 Has anybody else said that?

00:09:45.980 Has anybody else who's,

00:09:47.300 let's say, a prominent pundit

00:09:48.740 just said,

00:09:49.380 this isn't going to get assigned?

00:09:50.820 This is never going to happen.

00:09:53.700 Now, I don't know

00:09:54.440 if it'll get negotiated

00:09:55.680 down to a trillion or something.

00:09:59.400 So, Democrats,

00:10:01.480 would you like some advice?

00:10:04.260 This is free advice

00:10:05.460 for Democrats.

00:10:07.740 You ready?

00:10:08.880 Here's how to get

00:10:09.540 their infrastructure bill passed.

00:10:12.360 Not the full $3.5 trillion.

00:10:14.880 All right,

00:10:15.100 they're not going to get that passed.

00:10:16.120 But,

00:10:17.340 how to get something,

00:10:19.280 something passed.

00:10:20.280 Let me ask you this question,

00:10:22.060 and maybe you know the answer.

00:10:24.080 Of the $3.5 trillion

00:10:26.180 in infrastructure,

00:10:28.080 how much of the $3.5 trillion

00:10:29.980 goes toward fixing

00:10:32.400 our election systems

00:10:33.720 such that they could be

00:10:36.080 audited instantly

00:10:38.160 and we wouldn't have

00:10:39.140 any questions about

00:10:40.080 whether it was a fair election?

00:10:41.300 How much of the $3.5 trillion

00:10:45.620 goes to our most important infrastructure?

00:10:49.880 Oh, yeah, I said it.

00:10:51.160 Our most important infrastructure.

00:10:53.860 What's more important?

00:10:55.880 Your potholes

00:10:56.800 or your republic?

00:11:01.220 Which is the higher priority infrastructure?

00:11:04.320 It's not even close, right?

00:11:07.220 It's not even close.

00:11:09.140 So, here's what

00:11:10.160 the Democrats could do

00:11:11.960 to make their infrastructure bill

00:11:13.820 a little more palatable.

00:11:16.020 A little more palatable.

00:11:18.460 Put in a big part

00:11:20.120 that fixes

00:11:21.120 the most important infrastructure.

00:11:24.040 How about that?

00:11:25.780 Let's put some money in there

00:11:27.540 to fix the most important infrastructure,

00:11:30.140 the elections.

00:11:31.060 Because everything else

00:11:31.940 is subsidiary to that.

00:11:34.620 Now, that's not going to get you

00:11:36.220 all $3.5 trillion.

00:11:38.120 The Republicans aren't going to go for that.

00:11:40.060 But, do you think

00:11:41.360 you could get some Republicans on board

00:11:43.300 for a trillion

00:11:45.140 plus election reform?

00:11:48.440 One trillion plus election reform.

00:11:52.060 Who's against election improvements?

00:11:55.580 Does any...

00:11:56.260 Well, I mean, in public,

00:11:57.480 you can't say you're against it,

00:11:58.660 even if you are.

00:12:01.240 All right, that's my suggestion.

00:12:03.040 Fix that thing

00:12:03.940 by putting the election stuff in there

00:12:05.440 and hold tight.

00:12:06.720 I wouldn't say anything...

00:12:08.380 Let me say this again.

00:12:09.380 To Republicans,

00:12:11.380 don't say anything

00:12:12.260 that doesn't have election

00:12:13.360 reform in it

00:12:15.100 as part of the infrastructure.

00:12:17.760 Don't say anything.

00:12:18.620 Don't fix a road.

00:12:20.300 Don't give anybody Wi-Fi.

00:12:21.540 Don't do anything.

00:12:22.880 Election reform.

00:12:24.160 Number one priority.

00:12:25.680 Get that in there

00:12:26.560 and then you can negotiate.

00:12:27.720 But if that's not in there,

00:12:29.440 don't even negotiate.

00:12:30.820 There's nothing to talk about.

00:12:32.400 You can't have an infrastructure bill

00:12:33.820 that ignores the most important infrastructure.

00:12:36.780 Right?

00:12:37.000 I mean, that's just stupid.

00:12:38.880 There's some things you could say,

00:12:41.020 are, well,

00:12:41.700 I'm philosophically opposed

00:12:43.340 or I don't like this much socialism.

00:12:45.980 And those are sort of,

00:12:47.620 you know,

00:12:48.160 fair,

00:12:48.940 fair kinds of arguments.

00:12:51.460 But it's not a philosophical debate

00:12:54.020 to say that we have

00:12:55.260 skepticism in this country

00:12:57.180 about the election integrity.

00:12:59.500 I mean,

00:12:59.680 nobody would argue

00:13:00.360 that there is skepticism.

00:13:02.180 And that that needs to get fixed

00:13:03.700 to have a healthy republic.

00:13:05.840 Those are not really arguable points.

00:13:08.680 So I would say

00:13:09.860 that an infrastructure bill

00:13:11.240 that doesn't have fixing

00:13:13.060 the most important infrastructure in it

00:13:15.420 is just stupid.

00:13:17.860 So stop calling it,

00:13:19.300 you know,

00:13:20.060 whatever it is,

00:13:20.780 different priorities.

00:13:21.820 It's just stupid.

00:13:23.720 Put the infrastructure

00:13:24.820 in the infrastructure bill

00:13:25.960 and maybe you got a chance.

00:13:28.680 All right.

00:13:32.280 There was a black ex-Tesla worker

00:13:34.800 who won a court case.

00:13:36.860 He claimed he was racially abused

00:13:38.900 every day at a California plant,

00:13:41.100 including being called the N-word

00:13:43.120 and he was awarded $137 million.

00:13:47.280 Now,

00:13:47.780 when you read that headline,

00:13:48.780 if you did,

00:13:49.560 or maybe you're hearing it

00:13:50.520 for the first time,

00:13:52.060 did you not say to yourself,

00:13:53.740 this looks a little exaggerated,

00:13:57.160 meaning that the size of the award

00:13:58.640 seems crazy,

00:14:00.300 you know,

00:14:00.820 and of size with the crime.

00:14:03.400 But also,

00:14:04.180 I mean,

00:14:04.500 really,

00:14:05.300 really,

00:14:05.700 this guy was abused every day.

00:14:07.980 Every day.

00:14:09.180 Really,

00:14:09.580 every day he got racially abused.

00:14:13.540 And then,

00:14:14.180 so,

00:14:14.500 you know,

00:14:14.760 I'm totally skeptical.

00:14:16.200 Read the headline.

00:14:17.060 I go,

00:14:17.260 oh,

00:14:17.580 God,

00:14:17.900 it's one of these stories of,

00:14:19.660 you know,

00:14:20.020 somebody couldn't take a joke

00:14:21.980 or something like that.

00:14:22.960 And then I read the actual claims.

00:14:25.300 Are you ready for this?

00:14:26.780 These are the things that,

00:14:27.900 apparently,

00:14:28.200 the court found credible.

00:14:30.620 Right?

00:14:30.920 So,

00:14:31.200 the court found these claims credible.

00:14:34.200 Here's what he claimed.

00:14:35.320 I think this was from,

00:14:39.280 was it from Fox News?

00:14:41.260 I forget.

00:14:42.380 The 52-year-old,

00:14:44.160 he was a contracted elevator operator.

00:14:47.160 He claimed that fellow employees

00:14:48.600 drew swastikas

00:14:50.280 and left racist graffiti around the plant

00:14:53.460 while he said

00:14:54.900 one of his supervisors

00:14:56.080 drew a person with a black face

00:14:58.560 and a bone in his hair

00:15:00.420 and wrote boo,

00:15:02.740 short for jigaboo.

00:15:04.060 The supervisor then allegedly told him

00:15:07.720 he,

00:15:08.520 quote,

00:15:08.880 couldn't take a joke.

00:15:13.860 When Diaz confronted him,

00:15:17.040 Diaz contended that none of his supervisors

00:15:18.960 stepped in to stop the abuse.

00:15:20.580 Is any of that true?

00:15:22.380 I mean,

00:15:22.820 it sounds like it passed the test

00:15:24.520 for the jury.

00:15:29.540 But,

00:15:30.580 have any of you ever been

00:15:32.620 in any kind of environment like this?

00:15:35.280 Because I,

00:15:35.840 I've never been anywhere near

00:15:37.140 anything like this.

00:15:39.660 You know,

00:15:39.900 I live in California.

00:15:41.340 This,

00:15:41.580 this factory is,

00:15:43.300 you know,

00:15:43.760 just down the road.

00:15:46.860 And,

00:15:47.460 why could I live here

00:15:48.900 all my adult life?

00:15:50.660 I've never been anywhere near,

00:15:52.820 never where,

00:15:53.600 never anywhere near

00:15:54.800 any kind of behavior like this.

00:15:56.840 Have you?

00:15:57.400 I'm just looking at your comments

00:16:01.200 to see if any of you

00:16:02.840 have ever been near

00:16:03.860 this kind of behavior.

00:16:06.260 I'm not seeing any yeses.

00:16:09.340 Oh,

00:16:09.800 I saw yes.

00:16:11.180 Saw some more yeses.

00:16:13.340 Saw another yes.

00:16:15.060 I'm seeing some yeses.

00:16:17.140 Somebody said no

00:16:17.780 and I've worked in lots of blue collar.

00:16:19.400 That's sort of what I was looking for.

00:16:23.220 Somebody says no

00:16:24.160 and they've been to the deep south.

00:16:25.580 I don't know.

00:16:28.220 This is shocking.

00:16:30.580 And I'm seeing yeses.

00:16:32.340 So that,

00:16:32.740 all of you who said no,

00:16:35.460 you know,

00:16:35.640 you had the same experience

00:16:36.580 I have apparently,

00:16:38.180 just be aware.

00:16:39.860 There are people

00:16:40.640 who are probably credible

00:16:41.840 who are saying yes.

00:16:44.860 That this is real.

00:16:46.520 It's a little wake up call,

00:16:47.560 isn't it?

00:16:48.480 That,

00:16:48.880 you know,

00:16:49.060 you think things are good

00:16:49.960 but you're thinking

00:16:50.480 in terms of the average.

00:16:52.240 Right?

00:16:52.840 On average,

00:16:53.680 things are pretty good

00:16:54.480 relative to where

00:16:56.000 they used to be,

00:16:56.680 right?

00:16:57.000 Lots of improvement needed.

00:16:59.060 But man,

00:16:59.800 you see something like this

00:17:00.840 and you say,

00:17:01.380 if any of this

00:17:01.960 is even close to true,

00:17:04.420 it does kind of shock me.

00:17:06.880 I am a little bit shocked.

00:17:09.180 So in that case,

00:17:10.300 the $137 million is fine.

00:17:13.380 You know,

00:17:13.660 but if the claims are true,

00:17:16.340 suddenly the amount of money

00:17:17.720 doesn't look so high anymore,

00:17:18.960 does it?

00:17:19.300 Because,

00:17:20.220 you know,

00:17:20.460 the reason is punitive.

00:17:21.540 It's not about

00:17:22.140 rewarding this guy.

00:17:24.000 It's just punitive.

00:17:26.320 All right.

00:17:27.280 CNN has turned on Facebook,

00:17:29.260 which is interesting

00:17:30.020 in itself

00:17:30.720 because,

00:17:31.580 you know,

00:17:31.780 you would imagine them both

00:17:32.920 being left-leaning

00:17:34.760 organizations.

00:17:36.720 But in a

00:17:37.520 opinion piece

00:17:38.640 by Cara

00:17:39.280 Alemo,

00:17:41.080 Alemo,

00:17:42.200 I wish people had

00:17:44.220 some way for me

00:17:46.120 to pronounce their names

00:17:46.820 correctly.

00:17:49.560 So here's what she said

00:17:50.880 in an opinion piece

00:17:51.840 on CNN.

00:17:52.520 And the fact that it's on CNN

00:17:53.700 seems important,

00:17:55.520 right?

00:17:56.760 She said,

00:17:57.680 thus the debate

00:17:58.420 we should be having

00:17:59.260 isn't about whether

00:18:00.500 Facebook knows

00:18:01.480 its product is harmful.

00:18:03.400 These facts

00:18:04.080 were established

00:18:04.860 by independent researchers

00:18:06.280 long ago.

00:18:08.020 So a CNN opinion piece

00:18:09.540 is offering

00:18:10.520 as an established fact

00:18:12.420 that even Facebook

00:18:13.640 would agree to

00:18:14.420 that independent researchers

00:18:16.420 say that Facebook

00:18:17.220 is harmful.

00:18:19.780 Just a statement.

00:18:20.760 It's just harmful.

00:18:24.440 And so she says,

00:18:25.820 rather,

00:18:26.120 the question we should

00:18:26.780 be asking ourselves

00:18:27.500 is why Americans

00:18:28.660 are still spending

00:18:30.000 so much time

00:18:30.760 of their lives

00:18:32.020 on it

00:18:32.520 when it's making them

00:18:33.780 unhappy

00:18:34.280 and divided.

00:18:35.120 So we know

00:18:37.720 that Facebook

00:18:38.320 is harmful.

00:18:40.060 Why are people

00:18:40.880 spending so much time

00:18:41.780 on it?

00:18:43.060 Now again,

00:18:43.800 the big story here

00:18:44.640 is just that Facebook

00:18:45.540 is reporting it

00:18:46.540 or not reporting it

00:18:47.680 but putting this

00:18:48.820 opinion piece

00:18:49.660 on their site.

00:18:51.380 So, you know,

00:18:52.940 the left is fractured.

00:18:54.120 Not only the progressives

00:18:55.240 versus the Pelosi types

00:18:57.360 but even the Facebooks

00:19:00.080 versus the CNNs now.

00:19:01.580 Not really on the same

00:19:02.480 side anymore.

00:19:03.500 So when Rasmussen

00:19:04.520 did that poll,

00:19:05.320 are we more

00:19:05.940 or less divided?

00:19:07.820 Interestingly,

00:19:08.600 we're more fractured.

00:19:09.580 I don't know

00:19:11.200 that we're more divided

00:19:12.260 but we're more fractured.

00:19:13.980 Does that make sense?

00:19:15.100 Instead of two teams,

00:19:17.160 it's more like,

00:19:18.040 you know,

00:19:18.420 four or six teams

00:19:19.620 or something different.

00:19:21.540 So I don't know

00:19:22.300 if that's more divided

00:19:23.140 or more fractured

00:19:24.160 or is that the same thing?

00:19:28.540 But, of course,

00:19:29.380 the real reason

00:19:29.880 that we use Facebook

00:19:31.160 so much

00:19:31.660 is that many of us

00:19:32.900 can't avoid it.

00:19:34.420 You know,

00:19:34.660 you need it for business.

00:19:36.320 And it's addictive.

00:19:37.860 It's designed to be addictive.

00:19:39.700 So, of course,

00:19:40.460 it's harmful.

00:19:41.180 And, of course,

00:19:41.620 we do it.

00:19:42.860 Same as cigarettes.

00:19:44.540 Same as any other addiction.

00:19:46.480 Why do we treat

00:19:47.220 internet addiction

00:19:48.100 different than,

00:19:49.160 say,

00:19:50.700 heroin addiction?

00:19:52.000 Why do we treat

00:19:52.820 them differently?

00:19:55.500 You know,

00:19:55.840 they're not the same,

00:19:56.740 of course,

00:19:57.360 but it feels like

00:19:59.120 the concept is similar.

00:20:01.220 You know,

00:20:01.700 I'm not entirely sure

00:20:02.940 that Instagram

00:20:03.580 in particular

00:20:04.380 will survive

00:20:05.380 at least in its

00:20:07.040 current form.

00:20:08.300 I think Instagram

00:20:08.980 in particular

00:20:09.700 seems like

00:20:10.280 the more dangerous

00:20:11.580 one, frankly.

00:20:13.580 So, we'll see.

00:20:16.500 New York teachers

00:20:17.620 protested,

00:20:19.080 many of them,

00:20:19.960 and they were

00:20:20.480 shouting,

00:20:21.580 F Joe Biden

00:20:22.460 and F Bill de Blasio.

00:20:25.580 So, thousands

00:20:26.300 of teachers

00:20:26.960 lost their job

00:20:27.980 because of the

00:20:28.560 vaccine mandate.

00:20:30.500 But, let's put

00:20:31.880 some context

00:20:32.520 on this.

00:20:33.760 Does everybody

00:20:34.200 like context?

00:20:34.880 I had some

00:20:37.500 people arguing

00:20:38.180 against context

00:20:40.060 today.

00:20:43.140 Her argument

00:20:44.060 was that

00:20:44.720 if I asked

00:20:45.440 for context,

00:20:47.320 I was trying

00:20:49.400 to brainwash

00:20:50.400 them

00:20:50.640 or try to

00:20:52.500 convince them

00:20:52.960 of something

00:20:53.360 bad,

00:20:54.300 to which I say,

00:20:56.280 hmm,

00:20:57.060 I don't know

00:20:58.060 a situation

00:20:58.640 in which context

00:20:59.620 makes things

00:21:00.240 worse.

00:21:03.160 Is there one?

00:21:03.920 If you're

00:21:05.820 trying to

00:21:06.280 accurately

00:21:06.920 understand the

00:21:07.680 situation,

00:21:08.780 is there a

00:21:09.280 situation where

00:21:09.920 context makes

00:21:10.920 it worse?

00:21:12.300 There were

00:21:12.760 actually people

00:21:13.360 pushing back

00:21:14.980 because I asked

00:21:16.420 for context.

00:21:17.740 I'll tell you

00:21:18.160 why in a second.

00:21:19.480 So, the context

00:21:20.480 I asked for

00:21:21.060 is, are there

00:21:22.680 any other

00:21:23.220 mandatory

00:21:23.740 vaccinations

00:21:24.520 that teachers

00:21:25.300 also need

00:21:26.120 to have?

00:21:27.720 Was that

00:21:28.140 a fair

00:21:28.400 question?

00:21:28.780 Is it a

00:21:30.380 fair question

00:21:31.740 for context

00:21:32.700 to know if

00:21:34.140 there are

00:21:34.440 other vaccinations

00:21:35.340 that are required

00:21:36.260 of the teachers?

00:21:38.920 Now, the

00:21:39.740 critics said,

00:21:41.200 Scott,

00:21:41.700 Scott, Scott,

00:21:42.500 this is so

00:21:43.540 unfair,

00:21:43.940 you're just

00:21:44.460 trying to

00:21:44.840 get people

00:21:45.260 vaccinated.

00:21:46.300 That's your

00:21:46.700 real agenda,

00:21:48.340 is to embarrass

00:21:49.500 these people

00:21:50.080 and get people

00:21:50.880 vaccinated.

00:21:52.360 No, no.

00:21:54.340 You can't

00:21:54.960 read my mind

00:21:55.640 and that's

00:21:55.960 not my secret

00:21:56.660 agenda.

00:21:57.660 I really

00:21:58.000 don't care

00:21:58.440 if people

00:21:58.780 get vaccinated,

00:21:59.840 as long as

00:22:00.260 I am, right?

00:22:01.500 I care about

00:22:02.000 myself.

00:22:05.860 But here's

00:22:07.380 what the

00:22:07.660 context told

00:22:08.420 me.

00:22:09.060 First of all,

00:22:09.580 do you know

00:22:09.880 the answer

00:22:10.220 to the question?

00:22:11.280 In the

00:22:11.520 comments,

00:22:12.280 give me your

00:22:13.080 answer because

00:22:13.760 I don't

00:22:14.380 think anybody

00:22:15.080 has really

00:22:16.680 looked into

00:22:17.100 it too

00:22:17.640 deeply.

00:22:18.540 But are

00:22:18.940 there other

00:22:19.400 vaccinations

00:22:19.920 that teachers

00:22:21.040 in the United

00:22:21.520 States,

00:22:22.020 that might

00:22:22.280 differ by

00:22:22.740 state,

00:22:23.640 that are

00:22:24.320 required to

00:22:25.160 have?

00:22:26.920 I'm seeing

00:22:27.320 some people

00:22:27.760 say plenty,

00:22:29.280 saying yeses.

00:22:30.580 The answer

00:22:31.300 is sort of

00:22:31.980 no.

00:22:33.380 The answer

00:22:34.060 is sort of

00:22:34.720 no, meaning

00:22:35.340 there's nothing

00:22:36.000 that's enforced.

00:22:38.000 Right?

00:22:38.440 So based on

00:22:39.140 the answers

00:22:39.640 that I got,

00:22:40.940 my current

00:22:41.540 understanding,

00:22:42.120 which I

00:22:42.560 might revise

00:22:43.140 if I get

00:22:43.780 some new

00:22:44.100 information.

00:22:44.980 But it

00:22:45.220 looks like

00:22:45.700 there's some

00:22:46.880 mild preferences

00:22:48.820 in some

00:22:49.440 places, but

00:22:50.160 nobody's really

00:22:50.760 checking.

00:22:51.340 I don't think

00:22:51.740 any teacher

00:22:52.280 ever lost

00:22:52.940 a job

00:22:53.480 before now

00:22:54.860 for a

00:22:56.080 lack of

00:22:56.480 vaccination.

00:22:57.700 Is that

00:22:57.920 true?

00:22:59.180 Is there

00:22:59.820 any teacher

00:23:00.780 who ever

00:23:01.260 couldn't get

00:23:01.820 hired or

00:23:02.240 lost a job

00:23:02.980 for a

00:23:04.020 different kind

00:23:04.620 of vaccination

00:23:05.280 recently?

00:23:07.340 I don't think

00:23:08.100 that's the

00:23:08.480 thing.

00:23:09.340 So here's

00:23:10.040 your context.

00:23:12.600 Required

00:23:13.120 forced

00:23:13.820 vaccinations

00:23:14.460 of teachers

00:23:15.140 is not

00:23:17.260 a thing.

00:23:18.880 So if

00:23:19.300 it's a

00:23:19.560 thing now,

00:23:20.060 it's a

00:23:20.320 thing for

00:23:20.620 the first

00:23:20.940 time.

00:23:22.960 So I

00:23:23.720 think there's

00:23:25.060 still a

00:23:25.420 little bit

00:23:25.720 of disagreement

00:23:26.160 on fact.

00:23:27.220 So I

00:23:27.460 think you'll

00:23:27.860 find that

00:23:28.380 in some

00:23:28.720 places it

00:23:29.360 looks like

00:23:29.840 it's a

00:23:30.140 requirement,

00:23:30.820 but it's

00:23:31.040 not enforced.

00:23:31.960 So in

00:23:32.380 effect,

00:23:32.780 it's not.

00:23:34.060 This is

00:23:34.500 enforced.

00:23:36.240 Yeah.

00:23:37.080 So when

00:23:37.860 I ask for

00:23:38.360 context,

00:23:38.940 this is

00:23:39.680 what people

00:23:40.120 said,

00:23:40.840 Scott,

00:23:41.480 you bastard.

00:23:42.840 You're

00:23:43.240 trying to

00:23:43.640 make this

00:23:44.560 vaccination

00:23:45.200 like the

00:23:46.340 others.

00:23:46.980 And you

00:23:47.400 know they're

00:23:47.820 not the

00:23:48.200 same.

00:23:49.240 Damn it.

00:23:49.700 You know

00:23:50.060 they're not

00:23:50.380 the same.

00:23:51.180 Because this

00:23:51.720 one was

00:23:52.660 a faster

00:23:53.900 pace and

00:23:54.600 it didn't

00:23:54.840 have as

00:23:55.140 much time

00:23:55.720 so we

00:23:56.040 don't know

00:23:56.320 the safety.

00:23:57.180 It's a

00:23:57.420 different

00:23:57.620 technology.

00:23:58.760 Scott,

00:23:59.260 you bastard.

00:24:00.740 Stop

00:24:01.220 saying that

00:24:01.840 this

00:24:02.100 vaccination

00:24:02.700 is in

00:24:03.280 any way,

00:24:04.320 in any

00:24:04.900 way,

00:24:06.100 equivalent,

00:24:07.540 similar to

00:24:08.260 or we

00:24:09.220 should make

00:24:09.560 any

00:24:09.760 decisions

00:24:10.140 based on

00:24:10.880 what the

00:24:12.580 other

00:24:12.760 vaccinations

00:24:13.320 did.

00:24:13.660 They're

00:24:13.760 just

00:24:13.960 different.

00:24:15.500 True.

00:24:17.540 Can I

00:24:18.160 agree with

00:24:18.540 you?

00:24:19.660 Am I

00:24:20.180 allowed to

00:24:20.640 agree with

00:24:21.040 my critics?

00:24:21.680 Of course

00:24:22.160 they're

00:24:22.320 different.

00:24:23.340 This is

00:24:23.740 why I

00:24:24.120 say don't

00:24:24.480 use

00:24:24.700 analogies

00:24:25.340 to make

00:24:25.700 decisions.

00:24:26.960 Because it's

00:24:27.620 just a

00:24:27.940 different

00:24:28.160 thing.

00:24:29.760 But can

00:24:31.060 context ever

00:24:31.900 be useful?

00:24:33.920 What did

00:24:34.540 the context

00:24:35.160 tell me

00:24:35.720 once people

00:24:36.760 said no?

00:24:37.340 There's

00:24:37.580 no other

00:24:38.080 example where

00:24:40.020 it's been

00:24:40.420 old fool?

00:24:42.160 You old

00:24:42.460 fool?

00:24:43.280 There's no

00:24:43.820 other example

00:24:44.620 where we've

00:24:45.860 required

00:24:46.260 vaccinations.

00:24:47.780 So did

00:24:49.180 my context

00:24:50.100 support the

00:24:52.160 idea you

00:24:52.700 should get

00:24:53.040 vaccinated or

00:24:53.880 the teacher

00:24:54.260 should?

00:24:54.880 Or did

00:24:55.300 the context

00:24:56.080 support the

00:24:57.320 idea that

00:24:57.800 they shouldn't?

00:24:59.600 It supports

00:25:00.340 the idea that

00:25:00.920 they shouldn't.

00:25:01.820 Because it's

00:25:02.400 a new

00:25:02.640 precedent.

00:25:03.760 So if you

00:25:04.160 look at the

00:25:04.540 old precedent,

00:25:05.200 it's like we

00:25:06.160 were pretty

00:25:06.600 laissez-faire,

00:25:08.140 sort of let

00:25:09.060 it go.

00:25:10.360 So this is

00:25:11.160 different.

00:25:12.200 And I think

00:25:12.960 that's worth

00:25:13.540 noting.

00:25:14.400 Because if

00:25:15.060 this was in

00:25:15.700 any way

00:25:16.260 similar to

00:25:17.740 the past,

00:25:18.520 you'd feel

00:25:18.980 different about

00:25:19.540 it.

00:25:21.160 Than if you

00:25:21.860 knew, well,

00:25:22.260 this is

00:25:22.500 brand new.

00:25:23.280 Whoa, whoa,

00:25:23.760 this is

00:25:24.160 brand new.

00:25:25.140 So when I

00:25:25.880 asked for the

00:25:26.360 context, I

00:25:27.440 didn't ask for

00:25:28.100 the context

00:25:28.700 because it

00:25:29.280 would help

00:25:29.600 my argument,

00:25:30.640 which I don't

00:25:31.180 have, because

00:25:32.440 I don't have

00:25:32.820 an argument.

00:25:33.820 You're

00:25:34.040 imagining that

00:25:34.720 I'm trying

00:25:35.060 to persuade

00:25:35.520 you, and

00:25:35.860 I'm not.

00:25:36.200 I'm just

00:25:36.380 trying to

00:25:36.660 understand it.

00:25:38.240 So the

00:25:38.800 context went

00:25:39.620 exactly the

00:25:40.340 opposite of

00:25:40.860 the way that

00:25:41.180 my critics

00:25:41.760 thought it

00:25:42.480 would.

00:25:43.420 You thought

00:25:43.900 that when I

00:25:44.320 asked for

00:25:44.620 the context,

00:25:45.400 it was going

00:25:45.760 to support

00:25:46.140 the idea

00:25:46.540 that they

00:25:46.780 should get

00:25:47.040 vaccinated.

00:25:48.020 It didn't.

00:25:49.180 It was the

00:25:49.560 opposite.

00:25:50.560 That's why

00:25:50.960 you asked

00:25:51.260 for context.

00:25:52.400 You asked

00:25:53.000 for context

00:25:53.600 because you

00:25:54.240 don't know

00:25:55.100 which way

00:25:55.720 it's going

00:25:56.020 to point.

00:25:57.200 And by

00:25:57.500 the way,

00:25:57.820 context doesn't

00:25:59.140 answer the

00:25:59.800 story, because

00:26:00.600 again, they're

00:26:01.100 different vaccinations.

00:26:02.640 So you can't

00:26:04.000 take the

00:26:04.340 context and

00:26:04.940 just say,

00:26:05.420 okay, now we

00:26:06.720 know the

00:26:06.980 context.

00:26:08.100 We're all

00:26:08.640 done.

00:26:09.020 It doesn't

00:26:09.320 work like

00:26:09.680 that.

00:26:10.240 But it's part

00:26:10.900 of the larger

00:26:11.400 story, right?

00:26:12.660 It's part of

00:26:13.320 how we feel

00:26:13.980 about it.

00:26:14.480 It's part of

00:26:15.000 what we've

00:26:17.100 accepted in the

00:26:17.880 past.

00:26:18.260 It's part of

00:26:18.720 the story.

00:26:19.120 So let's know

00:26:21.080 about it.

00:26:21.500 So I would

00:26:22.560 say that the

00:26:23.000 context does

00:26:24.040 support the

00:26:25.640 teachers not

00:26:26.380 getting vaccinated.

00:26:27.840 Doesn't mean

00:26:28.300 that's the

00:26:28.660 right answer.

00:26:29.980 Doesn't mean

00:26:30.520 it's the right

00:26:30.980 answer, but

00:26:31.580 the context

00:26:32.120 would support

00:26:32.660 that.

00:26:35.260 All right.

00:26:39.580 Let's see,

00:26:40.200 what else

00:26:40.420 do we

00:26:40.600 have to

00:26:40.740 go on?

00:26:41.680 Playboy made

00:26:42.380 some news by

00:26:43.160 putting a man

00:26:44.020 on the cover.

00:26:45.740 A male cover

00:26:47.160 star dressed

00:26:48.760 as a bunny.

00:26:50.180 I'm not sure

00:26:50.860 what the guy's

00:26:51.740 deal was if

00:26:52.540 he was, I

00:26:53.800 don't know

00:26:54.040 what his

00:26:54.300 sexual identification

00:26:55.440 was, but it

00:26:56.480 was a male

00:26:57.340 dressed in a

00:26:58.580 bunny outfit.

00:27:02.400 Now, what

00:27:03.000 do you think

00:27:03.320 of that as

00:27:04.180 a strategy?

00:27:06.000 Is that a

00:27:06.620 good strategy

00:27:07.160 for Playboy?

00:27:09.080 Most of you

00:27:09.800 say it's

00:27:10.180 stupid, right?

00:27:11.180 I think almost

00:27:11.800 every person

00:27:12.400 here is going

00:27:12.800 to say that's

00:27:13.240 dumb, they've

00:27:13.960 destroyed their

00:27:14.520 brand.

00:27:15.660 Let me give

00:27:16.320 you the

00:27:16.600 counter-argument.

00:27:18.560 Okay?

00:27:19.140 Because you

00:27:19.520 think there's

00:27:19.960 no counter-argument

00:27:20.840 you probably

00:27:22.400 think there's

00:27:23.020 no way

00:27:24.600 this is

00:27:25.360 smart for

00:27:26.300 Playboy,

00:27:26.880 right?

00:27:28.100 All right,

00:27:28.380 here's the

00:27:28.700 counter-argument.

00:27:29.560 It's pretty

00:27:29.920 good.

00:27:30.680 I think you'll

00:27:31.160 be surprised

00:27:31.660 how good the

00:27:32.120 counter-argument

00:27:32.640 is.

00:27:33.720 Number one,

00:27:35.160 could Playboy

00:27:35.860 stay in

00:27:36.360 business by

00:27:37.300 continuing to

00:27:38.260 print nude

00:27:40.020 pictures of

00:27:42.160 women?

00:27:43.920 No.

00:27:45.440 So can we

00:27:46.620 all agree with

00:27:47.160 this?

00:27:47.420 that the

00:27:48.300 internet

00:27:48.880 makes it

00:27:50.580 ridiculous to

00:27:51.680 imagine that

00:27:52.240 Playboy could

00:27:52.880 exist as a

00:27:54.300 magazine that's

00:27:55.540 primary purpose

00:27:56.440 is to show

00:27:57.060 naked women.

00:27:58.180 We all agree

00:27:58.840 that Playboy

00:27:59.560 could not

00:28:00.200 exist the

00:28:02.060 way it was,

00:28:02.760 right?

00:28:03.380 So that's the

00:28:03.900 starting point.

00:28:04.700 They had to

00:28:05.260 change.

00:28:06.740 Now, how could

00:28:07.420 they change?

00:28:08.500 One way they

00:28:09.240 could change

00:28:09.660 is by trying

00:28:10.320 to be more

00:28:11.720 provocative than

00:28:12.640 the internet.

00:28:13.100 Is that

00:28:14.180 possible?

00:28:15.560 Could Playboy

00:28:16.300 be more

00:28:17.220 sexy than

00:28:18.600 the internet?

00:28:19.680 Can they

00:28:20.260 get some

00:28:20.600 attention by

00:28:21.180 being as

00:28:21.980 sexy as

00:28:22.560 the internet,

00:28:23.380 meaning as

00:28:24.080 much X-rated

00:28:24.800 stuff, etc.?

00:28:25.780 No.

00:28:26.620 No.

00:28:26.840 There's no

00:28:27.980 niche there.

00:28:29.220 There's no

00:28:29.580 place to go.

00:28:31.180 So agree with

00:28:32.160 me first that

00:28:34.080 Playboy as a

00:28:35.340 vehicle for

00:28:36.200 showing pictures

00:28:37.240 of naked

00:28:37.720 women was

00:28:38.380 dead.

00:28:39.880 It might have

00:28:40.760 had a few

00:28:41.120 months left,

00:28:41.700 but it was

00:28:42.000 dead.

00:28:42.420 So take

00:28:44.420 for the

00:28:45.720 assumption that

00:28:46.420 they were

00:28:47.400 dead.

00:28:48.180 So they had

00:28:48.580 to do

00:28:48.800 something.

00:28:49.640 Here's my

00:28:50.140 argument.

00:28:51.320 Playboy has

00:28:52.060 always been

00:28:52.580 at least three

00:28:53.340 magazines in

00:28:54.200 one.

00:28:55.700 People don't

00:28:56.220 realize it

00:28:56.800 because you

00:28:57.080 think about

00:28:57.960 the nudity.

00:28:59.320 But the

00:28:59.640 other parts of

00:29:00.240 Playboy was

00:29:00.800 it was a

00:29:01.160 lifestyle magazine

00:29:02.400 and it was a

00:29:03.800 lifestyle of

00:29:04.620 people very

00:29:05.260 open-minded.

00:29:06.500 The people

00:29:07.000 who had

00:29:08.660 just extreme

00:29:10.540 open-mindedness

00:29:11.460 about

00:29:11.760 progressive

00:29:12.940 anything.

00:29:14.260 So Playboy

00:29:14.740 was always

00:29:15.240 the ultimate

00:29:15.820 left-leaning

00:29:16.980 socially

00:29:17.860 progressive

00:29:18.500 vehicle in

00:29:20.080 addition to

00:29:21.980 having naked

00:29:22.560 pictures.

00:29:23.360 The third

00:29:24.020 thing they

00:29:24.420 were was

00:29:24.920 fairly serious.

00:29:26.540 The Playboy

00:29:27.180 interview was

00:29:28.780 usually a big

00:29:29.460 thing.

00:29:29.880 Jimmy Carter

00:29:30.520 was in the

00:29:31.020 Playboy

00:29:31.300 interview.

00:29:32.880 A lot

00:29:33.180 of news

00:29:35.600 was broken

00:29:36.260 with the

00:29:36.720 Playboy

00:29:37.040 interviews.

00:29:37.900 So the

00:29:38.120 Playboy

00:29:38.420 interview was

00:29:38.900 almost its own

00:29:39.520 magazine.

00:29:39.920 It was

00:29:40.660 within this

00:29:41.280 Naked People

00:29:42.300 magazine but

00:29:43.000 it was like

00:29:43.800 its own

00:29:44.120 entity.

00:29:45.760 By the way

00:29:46.220 I was once

00:29:47.260 the subject

00:29:47.880 of the

00:29:48.280 Playboy

00:29:48.660 interview years

00:29:51.340 ago when

00:29:51.760 Dilbert was a

00:29:52.480 bigger deal.

00:29:53.800 And I have to

00:29:54.780 tell you that

00:29:55.260 the Playboy

00:29:56.360 journalist and

00:29:58.040 the way they

00:29:58.460 handled it and

00:29:59.180 the fact-checking

00:29:59.980 was one of the

00:30:01.360 finest

00:30:01.900 journalistic

00:30:03.980 experiences I've

00:30:05.120 had, like

00:30:06.880 legitimately

00:30:07.540 journalistically

00:30:09.380 high quality

00:30:10.860 was Playboy.

00:30:13.520 Now most

00:30:13.940 people, you

00:30:14.560 don't think of

00:30:15.080 that.

00:30:15.400 You don't

00:30:15.620 think of

00:30:16.000 Playboy as

00:30:16.580 being a high

00:30:17.660 level journalistic

00:30:18.820 entity but it

00:30:20.260 is.

00:30:20.560 It always has

00:30:21.020 been.

00:30:21.740 Well I'm not

00:30:22.140 sure about

00:30:22.540 currently but it

00:30:23.580 always has

00:30:23.960 been.

00:30:25.100 So they had

00:30:26.060 to change and

00:30:26.820 they couldn't

00:30:27.200 give more

00:30:27.640 nudity but it

00:30:28.780 was always a

00:30:29.300 magazine about

00:30:30.500 progressive stuff

00:30:31.480 and about pushing

00:30:32.660 the boundaries and

00:30:33.540 about political

00:30:34.380 stuff.

00:30:35.360 I think this

00:30:36.340 was a Hail Mary

00:30:37.180 pass.

00:30:38.580 Meaning that

00:30:39.360 Playboy has to

00:30:40.300 turn into

00:30:40.740 something else to

00:30:42.080 survive.

00:30:42.960 There's no

00:30:43.280 question about

00:30:43.800 that.

00:30:44.480 And the only

00:30:45.080 thing they could

00:30:45.600 turn into was

00:30:47.100 something closer to

00:30:48.180 the other two

00:30:48.840 things that they

00:30:49.520 did besides

00:30:50.340 nudity.

00:30:51.340 And the other

00:30:51.840 two things they

00:30:52.520 did was get

00:30:53.140 your attention

00:30:53.700 and be relevant

00:30:55.720 about socially

00:30:57.100 provocative things

00:30:59.180 that are on the

00:31:00.460 edge.

00:31:01.900 Will it work?

00:31:03.540 I wouldn't bet

00:31:04.560 on it.

00:31:05.980 But did they

00:31:06.900 have a better

00:31:07.520 play?

00:31:09.400 Right?

00:31:10.220 Did Playboy have

00:31:12.080 a better play?

00:31:14.380 I don't think

00:31:15.300 so.

00:31:16.260 I think this was

00:31:17.040 the best of

00:31:17.920 their bad

00:31:18.380 options and

00:31:19.780 they executed

00:31:21.160 it really well.

00:31:23.140 They executed

00:31:24.400 this really well.

00:31:26.220 Why?

00:31:26.900 Because we're

00:31:27.260 talking about it.

00:31:28.720 We're talking

00:31:29.240 about it.

00:31:29.880 Suddenly Playboy

00:31:31.380 became relevant

00:31:33.220 the moment it

00:31:34.920 pissed you off.

00:31:36.360 As soon as you

00:31:37.120 were mad about

00:31:37.940 that cover,

00:31:38.760 what's happening

00:31:40.500 with all of my

00:31:41.440 traditions and

00:31:43.000 all that?

00:31:43.940 As soon as you

00:31:44.620 got mad about it

00:31:45.440 and thought they

00:31:45.940 were killing

00:31:46.300 themselves and

00:31:47.120 you get all

00:31:48.240 whatever you

00:31:49.140 thought about it,

00:31:49.940 it worked.

00:31:51.600 So Playboy

00:31:52.280 succeeded.

00:31:54.920 They succeeded

00:31:55.840 in pushing

00:31:56.500 themselves right

00:31:57.200 into the front

00:31:57.940 of a very,

00:32:00.140 let's say,

00:32:01.600 energy-filled

00:32:02.620 discussion about

00:32:04.140 gender and

00:32:05.400 sexuality and

00:32:06.220 stuff.

00:32:06.800 And they became

00:32:07.540 relevant by

00:32:09.460 making you a

00:32:10.200 little bit angry

00:32:10.840 or disturbed or

00:32:12.640 whatever it did

00:32:13.200 to you.

00:32:14.200 So that's my

00:32:15.020 argument.

00:32:15.840 My argument is

00:32:16.520 not that it will

00:32:17.140 work, but it

00:32:19.080 was their best

00:32:19.660 play and they

00:32:20.880 executed it well.

00:32:23.240 Disagreements?

00:32:24.120 In the comments.

00:32:25.640 Disagree?

00:32:28.240 I think I sold

00:32:29.120 you on that.

00:32:30.580 It looks like I

00:32:31.180 sold you on that.

00:32:32.100 Okay.

00:32:33.420 Let's talk about

00:32:34.420 China.

00:32:37.020 You remember

00:32:37.840 I gave Trump

00:32:39.440 credit, as many

00:32:40.760 did, for

00:32:41.840 negotiating a

00:32:42.520 trade deal with

00:32:43.640 China and

00:32:44.260 pushing hard and

00:32:45.360 there was all

00:32:46.200 that trade war

00:32:47.640 and stuff, but

00:32:48.240 at least he got

00:32:48.760 a good deal out

00:32:49.440 of it and

00:32:49.800 China was going

00:32:50.400 to buy a

00:32:50.840 bunch of our

00:32:51.580 farm goods,

00:32:52.400 et cetera.

00:32:53.720 And then they

00:32:54.460 just didn't.

00:32:57.320 That's what

00:32:57.820 happens when you

00:32:58.380 make a deal

00:32:58.920 with China.

00:33:00.140 You make a deal

00:33:01.060 and then they

00:33:01.580 just don't do

00:33:02.780 their part.

00:33:04.460 Why?

00:33:05.320 I don't know.

00:33:06.160 It doesn't

00:33:06.480 matter.

00:33:07.720 I'm sure they

00:33:08.340 would have found

00:33:08.720 some reason to

00:33:09.440 not do it.

00:33:10.700 They just

00:33:11.020 didn't do it.

00:33:12.560 So now Biden's

00:33:13.280 going to push

00:33:13.980 back.

00:33:15.260 So do we

00:33:16.120 give Trump a

00:33:17.420 win for

00:33:18.420 negotiating a

00:33:19.340 trade deal?

00:33:20.320 Well, maybe

00:33:22.100 only in the sense

00:33:23.240 that it exposed

00:33:24.260 China for what

00:33:25.200 it is.

00:33:26.760 So you had

00:33:27.560 to at least

00:33:28.400 make them

00:33:28.820 agree to a

00:33:29.460 deal and

00:33:31.180 then whether

00:33:31.680 they lived up

00:33:33.600 to the deal

00:33:34.000 is a second

00:33:34.560 question.

00:33:35.700 But I think

00:33:36.140 Trump's instinct

00:33:37.260 to get them

00:33:37.880 to agree to a

00:33:38.800 deal was right

00:33:39.460 and now we

00:33:40.820 can observe

00:33:41.260 that we can't

00:33:41.860 deal with them

00:33:42.320 because they

00:33:43.040 just didn't

00:33:43.380 keep their

00:33:43.720 deal.

00:33:44.600 Now I'm

00:33:44.900 sure if we

00:33:45.340 talked to

00:33:45.680 China they'd

00:33:46.120 have a

00:33:46.360 different opinion

00:33:46.880 of what's

00:33:47.440 going on here.

00:33:48.560 Probably would

00:33:49.200 say we didn't

00:33:49.740 do our part

00:33:50.280 of the deal

00:33:50.660 so maybe part

00:33:51.440 of this story

00:33:51.900 is missing

00:33:52.340 if we're

00:33:52.680 being fair.

00:33:53.620 There's

00:33:53.780 probably

00:33:53.980 something

00:33:54.280 missing in

00:33:54.780 the story.

00:33:56.140 But we

00:33:58.180 certainly didn't

00:33:59.560 get a good

00:33:59.940 outcome.

00:34:01.380 Now this

00:34:02.820 again plays

00:34:04.960 into the

00:34:05.900 notion here

00:34:07.700 that China

00:34:08.740 is very

00:34:09.220 unsafe for

00:34:09.880 business.

00:34:10.520 Not just

00:34:11.200 commercial

00:34:12.060 business but

00:34:12.840 also political

00:34:15.040 deals.

00:34:16.400 They won't

00:34:17.780 keep a deal.

00:34:18.260 If China

00:34:19.640 won't keep

00:34:20.480 a deal

00:34:20.900 you just

00:34:22.320 can't deal

00:34:22.740 with them.

00:34:23.560 You can't

00:34:23.960 deal with

00:34:24.220 them politically.

00:34:24.900 You can't

00:34:25.160 deal with

00:34:25.460 them commercially.

00:34:26.800 They are

00:34:27.380 unsafe for

00:34:28.740 business.

00:34:29.860 We also

00:34:30.540 have some

00:34:30.860 reports also

00:34:32.200 on CNN

00:34:33.420 about some

00:34:36.120 whistleblowers

00:34:36.820 or I guess

00:34:37.520 some people

00:34:38.540 who came

00:34:39.040 out of the

00:34:40.340 China system.

00:34:41.820 One Uyghur

00:34:42.520 and one

00:34:43.040 police officer

00:34:44.100 who apparently

00:34:45.440 was ordered

00:34:45.980 to torture

00:34:46.540 them.

00:34:47.820 And I

00:34:48.020 guess the

00:34:48.380 way that

00:34:48.720 the Uyghurs

00:34:49.180 are picked

00:34:49.580 up is that

00:34:50.140 they literally

00:34:50.600 put a black

00:34:51.300 hood over

00:34:51.740 their heads

00:34:52.300 and they

00:34:53.980 take them

00:34:54.560 away and

00:34:55.800 they beat

00:34:56.360 them until

00:34:57.060 they confess

00:34:59.860 to things

00:35:00.540 that they're

00:35:00.920 not guilty

00:35:01.400 of.

00:35:02.540 And this

00:35:03.120 is men

00:35:03.520 and women

00:35:04.000 and all

00:35:05.760 of the

00:35:06.100 suspects

00:35:06.660 apparently

00:35:07.240 get raped.

00:35:09.780 Men and

00:35:10.480 women.

00:35:12.140 Let me

00:35:12.720 say that

00:35:13.020 again.

00:35:14.520 There's

00:35:14.840 some

00:35:15.020 suggestion.

00:35:15.640 Now of

00:35:15.860 course we

00:35:16.240 don't know

00:35:16.560 if the

00:35:16.760 reporting

00:35:17.120 is correct.

00:35:18.600 I mean

00:35:18.940 this is the

00:35:19.800 sort of

00:35:20.040 thing you

00:35:20.360 would expect

00:35:21.000 people to

00:35:21.620 lie about.

00:35:23.560 So let

00:35:24.140 me say

00:35:24.360 this.

00:35:25.080 The reason

00:35:25.680 that we

00:35:25.980 attacked Iraq

00:35:26.820 and the

00:35:27.100 weapons of

00:35:27.540 mass destruction

00:35:28.200 we thought

00:35:28.680 were there

00:35:29.000 is that

00:35:29.380 somebody had

00:35:30.520 a reason

00:35:30.880 to lie

00:35:31.480 to get

00:35:32.340 us to

00:35:32.600 attack

00:35:32.880 Iraq.

00:35:34.280 So when

00:35:35.020 you see

00:35:35.280 a story

00:35:35.660 like this

00:35:36.260 you've

00:35:36.760 got to

00:35:37.140 say

00:35:37.500 historically

00:35:38.300 these

00:35:38.780 whistleblowers

00:35:39.580 of this

00:35:41.480 type

00:35:41.840 are lying.

00:35:43.020 historically

00:35:45.340 this kind

00:35:47.320 of story

00:35:47.660 would not

00:35:48.000 be true.

00:35:50.020 Anybody

00:35:50.460 disagree

00:35:50.800 with that?

00:35:52.480 Would you

00:35:53.040 say that

00:35:53.460 historically

00:35:54.080 the

00:35:55.100 whistleblower

00:35:55.800 who says

00:35:56.220 we get

00:35:56.700 tortured

00:35:57.040 every day

00:35:57.620 is usually

00:35:58.800 not true?

00:36:00.340 Now that

00:36:00.640 doesn't mean

00:36:00.980 there's no

00:36:01.340 torture.

00:36:02.060 I'm sure

00:36:02.300 there is.

00:36:03.460 But don't

00:36:04.040 you think

00:36:04.340 it's a

00:36:04.680 little bit

00:36:05.020 of hyperbole?

00:36:06.340 A little

00:36:06.880 bit?

00:36:07.700 Because this

00:36:08.460 person has

00:36:09.020 a great

00:36:09.500 incentive to

00:36:10.260 make it

00:36:10.680 sound worse

00:36:11.140 than it

00:36:11.420 is.

00:36:12.260 Now however

00:36:12.720 bad it

00:36:13.120 is,

00:36:13.500 it's a

00:36:15.000 10 and

00:36:15.340 a 10.

00:36:16.480 But the

00:36:17.680 whistleblower

00:36:18.140 is going

00:36:18.360 to make

00:36:18.580 it sound

00:36:18.860 like a

00:36:19.180 15.

00:36:20.540 So let

00:36:21.240 me not

00:36:21.520 minimize it.

00:36:22.540 On a

00:36:22.820 scale of

00:36:23.180 1 to

00:36:23.480 10,

00:36:23.920 it's a

00:36:24.180 10.

00:36:25.800 It's a

00:36:26.380 10.

00:36:27.860 But the

00:36:28.460 whistleblower

00:36:28.860 is going

00:36:29.080 to make

00:36:29.300 it look

00:36:29.560 like a

00:36:29.880 15.

00:36:30.720 That

00:36:30.940 would be

00:36:31.200 normal

00:36:31.600 to what

00:36:32.060 you

00:36:32.180 expect.

00:36:32.960 So just

00:36:33.340 keep that

00:36:33.720 in mind

00:36:34.100 that there's

00:36:35.120 an incentive

00:36:35.700 to at

00:36:38.240 least shade

00:36:38.800 things a

00:36:39.180 little bit.

00:36:40.320 But

00:36:40.680 the story

00:36:41.540 so far

00:36:42.020 is that

00:36:42.360 the police

00:36:43.080 use electric

00:36:43.820 batons on

00:36:44.660 the Uyghurs.

00:36:45.620 They put a

00:36:46.220 black hood

00:36:46.700 on them

00:36:47.060 when they

00:36:47.380 pick them

00:36:47.760 up in

00:36:48.020 the street.

00:36:48.780 They take

00:36:49.380 them back.

00:36:49.920 They beat

00:36:50.380 them badly

00:36:51.140 and often

00:36:52.020 and often.

00:36:55.520 And then

00:36:56.300 one of the

00:36:56.900 men reported

00:36:58.620 that the

00:37:00.060 guards forced

00:37:01.160 the other

00:37:01.880 prisoners to

00:37:03.120 rape him.

00:37:05.140 Gang rape

00:37:05.700 him,

00:37:05.940 apparently.

00:37:07.120 And that

00:37:07.500 that was

00:37:07.780 normal.

00:37:10.680 Now,

00:37:11.520 I don't

00:37:12.220 know about

00:37:12.520 that last

00:37:12.940 part.

00:37:13.880 I'm going

00:37:14.140 to say

00:37:14.360 that the

00:37:14.700 last part,

00:37:16.040 the guy

00:37:16.640 saying it

00:37:17.080 sounded

00:37:17.320 credible,

00:37:18.040 and if

00:37:18.340 it did

00:37:18.680 happen,

00:37:19.100 it's

00:37:19.240 horrible,

00:37:20.560 et cetera.

00:37:21.940 I don't

00:37:22.480 know if I

00:37:22.860 could go

00:37:23.120 that far.

00:37:23.700 But

00:37:23.840 whatever it

00:37:24.260 is,

00:37:24.460 it's a

00:37:24.740 10 out

00:37:25.040 of 10.

00:37:25.880 So bad

00:37:26.640 stuff's

00:37:27.000 happening

00:37:27.260 there.

00:37:32.140 And

00:37:32.580 again,

00:37:34.140 China is

00:37:36.700 unsafe for

00:37:37.220 business.

00:37:37.520 Now,

00:37:38.100 I did

00:37:38.280 get a

00:37:38.680 lengthy

00:37:39.120 message

00:37:39.560 from one

00:37:40.480 of my

00:37:40.700 contacts

00:37:41.120 on

00:37:41.480 LinkedIn,

00:37:43.600 and if

00:37:44.160 you're

00:37:44.320 watching

00:37:44.580 right now,

00:37:45.020 I won't

00:37:45.220 mention

00:37:45.460 your name,

00:37:46.440 but that

00:37:48.100 my context

00:37:48.960 is lacking

00:37:50.160 on China.

00:37:51.680 For

00:37:52.240 example,

00:37:53.520 here's the

00:37:53.980 counterargument,

00:37:55.400 that China's

00:37:56.120 aggressiveness

00:37:57.040 in the

00:37:57.760 South China

00:37:58.800 Sea is

00:37:59.900 actually

00:38:00.280 mostly

00:38:00.760 defensive,

00:38:01.880 because they're

00:38:03.200 putting up a

00:38:03.800 defense against

00:38:04.500 the, you know,

00:38:05.300 I don't know,

00:38:06.100 U.S.

00:38:06.620 Fifth Fleet

00:38:07.220 or something,

00:38:08.080 because they

00:38:08.900 don't want to

00:38:09.260 be, they

00:38:11.300 don't ever

00:38:11.660 want to be

00:38:12.060 locked into

00:38:12.860 their own

00:38:13.260 territory where

00:38:14.000 they can't

00:38:14.440 do trade.

00:38:15.520 And indeed,

00:38:16.240 having the

00:38:16.720 Belt and

00:38:17.080 Road Initiative

00:38:17.700 would give

00:38:18.220 them, you

00:38:19.120 know, some

00:38:19.380 diversification

00:38:20.260 of commercial

00:38:22.380 outlets, so

00:38:23.840 they wouldn't

00:38:24.220 need exclusively

00:38:25.700 the ocean,

00:38:26.660 and they'd have

00:38:27.040 an option,

00:38:27.580 et cetera.

00:38:28.360 Do you believe

00:38:28.880 any of that?

00:38:30.820 To me, I'm

00:38:31.820 not sure there's

00:38:32.480 such a difference

00:38:33.220 between a

00:38:33.840 defensive act

00:38:34.760 and an

00:38:35.160 offensive act.

00:38:36.620 I feel like

00:38:37.400 that distinction

00:38:38.100 is a little

00:38:38.900 bit artificial.

00:38:40.500 Don't you?

00:38:41.500 There we go.

00:38:42.420 Aggressive

00:38:42.840 defense.

00:38:44.220 Yeah.

00:38:44.680 Being aggressively

00:38:45.720 defensive looks a

00:38:46.860 lot like

00:38:47.260 offensiveness.

00:38:48.680 And we

00:38:49.320 certainly know

00:38:49.920 that the

00:38:50.520 Chinese government

00:38:52.520 has some

00:38:53.660 ambitions about

00:38:54.440 controlling as

00:38:55.300 much of the

00:38:55.760 world as they

00:38:56.340 can.

00:38:57.100 Same as we

00:38:57.640 do, right?

00:38:59.080 Every superpower

00:39:00.000 wants to control

00:39:00.840 as much as they

00:39:01.520 can.

00:39:02.580 Why wouldn't

00:39:03.040 you?

00:39:03.720 I mean, so do

00:39:04.400 you.

00:39:04.580 Don't you

00:39:05.180 want to

00:39:05.520 control as

00:39:06.060 much of

00:39:06.380 your life

00:39:06.760 as you

00:39:07.020 can?

00:39:07.880 So it's

00:39:08.620 pretty natural

00:39:09.480 that China

00:39:09.900 would be

00:39:10.200 trying to

00:39:10.560 control as

00:39:11.060 much as

00:39:11.400 they can.

00:39:12.420 But do

00:39:12.780 they have a

00:39:13.340 defensive

00:39:13.880 incentive

00:39:14.600 too?

00:39:15.420 Sure.

00:39:16.600 Now, apparently

00:39:17.220 also the

00:39:18.020 flyovers over

00:39:19.580 Taiwan were,

00:39:21.300 I think,

00:39:21.980 key to some

00:39:22.760 holiday or

00:39:23.360 something.

00:39:24.260 But that

00:39:24.640 doesn't really

00:39:25.520 make it

00:39:26.940 better.

00:39:27.200 So just

00:39:30.060 be aware

00:39:30.580 that there

00:39:31.160 is one

00:39:33.560 point in

00:39:34.020 view that

00:39:34.780 China's

00:39:35.240 actions are

00:39:35.800 a little

00:39:36.060 bit more

00:39:36.440 defensive than

00:39:37.260 they look.

00:39:38.500 But I'm

00:39:38.900 not buying

00:39:39.360 it.

00:39:40.680 I definitely

00:39:41.500 think that

00:39:41.920 they have a

00:39:42.260 defensive

00:39:42.640 motivation,

00:39:44.980 as everyone

00:39:45.540 does.

00:39:46.800 But I feel

00:39:47.580 like all of

00:39:48.260 their defense

00:39:48.760 has an

00:39:49.380 offensive

00:39:49.980 secondary

00:39:51.320 purpose.

00:39:52.760 So that's

00:39:53.280 what it looks

00:39:53.640 like.

00:39:54.120 And it

00:39:54.460 should.

00:39:55.200 I mean,

00:39:55.480 that would be

00:39:56.120 the rational

00:39:56.580 thing to do.

00:39:57.200 Why would

00:39:58.460 you have

00:39:58.680 something that's

00:39:59.180 purely defensive

00:39:59.960 when it

00:40:00.560 could be

00:40:01.000 both?

00:40:06.120 Here's a

00:40:07.120 question for

00:40:08.080 you that's

00:40:08.500 kind of

00:40:08.880 weird.

00:40:10.120 So on

00:40:10.980 Twitter,

00:40:11.480 Twitter user

00:40:12.180 Christopher Hill

00:40:13.140 noticed this,

00:40:14.400 and I guess

00:40:15.700 others noticed

00:40:16.620 it too.

00:40:17.300 But did you

00:40:17.780 know that

00:40:18.200 Biden's

00:40:18.980 Build Back

00:40:20.020 Better

00:40:20.360 slogan is

00:40:21.880 being used

00:40:22.540 in Canada

00:40:23.220 and Great

00:40:23.900 Britain?

00:40:24.120 Did you

00:40:25.880 know that?

00:40:27.200 I guess

00:40:29.120 Boris Johnson

00:40:29.860 uses it

00:40:30.620 and Trudeau

00:40:33.240 uses it

00:40:33.860 in Canada?

00:40:35.360 They all

00:40:36.160 use Build

00:40:36.640 Back

00:40:36.860 Better?

00:40:42.640 What's that

00:40:43.340 telling you?

00:40:46.220 I've never

00:40:46.960 seen that

00:40:47.380 happen before.

00:40:48.580 Have you?

00:40:49.320 Because it

00:40:49.760 feels like it

00:40:50.300 would be so

00:40:50.780 obvious that

00:40:51.640 you're cribbing

00:40:52.860 somebody's

00:40:53.320 slogan that

00:40:53.860 you wouldn't

00:40:54.180 do it.

00:40:59.360 Pelosi

00:40:59.840 called it

00:41:00.320 Obama's

00:41:01.020 Build Back

00:41:01.480 Better.

00:41:04.220 It's a

00:41:04.880 New World

00:41:05.300 Order

00:41:05.600 slogan.

00:41:09.040 I'm not

00:41:10.020 so much

00:41:10.820 into the

00:41:11.180 New World

00:41:11.560 Order

00:41:11.960 conspiracy

00:41:13.140 stuff,

00:41:14.300 but it

00:41:15.280 is a weird

00:41:15.680 coincidence

00:41:16.180 that it

00:41:17.320 doesn't have

00:41:17.720 an explanation

00:41:18.400 that I can

00:41:19.140 think of,

00:41:19.760 because it

00:41:20.180 isn't so

00:41:20.760 clever,

00:41:21.160 is it?

00:41:22.960 Now,

00:41:23.420 I will

00:41:23.640 give it

00:41:23.980 one benefit.

00:41:26.960 And I

00:41:27.140 don't think

00:41:27.420 it's like,

00:41:28.080 does it feel

00:41:28.940 like the

00:41:29.820 public is

00:41:30.480 saying Build

00:41:31.020 Back

00:41:31.260 Better the

00:41:31.740 same way

00:41:32.120 they were

00:41:32.400 saying MAGA

00:41:33.120 and Make

00:41:33.760 America

00:41:34.080 Great Again?

00:41:35.040 The genius

00:41:35.800 of Trump's

00:41:37.640 slogan making

00:41:38.880 is that people

00:41:39.820 would repeat

00:41:40.420 it,

00:41:40.760 because they

00:41:41.600 liked it.

00:41:42.800 Have you

00:41:43.100 ever heard

00:41:43.580 a Democrat

00:41:44.340 who proudly

00:41:45.160 says,

00:41:45.820 Build Back

00:41:46.240 Better?

00:41:47.120 I mean,

00:41:47.440 except for

00:41:47.860 the professional

00:41:48.440 politicians.

00:41:50.000 Do you see

00:41:50.400 it on Twitter?

00:41:52.100 Do you see

00:41:52.780 a lot of

00:41:53.260 just Biden

00:41:53.920 supporters

00:41:54.420 saying,

00:41:55.720 Build Back

00:41:56.060 Better?

00:41:57.620 Not really,

00:41:58.540 right?

00:42:00.680 It's,

00:42:01.860 I don't

00:42:02.500 know how

00:42:02.740 that slogan

00:42:03.220 became so

00:42:03.820 popular when

00:42:04.480 the public

00:42:04.860 doesn't care

00:42:05.360 about it

00:42:05.740 at all.

00:42:06.580 It's only

00:42:06.980 the politicians.

00:42:08.440 So there's

00:42:08.760 something weird

00:42:09.340 going on there,

00:42:09.940 we just

00:42:10.200 don't know

00:42:10.480 what it is.

00:42:13.820 Adam

00:42:14.300 Dopamine,

00:42:15.840 it's not

00:42:16.560 his real

00:42:16.900 name,

00:42:17.580 on Twitter,

00:42:19.000 asks,

00:42:19.940 why are

00:42:20.400 passenger

00:42:22.240 planes not

00:42:23.100 spreading

00:42:23.460 COVID?

00:42:24.400 So you

00:42:24.920 pack all

00:42:25.360 these people

00:42:25.780 in the

00:42:26.180 passenger

00:42:26.660 plane,

00:42:27.840 and we

00:42:28.160 know,

00:42:28.500 of course,

00:42:28.780 now that

00:42:29.200 just being

00:42:29.700 vaccinated

00:42:30.260 isn't enough

00:42:31.260 to prevent

00:42:32.500 COVID spread.

00:42:35.400 Why are

00:42:36.220 airplanes not

00:42:37.540 being grounded?

00:42:38.300 Why are we

00:42:40.280 not hearing

00:42:40.780 stories about,

00:42:41.820 well,

00:42:42.380 yeah,

00:42:42.600 we've got to

00:42:43.060 fly,

00:42:43.580 but yeah,

00:42:44.060 I have to

00:42:44.400 admit,

00:42:45.340 getting a lot

00:42:45.800 of infections.

00:42:46.440 We don't

00:42:47.520 want to

00:42:47.760 close the

00:42:48.180 airlines,

00:42:48.980 even though

00:42:49.760 we're getting

00:42:50.060 a lot of

00:42:50.440 infections.

00:42:51.840 I think it's

00:42:52.500 not happening,

00:42:53.160 right?

00:42:54.760 It's just

00:42:55.380 not happening.

00:42:57.500 So the

00:42:58.300 first question

00:42:58.860 is,

00:42:59.160 is it because

00:42:59.700 of the

00:43:00.100 filters,

00:43:00.900 the airflow?

00:43:01.600 Airplanes are

00:43:02.540 sensationally

00:43:03.540 well designed

00:43:04.380 in terms of

00:43:05.460 airflow.

00:43:05.860 They have to

00:43:06.240 be.

00:43:07.420 But here's

00:43:07.960 my counterpoint.

00:43:08.860 I tweeted

00:43:09.200 it and then I

00:43:09.780 untweeted it

00:43:10.400 after I thought

00:43:11.000 for a second.

00:43:11.860 Here's why I

00:43:12.460 untweeted it.

00:43:13.240 How many

00:43:15.560 infections are

00:43:16.120 we getting

00:43:16.340 from buses?

00:43:18.520 Right?

00:43:19.480 How many

00:43:19.960 infections do

00:43:20.660 we get from

00:43:21.280 subways?

00:43:23.940 How about

00:43:24.500 cars?

00:43:27.060 I feel like

00:43:27.940 it's sort

00:43:29.060 of none,

00:43:29.580 right?

00:43:30.840 Ubers?

00:43:31.660 Yeah,

00:43:31.880 Ubers.

00:43:33.000 How many

00:43:33.500 Ubers are

00:43:34.080 giving people

00:43:34.680 COVID?

00:43:37.000 What is

00:43:38.000 going on

00:43:38.620 in elevators?

00:43:39.980 Now,

00:43:40.260 elevators,

00:43:40.780 you're not in

00:43:41.140 there for very

00:43:41.680 long,

00:43:42.000 so maybe that

00:43:42.740 makes more

00:43:43.160 sense.

00:43:44.040 But I

00:43:44.920 feel as

00:43:45.440 if we

00:43:47.540 really don't

00:43:48.140 know how

00:43:48.520 this stuff

00:43:49.000 spreads still.

00:43:51.020 Am I

00:43:51.600 wrong?

00:43:53.100 Because we

00:43:54.340 should know

00:43:54.920 exactly where

00:43:56.480 people are

00:43:56.940 getting it by

00:43:57.480 now.

00:43:57.980 Because people

00:43:58.380 can kind

00:43:58.800 of, you

00:43:59.580 know,

00:43:59.880 they can

00:44:00.600 put together

00:44:01.640 where they

00:44:02.460 were and

00:44:03.000 who got

00:44:03.380 it in

00:44:03.920 enough

00:44:04.440 cases,

00:44:05.280 not every

00:44:05.800 case,

00:44:06.460 but in

00:44:06.800 enough

00:44:07.000 cases you

00:44:07.540 know where

00:44:07.840 you got

00:44:08.200 it.

00:44:09.300 That we

00:44:09.660 should know

00:44:10.120 by now

00:44:10.540 where people

00:44:11.200 are getting

00:44:11.600 it.

00:44:12.240 Why do

00:44:12.540 you think

00:44:12.760 you don't

00:44:13.080 know that?

00:44:14.300 Why do

00:44:14.660 you think

00:44:14.940 you as

00:44:15.360 a member

00:44:15.660 of the

00:44:15.860 public,

00:44:16.260 who is

00:44:16.420 really paying

00:44:16.880 attention,

00:44:17.700 because it

00:44:18.200 matters to

00:44:18.800 your daily

00:44:19.160 life,

00:44:19.760 you're really

00:44:20.220 paying attention.

00:44:21.440 You don't

00:44:21.960 know,

00:44:23.140 as of right

00:44:24.080 now,

00:44:24.560 given the

00:44:25.220 vaccination

00:44:25.580 status of

00:44:26.460 the country,

00:44:27.280 you don't

00:44:27.740 know where

00:44:28.120 people are

00:44:28.520 getting it,

00:44:28.940 do you?

00:44:30.220 Why not?

00:44:31.880 It's got to

00:44:32.700 be available,

00:44:33.540 right?

00:44:34.440 Somehow,

00:44:36.000 somebody's

00:44:36.440 studying this.

00:44:37.760 Somebody is

00:44:38.760 studying people

00:44:39.400 with COVID

00:44:39.880 and saying,

00:44:40.460 okay,

00:44:40.760 if you

00:44:41.180 know where

00:44:42.420 you were

00:44:42.700 infected,

00:44:43.220 what's your

00:44:43.500 best guess?

00:44:45.060 We kind

00:44:45.540 of know

00:44:45.840 that by

00:44:46.240 now,

00:44:46.500 don't we?

00:44:47.400 And

00:44:47.600 whatever it

00:44:48.100 was before

00:44:48.900 vaccinations,

00:44:50.060 it might be

00:44:50.580 different now.

00:44:51.600 It could

00:44:51.980 be that the

00:44:52.780 place we

00:44:53.240 get it now

00:44:53.680 is a

00:44:53.960 different way

00:44:54.440 and a

00:44:54.680 different

00:44:54.820 place.

00:44:56.200 Let me

00:44:56.760 give you

00:44:57.160 a provocative

00:44:58.140 thought.

00:45:02.200 Is it a

00:45:02.920 sexually

00:45:03.300 transmitted

00:45:03.960 disease now?

00:45:07.040 Think about

00:45:07.860 it.

00:45:08.740 If you're

00:45:09.740 not getting

00:45:10.160 it on the

00:45:10.580 plane and

00:45:11.680 you're not

00:45:12.020 getting it

00:45:12.380 in the

00:45:12.580 classroom,

00:45:13.760 you're not

00:45:14.220 getting it

00:45:14.580 at work,

00:45:15.300 and I

00:45:15.580 don't know

00:45:15.820 if that's

00:45:16.160 true because

00:45:16.880 we have a

00:45:17.320 lack of

00:45:17.780 data,

00:45:18.600 right?

00:45:19.480 Where are

00:45:19.960 people getting

00:45:20.460 it?

00:45:23.280 Sex?

00:45:24.620 Because I

00:45:25.080 feel like

00:45:25.580 if you're

00:45:26.800 vaccinated,

00:45:28.220 you've got to

00:45:28.840 slobber all

00:45:29.540 over somebody

00:45:30.180 to give it

00:45:30.640 to them,

00:45:30.900 don't you?

00:45:32.240 I'm just

00:45:32.880 speculating.

00:45:34.180 Nothing I

00:45:34.760 say now should

00:45:35.340 be taken as

00:45:35.940 any kind of

00:45:36.440 a fact,

00:45:37.540 right?

00:45:38.420 But I

00:45:38.900 wonder if

00:45:39.340 we get to

00:45:39.780 the point,

00:45:40.760 let's say

00:45:41.280 just about

00:45:41.840 everybody gets

00:45:42.340 vaccinated.

00:45:43.380 Let's say

00:45:43.740 we get to

00:45:44.040 90%.

00:45:44.680 And let's

00:45:46.820 say that

00:45:47.220 the vaccination

00:45:47.720 reduces the

00:45:48.660 amount of

00:45:49.020 viral load

00:45:49.680 so that

00:45:50.740 you don't

00:45:51.640 give it to

00:45:52.060 people so

00:45:52.500 much just

00:45:52.920 by talking

00:45:53.460 or just

00:45:54.440 by being

00:45:54.800 in the

00:45:55.080 room.

00:45:55.820 How would

00:45:56.320 you give

00:45:56.620 it to

00:45:56.820 people if

00:45:57.800 it's a

00:45:58.140 lower

00:45:58.380 viral load

00:45:59.600 and they're

00:46:00.940 vaccinated

00:46:01.340 too?

00:46:02.680 You pretty

00:46:03.400 much have to

00:46:04.440 stick your

00:46:04.920 tongue down

00:46:05.460 the throat.

00:46:06.440 Am I

00:46:07.000 wrong?

00:46:08.180 Now, I'm

00:46:08.800 exaggerating,

00:46:09.640 right?

00:46:10.100 I'm exaggerating

00:46:10.980 for effect.

00:46:13.520 But are we

00:46:14.240 reaching a

00:46:14.720 point where

00:46:15.240 the only way

00:46:15.880 this thing is

00:46:16.480 going to

00:46:16.760 spread in

00:46:17.380 any meaningful

00:46:18.020 way is

00:46:19.340 you've got to

00:46:19.780 climb on top

00:46:20.520 of another

00:46:20.920 human and

00:46:21.640 breathe in

00:46:22.100 their mouth?

00:46:24.140 Again,

00:46:24.740 exaggerating a

00:46:25.340 little bit.

00:46:25.900 But I feel

00:46:26.340 like it's

00:46:26.700 becoming a

00:46:27.200 sexually

00:46:27.540 transmitted

00:46:28.160 disease and

00:46:29.260 it might be

00:46:29.780 mostly transmitted

00:46:30.620 by people

00:46:31.120 having affairs.

00:46:31.820 Yeah, see

00:46:35.420 where I went

00:46:35.860 there?

00:46:36.640 It might be

00:46:37.160 mostly trans

00:46:37.940 at some point

00:46:39.100 and maybe

00:46:39.500 we're approaching

00:46:40.080 it.

00:46:41.020 At some point

00:46:41.720 if you get

00:46:42.140 enough people

00:46:42.800 vaccinated,

00:46:43.820 it's mostly

00:46:45.460 going to come

00:46:46.340 from sex

00:46:47.040 because that's

00:46:48.140 the only time

00:46:48.540 you're getting

00:46:48.840 that close

00:46:49.400 for that long.

00:46:51.280 Right?

00:46:52.300 Am I wrong?

00:46:53.420 Am I wrong

00:46:53.920 that this could

00:46:54.540 morph into a

00:46:55.540 sexually transmitted

00:46:56.480 disease because

00:46:57.520 it's just the

00:46:58.020 only way you

00:46:58.580 can get enough

00:46:59.160 virus into

00:47:00.560 another vaccinated

00:47:01.380 person?

00:47:04.240 I'll just put

00:47:05.040 that out there.

00:47:06.260 All right,

00:47:06.560 I saw Rasmussen

00:47:07.320 tweeting something

00:47:08.300 from the

00:47:08.820 Gateway Pundit

00:47:09.680 and there's a

00:47:10.920 claim here

00:47:11.540 that I will

00:47:12.380 give low

00:47:13.140 credibility

00:47:13.620 so I don't

00:47:14.900 get banned

00:47:15.520 from social

00:47:16.500 media.

00:47:17.600 And that's

00:47:18.320 my actual

00:47:18.760 opinion.

00:47:19.140 I think

00:47:19.360 there's low

00:47:20.000 credibility

00:47:20.420 to this

00:47:21.020 claim that

00:47:22.160 there are

00:47:22.460 393

00:47:23.500 illegal

00:47:25.340 registered

00:47:26.180 voters in

00:47:27.000 Arizona,

00:47:28.580 meaning that

00:47:29.260 there's two

00:47:29.840 databases that

00:47:30.560 didn't match.

00:47:31.380 There's a

00:47:31.700 social security

00:47:32.820 numbers that

00:47:34.120 didn't match

00:47:34.520 the voting

00:47:35.000 polls or

00:47:35.600 something like

00:47:35.960 that.

00:47:36.780 And there's

00:47:37.260 some discrepancy

00:47:38.040 of 393

00:47:39.240 people who

00:47:40.060 maybe shouldn't

00:47:41.020 have voted

00:47:41.420 that maybe

00:47:42.280 did.

00:47:44.160 Is that

00:47:44.740 real?

00:47:46.160 Is that

00:47:46.620 being reported

00:47:47.240 on CNN?

00:47:49.120 I don't

00:47:49.840 think so.

00:47:50.600 Is it

00:47:50.880 being reported

00:47:51.420 on Fox

00:47:52.460 News?

00:47:54.180 Is Fox

00:47:55.180 News reporting

00:47:55.940 this as

00:47:56.400 true?

00:47:57.660 Here's the

00:47:58.280 way I

00:47:58.860 approach this.

00:47:59.740 The gateway

00:48:02.000 pundit doesn't

00:48:02.740 have a

00:48:03.300 100%

00:48:04.860 accurate record.

00:48:06.480 I don't

00:48:06.800 know what

00:48:06.980 the record

00:48:07.320 is.

00:48:08.000 But like

00:48:09.020 most entities,

00:48:09.960 it's not

00:48:10.340 100%.

00:48:10.940 That's all I

00:48:12.260 can say for

00:48:12.700 sure.

00:48:13.020 I don't

00:48:13.160 know how it

00:48:14.060 compares to

00:48:14.540 the New York

00:48:14.900 Times, for

00:48:16.060 example.

00:48:18.960 But here's a

00:48:20.300 good standard.

00:48:21.040 If it's not

00:48:21.500 being reported

00:48:22.140 by both

00:48:22.960 entities, it's

00:48:23.700 probably not

00:48:24.160 true.

00:48:24.380 If you

00:48:25.580 don't see

00:48:25.920 CNN saying

00:48:26.700 it, and

00:48:27.180 also Fox

00:48:27.880 News saying

00:48:28.320 yeah, we

00:48:28.900 do have

00:48:29.220 this

00:48:29.420 discrepancy,

00:48:30.800 maybe one

00:48:31.280 would say

00:48:31.600 why and

00:48:32.080 the other

00:48:32.380 wouldn't,

00:48:32.860 but probably

00:48:34.280 not something

00:48:34.820 to worry

00:48:35.240 about.

00:48:36.960 Probably

00:48:37.440 just a

00:48:37.940 database

00:48:38.200 problem.

00:48:40.240 So I'll

00:48:41.460 say that's

00:48:42.460 not confirmed.

00:48:43.980 I mean, it's

00:48:44.340 certainly a

00:48:44.720 red flag and

00:48:45.500 certainly we

00:48:46.000 should know

00:48:46.380 why there's

00:48:46.920 a difference,

00:48:47.700 but probably

00:48:48.480 just a

00:48:48.880 database

00:48:49.140 difference.

00:48:50.220 Probably

00:48:50.500 not any

00:48:51.640 bad thing

00:48:54.040 found.

00:48:55.680 A

00:48:56.240 vaccinated

00:48:56.580 person who

00:48:57.240 develops

00:48:57.740 symptoms is

00:48:58.400 just as

00:48:58.960 contagious as

00:48:59.760 a non-vax.

00:49:01.160 True?

00:49:02.000 For a

00:49:02.680 shorter amount

00:49:03.180 of time.

00:49:04.440 So once you

00:49:05.060 add on top

00:49:05.720 of that,

00:49:06.080 that true

00:49:06.540 statement that

00:49:08.020 a vaccinated

00:49:08.780 person who

00:49:09.380 just got the

00:49:10.040 vaccination can

00:49:11.120 give off a

00:49:11.740 lot of virus,

00:49:12.660 but not for

00:49:13.300 long.

00:49:14.940 So they're

00:49:15.480 contagious.

00:49:17.000 They're that

00:49:17.500 contagious for a

00:49:18.520 short time,

00:49:19.160 I think.

00:49:20.140 Check on

00:49:20.660 that.

00:49:21.000 Do a fact

00:49:21.360 check on

00:49:21.720 that,

00:49:21.980 okay?

00:49:23.120 Not

00:49:23.400 positive.

00:49:26.640 I was

00:49:27.240 asked if

00:49:27.640 I'm getting

00:49:27.980 the booster.

00:49:28.840 My answer

00:49:29.320 to that is

00:49:29.760 the same as

00:49:30.400 my answer to

00:49:31.060 the original

00:49:31.840 vaccination

00:49:32.800 question.

00:49:34.140 Since I

00:49:34.560 got the

00:49:35.200 regular

00:49:35.500 vaccination as

00:49:36.360 late as

00:49:36.860 possible,

00:49:37.960 so that I

00:49:38.440 could have

00:49:38.680 the benefit

00:49:39.120 of as

00:49:39.520 many months

00:49:40.140 of other

00:49:40.680 people getting

00:49:41.320 it as

00:49:41.640 possible,

00:49:42.200 I'm also

00:49:44.120 going to

00:49:44.420 wait as

00:49:45.080 long as

00:49:45.540 possible for

00:49:46.220 the booster

00:49:46.660 so that I

00:49:47.820 have as

00:49:48.100 much information

00:49:48.900 about other

00:49:49.440 people's

00:49:49.840 experiences as

00:49:50.680 possible.

00:49:51.360 So the

00:49:51.740 answer is

00:49:52.100 I haven't

00:49:52.420 decided and

00:49:54.420 I shouldn't

00:49:55.160 until the

00:49:56.660 last minute.

00:49:57.440 The only

00:49:57.840 time to

00:49:58.220 decide this

00:49:58.700 is the

00:49:59.020 last minute.

00:50:00.260 Deciding

00:50:00.640 ahead of

00:50:01.060 time is

00:50:02.180 dumb.

00:50:03.580 It's

00:50:03.800 dumb.

00:50:04.800 Now,

00:50:05.240 I suppose if

00:50:06.580 you had some

00:50:07.440 profession that

00:50:08.100 required it,

00:50:08.660 you might decide

00:50:09.200 ahead of time.

00:50:09.640 But if you

00:50:11.220 have the luxury

00:50:14.020 of being able

00:50:15.340 to self-quarantine

00:50:17.620 and still

00:50:18.540 work, as I

00:50:19.760 do, I'll

00:50:21.420 wait until the

00:50:21.760 last minute.

00:50:24.200 All right.

00:50:27.440 The French

00:50:29.800 Catholic Church

00:50:30.720 discovered that

00:50:32.120 there were at

00:50:32.480 least 3,000

00:50:33.540 pedophiles who

00:50:34.460 have been

00:50:34.680 working within

00:50:35.300 the ranks of

00:50:35.940 the French

00:50:36.320 Catholic Church

00:50:37.060 since the

00:50:38.160 50s.

00:50:39.360 They estimate

00:50:40.020 that as many

00:50:40.740 as 330,000

00:50:42.880 children were

00:50:44.260 victims since

00:50:45.060 the 50s.

00:50:46.400 But on the

00:50:47.380 optimistic view,

00:50:48.440 some say only

00:50:49.300 200,000.

00:50:52.400 That's the

00:50:53.020 optimistic view.

00:50:54.720 Now, how many

00:50:56.380 is that?

00:50:56.960 That is 3,000 and

00:50:58.340 have around

00:50:58.800 115,000

00:51:00.200 priests.

00:51:00.620 That's a lot

00:51:00.920 of priests.

00:51:02.080 So 3,000 is

00:51:03.060 not a lot out

00:51:04.040 of 115,000.

00:51:05.880 I don't even

00:51:06.280 know if that's

00:51:06.760 higher than

00:51:07.200 the average

00:51:08.720 in the public.

00:51:10.240 It feels like

00:51:10.800 it is, but I

00:51:11.800 don't know

00:51:12.100 that it is.

00:51:15.880 I feel like

00:51:16.880 somehow this

00:51:20.580 needs to get

00:51:21.080 fixed.

00:51:22.500 Let me give

00:51:23.180 you the

00:51:24.500 hypnotist's view

00:51:25.640 of this

00:51:26.260 situation.

00:51:26.780 The hypnotist

00:51:28.860 says that

00:51:30.200 over time,

00:51:32.380 every shoe

00:51:33.300 salesman should

00:51:34.500 be a man

00:51:35.220 with a shoe

00:51:35.820 fetish or

00:51:37.100 a foot

00:51:37.380 fetish.

00:51:38.360 Let me say

00:51:39.060 that again.

00:51:40.200 Over time,

00:51:41.220 not on day

00:51:41.900 one, but

00:51:42.860 over time,

00:51:44.740 every shoe

00:51:45.500 salesman should

00:51:47.340 be a man

00:51:48.220 with a foot

00:51:48.760 fetish.

00:51:49.760 Why?

00:51:50.560 Because they'd

00:51:51.100 work for

00:51:51.480 cheaper.

00:51:53.020 A man with

00:51:53.580 a foot fetish

00:51:54.160 will take a

00:51:54.640 job as a

00:51:55.140 shoe salesman

00:51:55.720 for less

00:51:56.440 money.

00:51:57.560 He's like,

00:51:58.520 that's a

00:51:58.920 pretty good

00:51:59.160 job.

00:51:59.840 I love my

00:52:00.440 job.

00:52:00.860 I can't

00:52:01.120 wait to

00:52:01.360 go to

00:52:01.580 work.

00:52:03.700 Likewise,

00:52:05.260 over time,

00:52:06.300 you would

00:52:06.540 expect that

00:52:07.160 every coach

00:52:09.540 of an

00:52:10.140 all-female,

00:52:11.280 young-female

00:52:11.920 team would

00:52:13.800 be sexual

00:52:14.540 harassers.

00:52:16.120 Not on

00:52:16.800 day one,

00:52:18.360 but over

00:52:18.840 time, you'd

00:52:19.820 expect all

00:52:20.360 the harassers

00:52:21.260 to be attracted

00:52:21.940 to the place

00:52:22.440 where they

00:52:22.740 can do the

00:52:23.120 most harassing.

00:52:24.460 So over

00:52:24.960 time, you'd

00:52:25.480 expect every

00:52:26.080 organization that

00:52:27.140 has young

00:52:27.820 people as

00:52:28.460 their charge

00:52:30.040 and adults

00:52:31.840 in charge,

00:52:32.420 you'd expect

00:52:32.900 over time

00:52:33.600 that they

00:52:33.940 would all

00:52:34.200 become

00:52:34.440 pedophiles.

00:52:36.180 Sorry.

00:52:37.460 Human

00:52:38.000 motivation.

00:52:39.240 You can't

00:52:39.760 turn off

00:52:40.140 human motivation.

00:52:41.000 So if you

00:52:42.820 have an

00:52:43.140 organization that

00:52:44.140 absolutely is

00:52:45.120 going to

00:52:45.340 attract pedophiles,

00:52:47.260 you need to

00:52:47.860 do something

00:52:48.480 about that.

00:52:50.560 I don't know

00:52:51.160 what the

00:52:51.520 answer is,

00:52:52.060 but if you

00:52:52.580 know that

00:52:53.640 you're attracting

00:52:54.200 the wrong

00:52:54.980 people,

00:52:57.280 the Boy

00:52:57.780 Scouts,

00:52:58.240 perfect example,

00:52:59.340 exactly.

00:53:00.260 You would

00:53:00.560 expect over

00:53:01.180 time that

00:53:02.140 you would

00:53:02.380 have more

00:53:02.800 and more

00:53:03.120 of the

00:53:03.560 people you

00:53:04.120 don't want

00:53:04.500 in those

00:53:04.760 ranks because

00:53:05.780 they would be

00:53:06.140 attracted and

00:53:06.780 why not?

00:53:07.980 I mean,

00:53:08.300 from their

00:53:08.600 perspective,

00:53:09.180 why not?

00:53:10.680 All right.

00:53:12.660 Here's what

00:53:13.260 we think we

00:53:14.040 know about

00:53:14.420 shots.

00:53:14.840 I'll tell you

00:53:15.240 what I

00:53:15.860 think I

00:53:16.240 know so

00:53:17.720 far.

00:53:19.120 That two

00:53:19.860 shots is

00:53:20.340 better than

00:53:20.700 one.

00:53:21.420 All right.

00:53:21.700 Give me a

00:53:22.040 fact check as

00:53:22.680 I go.

00:53:23.700 I'm going to

00:53:24.040 state things

00:53:24.740 we think we

00:53:25.560 know are

00:53:26.260 true.

00:53:27.460 Two shots

00:53:28.160 is better

00:53:28.480 than one.

00:53:29.840 I hear that

00:53:30.440 we're assuming

00:53:31.120 that one

00:53:31.560 shot is not

00:53:33.040 going to kill

00:53:33.440 you.

00:53:35.700 And again,

00:53:36.420 this is not

00:53:36.860 necessarily your

00:53:37.680 opinion.

00:53:38.160 This would be

00:53:38.500 the consensus

00:53:40.040 scientific opinion.

00:53:42.160 We now

00:53:42.940 believe that

00:53:43.520 three shots

00:53:44.240 is better

00:53:44.600 than two.

00:53:46.260 Again,

00:53:46.800 I'm not

00:53:47.260 saying you

00:53:47.700 agree with

00:53:48.260 it.

00:53:48.740 I'm saying

00:53:49.140 this is the

00:53:49.640 consensus.

00:53:51.940 We believe

00:53:52.820 that natural

00:53:53.480 immunity is

00:53:54.340 better than

00:53:55.160 two shots.

00:53:57.120 Not quite

00:53:57.940 sure about

00:53:58.420 that.

00:53:59.400 But we do

00:54:00.180 know that

00:54:00.560 natural

00:54:00.940 immunity gives

00:54:01.980 you immunity

00:54:02.520 to sort of

00:54:03.340 every part

00:54:04.400 inside and

00:54:05.160 out of the

00:54:06.040 virus.

00:54:06.960 Whereas the

00:54:07.720 shots give

00:54:08.980 you a very

00:54:09.380 specific

00:54:09.940 immunity.

00:54:11.100 I'm probably

00:54:11.540 doing a bad

00:54:12.180 job of

00:54:12.520 explaining this.

00:54:13.500 But it's that

00:54:14.920 spike protein

00:54:15.740 that they're

00:54:16.160 targeting.

00:54:16.940 So they're

00:54:17.160 looking at

00:54:17.540 one element

00:54:18.380 and creating

00:54:19.780 a vaccine

00:54:21.200 around that

00:54:21.680 one element.

00:54:22.460 Whereas natural

00:54:23.200 immunity gives

00:54:24.140 you immunity to

00:54:24.880 basically all

00:54:25.600 of the parts.

00:54:26.200 Is that better?

00:54:28.100 Well, at least

00:54:28.680 one expert said

00:54:29.440 so on a video

00:54:31.000 I saw today.

00:54:31.600 But maybe

00:54:34.160 that's a

00:54:35.160 question.

00:54:37.340 So natural

00:54:37.880 immunity seems

00:54:38.580 better than

00:54:39.060 two shots.

00:54:40.740 Is natural

00:54:41.720 immunity better

00:54:42.440 than three

00:54:44.060 shots?

00:54:46.020 Probably.

00:54:47.220 Again, I'm not

00:54:47.980 sure we know

00:54:48.440 that.

00:54:49.320 But probably

00:54:49.820 because of the

00:54:50.820 completeness of

00:54:52.100 the immunity

00:54:52.540 for the

00:54:53.500 natural one.

00:54:54.600 If that

00:54:55.520 matters over

00:54:56.040 time, I don't

00:54:56.480 know.

00:54:56.660 The consensus

00:54:58.360 also is that

00:54:59.080 natural immunity

00:54:59.900 plus shots is

00:55:01.700 better than

00:55:02.160 either one

00:55:02.620 alone.

00:55:04.140 Yeah, how

00:55:04.820 about that?

00:55:06.220 Do you agree

00:55:06.700 with that?

00:55:07.060 That would be

00:55:07.400 the consensus.

00:55:08.780 That having

00:55:09.220 the shots is

00:55:10.080 good and

00:55:10.540 having natural

00:55:11.060 immunity is

00:55:11.620 good.

00:55:13.080 And regardless

00:55:14.020 of which one

00:55:14.560 is better,

00:55:16.000 it's better to

00:55:16.520 have both.

00:55:17.760 Especially if

00:55:18.440 you have the

00:55:18.760 shot first and

00:55:19.720 then you get

00:55:20.160 the natural

00:55:20.880 immunity on

00:55:21.440 top of it.

00:55:22.360 Because then

00:55:22.760 you'll be

00:55:23.100 protected from

00:55:23.920 hospitalization,

00:55:25.240 mostly.

00:55:25.500 And then

00:55:26.760 you'll get

00:55:27.060 the full

00:55:27.460 natural

00:55:27.880 immunity.

00:55:29.060 And then

00:55:29.520 I think we

00:55:31.900 know that both

00:55:32.440 the shot and

00:55:33.500 natural immunity

00:55:34.140 wane over

00:55:34.820 time.

00:55:35.880 But it

00:55:37.240 could be that

00:55:37.800 the natural

00:55:38.320 immunity doesn't

00:55:39.140 wane the

00:55:39.720 same way.

00:55:41.940 We don't

00:55:42.580 know that yet,

00:55:43.300 so that's still

00:55:43.720 a little bit

00:55:44.100 open.

00:55:44.920 But it

00:55:46.100 could be that

00:55:46.600 natural

00:55:46.960 immunity morphs

00:55:48.680 into something

00:55:49.300 that can more

00:55:50.760 quickly reconstitute

00:55:52.580 itself.

00:55:53.700 Whereas we

00:55:54.620 don't know if

00:55:55.080 that's true

00:55:55.420 of the shots.

00:55:56.160 If the shots

00:55:56.620 wear off,

00:55:57.920 is there any

00:55:58.600 traces of

00:55:59.900 them left that

00:56:00.360 can quickly

00:56:00.880 reconstitute what

00:56:01.920 was there?

00:56:02.920 Don't know.

00:56:04.160 But that's

00:56:04.800 where we're

00:56:05.120 at.

00:56:06.320 Andres

00:56:06.700 Bekaus notes

00:56:07.700 that the

00:56:08.300 immunity from

00:56:09.960 infections versus

00:56:11.680 the two shots

00:56:12.460 is still

00:56:12.860 uncertain.

00:56:14.020 So we don't

00:56:14.740 have data for

00:56:15.320 that.

00:56:15.600 All right.

00:56:19.320 And that

00:56:20.180 is what I

00:56:21.900 wanted to say

00:56:22.480 today.

00:56:23.140 That is

00:56:24.880 everything I

00:56:25.400 wanted to

00:56:25.700 say today.

00:56:31.000 Oh,

00:56:31.520 here's a

00:56:31.860 counterpoint.

00:56:32.880 I do not

00:56:33.400 agree that

00:56:34.540 both are

00:56:35.420 better.

00:56:36.180 You'll have

00:56:36.520 whatever the

00:56:37.100 VAX got to

00:56:37.860 give you,

00:56:38.620 plus, yeah.

00:56:40.320 So you get

00:56:42.140 the benefits of

00:56:43.140 both the

00:56:43.520 natural immunity

00:56:44.220 plus the

00:56:45.040 shots, but

00:56:46.340 you also get

00:56:47.060 whatever risks

00:56:48.200 come with

00:56:49.760 both getting

00:56:50.540 the virus

00:56:52.360 and also the

00:56:54.160 risk of

00:56:54.560 getting the

00:56:54.940 vaccine itself.

00:56:55.820 So that's

00:56:56.120 true.

00:56:56.820 But I don't

00:56:57.140 know that

00:56:57.440 that changes

00:56:57.920 your...

00:56:59.460 Mark says,

00:57:01.180 from one

00:57:01.700 cartoonist to

00:57:02.320 another, what

00:57:03.760 do you make

00:57:04.080 of Ben

00:57:04.420 Garrison's work

00:57:05.240 as a fellow

00:57:05.840 cartoonist?

00:57:07.500 Brilliant.

00:57:08.860 Ben

00:57:09.100 Garrison's work

00:57:10.020 as a

00:57:10.800 cartoonist, I

00:57:11.520 say, is

00:57:11.860 brilliant.

00:57:12.940 Why?

00:57:13.840 Because he

00:57:14.360 found a

00:57:14.860 market and

00:57:16.100 then he

00:57:16.420 addressed his

00:57:17.040 market.

00:57:18.020 Now, you

00:57:18.720 know, it

00:57:19.080 might not

00:57:19.400 be your

00:57:19.660 thing, if

00:57:20.200 you're left

00:57:20.580 leaning or

00:57:21.120 whatever, but

00:57:22.100 in terms of

00:57:22.980 a, let's

00:57:25.240 see, the

00:57:25.660 commercial

00:57:26.180 decisions,

00:57:28.540 they're right

00:57:29.300 on.

00:57:30.000 So you

00:57:30.260 found a

00:57:30.620 market, you

00:57:31.080 served his

00:57:31.500 market, and

00:57:31.900 he does it

00:57:32.300 very well,

00:57:33.140 very well.

00:57:33.920 So you

00:57:35.520 can disagree

00:57:36.040 with his

00:57:36.480 point of

00:57:36.880 view, that's

00:57:37.480 a separate

00:57:37.860 question, but

00:57:39.040 as a

00:57:39.420 cartoonist,

00:57:40.060 yeah, very

00:57:40.500 good, very

00:57:41.280 good.

00:57:45.660 All right,

00:57:46.340 that's about

00:57:46.700 all I

00:57:46.940 have.

00:57:47.140 I've got

00:57:47.320 to run

00:57:47.640 and do

00:57:47.980 something

00:57:48.200 else, and

00:57:49.420 thanks for

00:57:51.260 joining in.

00:57:52.560 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 05, 2021

Episode 1520 Scott Adams： We Are Going to Have Some Fun Today. Get In Here.

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript