Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1528 Scott Adams： I'll Tell You Which News is Fake Today. Spoiler： Most of it.

00:00:00.000 And watch me pause another moment until the YouTube feed catches up because it clips off

00:00:12.500 the first part here. And now. All right. Good morning, everybody. And welcome to the best

00:00:20.500 thing that's ever happened to anybody everywhere. Ever? Everywhere? Let's make that a word.

00:00:25.720 You've heard of anywhere. You've heard of nowhere. But introducing today a new word called

00:00:31.760 everywhere. Wait. I don't even know what the hell I'm talking about today. You think I'm stoned.

00:00:38.800 You think so. But I'm not. Maybe I should be. Because something's not working this morning.

00:00:46.600 Everywhere. Yes. Everywhere. Correct. Everywhere is the new word. Thank you. Thank you in the

00:00:52.880 comments. You know, have you realized that what we've created here collectively is like

00:01:00.720 a new kind of intelligence? Think about it. Your old kind of intelligence was just stuff

00:01:08.500 happening in your head in the old days. And then you got a smartphone or a computer and

00:01:14.520 your intelligence was a little offloaded. But you had to do some work. You had to go search

00:01:19.720 for stuff. But we've created with this model here with the live stream and the instant comments.

00:01:27.820 We've created a situation where I simply think I need to know something. I say it out loud.

00:01:34.860 Or even sometimes I don't say it. And then the new information appears for me on the screen.

00:01:39.860 Because many of you are anticipating or correcting me as I go. So my brain is actually now extended

00:01:49.100 to those of you who are watching live and commented live. The system is almost instant now.

00:01:56.060 It's kind of weird. I mean, you could argue that this is a form of intelligence because I don't

00:02:00.100 think I've ever seen this before. If I give a speech in a, let's say, a crowded room,

00:02:06.540 people can make comments, but not in any efficient way. That's just me talking. And if this were

00:02:14.480 recorded, of course, it would just be me talking. Those of you who watch it later. But when it's

00:02:18.960 live, there is actually a collective intelligence that is literally happening. It makes me amplified

00:02:29.200 in a way. But what is more important than the simultaneous sip? Yes, Dennis reminds me that

00:02:38.380 we should be doing more sipping and less talking. And I think that's fine advice. And I'm going to

00:02:43.720 take it. And all you need is a cup of mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or a

00:02:47.980 flask. A vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the

00:02:55.700 unparalleled pleasure. The dopamine hit of the day. Yeah, the thing that makes everything better.

00:03:01.420 It's called the simultaneous sip. And let's go, Brandon. Let's sip this baby. Go.

00:03:11.080 Oh, yeah. I think we sipped the hell out of that. You know, sometimes you're just sipping along the

00:03:17.480 edges. You know, you're almost a spectator to your own sip. But not today. I think we went deep today.

00:03:25.140 There was some serious sippage penetration into the deeper, deeper meaning of life. Yeah, that just

00:03:33.720 happened. What else happened? Well, Netflix has a big hit with a show called Squid Games. Not only did

00:03:46.620 100 million people, 111 million people at least sample it, which is a new record. But

00:03:55.040 I don't know why. I don't think I've ever seen a trailer for a movie that made me or a series that

00:04:07.680 made me less want to watch it. So here's the actual advertisement. This is how they're trying

00:04:18.200 to sell you to watch Squid Games on Netflix. It's about a bunch of people who are badly in debt.

00:04:26.080 Right? They're in desperate times. They're badly in debt. And they're somehow collected together to

00:04:30.920 play some deadly game where many of them die, I guess. Now, good times. If any of you are feeling bad

00:04:40.680 about yourself or your situation, I can't think of a more entertaining thing than to watch people in

00:04:49.000 desperate financial trouble playing a deadly game because it's the best chance they have.

00:04:54.180 Don't watch this show. Now, I get that you might enjoy it while it's happening, but how could that

00:05:07.340 possibly be good for you? Compare these two uses of time. One hour a day trying to meditate, which I'll

00:05:18.580 talk about in a moment, meditate for one hour a day, or watch a show about people in desperate

00:05:25.660 financial problems who are in great physical risk and many of them dying for fun. Which one of those

00:05:34.720 would help your life a little bit more? Well, I would like to refer back to Naval Ravikant, who is a big

00:05:43.920 proponent of meditating. And let me just give you an alternative. Because I like it when some

00:05:51.340 percentage of my listeners go away with a better life. I can't get you all every time, right? So

00:05:58.480 I'll pick off a little sliver of the viewers every time and make your life better. Here's where some of

00:06:05.140 you will get a better life right now. Listen, you might want to Google him, but look for Naval,

00:06:12.400 N-A-V-A-L, Ravikant, and read what you can about, I think he's been interviewed a number of times,

00:06:19.660 been on podcasts, about meditation. Now, the big thing that he brings to the meditation

00:06:26.160 conversation is he tells you, don't bother trying to clear your mind. 0.99

00:06:31.200 That's the dumb part. I mean, the dumb part of meditating is when they tell you, clear your mind. 0.98

00:06:39.560 That's not a thing. Who the hell is teaching you to meditate by clearing your mind? 0.99

00:06:47.340 The only way you can clear your mind is by being dead. It's not a thing. So there's this, like, 0.90

00:06:53.800 illusion that's kept, I don't know, seven billion people from meditating. It's the same illusion.

00:07:01.820 The illusion is that the point of it is to stop thinking, and people think, well, that's not going

00:07:07.400 to happen. I can't make that happen. And if they try, they realize quite quickly they can't make that

00:07:13.660 happen. So what is the great innovation that Naval brings to this? That it was always an illusion

00:07:20.820 that you needed to stop your mind from thinking. It was never possible. It was never a thing.

00:07:28.160 And it was never even desirable or necessary. The important part is to sit quietly for an hour a day

00:07:34.660 and let your mind do what it wants to do for an hour. That's it. You just let it play. Just stay awake.

00:07:42.900 Sit comfortably. Do it as a habit. Don't, you know, don't skip days. Just every day. Sit there for an hour

00:07:49.820 and let your mind play. The belief, the allegation, the proposition, if you will, is that that will

00:08:01.640 fundamentally change your entire mental outlook in a positive way. Now, I have, you know, great faith

00:08:11.460 in Naval's opinion and recommendations. Have I tried this technique? Nope. Because I don't know

00:08:19.840 how I would get an hour a day to sit there. I guess that's the hard part. If you can figure out

00:08:25.100 how to, any way to fit an hour a day of unmolested time, if you can figure out how to find an hour a day

00:08:34.200 to do that, good luck. That's the hard part. So forget the squid games. Even if it's entertaining,

00:08:41.820 it's going to put bad thoughts in your head. You don't need that. Instead, spend that same time,

00:08:46.580 one hour a day, trying to meditate. About 1% of you, your lives just changed. Isn't that cool? I mean,

00:08:55.720 most of you, you know, you're going to do what you were going to do, and this made no difference

00:08:59.480 whatsoever. But about 1% of you, your whole life just changed. Seriously. About 1% of you,

00:09:07.180 your whole life just changed. Because that's about how many people are saying, you know,

00:09:11.260 I might be able to find an hour. I'll give it a try. And try it for about two months. If you haven't

00:09:18.820 tried it for two months, you haven't tried it. All right, that's the other technique. So this is,

00:09:22.960 so the thing that Naval brings to this is the simplification and the removal of the illusion.

00:09:30.540 That's a big deal. If that seems like a small deal, it's not. It's a big deal. You got rid of

00:09:38.420 the illusion that you have to clear your mind. Now you're free of that. And he's described it in a

00:09:44.940 way that you can't do it wrong. Do it an hour a day for a couple months, see what happens.

00:09:49.280 That's it. That's it. Everybody can do that if they have an hour. All right. The most important

00:09:57.760 story in the country, and I think you'll agree, is that there was an elk that sometime in his early

00:10:03.800 life got his head stuck in a tire. So it had a tire around his neck for however many years.

00:10:10.340 It had been observed for a long time. But finally, I guess they tranquilized it and cut off its horns

00:10:15.400 and got the tire off. Now you might say to yourself, that was the way to get the tire off?

00:10:24.380 You had to remove the elk's horns. You couldn't think of another way to remove a tire from the neck.

00:10:32.540 I'm just going to brainstorm here for a moment. Cut the tire. I don't know. Did they think of that

00:10:41.960 one? Cut the tire? I mean, maybe they didn't have the right tools or something. There may have been

00:10:48.080 some practical reasons. Now, just for full context, I'm told that the antlers fall off once a year

00:10:56.220 anyway. So the elk would not be damaged by the removal of the horns because they just grow back

00:11:03.280 next season. I'm told. I think that's true. But still, still, is it just sort of messed up?

00:11:14.400 Don't those horns have some purpose? Like to protect them in a fight with another elk that does have his

00:11:21.820 horns? I mean, I feel like it was just a messed up thing to do. And why did they go into this project

00:11:28.840 not having a tool that can cut a tire? I mean, I feel like they should have brought a tire cutting

00:11:35.360 tool to the project. I mean, they had some planning. It wasn't like off the cuff, hey, let's trank an elk

00:11:41.820 and see what happens. But the most important thing about this story is the puns. That's right.

00:11:47.280 The worst part for this poor elk, when he had that tire around his neck, is that the other elk would

00:11:54.320 tease him. Yeah, it was almost sort of a Rudolph situation. Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer. The other

00:12:01.380 reindeer would tease him. Well, you know how it went for the elk. The other elk teased him. They say stuff

00:12:08.800 like, hey, Carl, you look tired. That's just messed up. They're bullies, really, is what I'm saying.

00:12:18.720 Yeah, they'd say stuff like, hey, Carl, did you have a good year? Was it a good year? That's just

00:12:26.420 messed up. You shouldn't say something like that to an elk who's having a tough time with a tire around

00:12:32.180 his neck. And then, of course, you know, there was no inner tube in the tire, which means that this elk

00:12:39.840 had no problem with inflation. No problem with inflation. See, that's not funny. This is just

00:12:46.920 bullies, elks making fun of another elk. I don't approve of this bully. And then somebody suggested 0.98

00:12:54.000 that he may have voluntarily been wearing that tire because, wait for it, he's had it for years

00:13:02.520 and his antlers fall off every season. Now, the tire was not stuck on the neck. It was sort of loose

00:13:13.520 fitting. And his antlers would fall off every year. What would happen when the antlers fell off

00:13:21.240 and the elk bent down to eat some food? It's almost as if the tire would fall off.

00:13:30.020 Like, maybe he liked it. Like, maybe he was wearing it like a crown because he was the king

00:13:38.300 of the elks and we just ripped him his crown off. I didn't make that one up. Somebody said

00:13:43.840 that on Twitter. But I liked it. It could have been an elk crown. We may have changed the entire

00:13:50.180 royal family situation for that elk group. Yeah. Well, maybe enough about that story.

00:14:01.080 Let's take a look at this story. Remember, I ran through the fake news filter, which you

00:14:07.960 can find on my Twitter feed. I tweeted it out. So it's a checklist to see if something is

00:14:13.940 fake news. And I ran the pilot sick out story through there. And what do you think? Do you

00:14:21.640 think it's true that pilots are calling in sick or taking personal days and that's the

00:14:27.480 reason that Southwest has slow flights? Well, it is not being reported by either Fox News or

00:14:38.600 CNN to be true. Somebody fact check me on that. I need to fact check. But I think, because

00:14:48.100 I'm saying I didn't see it, so maybe I missed it. But I don't think that CNN or Fox News are

00:14:53.760 confirming that Southwest had a problem because of the COVID mandate. Tucker's an opinion guy.

00:15:03.560 The opinion guys are not relevant to this truth filter. Because the opinion people are opinion

00:15:11.360 people. I'm talking about the news. And CNN reports it basically as a false claim. They

00:15:20.540 just report that Jen Psaki says that it's not true. But also according to the AP News, they

00:15:28.860 looked into it. And here's what the AP says. They say the airline, this being Southwest,

00:15:35.420 its pilots and the Federal Aviation Administration denied the claim circulating online that the

00:15:42.380 so-called mass sick out was over the mandate. So the Federal Aviation Administration, the pilots,

00:15:50.040 I don't know how many they talked to, and the airlines have all denied it. So basically everybody

00:15:55.460 who's close to it denies it. But there are pilots who say it's true, right? Haven't you

00:16:02.420 seen that online? You've seen the individual pilots say, oh yeah, it's totally true. And

00:16:07.280 when you see that, do you see the pilot saying it? No. You see somebody saying they talked to

00:16:13.400 a pilot who said it. I haven't seen a pilot say it. Have you? I've seen people say they know

00:16:19.100 a pilot. I know a pilot and the pilot said it. But I haven't seen a pilot say it.

00:16:23.860 So do the pilots believe it? Now I would definitely believe there are some pilots who believe it's

00:16:32.660 happening. Why would they believe it's happening? They saw it online. They saw it online, same

00:16:40.220 as you did. So they believe it's happening. I mean, if you were just one pilot and you knew

00:16:44.220 a few other pilots, you would only know what you thought. But if you read online that a bunch

00:16:49.280 of pilots at Southwest are doing this, you know, fake sick out thing or personal day

00:16:55.440 thing, you'd probably think it was true too. So that would be your interpretation, even

00:17:00.540 if you thought it was some other reason before that. All right. I'm going to call that fake

00:17:05.760 news preliminarily. It doesn't mean it's guaranteed to be fake news. It does mean that the odds

00:17:12.020 are against it being true. All right. And by the way, I'm going to go back to, let me ask

00:17:18.720 you this. I'm often asked this question. How do you know if somebody is lying? How do you

00:17:26.120 know to trust somebody? Just like an individual. I'm not talking about organizations or fake news,

00:17:31.000 but just an individual. How do you know if they're lying? And the answer is, you can't.

00:17:39.160 Most of the time. Most of the time you can't tell. Sometimes you can. But most of the time

00:17:43.400 you can't tell. Here's what you can know. The only thing you can know for sure, and even that's,

00:17:49.360 you know, not 100%, is that people will be the same people they were yesterday. Like if somebody

00:17:55.120 was a giant liar yesterday, well, probably today too. If they were always honest,

00:18:00.720 every day of their life up till yesterday, probably that last thing they told you is

00:18:05.200 true too. Or at least they think it's true. Right? So you can depend on people being like

00:18:11.060 the way they've been before. Do we have any history that Southwest Airlines is a gigantic

00:18:17.480 liar? Such a big liar that they would lie in a way that they could easily be discovered. 0.95

00:18:24.440 Really? Southwest Airlines. They have one of the best employee reputations of any company 0.91

00:18:33.600 in the United States. Year after year after year, they're in the top rung of somewhat trusted,

00:18:40.820 well-managed, straightforward companies. Do you think they suddenly became gigantic liars and

00:18:48.500 such liars that they're telling a lie that's easily discovered? Because it would be literally, 0.93

00:18:55.060 what, tens of thousands of witnesses that they lied? It would be all the pilots. Because the

00:19:01.540 pilots would say, oh my God, they're lying. My company's lying. Would they do that? It doesn't

00:19:08.720 make sense to me that anybody would tell a lie, a corporate entity would tell a lie that's so

00:19:14.240 easily discovered as a lie. That would be crazy. I don't think Southwest changed overnight from a

00:19:21.840 company that we trusted, relative to companies, right? It's still a company, to a company we trusted

00:19:27.780 to one we totally wouldn't trust overnight. I don't think that happened. It could have. I mean,

00:19:34.140 anything's possible. But that would be really unusual. So I'm going to say it's fake news until

00:19:40.160 something changes my mind. All right, here's another story. See if you believe this one.

00:19:45.940 A biological male in a skirt assaulted a student in a bathroom in Virginia. So a female student 0.96

00:19:53.620 was allegedly, so we're using the word allegedly in these stories, sexually assaulted by a biological

00:20:00.460 male wearing a skirt in a restroom in school. True or false? Run it through the fake news filter.

00:20:10.160 Which of the checklists fits this? Which of the, yeah, you got it. Two on the nose. Two on the nose.

00:20:24.020 What story did you most not expect but fear if you were a conservative? If you're a conservative

00:20:32.780 and you were sort of worked up about, you know, the trans issue, let's say you're not as pro-trans as

00:20:40.560 as a woke person should be. If that's what you were already worried about, what kind of story would

00:20:48.180 play perfectly into your bias? The story of a biological boy putting on a dress for the purpose of going into

00:20:58.180 a woman's facility, locker room or bathroom for a sexual assault. That story is exactly, 0.82

00:21:07.960 exactly on the nose for what people feared. The slippery slope. I mean, people who were drawing this

00:21:16.540 direct slippery slope line, okay, if you allow this, the next thing you know, they're going to be

00:21:21.840 assaulting people in the restrooms. Slippery slope. Well, there it is. There it is. Proof. There it is.

00:21:28.900 Somebody put on a dress just to assault somebody in a restroom. 1.00

00:21:35.280 I'm seeing a lot of people saying it's true. Why do you say it's true? Do you say it's true because it was on

00:21:41.780 the news? Or do you say it's true because the father of the alleged victim says it's true? And

00:21:49.640 the victim, alleged victim says it's true? The police report. The police report says it's true. So you

00:21:58.360 believe it because it's in the police report. Where did the police get their report from? Did they watch

00:22:02.760 it? Did they watch it happen? Or did somebody tell them it happened? Everything you know about this is

00:22:10.920 somebody told you. You didn't see it. You weren't there. And the people who told you,

00:22:18.920 how much do you trust them? Well, we don't know anything about the alleged victim.

00:22:24.480 If you told me the alleged victim had never told a lie, I would say, she'd never told a lie before.

00:22:32.200 Do you know that? Has the alleged victim ever made a false accusation before? Has the alleged victim

00:22:38.560 ever told a big whopper ever told a big whopper of a lie? I don't know. And I'm not alleging

00:22:44.540 that there's anything up with the victim. I'm just saying we don't know. The attacker did

00:22:51.960 it twice. Same way? Wearing a dress? Now, here's what I do believe. I do believe it's likely

00:23:02.880 there was an assault. I don't believe the assailant was wearing a dress. Do you? If somebody says

00:23:13.020 somebody got sexually assaulted, I'd go, well, probably, because that happens all the time,

00:23:17.620 unfortunately. But somebody says this fits your bias, does it? Am I the one with the bias?

00:23:26.460 Because I'm saying that unusual things don't happen very often. Is that a bias? That unusual

00:23:32.960 things don't happen? That's almost just the definition of unusual things. Somebody says

00:23:39.700 a Scottish kilt. Doubt it. All right, let me ask you this. Imagine you're this kid, you've

00:23:46.880 got bad intentions, and you're thinking to yourself, I think I want to assault somebody. Would

00:23:51.640 you put on a dress to do it? Would that be your plan? I think I'll put on a dress and

00:23:57.220 nobody will even know I'm a man, and I'll walk into that restroom and I'll be doing some 0.98

00:24:03.720 assaulting? Or do you think it was a genuine trans person who was identifying as female but

00:24:14.680 still wanted to do some raping of a woman with male equipment? I don't know. None of it checks 0.99

00:24:25.460 out, does it? So I'm going to go on record, okay? So this will be a test of the fake news

00:24:33.340 filter. So as far as I know, I'm the only one saying this. Can anybody confirm that there's

00:24:44.080 nobody else that you know of? At least nobody who's got a show? Is there anybody else saying

00:24:49.980 that this is almost certainly fake news? Not the assault. I'm not questioning that an assault

00:24:56.140 happened. I'm questioning that it was a boy dressed as a female so he could use the ladies 0.98

00:25:02.420 room. That part, no. Yeah, on the skirt detail, I think it's fake news. Let me ask you this.

00:25:11.180 How many of you have done a kid pickup at school? Took your car there, picked up a kid? You see

00:25:20.580 hordes, hordes of kids walking by. Lots and lots of kids. How many of the girls are wearing skirts? 0.99

00:25:27.780 How many of the girls are wearing skirts? None. None. The girls aren't even wearing skirts. 1.00

00:25:41.600 So he's going to wear a disguise as a girl, or whatever it was, and he's going to dress in the 0.98

00:25:47.060 most ridiculous way. Ridiculous in the sense it would be non-standard, even for the females. 0.99

00:25:53.460 Right? No. None of this story makes sense. It doesn't. Maybe he had a, you know, a sweater 0.95

00:26:03.000 wrapped around his waist and it looked like a skirt. I don't know. I don't know what happened.

00:26:07.920 But I don't believe any of the story, and I'm going to go on record saying it's probably fake

00:26:12.320 news and you're probably going to find out. Now, given that I'm the only person in the country

00:26:15.640 saying it, right? I think I'm the only person saying it, just like I doubted the, you know,

00:26:22.920 the Havana syndrome secret sonic weapon. Only person in the world saying it. So that's a good 0.95

00:26:30.120 challenge, isn't it? A good test of the filter. I'm the only one saying it. So if the filter

00:26:34.760 works, it will have caught this one. And if this turns out to be real, well, then we have

00:26:40.720 to revise the filter. Right? All right. Suddenly, you saw this in the news, that suddenly a whole

00:26:50.020 bunch of countries are real serious about nuclear. The United States being one of them.

00:26:55.100 Biden administration has gone strong on nuclear, which I credit it with. But also France has

00:27:01.300 decided instead of phasing them out, they're going to go hard. Great Britain and several

00:27:06.520 other countries have lobbied to have nuclear power labeled as green technology. Or zero

00:27:13.960 carbon, I guess. Or green, I don't know, whatever. Green technology, I guess. To which I said

00:27:18.360 to myself, what? Are you telling me there's any official body that didn't already include

00:27:25.080 nuclear energy as green technology? Did you know that wasn't already a thing? I just assumed

00:27:32.180 they thought that. Because it is. It doesn't produce, you know, I mean, it's probably the

00:27:40.560 best green technology of all. I had no idea that it wasn't considered green. I thought they

00:27:46.400 didn't want it for maybe other reasons. But I didn't think it was because it wasn't green.

00:27:52.120 How wrong could they be? But now they say it's green, of course. So what changed? Let me ask

00:27:59.260 you, what made everything change? Like over, it seems like overnight, doesn't it? We went

00:28:05.840 from, I don't know, to, somebody says the science changed. Somebody says that the Generation

00:28:13.580 4, but we haven't built a Generation 4 yet. There are no operating Generation 4. Somebody said

00:28:20.980 COVID changed things. The wind didn't blow, right? So the green technology didn't do its thing.

00:28:29.260 The space race. Some say it's me, but I don't think that's the full story. Bill Gates. No,

00:28:42.840 not Trump. I don't think Trump had anything to do with it. He should have. And I fault him

00:28:47.000 for that. Mike Schellenberger. Yeah. Mark Schneider. So I'm not sure it was one thing. It could

00:28:54.980 be that a whole bunch of things happened. But here are some of the things that happened

00:28:58.020 to make it look like there was an overnight change. The number one thing that happened

00:29:04.280 was the trigger. The trigger is the brown ounce and the black ounce and, you know, China having 1.00

00:29:12.760 to fire up their coal plants. So all over the world now, the stories are that the classic green

00:29:18.760 energies didn't work. So we know that just solar and, you know, adding solar and wind power can be

00:29:28.860 awesome, but it doesn't cover you if you need a, you know, if you need a little surge. So the first

00:29:36.980 thing is that we had triggers that happened about the same time all over the world where it was proven

00:29:42.020 that the way we were doing it wasn't working. The second thing is that the media has decided that

00:29:48.200 climate change will be another focus. It's been a focus in the past, but, you know, it's, it is a

00:29:54.420 focus. Someone also mentioned space, right? Space is very much on our mind now because of all the

00:30:00.540 flights going up. I guess Shatner's going up there today or something, 90 years old. So when you're

00:30:06.920 talking about space, you have to think nuclear. And I think every country is realizing that if they

00:30:12.960 don't have a domestic nuclear skill set, that they're not going to be part of space. It's just

00:30:22.180 a, it's a base requirement, as far as we know, for getting into space and being productive up there.

00:30:28.340 So there's that. So you've got a bunch of things that sort of coincidentally happened.

00:30:32.940 Um, but I think there's something else happening that the argument against it was slowly chipped

00:30:41.580 away by, I'm going to call it reframing, reframing. So, um, as you mentioned, Mike, Mike Schellenberger,

00:30:51.480 I think one of the biggest effects here, um, Mark Schneider, also very influential, uh, to me and,

00:30:58.400 you know, threw me to other people, et cetera. So there definitely was a more productive

00:31:04.100 communication and reframing that happened. Meaning that, um, the idea of the newer generations

00:31:12.200 being safer, I think that message finally got through. Yeah, nuclear, the old kind had some

00:31:19.760 problems, but even, even then it was safer than everything else. Even the old kind with its problems,

00:31:26.620 the meltdowns, et cetera, the Fukishimas, the, uh, et cetera. Even all of that was still safer than

00:31:33.620 all of the, you know, other alternatives. And, but now we have the newer technologies,

00:31:39.980 the generation three that this kind you would build if you built one today has never had a problem.

00:31:46.820 They figured out how to do it safe enough. And the generation after that would be so safe that

00:31:53.080 it won't even be an issue after that. And the generation after also will eat the existing waste

00:31:58.380 as part of its fuel. So we, we have a technical solution coming online for the waste.

00:32:07.660 Solution number one is you store it at the facility that created it because it's already a nuclear risk,

00:32:13.580 if you will. And that's been working. And then the fact that we might be able to eat that waste with

00:32:19.480 new generations of plants, that looks pretty good. So I think, I think that, uh, there was a whole

00:32:26.140 bunch of persuasion by all the right people to finally get the message to Congress. And, you know,

00:32:33.340 I think other countries were having the same realizations. So I think it was a whole bunch

00:32:37.160 of things happening at the same time, but essential to it is that it got framed correctly for the first

00:32:43.420 time. Um, if you were thinking of nuclear as safe or unsafe, that was the wrong frame.

00:32:53.360 It got changed to climate change solution or don't solve it. That's a big difference because once the

00:33:02.300 left had decided that climate change was their big existential risk, it was over. You could, you could

00:33:09.260 then, you know, see the future. As soon as they had said it's our existential risk, they didn't have

00:33:15.120 any other solution. There was only one solution. Once you said this is, this could end, you know,

00:33:21.580 civilization and you're all afraid of it. It had to go this way all the time. You do, it just had to be

00:33:27.060 greased. So the people like, you know, Schellenberger, uh, you know, greasing it, um, and, uh,

00:33:35.440 Mark Schneider and, you know, I tried to help. And I know a lot of you who are even watching this

00:33:40.420 would retweet us and, you know, boost the message. So I would say that this is yet another example of

00:33:46.940 the social media effect being productive because I think that smart people, you know, got to people

00:33:54.360 who were influential in terms of persuasion, influential people like me and between the,

00:34:01.220 the technical know-how and the reframing, it made it safe for politicians to say, hey, hey, hey,

00:34:09.220 now we're thinking about climate change. And we love science because they already said, the left said,

00:34:15.940 we love science. And they were denying science like mofos. You know, if they were against nuclear, 1.00

00:34:22.260 they were just denying science because we knew it was a safe alternative relative to the other risks.

00:34:27.960 So, so that's all good, but it's interesting to watch it all come together at the right time.

00:34:36.300 Uh, I think the lights had to actually turn off before we got serious about it, but that happened.

00:34:41.820 Um, I did a little research on, uh, I try to, try to figure out where ideas come from,

00:34:48.720 especially ones that I'm involved in. And here's a, I'm going to give you a, uh, a little history

00:34:55.740 of this idea. The, the idea of using small habits, changing a small thing to get some incentive or

00:35:01.760 get some, get some momentum going to get something done. Um, there was a book in 20, 2012, a book by

00:35:10.040 Charles Duhigg, The Power of Habits, giant bestseller. And The Power of Habits talked about how to,

00:35:16.460 how to change your habits or modify your habits to, to get what you want. Now, I don't remember it

00:35:22.280 talking about small changes. Maybe it was in there. I'm not sure. Now, uh, here's something

00:35:28.560 you don't know that the author of that book spent a full day with me. Um, so Charles Duhigg came to

00:35:36.160 my home and just spent the day with me, um, interviewing me about the things that he thought

00:35:41.260 would be relevant to his book. Now, I didn't make it into the book, so I don't think there, well,

00:35:47.040 I know that there's no mention of me in the book, but he did spend a day with me, um, sussing

00:35:53.480 out my habits for success because I've been talking about and blogging about them. In October

00:35:59.180 of 2013, now, if you're an author, you know that, um, it takes over a year to write a book

00:36:06.040 and get it published. So when, when he was talking to me was about the time I was putting together

00:36:11.900 in my book, how to fail at almost everything and still went big. And there I talked about,

00:36:15.860 um, micro steps, taking the smallest step and getting some momentum going. So that was 2013,

00:36:24.040 right? So power of habits, Duhigg was 2012, roughly the same time. And he interviewed me

00:36:29.220 roughly the same time how to fail came out, talked about micro steps. And then this is what

00:36:35.140 I found out today. Uh, on December, uh, just a few months after that, an ebook came out. Now you

00:36:42.320 can do an ebook pretty quickly because you don't have to wait for the whole printing, publishing

00:36:46.400 cycle. And just a few months after my book came out, uh, Stephen Geis, uh, published mini habits,

00:36:55.240 which is this concept, you know, getting a little habit going to, to movie in the right direction.

00:37:01.100 So that was just a few months later. And then after mini habits came micro habits by Brian

00:37:08.340 Ledger. Um, and then came, he was in 2015. I think that was an ebook too. And then came

00:37:17.160 small habits, big changes, how the tiniest steps lead to happier, healthier you. Steve Handel

00:37:23.020 in 2018. And then atomic habits, October, 2018. Uh, now these were obviously being written about

00:37:31.480 the same time because they came out pretty close to each other. So then atomic, atomic habits was a

00:37:36.940 huge bestseller. And I think that's the one that moves the, moves the needle the most on this topic.

00:37:41.900 And then right after that was tiny habits by BJ Fogg. Now here's the question.

00:37:50.920 Listen to these books, power of habits, then mind, how to feel, then mini habits, micro habits,

00:37:57.420 small habits, atomic habits, and tiny habits. Yeah. Is nano habits taken? Now here's the question.

00:38:06.720 Did I cause all of these or were they going to happen anyway? Did I cause them or were they going

00:38:14.040 to happen anyway? What do you think? Just looking at your comments, zeitgeist, good answer. That's

00:38:23.880 where I'm going to go with this too. So, um, you accelerated it. So some think, some, some people

00:38:31.240 think I had a role in it. Some don't. Let me tell you the story about, uh, Isaac Newton. My favorite

00:38:38.500 story about Isaac Newton, you know, you, of course you automatically think gravity with Newton, but,

00:38:45.340 uh, my favorite story about Isaac Newton is that he invented calculus just to solve a problem he was

00:38:51.440 working on. He invented calculus just to solve a problem he was working on. Now the fun story about

00:39:00.420 this is that somebody else invented calculus at the same time in the 1600s. Two people independently

00:39:08.960 invented calculus at the same time in different countries. They didn't know the other one was

00:39:17.160 doing it and they didn't share it. They, yeah, there was no communication. What's up with that?

00:39:23.300 Right? Um, somebody will give me the name of the other guy, Leibniz. Thank you. I knew it would take

00:39:30.220 about five seconds for you well-educated people to give me that name. Yeah. Leibniz, another, was he

00:39:37.060 an astronomer or scientist? I don't know what he was, but he invented it at the same time. So they, they

00:39:42.260 get sort of co-credit. So here's the question. How in the world do you explain calculus being invented

00:39:49.680 at the same time in two different places? Well, here's one explanation. It was just time. You know,

00:39:57.660 there, there was enough other stuff happening that the idea of calculus could have been thought of by

00:40:04.840 other people. In other words, the, the environment of whatever scientific mathematical things were

00:40:10.380 floating around was suggestive enough that two people got the same idea at the same time from maybe

00:40:16.860 the same kinds of influences, maybe, or they were trying to solve the same kinds of problems at the

00:40:21.580 same time. So maybe it wasn't a big coincidence. Maybe the environment just suggested it and two

00:40:26.860 of them picked it up. Likewise, there is something about the environment that changed to make all this

00:40:33.820 micro habit, tiny habit stuff make sense at the same time. And the thing that changed was life got

00:40:40.360 really complicated. Life got too complicated. That's the thing that changed everywhere at the

00:40:46.300 same time. So does it make sense that there would be more than one person who would say, how do you

00:40:53.540 solve all this complicated life stuff? Like, what do you do about it? And one of the solutions is to make

00:40:59.540 small steps because you know, it seems overwhelming to do anything bigger than a small step.

00:41:04.720 So it could be that the environment certainly just served up a situation that people like me and

00:41:13.360 people, other people said, you know, I can only think of one way to approach this. And we came up

00:41:18.520 with the same idea. You know, I'm not, I'm not going to compare this idea to calculus, right? So I'm not

00:41:24.600 comparing myself to Isaac Newton. Somebody's always going to say that. I think he compared himself to

00:41:30.420 Isaac Newton. No, no, I'm not doing that. I'm just saying that people think of the same ideas at

00:41:36.380 the same time. The other possibility is that I did have some influence on it. I can't rule that out

00:41:42.720 either. Well, it turns out that Mike Pence was right. So the New York Times commissioned a poll and

00:41:49.560 found that a majority of women and nearly half of men said it's unacceptable to have dinner or drinks

00:41:55.000 alone with someone of the opposite sex other than their spouse. Oh, oh, I am so going to have to 1.00

00:42:04.660 complain. Let me listen to this again. And you should be offended on behalf of other people, if not

00:42:13.740 yourself. It's unacceptable to have dinner or drinks alone with someone of the opposite sex. 1.00

00:42:19.080 Because that's the only people we have sex with, right? The only people you have sex with are people 0.98

00:42:26.680 of the opposite sex. So I can go to dinner with a gay guy and my wife won't care. So when did the 1.00

00:42:38.520 only kind of sex we think about turn into heterosexual sex? You think you can be woke? I will overwoke your 0.86

00:42:47.020 ass so hard. You can't overwoke me. No. New York Times, go back to your troglodyte world. Crawl back into 1.00

00:42:56.420 your caves. And don't ever, don't ever darken our doorway with your misogynistic, anti-LGBTQ crap. 1.00

00:43:07.840 Your crap. You can have sex with anybody you want. It's 2021 and you do not have to limit yourself to 1.00

00:43:16.680 the opposite sex. And by the way, what is the opposite sex? Correct me if I'm wrong. But the 1.00

00:43:27.240 idea of an opposite sex suggests there are two genders, which I don't, I can't, I can't buy off on 1.00

00:43:37.340 that. I believe there is infinite variety and that we are all special in our very different and unique

00:43:44.680 sexualities. I don't have an opposite, for God's sake. What is the opposite of bisexual? 0.68

00:43:52.220 Huh? I think this opposite stuff is very anti-woke and I complain. By the way, in an unrelated

00:44:00.820 view, I've been very jealous of the black community because they can sing all of the lyrics of their 1.00

00:44:08.700 favorite songs when they come on the radio or on some device. Because most of the best songs lately

00:44:16.980 have the N-word in them. And if you are black, you can just sing the entire lyrics, including that N-word. 1.00

00:44:25.920 But if you're white, you can't even sing your favorite song. Assuming your favorite song has those words in 1.00

00:44:31.840 it. If you're white, you can't even sing your favorite song out loud. So I thought, well, I do agree 1.00

00:44:41.960 that black Americans, they could have their reserved word. And I agree with it. It's an ugly word. And if 1.00

00:44:51.660 they want to reserve that word for just themselves and they have some historical, you know, reason for it

00:44:57.900 everything, I'm all for that. No objection whatsoever. But why can't white people have a 0.96

00:45:04.120 word that they can use and nobody else can? Why can't we do that? And so I did a little

00:45:10.120 brainstorming and I solved it. I was going to say cracker and say, hey, hey, I can call myself a

00:45:17.480 cracker and I can call other white people crackers. I mean, I could if I didn't identify as black, 0.99

00:45:23.320 but you get the point. Um, but cracker, it's not really, it doesn't sound good if it's in

00:45:32.160 a song. It needs to be cracker. Because the N-word, it has, you know, an E-R ending, but

00:45:38.720 also an A-H ending or an A ending. So instead of cracker, which is not cool at all, it's going

00:45:45.540 to be cracker. Cracker. And instead of the B-word, which you'll hear a lot in popular music,

00:45:51.200 bitch. Um, I don't like to use that word. I feel that's very disrespectful. So I want a, 0.98

00:45:58.320 sort of a white version of that. And I think Karen would do it. So I'm going to write a white 0.98

00:46:04.700 rap song in which it uses the word cracker quite a bit and refers to women as Karens because I don't

00:46:12.600 want to use the B-word. I think it's going to be a bestseller. We'll see. Anyway, Mike Pence was

00:46:20.060 right. Um, you don't want to have, uh, a meal with somebody that's going to get you in trouble.

00:46:25.880 Um, I have, I have adopted the Mike Pence, um, philosophy. I don't know if I've mentioned

00:46:31.880 that to you, but as a merry person, I would not have drinks. Uh, well, I don't drink, but

00:46:36.820 I wouldn't have drinks or, uh, dinner with a woman alone, nor a gay man, nor a gay man, 0.99

00:46:44.900 nor a, um, anybody else who might want to jump on me. Cause you know, that's a big problem.

00:46:56.040 The women, they just want to jump all over me. No, it's not a big problem. It turns out it's 1.00

00:47:01.380 not a big problem. All right. The Rolling Stones have decided to retire their song Brown Sugar.

00:47:06.060 The biggest surprising thing about this is how did they get along with it? How did they

00:47:12.480 get away with that song as long as they did? Isn't that the surprising part of the story?

00:47:18.560 For the longest time I've said to myself, is there anybody except the Rolling Stones who

00:47:25.920 could have done this song, you know, into the 2000s? I don't think so. I don't think so.

00:47:31.800 I think they did have a, like a protected status there. Now, part of it is because nobody is,

00:47:38.160 nobody is wondering if, uh, you know, Mick Jagger is a racist. Like literally nobody thinks

00:47:44.560 that. I mean, if you look at his dating history and everything else, it's pretty obvious that

00:47:48.920 he's not a racist. And we assume the same thing about the rest of the Stones. In fact, they're,

00:47:53.480 the Stones are the most, probably the most biggest promoters of, you know, black music. And

00:48:00.460 they say they borrowed slash stole it. And, and they're very generous about saying who really,

00:48:05.640 you know, muddy waters and everybody who should get the real credit. So we know the Rolling Stones

00:48:10.440 are nothing like racist in any normal way that we think of the word. But I did wonder how they got

00:48:16.340 away with that for so long. Now, I am aware that it's a anti-slavery lyrics. If you actually knew

00:48:25.120 what the lyrics were about, you would understand it was about the horror of slavery and therefore

00:48:29.980 there's no bad messaging intended. But I didn't know that. I've listened to that song about a million

00:48:38.320 times. I had no idea. I had no idea that it was about slavery and the, you know, I just thought it

00:48:48.080 was a little sort of not current way to refer to each other, if you know what I mean. So they decided

00:48:55.900 to retire it. I think that's probably a reasonable decision. There'll be a lot of, a lot of pushback

00:49:02.360 on that. I think Mick Jagger's take on it was it just wasn't worth the trouble. If people were going

00:49:07.040 to complain about it, it was too hard to explain that, you know, we're all on the same side here.

00:49:11.720 The song isn't what you think. It's just too much work. So, so I think I agree with him on a business

00:49:17.220 level that just wasn't worth the effort. They have other songs. Rasmussen says that 68% of those polled

00:49:26.000 either strongly or somewhat agree that the heated encounters between concerned parents and school

00:49:31.800 boards is protected speech. Yay. Two-thirds of the country still likes protected speech. Now, of course,

00:49:40.860 things can get heated and, you know, there has to be a limit, but good news. Two-thirds of the country

00:49:48.220 still like free speech. Biden's poll numbers are still plunging. 38% approval. That's based on doing

00:49:57.860 everything wrong. If you do everything wrong. All right. There's a, there was a study that came out

00:50:04.260 that said baby aspirin might help a lot for COVID. It was not a randomized, large controlled trial.

00:50:11.480 So it's a study which does need confirmation. You should not be taking baby aspirin because you

00:50:18.240 heard that there was that one study. But here's the weird thing. At about the same time that the news

00:50:26.900 was reporting the aspirin could be like a real godsend for people with COVID because apparently

00:50:33.380 it reduces blood clots. At the same time, we heard that unconfirmed, right? You still have to wait for

00:50:39.360 the real randomized trial. At the same time, just about the same time, it was announced that the medical

00:50:46.800 community says you should not be taking a baby aspirin every day to prevent strokes and other

00:50:53.900 problems. Is it a coincidence that the moment it works for COVID, or it looks like it might

00:51:00.000 unconfirmed, is the same time that the drug industry says stop taking it? And of course,

00:51:07.520 all the conspiracy people say, uh, that's just so you'll sell more vaccines, right? You're trying

00:51:14.440 to make people think that they can't easily treat it themselves or reduce their risk by taking an

00:51:19.580 aspirin. Well, I don't know that those are connected, but you sort of suspect it, don't

00:51:25.820 you? We live in a world in which that's a little bit too big of a coincidence. So I'm not going

00:51:31.240 to say that's a coincidence. I'm also not going to say it's not. It could be. I'm not going to rule

00:51:38.860 it out as coincidence, but it doesn't look like one, does it? It really doesn't. But here's the most

00:51:46.840 confusing part of the story. Are the rest of you just learning that, uh, baby aspirin is not

00:51:54.140 recommended? Um, I learned that years ago on the news. And then I asked my doctor and my doctor said,

00:52:05.740 yeah, we don't recommend that. Don't take that. And yet today people are treating it like it's new

00:52:12.840 news. It was years ago we do this, right? Now was the problem, was the problem that it wasn't

00:52:24.380 promoted as strongly as it was because they were selling a lot of baby aspirin, maybe? And maybe

00:52:30.100 the, maybe big baby aspirin was behind it. I don't know. I don't know how exactly that would be the

00:52:35.600 case. Um, doctors still prescribed it. So here's the deal. How many of you were still on baby aspirin

00:52:45.980 as of this morning? In the comments, how many of you are from the doctor? Let's say a doctor

00:52:52.580 recommended. How many are on doctor recommended baby aspirin as of today? A lot of you, a lot of you

00:53:03.440 look at the comments. It's just streaming by. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. My spouse. I am, I am. Yes,

00:53:10.620 yes, yes. A lot of no's. But the, how many of you went to a doctor who didn't know that aspirin was no

00:53:17.940 longer recommended? Here's a little wake up call for you. Let me, let me show you just what just

00:53:27.400 happened to all of you who are still taking baby aspirin because your doctor recommended it. May I do

00:53:33.260 this is my impression of what just happened to you right now? What? I would do it again,

00:53:48.480 but it kind of hurt. Your doctor didn't know as much as I did about baby aspirin if you're still

00:54:01.700 taking it because I heard this a long time ago. And you can see in the comments, many, many people

00:54:08.260 were aware of this for years, years. It's been in the news. This is not new. I don't know what's

00:54:15.380 going on. Are we just being gaslighted in some weird way? Anyway, link to a study. I don't have one.

00:54:23.040 You heard there was a big crash of a twin engine Cessna crashed into some buildings and a UPS truck

00:54:31.360 in San Diego. The driver of the UPS truck was killed by the airplane. Now, let me tell you,

00:54:39.600 if you're a UPS driver and you're putting in a million miles a year on the road and the thing

00:54:46.860 that kills you is an airplane, it was time. I don't mean to be insensitive to the family,

00:54:54.620 but talk about when your time is up, your time is up because a million miles of driving a UPS

00:55:01.140 truck didn't seem to faze him, but the airplane got him. All right. What question do I ask myself

00:55:09.000 when I hear that a small airplane crashed? What's the first question I ask myself? I mean,

00:55:15.480 after I asked myself if my wife was in it, because she flies Cessnas. So the first thing I ask is,

00:55:21.680 where's my wife? So I want to make sure she wasn't in it. The second thing I ask is,

00:55:29.700 what kind of doctor was he? Yeah. That's the second question. What kind of doctor was he?

00:55:39.980 Do you know why? Well, I don't know why, but doctors crash a lot of airplanes. So much so that

00:55:48.680 when I heard this, I said, and I'm not joking, the first thing I thought was, what kind of doctor

00:55:54.200 is he? He's a cardiologist. Now, the airplane is not the, there's a brand of airplane. I won't

00:56:02.320 mention it because I'll probably get sued or something, but not the Cessnas. The Cessnas are

00:56:06.220 actually easy to fly. So a doctor in the Cessna should not be crashing, but a doctor in another

00:56:13.660 airplane that I won't mention, sometimes called the doctor killer, more common. But it was still

00:56:19.820 the first question I asked, what kind of doctor was he? Sure enough, I don't know how to explain

00:56:24.200 that exactly. Do you? I don't know why doctors crash more airplanes than other people. Maybe they

00:56:30.400 can afford airplanes. Is that it? So Columbus got canceled. But there's still a lot of people

00:56:38.300 who are pretty happy about it. We changed that to Indigenous People's Day. I have some slightly

00:56:46.200 mixed feelings about Columbus, but I'm okay with canceling him. I'm okay with canceling Columbus.

00:56:52.740 Columbus. Columbus was horrible. I don't know if you've ever read, you know, the things that

00:57:00.640 Columbus and his actual crew did to the locals. I mean, I read a story where they used them as

00:57:07.220 horses. They actually would have them carry them on their shoulders so that, you know, Columbus's

00:57:14.360 men didn't, like, I don't know, get their feet dirty or something. Yeah, they beat them and killed 0.98

00:57:19.640 them and tortured them and treated them like horses, basically. Now, if there was anybody

00:57:26.280 who should get canceled, I would think it would be anybody involved with something like that.

00:57:30.760 So, I mean, it's a little bit like saying, you know, Hitler did a lot of bad things, but

00:57:37.980 you have to look at his accomplishments, too. The Volkswagen. I mean, it feels a little like

00:57:43.340 that. It's like, yeah, the Volkswagen's cool. I don't know if it's true that Hitler was behind

00:57:48.700 the Volkswagen. You know, it's probably not true, but just using it for my example. I

00:57:54.680 don't know that we can say Columbus did some awesome stuff, too. First of all, he didn't

00:58:00.500 find the right part of the world. And second of all, he was like a major torturer when he

00:58:04.260 was. So, I guess I'm in favor of Indigenous Peoples Day. You know, it feels like everything

00:58:12.060 white and European is getting canceled. But seriously, he was a torturer. I mean, that's 0.98

00:58:18.840 got to count for something. DeSantis went the other way because he's so good at this populist

00:58:24.280 stuff. But he characterized Columbus as, quote, a singular figure in Western civilization who

00:58:30.720 exemplified courage, risk-taking, and heroism in the face of enormous odds. A visionary,

00:58:40.380 et cetera. Now, those things can all be true, but can be said of other people who did bad

00:58:46.380 things. So, you remember the story about the trans employee who got suspended at Netflix,

00:58:54.600 allegedly for complaining about Dave Chappelle's show. But that was fake news. She did not get

00:59:00.460 suspended for complaining. And Netflix says that, and they've reinstated her. But the complaint

00:59:07.780 was that she got on some kind of a Zoom call that was only for executives. But it turns out

00:59:12.720 she was invited. Somebody sent her the link. So, some executive or somebody who had the link

00:59:18.480 seems to have invited her, and she didn't know she couldn't be there. So, there wasn't any

00:59:22.940 bad intention. And once Netflix looked into it, they just didn't find anything wrong. So,

00:59:29.100 they said, all right, you're back in. Do you like that? I like that. I like that. I like this

00:59:36.720 outcome. I like that the employee could complain, and that that wasn't the reason she got fired.

00:59:43.260 She was called to task for doing something that looked like it was against the rules.

00:59:49.000 But they didn't fire her. They just said, suspend you. We're going to look into this.

00:59:52.320 They looked into it. There was nothing to it. They said, oh, sorry. You're back.

00:59:58.620 I'm okay with that. She got a little attention. Her point of view got spread a little bit better.

01:00:05.060 Netflix looks like a responsible employer. I think everybody won. I think the trans community won.

01:00:11.360 I think Chappelle won. I think Netflix won. This is one of those weird stories where everybody won.

01:00:16.780 Am I wrong? Am I wrong? Didn't everybody win? How often do you get that? Everybody won?

01:00:26.300 Was it planned that way? No, I don't think it was planned that way.

01:00:29.400 I think it's just one of these rare situations where everybody did the right thing.

01:00:35.500 Maybe we should note that. Maybe we should note. Rare situation where everybody did the right thing.

01:00:41.360 I'm not saying you agree with their opinions, and you don't have to.

01:00:47.400 Shatner down. Oh, is Captain Kirk up? Did he make it?

01:00:53.500 Oh, so he's already been up and back. So Shatner's back.

01:00:58.380 Well, I'll tell you, if I had been on that flight, there's a pretty good chance I would have,

01:01:06.720 shall we say, Shatner my flight suit. That's right.

01:01:12.440 You put me in that experimental flight situation, and I would Shatner my flight suit.

01:01:23.020 And how's the Dow doing?

01:01:28.160 Yes, there is driving, but I get to go a little bit later today.

01:01:32.400 All right. But I do need to go.

01:01:41.040 Yeah, space travel for 10 minutes.

01:01:43.200 He's got four minutes of flight stuff.

01:01:52.460 Columbus was great because he was a good navigator, right?

01:01:55.740 And you know who else was great? O.J. Simpson.

01:01:58.520 O.J. Simpson was great at football.

01:02:03.620 Let's not forget that.

01:02:05.820 Let's not forget that O.J. was really good at football.

01:02:08.740 Same thing.

01:02:10.580 Yeah, Columbus, O.J., kind of similar.

01:02:16.320 Got to take the good with the bad or sort them out.

01:02:19.160 All right.

01:02:25.480 Yeah, I see you mentioning the aircraft correctly.

01:02:30.680 Read Delaney to find out why you're wrong.

01:02:33.900 Wrong about Columbus?

01:02:41.540 All right.

01:02:42.120 Carol Delaney.

01:02:43.300 Yes.

01:02:44.020 So there's...

01:02:45.160 Apparently somebody must be defending Columbus.

01:02:47.680 You know, does it matter?

01:02:51.140 Does it matter if the real story is that Columbus was an awesome guy

01:02:54.620 and he never did anything bad to anybody?

01:02:57.260 It kind of doesn't matter.

01:02:59.200 Because that's not who we think he is.

01:03:02.060 And as a national symbol, it only matters who you think he is.

01:03:06.100 It doesn't matter who he actually was.

01:03:08.800 Unfortunately, it's not relevant.

01:03:10.780 Should be.

01:03:11.900 If you're telling me it should be, or the truth matters, does it?

01:03:15.240 No, the truth should matter.

01:03:18.460 It doesn't.

01:03:19.880 The truth should matter in a perfect world.

01:03:24.140 All right.

01:03:25.220 That's all for now.

01:03:26.200 And I will go do something else now.

01:03:29.460 And I hope you agree.

01:03:31.360 This was the best thing that ever happened to you today.

01:03:33.700 Where are you?

01:03:35.120 Where are you?

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 13, 2021

Episode 1528 Scott Adams： I'll Tell You Which News is Fake Today. Spoiler： Most of it.

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript