Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 18, 2021


Episode 1533 Scott Adams: I'll Tell You About the Time I Met Colin Powell and More


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 1 minute

Words per Minute

147.38956

Word Count

9,127

Sentence Count

651

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

12


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum, bum.
00:00:06.660 Good morning, everybody.
00:00:09.380 And in a moment, YouTube will be up to speed and...
00:00:14.800 Now, welcome to the best thing that's ever happened to anybody, anywhere.
00:00:20.860 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:22.720 And it's a highlight of not only your day, not only your week and your year,
00:00:27.520 but your entire life.
00:00:29.040 Nay, the history of civilization.
00:00:31.560 That's how good it is.
00:00:33.400 With talent on loan from God, I know what you're thinking.
00:00:37.680 You're thinking, I stole that from Rush Limbaugh.
00:00:40.580 No, no.
00:00:41.980 When God loans talent, and then the person using it doesn't need it anymore,
00:00:47.640 it goes back to God, and then God's like, well, I got all this talent.
00:00:52.100 Got to give it to somebody.
00:00:53.200 I think I'll lend it out again.
00:00:55.320 So I sensed an opportunity, and I said to myself,
00:00:58.360 where can I get all that Rush Limbaugh talent that he was borrowing from God?
00:01:03.880 So I went to God directly, made a deal, because I'm kind of a deal maker.
00:01:09.100 And now I'm a talent on loan for God until he takes it back, which could be any moment.
00:01:15.400 How would you like to make this moment even more special than it is?
00:01:18.600 I mean, really, how could it be?
00:01:21.240 But watch this.
00:01:22.780 We can take this to another level.
00:01:24.720 Yeah.
00:01:25.260 You think you're having a good time now?
00:01:27.140 You haven't seen anything.
00:01:28.900 This gets so much better.
00:01:30.720 Watch this.
00:01:31.500 All you need is a cup or a mug, a glass, a tanker, a salad, a salad, a canteen jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:01:36.220 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:01:38.120 Feel the excitement.
00:01:39.980 Feel the excitement.
00:01:42.000 Do you feel it?
00:01:43.080 Chills, right?
00:01:44.000 This is the simultaneous sip.
00:01:47.240 And it's the dopamine hit of the day.
00:01:50.440 It's the unparalleled pleasure.
00:01:52.520 And it's going to happen now.
00:01:54.580 Go.
00:01:58.760 Ooh, ooh, what's happening?
00:02:00.580 Oh.
00:02:01.720 Oh, ah.
00:02:04.000 I got such a surge of antibodies there for a moment.
00:02:07.000 It was disconcerting.
00:02:08.800 I didn't know what was going on.
00:02:10.920 But now, ooh, I can feel it now.
00:02:12.620 Oh, those antibodies coming online.
00:02:15.360 Ooh.
00:02:17.040 I'll tell you.
00:02:18.340 Science has proven that if you get three vaccination shots plus a cup of coffee, it's very unlikely you'll die from COVID.
00:02:28.660 Have you heard that?
00:02:29.400 This is the newest science.
00:02:30.480 If you have three vaccination shots or natural immunity plus vaccinations and a cup of coffee, your odds of dying from COVID, so small, I wouldn't even worry about it.
00:02:46.640 Yeah, that's how good it is.
00:02:47.680 I just saw that there's a company called Framery selling a product that the world needs desperately.
00:02:57.280 It's a cubicle for your house.
00:02:59.280 It's actually like an enlarged phone booth, a silent chamber, so you can make your phone calls without having to hear the rest of the family, I guess, do your Zoom calls in there, too.
00:03:13.940 That's right.
00:03:14.520 It's about time somebody made a cubicle for your house because the only thing good about working at home, well, actually, there's lots of things good about working at home, but it does get you out of the cubicle until you buy a cubicle for your home and put yourself back in it.
00:03:30.580 Oh, I can't stand being outside of the cubicle.
00:03:34.480 I need one for my home.
00:03:36.420 I have to admit, I kind of liked how it looked, thinking of getting one, because for all those phone calls you make that you don't want anybody to hear, pretty good.
00:03:48.340 Pretty good idea.
00:03:50.700 Well, China launched a hypersonic nuclear missile into low orbit, I guess.
00:03:58.360 Or did they?
00:03:59.240 Or did they?
00:04:02.180 Well, we have two versions of the story.
00:04:04.120 One is that they were testing a nuclear missile that would go into space and it would be hard to track and hard to thwart if you're the opponent.
00:04:14.000 But when asked about it, China said, that's no weapon.
00:04:18.580 That's just a rocket.
00:04:20.020 We're just testing a spacecraft.
00:04:23.120 So what was it?
00:04:25.420 Was it a nuclear weapon they were testing?
00:04:29.240 Or were they just doing some space testing?
00:04:33.340 Testing on a spacecraft?
00:04:35.260 Or is it really the same thing?
00:04:38.660 Is it the same thing?
00:04:40.380 Because it seems to me that if you got really good at sending a spacecraft into low Earth orbit,
00:04:46.020 you could send something else into low Earth orbit, couldn't you?
00:04:51.040 Couldn't you?
00:04:51.440 So I'm not so sure that the either or of it's a spacecraft versus it's a weapon, not so different.
00:05:00.960 Now, remember I told you that we can't possibly have any hope of having some power in space unless we have a robust nuclear energy program domestically.
00:05:14.420 Because you would need that skill set to build nuclear engines that power space, and you're not going to have, you know, it's not going to be wind power in space, etc.
00:05:23.040 It's going to be nuclear.
00:05:24.100 So once Congress heard, let me ask you this.
00:05:31.860 One of the things I tried to add to the nuclear energy conversation is the notion that you had to do it for defense purposes.
00:05:42.240 For military purposes, you absolutely had to have a strong nuclear energy program domestically.
00:05:50.020 Because you had to build that skill set to take it into space, and if you give up space, you've given up everything in the long run.
00:05:57.640 So was there ever a chance that we would not go as strong for nuclear energy domestically?
00:06:06.180 The answer is there wasn't.
00:06:07.700 It was always going to go in this direction, but it took, it would require that the stuff that, you know, Elon Musk is doing and Jeff Bezos is doing and Richard Branson,
00:06:20.500 it would require that activity to make us hyper-aware that space is important strategically.
00:06:27.700 So that happened, right?
00:06:29.420 So we had so much attention about these low-earth, you know, low-orbit stuff, that now we're all thinking about going to Mars and everything.
00:06:36.540 And that's all Musk, that's all Bezos, that's all Richard Branson, mostly Musk, I think.
00:06:43.940 So once you knew that we would be thinking about really colonizing space and not just dicking around a little bit there,
00:06:51.440 but getting serious about having a space presence, once that was a given,
00:06:57.340 it was guaranteed that we would have to have a domestic nuclear program that was quite robust,
00:07:04.260 and they would have to be reinvigorated, because the military requirement is an open-and-shut discussion.
00:07:16.340 You know, as soon as you take somebody who knows what they're talking about, and I'll bet this happened, by the way,
00:07:20.740 I'll bet you somewhere in Congress there was a general who said this to Congress,
00:07:26.400 probably in direct language, some version of, we need to have a domestic energy program for nuclear,
00:07:33.140 or just give up.
00:07:35.420 Because the alternative is, you just give up being a superpower.
00:07:39.360 That's it.
00:07:40.240 It's binary.
00:07:41.560 You either have that capability, or you just stop being a superpower 20 years out, or whenever it happens.
00:07:47.880 So there was no chance it was going to go any other way, but I hope that those advocating for it made it happen faster.
00:07:57.540 I'm going to have a little recorded interview with Bjorn Lomborg this week.
00:08:05.400 I'll release it probably pretty quickly after I make it.
00:08:10.300 And he also is one of the first people talking about climate change and the economics of it.
00:08:15.840 So that'll be interesting, sort of related to this.
00:08:21.340 I understand that our intelligence agencies were completely surprised that China had the capability
00:08:26.960 to launch this hypersonic spacecraft and or missile.
00:08:33.000 That seems like a pretty big thing to miss, doesn't it?
00:08:37.260 Really?
00:08:38.040 Our intelligence agencies really didn't know that this was on the board?
00:08:42.500 But maybe they did, and they just can't tell us that they knew.
00:08:48.740 Because if China knew that we knew, maybe that would give up our sources somehow.
00:08:55.020 I'm not sure we're surprised, but the public was.
00:08:58.780 Well, Jon Stewart is making news.
00:09:00.360 He's got a new show.
00:09:01.440 So he's been promoting it, I guess, talking to a lot of people.
00:09:04.440 Is it my imagination, or is Jon Stewart, didn't he just push Bill Maher off the page for the first weekend?
00:09:14.800 You know how every weekend the headlines would be, well, Bill Maher said on Friday, Bill Maher said this.
00:09:23.300 But this week it's all about Jon Stewart.
00:09:26.420 It's Jon Stewart.
00:09:27.100 I feel like Bill Maher is like the poor man's Jon Stewart.
00:09:31.000 And now Jon Stewart is back, and it just, like, pushed Bill Maher off the page.
00:09:36.180 Because in some ways they have something in common, which is they're both independent thinkers,
00:09:40.640 who you imagine lean left, but they're willing to criticize the left as well as the right.
00:09:45.480 So they are very productive people that way.
00:09:49.240 But apparently Jon Stewart made some news because he was unwilling to say that Biden's doing a good job.
00:09:58.280 He basically said nobody's doing a good job, including Biden.
00:10:02.340 So if Jon Stewart is lost to the left, or as it's reported,
00:10:10.720 he pointedly declined to endorse President Joe Biden for doing an effective job,
00:10:15.800 and he said, quote, I don't think anybody is.
00:10:19.240 So that's a pretty fair statement.
00:10:25.980 But he's got a lot of smart things to say,
00:10:28.340 and it seemed to me that there was a giant opening for a Jon Stewart, don't you think?
00:10:34.960 Do you think he's going to run for office?
00:10:37.840 What do you think?
00:10:39.620 I feel as if Jon Stewart might be,
00:10:45.040 might be angling toward running for office.
00:10:48.460 He's well-informed, he's popular, he can do the communication part.
00:10:54.000 The right isn't going to hate him.
00:10:56.320 I don't think the right hates him, right?
00:10:58.120 They might not agree with him on stuff.
00:10:59.980 But he generally follows the data, doesn't he?
00:11:04.560 I mean, when he's doing his act, you know, if he's doing the act, that's different.
00:11:08.600 That's supposed to be biased.
00:11:10.000 But I feel like he has a weird ability to appeal to both sides if he wanted to.
00:11:17.580 He could be dangerous.
00:11:19.000 Dangerous in the sense that he could win if he ran for office.
00:11:22.540 I think he has exactly the right skill set.
00:11:26.160 Exactly the right skill set.
00:11:27.680 Could be interesting.
00:11:30.460 Keep an eye on that.
00:11:33.540 I saw a suggestion that we should call the vaccinations, the ones for COVID, shots, not vaccines.
00:11:41.880 What do you think of that?
00:11:42.980 Now, we could call it the jab or the shot.
00:11:45.180 But what do you think of that as a compromise for those who say,
00:11:48.820 no, stop calling it a vaccination because it doesn't completely vaccinate?
00:11:54.140 Let's just call it the shot.
00:11:55.360 Now, doesn't that work for everybody?
00:11:58.860 Because there's nobody who would argue that it's delivered by a shot.
00:12:02.760 But then you get out of the hole, did we promise you it would be 100% or not?
00:12:08.360 Well, it looks like everybody likes that idea.
00:12:11.660 That might be the best idea I've ever suggested here.
00:12:14.100 It wasn't my idea, by the way.
00:12:15.680 This came for me from a gentleman on Twitter just moments ago.
00:12:22.480 All right, let's call it the shot.
00:12:23.800 Let's call it the shot.
00:12:27.460 Yes, not my idea.
00:12:28.680 That is correct.
00:12:29.980 That was somebody else's idea.
00:12:31.700 But I like it.
00:12:34.160 I was alerted to a 2020 study, so it's been around a while.
00:12:37.840 It's a preprint, meaning it hasn't been peer-reviewed.
00:12:41.880 There's no randomized control trial here.
00:12:45.440 But interesting nonetheless.
00:12:47.920 Nonetheless.
00:12:48.260 And I want to give you, like, a long wind-up before I tell you this, because it's about a vitamin D study and latitude.
00:12:58.820 Here's the long wind-up.
00:13:00.360 I'm pretty sure that intelligence is mostly pattern recognition, which is why I'm also sure that we can build artificial intelligence that really seems like humans, because all we are is pattern recognition, but we're not very good at it.
00:13:18.300 And when we do it poorly, we become bigots and racists and misogynists and misenvious and whatever-ish you want to think about.
00:13:29.300 So we have to use pattern recognition because that's what our brain is.
00:13:33.800 It's like a lawnmower has to mow lawns.
00:13:36.820 Your lawnmower can't wash dishes.
00:13:38.820 It's just not made for that.
00:13:40.520 Your brain is just a pattern recognition machine, and it doesn't know how to turn off.
00:13:44.340 It can't not do it.
00:13:45.860 It can do it poorly.
00:13:47.700 It can do it very poorly, especially when it's about judging people.
00:13:52.240 But it can't turn off.
00:13:54.040 Now, let me give you a story that makes me sound good, so it will make you really disgusted pretty soon.
00:14:00.320 But if you can't handle that, you probably shouldn't be watching any of my content.
00:14:06.920 So let this be a warning to you.
00:14:11.300 If you can't handle somebody saying, I'm good at this thing, but I'm bad at this other thing, if they're both true,
00:14:20.300 if you can't handle that because it requires that somebody says they're good at something,
00:14:24.760 at the same time they're saying they're bad at something else,
00:14:27.320 if you can't handle that, this is not the content for you.
00:14:31.120 So just leave now.
00:14:33.180 All right, so years ago, and I may have told this story before somewhere,
00:14:37.920 I was working for the phone company,
00:14:39.960 and they were really good at training employees in a whole variety of skills.
00:14:44.080 One of the best experiences you'll ever have, weirdly, was working for the phone company when I did.
00:14:49.600 They would train you in everything from marketing to listening skills to reasoning skills,
00:14:56.120 all kinds of stuff, really good, too.
00:14:58.300 And one of the things that they brought in was a class we were required to take on critical thinking
00:15:05.800 and decision-making in complexity.
00:15:10.200 Decision-making in complexity.
00:15:11.960 So we were taught a rigorous process where you'd make a matrix and you'd put down all the variables
00:15:20.840 and you'd systematically rule out things.
00:15:23.740 You're like, well, if you imagine this was true, we can rule that out because of this fact.
00:15:29.800 So it was about ruling out things in complicated situations until you'd narrowed it down to what mattered.
00:15:36.280 So then we broke into teams and we were going to work on a specific question,
00:15:43.160 like a task that each team would have to work on.
00:15:46.580 And it was based on a real-life event that I'd not heard of at the time.
00:15:51.080 Maybe you hadn't either.
00:15:52.180 There was an airline that was trying to solve a mystery
00:15:55.640 that some but not all of their flight attendants were getting rashes,
00:16:01.640 like a red rash on their chest.
00:16:03.600 And they would get it near the beginning of flights
00:16:06.400 and they were trying to figure out what was causing it.
00:16:11.240 And it was just totally bedeviling them
00:16:14.060 because every time they thought they knew what was causing it,
00:16:18.420 they could rule that out.
00:16:20.340 And so we were given the task of figuring out,
00:16:24.460 just the way the airline did, what was causing it.
00:16:27.440 And what we were supposed to do is listen to this complicated story
00:16:33.200 with lots of variables, put it in our framework that they had taught us,
00:16:38.280 the matrix, and work for an hour or so.
00:16:40.720 And we were warned that a lot of people would never get the right answer.
00:16:43.880 It was actually designed to be complicated enough
00:16:46.560 that the instructor said,
00:16:48.600 some of you are just never going to get it.
00:16:50.820 But some of you might, and then you'll learn something.
00:16:52.980 So we go into our breakout rooms and we read the study.
00:16:57.780 And the study says lots of stuff, but among the stuff it said,
00:17:02.440 it said that the rash was affecting women but not men.
00:17:08.000 So that's one clue.
00:17:10.020 It was affecting some flights but not others.
00:17:15.300 So it was only women.
00:17:16.700 It was only at the beginning of the flight.
00:17:18.340 And it was only some flights.
00:17:22.780 Other flights never happened.
00:17:24.760 They would have zero cases on some flights,
00:17:27.060 even with the same flight attendant.
00:17:29.780 So what was it?
00:17:31.760 So we were supposed to look through all of the options,
00:17:34.900 except I read it and I said to myself,
00:17:37.420 wait a minute.
00:17:39.180 All of the flights in which it happens go over water.
00:17:43.820 Oceans.
00:17:44.220 All of the flights where it doesn't happen are not over water.
00:17:49.320 Just something I noticed as a pattern.
00:17:52.120 Now, they didn't call this pattern out.
00:17:53.840 It was just something I saw.
00:17:55.240 It was like, huh, seems like the ones that go over water have the problem.
00:17:59.720 The second one is it was only women.
00:18:02.940 What's the difference between women and men besides all of their biology?
00:18:07.960 The clothes they wear.
00:18:09.400 They wear different clothes.
00:18:11.700 Specifically, women wear a top which might be a little bit open at the top.
00:18:16.720 In other words, the part that got the so-called rash
00:18:23.300 was exposed on women but not on men
00:18:26.620 because men have their shirts closed.
00:18:29.240 So that was the most obvious thing.
00:18:31.100 One was exposed and one wasn't.
00:18:33.620 One was over water and one wasn't.
00:18:36.920 Thank you.
00:18:38.780 Of course, I'm leading you right to the answer,
00:18:41.160 so it's easier the way I led you to it.
00:18:43.820 Yes.
00:18:44.680 So the answer was that the new life vests,
00:18:48.140 because they got new life vests,
00:18:49.740 when they were demonstrated,
00:18:51.100 and they only demonstrated them when they were going over water,
00:18:54.220 the women would put them on
00:18:55.540 and it would touch against their open chest area
00:18:59.500 and they would just rub off.
00:19:01.220 So it wasn't a real rash.
00:19:02.260 It was actually just the color coming off of the preservers.
00:19:06.960 Now, here's the story.
00:19:09.700 We were supposed to spend an hour putting this into a matrix
00:19:12.700 and working through this process,
00:19:14.740 but I read the story and I said,
00:19:17.640 huh, looks like it's probably the life preservers.
00:19:22.420 I mean, I just read the story and looked at it and said,
00:19:25.040 looks like probably life preservers are the problem.
00:19:27.420 So when the rest of the team heard that,
00:19:30.800 they said, huh, let's see if that would make sense.
00:19:34.180 And it made sense with all the facts.
00:19:36.220 So we said, well, let's just take it back to the instructor
00:19:39.440 and see if this is the right answer.
00:19:41.320 So about five minutes into the process,
00:19:43.660 we go back and say,
00:19:44.840 we think this is the answer, it's the life preservers.
00:19:47.480 And the instructor looks at me and he said,
00:19:51.740 you cheated.
00:19:54.820 Because nobody's ever solved this before.
00:19:56.720 At least quickly.
00:19:58.540 I think some people got the right answer.
00:20:00.300 But nobody had ever solved it quickly.
00:20:02.260 Usually you had to work on it for an hour or so.
00:20:04.740 And he actually accused me of cheating.
00:20:06.820 He said, you've read this story in the news, haven't you?
00:20:09.460 And I hadn't.
00:20:10.980 I'd never heard of it.
00:20:14.400 And so,
00:20:15.640 how often does this happen to you?
00:20:18.860 The only things you get in trouble for
00:20:20.700 are the things you didn't really do.
00:20:22.840 I almost got fired.
00:20:24.100 You know,
00:20:26.540 it actually became sort of like a risky situation.
00:20:29.960 Because it looked like I'd done something pretty sketchy.
00:20:32.920 Which I hadn't.
00:20:34.020 I just read it and it looks like it's the life preservers to me.
00:20:37.400 Now,
00:20:38.640 take this story.
00:20:41.380 All right,
00:20:41.600 this is just a priming story.
00:20:43.440 It has nothing directly to do with what I'm going to talk about next.
00:20:46.380 Except for the priming part.
00:20:47.840 When the pandemic struck,
00:20:51.960 and I think many of you can be my witness for this, right?
00:20:54.820 So I need a witness for this.
00:20:56.760 Because without a witness,
00:20:58.100 you're never going to believe it.
00:20:59.940 At the very beginning of the pandemic,
00:21:02.620 I looked at where it was happening
00:21:04.500 and who was getting hit the hardest.
00:21:06.340 And said to myself,
00:21:07.580 this looks a lot like a vitamin D problem.
00:21:11.380 Because it looks like
00:21:12.500 all the places that have vitamin D shortages
00:21:14.760 are getting hit.
00:21:17.140 And that would include places with lots of pollution.
00:21:20.160 Like Wuhan and like Iran.
00:21:24.140 Tehran, for example.
00:21:25.800 And then when you looked at places like,
00:21:27.780 at the time,
00:21:28.460 we thought Sweden was doing better.
00:21:30.000 That's questionable.
00:21:31.620 But at the time,
00:21:32.980 people said,
00:21:33.780 hey, but what about Sweden?
00:21:35.940 You know,
00:21:36.140 where is their vitamin D?
00:21:37.180 It should be low because of their latitude, right?
00:21:39.660 But it turns out they supplement.
00:21:41.380 The Swedes all supplement
00:21:44.940 because they have low vitamin D.
00:21:47.100 So the outcome is that
00:21:48.720 they probably have pretty good vitamin D
00:21:50.160 because they supplement.
00:21:52.360 And so others noticed the same, right?
00:21:56.120 I think others maybe made the same observation.
00:21:59.680 But apparently it's,
00:22:01.180 there's at least this one preprint study.
00:22:03.660 So remember,
00:22:04.220 preprint study is the lowest level of credibility.
00:22:08.040 Everybody got that?
00:22:08.800 It's the lowest level of credibility,
00:22:11.780 the highest level being the randomized controlled trials,
00:22:14.780 which was not this.
00:22:16.700 So a study looked at,
00:22:18.900 this was in 2020,
00:22:20.540 and it looked at a bunch of stuff
00:22:21.960 and did find almost a perfect correlation
00:22:24.860 between latitude and vitamin D levels and outcomes.
00:22:29.560 One that's so strong
00:22:30.800 that it would be hard to imagine it was anything else.
00:22:33.240 Now, what we don't know is the causation, right?
00:22:36.580 Because it could be correlation without causation.
00:22:41.500 But there is some newer information
00:22:44.680 that does suggest that causation is suggested.
00:22:51.120 So we'll see.
00:22:52.700 I would say that's still unconfirmed,
00:22:54.400 but in terms of pattern recognition,
00:22:57.760 the vitamin D thing looked exactly
00:23:00.040 like the life preserver thing.
00:23:02.500 You just look at it, you go,
00:23:04.080 I don't know, I feel like I see a pattern here.
00:23:05.560 I can't say it's right yet.
00:23:08.800 Now, take that same pattern recognition
00:23:10.520 and apply it to a few other things.
00:23:13.340 Do you remember, as I've bragged too often,
00:23:16.480 that I predicted that there was no sonic weapon
00:23:19.260 with the Havana syndrome?
00:23:21.100 What was the basis of my prediction
00:23:23.180 that there was no secret weapon
00:23:26.180 with the Havana syndrome story?
00:23:28.300 The basis was pattern recognition.
00:23:30.740 It was pattern recognition.
00:23:31.840 Because I've seen that pattern.
00:23:34.760 And if you studied mass hysteria,
00:23:38.780 they're kind of easy to spot.
00:23:40.660 It's just a pattern.
00:23:42.480 So I just spotted it easily.
00:23:44.200 Do you remember when I had the weird prediction
00:23:48.200 that the Las Vegas shooter was not ISIS?
00:23:53.520 When the news was saying,
00:23:54.720 you know, this sort of looks like an ISIS attack.
00:23:56.860 And then ISIS claimed credit,
00:23:59.620 they claimed responsibility for it.
00:24:01.940 ISIS actually said it was us.
00:24:04.240 And what did I say?
00:24:05.620 No, it isn't.
00:24:07.180 That was after ISIS said it was them.
00:24:10.260 They claimed credit,
00:24:11.480 and they just don't do that.
00:24:13.440 ISIS is not someone,
00:24:14.720 a group that typically,
00:24:16.420 typically they don't claim credit.
00:24:18.440 But what pattern did I see?
00:24:20.700 The pattern I saw is
00:24:21.880 they don't do that kind of attack.
00:24:23.380 It just didn't look like an ISIS attack.
00:24:26.960 It was just pattern recognition.
00:24:28.620 And so I stuck with my pattern recognition,
00:24:30.700 turned out to be right.
00:24:33.580 So I'm pretty sure we can make in
00:24:36.780 artificial intelligence
00:24:38.000 that can do pattern recognition
00:24:39.660 at least as well as people,
00:24:41.720 because we're just not very good at it.
00:24:44.600 Yeah, and Bradley is saying ISIS in Vegas.
00:24:47.800 What were the odds
00:24:48.800 that these highly religious people
00:24:50.780 would pick Las Vegas
00:24:52.340 to go spend some time
00:24:53.500 and then do a murder?
00:24:54.340 I mean, it didn't make,
00:24:55.460 it just didn't have any ISIS pattern
00:24:57.240 to it whatsoever.
00:25:00.140 All right, so look for your patterns.
00:25:03.500 I say no vaxation without representation.
00:25:09.460 I'm just so proud of that,
00:25:12.440 that if you don't mind,
00:25:14.160 can I have permission
00:25:14.940 to pat myself on the back?
00:25:16.980 No vaxation without representation.
00:25:18.840 I'll talk about it in a minute.
00:25:21.040 Come on.
00:25:22.520 Come on.
00:25:23.220 That's good.
00:25:24.540 No vaxation without representation.
00:25:28.220 Pat, pat, pat, pat, pat.
00:25:29.940 All right.
00:25:32.060 Here's the context.
00:25:35.500 One of our leaders,
00:25:37.100 Senator Bill Cassidy,
00:25:38.620 a Republican,
00:25:39.780 he's a physician,
00:25:41.360 so it's important that you know
00:25:42.600 he's not only a senator,
00:25:43.900 but a physician.
00:25:44.620 And he did an interview
00:25:46.680 and said he favors
00:25:47.780 cognition tests
00:25:49.200 for aging leaders
00:25:50.220 in all three branches
00:25:51.940 of government.
00:25:56.040 Dr. Bill Cassidy,
00:25:58.300 a physician,
00:26:00.700 recommends cognitive tests
00:26:02.480 for aging leaders
00:26:03.560 in all three branches
00:26:04.680 of government
00:26:05.200 as a basic system,
00:26:07.880 you know,
00:26:08.140 to do it on a regular basis.
00:26:10.400 To which I say,
00:26:12.100 standing ovation.
00:26:12.820 standing ovation
00:26:14.520 for Bill Cassidy,
00:26:19.840 Republican senator,
00:26:22.260 saying and doing
00:26:23.560 the right stuff.
00:26:25.640 Thank you.
00:26:27.240 Thank you, Bill Cassidy.
00:26:28.840 And further,
00:26:29.480 I would like to say,
00:26:31.460 if we don't know
00:26:32.420 if our leaders
00:26:33.980 are competent,
00:26:35.840 and we don't, do we?
00:26:37.240 Because they're really old.
00:26:39.400 Pelosi, you know,
00:26:40.680 et cetera.
00:26:41.160 If you don't know
00:26:42.780 that your representatives
00:26:43.620 are competent,
00:26:45.460 can you say
00:26:46.100 you're represented?
00:26:49.280 Right?
00:26:50.440 Are you really represented
00:26:51.700 if your representatives
00:26:53.580 are not competent,
00:26:55.580 or at least you can't tell?
00:26:57.860 Not really.
00:26:59.800 So,
00:27:00.380 they're going to give us
00:27:01.380 a VAX mandate.
00:27:04.100 So,
00:27:04.640 these people
00:27:05.500 who are so old,
00:27:06.540 we can't even tell
00:27:07.540 if their brains work.
00:27:09.020 That's so old they are.
00:27:09.880 They're going to force us
00:27:12.020 to get
00:27:13.500 a medical procedure.
00:27:16.560 Well,
00:27:16.980 how about
00:27:17.420 no vaccination
00:27:18.420 without representation,
00:27:21.160 motherfuckers?
00:27:23.260 Yeah,
00:27:23.500 I know I try not to swear,
00:27:25.160 but sometimes
00:27:25.680 you just have to.
00:27:27.080 You just have to.
00:27:29.020 Come on.
00:27:29.940 You just have to sometimes.
00:27:33.700 Yeah,
00:27:34.320 I think it's completely fair.
00:27:35.880 In the context
00:27:36.840 of the government
00:27:37.660 asking you
00:27:38.340 to get a vaccination,
00:27:39.960 mandate,
00:27:41.120 a mandate.
00:27:42.540 How about them
00:27:43.180 getting a little
00:27:43.800 mandated medical procedure?
00:27:47.160 A little mandated
00:27:48.100 cognitive test,
00:27:49.440 how about that?
00:27:51.500 Yeah,
00:27:52.340 no vaccination
00:27:53.280 without representation.
00:27:55.020 And until you've taken
00:27:55.920 the cognitive test,
00:27:56.960 we don't even know
00:27:57.900 if we're represented.
00:27:59.440 Because it doesn't
00:28:00.100 look like it.
00:28:01.360 It doesn't look like it.
00:28:02.380 How well has your government
00:28:04.020 explained the whole
00:28:05.300 natural immunity
00:28:07.880 versus vaccinated immunity?
00:28:10.220 Have they explained
00:28:10.940 that well?
00:28:11.960 So the public says,
00:28:12.840 oh, okay,
00:28:13.760 I might like it,
00:28:14.720 might not,
00:28:15.140 but at least
00:28:15.420 I understand it.
00:28:17.240 No.
00:28:18.500 No,
00:28:18.840 they appear to be
00:28:19.500 lying to us
00:28:20.220 by omission,
00:28:22.580 lying by bias,
00:28:24.060 you know,
00:28:24.240 maybe not directly,
00:28:25.180 but lying,
00:28:26.340 lying in effect.
00:28:28.800 Is that representation?
00:28:29.980 Did you elect
00:28:31.860 your leaders
00:28:32.300 to lie to you?
00:28:33.640 No,
00:28:34.080 no,
00:28:34.300 that's not
00:28:34.700 representing you.
00:28:35.920 That's representing
00:28:36.680 the pharma companies
00:28:37.640 or something.
00:28:38.940 Representing themselves?
00:28:40.140 I don't know.
00:28:40.900 But they're not
00:28:41.360 representing you.
00:28:43.100 So no vaccination
00:28:44.200 without representation.
00:28:46.700 And by the way,
00:28:47.460 I'm not anti-vax
00:28:49.240 and I'm not pro-vax.
00:28:51.520 I'm just saying
00:28:52.480 you can't have a system
00:28:53.560 where a bunch of
00:28:55.040 brain-dead motherfuckers
00:28:56.880 are making you
00:28:57.640 get a vaccination
00:28:58.340 and you can't make
00:28:59.720 them get a cognitive test.
00:29:02.980 Let me remind you
00:29:04.240 who has the power
00:29:05.820 in this country.
00:29:07.520 It's not the government.
00:29:09.740 And it never will be.
00:29:11.660 It's not the government.
00:29:15.200 And if you let
00:29:16.160 the government act
00:29:17.160 as if they have the power,
00:29:18.160 then they do,
00:29:18.700 I guess,
00:29:19.520 for all practical power,
00:29:20.940 all practical purposes.
00:29:22.860 But I think we need
00:29:24.360 to demand
00:29:24.820 these cognitive tests.
00:29:27.180 I think we've got
00:29:28.380 to put down a marker
00:29:29.540 and say,
00:29:30.560 I hear you about
00:29:31.240 the mandates.
00:29:33.580 Because I hope
00:29:35.600 you would agree
00:29:36.100 with the following statement.
00:29:38.100 You could be
00:29:38.660 against mandates.
00:29:39.800 You could be for them.
00:29:42.260 But it's a fair question.
00:29:44.400 It's a fair question.
00:29:46.560 Right?
00:29:46.860 I think serious people
00:29:48.160 are trying to do
00:29:48.920 their best
00:29:49.540 when it comes to
00:29:50.480 this whole mandate
00:29:51.260 or no mandate situation.
00:29:52.920 And there are
00:29:53.520 genuine differences
00:29:54.380 of opinions
00:29:55.080 about the importance
00:29:56.540 of your personal freedom
00:29:57.720 versus, you know,
00:29:58.620 how much you can affect
00:29:59.360 other people's risks,
00:30:01.100 et cetera.
00:30:01.840 Those are fair questions.
00:30:03.940 Fair questions.
00:30:05.240 But we can't even
00:30:07.520 get to that question
00:30:08.500 until we have representation.
00:30:10.160 And we do not have
00:30:12.140 confirmed representation
00:30:13.760 because of the
00:30:14.720 cognitive abilities
00:30:15.800 of our leaders.
00:30:17.020 and they have
00:30:18.120 demonstrated
00:30:18.740 a level of competence
00:30:20.760 which does suggest
00:30:21.960 that we need
00:30:23.240 to check this.
00:30:25.100 Right?
00:30:25.520 Would you say
00:30:26.200 that everything's
00:30:26.780 working so well
00:30:27.760 that you're like,
00:30:28.980 well, you know,
00:30:29.880 nothing's going wrong.
00:30:31.420 So, you know,
00:30:32.640 if it ain't broke,
00:30:33.360 don't fix it.
00:30:34.560 It doesn't look like that,
00:30:35.620 does it?
00:30:36.220 It looks like some things
00:30:37.300 are pretty broken.
00:30:37.980 At least in the communication
00:30:40.980 of how things are going.
00:30:42.520 If not the,
00:30:43.340 you know,
00:30:43.680 the data.
00:30:44.060 So, no vexation
00:30:46.480 without representation.
00:30:50.880 We need brain audits.
00:30:53.760 The funniest story
00:30:54.720 of the day,
00:30:55.160 maybe,
00:30:56.040 although lots of competition.
00:30:58.320 Andy Ngo reports
00:30:59.260 that Antifa in Australia
00:31:01.320 just had a protest
00:31:03.700 demanding stronger
00:31:05.960 government restrictions.
00:31:12.120 What?
00:31:14.060 Do I have chocolate on me?
00:31:16.880 Yeah, I think I do.
00:31:20.560 Yeah, Antifa.
00:31:22.880 Because that's what
00:31:23.700 Antifa's all about.
00:31:26.220 Antifa wants
00:31:27.000 strong government
00:31:28.120 to tell the people
00:31:30.160 what to do.
00:31:31.860 Don't they?
00:31:32.460 Or is that
00:31:34.620 literally the opposite
00:31:37.280 of what Antifa is?
00:31:40.380 And it makes me wonder,
00:31:41.780 did somebody prank them?
00:31:44.060 This looks like a prank.
00:31:46.680 Doesn't it?
00:31:47.660 Doesn't it look like
00:31:48.480 somebody
00:31:48.960 who was mischievous
00:31:51.320 tried to figure out
00:31:53.560 how could we get Antifa
00:31:55.040 to protest
00:31:56.620 in favor of fascism?
00:31:59.060 And they figured out,
00:32:00.320 I think we can
00:32:01.020 get them to be
00:32:01.960 on the side.
00:32:02.960 Because they,
00:32:03.660 you know,
00:32:04.000 they side more
00:32:04.920 with the left.
00:32:06.340 And if the left
00:32:07.300 is pro-mandate,
00:32:08.320 I think we can
00:32:10.040 fool Antifa
00:32:10.780 into protesting
00:32:12.120 in favor of
00:32:13.080 greater government
00:32:13.980 control of our lives.
00:32:15.640 The opposite
00:32:16.460 of their
00:32:16.960 stated purpose.
00:32:21.440 So,
00:32:22.440 I can't tell you
00:32:24.740 it's a prank,
00:32:26.120 but it looks like one.
00:32:27.700 And as I've told you before,
00:32:29.000 parody and reality
00:32:30.200 have merged.
00:32:31.240 You really can't tell
00:32:32.380 a parody anymore.
00:32:33.220 If you think you can,
00:32:36.080 just wait a few weeks
00:32:37.420 and see how many times
00:32:38.660 there was somebody
00:32:39.540 kidding
00:32:39.980 that you thought
00:32:41.180 was real.
00:32:42.520 Watch how many times
00:32:43.260 you see it.
00:32:43.940 It's kind of shocking.
00:32:46.500 All right.
00:32:48.400 I guess the Bidens
00:32:49.700 went to a restaurant
00:32:50.460 last night
00:32:51.040 and didn't wear
00:32:51.620 their masks.
00:32:53.700 So they were
00:32:54.400 the only ones
00:32:54.980 in the restaurant
00:32:55.520 who entered
00:32:56.400 and left the restaurant
00:32:57.500 without masks.
00:32:59.160 Now,
00:32:59.780 do I think that
00:33:00.620 they caused a risk
00:33:01.640 to anybody?
00:33:02.360 No.
00:33:03.220 Do I think
00:33:04.900 everybody should wear
00:33:05.600 a mask walking
00:33:06.360 into a restaurant
00:33:07.100 and then just sit down
00:33:07.980 and take it off?
00:33:09.320 No.
00:33:10.740 So I don't think
00:33:11.660 that what the Bidens
00:33:12.660 did was,
00:33:13.720 you know,
00:33:14.840 bad in a health sense,
00:33:16.880 but his only job
00:33:19.380 is setting a role model
00:33:21.880 example, right?
00:33:22.940 It's like the main
00:33:23.660 thing he does.
00:33:25.360 So the main thing
00:33:26.540 that sells Biden
00:33:27.480 he didn't do,
00:33:28.220 which has set
00:33:28.840 a good example.
00:33:30.180 So it looks
00:33:30.880 pretty hypocritical.
00:33:31.760 People say,
00:33:32.280 I don't like
00:33:33.140 the hypocrite stories
00:33:34.020 because they're
00:33:34.400 too boring
00:33:34.860 and too numerous,
00:33:36.700 really.
00:33:37.540 But I think
00:33:38.200 this was notable.
00:33:39.920 So Christopher Steele,
00:33:41.040 the author
00:33:41.680 of the infamous
00:33:42.900 Russia collusion
00:33:44.960 dossier,
00:33:46.960 he's in the news
00:33:48.080 today and he says
00:33:49.120 of the alleged
00:33:50.680 pee tape,
00:33:52.600 the one that says
00:33:53.540 that Trump
00:33:56.280 allegedly
00:33:56.960 watched prostitutes
00:33:59.200 urinate on a
00:34:00.360 mattress that
00:34:01.720 had once been
00:34:03.280 slept on
00:34:03.840 by Obama.
00:34:06.160 And when asked
00:34:07.020 if he thought
00:34:07.460 it was true,
00:34:09.820 Christopher Steele
00:34:10.580 said he thinks
00:34:11.160 it probably
00:34:11.780 exists.
00:34:14.940 It probably
00:34:15.980 exists.
00:34:17.600 What is up
00:34:18.460 with this guy?
00:34:19.640 Who's paying him?
00:34:21.160 Is this just
00:34:21.820 part of the,
00:34:22.640 you know,
00:34:23.880 the long-term
00:34:24.740 project of making
00:34:25.680 sure that
00:34:26.240 Trump gets
00:34:29.380 stopped at
00:34:30.820 the starting
00:34:31.320 gate?
00:34:32.260 Because they
00:34:32.700 don't want him
00:34:33.020 running again.
00:34:34.060 So it looks like
00:34:34.680 it's just a
00:34:35.340 Trump suppression
00:34:36.520 act, right?
00:34:38.600 Because I can't
00:34:39.380 believe that
00:34:39.880 Christopher Steele,
00:34:41.440 without being
00:34:42.140 paid for it,
00:34:43.740 would go in
00:34:44.360 public and say
00:34:45.000 the pee tape
00:34:45.560 probably exists.
00:34:47.540 Do you think
00:34:47.980 he would bother
00:34:48.560 saying that
00:34:49.340 unless he was
00:34:51.060 getting some
00:34:51.460 kind of benefit
00:34:52.060 or he was
00:34:52.660 working for
00:34:53.260 somebody in
00:34:54.040 some way?
00:34:54.780 It doesn't
00:34:55.360 feel like
00:34:55.780 the sort
00:34:56.120 of thing
00:34:56.360 you would
00:34:56.640 say unless
00:34:59.680 you were
00:34:59.980 getting paid.
00:35:01.320 Does it?
00:35:04.520 Well,
00:35:05.700 here's the
00:35:06.520 funniest thing
00:35:08.220 about that
00:35:08.800 allegation.
00:35:10.720 You know
00:35:11.400 Trump is a
00:35:12.040 germaphobe,
00:35:12.740 right?
00:35:15.060 Trump is a
00:35:15.840 germaphobe.
00:35:17.380 He only
00:35:17.980 recently started
00:35:18.840 shaking hands
00:35:19.580 because he had
00:35:20.220 to, because
00:35:21.180 he was president.
00:35:22.520 But he's not
00:35:23.260 big on shaking
00:35:23.840 hands.
00:35:25.360 Now, do you
00:35:26.700 think that a
00:35:27.220 germaphobe said
00:35:28.880 to himself,
00:35:29.940 I'd sure like
00:35:30.520 to be in a
00:35:31.000 room with
00:35:31.500 prostitutes
00:35:32.420 urinating on
00:35:33.400 a mattress?
00:35:34.860 That's exactly
00:35:35.700 the kind of
00:35:36.200 fun I'm
00:35:36.580 looking for.
00:35:38.620 No.
00:35:39.900 Now, let me
00:35:40.580 ask you another
00:35:41.060 question.
00:35:42.140 Is that the
00:35:42.740 sort of thing
00:35:43.440 that anybody
00:35:43.940 would do unless
00:35:45.480 they were drunk
00:35:46.240 or on some
00:35:47.020 kind of drug?
00:35:49.400 No.
00:35:49.840 If you got
00:35:52.320 me drunk
00:35:52.760 enough, I
00:35:53.740 would definitely
00:35:54.220 watch prostitutes
00:35:55.260 peeing on a
00:35:55.880 mattress that
00:35:56.640 Obama slept
00:35:57.620 on.
00:35:58.500 There is some
00:35:59.080 amount of
00:35:59.500 alcohol that
00:36:00.020 would get me
00:36:00.400 in that
00:36:00.680 room.
00:36:02.600 Marijuana?
00:36:03.300 Probably not.
00:36:04.680 Alcohol?
00:36:05.500 Yeah.
00:36:06.540 I'll watch
00:36:07.460 some mattress
00:36:08.640 trashing.
00:36:10.240 Give me
00:36:10.520 three martinis
00:36:11.560 and I'm in.
00:36:12.800 But Trump
00:36:13.280 doesn't drink.
00:36:14.860 Trump doesn't
00:36:15.360 take drugs.
00:36:15.920 How do you
00:36:17.320 get a germaphobe
00:36:18.520 who doesn't
00:36:19.040 drink and
00:36:19.480 doesn't take
00:36:19.980 drugs to be
00:36:21.640 in a room
00:36:22.040 with prostitutes
00:36:24.740 urinating on
00:36:25.420 mattresses?
00:36:27.620 Could there be
00:36:28.400 anything less
00:36:29.000 likely than
00:36:29.640 that?
00:36:30.360 Could they
00:36:30.780 have ever
00:36:31.100 come up
00:36:31.500 with an
00:36:32.580 allegation
00:36:33.180 that is
00:36:33.560 less likely
00:36:34.420 than that
00:36:35.440 one?
00:36:36.240 That is
00:36:36.580 literally the
00:36:37.120 least likely
00:36:37.680 thing I've
00:36:38.200 ever heard
00:36:38.540 in my
00:36:38.740 life.
00:36:40.180 I suppose
00:36:40.500 nothing's
00:36:40.920 impossible,
00:36:41.740 but the
00:36:42.500 least likely.
00:36:43.060 All right.
00:36:49.920 So that's
00:36:50.780 pretty interesting.
00:36:52.460 I noticed
00:36:53.300 yesterday that
00:36:53.940 my grocery
00:36:54.520 store is
00:36:55.040 totally
00:36:55.340 gaslighting
00:36:56.020 me.
00:36:58.100 And it
00:36:59.360 really bothered
00:37:00.140 me yesterday.
00:37:01.260 So I think I
00:37:01.900 reported the
00:37:02.420 other day that
00:37:03.520 it seemed to
00:37:03.960 me that only
00:37:04.480 the items I
00:37:05.540 was shopping
00:37:06.020 for personally
00:37:06.940 were the
00:37:07.900 ones that
00:37:08.220 were missing.
00:37:09.400 Because I
00:37:09.820 would look at
00:37:10.140 the shelves
00:37:10.580 and the
00:37:10.880 shelves are
00:37:11.340 full,
00:37:11.940 except there
00:37:13.240 would be
00:37:13.380 this little
00:37:13.820 hole on
00:37:14.940 this entire
00:37:15.440 aisle.
00:37:16.480 And that
00:37:17.020 little hole
00:37:17.440 would be
00:37:17.720 just the
00:37:18.040 product I
00:37:18.520 was looking
00:37:18.820 for.
00:37:19.680 And I
00:37:19.920 thought,
00:37:20.240 is this a
00:37:21.520 simulation?
00:37:22.720 What's going
00:37:23.220 on?
00:37:23.720 And then I
00:37:24.280 realized what
00:37:24.800 the trick
00:37:25.160 is.
00:37:27.020 My grocery
00:37:27.840 store has
00:37:28.540 full shelves
00:37:29.500 and they're
00:37:31.040 out of almost
00:37:31.760 everything.
00:37:33.980 Except they
00:37:34.820 seem to have
00:37:35.340 lots of
00:37:35.640 fresh food,
00:37:36.420 so that
00:37:36.660 seems fine.
00:37:37.580 But the
00:37:37.940 package stuff,
00:37:40.000 do you know
00:37:40.560 what they
00:37:40.800 did?
00:37:41.940 Instead of
00:37:42.780 piling things
00:37:44.620 behind things,
00:37:46.160 they put
00:37:47.020 them sideways.
00:37:48.820 So they
00:37:49.460 filled the
00:37:50.000 shelf with
00:37:50.500 the same
00:37:50.820 product.
00:37:52.000 And I
00:37:52.300 didn't notice
00:37:52.760 the first
00:37:53.120 time I
00:37:53.440 went.
00:37:54.240 But this
00:37:54.580 next time I
00:37:55.180 went and I
00:37:55.760 noticed,
00:37:56.080 wait a minute,
00:37:56.560 if you take
00:37:57.000 a product,
00:37:58.220 there's nothing
00:37:58.880 behind it.
00:38:00.700 There's nothing
00:38:01.360 behind it.
00:38:02.740 Usually the
00:38:03.560 shelves are
00:38:04.300 several deep,
00:38:05.260 right?
00:38:06.000 But they
00:38:06.720 took the few
00:38:07.440 products they
00:38:07.940 have and they
00:38:08.540 just spread
00:38:08.960 them out
00:38:09.300 sideways to
00:38:09.940 fill the
00:38:10.300 shelves.
00:38:10.620 my store
00:38:12.460 is half
00:38:12.800 empty.
00:38:14.800 And I
00:38:15.280 didn't even
00:38:15.640 notice it.
00:38:17.380 So he
00:38:17.860 says, you
00:38:18.160 just noticed?
00:38:18.880 I know.
00:38:19.620 I know.
00:38:20.180 Dumb, right?
00:38:21.440 Like I
00:38:21.720 wasn't really
00:38:22.120 paying attention.
00:38:23.260 I'm the guy
00:38:23.880 who can't go
00:38:24.380 into the
00:38:24.840 refrigerator and
00:38:26.880 find the
00:38:27.220 ketchup, so
00:38:27.780 that's no
00:38:28.100 surprise.
00:38:29.040 And it's
00:38:29.420 weird that I
00:38:29.880 see other
00:38:30.240 patterns.
00:38:31.400 It's weird
00:38:31.920 that I can
00:38:32.320 see another
00:38:32.760 pattern, but
00:38:33.240 I can't
00:38:33.540 find something
00:38:34.060 in the
00:38:34.960 grocery store.
00:38:35.620 you won't
00:38:39.080 catch it
00:38:39.460 unless you
00:38:39.780 stock shelves
00:38:40.420 for a
00:38:40.720 living once.
00:38:41.540 Yeah.
00:38:42.880 All right.
00:38:43.500 But keep
00:38:44.000 an eye out
00:38:44.500 for that.
00:38:44.900 There is
00:38:45.140 something
00:38:45.360 happening
00:38:45.680 that's
00:38:45.940 bigger.
00:38:46.900 Now,
00:38:47.760 J.P.
00:38:48.260 Morgan's
00:38:48.920 Chase
00:38:49.680 CEO,
00:38:50.360 Jamie
00:38:50.580 Diamond,
00:38:51.160 who I
00:38:51.480 would say
00:38:51.740 is pretty
00:38:52.220 credible for
00:38:53.660 economic
00:38:54.680 predictions,
00:38:56.280 said that
00:38:57.640 he's not
00:38:59.100 worried about
00:38:59.460 the supply
00:38:59.860 chain in
00:39:00.240 the long
00:39:00.500 run.
00:39:02.040 He says
00:39:02.660 next year
00:39:03.100 it'll all
00:39:03.460 work out,
00:39:03.900 et cetera.
00:39:05.240 But you
00:39:05.480 know what
00:39:05.660 else is
00:39:05.960 weird?
00:39:08.760 I didn't
00:39:09.400 see any
00:39:09.760 hoarding.
00:39:10.860 Did you?
00:39:13.800 Notice how
00:39:14.460 different this
00:39:15.360 is.
00:39:16.080 When the
00:39:16.560 pandemic
00:39:16.920 started,
00:39:18.180 there was
00:39:18.520 hoarding
00:39:19.040 like crazy.
00:39:20.920 Hoard,
00:39:21.340 hoard,
00:39:21.600 hoard,
00:39:21.800 everything.
00:39:22.740 But at
00:39:23.080 the moment,
00:39:23.480 I didn't
00:39:23.720 see anybody
00:39:24.420 doing anything
00:39:25.320 that looked
00:39:25.740 remotely like
00:39:26.440 hoarding.
00:39:28.160 Why are
00:39:28.820 people playing
00:39:29.400 it cool this
00:39:30.000 time?
00:39:31.220 Is it because
00:39:31.780 this doesn't
00:39:32.340 seem permanent?
00:39:33.900 Because it's
00:39:34.900 not like a
00:39:35.340 pandemic,
00:39:35.880 it's just a
00:39:36.520 supply chain
00:39:37.420 thing.
00:39:39.460 Yeah,
00:39:39.980 wait a few
00:39:40.400 weeks,
00:39:40.900 right?
00:39:41.640 So we may
00:39:42.460 be on the
00:39:42.860 verge of
00:39:43.260 hoarding,
00:39:44.040 maybe,
00:39:44.800 but I
00:39:45.380 would say
00:39:45.680 this is,
00:39:46.620 I'm going
00:39:47.100 to agree
00:39:47.620 completely
00:39:48.140 with Jamie
00:39:49.180 Diamond,
00:39:49.960 which is
00:39:50.700 prices might
00:39:51.460 go up,
00:39:52.580 but I don't
00:39:53.020 think we're
00:39:53.380 going to run
00:39:53.760 out of stuff.
00:39:54.900 Because I
00:39:55.240 think at
00:39:55.720 some price
00:39:56.320 point,
00:39:56.820 everything
00:39:57.240 gets solved.
00:39:57.880 And I
00:39:59.980 would also
00:40:00.320 like to
00:40:00.640 put out
00:40:01.020 the idea
00:40:02.040 that I
00:40:03.120 think Trump
00:40:03.600 could have
00:40:03.920 solved this.
00:40:05.720 Don't you
00:40:06.220 think Trump
00:40:06.720 could have
00:40:07.140 solved the
00:40:07.820 shortage of
00:40:08.560 truck drivers?
00:40:09.980 Because what
00:40:10.740 is it that
00:40:11.180 causes a
00:40:11.740 shortage of
00:40:12.240 truck drivers?
00:40:15.600 Regulations,
00:40:16.880 probably.
00:40:18.380 Some kind of
00:40:18.960 regulations,
00:40:19.900 which he's
00:40:20.380 going to get
00:40:20.780 rid of.
00:40:21.840 Might be
00:40:22.520 money.
00:40:22.820 How did he
00:40:24.360 make Project
00:40:25.380 Warp Speed
00:40:25.880 happen?
00:40:26.280 He gave a
00:40:27.580 ton of
00:40:27.940 money to
00:40:28.360 the pharma
00:40:28.760 companies and
00:40:29.360 said,
00:40:29.740 don't worry
00:40:30.560 about the
00:40:30.920 money,
00:40:31.860 just make
00:40:32.500 this work.
00:40:33.860 How would
00:40:34.520 Trump have
00:40:35.000 solved the
00:40:35.700 trucking
00:40:36.420 shortage?
00:40:37.600 Well,
00:40:37.820 one of the
00:40:38.140 biggest problems
00:40:38.620 is they don't
00:40:39.080 pay the
00:40:39.380 truckers enough.
00:40:41.460 He could
00:40:42.080 have said,
00:40:42.500 well,
00:40:42.700 in the
00:40:42.880 short run,
00:40:43.360 we're going
00:40:43.620 to subsidize
00:40:44.620 something or
00:40:45.360 do something.
00:40:46.780 Maybe give
00:40:47.400 free health
00:40:48.260 care to
00:40:48.580 truckers so
00:40:49.180 it's like
00:40:50.040 a raise.
00:40:51.240 Something like
00:40:51.640 that.
00:40:52.540 But you
00:40:53.100 can imagine
00:40:53.560 some kind
00:40:54.100 of executive
00:40:54.600 order that
00:40:55.280 Trump could
00:40:55.740 have done
00:40:56.140 that maybe
00:40:57.160 Biden doesn't
00:40:57.980 have the
00:40:58.260 wherewithal or
00:40:59.800 is too much
00:41:00.940 of a Democrat
00:41:01.420 to do or
00:41:02.540 something.
00:41:04.740 Somebody says
00:41:05.420 it's the
00:41:05.760 trucker
00:41:06.080 mandates.
00:41:06.600 Yeah,
00:41:06.800 maybe that's
00:41:08.340 part of it
00:41:08.740 and maybe
00:41:09.280 Trump would
00:41:09.980 have gotten
00:41:10.240 rid of
00:41:10.500 those.
00:41:11.760 But it
00:41:12.000 does feel
00:41:12.580 to me
00:41:13.120 that this
00:41:14.480 is,
00:41:15.340 you know,
00:41:15.580 I've said
00:41:16.060 this often,
00:41:16.620 there's no
00:41:16.940 such thing
00:41:17.340 as a good
00:41:17.840 president or
00:41:18.460 a bad
00:41:18.780 one.
00:41:19.980 Now,
00:41:20.440 I'm being a
00:41:21.320 little bit
00:41:21.640 extreme there.
00:41:22.440 Obviously,
00:41:22.920 there could be.
00:41:23.360 But in
00:41:24.540 general,
00:41:25.740 you have
00:41:26.080 presidents that
00:41:26.840 tend to be
00:41:27.280 suited for
00:41:27.900 some kinds
00:41:28.480 of tasks
00:41:29.520 and less
00:41:30.560 suited for
00:41:31.100 others.
00:41:32.040 This is the
00:41:32.760 kind of
00:41:33.020 problem that
00:41:33.460 I think
00:41:33.720 Biden is
00:41:34.300 less suited
00:41:35.140 for and
00:41:36.380 Trump probably
00:41:37.120 a lot more
00:41:37.660 suited for,
00:41:38.780 in part because
00:41:39.540 he takes
00:41:39.860 more risks.
00:41:41.280 So I think
00:41:41.640 he might say,
00:41:42.260 yeah,
00:41:42.480 you know,
00:41:42.720 it would be
00:41:43.100 risky to
00:41:44.200 have truckers
00:41:44.840 who have
00:41:45.180 failed the,
00:41:46.240 I don't know,
00:41:46.660 let's say the
00:41:47.100 marijuana drug
00:41:48.340 test,
00:41:49.240 if there is
00:41:49.720 one.
00:41:50.160 I assume
00:41:50.640 there is.
00:41:51.520 But you
00:41:51.840 can imagine
00:41:52.260 Trump saying,
00:41:52.960 all right,
00:41:53.800 at least for
00:41:54.460 the short
00:41:54.820 run,
00:41:55.500 you can fail
00:41:56.680 the marijuana
00:41:57.280 drug test
00:41:57.880 and still be
00:41:58.380 a trucker.
00:42:00.100 I'm just
00:42:00.580 brainstorming
00:42:01.660 that there
00:42:02.000 could be
00:42:02.340 things that
00:42:03.520 Trump could
00:42:04.080 fix with
00:42:04.860 just a sweep
00:42:05.540 of a pen
00:42:06.080 and would,
00:42:07.800 whereas Biden
00:42:08.380 might not like
00:42:09.060 the risk
00:42:09.540 involved or
00:42:10.380 just wouldn't
00:42:11.240 have that
00:42:11.720 point of view
00:42:12.840 that you can
00:42:13.340 go in and
00:42:13.800 fix this stuff
00:42:14.460 by getting
00:42:14.920 rid of
00:42:15.180 regulations.
00:42:17.740 Somebody says
00:42:18.440 there aren't
00:42:18.800 drivers due to
00:42:19.560 the driving
00:42:19.940 schools being
00:42:20.600 closed.
00:42:21.240 How hard
00:42:21.640 would it be
00:42:22.020 for Trump
00:42:22.440 to fix
00:42:22.860 that?
00:42:24.240 Right?
00:42:25.360 Yeah,
00:42:25.820 I mean,
00:42:26.040 I feel like
00:42:26.520 you could
00:42:26.860 spring up
00:42:29.160 a bunch
00:42:29.500 of driving
00:42:30.080 schools,
00:42:30.940 because what
00:42:31.760 do you need
00:42:32.040 besides trucks?
00:42:34.100 How hard
00:42:34.740 is it to have
00:42:35.140 a driving
00:42:35.560 school?
00:42:37.360 Don't you
00:42:37.680 just need a
00:42:38.240 truck and
00:42:38.700 maybe a
00:42:39.020 classroom?
00:42:40.600 So this
00:42:41.300 is like the
00:42:41.700 most solvable
00:42:42.300 problem in
00:42:42.920 the world.
00:42:44.080 It just
00:42:44.680 takes a
00:42:45.080 little bit
00:42:45.500 of time to
00:42:46.000 work through
00:42:46.460 the details.
00:42:49.560 Somebody says
00:42:50.420 it's about
00:42:50.800 gasoline price.
00:42:53.040 Well,
00:42:53.360 that can be
00:42:53.780 solved by
00:42:54.280 raising the
00:42:54.980 price of
00:42:55.520 the,
00:42:57.660 or charging
00:42:58.400 more.
00:43:00.220 So inflation
00:43:01.060 is a problem
00:43:01.660 that we don't
00:43:02.060 have an
00:43:02.300 immediate solution
00:43:03.020 for,
00:43:03.360 but you can
00:43:03.720 certainly
00:43:03.960 solve this
00:43:05.860 stuff,
00:43:06.960 the supply
00:43:07.560 chains.
00:43:08.200 Let me tell
00:43:08.620 you a Colin
00:43:09.120 Powell story.
00:43:11.200 As you know,
00:43:11.960 Colin Powell
00:43:12.440 passed away,
00:43:13.500 and of
00:43:14.700 course the
00:43:14.940 big headline
00:43:15.460 is that he
00:43:15.940 was completely
00:43:17.240 vaccinated,
00:43:18.080 but he died
00:43:18.780 from COVID
00:43:19.340 related stuff.
00:43:20.420 He was 84
00:43:20.920 years old.
00:43:22.460 Now,
00:43:23.460 out of
00:43:23.780 respect for
00:43:24.680 the general,
00:43:27.060 I just
00:43:27.800 don't feel
00:43:29.140 like talking
00:43:29.680 about the
00:43:30.160 fact that he
00:43:30.680 got infected
00:43:31.560 after getting
00:43:32.360 vaccinated.
00:43:33.660 That doesn't
00:43:34.320 seem like the
00:43:34.820 important thing.
00:43:36.240 You know,
00:43:36.520 you're looking
00:43:36.840 at somebody's
00:43:37.400 entire life.
00:43:38.880 I don't feel
00:43:39.680 like that's the
00:43:40.320 part we should
00:43:40.980 be focusing on.
00:43:41.720 But I do
00:43:42.940 wonder how
00:43:43.680 many people
00:43:44.120 are waking
00:43:44.580 up today
00:43:45.080 and are
00:43:46.000 hearing for
00:43:46.400 the first
00:43:46.800 time that
00:43:47.360 you can
00:43:47.720 die from
00:43:48.240 COVID even
00:43:48.860 if you're
00:43:49.200 vaccinated.
00:43:51.160 This isn't
00:43:51.940 new news,
00:43:52.620 people.
00:43:53.360 We've known
00:43:54.000 this for a
00:43:54.420 long time,
00:43:55.540 especially if
00:43:56.320 you're 84.
00:43:57.960 All right,
00:43:58.340 here's my
00:43:58.680 Colin Powell
00:43:59.100 story.
00:43:59.680 Years ago,
00:44:00.900 when Colin
00:44:01.620 Powell had
00:44:02.060 left government
00:44:03.580 work and he
00:44:04.560 started his
00:44:05.240 speaking career,
00:44:07.100 I was also at
00:44:08.080 the height of
00:44:08.560 my own speaking
00:44:09.580 career.
00:44:10.440 And sometimes
00:44:11.040 he and I
00:44:11.580 would get
00:44:11.940 booked at
00:44:12.460 the same
00:44:13.120 events because
00:44:15.080 I was doing
00:44:15.600 pretty big
00:44:16.700 events,
00:44:17.140 as was he.
00:44:18.260 And one
00:44:18.840 day I was
00:44:19.440 booked to
00:44:20.000 speak directly
00:44:21.140 after him at
00:44:22.140 an industry
00:44:23.660 event.
00:44:24.720 And my
00:44:25.660 speakers bureau
00:44:26.480 had booked
00:44:27.240 him for the
00:44:27.700 event and
00:44:28.180 they had
00:44:28.420 booked me.
00:44:29.420 And the
00:44:29.680 speakers bureau
00:44:30.340 person was
00:44:31.600 with me
00:44:31.960 backstage as
00:44:32.960 I was waiting
00:44:33.340 to go on and
00:44:34.420 Powell was
00:44:34.980 speaking.
00:44:36.120 And the
00:44:36.980 person who was
00:44:37.400 with me said,
00:44:37.940 hey, do you
00:44:38.220 want to meet
00:44:38.620 Colin Powell when
00:44:40.500 he's done
00:44:40.860 speaking?
00:44:42.000 Now keep in
00:44:42.560 mind that I
00:44:43.020 was pretty
00:44:44.340 young to the
00:44:45.100 being famous
00:44:45.840 game.
00:44:47.060 You know, I
00:44:47.260 hadn't been
00:44:47.580 famous for
00:44:48.100 very long.
00:44:49.060 So when
00:44:49.580 somebody says,
00:44:50.260 hey, do you
00:44:50.460 want to meet
00:44:50.780 Colin Powell?
00:44:52.160 I just
00:44:52.760 thought, no,
00:44:55.020 I'm too
00:44:55.340 afraid to be
00:44:55.860 Colin Powell
00:44:56.380 because I
00:44:58.100 don't have
00:44:58.340 anything to
00:44:58.740 say to him.
00:44:59.720 And I'm
00:45:00.020 pretty sure he
00:45:00.540 doesn't want to
00:45:01.080 talk to me.
00:45:02.260 So why would I
00:45:03.200 bother him?
00:45:04.800 Why would I
00:45:05.460 bother him, you
00:45:06.280 know, with my
00:45:06.920 presence?
00:45:07.540 So at first I
00:45:09.580 demurred a little
00:45:10.400 bit.
00:45:10.640 I don't need to
00:45:12.420 meet Colin Powell.
00:45:13.460 Mostly because I
00:45:14.240 figured he didn't
00:45:14.780 need to meet me.
00:45:16.620 And so I was
00:45:18.740 just being a
00:45:19.860 little bit, I
00:45:21.900 guess, I guess I
00:45:23.500 was being
00:45:23.760 considerate and
00:45:24.680 respectful of his
00:45:25.640 time.
00:45:26.780 He doesn't need to
00:45:27.480 meet me.
00:45:27.840 I've got nothing to
00:45:28.720 offer.
00:45:30.000 There's nothing that
00:45:30.900 Colin Powell needs
00:45:31.680 from me.
00:45:32.580 Nothing.
00:45:33.680 Why take his
00:45:34.360 time?
00:45:34.600 But Colin
00:45:36.640 Powell finishes
00:45:37.200 his speech and
00:45:37.880 he walks directly
00:45:39.960 in my direction
00:45:41.560 backstage.
00:45:43.520 And my, let's
00:45:46.000 say, what would
00:45:47.180 you call it,
00:45:47.560 handler, my
00:45:48.360 handler at the
00:45:49.040 time, said,
00:45:50.140 hey, Colin
00:45:50.640 Powell, come over
00:45:51.400 here and introduces
00:45:52.740 me to Colin
00:45:53.640 Powell.
00:45:54.540 Now, if you
00:45:55.580 haven't had this
00:45:56.200 experience of
00:45:57.700 being introduced
00:45:58.460 to somebody who
00:45:59.120 was really
00:45:59.820 famous, you
00:46:01.200 know, at the
00:46:02.000 moment he was
00:46:02.520 at the peak of
00:46:03.680 his fame and
00:46:04.380 people were
00:46:04.720 talking about
00:46:05.200 him for
00:46:05.420 president and
00:46:06.000 stuff, it's
00:46:07.000 really intimidating.
00:46:09.220 Right?
00:46:09.920 Really
00:46:10.360 intimidating.
00:46:11.660 And so he's
00:46:12.900 walking toward
00:46:13.460 me and you're
00:46:14.260 having this
00:46:14.700 thought as he's
00:46:15.920 walking directly
00:46:16.660 toward you.
00:46:18.400 Colin Powell
00:46:19.060 is walking
00:46:19.720 directly toward
00:46:20.380 me.
00:46:21.660 And then when
00:46:22.340 you stop
00:46:23.180 thinking that,
00:46:23.940 you think again,
00:46:25.580 Colin Powell
00:46:26.220 is still walking
00:46:26.980 directly toward
00:46:27.660 me.
00:46:28.220 Oh, my God.
00:46:29.200 Colin Powell
00:46:29.680 is looking
00:46:30.140 directly in my
00:46:31.140 eyes.
00:46:31.800 Oh, no.
00:46:32.120 Colin Powell
00:46:33.040 just put out
00:46:33.780 his hand to
00:46:34.340 shake my
00:46:34.660 hands.
00:46:35.220 Oh, no.
00:46:35.660 I'm shaking
00:46:36.100 hands with
00:46:36.540 Colin Powell.
00:46:37.560 Like, your
00:46:38.220 brain is just
00:46:39.060 doing that
00:46:39.420 loop.
00:46:41.320 So, here's
00:46:42.920 the story
00:46:43.460 part.
00:46:45.240 I was
00:46:45.900 introduced as
00:46:46.600 the Dilbert
00:46:47.160 author.
00:46:48.200 Turns out,
00:46:49.860 Colin Powell
00:46:50.460 was a Dilbert
00:46:51.820 fan, of all
00:46:53.820 things.
00:46:54.740 He was a
00:46:55.200 Dilbert fan.
00:46:56.200 So he was
00:46:57.040 very aware of
00:46:58.020 Dilbert and
00:46:58.980 of me, I
00:46:59.700 guess.
00:47:00.340 So he knew
00:47:00.800 who he was.
00:47:01.520 And he
00:47:02.160 was really
00:47:02.500 nice.
00:47:03.960 And very,
00:47:05.680 what would
00:47:06.540 be the
00:47:06.780 word?
00:47:08.140 Very, not
00:47:09.800 approachable,
00:47:11.580 but from
00:47:13.500 the moment
00:47:14.060 he said hi,
00:47:16.180 and I shook
00:47:16.700 hands from
00:47:17.160 him, the
00:47:18.320 famous part
00:47:19.020 disappeared.
00:47:20.820 Does that
00:47:21.080 make sense?
00:47:22.320 The moment
00:47:23.440 he went
00:47:23.960 personal, all
00:47:25.820 of the fame
00:47:26.780 just disappeared.
00:47:28.860 And in one
00:47:29.580 moment, he
00:47:31.080 made you feel
00:47:31.620 comfortable.
00:47:33.400 But I'll
00:47:33.820 tell you what
00:47:34.220 you didn't
00:47:34.620 miss was
00:47:36.240 his charisma.
00:47:37.980 His charisma
00:47:38.840 was real.
00:47:40.380 Like, even
00:47:40.940 you take the
00:47:41.440 famous part
00:47:41.960 away, and
00:47:42.700 the charisma
00:47:43.120 is still
00:47:43.440 there.
00:47:43.740 Right?
00:47:44.640 So very
00:47:45.200 charismatic.
00:47:47.120 Big smile,
00:47:48.860 you know,
00:47:49.460 shakes my
00:47:49.980 hand, says
00:47:50.720 some kind
00:47:51.260 words about
00:47:51.840 my work.
00:47:54.080 And it was
00:47:54.820 awesome.
00:47:55.780 It was
00:47:56.080 awesome.
00:47:56.340 So the
00:47:57.200 only thing
00:47:57.500 I want to
00:47:57.820 add, since
00:47:58.580 he passed,
00:47:59.980 is it would
00:48:01.440 be easy to
00:48:02.020 throw in
00:48:02.680 our
00:48:03.420 criticisms of
00:48:05.940 the Iraq
00:48:06.360 war, etc.,
00:48:07.020 and those
00:48:07.300 are all
00:48:07.520 valid.
00:48:08.520 But I
00:48:09.100 would like to
00:48:09.540 say one
00:48:09.900 good thing
00:48:10.300 about him,
00:48:11.060 which is
00:48:11.480 that in
00:48:11.860 person, he
00:48:12.560 was awesome.
00:48:14.080 He was an
00:48:14.740 awesome person
00:48:15.360 in person, he
00:48:15.960 was kind, he
00:48:16.720 was generous,
00:48:17.600 and he made
00:48:18.800 eye contact, and
00:48:19.760 he treated me
00:48:20.680 like a human
00:48:22.860 being.
00:48:23.220 And I'm
00:48:24.600 not sure he
00:48:25.000 needed to,
00:48:25.820 because he
00:48:26.160 was pretty
00:48:26.480 famous.
00:48:27.240 So I just
00:48:27.880 appreciated him
00:48:28.580 on a human
00:48:29.180 level, in
00:48:31.520 my brief
00:48:31.960 interaction.
00:48:34.020 So let's
00:48:35.700 talk about
00:48:36.080 natural
00:48:36.480 immunity.
00:48:38.620 Do you
00:48:39.240 think you
00:48:39.560 understand the
00:48:40.260 issue of
00:48:41.740 natural
00:48:42.220 immunity versus
00:48:43.100 vaccination?
00:48:44.860 In the
00:48:45.360 comments, how
00:48:46.640 many of you
00:48:47.220 feel you've
00:48:47.720 got a good
00:48:48.140 handle on
00:48:48.740 it?
00:48:50.720 I just
00:48:51.340 want to see,
00:48:51.980 do your own
00:48:52.680 assessment,
00:48:53.220 of your own
00:48:53.700 knowledge, of
00:48:55.280 and let's
00:48:56.720 say it's
00:48:57.040 specifically
00:48:57.480 about the
00:48:57.980 question of
00:48:58.540 whether natural
00:48:59.240 immunity should
00:49:00.480 be considered
00:49:01.120 as good as
00:49:02.760 and give you
00:49:04.760 an excuse not
00:49:05.480 to get a
00:49:05.900 mandated
00:49:06.200 vaccination.
00:49:07.380 So that's
00:49:07.800 the only
00:49:08.040 question.
00:49:09.240 But how
00:49:09.500 is your
00:49:09.940 knowledge about
00:49:10.580 that topic?
00:49:12.020 See, lots
00:49:12.500 of people are
00:49:13.360 quite knowledgeable,
00:49:14.480 which is good.
00:49:16.340 Marginal, some
00:49:17.240 people, it's
00:49:18.440 common sense,
00:49:19.480 somebody said.
00:49:21.360 So itty bitty,
00:49:22.040 you made the
00:49:23.460 perfect comment.
00:49:25.100 Somebody said
00:49:25.680 it's common
00:49:26.220 sense.
00:49:27.680 Let me test
00:49:28.480 that.
00:49:29.220 How many of
00:49:29.760 you would say
00:49:30.240 that decision
00:49:31.000 boils down to
00:49:32.560 common sense?
00:49:35.300 Obviously, some
00:49:36.280 people say.
00:49:38.280 Some say no.
00:49:40.580 Some say no,
00:49:41.320 it's not common
00:49:41.900 sense.
00:49:42.980 Well, I'm on the
00:49:43.880 side that says
00:49:44.340 it's not common
00:49:45.140 sense.
00:49:45.540 it's sort
00:49:46.900 of an
00:49:47.600 illusion that
00:49:48.380 it is,
00:49:49.440 meaning that
00:49:50.020 it looks like
00:49:50.620 a simple
00:49:51.000 question that
00:49:52.660 has some
00:49:53.200 levels that
00:49:53.840 are not
00:49:54.140 obvious.
00:49:55.000 And I'll
00:49:55.200 tell you
00:49:55.440 about those.
00:49:57.660 And let me
00:49:58.320 start with
00:49:58.700 this.
00:49:59.960 Would you
00:50:00.440 agree?
00:50:01.020 I guess there
00:50:01.500 are a whole
00:50:01.720 bunch of
00:50:02.060 studies.
00:50:03.660 So Marty
00:50:04.420 Macari is a
00:50:05.320 professor at
00:50:06.080 John Hopkins
00:50:06.660 School of
00:50:07.980 Medicine.
00:50:09.340 And so he's
00:50:10.640 got credentials
00:50:11.280 and he's the
00:50:12.220 editor-in-chief
00:50:12.820 of MedPage
00:50:13.540 today.
00:50:14.480 So somebody
00:50:15.040 has really
00:50:15.440 tapped into
00:50:16.100 the scientific
00:50:16.720 and medical
00:50:17.560 process.
00:50:19.040 And he
00:50:20.000 tells us that
00:50:20.560 there are 15
00:50:21.220 studies that
00:50:21.860 have demonstrated
00:50:22.420 the power of
00:50:23.080 immunity by
00:50:24.460 the previously
00:50:25.200 infected.
00:50:26.560 There was a
00:50:27.260 700,000 person
00:50:28.620 study, pretty
00:50:29.680 big, from
00:50:30.760 Israel recently
00:50:32.640 that if you
00:50:34.600 had a prior
00:50:36.180 infection you
00:50:36.740 were 27
00:50:37.420 times less
00:50:38.280 likely to get
00:50:39.000 a second
00:50:39.520 symptomatic
00:50:41.020 infection.
00:50:42.120 I guess they
00:50:42.520 had the
00:50:43.000 symptomatic
00:50:43.460 part, than
00:50:44.580 those who
00:50:44.980 were vaccinated.
00:50:47.440 This affirmed
00:50:48.320 other studies
00:50:49.040 and apparently
00:50:49.520 the studies,
00:50:50.640 pretty much all
00:50:51.300 of them seem
00:50:51.720 to be in the
00:50:52.120 same direction.
00:50:53.580 That natural
00:50:55.060 immunity gives
00:50:57.120 you far more
00:50:58.140 immunity than
00:50:59.700 even vaccinations.
00:51:01.280 All right, how
00:51:01.540 many of you knew
00:51:02.100 that so far?
00:51:04.440 And somebody
00:51:05.160 says natural
00:51:05.980 is seven times
00:51:06.700 better.
00:51:07.140 Yeah, I don't
00:51:07.820 think it's 27
00:51:08.540 times, but that's
00:51:09.760 what this says.
00:51:11.020 I feel like it's
00:51:12.400 a multiple, but
00:51:13.220 that 27 sounds
00:51:14.280 high.
00:51:17.160 All right, so
00:51:18.640 if you knew
00:51:19.260 that, would you
00:51:20.200 say it's
00:51:20.580 common sense?
00:51:22.720 Common sense,
00:51:23.580 right?
00:51:24.260 If you've got
00:51:24.940 one kind of
00:51:25.520 immunity that's
00:51:26.200 27 times better
00:51:27.260 than the other
00:51:27.720 one, why do you
00:51:30.300 need a vaccination?
00:51:31.660 How many of you
00:51:32.280 would say that
00:51:32.860 is common sense
00:51:33.900 and we're done?
00:51:34.480 If it's true,
00:51:37.940 that on average,
00:51:38.840 I'm going to
00:51:40.780 throw you in a
00:51:41.380 little wrinkle
00:51:42.100 here, on
00:51:42.840 average, on
00:51:44.380 average, an
00:51:45.700 infected person
00:51:46.420 has way more
00:51:47.840 antibodies and
00:51:51.100 way more
00:51:51.720 protection, on
00:51:52.920 average.
00:51:54.340 So common
00:51:55.160 sense says you
00:51:56.280 don't need the
00:51:56.720 vaccination if,
00:51:58.400 on average, it's
00:52:00.880 just as good.
00:52:02.660 Right?
00:52:04.220 Jordan says,
00:52:05.220 is Scott
00:52:05.580 coming around?
00:52:09.200 What does
00:52:09.760 that mean?
00:52:11.140 Coming around
00:52:11.900 to what?
00:52:12.920 Well, let's
00:52:13.540 find out.
00:52:15.120 All right, so
00:52:16.660 let me test your
00:52:17.540 common sense.
00:52:18.860 So you all
00:52:19.480 employed your
00:52:20.000 common sense.
00:52:21.020 On average,
00:52:21.800 natural immunity
00:52:22.420 is way better
00:52:23.600 than a
00:52:24.020 vaccination.
00:52:25.060 I think we
00:52:25.580 all agree on
00:52:26.280 that.
00:52:26.840 Let's stipulate
00:52:27.540 that.
00:52:28.180 Can we
00:52:28.480 stipulate it?
00:52:29.760 Will you
00:52:30.360 allow me to
00:52:30.940 say that on
00:52:31.480 average, that
00:52:33.600 that's just
00:52:34.560 settled science
00:52:36.060 or as
00:52:37.080 settled as
00:52:37.540 anything gets
00:52:38.060 these days?
00:52:39.760 Okay, everybody's
00:52:40.460 saying yes.
00:52:41.820 Everybody's on
00:52:42.520 board with that
00:52:43.220 statement.
00:52:44.380 That on
00:52:44.820 average, natural
00:52:46.720 immunity is way
00:52:47.500 better than a
00:52:47.960 vaccination.
00:52:49.280 Okay?
00:52:50.060 All right, so
00:52:50.740 let me give you
00:52:51.320 another question
00:52:52.020 that's based on
00:52:52.740 also your
00:52:54.080 common sense.
00:52:56.000 You ready?
00:52:57.740 The people who
00:52:58.640 are on the
00:52:59.020 payroll of the
00:53:00.040 LA Lakers, a
00:53:01.040 basketball team,
00:53:02.620 are on average
00:53:03.560 6'5".
00:53:05.320 The people who
00:53:07.500 are on the
00:53:07.840 payroll for
00:53:09.000 all the jobs
00:53:09.800 related to the
00:53:10.520 LA Lakers are
00:53:12.260 on average, let's
00:53:13.680 just say the
00:53:14.100 men, are on
00:53:15.180 average 6'5".
00:53:17.060 How tall is
00:53:19.920 the guy who
00:53:20.900 cleans the
00:53:22.440 sweat off the
00:53:23.260 court?
00:53:24.060 He might be a
00:53:24.800 water boy too,
00:53:25.620 but how tall is
00:53:26.820 the guy who
00:53:27.200 cleans the sweat
00:53:27.860 off the court?
00:53:28.460 He's also on
00:53:28.940 the payroll.
00:53:31.820 Is he 6'5"?
00:53:33.220 Why not?
00:53:36.960 Oh, wait a
00:53:37.620 minute, wait a
00:53:38.060 minute.
00:53:39.020 I thought
00:53:39.660 common sense
00:53:40.240 told you he's
00:53:40.880 6'5".
00:53:41.660 You just told
00:53:44.820 me that if
00:53:46.160 the average
00:53:47.120 person with
00:53:47.800 immunity is
00:53:51.120 got, you know,
00:53:51.960 way more than
00:53:52.760 the average
00:53:53.400 person who's
00:53:53.960 vaccinated,
00:53:55.480 then you
00:53:59.820 know something
00:54:00.380 about whether
00:54:01.800 each individual
00:54:02.540 should get
00:54:02.960 vaccinated.
00:54:04.080 But are you
00:54:04.700 telling me that
00:54:05.220 just knowing the
00:54:05.860 average of how
00:54:06.580 tall people
00:54:07.120 doesn't tell you
00:54:07.880 anything about
00:54:08.300 the individual?
00:54:10.200 What, am I
00:54:10.640 just learning that
00:54:11.360 an average
00:54:11.980 doesn't tell me
00:54:13.040 anything about
00:54:13.540 an individual?
00:54:14.080 Well, my
00:54:15.820 common sense told
00:54:16.580 me everybody was
00:54:17.220 6'5".
00:54:18.080 Or close.
00:54:22.420 You're getting
00:54:23.100 really mad now,
00:54:23.920 aren't you?
00:54:24.860 All right, here's
00:54:25.740 the counter-argument
00:54:26.680 tentatively.
00:54:28.480 What if, on
00:54:31.160 average, the
00:54:31.960 natural immunity
00:54:33.680 is way better?
00:54:35.160 And I think we
00:54:35.720 all stipulate that
00:54:36.480 that's probably
00:54:37.160 true.
00:54:38.160 But what if the
00:54:38.840 variability is
00:54:40.420 greater?
00:54:42.300 What if the
00:54:43.600 people with
00:54:44.020 natural immunity,
00:54:45.200 some of them
00:54:45.800 have amazing
00:54:46.540 immunity, but
00:54:48.020 others have
00:54:48.800 much lower
00:54:49.820 immunity than
00:54:50.460 a vaccination
00:54:51.080 on average?
00:54:52.540 Is that
00:54:53.160 possible?
00:54:55.960 Is it?
00:54:56.920 Is it possible
00:54:58.360 that not all
00:54:59.840 the people who
00:55:00.380 get natural
00:55:00.960 immunity have
00:55:01.500 the same amount
00:55:02.160 and that some
00:55:03.120 have lower
00:55:03.820 immunity?
00:55:07.360 Yeah, it's
00:55:07.900 possible.
00:55:08.840 How do you
00:55:09.360 know?
00:55:10.680 What would be
00:55:11.420 the practical
00:55:12.180 way with our
00:55:13.360 current testing,
00:55:14.400 current technology,
00:55:15.380 right, and our
00:55:15.820 current limitations?
00:55:16.920 I know it's
00:55:17.420 technically possible,
00:55:18.800 but with current
00:55:19.540 limitations, how
00:55:21.300 would you know
00:55:21.840 if your natural
00:55:22.580 vaccination or your
00:55:24.240 natural immunity
00:55:25.140 was the good
00:55:25.740 kind, the
00:55:27.040 really high
00:55:27.480 kind, or not
00:55:28.660 the good
00:55:28.940 kind?
00:55:29.720 How would
00:55:30.040 you know?
00:55:32.480 You wouldn't
00:55:33.060 know.
00:55:33.840 You wouldn't
00:55:34.440 know if any
00:55:36.340 individual on
00:55:37.160 the Lakers is
00:55:38.020 seven foot tall
00:55:38.900 or five foot
00:55:40.640 three.
00:55:41.780 You have no
00:55:42.460 way of knowing.
00:55:43.000 If the only
00:55:43.380 thing you know
00:55:43.820 is the average,
00:55:44.560 you don't know
00:55:44.920 anything about
00:55:45.360 the individuals.
00:55:46.740 Now, here's the
00:55:47.300 question.
00:55:48.320 If you imagined,
00:55:49.500 and I'm just
00:55:50.560 going to make up
00:55:51.080 a number now
00:55:51.600 because I don't
00:55:52.000 know the actual
00:55:52.500 number.
00:55:52.720 Let's say 40%
00:55:56.700 of the people
00:55:57.500 with natural
00:55:58.100 immunity are a
00:56:00.660 little bit too
00:56:01.120 low, meaning
00:56:03.420 that they'd be
00:56:03.980 better off with
00:56:04.600 more immunity,
00:56:05.740 more antibodies.
00:56:08.040 What if?
00:56:09.860 Would that be a
00:56:10.740 reason to
00:56:11.440 immunize everybody
00:56:12.660 because you don't
00:56:14.320 know if somebody
00:56:15.860 has been
00:56:16.200 previously infected,
00:56:17.860 you don't know
00:56:18.520 if they're in the
00:56:19.000 40%.
00:56:19.700 They're probably
00:56:22.200 in the 60%,
00:56:23.200 but you don't
00:56:24.920 know, and you
00:56:26.380 don't have a way
00:56:26.880 to test.
00:56:28.020 You can test to
00:56:29.000 find out if they
00:56:29.500 have antibodies,
00:56:30.680 but you don't
00:56:31.220 have any mass
00:56:31.980 way to test
00:56:32.740 instantly to find
00:56:34.280 out if anybody's
00:56:34.940 got good immunity.
00:56:38.400 Now, here's the
00:56:40.880 second question.
00:56:42.280 Let's see if your
00:56:42.880 common sense told
00:56:43.740 you this.
00:56:44.200 Is it true that
00:56:46.920 the more antibodies,
00:56:48.260 the better?
00:56:49.700 Go.
00:56:50.920 In the comments,
00:56:53.040 is it true,
00:56:53.920 just always true,
00:56:55.740 is it just always
00:56:56.480 true that more
00:56:57.780 antibodies is better
00:56:58.860 than not having
00:57:01.000 more?
00:57:02.940 Exactly.
00:57:04.020 Some people say
00:57:04.700 true.
00:57:05.240 Some people say
00:57:05.880 no.
00:57:07.020 Well, now, what
00:57:07.660 happened to your
00:57:08.120 common sense?
00:57:09.760 You told me that
00:57:10.880 this was common
00:57:11.540 sense, but why are
00:57:13.340 you disagreeing on
00:57:14.180 such an important
00:57:14.780 question?
00:57:15.820 If it's common
00:57:16.420 sense, you'd all
00:57:17.000 have the same
00:57:17.380 answer.
00:57:17.620 Yeah, so here's
00:57:22.900 the question.
00:57:24.480 If it's true that
00:57:25.560 natural immunity
00:57:26.620 gives you more
00:57:27.740 antibodies, does it
00:57:28.880 matter?
00:57:30.240 Or does everybody
00:57:31.720 have enough if
00:57:32.460 they've got
00:57:32.840 vaccinated?
00:57:33.960 And secondly, if
00:57:35.840 you've got some
00:57:36.660 antibodies, but
00:57:37.520 let's say it's way
00:57:38.620 less than the
00:57:39.400 average vaccinated
00:57:40.260 person.
00:57:41.480 Let's say you've
00:57:42.280 got natural
00:57:42.780 immunity.
00:57:43.160 What if it
00:57:44.600 could be tested?
00:57:45.580 You have fewer
00:57:46.360 antibodies than a
00:57:47.340 vaccinated person.
00:57:49.440 Should that person
00:57:50.340 be vaccinated?
00:57:53.460 Now, I say it's a
00:57:54.440 personal choice, so
00:57:55.620 I'm anti-mandate.
00:57:57.320 So, but could a
00:57:59.460 reasonable person, if
00:58:01.480 they didn't know what
00:58:02.620 their immunity level
00:58:03.540 was, and let's say
00:58:05.020 they're 80.
00:58:06.380 Let's say you're 80
00:58:07.280 years old.
00:58:09.040 Well, actually, if
00:58:09.800 you're 80 and you've
00:58:10.520 already survived COVID,
00:58:11.940 you're probably
00:58:12.480 bulletproof, you're
00:58:13.820 probably immortal at
00:58:14.660 that point.
00:58:15.500 So maybe that's a
00:58:16.280 bad example.
00:58:17.160 Let's say you're 60.
00:58:19.380 Let's say you're 60
00:58:20.460 and you've already
00:58:21.160 been infected, but
00:58:22.600 you don't have any
00:58:23.500 practical way of
00:58:24.320 knowing if you're one
00:58:25.760 who got enough
00:58:26.420 antibodies, or if
00:58:27.720 you're on the lower
00:58:28.340 end, and it's better
00:58:29.540 than nothing, but you
00:58:30.380 might get pretty sick
00:58:31.180 anyway.
00:58:32.340 Should you get
00:58:32.780 vaccinated?
00:58:36.540 All right.
00:58:38.500 So here's the only
00:58:39.300 thing I'm trying to
00:58:39.880 add to the
00:58:40.280 conversation.
00:58:41.940 Don't trust your
00:58:42.580 common sense, because
00:58:45.260 it doesn't apply here.
00:58:47.380 The things you don't
00:58:48.440 know are if you're
00:58:49.600 looking at the
00:58:50.060 average of one thing
00:58:51.060 compared to the
00:58:51.640 average of another,
00:58:52.760 that's not enough
00:58:53.640 information.
00:58:54.940 Because if one is
00:58:55.920 wildly varied, let me
00:58:57.520 give you the extreme.
00:58:59.660 So this will be
00:59:00.460 easier to, you know,
00:59:01.480 not everybody's good
00:59:02.620 with statistics.
00:59:04.200 So I'll give you an
00:59:04.920 extreme just to
00:59:06.720 understand the math,
00:59:07.840 right?
00:59:08.040 But the reality is
00:59:09.200 not the extreme.
00:59:10.300 So let's say that of
00:59:11.800 all the people in the
00:59:12.580 world who had ever
00:59:13.220 been infected, that
00:59:16.460 one of those people,
00:59:17.460 just one, out of the
00:59:18.920 hundreds of millions
00:59:19.920 who got infected, what
00:59:21.080 if one of them got a
00:59:24.220 zillion, trillion
00:59:25.040 antibodies, and all the
00:59:27.160 other people didn't get
00:59:27.940 any?
00:59:28.920 What would be the
00:59:29.780 average?
00:59:31.480 All right.
00:59:31.740 On average, it would
00:59:33.200 look like natural
00:59:34.260 infection is way better.
00:59:35.240 Because that one person
00:59:36.620 got a million trillion
00:59:38.640 antibodies.
00:59:40.440 Nobody else got any.
00:59:42.460 But when you averaged
00:59:43.300 them together, it was
00:59:44.180 higher than the average
00:59:45.720 of vaccination.
00:59:47.220 Now, of course, I'm
00:59:48.040 making up the example.
00:59:49.280 But the point is, if you
00:59:50.920 had wide variability in
00:59:52.500 one thing and narrow
00:59:54.740 variability in another,
00:59:56.720 you can't compare the
00:59:57.940 average for this
01:00:00.140 decision.
01:00:01.220 For other decisions,
01:00:02.480 yes.
01:00:03.280 But for this decision,
01:00:04.440 you can't compare
01:00:05.720 averages, and that's
01:00:06.600 what you all did.
01:00:08.360 Am I right?
01:00:09.360 Am I right that you all
01:00:10.540 compared averages and
01:00:12.220 thought that you used
01:00:13.180 your common sense?
01:00:14.660 And when I walked you
01:00:15.600 through this, you could
01:00:16.260 see that comparing
01:00:16.920 averages could get you
01:00:19.400 to the absolute wrong
01:00:20.460 decision.
01:00:24.880 All right.
01:00:25.780 But let me ask you to
01:00:27.020 just bring it down to
01:00:28.340 this.
01:00:28.880 Would you agree with
01:00:29.700 the general statement
01:00:30.420 that you can't compare
01:00:31.320 the averages because it's
01:00:32.360 not enough information?
01:00:33.340 Have I sold you on just
01:00:35.700 that one point?
01:00:36.820 I'm not going to try to
01:00:37.540 change your mind on
01:00:38.200 vaccinations.
01:00:39.760 I'm not going to try to
01:00:40.700 change your mind on
01:00:41.480 mandates.
01:00:42.500 None of that.
01:00:43.780 I'm just asking you, do
01:00:45.700 you think that knowing the
01:00:46.580 average of immunity from
01:00:47.920 one and comparing it to
01:00:49.640 the average immunity of
01:00:50.840 the other tells you
01:00:51.780 enough?
01:00:53.340 It doesn't.
01:00:54.940 It doesn't.
01:00:55.640 Now, if you wanted to
01:00:56.560 argue it tells me enough
01:00:57.660 for freedom purposes, I
01:01:00.620 would agree with you on
01:01:01.340 that, okay?
01:01:02.680 If you're making a
01:01:03.480 medical decision, it
01:01:04.380 doesn't tell you enough.
01:01:05.700 If you're making a
01:01:06.580 personal freedom decision,
01:01:08.500 sure.
01:01:11.100 Whatever you want is
01:01:12.200 enough.
01:01:13.100 If it's your personal
01:01:13.980 freedom that you're
01:01:14.760 making the decision, if
01:01:15.520 that's your main
01:01:16.080 variable, then I don't
01:01:18.760 even care how much
01:01:19.500 information you have.
01:01:20.980 That's up to you.
01:01:22.500 You figure it out.
01:01:24.020 Oh, shit.
01:01:24.740 I'm late.
01:01:25.240 I've got to go.
01:01:25.660 Okay.
01:01:26.900 Alright.
01:01:28.400 Hold on.
01:01:41.200 Bye.
01:01:41.460 Bye.
01:01:41.520 Bye.
01:01:41.580 Bye.
01:01:42.720 Bye.
01:01:43.020 Bye.
01:01:43.940 Bye.
01:01:48.880 Bye.
01:01:53.540 Bye.